phil



FICGS - Search results for phil





There are 202 results for phil in the forum.


Phil Cook    (2006-05-25 12:04:06)
Players online

I see players login, is there a chat room somewhere? or message sending, how to do it?


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-05-25 12:10:06)
Messages

Hello Phil.

There's no chat yet, if you want to send a message to players, you can use this forum... Private messages are authorized during the games.


Phil Cook    (2006-05-25 12:13:22)
(repetition)




Phil Cook    (2006-05-25 12:16:07)
(repetition)




Phil Cook    (2006-05-25 12:18:34)
FICGS__CHESS__CLASS_G__000001

Have I entered the above tournament?I dont see my name anywhere.


Phil Cook    (2006-05-25 12:20:49)
refreshed page

I think there is a small bug in the system,I only refreshed my page,now I see I've posted three times,same subject.


Phil Cook    (2006-05-25 12:25:35)
(repetition)




Thibault de Vassal    (2006-05-25 12:26:04)
refreshed page

Phil, when your browser ask if you want to submit the form again, you don't only refresh the page... Click on forum to refresh the page.

Please post your messages in a unique thread.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-05-27 23:02:00)
An interesting quote :)

"Go is to Western chess what philosophy is to double entry accounting." from Shibumi, bestseller by Trevanian

Thanks to Vincent from http://www.godiscussions.com


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-06-20 17:17:19)
Re: "Revolver" movie...... cinema UFO !

Yes :) ... I saw it in french version... It was really IMO one of the biggest deceptions of the year... probably because I expected a lot, when seeing this fantastic trailer.

This film should have been one of the greatest chess (games in general) relative movies. There was all matters, and many interesting philosophical thoughts... maybe not supported enough by the movie. And I suspect director Guy Ritchie of having voluntarily suicided the movie during the shooting... Luc Besson or other reasons... How to explain such fantastic pictures, then such obvious faults all long. The screenplay surely was better than the result.

Finally, cinema press judged it as totally pretentious and it was a commercial failure. That's a pity, really.


Amir Bagheri    (2006-06-23 12:25:36)
Blindfolded Chess

THE chess-world (for there is a "world" in chess as in other matters) has lately been startled by a very extraordinary performance at one of the "divans" of the metropolis. A young American has played ten games at once, against an equal number of players, without, on his part, obtaining a single glimpse at any one of the chess-boards. The feat is not new; but never before was it performed so triumphantly as in the present day. The writers who have ferreted out the early history of this beautiful game have found the name of one Tchelebi, who, nearly nine centuries ago, was able to play at chess without seeing the board. Many persons in the East acquired the art of playing by feeling instead of seeing pieces; but that is a very different affair, since in such a case the sense of touch comes in aid of the memory. In 1266, a Saragen, named Buzecca, came to Florence and at the Palazzo del Popolo played three games at once, looking at one board, but not at the other two. He won two of the games, and made a drawn or abandoned game of the other. As all his competitors were skilful players, his achievement caused irrepressible astonishment. At various times, in later centuries, this mode of play was exhibited by different persons--Ruy Lopez, the author of one of the earliest treatises on chess; Mangiolini of Florence, Zerone, Medrano, Leonardo da Cutri, Paolo Boi, Salvio, and others, many of whom were Spaniards. Boi is reputed to have played three games at once without seeing the board. Damiano, an Italian, who wrote a treatise on chess more than three centuries and a half ago, gave what he called the "Rules" for learning to play without seeing the board; but his rules are worth very little, amounting chiefly to a recommendation to cultivate the memory. Keysler, in his Account of Turin (1749), says: "The late Father Sacchieri, Lecturer on Mathematics at Pavia, was a remarkable instance of the strength of the human understanding, particularly that faculty of the soul we term memory. He could play at chess with three different persons at the same time, even without seeing any one of the three chess-boards. He required no more than that his substitute should tell him what piece his antagonist had moved, and Sacchieri could direct what step was to be taken on his side, holding, at the same time, conversation with the company present. If any dispute arose about the place where any piece should be, he could tell every move that had been made, not only by himself, but by his antagonist, from the beginning of the game, and in this manner incontestably decided the proper place of the piece. This uncommon dexterity at the game of chess appears to me almost the greatest instance that can be produced of a surprising memory." The most celebrated player of the last century, however, in this peculiar achievement, was the Frenchman Andre Danican, who then, and afterwards, was generally known by the name of Philidor. In 1743, when Philidor was about eighteen years old, M. de Legalle asked him whether he had ever tried to play from memory, without seeing the board. The youth replied, that as had calculated moves, and even whole games, at night in bed, he thought he could do it. He immediately played a game with the Abbe Chenard, which he won without seeing the board. After that, a little practice enabled him to play nearly as well in this as in the ordinary fashion--sometimes two games at once. The French Cyclopedie told of a particular game in which a false move was purposely made by his antagonist; Philidor discovered it after many moves, and replaced the pieces in their proper position. Forty years afterwards, he was residing in England, where he astonished English players by his blindfold achievements at a chess-club in St. James' Street. He played three games at once, with Count Bruhl, Mr. Bowdler, and Mr. Maseres, the first two of whom were reputed the best players at that time in England. Philidor won two of the games, and drew the third, all within two hours. On another occasion, in the same year (1788), he played three games at once, blindfold as before, and giving the odds of pawn and move to one of his antagonists; again did he win two of the games, and draw the third. His demeanor during these labors surprised his visitors as much as his skill, for he kept up a lively conversation during his games. Many eminent chess-players, including M'Donnell, La Bourdonnaye, Staunton, etc., have achieved these blindfold wonders, in greater or less degree, since the days of Philidor. M'Donnell, a famous player about thirty years ago, played his moves even more rapidly without than with the board; he did not object to any amount of conversation in the room during his play, but disliked whispers. La Bourdonnaye could play within a shade of his full strength without seeing the board; he won against good players, on some occasions two at a time; but when trying the threefold labor, his brain nearly gave way, and he wisely abandoned all such modes of playing his favorite game. Mr. Staunton, the leading English player at present (but who has almost ceased to play since he undertook the editing of an edition of Shakespeare), some years ago played many blindfold games with Harrwitz and Kieseritzky, foreign players of note.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-07-28 02:31:50)
Blogs !

Everyday a new feature, I keep in the rhythm ;)

You may have noticed this link ('see the players blog') at the top of the forum page. A new interface that simply looks like the forum, but built like a blogs website.

You may want to relate your Chess life or Go philosophy, your games or whatever.. you can do it there.

Like in the forum, links are automatically parsed. The html < br > tag to begin a new line. Comments by everyone are also available.


Thomas Gilbreath    (2006-10-11 07:04:35)
Pairings:

cyrano (still waitimg on name) vs. Glen D.Shields*****cairo (ottesen_soren) vs. Miguel Pires*****ccmcacollister (collister_craig) vs. Benjamin Aldag*****thumper (jacobs_doug) vs. James Stripes*****tugger (edwards_matthew) vs. Trond Michalsen*****yanm (maret_yannick) vs. Peter Willoughby*****taikaviitta (koivuniemi_raimo) vs. Richard Grady*****tag1153 (gilbreath_thomas) vs. Regis Ducreux*****eqj2 (johnson_eddie) vs. Martin Selby*****dewillget8 (bingham_anthony) vs. Ilmars Cirulis*****mozz (price_richard) vs. Julien Baudement*****lofix (mankowski_peter) vs. Phil Cook.***********************************************************That's a 12 vs. 12 match. 24 points possible. First team to 12.5 wins. Are we in agreement? - Thomas


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-11-21 21:30:43)
Go: komi

Hi Don.

As Lionel explained to me a few months ago, Komi shouldn't be interpreted as an advantage or handicap !

I first thought komi could be 0... but it doesn't make any sense in Go philosophy & theory. Komi's purpose is only to make the game fair, and the estimated value seems to be about 6.5 or 7.5


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-12-04 12:52:51)
Intuition

I don't agree with that. If you oppose intuition to calculation / algorithm / reasoning, chess engines do have intuition. Even Fritz has chess knowledge, that looks like ours by the way, and can play at a 1900-2000 level OTB without any calculation (1 move forward) IMO. And the same, some chess engines improve their evaluation of positions by training.

Quite complex question, nearer philosophy than computers :)


Don Groves    (2006-12-05 02:05:37)
Intuition

Thibault, I understand your point but in humans (all living things having a brain actually) there is a moment between the observation of something and when we begin to think about it. Robert Pirsig calls this moment our entire knowledge of "external reality." Intuition happens in that moment. I don't think computers have a corresponding state to this (and possibly our own is an illusion ;). You are right that this is a more philosophical question than technical, but as long as we insist on comparing "artificial" intelligence to our own, computers must be subjected to these questions.


Phil Cook    (2007-01-26 22:27:16)
Horrible player

Its not just me then,join the horrible player club,total members just me ;op seriously just play,have fun and enjoy,if they use computer they do,at least your using your brain not machine!


Phil Cook    (2007-01-26 22:47:41)
chat box

Just notice,its missing or is it unavailable?


Phil Cook    (2007-01-26 23:19:09)
found it

nevermind,I need glasses :o)


Phil Cook    (2007-02-21 06:33:47)
Novice player

I'm keen,but any room for a novice player 1200- rated??


Phil Cook    (2007-03-03 09:20:01)
Good point

Agree totally!!


Phil Cook    (2007-03-11 06:34:53)
(repetition)




Phil Cook    (2007-03-11 06:36:09)
Quote "Go"

To resign in a game of GO,then find your estimate was wrong!


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-03-11 23:44:31)
Quotes from the forum...

I picked up a few ones from the forum ! .. I have great ones by Elmer Valderrama, Ilmars Cirulis, Don Groves and Heinz-Georg Lehnhoff. I keep it secret and I'll add it very soon, I think the authors will appreciate :)

Feel free to suggest me other ones...


Phil, about your quote it also happen at chess ;)


Phil Cook    (2007-03-13 06:59:33)
Chess/Go

You think you've found a good move,but look for the better move,the problem is finding it!


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-03-14 17:00:55)
Elections in France :-)

A small thread about politics (could be interesting), just curious about what people from the whole world see and hear about elections in France, that will start in about 40 days from now.....

The news that Jacques Chirac will not try to be re-elected has been relayed everywhere, but what about the election itself ?

One more time opinion polls could influence the way people will vote and create a surprise at the end of the first "round"...

So just curious, who did you hear about among them : Nicolas Sarkozy, Ségolène Royal, François Bayrou, Jean-Marie Le Pen, Marie-George Buffet, Dominique Voynet, Olivier Besancenot, Arlette Laguiller, José Bové, Philippe de Villiers, Nicolas Dupont-Aignant, Frédéric Nihous ?

And last but not least, any predictions ? :-)


Phil Cook    (2007-03-17 06:06:18)
Smile

See someone without a smile,give'm one of yours :o)


Phil Cook    (2007-03-19 05:05:47)
$

Experience is learnt,not brought $$


Nick Burrows    (2007-03-19 20:05:47)
sun tzu

yeah funnily i was reading Phil Gordons little green book of poker today and he inserts a few quotes by sun-tzu. 'In war, then, your great object is victory, not lengthy campaigns.' 'To secure ourselves against defeat lies in our own hands, but the opportunity of defeating the enemy is provided by the enemy himself.' 'Supreme excellence consists in breaking the enemy's resistance without fighting.'


Don Burden    (2007-03-20 02:31:31)
Brainyquote

I see you found the brainyquote web site. I like a lot of the Greek Philosopher quotes:

All paid jobs absorb and degrade the mind. Aristotle.

I don't need a friend who changes when I change and who nods when I nod; my shadow does that much better. Plutarch.

The mind is not a vessel to be filled but a fire to be kindled. Plutarch.


Phil Cook    (2007-03-20 07:10:36)
Word

For such a small word:IF,is so big!!


Elmer Valderrama    (2007-03-26 18:15:28)
How Life Imitates Chess

Has it been already published?

To start with, something tells me that the title should have been: How Chess Imitates Life, as it is written by a chess player not a philosopher or politician.

Not just because there is nothing bigger than life, but because we would be in real trouble if we had to make use of chess methodology to find out how to make the right decisions in life.

It can help, true, but no more than it did for Napoleon, for example ;)
(--Wellington would be turning in his grove trying to claim a Master Norm for Waterloo ;)

I have real difficulties trying to grasp the link between chess and politics.

Was Churchill a chess Master? if that is so, then Bush and Blair must be ELO 1200 ;-), and Garry must be declared Russian President ipso facto

Which French presidential candidate from your list plays chess?

Which one is considering learning some chess strategy?

Would they get more votes if they declare this intention? -sort of getting into their rights minds and improving their decision making? Hey, Garry is missing some prospective customers here..8-)


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-03-26 18:59:43)
How Politics Imitates Chess

Garry Kasparov is probably not a philosopher, however it is not obvious to me that Chess Imitates Life, as (you said it) there's nothing bigger than life... Chess is a part of life. On the contrary, we could say life imitates chess because some decisions, sometimes, can be reduced (as far as possible) to chess strategies like reality can be reduced to science. The same, How Reality Imitates Science makes sense to me, whereas How Science Imitates Reality doesn't.

"How politics finally does not imitate Chess" by Garry Kasparov should be much more interesting :-) .. with a preface by Vladimir Putin : "How life doesn't imitate politics" :>


In France, the election sometimes makes me think to a.. more than chess, a Go game... I think Nicolas Sarkozy uses some chess(Go)-like strategies and knows openings/Joseki & tactics best. At least he may know very well the work of Arthur Schopenhauer : "The world as will and representation" & "L'art d'avoir toujours raison". In comparison, Ségolène Royal and other candidates seem to use faith and "religion". Anyway, the result should be quite the same as life doesn't imitate politics much nowadays :/


Phil Cook    (2007-04-05 21:28:26)
Easter Holiday

last minute decision here,I'll be away for 1 week +/- 2 days,I've enough time to cover my time,so to players I'm playing @ GO,see you soon :o)


Phil Cook    (2007-04-05 21:32:45)
Bithday Wish's

Firstly: Congrats to all those people who got FICGS up-to & beyond 1yr Secondly: Happy Birthday to all this month Lastly:See my post on Easter Holiday


Phil Cook    (2007-04-25 06:03:35)
Virus

Bad news this end,got a little gremlin in my system,,I'll be outta action till Sunday 30 April 2007 All players I'm playing,Sorry unavoidable,I've enough time to carry me for that period,so wont take vacation.


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-04-30 14:05:46)
The meaning of Go for modern Russia

An interesting (as usual) article from IGN "Goama" newsletter - http://gogame.info


Alexander Rodin, the member of Go Federation
"The meaning of Go for modern Russia"

I'll try to state my thoughts about the meaning of the Go for modern Russia.

To begin with I suggested that we extrapolate Go models on the political and economical maps. These maps are very important as the spheres of social life, because the questions that are discussed at political and economical levels touch upon our lives, the lives of ordinary Russian citizens. In these spheres they continue the fierce struggle for life and death; in these spheres rivalry is especially keen and the made decisions define the vectors of our country development.

Let's imagine a situation if somebody inadequate came to power and set the totalitarian regime! Then all social "dissident" institution would start dying and so would do the Go Federation as a phenomenon which unifies people with independent thinking. Then it would be inevitable to start "hiding in basements" to keep the organization and set the secret addresses. Under conditions of modern Russia such kind of reasoning seems to be mostly fantastic than real. But if we look behind into our history we’ll remember that we have already had this phase of social development and know everything about it.

I am for that only "adequate" people, patriots, must hold power (I mean all its levels: federal, regional, local and busyness elite as well). These people must think independently and it would be just perfect if they were the people who both understand the very notion of strategy and use in their activity all the arsenal of strategic instruments and among them principles, stratagems and Go philosophy.

Someone can argue: "What are the patriots who set Japan draughts?" the heart of the problem is not in the fact that somebody sets draughts and even the Japan ones. The matter of fact is that there is a "pacific" model the centre of which is the idea of balance and peaceful division of the territory and influence. If someone of us can offer something better, so let him rule. In my opinion, it's the same as to rewrite the Bible or "The Treatise of Military Art" Soun Tsi.

The Go essence manifests in the state scale in the following aspects:

The first one is historical and cultural. The game has a great history and longstanding traditions. Go is no less than a civil game with the development of which hand by hand goes statehood making in many countries. Besides, it's followed by strengthening of spirituality and moral principles of society.

The second aspect is social. Go unifies people, sets friendly relationships between them. Through Go a man manifests quickly, through it s/he can see his/her reflection. Owing to "open spiritual fight" your adversary is likely to become your best friend without saying a word during a game.

The third aspect is pedagogical. Through Go they bring up the grown generations and form their active civil position. Like chess, Go forms and consolidates dynamical stereotypes showing in following behavioral models of people. Penetrating and consolidation happen imperceptibly when sleeping, during the junction of conscious and unconscious.

The fourth aspect is economical. Why are business people interested in Go? Because through the game model a man learns how to manage material and non-material resources. Via the game s/he realizes economical and management notions: market (territory), economical integration, SWOT-analysis (the analysis of weak and strong aspects) etc. Managers start realizing the importance of interconnection and interaction of structural subdivisions ensuring. These subdivisions shouldn't be isolated from each other. They should work time in time like a well-tuned tuning fork.

The fifth aspect is political. The idea of community in politics is as relevant as the idea of group of stones. When a group is weak there is always a possibility of dividing it and this is a sign for the whole group. When our country, being a federal union of equitable subjects, was going through its stage of making a number of subjects had a wish to use the weakness of this chain. So, in 1992 ­ 1994 for the first time after the collapsing of the USSR there appeared first separatist tendencies. E.Rossel, the governor of Sverdlovskaya region, A. Philipenko, the governor of HMAO, claimed about the possibility of Ural republic creation. The emissary of Chechen separatists Gokhar Dudaev proclaimed the independence of Chechen-Ingush republic. The detachment didn't happen but the country paid with blood for it. Nowadays we can see demonstration of political integration and isolation on the modern political world map. Take a strong unity of the European Union and states-outsiders: Democratic People's Republic of Korea and Iran.

In terms of remaining of the USA's striving for establishment of world hegemony (from V.V.Putin's speech at the recent Munich conference), Russia needs the processes of integration and consolidation with other countries aimed at its strengthening. The unified countries have a lot of dame. Now we can observe the stronger split in the CIS as a consequence of energetic and territorial policy of Russia that uses economical instruments of pressure upon "unfriendly and opposing" countries. Is it good or not? It's more likely that it‘s bad. But there are some positive tendencies: the role of the EurAsEC as a community which's built not on the basis of "strange brotherhood" and the role of Russia in it are increasing. Go is an ideological and spiritual base making us related to the countries of Asia-Pacific region. Go teaches how to see and distinguish creative and destroying processes.

The sixth aspect is psychological. The game develops thinking, in particular such processes as analysis and synthesis. It develops the ability of seeing the whole board and its details, the ability of seeing processes proceeding at global and local levels.

The seventh aspect is verbal and lexical or even philosophical. Through studying of the game theory we realize such categories as life and death, territory and influence, reliability, stability, the whole and the parts etc.

So, what is the Go meaning on the country scale? I assume that Go, as philosophy (an ideological and spiritual base), is a very important instrument of upbringing of strategic leaders, those who make decisions at high economical and political levels that influence the country's fate. Because in Go the idea of peaceful co-existence shows the way to harmony. The most pleasant is the fact the "Go way" doesn't have an end and there sky's the limit.


Phil Cook    (2007-05-04 08:35:03)
Chat box

Is the chat box missing,undergoing repairs or disabled? It's missing from were I'm looking from,lol ;o)


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-05-04 15:44:25)
Chat box

Hi Phil.

No it isn't missing !? .. Where are you looking from ? (unusual browser ?!)


Phil Cook    (2007-05-06 03:22:53)
update

IE,I think I requie an update


Phil Cook    (2007-05-21 08:56:19)
Challenge

Your 2 games Vs my two games I'll play Petrov,if you accept opening I'll accept Petrov If you play it


Ilmars Cirulis    (2007-05-21 19:32:10)
Hi, Phil! :)

I agree.

My suggestion is to play our games in that order:

1- Petrov's defence (I vs You)
2- Petrov's defence (I vs You)
3- Traxler counterattack (I vs You)
4- Evans gambit (You vs Me)

Let me to guess...
You mean that Petrov's defence games will be money games and I must win. And all games will be lighting games.

Four lighting games in a row - it will take at least seven hours. I have so much time only in holidays - Saturday and Sunday.

And we need help of Thibault to organize Petrov's defence and Evans gambit games.


Ilmars Cirulis    (2007-05-21 20:01:44)
Hi, Phil! :)

I hope I understood all correctly...


Phil Cook    (2007-05-21 21:44:17)
Ilmars

1- Petrov's defence (I vs You) 2- Petrov's defence (You Vs I) 3- Traxler counterattack (I vs You) 4- Evans gambit (You vs Me) See number 2,That makes 4 games? unless 3- Traxler counterattack (You Vs I) 4- Evans gambit (I Vs You) That makes 6,what time frames are we likely to be playing? As for the money,I think we donate to Ficgs, that way our games are fun,what do you think Ilmars.


Phil Cook    (2007-05-22 08:57:09)
ok

Now to agree on what time limit to play,I'm usually online most (my nights Gmt +10 I'm in aussie till 31st May then back home NZ 1st June-11 June then back to aussie on that night,11 June) I'm not sure about traxler opening,but I think,I could get a drawn game Evens. Btw: The 2 Petrov lines to follow: 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.Nxe5 * our 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.Nc3 * The donate is for Thibault,as he would have to setup the 4 games.


Phil Cook    (2007-05-23 09:52:59)
Chat Box

Last nite,chat box was there,tonite its gone,Is chat box java? what settings are required to see it?


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-05-23 16:09:31)
Chat box

Hi Phil. No, chat box isn't java, it's "OBJECT DATA"... So old or strange browsers may not recognize it.


Phil Cook    (2007-05-29 08:17:01)
Call Ref

Question,I asked ref to adj a go game,Who is the ref?


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-05-29 15:07:34)
Call Referee

Hi Phil,

I'm still the only referee... What game is it about ?

Best, Thibault


Phil Cook    (2007-05-30 10:49:01)
Thibault

Game 9752


Mikhail Ruzin    (2007-05-30 13:08:42)
White win the game

Hi Phil. And what is question about game 9752? White win the game. Its clear. There are not any groups with unknown (questionable) status. Use MultiGo (for example) to count result of game. (M19 stil not defended) "Chinese Rule: White: 191.25 = 186 (Points) + 3 (Shared) / 2 + 7.5 (Komi) / 2 Black: 169.75 = 172 (Points) + 3 (Shared) / 2 - 7.5 (Komi) / 2 W + 10.75 Japanese Rule: White: 119.5 = 100 (Territory) + 12 (Black's Dead) + 7.5 (Komi) Black: 98 = 98 (Territory) + 0 (White's Dead) W + 21.5"


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-05-30 15:16:36)
White wins

Hi Phil, didn't you receive my email after you & your opponent called referee ?

Indeed, White wins this game. Feel free to try the Go scorer :

http://www.ficgs.com/user_page.php?page=score&game=9752

.. you'll see the score after removing stones s11, s17, r18.

You have to resign, sorry.

Best, Thibault


Garvin Gray    (2007-06-04 11:41:42)
Wch 3 in rating order


KAZ Balabaev, Farit 2580

FRA de Vassal, Thibault 2512

USA Ingersol, Harry 2502

NZL Noble, Mark 2497

DEU Schuster, Peter 2480

POL Ostrowski, Leszek 2458

ARG Brunsteins, Daniel 2452

CAN Zubac, Marius 2415

ROU Mathe, Iosif 2414

UKR Khokhlov, Igor 2370

MLT Sammut, Ronald 2362

ROU Helmer, Janos 2343

PRT Pires, Miguel 2270

LKA De Silva, Dinesh 2235

POL Sanner, Zdzislaw 2219

RUS Dyakov, Alexander 2217

DEU Schiller, Wilfried 2217

DEU Koslowski, Volker 2204

DZA Ould Ahmed, Samy 2195

FRA Appendino, Jérome 2192

GBR Taylor, William 2182

GRC Bleker, Frits 2171

DNK Jorgensen, Poulerik 2168

DEU Kesselheim, Peter 2149

CAN Repa, Jason 2144

PRT Louro, Eugénio 2123

USA Kotlyansky, Edward 2114

DEU Markus, Roland 2103

FRA Czekaj, Christophe 2098

AUT Dudulec, Konstantin 2084

CAN Plante, Marc-Eric 2079

LVA Borisovs, Leonids 2078

AUT Mueller, Robert 2069

DEU Unger, Peter 2065

AUT Riha, Josef 2019

POL Skwarczylo, Marek 2018

MUS Stephenson, Andrew 2000

CZE Stanislav, Musil 1990

SCG Vidanovic, Djordje 1966

USA Burden, Don 1959

DEU Haluschka, Rainer 1950

CAN Rotaru, Dan 1937

GBR Wyborn, Graham 1890

GBR Burrows, Nick 1884

POL Broniek, Mariusz Maciej 1879

BIH Dautovic, Dzenan 1875

AUS Gray, Garvin 1863

USA Minkin, Alexander 1850

GBR Josse, Mark 1806

ARM Khachaturov, Vadim 1803

USA Kotlyanskiy, Ilya 1800

DEU Krueger, Karsten 1800

PRT Vasquez, Fernando 1775

DZA Toutaoui, Khaled 1763

DEU Wosch, Arkadiusz 1746

TUR Yuvarlak, Ugur 1732

ROU Hrubaru, Mircea 1726

ARG Carrizo, José 1724

USA Phillip, Lennox 1700

ROU Kondort, Mihai 1700

ROU Ioan, Bucsa 1700

BRA Miranda, Marcus 1691

VEN Flores, Luis 1680

RUS Ruzin, Mikhail 1639

DEU Faust, Dieter 1627

MYS Behrmann, Klaus 1617

FRA Bellanger, Michel 1606

POL Bester, Kazimierz 1600

DEU Nent, Alexander 1593

PRT Oliveira, Carlos 1586

HUN Nagy, Attila 1549

ROU Ionescu, Catalin 1535

HUN Kis-Kos, Laszlo 1512

ITA Lupinacci, Nicola 1492

BEL De Groof, Pieter 1465

DEU Odendahl, Marcel 1462

USA Hendricks, Richard 1459

BRA Queiroz, Florencio 1444

CZE Pech, Jaroslav 1433

USA Goodwin, Adam 1415

HUN Csoma, Robert 1400

USA Gillz, Nicolas 1400

BGR Toktas, Ibrahim Ugras 1400

IND Veeraiah, Karuppaiah 1400

MEX Ortiz Durán, Esteban 1400

TUR Ilhan, Alper 1400

CHE Margot, Alain 1400

TUR Erdonho, Erdinç 1400

USA Lipsits, Sasha 1400

BRA B. Lima, Edmilson 1400

DEU von Buttlar, Paul 1386

HUN Fenyves, Adam 1330

BGR Stoianov, Stoian 1316

GRC Serd, Than 1300

TUR Ak, Murat 1300

GBR Willoughby, Peter 1294

ARG Orden, Jorge 1264

GBR Neil, Charlie 1212

NLD Oldenhof, Dwight 1203

USA Greer, Stephen 1200

BRA Barradas, Anderson 1194

IND Malvankar, Vikrant 1188

BEL Tuteleers, Bruno 1145

DEU Bothe, Matthias 1143

BGR Stoyanov, Zdravko 1136



Thibault de Vassal    (2007-06-20 15:46:39)
Players for FICGS team (by rating)

Here is the complete list of players who registered for the FICGS vs IGAME.RU match. Unfortunately, a few players couldn't play :( .. I think our team is strong enough, as rating rules are quite hard at FICGS and some ratings are still provisional.

