mat



FICGS - Search results for mat





There are 2453 results for mat in the forum.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-04-08 13:45:15)
Inaugural match : Big chess

Hello to all.

The inaugural Big chess game (on the 16x16 board) restarts. As it was a bit hard to organize such a game between 2 GM, the two players finally are myself and... you :)

This is is 'priority game', just for fun. If you want to play a move just connect with the guest/guest account, if it is 'guest' turn, you can play...

http://www.ficgs.com/game_1.html

Have a good big chess game :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-04-08 14:49:23)
FICGS titles

As you may have read on TCCMB forum, ICCF officials reacted when they learnt about FICGS titles. My idea was it first to be informative (titles from ICCF/IECG/FIDE), because I think players like to know who they play against, particularly if their opponents are titled. It seems obvious to me that FICGS titles are FICGS ones, not "official", not ICCF or FIDE.. even if words are quite the same (titles are FICGS IM, not IM).

I would like to know what you think about that. Do you think FICGS titles should be renamed (ie. FEM, FIM, FSM, FGM), or do you think there's no possible confusion between FIDE/ICCF/IECG/FICGS titles ? This is an interesting debate I invite you to follow :

http://pub11.bravenet.com/forum/924995304/fetch/552912/

Thank you for your advices.


Per Lea    (2006-04-08 23:09:40)
Titles

A provocative question: Do we really need titles at all? Isn't rating more informative than a title that maybe has been won when the player was at the top of his playing strength, many years ago? I admit the rating system isn't perfect, but I still claim it tells me more than a title. Being a Norwegian I am possibly less obsessed with titles (within all walks of life) than people from other countries?


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-04-10 21:51:58)
Exclamation mark

Hello Patrice, is the exclamation mark "!" okay for you ?


Patrice Verdier    (2006-04-10 22:16:07)
Exclamation mark

Yes It's OK


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-04-11 13:23:44)
CC players vs. Computers

Hello Marc, the idea is good for sure, but I doubt developers would want to see their "beta babies" to achieve a 2000 ELO rating with pain :) If matches like CC GM - Engines are quite balanced, so would be a CC 1800 - Engines one... Anyway, if you know developers interested, we could envisage something in this way...


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-04-11 18:33:13)
Bug fixed...

Many improvements in the send move process... It should not be possible anymore to make a wrong move. Stalemate detection is implemented. In checkmate case, nothing else should be possible than resigning. Thanks for your feedback.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-04-12 14:02:49)
Solution...

One solution could be to display titles from organizations in separated columns named FICGS, ICCF, FIDE, IECG etc... (as Chessfriend do) It's quite heavy for the rating list page :/ So the idea was to display the player's highest title only, and player is free to mention his titles in his own informations page.

That's not a completely satisfying solution, I agree...


Hannes Rada    (2006-04-12 19:15:19)
Titles

>> One solution could be to display titles from organizations in separated columns named FICGS, ICCF, FIDE, IECG etc... (as Chessfriend do) It's quite heavy for the rating list page :/ So the idea was to display the player's highest title only, and player is free to mention his titles in his own informations page.

I think that's the best idea. Maybe you can use smaller fonts, so that all information can be displayed on that page.


Hakon Anda    (2006-04-14 16:52:42)
Some wishes

I think this server works great after so short time online. However I think there are som possible improvements that could be done: 1. Option that can disable e-mail notification of one own moves. 2. It should be possible to take leave. 3. A better list of our own games, like when last move was done, reflection time left and so on. 4. A flag for every player that shows the nationality and other information that could be found in the rating list. Best regards, Hakon Anda


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-04-14 17:08:26)
Answers...

Hello Håkon. Some answers :

1. Maybe try : Preferences -> Notification checkbox
2. Right, other players already asked for this. Now you have 2 months to play a single move, so few chances to be late. The council will discuss about vacation option before to be implemented.
3. Some players asked these informations not to appear in the list to reduce it in size, so you can check this just by clicking on the games. ("when last move was done" : right !)
4. For website design reasons, I can't display many informations on the same page. I don't think flags are essential, but it will probably be implemented anyway !


Glen D. Shields    (2006-04-15 19:01:14)
Extend Timeout

I agree great server. The board definiely would be better with coordinates. Is there a way to extend the timeout time? Or an option to save one's login information so you don't have to input name and password after being tossed? Thanks!


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-04-16 16:02:22)
Right again

You'll have both options very soon.

In case of crash, the database is automatically & periodically saved out of the server.


Henri Muller    (2006-04-16 18:14:39)
some whiches/qqs souhaits.

Pourquoi pas songer aussi à des matches entre DEUX joueurs ?? ( nombre de parties au choix et à déterminer au début !?)


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-04-16 18:42:59)
Two players matches

Question about 2 players matches will be discussed too. I first decided not to offer these formulas because it may lead to cheating problems, at least unfair results. I have implemented processes to detect cheaters, but avoiding temptations is probably best for all :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-04-17 09:23:44)
Fraudulent ?

I'm not sure.. is really an "automatic player" fraudulent ? Many players are centaurs (human + computer). The decision to let an engine play would be a human one after all.. Anyway, a script player doesn't seem so easy to make. (and for what ?)


Glen D. Shields    (2006-04-17 19:01:10)
Thanks for the Comments Guys

Dinesh - since computer use is allowed I have no problem if someone uses a "script" to automate moves. I don't think that would be fradulent. Actually I think it would be clever :) The point I was trying to ask is anyone concerned (besides me) that we created a chess medium (server chess) where it's so easy to make moves that the games move too fast? I dread the start of a new section, particularly large sections with 10+ players. It's impossible to keep one's inbox empty for even a minute. I know I should show more discipline and walk away, but it's almost like an illness "just one more move then I'll stop" and I don't! One practice I've been using lately is to make a move in a notebook and sit on the move for a day or two before sending it. That helps slow things down. I wonder if a delay send option on the server would make any sense? One could make a move and then click a delay send button for 24 or 48 hours. One would be charged time during the delay, but it would automate the slow down and make tournament startups a little less hectic. Maybe I'm the only one who sees this as an issue> If so, then label this just one crazy man's thoughts :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-04-17 19:25:06)
New features...

Coordinates & last move have been implemented... Now the "live games" concept of the site extends to the home page :)

Also, player informations are 5 successive pages (informations, elo history, title norms, tournaments, games), reachable just by clicking on "ELO" (to improve yet) after clicking the magnifying glass.


Elmer Valderrama    (2006-04-20 14:52:47)
search by ECO code

Wonderful feature to have all on-going games available just one click away (an old request to Reimund @chessfriend). Even more interesting to be able to search games by player name. Now would it be too much to ask for a search by ECO? --similar games would be identified in a second, a good thing; and information for choosing different variations would be available..


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-04-23 06:01:44)
explanation

Hello Elmer.

It's possible the player entered an ambiguous move in plain text format. The program may have interpreted this move as the first one possible. Anyway he probably did not verify his move before confirmed (inquiring), I can't correct that. I'll fix that as soon as the next update of the site is done. Thank you.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-04-23 06:12:25)
Not yet

Conditional moves will be probably implemented, but not this week... Many things to do before.

I think it's generally an appreciated feature. Some players don't like to receive "automatic" moves just after they played, but it seems to be a "must" have for CC servers.


Elmer Valderrama    (2006-04-23 11:56:55)
not PGN

Maybe bringing the text-entry move facility closer to the board might be a quick fix (for the player checking the validity of intended move).

Regarding the format of the on-going games, it appears the player's move is copied "as is" directly to the game score (I have just entered "e7-e5", accepted by the interface as "e5", but it was copied as "1...e7-e5" into the PGN score of the on-going game), regards


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-04-23 12:33:40)
Checkmate / Stalemate

Note : Checkmate and stalemate are not automatically converted as a win or draw, your opponent has to resign or accept draw before.. I thought it was a more friendy way, and you have the possibility to send a last message with your move.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-04-23 13:48:27)
French websites

Quelques liens de sites français tout d'abord :

http://www.france-echecs.com
(le forum français bien connu)

http://echecsmag.over-blog.com
(un nouveau magazine sans lange de bois)

http://www.asso-ecam.com
(les échecs par correspondance sans assistance informatique)


Michael Hoppenstein    (2006-04-24 06:42:14)
Michael Höppenstein

What will happen, if my opponent won't resign after a checkmate?


Michael Hoppenstein    (2006-04-24 15:45:19)
Referee - Checkmate

That's not quite all right, I think. In case a game is won by checkmate, the game should be over - that is: without referee and without me waiting for my opponent losing on time. Would you consider changing this? Just a suggestions.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-04-24 15:59:32)
Checkmate

I considered that there wasn't so much difference : Generally players resign before being checkmated. Whoever playing until checkmate "quickly" will probably resign quickly... A player who wants to last a game will do it before checkmate... I really think it's only more friendly (and original).

Anyway, if too much players or council think otherwise, I'll change it. Thanks for your feedback.

About checkmate, I just fixed a bug that prevented players to resign if they were checkmated. (hum :)) That's why 2 players called the referee.


Stefano Ghisi    (2006-04-24 16:18:59)
Quad tourn

Do you think it's possible in future to have quad tournaments? (4 players 6 match each one)


Michael Hoppenstein    (2006-04-24 18:13:20)
Checkmate

I think I was one of those payers. I won the game a few days ago but my opponent has not as yet resigned the game.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-04-24 18:43:59)
It was precisely one...

... of these two games ! The player wanted to resign but he couldn't "because" he was checkmated. The bug has been fixed today.


Michael Hoppenstein    (2006-04-25 17:15:18)
Opponent does not resign after checkmate

The bug might be fixed but my opponent won't resign. Do I really have to wait 48 days - I've just checked - till he forfeits on time? How do I make him resign?


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-04-25 23:23:09)
Forums

Here are some forums where I announced FICGS. Most of them are well known & good places :

http://pub11.bravenet.com/forum/924995304
TCCMB

http://www.quebecechecs.com
Quebec Echecs

http://www.talkchess.com
Talk Chess

http://www.chessninja.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi
Chess Ninja

http://chessexchange.com/
Chess Exchange


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-04-26 16:07:15)
Special tournaments

Hello Daniel. Chess 960 & Thematic tournaments (actual is king's gambit) are in category :

Ficgs__Chess__Special__Tournaments


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-05-04 17:25:27)
FICGS statistics

2006 may 4

Dear chessfriends, the first FICGS statistics (1 month after server start) are displayed on the informations page : http://www.ficgs.com/informations.html

Google just reacted (today), so I hope for new players coming from search engines soon...


Jose Carrillo    (2006-05-05 00:34:33)
Re: Update - Chess 960

Excellent news! How do I set up a one game match against somebody?


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-05-05 15:19:03)
FICGS world championship

Hello to all.

Please post here all your questions / suggestions about the FICGS world championship rules.

There are many answers to bring yet : about the building of groups, who exactly will play which stage, etc...

It seems that many players like this scheme : knockout / round-robin tournament, that is more fair and much more interesting than a pure round-robin cycle. The final match rules are particularly hard (24 games, 30 days + 1 day / move), but I think it's a good way to make it different and give value to the title. Rules are not far from the old classical world championship, the champion will only play the next final match against the challenger...

FICGS WCH Rules :
http://www.ficgs.com/membership.html#tournament


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-05-05 15:36:17)
2 players matches

Hello Jose ! That is not possible yet. There's no players enough to create other tournament categories.. The delay before tournament start could increase significantly.


Jose Carrillo    (2006-05-05 18:37:09)
Re: 2 players matches

Don't we need only 2 players for a two-game match? Why do we need to create a whole tournament? I'm only interested in playing one other player. Are all the games in FICGS tournament based? Are there no individual matches?


Konstantin Konuhov    (2006-05-07 21:25:15)
Mate

Game 255. Help. Game is check and mate, but it is no end. What to do with it?


Trent Parker    (2006-05-08 01:19:43)
re: Mate

Hello Konstantin! your opponent has to resign. Hey Thibault. Could i suggest that you send a message to everyone in regards to this issue? I suspect that quite a lot of people do not read these forums regularly. Just a thought. Cheers, Trent Parker


Jose Carrillo    (2006-05-11 00:09:47)
Re: Qualifying

The top 4 players in the round robin qualify for the quarterfinals.

The beauty of this system is that the #1 and #2 players in the round robin have a 50% chance of going to the final (they deserve it too! as they finished top 2 in the round robin).

The loser of the 1st-2nd match still has a chance to go to the finals if he wins the semi-finals.

This system prevents lower ranked 3rd and 4th players in the round robin to knock out in one round the top players of the round robin.

If you play the round robin to win (and finish 1st or 2nd) you are rewarded for the finals.

There is still the possibility of the 1st and 2nd place in the round robin to play in the final match.

If you just play to finish 3rd or 4th, you have to fight your way to the final.

There will never be a 3rd vs 4th final match, something very well possible in a knock out tournament.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-05-12 07:39:04)
Re: Qualifying + Banned players

Hello Jose. You said : "There is still the possibility of the 1st and 2nd place in the round robin to play in the final match."

Actually this is the case, 1st and 2nd qualify for the next stage. How your system works for a 3 stages round-robin tournament cycle ? We can't add 2 extra-stages to designate who qualify from each round-robin tournament...


Hello Trent. There are 3 players who unregistered (not banned), they still appear in the WCH waiting list but they will be automatically removed when building groups.


Jose Carrillo    (2006-05-13 00:28:45)
Re: Qualifying

In a Knock out you can have 3rd vs 4th in the final. In the Page system you can't.

It's just a matter of whether you want to acknowledge the top players in the round robin.

In the page system ONLY the top four players in the round robin qualify for the playoffs.

Look at the Page system in practice in the Gligoric Cup tournament that we are running in FRCEC at:

http://frcec.chess960.info/GligoricCup.htm


Heinz-Georg Lehnhoff    (2006-05-14 00:47:20)
Swiss

Hello Thibault these are the "rules" (see at http://www.chessfriend.com/ and then Tournaments-CFC World-Championship-CFC Championship 2003)
Modus: 3 rounds Swiss à 10 games each. ... Every player is allowed to participate in all 3 rounds. Pairings of the 1st round are based on rating. We will build equal groups where possible. In the second round we will do the pairings so that be build at first 3 groups depending on score and rating. Among this three groups we will build new tournaments which should be of about equal rating.. Third round will be paired in the same way with the exception that the first group will be the strongest (score and rating). Normally two players should play during a championship cycle only one game. If it will be necessary in a following round that two players play a second game, this game should be played with revised colours.
I will send you more information.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-05-14 16:07:16)
"Blitz" cup...

Thank you Heinz Georg, for the files you sent to me.

Now I understand better the work and ideas of Reimund Lutzenberger in Chessfriend.com, a great experimentation field for sure...

I first concluded some things not to do in FICGS WCH. In example, a player rated 2500 (even provisional rating from fide) shouldn't have to play in the first stage against a low-rated player in a world championship [but that could be possible in a cup tournament cycle]. So I'll add special rules for high rated players (who are not qualified for the WCH knockout tournament) to begin directly in a 2nd stage tournament...

I agree with Dinesh, the aim is not to use the same formulas, even good ones. Anyway I think we can find new interesting (better :)) ones. But as the WCH is already a rapid tournament cycle, the CUP could be an unrated "blitz" (30 days per game with no increment, or even 10 days + 1 hour / move) knockout (2 games / match + playoffs) !! Something quite "brutal" and unfair between correspondence chess & classical rythms. What do you think ?


Wilhelm Schuett    (2015-11-05 01:24:27)
Thematic tournaments?

Sicilian Labourdonnais or French McCutcheon


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-05-15 08:33:32)
Team Championship

In brief : The idea of a team championship is very good, but of course it's too early... Such a championship could be a 2 stages round-robin tournament with teams of 6 or 7 players.


Bonjour Sébastien. Pourquoi discorde ? :) Au contraire...

Pour le moment j'envisageais des matchs par équipe occasionnels (FICGS vs. fédération ou autre serveur de jeu).

Le problème d'un championnat est qu'il soit représentatif, il serait donc souhaitable (dans le cas par pays) de pouvoir monter des équipes complètes (6 ou 7 joueurs) et que les plus forts joueurs trouvent un "intérêt" à défendre leurs couleurs (dépend de la popularité du serveur). L'idée est de toutes manières des plus intéressantes, mais le serveur doit gagner en confiance et en expérience sur la durée, il est encore tôt. Par contre je me demande comment se déroulerait un tel championnat... Un tournoi toutes ronde (round-robin) entre 5 à 9 pays, divisés par groupes, puis une phase finale ?!


Wayne Lowrance    (2006-05-17 08:41:06)
overall evaluation of this new site

This mate problem on this site is a big problem. Only chess site I play on where you have won and it is not won until the player resigns. Secondly I am in a game where mate is in 2. but my opponent has stopped playing. Many others are reporting the same thing. The idea is nice, it assumes that all players are good sports. Over all I would say many players here are not considerate of their opponents, and it is a reflection of their charachter. I dont think to much of the moderaters or those who are responsible and have taken a no action stance despite many complaints. Moderator or responsible authority take care of this ridiculous policy Regards Wayne


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-05-17 13:53:11)
ref : Wayne

You pointed out the problem : Actually, the situation is the same if there's is mate in 2 or mate already... or mate in 15...

Anyway, the "call refere" should have been reachable when it's not your turn. I'll tell here when it's fixed.

Thanks for feedback !


Glen D. Shields    (2006-05-18 00:53:27)
Mate Problem Should be Fixed

Thibault - Since I am never at a loss to voice an opinion , I'll go ahead and voice one here :)


I don't know how much work it is for you to fix the mate problem, but I think it should be fixed. I admit in the 1000+ correspondence games I've played through the years very few games actually get to the checkmate move. When they do, the game should be over. There is no reason one should have to beg his opponent to resign or beg the referee to do something. That doesn't make any sense. Is it a HUGE problem to fix this? I'm perplexed.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-05-18 03:18:57)
Let's see...

Hello Glen.

This is quite unusual and it may look strange at the first sight, but I still think that this rule is positive and is not a nonsense !

That's true I prefer the server working this way, and it saves time process, but I keep in mind : First, this is friendly... 2nd, if a player want to last a game, he will do it before being checkmated. 3rd, I didn't adjudicate Wayne's game, and his opponent just resigned only 2 days after his move. Let's give a chance to this rule, I'm convinced time will show that it is not a nonsense ;)


Wayne Lowrance    (2006-05-19 00:50:31)
It is not nonsense

He resigned i believe cause of opinion of those here. It is not nonsence. The fact that this site is correspondence has nothing to do with it. absolutley nothing ! You go to any club tournament and you will not be welcome back with such over the board conduct. It is rude, spitefull and counter productive to good chess and fair play. You will change this rule my friend. There is NO justification for a player to drag out a forced mate loss if he sees it. and believe me in the case of my game 205 you must admit it is obvious. In fact he should have resigned many moves earlier, I would have 4 sure. do not like your weak argument justifying the mate implementation.... Here is to a nice cite for corresponse chess. Respexctfully Wayne


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-05-19 02:15:13)
Amici sumus

Hello Wayne. I agree, of course, your game was won. Here the problem is not the checkmate rule, it is about the adjudication of a forced win or draw ! Clearly, there's no perfect solution. There will be some abuses, more or less important ! One can't prevent this... Rules (particularly time rules) mean abuses. But don't forget that if a player abuses, it doesn't mean all players do the same intentionally in such a situation. I don't know if your opponent really stopped to play... (what for ? .. you'll get the point anyway) Maybe he just had other things to do these days... Who knows ? Even if this is not the case, it could have been ! It is the same problem (in the forced mate case) everywhere, there's simply nothing else to do than wait, then call referee when a time limit is reached. There's no other reasonable rule ! (and it would be too much work for referees)

Understand me, I don't say it was not an abuse, I just say there's no solution. If I change the rule, there will be abuses in another way ! There will be abuses anyway... Nevertheless, if you have an idea, I'll read it with interest.

Respectfully.


Glen D. Shields    (2006-05-19 03:40:33)
I See Two Issues

Perhaps I miss something, but I see two separate issues here. One issue is technical, the other is chess etiquette.

The inability of the server to recognize that a game is over when one player is checkmated is a technical issue that should be fixed (in my opinion). No resignation should be necessary to end the game.

The chess etiquette issue is different. I agree it is rude for a player to drag out an obviously lost game. Despite the bad behavior, I think it is the individual's right to continue to fight to the bitter end. We might not like it, but that's just part of the game. I never played in any correspondence or over-the-board club where a player's decision to resign was determined by his opponent or the referee.


Trent Parker    (2006-05-19 08:04:48)
My Overall evaluation of this new site

I really like this site. I like the format of the tournaments, I like the fact that the number of games one can play are not limited.

I like the idea of the best game function, however i do not think it is properly utilised (I have aired my ideas on this elsewhere....)

I personally think the resign for checkmate rule is ok, although none of my games have gotten that far yet. After all a) this does not limit the amount of games that you can play on this site and b) your opponent will run out of time anyhow. So what is the difference? You are going to get the point anyhow.
I have the following criticisms:
I am on Dial up. This site is very slow to play on, very time consuming with the amount of games that i am up to. would it be possible to... I dunno... make it like a javascript or something, just to speed it up a bit. Or perhaps even make the submit button further up the page a bit? Often i have gone out of a game thinking that i have made the move when i have forgotten to click the submit button. (By the way this site would be excellent if i had broadband but i don't.)

I may have some more comments later on but at the moment i've said enough.

Thanks for this site Thibault!

Trent Parker


Wayne Lowrance    (2006-05-19 08:05:25)
suggestion

I see your points. I play at another corresponce sight, Pacific-mall.com/chess. They have solved the problem there and incidentally it will satisfy those who have mentioned the desirability to chat with your opponent during the game. At pac-mall you can chat about the game or any subject, others can view the game and drop by to say hello, or what ever. Outsiders do not suggest moves but are allowed to talk about a particuliar line after the fact, but in ten years there I have not seen this done only in rare circumstances. In the talk window you can politely tell your oppent "it is mate come up. giving the forced line" or you can just say "Dan the game is lost for you, give your reason. All accept this decorum there. and it is the friendliest cite on the web. The players there range from novices to close to 2300 which I am. By the way, my name there is globalpac, look me up on the ladders (2). Do me a favor and check it out. Tell me what you think. Thank you With respect.... Wayne


Mircea Hrubaru    (2006-05-21 18:16:00)
Adjudication?

Why wasn't game 201 ended in mate?


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-05-22 07:35:15)
Checkmate / Stalemate...

Hello Mircea.

Please read the F.A.Q. in Help :
http://www.ficgs.com/help.html

You may read this discussion too :
http://www.ficgs.com/forum_read_302.html


Henri Muller    (2006-05-23 09:43:09)
Time reflexion !!

Je rejoins en partie la note de Wayne Lowrance. Il y a quelque chose d'incorrect dans le décompte du temps de réflexion. Il suffit de jouer les 10 premiers coups très rapidement, et on dispose ensuite de 60 jours de réflexion !!! Ainsi, un joueur, sur le point d'être maté, peut attendre DEUX mois avant de répondre !? Et certaines parties traînent ainsi lamentablement....par manque de fair-play de l'adversaire. Aberrant ! Pourquoi pas limiter une réponse à 5 ou 7 jours de réflexion MAXIMUM - tout en conservant le décompte habituel. Il FAUT donc répondre endéans les 5 ou 7 jours ( ou perdre la partie ). Cette pratique est courante partout !!


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-05-26 21:19:33)
transpositions...

Hello David. Thanks for your feedback !

That's a big deal. Actually I have a solution to automate transpositions management. But it could bring other problems... In example, a secondary (or totally wrong) line should always transpose to the main line..

Your example (f4 e5 e4) is true, so we should give our opinion about the position (and future moves), not the last move...

About the search function, you're right again, but this point is even more complex ! I'll think about it later, I must care about time processing. Anyway, you can use Chessbase or Chess Assistant to find games sorted by position. So, by now, the search function works for openings, not positions.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-05-28 14:06:07)
Go games - SGF format / Java viewer

Hello to all.

Go games can be replayed with the Java viewer. Click on the magnifying glass near Game #

SGF format is available for your games (see help), ie. :

http://www.ficgs.com/format_viewer_sgf.php?game=805


Heinz-Georg Lehnhoff    (2006-05-29 13:51:27)
Remaining time

Hello Thibault!

What a pity! Everything I would like is a short overview of my running games - with the remaining time(s). I don't need the start date of the tournament at this page. You can delete it to get more space. My messages doesn't contain further information which I need.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-05-29 22:57:28)
Bobby Fischer vs. Boris Spassky

Hello Steven.

That's great ! Where did you find such information ? Do you know the name of the film ? (Bobby & Boris ? :))

Thanks.


Heinz-Georg Lehnhoff    (2006-05-29 23:44:30)
Value of the pieces...

A bishop against two pawns - never if it is not mate. You have two open lines and I lack an important piece.


Michael Aigner    (2006-06-01 20:48:46)
FICGS reminder

I have a lot of time left in all off my games and got the following reminser mail.

Did anyone get the same strange mail?

This is a reminder.

You did not connect to FICGS for 13275 days. You may have running games that will be lost on time. If you don't want to receive any reminder, you can turn off the notification options in preferences. There will be no more than 3 consecutive reminders. This email was generated automatically by http://www.ficgs.com/


Lionel Vidal    (2006-06-01 22:17:30)
Go rules

I don't quite understand what kind of problems with draws remains with FICGS (sic!) rules: as passing is not allowed, if you add the non repetition of the same whole board position and a non integer komi, I do not see how a draw is still possible.

BUT... this solution does actually not solve anything as I don't think you can forbid passing (as a matter of fact, I checked the official japanese, chinese, new-zealand, AGA (USA) and SST rules: pass is allowed and needed)
The main reason is, IMO, that you need a legal way to end the game (double pass). And yes there are situations where the best move for BOTH players is NOT to move at all in the area: the simplest case I can think of is thousand-year kos, which in the case of japanese rule usually end in seki.
Note that a single pass (that is the game goes on after it) can change the difference in scores in area mode: the AGA rule introduces the concept of pass stone to compensate and insists on white making the last move (if necessary with an additional pass and pass stone) to ensure that the total number of stones played by the two players are equal!
(BTW this is one of the reasons, admitedly far behind familiarity, why I prefer the japanese rule in face to face go)

To sum things up (!!), while I agree that FICGS could develop its own set of rules, I feel that the subject is too complex and error-prone, and has been long, and still is, disputed by highly competent authorities : why not use the result of their work?
I would add that the point of all this is rather moot if you consider that situation like triple ko and alii are indeed rather rare: why not stricly stick to, say, the official chinese rule, and replay the game by referee decision in the rare cases where neither playing side will yield?

oh, but I could also check what they do in the kiseido server ?!?
oh, and do take what I say with great caution: I don't feel and I am certainly not competent enough on the subject! Any other advice over there? :-)


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-06-01 21:25:04)
Discrepancies

It is very clear Lionel.

In another hand, each tournament rules and generally each situation influence the strategy at chess (so other games). And FICGS chess wch rules are special ones in the knockout tournament that should avoid draws. Actually, only a "one game match" can have no influence on 'the game'. (not perfectly true, as the player's strength is another factor)

Rules are flexible, particularly for the game of Go, so I think we can use even uncommom ones, if it is balanced enough (= there's still a challenge). Do you have an idea about this rule avoiding repetition, how many stones or komi it could be worth ?

Another question : Are there situations that look like zugzwang in Go (where the best move could be 'passing') ?


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-06-02 17:48:34)
Go rules

Hello Lionel. I just read the 1988 version of the official rules of the Chinese Weiqi Association.

The point here is to play with the most interesting & fair rules, not 'official' ones or others if it could be improved...

Note that FICGS chess rules have a peculiarity : 50 moves rules isn't applied if the mate can be forced. FICGS chess world championship rules are not (of course) the rules used by FIDE. I spent much time thinking about rules which are IMO the best thing in this server and I think most players will appreciate these points.

I think avoiding draws in Go is interesting because energy consuming could be too different in some games and lead to unfair situations in tournaments.

Hash keys don't solve all problems, 'superko' situations could remain as draw, furthermore these special rules could avoid any ambiguity. It is clear, it brokes 'symmetry' and I feel it is fair enough.

Then, rules exist to be enforced ! :) .. More seriously, I'm not convinced these new rules don't make sense, even if it needs adjustments. Still inquiring, but unless I find (or you convince me :)) a solid argument in another way, I think I'll apply them.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-06-03 07:03:45)
Download chess games

Hello Karlheinz.

Ok, I'll make something today to download directly all finished chess games in PGN format ! Sorry, not much time before and I had to think about it a little, so that it uses as less resources as possible.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-06-03 19:22:18)
Download games + RSS feed

Hello Karlheinz.

It's now possible to "directly" download games in PGN format. Please try the 'download' link on the viewer page for any game, or try ie. this one - http://www.ficgs.com/game_136.pgn

I've also added links to RSS feeds for games in the viewer page, and for the forum.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-06-09 14:34:14)
Email webmaster, 2 players matches

Bonjour Julien, merci :)

My email is displayed (just replace the symbol by @) on the 'About' page.

As I explained in another (old) thread, priorities are to reduce the delay for tournaments to start and to make it as simple as possible. As this server offers all games live, I think it to be 'competition oriented' is the best choice. It would be easy to offer many sorts of tournaments, rated/unrated, different time controls, quad/round-robin/ko etc... but it would loose his interest.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-06-10 10:52:11)
Team championship

Très exactement 3... (en me comptant :)) C'était prématuré de toutes manières, et il faudrait que je réfléchisse à une autre approche. Cela dit, je ne suis effectivement pas certain de la nécessité d'une telle compétition, les échecs par correspondance s'y prêtant sans doute moins. A suivre...


Amir Bagheri    (2006-06-13 11:35:10)
help (2 players matches)

i would like to know if it is possible to challenge an individual for a game. ie. I would like to play vs Nigel Davis but dont know how to challenge him.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-06-13 11:58:41)
2 players matches

Hello Amir.

Sorry, this is not possible yet to invite players for a 2-games match.

Nevertheless, you can start a game with Nigel instantly just entering the FICGS CHESS CLASS M 000005 tournament waiting list. One player more, and the tournament will start !

Another way, as it would be an interesting match for sure, I can create a special match if Nigel agrees to play.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-06-14 08:12:37)
FICGS 1st chess world championship

That's right.

However, it's more like an extra championship, it doesn't change anything for players rated under 2300, ie. a player rated 1700 who register next year couldn't play the 2nd FICGS chess championship since 2nd stage begin... But he could register for the 3rd wch.

The positive points are everyone can play immediately and 2nd wch could be a complete cycle (with a final match)


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-06-15 16:36:17)
Criteria

Hello Dorel and Daniel.

As you noticed, rating is quite important in FICGS world championship cycle (particularly established ratings, obtained from IECG / ICCF or after 9 games finished in FICGS) !

I think these rules are really the best choice in order to designate a world champion. It's more logical IMO to favour players who obtained previously the best results in FICGS and recognized organizations, and consequently a high rating. It takes time, of course. Even very strong players starting with a 1700 rating won't achieve a 2300 established rating before months !

Criterias in FICGS wch are (from most important to least) :

1) Winner of the previous cycle (qualify for the final match)
2) The eight best established ratings (play the KO tournament)
3) Points obtained in the wch tournaments
4) The tournament entry rating (TER)


Of course, there are some provisional ratings that will increase a lot, but it is not possible to grant a 2300 rating to any player saying so. It's already a lot of time gained that ratings from FIDE, ICCF, IECG be recognized.

Finally it is the same in IECG / ICCF : it's very hard to achieve a high rating, it's very hard to directly qualify for a 2nd stage too, it takes months, probably years in email chess...

Now, please consider this, if we start 1st wch at stage 1 : It won't change anything for your play, as the 1st stage of the 2nd wch is exactly the same... 2300+ players won't play before months... and if the rule is changed about 2300 mark and everyone playing 1st stage, probably all games for 2300+ players won't be rated with a 100% result... and at last it will be harder for you to qualify for 2nd stage...

It is a hard work to write rules as fair, balanced and interesting as possible. Rules can't satisfy everyone, sorry about that.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-06-15 17:51:02)
Candidate and World champion...

That's right, Daniel... In another hand, the 1st wch wouldn't be complete without a final match.

Here is a suggestion : What I called 1st wch wouldn't be named 1st wch, it would be only a cycle that will designate the 1st candidate for the 1st wch title and final match... The other one will be the winner of the 1st wch cycle. And both will play the first final match for the 1st wch title. Thus everyone can play immediately, and you play in the 1st world championship.

I think it could satisfy everybody.. !? What do you think ?


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-06-16 13:46:10)
Right...

Hello Heinz-Georg.

Thanks for help :) Indeed, I've forgotten the parameter for provisional ratings (that evolve quicker than established ratings)... I'll change these points within hours. (right, 95 to 99 values in the bonus table are useless, but it is informative about the formula)


Amir Bagheri    (2006-06-19 14:53:39)
1. d4

The move 1.d4 offers the same benefits to development and center control as does 1.e4, but unlike with the King Pawn openings where the e4 pawn is undefended after the first move, the d4 pawn is protected by White's queen. This slight difference has a tremendous effect on the opening. For instance, whereas the King's Gambit is rarely played today at the highest levels of chess, the Queen's Gambit remains a popular weapon at all levels of play. Also, compared with the King Pawn openings, transpositions between variations are more common and critical in the closed games. White develops aiming for a particular formation without great concern over how Black chooses to defend. Both these systems are popular with club players because they are easy to learn, but are rarely used by professionals because a well prepared opponent playing Black can equalize fairly easily.


Amir Bagheri    (2006-06-19 15:10:14)
thibault

je viens de recevoir un email de Nigel consentant a un match. je lui ai offert un match comportant 3 parties. je pense qu il sera d accord avec ce format. peux tu arranger ca? j'ai aussi repondu a ton email


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-06-19 16:34:56)
GM special match

Hello to all.

From time to time, special events will take place on FICGS.

A 4-games match just started between GM Nigel Davies (GBR) and GM Amir Bagheri (FRA).

http://www.ficgs.com/tournament_FICGS__CHESS__MATCH_EVENT__000001.html

I think we'll watch these games with interest :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-06-19 18:42:16)
FICGS 1st world championship

Hello Heinz-Georg.

While watching the wch waiting list, I realized that there could be an improvement more about this "extra-group". So here is the 1st wch scheme (and next ones, without the special group in the first stage), according to the rules.

Stage 1 :

-- Knockout tournament --

FICGS__CHESS__WCH_QUARTER_FINAL_1__000001
FICGS__CHESS__WCH_QUARTER_FINAL_2__000001
FICGS__CHESS__WCH_QUARTER_FINAL_3__000001
FICGS__CHESS__WCH_QUARTER_FINAL_4__000001

with John Anderson, Petr Makovsky, Daniel Cinca and 5 other players...

-- Round-robin tournaments --

FICGS__CHESS__WCH_STAGE_1_GROUP_1__000001
FICGS__CHESS__WCH_STAGE_1_GROUP_2__000001
FICGS__CHESS__WCH_STAGE_1_GROUP_3__000001
(...)

And at last, a special and one-time group :

FICGS__CHESS__WCH_STAGE_1_GROUP_M__000001

This will be a high rated group, with GM Nigel Davies, GM Amir Bagheri and the ~10 players 2300+ who won't play the knockout tournament according to the rules. The winner of this group will directly qualify for stage 3 round-robin final tournament (a one-time rule). The others can play stage 2 as specified in the rules.

Thus, only the 1st wch will start on july 1st. I think it's fair enough and finally everyone can play...


Stage 2 :

-- Knockout tournament --

FICGS__CHESS__WCH_SEMI_FINAL_1__000001
FICGS__CHESS__WCH_SEMI_FINAL_2__000001

-- Round-robin tournaments --

FICGS__CHESS__WCH_STAGE_2_GROUP_1__000001
FICGS__CHESS__WCH_STAGE_2_GROUP_2__000001
(...)


Stage 3 :

-- Knockout tournament --

FICGS__CHESS__WCH_KNOCKOUT_FINAL__000001

-- Round-robin tournament --

FICGS__CHESS__WCH_ROUND_ROBIN_FINAL__000001


Stage 4 :

-- Candidates match --

FICGS__CHESS__CANDIDATES_FINAL__000001


Stage 5 :

-- Title match --

FICGS__CHESS__WORLD_CHAMPIONSHIP__000001

... if there's a world champion and if he defends his title. Consequently we won't have a stage 5 this time, but as it could happen again in the future...

