|
|
Home Information Login Register Waiting lists Membership Hall of fame Tournaments Best game Wikichess Rating list Problems Forum Links Help About
Hot news Discussions Files search Social network
|
Here are 0 results for Oriti Andrea in the games. There are at least 19 results for Oriti in the forum. George Jempty (2025-11-17 23:47:07) Clarification of Rating Groups There is no favoritism in my case, the rule ALSO states if your rating is within 50 points of the higher group, that waiting list has at least 5 entries already, and you pay 10 epoints, you can enter. Perhaps those last qualifications have been amended since last time knew of the rule? I've just brought up my ratings to defend against that I'm making a mockery of this rule. So no favoritism, no mockery, and I'm done with this discussion altogether, Juri Eintalu (2023-11-05 18:00:41) A Public Appeal to Chess Organisations The following paragraph was added after the publication of the first version of the Public Appeal: “However, at a non-individual, organisational, official level, the third point above, which calls for public condemnation of Israel’s actions, should be avoided. Notably, the Israeli police have threatened to severely punish anyone who criticises Israel’s current military action in the Gaza Strip. It is unreasonable to formally demand that a sports person should make such a statement, which would result in him being punished by the authorities in his own country.” Kym Farnik (2018-01-17 02:06:39) Conditional chess moves (again) Thanks for the consideration. I understand your priorities. Ilmars Cirulis (2017-12-08 21:12:35) AlphaZero stronger than Stockfish Btw, AlphaZero and the match is proof of concept, for research purposes. And that was done excellently. If one remembers that Deepmind priorities isn't being computer chess or Go champion, but advancing Artificial Intelligence research (and earning money for Google - using those advances and gained experience) then any accusations of cheating or not participating in CCRL seems meaningless. George Jempty (2016-09-13 14:41:12) Missing chat I once accidentally deleted a comment the first time ever I clicked on the triangle -- I did not realize the purpose was to delete. Rather I thought it would "expand" a chat topic. This was probably close to a year ago. In the meantime yes I primarily delete my own comments. However recently Duenas decided to post comments about an ongoing game of his with Cirulis, which to me just seems inappropriate for chat as there is a message box for each move of a game, as well as private messages. Those comments bumped a bunch of other comments possibly relevant to the whole FICGS community off the front page, so I deleted them. I'm sorry if you Mr. Brodie if you think this makes me a cretin, but I'm just trying to keep the chat relevant to *everybody* on FICGS, not just two players, and in any case I think you rather over-state your case: "illegal hacking", references to "justice", etc. -- it's just a chat board. In any case what you are suggesting is a "policy" issue, but I think there is a "technical" issue too. And that is, once you click on the triangle you get a popup box with one button (an "alert") instead of two buttons (a "confirm"). A confirm would allow you to undo the delete, for instance if you accidentally clicked the triangle. Thib if you are reading this I am a web developer with nearly 20 years experience and could quite easily implement this, as I know you have a lot of other priorities. Dominique Geffroy (2014-09-04 21:58:31) Ficgs is a money trap * BEWARE * 1. I guess he obeys laws imposed on him without delving into the whys and hows of why they exist... 2. Well, the message I was trying to convey is that in the eye of the authorities and the regulator, a conversion of epoints to money triggered by a game which looks fixed is an open door to money laundering, and therefore ruled out. Regulator says: no risk, no money. If there was no move on the opponent's side, the regulator says there was no risk. I nevertheless have to agree with you, as anyone with common sense would, that it is very convoluted and unfair, because you are obviously not a money launderer and you would deserve your reward. Such server rule therefore probably needs to be put forward much more clearly by the organisers, who have in my opinion absolutely no leeway in this respect (This forum post will probably useful for that). So maybe there is greed, maybe you are right. I do not know this person and will neither launch an attack on his personal character, nor try a defense. But all I can say is that even if he was a benevolent benefactor of humanity, he would risk prison if he converted epoints to money following a not contested game. Dura lex, sed lex. Garvin Gray (2013-12-24 11:01:28) Withdrawal from all standard time events Josef: I would prefer not to talk much about unrated events. In terms of priorities for players, unrated events will always be last. So they will be shuffled to the end. So time priorities for unrated games can always be excused as they are given the least amount of time after, in rough order of importance: WCH games Divisions where you have a chance of a norm Divisions where you have a chance of winning, so win a prize Division where you can gain points. Games where you are doing well, which is a vague criteria. And then everything after that. As a key supporter and one of the original creator of the standard open events, I would like to see those change to rapid time control from now on. Most of the players in those divisions rarely would need all the time that is offered. It would also mean more cycles could move quicker. Garvin Gray (2013-08-31 09:27:36) New my games feature requested I would like to see an additional heading item added to the my games page. Currently I have a heap of games going. Some of them are class time control and some are rapid time control. I think it would improve the site and make 'things' much easier if in the space between each tournament games, a new heading was added telling you either: 1) The actual name of the tournament those particular games belong to or 2) Just a listing of class or rapid. Because currently a game says 10 days remaining, but 10 days and 8 moves to the time control in a class event is different to having 10 days remaining in a rapid. This would then make it easier to prioritise games. Thibault de Vassal (2012-10-15 12:50:09) Ficgs World Cup Hi Garvin, I still have doubts on launching what would look like another championship based on ICCF WCH format when we don't have players enough... I'm afraid we have other priorities before that :/ Dmitri Mamrukov (2012-08-21 06:13:22) This is Russia :( Vadim, you say the authorities reacted in a very awkward way? What would be a proper way to handle similar offenses? If you want to protest, get a permit and do so in a peaceful