<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="0.92">
<channel>


<title>FICGS forum</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/forum.html</link>

<description>Last messages in FICGS forum</description>

<item>
<title>Berlin Defense</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/Berlin-Defense-q13131.html</link>
<description>Did we had Berlin Defence or the Berlin Wall as a thematic tournament? (...)</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Call referee about game ...</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/Call-referee-about-game-q13967.html</link>
<description>if i lose on time until an answer, have i lost? (...)</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Next thematic tournament</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/Next-thematic-tournament-q13465.html</link>
<description>Yes, 1.b4 c6 is an option (...)</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Call referee about game ...</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/Call-referee-about-game-q13967.html</link>
<description>how long must i wait? (...)</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>PGN</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/PGN-q13959.html</link>
<description>yes,and If I do, i have it. but how to put it in a program like chess lab for example (...)</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>PGN</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/PGN-q13959.html</link>
<description>In example this one:    https://ficgs.com/user_page.php?page=viewer&amp;game=149787    Do you see the (download) link at the bottom of the page? (...)</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>PGN</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/PGN-q13959.html</link>
<description>Not one particular, new on this site and just wondering. Thank you for answering (...)</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Cheating / Forfeiting</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/Cheating-Forfeiting-q164.html</link>
<description>Indeed. I observe it for years, but obviously rating is not the motivation so... (...)</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>PGN</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/PGN-q13959.html</link>
<description>For what game number in example? (...)</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Cheating / Forfeiting</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/Cheating-Forfeiting-q164.html</link>
<description>Pretty SUSPECT that 4 players, atleast 1 not part of the family,     take vacation AT 4 AM (in the MORNING!)... minutes or seconds from one-an-other! (...)</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Cheating / Forfeiting</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/Cheating-Forfeiting-q164.html</link>
<description>Matej Pech   ... is in vacation until   2026 April 17   4:19:39 (...)</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>PGN</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/PGN-q13959.html</link>
<description>I can not make a PGN of a game here, somebody can help me? thank you (...)</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Cheating / Forfeiting</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/Cheating-Forfeiting-q164.html</link>
<description>you should add to analysis:    Jiri Mach   ... is in vacation until   2026 April 17   4:18:57 (...)</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Cheating / Forfeiting</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/Cheating-Forfeiting-q164.html</link>
<description>&quot;Pech/Pechova, I'm looking at you&quot;    this might actually be true:  Stepan Pech   ... is in vacation until   2026 April 17   4:20:21    Hana (...)</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Too many groups for tourneys</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/Too-many-groups-for-tourneys-q13903.html</link>
<description>Done... Let's try new ranges, somewhat more coherent with current ratings. (...)</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Too many groups for tourneys</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/Too-many-groups-for-tourneys-q13903.html</link>
<description>PLEASE. CHANGE. THE. RATING. BANDS. (...)</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Next thematic tournament</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/Next-thematic-tournament-q13465.html</link>
<description>Next thematic suggestion, esp. as there are not yet any entries for 1.e4 e6 2.Qe2, is .... 1.b4 c6 (...)</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Is rating just a number on this site?</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/Is-rating-just-a-number-on-this-site-q13942.html</link>
<description>Hello, I'd not responded earlier because I'd taken 45 days leave to begin the year, largely because of frustration around these very sorts of things.  (...)</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Is rating just a number on this site?</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/Is-rating-just-a-number-on-this-site-q13942.html</link>
<description>In terms of Tournament Rating range:    what can be done... like in IECG/LSS create 2 tiers of tournaments...    the current one where we have 2200-2600 (...)</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Post-tickets FICGS</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/Posttickets-FICGS-q13944.html</link>
<description>Thanks for this post. Here are my ideas.  The problem for the 2400+ rated players is:-  most have left or stopped playing (not sure why) - so those who (...)</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Post-tickets FICGS</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/Posttickets-FICGS-q13944.html</link>
<description>The long answer:    FICGS story is a quite simple &amp; classic one, the reasons why it's declining are quite obvious, and unfortunately the solutions (...)</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Next thematic tournament</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/Next-thematic-tournament-q13465.html</link>
<description>It does look like black is skating on thin ice in this line. These are exactly the kind of lines that might still be interesting to play in the Stockfish (...)</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Next thematic tournament</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/Next-thematic-tournament-q13465.html</link>
<description>I amused myself by looking at the most frequently played lines at the top level, stopping at the first six moves. Then I used Stockfish to evaluate the (...)</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Post-tickets FICGS</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/Posttickets-FICGS-q13944.html</link>
<description>Now 3 players in the rapid M, 2 in the rapid A... but the main point remains, it takes too long to fill waiting lists.    The short answer to &quot;What (...)</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Is rating just a number on this site?</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/Is-rating-just-a-number-on-this-site-q13942.html</link>
<description>There are two types of tickets.    The first kind is when you win a lower class/rapid event and that qualifies you to enter the next higher rated event, (...)</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Is rating just a number on this site?</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/Is-rating-just-a-number-on-this-site-q13942.html</link>