That's all folks !


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-06-20 17:17:19)
Re: "Revolver" movie...... cinema UFO !

Yes :) ... I saw it in french version... It was really IMO one of the biggest deceptions of the year... probably because I expected a lot, when seeing this fantastic trailer.

This film should have been one of the greatest chess (games in general) relative movies. There was all matters, and many interesting philosophical thoughts... maybe not supported enough by the movie. And I suspect director Guy Ritchie of having voluntarily suicided the movie during the shooting... Luc Besson or other reasons... How to explain such fantastic pictures, then such obvious faults all long. The screenplay surely was better than the result.

Finally, cinema press judged it as totally pretentious and it was a commercial failure. That's a pity, really.


Amir Bagheri    (2006-06-22 15:47:42)
Interesting question for the Gambit's a

Gambits are the schizophrenics of the chess openings. Most players love to play through a finished game that starts as a gambit, but few players dare to play gambits themselves. Gambits lead to attacking games that avoid the calculated buildup preceding a classic attack. Can the gambiteer justify the material disadvantage? Can the opponent overcome the positional disadvantage that comes with grabbing the gambit sacrifice?


Amir Bagheri    (2006-06-23 12:25:36)
Blindfolded Chess

THE chess-world (for there is a "world" in chess as in other matters) has lately been startled by a very extraordinary performance at one of the "divans" of the metropolis. A young American has played ten games at once, against an equal number of players, without, on his part, obtaining a single glimpse at any one of the chess-boards. The feat is not new; but never before was it performed so triumphantly as in the present day. The writers who have ferreted out the early history of this beautiful game have found the name of one Tchelebi, who, nearly nine centuries ago, was able to play at chess without seeing the board. Many persons in the East acquired the art of playing by feeling instead of seeing pieces; but that is a very different affair, since in such a case the sense of touch comes in aid of the memory. In 1266, a Saragen, named Buzecca, came to Florence and at the Palazzo del Popolo played three games at once, looking at one board, but not at the other two. He won two of the games, and made a drawn or abandoned game of the other. As all his competitors were skilful players, his achievement caused irrepressible astonishment. At various times, in later centuries, this mode of play was exhibited by different persons--Ruy Lopez, the author of one of the earliest treatises on chess; Mangiolini of Florence, Zerone, Medrano, Leonardo da Cutri, Paolo Boi, Salvio, and others, many of whom were Spaniards. Boi is reputed to have played three games at once without seeing the board. Damiano, an Italian, who wrote a treatise on chess more than three centuries and a half ago, gave what he called the "Rules" for learning to play without seeing the board; but his rules are worth very little, amounting chiefly to a recommendation to cultivate the memory. Keysler, in his Account of Turin (1749), says: "The late Father Sacchieri, Lecturer on Mathematics at Pavia, was a remarkable instance of the strength of the human understanding, particularly that faculty of the soul we term memory. He could play at chess with three different persons at the same time, even without seeing any one of the three chess-boards. He required no more than that his substitute should tell him what piece his antagonist had moved, and Sacchieri could direct what step was to be taken on his side, holding, at the same time, conversation with the company present. If any dispute arose about the place where any piece should be, he could tell every move that had been made, not only by himself, but by his antagonist, from the beginning of the game, and in this manner incontestably decided the proper place of the piece. This uncommon dexterity at the game of chess appears to me almost the greatest instance that can be produced of a surprising memory." The most celebrated player of the last century, however, in this peculiar achievement, was the Frenchman Andre Danican, who then, and afterwards, was generally known by the name of Philidor. In 1743, when Philidor was about eighteen years old, M. de Legalle asked him whether he had ever tried to play from memory, without seeing the board. The youth replied, that as had calculated moves, and even whole games, at night in bed, he thought he could do it. He immediately played a game with the Abbe Chenard, which he won without seeing the board. After that, a little practice enabled him to play nearly as well in this as in the ordinary fashion--sometimes two games at once. The French Cyclopedie told of a particular game in which a false move was purposely made by his antagonist; Philidor discovered it after many moves, and replaced the pieces in their proper position. Forty years afterwards, he was residing in England, where he astonished English players by his blindfold achievements at a chess-club in St. James' Street. He played three games at once, with Count Bruhl, Mr. Bowdler, and Mr. Maseres, the first two of whom were reputed the best players at that time in England. Philidor won two of the games, and drew the third, all within two hours. On another occasion, in the same year (1788), he played three games at once, blindfold as before, and giving the odds of pawn and move to one of his antagonists; again did he win two of the games, and draw the third. His demeanor during these labors surprised his visitors as much as his skill, for he kept up a lively conversation during his games. Many eminent chess-players, including M'Donnell, La Bourdonnaye, Staunton, etc., have achieved these blindfold wonders, in greater or less degree, since the days of Philidor. M'Donnell, a famous player about thirty years ago, played his moves even more rapidly without than with the board; he did not object to any amount of conversation in the room during his play, but disliked whispers. La Bourdonnaye could play within a shade of his full strength without seeing the board; he won against good players, on some occasions two at a time; but when trying the threefold labor, his brain nearly gave way, and he wisely abandoned all such modes of playing his favorite game. Mr. Staunton, the leading English player at present (but who has almost ceased to play since he undertook the editing of an edition of Shakespeare), some years ago played many blindfold games with Harrwitz and Kieseritzky, foreign players of note.


Amir Bagheri    (2006-06-23 12:26:28)
Blinfolded chess ( part II )

Very recently, however, all the honors of Europe, in this department of indoor games, have been run away with by two young Americans, Morphy and Paulsen. Paul Morphy, a native of New Orleans, seemed to be born with chess in his blood; he played almost from childhood; and at thirteen years of age he proved a formidable antagonist to Herr Lowenthal, a noted Hungarian. In 1857, when just twenty years of age, Morphy encountered Paulsen, a native of Iowa, only a little older than himself, at a chess congress in New Orleans (Editor: It was New York!). All the gray-beards struck their flag to Paulsen, and then he struck to Morphy. Of Morphy's subsequent achievements in regular play, which stamp him as perhaps the first living chess-player (we say this with fear and trembling; however, for the knights of the game are a sensitive race), we will not speak here, for our purpose is only to notice the blindfold performances. At the chess congress above mentioned, he finely played a blindfold game with a leading German player. Early in 1858, he struck the New Orleanists with amazement by playing six games simultaneously, without seeing any other the boards; winning five of them, and exhibiting beautiful play throughout. He then came to Europe, not only to "lick the Britishers," but "all creation;" and it must be admitted that he made great progress towards that achievement. At a meeting of the Chess Association at Birmingham, in August 1858, he played eight games simultaneously, without sight of the boards. His opponents were Lord Lyttelton, and seven other persons, mostly presidents or secretaries of provincial chess clubs. Against such players, and under such tremendous conditions, he won no less than six games out of the eight, drawing a seventh, and losing the eighth. In the following month, he went over and astonished the Parisians in a similar way; he contended blindfold against eight practised players at once, at the Cafe de la Regence, a famous resort of chess-players; and out of these did not lose even one; he was the victor in six, and drew the other two. In the spring of 1859, Morphy contended against eight of the most experienced members of the London Chess Club, including Mr. Mongredien and Mr. Walker, two distinguished players. He won two games, and drew the other six--all the players except himself being wearied out by a very protracted sitting. A few days afterwards, he played with eight members of the St. George's Chess Club, including Lord Cremorne, Lord Arthur Hay, and Captain Kennedy; he won five, and the rest were drawn through want of time to finish them. Nevertheless, inconceivable as these mental labors are, Morphy yields to Paulsen in blindfold play. There are whispers of twelve or fifteen games having been tried simultaneously by the latter; but the number ten has been most certainly reached, under conditions of the utmost publicity. On the 7th of October in the present year, at a Divan in the Strand, ten players accepted Mr. Paulsen's challenge to grapple with them all simultaneously, the boards being placed out of his sight. One of the players was M. Sabouroff, secretary to the Russian Embassy in London; the other nine comprised many names well known among chess-players. Ten chess-boards were placed on ten tables in the room. An arm-chair, turned away towards a window, was mounted on a dais. At two o'clock in the afternoon, Mr. Paulsen, a quiet, courteous young man, with not a trace of "brag" in him, took his seat in this arm-chair. For twelve mortal hours he never rose, never ate, never smoked, and drank nothing but a little lemonade. What were his mental labors during that time, we shall see. His ten antagonists took their seats at the ten tables; and each table speedily became the centre of a group of spectators, whose comments were not always so silent as in fairness they ought to have been. Paulsen could not see any of the chess-boards. Herr Kling, a noted player and teacher of chess, acted as general manager. He called the boards by numbers--No. 1 to No. 10. Paulsen audibly announced his first move for board No. 1; Kling made that move; the antagonist replied to it; Kling audibly announced the reply; Paulsen considered what should be his second move, and when he had audibly announced his decision, Kling made the proper move on the board. Here No. 1 rested for awhile. No. 2 now made his move, leading to the same course of proceeding as before. Then No. 3 in the same way; then No. 4; and so on to No. 10; after which No. 1 began a new cycle, by playing a second move; and thus they proceeded over and over again. Now let us see what all this implies and involves. Chess is not one of the most frolicsome of games; indeed, ladies generally declare it to be very dull, seeing that a chess-player is apt to be "grumpy" if spoken to on other matters while playing. The truth is, there is a demand for much mental work in managing a game well; the combinations and subtleties, the attacks and counter-attacks, are so numerous and varied, as to keep the mind pretty fully occupied. Nevertheless, a fine game between two fine players is mere child's play compared with this wonderful achievement of Paulsen. He was obliged to form ten mental pictures; and every picture changed with every move, like the colored bits in a kaleidoscope. Most persons, even though knowing nothing of the game, are aware that it begins with thirty-two pieces of different colors and forms, and that these move about over a board of sixty-four squares. After every change of position in any one of the pieces, Paulsen must have changed his mental picture of the board, the field of battle, and then made that a fixture until the next move was made. This is hard enough in even one game, against an antagonist who has his eyes to help him in planning attacks and defences; but how hard must it be against ten! It is difficult to conceive what is the condition of the mental machinery under such circumstances; and yet, there he sat, the calmest man in the room. When told of his antagonist's doings, one by one, he looked quietly out of window, and rubbed his chin, as a man often does when thinking, and then announced his move--never mistaking No. 1 for No. 7, No. 9 for No. 3--never failing to recover the proper mental picture, and making the proper change in it; never embarrassed; never making an unlawful move, or likely to lose sight (mental sight) of any unlawful move made by his antagonists. Nor did he obtain the least pause for mental rest. Without one minute's interval, as soon as he had announced a move for one board, he was required to attend to the move of another antagonist at another board. Hour after hour did this continue--all the afternoon, all the evening, midnight, until two in the morning. He made two hundred and seventy moves in the twelve hours, twenty-seven per game average; this gave two minutes and a quarter for the consideration of each move. As all his moves were met by corresponding moves on the part of his antagonists, he was called upon to form five hundred and forty complete mental pictures in twelve consecutive hours, each picture representing the exact mode in which all of the sixty-four squares of a chess-board were occupied. Paulsen won two games, lost three, and drew five.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-06-27 16:58:03)
FICGS world chess championship

A minor update in the rules that fixes many problems for future wch cycles... Nothing has changed in the rules for the 1st cycle that begins in 4 days, changes only concern next cycles, with the extension of the one-time rule mentioned above.

The equation was :

- No confusion with the cycles when entering the waiting list (2300+ players qualified for 2nd stage of the previous cycle is too confusing).

- Avoiding tournaments with too big rating gaps (and encourage high rated players to participate)

- The formula combining knockout tournament, round-robin cycle (so that everyone can play wch, with no more than 5 stages), and the final 2 players matches in the last stages.

- Making it as understable as possible...


It is now mentioned in the rules that 2300+ players will play 1st stage in high rated groups (ratings superior or equal to 2300). Winners of such groups (same criterias) will be qualified for the 3rd stage round-robin tournament, the others will play 2nd stage.

As all games are played with rapid time controls, a new cycle will probably begin every 6 months !


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-06-30 12:50:53)
Games lost on time

Hello Paul-Iosif.

When a game is lost on time you just have to wait a few hours and the game is adjudicated automatically.

I'll try to make a replacement in the tournament soon. You may have noticed that the game has been rated as a loss for your opponent, but not as a win for you, according to the rules cause less than 10 moves have been played.


John Knudsen    (2006-07-01 17:17:01)
Format For Championship?!

8 games with 1 player at one time?! That is rather unusual, to say the least. I have never heard of such a thing... What is the reasoning behind that? John


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-07-01 17:20:35)
1st FICGS chess championship started !

Hello to all.

As you may have noticed, 23 new tournaments just started :

http://www.ficgs.com/category__ficgs__chess__wch.html


4 matchs (quarter final) started in the knockout tournament

QF 1 : John Anderson (SM) - Farit Balabaev (GM)
QF 2 : Daniel Cinca - Peter Schuster (SM)
QF 3 : Gilles Hervet (SM) - Gino Figlio (IM)
QF 4 : Petr Makovsky (SM) - John Knudsen (SM)


19 tournaments (groups) started in the round-robin cycle, 17 tournaments with an elo average between 1672 and 1732 (16 tournaments of 17 are in a 32 points range), and 2 "group M" with an elo average about 2390.

All round-robin tournaments are groups of 7 players as it was the best way to make it fair.

I wish you all good games and have fun :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-07-01 17:44:41)
Format For Championship

Hello John.

After all, if it wasn't unusual, the interest would be lower for sure... :)

So you noticed, the 8 players with the highest established correspondence chess ratings play a pure knockout tournament.

I thought about this format a long time ago (and a long time). Combining a knockout tournament (more "spectacular") and a round-robin cycle (everyone can play, no more than 5 cycles) gather together the advantages of both. It is one of the reasons I made FICGS... I think pure knockout or pure round-robin wch cycle is not efficient enough for chess championships.

The other thing you'll notice in the rules : "The special rule is that in case of equality (4-4), the winner is the player with the strongest tournament entry rating if all games are draw, the player with the lowest tournament entry rating if not all games are draw. The winner is qualified for the next stage."

This rule (in case of equality in the round-robin tournaments, the player with the strongest TER is qualified too) is another way to avoid short draws... It may sound strange at a first sight, but I really think it's fair enough and a good way to find most probably the really strongest players in the last stages. Anyway, it's amazing for sure :)


The FICGS chess wch rules :

http://www.ficgs.com/membership.html#tournament


Peter Konig    (2006-07-02 10:50:19)
rules & ratings

Hi, the rules on registration were different, and stating personal rating seemed just to be of informative value, no checking of numbers or anything. Now, it seems that I have a disadvantage by stating that, I feel treated second class (I wholeheartedly ackowledge that there are much stronger players around) and my motivation dropped considerably. it is like in real live. There are people earning more or less money, but they should be equal before the law (rules). That's in the spirit of 1789! Je t'embrasse, Peter Konig


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-07-02 12:52:15)
rules & ratings

Hello Peter.

Indeed, you were one of the very first registered players. I have fixed the rules since this time, though it seems to me this point was the same already.

Anyway, ratings of course are not only informative (like in life :)), as it allows to play class tournaments. Now, there must be a way to choose a winner in certain cases, even if there's no "perfect" way. But if you win the tournament, there's no discussion. It only lights the battle a little more... When a player register he can ask for a >1700 rating only if he has got an "official" rating already, so the influence of choice is not so important at registration.

Your reference to 1789 is amazing, but actually we ARE equal before the law (rules). Doesn't mean the law is perfectly fair, that's impossible, of course. Like in life... The rules slightly favourize the best players. Je t'embrasse itou :)


Dinesh De Silva    (2006-07-02 14:51:28)
Re: France vs Brazil soccer match

I watched the match. France deserved it's 1:0 victory over Brazil, as France were clearly the better team on the day. Zinedine Zidane was at his very best, and he easily outshone the Ronaldos, Ronaldinhos etc.


Gino Figlio    (2006-07-04 01:07:56)
Symmetrical games

The format used(8-game match with simultaneous games, 4 white and 4 black) brings up the issue of avoiding symmetrical games. I don't see a perfect way of doing this other than being conscious of the problem, and trying to deviate early on. If I see an opening chosen by my opponent that I am also planning to use, I have waited to respond in one(or more) of the games, until the position reached a point where I would normal deviate, and choose an alternate move with the opposite colour. Anyone else with better ideas about how to avoid this problem?


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-07-04 01:25:41)
Go rating list

Hello Sebastian.

So it was a GO rating about Ion... (I did not understand that :/)

Still thinking about a Go rating list... If I implement something would it be better to have only informative ratings (from federations) or rating calculated from the games played here (probably not very relevant) ?

Anyway, players who didn't play a single chess game with a rating <1700 (~not from FIDE / IECG / ICCF) won't appear on the chess rating list in a while.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-07-04 01:52:31)
Symmetrical games

Hello Gino.

What do you mean "symmetrical games" exactly ? (time is an important element)

First case, a player copies move after move another game played at the same time (a move after). Cheating is obvious and it's forbidden (rules)...

Second case, a game is symmetrical but moves are not played "at the same time" : It means suicide in the match for the player who has to win, with either Black or White... The same about the games played by the same player as White, there's no interest to play the same openings, as it would save his opponent's energy and loose chances to provoke a fault.

I had seen you were waiting to move with black in your match, but you can play the same opening with Black, it's up to your opponent to play different openings, otherwise it's good for you...


John Knudsen    (2006-07-04 05:31:49)
Symmetrical games

This format (8 games against the same player at once) is really strange and not normal at all, IMHO. Don't get me wrong - I am enjoying my games. I would not recommend this format for future versions of the quarter-final. Most strong players that I know would not even consider playing in this kind of format for one minute. Better to have a RR, with X number of players advancing from that. If you wish to make the championship attractive to stronger players, you won't want to repeat this format in the future. John


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-07-04 12:17:36)
Symmetrical games

Playing the same opening until move 20 is not a problem IMO, particularly in correspondence chess nowadays...

John, about the format, that's interesting discussing... Why wouldn't it be "normal" in your opinion ? Not usual for sure, as round-robin tournaments are used everywhere in correspondence chess. So it will be a surprise for hardened CC players, but will it be for OTB players ? Why the "match format" couldn't be an acceptable alternative ?


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-07-04 16:55:10)
Symmetrical games

I don't understand how it could be a problem. If one consider a critical position at the end of the opening (ie. clear advantage for White), who plays White first knows the position is bad for Black... Why would he play the same opening with Black ? It's a wrong question IMO, there are very few cases where there's only a "good" move until the end of the game.

Anyway, this question is even more relevant when playing different tournaments in different organizations (a player may respond moves played by an opponent in a game at IECG in another game at ICCF....) than in two players matches. Nothing can prevent that, but what a shame and where's the satisfaction ? I think it's not a problem there.


John Knudsen    (2006-07-04 18:50:05)
Symmetrical games

Hi Thibault: The format is unusual, and not desired, IMHO, because you do not need an 8-game match with one opponent to determine who is the superior player. Think about it - it is 4 games with white, and 4 games with black. Overkill. You mention OTB chess players. What OTB player has played an 8-game match with the same opponent, lately? Never happens. It also never happens in serious correspondence chess, except here. I do not want to complain too much, because I thank you for the neat server, and the opportunity to play some serious games for free. However, the format will need to change, in the future, if you want to attract excellent players. John


Gino Figlio    (2006-07-04 18:54:07)
Difficult to prove

If it's difficult to prove who is "cheating" in a match like this, it's practically impossible to prove foul play when the incident occurs in 2 different tournaments, against 2 different opponents. I'm sure this has happened in ICCF but unfortunately there is no way to detect it. I remember chessfriend claimed to have this figured out, but it was just one person's opinion. Players need to be aware of this problem and avoid it, nothing worse than being forced to play against yourself.


Gino Figlio    (2006-07-04 19:08:38)
8-game matches

Just to clarify my position about this format, I think it's just fine if the players are alert and avoid playing symmetrical lines/games. I actually think it's a good idea to play a simultaneous 8-game match to see who's better. It's just a bit different than your normal round-robin tournament, perhaps that makes your site unique!


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-07-04 20:15:35)
8-game matches

John... ??? :)

Vladimir Kramnik - Peter Leko (match for WCH classical title)
Vladimir Kramnik - Deep Fritz...

Of course it is desired... Who will remember the names of the players in the last ICCF final tournament ? Even if ICCF doesn't use this format, and (as you say) serious CC players didn't have the opportunity to play such tournament, knockout format is still desired.

My first idea was a pure enormous knockout tournament, but it's obviously not possible (too much rounds, a time problem), that's why I thought about this combined system.

Now look at the chess world : Many players don't understand why FIDE progressively reduces the number of games and time controls in WCH matches. It is the main reason why FIDE world champion title looses value. Not hard / accurate, not spectacular enough !! ..

What many players (me, at least :)) expect is a classical world championship with a big final match. You may have noticed that FICGS champion will have the opportunity to defend his title in a... 24 games match against his challenger... (!!) That's real fight, that's real challenge and that's what I expect to see from a championship, a big opposition between 2 players, and not a round-robin more or less aleatory, with too much names, not understandable for the most.

Now, as we said on TCCMB : FICGS is not "official" matter, chess is for fun here, but chess must be a show and I'm convinced it is relevant in correspondence chess too. We'll see that ;)


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-07-04 21:03:47)
Symmetrical games

Understand me, referee has to validate the evidence, nothing more. There can't be any ambiguity in this case (all moves are copied ad tempo, or not). Rules are written in this way : No human factor.

However I can't let the program close an account because of cheating :) .. There are a few players trying to use several accounts, they are automatically detected, but we can discuss (and finally close the facticious one). This site is friendly, we are not in Matrix :>


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-07-06 16:38:23)
Out-of-time

Hello Marc.

You just have to wait the robot to adjuge the game (takes a few hours). If your opponent tries to play a move more, the game will be adjudicated automatically.


John Knudsen    (2006-07-06 18:33:27)
Leave/Reflection Time

Hi Thibault: Of course you can take leave in any cc organization. FICGS, however, is the only one that I am aware of that, not only do you get annual leave, but also 1 day extra reflection time per day of leave! :) The concept is simply ridiculous in a 30 +1 time control format. Look, I hope you don't think I just complain about stuff - there is a lot that I like here, too. I also do have a bit of experience playing serious correspondence chess (since 1978). New cc players, or OTB players, are the last people who know anything about the ins and outs of correspondence chess, IMHO. John


Marc Lacrosse    (2006-07-08 11:08:51)
Modifying "rapid" tournament rules ?

Hello all,
Hello Thibault
As I already said in an earlyer thread, one of the reasons why I joined FICGS was the possibility to play fewer games simultaneously at a faster pace than in other corr. chess associations.
So I enrolled in a first rapid tournament where I find two things unpleasant for a so-called "rapid" category:
1. some of my opponents (and myself also) accumulated reflection time "reserves" of 40 or even 50 days in some cases, which is not appropriate for a "rapid" tournament IMHO.
2. my last unfinished game is completely won for more than ten moves now (it's K+pawns against K+pawns with an unstoppable passed pawn for me where computers announce forced mate in ... max 40 moves). My 2200+ opponent continues to play at a very slow pace. It's pretty annoying : I bet I could win my game at blitz tempo against Kasparov analysing for three days per move but I suppose I will have to play for weeks until his king is mated!

So I propose :
1. To have an absolute limitation of the time reserve a player can accumulate in rapid tournaments (30 ?)
2. To have a procedure allowing to call for external adjudication when a player refuses to resign a forcefully lost game.

Your opinion ?

Marc


Glen D. Shields    (2006-07-08 21:05:41)
Thibault You Have a Golden Opportunity

Thibault - one of the reasons that FICGS has grown so quickly is that you've welcomed input and implented the things the players have asked for. John is right on this issue. I urge you to listen to him. Take this opportunity and make FICGS the chess server that leads the way in establishing logical time rules.

Here are some suggestions for regular tournaments. You and others can build on these:
- 30 days start +2 days added per move
- 100 days maximum accumulated time
- 30 days maximum limit for one move
- 4 weeks (28 days) annual leave
- no time lost or added during leaves
- no moves made during leaves
- all time calculated by a running clock in hours and minutes

My recommendation for rapid tournaments are:
- 14 days start +1 day added per move
- 30 days maximum accumulated time
- 10 days maximum limit for one move
- 2 weeks (14 days) annual leave
- no time added or lost during leaves
- no moves made during leaves
- all time calculated by a running clock in hours and minutes

I recommend you let the server automatically handle time limit oversteps and make no exceptions. The only exception I would offer is if someone is ill or injured and needs to take an extended medical leave (these things happen). Let there be an option for that player to file an approved leave with you.

Thibault love your server and the hard work you put into it. You and others feel free to critique my suggestions. I strongly urge you to use this opportunity to lead the world in logical time rules. You don't have federations or tempermental world champions to appease. You are the boss. Do it RIGHT. Good luck.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-07-10 02:04:36)
Vacation and reflection time

Hi John, Glen & Heinz-Georg. Thanks for all suggestions... ;)

Some responses, particularly about vacation (towards a compromise ?) :

* 30 days + 2 days/move : Not "beautiful" (not a joke, it is design matter)

* 30 days max for one move : Not convinced it can really bring something... if a player want to last a CC game, I think no reasonable rule (without human factor) can prevent him to do so.

* 14 days + 1 day/move (rapid) : As players don't know exactly when tournaments will start, I think 30 days at start (ie. compared : email tournaments often start before the real date) is a good choice to avoid accidental forfeits during holidays !

* 2 weeks annual leave : Even for different time controls, I'm not favourable to make too many different rules.. 30 days (for all games per year) is a balanced choice IMO.

* Vacation : Ok, I make note of this. I was not favourable to any leave system, cause it's obviously a way to have days more in time trouble, even if time is frozen ! .. That's why I made it "hard" to use.. If players can stop their leave when they want, just by playing a move, it becomes easier to manage time trouble situations. The 60 days rule for 1 move was a solution avoiding vacation IMO but we discussed it already... Now I'm to decide to change the vacation rule, as John (& you) urged me. I thought it was a good thing not to prevent players to make moves during the leave... Maybe most think different, ok... However I have a problem yet with vacation as it's really a way to get more reflection time... Here is what I suggest, simply a harder rule : Players who take days leave CAN'T play during their vacation and CAN'T take days back (stopping their leave by playing a move) ! Then 2 options, players must wait their vacation end date to play again, or they can play, but provoking the cancellation of their leave (loosing the days leave taken and not used yet).. Maybe it won't be appreciated in some particular cases if players have to modify their plans, but the aim is clearly to reduce the vacation effect on the game... What do you think ?


Rodrigo Jaroszewski    (2006-07-10 10:23:56)
Materazzi

I was watching a few days ago the "best moments" of Marco Materazzi on YouTube. I can only say that, if you ever watch it, you'll know why I saw that one comming. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7HblsV-urHg&search=materazzi


Dinesh De Silva    (2006-07-10 11:37:06)
Re: Marco Materazzi.......

Rodrigo, Thanks for the link! I watched it just now. "The truth is out there" about the past (mis)deeds of Marco Materazzi for all to see.


Glen D. Shields    (2006-07-10 15:21:09)
Sounds good ....

Thibault - thanks for the feedback and your openess to make changes in the vacation rules.

It's important to get some of these rules right while the player list is still relatively small and the players are still geting use to playing at FICGS. It will be harder to make rule changes in the future.

The 100 day maximum you set on accumulated time establishes FICGS as the trend setter in how to manage modern correspondence chess games. Excellent decision! Much of the problems people talk about in time control are prevented by the addition of this rule.

I'm sure you are aware the IECG has a 30 day maximum per move and the ICCF a 40 day maximum. The IECG limit is firm. You exceed 30 days once you lose. The ICCF's rule is unclear and unevenly managed. You reach 40 days, you need to beg the TD to do something. Sometimes he helps, sometimes he doesn't. Not a good situation.

Whatever limit you set at FICGS, I recommend you keep it firm and automatic like IECG. Personally I prefer 30 days, you prefer 60. IMHO 30 days is plenty of time to make a move is someone is serious about playing. 60 days is too long to wait. My preference is to make the rules enjoyable for those who want to play, not for those who sign up and then get "busy" and rudely make their opponents sit and wait. IMHO you'll attract and keep a better membership base by making the rules player friendly, not player annoying.

Thanks again. My best to you.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-07-10 15:51:29)
Zidane / Materazzi... provocations

Les esprits sont encore à vifs après ce moment fort du sport...

Un fil sur un événement extérieur aux échecs ou au Go ne me parait pas de trop ici, c'est une manière comme une autre d'échanger, personne n'est obligé de lire.

Je suis d'accord sur le fond avec Henri, même si la forme est un peu rude... Je suis d'accord sur le fond avec Marc pour le signaler, mais la forme est clairement TROP rude.

Nous ne sommes pas sur un terrain de football, mais un minimum de bon sens sur la forme est bienvenu où que ce soit, peu importe les sujets abordés ici et le fond du propos ! .. le coup de tête de Zidane était de trop, quelle qu'en soit la raison et ce post aussi.

J'espère que cet échange s'arrêtera ici, en tout cas sous cette forme, sans quoi j'aurai le grand bonheur de devoir modérer... :(

Bonne journée à tous...


Salvatore Cuomo    (2006-07-12 09:01:54)
Materazzi provocations.

"Materazzi Provocations".... Siete patetici ed antisportivi. Non sapete perdere e non avete il senso della misura. Zinedine Zidane non è nuovo a queste imprese, di testate agli avversari ne ha date parecchie, è un suo vizio. Ne ha date quando giocava nella Juventus e quando gioave nel Real Madrid. La cosa essenziale, in ogni caso, è che avete perso: fatevene una ragione. Salvatore Cuomo


Dinesh De Silva    (2006-07-12 14:50:41)
Re: " What Materazzi said "

World renowned lip-reading experts are in agreement as to what Materazzi has said to Zidane, which provoked Zidane's headbutt. This was in the news the last few days. What Materazzi has said is horrible! FIFA has opened an investigation into this.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-07-20 05:51:19)
Bug fixed

Eh bien non, ce n'était pas un pirate mais un simple hasard improbable dans un océan de mathématiques... Le bug est corrigé. Merci pour le retour !


Glen D. Shields    (2006-07-22 19:50:51)
Interesting Discussion Topic

Thibault - this is a interesting discussion topic. Of course, no one knows the future with certainty, but we can all offer an opinion :)

I'm nearing my 40th year of correspondence play. Sometime later this year I will complete my 1000th tournament game. All my games were played by postcard until the mid 90's. E-mail dominated my CC schedule from about 1998 until 2002. Now I only play server chess. I've played on the FICGS, IECG, GameKnot, ChessFriend, Schemingmind and ICCF servers.

Contrary to many people who've played as long as I have, I do NOT see chess engines as a threat to the game. I think they've changed the game, but not hurt the game. I believe they've increasd CC's popularity and game quality. The same is true for opening and ending databases.

Some of the changes that will occur in CC the next ten years:

- Servers will improve functionality and ease of use.

- Due to engine use we will grow to accept 2200 as an "average" rating rather than "Master."

- Tournaments will be re-structured to include fewer players per section and shorter tournament durations. This particularly applies to ICCF where 15 player sections and slow time rules to simulate postal chess are used.

- New server functionality will be added to allow players the option to SLOW down the game. It's too easy to get caught in a mindless "server flurry."

- New chess software will be developed to analyze games. This analysis tool will give proability estimates on what engine one's opponent is using. That information will allow one to counter and plan against one's opponent.

- There will be more anti-computer books written and theories developed. We will use these techniques to beat our opponent and and improve our chess planning skills.

Bottomline ... I am excited by the new technology. I see continued advances in the way we manage our gameload, the way we send moves, the way we play, plan and analyze our moves. The way we play in the future will be different and will still be fun for those who embrace new technology. My disappointment is I am an old man and unlikely to enjoy all the advantages the future brings. I hope those who follow me enjoy what I will miss :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-07-23 19:54:58)
Chess thematic tournaments

Hello to all.

The 7th chess thematic tournament (waiting list is open) may be a very interesting challenge...

The opening : 1.Nf3 Nf6 2.d4 Ng8 3.e4 Nf6 4.Nc3 Ng8

Is it a lost position or not, you can try to respond ! (it is at least very hypermodern style, but is there a name for such a manoeuvre ? :))

There are many other ideas of openings, but you can make suggestions for future thematic tournaments.

Previous ones :

FICGS__CHESS__THEMATIC_TOURNAMENT__000001
King's gambit (winner : Josef riha)

FICGS__CHESS__THEMATIC_TOURNAMENT__000002
Wing's gambit

FICGS__CHESS__THEMATIC_TOURNAMENT__000003
Benko gambit

FICGS__CHESS__THEMATIC_TOURNAMENT__000004
Orang-utan

FICGS__CHESS__THEMATIC_TOURNAMENT__000005
Danish gambit

FICGS__CHESS__THEMATIC_TOURNAMENT__000006
Scotch gambit


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-07-24 13:03:25)
Future of correspondence chess......

That's a fine analysis, Glen.

However, it's legitimate to consider that chess at a higher level is becoming much harder so that some of the very best players may stop their career, thinking that it's no worth the energy anymore, for results more influenced by 'chance' in statistics...

How many "super-grandmasters" (2700+) said that each point over this mark represents more and more work ?

It's probably the same (and more) in correspondence chess. I do think that it's still possible to improve a lot ! .. but there's a lack of a higher class of players. That's a pity the very best correspondence chess players (ie. former ICCF world champions : Joop van Oosterom, Gert Jan Timmerman...) retire or at least don't defend their title since they achieved it. Of course it's a lot of time, but result is the top class appear to be bigger and there's no clear champion. That's not good IMO to popularize correspondence chess.

All games need champions. I read recently on a Go forum that the success of Chess nowadays was due to his champions (Go is not popular yet in the west because there's noone to represent it, except a manga [Hikaru No Go]..), Garry Kasparov, Bobby Fischer... That's true IMO, and that's what particularly misses to correspondence chess. Maybe things won't change in ICCF (maybe I should pretend to the board :)), but anyway that's why I chose the knockout system for the FICGS world chess championship, and the possibility for the winner to play a final against a challenger. We'll see...


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-07-24 15:52:50)
TCCMB exhibition match

Hello to all.

I couldn't resist.. chess and hormones, an explosive cocktail :)

The whole story - http://www.ficgs.com/game_2222.html


... and of course on The Correspondence Chess Message Board :
http://pub11.bravenet.com/forum/924995304


Have fun ! :)


Dirk Jan Van Dijl    (2006-07-24 18:59:04)
Copyright issues

Indeed, moves are free, but not necessarily the comments, question marks, exclamation marks etc.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-07-25 01:51:34)
Handicap moves

That's an idea... Actually I don't think many players (benefiting of the handicap moves) with a 200 points lower rating would be interested, cause it's quite "risky" to play with an advantage. If you win, that's just normal, if you loose (even draw): that's a big defeat.

Such matches may be interesting for both masters (2400+) and amateurs (1600-), maybe even in a simultaneous context, so that draws could satisfy everyone.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-07-26 20:46:02)
New profile feature : Photos :)

Just added this new feature in 'Preferences'. You can now upload a photo... (JPG format, 100 ko max)

Thanks to Dinesh for the idea (indirectly). By the way, for live video chat you can use other services... :) (we are still there to play chess ;))


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-07-28 02:31:50)
Blogs !

Everyday a new feature, I keep in the rhythm ;)

You may have noticed this link ('see the players blog') at the top of the forum page. A new interface that simply looks like the forum, but built like a blogs website.

You may want to relate your Chess life or Go philosophy, your games or whatever.. you can do it there.

Like in the forum, links are automatically parsed. The html < br > tag to begin a new line. Comments by everyone are also available.


Pablo Schmid    (2006-07-28 21:39:19)
..

Je ne sais pas quelle partie n'aurait pas compté. Mais avec mon ELO actuel à 1736 max, il faudrait que j'ai battu un adversaire en dessous de 1386 ce qui n'est pas le cas. Enfin bon au pire tampis c'est pas dramatique.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-08-01 11:52:23)
PGN format

Hello Mark.

The correct move was Nbd2 ... "1" is useless in Nb1d2, as "b" is enough to know what knight is moving. If the knight had taken a piece, the notation would have been Nbxd2 ...

I suggest you to familiarize with PGN format (Portable Game Notation). You can check the link below.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portable_Game_Notation

The best way is to look at many PGN games...