way like it's done in the West. Why double standards? Vadim Khachaturov (2012-08-20 07:47:14) This is Russia :( Dmitri, You are right. Nowadays in Russia everything, that goes against mr Putin or mr Gundyaev is inspired by US State Department.We dont even need any proof of that.And even if it was a provocation, the authorities reacted in a very awkward way. If Kramnik wants to bear in mind the whole chessboard, let him compare the oil prices now and some ten, fifteen years ago when comparing peoples living. Paul Valle (2011-04-02 21:59:27) Conditional moves I dont know how difficult it is to implement conditional moves (Im sure Thib has a short list of pending improvements with priorities). If its easy - I vote for including it. I cant really see any major problems with offering it. On gameknot you can enter a long sequence of moves and Ive had a game go the first 15 conditional moves before my opponent deviated. If something similar was implemented here, it would cut the average playing time for any tournament significantly. Thibault de Vassal (2010-03-03 15:01:34) Conditionnal moves Hi Hannes (sorry for the delay). Well players may save time thanks to conditional moves, but not at the same time and nothing guarantees that it will not be at the advantage of one player only during a particular game. Anyway, a conditional field exists in the database so there is some hope to see it one day, but it will be a big & complex work to make it coherent for the different games. Not for these months as there are other priorities, I'm afraid :/ But feel free to mention the other minor improvements, if I can do it within minutes, it will be done. Normajean Yates (2008-10-26 20:06:26) i disagree... I disagree :) I mean - i dont know your OTB interest and it is not relevant - but even if we assume for the sake of argument that a superGM might defeat you 10-0 OTB with latvian as black , then that will be because of tactical complications they can create, NOT because of mastery over latvian [ok the two are connected.. they can *see* more of what can be extracted out of things... Even if we assume above (purely for argumnt's sake) you are at least some kind of authority on authorities ;) [i mean you gave so many links...] ,br> Not really. I have a low opinion of Silman's books :( ;) Denis Ivanchenkov (2008-09-30 00:30:57) Lermontov s Pushkinim vmeste "Russians are not "National Minorities", as Choukchas or Eskimos" Readers already understood that you HATE Russians (with all you references to Pushkin and Lermontov) that you don't even give them right to be nationality (and thus minority). and this hate - is the only thing that speaks in you. Iouri Basiliev (2008-09-29 23:53:18) Second language <<you think it is good to use communist methods - making LESS than 10% of russian language schools>> where i sad this? as i told your imagination is very turbulent :) Russians are not "National Minorities", as Choukchas or Eskimos. If you so lazy to learn Ukrainian or you hate Ukraine, why you are living there? Go to Siberia or Chechen and hate Ukraine from there. You, probably, gifted by russian TV :) Denis Ivanchenkov (2008-09-29 23:27:26) Iouri Basiliev "Communists 70 years artIficially propagate russian in Ukraine. It were only 10% of ukrainian schools at that time. Nowadays the situation is opposite." so you think it is good to use communist methods - making LESS than 10% of russian language schools? "If you living in Ukraine, spend some time to learn ukrainian if you are able." oh thanks for such a deep, wise and unexpected advice. and this is my advice for you - to read "European Convention for the Protection of National Minorities" this will also ansver your Alsace issue. Thibault de Vassal (2006-06-09 14:34:14) Email webmaster, 2 players matches Bonjour Julien, merci :) My email is displayed (just replace the symbol by @) on the 'About' page. As I explained in another (old) thread, priorities are to reduce the delay for tournaments to start and to make it as simple as possible. As this server offers all games live, I think it to be 'competition oriented' is the best choice. It would be easy to offer many sorts of tournaments, rated/unrated, different time controls, quad/round-robin/ko etc... but it would loose his interest. Lionel Vidal (2006-06-01 22:17:30) Go rules I don't quite understand what kind of problems with draws remains with FICGS (sic!) rules: as passing is not allowed, if you add the non repetition of the same whole board position and a non integer komi, I do not see how a draw is still possible. BUT... this solution does actually not solve anything as I don't think you can forbid passing (as a matter of fact, I checked the official japanese, chinese, new-zealand, AGA (USA) and SST rules: pass is allowed and needed) The main reason is, IMO, that you need a legal way to end the game (double pass). And yes there are situations where the best move for BOTH players is NOT to move at all in the area: the simplest case I can think of is thousand-year kos, which in the case of japanese rule usually end in seki. Note that a single pass (that is the game goes on after it) can change the difference in scores in area mode: the AGA rule introduces the concept of pass stone to compensate and insists on white making the last move (if necessary with an additional pass and pass stone) to ensure that the total number of stones played by the two players are equal! (BTW this is one of the reasons, admitedly far behind familiarity, why I prefer the japanese rule in face to face go) To sum things up (!!), while I agree that FICGS could develop its own set of rules, I feel that the subject is too complex and error-prone, and has been long, and still is, disputed by highly competent authorities : why not use the result of their work? I would add that the point of all this is rather moot if you consider that situation like triple ko and alii are indeed rather rare: why not stricly stick to, say, the official chinese rule, and replay the game by referee decision in the rare cases where neither playing side will yield? oh, but I could also check what they do in the kiseido server ?!? oh, and do take what I say with great caution: I don't feel and I am certainly not competent enough on the subject! Any other advice over there? :-) There are 0 results for Oriti in wikichess.
[Chess forum]
[Rating lists]
[Countries]
[Chess openings]
[Legal informations]
[Contact]
[Social network] [Hot news] [Discussions] [Seo forums] [Meet people] [Directory] |
|
Support to all people under attack
Social network : create your photo albums, discuss with your friends... Hot news & buzz : discover the latest news and buzz on the internet... Discussions : questions and answers, forums on almost everything... Seo forums : search engines optimisation forums, web directory... Play the strongest international correspondence chess players !
|