|
|
Home Information Login Register Waiting lists Membership Hall of fame Tournaments Best game Wikichess Rating list Problems Forum Links Help About
Hot news Discussions Files search Social network
|
Here are 40 results for Davies Nigel in the games. Game_3728 Game_3727 Game_3726 Game_3725 Game_3720 Game_3715 Game_2930 Game_2929 Game_2928 Game_2927 Game_2922 Game_2917 Game_2705 Game_2703 Game_2701 Game_2698 Game_2694 Game_2689 Game_1775 Game_1774 Game_1773 Game_1772 Game_1771 Game_1770 Game_1202 Game_1201 Game_1200 Game_1199 Game_1146 Game_1145 Game_1144 Game_1143 Game_1142 Game_1136 Game_882 Game_881 Game_878 Game_875 Game_871 Game_866 Here are 0 results for Davies Johnny in the games. Here are 0 results for Davies Steven in the games. Here are 0 results for Davies Michael in the games. Here are 0 results for Davies Alban in the games. There are at least 16 results for Davies in the forum. Nick Burrows (2009-11-29 21:52:21) thankyou Very interesting - thanks guys! Incidentally i once beat GM Nigel Davies in a simul! Quite a poor game, but complicated!! He won 26 drew 3 and lost to little old me ;O) Thibault de Vassal (2009-11-29 17:15:18) Nigel Davies & Garry Kasparov Hi Nick, Nigel Davies played with computer assistance but IMO only to verify his moves, he was very creative in some games. As for Garry Kasparov, if I remember well, he said a long time ago that he could become easily the best correspondence chess player (if assisted by computers, I guess). However I'm not sure if his preparations for OTB chess would be useful here, but most probably he could achieve this. Hard to predict what rating he could reach as a centaur, maybe 2650-2700....... Without computer assistance, it would be much harder, maybe 2300-2350 .. It seems to me that Peter Leko played some games at ICCF, without so much success also, right? Nick Burrows (2009-11-29 03:19:18) What would Kasparov's Ficgs rating be? Just out of curiosity, are there any educated guesses as to what Gary Kasparov's Ficgs rating would be if he played seriously but without any computer analysis? I noticed GM Nigel Davies played here and his rating was in the 2300's and i suspect without computer assistance, though i'm not at all sure about that. Kasparov = 2500?? Don Groves (2009-07-08 08:50:04) High rated FICGSers GM Nigel Davies played here for a while a year or so ago. Thibault de Vassal (2007-10-02 19:33:41) CC / OTB ratings Since strong engines appeared, there's no more a clear relation between OTB and CC ratings IMO. A few months ago, GM Nigel Davies explained that he gave up correspondence chess because it simply asks too much energy and time. Don Groves (2007-06-12 09:22:59) Nigel Davies on the Pirc Interesting that he would write about the Pirc since I thought he said something in his mailing list a few months ago about giving up on the Modern (a variant of the Pirc) for black which he had played for some time. Thibault de Vassal (2007-06-11 17:54:15) Pirc defense by Nigel Davies A new DVD on Pirc Defense by GM Nigel Davies : http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=3913 Is Pirc a good weapon at correspondence chess ?! .. Any fans ? Nigel Davies (2007-01-20 07:42:54) Correspondence Chess Hi Thibault, I picked up your message and I would agree in terms that an OTB player should not try to play 'perfectly'. The point of my article was that correspondence chess can help cure OTB players of becoming 'too practical' at the expense of good moves. A lot of OTB players will develop defective (but dangerous) methods to score heavily against weaker players but get cut to ribbons when they use the same methods against a stronger player. This is particularly noticeable on the ICC, where some players will just try to win on the clock regardless of the objective strength of their moves, and most of the time it works. But their 'chess habits' suffer mightily as a result. Best wishes, Nigel Wayne Lowrance (2007-01-19 00:25:10) Nigel davies http://www.chesscafe.com/davies/davies.htm This very interesting link provided here on FICS is good reading "chess Cafe" The article by Nigel is very interesting and informing. I find it very interesting that he uses Fritz as his analysis partner here on Fics. Speaks volumes for Fritz I think. I have had Fritzies for long long time starting with Fritz5, and have learned a lot that has helped me with OTB as with Nigel. I would love to find out what Nigel thinks about the latest releases of other chess engines. Sad to hear him say he no longer has time for coorespondence chess. The loss is mine and all of you. Wayne Thibault de Vassal (2007-01-17 14:26:42) Correspondence chess & OTB chess An interesting article by GM Nigel Davies on ChessCafe, a GM's view of this 'other' game : http://www.chesscafe.com/davies/davies.htm I hope you enjoyed your games at FICGS even (true) if it takes a lot of time... Also thanks for the link. Best wishes :) Nigel Davies (2006-09-30 13:50:51) Re: Legitimacy Hi Rodrigo, I haven't played Kramnik but I met him once; my impression is that he's a proud and rather honourable person. I don't see him organising his own cycle, but there are plenty of people opposed to FIDE who could. This might be just the opportunity they need. Kramnik couldn't really have refused a 'reunification' match before this, it would have looked like he didn't want to play. But now he's got a strong case that FIDE cannot provide a suitable aegis. Nigel Nigel Davies (2006-09-30 09:07:48) Legitimacy This is (or should have been) the real point of these championships from FIDE's point of view. Rather than being seen as a banana republic with a paper champion their aim should have been to establish legitimacy for their cycle and organisation. FIDE established itself by taking over the World Chess Championships with the death of Alekhine. If it can no longer do that, a large