Marc Lacrosse    (2006-08-02 22:14:10)
Request for adjudication & rules

In game *** my opponent has a completely lost position for more than 2 months by now and refuses to resign.
How long will he require that I play child-level uninteresting moves?
I announce mate in 8 moves and request adjudication against this completely disgraceful way of playing.
I am evidently able to prove the win.
I already said how I felt this kind of proceeding to be completely disgusting.

If my requirement is not fulfilled I will leave this site being the first master-class tournament winner.

Nice...

Marc


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-08-02 23:07:36)
Adjudication, forced mate & rules

Hello Marc.

According to the rules, the game has been adjudicated.

I think this is a good moment to discuss this adjudication rule.. (see 11.5 - http://www.ficgs.com/membership.html)

Surely it can be improved, but how.. I'd like to have players opinion on what cases (position + time) should be adjudicated or not, so that we find a better & fair compromise.

Any ideas ?

Thibault


Marc Lacrosse    (2006-08-02 23:52:15)
Adjudication

Thanks Thibault.

I was not aware of the 11.5 rule which is very good IMHO and I am very glad that you agreed to apply it in my game.
I think this is a good rule "as is" and it does not need to be changed.

To Graham : Sure you are right.

But it's the same in OTB play : almost nobody waits until the final mate move.
However when one disgracefully requires you go until mate has effectively been done, you just have to wait for less than a few hours at most.
In my case the win was evident for more than two months and my opponent still meticulously waited until he only had a few hours left...
Did he wish to wait for a new rating,did he wish to have won other games to take the lead in the tournament : I really don't know (and I truly cannot fully understand)...
In any case the rules were respected...
Maybe this could be an additional argument for limiting the maximum amount of accumulated thinking time ?

Marc


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-08-03 20:30:44)
Update of the 11.5 rule

A small update of the 11.5 rule, that should clarify some ambiguous cases (referee calls are stored) :

"In some cases, the game continues but the result is obvious. If a player doesn't want to resign (or accept draw) and obviously last the game, his opponent may report to referee a first time. If the player takes 30 days more to finish the game, his opponent may call referee another time, then the game will be adjudicated. An analysis submitted by a player should contain sufficient information so that no doubt is possible. This may include a sequence of moves, but in some circumstances it may be sufficient to claim a win or a draw on the basis of material or positional advantage. Final decision belongs to referee."


Gino Figlio    (2006-08-04 02:55:44)
tricks

Hi Thibault,

Players use tricks to distract the opponent when they suspect they are losing, one of them is offering draws many times, another trick is to delay the game.

I am afraid this rule can be used as another trick by a player losing the game, but still able to call the referee and claim a draw.

If you allow them to do this once a month, even better for them.

I suggest using more strict criteria to call the referee: obvious checkmate or tablebase win...otherwise this rule may be abused to distract the opponent...

Best,

Gino


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-08-04 12:02:56)
tricks

Hi Gino.

You may be right... However many cases (ie. clear material advantages, draws in closed positions) couldn't be considered. I think we can try this rule as is, if it's not sufficient I'll add some criterias or abuse cases.

Note : This rule also works for Go game (and all games on FICGS)!

I think that's an interesting rule, as the "human decision" (I agree with you it must be avoided as much as possible) finally is provoked by the player who obviously lasts the game.


Dinesh De Silva    (2006-08-07 22:23:56)
Suggestion (sponsors)

Thibault, Are you looking at the possibility of getting some sponsors for this FICGS website in the near future?! If it materialises, it'll be a win-win situation for all.


Dinesh De Silva    (2006-08-09 07:47:30)
Re: download

Hey, Graham When you click the game number, it takes you to a page where there's a "download" link down at the bottom. When you click it, the game file will download in pgn format. ( Yes, altogether it would be two clicks. If you mistakenly click it for a third time, you'll launch a nuclear bomb! Haha! Just kidding ).


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-08-10 11:56:01)
Vacances

Bonjour Samy.

Je confirme que le temps des parties ne s'écoule pas (un simple refresh le démontre)... Et je vois qu'il y a "zeitnot" en effet dans certaines parties. La partie perdue au temps l'a été visiblement juste avant que ces vacances soient prises (et sera adjugée automatiquement)... Désolé, la cadence rapide n'est pas si facile à tenir, je le constate moi même.


Jaimie Wilson    (2006-08-11 16:10:55)
Unrated miniatures

I read that games are not rated for the winner if less than 10 moves have been played by his opponent (most probably forfeit or obvious cheating). So if my opponent plays brilliantly, lures me into a catastrophic error and mates me on move 9, then he or she would not get any rating benefit.


Graham Wyborn    (2006-08-13 17:32:35)
(download) in Go games!

Recently started playing Go. Similar problem to (download) in chess. If I hoover over the Go (download) button, the ballon reads, "Download this game in PGN format". If I press it, it tries to download game into my chess database!
Can you help? You solved it last time, can you do it again?


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-08-17 21:57:51)
Ratings FIDE / ICCF

Hello Benjamin.

These players probably have an established correspondence chess rating over 2000 at ICCF or IECG. Players can't be forced to specify their FIDE rating, but they can do it in the 'player informations' text area.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-08-20 21:59:53)
TCCMB exhibition match

Game over, John did it well !

http://www.ficgs.com/game_2222.html

I hoped a miracle until the end. The trap did not work, 28.Qd8+ and it was probably a draw... After 28.Qf8+ ! .. I only can resign. Lots of fun :)

I'll look at the next chess thematic tournament (same opening) with interest...

Thanks to John Knudsen for this nice game !


Marc Lacrosse    (2006-08-22 12:04:09)
Thematic Blackmar

Hi Thibault

I think you should go one move further for the Blackmar thematic tourney (2..dxe4).
In the present definition you will get loads of French and Caro-Kann defences through 2..e6 or 2..c6 !

:-)))

Marc


Dinesh De Silva    (2006-08-22 12:32:21)
Re: Thematic Blackmar......

Hey, Marc & Thibault! Look at this: 1. d4 d5 2. e4 dxe4 3. Nc3 c6 4. Nxe4 Bf5/Nd7/Nf6 (It's still a Caro-Kahn!). OR 1. d4 d5 2. e4 dxe4 3. Nc3 e6 4. Nxe4 Nf6/Nd7 (It's still a French Defence!). Haha!


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-08-22 14:36:59)
Re: Thematic Blackmar......

Hi Marc & Dinesh... You're right. Anyway it's too late, already 5 (!) players in the waiting list. So we'll see...


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-08-22 14:55:18)
How to know future rating

Hello to all.

A reminder about future rating and personal statistics... You can check it by going into Preferences, click on the picture just after your chess rating, a new window will appear, then click on "elo"... Several pages with different informations will be displayed.

You can check these informations for any player, by clicking on this pic in the rating list.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-08-22 16:48:47)
Thematic Blackmar : 1 day !

Obviously, you were interested in playing Blackmar thematic tournament. The waiting list has been completed in only 1 day :)

I'll try to find more openings like this one...


Benjamin Aldag    (2006-08-22 17:48:09)
I prefer the following Gambit

Ok, here my idea, for one of the following thematic tourneys.

The Goering Gambit:

1.e4 e5
2.Nf3 Nc6
3.d4 exd4
4.c3 dxc3
5.Nxc3

This Gambit is full of great tactical play.

Benny


Benjamin Aldag    (2006-08-22 19:18:37)
New Thematic - Tourney Trompowsky !

Hi,

since 3 days i have the Chessbase DVD "The Trompowsky - The easy way" (http://www.chessbase.com/shop/product.asp?pid=249&user=&coin=). Thank you for starting a thematic tornament with the Trompowsky-Opening. The right time, to test my knowledge about the DVD.

Benny


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-08-22 19:52:28)
Thematic tournaments & King's gambit

Danish gambit and scotch gambit have been played already. (not far)

FICGS__CHESS__THEMATIC_TOURNAMENT__000005
FICGS__CHESS__THEMATIC_TOURNAMENT__000006

I'll keep the idea...

Where did you see that king's gambit is not playable ??? Disproved doesn't mean anything IMO... (& this is probably the most known chess 'troll' :))


Benjamin Aldag    (2006-08-22 20:12:07)
Disproved

Ok,

i got my knowledge by GM Roman Dzindzihasvili's Video-Tapes, some studys and a lot of played games of Kings Gambit. Latvian isn't good too. I think, with a good computer and a good knowledge about kings gambit, the minimum what black can reach is a draw. If white play latvian, black will win ever. Latvian Gambit is so easy to calculate with a computer. Black has from the beginning on, no move-options.

But we can try both desasters in a thematic-tourney.

Benny


Benjamin Aldag    (2006-08-26 01:37:37)
"NEW" Opening Idea !

Hello,

i would be very happy, to see the following line in a thematic opening tourney:

1.e4 e5
2.Nf3 Nc6
3.Bc4 Bc5
4.c3 Nf6
5.d4 exd4
6.cxd4 Bb4+
7.Nc3 Nxe4
8.0-0 0-0!

ok folks, i am searching for this line in my database and found just a handfull games, played by low rated players. I am searching in many books for this line, but i found nothing ! I've analysed this line and i believe, this line is good for BLACK ! What do you think about this line ??? Do you see more than me ? Do you have any GM-Commentary about this line ? Maybe in an ebook or something else ? Please help me to find the answer, why this line is never played by some very good players. It would be helpful, to start a thematic-tourney'bout this nice line.

Benny


Don Burden    (2006-08-26 18:51:54)
Opening Idea

I'd say it is a fairly big advantage to black. He's a solid pawn up and threatens to win another. Found two games in my database with higher rated players:

[Event "ICCF MN/12 corr"]
[Site "ICCF corr"]
[Date "1995.06.30"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Majewski, Jan"]
[Black "Chorvat, Marian"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "C54"]
[WhiteElo "2335"]
[BlackElo "2305"]
[PlyCount "122"]
[EventDate "1995.??.??"]
[Source "www.chesslib.no"]
[SourceDate "2006.04.01"]

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4. c3 Nf6 5. d4 exd4 6. cxd4 Bb4+ 7. Nc3 Nxe4 8. O-O O-O 9. d5 Bxc3 10. bxc3 Ne7 11. Re1 Nf6 12. d6 Nf5 13. Ba3 Nxd6 14. Bxd6 cxd6 15. Qxd6 Ne8 16. Qd5 Nf6 17. Qd6 Ne8 18. Qd2 d6 19. Ng5 Nf6 20. Rad1 d5 21. Bb3 h6 22. Ne4 Bg4 23. Nxf6+ Qxf6 24. f3 Qb6+ 25. Qd4 Be6 26. Bxd5 Bxd5 27. Qxb6 axb6 28. Rxd5 Rxa2 29. f4 Rc8 30. Rd3 Rc2 31. Ree3 Ra8 32. h4 Raa2 33. Rg3 Rd2 34. Rde3 Kf8 35. Re4 b5 36. Re5 Rab2 37. Rc5 b4 38. Rc8+ Ke7 39. cxb4 Rxb4 40. Rxg7 Rxf4 41. Rh7 Rf6 42. Kh2 Ke6 43. h5 Rd5 44. g4 Rd4 45. Kg3 Rd3+ 46. Kg2 Rd6 47. Re8+ Kd7 48. Rf8 Ke7 49. Rhh8 Ke6 50. Re8+ Kd5 51. Re7 b6 52. Rf8 Rf4 53. Kg3 Rdf6 54. Rc8 Rf3+ 55. Kg2 Rf2+ 56. Kg1 R2f4 57. Rg8 b5 58. Re3 b4 59. Kg2 Kd4 60. Rb3 Rb6 61. Kg3 Rf1 0-1

[Event "ICCF MN/12 corr"]
[Site "ICCF corr"]
[Date "1995.06.30"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Mathias, Manfred"]
[Black "Chorvat, Marian"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "C54"]
[WhiteElo "2370"]
[BlackElo "2305"]
[PlyCount "110"]
[EventDate "1995.??.??"]
[Source "www.chesslib.no"]
[SourceDate "2006.04.01"]

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4. c3 Nf6 5. d4 exd4 6. cxd4 Bb4+ 7. Nc3 Nxe4 8. O-O O-O 9. d5 Bxc3 10. bxc3 Ne7 11. Re1 Nf6 12. d6 Nf5 13. dxc7 Qxc7 14. Qb3 d5 15. Bd3 Be6 16. Rb1 b6 17. Qc2 g6 18. Bb2 Ne8 19. Re2 Neg7 20. Rbe1 Rfe8 21. Qd2 Nd6 22. c4 dxc4 23. Qc3 f6 24. Bxg6 hxg6 25. Qxf6 Qf7 26. Rxe6 Qxf6 27. Rxf6 Rxe1+ 28. Nxe1 Re8 29. Nf3 Re2 30. Be5 Nf7 31. Bd4 Re6 32. Kf1 Rxf6 33. Bxf6 b5 34. Bc3 Ne6 35. h4 Nf4 36. a3 Nd5 37. Bb4 a6 38. g3 Kg7 39. Ke2 Kf6 40. Ba5 Nd6 41. g4 Nb7 42. Bd2 a5 43. Bg5+ Kg7 44. Ne5 c3 45. Kd3 b4 46. Kc4 Nb6+ 47. Kd4 Nc5 48. axb4 axb4 49. f3 Nd5 50. Nc4 Ne6+ 51. Kd3 Nxg5 52. hxg5 b3 53. Na3 Kf7 54. f4 c2 55. Nxc2 Nxf4+ 0-1



Ryaad Aabid    (2006-08-27 14:33:55)
CheckMate = Not lost yet

FICGS__CHESS__CLASS_C__000006 (type : rated round-robin , increment : 40 days / 10 moves) Game 972 Hi! The mentioned game is still at my games list ! Thanks for your attention. Ryaad


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-08-27 14:49:29)
CheckMate = Not lost yet

Hello Ryaad.

"Reminder : Chess games are not adjudicated automatically if a player is checkmated. You still have to resign (rules)."

Kind regards.


Julien Baudement    (2006-08-29 19:44:00)
Go (re ->Thibault de Vassal)

Ou bien il bluffe, ou bien il est très fort car il m'a assez rapidement demandé si je connaissait les règles ! Pourtant, je n'avais pas particulièrement l'impression de jouer mal !! Une petite question technique, comme dans lesègles usuelles, après qu'on ait pass 2x, on décompte les points, c'es fait automatiquement ?


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-08-31 01:51:59)
Go (re -> Julien)

Points are not counted automatically in Go games (not possible), even after both players pass... Players may discuss the score by passing more than 2 times, but in all cases one of them has to resign to end the game (or call referee in case of disagreement)...

About your Go games, I saw you use a personal strategy quite far from theory (basically corners, bands, then center)... Original one, but it will be hard, undoublty :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-08-31 03:16:24)
New best game...

Finally, we have a new "best game", after about 2 months of clear domination by chess game 342...

Game 2198, from the scotch gambit chess thematic tournament, is a funny King's hunt :)


Marius Zubac    (2006-09-01 16:19:35)
Title norms page update

Hi, My question is how and when is the title norms information page (from player's statistics) get updated. Thanks


Dirk Ghysens    (2006-09-05 12:16:53)
Time control in thematics

How about time controls in thematic tournaments? Suppose the first 12 moves are "given": are there still 40 days for the first 10 moves then?


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-09-05 12:42:18)
Time control in thematics + Winning time

Hello Dirk & Ulrich

That's a good remark ! .. The program wouldn't add these first 40 days in thematic tournaments, as move 10 has already been played. Anyway that's fair IMO and not so important with this slow time control.

Ulrich, the answer is yes, the faster you play, the more time you save for the rest of the game...


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-09-05 16:21:34)
Tournament winners & leaders displayed !

Hello to all.

Tournament winners & leaders (2 at most) are now displayed in all tournament categories. Just click 'Tournaments' and see...

These informations are not displayed in real time, but will be updated at least every 2 months (while chess rating calculation)

All comments welcome.


Heinz-Georg Lehnhoff    (2006-09-05 17:03:50)
Time to display all informations

35 seconds - but the page is great


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-09-05 17:04:09)
Translation : Draw proposal

Hello Karlheinz !

Humm... Babelfish just told me it could (very) approximatively mean : "Your opponent offered a draw".

I still do not speak a single word in German... :/

Thanks for your help.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-09-05 17:07:17)
Time to display all informations

Hmm.. That's a real problem :/

Could you tell me more about your processor / browser / internet speed ?
(by email if you prefer)

Thanks !


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-09-05 17:40:48)
Time to display all informations

Do you know your computer (processor) speed ? That's very slow...


Heinz-Georg Lehnhoff    (2006-09-05 17:52:21)
Time to display all informations

Pentium 4, 3 GHz

I have closed all "working" applications (Word, Excel), but the time is the same.

How much time takes your browser?


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-09-05 18:08:35)
Time to display all informations

....... don't laugh :)

More than 60 seconds. I have a timeout, so I can't even load the whole page !

Reason is first a ~33kbps connection (no adsl where I live), then a slow computer, for internet only.. :))

This is prehistory here ;)


Heinz-Georg Lehnhoff    (2006-09-05 18:26:38)
Time to display all informations

No reason to laugh. Excuse my question! I hope you don't have to develop these wonderful programs at this computer ... Or with what have you earned this punishment?


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-09-05 19:27:54)
Time to display all informations

Of course not. I have other computers... But slow connections have advantages : Finally I just can't loose too much time on the internet this way, watching 'youtube' videos or hunting divx & mp3 on edonkey, bit torrent...

So, convinced ? .. do we exchange ? :)


Heinz-Georg Lehnhoff    (2006-09-05 23:13:06)
Time to display all informations

... watching videos, hunting for divX and mp3? What's that all? No time! I had to find the next move in the game no 1


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-09-06 03:41:02)
Time to display all informations

It seems complications did not begin yet... :)

Heinz-Georg, could you try a last time to load the tournament (with boards) page ? It should run 'a bit' faster now... Thanks !


Heinz-Georg Lehnhoff    (2006-09-06 09:04:10)
Time to display all informations

~ 15 seconds now.

I suspect the program uses most of the time to collect the information from the database tables. If I save the page it needs less than 400 kilobytes.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-09-06 13:21:27)
Time to display all informations

Actually, it's only due to recursive call s to other files...

I firstly thought this slowness was caused by browsers because of all the pictures to display. I was wrong... Now the program is less "beautiful", but it works much faster, don't you think ? ;)




Heinz-Georg Lehnhoff    (2006-09-06 14:16:25)
Time to display all informations

yes, it is much faster than the first version.

Two remarks:

- The reflection time also is shown if the game is already ended - and the time goes on.
- What does it mean if a text stands above the diagram? Example: in the game 1626 (FICGS__CHESS__WCH_STAGE_1_GROUP_12__000001) I can read "ok".


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-09-06 14:42:30)
Time to display all informations

It's all corrected. Thanks for your help !


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-09-06 15:43:12)
FIDE WCH : Kramnik vs. Topalov

Do you believe it ? .. now it's most probably almost sure :-)

We'll have a new FIDE-Classical world champion in a few weeks !

A reminder : This will be a 12-games match, taking place from September 21 to October 13 in the capital of Kalmykia (whose president is FIDE president : Kirsan Ilyumzhinov himself), Elista. In case of equality, four rapid games will be played, if equality again two blitz games will be played and finally a sudden death blitz game. The prize fund of one million US dollars will be equally divided between Vladimir Kramnik and Veselin Topalov, whatever the result. The looser won't play the next world championship tournament (quite strange).

Anyway, that's a great thing for chess, even if I'm not very optimistic for the next FIDE world championship cycles, particularly if the world champion has to play a knockout tournament, instead of a classical 12 or 24 games match...

My favourite in this match is still Kramnik because of his style, but Topalov is really getting stronger IMO... It will be a hard match !

Any predictions about the result & games ? .. Will Vladimir Kramnik play his Berlin defense in the Ruy Lopez again...


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-09-06 23:44:33)
Vladimir Kramnik vs. Peter Leko

Hi Dinesh.

I still can't explain myself this incredible outcome in Brissago. First, this "extraordinary" Marshall gambit, Leko leading the whole match... At last Kramnik winning the very last game. Then Peter Leko smiling, just saying (~) : "I'm glad about my play." .. and that's finished.

It just reminded me the second match Kasparov vs. Deep Blue ...

Anyway, it's always time to be paranoid :-)


Dinesh De Silva    (2006-09-07 06:40:18)
Re:

I'm almost certain that Kram. will dump the 1.e4 opening, as his only Achille's Heel seems to be all out tactics (which Top. is brilliant at), and some blunders (but that was when he was ill). Regarding Leko.......he might fancy his chances if he meets Kram. again, but I don't see any sorta match up, as Anand is waiting in the wings to have a shot at either Kram. or Top.


Charlie Neil    (2006-09-07 09:02:54)
Krammik vs Topalov

Krammik will play 1.Nf3 with his 1st 5 games with white and as Topalov is dozing off.....POW! It's going to be a tense match. A clash of styles I'd say. But it is all good for chess. We need an undisputed OTB champion again, it can only be good for chess. ( A million dollars for the best of twelve games.....I think I'll go and buy myself a database....:-)


Dinesh De Silva    (2006-09-07 14:11:14)
Re:

Thibault, regarding your question..... I was 3rd in that Candidates Final. I was just 1/2 point short of getting into the top 2 and automatically qualifying for the FINAL. But as the first placed Nigel Robson is also qualified by another cycle, and as my rating is quite high now, I might get a chance to play in the FINAL there.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-09-08 18:10:52)
Chess tournament : Zero-sum or not ?

While discussing about Sun Tzu's "The Art of War", and the question "Is the best player always the champion ?" (of course not IMO) , I was argued that any chess tournament "was" (actually could be "reduced to") a zero-sum game :

"In 1944 John von Neumann and Oskar Morgenstern proved that any zero-sum game involving n players is in fact a generalised form of a zero-sum game for two persons, and that any non-zero-sum game for n players can be reduced to a zero-sum game for n + 1 players; the (n + 1) player representing the global profit or loss. This suggests that the zero-sum game for two players forms the essential core of mathematical game theory."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero_sum_game

It seems to me that it's out of topic, but I couldn't say exactly why... In my opinion, a tournament is nearer life than game, at least quite far from it. Much more rules, often complex ones, and results that depend on many parameters you couldn't influence...

The word "champion" depends on accurate rules (the best player could finish 2nd, even if he wins all games ie. in an open tournament..), the "best player" depends on general opinion (most commonly through ratings), ie. Topalov vs. Kasparov ...

What do you think ? :-)


Where the discussion started from :

http://www.gamasutra.com/features/20060907/sirlin_01.shtml

I agree with many points about how to win, but the use of some words seems to be dubious...

I like much this quote :

"I was surprised to see that Capablanca did not initiate any active maneuvers and instead adopted a waiting game. In the end, his opponent made an imprecise move; the Cuban won a second pawn and soon the game. “Why didn’t you try to convert your material advantage straight away?” I ventured to ask the great chess virtuoso. He smiled indulgently. “It was more practical to wait.” "

—Mikhail Botvinnik, 6th World Chess Champion


Dinesh De Silva    (2006-09-10 16:19:37)
Re: Money Tournaments.......

I'm optimistic! Probably double-player matches might be more popular than multi-player tournaments in Money Tournaments category, as it gives a better chance to win. Some players might play it for fun too, if GMs could be challenged for a fee. Many possibilities why it'll be a success.


Ulrich Imbeck    (2006-09-10 22:54:54)
Not only the opening

With normal openings that you like only the personal power matters. Don't pay attention to such bullshit openings. It is worth to think about 1.b4, 1.g4 or 1.a3. These 3 examples are the border.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-09-11 00:26:57)
1.b4

Hello Ulrich.

1.b4 is not bad enough :) The idea is to organize ie. money matches (with only 1 game) & tournaments where draws can't happen. So it's important to have about 50% chances at a high level.

Just an idea.

Maybe normal start positions with a pawn less could work...


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-09-11 13:38:25)
Openings

It could be fair in tournament cases (but without any interest, just a thematic tournament more). But it couldn't have any sense in a 1 game match. That's the problem...


Gino Figlio    (2006-09-11 13:45:43)
OTB idea

Why not for a 1-game match, use the OTB tie-breaking idea of black winning with the draw but starting with less time on the clock, 20% less in a fast time control match?


Dinesh De Silva    (2006-09-11 18:38:45)
Re: Big Chess name.........

Historically speaking, it was a choice of naming such a variant of chess as either FAT CHESS, BULKY CHESS, LARGE CHESS, GIGANTIC CHESS, HUGE CHESS, OH- MY-GOSH! CHESS or BIG CHESS. Finally, it must have been decided that BIG CHESS was the most suitable, politically correct/diplomatic name.


Ron Keyston    (2006-09-12 00:01:50)
Thematic Suggestion: Traxler

I think a Thematic Tournament based on the Traxler Counterattack would be interesting: 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6 4.Ng5 Bc5


Ulrich Imbeck    (2006-09-12 01:07:36)
White to win

What's the matter with 1.e4 d6 2.d4 Lb7 3.Ld3 f5? I think it's won for white. You should look for a position hat would give White 50% chances to win & Black 50% chances draw. Only well known openings can give an experience for a score.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-09-12 01:08:25)
Traxler Counterattack

Hello Ron.

That's an interesting opening... Ok, we'll use it for the next thematic tournament...

Thematic tournaments waiting lists are filled quickly now.. but often by the same players. Maybe we should propose some boring openings too, to help them to have a rest & slow down the rhythm... :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-09-12 03:42:57)
Match FICGS vs. GameKnot

Dear chessfriends, a match FICGS vs. GameKnot may start in a few weeks ! The idea is to oppose players in different rating categories (1200 to 2400+ elo), playing one game with Black on FICGS, one game with White on GameKnot.com ... Please send an email to info (at) ficgs.com (specifying your name) if you're interested. More info in a few days & weeks...

It seems that many players from GameKnot want to play this match, we need a large team ! :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-09-12 12:55:06)
Scoring function for Go

Hello to all.

I'll add in a few days a scoring function for Go games. Players could retire dead groups, then the program just covers the board (line after line & column after column to compare) and adds empty spaces points to the stones that surround it. The aim is to give an evaluation of the position only, not to decide the result automatically.

Just tell me if you have an idea about a better algorithm, as I realize the difficulty of programming Go.

Thanks in advance ! ;)


Rodrigo Jaroszewski    (2006-09-12 13:19:57)
Math... *sigh*

LOL Thibault, I guess it was.

I'm no mathematician (far from it), but I don't think that this theory will turn out to be true anytime in the near future, even in a "predictable" game like chess. Even chess engines depend on the skill of their programmers to find new ways to make their search algorithms become reliable and faster, and tablebase development is still petabytes away from being complete.

Anyway, I guess the future generations will have to tell us if it worked or not. Only God knows what can get in the way of this "gaming nirvana" as they call, and after I heard that it was proven possible that a computer user can subconciously influenciate the way an idle machine performs, I don't feel like trying to impersonate Baba Vanga on this subject! ;)


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-09-12 13:32:36)
Math... *sigh*

... Well.. I forgot my question :-))


Miguel Pires    (2006-09-12 15:08:51)
Match FICGS vs. GameKnot

I wana say they have a lot of strong player signing to play. I hoppe we can create a very strong team


Thomas Gilbreath    (2006-09-14 05:19:28)
Greetings from GameKnot :)

Hello friends, my name is Thomas, and I am the representative from GameKnot. We look forward to playing a match against you! GameKnot has played two matches vs. other sites in the past, and we have enjoyed the competition very much. It is my sincere hope that we can pull this thing off! As FICGS is a newer site with a smaller community than ours, we hope that you guys can field a team of approximately 12-20 players of ALL ratings ranges. We intend to put up at least 2 players in each of 7 ratings classes (U2400, U2200, U2000, U1800, U1600, U1400, and U1200). The rules of the match are currently being negotiated between Thibault and myself, and we would like to commence as soon as possible. I highly encourage the members of FICGS to participate, as these matches are a lot of fun! You guys will get a chance to visit our site, and we yours. Please contact Thibault and sign on! We look forward to seeing you OTB :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-09-14 12:01:30)
Re: Greetings from GameKnot :)

Hi Thomas !

7 players of all levels are ok to play this challenge already. I'm sure we'll complete our team in about a week. And I have no doubt about that, we'll win this match ! :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-09-14 12:12:22)
Re: Latvian Gambit

Hey Benny !

That's ok ! .. Maybe you should try not to register for another thematic tournament (that's not the reason why waiting list is closed right now ;)) before to kill Latvian gambit... :> You're definitely a fanatic ! :)


Jay Melquiades    (2006-09-15 02:43:26)
so i guess...

no steel cage matches then huh? :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-09-15 03:08:36)
Ratings used

It's logical IMO to consider OTB ratings if we all play in OTB conditions, without computer assistance... FIDE or self-estimated OTB ratings should prevail over CC ratings (ICCF, FICGS or so) for the pairings.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-09-15 17:09:17)
Scoring function for Go

The scoring function for Go is now online !

When you are to play your move, there's a (Score) link under the Goban, that leads to the score page. Just enter a stone coordinates (ie. f14) for each group to remove, separated by space or coma, then Submit.

The score is calculated by covering the board horizontally, then vertically... If the two results are near from each other, the estimation may be quite good. Empty points between black stones and white stones are shared !


Here is an example - http://www.ficgs.com/game_814.html

Game 814, removed groups : m19 l16 f13 d11 f7 g4 k4 b5


Scoring method : Horizontally
Black points : 240 White points : 106 Unknown points : 15

* Scoring method : Vertically
Black points : 238 White points : 102 Unknown points : 21


Black wins the game by about 135 points.

Reminder : This program doesn't decide the game, it gives an evaluation only !! .. It's up to the players to discuss the score, then resign.

All feedbacks welcome !


Elmer Valderrama    (2006-09-15 19:59:46)
two moves from the start

Interesting idea, Thibault, for having a winner in just one-game match. (I mean of course giving clear advantage to White from the start in a must-win game (any other result would be failure).

In this same line of thought, I would suggest to give White two consecutive starting moves (no captures allowed), W player chooses which are those two moves ( 0.e4 1.d4 or 0.e4 1.Nf3 or 0.e4 1.Bc4 or why not 0.e4 1.Qh5!? or whatever )

However, in all cases where White is giving a significant advantage at start, I believe, White has a 2/3 (66%) chance to win, and 1/3 (34%) to draw, so that in a match a strong player with White should go the next round. (assuming he has played the best two consecutive moves and then mantained the advantage all the way --although with the current wonderful defending capabilities of the engines it could add some serendipity to the game ;)


Elmer Valderrama    (2006-09-16 10:20:16)
color won't matter

yes, color or turn to move at start has little importance: Black to move, he would play 0.d5 1...Nf6 now is White to make second move 2.Nf3 for example..then Black would have 66% chances to win... (or at least significantly more chances than in the usual starting position)

I mean 66% to win, 33% to draw and 1% to lose ;) (that's 34% to draw and lose)

I think the more moves are given to White(Black) the more advantage he will have, i.e. statistics would be higher to win (like 80%, 19.5% to draw and 0.5% to lose) However all this could be tested in practice, it certainly could add more picant (spice?!) to the game ;)


Elmer Valderrama    (2006-09-16 10:54:22)
2-games matches

The test ground could be 2-games matches between weak v weak, weak v strong, and strong v strong players(*in the ELO sense) : in the first game, the player has odds of two moves, in the second, he must defend the side with two moves down..

This could shed more light into this scheme..


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-09-16 12:24:20)
2-games matches

Well, why not such a thematic tournament soon (after Traxler)... The one with opening :

1.Nf3 Nf6 2.d4 Ng8 3.e4 Nf6 4.Nc3 Ng8

.. is 100% wins for White so far !


Elmer Valderrama    (2006-09-16 15:14:06)
5 moves in fact

..just checked the thematic tournament 0007 on this sequence, and in fact White has 5(!) extra moves at the starting position (as it's his turn after 4.Ng8). No surprise most of the games are 1-0 (there are a couple of 0-1 too)

So 5 moves are too much; same would be for 4, or 3,..to me 2 moves it's a reasonable deal for Black (i.e. if draw Black "wins")


Thomas Gilbreath    (2006-09-16 23:46:58)
Udate from GameKnot:

I just wanted to give you guys a heads up as to the players from my site that are being CONSIDERED for playing in the match. As ratings fluctuate, I have simply rounded and given approximate strength: mateintwo - 2400+ cyrano - 2400+ cairo - 2300+ fmgaigin - 2300+ drdesoto - 2300+ papani - 2300+ harlekin - 2300+ nestorix - 2300+ drunken_rabbit - 2200+ kumpan - 2200+ grandpatzer - 2200+ os5213 - 2200+ carlosmart - 2200+ chrisp - 2100+ nottop - 2100+ gloomy_den - 1900+ thumper - 1700+ gwalchmai - 1600+ tugger - 1600+ yanm - 1500+ mattw - 1500+ patagusto - 1500+ tag1153 - 1400+ cjjpeterson - 1400+ simian9 - 1400+ eqj2 - 1400+ hollcanna - 1300+ dewillget8 - 1200+ mozz - 1200+ These GameKnot players have expressed an interest in playing. More will sign on I'm sure, as I have set Oct 1, 2006 as the sign up deadline. I will put together our team during the first week of October, and will be ready to commence play by the second week of October. During the interim, Thibault and I will finalize the details of the match. I realize that this short list is very master and expert heavy, but have no worries - I will be contacting more of our A, B, C, and D class players and asking them to participate. We look forward to the match:) Thomas


Don Groves    (2006-09-17 08:02:47)
Go rules

Thanks, Thibault, for the information.


Claude Brisson    (2006-09-18 06:49:19)
"pass" move not shown

Hello.
I just passed in a Go game and the "pass" move doesn't appear in the list of moves.
Oh, by the way, couldn't we have a small sgf link for go games?
http://senseis.xmp.net/?SmartGameFormat
It would really be usefull!

Thanks,
Claude.



Henri Muller    (2006-09-18 09:39:42)
match vs gameKnot

I have a great experience to play in Gameknot and can say that ALL( or MIN 95%) players with a rating above 1600 elo uses a chess-engine !!


Marc Lacrosse    (2006-09-18 11:22:31)
Computer use

I completely agree with H Muller.
In most web-based sites where computer use is forbidden most high-rated players do actually use them.
The most intriguing example is the very well organised www.playchess.de (not related to Chessbase server) where there are two different sections with respectively computer use allowed and forbidden : there are much more players in the "computer forbidden" section but almost all high-rated players in this section are cheaters (I was one of them and I left because I began to fell disgusted with this necessity to cheat for not being crushed).
That's why I came here and that's also why I will not in any case join the team for the match against GameKnot (or others) if the rules are not modified.

Marc


Thomas Gilbreath    (2006-09-18 12:55:35)
My friends at FICGS:

I am a little concerned, yet understanding, of your feelings about the possibility of cheating in our proposed match. Please understand that there are two sides to the suspicion coin. For those of you who are not familiar with the GameKnot website, let me assure you that I will only be putting up players who I am familiar with, and who have proven themselves to play honorably. I am a three year veteran of GameKnot, and play on the site daily. I will be selecting my team from players whom I feel confident will conduct themselves within the rules we agree on. The intent of arranging this match is NOT to simply put up all of our master level players and attempt to whitewash you guys 100-0. The intent is to provide as MANY matches of ALL ratings ranges for a fun, competetive match. If we lose every match we will have no hard feelings towards you. As the game results in our proposed match will have no bearing on ratings changes, we view the match as a simple, friendly exercise. So, having said all of that, we hope that FICGS will offer up as many people as possible, and Thibault and myself will pair them with my guys in such a way that is FAIR and equitable to both sides. Should anyone here at FICGS have any questions, please feel free to post them here or in the GameKnot forum (in the GameKnot Related threads). Thanks:) - Thomas


Dinesh De Silva    (2006-09-18 13:32:15)
Re:

Hey, Thomas! That was nicely said. As it's a friendly match, I think the right spirit of sportsmanship will prevail. By the way, why were some players thrown out of GameKnot?!? When you say some of them were a "nuisance", what exactly did they do?!? I don't think a single player of FICGS has so far been thrown out by FICGS officials.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-09-18 14:00:30)
FICGS vs. GameKnot

Thomas :

I agree with you, the match is for fun only, I like the idea whatever the result, even 100-0 :) .. If players use engines, their problem.. we can't avoid the risk totally... I think it's more logical to prohibite databases too or to allow both databases and chess engines, playing "real correspondence chess", and we could have a larger team for sure... Still discussing.