I don't know how players will be distributed on "tables", if it's freestyle I think Wolfgang should play at table 1.

I am also surprised to see players coming from IGAME.RU or russian forums who entered FICGS team !? .. Anyway, I'm sure there are no spies :)


Thibault de Vassal (2512)
Mark Noble (2496)
Wolfgang Utesch (2466)
Albert Popov (2463)
Michael Aigner (2354)
Janos Helmer (2343)
Miguel Pires (2270)
Leszek Tymcio (2270)
Alexander Shalamanov (2252)
Heinz-Georg Lehnhoff (2246)
Silviu Nenciulescu (2194)
William Taylor (2182)
Poulerik Jorgensen (2168)
Wayne Lowrance (2124)
Edward Kotlyansky (2114)
Christophe Czekaj (2098)
Konstantin Dudulec (2084)
Polina Romanova (2000)
Dan Rotaru (1937)
Nick Burrows (1884)
Garvin Gray (1863)
Vadim Khachaturov (1803)
Janusz Kepinski (1599)
Alexander Nent (1593)
Graham Cridland (1406)
Edmilson B. Lima (1400)
Sasha Lipsits (1400)
Ilmars Cirulis (1305 ~ >2100)
Than Serd (1300)
Charlie Neil (1212)
Phil Cook (1132)


Wolfgang Utesch    (2007-06-23 16:53:28)
Last try

180702 Humez, Philippe 28 2415 M i


Phil Cook    (2007-08-18 04:09:51)
Unknown Author

See someone without a smile,give'm one of yours.


Philip Roe    (2007-08-21 00:19:50)
Best game voting

It is a nice new feature to be able to see all the board positions in a tournament. This inspired me to look through the "20 best games". On average a mediocre bunch! Perhaps the problem is the link "vote for best game" You look at this and wonder "What happens if I click on this?" and then discover that you have voted for the game you happened to be examining. I suggest a less ambiguous wording "Endorse this game as a best game candidate"


Phil Cook    (2007-08-21 06:29:02)
No Machine

"I use what's between my ears"


Phil Cook    (2007-08-21 11:39:25)
The 3 Monkey's

The 3 Monkey's: See no evil,speak no evil,hear no evil


Philip Roe    (2007-08-23 17:31:35)
draws and wins

Those statistics might have some curiosity value but perhaps not much deep meaning. Especially in the lower sections, all of the games defaulted in ten moves or fewer give a false impression of decisive play. Even if they are excluded, I feel sure that the proportion of draws is much higher for stronger players, so I dont know what an average percentage would tell us.


Philip Roe    (2007-08-28 22:52:27)
Quotes

Work expands to fill the time available (C. Northcote Parkinson, in Parkinsons Laws)


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-08-30 16:08:17)
The 3 Monkey's

Hi Phil ! .. In french it seems to me the 3 Monkey's is said something like "I see nothing, I say nothing, I hear nothing".. Funny.


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-08-31 09:40:32)
Neuroanatomy of a chess player

http://maverickphilosopher.powerblogs.com/chess

http://maverickphilosopher.powerblogs.com/files/maverickphilosopher-IMG_0256.JPG


Quite funny, and interesting blog :)


Philip Roe    (2007-09-01 04:24:39)
private/public messages

I too would like to send private messages, perhaps to congratulate the winner of my tourney. Also, can one add public comments to a game that is finished? Either ones own game or someone elses?


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-09-01 10:24:20)
private/public messages

Hello Phillip.

Yes, it is possible to leave a public comment for your own finished games (you can find it through 'My tournaments'). I'll work on the private message facility soon.


Philip Roe    (2007-09-01 20:04:25)
engine-free chess

When I started playing here about three months ago I did not realise that engine use was allowed (or even encouraged, according to some) What did attract me were some features like being able to see ongoing games of other players, which makes the experience more like a "real" OTB event. I have played on other sites (IECG,ICC) where engines are forbidden, and ICC at least claims to have software that detects cheating. I play without an engine (but using books)simply because I enjoy it more. I dont care all that much what you do as long as you play interesting moves. It seems very clear from the games that lower-rated players certainly dont use engines and higher-rated players probably have to. At my kind of level (1900ish) it seems optional, but the suspicion that my opponent analyses with an engine steers me away from certain types of position (speculative sacs, or clear strategy but complex tactics) which is a shame because that may be where the position wants to go. The previous thread got very heated, and Im not sure why. One suggestion was to let non-computer users go away and play funny little unrated games by themselves. That is not attractive. Im not interested in playing walkover games against weak opponents. Rating is essential. Other than that, Im very interested to find out what other people think. That will determine whether or not I come to feel at home here.


Philip Roe    (2007-09-01 22:01:21)
quotes

As the days dwindle down.. to a precious few...(Maxwell Anderson, September Song.. or any CC-player)


Christophe Czekaj    (2007-09-03 12:53:52)
no chess engines

Hello Thibault, I play here without chess engine. Anyway, recently I tried to play "hippopotamus defence", (with no good result yet, I have to admit) so a computer is no use, it doesn't understand anything, but perhaps it's hippopotamus which is wrong, not the computer ;-D. Anyway a difficult defence in correspondence play). I began on this site with 2000, and so my elo was too high to play against human only ? I don't see how it's possible a sofware detect computer use ? Ok we see strange, computer-like moves sometimes, but... Perhaps two players, at the beginning of the game can agree to not use computer. Again about chess engine, I use a computer to record the moves (chessbase),to gain time, and replay fast the moves to get to the actual position, but my chess engines (an old fritz (5) and chess tiger (14) all that on a old PC) would certainly suffer a lot use against more recent chess engines ;-D Like Philip, I like to play on ficgs and it would be nice to plmay against more human opponent. I play one tournament on itsyourturn since last year, and I saw a lot more human mistakes than on ficgs. So, how explain it, I sometimes feel more comfortable on itsyourturn, but still I do like the spirit of ficgs, match against RU, the tournaments, forum, nice people to meet on the board, and so on


Philip Roe    (2007-09-03 18:59:27)
CC without engines

Thibault, Christophe, All I did was to pass on that ICC CLAIMS to be able detect computer use. They dont say how they do it. Maybe they are just bluffing, or maybe they have an algorithm that kind of works and they dont want people to work around it by knowing how it works. The reason I dont use engines is because I want to take full credit for any wins I get. I can imagine using an engine and telling myself that I will just use it to prevent oversights. But I cant control what the engine will tell me. It might recommend a move that tells me that I am planning to attack the wrong target. If I then switch plans and win, what is left for me to feel proud of? But I can understand that others may feel differently, and there is much to be said for a site where everything is allowed because it gets around the issue of making a rule that is certainly very hard to enforce. But just because that rule does not exist on FICGS, it seems to me that if somebody on FICGS says that they are not using an engine, then you can probably believe them. The problem with other sites is that if a player with an umimpressive rating fires back a series of accurate moves very quickly in a difficult situation then you suspect that he is using an engine (although he promised not to) and there is not much you can do about it. If the same thing happens on FICGS you are pretty sure that he is using an engine, but you have already agreed that he can, so it doesnt irritate you. For that reason, I think that a computers-barred tournament might actually make sense on FICGS because those who want to use engines can legitimately do so. But for me, it would need to be chess that means something, with at least rating points at stake. Interestingly, Christophe and I are drawn in the same tournament, so we can declare at least that one game computer-free!


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-09-03 23:52:20)
CC without engines

Philip, that's a good point, I'll create the new category tomorrow anyway.

I hope we will see beautiful and imaginative games there :)


Philip Roe    (2007-09-05 23:13:44)
CC without engines

Well, you learn something new every day.

About paragraphing anyway!

Garvin, dont give it a second thought. Christophe and myself have both said that we accept your use of engines: we signed up for it.

Jason, I'm sure I speak for Christophe in saying that neither of wants to change anything for you happy centaurs. All we said was that IF enough other people felt the same way, THEN maybe Thibault might add that feature to his excellent site.

The parallel thread on tablebases is interesting. I find myself taking the opposite view. I dont see them as being very different from looking up KBNk in a textbook. They dont take fun out of the game because most of those rare positions are so impenetrable that they are not much fun anyway.

So I am not very consistent in my views. Who was it said that consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds?


Philip Roe    (2007-09-06 13:55:03)
Jason

[moderator : is it worth to respond and add to the provocation ? :)]


Jason Repa    (2007-09-06 20:56:31)
Philip Roe

You're joking here right? I made a benign and topical post trying to explain things for some people. I attacked or provoked NOBODY. You started in on me with this "for you happy centaur" remark that was completely uncalled for and unsolicited.

I can't seem to win with the forum here. Even when I make an innocent post I get insulted and harassed. Then when I defend myself the Admin sides against me like clockwork, lol.


Christophe Czekaj    (2007-09-07 12:44:20)
To Jason

Hello Jason ! It’s just a question to have the possibility to play correspondence chess (for fun, not neccesarily studying or analysis, just the pleasure of finding moves, ideas (you know, what Bronstein called imagination) not rating, not to be classified as expert, or I don’t know what…) with people without computer. If they lie and use computer ; OK, we can’t be sure, but I’m certain you could accept that some players can trust other players when they say they don’t use computers. For example, I trust Philip when he said this, it’s just a question of being a gentleman. If there are cheaters ok, so what… Rybka will win And I don’t undestand your topic about class of players : I hope I‘ve the right of posting some commentaries on this forum, despite the fact being largely behind you in term of rating… I think we can still play chess without computer, and with rating or not, it’s the same game for me. Philip and I just think it could be kind to play with other players with a kind of gentleman’s agreement. Sorry if it bother you


Phil Cook    (2007-09-08 05:04:08)
Long Shot

AB's of course,but will be on the look out now France lost,They will play one another in the semi's


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-09-08 12:56:34)
No engines tournaments

Jason, of course you may be right ! .. We'll see, but I think the experience may be interesting anyway. As Philip said, FICGS main tournaments are designed for centaurs, and basically these "no engines" unrated tournaments are really just for fun... Unlike some of the other sites you mentioned, where to be ranked 1st may incite to use chess engines, I feel that these tournaments (with no rating ranges) will not attract many centaurs, simply because there's no interest at all for them...


Philip Roe    (2007-09-11 03:59:50)
Netiquette

Thibault,

Your proposal is good. You should not have to make decisions about who "started" an altercation, because sometimes it will be a close call. The only way to avoid making the close calls is to decline to make any calls.


Philip Roe    (2007-09-13 00:37:23)
Andrew Stephenson

You post makes a lot of sense, and I can absolutely agree that being a centaur can be fun and educational (Centaurs in Greek mythology, by the way, were a highly respected race, and usually described as happy) However, I am puzzled by something which maybe you or someone else can explain.

You and others assert that playing the engines first choice every time will drop points against an intelligent centaur. Does it not follow that a centaur should have a higher rating than its engine? But in fact the ratings quoted for the top engines are substantially higher than the ratings of anyone on FICGS, which seems a paradox.

Does the explanation lie in unsynchronized rating systems, or am I just missing something? This question has nothing to do with value judgements, merely with satisfying a curiosity.


Andrew Stephenson    (2007-09-13 06:35:12)
Ratings

Hi Phillip I don't know what "an unsynchronised rating system" is. However at the rate of play 40/20 for example I am not sure I would be able to improve so much on the engines first choices. At the free style tournament stand alones do pretty well. If I needed 45 minutes to find one best move in the Topalov Kramnik line..... So yes a centaur can easily have a higher rating than the engine(s) he is using at cc time rates (on the same hardware). For one thing the centaur can use different engines and for another its a bit like taking a move back all the time and pushing past any horizon limitations plus there is the restrictions of opening books that all engines have. However I am not going to play my own cc games against Fritz 10 (Fritz 9 in my case)by giving it 1 day or even 10 minutes per move because I am not motivated - you need the human element for that. Hope that helps.


Philip Roe    (2007-09-14 17:53:56)
Andrew Stephenson

Thanks for your explanations. They were helpful. Let me try to say what I meant by unsynchronised rating systems (maybe I could have found a better word)

The difference between your rating and mine is a measure of how likely you are to beat me, and that relationship between rating difference and percentage score is similar for any system I have come across.

However, the absolute numbers mean little if anything. There was a widespead belief for some time that US players were overrated, even though the system worked fine internally. My understanding is that from time to time organisations check to see if they have drifted too far from FIDE standards.

This sort of calibration works fine for human OTB games, but for anything else it is not easy to see how to "set the zero", and that possible mismatch is what I called "unsynchronised".

I think that standard CC practice is to try to give each player a rating similar to their OTB rating. I do not know how the engine ratings quoted were tied down, and I imagine that centaur ratings are very difficult to calibrate.




Philip Roe    (2007-10-15 16:56:55)
Chess 960 masterpieces

Have there been any games of chess 960 played, of a quality that would justify them being included in an anthology of great games? If so, I would like to see some.


Philip Roe    (2007-10-18 00:40:41)
Feynman on Go

In a 1985 lecture, Nobel laureate Richard Feynman said that creating an expert program for Go would be a scientific project of very high importance. His reason was that he did not believe that it could done by brute force, and that it would therefore compel researchers to grapple with the problem of just how human beings manage to do what they do with seemingly meager processing power.

Of course brute force has come a long way in 20 years, but my impression is that virtually no progress has been made of the kind that Feynman hoped to see. Does anyone know otherwise?


Don Groves    (2007-10-18 04:40:54)
Feynman on Go

Hi, Philip -- I don't know of any specific details on that sort of progress but Richard Feynman was one of my heroes. I was blessed to get to attend a lecture of his on a field trip to Caltech for high school math and science seniors and have never forgotten the experience.


Philip Roe    (2007-11-11 19:16:42)
cui bono?

Thibault,

I'm not at all clear what your proposal is intended to achieve.

Are you trying to save us from ourselves? Ruined careers, failed marriages, social withdrawal, vitamin deficiency...? If so I can't imagine a one-size-fits-all solution.

Or are you protecting other players from the phenomenon of a player who takes on a large number of games and then, for whatever reason, forfeits many of them? This seems to happen regrettably often and for that purpose it seems perfectly reasonable to ask people to qualify before managing a large number of games. Can you pull any statistics that might be revealing?


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-11-11 19:33:21)
Save our souls :)

Hi Philip... No, the aim is not exactly to save carriers, marriages or whatever, but it may help in some cases :)

The main problem is to see general forfeits from serious players who were playing 60, 80 or more games.. I have no statistics but I see every game result, so it is quite obvious to me when a player forfeits all his ongoing games. So in a way, I'd like to protect everyone, players and their opponents, from this.


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-11-12 00:51:23)
Number of games limitation

Hello Lincoln and welcome to the forum :)

Of course you're right, there may be better rules and an optimized system to reduce the effects of this problem in both directions... My philosophy so far for this server is "make it simple" and to keep the rules as short as possible (well, the rules & conditions page size is quite huge already), moreover it is not obvious to detect forfeits automatically but I'll try to think about such improvements later.


Philip Roe    (2007-12-02 01:01:39)
I think this is original

Chess, like love, like music, has the power to make men miserable.


Philip Roe    (2008-01-11 20:49:15)
game search

At present the "search games" facility allows to search by player's name or by opening. It might be convenient also to be able to search by game number. For example when a particular game is mentioned in the forum by number.


Philip Roe    (2008-01-17 03:05:06)
Excellent enhancements

Thibault,

Many thanks for the work you put into this!

I have one minor complaint. I think it is very unlikely that I will ever want to respond to any of the displayed challenges, so for me that is just clutter. Is there way to opt out of having this feature displayed?


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-01-17 04:10:04)
Challenges option

Hi Philip and Don, yes of course I have to add this option. A few more days or weeks, and it will appear in preferences, that's written on my sheet anyway ;)


Philip Roe    (2008-01-18 23:09:34)
congratulations

to Gaetano for what is surely our only 2-0 score


Gaetano Laghetti    (2008-01-22 09:00:36)
congratulations

Dear Philip, it is very kind of you. Thank you also to Thibault for giving me the chance to play in this match. Ciao Gaetano


Philip Roe    (2008-02-09 18:01:20)
Moving advertisements

Thibault,

I understand your need to generate revenue, and I may be the only one to feel this way, but I find it very irritating to have advertisements displayed that employ dynamic graphics.

They are, of course, designed to be eyecatching, and I find that they make it almost impossible to focus on the analysis board, which was a very welcome recent innovation.


Philip Roe    (2008-02-09 21:28:14)
Simple fix

Or, as I realised about ten seconds after posting, I can just maximise the analysis window to hide the ads...


Philip Roe    (2008-02-15 18:48:06)
Current WC

Sorry, Iouri, but you are wrong.

But even if you were correct, your comment would be wrong (IMO of course)


Iouri Basiliev    (2008-02-16 00:16:43)
2 Philip

Sorry Philip, but it's MY opinion. Kramnik got his title when he won WC match against Garry. Nobody got it from him. It was "No rematch" and Leko was not a legitime pretendent. So unfortunately.


Rodolfo d Ettorre    (2008-06-12 15:12:47)
More thematics ...

Also the old indian defence or janowskey indian thematic tournament would be nice, Tal used the latter occasionally. They are solid, a bit passive. I played a few times the janowskey indian and I felt like I was playing a Philidor with steroids.


Normajean Yates    (2008-07-11 01:08:02)
response to TLP's last sentence is relev

Last proposition and last sentence Wittgenstein's Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus [english translation:] Whereof cannot speak; we must remain silent. Someone's response [mentioned in a book by Karl Popper - Popper didn't remember who gave this response] - But it only then that breaking the silence is most important!


Philip Roe    (2008-07-23 20:42:20)
poems against humanity

Normajean,

I cant recall the ending either, but in a similar vein,

My fellow man I do not care for
I often ask me whats he there for
The only answer I can find
Is reproduction of his kind.


Normajean Yates    (2008-07-24 00:38:58)
Mark, where is your sensayuma?:)

Get a sense of divers humour, man!
Philip, :) [same thing, more seriously, but not only about humans - Dawkins's 'Selfish Genes' presentation of [neo-]Darwin?] Dawkins is, or rather used to be, interesting - but not half as funny as Philip's contribution is :D
PS: I am lesbian, so the likes of me would have mightily puzzled whoever wrote that poem :) :)


Philip Roe    (2008-07-27 03:39:07)
Notation

There is a history of chess notation at

http://www.excaliburelectronics.com/history0799.html
crediting algebraic notation to Philip Stamma in 1737 and stating that "by the 19th century Stamma's simple system had become the norm in some European countries".

So if Breyer did make the remark attributed to him it would probably have read something like "after Nf3..." bur with N replaced by the symbol for Knight in whatever language he was using.

Descartes of course, invented algebraic geometry, in which a straight line is represented by

ax+by=c

and so on.


Normajean Yates    (2008-07-27 20:28:23)
adding to Philip Roe 's post...

It is funny that high-school algebraic geometry is more often called analytic geometry; while in algebraic geometry, 'analytic geometry' is the branch that deals with power series in general rather than polynomials ... so what in analytic (power-series) geometry corresponds to Bezout's theorem? (I have no idea...)


Phil Cook    (2008-08-11 05:23:46)
getting a game annotated

any thoughts on this? or would that slow server ?


Normajean Yates    (2008-08-11 09:33:10)
or maybe the question is not clear to me

Exactly what do you mean, Phil and others - getting a game annotated?

Specially since this is primarily a computer-chess site so of course you dont want engine annotation. You want the sort of human annotation that engines cannot do, right?


Phil Cook    (2008-08-11 12:03:53)
Correct

Normajean,,human annotation,if possible


Philip Roe    (2008-08-11 16:25:09)
Pie in the Sky

Getting free annotations from a strong player seems a bit much to expect.

If you belong to the Internet Chess Club, and type help Services, you get a list of people willing to teach lessons or annotate games. They all charge by the hour, depending on their strength and economic situation. An IM from a third world country charges about $20 per hour. I doubt that you can do better.


Phil Cook    (2008-08-12 07:34:16)
Morales Vs Cook

[Event "Single game, E4EC"] [Site "http://gameknot.com/"] [Date "2008.04.22"] [Round "-"] [White "Morales, Rafael (rafafallo)"] [Black "Cook, Phil (Kiwi)"] [Result "0-1"] [WhiteElo "1078"] [BlackElo "1170"] [TimeControl "10/30"] 1. d4 {(D 00 Queeens Pawn,Chigorin varation) 1. d4 d5 2. Nc3 } d5 2. Nc3 {(D 00 Queeens Pawn,Chigorin varation) 1. d4 d5 2. Nc3 e6..not commonly played } e6 {(D 00 Queeens Pawn,Chigorin varation) 1. d4 d5 2. Nc3 e6..not commonly played} 3. a3 {3.blocking ..Bb4} h6 4. e4 a6 5. g3 dxe4 6. Nxe4 Nf6 {3. ....... h6 4. e4 a6 5. g3 dxe4 6. Nxe4 Nf6 attemps white into another exchange} 7. Bg2 {7.Bg2 defends } Nxe4 8. Bxe4 c6 9. c4 Be7 10. d5 {7. Nxe4 8. Bxe4 c6 9. c4 Be7 10. d5 (white here,trying to open the middle up) so black attacks} cxd5 11. cxd5 O-O 12. dxe6 {12.dxe6,,(black gives up a pawn or does he)} Qxd1+ 13. Kxd1 Rd8+ 14. Bd2 fxe6 {12. dxe6 Qxd1+ 13. Kxd1 Rd8+ 14. Bd2 fxe6(wins the pawn back,has white in disarray here)} 15. Nf3 Bf6 16. Rb1 Nd7 17. b4 Ne5 18. Ke2 Nxf3 19. Bxf3 {15. Nf3 Bf6 16. Rb1 Nd7 17. b4 Ne5 18. Ke2 Nxf3 19. Bxf3 (note whites black bishop)} Rb8 20. a4 b5 21. a5 Bb7 22. Rbc1 Bxf3+ {19. Bxf3 Rb8 20. a4 b5 21. a5 Bb7 22. Rbc1 Bxf3(white lost contol and game from here,yet plods on)} 23. Kxf3 Rxd2 {22. Rbc1 Bxf3+ 23. Kxf3 Rxd(loss of bishop)} 24. Rc6 Rd3+ 25. Ke4 Rbd8 26. Rxe6 Rd3d6 27. Rxd6 Rxd6 28. Rc1 Rd4+ 29. Kf5 Rxb4 30. Kg6 Rg4+ 31. Kf5 Rc4 32. Rd1 Rc5+ 33. Ke4 b4 34. Rb1 Rb5 35. Rb3 Bc3 36. f4 Rxa5 37. f5 Ra3 0-1


Phil Cook    (2008-08-16 10:54:51)
(D 00 Queeens Pawn,Chigorin varation)

Morales Vs Cook [Event "Single game, E4EC"] [Date "2008.04.22"] [Round "-"] [White "Morales, Rafael (rafafallo)"] [Black "Cook, Phil (Kiwi)"] [Result "0-1"] [WhiteElo "1078"] [BlackElo "1170"] [TimeControl "10/30"] 1. d4 {(D 00 Queeens Pawn,Chigorin varation) 1. d4 d5 2. Nc3 } d5 2. Nc3 {(D 00 Queeens Pawn,Chigorin varation) 1. d4 d5 2. Nc3 e6..not commonly played } e6 {(D 00 Queeens Pawn,Chigorin varation) 1. d4 d5 2. Nc3 e6..not commonly played} 3. a3 {3.blocking ..Bb4} h6 4. e4 a6 5. g3 dxe4 6. Nxe4 Nf6 {3. ....... h6 4. e4 a6 5. g3 dxe4 6. Nxe4 Nf6 attemps white into another exchange} 7. Bg2 {7.Bg2 defends } Nxe4 8. Bxe4 c6 9. c4 Be7 10. d5 {7. Nxe4 8. Bxe4 c6 9. c4 Be7 10. d5 (white here,trying to open the middle up) so black attacks} cxd5 11. cxd5 O-O 12. dxe6 {12.dxe6,,(black gives up a pawn or does he)} Qxd1+ 13. Kxd1 Rd8+ 14. Bd2 fxe6 {12. dxe6 Qxd1+ 13. Kxd1 Rd8+ 14. Bd2 fxe6(wins the pawn back,has white in disarray here)} 15. Nf3 Bf6 16. Rb1 Nd7 17. b4 Ne5 18. Ke2 Nxf3 19. Bxf3 {15. Nf3 Bf6 16. Rb1 Nd7 17. b4 Ne5 18. Ke2 Nxf3 19. Bxf3 (note whites black bishop)} Rb8 20. a4 b5 21. a5 Bb7 22. Rbc1 Bxf3+ {19. Bxf3 Rb8 20. a4 b5 21. a5 Bb7 22. Rbc1 Bxf3(white lost contol and game from here,yet plods on)} 23. Kxf3 Rxd2 {22. Rbc1 Bxf3+ 23. Kxf3 Rxd(loss of bishop)} 24. Rc6 Rd3+ 25. Ke4 Rbd8 26. Rxe6 Rd3d6 27. Rxd6 Rxd6 28. Rc1 Rd4+ 29. Kf5 Rxb4 30. Kg6 Rg4+ 31. Kf5 Rc4 32. Rd1 Rc5+ 33. Ke4 b4 34. Rb1 Rb5 35. Rb3 Bc3 36. f4 Rxa5 37. f5 Ra3 0-1


Phil Cook    (2008-08-17 01:29:23)
wiki

Have entered a few moves in wiki, Thibault, would like to see if anyone adds to it from this game??


Philip Roe    (2008-10-31 13:24:41)
Chess extensions

There seem to be many ways to extend chess. Most proposals, like yours Normajean, combine the powers of existing pieces. There may be other ways.

I saw it pointed out somewhere that if you put a piece somewhere near the middle of the board, at the center of a 5x5 patch of squares ,the N can go to any square in the patch not covered by a R or B. It was suggested that this might have been the reasoning of the original inventor. This makes even more sense if you consider that under medieval rules the K+Q covered a 3x3 patch.

Along these lines, consider a 7x7 patch and let the new piece go to any square not covered by an existing piece. Such a piece might be interesting. It would cover up to 16 pieces and be a formidable long-range weapon, but perhaps rather helpless at close quarters.

In designing an initial position, I would want to take into account the possibility of early interactions. In regular chess the placing makes such possibilities as the pinning of Nc3 by Bb4 possible. Proponents of FischerRandom call this kind of thing hackneyed, but I find most FR positions sterile because the game has no initial shape.


Normajean Yates    (2008-10-31 22:52:08)
I love [16x16] bigchess! :)

But disclosure of bias: I am winning my first bigchess (16x16) tournament 6-0 I think ;)

[4-0 I have already, One opp is timing out, and the only remaining opp: well see game 23201... ]

Let me be clear, 16x16 is very nice, need 'far' sight in two senses of the word :), and I would still love it - even if I was losing!

If some genie gave me the option that 'okay, from tomorrow at ficgs there will be no bigchess but there will be 5x5 and 10x10 and Philip Roe's generalisation to 7x7 with a nice initial position worked out -

I'd say no! I want bigchess!


Normajean Yates    (2008-10-31 23:07:40)
small correction + apology to philip..

