|
|
|
There are 58 results for Nabe Yuki in the games. Game_15647 Game_15648 Game_16179 Game_16185 Game_16186 Game_16187 Game_16188 Game_16189 Game_17872 Game_17877 Game_17881 Game_17885 Game_17886 Game_17887 Game_18009 Game_18014 Game_18018 Game_18021 Game_18024 Game_18025 Game_18645 Game_18650 Game_18655 Game_18656 Game_18657 Game_18658 Game_20009 Game_20014 Game_20019 Game_20020 Game_20021 Game_20022 Game_22711 Game_20533 Game_20538 Game_20542 Game_20545 Game_20547 Game_20549 Game_21679 Game_21678 Game_22704 Game_21682 Game_21683 Game_21681 Game_21680 Game_22712 Game_22697 Game_22713 Game_22714 Game_22715 Game_22716 Game_25495 Game_25506 Game_25507 Game_25500 Game_25508 Game_25505 There are 2 results for Nabe in the forum. Lionel Vidal (2007-01-21 17:49:41) Go and Chess About your point number 3... A chess world champion could very well note its moves before playing and yet be mated in one move :-) In Go pro-matches, the moves are usually recorded during play by another (younger :-) pro, who has also to deal with time keeping: it makes sense not to disturb gods at play by basic housekeepings :-). I remember an article on the WEB counting the numbers of obvious blunders in go pro-games, and it was *very* low compared to chess. Concerning your point 2, it is not quite true AFAIK: most top pros run a school of younger pros or wanabe pros who play and analyse numerous games on the Master supervision (He does rarely play with students and then it is a great honour!). So a master does not not really analyse alone, but discuss many ideas with others. Concerning your point 4, I think that increasing the number of games would change the playing calendar too much and a pro cannot play many more games by year without consequences on his results... even at my very low level, I find a go game *much* more tiring than a chess one (here I mean a face to face game, not correspondence or server go... something I still don't manage to get used to :-) BTW, I also find that recovering from a loss in go is much more difficult (again I mean face to face Go) than in chess: maybe because of a higher involment, maybe it is just me. What do others players think? Another point is that a pro is paid by the federation (a fixed amount depending on its rank, not linked with his gains in tournaments that are much more important), and have to give some services to the community: lessons, conferences, teaching games... and so on... and this is more true for the lowest ranked pros! Dinesh De Silva (2007-08-03 09:39:16) Re: I couldn't make any sense out of what this particular thread is about. It sounds like "R2 D2 Computer Speaking". A space fight?!? Some "command" problems in Moscow?!? Some killers & narcotic addicts attacking some game & a god wannabe??! There are 0 results for Nabe in wikichess. ... or search for Nabe in FICGS via Google
[Chess rating list]
[Go ranking list]
[Chess & Go links]
[Chess forum]
[Players blog]
[Countries]
[Chess openings]
[Encyclopedia] [Seo forums] [Discussions] [Buzz] [Meet people] [Directory] [Contact] [Legal informations] |
|
FREECHESS SPAGHETTICHESS FICGS is also a social network including seo forums, a hot news & buzz blog, a free web directory and discussion forums to meet people from all over the world. Discuss the last events, improve your search engines optimization, submit your website, share your interests...
Feel free to link to FICGS to get referer links. |