|
|
Home Information Login Register Waiting lists Membership Hall of fame Tournaments Best game Wikichess Rating list Problems Forum Links Help About
Hot news Discussions Files search Social network
|
Here are 100 results for Goti Javier in the games. Game_78394 Game_78393 Game_78391 Game_78388 Game_78384 Game_78379 Game_74935 Game_74934 Game_74933 Game_74932 Game_74931 Game_74930 Game_74807 Game_74806 Game_74805 Game_74804 Game_74803 Game_74797 Game_73944 Game_73943 Game_73942 Game_73941 Game_73936 Game_73931 Game_73568 Game_73567 Game_73566 Game_73565 Game_73560 Game_73555 Game_73119 Game_73118 Game_73115 Game_73112 Game_73108 Game_73103 Game_73043 Game_73042 Game_73041 Game_73040 Game_73039 Game_73033 Game_72761 Game_72760 Game_72759 Game_72758 Game_72757 Game_72751 Game_72478 Game_72477 Game_72476 Game_72475 Game_72474 Game_72468 Game_71901 Game_71900 Game_71899 Game_71898 Game_71897 Game_71891 Game_71758 Game_71757 Game_71756 Game_71755 Game_71750 Game_71745 Game_71133 Game_71132 Game_71131 Game_71130 Game_71129 Game_71123 Game_70454 Game_70453 Game_70452 Game_70451 Game_70446 Game_70441 Game_70244 Game_70243 Game_70240 Game_70237 Game_70233 Game_70228 Game_69661 Game_69660 Game_69659 Game_69658 Game_69653 Game_69648 Game_68616 Game_68615 Game_68614 Game_68610 Game_68606 Game_68601 Game_67286 Game_67285 Game_67284 Game_67280 There are at least 6 results for Goti in the forum. Garvin Gray (2021-04-18 17:28:11) Wch 22 Stage 2 ended I do not disagree with your general sentiment, but as someone who has been on this site a long time, I have experienced a lot of negotiations and discussions like this, where the discussions end up going nowhere, or some kind of 'change' is promised , and then after a while, those format changes are walked back. Therefore, I have become rather jaded by this entire process and I am now of the opinion that Thibault just offers these discussions in an attempt to make it look like he is entertaining differing opinions, when really he TRULY can not bring himself to make the changes that some of these discussions are asking for as he already believes that the site is perfect as it is. So, you are then treating the forum posters like mugs if you are saying, lets discuss the topic and come up with new ideas, if you have no genuine intention of embracing any of the ideas proposed. I have now said my last post on this matter for quite a while. I have made it clear what I think of these forum discussions and their purpose, so there is now no further requirement for me to reply. Garvin Gray (2012-04-20 15:28:37) Slow tournament entries Ramil: When I first came across this site, the rating bands used to be 400 points, and then after a lot of negotiation, debates and cross topics, it was changed to 200, with the even numbers (2400, 2200, 2000) in the standard category, and (2300, 2100, 19000 in the rapid category. While I understand your point that perhaps these should be changed to 100 point bands as this is what I think the market is trying to say, I think it is an issue of total number of players. If we had many more players, then each category would fill quicker. Your point is certainly worth discussing and I would not be upset to see it work in practice, but we have had quite a few changes, and another change might just be a bit much for Thibault to consider at this stage. I could be wrong though ;) Normajean Yates (2009-07-03 14:03:22) ficgs v 'the scheming mind' .. well 'the scheming mind' seems to be a no-engines no-tablebases site. But, for ficgs v 'the scheming mind' engine-use a matter of negotiation.. Thibault de Vassal (2009-02-28 03:35:14) Svante Carl wins FICGS Go WCH (again) Congratulations to Svante Carl von Erichsen who keeps the FICGS Go champion title by beating Ke Lu 5d on an impressive 5-0 score, also reaching a rating of 2653 ! A rematch just started between our two top Go players, as Ke Lu convincingly won the 3rd FICGS Go WCH preliminary tournament by 7/7 You can follow the games here : http://www.ficgs.com/user_page.php?page=tournament&tournament=FICGS__GO__WORLD_CHAMPIONSHIP__000003 Svante Carl kindly accepted to answer a few questions on his match : FICGS - Hello Svante Carl, first of all congratulations for your win in the FICGS correspondence Go championship final. Your opponent was Ke Lu 5 dan, you won 4 games out of 5 already (the last game is not finished yet), how do you explain such a result? Svante Carl - Hello! Thank you very much! It is certainly astonishing for me that I was able to hold my own in these games. I believe that the main factor that helped me in getting on even terms with such a strong player was that I could spend much more time analyzing each move than in a face-to-face or online direct playing situation. FICGS - Did you have a particular preparation or plan before to start the games? Svante Carl - The only things I planned beforehand was to really give my best, and to make the games as distinct as possible. FICGS - The site will now try to attract more correspondence Go players from Asia (with a few chinese, japanese or korean words on the home page already), what do you think about the games format played at FICGS (30 days + 1 day / move, chinese rules komi 7.5 points) and the championship rules? Svante Carl - I like the format. I am also interested in the rules of Go as well as the rules that surround Go, like tournament rules and time settings. My current conviction is that the "real, pure" Go rules are area rules with superko, and territory rules should be seen as a shortcut which should give the same result. I have come to think that the "Taiwan rule", i.e. White gets a point of compensation if Black got the last play (before the first pass), is a sensible part of the rules. FICGS has taken a very easy route by declaring the rule set and leaving