When I mistakenly said Philip Roe's 7x7 chess -- I meant just what Philip meant - i.e. some variant (10x10?) with two of those pices which can move only to those squares of the 7x7 patch they are at the centre of where it couldn't move were it a 'normal' chess piece. Sorry for the mistake.. and for the correct but perhaps obfuscating expression of the concept in *this* post ... [I took Roe's clear prose and ran an obfuscator on it ;)]


Rodolfo d Ettorre    (2008-12-03 00:22:53)
More Doping

Lasker use to smoke cigars during a chess game and karpov used Yogurt, which contains the bacteria Lactobacillus acidophilus. New studies seem to indicate that that bacteria may enhance concentration.


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-12-10 19:39:04)
Rune Vik-Hansen's article on Chessbase

Chessbase just published a long article by the Norwegian philosopher Rune Vik-Hansen (graduated from the University of Tromsø in 1999 with a thesis on Heidegger's concept of Dasein) on consciousness and development of chess skills.

"Conscious memory", "Pattern recognition", "Pattern vs. Structure", "Exformation", "Chess Improvement", "Conceptual problems"...

http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=5055

What do you think about it ?


Philip Roe    (2008-12-11 14:08:02)
Seems it can go either way..

I have played chess with a world champion poker player. He is an above-average chessplayer, but just a US master.


Philip Roe    (2008-12-11 15:32:43)
Interesting for sure..

Impressive, not so much.

He seems to make a big distinction between conscious and unconscious thought with no real justification. The fact that electrical activity can be detected prior to awareness does not tell us much. Daniel Dennett's "Consciousness Explained" is the most satisfactory account that I have read, and his "multiple drafts" theory is not unlike Runes, except that it allows for a more sophisticated interaction. Roughly, the conscious mind sets goals "I want to attack on the k-side" and the subconscious suggests means "How about Qh5" which the conscious rejects or selects for further review by setting a new goal " Lets see if Qh5 works". By ignoring this interplay Rune creates difficulties from which he cannot extricate himself. And Dennett also asks himself much tougher questions like "why is there consciousness at all? What evolutionary purpose could it serve?"

Interestingly, the subconscious seldom suggests really silly ideas, like Qh5 if there is a pawn on g6 and nothing else going on. Indeed, the filtering out of "non-candidates" can be quite impressive. I recall a moment from the BBC TV series The Master Game. Bill Hartston, an IM and a psychologist, was momentarily taken aback by an unexpected move made by his (weaker) opponent. "Why didn't I see that?" A few seconds later "Oh, that's why I didn't see it!" (the move involved an unsound combination) Hartston was about to coauthor a book on chess psychology with John Wason, and his remark was not entirely in jest.

Hartston was suggesting, by his remarks, that he could usually trust his unconscious not to show him anything irrelevant. That, to my mind, is one of the things that characterizes a strong player. The irrelevant moves just don't occur to them.

So then what about blunders? Well, the system is very fallible. It IS just made of meat, and the real surprise is that blunders do not occur more often. But the blunders made by strong players seem different from the blunders made by rabbits. They are usually relevant to something, but they have a hole in them. I dont see anything at all about Runes proposals that would eliminate blunders, except through the indirect route of making you a stronger player.


Philip Roe    (2009-01-14 05:00:51)
Tom, if you are still with us..

Not everyone here uses engines, even in events where it would be allowed. As proof, some of us occasionally play moves that would disgrace a cell phone (and have long ago learned not to aspire to high honours).

However, the site has many nice features, and the absence of rules, "bizarre" as it may seem at first, does mean that whatever is going on is not actually cheating.


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-01-15 12:25:46)
Tom

No problem, Tom.

Everyone cannot (shouldn't btw) share the same philosophy :)

See you in another place.


Philip Roe    (2009-02-08 22:43:43)
Capablanca?

Is that Capa on deciding to accept the challenge of the Marshall gambit?


Scott Nichols    (2009-02-09 04:05:25)
Give Philip Roe a cigar!

That is it. St. Petersburg 1918.


Philip Roe    (2009-02-16 16:05:24)
Nice one..

..Svante Carl!


Philip Roe    (2009-02-20 14:36:04)
Complexity of Go

Don, I think the extra complexity may be more than your calculation shows.

On a Go board with 39 extra points, I think you are assuming that each extra point could be occupied by either a white stone or a black stone, giving 2 to the power 39 extra possibilities. Actually, since the extra stones need to be equally of each color, the possibilities are not quite so great. (about 2 to the power 36)

Anyway, what that calculation gives is the number of additional POSITIONS, but in calculating the number of additional GAMES the order of playing the stones must matter. On a board with n points, the number of possible games seems to be just factorial(n). In that case, going from a 19 x 19 board to a 20 x 20 board increases the number of possible games by a factor factorial(400)/factorial(361), which my computer gives as about 2 to the power 334.

I don't know enough about Go to judge how significant these numbers are, and surely various heuristics will cut them down a lot. But I thought that this observation might be worth making.


Don Groves    (2009-02-21 00:30:03)
Thanks...

... for the correction, Philip!

Another thing I wonder is if we should give each point three states: black, white, or empty. This would increase the complexity even further but I'm not certain if it is a correct thing to do.


Philip Roe    (2009-03-06 14:06:34)
Thanks for the check, not for the clock

Thibault,

The notification check on the My Games title is a typically thoughtful touch. Thank you.

However, the clock just adds clutter unless you have a use for it. Can this enhancement be made an optional preference?

Also, since I am not interested in accepting challenges, is there a way to prevent challenges from being issued?


Don Groves    (2009-03-07 00:50:45)
Agreed...

... on both counts, Philip.

The Challenges at the top of the page are more annoying than the clock for those of us who are not interested in challenges since they take up space that could be better used by displaying games. Making both of them optional would be a welcome change.

Another solution might be to put the Challenge section also at the bottom of the page.


Philip Roe    (2009-04-05 08:21:08)
Will the games be viewable?

I see that the first unrated tournament has begun, but it doesnt seem to possible to view the games (There is no entry under "Tournaments"). Since the players have expressed an interest in trying opening experiments, it might be interesting to watch their adventures.


Heinz-Georg Lehnhoff    (2009-04-05 13:21:55)
Will the games be viewable?

Hello Philip,

you can try

http://www.ficgs.com/user_page.php?page=tournament&tournament=FICGS__CHESS__UNRATED_TOURNAMENT__000001
or
https://www.ficgs.com/user_page.php?page=tournament&tournament=FICGS__CHESS__UNRATED_TOURNAMENT__000001


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-04-05 14:57:31)
Thanks Philip !

Indeed, I forget to add the link in the tournaments categories.. I'll add it soon, thanks !


Philip Roe    (2009-04-27 20:32:11)
Nine half-moves

1. e2-e4 m15-m13 2. Bf1-a6 Bl16-n14 3. Nj2-h4 j14-j13 4. Qh1-k3 helps 5. Qk3xk13 mate

with many minor variations.


Normajean Yates    (2009-04-28 12:25:12)
PhilipRoe+SophieLeClerc - wonderful!

PhilipRoe+SophieLeClerc (Sophie should get joint credit I think because she first posted in 'international chat' (2009-04-16 08:31:15-25) that a Q+N mate would be even shorter) - that's wonderful - congratulations!

But Sophie had posted that 'it can be done in 8 half-moves with the Q and N' (she didn't give the line). Philip's line, if reversed so that *black* checkmates white, will need 10 half-moves because the mating side in this process needs to free the f-Bishop, free the Q, move the f-bishop once and move the Q twice - a total of 5 [half-]moves. So if black mates by Roe's method it on black's 5th move - which means 10 half-moves.

So, is there a shorter way [specially, with *black* mating]?

Waiting for more posts..


Philip Roe    (2009-04-28 19:50:26)
Thanks for the appreciation, Normajean

I hadn't seen Sophies post. Do you have a line, Sophie? The knight looks awfully slow! Perhaps Big Chess needs Big Knights.


Normajean Yates    (2009-04-29 00:53:19)
Philip, Sophie posted in the chat..

not the forums - I am not sure she has noticed this thread. Perhaps we should send a message to her and/or post in the international chat - ok, I'll do the latter.


Normajean Yates    (2009-04-29 13:39:24)
sorry: correction: sophie said Q+B!

I typed Q+N but I was thinking of Q+B which is what Sophie leclerc had posted: I was slightly puzzled by Philip's reference to Knights in this context and I just realised I must have mistyped 'N' for 'B'; saw that I *had* ! :(

Sorry for the confusion, the misquotation and the inconvenience...


Normajean Yates    (2009-05-01 04:06:00)
sorry+thanks Sophie - but: its still 9..

but it is still 9 [half-]moves because the mate is on white's 5th move, so 5 white-moves + 4 black-moves, = 9 [half-]moves.

If you see, yours and Philip's solutions are essentially minor variants of each other...

In Sophie's solution, 2..h14 is of couse an easily repaired mistype [2..h14 is not possible, you see]- one can just replace it by say 2..a14.


Normajean Yates    (2009-05-01 04:18:45)
Sphie's soln is a tad more interesting..

arguably. Because, the L16-B instead of moving away, comes to k15 to be captured..

Interestingly, (very minor point) both Philip and Sophie mistype the checkmating move 5.Q(k3)xk15 mate: Philip gives 5.Qk3xk13, Sophie gives 5.Qxk5... (I just noticed it because I was reading what was meant, not what was written..)

Finally, by 'she' I meant 'she or he': I sometimes do...


Philip Roe    (2009-05-01 04:49:32)
We should all be so lucky..

to have readers who read what we mean and not what we write!


Philip Roe    (2009-06-04 17:35:08)
Hypothetical case

Suppose that my opponent has a tricky move coming up, but I know that I can defend against it. Because I assume that they have seen both the move and the defense , I offer a draw.

They play the move anyway, thinking that I might not find the defense. But I defend correctly and offer the draw again.

Nothing evil has happened, but this sequence of events would be forbidden by some proposals. It seems to be an over-reaction to make elaborate rule changes in response to an isolated incident.


Daniel Parmet    (2009-08-11 20:08:24)
Quotes!

The following 11 quotes are all by me:
1- "Experiences are the keys to life."
2- "Happy endings are just stories that haven't finished yet."
3- "If you expect nothing then the following will happen: either 1) you will receive nothing and thus can be happy your expectations were met or 2) You will receive something and thus be happy you have received something. And.... Happiness ensues..."
4- "Step up and face your fear or you will never be what you should be."
5- "A mistake is only a mistake if you let it happen twice. Otherwise it is a learning experience. your experience."
6- "Life is painting a picture over many years with different paints and tools."
7- ""Horney concluded that love was at least a temporary escape from all her anxiety and insecurity" - Karen Horney
Does anyone else think that someoe named 'Horney' shouldn't be talking about love?"
8- "Take each event in a singularity and say if time passes will any of this matter?"
9- "Plans are ideas that never come to fruition."
10- "You should only get upset about the little things cause you have no control over the big things."
11- "Causing another problem without fixing the initial problem just makes the initial problem worse as time continues"

The following are classic quotes:
11- "If you lose the game you should win the analysis!"
12- "Every passing minute is a chance to turn it all around." - Vanilla Sky
13- "Life is pain my dear and anyone who says otherwise is selling something." - Princess Bride
14- "The 7ps: Prior Proper Planning Prevents Piss Poor Performance" - U.S. Military
15- "Water water everywhere but not a drop to drink!" - Rhyme of the Ancient Mariner
16- "You can get in way more trouble with a good idea than a bad idea cause you forget the good idea has limits" - Warren Buffet
17- "Teach a child to be polite and courteous and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to merge his car onto the freeway."
18- "Experience is the thing you have left when everything else is gone."
19- "There is no tomorrow without the pains and pleasures of today" - Gabriel
20- "If life weren't this complicated, it would be nowhere near as fun. Why? WHY NOT!" - Catch-22
21- "When you've done things right people won't know you've done anything at all." - Futurama
22- "The right perception of any matter and a misunderstanding of the same matter do not wholly exclude each other." - Kafka's the trial
23- "the Trausi follow the normal practices of Thracians in general, except in one particular- their behaviour, namely, on the occasion of a birth or a death. When a baby is born the family sits round and mourns at the thought of the sufferings the infant must endure now that it has entered the world, and goes through the whole catalogue of human sorrows; but when somebody dies, they bury him with merriment and rejoicing, and point out how happy he now is and how many miseries he has at last escaped." -Herodotus Viv
24- "When a Persian herald demanded the surrender of arms, the king shouted back 'come here to get them'; and when he had seen that he was surrounded, he commanded his men to have a good breakfast since their dinner would be served in hell." - Herodotus
25- "I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it"
26- "Why, we don't even know what living means now, what it is, and what it is called? Leave us alone without books and we shall be lost and in confusion at once. We shall not know what to join on to, what to cling to, what to love and what to hate, what to respect and what to despise." - Fyodor Dostoyevsky Notes from the Underground
27- "Creativity is allowing yourself to make mistakes. Art is knowing which ones to keep." - Scott Adams
28- "Nobody is always a winner and anyone who says otherwise either is a liar or doesn't play poker."
29- “The darkness immutable tranquility holds sway.” - Jun’ichiro Tanizaki
30- “People who are constantly asking 'why' are like tourists who stand in front of a building reading Baedeker and are so busy reading the history of its construction, etc., that they are prevented from seeing the building.” - Ludwig Wittgenstein
31- “Either move or be moved.” - Ezra Pound
32- "The real meditation is the meditation of one's identity..... You try finding out why you're you and not somebody else. And who in the blazes are you anyhow??" - Ezra Pound.
33- “The image is more than an idea. It is a vortex or cluster of fused ideas and is endowed with energy.” - Ezra Pound
34- “The thought working its way towards the light.” - Ludwig Wittgenstein
35- “There are always two people in every picture: the photographer and the viewer.” - Ansel Adams
36- “When words become unclear, I shall focus with photographs. When images become inadequate, I shall be content with silence.” - Ansel Adams
37- "Wanting to think is one thing; having a talent for thinking is another." - Ludwig Wittgenstein
38- “Philosophers use a language that is already deformed as though by shoes that are too tight” - Ludwig Wittgenstein
39- “Nothing is more important for teaching us to understand the concepts we have than constructing fictitious ones” - Ludwig Wittgenstein
40- “don’t for heaven’s sake, be afraid of talking nonsense! But you must pay attention to your nonsense” - Ludwig Wittgenstein
41- “In a conversation: One person throws a ball; the other does not know: whether he is supposed to throw it back, or throw it to a third person, or leave it on the ground, or pick it up and put it in his pocket, etc” - Ludwig Wittgenstein
42- “I really do think with my pen, because my head often knows nothing about what my hand is writing” - Ludwig Wittgenstein
43- “What I am writing here may be feeble stuff; well, then I am just not capable of bringing the big, important thing to light. But hidden in these feeble remarks are great prospects.” - Ludwig Wittgenstein
44- “I ask countless irrelevant questions. If only I can succeed in hacking my way through this forest!” - Ludwig Wittgenstein
45- “Even to have expressed a false thought boldly and clearly is already to have gained a great deal” - Ludwig Wittgenstein
46- “Don’t concern yourself with what, presumably no one but you grasps!” - Ludwig Wittgenstein
47- “when you are philosophizing you have to descend into primeval chaos and feel at home there” - Ludwig Wittgenstein
48- "You cannot step into the same river twice." - Heraclitus
49- "Eternity is a child playing, playing checkers; the kingdom belongs to a child." - Heraclitus
50- "Nothing endures but change." - Heraclitus
51- "For a guest remembers all his days the hospitable man who showed him kindness." - Odyssey Book 15 Line 75
52- "Watching [GM Nigel] Short peruse the photos of young women, I had a fanciful notion that the development of specialized skills and character traits in early childhood is like a country fair in which you are alotted a fixed number of tickets to spend on the various concessions. This particular fixed number of tickets to spend on the various concessions. This particular fair is of short duration and happens only once in a lifetime. Nigel took the chess roller-coaster a dozen times, and rode the honesty ride twice, and so he had insufficient tickets left to take the Train Beyond Adolescence more than a stop or two. I myself missed the athletic concession, and I should have ridden -damn it- the chess coaster three or four times." - King's Gambit: A Son, A Father, and the World's Most Dangerous Game by Paul Hoffman page335
53- “I don’t know, but I do know with great precision why nobody else knows either.” - John H. Cochrane
54- "One must have chaos within oneself, to give birth to a dancing star." - Friedrich Nietsche
55- "I created chaos on the chess board and my strength lay in finding hidden harmonies. I always cultivated being at peace in chaos. manifest your unique character on the chess board." - Josh Waitzkin
56- "Leave numbers behind and ride the wave of the game." - Josh Waitzkin
57- "The weakness of an artist is dogma." - Josh Waitzkin
58- "Everything i've learned, i've eventually unlearned. I spend more time unlearning than learning. You must challenge your own micro thought constructs." - Josh Waitzkin
59- "It is like a tunnel, the deeper you get into the more you see there is to learn." - Josh Waitzkin
60- "Your emotions are there for a reason. Observe their ripple." - Josh Waitzkin
61- "The same mold, teachers have learned a certain way. great teachers should listen first." - Josh Waitzkin
62- "Change from psychology and technical errors, transition from opening prep to first middlegame decision or tactical to strategical." - Josh Waitzkin
63- "There is some part about any discipline that should appeal to any person." - Josh Waitzkin
64- "Identify thematic connections by breaking down the walls between different disciplines." - Josh Waitzkin
65- "You know your country is dying when you have to make a distinction between what is moral and ethical, and what is legal." - John de Armond
66- "In times of universal deceit, telling the truth will be a revolutionary act." - George Orwell
67- "When you stop learning you start dying." - Scott Adams
68- "If you could buy some people for what they are worth, and sell them for what they "think" they are worth, there would always be a profit margin."
69- "Don't compare your life to others. You have no idea what their journey is all about."
70- "Life is too short to waste time hating anyone."
71- "When in doubt, just take the next small step."
72- "When it comes to going after what you love in life, don't take no for an answer."
73- "Frame every so-called disaster with these words 'In five years, will this matter?" - Ellis
74- "If we all threw our problems in a pile and saw everyone else's, we'd grab ours back."
75- "Envy is a waste of time. You already have all you need."
76- "There are three sides to every story: your side, their side and the truth." - Bablyon 5
77- "Better than a thousand days of diligent study is one day with a great teacher." - Japanese Proverb


My apologies if some of the classics are in the ficgs quote file already as I just keep my own (and pull quotes from everywhere). I tried to cull out the duplicates.


Philip Roe    (2010-06-11 17:37:29)
Analysis board in Chess 960

Thibault,

I notice that when playing Chess 960 the analysis board does not come up. Is there a reason for that?


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-10-29 23:01:27)
Most active players, amazing statistics!

These statistics (updated every 2 days) are available at :
http://www.ficgs.com/about.html


And the overall winner is........ :)

Players most active : General (moves played)


1. Heinz-Georg Lehnhoff : 124234
2. Rolf Staggat : 81806
3. Anderson Barradas : 55829
4. Stephane Legrand : 47936
5. Scott Nichols : 46711
6. Mark Noble : 37387
7. Findlay Murray : 35874
8. Volker Koslowski : 33241
9. Don Groves : 29539
10. Thibault de Vassal : 26104
11. Francisco Gramajo : 25281
12. Sergey Uzdin : 25256
13. Michael Sharland : 24890
14. Josef Riha : 24193
15. Jason Repa : 22765
16. Laurine Ségur : 22577
17. Alexis Bromo : 20198
18. Benjamin Collette : 20112
19. Fernando Vasquez : 19928
20. Laszlo Kis-Kos : 19174
21. Christian Koch : 18450
22. Evgeny Yarkov : 17168
23. Xavier Pichelin : 16559
24. Garvin Gray : 16388
25. Ranganathan Raman : 15750
26. Sebastian Boehme : 15190
27. Zdravko Stoyanov : 15186
28. Nick Ioffe : 15151
29. Phil Cook : 15007
30. Sean McNabb : 14572
31. Daniel Parmet : 13814
32. Ilmars Cirulis : 13118
33. Joaquim Malpalma : 13057
34. Dmitriy Panov : 12733
35. Nelson Bernal Varela : 12119
36. Marco Roncagliolo : 11741
37. Dmytro Romaniuk : 11648
38. Miroslav Rakovic : 11435
39. Nick Burrows : 11242
40. Janeen Walden : 10967
41. Claude Brisson : 10812
42. Sandor Porkolab : 10714
43. Christophe Czekaj : 10678
44. Janusz Kepinski : 10675
45. Peter Willoughby : 10634
46. Benjamin Block : 10633
47. Kate Lubeck : 10155
48. Charlie Neil : 10076
49. Darko Pipac : 10072
50. William Taylor : 10036



Players most active : Go


1. Don Groves : 17026
2. Claude Brisson : 10812
3. Nick Ioffe : 10795
4. Alejandro Suarez-Moreno : 10018
5. Mickaël Simon : 8986
6. Thibault de Vassal : 8870
7. Sean McNabb : 8666
8. Sergey Tarassov : 8236
9. Phil Cook : 8186
10. Tetsuya Kobayashi : 7816



Players most active : Chess


1. Josef Riha : 24119
2. Fernando Vasquez : 19820
3. Zdravko Stoyanov : 14523
4. Anderson Barradas : 12587
5. Ilmars Cirulis : 12200
6. Laszlo Kis-Kos : 12068
7. Janusz Kepinski : 10675
8. Garvin Gray : 10638
9. Scott Nichols : 10211
10. Charlie Neil : 10076



Players most active : Chess 960


1. Christophe Czekaj : 1224
2. Joaquim Malpalma : 916
3. Frederick Estieu : 672
4. Ilmars Cirulis : 605
5. Pavel Háse : 600
6. Sefa Sarihan : 524
7. Sandor Porkolab : 512
8. Jay Melquiades : 495
9. Christian Koch : 470
10. Rick Spangler : 447



Players most active : Big Chess


1. Heinz-Georg Lehnhoff : 5583
2. Peter Willoughby : 4368
3. José Carrizo : 3319
4. Thibault de Vassal : 3199
5. Mark Noble : 2949
6. Sandor Porkolab : 2467
7. Volker Koslowski : 1887
8. Paul König : 1790
9. William Taylor : 1706
10. Ranganathan Raman : 1620



Players most active : Poker Holdem


1. Heinz-Georg Lehnhoff : 111119
2. Rolf Staggat : 75570
3. Stephane Legrand : 41639
4. Anderson Barradas : 38671
5. Scott Nichols : 36500
6. Findlay Murray : 33008
7. Mark Noble : 31172
8. Volker Koslowski : 25829
9. Michael Sharland : 20721
10. Francisco Gramajo : 20431


Congrats Heinz-Georg, definitely you're the most addicted player ;)


Philip Roe    (2009-11-03 18:15:59)
Only after the finish

Suppose A is the strongest player in a WCH qualifier, and B is his nearest rival. A could use the thread to give advice to B's opponents.


Philip Roe    (2009-11-06 03:54:51)
Luck is the residue of design

Nick, I did not know that one. It is quite splendid and I thank you for it.

But it may not be Milton. I tried to look it up and quotation sites attribute it to a poem of his called "At a Vacation Exercise in the College" However, it does not occur there, and the Yale book of quotation credits someone called Branch Rickey in Sporting News, Feb 21 1946. A rather different source.

See http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/04/16/quotes-uncovered-who-worried-about-events/


Nick Burrows    (2009-11-06 06:56:01)
"At a Vacation Exercise in the College"

Hi Phillip. I had a look around also, many sources site the quote as being wrongly attributed to the baseball player Branch Rickey.
The poem itself was written in Latin & English, then finished with lines of prose which are usually not published.
The quote is said to come from this prose and not the main body of the poem.


Philip Roe    (2009-11-06 08:46:48)
Milton Scholarship

Nick,

So you've dug deeper than I have.

Fascinating. I would certainly like to see it in context.

Phil


Philip Roe    (2009-11-29 21:47:19)
Korchnoi and Castling

I read an account by Korchnoi himself (although I dont recall where) that it was a real uncertainty. He said that in all his career he had never encountered the situation.


Philip Roe    (2009-11-30 04:11:28)
Further Clarification

For further clarification on the catling rules, see Tim Krabbe's contribution in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joke_chess_problem


Philip Roe    (2009-12-08 05:21:27)
Marcs notes

Thibault,

Presumably if these notes do come to light you will put them where all of the participants in Thematic 100 (and any subsequent sections) can see them.

Perhaps if they form the basis for a monograph, somebody might be prepared to edit it.


Philip Roe    (2009-12-09 04:14:10)
William

I already tried that and got the response "The page you are looking for could not be found" Do you know something that gets past that?


William Taylor    (2009-12-09 09:55:08)
Philip

If I try to click that link on the chessbazaar homepage (got to via archive.org), I get an error message. However, if I paste the url of the link directly into the box on the homepage of archive.org then I get there eventually, though it takes a loong time to load. Can you get to the chessbazaar homepage ok through archive.org?


Philip Roe    (2009-12-09 21:59:40)
Wiiliam

Using that trick I can get either to the chessbazaar homepage or to the Basman-Sale index. After that I get stuck because none of the links seem to go anywhere. Im not a very sophisticated web searcher!


Philip Roe    (2009-12-10 04:14:35)
Rodolfo

So although you say that you downloaded Marcs notes some time ago, you may have the latest version in existence. Perhaps you could forward it to Thibault and he can create a space for it.

It looks as if Marc put substantial effort into collecting it, and did intend some form of publication.


Philip Roe    (2009-12-16 18:44:59)
possibilities

I dont know much about Go, but I do know that you cannot cover a region of the plane with pentagonal tiles.

If a polygon has n sides, each angle is 180-360/n degrees, and this must be a factor of 360 if some number of these polygons can meet in a point. The only possibilties are six triangles, four squares or three hexagons.

Other, irregular shapes can be combined to tile without gaps. They would be even more of a headache!


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-12-17 11:16:54)
3dGo

True, thanks Philip.

I created a thread at GoDiscussions on that topic, a member mentioned another discussion :

http://godiscussions.com/forum/showthread.php?t=10871
http://www.godiscussions.com/forum/showthread.php?t=250

It reminds me that I played 3d Blokus a few months ago, it is a quite strange game also, particularly compared to 2d-squared Blokus !


William Taylor    (2010-01-04 18:35:41)
Rodolfo

I haven't managed to get hold of anything other than the Basman-Sale index page, so I second Philip's request for you to make the files you downloaded generally available somehow. Perhaps Thib could host them - or if not then maybe you could upload them to some site like rapidshare?


Philip Roe    (2010-01-08 05:09:47)
Marc Lacrosse memorial

Thank you, Rodolfo!

Marc did indeed put enormous effort into this labor of love. I do wonder what his plans were.

I see that there are a lot of ICC games which were presumably speed games of some sort, and perhaps need to be taken with a grain of salt. Anyhow, it doesn't seem that I have made any blunders yet.


Philip Roe    (2010-02-22 16:39:32)
Rating calculation

The link is not totally clear, but the way I read it, your performance is based on your opponents TERs. This is then used to modify your current rating. Am I right?


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-02-22 23:20:19)
Rating calculation

Thanks Hannes, Philip & Wayne... Yes I am not clear enough, I should have used the term "performance", sorry :/


Philip Roe    (2010-03-12 15:45:54)
Tournament Leaders

But 1/1 is not better than 4.5/5


Philip Roe    (2010-05-12 01:07:56)
A suggestion

Don, Somone who is not as nice as you might move against players who are not present, so as to put extra time on their clock.