Miguel :

I prefer to avoid to "mail" everyone about the match.. It's clearly announced in the news, so I think most players here are "more CC ones" and don't trust the no use of engines...


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-09-18 14:08:20)
Pass + SGF format

Hello Claude.

Did you really send (confirm) your move ?

About Go SGF format, there's a link (download) at the bottom of the viewer / move page for each game...

Best.


Dinesh De Silva    (2006-09-18 14:31:11)
Re:

Thomas! Thanks for the info. I hope the FICGS vs GAMEKNOT match will be a success! Hope there'll be some very exciting games!


James Stripes    (2006-09-18 15:56:13)
27 years ago

When I first played correspondence chess, books were encouraged and the few chess engines in existence were garbage. Good quality engines and comprehensive databases have changed the nature of correspondence play. Nearly everyone permits databases (electronic books), although endgame tablebases are less clear. Engines are permitted some places, while banned others. This site is my first foray into CC where engine use is permitted, but I've played at dozens of sites where I can use databases. (I don't believe I've ever reached a position in which tablebases would be useful, except a few elementary positions that any average player could win against Kramnik.) These inter-site matches, it seems to me, nurture connections across the broad community of correspondence players--a rapidly expanding coterie of chess aficionados thanks to the likes of GameKnot and similar sites.


Ilmars Cirulis    (2006-09-19 10:16:32)
2 players match...

Is it possible to challenge a player to match? Or not yet? Thanks, Cirulis


Henri Muller    (2006-09-19 12:53:49)
match GameKnot-FICGS

Hello Dirk (Ghysens ) Accordingly with you, there are exceptions - I said that 95% players from GameKnot used computers ! Therefore not 100% !!


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-09-19 13:14:35)
2 players match...

Hello Ilmars.

No, it's really too early yet :/ .. Some waiting lists are quite long to fill. Sorry about that...


Jaimie Wilson    (2006-09-19 14:28:46)
match GameKnot-FICGS

Here at FICGS, real names have to be supplied. This gives FICGS a human element that encourages honour and sportsmanship and in my opinion gives this site a clear edge over its rivals.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-09-19 14:40:42)
match GameKnot-FICGS

That is the case. GameKnot players who already registered will play under their real name.

Now, there are 12 players in FICGS team.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-09-19 15:03:13)
Computer use on GameKnot......

I just read GameKnot forum about the FICGS vs. GameKnot match :

http://gameknot.com/fmsg/chess3/3860.shtml

It seems to me this question of computer use on GameKnot is quite out of topic (and on the wrong forum)... I proposed to GameKnot rep (Thomas) to prohibite any computer assistance (engines + databases) for the match or to simply authorize it, as I think more players from FICGS would play, and surely players from GameKnot too... Then everyone is free to play, accepting the rules and the risk of cheating (quite small IMO), but it's up to I & Thomas to deal with that. This debate shouldn't happen here IMHO.


Ilmars Cirulis    (2006-09-19 16:21:14)
Thematic tournament 14

IMO - after 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6 4.Ng5 Bc5 white has easy win: Nxf7 and Nxh8. Exchange and pawn more. May be it is possible to put 4.. d5 instead of 4.. Bc5?! No one is in the waiting list yet. Cirulis


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-09-19 18:42:49)
Really?

Waiting for your reply : 12.Qb3 O-O-O

You entered so many lines I don't know which one to play :) .. but you can see it's not so easy. I think this thematic tournament will be interesting.


Ilmars Cirulis    (2006-09-19 19:10:56)
Really!

Yes! It is not easy to win. But white wins, i still think. OK - you interested me in that thematic. I will join! And, I am sure, I will all white games. :D


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-09-19 19:13:07)
No cumputer use at all

Thomas & I finally agreed to prohibite chess engines & chess databases for this friendly match ! :-)

Games should be really interesting this way.


Elmer Valderrama    (2006-09-19 19:42:56)
FICGS correspondence chess database

That's a great improvement on the former listing of un/finished games (somehow it took ages to load those pages on my PC).

Now why is it that it will be updated 'at least' every 2 months, not daily as the former pages? (assuming fetching all the PGN scores into a single PGN file is done automatically by a script) Thanks


Ilmars Cirulis    (2006-09-19 19:53:35)
Really!

Vassal, will you join to the thematic? It will be very nice! Of course, if you aren't busy. (:


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-09-20 02:07:42)
Traxler thematic tournament

The waiting list is filled already for this 14th thematic tournament ! .. The last player who entered is Benjamin Aldag :) (Benny, this is not reasonable ;))

This opening was definitely a good idea :) Thanks, Ron.


Claude Brisson    (2006-09-20 10:48:16)
Re: Pass + SGF format

> "Did you really send (confirm) your move ?"
Yes. The "pass" appeared after my opponent played.

"About Go SGF format, there's a link (download) at the bottom of the viewer / move page for each game..."
Oh, great! I hadn't seen! Thanks!


Thomas Gilbreath    (2006-09-24 02:45:17)
One week till our sign up deadline:

To my friends at FICGS - the GameKnot team will be set in one week. Thibault - please begin finalizing your team. I will send you (via e-mail) my proposed matchups by Oct 2, 2006. Thomas


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-09-24 20:53:32)
Kramnik wins Game 2

Veselin Topalov - Vladimir Kramnik (game 2)

1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.Nf3 dxc4 5.a4 Bf5 6.e3 e6 7.Bxc4 Bb4 8.0-0 Nbd7 9.Qe2 Bg6 10.e4 0-0 11.Bd3 Bh5 12.e5 Nd5 13.Nxd5 cxd5 14.Qe3 Bg6 15.Ng5 Re8 16.f4 Bxd3 17.Qxd3 f5 18.Be3 Nf8 19.Kh1 Rc8 20.g4 Qd7 21.Rg1 Be7 22.Nf3 Rc4 23.Rg2 fxg4 24.Rxg4 Rxa4 25.Rag1 g6 26.h4 Rb4 27.h5 Qb5 28.Qc2 Rxb2 29.hxg6 h5 30.g7 hxg4 31.gxf8Q+ Bxf8 32.Qg6+ Bg7 33.f5 Re7 34.f6 Qe2 35.Qxg4 Rf7 36.Rc1 Rc2 37.Rxc2 Qd1+ 38.Kg2 Qxc2+ 39.Kg3 Qe4 40.Bf4 Qf5 41.Qxf5 exf5 42.Bg5 a5 43.Kf4 a4 44.Kxf5 a3 45.Bc1 Bf8 46.e6 Rc7 47.Bxa3 Bxa3 48.Ke5 Rc1 49.Ng5 Rf1 50.e7 Re1+ 51.Kxd5 Bxe7 52.fxe7 Rxe7 53.Kd6 Re1 54.d5 Kf8 55.Ne6+ Ke8 56.Nc7+ Kd8 57.Ne6+ Kc8 58.Ke7 Rh1 59.Ng5 b5 60.d6 Rd1 61.Ne6 b4 62.Nc5 Re1+ 63.Kf6 Re3 0-1


Great game, great match, real chess !


Marius Zubac    (2006-09-24 23:51:54)
How about two matches?

One match with no computers and one match with.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-09-25 00:08:52)
How about two matches?

Hello Marius.

That's a good idea... but it seems that players at GameKnot are really against computer use in such a match. Anyway, that's probably better like that.. Teams will be quite low-rated, more friendly, more fun :)


Benjamin Aldag    (2006-09-25 17:20:58)
????

Great Game ???? Both games are filled up with blunders !!! I've never sawn so bad games in a WM-Match !!! Benny


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-09-25 18:15:04)
Kramnik vs. Topalov

Benny, what did you think about the match Kramnik vs. Leko (with such fantastic games, ie. Marshall gambit) ? What about Kasparov vs. Deep Blue.. (only examples).. I prefer to see human chess with blunders at top level than to doubt.

Anyway, the match is not over yet, but Kramnik probably won the psychological battle already. Now Topalov must prove he plays the best chess...


Elmer Valderrama    (2006-09-26 09:15:06)
..f5?? > ...f5!!

..100% agreed.. they are (especially Topalov) playing variations which make sense to enter only in engine-assisted chess (CC)... (as a result they are tired after calculating the first set of 8 variations with 18 non-forced plies each ;)

Regarding the match, fingers crossed Topo will pull a Phoenix as in other tournaments when he was -2 after the first round...




Thibault de Vassal    (2006-09-26 15:29:42)
Thematic : Beefeater defense

The new waiting list for next - 16th - thematic tournament is open...

Beefeater defense : 1.d4 g6 2.c4 Bg7 3.Nc3 c5 4.d5 Bxc3+ 5.bxc3 f5

Lines with 6.e4 are particularly interesting...


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-09-28 17:28:04)
Re: Offering duel (go)

Hello Ismail.

2 players Go matches are not available right now, sorry... The next Go tournament (FICGS__GO__TOURNAMENT_KYU__000004) will begin soon... Be patient ;)

(but feel free to offer games played out of the server, of course)

Best wishes.


Dinesh De Silva    (2006-09-29 13:41:10)
Re:

BOTH Topalov's team & Kramnik's team had clearly agreed to a set of legally binding rules, regulations & facilities prior to the World Championship match up. But now suddenly Topalov's team fires accustation after accusation DURING the match. Personally I think if they can't prove a thing, they should not make accusations. The world likes to see exciting chess games, not verbal fights.


Dinesh De Silva    (2006-09-29 13:09:10)
Psycho(logical) games?...........

Silvio Danailov., Manager of the Bulgarian team says:

To all mass media

Ladies and Gentlemen,

After we got acquainted with the ruling of the Appeals Committee of the Topalov vs. Kramnik world championship match we deem it necessary to point out the following:

The ruling in its present form is not satisfactory to us since it practically does not result in any change. Mr. Kramnik will be able to visit the new bathroom an unlimited number of times without being subject to further control.

We would accept the current relaxation rooms to continue to be used provided that the presence of controllers in both rooms is ensured.

When the two players need to go to the bathroom, they should be accompanied by an assistant arbiter.

The checks carried out in the relaxation rooms were made only by experts of the Organizing Committee, whereas our experts were present as observers and only after the second game.

We find it difficult to understand why is it that the accredited journalists are denied access to the video tapes from the relaxation rooms.

The World Champion Veselin Topalov is outraged by the suspicious behavior of his opponent Mr. Vladimir Kramnik who in actual fact takes his most significant decisions in the bathroom.

Despite the above, in the name of the chess game and out of respect to FIDE, to Kalmikia and the millions of chess lovers, Veselin Topalov is willing to continue his participation in the match provided that measures to guarantee fair play are taken.

If the match were to continue, the World Champion would refrain from shaking hands with Mr. Kramnik before the games and would not take part in joint press conferences with him. Veselin Topalov will make statements for the media separately.

We look forward to receiving your response by 14.30 h hoping that it will give concrete answers to the questions that we pose.

28.09.2006
Elista Sincerely:
Silvio Danailov
Manager of the Bulgarian team


Dinesh De Silva    (2006-09-29 13:14:25)
Kramnik's team says...........

Kramnik threatens to stop playing the match......

29.09.2006 Statement from the team of Vladimir Kramnik, rejecting the decision of the Appeals Committee of FIDE : "The protests of the Topalov team and the suspicions in the press release of Mr. Topalov are utterly disgraceful and are touching Mr. Kramnik’s privacy."

Elista, 29 September 2006

Open Letter to FIDE President H.E. Kirsan Iljumshinov

Copied to Executive Committee of Kalmykia Mr. Valery Bovaev, Chief Arbiter Mr. Geurt Gijssen, Russian Chess Federation

Dear Mr. President,

The Appeals Committee of the World Championship Match between Veselin Topalov and Vladimir Kramnik made the following decision on the protest of the Topalov Team:

“to close both the toilets in the players rest rooms and to open another toilet that will be available only to the two players”

The Kramnik team received the mentioned decision a few hours before the start of game 5 and was officially informed about the protest of Mr. Topalov only yesterday evening, 10 p.m., 28 September 2006. With such a decision the WCC Committee is clearly violating both the rules and regulations of the WCC match and the rights of Mr. Kramnik.

The relevant clause in contract of Mr. Kramnik expels: “FIDE shall provide a rest room and toilette for the players during the WCC match in the playing hall and close to the stage (if possible backstage) to be equipped with a live monitor furnished with coffee and tea as well as with light refreshments.”

The reasons that Mr. Kramnik is entering his own bathroom often is simple: The restroom is small and Mr. Kramnik likes to walk and therefore uses the space of the bathroom as well. The Appeals Committee has been informed about the issue before they decided. It should also be mentioned that Mr. Kramnik has to drink a lot of water during the games.

On the request of Mr. Topalov the agreed live monitors have been removed as well as the shower cabines in the bath rooms. The moves are provided on demonstration boards only. The substance of Mr. Topalov protests (dated 22, 24 and 28 September 2006) were basically always met by the approval of the Appeals Committee. Everything has been done here to satisfy Mr. Topalov’s requests.

On a regulary basis the restrooms and toiletts are heavily checked by specialists, obviously local police forces. This goes together with the arrival of the players. The arbiters are observing all the measures. One representative of each team has the right of being present in order to observe the activities. The playing area is banned from signals and the glas wall protects from any kind of view contact and/or body language. There is not a single reason or evidence to believe that a player would have any kind of cheating possibilities.

It is and was no problem for the organization to assure all necessary measures in order to avoid any kind of cheating. By starting the match both participants agreed all the playing conditions de facto and de jure and the conditions are therefore legally binding. Any change of the playing conditions without a good reason would in our understanding request the approval of both players which is not the case here.

Mr. Kramnik believes that the latest decision should increasingly concern the world of chess as it shows very clearly and once again the biased stand of the Appeals Committee members involved. In person: Mr. Makropolous, Mr. Azmaiparashivili (well known as a close friend to Mr. Danailov), Mr. Gelfer (now replaced by Mr. Vega). Therefore Mr. Kramnik requests to exchange the mentioned persons immediately. Enough is enough.

We would like to add that the recent decision not only insults Mr. Kramnik but is clearly critizing both the excellent work of the local organisation at Elista and the nominated arbiters. Yesterday evening the chief arbiter and the head of the excutive committee once again confirmed that the indirect accusations of cheating are nonsense.

The protests of the Topalov team into the direction of Mr. Kramnik and the suspicions in the press release of Mr. Topalov are utterly disgraceful and are touching Mr. Kramnik’s privacy. We do not think that the Topalov team has any right of getting access to the recordings. This shall be job of the nominated arbiters only.

The Topalov team includes a parapsychologist and more people which are obviously having no other tasks as to distract and to insult Mr. Kramnik especially since their team is realizing that Mr. Topalov finds himself in a difficult situation. This is what we call an utterly unfair behaviour which is not in accordance with the FIDE Code of Ethics. The decision taken by the Appeals Committee can only be seen as another attempt to disturb Mr. Kramniks concentration since it is difficult to understand what kind of improvement it shall be to have one toilet instead of two.

Our team does not trust the objectivity of the Appeals Committee anymore. Therefore it makes no sense for us to bring a protest to this table and Mr. Kramnik strongly insists once again that the members of the Appeals Committee will be changed immediately and that the heads of the Organizing Committee are taking their responsibilities.

In the meanwhile Mr. Kramnik will stop playing this match as long as FIDE is not ready to respect Mr. Kramnik’s rights, in this case to use the toilet of his own restroom whenever he wishes to do so.

Further and more detailed legal investigations are already in process.

On behalf of Vladimir Kramnik
Yours sincerely,
Carsten Hensel
(Manager to Vladimir Kramnik, Classical World Chess Champion)


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-09-29 13:19:45)
FIDE world championship (suspicions)

A "toiletgate" : Kramnik visiting the bathroom unreasonably often (according to Bulgarian delegation), video surveillance in rest rooms, Topalov threatening to stop the match, FIDE decisions (common toilets, players accompanied...), now Kramnik threatening to stop the match !

Tension is high, reminds us old memories :) ..

Can this world chess championship be finished yet ??

http://www.chessbase.com


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-09-29 14:12:14)
Clock - Out of time

Hi Graham.

You just have to wait a few hours, the game will be adjudicated automatically.

Best regards. Thibault


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-09-29 15:57:14)
Fischer vs. Spassky ?

Vladimir Kramnik did not play game 5 !

All this reminds me the first match Fischer vs. Spassky... In a documentary, Boris Spassky said he lost the match when he accepted Fischer's new conditions (ie. playing in another room) in order to continue to play...

Seems to be quite the same situation here...

Now who made the mistake : Kramnik, Topalov or FIDE... I hope game 5 will be replayed.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-09-30 03:31:40)
Topalov vs. FIDE vs. Kramnik

I agree with you, Nigel.

Obviously Topalov's team 'manipulates' FIDE against Kramnik. Worked quite well... But now the situation seems to be best for both Topalov and Kramnik... If the match does not continue Kramnik will stay clear classical World Chess Champion (3-1) with a new legitimacy, Topalov will stay clear FIDE World Chess Champion (playing the best chess) and FIDE will remain... the organizer of chess championships in Kalmykia... :/

Finally, only FIDE made a clear mistake during the event, but is it so important... Kramnik wins, Topalov wins, Ilyumzhinov always wins...

I hope the match will continue but I'm not very optimistic.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-09-30 03:39:05)
Vladimir Kramnik - Open letter

Open Letter To
FIDE President
Kirsan Iljumshinov
Russian Chess Federation

Elista, 29. September 2006

Requests of Vladimir Kramnik

• To proceed with GAME 5

Clause 3.17.1., Schedule 2 of the contract: “All protests must be submitted in writing to the Appeals Committee not more than 2 hours after the relevant playing session.”

The protest made by the Topalov Team were not made within this window after game 4 (27 September 2006) but only hit the FIDE Office and the Appeals Committee on the rest day (28 September 2006). Therefore the protests are not even relevant and should have been rejected by the Appeals Committee immediately.

Clause 3.18.3., Schedule 2 of the contract: “After the World Chess Championship Committee agrees with the Organizers on the arrangements in respect of the tournament hall, facilities etc. etc. etc……., no objections from the participants shall be acceptable as long as the conditions are in accordance with the rights of the players granted in their agreements.”

This clause clearly underlines the statement made in today’s Open letter: “By starting the match both participants agreed all the playing conditions de facto and de jure and the conditions are therefore legally binding. Any change of the playing conditions without a good reason would in our understanding request the approval of both players which is not the case here.”

Therefore it is clear that the Appeals Committee took a completely wrong decision and was obviously not even aware of the Rules and Regulations. The decision of Chief Arbiter Mr. Gijssen to forfeit game 5 was clearly based on a wrong decision of the Appeals Committee and shall be nullified.

Mr. Kramnik is ready to continue the match and to play the 5th game (with a leading score of 3:1) on the conditions that were accepted prior to the start of the match.

• Toilet issue The toilets connected to the restrooms shall be opened again. This request is in accordance with clauses 3.17.1. and 3.18.3 (see above) and in the general understanding that by starting of the match both participants agreed to all the playing conditions. Any change of the playing conditions without a good reason would require the approval of both players which is not the case here.

Mr. Kramnik is ready to accept even stricter controls by sealing the toilets before and after inspections. Inspections shall be done before and after each game.

• Exchange of members of the Appeals Committee
We repeat that the Kramnik team does not trust the objectivity of the Appeals Committee anymore. It is evident from this letter and our first Open Letter today that the existing Appeals Committee is biased and incompetent. Mr. Kramnik strongly insists once again that the members of the Appeals Committee will be exchanged immediately.

• Access to Recordings As Mr. Kramnik in the press conference stated he did not sign a contract for acting in a reality show. The recordings shall be observed by the arbiters. Neither Team Topalov nor Team Kramnik shall have access to the recordings. Investigations shall be in the sole responsibility of the Arbiters.

• Requested Apology Last but not least Mr. Kramnik believes that Mr. Danailov should apologize to Mr. Kramnik in writing. Remarks such as:

“If the match were to continue, the World Champion will refrain from shaking hands with Mr. Kramnik before the games and will not take part in joint press conferences with him.” and “Veselin Topalov is disturbed by the suspicious behavior of his opponent Mr. Vladimir Kramnik who takes his most significant decisions in the bathroom.” are clearly insulting.

On behalf of Vladimir Kramnik
Yours sincerely,
Carsten Hensel
(Manager to Vladimir Kramnik, Classical World Chess Champion)


Nigel Davies    (2006-09-30 09:07:48)
Legitimacy

This is (or should have been) the real point of these championships from FIDE's point of view. Rather than being seen as a banana republic with a paper champion their aim should have been to establish legitimacy for their cycle and organisation. FIDE established itself by taking over the World Chess Championships with the death of Alekhine. If it can no longer do that, a large part of its raison d'etre disappears, in my view. I'm not sure they realise it yet, but if Topalov 'wins' from his 1-3 position with some trumped up accusation of cheating, their legitimacy is not enhanced. Quite the opposite in fact. Kramnik goes home with a very strong claim to being the REAL World Champion (he beat Kasparov in a match) and having allowed FIDE to demonstrate its true colours. I think that the odds of him establishing his own cycle will have improved dramatically, he just needs a sponsor. Nigel


Rodrigo Jaroszewski    (2006-09-30 09:41:27)
Re: Legitimacy

Hey, you don't have the chance of asking a GM a question every day! :)

Nigel, since my limited database and research resources here didn't allow me to know if you played a game against Kramnik, much less if you ever had a nice chat with him, I'd like to know if you did and if you really believe that he'd be the kind of guy that would go out and organize a WC Cicle on his own, like Kasparov did (well, tried)?

I take this match as a display he is willing to expose himself in order to get things straight once and for all, but going to the business side of the game is for those that really want to risk a lot to get things done.


Nigel Davies    (2006-09-30 13:50:51)
Re: Legitimacy

Hi Rodrigo, I haven't played Kramnik but I met him once; my impression is that he's a proud and rather honourable person. I don't see him organising his own cycle, but there are plenty of people opposed to FIDE who could. This might be just the opportunity they need. Kramnik couldn't really have refused a 'reunification' match before this, it would have looked like he didn't want to play. But now he's got a strong case that FIDE cannot provide a suitable aegis. Nigel


Benjamin Aldag    (2006-09-30 15:57:58)
e4-Line !

The e4-Line is the only line, which gives white the possibility of an clear advantage. All other lines are really bad for white. The point of this opening is, to have with the black color good knights versus a bad bishop-pair of white. Roman Dzindzihasvili is the founder of this Defense and i think, "Beefeater" is not the right name. I call it "Dzindzi-Indian-Defense". There are many interesting lines and some of them, transpose the game to other openings (Pirc, Sicilian-Dragon, Kings-Indian etc.). The move 5...f5 was played to prevent black of 6.e4, but 6.e4! is the best move, white can play. I've played last year in Litomysl in a Simultan versus GM Sergey Movsesian this "Dzindzi-Indian-Defense". Sergey played 6.h4?! and after 15 moves, we draw the game. The Dzindzi-Indian-Defense is an easy to learn opening and i've got good results with it in many tourneys. Last time i've saw this Defense at the Chess-Olympic, played by players around 2400-2500. 6.e4! is the best move, but many many players don't know it and the possibility for black, to get a good result in a game is very high. I can say, i know all variations about this opening and this thematic tournament will be my first tourney here, where i will not use computer-assistence. Its funny to see, that an Engine (Rybka,Fritz etc.) dont understand the ideas behind this defense and without an opening-book, engines dont see that 6.e4! is the only way, to get an advantage.

I luv Dzindzi-Indian-Defense

Benny


Ilmars Cirulis    (2006-09-30 23:06:46)
Suggestion...

Hi, Thibault. What about new feature - theoretical matches. Example. One [A] think - in the line white wins, another [B] - it's drawish. [A] plays 6 games with white pieces against [B]. I'm OK to wait a year or two. :D For example, I think - 6.e4 is drawish. :D :D Yes, I know. I am thinking too much. :D Cirulis


Dinesh De Silva    (2006-10-01 07:34:31)
Re:

Hello! What's the latest news?!....... Is the Kramnik vs Topalov match going ahead?


Rodrigo Jaroszewski    (2006-10-01 11:25:13)
LOL

I've been reading Mig's Daily Dirt so often that I'm beginning to get an unconscious feel of what he just posted before I read it! LOL

"As Kasparov just pointed out to me, Ilyumzhinov is about the only one in Elista without a vested interest in the match ending now."

http://www.chessninja.com/dailydirt/2006/09/whats_the_problem.htm


Thomas Gilbreath    (2006-10-02 00:33:32)
GameKnot match pairings:

Thibault, I have submitted my pairings to your e-mail for your approval. Thomas


Dinesh De Silva    (2006-10-02 13:30:08)
Re: Kram. vs Top. match......

Game 6 just started with the score standing at Kram. 3: Top. 2. ( Kram. playing "under protest" regarding the earlier game number 5 status ).


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-10-02 15:06:33)
Chess / FIDE

Why did Kramnik accept to continue this match... Becoming a chess (FIDE) hero ? Prize ?

Finally I would prefer the prize reason... :)

It seems he just resigned the psychological battle against Kirsan Ilyumzhinov, unless he's sure he can contest the final score once the match is over, but it would be harder for sure.

It will be just harder for him to play now... Anyway, the result in this match is not so important, the real issue is future of world chess championships, but in the 'other match' that just began, FIDE scored one more point.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-10-02 15:11:16)
Kramnik plays under protest

Official statement and protest by V. Kramnik

To FIDE President H.E. Kirsan Iljumshinov
To the WCC Appeals Committee

On 2 October 2006 my manager received the following decision from FIDE:

“Tomorrow, 2 October 2006, at 15.00, the 6th Game of the World Chess Championship Match a Topalov-Kramnik with the score 3:2 in favour of Kramnik, will take place.”

Based on this decision I make the following statement:

I inform that I am ready to proceed playing the match by reserving all my rights. My further participation will be subject to the condition to clarify my rights regarding game five at later stage.

I do not agree with the decision made by FIDE and I formally protest against it. The decisions made on my requests, especially the resignation of the Appeals Committee, opening the toilets to the restrooms again, are chrystal clear admissions of FIDE of having taken a false decision. Logically FIDE admits herewith that it was a mistake to start game five by violating the rules and regulations of the competition and by changing the agreed playing rules and conditions during the match without my approval.

I deeply regret the unsportsmanlike and unequaled behaviour of my opponent whom FIDE donated a victory outside of the board by using dirty tricks.

High level functionaries inside FIDE once again were making the professional part of the chess world a disgraceful playground of their own interests. I strongly believe and hope that the course of these events made it obvious to everyone that drastic changes with regard to the professional management structures inside FIDE are evident.

By deciding just a couple of hours ago I had to assess between my personal interests and the interests of the entire chess world. It is very difficult to play under these circumstances. But I came to the conclusion to proceed under protest because I do not want to disappoint the overwhelming majority of the chess fans which are hoping for the unification since so many years.

I also had in mind the people of Kalmykia which are doing their utmost to organize this match on the highest level possible.

Last but not least I would like to thank very much for all the support I experienced during these days.

Elista, 2 October 2006
Vladimir Kramnik Classical World Chess Champion


Dinesh De Silva    (2006-10-02 16:33:57)
Re:

Thibault, I'm sure Kramnik is continuing the match NOT mainly for the prize money, because if information I've gathered is correct, the prize money is financed from Kramnik's side. By managing to draw the 6th game, Kramnik has shown that he certainly ain't pyschologically down because of his opponent's antics. If Kramnik goes on to win the championship, the majority of the world is bound to accept him as the one true champion.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-10-02 17:46:46)
Re:

"the one true champion" .. until next FIDE wch cycles, where Kramnik will most probably loose his title, simply because he'll have to play a 4 rounds / 16 players knockout tournament (if I understood well, not sure.. :/) that he could even refuse to play ! :)

Let's say he will be the last one true champion. Maybe that's a reason enough to continue the match after all :)


Dinesh De Silva    (2006-10-03 01:01:03)
Re:

Thibault, you have made a good observation there. But there's some news that Kirsan might hand over FIDE professional match organization part to Besel Kok, who ran against him at FIDE elections. Kok might decide to have a candidates style of qualifying, instead of knockout.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-10-03 14:40:57)
About 50% IMO

Just a personal estimation, according the number of moves played & time.

I would say about 50% ...


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-10-03 14:52:20)
Kasparov on the match

http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=3396

http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110009029


Anthony Bingham    (2006-10-03 15:47:07)
Introduction

Hello all, my name is Tony, aka (DEwillget8 @ Gameknot). I am looking forward to our upcoming tournament and would like to give a big thank you to all involved. I do have one question. How do I challenge a player here to a match so I can get used to the layout of your site? Thanks, Tony


Smith Dhumbumroong    (2006-10-03 15:55:17)
Interesting

Thanks for information, Thibault. I've never play in an association that explicitly allows computer assitance before, so I'm curious what is the reason most people use it, which is very interesting after reading the thread in Thibault's post. In the end I just have to agree with you, Thibault, centaurs will play with centaurs & humans against humans, and who cares if you're playing against a centaur if it is a good game, right? :)


James Stripes    (2006-10-03 16:13:13)
curious

I have approximately 64 chess engines, including the beta version of Rybka 1 (the free version). In engine tournaments on my box, it has prevailed against my strongest commercial engines. However, the centaur play that is the norm here presents Rybka with an entirely different sort of playing environment than those in which it has demonstrated its superiority. As I am new to this type of play, I don't yet know how Rybka measures up to the likes of Junior, Shredder, and Hiarcs.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-10-03 19:18:18)
Open letter

Another letter of support to Vladimir Kramnik, written by famous chess grandmasters... (source www.chessbase.com)


Monday 2nd of October 2006

Dear Vladimir,

Through absolutely no fault of your own, you have suffered the consequences of an unprecedented combination of unethical behaviour from your opponent and glaring incompetence, for lack of a stronger word, on the part of the Appeals Committee.

In spite of evidently unfair treatment, which has not only resulted in your being forfeited one game, but also being subjected to petty attacks and ridiculous accusations from the opposing camp, you have agreed to continue the match for the sake of reunifying the chess world. This is a very impressive decision. It testifies to your remarkable sense of honour and is worthy of your true status of World Champion.

Regardless of the final result of this match you have earned the deepest respect of your fellow Grandmasters and colleagues as well as countless chess fans around the world. Thank you for being a model sportsman in a time and place where so many circumstances turned against you. You deserve to win.

With unfailing support,


GM Joel Lautier
IM Almira Skripchenko
GM Viktor Korchnoi
GM Laurent Fressinet
GM Nigel Short
GM Alexandra Kosteniuk
GM Pavel Tregubov
GM Pentala Harikrishna
GM Yannick Pelletier
WGM Sophie Milliet
GM Lev Alburt
WIM Anna Hahn
GM Rustam Dautov
GM Yasser Seirawan
GM Emanuel Berg
GM Helmut Pfleger
WIM Olena Boytsun
GM Vladimir Barksij
GM Bartlomiej Macieja
IM Maxim Notkin
GM Alexander Baburin
GM Tony Kosten
GM Alexander Khalifman


Ilmars Cirulis    (2006-10-03 23:13:37)
What about...

... friendly match?
I fight with white in 6.Kxf2 Nxe4+ 7.Ke3 variation, you of course, with black.
:D
You can understand it as joke, too.


Marcin Kasperski    (2006-10-04 12:27:12)
Exaggerating?

I googled this thread accidentally, and ... I would like to say that some opinions here seem to be going too far. I am just an amateur player (no FIDE rating, but according to my results on FICS and Playchess I would estimate myself about elo 1900). I play on a few servers including gameknot (my nick there is Mekk). I have never used chess engine there (or anywhere), and I am at the moment rated 1654 on gameknot, I also happened to win and draw some games against 17xx rated players. Surely they were not using engines, if they were, I would lost those games - my results on IECG (where I lost everything I tried to play) show this clearly. Of course my claim, that I am not using an engine, is just my claim - but you can take a look at my games, if you like...


Roger Weber    (2006-10-04 13:21:29)
Computers

@Marius
If I may ask the question, why would you even want to play a match with chess engines?
I don't see the point, except if you're a chess engine addict and can't play without.

I am totally against the usage of chess engines on internet servers, as its just not sportsmanlike and a match where both players agree using engines is IMHO not worth playing it.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-10-04 16:21:00)
Danailov accuses Kramnik of using Fritz9

The manager of Topalov (Silvio Danailov) now accuses Kramnik of cheating, using Fritz 9.

Here are his statistics :


Game 1 :

From 75 moves: After move 12, from 65 remaining moves 41 moves match with the first line of Fritz 9. (63% of matches)

Game 2 :

From 63 moves: After move 17, from 46 remaining moves 40 moves match with the first line of Fritz 9. (87% of matches)

Game 3 :

From 38 moves: After move 10, from 46 remaining moves 40 moves match with the first line of Fritz 9. (87% of matches)

Game 4 :

From 54 moves: After move 14, from 40 remaining moves 30 moves match with the first line of Fritz 9. (75% of matches)

Game 6 :

From 31 moves: After move 13, from 18 remaining moves 14 moves match with the first line of Fritz 9. (78% of matches)


Out of 5 games, 78% of Vladimir Kramnik’s moves would match with the first line of Fritz 9.


Seems to be a lot but is it enough ? (no IMO, and it simply doesn't mean anything at all...)

Furthermore, it seems to be very hard to prove, as the "first line" of Fritz 9 depends on many parameters... It's probably easy to obtain this result on demand, or to say at a 2800 level, if it doesn't match with Fritz moves, that it matches with Shredder, Junior or Hydra or... :(

The only conclusion is Kramnik's style is closer to Fritz than other engines..
(what a scoop...)

Topalov's team has probably no other choice now than to attack & attack until death... This is clearly psychological attack, this match could end really dirty :/

I think these statistics are really too conclusive so that it's realistic ! .. Kramnik is not stupid : There's no need to play Fritz first line to win against Topalov (and finally be accused of using Fritz 9), and it's certainly not the best way to win either...


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-10-04 16:31:45)
Re: Computers

My two cents, as I probably share Marius point of view : The same reasons you like to play a match or any game without engines... Challenge, chess beauty, and so on..

It is sportsmanlike ! .. simply because the rules allow it ! .. and it's worth playing such a match, simply because we like it :)


Glen D. Shields    (2006-10-04 17:52:20)
Yes Thibault - Thanks for Asking

Thibault -

I see a need to offer player defined delays. My desire would be that when a move is sent, I have the option to post the move immediately or 1, 2 or 3 days later (using my reflection time during the delay). This option allows players to stagger their games and better manage the pace particularly at the beginning of a tournament.

Servers like FICGS have become the meeting place for postal players, e-mail players, correspondence server players and real time server players. It's a diverse and interesting group. Server chess is nothing like postal chess, but it shouldn't be a substitute for OTB chess either.

Starting a server tournament is like a ping pong match. You send a move and ten minutes later you have a reply. One can't ever keep their inbox empty.
Once the opening is over, the match then moves into "Groundhog Day" mode. You wake up to an inbox full of moves, you work all day on them and then wake up the following day to an inbox of moves from the same players. It's tiring.
I'd like the option to send a move, forget about it and then chose whether it should be visible to my opponent immediately, 24 hours, 48 hours or 72 hours later. The delay allows me to manage my game load better and gives me some flexibility how fast I want to play.

Server chess has grown rapidly the last five years. Its benefits are fantastic. Curiously, however, this year is the first year since e-mail chess was officially introduced that ICCF is reportedly (unoffical source) seeing an increase in postal chess. One of the biggest reasons talked about for this change is players are worn out from the fast server pace. I can relate to that. I'd hate to give up server chess because it makes so much sense. I know no one twists my arm to move fast, but why not give me server tools to help me manage my game load? I let the server count my time, keep my game score, chase my opponent when he forgets to move and report my results. Why can't it also help me manage my game load and slow down the pace when it needs to be slowed?

You asked ... so here are my two cents :)


Wayne Lowrance    (2006-10-04 18:48:59)
Delay/Slow down games

Thibault, I see no reason to slow down play, I would be dead set against any such change. The current format is sufficient. I am playing in six tournaments,just signed up for a seventh, which I expect will open up soon. I have had no trouble keeping up and my site clock is in no danger. That is the way I feel. Wayne


Elmer Valderrama    (2006-10-04 22:36:44)
Toga

Since everyone is being honest in this thread here is my confession..

