<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="0.92">
<channel>


<title>FICGS forum</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/forum.html</link>

<description>Last messages in FICGS forum</description>

<item>
<title>*edit*</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/forum_read_7422-Minimum-rating-idea.html</link>
<description>I should have said 'the threat of a death penalty'. The death penalty itself would certainly stop you from stealing!!</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Minimum rating idea</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/forum_read_7422-Minimum-rating-idea.html</link>
<description>A common problem encountered in correspondance chess is that of strong players forefitting several games and their rating dropping by hundreds of points     This spoils the tourny for lower rated players who often have a 2200 rated player in their group with a misleading rating of 1600.    It also de-stabilises the ratings across the whole site as many players grades are false.    Lastly, and of least concern because players who made the drop deserve some handicap - the artificially low-graded player has a whole year of uncompetitive matches as he waits to regain points.     In o.t.b tournaments in England, a method employed to stop rating cheats is that a player who has won a certain class of tournament previously, cannot re-enter at that level.    The equivalent here would be that your rating has a minimum value, equal to the highest rating requirement of a tournament class you have previously won.     This seems to solve the problems experienced by many on this site.     It may be said that the rating drop is a necessary deterrent to prevent players from doing this. My experience is that it occurs from factors out of one's control (illness) and any deterrant is irrelevant - just as a death penalty doesn't stop heroin addicts from stealing!     What d'yall think?</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Chessbazaar</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/forum_read_7416-My-chess-site.html</link>
<description>More, more :)    By the way it could be interesting to gather every chess blogs maintained by correspondence chess players...</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Your chess site</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/forum_read_7416-My-chess-site.html</link>
<description>Very nice!</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Shatranj</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/forum_read_7414-The-Scheming-Mind.html</link>
<description>I played it once, and got beaten by following the instincts from regular chess.  Strange and slow game. It's much more a simulator of a battlefield than a game.</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>ficgs v 'the scheming mind' ..</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/forum_read_7414-The-Scheming-Mind.html</link>
<description>well 'the scheming mind' seems to be a  no-engines no-tablebases site. But, for ficgs v 'the scheming mind' engine-use a matter of negotiation..</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Match vs. Scheming Mind</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/forum_read_7414-The-Scheming-Mind.html</link>
<description>Maybe we should try a FICGS vs. Scheming Mind match :-)</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>My chess site ...</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/forum_read_7416-My-chess-site.html</link>
<description>... has been rejuvenated and I intend to add content more regularly.   Address is still http://chessbazaar.mlweb.info   I hope computer chess and correspondence chess fans will find some interesting info there.   There is a linked blog where comments and suggestions are welcome.      Marc</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>The Scheming Mind</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/forum_read_7414-The-Scheming-Mind.html</link>
<description>This is a well known website !  I did not know how to play &quot;Shatranj&quot;, but it is fully explained on Wikipedia :    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shatranj    Maybe it is worth a try.</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>The Scheming Mind</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/forum_read_7414-The-Scheming-Mind.html</link>