Don Groves    (2010-05-12 05:37:23)
A suggestion

Philip, This happens all the time anyway since we have players from around the world. When I log on, usually very few of my opponents are online, sometimes none.


Philip Roe    (2010-06-23 18:18:11)





Phil Cook    (2010-08-08 08:46:56)
Stay on Same Board

Is it possible,to have an option : Stay on the game board?


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-08-08 13:12:37)
Stay on Same Board

Hi Phil, ok now I see what you mean : "redirected to the viewer page after playing your move", yes it could be useful for Poker (in the fast moves process). Ok, I could add a checkbox somewhere so that when one play a move, the next window be the viewer (to see the new card or result)... Added to the wishlist.

I had some busy times these last weeks but there should be numerous updates at the end of the month.


Wayne Lowrance    (2010-08-09 20:19:40)
Stay on Same Board

Phil ya gotta take by faith when Thibault say's "added to the wish list", hehehehe, just a private joke Phil. :)


Philip Roe    (2010-08-16 00:55:23)
Tournament entry conditions

Thibault,

Is it reasonable for someone to enter a new tournament when they have twenty four existing games and have not played a single move in any one of them?

This situation makes me hesitate to enter either B 00120 or Rapid B 00158.


Philip Roe    (2010-08-16 08:45:30)
Quote festival, part 6

Not to mention John Milton. See posts above.


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-08-16 14:55:01)
Tournament entry conditions

Hello Philip, thanks for warning me... I just removed the player from the waiting lists & sent him a message about this. If it happens again, I'll make some replacements.


Phil Cook    (2010-08-22 02:59:44)
Quote festival, part 6

If you can't find a way out,look for a way in.


Philip Roe    (2010-09-01 04:27:05)
Latest deletions of chat

If I'm right, chat messages are deleted by clicking on the triangle to the left. I have no idea whether this is some kind of standard practice, but I must admit that once (long ago) I wondered "What happens if I click on this? Oh dear, I seem to have deleted it" I feel sure that others must have done the same.

So, Thibault, you have to work around the ignorance of people like me.


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-09-01 14:01:03)
Latest deletions of chat

Hi Philip, it is true that the interface is not so easy at the beginning... the mouse over the pics tell what's the click's effect. I don't know how to improve it yet but suggestions are welcome :)

Don, it wouldn't be a problem to do that but as the chat bar is available on all public pages as well, I prefer that everyone be able to moderate it quickly if necessary... I'll update it so that the posts be deleted when at least 2 or 3 persons click the arrows, then we will see...


Daniel Parmet    (2010-09-20 01:22:07)
Corr. Chess Maxims

Haha you're psycho, you call me the bull head yet you're the one who has managed to make 7! posts without a single point. All insults. Obama this Obama that. What the f does Obama have to do with anything? You brought up and you keep bringing him up for god knows what reason.

Your lack of logic is astounding. You admit 1 rating point is enough that the lower rated should still be allowed to offer a draw but not at 80pts. What about 2 pts can he offer a draw here or is it still illegal? Where do you draw the line? Can't you see how stupid this is? You know ratings are considered on 200 pt bands right and anything within 200pts is always considered comparable skill levels hence why terms such as Class B( 1600 1799) and Class A 1800 (1999) developed in the first place. Guess what, 80 pts is less than 200 so its the same skill band hence why they were in the same tournament in the first place.

I know exactly what a maxim is and what a rule is. I know the damn difference. You seem to not understand that your proposition is not acceptable as either. In no circumstance should rating ever matter when a player is thinking about whether he/she wants to offer a draw. It is irrelevant as I've proved to you time and time again.

I do care about my OTB rating yes because I try my hardest there when I have time. But my corr rating nope. Its meaningless. I've given draws in winning positions many times because I don't care. What you describe is utter insanity (must be your philosophy). You realize whether your 2084 or 2240 or 2300 or 2400 you're just a fish right? Trying to brag like its an accomplishment is a joke beyond all measure. There is ALWAYS someone better. As IM William Hartson aptly put it, "playing chess badly is where the growth is."

And don't worry you don't have to check for my tournaments as TD because I wouldn't permit you in my tournament anyways. I don't want known trouble makers.

oh well: " If I agreed with you we'd both be wrong."


Daniel Parmet    (2010-09-23 07:59:05)
Quote festival, part 6

Then I apologize.

I like the Voltaire quote but like most things Voltaire says, I think its dripping with sardonic flavor (if you have read Candide). The problem in my mind is that reason comes and goes with all people. No one seems to always possess reason or common sense. The problem philosophically speaking can be addressed in any number of ways. Skeptically, you can ask if one could EVER claim to have reason. Etymologically, as you have done, one can pose the question of whether you can ever have reason. And the third problem, which consequently solves the 2nd problem, is linguistically. Here, you might look to someone like Wittgenstein who would ask the question of whether you need to specifically define the concept. Can you leave the concept open ended where it merely attempts to address a relative issue we can all pretend to agree on. In this case, you will notice that this is how language actually operates except when people like to get overly serious or detail oriented.

For example, if someone says "that is reasonable" you would know what they MEANT whether you agreed with them or not. It does not need to be laboriously defined that said action, thought or word was in fact the exact embodiment of "reason."


Philip Roe    (2010-10-05 17:20:42)
WCH Stage 1 groups (new players)

I think that the management of the WCH should not be too heavily weighted toward ensuring that "the best player" wins. On behalf of the underdogs, I would like us to have at least a sporting chance. If the cards are too much stacked against us the idea of an "open" tournament is lost, and we won't enter.

I looked at the statistics for cycle 000007. The top seed won outright 7 times, and tied for first on 7 other occasions. The second seed won outright twice, and tied first 7 times. The third seed won 5 times and tied twice. The fourth seed won once and tied twice. Out of all the winners, only the the two fourth seeds who tied had provisional 1800 ratings.

Are these numbers really a cause for concern?


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-10-05 17:58:43)
WCH Stage 1 groups (new players)

Hi Philip, thanks for taking some time to give us these numbers, really appreciated!

Well, I did not hide that I thought about this championship this way, simply because I wanted it also to look like the old classical chess championship. The point that is discussed here is a tiny detail only compared to the whole idea... Of course the 8 players of the knockout cycle have much better chances to reach the final, and the current champion is by far the favourite. Why to play a WCH that would be a boring copy of IECG & ICCF WCH?

I think that everyone has a real chance though, maybe hardly on 1 cycle but by playing 2 or 3! Have a look at Edward Kotlyanskiy's tournaments, he started WCH 3 with a rating of 2132, seed #2 in a RR group... he is champion!

http://www.ficgs.com/tournament_FICGS__CHESS__WCH_STAGE_1_GROUP_10__000003.html


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-10-05 19:36:41)
WCH Stage 1 groups (new players)

Well, according to the numbers given by Philip, the number of wins by a player who is not seed 1 is over the number of wins by seed 1, but I agree that the advantage is big, that's why we could reverse the colors (I'll open a new topic to discuss it if we continue this way). But I still think that 7 players are open enough, everything can happen.


Daniel Parmet    (2010-10-05 20:41:54)
WCH Stage 1 groups (new players)

No according to the numbers given by Philip my point is huge.

7 wins, 7 ties meaning 14 went on.
2 wins, 7 ties meaning 2 went on.
5 wins, 2 ties meaning 5 went on.
1 win, 2 ties meaning 1 went on.

Notice that because of color and tiebreaks the giant separation in place 1 2 and 3. It actually went back on spot 3 because they had white most likely. Clearly spot 2 is the worst position to hold in the tournament. Everything is against you. Color and tiebreaks.

Anyways, I agree it needs to be discussed. If others disagree with me then thats that I guess.


Philip Roe    (2010-12-16 03:31:35)
Chess positions too complex for engines

This ending is taken from Nunn's Chess Endings (Om. Garcia-Otero,Cuba 2002).
ChessPosition (see diagram)

White, to play, can force a Queen and Pawns ending that would be a long slow win, but he can also make a very profound triangulation that leads much more forcefully to the win. Nunn was very impressed that White found this at the board.

I would be interested to know how the engines do on this position.


Daniel Parmet    (2011-02-28 23:50:22)
Plea for classical rating help

yes this is exactly why I love your tournament ;) losses do not bother me. I learn from them. This has been my philosophy ever since I picked up chess a mere 3 years ago. What bothers me is all the restrictions people put into to place to prevent players from improving. Most do it unintentionally. However, many US organizers do it intentionally. They either cap their event sections strictly for 2200+ or they make insane rating determine entry fees. For a non 2400+ player to enter a GM norm swiss event it can cost $400. Or for an expert to enter a 2200+ section will cost you an extra $50 at the Goichberg style events or an extra $100 for the National Open.

It is this kind lunacy that makes improvement hard. You can have all the time and money in the world and still find through no lack of effort or skill that you are not allowed to improve.

I find most of the otb tournaments I am allowed to play in now... I usually end up being seed 1 or 2. Not exactly encouragement for me to use my whole weekend is it? I would dream to be able to enter a swiss where I am the bottom seed. But for this to happen I have to break the barriers without the extreme advantage of being allowed to play strong players.

FYI, I practice what I speak. The local tournament I am running next in my area will feature 5 masters (1 IM, 2 FM and 2 NM) - and it has a low entry fee. This is the type of event I wish was more common...


Philip Roe    (2011-04-30 01:34:38)
Amateur player beats Rybka 4 !?

The description of the play is not precise, but for sure what this guy did was to pull some version of the old trick of pitting Rybka White versus Rybka Black (Oh look, I can beat TWO computers!)


Philip Roe    (2011-09-18 05:19:36)
Phantom ficgs

When I am in the ficgs site, a second tab opens spontaneously in the ficgs format, and bearing some random message from the real site. The message scrolls across the page from right to left. I kill this tab and it returns after about a minute. It carries a label in the tab box "Message box 1"

Does this happen to anyone else? how do you get rid of it?


Thibault de Vassal    (2011-09-19 18:10:05)
Phantom ficgs

Hi Philip,

That's quite strange, this windows should appear in the main FICGS window (the chat bar is below this one).

What navigator do you use (on what computer or mobile)?


Philip Roe    (2011-09-19 21:44:13)
Phantom ficgs

Hi Thibault,

This happens on an HP Pavilion laptop, when I connect using either IE or Firefox.

There is no apparent pattern to the messages. Just now I got a line from Wikichess, a tornament start announcement, a note from you, part of a thread on Game 58473, advice that a player has just logged on. They seem to be things that have recently appeared above the chat bar.


Philip Roe    (2011-09-20 19:11:01)
Phantom ficgs

Hi Thibault,

Thanks for trying to think about this.

I was just about to post that it had disappeared as mysteriously as it arrived, but as I was typing it came back!!

It must be something odd that only happens to me. Perhaps a side effect of some automatic upgrade. Who knows??


Thibault de Vassal    (2011-11-13 19:52:28)
List ordered by rating

Here is, but as usual the new ratings (january 2012) will be taken in account...

Erwin Thiering 2515
Michael Bergmann 2475
Xavier Pichelin 2454
Thibault de Vassal 2449
Herbert Kruse 2436
Pavel Háse 2332
Ljubomir Tsenkov 2314
Rubén Cómes 2300
Wayne Lowrance 2266
Dariusz Fraczek 2261
Ramil Germanes 2255
Miroslav Gazi 2255
Alexander Blinchevsky 2253
Michael Sharland 2251
Sergey Kokoryukin 2251
Andrey Razumikhin 2250
Valery Nemchenko 2245
Lubos Fric 2241
Kevin D. Plant 2237
Christoph Schroeder 2236
Viktor Shishkin 2234
Slobodan Ilic 2218
Dmitri Mamrukov 2211
Vitaly Rudenko 2203
Alvin Alcala 2203
Carlos Sánchez 2203
Garvin Gray 2200
Scott Nichols 2189
Peter Unger 2181
Martin Zeman 2181
Christian Koch 2167
Stephen Hamby 2163
John Schutte 2136
David Evans 2132
Nelson Bernal Varela 2130
Darren DiAlfonso 2123
Ardiantez Polkwitzauer 2123
Thomas Dineen 2118
Peter W. Anderson 2112
Steve Lim 2110
Yu Ming Hoe 2100
Arkadiusz Wosch 2093
Djordje Kasabasic 2093
Luis Flores 2084
Daniel Parmet 2083
Lalit Kapoor 2080
Erik L. van Dijk 2074
Bernd Wolf 2072
Jose Lopez 2071
Sergey Uzdin 2064
Rodolfo d Ettorre 2064
Janos Helmer 2063
Om Prakash 2053
Mykola Simashkevitch 2043
Alexis Duenas 2037
Ireneusz Kasznia 2036
Mihail Larsky 2028
Joop Simmelink 2026
Pan Hardfeldt 2020
Henri Muller 2000
Jaroslav senior Pech 2000
Jaroslaw Gibas 2000
Bogoljub Teverovski 1997
Willy De Waele 1996
Fernando Vasquez 1992
Jose Moreira 1979
Andrew Endean 1975
Henri-Louis Muller 1972
Jose Maria Velasco 1972
Jordi Domingo 1969
Janeen Walden 1958
Andy Richard 1956
Roberto Migliorini 1949
Erika van Dijk 1943
Daniel Reboredo 1938
Coco Maceda 1938
Michael Rogers 1933
Aleksandr Aksenov 1927
Mariusz Maciej Broniek 1923
Robert Wilhelm 1901
Kieran Moore 1900
John Dyson 1889
Catalin Nita 1888
Daniel Jabot 1878
Johanes Suhardjo 1875
Mikhail Ruzin 1871
Benjamin Block 1863
Ilmar Ambos 1859
Vyacheslav Shchelykalin 1859
Jan Peter Lommler 1844
Stanislas Gounant 1840
Mircea Hrubaru 1838
Sasha Lipsits 1833
Nilson Pereira 1833
Aleksey Payzansky 1804
Jai Prakash Singh 1800
Fredi Brumec 1800
Gleen Duran 1800
Josef Strohmeier 1800
Ryszard Sternik 1776
Stepan Pech 1767
Dieter Faust 1764
Dmitriy Malish 1760
Dimitrios Ropokis 1743
Hasan Kirali 1715
Eddit Moreul 1700
Behzad Shahmiri 1700
Jaimie Wilson 1684
Dinesh Bhandarkar 1682
Philip Roe 1667
Olli Ylönen 1660
Graham Cridland 1655
Juan Alvar 1653
Jeremy Banta 1644
Luís Gonzaga Grego 1643
Pablo Siciliano 1623
Mariusz Jandula 1600
Sergey Biryukov 1598
Alejandro Canovas 1589
Jimmy Huggins 1577
Matthew O Brien 1575
Pablo Ruano 1565
Khaled Toutaoui 1528
Stanimir Denchev 1505
Leo Malagar 1500
Richard Hendricks 1479
Eric Price 1469
Antonio Pereira 1456
Angelo Piantadosi 1420
Simon Huxtable 1388
Peter Krakovsky 1326
Marc-Antoine Leurette 1243
Jorge Orden 1204
Hana Pechova 1204
Jorma Häkkinen 1192
Des Jefferis 1186
Deon Whittaker 1111
Matej Pech 1074
Jiri Mach 1022
Cédric Cavaillé 1003
Jay Melquiades 0909
Jaroslav Pech 0697


Graham Philips    (2011-12-05 17:22:45)
Who wants a Freestyle GO tournament soon?

Yeah, sounds like a good idea, not sure enough how the timing works for them though ?


Graham Philips    (2011-12-05 18:15:49)
Who wants a Freestyle GO tournament soon?

Mmmm, yeah, ok, won't be able to do it during the middle of the day I suspect, hope it happens anyway though!


Philip Roe    (2012-01-04 00:02:21)
On rules & players who lost 300 pts

There are players (who I could name if asked) who are capable of strong play but who start many more games than they finish. Whatever the outcome, there is little satisfaction to playing them. The problem with trying to impose any penalty is to identify them without closely policing the sytem.

A possible solution might be that players who have recently lost many short games could be restricted in the number of new entries that they can make.


Paul Campanella    (2012-03-05 03:29:32)
FICGS poker ratings

Thank you for the compliment, Scott!

I consider you to be one of the top players and have great respect for you: as both top poker and as a person. You're also a very worthy adversary and our matches are almost always 3-2 (on either side)! :)

Thank you, Thibault, for recognizing my point that it is possible to climb the ladder quite quickly using the current rating system.

I would like to note that it is also possible to climb the ladder without using any strategy. Throughout all of my poker matches on FICGS, I always finished my games (both the winning games and the losing games). I could have easily waited a long time (like some players obviously do on this site) to finish my losing games, but I refuse to do that out of respect for my opponents.

Although poker is a game that requires a combination of luck and skill, I believe that respect belongs here as well. Out of my overall record of 202 completed games, I have won 120 and lost 80. During each game, I was always honorable. For instance, if it is my turn and I know that I am 4 chips away from losing a match 3-0, I will refuse to delay the game and deny my opponent his victory for the next two months even though I have 60 days left on the clock.

Besides, it is my philosophy that the best thing to do when opponent outplays me is to accept the loss, learn from it, and then try to win in a rematch! :)


Philip Roe    (2012-11-28 10:08:59)
How do I stop the pop-up message boxes?

This happened to me (still does) using either IE or Firefox. I cant close the annoying tab, but I can just minimize it, which makes it invisible.


Philip Roe    (2013-06-11 14:08:13)
Vacation: change for 3 days minimum?

There are players, who I could name, who always run their clocks very low and use vacation a day or two at a time to avoid loss. I have absolutely no idea why they do that. They gain no advantage, and in fact frequently lose on time. In consequence they are greatly underrated. Paired against one of them, you may in fact lose (against a low-rated player) or gain an unsatisfying forfeit. This behavior is legitimate under the current rules but extremely irritating.

It is true that all rules can be abused, but it is not unreasonable to set up rules so that abuse is less likely.


Philip Roe    (2013-10-03 21:01:42)
Tablebases and no-engines tournaments

Bogoljub,

When you enter the tournament by clicking on the waiting list, you are told that "chess engines, databases and opening books are strictly forbidden". I guess the idea is to reproduce OTB conditions as closely as possible.


Scott Nichols    (2016-02-06 18:36:40)
New quotes?

"Where are you going, mon ami?

"Why, ro the Cafe de la Regence to watch Voltaire and Rousseau play at chess."

"Pooh! Mere scribblers!"

"True, but today they play Phildor."

(Chess Chronicles)


Thibault de Vassal    (2018-04-07 03:09:02)
Harold Moye, man of arts... and chess

I'm very sad to announce here that we just lost a chess friend, Harold Moye, who played chess with us while he was involved in a much more difficult battle. My condolences to his family.

Here is the first part of the obituary:

"Harold Anthony Moye, age 62, died on March 4, 2018, wife Linda (Polhemus) Moye at his side. They were devoted to each other for 17 years since vowing their love on a mountain in Wyoming. For 13 of those years, Harold endured bone marrow cancer (Multiple Myeloma) with grace, unusual resilience, and quiet courage.

He loved poetry, languages, art, music, history, philosophy, astronomy, cinema, flying airplanes (actually and with flight simulator) and coffee. Some of his favorites were Shelley, Blake, Rilke, Shakespeare, Norse sagas, VanGogh, Mahler, Bach, Beethoven, and Sumatran and Guatemalan beans. Harold said that Blake taught him the most about art; Shelley was his brother; VanGogh his first cousin; and coffee a major food group (along with pizza and cookies). Above all, he valued imagination, compassion, and generosity of spirit in others. He played Shogi and Chess with friends all over the world online and in person, reaching the distinction of Chess Master when he coordinated tournaments in Wyoming. (...)"

http://www.ficgs.com/moye_harold.htm


Thibault de Vassal    (2018-06-30 20:22:16)
Interview with 15th chess WCH finalist

For once, as Eros & I couldn't find much more to say after all his consecutive wins, I asked Ramil Germanes these few questions around his match & correspondence chess (with what may look like a quite surprising conclusion).

_______________________


- Hello Ramil, many thanks for answering those few questions! This is a first time with the WCH finalist, as the winner (Eros again) agreeded this could be an interesting experiment for a change, so we'll probably have a quite different point of view this time! You just finished your games to score 6-6 (12 draws), Eros retaining the title again. I guess this was the first time you played such a correspondence chess match, what are your impressions on this knockout format?

Yes this is the first time I've played a world championship match although I played before in earlier editions of this world championship but not reaching the challenger level. My impression? Its great playing for the world championship but I know its nearly impossible to beat the world champion.


- Let's rewind a few months backward, would you make other choices, in openings or anything?

I don't know. Tbh, I'm not very good on chess theory and not very updated as well. So I'm just playing basic moves hoping for opportunities to come up.


- So, is Eros beatable in this final match according to you? (please give us some hope) ^^

With how quickly you can search information and the strength of chess engines nowadays, its almost impossible to beat him unless you have access to alpha zero (haha). Though maybe Herbert Kruse can pull it off.


- What can you tell us about yourself and your relation to chess & correspondence chess?

I'm just an ordinary guy from the Philipines who happens to love playing chess. But my love of computers is what brought me to correspondence chess and to ficgs.


- Do you play other games, e.g. Go, Shogi, cards games?

No I don't know how to play those games.


- Could you tell us how these 12 games went from your own point of view?

For me, the games went through their normal course. Both of us didn't made any major mistakes so all games were drawn. That's just how it went. Though there were new moves on some the games it doesn't really changes result of the older games played before.


- Would you share a few tips to play good correspondence chess in 2018, or at least to beat the best chess engines? :)

Sorry but i dont know. I will be the new world champion by now if i know, hehehe.


- You told me that your computer configuration was basically a quad-core i5 3570 / 4gb on Fritz GUI (about 10,500 kn/s) / Windows 10, and we know that many of us (Eros included) still use such configs or even dual-core, would an octa-core have brought a significant advantage to you to win this match according to you?

Oh I don't know they still have those configurations. But I've already encountered opponents in Infinity Chess with 18-22 cores configs. Anyways, an octa-core or faster cpu would definitely be going to speed up my analysis and will let me analyze more lines and variations which may improves my overall play.

Honestly, I don't have that much time these days for correspondence chess. In my match against Eros, I had only about 1 hour of analysis time before work and about another 1 hour after work. Since I already have a family and 2 kids, they have to be my priority first. And I think somebody also can relate to this. So a faster cpu would be very helpful in the match and maybe will give a better chance than a slower cpu.


- As far as I know, you love to build computers, did you use or think about using several ones at the same time for analysis?

No. I only used one computer in my match against Eros. I have 2 other computers but both are slower.


- How much time you've been playing correspondence chess & how do you feel the way the game changed over the years?

I've been playing correspondence chess since 2010 and I have observed that its easier to win games in the past when chess engines were still weaker. Because you notice some players depend only on engine moves and engines still commit mistakes and you can exploit those mistakes if you "investigate" further.

Unlike now, engines are very strong that even players who rely solely on engines moves will be very hard to beat. It lessens the gap of players that know how to "use" the engines and the ones who do not.


- Finally, what makes you love correspondence chess in 2018?

I will always love chess and correspondence chess but what makes it exciting now is the rise of the new kind of engines.

Engines like Leela chess zero that has a different approach in playing chess. Maybe more of these kind of chess engines will be seen in the future. Because of its use of monte carlo analysis and neural networks, we are starting to see moves that we have never seen before. Very aggressive attacks and moves defying opening principles can now be seen. Correspondence chess is getting exciting again!


Juri Eintalu    (2022-03-22 22:10:27)
FIDE BANS KARJAKIN

When FIDE decided to complain about Karjakin to the ethics committee, FIDE said that Karjakin was "supporting the unjustified war".

In the decision of the ethics committee, no references are given to Karjakin's relevant announcements.

As a philosopher, I am unable to understand how the chess organization can decide whether some war is a justified war. Moreover, "supporting the unjustified war" may mean that Karjakin tried to show that this war is justified indeed.

While I feel that this war is unjustified, I also feel that FIDE has chosen a side in the complex conflict and is far from being neutral.


Thibault de Vassal    (2022-03-22 22:49:38)
FIDE BANS KARJAKIN

As a philosopher, I'm not sure if "how the chess organization can decide whether some was is a justified war" is relevant when everyone can decide whether some war is NOT a justified war.

As for me I support FIDE decision particularly if such a case is written in FIDE rules... I do not feel that this case is so complex (in example compared to war in Iraq or Syria).


Juri Eintalu    (2023-11-15 01:32:18)
A Public Appeal to Chess Organisations

Herbert Kruse:

"jews fear for their lifes in germany now"

Collective punishment is banned by the international law.

Collective punishment during war activities is considered a war crime.

Right now, Israel is applying collective punishment towards the Palestinians living in the Gaza Strip.

It was amazingly explicit in the speech of Israel's president.

The current rise of antisemitism outside of Israel is a reaction to Israel's war crimes and crimes against humanity in the Gaza Strip, but this antisemitism is too collective punishment.

In my Public Appeal, I have explicitly said that in the case of chess sanctions, the Jews should not be targeted. No discrimination is allowed based on nationality.

My Public Appeal addresses only Israel's current administration.

Besides, there are some interesting facts about Jewish great thinkers.

After WWII, Jewish philosopher Hannah Arendt published her famous book

"The Roots of Totalitarianism"

The Stalinist regime and the Hitlerian regime were both regarded as totalitarian regimes in that book.

I have read that Arendt had conflicts with ultra-Zionists after WWII.

Albert Einstein wrote a letter on 10 April 1948. It was 1 day after the Deir Yassin massacre, committed by Israel's radical Zionists. Einstein called them "terrorists" and declared that he did not want to see them or talk to them.


Juri Eintalu    (2023-11-25 21:54:54)
A Public Appeal to Chess Organisations

Herbert Kruse:

"now the russian trolls are here too, its sad"

I do not know, perhaps Herbert Kruse kept in mind, for example, the following section from my Public Appeal:

"Suppose it is permissible to obstruct Russian sports persons to get Russia to stop its military aggression against Ukraine. In that case, it must also be permissible to obstruct Israeli sports persons to get Israel to stop its war crimes and to punish the perpetrators."

Or, perhaps the following one:

"However, the civil war in Ukraine, which started in 2014, had killed around 20,000 civilians by 2022. But, by November 2023, the Russian invasion that began in 2022 had already killed hundreds of thousands of Ukrainian soldiers and hundreds of thousands of Russian soldiers."

You are a moral and intellectual bastard, Mr. Herbert Kruse.

And what if someone says here, on the Forum of the chess platform:

"Now the paedophiles, sodomites and corpse-eaters are here too, its sad."

How would you publicly prove here, on the Forum, that you are not a paedophile, sodomite and corpse-eater?


Bogoljub Teverovski    (2024-03-26 11:40:41)
Next thematic tournament

I'd like to offer an old Philidor Defence 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 d6 as the next thematic tournament.


Thibault de Vassal    (2024-03-27 02:33:38)
Next thematic tournament

Let's wait for the current waiting list to finish, then we'll try Fried Liver attack (e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 Ng5 d5 exd5 Nxd5), and then we'll try Philidor Defence...


Bogoljub Teverovski    (2024-06-15 12:06:38)
Next thematic tournament

Yes, Philidor is upcoming


Wilhelm Schuett    (2024-06-22 20:23:39)
Next thematic tournament

Which way to Philidor? Or 1.e4 d6 2.d4 Sf6 3.Sc3 e5 for another thematic tournament?




There are 839 results for phil in wikichess.


Thibault de Vassal    (2407)
e4 e5 Nf3

King's knight opening is prefered at 90% cases.