Usually I use latest Toga, I bought Rybka 1.2 series, but I've found it is not better than Toga, especially if run in a slow computer (I still use a AMD +1600, with Windows 98: I know I should buy a better computer but this one is already a recent "upgrade" from a Pentium 700Mhz running Fritz 8 ;) and I dont want to fall in the endless (and costly) chain of keeping -up-to-date just to get a few more ELO points ;)

Sometimes I test the positions with other engines (Fritz 8, Schredder 8, free Fruit) just to prove how right was Toga in the initial evaluation. In those rare but happy occasions when I make my own input is simply to give an idea of where should the engine "think". When things go well, after some point, it is just a matter of setting the engines on my opponents, they would finish the job.


Marc Lacrosse    (2006-10-04 22:50:34)
How many people actually use chessengine

I do, and I cannot even understand why some feel it is not fair : it is explicitly allowed here.
My feeling is that most (if not all) my opponents do use them also.
And this is perfectly OK for me. For several reasons :

1. I prefer not to have worked hard on a game and then win it because a sudden tactical error leads to a premature end after months of intense struggle.

2. I am far from being able on my own forces to have such interesting games as those that I play with help of engines.

3. Being on almost the same basis of computer help as my opponents, I feel that the human touch is clearly decisive in these computer-assisted correspondence games : it's precisely there that the difference can be made.

Marc


Glen D. Shields    (2006-10-05 05:25:52)
Wayne no one ...

Wayne - no one is time trouble because no one is using their time. That's the point! "Correspondence chess" on a server has basically become an OTB match between chess engines. Players in all organizations are complaining about server burnout. Players who swore off postal are re-considering their decision.

What Thibault is trying to find out is how prevalent is the burnout. What I'm proposing any player can do manually, but why should it be done manually when the server can do it for us? Isn't automation the whole purpose of the server?

Help from the server to manage the pace (and one's game load) is a perfectly logical extension of server play. If you want to play fast, play fast. If you want to play slow, slow the pace, use the server to do it for you. Why is that bothersome? No one is suggesting a change from the 40/10 limit. There's no proposal to deviate from the 100 maximum accumulated days (great rule - every server should follow this rule!). What am I missing? I really don't get it :)


Thomas Gilbreath    (2006-10-05 13:21:39)
Thibault

I have a substitution. My player bunta has had to withdraw, and I am replacing him with ccmcacollister in the match vs. Benjamin Aldag. Is this ok with you? Thomas


Thomas Gilbreath    (2006-10-08 02:40:55)
Thibault

12 of my 13 are ready. If my player ritt doesn't register with you within 48 hours, I propose to simply drop him from the match, as I don't have a fair match for Charlie Neil (I do have many higher rated players if he really wants to play). Let me know, and please explain to me the format here on FICGS as you guys only play tournament style - are you going to set up a tourney especially for our match? Get with me tonight or tomorrow, as we hope to start the match Monday:) Thanks - Thomas


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-10-08 13:24:25)
FICGS vs. GameKnot tournament

Hi Thomas.

The games here will be played under the tournament name :
FICGS__CHESS__FICGS_VS_GAMEKNOT_MATCH

I just sent an email about pairings.

Best wishes.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-10-09 09:32:36)
FICGS vs. GameKnot ... about to start

Our friendly match against well-known GameKnot chess server is about to start.

2 players still have to tell me their nickname on GameKnot so that Thomas and I can create the games on both servers. If players want to register now, there could be a replacement... Feel free to send an email to info [at] ficgs.com if you're interested to play.


Thomas Gilbreath    (2006-10-10 01:32:29)
Thibault

I can't seem to find FICGS__CHESS__FICGS_VS_GAMEKNOT_MATCH .....is it up and running yet? I need to research the "how to's" and explain them to my guys. I'll post my guys names on FICGS sometime tonight. - - - Thomas


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-10-10 16:16:37)
To be continued...

Open Letter

To
FIDE President
H.E. Kirsan Illyumzhinov

To
Head of the 2006 Executive Committee
Mr. Valery Bovaev

Dear Mr President, Gentlemen,

Having received innumerable published and unpublished inquiries I would like to clarify, in the name of Vladimir Kramnik and his team, our position in the decision taken by FIDE regarding the fifth game of the current World Championship match.

As you know Vladimir Kramnik is playing the current match under protest. Nothing has changed in our attitude, which is documented by Kramnik’s actions around the fifth game and our statements, protests and letters:

29.09.2006:
http://www.kramnik.com/eng/news/viewarticle.aspx?id=104
02.10.2006:
http://www.kramnik.com/eng/news/viewarticle.aspx?id=106
04.10.2006:
http://www.kramnik.com/eng/news/viewarticle.aspx?id=107

Consistent with this standpoint Vladimir Kramnik will be playing this match, including a possible tiebreak, up to the last move under protest.

Should the decision of FIDE regarding the fifth game have any influence on the awarding of the World Championship title, with Mr Topalov receiving the title after being granted a free point for the unplayed game, Mr Kramnik declares unequivocally: “I will not recognize Mr Topalov as World Champion under these conditions, and I will take legal action against FIDE at the end of the World Championship.”

The damage done to Mr Kramnik in public opinion (e.g. the slander campaign) after the illegal release of private video images by the then FIDE Appeals Committee or the WCC 2006 Executive Committee to the Topalov team, and the subsequent release of these video images and private information of Mr Kramnik in his restroom to the mass media, as well as the interruption of the match, which broke Mr Kramnik’s concentration and playing rhythm, will all be part of the legal action which will be initiated.

As a sign of good will Mr Kramnik once again requests FIDE to arrange for game five to be played out on the board immediately after game 12. This in our opinion is the only way to alleviate the personal, sporting, judicial and ethical injuries that have been incurred by Mr Kramnik.


Elista, October 10, 2006
On behalf of Vladimir Kramnik
Yours sincerely
Carsten Hensel
(Manager to Vladimir Kramnik, Classical World Chess Champion)


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-10-10 18:39:24)
Game 11 : Draw

Veselin Topalov - Vladimir Kramnik (game 11)

1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.e3 Bf5 5.Nc3 e6 6.Nh4 Bg6 7.Nxg6 hxg6 8.Rb1 Nbd7 9.c5 a5 10.a3 e5 11.b4 axb4 12.axb4 Qc7 13.f4 exf4 14.exf4 Be7 15.Be2 Nf8 16.0-0 Ne6 17.g3 Qd7 18.Qd3 Ne4 19.Nxe4 dxe4 20.Qxe4 Qxd4+ 21.Qxd4 Nxd4 22.Bc4 0-0 23.Kg2 Ra4 24.Rd1 Rd8 25.Be3 Bf6 26.g4 Kf8 27.Bf2 Ne6 28.Rxd8+ Bxd8 29.f5 gxf5 30.gxf5 Nf4+ 31.Kf3 Nh5 32.Rb3 Bc7 33.h4 Nf6 34.Bd3 Nd7 35.Be4 Ne5+ 36.Kg2 Ra2 37.Bb1 Rd2 38.Kf1 Ng4 39.Bg1 Bh2 40.Ke1 Rd5 41.Bf2 Ke7 42.h5 Nxf2 43.Kxf2 Kf6 44.Kf3 Rd4 45.b5 Rc4 46.bxc6 bxc6 47.Rb6 Rxc5 48.Be4 Kg5 49.Rxc6 Ra5 50.Rb6 Ra3+ 51.Kg2 Bc7 52.Rb7 Rc3 53.Kf2 Kxh5 54.Bd5 f6 55.Ke2 Kg4 56.Be4 Kf4 57.Bd3 Rc5 58.Rb4+ Kg3 59.Rc4 Re5+ 60.Re4 Ra5 61.Re3+ Kg2 62.Be4+ Kh2 63.Rb3 Ra2+ 64.Kd3 Bf4 65.Kc4 Re2 66.Kd5 1/2-1/2


It is still possible Kramnik walks out the match if next (and last) game is a draw too... :/


Graham Wyborn    (2006-10-11 00:13:44)
See Below

You just have to wait a few hours, the game will be adjudicated automatically. Reply given to me in a previous response to a similar question


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-10-11 02:35:32)
Karpov vs. Korchnoi 1978

A must read, for those who don't know the full story yet... Battle over flags, yogurt, audience (Zukhar & parapsychology) and so on :)

http://www.mark-weeks.com/chess/78kk$$01.htm


The two giants now agree that Kramnik shouldn't have continued the match...


Thomas Gilbreath    (2006-10-11 07:04:35)
Pairings:

cyrano (still waitimg on name) vs. Glen D.Shields*****cairo (ottesen_soren) vs. Miguel Pires*****ccmcacollister (collister_craig) vs. Benjamin Aldag*****thumper (jacobs_doug) vs. James Stripes*****tugger (edwards_matthew) vs. Trond Michalsen*****yanm (maret_yannick) vs. Peter Willoughby*****taikaviitta (koivuniemi_raimo) vs. Richard Grady*****tag1153 (gilbreath_thomas) vs. Regis Ducreux*****eqj2 (johnson_eddie) vs. Martin Selby*****dewillget8 (bingham_anthony) vs. Ilmars Cirulis*****mozz (price_richard) vs. Julien Baudement*****lofix (mankowski_peter) vs. Phil Cook.***********************************************************That's a 12 vs. 12 match. 24 points possible. First team to 12.5 wins. Are we in agreement? - Thomas


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-10-12 17:02:26)
Tie break

... I wouldn't like to be this world champion :/

Tie break with rapid games is definitely a bad idea IMO.

Former world champion should retain the crown in case of equality... Ok, this is particular case here as they're two world champions, but the result will be difficult to accept for everyone... In this case the match should continue until one takes a 1 or 2 points lead.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-10-12 17:21:24)
... rapid games

Huh.. I've no idea... All I know : They played a blitz game just before the match and it was a draw (dutch opening) :)

Maybe we'll have surprises (at last) in the openings, but the result will be so aleatory...


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-10-12 18:56:37)
80 -> 50 -> 20

Actually, my estimation was probably right a few months ago, but not anymore... When the server started, the elo average was really strong, most players coming from well-known correspondence chess places (TCCMB, IECG...), but more and more beginners sign up, so the proportion of centaurs (human + engine) already is or will be nearer 20%, slowly but continuously decreasing (Google effect)...


Thomas Gilbreath    (2006-10-12 21:07:39)
cairo is ottesen_soren

.....but I've got him at board 2 vs. Miguel Pires.. I guess it doesn't matter what board we call it here on FICGS, as long as the players are correct. - Thomas


Dinesh De Silva    (2006-10-14 06:45:39)
Re:

Hi, Utesch, Rada & Thibault, I guess this thread is about me?! Let me clarify...... I am in over 80 games at this time in FICGS, ICCF, LIAPE, and IECG. Quite a few of the games are world championship final matches, world candidate matches & world champioship matches. So I have to naturally concentrate on those critical middle games & end games matches mainly. I'm only human. I have a severe case of catarrh due to break of rest. So in ccertain games I get into time trouble, but as you can see I try to be very creative/original in my games & try to find new variations even in openings.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-10-14 18:33:37)
Chess and Go diagrams / Forum update

A major update for FICGS forums (& blogs) !

Now you can insert Chess & Go diagrams in messages...
(useful to submit chess problems, analysis and so on...)

See the FAQ in help section - http://www.ficgs.com/help.html - for details, in example here is the position of the last game in the FIDE world chess championship between Veselin Topalov & Vladimir Kramnik, just before Topalov blunder 44. ...Rxc5 ??

ChessPosition (see diagram)

Diagrams format is quite simple (see Help), please note only one diagram / position will be displayed per message.

Also minor bugs (links, search functions) corrected...


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-10-17 12:43:42)
GM Suat Atalik

GM Suat Atalik is about OTB #100 ranked player in the world (GM FIDE), and one of the first players who registered at FICGS. Ratings & titles are also displayed in an informative way, some other strong players will probably register when it will be possible to play unrated simultaneous games for money, but they'll keep a provisional rating. I still have to separate the rating lists, but provisional ratings aren't displayed the same way already.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-10-17 12:56:02)
Games started / TIME CONTROL

Hello Miguel.

It seems that time controls can't be the same on GameKnot...


Games just started ! .. (there will be a replacement soon in the last 2 games)

http://www.ficgs.com/tournament_FICGS__CHESS__FICGS_VS_GAMEKNOT_MATCH.html


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-10-19 20:06:19)
Mate in 292 moves

Otto - Titus Blathy (1860 - 1939), Hungary
Vielzügige Schachaufgaben, 1889
(10 + 12)
Mate in 292 moves

Illegal position


Now you may try to solve the problem, but my question is : Why is this position illegal ??


ChessPosition (see diagram)


Wolfgang Utesch    (2006-10-19 20:19:50)
Mate in 292 moves

Hello Thibault, I think the pairs of double pawns on e-g-h-lines are impossible to achieve out of the normal chess start position! Wolfgang


Wolfgang Utesch    (2006-10-19 20:47:01)
Mate in 292 moves

The white pawn h4 cannot reach its position without striking the black g-pawn - but this g-pawn is still there! Wolfgang


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-10-19 23:07:16)
Re: Mate in 292 moves

Can't the pawns strike other pieces, rooks, bishops... ?!


Wolfgang Utesch    (2006-10-20 07:22:10)
Mate in 292 moves

You're right! But this position seems to be so artificial, that I can't believe to reach it in order with all chess rules out of a normal chess start position. And I can't see any other problem with this position. Wolfgang


Wolfgang Utesch    (2006-10-19 20:56:51)
Mate in 292 moves

More accurate: The white pawn h4 cannot reach its position without striking the black g- and h-pawns - but this g- and h-pawns are still there! In combination with the black g-double pawn an the black h5-pawn, which position need to strike the white g- and h-pawns is it unpossible to reach out of the normal chess start position! Wolfgang


Wolfgang Utesch    (2006-10-20 09:39:00)
Mate in 292 moves

Yes, Gino, you are right! All pawns on board, so the double pawns can reach their position only by striking of other figures. For this position black should have had 9 (!) other figures (h4 by 2 figures; g5 by 3; e6 by 4) - but only 4 are missing. Wolfgang


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-10-20 14:09:35)
Re: Mate in 292 moves

The minimum number of pawn captures is 8, that's a funny problem :)


Now here is the solution for the mate :

http://www.chess-problem.com/classic4.htm


Elmer Valderrama    (2006-10-20 18:23:22)
other surreal mating positions

..I mean mating as in mate in 2,3..;)

There are far more surreal positions even with fancy names for each of them however no-one calls them "illegal" why is it? ..just wondering..


Scott Prestwood    (2006-10-21 02:42:17)
Moderation in everything

I find it easy to take on too many correspondence games my self. I prefer to have time to analyze as this is the tradition of coorespondence chess. I often feel busy (zeitnot as you call it) with just 15 games with long time controls. Some principals I use in moderating my challenge rate are; 1) I dont start new games if I have a game under 15 moves in progress, opening require less analysis, and the mid game is where most of the work is done. 2) whatever the estimated days per moves is I limit myself to 1/4th of that as my limit of games. i.e. if the average days per moves is 12 days I will try to keep around 3 games going if possible. These limits work well and I'm on several coorespondence sites.


Elmer Valderrama    (2006-10-20 21:55:18)
retrograde analysis

from math.harvard.edu

"Legal position (n.): a position that can be reached from the initial array by game consisting entirely of legal moves, however bizarre. Conventionally every chess problem should have a legal position. Naturally then, an illegal position is a position that cannot be reached by a legal game. For instance, a position in which one side has more than 8 pawns, or has both White and Black Kings in check, is illegal (why?). So is any position with a White Bishop on h1 and White pawn on g2 (why?), such as the following mutual Zugzwang (q.v.), which Lewis Stiller discovered in the course of an exhaustive computer search: White Kg6, Bh1, Pg2; Black Kg4, Pg3. The Kniest position White Kc8,Pb6; Black Ka8,Pa7 (seen above under Helpmate) is legal BTM, but not WTM since Black is in ``retro-stalemate'': Black could not have made a legal move to reach this position. [Thus this position can be set as a Helpmate in Two but not a Mate in One (or ``helpmate in 0.5'').] There are positions that can be recognized as illegal only after extensive retrograde analysis. To prove that a position is legal, one need only exhibit a single legal game reaching the position; such a game is called a proof game. Some retrograde analysis may still be needed to construct a proof game."

I bet nowadays there exist a problem solving chess engine which can give such a 'proof game' in 0.0001milisec (as the moves maybe bizarre, no need to evaluate positions, just to check them for legality)


Ryan Benitez    (2006-10-23 08:33:28)
RE: Thinking on opponents' time

I dont get why you want to save time. You have plenty and I see no reason not to use it. Any line that is not a forced mate yet needs more time imo.


Wolfgang Utesch    (2006-10-23 11:13:43)
Rating / 8-game match

Hello Thibault, it doesn't make any sense to count all results for the rating, independent whether generated by playing out or forfeits about time issues. At least one rating seems to be very excessive affected by this practise in the FICS Chess Championship! Wolfgang


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-10-23 18:00:29)
Rating / 8-game match

Hello Wolfgang. (FICGS, not FICS ;))

In these 1st FICGS WCH quarter finals, there were 2 forfeit cases & 1 match with 6 games out of 8 lost on time. In the first 2 cases, not all games were rated as a win (according to the 8-game match rule), the last case was a bit different but as far as I remember, the winner had a better position (winning or small advantage) in all games... Anyway, ratings wouldn't change significantly if 2 wins were not rated.

The real question is about 8-game matchs & fast time control 30 days + 1 day / move (quite hard). There's no perfect rule & particular cases could happen, but that's really interesting IMO & the number of games with rapid time controls are probably enough to balance ratings in time. We'll see...

Anyway, several players were surprised by the difficulty of this time control, I hope it won't happen again during the next cycle (that should start in january)...


Peter Schuster    (2006-10-24 12:57:17)
Rating / 8-game-match

Hallo Wolfgang, ich fuehle mich durch Deinen Beitrag angesprochen. Alle meine Spiele sollten fuer das Rating gewertet werden. Dass SF Cinca ein sehr unangenehmer Mensch (ich hatte leider in einem GM-Normturnier schon mal mit Ihm zu tun) und aeusserst unsportlicher Gegner ist, kann nicht mir angelastet werden. Nach 2 Remis stand ich in 2 weitern Partien klar auf Gewinn und haette keines der restlichen Spiele verloren. Als er das eingesehen hat, hat er einfach aufgehoehrt zu ziehen und seine Zeit ablaufen lassen. Ich hoffe, dass solche Unsportlichkeit auch entsprechend bestraft wird. Viele Gruesse Peter


Wolfgang Utesch    (2006-10-24 20:14:40)
Rating / 8-game match

Hallo Peter, nein - du warst nicht gemeint - dein Rating ist vollauf verdient! Ich meinte das stark gestiegene Rating von Balabaev. Gruß, Wolfgang ........................................................ Hello Peter, no - I didn't mean you - your rating is hard earned! I meant the considerable increase of rating of Balabaev. Greetings, Wolfgang


Farit Balabaev    (2006-10-25 08:28:49)
Rating / 8-game match

Hello Wolfgang, Thank you for the message. 1. John resigned 8 games 2. If you see carefully these 8 games, you make certain of in games 1793,1797,1798 I have a decisive advantage, in games 1791,1792,1794,1796 I have the upper hand, the game 1795 is even (as was established in game Lautier-Leko Batumi 1999) As a result, expected score might be between 7,5 : 0,5 and 5,5 : 2,5 up to me Best , Farit.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-10-25 11:47:22)
Once upon a time in Kalmykia

An interesting interview of FIDE president Kirsan Ilyumzhinov about future of chess, reunification match and other things...

http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=3448


I can't resist this quote :


Misha Savinov : Bearing in mind successful unification, do you see a chance of Kasparov returning to chess?

Kirsan Ilyumzhinov : In my opinion, Garry will not return. His age will not permit him returning, chess advanced too far. But, of course, we would all be happy if he returns. Actually, I would be happy if not only Kasparov, but also Spassky and Fischer come back. If they do, I am ready to organize a supermatch of FIDE champions. A good idea, by the way! We’ll invite Vassily Vassilyevich Smyslov, Spassky, Fischer, Karpov, Kasparov, Khalifman, Kasimdzhanov, Topalov, Anand, Ponomariov… It is going to be a good supertournament!

Misha Savinov : In Elista?

Kirsan Ilyumzhinov : In Elista. And, probably, it will be 25-minute games, double round-robin. I wonder if Fischer accepts the invitation, what do you think? We will announce the winner a superabsolute champion (laughs)!

Misha Savinov : One can call it an open championship of Kalmykia…

Kirsan Ilyumzhinov : Are you suggesting inviting the Kalmyk champion of 1978? I think I could play 25-minute games…


.....


Wolfgang Utesch    (2006-10-25 12:32:12)
Rating / 8-game match

Hello Farit, the problem with rating of contests by duels is a generally: If one player knows that the whole duel is no to win he will abandon all games - independent from the particular situation in all of the open games! Greetings, Wolfgang


Dinesh De Silva    (2006-10-25 12:55:01)
Re: Rating / 8-game match........

What Utesch says is quite true. But of course it's not the fault of the players of the duels. Simply, the duels system does seem to be a flawed concept!


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-10-25 13:37:13)
Rating / 8-game match

Anyway this result is quite unusual in correspondence chess... :)

Conditions were best to realize such an increase of rating, and a part of the forfeit reasons are probably out of the match (a flag gate)... 6 games out of 8 were rated as a win in this match between Farit & John, with no other result for Farit when the rating calculation occured. It happened, it can happen, I think it won't happen often (I would be surprised if such a case occurs in semi-finals) but in all ways : That's great ! .. IMO :)

There's a part of "injustice" in all most watched sports and games, it's an essential element ! .. The biggest one 'strangely' is in soccer. At another level, chess stars choose their tournaments and manage their FIDE rating, remember ie. this match Etienne Bacrot (2470) vs. Vassily Smyslov (2510, wch) in Albert, with this result 5-1

An obvious, topical and nearer example : FIDE classical (old) world championship system is deeply unfair (for the challenger) but it MUST be kept !

As I said above, the concept (added to fast time control) may create some - rare - rating peaks, but effects are limited and I'm convinced it's interesting enough to try it.

To be continued... in a few years ? ;)


Don Burden    (2006-10-26 02:32:25)
Rating / 8-game-match

Seems to me that the large jump in ratings is the result of a problem, where the root problem seems to be that there are just way too many players on here that for whatever reason just drop out and don't want to finish their games. Don't know how you would fix that.

In my WCH Stage 1 section that I just finished, two of the top 3 rated players in my section both gave up and quit. One player without playing a single move. The rules say that in the case of tied scores, only the higher rated player advances. There are two players in my section, myself and another, both finishing with 5.5 points out of 6. I think that's a pretty good score, but apparently it's not good enough because only one advances. If all 7 players had played all games to completion, the chances of having a clear winner, and a final score somewhat lower than 5.5 out of 6 would have been much greater.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-10-26 15:20:20)
Re: Rating / 8-game-match

That's not right.

These quarter finals are particular cases because there were no forfeit before move 10 in all games... (games with less than 10 moves played are not rated for the winner) That's why there's a special rule 'general forfeit' for 8+ games matches.

Moreover, the waiting list for the 1st FICGS WCH remained open from april to july, maybe it was a too long period, that's why the waiting list for the 2nd FICGS WCH (that could begin in january) is still closed.


Glen D. Shields    (2006-10-26 16:21:03)
It's Been Awhile ....

This tournament is the first time in awhile since I played on the Gameknot server. A lot has changed in server chess during my absence, but not at GameKnot. There are two GK annoyances. I point them out NOT to trash GK, it's a well designed chess server, but hope that someone from GK who is following this match can instigate appropriate modifications. I REALLY wish the e-mail notification indicating my opponent has moved would show his move. I have a lot of on-going games and don't have the time to make an extra log-on to GK just to get my opponent's move. Also for those who use Opera, take note GK does not work (at least not for me). The board consistently shows up minus half the pieces. Refreshing the screen helps sometimes, but not always. An extra log-in with my non-favorite browsers is not particularly endearing :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-10-26 19:05:48)
Last 2 games started

Finally we have a 12 boards match, the last 2 games just started :

Edwards, Matthew (tugger) vs. Kepinski, Janusz (kolarz)
Johnson, Eddie (eqj2) vs. Vasquez, Carlos (errantknight)


Best wishes.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-10-27 19:37:08)
Chess quizz :-)

A chess quizz ? ... Feel free to post any funny question about chess.. :)

1/ Who said that : "At night Kramnik is in my dreams. I dream that he has accepted my offer for a return match in Sofia. Or that I make a long stroll with him in Moscow, after which we visit an expensive nightclub. The strange thing is that the two of us are the only visitors there."


Ok, quite easy... The pressure should have been really high... :/

Solution - http://susanpolgar.blogspot.com


Another one... May be interesting :)

2/ Who lost........ ? (question unfinished, just say your first thought :))


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-10-28 17:43:05)
Match FICGS vs. GameKnot , the games

Hello to all.

It would be great to follow how the match evolve in this thread. As far as I know GameKnot leads by 1-0 (Ilmars blundered :))

http://gameknot.com/anbd.pl?bd=5966999&rnd=0.9197820842414586

It seems that's possible to link to all games (that started) on GameKnot, so feel free to post the links & results here.


Reminder, you can follow games played on FICGS there :
http://www.ficgs.com/tournament_FICGS__CHESS__FICGS_VS_GAMEKNOT_MATCH.html


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-10-30 08:54:15)
Re: JUDIT POLGAR

Hi Dinesh.

Seems to be a question a money ?! .. If I remember correctly, Sergey Karjakin was to play Topalov with a 1 M$ prize fund (?), so why not a Judit Polgar vs. Vladimir Kramnik match...

She (probably) only needs a good sponsor and a serious preparation to create such an interesting event... I'm sure Kramnik would play it. I don't remember Judit playing a 6+ game match, but I feel it would be hard for her, first because of Kramnik style (& Judit's).

Anyway, great performance at Essent with a 2-0 mini-match against V. Topalov and I. Sokolov !


Graham Wyborn    (2006-10-30 10:04:22)
Go games "display"

First allow me to say how much I enjoy playing chess & go on this site. Keep up the very good work!

Would it be possible to mark or display on the board when playin Go the piece that was last moved?

Also on other sites the option to flip the board is present. On this site the board is already fliped when playing white. Is this needed? If you download the .sgf to a viewer it will not show the game the same way round.

We have to press "send" and then "next". Is it possible to have an option included where after pressing "send" you go automatically to the next game?


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-10-30 13:16:29)
Update : last move (Go)

Hello Graham, thanks :)

I just updated the display of Go games, the last move is now marked in red.

Boards are fliped because it's more logical at chess (and most games), to be nearer "reality". I prefer all games displayed the same way, sorry :/

At last, about going automatically to the next game, that's quite right but the confirmation page ('Your move has been sent') may avoid some "problems"... I prefer this way, unless many players ask for this change.

Kind regards.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-10-30 18:13:36)
Big chess "birthday" tournament !

FICGS now counts more than 1000 members :)

The display of Big Chess games has just been improved : Last move marked, coordinates, speed, bugs fixed... So it may be funny to see more games !!

A special tournament will start soon, if you want to enter it, just post "I'm in." (or something like that :)) in this thread. The first 7 players will be in.

The tournament will be there :

http://www.ficgs.com/tournament_FICGS__BIG_CHESS__THOUSAND_MEMBERS_EVENT.html

Games unrated, time control is 30 days + 1 day / move... 7 players -> 6 games per player (big challenge).


Reminder : To see what Big Chess is, see the Inaugural match game...

http://www.ficgs.com/tournament_FICGS__BIG_CHESS__INAUGURAL_MATCH.html


100% human chess guaranteed, no chess engines & databases :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-10-30 20:20:03)
2nd FICGS chess WCH waiting list is open

Hello to all.

The waiting list for the 2nd FICGS chess world championship is open !

The 2nd stage of the first cycle may begin before the end of 2006. Thus, a new WCH cycle should begin every 6 months !


A small update in the rules : "A player can't be involved in two consecutive knockout tournaments." (of course, the 8 players involved in the quarter finals during the last cycle can enter the round-robin tournaments cycle)

Several logical reasons to this change : More fun & more chances for more high-rated players, decreasing the risk of rating peaks & to see a world champion involved in several knockout tournaments & candidates finals... to play the final match against himself :)

[edit : this rule is no more effective, simulations show the results wouldn't be interesting enough, and as it will be hard to start a new WCH cycle every 6 months, it's simply better to see the highest rated players in the knockout tournament, whatever the consequences]

Good luck & best wishes to all...


John Acre    (2006-10-30 22:09:15)
lowball

I absolutely use an engine. The permitted use of engines is the only reason I'm at this site to begin with..... ........... ........... ........... ............. .............. ........... Engine assisted games can be a great study tool, if used correctly. I analyze each position to the best of my ability, record my candidate moves. Select one, record it, and then feed the position into Fritz to see how it evaluates the position......... ........... ............ ............. ........... ............. ............... ............. If my move is in the same ballpark, I make my selected move, I feel fricking great, and I await my opponent's reply. If my move is substantially inferior to Fritz's selection, I try to figure out why, and then I play Fritz's move. This way, not only do I get to understand the positions rising out of my chosen opening in a depth I could otherwise never approach without professional guidance, but each step of the way, I learn to play the next move's position as if the strongest move had been played............. ............ ........... ............. ............ ........... ........... .......... .......... If an opponent blunders in a big way, I mostly let Fritz finish him off, because the game is of no study value to me beyond that point. I don't care what my rating is, except that it be at a number where I can join a variety of rated tournaments (to face a variety of opposition). I don't play at this site to win, or to lose. I play here to get as close as a ~1600 OTB player like me can get to understanding the objective truth of the game............ ........... ........... ........... ........... ............. ............ ........ Sorry if that upsets anybody, but that's the whole reason I'm here. The community isn't big enough to have much independent value as a non-engine-assisted place to play correspondence matches. And why would one bother? There are a million of those places on the web. This place, however, is a one-of-a-kind goldmine. If engine play were to dry up or be outlawed here, what would be the point?....... ........... .......... ........ ........... ......... ........ ........... ............ .......... Anyway, to answer, from my viewpoint, another question asked in this thread, I'm currently self-rated at 1500 for this site. I'm playing in tournaments at about that level, and am admittedly using Fritz 9. My record, out of 20 or so games, looks like it's going to be about 4 wins, 6 losses, and 10 draws......... ............ ........... ............ ............ ............ ........... ............. ...... Only two of those wins are going to be miniatures, and both of those against the same guy. So playing with engine-assisted strength of around 2500 on my slow-ish machine, I'm going to score around 45%, with about 17 out of 18 opponents playing at or above my machine-enhanced strength............... ........... ............. ............ ........ ............ ........... People guessing 50% of users here use engines are lowballing, bigtime. I estimate around 95%. And I have no problem saying that I'm one of them.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-10-31 09:58:18)
2nd FICGS chess WCH waiting list is open

Hello Wayne.

I can do this tomorrow. If the issue is about rating, please note that ratings taken in account at the start of the tournaments (TER : Tournament Entry Rating) are current ones at this time - november rating if this cycle starts ie. on december 15) - so ratings will be automatically updated in the waiting list...

Kind regards.


Stefano Ghisi    (2006-10-31 19:18:13)
Time overstopping

My games 3516 and 3519 had never begun. I won for overstopping or the match is "no contest"?


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-10-31 20:49:57)
Time overstopping

Yes, that's a pity players give up games (particularly in thematic tournaments) like this... It can happen, but not so much games are given up in comparison to other chess servers. Just wait a few days more and it will disappear from your games list...

Kind regards.


Stefano Ghisi    (2006-11-01 19:42:06)
Checkmate

My match 1679 was won by checkmate. Is automatic the adjudication?


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-11-01 20:52:43)
Checkmate / Stalemate

Hello Stefano.

No, your opponent still has to resign if he's checkmated (or accept draw if stalemate).

http://www.ficgs.com/forum_read_185-Checkmate-Stalemate.html


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-11-02 08:31:47)
Partie perdue au temps

Bonjour Daniel.

Exact. Il apparait que le coup a été joué dans l'intervale de quelques heures qui séparent la perte d'une partie au temps de l'adjudication automatique par le robot. Dans ce cas, c'est le joueur lui même qui met fin à la partie... (l'horloge indiquant 'out of time')

Le temps restant pour le dernier coup était de [correction] 127837 secondes, soit 35 heures, 30 minutes et 37 secondes... Votre adversaire a joué le 29/10 à 13h 48 et vous avez répondu le 31/10 à 01h 53, soit 36 heures et 5 minutes après, ce qui explique le message.

Désolé, la cadence 30 jours + 1 jour par coup est difficile à tenir...


Wayne Lowrance    (2006-11-03 04:18:01)
Rating change

Hello, sorry, but try as I do I have difficulty with the rating calculaltion here. I am in a dead draw game with a player rated 1765 at table 236. I wonder if you would not mind giving me my expected loss in rating points with this draw. My rating is 2005. By way of information, I have offered twice now, but he plays on. That is ok, that is his privilage. Thank you Wayne


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-11-03 12:03:47)
temps de réflexion

Bonjour Henri-Louis.

Disons les choses... Ceci est clairement un sujet sans fin et sans solution, discuté sur les forums d'échecs par correspondance (ICCF, IECG etc...) depuis leur création. C'est mathématique, le problème est né de la lenteur de certaines cadences (40 jours + 40 jours / 10 coups), d'où le choix d'une cadence de 30 jours + 1 jour / coup pour les tournois rapides, peu demandés à haut niveau, et le championnat.

Et comme le dirait un certain Dominique de Villepin, j'entends ceux qui se plaignent, mais j'entends également ceux qui ne se plaignent pas :) ... J'ai lancé un fil il y a quelques semaines sur les temps de réflexion, les seules réponses que j'ai eues étaient claires : "Ne changez rien !" .. Tous les joueurs n'ont pas les mêmes dispositions de temps pour jouer aux échecs par correspondance, j'ai simplement mis en place la formule qui à mon avis peut convenir au plus grand nombre.. Pour certains, les cadences lentes sont trop rapides (je ne blague pas), pour d'autres les cadences rapides sont trop lentes... A cela je n'ai pas de solution raisonnable, je suis à peu près certain qu'aucune amélioration sensible ne peut être apportée dans un sens ou l'autre sans que beaucoup de joueurs ne s'en plaignent... La règle des 60 jours ne s'applique en général qu'à ceux qui abandonnent leurs parties et qui n'en tirent donc aucun avantage. Pour les autres, si la limite était fixée à 30 jours, cela ne changerait rien, avec un coup joué tous les 30 jours pour faire "durer", le temps total de la partie serait le même...

Le nombre de plaintes est très faible pour plus de 4000 parties arbitrées. A moins d'une meilleure idée qui satisferait tout le monde, je pense qu'il faut laisser les choses en l'état.

Amicalement, Thibault.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-11-03 14:55:07)
Only 965 ?!

About the chess rating list, I updated the code a few days ago. It is now "semi-static" (automatically updated every 6 hours at most)

6 hours, that was theory... I just found the small bug, thanks :)


Thomas Gilbreath    (2006-11-04 15:51:55)
The matter is resolved

Thanks, and good luck with the rest of the games....... - Thomas


Sebastian Palozzi    (2006-11-05 14:29:19)
A Moment of Clarity

I find it interesting that no matter how bizzare his life and his thoughts might be I can usually find a moment of perfect clarity and thought; his description of Capablanca's style and ability coincide very nicely with the latest computer analysis of World Champion strength and style as posted on Chessbase. It seems to me that putting aside all questions of strength or playing ability Fischer has a profound knowledge and love of chess. If he is wrong about anything he is wrong about his own feelings about the game.


Dinesh De Silva    (2006-11-06 05:59:08)
Re:

What was the last tournament Fischer played in?!...... the rematch with Spassky in the 1990s?!?


Charlie Neil    (2006-11-07 15:06:33)
Fischer's last tournament

would've been the 1971 Interzonal. After that all his games with , Taimanov, Larsen, Petrosian and Spassky were all matches. How's that for being pedantic?


Dinesh De Silva    (2006-11-07 15:45:25)
Re:

Charlie, I'm almost certain that Fischer played some sorta return match versus Spassky somewhere in the ninetees in Yugoslavia!?? & won. Maybe Thibault knows some details about it.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-11-07 16:14:47)
Match of the century

Revenge match of the 20th century happened in 1992 in Yugoslavia...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bobby_Fischer#Revenge_Match_of_the_20th_Century

About his last tournament, I've no idea...


Dorel Oltean    (2006-11-10 22:00:27)
retire, come back. What's next ?