part of its raison d'etre disappears, in my view. I'm not sure they realise it yet, but if Topalov 'wins' from his 1-3 position with some trumped up accusation of cheating, their legitimacy is not enhanced. Quite the opposite in fact. Kramnik goes home with a very strong claim to being the REAL World Champion (he beat Kasparov in a match) and having allowed FIDE to demonstrate its true colours. I think that the odds of him establishing his own cycle will have improved dramatically, he just needs a sponsor. Nigel Nigel Davies (2006-09-29 22:59:40) Topalov's Outrageous Accusation I'm of the opinion that Topalov's accusations are an outrageous bit of gamesmanship - there's no evidence whatsoever that Kramnik was 'cheating' in some way so this looks like an attempt to embarrass him. If Kramnik sticks to his guns this will backfire on Topalov. I don't believe Kramnik should continue whilst his opponent (backed, in its actions by the 'appeal committee) is essentially saying that he was cheating in some way. At one time this would have meant pistols at dawn. Nigel PS. There's more at my blog: http://www.gmgrowl.com Thibault de Vassal (2006-06-19 18:42:16) FICGS 1st world championship Hello Heinz-Georg. While watching the wch waiting list, I realized that there could be an improvement more about this "extra-group". So here is the 1st wch scheme (and next ones, without the special group in the first stage), according to the rules. Stage 1 : -- Knockout tournament -- FICGS__CHESS__WCH_QUARTER_FINAL_1__000001 FICGS__CHESS__WCH_QUARTER_FINAL_2__000001 FICGS__CHESS__WCH_QUARTER_FINAL_3__000001 FICGS__CHESS__WCH_QUARTER_FINAL_4__000001 with John Anderson, Petr Makovsky, Daniel Cinca and 5 other players... -- Round-robin tournaments -- FICGS__CHESS__WCH_STAGE_1_GROUP_1__000001 FICGS__CHESS__WCH_STAGE_1_GROUP_2__000001 FICGS__CHESS__WCH_STAGE_1_GROUP_3__000001 (...) And at last, a special and one-time group : FICGS__CHESS__WCH_STAGE_1_GROUP_M__000001 This will be a high rated group, with GM Nigel Davies, GM Amir Bagheri and the ~10 players 2300+ who won't play the knockout tournament according to the rules. The winner of this group will directly qualify for stage 3 round-robin final tournament (a one-time rule). The others can play stage 2 as specified in the rules. Thus, only the 1st wch will start on july 1st. I think it's fair enough and finally everyone can play... Stage 2 : -- Knockout tournament -- FICGS__CHESS__WCH_SEMI_FINAL_1__000001 FICGS__CHESS__WCH_SEMI_FINAL_2__000001 -- Round-robin tournaments -- FICGS__CHESS__WCH_STAGE_2_GROUP_1__000001 FICGS__CHESS__WCH_STAGE_2_GROUP_2__000001 (...) Stage 3 : -- Knockout tournament -- FICGS__CHESS__WCH_KNOCKOUT_FINAL__000001 -- Round-robin tournament -- FICGS__CHESS__WCH_ROUND_ROBIN_FINAL__000001 Stage 4 : -- Candidates match -- FICGS__CHESS__CANDIDATES_FINAL__000001 Stage 5 : -- Title match -- FICGS__CHESS__WORLD_CHAMPIONSHIP__000001 ... if there's a world champion and if he defends his title. Consequently we won't have a stage 5 this time, but as it could happen again in the future... That's all folks ! Amir Bagheri (2006-06-19 17:57:15) Ruy Lopez Tim, i am now playing a Ruy Lopez in my game vs Nigel Davies. I will try to show that that old opening still have some surprises... Thibault de Vassal (2006-06-19 16:34:56) GM special match Hello to all. From time to time, special events will take place on FICGS. A 4-games match just started between GM Nigel Davies (GBR) and GM Amir Bagheri (FRA). http://www.ficgs.com/tournament_FICGS__CHESS__MATCH_EVENT__000001.html I think we'll watch these games with interest :) There are 1 results for Davies in wikichess. Thibault de Vassal (2407) e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Bc5 b4 The gambit is named after Captain William Davies Evans, the first player known to have employed it. The first game with the opening is considered to be Evans - McDonnell, London 1827, although in that game a slightly different move order was tried (1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4. O-O d6 and only now 5. b4). The gambit became very popular shortly after that, being employed a number of times in the series of games between McDonnell and Louis de la Bourdonnais in 1834. Players such as Adolf Anderssen, Paul Morphy and Mikhail Chigorin subsequently took it up. It was out of favour for much of the 20th century, although John Nunn and Jan Timman played some games with it in the late 1970s and early 1980s, and in the 1990s Garry Kasparov used it in a few of his games (notably a famous 25-move win against Viswanathan Anand in Riga, 1995), which prompted a brief revival of interest in it. The Evans Gambit is basically an aggressive variant of the Giuoco Piano, which normally continues with the positional moves 4. c3 or 4. d3. The idea behind the move 4. b4 is to give up a pawn in order to secure a strong centre and bear down on Black's weak-point, f7. Ideas based on Ba3, preventing black from castling, are also often in the air. The most obvious and most usual way for Black to meet the gambit is to accept it with 4... Bxb4, after which White plays 5. c3 and Black usually follows up with 5... Ba5 (5... Be7 and, less often 5... Bc5 and 5... Bd6 are also played). White usually follows up with 6. d4. ============ Contributors : Thibault de Vassal
[Chess forum]
[Rating lists]
[Countries]
[Chess openings]
[Legal informations]
[Contact]
[Social network] [Hot news] [Discussions] [Seo forums] [Meet people] [Directory] |
|
Support to all people under attack
Social network : create your photo albums, discuss with your friends... Hot news & buzz : discover the latest news and buzz on the internet... Discussions : questions and answers, forums on almost everything... Seo forums : search engines optimisation forums, web directory... Play the strongest international correspondence chess players !
|