The knight simply attacks black's e5 pawn, that is not protected yet and controls d4 and e5 squares.

By far the most played continuation is the King's Pawn Game 2...Nc6, and it is sub-divided into many familiar opening names like Ruy Lopez. Petrov's Defense, 2...Nf6, and the Philidor Defense, 2...d6, are also familiar opening names.

Some less familiar continuations of the King's Knight Opening include:

- Gunderam Defense 2...Qe7
- Greco Defense 2...Qf6
- Damiano Defense 2...f6 ?
- Elephant Gambit 2...d5
- Latvian Gambit 2...f5

According to Chessbase, white chances are about 58%

============

Contributors : Thibault de Vassal


Thibault de Vassal    (2407)
e4 e5 Bc4

The Bishop's Opening is one of the oldest openings to be analyzed; it was studied by Lucena and Ruy Lopez. Later it was played by Philidor. Larsen was one of the few grandmasters to play it often, after first using it at the 1964 Interzonal Tournament. Although the Bishop's Opening is uncommon today, it has been used occasionally as a surprise by players such as Kasparov and Nunn.

White attacks Black's f7-square and prevents Black from advancing his d-pawn to d5. By ignoring the beginner's rule, "develop knights before bishops", White leaves his f-pawn unblocked allowing the possibility of playing f4. This gives the Bishop's Opening an affinity to the King's Gambit and the Vienna Game, two openings that share this characteristic. In fact, the Bishop's Opening can transpose into the King's Gambit or the Vienna Game, and transpositions into Giuoco Piano and Two Knights Defense and other openings are also possible. In particular, White should remain alert for any chance to transpose into a favorable variation of the King's Gambit, but with careful play Black can avoid this danger.

According to Chessbase, white chances are about 55%

============

Contributors : Thibault de Vassal


Thibault de Vassal    (2407)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 e3

When learning chess, I often heard that e3 was the best and more logical move. These considerations probably points out more philosophy than chess, but this move has been played in about half games so far.

According to Chessbase, white chances are about 57%

============

Contributors : Thibault de Vassal


Philip Roe    (1950)
e4 e5 f4 d5 exd5


============

Contributors : Ron Keyston, Philip Roe


Adam Goodwin    (1500)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3

This position gives us a real battle of philosophies! White will give his center all the support it needs, since if he succeeds, then Black will be without space and counterplay.

Black, however, labels White's center as a target and decides to attack it with everything he's got. Black would like to force the advance of a pawn, when the squares the pawns vacate will become available to Black's army.

============

Contributors : Adam Goodwin


Phil Cook    (1132)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 Ng5 Bc5 Bxf7 Ke7 Bc4 Na5 Be2 h6 Nf3 Nxe4 O-O Nc6 Nc3 d5 Nxe5 Nxe5 d4 Nc3 bxc3 Bd6 dxe5 Bxe5 Re1 Qd6 f4



============

Contributors : Phil Cook


Philip Roe    (1950)
e4 e5 f4 d5 exd5 exf4


transposing back to accepting the gambit
============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Terry Godat    (2088)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 g5 h4 g4 Ne5 Nf6 Bc4 d5 exd5 Bd6 d4 Nh5 O-O O-O Rxf4 Nxf4 Bxf4

============

Contributors : Terry Godat
Here Black can either play 11...Bf5 or grab the h-pawn. In either case, White has excellent compensation for the exchange. In the game, Black fought an uphill battle for a draw.


Philip Roe    (1804)
e4 c6 d4 d5 exd5 cxd5 c4 g6 Nc3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1804)
e4 c6 d4 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 Bf5 Ng3 Bg6 h4 h6 Nh3 Nf6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1804)
e4 c6 d4 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 Bf5 Ng3 Bg6 h4 h6 Nh3 Nf6 Nf4 Bh7

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1804)
e4 c6 d4 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 Bf5 Ng3 Bg6 h4 h6 Nh3 Nf6 Nf4 Bh7 Bc4 e6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1804)
d4 f5 c4 d6 Nf3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1804)
d4 f5 c4 d6 Nf3 g6 Nc3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1728)
d4 Nf6 Nf3 e6 Bf4 b6 e3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1804)
d4 f5 c4 d6 Nf3 g6 Nc3 Bg7 g3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1804)
d4 f5 c4 d6 Nf3 g6 Nc3 Bg7 g3 c6 Bg2

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1728)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Bxc6 dxc6 d4 exd4 Qxd4 Qxd4 Nxd4 Bd7 Nc3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1728)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Bxc6 dxc6 d4 exd4 Qxd4 Qxd4 Nxd4 Bd7 Nc3 O-O-O Bd2

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1804)
d4 f5 c4 d6 Nf3 g6 Nc3 Bg7 g3 c6 Bg2 Nf6 O-O

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1804)
d4 f5 c4 d6 Nf3 g6 Nc3 Bg7 g3 c6 Bg2 Nf6 O-O O-O d5

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1804)
d4 f5 c4 d6 Nf3 g6 Nc3 Bg7 g3 c6 Bg2 Nf6 O-O O-O d5 e5 dxe6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1728)
e4 c6 c4 d5 exd5 Nf6

Transpose to wikichess #6692#

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1728)
e4 Nc6 d4 e5 dxe5 Nxe5 Nf3 Bd6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1728)
e4 Nc6 d4 e5 dxe5 Nxe5 Nf3 Bd6 Nc3 Nf6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1728)
e4 Nc6 d4 e5 dxe5 Nxe5 Nf3 Bd6 Nc3 Nf6 Nd4 b6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1728)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 a6 Nc3 Qc7 g3 Bb4

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1728)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 a6 Nc3 Qc7 g3 Bb4 Nde2 Be7

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1728)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Be7 d4 Nf6 dxe5 Ng4 Bf4

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1728)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Be7 d4 Nf6 dxe5 Ng4 Bf4 f6 h3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1728)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 a6 Nc3 Qc7 g3 Bb4 Nde2 Be7 Bg2 Nf6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1728)
e4 Nc6 d4 e5 dxe5 Nxe5 Nf3 Bd6 Nc3 Nf6 Nd4 b6 f4 Neg4

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1728)
e4 Nc6 d4 e5 dxe5 Nxe5 Nf3 Bd6 Nc3 Nf6 Nd4 b6 f4 Neg4 e5 Bc5

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1728)
e4 Nc6 d4 e5 dxe5 Nxe5 Nf3 Bd6 Nc3 Nf6 Nd4 b6 f4 Neg4 e5 Bc5 exf6 Nxf6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1728)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Be7 d4 Nf6 dxe5 Ng4 Bf4 f6 h3 Ngxe5 Nxe5

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1728)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Be7 d4 Nf6 dxe5 Ng4 Bf4 f6 h3 Ngxe5 Nxe5 fxe5 Qd5

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1684)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 a6 Nc3 b5 Bd3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1684)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nge7 O-O Ng6 d4

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1684)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nge7 O-O Ng6 d4 exd4 Nxd4

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1684)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nge7 O-O Ng6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Bc5 Nf5

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1728)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 a6 Nc3 Qc7 g3 Bb4 Nde2 Be7 Bg2 Nf6 O-O Nc6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1684)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 a6 Nc3 b5 Bd3 Bb7 O-O

Transpose to wikichess #20287#

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1684)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nge7 O-O Ng6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Bc5 Nf5 O-O Nc3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1684)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nge7 O-O Ng6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Bc5 Nf5 O-O Nc3 d6 Be3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1668)
e4 c6 d4 d5 exd5 cxd5 Bd3 Nc6 c3 Qc7 Nf3 Bg4

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1668)
e4 c6 d4 d5 exd5 cxd5 Bd3 Nc6 c3 Qc7 Nf3 Bg4 Nbd2 Nf6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1668)
e4 c6 d4 d5 exd5 cxd5 Bd3 Nc6 c3 Qc7 Nf3 Bg4 Nbd2 Nf6 O-O e6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1668)
e4 c6 d4 d5 exd5 cxd5 Bd3 Nc6 c3 Qc7 Nf3 Bg4 Nbd2 Nf6 O-O e6 Re1 Bd6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1668)
Nc3 Nf6 e4 d6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1668)
c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 Nf3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1668)
c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 Nf3 d6 g3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1668)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 a6 Nc3 Qc7 Bd3 b5 a3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1668)
c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 Nf3 d6 g3 f5 Bg2

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1668)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 a6 Nc3 Qc7 Bd3 b5 a3 Bb7 Be3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1668)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 a6 Nc3 Qc7 Bd3 b5 a3 Bb7 Be3 Nf6 O-O

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1668)
c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 Nf3 d6 g3 f5 Bg2 e5 O-O

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1668)
c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 Nf3 d6 g3 f5 Bg2 e5 O-O Nf6 d3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1668)
c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 Nf3 d6 g3 f5 Bg2 e5 O-O Nf6 d3 O-O b4

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1668)
c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 Nf3 d6 g3 f5 Bg2 e5 O-O Nf6 d3 O-O b4 a5 bxa5

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1667)
e4 Nc6 d4 d5 Nc3 dxe4 d5 Ne5 Qd4 Ng6 Bb5 Bd7

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1667)
e4 Nc6 d4 d5 Nc3 dxe4 d5 Ne5 Qd4 Ng6 Bb5 Bd7 Bc4 e5

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1667)
e4 Nc6 d4 d5 Nc3 dxe4 d5 Ne5 Qd4 Ng6 Bb5 Bd7 Bc4 e5 Qxe4 Nf6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1667)
e4 Nc6 d4 d5 Nc3 dxe4 d5 Ne5 Qd4 Ng6 Bb5 Bd7 Bc4 e5 Qxe4 Nf6 Qe2 Bb4

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1667)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 a3 g6 Bc4

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1667)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 a3 g6 Bc4 Bg7 d3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1667)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 a3 g6 Bc4 Bg7 d3 e6 Nf3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1667)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 a3 g6 Bc4 Bg7 d3 e6 Nf3 Nge7 O-O

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1667)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 a3 g6 Bc4 Bg7 d3 e6 Nf3 Nge7 O-O d5 Bb3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1667)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 a3 g6 Bc4 Bg7 d3 e6 Nf3 Nge7 O-O d5 Bb3 O-O h3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1667)
e4 c6 d4 d5 exd5 cxd5 Bd3 Nc6 c3 Nf6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1667)
Nc3 c5 g4

Transpose to wikichess #7185#

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1667)
e4 c6 d4 d5 exd5 cxd5 Bd3 Nc6 c3 Nf6 Bf4 Bg4

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1667)
e4 c5 d3 e6 Nf3

Transpose to wikichess #17305#

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1667)
e4 c6 d4 d5 exd5 cxd5 Bd3 Nc6 c3 Nf6 Bf4 Bg4 Nf3 Bxf3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1667)
e4 c6 d4 d5 exd5 cxd5 Bd3 Nc6 c3 Nf6 Bf4 Bg4 Nf3 Bxf3 Qxf3 e6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1667)
Nc3 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1667)
e4 c6 d4 d5 exd5 cxd5 Bd3 Nc6 c3 Nf6 Bf4 Bg4 Nf3 Bxf3 Qxf3 e6 O-O Bd6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1667)
Nc3 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Bc5

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1667)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Bxc6 dxc6 O-O Bd6 d4 f6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1667)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Bxc6 dxc6 O-O Bd6 d4 f6 dxe5 fxe5

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1667)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Bxc6 dxc6 O-O Bd6 d4 f6 dxe5 fxe5 Nxe5 Nf6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1667)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Bxc6 dxc6 O-O Bd6 d4 f6 dxe5 fxe5 Nxe5 Nf6 Nc4 Be6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1667)
Nc3 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Bc5 Nxc6 bxc6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1667)
Nc3 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Bc5 Nxc6 bxc6 g3 d5

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1667)
Nc3 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Bc5 Nxc6 bxc6 g3 d5 Bg2 Nf6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1667)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 a6 c4 Ne7 Nc3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1667)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 a6 c4 Ne7 Nc3 Nbc6 Be3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1667)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 a6 c4 Ne7 Nc3 Nbc6 Be3 Nxd4 Bxd4

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1667)
Nf3 d6 e4

Transpose to wikichess #13871#

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1667)
Nc3 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Bc5 Nxc6 bxc6 g3 d5 Bg2 Nf6 O-O O-O

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1667)
Nc3 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Bc5 Nxc6 bxc6 g3 d5 Bg2 Nf6 O-O O-O Na4 Bd6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1667)
d4 Nf6 c4 Nc6 Nc3 e5 d5

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1667)
d4 Nf6 c4 Nc6 Nc3 e5 d5 Ne7 e4

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1667)
d4 Nf6 c4 Nc6 Nc3 e5 d5 Ne7 e4 Ng6 h4

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1667)
d4 Nf6 c4 Nc6 Nc3 e5 d5 Ne7 e4 Ng6 h4 h5 Bg5

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1667)
d4 Nf6 c4 Nc6 Nc3 e5 d5 Ne7 e4 Ng6 h4 h5 Bg5 Bc5 Qd2

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1667)
d4 Nf6 c4 Nc6 Nc3 e5 d5 Ne7 e4 Ng6 h4 h5 Bg5 Bc5 Qd2 d6 Nge2

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1667)
e4 c6 d4 d5 e5 Bf5 h4 h5

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1667)
e4 c6 d4 d5 e5 Bf5 h4 h5 c4 e6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1667)
e4 c6 d4 d5 e5 Bf5 h4 h5 c4 e6 Bg5 Qb6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1667)
e4 c6 d4 d5 e5 Bf5 h4 h5 c4 e6 Bg5 Qb6 Qd2 Bb4

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1667)
e4 c6 d4 d5 e5 Bf5 h4 h5 c4 e6 Bg5 Qb6 Qd2 Bb4 Nc3 Ne7

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1667)
e4 c6 d4 d5 e5 Bf5 h4 h5 c4 e6 Bg5 Qb6 Qd2 Bb4 Nc3 Ne7 c5 Qa5

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1667)
d4 Nf6 c4 Nc6 Nf3 e6 Bg5

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1667)
d4 Nf6 c4 Nc6 Nf3 e6 Bg5 Bb4 Nbd2

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1667)
d4 Nf6 c4 Nc6 Nf3 e6 Bg5 Bb4 Nbd2 h6 Bh4

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1705)
Nc3 d5 e4 d4 Nce2 e5 Ng3 Be6 Nf3 f6 Be2 Qd7

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1705)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 a6 Nc3 b5 Bd3 Qb6 Be3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1705)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 a6 Nc3 b5 Bd3 Qb6 Be3 Bc5 Nce2

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1705)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 a6 Nc3 b5 Bd3 Qb6 Be3 Bc5 Nce2 Nc6 c3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1667)
d4 Nf6 c4 Nc6 Nf3 e6 Bg5 Bb4 Nbd2 h6 Bh4 g5 Bg3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1667)
d4 Nf6 c4 Nc6 Nf3 e6 Bg5 Bb4 Nbd2 h6 Bh4 g5 Bg3 g4 Ne5

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1705)
Nc3 d5 e4 d4 Nce2 e5 Ng3 Be6 Nf3 f6 Be2 Qd7 O-O Nc6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1705)
e3 f5 d4

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1705)
e3 f5 d4 Nf6 Bd3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1705)
e3 f5 d4 Nf6 Bd3 g6 Nf3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1705)
e3 f5 d4 Nf6 Bd3 g6 Nf3 d6 O-O

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1705)
e3 f5 d4 Nf6 Bd3 g6 Nf3 d6 O-O Bg7 Nbd2

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1705)
e3 f5 d4 Nf6 Bd3 g6 Nf3 d6 O-O Bg7 Nbd2 O-O c3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1705)
e3 f5 d4 Nf6 Bd3 g6 Nf3 d6 O-O Bg7 Nbd2 O-O c3 Qe8 e4

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1705)
e3 f5 d4 Nf6 Bd3 g6 Nf3 d6 O-O Bg7 Nbd2 O-O c3 Qe8 e4 e5 dxe5

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1705)
Nc3 d5 e4 d4 Nce2 e5 Ng3 Be6 Nf3 f6 Be2 Qd7 O-O Nc6 Bb5 a6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1705)
Nc3 d5 e4 d4 Nce2 e5 Ng3 Be6 Nf3 f6 Be2 Qd7 O-O Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 h5

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1705)
e3 b6 Nh3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1705)
Nc3 d5 e4 d4 Nce2 d3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1705)
Nc3 d5 e4 d4 Nce2 d3 cxd3 c5

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1705)
e3 b6 Nh3 Bb7 Nc3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1705)
Nc3 d5 e4 d4 Nce2 d3 cxd3 c5 d4 cxd4

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1705)
Nc3 d5 e4 d4 Nce2 d3 cxd3 c5 d4 cxd4 Nf3 Nc6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1705)
Nc3 d5 e4 d4 Nce2 d3 cxd3 c5 d4 cxd4 Nf3 Nc6 Qa4 Bd7

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1705)
Nc3 d5 e4 d4 Nce2 d3 cxd3 c5 d4 cxd4 Nf3 Nc6 Qa4 Bd7 Nexd4 a6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1705)
e3 b6 Nh3 Bb7 Nc3 e6 Ng5

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1705)
e3 b6 Nh3 Bb7 Nc3 e6 Ng5 Qxg5 Ne4

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1705)
Nc3 d5 e4 d4 Nce2 d3 cxd3 c5 d4 cxd4 Nf3 Nc6 Qa4 Bd7 Nexd4 a6 Qb3 Nxd4

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1705)
e3 b6 Nh3 Bb7 Nc3 e6 Ng5 Qxg5 Ne4 Bxe4 f4

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1705)
e3 b6 Nh3 Bb7 Nc3 e6 Ng5 Qxg5 Ne4 Bxe4 f4 Qh4 g3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1705)
e3 b6 Nh3 Bb7 Nc3 e6 Ng5 Qxg5 Ne4 Bxe4 f4 Qh4 g3 Qh6 Rg1

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1705)
e3 b6 Nh3 Bb7 Nc3 e6 Ng5 Qxg5 Ne4 Bxe4 f4 Qh4 g3 Qh6 Rg1 Qxh2 Qe2

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1705)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 Nc3 Be7 O-O

Transpose to wikichess #14718#

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1705)
e4 c5 f4 g6 Nf3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1776)
d4 Nf6 c4 Nc6 Nf3 e6 e3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1705)
e4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 f4 d5 fxe5 Nfd7

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1705)
e4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 f4 d5 fxe5 Nfd7 d4 dxe4

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1776)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 a6 Bd3 Bc5 Nb3 Be7 Qg4 Bf6 O-O

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1776)
d4 Nf6 c4 Nc6 Nf3 e6 e3 Bb4 Bd2

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1776)
d4 Nf6 c4 Nc6 Nf3 e6 e3 Bb4 Bd2 Bxd2 Nbxd2

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1776)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 a6 Bd3 Bc5 Nb3 Be7 Qg4 Bf6 O-O d6 N1d2

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1776)
d4 Nf6 c4 Nc6 Nf3 e6 e3 Bb4 Bd2 Bxd2 Nbxd2 O-O a3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1705)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 b5 Bb3 d5 dxe5 Be6 Be3 Be7

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1776)
d4 Nf6 c4 Nc6 Nf3 e6 e3 Bb4 Bd2 Bxd2 Nbxd2 O-O a3 a5 Bd3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1776)
d4 Nf6 c4 Nc6 Nf3 e6 e3 Bb4 Bd2 Bxd2 Nbxd2 O-O a3 a5 Bd3 d6 O-O

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1776)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 d4 cxd4 Qxd4 Nf6 e5 Nc6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1705)
e4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 f4 d5 fxe5 Nfd7 d4 dxe4 Nxe4 Nc6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1776)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 d4 cxd4 Qxd4 Nf6 e5 Nc6 Qa4 Nd5

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1776)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 d4 cxd4 Qxd4 Nf6 e5 Nc6 Qa4 Nd5 Qe4 Nb6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1705)
e4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 f4 d5 fxe5 Nfd7 d4 dxe4 Nxe4 Nc6 Nf3 Be7

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1776)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 d4 cxd4 Qxd4 Nf6 e5 Nc6 Qa4 Nd5 Qe4 Nb6 Bf4 Bg7

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1776)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 d4 cxd4 Qxd4 Nf6 e5 Nc6 Qa4 Nd5 Qe4 Nb6 Bf4 Bg7 Nc3 O-O

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1776)
Nc3 d5 e4 d4 Nce2 e5 Ng3 Be6 c3 c5

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1776)
Nc3 d5 e4 d4 Nce2 e5 Ng3 Be6 c3 c5 Bb5 Nd7

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1776)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 d3 Be7 c3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1776)
Nc3 d5 e4 d4 Nce2 e5 Ng3 Be6 c3 c5 Bb5 Nd7 Qe2 Ne7

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1776)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 d3 Be7 c3 O-O a3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1776)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 d3 Be7 c3 O-O a3 d5 exd5

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1776)
Nc3 d5 e4 d4 Nce2 e5 Ng3 Be6 c3 c5 Bb5 Nd7 Qe2 Ne7 Bc4 Ng6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1776)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 d3 Be7 c3 O-O a3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 h3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1776)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Bxc6 dxc6 O-O Bg4 h3 h5 d3 Qf6 Nbd2 Bd6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1776)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Bxc6 dxc6 O-O Bg4 h3 h5 d3 Qf6 Nbd2 Bd6 Re1 Bxf3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1776)
Nc3 d5 e4 d4 Nce2 e5 Ng3 Be6 c3 c5 Bb5 Nd7 Qe2 Ne7 Bc4 Ng6 Bxe6 fxe6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1776)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 d3 Be7 c3 O-O a3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 h3 Nb6 Ba2

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1862)
e4 e5 f4 d5 exd5 exf4 Nf3

Transpose to wikichess #737#

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1862)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 Qc2 Nc6 Nf3 d6 a3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1862)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 Qc2 Nc6 Nf3 d6 a3 Bxc3 Qxc3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1862)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Bc5 Nxe5 Nxe5 d4 a6 Be2 Bxd4

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1862)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 Qc2 Nc6 Nf3 d6 a3 Bxc3 Qxc3 a5 g3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1862)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Bc5 Nxe5 Nxe5 d4 a6 Be2 Bxd4 Qxd4 d6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1862)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Bc5 Nxe5 Nxe5 d4 a6 Be2 Bxd4 Qxd4 d6 Nc3 O-O

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1862)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 Qc2 Nc6 Nf3 d6 a3 Bxc3 Qxc3 a5 g3 a4 Bg2

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1862)
e4 b6 d4 Bb7 Nc3 Nf6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1862)
e4 b6 d4 Bb7 Nc3 Nf6 Bd3 e6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1862)
e4 b6 d4 Bb7 Nc3 Nf6 Bd3 e6 Nge2 d5

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1862)
Nc3 d5 e4 d4 Nce2 e5 Ng3 c5

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1862)
Nc3 d5 e4 d4 Nce2 e5 Ng3 c5 Nf3 Bd6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1862)
Nc3 d5 e4 d4 Nce2 e5 Ng3 c5 Nf3 Bd6 c3 Be6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1862)
Nc3 d5 e4 d4 Nce2 e5 Ng3 c5 Nf3 Bd6 c3 Be6 Bb5 Nd7

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1862)
Nc3 d5 e4 d4 Nce2 e5 Ng3 c5 Nf3 Bd6 c3 Be6 Bb5 Nd7 b4 Qc7

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1862)
Nc3 d5 e4 d4 Nce2 e5 Ng3 c5 Nf3 Bd6 c3 Be6 Bb5 Nd7 b4 Qc7 bxc5 Qxc5

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1862)
Nf3 d6 g3 e5 Bg2

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1862)
e4 b6 d4 Bb7 Nc3 Nf6 Bd3 e6 Nge2 d5 e5 Ne4

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1862)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 Ne7 Bc4

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1862)
e4 b6 d4 Bb7 Nc3 Nf6 Bd3 e6 Nge2 d5 e5 Ne4 Nf4 Nxc3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1862)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 Ne7 Bc4 Ng6 O-O

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1862)
Nf3 d6 g3 e5 Bg2 f5 d3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1862)
e4 b6 d4 Bb7 Nc3 Nf6 Bd3 e6 Nge2 d5 e5 Ne4 Nf4 Nxc3 bxc3 c5

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1862)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 Ne7 Bc4 Ng6 O-O d6 d4

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1862)
e4 b6 d4 Bb7 Nc3 Nf6 Bd3 e6 Nge2 d5 e5 Ne4 Nf4 Nxc3 bxc3 c5 Ba3 g6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1862)
e4 c6 d4 d5 exd5 cxd5 Bd3 Nc6 c3 Qc7 Nf3 Bg4 Nbd2 e6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1862)
Nf3 d6 g3 e5 Bg2 f5 d3 Nf6 c4

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1862)
e4 c6 d4 d5 exd5 cxd5 Bd3 Nc6 c3 Qc7 Nf3 Bg4 Nbd2 e6 O-O Nf6

Transpose to wikichess #27381#

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1862)
Nf3 d6 g3 e5 Bg2 f5 d3 Nf6 c4 g6 b4

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1862)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 Ne7 Bc4 Ng6 O-O d6 d4 Be6 Bxe6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1862)
Nf3 d6 g3 e5 Bg2 f5 d3 Nf6 c4 g6 b4 Bg7 Bb2

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1862)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 Ne7 Bc4 Ng6 O-O d6 d4 Be6 Bxe6 fxe6 Nc3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1862)
Nf3 d6 g3 e5 Bg2 f5 d3 Nf6 c4 g6 b4 Bg7 Bb2 O-O O-O

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1862)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 Ne7 Bc4 Ng6 O-O d6 d4 Be6 Bxe6 fxe6 Nc3 Be7 Qe2

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1862)
Nf3 d6 g3 e5 Bg2 f5 d3 Nf6 c4 g6 b4 Bg7 Bb2 O-O O-O h6 Nbd2

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1952)
b4 e5 Bb2 Bxb4 Bxe5 Nf6 Nf3 O-O

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1952)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 a6 Nc3 b5 Bd3 Qb6 Nf3 Bb7 O-O

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1952)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Bc5 Be3 Qf6 c3 Nge7 Bc4 Bb6 O-O

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1952)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 a6 Nc3 b5 Bd3 Qb6 Nf3 Bb7 O-O Qc7 Re1

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1952)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 g6 O-O Bg7 Re1 e5 Bxc6 dxc6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1952)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 g6 O-O Bg7 Re1 e5 Bxc6 dxc6 d3 Qe7

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1952)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 g6 O-O Bg7 Re1 e5 Bxc6 dxc6 d3 Qe7 Nbd2 Nh6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1952)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 g6 O-O Bg7 Re1 e5 Bxc6 dxc6 d3 Qe7 Nbd2 Nh6 a4 f6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1952)
e4 c6 d4 d5 exd5 cxd5 Bd3 Nc6 c3 Nf6 Bf4 Bg4 f3 Bh5 Ne2 e6 Nd2 Bd6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1937)
d4 Nf6 c4 Nc6 Nf3 e6 e3 Bb4 Nbd2

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1937)
b3 e5 Bb2 Nc6 e3 Nf6 g3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1937)
e4 c5 Nc3 d6 Nge2 e5 Nd5 Nc6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1937)
e4 c5 Nc3 d6 Nge2 e5 Nd5 Nc6 Nec3 Nge7

Transpose to wikichess #42921#

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1937)
d4 Nf6 c4 Nc6 Nf3 e6 e3 Bb4 Nbd2 O-O Bd3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1937)
d4 Nf6 c4 Nc6 Nf3 e6 e3 Bb4 Nbd2 O-O Bd3 d6 O-O