negotiation of the result to the players. While in the end, it is only important who won, I think that showing a result as e.g. "White+3", "Black+Resign" adds a lot of flavour. As a time system, I think that bonus time (a.k.a. Fischer time), like on FICGS, is a very general and sensible approach to timing a game like Go. I think that many "real-world" tournaments and internet servers will switch to that in the future, for all, blitz, speed, normal, slow, and correspondence games. The championship format is quite nice. I like the title holder/challenger way of tournament series. The only thing I would like to see is some sort of nigiri to determine the colours in the odd game. Attracting players from Asia is really a worthwhile goal. I look forward to playing players from all over the world. FICGS - Does correspondence Go bring you something more than real time Go? What is more addictive according to you? Svante Carl - Since I think that analyzing is a forte of mine, I might be a bit stronger at correspondence Go than at "real time" Go. I don't think that one is more addictive than the other. FICGS - Do you often play real time Go online? What servers do you prefer? Svante Carl - I usually play on KGS, but not too much, perhaps one or two games per week on average, often in "bursts". KGS is quite nice, but not perfect. Sometimes I play at CyberOro, but there is much less communication; I like to watch pro games there. FICGS - Do you use softwares that assist you in your games (FICGS rules allow this)? What do you think about computer Go in general nowadays? Svante Carl - I only use a board or a simple SGF file viewer for analyzing. There are no playing programs that could help me. The programs have advanced quite much recently, but I think that it will still be a long time before they can beat me in an even game. Currently, most tests of these programs are against professional players with high handicaps, and I think that this is a good situation for the bots, since they get exponentially weaker the further the game is from the end -- high handicap practically eliminates the opening, their weakest spot. I would like to see more tests against amateur players at the bots' own level. FICGS - Do you play other games (board games, video games...), what is your favourite one? Svante Carl - Go is certainly my absolute favourite. I also know chess, although I am really weak at that. I also like "german board games", there are some really nice pearls there. In video games, well, there are also some pearls, but they get drowned by a mass of ... not so good games..., I don't waste time looking at that scene any more. I also played some online poker, but it wasn't able to keep me interested. FICGS - Will you defend your title again against Ke Lu who also won the 3rd wch tournament? Svante Carl - Of course, I am looking forward to that! FICGS - Could you give us your impressions on the games, how it went from the beginning to the end, do you think that time pressure were a non-negligible factor in the result (the clocks of Ke Lu were quickly near 1 or 2 days left)? Svante Carl - I was a bit surprised that he let his time drop to such a low level right at the beginning, perhaps he was not familiar yet with the vacancy feature at FICGS. I can't see his reasons for this, or how much time he actually could spend on his games. I was ahead in each game when it timed out, though. I think that game 2 was quite even from the start. The skirmish in the lower left resulted in me capturing a little group, but he got a nice framework on the lower side. My prospects of reducing this were a bit hampered by the fact that my right side group was not completely settled. I found a way to sacrifice some stones to settle my group while fixing the framework's extent and keeping sente to secure my top side, at which time, the game was still almost even, but I think that I was a few points ahead then. Later, I could seal the top side with some extra points through some rather blunt forcing moves. In game 3, my opponent made an approach with White 24 that is usually regarded as bad in this situation, because the pincer Black 25 works out very well in conjunction with the stone on the left side. He tried to settle with White 26, but I refused to make things so easy, even though the result from the usual joseki would not have been bad. He resisted Black 27, but I think that White 28 is an overplay. The resulting fight left me with nice profit in that corner and sente, while he made some centre thickness. I then tried to carefully neutralize this thickness, but I may have played some slack moves in the course. Later, I was able to keep a little moyo in the lower right centre, and then I poked into his right-side territory where he had left a serious weakness earlier. Game 1 started out with an interesting fight in the upper right. After White 42, both the three captured black and the two almost captured white stones retain some serious aji, which I came back to fix on my side a few moves later. When I could set up a splitting attack with Black 77, he was able to connect his two weak groups, but in bad shape. I continued to keep this dragon separated from the top, planning to invade the top side afterwards. However, with White 110, instead of connecting by playing B6, he saved some centre stones, and I proceeded to separate and kill the dragon. He may have overlooked that my upper left side group was still able to live after 110 and 111. In game 4, after White 22, Black's stones on the left side have a strange relation. The three stones in the corner are a bit far from C10, but putting another move here is way too slow. He tried to remedy this situation with the following moves. After Black 27, there are weaknesses left in both sides' shape. When I entered with White 