<description>I provided a quote from Arthur Conan Doyle where Sherlock Holms says that excellence at chess is a mark of a scheming mind.      Voila, there is a correspondence site called 'the scheming mind', and its motto is precisely that quote!      http://www.schemingmind.com/ . This offers some variants also; it is the only site I have seen which offers the 7th century persian chess 'shatranj' at correspondence time controls.. [engines won't help in that one!]</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Chucky</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/forum_read_7412-FIDE-rating-list-july-1st-2009.html</link>
<description>Ivanchuk lost a lot of rating points, but it would have been OK if FIDE had recognised a tournament he won convincingly, in which case he would have had almost 30 points more. Perhaps this is a hidden punishment from FIDE for Ivanchuk's doping incident during the chess olympiad in Germany earlier this year.       Pity how politics can influence our game.</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>FIDE rating list, july 1st 2009</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/forum_read_7412-FIDE-rating-list-july-1st-2009.html</link>
<description>The new FIDE rating list is out, Veselin Topalov (2813) still tops it 25 points ahead of FIDE world champion Viswanathan Anand (2788), in third place Magnus Carlsen (2772)...      All players rated over 2700 :      1  	Topalov, Veselin  	 g  	 BUL  	 2813    2 	Anand, Viswanathan 	 g 	 IND 	 2788    3 	Carlsen, Magnus 	 g 	 NOR 	 2772    4 	Aronian, Levon 	 g 	 ARM 	 2768    5 	Jakovenko, Dmitry 	 g 	 RUS 	 2760    6 	Kramnik, Vladimir 	 g 	 RUS 	 2759    7 	Leko, Peter 	 g 	 HUN 	 2756    8 	Radjabov, Teimour 	 g 	 AZE 	 2756    9 	Gelfand, Boris 	 g 	 ISR 	 2755    10 	Morozevich, Alexander 	 g 	 RUS 	 2751    11 	Gashimov, Vugar 	 g 	 AZE 	 2740    12 	Svidler, Peter 	 g 	 RUS 	 2739    13 	Wang, Yue 	 g 	 CHN 	 2736    14 	Grischuk, Alexander 	 g 	 RUS 	 2733    15 	Shirov, Alexei 	 g 	 ESP 	 2732    16 	Ponomariov, Ruslan 	 g 	 UKR 	 2727    17 	Bacrot, Etienne 	 g 	 FRA 	 2721    18 	Kamsky, Gata 	 g 	 USA 	 2717    19 	Mamedyarov, Shakhriyar 	 g 	 AZE 	 2717    20 	Karjakin, Sergey 	 g 	 UKR 	 2717    21 	Eljanov, Pavel 	 g 	 UKR 	 2716    22 	Movsesian, Sergei 	 g 	 SVK 	 2716    23 	Dominguez Perez, Leinier 	 g 	 CUB 	 2716    24 	Alekseev, Evgeny 	 g 	 RUS 	 2714    25 	Akopian, Vladimir 	 g 	 ARM 	 2712    26 	Nakamura, Hikaru 	 g 	 USA 	 2710    27 	Motylev, Alexander 	 g 	 RUS 	 2710    28 	Malakhov, Vladimir 	 g 	 RUS 	 2707    29 	Vachier-Lagrave, Maxime 	 g 	 FRA 	 2703    30 	Ivanchuk, Vassily 	 g 	 UKR 	 2703    31 	Rublevsky, Sergei 	 g 	 RUS 	 2703    32 	Bu, Xiangzhi 	 g 	 CHN 	 2702    33 	Ni, Hua 	 g 	 CHN 	 2701</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>WCH 7</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/forum_read_7404-WCH6.html</link>
<description>Right, Robert :)  Usually, I change the number later.. I just did it.      WCH 7 .. already !</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>WCH6 has already been played</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/forum_read_7404-WCH6.html</link>
<description>At least stage 1 has been played. How could anyone sign up for this event now, if it is already between stages 1 and 2?</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>The Bucharest gambit?</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/forum_read_7368-Suggestion-for-thematic-tourny.html</link>
<description>Good idea, I think</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Budapest gambit.</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/forum_read_7368-Suggestion-for-thematic-tourny.html</link>
<description>Is the Budapest gambit a good choice, or is it a choice that refute white as Yugi would say ?</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>WCH6</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/forum_read_7404-WCH6.html</link>
<description>Thank you so very much Thibault, sorry for my impatience, my bad, as usual  Wayne</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>WCH 6 waiting list</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/forum_read_7404-WCH6.html</link>
<description>Hi Wayne, it is too early yet to open the waiting list, I only set the date to announce it but that's right, it may be not clear enough. You won't miss it anyway :)</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>dad blame it  Thibault</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/forum_read_7404-WCH6.html</link>
<description>I want to enter, it says deadline nov 1 2009, but it  says's closed. whats's up mate ?. (second  request)   Wayne</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>WCH6</title>
<link>http://www.ficgs.com/forum_read_7404-WCH6.html</link>
<description>Thibault. Why does it say closed ?   Wayne</description>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>