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1937)
d4 Nf6 c4 Nc6 Nf3 e6 e3 Bb4 Nbd2 O-O Bd3 d6 O-O Bxd2 Nxd2

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1937)
d4 Nf6 c4 Nc6 Nf3 e6 e3 Bb4 Nbd2 O-O Bd3 d6 O-O Bxd2 Nxd2 e5 d5

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1937)
Nc3 d5 e4 d4 Nce2 e5 Ng3 Be6 Nf3 f6 Be2 g6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1937)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 a6 Bd3 Bc5 Nb3 Be7 Be3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1937)
Nc3 d5 e4 d4 Nce2 e5 Ng3 Be6 Nf3 f6 Be2 g6 d3 h5

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1937)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 a6 Bd3 Bc5 Nb3 Be7 Be3 d6 N1d2

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1937)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 a6 Bd3 Bc5 Nb3 Be7 Be3 d6 N1d2 Nf6 f4

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1937)
Nc3 d5 e4 d4 Nce2 e5 Ng3 Be6 Nf3 f6 Be2 g6 d3 h5 Nh4 Bf7

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1937)
Nc3 d5 e4 d4 Nce2 e5 Ng3 Be6 Nf3 f6 Be2 g6 d3 h5 Nh4 Bf7 c3 Nc6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1937)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Be7 d4 d6 dxe5

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1937)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Be7 d4 d6 dxe5 dxe5 Qxd8

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1937)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Be7 d4 d6 dxe5 dxe5 Qxd8 Bxd8 Nc3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1917)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 Ng5 d5 exd5 Na5 d3 h6 Nf3 Nxc4 dxc4

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1917)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 Ng5 d5 exd5 Na5 d3 h6 Nf3 Nxc4 dxc4 e4 Nd4

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1937)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Be7 d4 d6 dxe5 dxe5 Qxd8 Bxd8 Nc3 Be6 Bb5

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1917)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 a6 Bd3 Nc6 Nxc6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1937)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Be7 d4 d6 dxe5 dxe5 Qxd8 Bxd8 Nc3 Be6 Bb5 f6 Be3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1917)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 a6 Bd3 Nc6 Nxc6 dxc6 Nd2

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1917)
e4 c6 d4 d5 e5 Bf5 Nf3 e6 Be2 Nd7 O-O h6 c3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1917)
e4 c6 d4 d5 e5 Bf5 Nf3 e6 Be2 Nd7 O-O h6 c3 Qc7 Be3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1917)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Bb4 e5 c5 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 Qa5 Bd2 Qa4 Qb1 c4 f4 Ne7

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1917)
e4 c6 d4 d5 e5 Bf5 Nf3 e6 Be2 Nd7 O-O h6 c3 Qc7 Be3 O-O-O Nbd2

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1917)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 a6 Bd3 Nc6 Nxc6 dxc6 Nd2 b5 O-O

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1917)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 a6 Bd3 Nc6 Nxc6 dxc6 Nd2 b5 O-O Nf6 e5

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1895)
Nf3 d6 g3 e5 d3 f5 c4

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1895)
Nf3 d6 g3 e5 d3 f5 c4 g6 Bg2

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1895)
Nf3 d6 g3 e5 d3 f5 c4 g6 Bg2 Bh6 Nc3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1895)
Nf3 d6 g3 e5 d3 f5 c4 g6 Bg2 Bh6 Nc3 Nc6 O-O

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1895)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 c4 Bg7 Nc3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1895)
Nf3 d6 g3 e5 d3 f5 c4 g6 Bg2 Bh6 Nc3 Nc6 O-O f4 gxf4

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1895)
Nf3 d6 g3 e5 d3 f5 c4 g6 Bg2 Bh6 Nc3 Nc6 O-O f4 gxf4 exf4 Nd5

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1895)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Ndb5 d6 Nd5 Nxd5 exd5 Nb8 c4 a6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1895)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 c4 Bg7 Nc3 Nc6 d3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1895)
Nc3 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 g6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1895)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 c4 Bg7 Nc3 Nc6 d3 e6 Be2

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1895)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 c4 Bg7 Nc3 Nc6 d3 e6 Be2 Nge7 Bg5

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1895)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 c4 Bg7 Nc3 Nc6 d3 e6 Be2 Nge7 Bg5 h6 Bh4

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1895)
Nc3 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 g6 Nd5 Bg7

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1895)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 c4 Bg7 Nc3 Nc6 d3 e6 Be2 Nge7 Bg5 h6 Bh4 O-O Qd2

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1895)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Bxc6 bxc6 O-O d6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nf6

Transpose to wikichess #67036#

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1873)
e4 c5 a3 Nc6 b4 cxb4 axb4 Nxb4 d4 g6 Ba3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1895)
Nc3 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 g6 Nd5 Bg7 Nb5 Be5

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1873)
e4 c5 a3 Nc6 b4 cxb4 axb4 Nxb4 d4 g6 Ba3 Qb6 c3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1895)
Nc3 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 g6 Nd5 Bg7 Nb5 Be5 f4 Bd6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1895)
Nc3 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 g6 Nd5 Bg7 Nb5 Be5 f4 Bd6 e4 a6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1873)
e4 c5 a3 Nc6 b4 cxb4 axb4 Nxb4 d4 g6 Ba3 Qb6 c3 Nc6 Nd2

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1873)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Bc5 Nxc6 Qf6 Qf3 Qxf3 gxf3 bxc6 Be3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1873)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Bc5 Nxc6 Qf6 Qf3 Qxf3 gxf3 bxc6 Be3 Bxe3 fxe3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1873)
e4 c5 a3 Nc6 b4 cxb4 axb4 Nxb4 d4 g6 Ba3 Qb6 c3 Nc6 Nd2 d6 Ngf3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1873)
e4 c5 Nc3 g6 Nge2 Bg7

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1873)
e4 c5 Nc3 g6 Nge2 Bg7 g3 Nc6

Transpose to wikichess #25005#

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1895)
Nc3 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 g6 Nd5 Bg7 Nb5 Be5 f4 Bd6 e4 a6 Nxd6 cxd6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1873)
Nc3 d5 e4 d4 Nce2 e5 Ng3 Bd6 Bc4 a6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1873)
Nc3 d5 e4 d4 Nce2 e5 Ng3 Bd6 Bc4 a6 d3 Bd7

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1873)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Bxc6 dxc6 O-O Bg4 h3 h5 d3 Qf6 Nbd2 g5

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1873)
d4 Nf6 Bf4 c5 dxc5

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1873)
Nc3 d5 e4 d4 Nce2 e5 Ng3 Bd6 Bc4 a6 d3 Bd7 Nf3 Nf6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1873)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 f4 e5

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1873)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Bxc6 dxc6 O-O Bg4 h3 h5 d3 Qf6 Nbd2 g5 Nc4 Bxf3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1873)
Nc3 d5 e4 d4 Nce2 e5 Ng3 Bd6 Bc4 a6 d3 Bd7 Nf3 Nf6 O-O Nc6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1873)
d4 Nf6 Bf4 c5 dxc5 Na6 Qd4

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1873)
Nc3 d5 e4 d4 Nce2 e5 Ng3 Bd6 Bc4 a6 d3 Bd7 Nf3 Nf6 O-O Nc6 c3 O-O

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1873)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 f4 e5 Nf3 Nbd7

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1873)
d4 Nf6 Bf4 c5 dxc5 Na6 Qd4 Qa5 c3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1873)
d4 Nf6 Bf4 c5 dxc5 Na6 Qd4 Qa5 c3 Qxc5 e3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1873)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 f4 e5 Nf3 Nbd7 a4 Be7

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1873)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 f4 e5 Nf3 Nbd7 a4 Be7 Bc4 O-O

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1873)
d4 Nf6 Bf4 c5 dxc5 Na6 Qd4 Qa5 c3 Qxc5 e3 b6 Nf3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1873)
d4 Nf6 Bf4 c5 dxc5 Na6 Qd4 Qa5 c3 Qxc5 e3 b6 Nf3 g6 Na3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1873)
d4 Nf6 Bf4 c5 dxc5 Na6 Qd4 Qa5 c3 Qxc5 e3 b6 Nf3 g6 Na3 Bg7 Nb5

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1913)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nge7 c3 g6 O-O

Transpose to wikichess #11868#

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1913)
e4 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qd6 d4 Nf6 Nf3 c6 Ne5 Nbd7 Nc4 Qc7

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1913)
e4 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qd6 d4 Nf6 Nf3 c6 Ne5 Nbd7 Nc4 Qc7 Qf3 Nb6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1913)
e4 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qd6 d4 Nf6 Nf3 c6 Ne5 Nbd7 Nc4 Qc7 Qf3 Nb6 Bf4 Qd8

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1913)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 g3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Bg2 Nb6 O-O Be7 a3 O-O d3

Transpose to wikichess #16125#

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1913)
Nc3 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Be7

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1913)
Nc3 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Be7 e4 Nf6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1913)
Nc3 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Be7 e4 Nf6 Be2 O-O

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1913)
Nc3 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Be7 e4 Nf6 Be2 O-O O-O d6

Transpose to wikichess #37475#

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1913)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nge7 O-O

Transpose to wikichess #44325#

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1913)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 g3 Bb4 Nf3 e4 Nd4 O-O

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1913)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 g3 Bb4 Nf3 e4 Nd4 O-O Bg2 Re8

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1913)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 g6 Bxc6 dxc6 d3 Bg7 h3 b6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1913)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 g6 Bxc6 dxc6 d3 Bg7 h3 b6 a4 a5

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1913)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 g6 Bxc6 dxc6 d3 Bg7 h3 b6 a4 a5 Na3 Qc7

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1913)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 g6 Bxc6 dxc6 d3 Bg7 h3 b6 a4 a5 Na3 Qc7 O-O Nf6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1913)
e4 c6 d4 d5 e5 c5 dxc5 Nc6 Nf3 e6 Be3 Nge7 Bd3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1913)
e4 c6 d4 d5 e5 c5 dxc5 Nc6 Nf3 e6 Be3 Nge7 Bd3 Ng6 Bxg6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1913)
e4 c6 d4 d5 e5 c5 dxc5 Nc6 Nf3 e6 Be3 Nge7 Bd3 Ng6 Bxg6 hxg6 O-O

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1911)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 a6 Bd3 Bc5 Nb3 Be7 O-O d6 Qg4 g6 Qd1

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1917)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 Nbd2 d6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1917)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 Nbd2 d6 c3 O-O

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1917)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 Nbd2 d6 c3 O-O h3 Ne7

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1917)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 Nbd2 d6 c3 O-O h3 Ne7 d4 Bb6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1917)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 Nbd2 d6 c3 O-O h3 Ne7 d4 Bb6 O-O Ng6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1917)
c4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 e4 c5

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1917)
c4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 e4 c5 Nf3 d6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1917)
c4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1917)
c4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nc6

Transpose to wikichess #204#

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1917)
e4 c6 c4 d5 cxd5 cxd5 exd5 Nf6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1917)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Ndb5 d6 a4 a6 Na3 Be6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1917)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Ndb5 d6 a4 a6 Na3 Be6 Bg5 Be7

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1917)
e4 e5 Bc4 Nf6 d3 c6 Nf3 d5 Bb3 Bd6 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1917)
e4 e5 Bc4 Nf6 d3 c6 Nf3 d5 Bb3 Bd6 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 Nxe4 dxe4

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1917)
e4 e5 Bc4 Nf6 d3 c6 Nf3 d5 Bb3 Bd6 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 Nxe4 dxe4 O-O Bg5

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1917)
e4 c6 d4 d5 e5 c5 dxc5 Nc6 Nf3 e6 Be3 Nh6 Bxh6 gxh6 Bb5 Bxc5 O-O

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1966)
Nc3 e5 Nf3 d6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1966)
Nc3 e5 Nf3 d6 d4 exd4

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1966)
d4 Nf6 c4 Nc6 Nc3 e5 d5 Ne7 e4 Ng6 Nf3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1966)
Nc3 e5 Nf3 d6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nf6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1966)
d4 Nf6 c4 Nc6 Nc3 e5 d5 Ne7 e4 Ng6 Nf3 Bc5 Bd3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1966)
c4 Nf6 Nc3 e6 g3 d5 Bg2 dxc4

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1966)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Bxc6 bxc6 O-O d6 d4 d5

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1966)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Bxc6 bxc6 O-O d6 d4 d5 Nxe5 Ne7

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1966)
d4 Nf6 c4 Nc6 Nc3 e5 d5 Ne7 e4 Ng6 Nf3 Bc5 Bd3 O-O O-O

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1966)
c4 Nf6 Nc3 e6 g3 d5 Bg2 dxc4 Qa4 Nbd7

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1966)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Bxc6 bxc6 O-O d6 d4 d5 Nxe5 Ne7 Qh5 Be6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1966)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Bxc6 bxc6 O-O d6 d4 d5 Nxe5 Ne7 Qh5 Be6 Nc3 g6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1966)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Bc5 Nxc6 dxc6 Qxd8 Kxd8 Nc3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1966)
d4 Nf6 c4 Nc6 Nc3 e5 d5 Ne7 e4 Ng6 Nf3 Bc5 Bd3 O-O O-O d6 Bg5

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1966)
c4 Nf6 Nc3 e6 g3 d5 Bg2 dxc4 Qa4 Nbd7 Qxc4 Nb6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1966)
e4 c6 d4 d5 exd5 cxd5 c4 Nf6 Nc3 Be6 c5

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1966)
e4 c6 d4 d5 exd5 cxd5 c4 Nf6 Nc3 Be6 c5 g6 Nf3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1966)
e4 c6 d4 d5 exd5 cxd5 c4 Nf6 Nc3 Be6 c5 g6 Nf3 Bg7 Qb3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1966)
e4 c6 d4 d5 exd5 cxd5 c4 Nf6 Nc3 Be6 c5 g6 Nf3 Bg7 Qb3 Qc8 Bb5

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1966)
c4 Nf6 Nc3 e6 g3 d5 Bg2 dxc4 Qa4 Nbd7 Qxc4 Nb6 Qb3 Bd7

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1966)
c4 Nf6 Nc3 e6 g3 d5 Bg2 dxc4 Qa4 Nbd7 Qxc4 Nb6 Qb3 Bd7 Bxb7 Rb8

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1966)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Bc5 Nxc6 dxc6 Qxd8 Kxd8 Nc3 Be6 f3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1966)
c4 Nf6 Nc3 e6 g3 d5 Bg2 dxc4 Qa4 Nbd7 Qxc4 Nb6 Qb3 Bd7 Bxb7 Rb8 Bg2 Bd6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1966)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Bc5 Nxc6 dxc6 Qxd8 Kxd8 Nc3 Be6 f3 Nf6 Bg5

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1966)
e4 c6 d4 d5 Nd2 g6 Ngf3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1966)
e4 c6 d4 d5 Nd2 g6 Ngf3 Bg7 Bd3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1966)
e4 c6 d4 d5 Nd2 g6 Ngf3 Bg7 Bd3 Nh6 O-O

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1966)
e4 c6 d4 d5 Nd2 g6 Ngf3 Bg7 Bd3 Nh6 O-O O-O c3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1966)
e4 c6 d4 d5 Nd2 g6 Ngf3 Bg7 Bd3 Nh6 O-O O-O c3 f6 Re1

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1966)
e4 c6 d4 d5 Nd2 g6 Ngf3 Bg7 Bd3 Nh6 O-O O-O c3 f6 Re1 Nf7 h4

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1961)
d4 Nf6 c4 Nc6 Nc3 e5 d5 Ne7 a3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1961)
d4 Nf6 c4 Nc6 Nc3 e5 d5 Ne7 a3 Ng6 h4

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1961)
d4 Nf6 c4 Nc6 Nc3 e5 d5 Ne7 a3 Ng6 h4 h5 Nf3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1961)
d4 Nf6 c4 Nc6 Nc3 e5 d5 Ne7 a3 Ng6 h4 h5 Nf3 Be7 g3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1961)
d4 Nf6 c4 Nc6 Nc3 e5 d5 Ne7 a3 Ng6 h4 h5 Nf3 Be7 g3 Ng4 Ng5

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1961)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Bxc6 dxc6 O-O Bg4 h3 h5 d3 Qf6 Be3 Bxf3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1961)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Bxc6 dxc6 O-O Bg4 h3 h5 d3 Qf6 Be3 Bxf3 Qxf3 Qxf3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1961)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 a6 Bd3 b5 a4

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1961)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 a6 Bd3 b5 a4 b4 O-O

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1961)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 a6 Bd3 b5 a4 b4 O-O Bb7 Nd2

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1961)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 a6 Bd3 b5 a4 b4 O-O Bb7 Nd2 Nc6 Nxc6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1961)
Nc3 d5 e4 d4 Nce2 Nc6 Ng3 Qd6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1961)
Nc3 d5 e4 d4 Nce2 Nc6 Ng3 Qd6 Nf3 h5

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1961)
Nc3 d5 e4 d4 Nce2 Nc6 Ng3 Qd6 Nf3 h5 c3 d3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1961)
Nc3 d5 e4 d4 Nce2 Nc6 Ng3 Qd6 Nf3 h5 c3 d3 Qb3 h4

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1961)
Nc3 d5 e4 d4 Nce2 Nc6 Ng3 Qd6 Nf3 h5 c3 d3 Qb3 h4 Nf5 Bxf5

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1961)
Nc3 d5 e4 d4 Nce2 Nc6 Ng3 Qd6 Nf3 h5 c3 d3 Qb3 h4 Nf5 Bxf5 exf5 O-O-O

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1961)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 d3 Be7 O-O O-O a4

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1961)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 d3 Be7 O-O O-O a4 d6 c3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1961)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 d3 Be7 O-O O-O a4 d6 c3 Be6 Bxe6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1961)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 d3 Be7 O-O O-O a4 d6 c3 Be6 Bxe6 fxe6 Nbd2

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1961)
e4 c6 d4 d5 e5 Bf5 h4 h5 c4 e6 Nc3 Ne7 Nge2 Nd7

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1961)
e4 c6 d4 d5 e5 Bf5 h4 h5 c4 e6 Nc3 Ne7 Nge2 Nd7 Ng3 Bg6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1961)
e4 c6 d4 d5 e5 Bf5 h4 h5 c4 e6 Nc3 Ne7 Nge2 Nd7 Ng3 Bg6 cxd5 cxd5

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1891)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 e5 Nb5 d6 a4 Be6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1891)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 e5 Nb5 d6 a4 Be6 N1c3 a6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1891)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 e5 Nb5 d6 a4 Be6 N1c3 a6 Na3 Be7

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1891)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 e5 Nb5 d6 a4 Be6 N1c3 a6 Na3 Be7 Nc4 Nf6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1891)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Bc5 Be3 Qf6 c3 Qg6 f3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1891)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Bc5 Be3 Qf6 c3 Qg6 f3 Nge7 Nd2

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1891)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Bc5 Be3 Qf6 c3 Qg6 f3 Nge7 Nd2 O-O N2b3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1891)
e4 c6 d4 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 Nd7 Bc4 Ndf6 Ng5

Transpose to wikichess #77267#

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1891)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 c3 Nf6 e5

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1891)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 g3 Bb4 Bg2 O-O O-O e4 Ne1 Bxc3 bxc3 d5

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1891)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 g3 Bb4 Bg2 O-O O-O e4 Ne1 Bxc3 bxc3 d5 cxd5 Qxd5

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1891)
d4 Nf6 c4 Nc6 Nc3 e5 e3

Transpose to wikichess #55672#

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1894)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 Nc3 Nf6 d4 Be7 Bd3 O-O O-O Nc6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1894)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 Nc3 Nf6 d4 Be7 Bd3 O-O O-O Nc6 d5 Ne5

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1894)
b4 e5 Bb2 Bxb4 Bxe5 Nf6 Nc3 Nc6 Bxf6 Qxf6 Nd5 Qd6 Nxb4 Qxb4 Nf3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1894)
b4 e5 Bb2 Bxb4 Bxe5 Nf6 Nc3 Nc6 Bxf6 Qxf6 Nd5 Qd6 Nxb4 Qxb4 Nf3 d5 e3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1894)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Qxd4 Nc6 Qd3 Nf6 Nc3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1894)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Qxd4 Nc6 Qd3 Nf6 Nc3 Qb6 h3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1894)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Qxd4 Nc6 Qd3 Nf6 Nc3 Qb6 h3 d5 exd5

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1894)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Qxd4 Nc6 Qd3 Nf6 Nc3 Qb6 h3 d5 exd5 exd5 Be2

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1894)
g4 d5 Bg2 c6 g5 h6 d3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1894)
g4 d5 Bg2 c6 g5 h6 d3 hxg5 Bxg5

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1894)
g4 d5 Bg2 c6 g5 h6 d3 hxg5 Bxg5 Qb6 Bc1

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1894)
g4 d5 Bg2 c6 g5 h6 d3 hxg5 Bxg5 Qb6 Bc1 Nf6 e4

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1894)
g4 d5 Bg2 c6 g5 h6 d3 hxg5 Bxg5 Qb6 Bc1 Nf6 e4 Bg4 Qd2

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1894)
g4 d5 Bg2 c6 g5 h6 d3 hxg5 Bxg5 Qb6 Bc1 Nf6 e4 Bg4 Qd2 dxe4 Bxe4

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1894)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 Nge2 g6 g3 d6

Transpose to wikichess #102298#

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1894)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 e5 Nb3 Be6 h3 Nbd7 f4 Rc8

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1926)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Bc5 Nxc6 Qf6 Qd2 dxc6 Nc3 Bd7 Bd3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1926)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Bc5 Nxc6 Qf6 Qd2 dxc6 Nc3 Bd7 Bd3 O-O-O O-O

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1926)
e4 c5 b3 d6 Bb2 Nf6 Nc3 Nc6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1926)
e4 c5 b3 d6 Bb2 Nf6 Nc3 Nc6 Bb5 Bd7

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1926)
e4 c5 b3 d6 Bb2 Nf6 Nc3 Nc6 Bb5 Bd7 f4 a6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1926)
e4 c5 b3 d6 Bb2 Nf6 Nc3 Nc6 Bb5 Bd7 f4 a6 Bxc6 Bxc6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1926)
e4 c5 b3 d6 Bb2 Nf6 Nc3 Nc6 Bb5 Bd7 f4 a6 Bxc6 Bxc6 Qe2 e6

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1926)
c4 Nf6 g3 c6 Bg2 d5 Nf3 g6

Transpose to wikichess #40818#

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1926)
e4 c5 b3 d6 Bb2 Nf6 Nc3 Nc6 Bb5 Bd7 f4 a6 Bxc6 Bxc6 Qe2 e6 Nf3 Be7

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1926)
d4 g6 c4 Bg7 g3

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1926)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 d6 c3 Bd7 d4

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Philip Roe    (1926)
d4 g6 c4 Bg7 g3 d6 Nf3

Transpose to wikichess #41029#

============

Contributors : Philip Roe


Rei Phil    (2000)
e4 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qd8 d4 Nf6 Bc4

============

Contributors : Rei Phil


Rei Phil    (2000)
d4 e6 Nf3 b6 g3 d5

============

Contributors : Rei Phil


Rei Phil    (2000)
d4 e6 Nf3 b6 g3 d5 Bg2 Bb7

============

Contributors : Rei Phil


Rei Phil    (2000)
d4 e6 Nf3 b6 g3 d5 Bg2 Bb7 O-O Nf6

============

Contributors : Rei Phil


Rei Phil    (2000)
d4 e6 Nf3 b6 g3 d5 Bg2 Bb7 O-O Nf6 Ne5 Qc8

============

Contributors : Rei Phil


Rei Phil    (2000)
d4 e6 Nf3 b6 g3 d5 Bg2 Bb7 O-O Nf6 Ne5 Qc8 c4 dxc4

============

Contributors : Rei Phil


Rei Phil    (2000)
d4 e6 Nf3 b6 g3 d5 Bg2 Bb7 O-O Nf6 Ne5 Qc8 c4 dxc4 Qa4 Nfd7

============

Contributors : Rei Phil


Rei Phil    (2000)
d4 e6 Nf3 b6 g3 d5 Bg2 Bb7 O-O Nf6 Ne5 Qc8 c4 dxc4 Qa4 Nfd7 Nxd7 Nxd7

============

Contributors : Rei Phil


Philip Reilly    (1800)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 f3 O-O Bg5 Nc6

============

Contributors : Philip Reilly


Philip Reilly    (1800)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 f3 O-O Bg5 Nc6 Nge2 a6

============

Contributors : Philip Reilly


Philip Reilly    (1800)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 e4 Nf6 e5 Nd5 Bxc4 Nb6 Bd3 Nc6 Ne2 Bg4 f3 Be6 Nbc3 Nb4

============

Contributors : Philip Reilly


Philip Reilly    (1800)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 f3 O-O Bg5 Nc6 Nge2 a6 Qd2 Qe8

============

Contributors : Philip Reilly


Philip Reilly    (1800)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 f3 O-O Bg5 Nc6 Nge2 a6 Qd2 Qe8 Nd5 Nxd5

============

Contributors : Philip Reilly


Philip Reilly    (1800)
d4 Nf6 c4 c5 Nf3 cxd4 Nxd4 e5 Nb3

============

Contributors : Philip Reilly


Philip Reilly    (1800)
d4 Nf6 c4 c5 Nf3 cxd4 Nxd4 e5 Nb3 a5 a4

============

Contributors : Philip Reilly


Philip Reilly    (1800)
d4 Nf6 c4 c5 Nf3 cxd4 Nxd4 e5 Nb3 a5 a4 d5 e3

============

Contributors : Philip Reilly


Philip Reilly    (1800)
d4 Nf6 c4 c5 Nf3 cxd4 Nxd4 e5 Nb3 a5 a4 d5 e3 Be6 cxd5

============

Contributors : Philip Reilly


Philip Reilly    (1800)
d4 Nf6 c4 c5 Nf3 cxd4 Nxd4 e5 Nb3 a5 a4 d5 e3 Be6 cxd5 Bb4 Nc3

============

Contributors : Philip Reilly


Phil Roe    (2000)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Bd3 dxe4 Bxe4 Nf6 Bf3 Nbd7 Ne2

============

Contributors : Phil Roe


Phil Roe    (2000)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Bd3 dxe4 Bxe4 Nf6 Bf3 Nbd7 Ne2 Bd6 Ng3

============

Contributors : Phil Roe


Phil Roe    (2000)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Bd3 dxe4 Bxe4 Nf6 Bf3 Nbd7 Ne2 Bd6 Ng3 c6 Nc3

============

Contributors : Phil Roe


Phil Roe    (2000)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Bd3 dxe4 Bxe4 Nf6 Bf3 Nbd7 Ne2 Bd6 Ng3 c6 Nc3 O-O O-O

============

Contributors : Phil Roe


Phil Roe    (2000)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 Nd7 Nf3 Ngf6 Nxf6 Nxf6 Bd3 c5 Be3 Qc7 Bb5

============

Contributors : Phil Roe


Jean-Philippe Wagschal    (1701)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Be2 O-O Be3 e5 d5 a5 g4

============

Contributors : Jean-Philippe Wagschal


Jean-Philippe Wagschal    (1701)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O Nc3 d6 Nf3 Nc6 O-O a6 b3 e5 dxe5

============

Contributors : Jean-Philippe Wagschal


Jean-Philippe Wagschal    (1701)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Be2 O-O Be3 e5 d5 a5 g4 Na6 g5