32, I thought that his weakness at F13 would let me settle easily, but he attacked very hard. After White 60, there are some weaknesses in my shape, but he also has a weakish group in the centre. Playing at K10 with White 76 before taking the two stones with H2 felt very important to me. At move 94, I couldn't find a good move to complete my moyo at the top, but I thought that I had found a good point to invade. This was much harder than I thought, since after Black 95, the 3-3 point fails to live. With 96 and 98, I thought that I would get a ko, but he played a line that I had excluded earlier on account of too many cuts in Black's outside shape. However, with Black 107, he made things very difficult for me, since cutting at P16 doesn't work out too well -- my inside group doesn't have enough liberties. I cut at Q14 instead with the hope to at least get some outside forcing opportunities that might have been able to keep me in the game. I think that Black 115 should have been at R12, because after White 116, R12 and N16 have become miai. Black 117 just doesn't work at all. I really got lucky in the end here. These impressions are naturally one-sided, and I would be really interested what stronger players might say about these games. FICGS - Thank you very much and have good games ! Svante Carl - Thank you! Thibault de Vassal (2008-11-09 00:08:30) Fire on board... Open letter by Gata Kamsky : "Dear President, gentelmen, Susan, When I first saw Bill's letter I was happy, because finally USCF has been showing strong support for their representative. Whether there could be a better solution or a more diplomatic one is a good question, but the reality is that there is no time to negotiate and given FIDE's strong-arm history of negotiating, it is not likely to succeed. When I spoke with FIDE Vice President Mr. Makropoulos in Greece, it was decided that both my team and Mr. Topalov's team would meet during the rest day at the Olympiad in Dresden to negotiate and discuss everything, including technical details. With their last public statement, Mr. Illumjinov not only attempted to revoke his personal guarantee of the match, but he also imposed the time limit of one week for the players to acceed to his demands and at the same time re-awarded the bid to the Bulgarian Federation, which was the original FIDE's intention in the first place. You all are aware of the clause in the FIDE regulation for this "special" match that gave the Bulgarian Chess Federation a privilege of matching any bid that is coming from my side, which effectively ruined any attempt to find and submit a bid from the United States. Throughout the negotiations with my managers, FIDE did nothing to find a sponsor on their own, despite the fact that it was solely FIDE's decision to create this match, and thus to allow Mr. Topalov a backdoor into the final steps of the qualification proceedings for the world championship title, quite unfairly, I might add. FIDE's entire purpose, for chess players, for fairness, has been changed into a special interest group organization and I personally believe that any negotiations with FIDE rulers or tsars, or whatever you like to call them, will be unsuccessful. The time for the negotiation is over and the only way to fight FIDE is to expose their mistakes, and perhaps fight them in a court of law if and when FIDE broke the law. Therefore, I would respectfully request all USCF Board members to unite and find ways to make sure that justice and fairness will prevail. Sincerely, Gata Kamsky Saturday, November 8, 2008" More informations on Chessbase news : http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=5004 Thomas Gilbreath (2006-09-14 05:19:28) Greetings from GameKnot :) Hello friends, my name is Thomas, and I am the representative from GameKnot. We look forward to playing a match against you! GameKnot has played two matches vs. other sites in the past, and we have enjoyed the competition very much. It is my sincere hope that we can pull this thing off! As FICGS is a newer site with a smaller community than ours, we hope that you guys can field a team of approximately 12-20 players of ALL ratings ranges. We intend to put up at least 2 players in each of 7 ratings classes (U2400, U2200, U2000, U1800, U1600, U1400, and U1200). The rules of the match are currently being negotiated between Thibault and myself, and we would like to commence as soon as possible. I highly encourage the members of FICGS to participate, as these matches are a lot of fun! You guys will get a chance to visit our site, and we yours. Please contact Thibault and sign on! We look forward to seeing you OTB :) There are 100 results for Goti in wikichess. Javier Goti (1336) c4 g6 Nc3 Nf6 Transpose to wikichess #11253# ============ Contributors : Javier Goti Javier Goti (1336) e4 c5 Nc3 g6 Nf3 Bg7 Be2 d6 d3 Nf6 b3 Transpose to wikichess #11315# ============ Contributors : Javier Goti Javier Goti (1336) c4 c5 Nc3 d6 g3 g6 Bg2 Bg7 Nf3 Nc6 Transpose to wikichess #9645# ============ Contributors : Javier Goti Javier Goti (1336) c4 c5 Nc3 e5 g3 Nf6 Transpose to wikichess #70473# ============ Contributors : Javier Goti Javier Goti (1336) c4 d6 Nc3 c5 Transpose to wikichess #69209# ============ Contributors : Javier Goti
[Chess forum]
[Rating lists]
[Countries]
[Chess openings]
[Legal informations]
[Contact]
[Social network] [Hot news] [Discussions] [Seo forums] [Meet people] [Directory] |
|
Support to all people under attack
Social network : create your photo albums, discuss with your friends... Hot news & buzz : discover the latest news and buzz on the internet... Discussions : questions and answers, forums on almost everything... Seo forums : search engines optimisation forums, web directory... Play the strongest international correspondence chess players !
|