I’m playing in two tournaments with Mr Marez : class M02 and WCH M01. Mr Marez had practically retired from the FICGS tournaments because he did not play for a very long period (one-two month). He lost on time 4 of 5 remaining games in each tournament. Now he comes back to continue the games he did not lose on time. By proceeding like that he is not fair to all the participants in the given tournaments, ruins the results and gives a not serious character, an amateur-like flavor to the tournaments. On top of that he is now registered for other tournaments. I think someone must do something about that.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-11-11 07:24:59)
temps de réflexion

Such a rule (a player who do not connect to the server during more than 30 or 60 days [+holidays] automatically looses all his games at the same time) could be applied, but would it solve all cases & problems. I don't think so...

About time controls, is 30 days + 1 day / move really too slow ? What else ?


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-11-11 19:27:15)
Chess tournaments : Performances

Hello to all.

Performances are now displayed for chess tournaments in the tournament crosstable pages.. (click the picture near the tournament name)

It doesn't mean anything for the rating calculation as games taken in account depend on tournament entry ratings (TER). Informative only :)


Wolfgang Utesch    (2006-11-12 17:04:21)
Black to move!

It seems to be an easy way for White after 50.g5! - but wait and see. The Black defending resources are not to underestimate. FEN= 4bk2/q3r1p1/1R1p1p1p/3P1PP1/4PK1P/4QN2/8/8 b - - 0 50


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-11-12 18:41:41)
Incredible life of chess players...

Sometimes I'm simply stunned by the players informations I can read... :)

http://www.ficgs.com/display_informations.php?member=1065


That's great to welcome players from all horizons... and ages !


Dinesh De Silva    (2006-11-13 07:41:10)
Re:

Yes, the informations regarding Mr Macarsindale is very interesting! I did some quick research & found out that he speaks quite a number of languages.......English,French,German,Dutch,Portugese.......


Ilmars Cirulis    (2006-11-13 22:11:42)
Thanks!!!

Thibault, did you read my thoughts? :D

Thanks very much fo Marshall counterattack thematic!!


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-11-14 16:47:18)
Kramnik vs. Deep Fritz, 2006

In less than 2 weeks from now, classical & FIDE world champion Vladimir Kramnik will play the best (at least most famous) chess program Deep Fritz 10 !

From november 25 to december 5, 2006 at the Federal Art Hall in Bonn. One million US dollars for Kramnik if he defeats Deep Fritz, half this amount otherwise...

We did not forget the previous match in Bahrain (2002), that ended with a 3-3 score.

Do you feel Fritz improved enough to beat a player like Kramnik, who most probably improved his play too... Will Kramnik play rather different openings than in his match against Topalov ? .. Anyway it should be an interesting match to follow.


A few links :

http://www.kramnik.com/eng/news/viewarticle.aspx?id=95
http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=2947



Thibault de Vassal    (2006-11-15 21:30:40)
New chessboards

Ok, some new chessboards (default big & giant) are really awful :)

I've just added two sets : "Graphics" is nice and quite big, "Phantom" is... big only !

If you know places on internet where one can download nice free pictures (gif format) for each chess pieces, please send me your links...

Thanks in advance.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-11-16 04:42:49)
Go scorer improvement

Actually both methods will return the same score for closed positions only (after removing dead groups), but it can also estimate an early position by sharing out undecided territories. There, the two methods may return different values.


Ryaad Aabid    (2006-11-16 09:28:27)
Suggestion

All openings became known nowadays. If the opponents ends the openinig step, the clock will automatically be changed from 30 or 40 days to 7 or 10 days. If the player has no time enough to visit the website during 7 or 10 days, he/she should take vacation, otherwise to leave! instead of bothering his/her opponents. Thank you Thibault, Ryaad


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-11-17 14:40:56)
Chess and politics...

Just noticed this link on TCCMB correspondence chess forum, to MSNBC article by Howard Fineman : "Iraq exit strategy and the Tehran gambit"... Quite funny. (no matter political ideas, only chess metaphors)

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15728086


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-11-17 18:59:02)
Tournaments with money prizes

Hello to all.

Finally, Chess & Go tournaments with money prizes will begin in 2007 january !

"Money chess" is an all times controversy, many players play for fun only (even at the highest levels), others like much more this way of play. I think it's simply the most challenging, finally it quite looks like classical tournaments.

About Go, things are quite different, as software & particularly engines are a negligible factor in the play. The best players will probably always win, but weak players may be interested in a lesson.


You may have noticed some changes in the waiting list categories for money tournaments :

Two formats for 2-players matches will be available, 8 games matches (time control 30 days + 1 day / move) and 2 games duels (time control 40 days + 40 days / 10 moves) renewed in case of a draw.

Simultaneous games will be also organized with international masters for both games, with prizes shared if some players could beat the masters.

Of course, it won't change anything to the free tournaments & championships, it will be optional only. I hope it will help to provide prizes for the FICGS chess & Go world championships (sponsors are welcome :)) ...

The membership page - Terms and Conditions - has also been updated.

http://www.ficgs.com/membership.html

Some major changes (as in money tournaments pages) might happen until 2007 january.


Feel free to post here if you have any comment or suggestion.

Best wishes.


Charlie Neil    (2006-11-19 21:05:51)
Match FICGS vs GameKnot

How/where can I view the match games on GameKnot? Is it possible to see them as there being played as we can here? I'm just nosey.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-11-19 21:19:37)
Match FICGS vs GameKnot

It should be possible, but I don't know all links for the games... :/


Miguel Pires    (2006-11-19 22:20:57)
Match FICGS vs GameKnot

I draw my GK game with Cairo. I hoppe i can win in FICGS, but... Regard's Miguel Pires


Marius Zubac    (2006-11-20 00:25:05)
The penalty system - a proposal

A player that for a (good) reason is not able to continue his games should have two choices: A) Let some games get lost on time and then he would be treated under the penalty system. B) Ask for a retirement and in this case no penalties should be applied. Once a player asks for retirement the following actions should be taken: 1. His status in the rating list should be flagged to retired; perhaps a retired player should not be able to register a new tournament; 2. A retired player could get re-instated by applying directly to the FICGS adjudication commission; 3. All the retired player’s running games should then be frozen and dealt with on a by tournament basis: 3a) if in a tournament the retired player has finished games that are not lost the remaining games should be adjudicated by FICGS for rating purposes. However all the retired player’s games should not be counted for qualification purposes (if the tournament provides qualification to a next stage); how the games are to be considered for norms is a matter to be discussed. 3b) if in a tournament the retired player has finished games that are all lost the tournament director can act as in 3a) or has the option of canceling all the retired player’s games. This proposal is far from perfect but shows that we are not helpless and some action can be taken. The reason I mentioned IECG is because probably on the server the population is roughly equivalent with the FICGS’s one but in IECG’s case the distributed is more favorable in the upper section. This is the reason why there is enough active population at any given time for new tournaments and severe rules are not needed as much as in FICGS’s case in order to maintain a meaningful activity. My belief is that the centaur mode will prove in time to generate stronger games, stronger chess and FICGS will have chances to become in time the most relevant correspondence chess server. The technical conditions are already met. Marius


Lawrence Nesko    (2006-11-20 01:39:51)
Thank you....

...for the timely and informative response, Thibault.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-11-20 15:59:46)
Go : Komi

Komi 7.5 points is the 'estimated' fair value while playing perfect (at least pro)...

Since we use elo rating system for Go, I think any handicap (stones or komi) is nonsense, but maybe we could create an unrated category of tournaments, simultaneous games or matches with a handicap... Could be fun & more interesting in some cases.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-11-20 16:20:17)
Wikichess

Wikichess is a chess tree, you can go forward or back just by following the links - moves or 'back', then enter new moves...

When you browse Wikichess in contributor mode (when logged in), your name is automatically added but it will be recorded only if you submit the commentary. It's all explained on the wikichess page ;)


Lionel Vidal    (2006-11-20 16:40:27)
7.5 or 6.5 ?

In most recent pro games (eg. last meijin match) the komi was 6.5 if I remember well.
Oh, but that was japanese rule ?!? Is that where the difference comes from? hum, I am sure I *knew* that... :-(


Lawrence Nesko    (2006-11-20 19:42:00)
Thanks, Thibault

I appreciate the response. In many of the books I have read (particularly Seirawan's series), I have almost always seen e.p. as the notation for an en passant capture. Perhaps my source materials are older, or perhaps they are not using tournament conventions?

Either way, I'll keep this in mind for future reference. Thanks again!


Lionel Vidal    (2006-11-20 21:57:03)
Go handicap and rating

Is handicap Go really nonsensical in rated tournaments?
While it seems so in a world championship, where the aim is to determine the stronger player in an absolute sense, why should it be so in a tournament, where the aim is to determine the best player in a relative sense... hum, not a very clean or clear sentence, but I hope you got the idea :-)

In face to face Go, in most amateur tournaments, it is not a problem, and you can win or loose a tournament, win or loose points, playing with an handicap (some tournaments set a limit lower than 9 in the number of handicap stones). I do not know the formulae used to compute the knew ratings, but in practice it works well. (and the same thing works also in Shogi tournaments)

Before WWII, even pros played with handicap (one or two stones at most, more commonly with a fixed color and no komi) and that *for money*!! Nowadays this is not the case anymore: maybe the increase of pro-tournament prizes change the noble way to be the best of two players fighting *their best* at their *respective* level!

Anyway, I think such an idea may be interresting to motivate players: when weaker, I will fight my best because I have a chance to win, and when stronger, I *have* to fight well :-)

We could think of a rating system where you play your first, say, 20 games without handicap to get a starting rating, and then to receive or give handicaps automatically in tournaments. We could then consider a rating as fixed after a bunch of 20 more games...
Or any other system that will always generate tense and dangerous games! That will be, at least for me, a great motivation to play more :-)
(but then I do not care much for my rating :-))


Daniel Khayman    (2006-11-20 22:13:29)
Messages

hello Wayne, i'm glad you've popped in. yeah, apparently not many players here like to have a friendly chat while playing but, hey, you can always find a way around it so, if you wanna talk, my friend, just post a topic here and we'll discuss it......or maybe we can do by the usual e-mails :-). thanks for your welcoming Wayne and hope to meet you soon across the board.. daniel p.s.: today my son has been hospitalised for 10 days to examine what appears to be a certain case of autism: the final diagnosis will be made at the end of this session but i'm not to optimistic anymore; he looked like he'd been improving but it was only a mirage or maybe just my irrational hope that all this be a bad dream from which i'll soon wake up. i've woken up, alright?!?! what can you do? life goes on and he's forever gonna need me so i can't afford to despair. the greatest match of my yet short life has begun. see you around Wayne.


Don Groves    (2006-11-21 00:45:58)
Go: Komi

Hi Thibault, I'm confused as to why elo ratings matter. Go has used komi a long time to compensate for the first move while chess never has. But in chess, you have narrower rating groups, so practically never is an expert matched against a novice. Since in Go we have only three rating groups, these uneven matches happen many times. Until we have enough Go players to have more rating groups, a sliding komi scale would be a way to level the playing field a bit. PS - I'm not interested in traditional Go handicap games -- the empty board is the only true way to begin, IMHO.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-11-21 21:24:02)
Poker, chess & chance

As many of you, I regularly read Chessbase news and I was quite surprised to read this article "A chess master's poker tour" by Almira Skripchenko about World Poker Championship, french celebrities and so on... (a way to popularize chess ? or is it only Almira ? :))

I used to play stud poker and I was just looking informations about the part of chance in games. I only found this article written in french (sorry) :

http://jeuxstrategie.free.fr/page_le_jeu_de_strategie_cest_quoi.php

If you know something about that or an article on the internet, I'm quite interested in.

Here is a personal estimation - at first sight - of the part of chance (opposed to a perfect play) in some games :


Chess, Go (& all determined games) : 0 %

Scrabble, Trivial pursuit : 20 %
Poker : 30 %
Monopoly : 70 %

Roulette, Loto (& all chancy games) : 100 %


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-11-21 21:30:43)
Go: komi

Hi Don.

As Lionel explained to me a few months ago, Komi shouldn't be interpreted as an advantage or handicap !

I first thought komi could be 0... but it doesn't make any sense in Go philosophy & theory. Komi's purpose is only to make the game fair, and the estimated value seems to be about 6.5 or 7.5


Barry Bell    (2006-11-22 05:17:38)
Introduction

Thank you Thibault for your warm welcome, please feel free to create a 178 x 159 pixels jpg providing information about your site and I will post it a soon as possible. P.S. this offer is available to any webmaster that runs an online turn based chess system. Thanks again.


Lionel Vidal    (2006-11-22 13:51:55)
Scrabble?

Just to point out that scrabble, when played in duplicate, is 0% chance (but I vastly prefer the game as a duell, despite some luck, easily almost cancelled by a 10 games match, because of the various blocking and counting strategies involved :-)).
Same thing for bridge BTW.


Barry Bell    (2006-11-23 06:35:18)
Re:

I also want to mention that our system is very fexiable, with tournament play and normal game play. Example re tournaments: You start the tournament, you get choose whether it is open or closed, you make decisions on pairings if you want or just let the computer decide. You deal with complaints, withdraw or return players in the tournament, declare a winner, draw etc. In other words you cant just set the tournament on auto pilot and forget about it (well I can no else can...grin). Normal play, you find 7 days is not enough time, if the other player agree you baiscly can set your own time frames. Yes an option to claim a win will appear if your opponent does not move in 7 days but you dont have to accept it! I hope this is not to much information. - Thanks


Glen D. Shields    (2006-11-23 06:38:17)
No Thanks

Why in the world would I want to play on a site that sounds as disorganized as yours? There are tens of places to play like FICGS that are well organized and aren't shrouded in mystery. When you figure out what you want to be, want kind of tournaments you want to offer (turn based doesn't mean anything sorry), and you offer folks the opportunity to evaluate your site without harvesting their personal information, I'll take a look and re-consider.

Good luck.


Peter Eizenhammer    (2006-11-23 16:00:42)
No information and too ambitious

Visiting the homepage one can read some/few lines and is told that anyone4chess is going to "create the rules of chess" (sic!) and wants to be a "chess entity" "following the example of Fide". Wow, very ambitious. Thinking about it I am not so sure if people would be impressed if I told them that I am a GM created by anyone, ah Anyone. Really, these creative some lines full of hubris could not convince me to register, sorry. Peter


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-11-24 01:16:50)
dreams are not reality...

Elmer, let me dream a few days more, please :)

If the match is not 'arranged', everything can happen. I'm sure Kramnik can win 1 game or 2, and draw the other ones...

Chess engines have nothing more to prove, a win for Kramnik would give new interest for the match Kramnik vs. Fritz 12, a draw would be a non-event and a loss for Kramnik would be interpreted as "Chess is completely dead"... Not so good for Chessbase... Choose.

But finally, if Bobby was right ? :) .. (sure not)


Wayne Lowrance    (2006-11-24 06:44:37)
Kramnik vs. Deep Fritz, 2006

My two cents. I have little interest in this match. It is no longer any doubt wheather the programs are stronger than the Human. The playing field for this match is not even,. Kramnik has secured far too much of an advantage based on the rules of the match. He will play just well enough to secure a draw, or even perhaps push to a 31/2-21/2 win. After all gotta keep up the suspense for the next big payday cow. Anyways Fritz is not the strongest Engine I believe Human-Program matches should be played without handicap for the program. Then we know who is champs. so now in my view I already know. Wayne


Marc Lacrosse    (2006-11-24 09:27:56)
completely unfair and thus impredictible

The fact that the match conditions have been arranged on such unfair rules has two immediate consequences :
- we already know for sure that Kramnik himself is sure that he could not succeed on a more fair ground
- final result is unpredictible and probably already arranged beforehand

Marc

By the way the rules are really incredible.
Just an example : not only does Kramnik have the final opening book of Fritz at home for preparation, but moreover he will have the right to see Fritz's opening book _during_ the games with the various moves that could be played by the engne according to the player's intended move, together with the associated statistics. so in the unfortunate case where Kramnik could not remember is home killer preparation he will have the various choices presented to his eyes during play. Pretty incredible !
and there are quite a dozen rules like that ... (including the right for Kramnik only to call for an adjournement with subsequent overnight computer- or fellow-GM-assisted analysis ...)
For those who would like to have a look the complete rules are on Susan Polger's blog : http://www.susanpolgar.blogspot.com/



Thibault de Vassal    (2006-11-26 12:51:03)
Game 1

Vladimir Kramnik - Deep Fritz

1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.g3 d5 4.Bg2 dxc4 5.Qa4+ Nbd7 6.Qxc4 a6 7.Qd3 c5 8.dxc5 Bxc5 9.Nf3 0-0 10.0-0 Qe7 11.Nc3 b6 12.Ne4 Nxe4 13.Qxe4 Nf6 14.Qh4 Bb7 15.Bg5 Rfd8 16.Bxf6 Qxf6 17.Qxf6 gxf6 18.Rfd1 Kf8 19.Ne1 Bxg2 20.Kxg2 f5 21.Rxd8+ Rxd8 22.Nd3 Bd4 23.Rc1 e5 24.Rc2 Rd5 25.Nb4 Rb5 26.Nxa6 Rxb2 27.Rxb2 Bxb2 28.Nb4 Kg7 29.Nd5 Bd4 30.a4 Bc5 31.h3 f6 32.f3 Kg6 33.e4 h5 34.g4 hxg4 35.hxg4 fxe4 36.fxe4 Kg5 37.Kf3 Kg6 38.Ke2 Kg5 39.Kd3 Bg1 40.Kc4 Bf2 41.Kb5 Kxg4 42.Nxf6+ Kf3 43.Kc6 Bh4 44.Nd7 Kxe4 45.Kxb6 Bf2+ 46.Kc6 Be1 47.Nxe5 ½-½

Does Kramnik really hope to win the match in a struggle, just wait for a bug or only manage a draw more... Waiting for the 2nd game.


Elmer Valderrama    (2006-11-27 20:40:39)
one move deeper..

..well, "Deep" Fritz 10 is at least one move deeper than Kramnik

Kramnik blundered mate in 1 in game 2 :(


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-11-28 23:06:59)
new chat bar

Hello Jason.

Sorry about that. I'll think about a new option in preferences to automatically disable the chat bar. However you can close it already during your session by clicking the arrow just before 'International chat'.

Thanks for feedback.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-11-29 15:11:37)
White to move :)

Okay, I just made a test.

Three beginners who were not aware of the game... 'White to move' : Only 1 of 3 found the checkmate, so maybe it's harder than we thought :)

ChessPosition (see diagram)


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-12-01 11:19:43)
Deep Fritz, Rybka & future

The Chess Challenge 2006 in Bonn between classical world champion Vladimir Kramnik and chess engine Deep Fritz 10 confirms (who ignored ?) the best chess programs can rivalize with the world champion in a match, but it first shows us these calculating monsters still have weaknesses.

Question is : What are the real improvements in Fritz 10 compared to Fritz 9 (engine speaking only) ?

Here is what I think about chess engines nowadays (Fritz 10, Shredder, 10, Junior 10, Hiarcs 10 and particularly Rybka 2.2) :

The way of think to play correspondence chess is (or should be) mostly human one combined with a chess engine algorithm. We follow the tree of moves like a program with our selective algorithm (much better than chess engines), applying our judgement of the position when necessary only. The point is we evaluate moves and we almost never evaluate a position twice.

Chess engines are very good analysis tools but are surprisingly not designed to be very good chess players. I think a major improvement in chess engines should be recognition of 'sufficient moves' : ie. it is no worth to always find the best move at a particular point of the tree, this reflection time could be used later... It depends on the evaluation of the position, on the clocks... Iterative model is quite basic (in a game at least !).

Another point is recognition of traps. This is the start of psychology in chess engines, and basics of the art of war. It first depends on who your opponent is, and on the clocks too. Finally, at the end of the tree, chess engines evaluate positions, but how many evaluate moves ? .. Speculative moves were a step, but it first shew chess engines were not able yet to see what move is worth to be analysed really deeper, consequently creating a 'human' weakness, particularly against some other chess engines.

I don't know how Rybka works, but as far as I read about this one that calculates much less positions (about 10 times) than Fritz, I wouldn't be surprised that Vasik Rajlich had implemented a better approach of human way of think, which is undoubtly the future of chess engines.

A good 'centaur' in ie. Playchess rapid tournaments is first a good choice between Chessbase engines according to the position and clocks. Fritz qualities probably apply best in standard games, where clocks are really designed for him. Among Chessbase engines, Hiarcs is probably the best Blitz player and could be the best correspondence chess player (even if it isn't the best CC tool for humans). Rybka is probably a kind of centaur itself (sorry, herself ;)), knowing when to use (in the tree !) brute force and more selective approachs - not to be compared to Hydra or Deep Blue which, on contrary, use most brute force.

My conclusion is chess engines have much to learn from humans yet, we'll see a Rybka 5 and Fritz 13, with much better results against other chess engines, but their results shouldn't increase a lot against the best humans in future. Finally, it will never be a good correspondence chess player :)

My two cents.


If I find time, I'll continue to implement my own chess engine..... but it's a lot of work :/


Lionel Vidal    (2006-12-02 08:55:46)
Intuition?! What for ?

3 out of 4? Really? Which test-matches are you refering to?
Leotard made a test (won :-) and with grand manner) but that was years ago, and besides, he is one of the very best :-)
Then there is the match against a panel of different engines by Ham: even if he does not play at the same level than Leotard, he is quite a good player!... and the results were very far from 3 to 4 for human :-( (that was also years ago!) Then there are the hydra matches... :-( the results are not very good also for humans and the game comments are very instructive: against first class expertise chess knowledge and intuition, the 'dump' brute force machine managed to handle quite well complex ending positions...at least as well as all correspondence players but the very best (I would say the top 20 at most :-()
Maybe there is some recent test I am not aware of?

But the point really is: who can play like, say, Leotard? Of course, he says he can crush computers, just by playing them like 2500 rated players... well, I can believe that... but when I play a fritz-push-button opponent, I am only a 2300 player... have I to use also an engine to have a chance (and one game out of ten, be very proud to have chosen another move than one of the few the engine suggested as best and still not have lost... ok, just kidding :-)?
It can be still fun, but I think it is not the same kind of chess Leotard alludes to when speaking of himself in his after match interview :-)


Lionel Vidal    (2006-12-02 09:54:32)
A lone engine in CC :-)

Suppose I make the following test (it has certainily be proposed before, but let's do it again, for the fun of the argument):
- I buy a recent engine (say the new Fritz10)
- I play in some CC tournaments (I do not want to pay fees, so let's say, here at FICGS of course :-), and at iecg)
- I choose the first moves of all my games based on some statistics made on a CC base (just to avoid some openings statistically bad in CC)
- starting from a few moves before the engine goes out of its opening book (to be defined, maybe 4 moves) I let my average computer run 10 hours by move (around one night per move... I know, I sleep too much :-)
- I *always* play the very move the engine finds as best
- I play as many tournaments as I can, considering the time constraint that limits the number of games (just to get a meaningful rating as fast as possible)

Now, what rating do you think I can reach at most, strictly following these guidelines?
(note that if I know some basic maths to do the stats, I do not even have to know chess rules... although a basic knowledge is assumed to ease the play in practice)
Are you ready to bet on your guess ? :-)

In pratice, the test does not work, because the tester dies from boredom long before he gets any rating :-))


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-12-02 13:40:46)
Chess engines CC ratings

It is my estimation. 3 out of 4 represents about 200 elo points. I doubt Chessbase will organize a Man(+Machine) vs. Machine correspondence chess match... However there are a few examples : Arno Nickel - Hydra (2,5-0,5), Hydra which beat Adams over the board 5,5-0,5 ... And I suppose Arno Nickel did not have access to the program, but knowing better his opponent I'm sure it's possible to reach such a score against any program.

About your test, it's been discussed here already :) .. In my opinion such a player's rating would travel between 2200 and 2400 (at most) mark !

Waiting for a match against Rykba :)


Charlie Neil    (2006-12-03 15:03:09)
New chessboards

Enormous is big enough! Sometimes size does matter. Thanks Thibault for another improvement to an improving site.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-12-04 01:27:44)
Reminds me something...

Ok, now I'm afraid conditions are 'ok' so that Kramnik looses this match...

Let's say game 6 is a draw, Deep Fritz 10 wins the match by score 3,5-2,5 first program on a normal computer to beat a world champion. Great...

However Vladimir Kramnik can be satisfied of his performance, he obtained a completely winning position and didn't really loose any game. He just gave his opponent a full point in a draw position.

Honor is safe, everyone wins. Like the song, what a wonderful world :)


Don Groves    (2006-12-04 05:25:01)
Intuition

A good definition of intuition is the immediate knowing of something without the conscious use of reasoning. This leads to two observations: (1) Computers cannot do anything without reasoning (programming) and thus cannot act intuitively. (2) Intuition can be trained by practice. The more intimately we are familiar with anything (say a game), the more likely our first impression (immediate knowing) will be correct. So, I think intuition gained through experience plays a large role and an intuitive player can go far in Chess or Go. At some point, however, one must become a good analyst to progress further. I would be interested in opinions about how far in each game (elo rating) a purely intuitive player might progress.


Elmer Valderrama    (2006-12-04 14:18:02)
intuition

I disagree, chess knowledge can't be equated to intuition, here is my long post about it (why am I writing about the same things all over and over and at the same time of year, I dunno ;)

1. Players without any intuition whatsoever but great working capabilitites (as Botvinnik, Fischer, Kasparov, ..engines..)

-they never relie on intuition (they dont have any at all after all) so everything must be subject to calculation, they have the "hardware" (perfect body and mental conditions, rigorous training, perfect visual/realistic representation of positions and a great chess knowledge which must be kept fresh in mind -if not, they wouldn't have reference points to judge/evaluate resulting positions.

When on top form they can beat anybody and I mean ANY body: human, extraterrestial, ultragalactic, trans-natural, hyper-divine,etc, and for an overwhelming score, like 6-0 ;)..well you know what I mean.

The drawback well you already know it, it last a mig, except for the engines, no-one can keep up with this regime (GK could for a long time, but resorting to short breaks (not playing for WC, choosing carefully where to play etc,) But most important it's impossible to implement for long if the "hardware" -see above- starts to "leak oil" then it's all over..

This can be brought up to an art, like Kasparov or Fischer, it is more powerful than understanding chess as a natural tongue (as intuitive players) because the "top-form" competitive element is always present and the "hardware" works in pristine conditions.

From the above it follows of course that engines are the ultimate chess warrior over the board at least (and only there, not in CC)

2. Those who have strategical intuition. (Capablanca, Petrosian, Karpov maybe Anand..)The general impression is that they are simply lazy people: not need to work out any thing as they just "know" where pieces should go and what the point is of their moves, usually there is no need for deep calculations, just two or three moves (4 to 6 plies) to corroborate the "feeling" and the game is won.

The "feeling" is hard to express in words, and usually is lost if expressed in words ;). It goes beyond a simply pattern recognition, or a full database of chess knowledge, it is about predicting the future possibilities (not having real positions in mind, just the "possibilities" or general lines of play in future positions which may or may not happen to appear for real in the game. They can play for long long time and win a lot of tournaments (Karpov I believe have the record of won tournaments)

3. Those who have special understanding in unbalanced positions (Alekhine, Tal, Korchnoi..) They are dynamic players who love to calculate but not for the sake of finding the best of the best of the best of the moves (as those in group 1 would do), they calculate SOME variations, those who have meaning to them I see them as players of group 2 with a more or less working "hardware" i.e they are not going to trust 2 or 3 moves variations neither they are going to speculate on the future possibilities without any ground/basic calculation under it. Their "feeling" is again hard to express in words, but I believe it is something like calculating a 10-12 plies variation with every position in-between being subconciously excrutinated for crushing unexpected turning moves (this is not done by players of group 1, they would calculate "normal replies" in that 10-12 plies variation and would have to go deeper (like 20-30 plies to see the point ;)

So that "feeling" is what enable us to compose music, create art etc but also it is something that enable us to err like fools :( Whether it can be mimicked by software or not it's an open question but as I said a calculation 40-50 plies deep it's practically equal to using intuition... Obviously the above classification of G Kasparov it's a bit rough in the sense that there are very few "pure intuitive" players (of either group 2 or 3) as mentioned by Don in his post most of the players is a mix of talent I believe, if I had to choose a pure intuitive player from those groups I would point Capablanca and Korchnoi, and of course Kasparov of group 1


Wayne Lowrance    (2006-12-05 03:26:24)
Chess Engines CC Ratings

Waiting for a match against Rybka ? :) hummmm Wayne


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-12-06 00:05:33)
Deep Fritz 10

... wins the match 4-2

It's a shock (even if Kramnik said it and repeated - deeeep fritz is favorite). It's hard to explain such a result.


Deep Fritz - Vladimir Kramnik

1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 a6 6.Bc4 e6 7.0-0 Be7 8.Bb3 Qc7 9.Re1 Nc6 10.Re3 0-0 11.Rg3 Kh8 12.Nxc6 bxc6 13.Qe2 a5 14.Bg5 Ba6 15.Qf3 Rab8 16.Re1 c5 17.Bf4 Qb7 18.Bc1 Ng8 19.Nb1 Bf6 20.c3 g6 21.Na3 Qc6 22.Rh3 Bg7 23.Qg3 a4 24.Bc2 Rb6 25.e5 dxe5 26.Rxe5 Nf6 27.Qh4 Qb7 28.Re1 h5 29.Rf3 Nh7 30.Qxa4 Qc6 31.Qxc6 Rxc6 32.Ba4 Rb6 33.b3 Kg8 34.c4 Rd8 35.Nb5 Bb7 36.Rfe3 Bh6 37.Re5 Bxc1 38.Rxc1 Rc6 39.Nc3 Rc7 40.Bb5 Nf8 41.Na4 Rdc8 42.Rd1 Kg7 43.Rd6 f6 44.Re2 e5 45.Red2 g5 46.Nb6 Rb8 47.a4 1-0


It seems to me it was allowed to Kramnik to consult Fritz opening book, so first why to play 8. ...Qc7 !?


Charlie Neil    (2006-12-06 09:55:45)
Ficgs vs Gameknot

What is the current totals is the match. I can see the Ficgs score but I can't find the Gameknot results. I'm sure we (ficgs) are doing well.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-12-06 18:18:54)
David Bronstein

David Bronstein (February 19, 1924, Bila Tserkva, Ukraine - December 5, 2006, Minsk, Belarus) was not only one of the fathers of anti-computer play, he also drew a challenge match for the title of world champion by a score of 12-12 with Mikhail Botvinnik, the reigning champion.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Bronstein

He played (and beat) all the first well known chess programs : Rebel, Fritz, Zarkov, Chess player, Deep Thought, Socrates, Saitek Sparc, MChess, Genius, Dark Thought, Deep Blue Jr., XXXX ...

Some of his games - http://www.angelfire.com/on/anticomputer/bronst.html


Wayne Lowrance    (2006-12-06 22:53:58)
Very surprised

F10 4-2, simply amazing and unbelievable. I will never put faith in any of these chessbase promotional matches. With the advantages (various) that Kas had and given his chess stature this result cannot be trusted. F10 is a great program for sure but should not have been able to win 4-2. My two cents Wayne


Lionel Vidal    (2006-12-09 21:24:05)
scrabble+

Your idea for scrabble is interesting but the luck seems still there (not that luck is a problem per se IMO): even if the letters are shown, their very order is luck dependend ; and the only thing that really changes is that you can forsee the letters of your opponent and play accordingly... and so the game is actually more simple (!) IMO, more calculating prone and less strategic because you remove some possibilities, all as likely, in your move tree.
To be more concrete, suppose you can play a scrabble for, say, 75 points, and open the grid for the opponent, or play a nice glue-word for, say 40 points, but let the grid closed enough. In your proposed game, I just have to look at my opponent possibilities, as I know his letters... I calculate one, two or more moves ahead and say, ok, I can open the grid and still win by 10 points. In the normal game, I have to estimate, if the openess of the grid is worth the 35 points difference and that means calculating the rough propabilities to score points on the letters I open, considering what my opponent already played, if he seems waiting for some specific letters, or maybe he is bluffing, but then by experience I know that the double 'e' I let is not very valuable, considering that only four expensive letters remain...and so on: the game seems much more strategic and interesting for me.
Of course, I can loose because my letters are really bad... but that is quite uncommon on a whole game for good players, and almost meaningless on a match with, say, five set or more. (remember that the goal is not to make words, but to score points, or to prevent your opponent doing so on the grid, something a good player can almost always do whatever his letters).

For the chess engine, I did try some, and frankly my level in blitz play is so terrible that gnuchess is enough for me for a quick match:-). Now I tried Fruit and Hiarcs on some of my correspondence games and even on my modest scale, I was not very happy with the result: they did suggest others moves than mine, but that were moves I would never have played (maybe (surely?) I am wrong, but I am not sure)... so what would be the point to waste computer time? Even if they may suggest a good move I missed, I would still feel uneasy to play something 'outside' my own mind... old fashion maybe, but that is how I have fun in chess :-) I still like the waiting of the reply, while wondering if I made an oversight! (that being said, I used and will still use the tablebases reading engine when needed: very useful at some points :-)
But then maybe my biais against engines made me use them badly :-) Never mind, I am not going to apologize for that to a silicon piece of junk :-) And if the beast feels somehow insulted and asks for a real time match, let's just play Go!


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-12-10 16:20:16)
FIDE's world championship format

Quite good news...

http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=3530

Ok, we'll have a final match between a challenger and the world champion, this is great !
(the worst is avoided)


In future, the challenger should be designated after a multi-stages round-robin tournaments cycle, then a candidates match (original :))

Will it be enough to attract sponsors... In my opinion the candidates match should be played in 6 games at least, and the knockout tournament should be at least 2 or 3 rounds long. Several round-robin tournaments, this looks like correspondence chess format and this is useful when you have many players and few time. I'm not sure it's a good choice for OTB world chess championship... :/

What do you think ?


Dinesh De Silva    (2006-12-10 17:37:05)
Re:

I fully agree with the view that the candidates match should be played in 6 games at least, and the knockout tournament should be at least 2 or 3 rounds long.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-12-11 17:32:37)
Portuguese Oppening

Ok, we'll have this thematic tournament :)


Wayne Lowrance    (2006-12-13 17:13:33)
Rubka clearly the best !

Yes, iv'e seen similiar postings with similiar results. I am wondering if programs like DF10 are better in coorespondence chess such as in the centaur mode. I have also read that DF10 is probobly better against a human. Ie recent match. And their is the latest Hiarcs etc...very interesting to me.


Daniel De Noose    (2006-12-13 14:29:26)
Rybka clearly the best ?

This week I have tested Rybka againt 3 others engines.

The parameters :
----------------

Intel Centrino 725 (1,67 Ghz), 64 Mb Hash Tables, games in 10 minutes (+ 2 seconds per move) for each "player", Shredder 9 interface, 20 games' matches, HS-Masterbook Opening book .

The Engines :
-------------

Rybka 2.2 W32, Gambit Fruit 1.0 Beta 4bx, Toga 1.2.1a and Shredder 9.

The Results :
-------------

1) Rybka - Shredder 9 :

15,5 / 4,5 (+13,-2,=5)

2) Rybka - Toga 1.2.1a :

12 / 8 (+8,-4,=8)

3) Rybka - Gambit Fruit :

13,5 / 6,5 (+10,-3,=7)

The comments :
--------------

Rybka seems to be clearly the best for the moment ... I would like to test Rybka against other engines like Fritz 10, Shredder 10, ... but I don't have these engines. Perhaps later... ;-)

Do you have comments about this ?


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-12-16 03:37:22)
Thematic tournament : Portuguese op.

Waiting list is open :)

Best wishes.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-12-16 03:55:35)
Topalov vs. Kramnik v2, is it worth ?

I don't know how many times Kramnik will have to defend his title if challengers provide the money, but I'm quite disappointed with this news of a match scheduled only 6 months after the previous one.

I suggest they organize a match Topalov vs. Deep Fritz 10 (reigning world champion) first...

What do you think ? :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-12-16 04:05:26)
Topalov vs. Kramnik v2, is it worth ?

Responding to myself, according to FIDE rules there could be a match about every 6 months (WCH tournament or Prize funded)...

Obviously good for world champion (and for FIDE), but maybe that's also good for chess after all. What disturbs me more is last result against Deep Fritz :/


Dinesh De Silva    (2006-12-16 05:39:02)
Re:

The DF 10 vs Kramnik game was a bit disappointing (probably because of Kramnik's shocking blunder & his loss in the last game which gave DF 10 a spiffy looking 4:2 win), but I guess the games were quite interesting to analyse. A World Championship match every 6 months is much too soon. Maybe every 10 months might be more reasonable.