============

Contributors : Jean-Philippe Wagschal


Wendell Phillips    (1800)
e4 d6 d4 c6 Nf3 Qc7 Bd3

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1800)
e4 d6 d4 c6 Nf3 Qc7 Bd3 e5 c3

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1800)
e4 d6 d4 c6 Nf3 Qc7 Bd3 e5 c3 h6 Be3

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1800)
e4 d6 d4 c6 Nf3 Qc7 Bd3 e5 c3 h6 Be3 Be7 Nbd2

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1800)
e4 d6 d4 c6 Nf3 Qc7 Bd3 e5 c3 h6 Be3 Be7 Nbd2 Nd7 Qb3

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1800)
e4 d6 d4 c6 Nf3 Qc7 Bd3 e5 c3 h6 Be3 Be7 Nbd2 Nd7 Qb3 Nf8 Bc4

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1800)
d4 d6 c4 Nd7 g3

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1800)
d3 d5 Nd2 e5

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1800)
e4 d6 d4 c6 c4 Nd7 Nf3 e5 Nc3

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1800)
d3 d5 Nd2 e5 e4 Nf6

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1800)
e4 d6 d4 c6 c4 Nd7 Be2

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1800)
d3 d5 Nd2 e5 e4 Nf6 Be2 Nc6

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1800)
e4 d6 d4 c6 c4 Nd7 Be2 e5 Nf3

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1800)
e4 d6 d4 c6 c4 Nd7 Nf3 e5 Nc3 Be7 d5

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1800)
e4 d6 d4 c6 c4 Nd7 Nf3 e5 Nc3 Be7 d5 h6 Be3

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1800)
e4 d6 d4 c6 c4 Nd7 Be2 e5 Nf3 Be7 O-O

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1800)
e4 d6 d4 c6 c4 Nd7 Nf3 e5 Nc3 Be7 d5 h6 Be3 Nf8 Be2

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1800)
e4 d6 d4 c6 c4 Nd7 Nf3 e5 Nc3 Be7 d5 h6 Be3 Nf8 Be2 Ng6 Qd2

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1800)
e4 d6 d4 c6 c4 Nd7 Be2 e5 Nf3 Be7 O-O h6 Qc2

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1800)
d3 d5 Nd2 e5 e4 Nf6 Be2 Nc6 c3 Be7

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1800)
e4 e5 Nf3 d6 d4 Qe7 Bc4

Transpose to wikichess #55262#

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1800)
d3 d5 Nd2 e5 e4 Nf6 Be2 Nc6 c3 Be7 h3 O-O

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1800)
e4 d6 d4 c6 c4 Nd7 Be2 e5 Nf3 Be7 O-O h6 Qc2 Qc7 Nc3

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1800)
e4 d6 d4 c6 c4 Nd7 Be2 e5 Nf3 Be7 O-O h6 Qc2 Qc7 Nc3 Nf8 Rd1

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1800)
d3 d5 Nd2 e5 e4 Nf6 Be2 Nc6 c3 Be7 h3 O-O Qc2 Qd6

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1800)
d3 d5 Nd2 e5 e4 Nf6 Be2 Nc6 c3 Be7 h3 O-O Qc2 Qd6 Nf1 Be6

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1800)
d4 d6 c4 Nd7 g3 e5 Nf3

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1800)
d3 d5 Nd2 e5 e4 Nf6 Be2 Nc6 c3 Be7 h3 O-O Qc2 Qd6 Nf1 Be6 Ng3 dxe4

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1800)
d4 d6 c4 Nd7 g3 e5 Nf3 Be7 Bg2

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1800)
d3 d5 Nd2 c5

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1800)
d3 d5 Nd2 c5 e4 Nf6

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1800)
d3 g6

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1800)
d3 g6 e4 c5

Transpose to wikichess #30636#

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1800)
d4 d6 c4 Nd7 g3 e5 Nf3 Be7 Bg2 c6 Nc3

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1800)
d4 d6 c4 Nd7 g3 e5 Nf3 Be7 Bg2 c6 Nc3 h6 O-O

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1800)
d4 d6 c4 Nd7 g3 e5 Nf3 Be7 Bg2 c6 Nc3 h6 O-O Qc7 e4

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1800)
d3 d5 Nd2 c5 e4 Nf6 Be2 Nc6

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1800)
e4 d6 c4 Nd7 Nc3

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1819)
d3 d5 Nd2 e5 e4 Nf6 Be2 c5

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1819)
d3 d5 Nd2 e5 e4 Nf6 Be2 c5 c3 Nc6

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1819)
d3 d5 Nd2 e5 e4 Nf6 Be2 c5 c3 Nc6 h3 Be7

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1819)
d3 d5 Nd2 e5 e4 Nf6 Be2 c5 c3 Nc6 h3 Be7 Qc2 Be6

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1819)
d3 d5 Nd2 e5 e4 Nf6 Be2 c5 c3 Nc6 h3 Be7 Qc2 Be6 Nf1 a5

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1819)
d3 d5 Nd2 e5 e4 Nf6 Be2 c5 c3 Nc6 h3 Be7 Qc2 Be6 Nf1 a5 Ng3 a4

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1800)
e4 d6 c4 Nd7 Nc3 c6 g3

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1800)
d3 d5 Nd2 c5 e4 Nf6 Be2 Nc6 c3 e5

Transpose to wikichess #224461#

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1800)
e4 d6 c4 Nd7 Nc3 c6 g3 e5 Bg2

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1800)
e4 d6 c4 Nd7 Nc3 c6 g3 e5 Bg2 Be7 Nge2

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1800)
e4 d6 c4 Nd7 Nc3 c6 g3 e5 Bg2 Be7 Nge2 Nf8 d3

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1800)
e4 d6 c4 Nd7 Nc3 c6 g3 e5 Bg2 Be7 Nge2 Nf8 d3 Ng6 d4

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1800)
d4 d6 c4 Nd7 g3 e5 Nf3 Be7 Bg2 c6 Nc3 h6 O-O Qc7 e4 Nf8 d5

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1800)
e4 d6 d4 c6 Nf3 Qc7 c4

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1800)
e4 d6 d4 c6 Nf3 Qc7 c4 e5 Nc3

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1800)
e4 d6 d4 c6 Nf3 Qc7 c4 e5 Nc3 h6 h3

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1800)
e4 d6 d4 c6 Nf3 Qc7 c4 e5 Nc3 h6 h3 Be7 Be3

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1800)
e4 d6 d4 c6 Nf3 Qc7 c4 e5 Nc3 h6 h3 Be7 Be3 Nd7 Qc2

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1800)
e4 d6 d4 c6 Nf3 Qc7 c4 e5 Nc3 h6 h3 Be7 Be3 Nd7 Qc2 Nf8 c5

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1800)
d3 d5 Nd2 e5 e4 Nf6 Be2 c5 c3 Nc6 h3 Be7 Qc2 Be6 Nf1 a5 a4 O-O

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
d3 d5 Nd2 e5 e4 c6

Transpose to wikichess #19470#

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
d3 d5 Nd2 Nc6

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
e4 d6 Nf3 Nd7 Bc4

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
e4 d6 Nf3 Nd7 Bc4 h6 h3

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
e4 d6 d4 c6 Nf3 Qc7 Be2

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
e4 d6 d4 c6 Nf3 Qc7 Be2 e5 c4

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
e4 d6 d4 c6 Nf3 Qc7 Be2 e5 c4 h6 d5

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
e4 d6 d4 c6 Nf3 Qc7 Be2 e5 c4 h6 d5 c5 O-O

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
d3 d5 Nd2 Nc6 e4 Nf6

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
d3 d5 Nd2 Nc6 e4 Nf6 c3 e6

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
e4 d6 d4 c6 Nf3 Qc7 Be2 e5 c4 h6 d5 c5 O-O Be7 Nc3

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
e4 d6 d4 c6 Nf3 Qc7 Be2 e5 c4 h6 d5 c5 O-O Be7 Nc3 a6 a4

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
e4 d6 Nf3 Nd7 Bc4 h6 h3 c6 O-O

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
e4 d6 Nf3 Nd7 Bc4 h6 h3 c6 O-O e5 Nc3

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
e4 d6 Nf3 Nd7 Bc4 h6 h3 c6 O-O e5 Nc3 Ne7 d4

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
e4 d6 Nf3 Nd7 Bc4 h6 h3 c6 O-O e5 Nc3 Ne7 d4 Qc7 Be3

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
e4 d6 Nf3 Nd7 Bc4 h6 h3 c6 O-O e5 Nc3 Ne7 d4 Qc7 Be3 Ng6 Qd2

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
d3 d5 Nd2 Nc6 e4 Nf6 c3 e6 g3 e5

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
d3 d5 Nd2 e5 e4 Nf6 Be2 c5 c3 Nc6 h3 a6

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
d3 d5 Nd2 e5 e4 Nf6 Be2 c5 c3 Nc6 h3 a6 Qc2 d4

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
d3 d5 Nd2 e5 e4 Nf6 Be2 c5 c3 Nc6 h3 a6 Qc2 d4 Nf1 h6

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
d3 d5 Nd2 Nc6 e4 Nf6 c3 e6 g3 e5 h3 Be6

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
d3 d5 Nd2 e5 e4 Nf6 Be2 c5 c3 Nc6 h3 a6 Qc2 d4 Nf1 h6 Ng3 Bd6

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
d3 d5 Nd2 Nc6 e4 Nf6 c3 e6 g3 e5 h3 Be6 Be2 Be7

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
d3 d5 Nd2 Nc6 e4 Nf6 c3 e6 g3 e5 h3 Be6 Be2 Be7 g4 d4

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
d3 d5 Nd2 Nc6 e4 Nf6 c3 e6 g3 e5 h3 Be6 Be2 Be7 g4 d4 c4 O-O

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
f4 d6 Nc3

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
Nf3 d6 d4 Nd7 e4

Transpose to wikichess #149316#

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
f4 d6 Nc3 c6 e4

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
f4 d6 Nc3 c6 e4 e5 fxe5

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
f4 d6 Nc3 c6 e4 e5 fxe5 dxe5 Nf3

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
f4 d6 Nc3 c6 e4 e5 fxe5 dxe5 Nf3 Nd7 Bc4

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
d3 d6 d4

Transpose to wikichess #4051#

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
g4 d6 Bg2 c6 h3

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
g4 d6 Bg2 c6 h3 e5 d4

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
e4 d6 d4 c6 h3

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
d3 d5 Nd2 c5 e4 Nf6 Be2 e5

Transpose to wikichess #224459#

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
g4 d6 Bg2 c6 h3 e5 d4 Nd7 Nc3

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
e4 d6 d4 c6 h3 Qc7 Nf3

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
e4 d6 d4 c6 h3 Qc7 Nf3 e5 Be2

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
e4 d6 d4 c6 h3 Qc7 Nf3 e5 Be2 h6 O-O

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
e4 d6 d4 c6 h3 Qc7 Nf3 e5 Be2 h6 O-O Be7 Nc3

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
g4 d6 Bg2 c6 h3 e5 d4 Nd7 Nc3 h6 e4

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
e4 d6 d4 c6 h3 Qc7 Nf3 e5 Be2 h6 O-O Be7 Nc3 Nd7 d5

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
f4 d6 Nc3 c6 e4 e5 fxe5 dxe5 Nf3 Nd7 Bc4 Be7 d3

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
e4 d6 d4 c6 h3 Qc7 Nf3 e5 Be2 h6 O-O Be7 Nc3 Nd7 d5 Nf8 Be3

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
f4 d6 Nc3 c6 e4 e5 fxe5 dxe5 Nf3 Nd7 Bc4 Be7 d3 h6 Be3

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
f4 d6 Nc3 c6 e4 e5 fxe5 dxe5 Nf3 Nd7 Bc4 Be7 d3 h6 Be3 Ngf6 h3

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
g4 d6 Bg2 c6 h3 e5 d4 Nd7 Nc3 h6 e4 Be7 Nf3

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1800)
e4 d6 c4 Nd7 Nc3 c6 g3 e5 Bg2 Be7 Nge2 Nf8 d3 Ng6 d4 Bd7 d5

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
g4 d6 Bg2 c6 h3 e5 d4 Nd7 Nc3 h6 e4 Be7 Nf3 Qc7 Be3

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
g4 d6 Bg2 c6 h3 e5 d4 Nd7 Nc3 h6 e4 Be7 Nf3 Qc7 Be3 Nf8 Qd2

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
e4 d6 d4 c6 Nf3 Qc7 Bc4

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
e4 d6 d4 c6 Nf3 Qc7 Bc4 h6 Bf4

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
e4 d6 d4 c6 Nf3 Qc7 Bc4 h6 Bf4 Nd7 e5

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
e4 d6 d4 c6 Nf3 Qc7 Bc4 h6 Bf4 Nd7 e5 dxe5 Nxe5

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
e4 d6 d4 c6 Nf3 Qc7 Bc4 h6 Bf4 Nd7 e5 dxe5 Nxe5 Nxe5 Bxe5

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
e4 d6 d4 c6 Nf3 Qc7 Bc4 h6 Bf4 Nd7 e5 dxe5 Nxe5 Nxe5 Bxe5 Qa5 c3

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
d3 d5 Nd2 e5 e4 dxe4

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
d3 d5 Nd2 e5 e4 dxe4 dxe4 Be6

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
d3 d5 Nd2 e5 e4 dxe4 dxe4 Be6 c3 Nf6

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
d3 d5 Nd2 e5 e4 dxe4 dxe4 Be6 c3 Nf6 Be2 Bc5

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
d3 d5 Nd2 e5 e4 dxe4 dxe4 Be6 c3 Nf6 Be2 Bc5 h3 O-O

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
d3 d5 Nd2 e5 e4 dxe4 dxe4 Be6 c3 Nf6 Be2 Bc5 h3 O-O Qc2 Nc6

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
e4 d6 d4 c6 Nc3 Qc7 f4

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
e4 d6 d4 c6 Nc3 Qc7 f4 e5 Nf3

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
e4 d6 d4 c6 Nc3 Qc7 f4 e5 Nf3 Nd7 g4

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
e4 d6 d4 c6 Nc3 Qc7 f4 e5 Nf3 Nd7 g4 h6 a4

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
e4 d6 d4 c6 Nc3 Qc7 f4 e5 Nf3 Nd7 g4 h6 a4 a5 Be3

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
e4 d6 d4 c6 Nc3 Qc7 f4 e5 Nf3 Nd7 g4 h6 a4 a5 Be3 Ngf6 Rg1

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
d3 d5 Nd2 e5 e4 dxe4 dxe4 Be6 c3 Nf6 Be2 Bc5 h3 O-O Qc2 Nc6 Nf1 h6

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
e4 d6 d4 h6 f4

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
e4 d6 d4 h6 f4 c6 Nf3

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
e4 d6 d4 h6 f4 c6 Nf3 Qc7 Nc3

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
e4 d6 d4 h6 f4 c6 Nf3 Qc7 Nc3 Nd7 Bc4

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
e4 d6 d4 h6 f4 c6 Nf3 Qc7 Nc3 Nd7 Bc4 e5 fxe5

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
e4 d6 d4 h6 f4 c6 Nf3 Qc7 Nc3 Nd7 Bc4 e5 fxe5 dxe5 dxe5

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1771)
e4 d6 d4 h6 f4 c6 Nf3 Qc7 Nc3 Nd7 Bc4 e5 fxe5 dxe5 dxe5 Nxe5 Nxe5

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1717)
e4 e5 d3 Bc5 c3 Nc6

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1717)
e4 e5 d3 Bc5 c3 Nc6 h3 d6

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1717)
e4 d6 f4 Nd7 Nf3

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1717)
e4 e5 d3 Bc5 c3 Nc6 h3 d6 Nf3 h6

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1717)
e4 d6 f4 Nd7 Nf3 e5 Bc4

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1717)
e4 e5 d3 Bc5 c3 Nc6 h3 d6 Nf3 h6 Be2 Qf6

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1717)
e4 d6 f4 Nd7 Nf3 e5 Bc4 Be7 O-O

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1717)
e4 d6 f4 Nd7 Nf3 e5 Bc4 Be7 O-O c6 a4

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1717)
e4 e5 d3 Bc5 c3 Nc6 h3 d6 Nf3 h6 Be2 Qf6 Nbd2 Qg6

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1717)
e4 e5 d3 Bc5 c3 Nc6 h3 d6 Nf3 h6 Be2 Qf6 Nbd2 Qg6 g4 Qf6

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1717)
e4 d6 f4 Nd7 Nf3 e5 Bc4 Be7 O-O c6 a4 h6 h3

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1717)
e4 d6 f4 Nd7 Nf3 e5 Bc4 Be7 O-O c6 a4 h6 h3 Ngf6 d3

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1717)
e4 e5 d3 Bc5 c3 Nc6 h3 d6 Nf3 h6 Be2 Qf6 Nbd2 Qg6 g4 Qf6 Nf1 Nge7

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1717)
e4 d6 f4 Nd7 Nf3 e5 Bc4 Be7 O-O c6 a4 h6 h3 Ngf6 d3 Qc7 f5

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1717)
e4 d6 d4 c6 c4 Nd7 Nf3 e5 Nc3 Be7 Be2

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1717)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Bd3 e5 d5

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1722)
e4 e5 d3 Bc5 c3 Qf6

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1722)
e4 e5 d3 Bc5 c3 Qf6 Nf3 Nc6

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1722)
e4 e5 d3 Bc5 c3 Qf6 Nf3 Nc6 h3 h6

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1722)
e4 e5 d3 Bc5 c3 Qf6 Nf3 Nc6 h3 h6 Be2 d6

Transpose to wikichess #230621#

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1722)
e4 c6 d3 d5 Nd2 e5 c3 Nd7

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1722)
e4 d6 d4 c6 Nf3 Qc7 Bc4 h6 h3

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1722)
e4 d6 d4 c6 Nf3 Qc7 Bc4 h6 h3 e5 Be3

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1722)
e4 e6 d3 d5 Nd2 c5 c3 Nc6

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1722)
e4 d6 d4 c6 Nf3 Qc7 Bc4 h6 h3 e5 Be3 Be7 O-O

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1722)
e4 c6 d3 d5 Nd2 e5 c3 Nd7 Be2 Ngf6

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1722)
e4 c6 d3 d5 Nd2 e5 c3 Nd7 Be2 Ngf6 h3 Bd6

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1722)
e4 d6 d4 c6 Nf3 Qc7 Bc4 h6 h3 e5 Be3 Be7 O-O Nd7 Nbd2

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1722)
e4 e6 d3 d5 Nd2 c5 c3 Nc6 Ngf3 Nf6

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1722)
e4 c6 d3 d5 Nd2 e5 c3 Nd7 Be2 Ngf6 h3 Bd6 Qc2 O-O

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1722)
e4 c6 d3 d5 Nd2 e5 c3 Nd7 Be2 Ngf6 h3 Bd6 Qc2 O-O Nf1 h6

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1722)
e4 d6 d4 c6 Nf3 Qc7 Bc4 h6 h3 e5 Be3 Be7 O-O Nd7 Nbd2 Nf8 Bb3

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1722)
e4 e6 d3 d5 Nd2 c5 c3 Nc6 Ngf3 Nf6 h3 Be7

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1717)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Bd3 e5 d5 h6 c4

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1722)
d3 d5 Nd2 e5 e4 Nf6 Be2 c5 c3 Be7

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1722)
e4 e5 Nf3 d6 d4 Qe7 Nc3

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1722)
b4 d6 e3 c6 d4

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1722)
e4 c6 d3 d5 Nd2 e5 c3 Nd7 Be2 Ngf6 h3 Bd6 Qc2 O-O Nf1 h6 Ng3 a5

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1722)
e4 e6 d3 d5 Nd2 c5 c3 Nc6 Ngf3 Nf6 h3 Be7 Be2 Qc7

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1722)
e4 e6 d3 d5 Nd2 c5 c3 Nc6 Ngf3 Nf6 h3 Be7 Be2 Qc7 Qc2 O-O

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1722)
e4 e6 d3 d5 Nd2 c5 c3 Nc6 Ngf3 Nf6 h3 Be7 Be2 Qc7 Qc2 O-O Nf1 Nh5

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1717)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Bd3 e5 d5 h6 c4 c5 Nc3

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1717)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Bd3 e5 d5 h6 c4 c5 Nc3 a6 h3

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1717)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Bd3 e5 d5 h6 c4 c5 Nc3 a6 h3 Be7 Nf3

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1722)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 h6 h3

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1722)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 h6 h3 Nbd7 Nf3

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1722)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 h6 h3 Nbd7 Nf3 e5 dxe5

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1722)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 h6 h3 Nbd7 Nf3 e5 dxe5 dxe5 Bd3

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1722)
e4 d6 d4 h6 Nc3 Nd7 Nf3

Transpose to wikichess #149331#

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1722)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 h6 h3 Nbd7 Nf3 e5 dxe5 dxe5 Bd3 c6 Be3

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1722)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 h6 h3 Nbd7 Nf3 e5 dxe5 dxe5 Bd3 c6 Be3 Be7 O-O

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1722)
e4 d5 Bd3 dxe4 Bxe4 Nf6 Bf3 Bf5

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1722)
b4 d6 e3 c6 d4 Qc7 Bd3

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1722)
e4 e5 d3 Bc5 c3 Nc6 Nf3 h6

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1717)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Bd3 e5 d5 h6 c4 c5 Nc3 a6 h3 Be7 Nf3 Nbd7 a4

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1722)
e4 d5 Bd3 dxe4 Bxe4 Nf6 Bf3 Bf5 d3 e6

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1722)
e4 e5 d3 Bc5 c3 Nc6 Nf3 h6 h3 Qf6

Transpose to wikichess #231304#

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1722)
e4 d5 Bd3 dxe4 Bxe4 Nf6 Bf3 Bf5 d3 e6 Bxb7 Nbd7

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1722)
e4 e5 d3 Bc5 c3 Nc6 h3 h6

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1722)
e4 d5 Bd3 dxe4 Bxe4 Nf6 Bf3 Bf5 d3 e6 Bxb7 Nbd7 Bxa8 Qxa8

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1722)
e4 d5 Bd3 dxe4 Bxe4 Nf6 Bf3 Bf5 d3 e6 Bxb7 Nbd7 Bxa8 Qxa8 Qf3 Qb8

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1722)
e4 d5 Bd3 dxe4 Bxe4 Nf6 Bf3 Bf5 d3 e6 Bxb7 Nbd7 Bxa8 Qxa8 Qf3 Qb8 h3 Bd6

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1722)
b4 d6 e3 c6 d4 Qc7 Bd3 e5 Bb2

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1722)
b4 d6 e3 c6 d4 Qc7 Bd3 e5 Bb2 Nd7 Nf3

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1722)
b4 d6 e3 c6 d4 Qc7 Bd3 e5 Bb2 Nd7 Nf3 Ngf6 Nbd2

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1722)
b4 d6 e3 c6 d4 Qc7 Bd3 e5 Bb2 Nd7 Nf3 Ngf6 Nbd2 h6 c4

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Wendell Phillips    (1722)
b4 d6 e3 c6 d4 Qc7 Bd3 e5 Bb2 Nd7 Nf3 Ngf6 Nbd2 h6 c4 Be7 a4

============

Contributors : Wendell Phillips


Lennox Phillip    (1551)
e4 e5 Nf3 d6 d4 Bg4 Be2 Nf6 Nc3 h6

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1551)
e4 e5 Nf3 d6 d4 Bg4 Be2 Nf6 Nc3 h6 dxe5 Bxf3

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1551)
e4 e5 Nf3 d6 d4 Bg4 Be2 Nf6 Nc3 h6 dxe5 Bxf3 Bxf3 Nh7

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1551)
e4 e5 Nf3 d6 d4 Bg4 Be2 Nf6 Nc3 h6 dxe5 Bxf3 Bxf3 Nh7 exd6 Qxd6

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1551)
e4 e5 Nf3 d6 d4 Bg4 Be2 Nf6 Nc3 h6 dxe5 Bxf3 Bxf3 Nh7 exd6 Qxd6 Qxd6 Bxd6

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1551)
d4 f5 d5 Nf6 Nc3

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1551)
d4 f5 d5 Nf6 Nc3 c6 dxc6

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1551)
d4 f5 d5 Nf6 Nc3 c6 dxc6 bxc6 Nf3

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1551)
d4 f5 d5 Nf6 Nc3 c6 dxc6 bxc6 Nf3 d6 e4

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1551)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 b5 Bb3 Na5 Nxe5 Nxb3 axb3 d6

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1551)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 b5 Bb3 Na5 Nxe5 Nxb3 axb3 d6 Nf3 Nf6

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1551)
d4 f5 d5 Nf6 Nc3 c6 dxc6 bxc6 Nf3 d6 e4 fxe4 Ng5

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1551)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 b5 Bb3 Na5 Nxe5 Nxb3 axb3 d6 Nf3 Nf6 O-O Bb7

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1551)
d4 f5 d5 Nf6 Nc3 c6 dxc6 bxc6 Nf3 d6 e4 fxe4 Ng5 d5 f3

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1551)
d4 f5 d5 Nf6 Nc3 c6 dxc6 bxc6 Nf3 d6 e4 fxe4 Ng5 d5 f3 h6 Nh3

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1551)
e4 e5 f4 d5 exd5 c6 dxc6 Nxc6 fxe5 Qh4 g3 Qe4 Qe2 Qxh1 Nf3 Bg4 e6

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1696)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 b5 Bb3 Nf6 d4 d6 c3 Be7 h3 O-O

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1696)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 b5 Bb3 Nf6 d4 d6 c3 Be7 h3 O-O O-O a5

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1696)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Bc5 c3 h6

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1696)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Bc5 c3 h6 d4 exd4

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1696)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Bc5 c3 h6 d4 exd4 cxd4 Bb4

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1696)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Bc5 c3 h6 d4 exd4 cxd4 Bb4 Nc3 d5

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1696)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Bc5 c3 h6 d4 exd4 cxd4 Bb4 Nc3 d5 Qb3 Bxc3

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1696)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Bc5 c3 h6 d4 exd4 cxd4 Bb4 Nc3 d5 Qb3 Bxc3 bxc3 dxe4

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1696)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 g6 d4 cxd4 Nd5

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1696)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 g6 O-O Bg7 c3 e5 Bxc6

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1696)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 g6 O-O Bg7 c3 e5 Bxc6 dxc6 Re1

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1696)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 g6 d4 cxd4 Nd5 e6 Nf4

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1696)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 g6 O-O Bg7 c3 e5 Bxc6 dxc6 Re1 Qd3 Re3

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1696)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 g6 O-O Bg7 c3 e5 Bxc6 dxc6 Re1 Qd3 Re3 Qd6 Re1

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1696)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 g6 d4 cxd4 Nd5 e6 Nf4 Bg7 Bd3

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1696)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 g6 d4 cxd4 Nd5 e6 Nf4 Bg7 Bd3 Nf6 O-O

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1696)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 g6 d4 cxd4 Nd5 e6 Nf4 Bg7 Bd3 Nf6 O-O O-O Bd2

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1696)
d4 f5 f4 b6 Nf3

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1696)
d4 f5 f4 b6 Nf3 Bb7 Nc3

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1696)
d4 f5 f4 b6 Nf3 Bb7 Nc3 Nf6 e3

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1696)
d4 f5 f4 b6 Nf3 Bb7 Nc3 Nf6 e3 e6 Be2

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1696)
e4 e5 f4 Bc5 Nf3 d6 f5 Nf6 Nc3