<description>It became just a number after tickets were introduced.    I could easily have been 2400 if tickets were promoted from the beginning and I bought them whenever (...)</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Post-tickets FICGS</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/Posttickets-FICGS-q13944.html</link>
<description>Nobody has joined the FICGS__CHESS__RAPID_M__000182 waiting list or the FICGS__CHESS__RAPID_A__000321 waiting list. Everything feels emptier and the guy (...)</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Is rating just a number on this site?</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/Is-rating-just-a-number-on-this-site-q13942.html</link>
<description>So much discussion in the chat bar, but as soon as I take it to the forum, all I get is crickets. (...)</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Is rating just a number on this site?</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/Is-rating-just-a-number-on-this-site-q13942.html</link>
<description>I am taking this comment from the chat to this forum for further discussion.    In my opinion, this statement is false. On this site, your rating is not (...)</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>following the knock out stage of wch 28</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/following-the-knock-out-stage-of-wch-28-q13923.html</link>
<description>And then may the next cyrcle start too (...)</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>following the knock out stage of wch 28</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/following-the-knock-out-stage-of-wch-28-q13923.html</link>
<description>Yes, the candidates final #28 will start as soon as this one finishes. (...)</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Poker ELO</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/Poker-ELO-q13893.html</link>
<description>Hello Yeturu &amp; very sorry, for some reason I completely overlooked that post.    Of course I agree that ELO is not ideal for poker, I quickly changed (...)</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>WCH_STAGE_2_GROUP_01__000029</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/WCH-STAGE-2-GROUP-01-000029-q13930.html</link>
<description>Rounds number now fixed as well... (...)</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>WCH_STAGE_2_GROUP_01__000029</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/WCH-STAGE-2-GROUP-01-000029-q13930.html</link>
<description>Because I'm distracted :)    Sorry about that, I've added the missing games... (some had started already)    By the way, I made a mistake that affected (...)</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>WCH_STAGE_2_GROUP_01__000029</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/WCH-STAGE-2-GROUP-01-000029-q13930.html</link>
<description>What is happening with these groups? (...)</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Too many groups for tourneys</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/Too-many-groups-for-tourneys-q13903.html</link>
<description>... but well, I'm not completely opposed to such a change for a try, even if I think that problems come from elsewhere. (...)</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Too many groups for tourneys</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/Too-many-groups-for-tourneys-q13903.html</link>
<description>Changing rating bands is not a big effort (at all), but it would ruin coherence of each category... and we should change it again if the number of players (...)</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Too many groups for tourneys</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/Too-many-groups-for-tourneys-q13903.html</link>
<description>Time to wind the clock back quite a few years. What I suggested as a solution to this issue was that the rating bands for the class tourneys and the rapid (...)</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Too many groups for tourneys</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/Too-many-groups-for-tourneys-q13903.html</link>
<description>I'm not going to use this platform anymore until this is rectified. (...)</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>WCH_STAGE_2_GROUP_01__000029</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/WCH-STAGE-2-GROUP-01-000029-q13930.html</link>
<description>It is even in the rules: there will be double round-robin tournaments for 5 players groups only.    Therefore, these 5 player groups need to be deleted (...)</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>WCH_STAGE_2_GROUP_01__000029</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/WCH-STAGE-2-GROUP-01-000029-q13930.html</link>
<description>Why is this only single round robin?    We have discussed this previously. Five players. Double round robin.    I am asking for this tournament to be deleted (...)</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>start third stage chess WCH 28</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/start-third-stage-chess-WCH-28-q13816.html</link>
<description>Candidates final 28 can start too (...)</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>start third stage chess WCH 28</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/start-third-stage-chess-WCH-28-q13816.html</link>
<description>semis 30 can start too (...)</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>start third stage chess WCH 28</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/start-third-stage-chess-WCH-28-q13816.html</link>
<description>semis 29 can start too (...)</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>following the knock out stage of wch 28</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/following-the-knock-out-stage-of-wch-28-q13923.html</link>
<description>Hmm this would be the right number. But I believe there is still a knock out phase coming, following this final group phase:    https://ficgs.com/tournament_FICGS__CHESS__WCH_ROUND_ROBIN_FINAL__000028.html (...)</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>start third stage chess WCH 28</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/start-third-stage-chess-WCH-28-q13816.html</link>
<description>Candidates final 27 started, at last. (...)</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>following the knock out stage of wch 28</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/following-the-knock-out-stage-of-wch-28-q13923.html</link>
<description>You mean this one?    FICGS__CHESS__WCH_KNOCKOUT_FINAL__000028    Just click Tournaments, then:    FICGS__CHESS__WCH_KNOCKOUT_FINAL (...)</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>following the knock out stage of wch 28</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/following-the-knock-out-stage-of-wch-28-q13923.html</link>
<description>Where can you follow the knock out stage of wch 28? I can't find it. (...)</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>start third stage chess WCH 28</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/start-third-stage-chess-WCH-28-q13816.html</link>
<description>Start final 27 😁 (...)</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Ghost player</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/Ghost-player-q13918.html</link>
<description>Most probably he connected on Jan 18 and never disconnected since that time. (...)</description>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>