James Stripes    (2006-12-16 16:19:10)
bad timing, but

World Championships should be decided by matches, nit by a tournament such as that planned in Mexico. Topalov was never a legitimate champion, but he is perhaps now a legitimate champion (and FIDE finally recognizes the legitimate champion again). If this challenge by Topalov succeeds in derailing Mexico, it will have accomplished a useful purpose. Of course I'm lookin forward to watching the games in Mexico, and would be wholehearted in support if it were a qualifying tournament. Thus Topalov should be playing, rather than Kramnik; the winner should then challnge Kramnik with the full backing of FIDE.


James Stripes    (2006-12-16 16:21:38)
Rybka vs Kramnik

When Rybka defeats the top human in a match, it will earn something far more important than demonstrating its prowess over silicone opponents.


Thomas Gilbreath    (2006-12-18 05:17:02)
Update:

Ilmars Cirulis has defeated dewillget8 in their second game. The match score now stands 8 to 5 in favor of GameKnot.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-12-19 19:04:38)
Revenge

It seems the match already started :)

http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=3553


Dinesh De Silva    (2006-12-21 10:40:17)
Re:

A real cliffhanger! My opponent Krol is a very good player. When endings are interesting as this, correspondence chess is the ultimate winner.


Steve Sabean    (2006-12-23 16:58:08)
Traxler/Wilkes-Barre

I have heard from many players of a wide range of strength that the Traxler is busted for Black. The trouble is, none of them appear to have proof. A few years ago, I played in a Traxler thematic in IECG. I had a great time, learned a lot, and managed second place overall. My own assessment is: unclear, but Black is probably OK. So, why not have a Traxler thematic tournament here on FICGS, to settle the matter once and for all. :D Maybe it could be a double round robin, to be fair to those who feel that one side or the other has the advantage. I would sign on for such a tournament. Nice Latvian, btw.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-12-24 11:57:24)
Traxler/Wilkes-Barre

Hello Steve.

We had 2 Traxler thematic tournaments already :)

http://www.ficgs.com/tournament_FICGS__CHESS__THEMATIC_TOURNAMENT__000014.html
http://www.ficgs.com/tournament_FICGS__CHESS__THEMATIC_TOURNAMENT__000015.html

Maybe we'll have another one (or double round-robin, why not) :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-12-24 17:25:20)
Karpov, Kasparov, Fischer play Go !

Just read this in IGN "Goama" newsletter (by Alexander Dinerchtein)

http://gogame.info/


"3. Both Karpov and Kasparov, former World Chess Champions plays Go on 10-kyu level."

"4. Somebody noticed, that Robert Fisher, the former Chess champion played Go a lot during his stay in Japan and reached the amateur 3-dan level."


Quite impressive. (particularly Fischer)


Miguel Pires    (2006-12-26 20:25:02)
about the FICGS vs GK match

is to someone evaluate the position


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-12-26 20:51:18)
Opinion

Hi Miguel.

In rules, 'assistance' is the key word... So to evaluate a position is not allowed for FICGS vs. GK match ! ... But it is allowed in regular FICGS games.


Miguel Pires    (2006-12-26 21:20:05)
Thematicall Tournaments

Thibault de Vassal i think in the thematical tournaments you should put an double round robin, not only one round. I've played some thematical tournaments and that is what append. Just my opinion Regard's Miguel Pires


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-12-26 22:40:28)
Double round robin

In 'theory', that's fully right... I finally chose single round robin because double round robin means 6 games more per tournament, meaning less tournaments, less opponents and so on. As thematic tournaments are friendly - not rated - score is not so important, it's more interesting to play different openings IMO.


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-12-27 20:51:21)
Ratings

Hello Jason.

Next rating calculation will occur on 2007, january 1st

All informations about rating calculation are here :

http://www.ficgs.com/membership.html#rating

How many games must be completed until the rating is regular : 9 rated games


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-12-28 10:47:52)
Cheating : Future is now

An indian player (rated 1900, suddenly 2484) gets ten year ban from FIDE for cheating... Using a bluetooth device stitched into his cap to receive external computer assistance.

Source - http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=3573


A new danger for OTB chess... Could suspicion (like Topalov-Kramnik match) kill the game ?


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-12-28 11:30:57)
Amazing

That's funny to see how this thematic tournament (portuguese opening) attracted players from Portugal.

I wonder if french players would fight for french defense the same... :-)

A high-rated one with a very strong correspondence chess player !

http://www.ficgs.com/tournament_FICGS__CHESS__THEMATIC_TOURNAMENT__000020.html


Thibault de Vassal    (2006-12-29 14:48:31)
To be continued

It has been discussed already, my conclusion was vacation had to be hard to use enough, in order to reduce influence on time controls, ie. a player shouldn't be able to take days to think more time when having difficulties in some games and cancel his 'holidays' after finding a solution... So it has to be discussed. Anyway, I'll add a message specifying vacation can't be canceled when taking days leave.

Reminder :


http://www.ficgs.com/membership.html#playing

11. 4. Time rules

Any move in any game shall be played in a maximum period of 60 days, otherwise the game will be adjudicated on time. Time accumulated in a game can't exceed 100 days. Please don't call referee since you see your opponent's clock 'Out of time', you just have to wait a few hours a robot automatically adjuges the game.

Please be aware that it's possible sometimes your internet provider or a point between the server and you may block the connection between the server and you. Even it's a rare thing, it's strongly recommended to always have several days left at your clock. No result will be reconsidered or time added due to such a technical problem. No time will be added due to any problem during a period less than 1 day long.

It is possible to take a maximum of 30 days leave per year, called vacation. During this time, clocks are frozen and it is no more possible to play, in order to reduce the effects on time controls.

Please note the time limit per move clock still runs during vacation. Take your days carefully, as it's not possible to take back or displace your leave dates. However you can add days leave.


Charlie Neil    (2006-12-30 17:04:54)
Match vs gameknot

So, is the score now 9-5 for GameKnot?


Elmer Valderrama    (2006-12-31 11:01:04)
Blitz CC

It looks like half-way between chessbase freestyle and rapid CC time control, personally would prefer the old OTB control of 2h + 30min for 40 moves + 1h for 20 with adjourn; or similar TC.

Another time control variation on the 10moves/1h format would be to add an adjourn (suspend for a later specified time), this could be done after 4 hours of playing (or 6 hours) Then, players meet the next day after some home analysis for continuation with the same format (+ second adj after 4h or 6h)

I presume Thibault will enlighten us soon on this subject.

However I think it would be nice to let the player choose a time control for a chess challenge (duel) so all flavours and individual tastes are met.




Thibault de Vassal    (2006-12-31 14:53:21)
Blitz correspondence chess

Hello Charlie & Elmer.

Still thinking about it, I don't think it should look like standard OTB time control, some points are :

- How many games played at the same time (2-game match or tournament) ?

- Entries in waiting list will have a life period (someone agrees the challenge in the next hour, if not it's canceled)

- Adjournment is a big issue... It could cause many problems :/

- Too many time controls is not good IMO.


Elmer Valderrama    (2007-01-02 18:41:01)
Blitz correspondence chess

Do the games have to be played at the same time?

I mean if the time format is 4-6 hours per game, a 2-game match will be over in two days (weekend?), and a tournament of 6 rounds -in a week (or two weekends)..


Elmer Valderrama    (2007-01-02 20:43:37)
Blitz correspondence chess

Programming problems you mean?

In a 1-game match I would gladly play Black all the time :) -provided that if draw Black "wins" of course-

It's tricky to make a fair 1-game match; the old proposal of giving odds to White (first two consecutive moves in a MUST WIN -other result loses- situation) would give White -I reckon- 60-to-70% chance to win, which is about the same odds as playing Black for a draw. But it's something new, which could be tested. Here I could play Black just to try to prove me wrong, lol.




Graham Wyborn    (2007-01-03 00:12:41)
I'll stop moaning!

It appears to me that the "hard rule" re vacation is to stop players wasting time or using time in a mischievous way. All it has done for me and my opponents is waste time that could have been used wisely. This is the only site that I use that applies such hash rules, I wish I had seen the earlier correspondence on this matter, as I would had voiced my opinion then, but now it is too late. Anyway, thank you for the replies. I will stop moaning and look forward to the end of my vacation which will be on January 10th about 4 am!!


Elmer Valderrama    (2007-01-03 11:00:42)
Blitz correspondence chess

Well, as long as it's an unrated chess game, you can call it Silver Thematic and virtually any variation would qualify as a real chess game..

The way the winner is chosen in a 1-game (or 2-game for that matter) match is what is debatable, it's a little advantage to have White that's why having Black would be good if the color decides.

I think that players would agree to enter a tournament under some conditions (e.g. as playing on Satuday 3pm & Sunday 3pm), people were/are happy to enter the Chessbase "marathon" (freestyle with 3 rounds per day) and most here hang around making several moves per day in their CC games every day, so it's a matter of agreement about the appropiate time (easier to achieve with just two players (2-game match) than a tournament of course)

Maybe a poll would help although the players who would enter these events may not be even registered to FICGS yet, lol


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-01-03 12:04:10)
Blitz correspondence chess

Actually I'm thinking about 1-game match in the classical way, there will be draws, hard to avoid it. "Silver thematic" is a good idea for another category (ie. with no draws). About tournaments with several rounds / several days, well, why not... maybe later :)


Miguel Pires    (2007-01-04 14:35:29)
Blitz Chess

I think the best is 2h/40 moves One more thing, you can create tournament's/match with the help of engines (Freestyle) and without engines. what you think?


Barry Bell    (2007-01-07 18:50:34)
Association Website

Well, the second phase of development has started and you can visit the Anyone 4 Chess association webpage at http://www.association.anyone4chess.com this is not a online playing site and their are no logins required. It is dedicated to providing information and tool to webmasters and people who may want to become a webmaster of a online chess system. The site is young but we that over the next several months to have enough content to be of value to the new and old webmaster. Thanks


Jaimie Wilson    (2007-01-08 18:00:37)
ECF ratings

There seem to be two formulae for converting between ECF (formerly the BCF) and FIDE ratings. The old one which still seems to be in use is ECF x 8 + 600 = FIDE ELO. A Newer formula I have seen is ECF x 5 + 1250 = FIDE ELO. This newer formula rates ECF players higher on the FIDE scale than the old one did. I don't know which is more accurate although I certainly like to believe that the old formula underestimates us a little bit. It's as clear as mud.


Kieran Child    (2007-01-13 12:05:50)
ooh

That's a very very nice idea. I would suggest an immediate split in it between "pawn-dominant endings" and "piece dominant endings" then further splits for the type of pieces on the board and the opponent's material. If you stick to an advantage rule (like, white always has the greater points value) then it doesn't sound too hard. I would very much like to see this.


Wayne Lowrance    (2007-01-14 19:59:13)
Draw declared

Is it possible that a draw take place without confirmation, only e-mail that it had taken place ? No cpmplaint intended in this instance. I was just inquiring if it could happen cause otherwise the draw could not be acceptable to me in another circumstance. The game indeed was drawish and my opponent was higher rated,. Thank you Wayne


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-01-15 12:10:16)
Draw declared

Hello Wayne.

You mean if a draw can happen without offer AND acceptance by both players ? Two cases...

1/ The referee grants a draw (according to rules).

2/ A stalemate position automatically generates a draw offer.


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-01-15 12:18:28)
Go : Korean awards

Korean awards 2006

Best player of the year: Lee Sedol, 9-dan
Fighting spirit prize: Seo Bongsu, 9-dan
Best junior master: Paek Hongsuk, 5-dan
Top female prize: Rui Naiwei, 9-dan
Best Korean amateur: U Dongha, 7-dan
Most popular male and female players: Lee Changho, 9-dan and Park Chiun, 6-dan


Korean records 2006

The highest number of wins: Lee Sedol, 9-dan, 78-28
The highest winning percentage: Paek Hongsuk, 5-dan, 77%
The longest winning streak: Lee Sedol, 9-dan, 14 games straight (2.13.2006 -3.21.2006)


From IGN "Goama" newsletter - http://gogame.info


Wayne Lowrance    (2007-01-15 19:01:00)
Draw declared

okey dokey 1) no Stalemate ! 2) if it was adjudicated I was not aware of it. Not to worry. Thank you Wayne


Sandor Marton-Bardocz    (2007-01-16 18:29:21)
Conditional Move

Hi there! I noticed that there was a topic regarding conditional moves but it is closed. I think that conditional moves, aren't a bad thing after all..it should be implemented..Just think about the first moves of a game....for now, even the weakest players play theory ( fritz database or something)and this implies that the first moves will be played rather fast...Then why spend time clicking around to get to the games on a starting tournament over&over again, just to play the well known moves? U can overcome the "irritation" issue by limitating the use of conditional moves. Let's say every player has the right to use for example ...10 conditional moves in the begining of the game (in the first 15 moves for example). After that in 10 to 10 moves have let's say 2 possibilities to use conditional moves...This way it's erradicated the annoyance of countless use of premoves. Btw. I think that the example of those players who might use Fritz or whatever chessprogram to play, and then premove the lines indicated by the engine isn't really good..Only if the opponnent against whom they use it ...playes using the same lines indicated by ....an engine :-) Otherwise I can't realise how on earth the replied moves can be the same and matching with....or those lines are really forced..and if that is the case then the use of premoves is normal. Thank You.


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-01-17 17:59:25)
2nd FICGS chess world championship

Hello to all.

2nd FICGS chess WCH just started only 6 months after the first one and with about 75% players more.


24 tournaments with an elo average from 1620 to 1698, 1 group M (elo average 2363) and 4 quarter final matches in the knockout tournament :


GM Farit Balabaev (2569) - FEM Wolfgang Riemer (2415)
Thibault de Vassal (2514) - FEM Wolgang Utesch (2460)
SM Peter Schuster (2537) - FIM Harry Ingersol (2456)
Wolfgang Kund (2557) - SM Wladyslav Krol (2423)


By seeing the first moves, I predict the 4th quarter final will be a very exciting match with risky games :)

Thanks to all for enjoying these tournaments, I wish you good games and may the best player win !

http://www.ficgs.com/category__ficgs__chess__wch.html


WCH waiting list will stay open during next months for eventual replacements.


Wayne Lowrance    (2007-01-17 18:53:15)
Wch Stage 1 group 15 00001

What is next for the winners of WCH stage winners. ? The above group now has a winner (me). What is next ? Sorry, I have to ask, I don't think I understand the formats yet. Thank you Wayne


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-01-17 19:01:46)
Wch Stage 2

Hi, Wayne. Good games ;)

Stage 2 should begin in a few days/weeks. Only 1 decisive game to finish before I can make pairings. It will quite look like stage 1 : Round-robin tournaments involving winners of previous stage & semi-final matches in the knockout tournament.


Wayne Lowrance    (2007-01-18 01:19:11)
Chess engines rating

Very nice information. A great big word of caution. We play coorespondence games here. Those engine-engine tournaments do not indicate directly which program is best suited for correspondence deep analysis, I do not have enough experience with the engines except earlier versions of Fritz, shredder, Hiarc, Junior and of course Dr Robert Hyatts Various versions of Crafty and Rybka. Rybka is top rated eng-eng program for fast time controls. But not sure that it is best for deep analysis. My guess is that Latest Fritz is at least as well suited for deep analysis and perhaps better. Then their is Shredder another top eng-eng program that is very very good at deep analysis. From what I read and for what it is worth those are the best engines. But if you want the strongest program for 40/120 time control down to bullet chess,then the clear winner is Rybka by Vas. Hope this is of interest. Wayne


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-01-19 11:41:07)
FICGS login & registration problems

Hello to all.

It seems there are some login, password recovery & registration problems for a few players. I'm looking for an explanation...

Some can't register without getting message "please enter the correct number" while they did enter it, so it may be a format problem for numbers. (in this case please write to the email at the bottom of the page)

If you failed to obtain a new password that works with password recovery, just try once more and it will 'most probably' work.

Really strange... I'm inquiring.

An example : "Although I got a new password I was not able to use my account from my PC!-So I decided to log in from my colleague´s one and it worked - I don´t know why."

So some computers could send a format for numbers that the program does not recognize yet. (?!)


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-01-21 13:48:44)
Go and chess, IGN Goama newsletter

From IGN Goama newsletter by Alexander Dinerchtein - http://www.gogame.info


Go and Chess ­ Two Games, Shared Experiences

Chess and go show are similar in many ways, yet it's always strange to see how the masters of each game try to "invent the wheel", instead of benefiting from the knowledge of their colleagues.

Let's consider sharing experiences!

These ideas can be useful even for strong Asian Go professionals:

1. Currently, only a few pros use Go databases and programs for studying. It is easy to find commentaries, written by 9-dan masters, which state that a move is new and has never been played before. Yet if one checks such moves in Go databases, one can sometimes find up to 100 examples from professional games. How can they cheat the readers who study these commentaries?

Once in Korea, I showed the Bigo Assistant program (similar to GoGod, MoyoGo and SmartGo) to Lee Sedol's brother Lee Sanghun, 5-dan, who is the director of a large children's Go school. He was surprised and said that the program looked very useful, and he added that he had never met this kind of program before. He even suggested deleting all amateur games and games played on Go servers, because of their low quality. I promised to order the programs and to install them on the school's computers if he liked this idea, but he did not follow up. Lee Sanghun, 5-dan was not able to break the traditions of his forefathers …

2. Even such top chess players as Kasparov, Kramnik and Topalov enlist the support of trainers during important tournaments and matches. During the Communist era, almost every Russian grandmaster worked on behalf of world championship candidates. Our government forced them to help, to show them new moves and ideas. Those who refused to help were punished severely: for example, sometimes a player would be prohibited from playing in tournaments abroad and would be refused foreign visas.

We do not see this in Go. Everyone thinks only about his or her own self. Do you know who is currently assisting Lee Changho? I don't know, either!

3. I would like to say a few words about playing technique. Chess players often used to write the move on paper first and then make it on the board. This helps to avoid impulsive moves and to prevent blunders. Go masters record the game afterwards, and so one can often find terrible mistakes, such as overlooking ataris and recapturing ko without playing a ko threat first. As an example you may see Black's move number 271 from this game: http://www.go4go.net/v2/modules/collection/sgfview.php?id=10828 I am sure that if a player looked at their move at least twice ­ before they write it on paper and after ­ they would not make such mistakes.

4. Even top Go tournaments are usually run by the knock-out system so we often see sensational results. Mightn’t it be reasonable to think about increasing the number of games in each round? If rounds were best-of-three (in case of time constraints, it would be possible to use blitz time controls for the third game), it would help to minimize sensations.

How about organising a definitive World Go Championship? Chess players have contested one for more than 100 years, and competitions for this World Championship have revealed the very best players of each generation. In Go it's harder to tell which player is true champion. In 2006, for instance, one international tournament was won by Lee Changho and another one by Lee Sedol, while Cho U won the largest amount of prize money. Whom can we call the World Champion? Who can say which tournament is the most important : LG, Samsung, Fujitsu, Chunlan or another? We don't even have a unified rating system …

If we determined a single World Go Champion, he might earn the same degree of popularity as Garry Kasparov achieved in chess, and this could have a very positive influence on Go popularity around the world!


Heinz-Georg Lehnhoff    (2007-01-21 15:16:26)
Chess ratings

I have formatted my message (and partly corrected) to be able to read the text better.

Rating system:
Look at this situation: Current rating ot the player: 2200,
10 games, all players with TER 2200, result 9=, 1+

Case 1: Finished games:
01.01-28.02: 9= New rating 01.03: 2200
01.03. 1+, no other finished games in this period: --> New rating 01.05: 2228

Case 2:
Finished games 01.01-28.02: 9=, 1+ --> New rating 01.03: 2214

In case 1 the value of the won game was 28, in case two it was 14.

IMO the value of a result should not depend from the number of games you have finished in a period. The value of a result only should depend on the rating of both players that they have at the start (preferable) or at the finish date of the game and the result. And the rating formula should be like
NewRating = LastRating + SumOfAllValuesOfFinishedGamesInThisPeriod.

That's the way (idea) IECG is computing the ratings.


Lionel Vidal    (2007-01-21 17:49:41)
Go and Chess

About your point number 3... A chess world champion could very well note its moves before playing and yet be mated in one move :-)
In Go pro-matches, the moves are usually recorded during play by another (younger :-) pro, who has also to deal with time keeping: it makes sense not to disturb gods at play by basic housekeepings :-). I remember an article on the WEB counting the numbers of obvious blunders in go pro-games, and it was *very* low compared to chess.

Concerning your point 2, it is not quite true AFAIK: most top pros run a school of younger pros or wanabe pros who play and analyse numerous games on the Master supervision (He does rarely play with students and then it is a great honour!). So a master does not not really analyse alone, but discuss many ideas with others.

Concerning your point 4, I think that increasing the number of games would change the playing calendar too much and a pro cannot play many more games by year without consequences on his results... even at my very low level, I find a go game *much* more tiring than a chess one (here I mean a face to face game, not correspondence or server go... something I still don't manage to get used to :-)
BTW, I also find that recovering from a loss in go is much more difficult (again I mean face to face Go) than in chess: maybe because of a higher involment, maybe it is just me. What do others players think?
Another point is that a pro is paid by the federation (a fixed amount depending on its rank, not linked with his gains in tournaments that are much more important), and have to give some services to the community: lessons, conferences, teaching games... and so on... and this is more true for the lowest ranked pros!


Michael Finkelstein    (2007-01-22 08:39:51)
problems with playback --

Whenever I play back a game and hit the move button, the computer screen drops down a quarter of a page and I have to move the screen up to get to the move buttons. I use firefox as my browser I came here from playing a lot at queen alice. That site has an easier to use and more informative interface. For instance, allowing me to download my games in progress all at once instead of one at a time; also, have a light by the name of a player to indicate he is online; a buddy list, etc.


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-01-22 11:26:58)
problems with playback

Hello Michael.

Sorry, so many things to implement yet :)

What do you mean 'Whenever I play back a game' ?

I use Firefox and Explorer and I didn't see that until now ?! (if I understood well)

I'll add a download button for all games, right now you can try to click the printer icon in 'My games', there's a list of your games in PGN format.

You can see who's online at the bottom of the page 'My messages' or go to http://www.ficgs.com/informations.html

My best.


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-01-23 12:27:06)
Famous chess games

Hello to all.

I am testing a new database which will contain famous chess games / games from famous chess players... World championships, Man vs. Machine, Computer games, Correspondence chess, Curiosities etc.. Now 2200+ games in, but it will grow quickly.

Feel free to suggest any link with interesting free chess database, or you may send to me PGN games (particularly looking for non-chess celebrities chess games).

http://www.ficgs.com/informations.html

(see A-Z)


All suggestions & feedback are welcome. Thanks in advance :)


Michael Finkelstein    (2007-01-25 08:07:51)
playback

Thibault, Thanks for the advice -- it worked fine. I clicked on the magnifying glass and then clicked on the numbers on verticle side of the board to change the prespective. Still cannot paragraph space no matter what I do when I post in this forum. Mike


Mladen Jankovic    (2007-01-26 13:51:40)
paragraphs, html tags

http://www.w3schools.com/html/

It explains html, along with br tags.

It might be too much information, but, you never know... ;)


Miguel Pires    (2007-01-26 21:36:21)
Scandinavian defense

Hi, I wana sugest a new thematical tournament: 1. e4 d5; 2. exd5 Nf6 I think is called the Portuguese atack in the scandinavian defense. What you think?


Jaimie Wilson    (2007-01-27 01:44:28)
Scandy

I thought the Portuguese attack referred specifically to the line 1.e4 d5 2.exd5 Nf6 3.d4 Bg4!? which would certainly make for an interesting thematic tournament.


Miguel Pires    (2007-01-27 11:09:59)
Thibault de Vassal

I can't say if the portuguese attack start's with Nf6 or after d4 Bg4, because i never study this. Like you say i find a new line that was "invented" by portugueses: 1.d4 d6; 2. c4 e5; 3. dxe5 Nc6!? IS called (in Portugal) The Gambit of Barreiro. when you wana you can start a new thematicall tournament


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-01-28 14:01:35)
IGN Goama

Lionel, your answer has been published in 41st IGN Goama newsletter... :)

Another answer :


"Also we got a letter from Benjamin Schooley:

Dear Alex, I have been having these very same thoughts. I think after awhile I started to accept the way things were done in the East and tried to see the positive side of it. Maybe three world champions are better than one. And really isn't it better that people don't have endless helpers and seconds, then it almost becomes a matter of who has the most help and the most money to hire that help and not the most skill on an individual basis. But I do get the sense there is more of a community in Go. Go players are more apt to share their ideas and puzzles with each other and not prepare secret variations in some unscrupulous plot. I would be more curious if the Korean paper at least acknowledges your thoughts, I highly doubt they will try to change anything though.

Still I do lament the absence of a broader tournament format. Not all are knockout but they all tend to have the knockout "flavor." I think some players who are really talented get overlooked (Hane Naoki) because their playing style doesn't mesh as well with a knockout tournament. On the other hand people who have novel playing styles like Cho U and Takao Shinji do pretty well in the KO format. They benefit from a smaller sample size, harder to get a read on their strengths and weaknesses."


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-01-28 19:34:00)
Rybka 2.2 vs. Fritz 10

Harry Schnapp organized a 6 games match between Rybka 2.2 and Fritz 10 on DUAL XEON 5160 (4x3000Mhz), the same computer Fritz 10 played and won against Vladimir Kramnik.

Rybka : 5,5 - Fritz : 0,5

http://perso.orange.fr/lefouduroi/tournois/tournois66.htm

All details and article in German / French.


Now look at the games...

What do you think ?


Ron Keyston    (2007-01-29 19:04:14)
Specifics and Examples

OK, one PC is a 3.2GHz P4 w/1GB RAM running XP Pro. 256MB Hashtables with an ~800MB Maximum possible. The other PC is an Athlon X2 4600+ w/2GB RAM running Vista Ultimate (RTM.) It has 1GB Hashtables with ~1.5GB Maximum Possible. I can pretty much guarantee that it is not a hashtable issue though as the problem is with the legality of a move and only arises after saving into a database, closing the game and then re-opening it from the database. Also, if I open the same saved game from the database into Fritz 9, castling long as black is perfectly OK.

As for some examples, I will give the same five games that I sent to Chessbase. Some of these are contrived examples, whereas some are from my games here at FICGS:

1.e4 d5 2.exd5 Qxd5 3.Nc3 Qd6 4.Nf3 Nf6 5.Bc4 Bg4 6.O-O Nc6 7.d4

1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.Bg5 dxe4 5.Nxe4 Be7 6.Bxf6 gxf6 7.Nf3 b6 8.Bc4 Bb7 9.Qe2 Nd7 10.O-O-O c6 11.Rhe1 Qc7 12.g3

1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.e5 c5 5.a3 Bxc3+ 6.bxc3 c4 7.Qg4 g6 8.Nf3 Qa5 9.Bd2 Nh6 10.Qh3 Nf5 11.g4 Nxd4 12.cxd4 Qb6 13.Bg2 Nc6 14.Qh6 Nxd4 15.O-O Bd7 16.Bg5 Ba4 17.Nxd4 Qxd4 18.Qg7 Rf8 19.Be3 Qxg4 20.Bc5

1.e4 d5 2.exd5 Qxd5 3.Nc3 Qd6 4.d4 Nf6 5.Nf3 a6 6.Be3 Nc6 7.Qd2 Bf5 8.Bd3 Bg4 9.Be2 e6 10.O-O-O

1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.e5 c5 5.a3 Bxc3+ 6.bxc3 c4 7.Qg4 g6 8.Nf3 Qa5 9.Bd2 Nh6 10.Qh3 Nf5 11.g4 Nxd4 12.cxd4 Qb6 13.Bg2 Nc6 14.Qh6 Nxd4 15.O-O Bd7 16.Qg7

In all five examples, it is black to move from the final position. Also, in all five examples, castling long/queen-side is perfectly legal and likely one of the best moves. BEFORE the game(s) is/are saved into the database, Fritz allows black to castle long (and it is at or near the top line in infinite analysis mode.) AFTER saving the game into a database, closing the game window, and re-opening the game from the database, Fritz treats castling long as an illegal move.


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-01-31 18:21:40)
1.e4 c5 2.f4 d5 3.Nf3

This is the line for the next chess thematic tournament :

http://www.ficgs.com/tournament_FICGS__CHESS__THEMATIC_TOURNAMENT__000023.html

A line played several times here already by SM Wladyslav Krol, and a really interesting opening that produced the current 'best game' :

http://www.ficgs.com/game_864.html


Does anyone know a name for this opening, or may I call it "Krol attack" :)

Anyway, it should be a spectacular tournament !


Xavier Pichelin    (2007-02-02 21:04:44)
Stage 2

Bonsoir, Une petite question en français je suis désolé je ne comprends pas l'anglais (enfin très peu). Les vainqueurs des groupes du stage 1 doivent t-il s'inscrire pour le tour supérieur ou bien simplement qualifié automatiquement pour le stage 2? Et quand les matchs vont-ils commencer? Je vous remercie. Amicalement Xavier.


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-02-05 12:37:22)
Stage 2

Bonjour Xavier.

Les qualifications sont automatiques... Les tournois devraient commencer d'ici une semaine à trois semaines maximum (j'espère)...

Amicalement, Thibault


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-02-07 00:52:58)
Rybka 2.3

An interesting thread about Rybka 2.3 (should be available on february 12) and his new features, described by Vasik Rajlich. In a few words : stronger, new chess knowledge, better search algorithm, better positional play, bug fixes and an interesting feature called "randomizer" :

Quote : "You can put Rybka into a mode where she will play against herself over and over from the same position without repeating variations - she will systematically explore the space of possibilities in the variation, branching from the previous games at later and later points. It's an effective way to get a Monte-Carlo-based evaluation of a position."

http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=180


Wayne Lowrance    (2007-02-15 23:05:38)
more chess engine talk.

Thibault, you miss the boat on Hydra futre expectations in my opinion. Its advantage over pc engines was dedicated hardware (no necessarily speed) and ease of making program modifications. However you perhaps neglect to consider the tremendous improvement in PC performance multiple cores, processors and et all. My thought is that the pc programs already are superior to Hydra. Correct me if I am wrong, but I seem to recall that Rybka has finished ahead of it in tournament play. As far as other programs, you did not mention Zap. You best keep an eye on this one. It is very very strong and improving. Right now it is the only engine that has a chance of catching Rybka in eng-eng matches. I think it will be number two on the computer rankings. I will try to look further into Zap for a top CC engine. we see. again, my thoughts Wayne


Don Groves    (2007-02-16 00:47:37)
I Agree...

... both for Chess and Go. Such information will give a much more accurate idea of where each player fits in on FICGS.


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-02-16 02:11:07)
Rybka 2.3

More info about Rybka 2.3

www.rybkachess.com/index.php?auswahl=Rybka+2.3+readme

The new engine should be a bit stronger than the previous version, Vasik Rajlich ran a blitz match (1' + 1") between Rybka 2.3 and Rybka 2.2n2 and got a result of: +245 =607 -193 (52.5%, +17 Elo).


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-02-16 15:37:47)
More columns

These informations are available already, what Dan would like to know is how many players are "active", so I think I'll add (quite easy) in the statistics page [Menu -> About] the number of players who connected to FICGS for a period of time to define.


Elmer Valderrama    (2007-02-17 10:59:30)
like a no-smoking zone?

I believe what Aldag want is a place with a sign "computer-free chess" just like those pubs, restaurants, trains, etc use a "no-smoking zone" sign. It will be visible so that it will deter smokers/engine-users to enter that zone.

To make it less attractive to engine assistance, these games should be unrated, with player automatically losing their current ELO (that ELO rating could have been "won" using engines previously anyway) so just their names will suffice, and there should not be no tournaments --so that there is no "winners" as this will trigger the use of engines-- The players will only challenge each other and the winner will not be known to anybody except the players, and the games will not be recorded in the general database and they will not be shown live: all this will for certain deter any need to use an engine i.e. 'winning' means nothing literally and it will look as if it never happened

This way chess without engines will be as if doing something clever when actually it is a loss of time -can't remember who said this about chess 8-)


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-02-17 12:26:13)
Les échecs en France

Here is the agreement just signed by the ministry of education and the french chess federation - fédération française des échecs (F.F.E.)

This should help to promote chess in France.



CONVENTION-CADRE

Établie entre les soussignés :

L'État - Ministère de l'Education nationale, de l'Enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche représenté par Monsieur Gilles de Robien, ministre, ci-dessous dénommé " le Ministère "

et

La Fédération française des échecs représenté par Monsieur Jean-Claude Moingt, président, ci-dessous dénommé " la Fédération "

Rappelant

Que le jeu d'échecs, activité à la fois ludique et sportive, constitue aussi et surtout une activité intellectuelle qui permet de développer des compétences diverses chez ceux qui le pratiquent, et notamment chez les jeunes auprès de qui il constitue un réel vecteur de formation ;

Que la pratique des échecs encourage notamment le développement des capacités intellectuelles telles que la mémoire, le raisonnement logique, la capacité d'abstraction, l'analyse de problème et la mise en oeuvre de stratégies de résolution ;

Que la pratique des échecs contribue également à la construction de la personnalité en encourageant l'attention, l'imagination, l'anticipation, le jugement et la confiance en soi ;

Que le jeu d'échecs, école de concentration et de maîtrise de la pensée, est enfin une école de maîtrise de soi qui favorise l'apprentissage des règles et le respect d'autrui, et à ce titre participe de l'apprentissage de la citoyenneté ;

Considérant

Que, pour toutes ces raisons, le jeu d'échecs constitue un complément légitime et pertinent des activités éducatives proposées par l'Ecole ;

Que de nombreuses expériences menées en académies ont permis de mettre en oeuvre des projets de qualité associant des établissements scolaires et des clubs d'échecs dans un cadre réfléchi et concerté entre les parties concernées ;

Que ces initiatives ont permis de développer des pratiques et des outils permettant une exploitation du jeu d'échecs dans un cadre scolaire et/ou périscolaire ;

Il a été convenu ce qui suit :

Article 1 - Objectifs

Par la présente convention le Ministère et la Fédération affirment leur volonté commune de favoriser le développement de la pratique du jeu d'échecs dans les écoles, les collèges et les lycées. Ils se donnent comme objectifs la mise en oeuvre de deux axes de travail privilégiés :

- le jeu d'échecs au service de l'égalité des chances, l'expérience montrant que la pratique des échecs peut constituer pour des élèves en difficulté scolaire une occasion privilégiée de se remotiver et de se remettre sur la voie de la réussite scolaire ;

- la dimension éducative du jeu d'échecs auprès du plus grand nombre, en favorisant la transférabilité des acquis entre les pratiques ludiques et les situations d'apprentissage.

Article 2 - Egalité des chances

Le Ministère et la Fédération conviennent de développer l'accès de la pratique des échecs auprès des publics scolaires qui en sont les plus éloignés pour des raisons sociales ou géographiques. Le partenariat portera en particulier sur des actions impliquant :

- les collèges " ambition réussite ", qui visent à offrir un cadre d'excellence à des publics scolaires confrontés aux plus grandes difficultés socio-économiques. La contribution de la Fédération consistera notamment en mise à disposition de matériel (ludique et/ou pédagogique), en actions de sensibilisation ou de formation organisées dans le cadre des établissements concernés, en appariements des collèges avec des clubs de proximité ou encore en parrainage de certains collèges par des joueurs de haut niveau recommandés par la Fédération.

- l'opération " Ecole ouverte ", qui accueille les jeunes dans les EPLE pendant les vacances scolaires pour leur proposer des activités de loisirs à visée éducative. Parce qu'il conjugue les dimensions ludique et formatrice, le jeu d'échecs correspond bien à l'esprit de ce dispositif qui contribue à modifier l'image de l'école auprès des jeunes.

- les dispositifs relais (classes et ateliers), qui accueillent temporairement des élèves en voie de décrochage ou de désocialisation. La pratique des échecs peut permettre à ces jeunes de reprendre goût à l'activité intellectuelle, tout en leur inculquant le respect des règles et de l'autre.

Article 3 - Action éducative

De façon plus générale, le Ministère et la Fédération conviennent d'encourager la connaissance et la pratique des échecs auprès du plus grand nombre. A ce titre, ils pourront notamment :

- développer la pratique des échecs dans le cadre des activités péri-scolaires au sein des internats scolaires, des clubs et des foyers socio-éducatifs, en partenariat avec les clubs locaux.