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1696)
d4 f5 f4 b6 Nf3 Bb7 Nc3 Nf6 e3 e6 Be2 g6 O-O

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1696)
e4 e5 f4 Bc5 Nf3 d6 f5 Nf6 Nc3 h6 d3

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1696)
e4 e5 f4 Bc5 Nf3 d6 f5 Nf6 Nc3 h6 d3 Bd7 Be2

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1696)
d4 f5 f4 b6 Nf3 Bb7 Nc3 Nf6 e3 e6 Be2 g6 O-O Bg7 b3

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1696)
e4 e5 f4 Bc5 Nf3 d6 f5 Nf6 Nc3 h6 d3 Bd7 Be2 a5 a4

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1696)
e4 e5 f4 Bc5 Nf3 d6 f5 Nf6 Nc3 h6 d3 Bd7 Be2 a5 a4 Nc6 Nd5

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1696)
d4 f5 f4 b6 Nf3 Bb7 Nc3 Nf6 e3 e6 Be2 g6 O-O Bg7 b3 O-O Ba3

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1696)
e4 e5 d4 exd4 c3 dxc3 Bc4 cxb2 Bxb2 Nf6 e5 Bb4 Nc3

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1696)
e4 e5 d4 exd4 c3 dxc3 Bc4 cxb2 Bxb2 Nf6 e5 Bb4 Nc3 d5 Nge2

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1696)
e4 e5 d4 exd4 c3 dxc3 Bc4 cxb2 Bxb2 Nf6 e5 Bb4 Nc3 d5 Nge2 dxc4 Qxd8

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1696)
e4 c5 Bc4 e6 Nf3 Nf6 O-O

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1696)
e4 c5 Bc4 e6 Nf3 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d3

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1696)
e4 c5 Bc4 e6 Nf3 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d3 Nf6 Bg5

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1696)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nd4 Nxd4 exd4 O-O c6 Bc4 b5

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1696)
e4 c5 Bc4 e6 Nf3 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d3 Nf6 Bg5 h6 Bxf6

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1696)
e4 c5 Bc4 e6 Nf3 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d3 Nf6 Bg5 h6 Bxf6 Qxf6 Nc3

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1696)
e4 c5 Bc4 e6 Nf3 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d3 Nf6 Bg5 h6 Bxf6 Qxf6 Nc3 Nc6 Ne4

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1696)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 O-O Bxc6 dxc6 Nxe5 Nd7

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1696)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 O-O Bxc6 dxc6 Nxe5 Nd7 Nf3 Re8

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1886)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Bb4 e5 c5 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 Ne7 h4 h5

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1886)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Bb4 e5 c5 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 Ne7 h4 h5 Nf3 Nbc6

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1886)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Bb4 e5 c5 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 Ne7 h4 h5 Nf3 Nbc6 Rb1 Qc7

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1886)
d4 Nf6 c4 c5 d5 b5 cxb5 a6 e3 Bb7 Nc3

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1886)
d4 Nf6 c4 c5 d5 b5 b3 e6 dxe6 fxe6 Bb2

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1886)
d4 Nf6 c4 c5 d5 b5 b3 e6 dxe6 fxe6 Bb2 bxc4 bxc4

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1886)
d4 Nf6 c4 c5 d5 b5 b3 e6 dxe6 fxe6 Bb2 bxc4 bxc4 Nc6 Nf3

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1886)
d4 Nf6 c4 c5 d5 b5 b3 e6 dxe6 fxe6 Bb2 bxc4 bxc4 Nc6 Nf3 Rb8 Qc2

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1886)
d4 Nf6 c4 c5 d5 b5 cxb5 a6 e3 Bb7 Nc3 Qa5 Bd2

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1886)
d4 Nf6 c4 c5 d5 b5 cxb5 a6 e3 Bb7 Nc3 Qa5 Bd2 axb5 Bxb5

Transpose to wikichess #200610#

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1886)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Bb4 e5 Bxc3 bxc3 Ne7 Qg4 g6

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1886)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Bb4 e5 Bxc3 bxc3 Ne7 Qg4 g6 Bd3 Nf5

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1886)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Bb4 e5 Bxc3 bxc3 Ne7 Qg4 g6 Bd3 Nf5 Bg5 Qd7

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1886)
f4 d5 Nf3 g6 e3 Bg7 Bb5

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1886)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Bb4 e5 Bxc3 bxc3 Ne7 Qg4 g6 Bd3 Nf5 Bg5 Qd7 Qh3 Qc6

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1886)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 Nc6 Bg5 e5 Bxf6 gxf6 Nf5 Be6 Nd5 Bxd5

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1886)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 b5 Bb3 Na5 Nxe5 Nxb3 axb3 Qg5

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1886)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 b5 Bb3 Na5 Nxe5 Nxb3 axb3 Qg5 Nf3 Qxg2

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1886)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 b5 Bb3 Na5 Nxe5 Nxb3 axb3 Qg5 Nf3 Qxg2 Rg1 Qh3

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1886)
f4 d5 Nf3 g6 e3 Bg7 c4

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1886)
f4 d5 Nf3 g6 e3 Bg7 c4 e6 Nc3

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1886)
f4 d5 Nf3 g6 e3 Bg7 c4 e6 Nc3 Ne7 b4

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1886)
f4 d5 Nf3 g6 e3 Bg7 c4 e6 Nc3 Ne7 b4 O-O d4

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1886)
f4 d5 Nf3 g6 e3 Bg7 c4 e6 Nc3 Ne7 b4 O-O d4 b6 Ba3

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1886)
f4 d5 Nf3 g6 e3 Bg7 c4 e6 Nc3 Ne7 b4 O-O d4 b6 Ba3 Nf5 Qd2

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1979)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Qf6 Nc3 Qg6 O-O Bc5 Nd5 Bb6 d4 exd4

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1979)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Qf6 Nc3 Qg6 O-O Bc5 Nd5 Bb6 d4 exd4 Nh4 Qd6

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (1979)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Qf6 Nc3 Qg6 O-O Bc5 Nd5 Bb6 d4 exd4 Nh4 Qd6 Bf4 Ne5

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2055)
f3 e5 Nc3 Nc6 e4

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2055)
f3 e5 Nc3 Nc6 e4 Bc5 Bc4

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2055)
f3 e5 Nc3 Nc6 e4 Bc5 Bc4 d6 d3

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2055)
f3 e5 Nc3 Nc6 e4 Bc5 Bc4 d6 d3 a5 a3

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2055)
f3 e5 Nc3 Nc6 e4 Bc5 Bc4 d6 d3 a5 a3 h6 Nge2

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2055)
f3 e5 Nc3 Nc6 e4 Bc5 Bc4 d6 d3 a5 a3 h6 Nge2 Nge7 f4

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2055)
f3 e5 Nc3 Nc6 e4 Bc5 Bc4 d6 d3 a5 a3 h6 Nge2 Nge7 f4 Bg4 Qd2

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2055)
f3 e5 Nc3 Nc6 e4 Bc5 Bc4 d6 d3 a5 a3 h6 Nge2 Nge7 f4 Bg4 Qd2 Ng6 h3

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2055)
f3 e5 Nc3 Nc6 e4 Bc5 Bc4 d6 d3 a5 a3 h6 Nge2 Nge7 f4 Bg4 Qd2 Ng6 h3 Bh5 f5

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2055)
f3 e5 Nc3 Nc6 e4 Bc5 Bc4 d6 d3 a5 a3 h6 Nge2 Nge7 f4 Bg4 Qd2 Ng6 h3 Bh5 f5 Nh4 Kf1

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2055)
f3 e5 Nc3 Nc6 e4 Bc5 Bc4 d6 d3 a5 a3 h6 Nge2 Nge7 f4 Bg4 Qd2 Ng6 h3 Bh5 f5 Nh4 Kf1 Bf3 gxf3

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2055)
f3 e5 Nc3 Nc6 e4 Bc5 Bc4 d6 d3 a5 a3 h6 Nge2 Nge7 f4 Bg4 Qd2 Ng6 h3 Bh5 f5 Nh4 Kf1 Bf3 gxf3 Nxf3 Qd1

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2055)
f3 e5 Nc3 Nc6 e4 Bc5 Bc4 d6 d3 a5 a3 h6 Nge2 Nge7 f4 Bg4 Qd2 Ng6 h3 Bh5 f5 Nh4 Kf1 Bf3 gxf3 Nxf3 Qd1 Qh4 d4

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2055)
f3 e5 Nc3 Nc6 e4 Bc5 Bc4 d6 d3 a5 a3 h6 Nge2 Nge7 f4 Bg4 Qd2 Ng6 h3 Bh5 f5 Nh4 Kf1 Bf3 gxf3 Nxf3 Qd1 Qh4 d4 exd4 Na4

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2055)
d4 Nf6 f3 d5 Nc3 e6 e4

Transpose to wikichess #25144#

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2055)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nxc6 bxc6 e5 Qe7 Qe2 Nd5 c4 Ba6 b3 g6 g3 Bg7 Bb2 d6 Bg2

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2055)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nxc6 bxc6 e5 Qe7 Qe2 Nd5 c4 Ba6 b3 g6 g3 Bg7 Bb2 d6 Bg2 O-O-O O-O

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2055)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nxc6 bxc6 e5 Qe7 Qe2 Nd5 c4 Ba6 b3 g6 g3 Bg7 Bb2 d6 Bg2 O-O-O O-O dxe5 Nc3

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2156)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2156)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 Bb4 Qd3

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2156)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 Bb4 Qd3 d6 Bd2

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2156)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 Bb4 Qd3 d6 Bd2 O-O a3

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2055)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nxc6 bxc6 e5 Qe7 Qe2 Nd5 c4 Ba6 b3 g6 g3 Bg7 Bb2 d6 Bg2 O-O-O O-O dxe5 Nc3 f5 Na4

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2055)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nxc6 bxc6 e5 Qe7 Qe2 Nd5 c4 Ba6 b3 g6 g3 Bg7 Bb2 d6 Bg2 O-O-O O-O dxe5 Nc3 f5 Na4 h5 h4

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2055)
e4 g6 d4 Bg7 Nf3 d6 Bc4 Nf6 Qe2 O-O e5 dxe5

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2156)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 c3 d5 e5 Nc6 h3 a6

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2055)
e4 g6 d4 Bg7 Nf3 d6 Bc4 Nf6 Qe2 O-O e5 dxe5 dxe5 Nd5

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2156)
Nh3 d5 g3 Bf5 Bg2

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2156)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 c3 d5 e5 Nc6 h3 a6 d4 Bg7

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2156)
d4 Nf6 Nc3 d5 Bf4 e6 Nf3 Bb4 Qd3 c5 dxc5 Ne4 Nd2 Nxd2 Bxd2 Bxc5 O-O-O

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2156)
d4 Nf6 Nc3 d5 Bf4 e6 Nf3 Bb4 Qd3 c5 dxc5 Ne4 Nd2 Nxd2 Bxd2 Bxc5 O-O-O O-O Qg3

Transpose to wikichess #249592#

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2156)
Nh3 d5 g3 Bf5 Bg2 e5 d4

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2156)
e4 e6 d4 d5 e5 c5 c3 a6

Transpose to wikichess #190895#

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2156)
Nh3 d5 g3 Bf5 Bg2 e5 d4 Qc8 Ng1

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2156)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 c3 d5 e5 Nc6 h3 a6 d4 Bg7 g3 f6

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2156)
Nh3 d5 g3 Bf5 Bg2 e5 d4 Qc8 Ng1 e4 f3

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2055)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nxc6 bxc6 e5 Qe7 Qe2 Nd5 c4 Ba6 b3 g6 g3 Bg7 Bb2 d6 Bg2 O-O-O O-O dxe5 Nc3 f5 Na4 h5 h4 Nb6 Qe3

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2055)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nxc6 bxc6 e5 Qe7 Qe2 Nd5 c4 Ba6 b3 g6 g3 Bg7 Bb2 d6 Bg2 O-O-O O-O dxe5 Nc3 f5 Na4 h5 h4 Nb6 Qe3 Bb7 Nc5

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2156)
Nh3 d5 g3 Bf5 Bg2 e5 d4 Qc8 Ng1 e4 f3 Nf6 g4

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2156)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 c3 d5 e5 Nc6 h3 a6 d4 Bg7 g3 f6 Bg2 fxe5

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2156)
Nh3 d5 g3 Bf5 Bg2 e5 d4 Qc8 Ng1 e4 f3 Nf6 g4 Bg6 g5

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2156)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 c3 d5 e5 Nc6 h3 a6 d4 Bg7 g3 f6 Bg2 fxe5 dxe5 e6

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2055)
e4 g6 d4 Bg7 Nf3 d6 Bc4 Nf6 Qe2 O-O e5 dxe5 dxe5 Nd5 h3 Be6

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2156)
Nh3 d5 g3 Bf5 Bg2 e5 d4 Qc8 Ng1 e4 f3 Nf6 g4 Bg6 g5 exf3 exf3

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2156)
Nh3 d5 g3 Bf5 Bg2 e5 d4 Qc8 Ng1 e4 f3 Nf6 g4 Bg6 g5 exf3 exf3 Nh5 f4

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2156)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 c3 d5 e5 Nc6 h3 a6 d4 Bg7 g3 f6 Bg2 fxe5 dxe5 e6 O-O Nge7

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2055)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nxc6 bxc6 e5 Qe7 Qe2 Nd5 c4 Ba6 b3 g6 g3 Bg7 Bb2 d6 Bg2 O-O-O O-O dxe5 Nc3 f5 Na4 h5 h4 Nb6 Qe3 Bb7 Nc5 Nd7 Nxd7

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2055)
e4 g6 d4 Bg7 Nf3 d6 Bc4 Nf6 Qe2 O-O e5 dxe5 dxe5 Nd5 h3 Be6 O-O Nd7

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2156)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 c3 d5 e5 Nc6 h3 a6 d4 Bg7 g3 f6 Bg2 fxe5 dxe5 e6 O-O Nge7 Re1 O-O

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2156)
Nh3 d5 g3 Bf5 Bg2 e5 d4 Qc8 Ng1 e4 f3 Nf6 g4 Bg6 g5 exf3 exf3 Nh5 f4 Qe6 Kf2

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2156)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 c3 d5 e5 Nc6 h3 a6 d4 Bg7 g3 f6 Bg2 fxe5 dxe5 e6 O-O Nge7 Re1 O-O Bf4 Ra7

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2156)
Nh3 d5 g3 Bf5 Bg2 e5 d4 Qc8 Ng1 e4 f3 Nf6 g4 Bg6 g5 exf3 exf3 Nh5 f4 Qe6 Kf2 Nc6 Nc3

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2156)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 c3 d5 e5 Nc6 h3 a6 d4 Bg7 g3 f6 Bg2 fxe5 dxe5 e6 O-O Nge7 Re1 O-O Bf4 Ra7 Qd2 b5

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2156)
Nh3 d5 g3 Bf5 Bg2 e5 d4 Qc8 Ng1 e4 f3 Nf6 g4 Bg6 g5 exf3 exf3 Nh5 f4 Qe6 Kf2 Nc6 Nc3 Bd6 Bh3

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2156)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 c3 d5 e5 Nc6 h3 a6 d4 Bg7 g3 f6 Bg2 fxe5 dxe5 e6 O-O Nge7 Re1 O-O Bf4 Ra7 Qd2 b5 Na3 Nf5

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2156)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 c3 d5 e5 Nc6 h3 a6 d4 Bg7 g3 f6 Bg2 fxe5 dxe5 e6 O-O Nge7 Re1 O-O Bf4 Ra7 Qd2 b5 Na3 Nf5 Nc2 Raf7

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2156)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 c3 d5 e5 Nc6 h3 a6 d4 Bg7 g3 f6 Bg2 fxe5 dxe5 e6 O-O Nge7 Re1 O-O Bf4 Ra7 Qd2 b5 Na3 Nf5 Nc2 Raf7 Ng5 Rc7

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2156)
Nh3 d5 g3 Bf5 Bg2 e5 d4 Qc8 Ng1 e4 f3 Nf6 g4 Bg6 g5 exf3 exf3 Nh5 f4 Qe6 Kf2 Nc6 Nc3 Bd6 Bh3 f5 Bg2

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2156)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 c3 d5 e5 Nc6 h3 a6 d4 Bg7 g3 f6 Bg2 fxe5 dxe5 e6 O-O Nge7 Re1 O-O Bf4 Ra7 Qd2 b5 Na3 Nf5 Nc2 Raf7 Ng5 Rc7 h4 h6

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2156)
Nh3 d5 g3 Bf5 Bg2 e5 d4 Qc8 Ng1 e4 f3 Nf6 g4 Bg6 g5 exf3 exf3 Nh5 f4 Qe6 Kf2 Nc6 Nc3 Bd6 Bh3 f5 Bg2 h6 Bxd5

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2156)
Nh3 d5 g3 Bf5 Bg2 e5 d4 Qc8 Ng1 e4 f3 Nf6 g4 Bg6 g5 exf3 exf3 Nh5 f4 Qe6 Kf2 Nc6 Nc3 Bd6 Bh3 f5 Bg2 h6 Bxd5 Qd7 h4

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2156)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 c3 d5 e5 Nc6 h3 a6 d4 Bg7 g3 f6 Bg2 fxe5 dxe5 e6 O-O Nge7 Re1 O-O Bf4 Ra7 Qd2 b5 Na3 Nf5 Nc2 Raf7 Ng5 Rc7 h4 h6 Nh3 Rcf7

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2156)
Nh3 d5 g3 Bf5 Bg2 e5 d4 Qc8 Ng1 e4 f3 Nf6 g4 Bg6 g5 exf3 exf3 Nh5 f4 Qe6 Kf2 Nc6 Nc3 Bd6 Bh3 f5 Bg2 h6 Bxd5 Qd7 h4 Bxf4 Bxf4

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2156)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 c3 d5 e5 Nc6 h3 a6 d4 Bg7 g3 f6 Bg2 fxe5 dxe5 e6 O-O Nge7 Re1 O-O Bf4 Ra7 Qd2 b5 Na3 Nf5 Nc2 Raf7 Ng5 Rc7 h4 h6 Nh3 Rcf7 a4 Na5

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2156)
Nh3 d5 g3 Bf5 Bg2 e5 d4 Qc8 Ng1 e4 f3 Nf6 g4 Bg6 g5 exf3 exf3 Nh5 f4 Qe6 Kf2 Nc6 Nc3 Bd6 Bh3 f5 Bg2 h6 Bxd5 Qd7 h4 Bxf4 Bxf4 Nxf4 Qf3

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2156)
Nh3 d5 g3 Bf5 Bg2 e5 d4 Qc8 Ng1 e4 f3 Nf6 g4 Bg6 g5 exf3 exf3 Nh5 f4 Qe6 Kf2 Nc6 Nc3 Bd6 Bh3 f5 Bg2 h6 Bxd5 Qd7 h4 Bxf4 Bxf4 Nxf4 Qf3 Nxd5 Qxd5

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2055)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 Ng5 d5 exd5 Na5 Bb5 c6 dxc6 bxc6 Be2 h6 Nf3 e4 Ne5 Bc5 O-O O-O

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2055)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 Ng5 d5 exd5 Na5 Bb5 c6 dxc6 bxc6 Be2 h6 Nf3 e4 Ne5 Bc5 O-O O-O Kh1 Re8

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2055)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 Ng5 d5 exd5 Na5 Bb5 c6 dxc6 bxc6 Be2 h6 Nf3 e4 Ne5 Bc5 O-O O-O Kh1 Re8 f4 exf3

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2055)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 Ng5 d5 exd5 Na5 Bb5 c6 dxc6 bxc6 Be2 h6 Nf3 e4 Ne5 Bc5 O-O O-O Kh1 Re8 f4 exf3 Nxf3 Bb6

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2055)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 Ng5 d5 exd5 Na5 Bb5 c6 dxc6 bxc6 Be2 h6 Nf3 e4 Ne5 Bc5 O-O O-O Kh1 Re8 f4 exf3 Nxf3 Bb6 Nc3 c5

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2156)
c4 e5 Nc3 f5 d4 exd4 Qxd4 Nf6 g3 Nc6 Qe3 Qe7 Bg2 Qxe3 Bxe3 Bb4 Rc1

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2055)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 Ng5 d5 exd5 Na5 Bb5 c6 dxc6 bxc6 Be2 h6 Nf3 e4 Ne5 Bc5 O-O O-O Kh1 Re8 f4 exf3 Nxf3 Bb6 Nc3 c5 Bb5 Re6

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2055)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 Ng5 d5 exd5 Na5 Bb5 c6 dxc6 bxc6 Be2 h6 Nf3 e4 Ne5 Bc5 O-O O-O Kh1 Re8 f4 exf3 Nxf3 Bb6 Nc3 c5 Bb5 Re6 d3 Bb7

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2055)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 Ng5 d5 exd5 Na5 Bb5 c6 dxc6 bxc6 Be2 h6 Nf3 e4 Ne5 Bc5 O-O O-O Kh1 Re8 f4 exf3 Nxf3 Bb6 Nc3 c5 Bb5 Re6 d3 Bb7 Bf4 a6

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2055)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 Ng5 d5 exd5 Na5 Bb5 c6 dxc6 bxc6 Be2 h6 Nf3 e4 Ne5 Bc5 O-O O-O Kh1 Re8 f4 exf3 Nxf3 Bb6 Nc3 c5 Bb5 Re6 d3 Bb7 Bf4 a6 Ba4 Nh5

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2156)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 Qb6 Na4 Qa5 c3 Nxd4 Nxd4 cxd4

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2156)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 Qb6 Na4 Qa5 c3 Nxd4 Nxd4 cxd4 b4 Qc7

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2156)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 Qb6 Na4 Qa5 c3 Nxd4 Nxd4 cxd4 b4 Qc7 Bxd4 b6

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2156)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 Qb6 Na4 Qa5 c3 Nxd4 Nxd4 cxd4 b4 Qc7 Bxd4 b6 Bd3 g6

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2156)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 Qb6 Na4 Qa5 c3 Nxd4 Nxd4 cxd4 b4 Qc7 Bxd4 b6 Bd3 g6 O-O Be7

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2156)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 Qb6 Na4 Qa5 c3 Nxd4 Nxd4 cxd4 b4 Qc7 Bxd4 b6 Bd3 g6 O-O Be7 Rc1 Bb7

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2156)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 Qb6 Na4 Qa5 c3 Nxd4 Nxd4 cxd4 b4 Qc7 Bxd4 b6 Bd3 g6 O-O Be7 Rc1 Bb7 Nb2 Nb8

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2156)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 Qb6 Na4 Qa5 c3 Nxd4 Nxd4 cxd4 b4 Qc7 Bxd4 b6 Bd3 g6 O-O Be7 Rc1 Bb7 Nb2 Nb8 Bb5 Bc6

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2156)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 Qb6 Na4 Qa5 c3 Nxd4 Nxd4 cxd4 b4 Qc7 Bxd4 b6 Bd3 g6 O-O Be7 Rc1 Bb7 Nb2 Nb8 Bb5 Bc6 a4 O-O

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2156)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 Qb6 Na4 Qa5 c3 Nxd4 Nxd4 cxd4 b4 Qc7 Bxd4 b6 Bd3 g6 O-O Be7 Rc1 Bb7 Nb2 Nb8 Bb5 Bc6 a4 O-O Qe2 a5

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2156)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Ndb5 d6 Nd5 Nxd5 exd5 Nb8 a4 Be7 Be2 O-O O-O Nd7 b4 a6 Na3 f5 Nc4 f4 a5 e4 Nd2 Bf6

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2156)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Ndb5 d6 Nd5 Nxd5 exd5 Nb8 a4 Be7 Be2 O-O O-O Nd7 b4 a6 Na3 f5 Nc4 f4 a5 e4 Nd2 Bf6 Ra3 Qe7

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2156)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Ndb5 d6 Nd5 Nxd5 exd5 Nb8 a4 Be7 Be2 O-O O-O Nd7 b4 a6 Na3 f5 Nc4 f4 a5 e4 Nd2 Bf6 Ra3 Qe7 Bg4 Kh8

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2156)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Ndb5 d6 Nd5 Nxd5 exd5 Nb8 a4 Be7 Be2 O-O O-O Nd7 b4 a6 Na3 f5 Nc4 f4 a5 e4 Nd2 Bf6 Ra3 Qe7 Bg4 Kh8 Be6 Ne5

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2192)
e4 c6 d4 d5 e5 Bf5 Be2 h6

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2192)
e4 c6 d4 d5 e5 Bf5 Be2 h6 Nf3 e6

Transpose to wikichess #122550#

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2192)
f4 d5 Nf3 g6 e3 Bg7 c4 e6 Nc3 Ne7 b4 b6 Ba3

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2192)
f4 d5 Nf3 g6 e3 Bg7 c4 e6 Nc3 Ne7 b4 b6 Ba3 O-O d4

Transpose to wikichess #255261#

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2192)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Qc7 c4 Nxd4

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2192)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Qc7 c4 Nxd4 Qxd4 e5

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2192)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Qc7 c4 Nxd4 Qxd4 e5 Qd3 Bc5

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2192)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Qc7 c4 Nxd4 Qxd4 e5 Qd3 Bc5 Nc3 Ne7

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2192)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Qc7 c4 Nxd4 Qxd4 e5 Qd3 Bc5 Nc3 Ne7 Rb1 Qb6

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2192)
e4 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qa5 d4 Nf6 Nf3 Bf5 Ne5 c6 Bc4 e6 g4 Bg6 h4 Nbd7 Nxd7 Nxd7 h5 Be4 O-O Bd5 Nxd5 cxd5 Bd3 Bd6 a4 g6 Bd2 Qb6

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2192)
e4 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qa5 d4 Nf6 Nf3 Bf5 Ne5 c6 Bc4 e6 g4 Bg6 h4 Nbd7 Nxd7 Nxd7 h5 Be4 O-O Bd5 Nxd5 cxd5 Bd3 Bd6 a4 g6 Bd2 Qb6 c3 Bc7

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2192)
e4 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qa5 d4 Nf6 Nf3 Bf5 Ne5 c6 Bc4 e6 g4 Bg6 h4 Nbd7 Nxd7 Nxd7 h5 Be4 O-O Bd5 Nxd5 cxd5 Bd3 Bd6 a4 g6 Bd2 Qb6 c3 Bc7 h6 Qd6

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2192)
e4 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qa5 d4 Nf6 Nf3 Bf5 Ne5 c6 Bc4 e6 g4 Bg6 h4 Nbd7 Nxd7 Nxd7 h5 Be4 O-O Bd5 Nxd5 cxd5 Bd3 Bd6 a4 g6 Bd2 Qb6 c3 Bc7 h6 Qd6 f4 a6

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip


Lennox Phillip    (2192)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O d4 Bf6 Re1 Re8 c3 Rxe1 Qxe1 Ne8 Bf4 d5 Nd2 Bf5 h3 c6

============

Contributors : Lennox Phillip






FICGS : phil ,   Wikipedia : phil ,   Dmoz : phil ,   Google : phil ,   Yahoo : phil




Chess is a sea in which a gnat may drink and an elephant may bathe. (Hindu proverb)

Methodical thinking is of more use in Chess than inspiration. (C. J. S. Purdy)

In Chess, at least, the brave inherit the earth. (Edmar Mednis)




Back to FICGS , Wikichess




[Chess forum] [Rating lists] [Countries] [Chess openings] [Legal informations] [Contact]
[Social network] [Hot news] [Discussions] [Seo forums] [Meet people] [Directory]