- mettre en place des actions de sensibilisation et/ou de formation dans les écoles et les établissements volontaires, en rapprochant les équipes éducatives et les clubs selon des modalités à préciser entre les partenaires concernés : enseignement et pratique dans le temps scolaire ou périscolaire, projets thématiques fédérateurs s'appuyant sur les dispositifs transversaux, opérations d'information et d'animation, tournois scolaires à l'échelle d'une ville ou d'un bassin, etc.

- développer des ressources en co-édition, en lien avec le réseau des CRDP et des CDDP (sites Internet de jeu pour les écoles, dépliants de présentation, outils pédagogiques, etc.).

Article 4 - Contribution des partenaires

La Fédération française des échecs s'engage à apporter aux écoles, collèges et lycées qui en font la demande une aide en matériel ou en ressources diverses (publications, outils pédagogiques etc.). Dans le cas d'actions spécifiques conduites au sein des établissements dans les temps scolaire ou périscolaire, les cadres qualifiés de la Fédération ou de ses organes déconcentrés devront avoir reçu un accord préalable du Ministère et/ou de ses services déconcentrés ; ils pourront apporter des aides techniques ponctuelles auprès des enseignants qui en feront la demande après avoir pris l'avis des corps d'inspection.

De son côté, le Ministère s'engage à diffuser, par le biais de son réseau de communication et de diffusion ainsi que par l'intermédiaire de ses services déconcentrés, l'information nécessaire à la mise en oeuvre de ce partenariat.

Article 5 - Communication

L'application du présent accord-cadre peut donner lieu à des déclarations et communications aux médias par chacun des partenaires, lesquels conviennent de se concerter préalablement.

Article 6 - Mise en oeuvre et suivi

Les partenaires conviennent de se réunir au moins une fois par an pour examiner les conditions de mise en œuvre de l'accord-cadre et dresser un état des lieux des actions entreprises sur la période de l'année écoulée.

Article 7 - Durée

La présente convention est signée pour une durée de trois ans à compter de la date de la signature. A l'issue de ces trois années un bilan global permettra de faire le point sur l'évolution des pratiques à l'école, au collège et au lycée et d'étudier sur cette base les termes du renouvellement de la convention. Elle peut être résiliée par l'une ou l'autre des parties, à l'expiration d'un délai de trois mois suivant l'envoi d'une lettre recommandée avec accusé de réception valant mise en demeure.


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-02-17 13:45:09)
Tablebases 6 pieces

There was a russian website where tablebases 6 pieces were available. You just had to set up a position, then see the move to play and if it's a draw or mate in x moves.

I suppose there are other places with this feature now, does anyone know more websites like this one ?


Charlie Neil    (2007-02-17 15:36:41)
Gameknot Match

What's the score now? And are there any challanges to others sites planned? I enjoyed the visit to gameknot. Put me down for any other inter-site challanges.


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-02-17 18:07:31)
Gameknot vs. FICGS, other challenges

It seems GameKnot leads 5-4 in the games played here... Not bad :)

Any news about the games played at GameKnot ?

It could be interesting to discuss about other team challenges... A team tournament, matches against other servers or forums (which ones ?), maybe at different time controls or playing chess variants (chess 960) or other games (could be fun to play chess & Go, poker or anything against the same players).. with or without computer assistance and so on... It should be easier to build teams now thanks to the chat bar.

It seems there was no problem of cheating with chess engines during the match against GameKnot, that's encouraging to organize other ones.


Charlie Neil    (2007-02-18 12:09:03)
Gameknot Match

Well I know I won my game at Gameknot. And as for further team matches I'll sign up for standard chess without computer assistance thank you. Will Marc and Beranard be Vice Team Captains?.....8-)


Charlie Neil    (2007-02-19 13:57:34)
Gameknot match

Yes Marc, good for you! 2050-2100! I dream of making 1600!, (and keeping it!) Let's go!


Charlie Neil    (2007-02-19 14:01:54)
Without Computer!

I am just going to say at the start of my games that "I don't use computer assistance". It will be obvious by move 10 usually! But why don't you just state your intention at the start of the match to use books, computers or smoke, (tobacco, of course!)..... %-}


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-02-21 18:52:58)
Unrelated suggestion

Thanks Marcus. As I said before, it may be quite hard to make it automatic, as rules may differ according to the tournaments. And it will be more true with the new tournaments to come...


Marc Lacrosse    (2007-02-24 21:22:11)
not so simple ...

"I think Kasparov is the best for his aggressivity, Capablanca for his semplicity, and Alechine for his tattics."

This is way too simple...

Remember Kasparov drawing game after game for recovering after Karpov led by 5-0 in their match ...

Capablanca's play was full of tactics (I would better say full of sophisticated ways to avoid tactics - which _is_ tactics at a supreme degree).

Alekhine's tactics were most of the time allowed by too weak opposition. Among great tactical geniuses far stronger than Alekhine in this field I would cite Bronstein, Tal, Spassky, Nezmetdinov, Fischer, Shirov, Kasparov, Topalov ...


But there are also :
- Positional geniuses : Morphy, Capablanca, Botvinnik, Petrosian, and an entire class above them all Karpov, Ivanchuk, Kramnik.
- Opening prep geniuses : Botvinnik, Fischer, Kasparov
- Endgame geniuses : Rubinstein, Karpov, Korchnoi...

Well a difficult question because all top class players had several masterpieces in any of these fields ...


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-02-25 13:23:18)
Big Chess

Finally, Big Chess tournaments waiting list is open !

If you like to play without chess engines and against human players only, you may try this really interesting variant of chess. (unrated games)

Have a look at these Big Chess events by clicking 'Tournaments', then 'FICGS__CHESS__SPECIAL_EVENTS' :


FICGS__BIG_CHESS__THOUSAND_MEMBERS_EVENT
FICGS__BIG_CHESS__INAUGURAL_MATCH


Have good big chess games :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-03-03 13:32:43)
FIDE world championship, Mexico

Here is the decision of the FIDE President (Kirsan Ilyumzhinov) in respect of the World Chess Championship cycle :

http://www.fide.com/news.asp?id=1277


Now if Kramnik wins in Mexico, Topalov will play his match against him... But if Kramnik loses his title, he (Kramnik) will play a match against the winner.

Conclusion : Topalov will support Kramnik in Mexico :)


Catalin Ionescu    (2007-03-04 22:48:57)
round 10

Again Anand defeats Carlsen :) ...
What a great match between Leko and Topalov ... after 7 hours the game was a draw. Excellent !!!


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-03-09 15:11:18)
Kingston Defense !

While looking at links poiting to FICGS.com, I found this Wikipedia article and realized that one of the Kingston Defense's fathers was among us :)

http://www.ficgs.com/wikichess_3670.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingston_Defence
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gavin_Wilson


"Crack the Frutch : How to play the Kingston Defense"
.. by Gavin Wilson. ISBN 0-9514103-0-X

The opening is fully commented in Wikichess by Gavin... Quite funny :)


By the way, this opening looks interesting ! .. I just launched a thematic tournament. Thanks for all your comments in Wikichess, Gavin :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-03-09 16:53:11)
GM Ehlvest vs. Rybka

A strange match happened between FIDE GM Jaan Ehlvest (2610) and Rybka, with White playing with 7 pawns in all games...


http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=519

http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=564


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-03-09 20:36:44)
GM Ehlvest vs. Rybka

... of course Rybka won the match : 5,5 / 2,5


Elmer Valderrama    (2007-03-10 15:27:33)
Playchess Freestyle Tournaments

Interesting and true observation, Thibault.

What about the format 2h/40moves displayed under Money Tournaments in Waiting Lists? Maybe this is equally harder (in order to beat Rybka) that at 1h+15sec (!?)

And second question is why do you think Black needs so many moves to have winning chances in the proposed Silver/Gold Thematic game, or a better question could be: Do you think White can get a draw after that sequence: 1.Nf3 Nf6 2.Ng1 d5 3.Nf3 c5 4.Ng1 Black to move. -->assuming the idea is that if the game is drawn White would win the 1-game match--.


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-03-10 15:43:17)
Playchess Freestyle Tournaments

Hi Elmer.

1h+15 is worth 1h10/40 moves... 2h/40 moves is the longest time control before correspondence chess (games that don't finish the same day it started) and I think it's long enough so that human can do something else than operate Rybka :)

About Silver/Gold Thematic game, if White/Black obtains much more than 50%, I'll change the opening until to find one that give about 50% chances. What do you think ? .. About this opening, I think chances are about 50%, I would play it with both colors :)


Elmer Valderrama    (2007-03-10 15:56:59)
Playchess Freestyle Tournaments

..Well, I would play only Black there, so I guess I know who could be my opponent in the first Gold thematic -isn't there a Platinum with 1000 EUR at stake?! ;)


Phil Cook    (2007-03-11 06:36:09)
Quote "Go"

To resign in a game of GO,then find your estimate was wrong!


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-03-11 21:05:57)
Shredder 10 vs. Rybka 2.3.1

Quite funny, Harry Schnapp 'organized' a match with the same conditions between Shredder 10 UCI and Rybka 2.3.1 (still playing with 1 pawn less) : Shredder 10 won the match 5,5 / 2,5


Don Groves    (2007-03-13 06:55:09)
Login timeout is sometimes too quick.

Hi Thibault -- I was just typing a long response to a Forum article and when I tried to preview what I had written, I got the dreaded "Try again" message. My login had apparently expired and when I logged in again, all my typing was gone! Is it possible to extend the period of inactivity before we are automatically logged out so this is less likely to happen?


Nick Burrows    (2007-03-15 00:16:26)
quotationes

I think the different quotes popping up, enhance the site immeasureably. It's good that they are not all chess related, here are some more metaphysical offerings from my favourite film - 'Waking life' "Life is a matter of a miracle that is collected over time by moments flabbergasted to be in each others presence." “The quest is to be liberated from the negative, which is really our own will to nothingness…To say yes to one instant is to say yes to all of existence.” "Whatever you do, don’t be bored. This is absolutely the most exciting time we could have possibly hoped to be alive. And things are just starting.” Has anyone seen it? Peace, nick burrows.


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-03-15 13:59:35)
Lightning chess games

Hello to all.

A new update, you may have seen a new category in money tournaments :

Lightning (correspondence) chess games, time control 30 minutes + 1 minute / move


I think it's a quite interesting time control for chess, it should attract more advanced chess players (or simply strong computers).. Really faster than "blitz correspondence chess".

I updated the server so that it is really easier to play fastly in these games. When you send your move, a new option will appear next to (Flip) and (Next). The link (Wait) will redirect you to the viewer page that will be auto-refreshed every 10 seconds. When your opponent play his move, you'll be automatically redirected to the "move" page to play your move and a pop-up window will appear to warn you (if Javascript is activated)...

Read more about in Time rules - http://www.ficgs.com/membership.html#time


Money tournaments will start on April, 2


Charlie Neil    (2007-03-17 21:18:40)
FIDE time controls

OTB 1 hour plus 10 seconds a move. The Fischer time clock manufacturers will be happy with that.....and it makes my old turnier clock obsolete! I checked out the site and read about the candidate matches in June. Boris Spassky is on the appeals committee. I wonder how he will deal with the ridiculous acussations that no doubt will arise.


Nick Burrows    (2007-03-21 01:20:27)
*Go to Pi*

The film Pi is about a mathmetician who is using chaos theory to find a pattern within the stock market. His obsession leads him to observe the mathematical structures underpinning the whole of nature - eg spiral shells.
He visits his old maths teacher. They play Go together. The teacher explains that the ancient chinese saw the Go board as representing the whole universe, and so Go is used as a metaphor to understand chaos theory.
Starting with a very simple set of rules structures of untold complexity can form, systems such as the weather are so complex that they appear to be 'chaotic' or random. Go shows us that although it is too complex to see a game to its end, or understand the whole structure, there is logic or order within the chaos. It is just beyond our humble human limitations to understand it fully.
Go and chess intrigue us because in revealing the hidden truth within a chaotic structure, we are understanding a wider truth of order behind ALL phenomenon in the universe. Peace.


Nick Burrows    (2007-03-21 01:59:01)
pi

Chaos theory shows patterns in such diverse matters as, weather patterns, taps dripping, rise and fall of the nile, market forces etc. Unexpected order appears in all observable phenomena. these patterns are represented visually through fractals.


Don Groves    (2007-03-21 02:24:38)
chaos and order

Yes, I'm familiar with chaos theory and fractals but are not these examples of how our rational minds (and our mathematics) impose order on whatever we see?


Nick Burrows    (2007-03-21 03:30:05)
order

I believe life has meaning and that the universe follows an anthropic principle, in that it is within the nature of matter to organise itself and evolve into more complex structures. All forms of life are complex organised structures that have arisen out of 'chaos'. <tr> Our minds are the only tool we have to gain an understanding of these structural facts. So we can't seperate ourselves from the 'rational' to be truly objective, but we are here nonetheless. Although if a tree falls when nobody is around, does it make a sound? Is there any reality outside of human consciousness? <tr> which other games stimulate conversations such as this!?


Don Groves    (2007-03-25 03:10:20)
A new computer Go era?

Eventually computers will be able to play Go on a 19x19 board as well as they can now play on a 9x9 board. It's just a matter of spending the time and money to build a powerful enough computer. But, there's no reason why the Go board cannot grow larger. A larger board, say 23x23, wouldn't change the game much for humans but would astronomically increase the time required for expert computer play. But again, if someone wants to spend the time and money, computers will eventually have the power to be the best Go players, just as in Chess.


Lionel Vidal    (2007-03-25 11:24:50)
Computer Go

While I agree that programming Go is much more a problem of algorithm than a hardware one, I think you underestimate the theorical difficulties.

First, a word on the alluded new approach (BTW the french edition of 'Pour la Science' has an article on this algorithm this month, but not very involved): it seems promising only because that program regularly beats other program using what we can call a traditional approach: tree exploration combined with pattern recognition and some clever splitted evaluation function. That is fine, but does not mean much for human, considering the poor level of all these programs.
AFAIY the very best program is said to be at low pro-dan level on a 9x9 (without any concrete real test match, that is with money at stakes... but let's suppose it is true). The problem to play on 19x19 is that the nature of the game dramatically changes: in short the tactics is more complicated and the once very basic strategy of 9x9 becomes overwhelming! There is still no known algorithm to tackle that problem. Such algorithm could exist of course, but don't hold your breath :-)
Now I am quite eager to read the tests and pubications on these researches :-)

The neural network approach is interresting but is more or less stalling (again AFAIY) in recent programs mainly because of a fundamental flaw: the tuning of the gap functions. In Backgammon, where this approach works very well, these functions are tuned by simulation: basically, the program plays many, many games against himself and in a way learns (that is tunes its network) depending on the results. As you may guess, this can not work in Go because of the complexity of the branch tree. So the problem is how to tune the network (and 'by hand' cannot be a soution, believe me, considering the number of nodes and the type of the functions being commonly used!)

Of course I simplified a lot and the maths behind these kind of algorithm are involved enough (and very interresting :-)) that someone may find new ideas that will revive one path or another. But my feeling is that the pros of go have nothing to fear for a long time...
You have to consider that the very best programs are not beaten, but crushed, by multi-dans amateurs, you know, the kind of player a top pro will beat at 5 stones while blitzing and at 9 stones if some money is at stakes :-)

Now I may be wrong, and I remember in the 80s many people saying the same thing for chess, and betting on the fact that a program could never beat a good player in at least 50 years :-)... but at that time, I did not agree :-)) mainly because the algorithms were more or less basically known already... the 80s hardware was a problem, but a technical and not theorical one...

Sorry for that too long reply... I can't believe I typed so much... that must be my new keyboard, and the fond memories of some past jobs ... :-)


Elmer Valderrama    (2007-03-26 20:12:01)
The perfect title

As the title couldn't be more awefull, let's try to improve it:


"Decision Making: Invaluable Lessons Taken from Chess"
by G Kasparov


Instant best-seller.

Although the decisions of splitting from FIDE, creating a ghost GM association, not defending the WC in a proper Cycle, and....etc,etc..premature retirement, ..etc ..etc, don't speak too well about the lessons, let's try and improve it:


"Decision Making: Invaluable Lessons Taken from Chess, With Emphasis in What Not to Do"
by G Kasparov


A killer.


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-03-26 20:32:13)
:-)

Premature retirement... I don't know but who else than Garry can say ? .. Even if politics is a bad personal choice, it is a respectable one anyway.


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-03-27 16:42:53)
Xiangqi

http://www.chesscafe.com/mueller/mueller.htm

I can't motivate myself to learn this game.. :/ .. rules are so strange, even less natural than chess !? Is it really played elsewhere than in China ?


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xiangqi

"As of 2005, the world's best human xiangqi players remain better than the world's best computer players. The game-tree complexity of xiangqi is approximately 10^150, so it is projected that a human top player will be defeated before 2010."


Elmer Valderrama    (2007-03-29 13:00:51)
Chess and politics

Look no further. Here it is.

The (Chess)Recipe for Success in Bussines and/or Politics
--------------------------------------
--(fortunately it had already been discovered)--
--------------------------------------

* Politics is a fairy tale of 1001 bad decisions.

* Bad decisions are all there, waiting to be made.

* Some part of a bad decision is always correct.

* The winner is the one who has made the next-to-last bad decision.

* Losses only prove that someone has erred in his decision.

* Moral victories do not count.

* To avoid losing a man, many a general has lost the war.

* It is always better to sacrifice your opponent's men.

* A threat is more powerful than its execution [the most violated rule]

* There is really only one big mistake - underestimating your opponent [The next-most violated rule]


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-03-31 16:14:34)
Grand prix attack sac. against Caro Kann

I always look with interest the games played by Wladyslav Krol :)

We discussed last month this explosive variant with 3.Nf3!? in Grand Prix attack, now Wladyslav used the same opening against Caro Kann !

1.e4 c6 2.f4 d5 3.Nf3 ...


I found 3 results on Google about this opening, 2 come from FICGS :

http://www.ficgs.com/game_6886.html
http://www.ficgs.com/game_8263.html

http://www.chesspublishing.com/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1160671893;start=all


It would be interesting to have comments from the players for this interesting opening, out of the books at move 3... Could be a new thematic tournament very soon :)


Catalin Ionescu    (2007-04-04 21:49:29)
European Individual Championships

2 rounds played ... who do you think will win?

top seed Jakovenko has 2 points (already); the same is in the women section where Stefanova won the first 2 matches


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-04-05 01:58:22)
Big Chess championship

Hello to all.

You may have seen in the chat bar the idea to organize a Big Chess championship at FICGS is in the air.

It could be interesting for several reasons, the first one of course is there's no engine to help players :) .. by the way, it may be really hard to program a good Big Chess engine, it should use some Go concepts combined to a powerful chess engine (with quite different parameters).

Now there are some questions :

- What rules for a Big Chess championship ?
- What about a Big Chess rating ?


In my opinion, there shouldn't be a Big Chess rating. That's a pity, but "simple" chess should remain the main rated game here. Actually, the nature of this game (and time control) makes me think it should remain a friendly game first. However there could a championship for fun...

About the rules for such a championship, it could look like the Go championship : A two-stages tournament, first stage would be a single round-robin tournament with the 7 players who won most Big Chess tournaments (will help to promote tournaments ;)), second stage would be a 6 games match against current champion (if the final score is a draw, the current champion will keep his title).

What do you think ?


Don Groves    (2007-04-05 07:51:16)
FICGS Birthdays

I just learned that Alejandro Suarez-Moreno's wife's birthday is also today! I think we should know players birthdays so we can send them greetings on that day. Maybe put them in each player's information. Mine is Sunday ;-)


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-04-06 01:02:05)
FICGS Birthdays

Thanks Wolfgang :)

Don, birthdays are already displayed in players informations ;) .. See mine ! You just have to enter it in "Preferences".

... and happy birthday to Mrs Suarez-Moreno ! :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-04-06 05:00:13)
Automatic login

Hello to all.

Everyone probably noticed security improvements these months. To use the SSL left form when you login is recommended for maximum security.

However, you could prefer to login faster, in this case you may bookmark the link below (working only if you use the right form & save your username and password in a cookie) :


http://www.ficgs.com/index_identify.php

https://ficgs.com/index_identify.php (SSL)


No more need to click the login button this way...


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-04-07 18:52:59)
Lightning demo game

Finally it was a lightning (time control 30 min + 1 min / move) game.

A lot of thanks to Catalin for playing this nice game... another one with this funny thematic opening 1.Nf3 2.Ng1 3.Nf3 4.Ng1

All seems ok, but it would be better if the page isn't refreshed until the position change on the board. I'll make some improvements this way.


Mikhail Ruzin    (2007-04-09 15:50:04)
Mikan no taikyoku

Ten years before the outbreak of the Second World War in Asia, a Japanese Go master and his Chinese rival meet in China to play a game of Go (loosely described as an Asian version of chess). It soon becomes evident that the Chinese master's son is the most talented player that the Japanese master has ever encountered, and he convinces the boy's father to let him bring the child back to Japan to train him as a professional Go player. Years pass, and as the young Chinese master grows to maturity in Japan, the Japanese invasion of China forces him to choose between his triumphant career and his loyalty to his native country. His decision is complicated by his marriage to the daughter of the Japanese master, with whom he has produced a child. His choice will profoundly alter the lives of two families. Their saga serves as a reflection of the tragic relations between their two great countries, and the possibility of reconciliation and healing. Summary written by Simon Levy {levy (at) cs.brandeis.edu}


Mikhail Ruzin    (2007-04-09 19:24:34)
Go : Pro vs Amateur on Japanese Agon Cup

Mace Li on go4go wrote: "A contributor sent me quite a few game records from Japanese Agon Cup, the only tournament that reserve some seats for amateur players. The amaturs are doing extremely well!" ... The game records: http://www.go4go.net/v2/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=217&forum=6&post_id=864#forumpost864


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-04-09 19:33:54)
Pro vs Amateur

Really surprising... Now does it mean something ??


Marc Lacrosse    (2007-04-09 23:43:22)
Thematic tournaments suggestion

A small and hopefully interesting suggestion :

When we go to the list of running and/or finished thematic tournaments we just see "tournament 001", tournament 002" and so on.

It would be nice to have the start position (as a PGN line) immediately under each tournament title so as to see at a glance which opening was played.

Marc


Jason Repa    (2007-04-10 00:13:32)
chess movie

I can't speak for Go, but there hasn't been a good chess movie yet. By far the absolute worst was "Searching for Bobby Fischer" which was a predictable prozaic drama that had nothing whatsoever to do with Bobby Fischer, or chess (real chess) for that matter. Dembo's "Dangerous Moves" was a pass. At least it was actually about chess. It was loosely based on a Karpov - Korchnoi championship but the character who was supposed to be Karpov was the older man. Neither of the actors were convincing in their attempt to portray top chess grandmasters. It would be nice to see a factual and well made movie about chess. Perhaps the Bobby Fischer story. I think an actor like James woods would be perfect to play an older Fischer.


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-04-10 00:32:54)
chess movie

Nice idea ! (James Woods as Bobby Fischer)

Maybe you're right, a good chess movie is to be done yet.. but I quite like some of these ones... and what about John Dahl's "Rounders" with Matt Damon, Edward Norton, John Turturro and John Malkovich about Poker ?

Waiting for a movie from Stefan Zweig's novel "The Royal Game" (Le joueur d'échecs).. huh actually it has been made already, did anyone see it ??

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Royal_Game

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Royal_Game_%28film%29


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-04-10 02:04:50)
Thematic tournaments suggestion

Quite true... I did not think about "comments" for tournaments, but it would be useful for thematic ones :/


Wayne Lowrance    (2007-04-10 20:48:29)
Rating calculation (algorithm update)

I think I will never understand FICS rating system. I gave up long, long time ago. Now it is changed again I guess. No matter, it is what it is. :) Thibault I will play, you and your server rate em.. heheheh Wayne


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-04-11 01:20:30)
Active players rating list

Hello to all.

For information only at the moment but it will replace the current list as the "main" list, here is the active players rating list (displaying players who connected to the server these last 30 days) for chess :

http://www.ficgs.com/user_page.php?page=rating_list&active=1

It is about 1/3 of the members, so not bad "for a start" in my opinion.. :)

To be continued.


Matt Lasley    (2007-04-13 22:15:13)
Skip feature

Is there a skip feature? When a move is entered on one game, it's great to hit "next" and move to the next game. Sometimes, I want to "skip" a game, and go to the next without making a move. So far it seems I must go back out to "games" and come back in to a different game. tx-Matt


Scott Prestwood    (2007-04-16 16:19:09)
Consider this

It has been a part of the correspondence chess tradition that you can use your own personal databases. Well, what if this database has a large proportion of computer verses human games? Computer verses computer? What if these databases were being generated by computers? Many chess viewers and database applications provide statistics and information are not reasonably generated by anything other than a computer. It seems that computer chess will be slowly keeping in.


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-04-16 16:43:15)
correspondence simul

Actually, it won't be lightning 7-players tournaments, but 2 players 1 game matches. See chess money tournament waiting lists.


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-04-18 17:18:32)
Next & Download

Hello Graham.

About the (Next) link, the page 'move_send' guarantees to the player the move has actually been sent. It can avoid some complaints. Anyway to skip this page is not easy, you could be redirected to the next game automatically after this page but it could be a bit disagreeable.

Do you use (download) after each move ? .. Just trying to make this part of the window quite 'light'.

Thanks for suggestions.


Achim Mueller    (2007-04-21 09:59:26)
One additional thought

Take this sample of group 12, where we actually play a tournament with 4 participants. A player with the nominell highest rating can easily play on draw (using todays computer programs) in the one or two important games.

You all probably know how difficult it is to win against such a blocking guy, no matter whether your "realistic" rating would be equal to his or 200 ELO points better.

Ciao

acepoint


Don Burden    (2007-04-21 16:56:18)
WCH Rules

In the first WCH tournament, I had a tied high score (5.5 out of 6), but didn't advance because of my lower rating. With only 7 players in each group, the chance seems to be very high that we will have matching high scores, especially if some players drop out. It makes sense (in my opinion) that the chance could be lowered significantly if the number of players are increased to 11 or 13.


Mikhail Ruzin    (2007-04-21 17:28:02)
Group 02 =)

Fight the 3 top-rated players in group 12? What about group 02? How match players fights in this group? =) Lets play in chess and go! And enjoy the games!


Achim Mueller    (2007-04-22 23:55:20)
Final statement

Guys, I see that noone has a plausible answer. Doesn't matter. I only made the hopeless attempt to understand the logic of the rules and what is behind it. Don't mind. I'm probably too stupid for it.

See you at iccf or bdf.

Ciao

acepoint


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-04-23 01:05:39)
Performance / Rating

Achim, you just pointed it : "Regarding the rating as a decision maker I have one questions: Who showed the better performance if two players have the same number of points at the end? The player with the higher or the player with the lower rating?" .. of course the player with the lower rating :)

Once more, the aim of these rules is to find the very best player, NOT the best 'performer' in a group, tournament, match or whatever... ICCF & IECG do it well already and I thought this system could be more exciting. Maybe there could be some improvements in the rules yet, but the idea makes sense IMO. Does it really make sense to speak of performance in correspondence chess ? .. It makes sense in OTB chess because it reflects the level of players at a particular moment. But you can play a good CC tournament and a bad one at the same time...

Best wishes, Thibault


Nick Burrows    (2007-04-23 01:50:31)
my 64 pence worth...

I must admit that i have always disliked the Fide WC rule. It seems to be there to protect the champion rather than creating a level playing field.
The fide WC is also played over 24 games rather than 5 in the groups here.
My humble opinion is that for the WC groups of 11/13 or double round robin, would be fairer and give the skillfull players more oportunity to demonstrate that skill.
It is quite likely that in a group of 5, with just 1 or 2 critical games - the better player could finish even and be eliminated. Fine for class groups, but surely the in a 'World Championships' its worth exploring a little extra detail to find the real deserving winner.
A healthy debate! No matter what, thankyou for the provision of such a great site :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-04-23 21:34:41)
Deep Fritz vs. Deep Junior

http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=3802

FIDE will organize a computer-computer 6-games match during the final days of the candidates match in june in Elista.

The "players" : Reigning computer chess world champion Deep Junior and 'reigning world champion' Deep Fritz. Time control : 75 min + 5 sec / move, the winner will get $60,000, the loser $40,000

This match brings a few questions : No particular comment on the choice of the engines, Rybka will wait for a win in a computer chess world championship... However I can't see a real interest for FIDE and for chess in such a match. I mean 6 games of rapid computer chess.. $100,000 !? Of course it will attract a few new players - to beat computers is an attractive challenge. But at least I hope Chessbase is the main sponsor :) .. does it mean a new Deep FRitz and Deep Junior version in june ? .. I hope that the games analyzed by Rybka 2.3 won't reveal the engines too poor.. :/ .. Finally what 'title' for the winner ?! ;)


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-04-27 03:09:26)
Elo calculation

Hello Nicola.

Elo calculation must be a clear and fair algorith as much as possible... These rules are statistically quite good IMO (and I suppose not many players will ask for less points ;)) because rating is quite dynamic (if your rating is really too high, you'll most probably quickly lose points until the next update) then most forfeits are done before the 10 first moves. In a way, you deserved these points because you played moves enough in these games, otherwise ie. what would happen if a player forfeits after 40 moves in a drawn or lost position ? .. Is the game unrated, rated as a win, a draw ? .. It would be unrated in some other places, that's not fair IMO. There are more complex cases. One thing most important is to make rating calculation 100% automatic (no human decision is a very asked 'feature'), this way there can't be any complaint about ratings as the future rating option makes it clear.

Best, Thibault


Matt Lasley    (2007-04-27 15:24:15)
Reward consistency

You could say that the forfeiture points are awarded for consistency. That's a valuable trait. Perhaps such points may not reflect play yet, but the consistency that lead to their award will show up in your game play in the long run. So, the points are deserved either way. And as T said, the algorithm takes care of it anyway. Ratings are a measure of history, not a measure of skill.


Nicola Lupinacci    (2007-04-27 21:30:34)
Elo

Yes, I agree whit you Matt when you said "Ratings are a measure of history, not a measure of skill", IMO elo is only a statistic of our results...

Chess skill is more complex and it can't been explained only whit a number...


Sandor Marton-Bardocz    (2007-04-30 11:54:47)
WCH Stage 1 rules

Hi everyone! Let me introduce my self :-) I'm the highest rated player in the Wch stage 1 group 12 "the blocking guy" how Achim described me...whatever that means.. 1. there is no dead draw in my opinion likewise there is no absolute winning lines, openings in a chess game...And this is most true in our "centaur, human-engine tandem" era where lines are very "unstable" to say the least..so I don't believe that one can play for a absolute draw without any risk..avoiding complicated variations...the variations complexity is very relativ...line can be "cristal clear" for one and most complicated for other..In my opinion high rates of draws among world class cc player isn't because they all play for draws ...It's a tendency..like it was in otb chess among super gm-s...not long ago...until the "no draw alowed" rules were aplied...i don't want to speculate why this happens.. 2. If someone really want to win...then should play for a win ...no matter what regulations are applied for that particular tournament 3. I think that if someone might want to take a look to the game that I played against mister Deeb in the same tournament ...starting from the move 17 of mine...hardly can to argue that I wanted to play for draws just to achieve equal points to advance. I think that none of the engines can even "smell" the outcome of the game in that position after 17..d5!?...so...saying that nowdays it's easier to achieve draws because of engines....it's a little bit exaggerated The plan started with the move 17 ...d5!? that I have played it was an absolute rejection of a drawish (by repetation) position...and it was played just because i wanted to ...play.. not to advance in a higher stage of the tournament or something...even though the final outcome ( just in my opinion! and this isn't an absolute true by far) is probably ...still a draw. 4. The regulations regarding the advance in the higher stages of the tournament..now this are definitly arguable!there are pro's and con's...and always be. We don't have plausible answers for this kind of issues...because it's is a subjectiv matter. I'm not convinced too that "higher rated player advance"is the right regulation..few examples...just look for example ...Kramnik - Leko WCH . a. ..challenger and his fans can say.."hey he didn't beat him...why should remain WChampion?! He didn't proved that he is better!" b. ..Wchampion and his fans can say.."hey u want my crown?! than beat me, and take it! draw isn't enough!" The line of examples doesn't stops here ..i don't want to prolong this subject...No rule can satisfy both sides...polemics, flame are always present :-) 5. None can predict what will be the process in a group...If 2-3 or even 4 players changes they mind and doesn't really play..that's it, and none can't do a thing about that ...maybe some sanctions later...i don't believe it will do any good anyway... 6. In the game betwen me and Achim...I don't think that I choosed a draw line...I think that I had the initiative but probably it wasn't enough for a win, Achim overforced it ....which isn't a bad thing but probably not with the plan he had preferred. good day for everyone!


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-04-30 14:05:46)
The meaning of Go for modern Russia

An interesting (as usual) article from IGN "Goama" newsletter - http://gogame.info


Alexander Rodin, the member of Go Federation
"The meaning of Go for modern Russia"

I'll try to state my thoughts about the meaning of the Go for modern Russia.

To begin with I suggested that we extrapolate Go models on the political and economical maps. These maps are very important as the spheres of social life, because the questions that are discussed at political and economical levels touch upon our lives, the lives of ordinary Russian citizens. In these spheres they continue the fierce struggle for life and death; in these spheres rivalry is especially keen and the made decisions define the vectors of our country development.

Let's imagine a situation if somebody inadequate came to power and set the totalitarian regime! Then all social "dissident" institution would start dying and so would do the Go Federation as a phenomenon which unifies people with independent thinking. Then it would be inevitable to start "hiding in basements" to keep the organization and set the secret addresses. Under conditions of modern Russia such kind of reasoning seems to be mostly fantastic than real. But if we look behind into our history we’ll remember that we have already had this phase of social development and know everything about it.

I am for that only "adequate" people, patriots, must hold power (I mean all its levels: federal, regional, local and busyness elite as well). These people must think independently and it would be just perfect if they were the people who both understand the very notion of strategy and use in their activity all the arsenal of strategic instruments and among them principles, stratagems and Go philosophy.

Someone can argue: "What are the patriots who set Japan draughts?" the heart of the problem is not in the fact that somebody sets draughts and even the Japan ones. The matter of fact is that there is a "pacific" model the centre of which is the idea of balance and peaceful division of the territory and influence. If someone of us can offer something better, so let him rule. In my opinion, it's the same as to rewrite the Bible or "The Treatise of Military Art" Soun Tsi.

The Go essence manifests in the state scale in the following aspects:

The first one is historical and cultural. The game has a great history and longstanding traditions. Go is no less than a civil game with the development of which hand by hand goes statehood making in many countries. Besides, it's followed by strengthening of spirituality and moral principles of society.

The second aspect is social. Go unifies people, sets friendly relationships between them. Through Go a man manifests quickly, through it s/he can see his/her reflection. Owing to "open spiritual fight" your adversary is likely to become your best friend without saying a word during a game.

The third aspect is pedagogical. Through Go they bring up the grown generations and form their active civil position. Like chess, Go forms and consolidates dynamical stereotypes showing in following behavioral models of people. Penetrating and consolidation happen imperceptibly when sleeping, during the junction of conscious and unconscious.

The fourth aspect is economical. Why are business people interested in Go? Because through the game model a man learns how to manage material and non-material resources. Via the game s/he realizes economical and management notions: market (territory), economical integration, SWOT-analysis (the analysis of weak and strong aspects) etc. Managers start realizing the importance of interconnection and interaction of structural subdivisions ensuring. These subdivisions shouldn't be isolated from each other. They should work time in time like a well-tuned tuning fork.

The fifth aspect is political. The idea of community in politics is as relevant as the idea of group of stones. When a group is weak there is always a possibility of dividing it and this is a sign for the whole group. When our country, being a federal union of equitable subjects, was going through its stage of making a number of subjects had a wish to use the weakness of this chain. So, in 1992 ­ 1994 for the first time after the collapsing of the USSR there appeared first separatist tendencies. E.Rossel, the governor of Sverdlovskaya region, A. Philipenko, the governor of HMAO, claimed about the possibility of Ural republic creation. The emissary of Chechen separatists Gokhar Dudaev proclaimed the independence of Chechen-Ingush republic. The detachment didn't happen but the country paid with blood for it. Nowadays we can see demonstration of political integration and isolation on the modern political world map. Take a strong unity of the European Union and states-outsiders: Democratic People's Republic of Korea and Iran.

In terms of remaining of the USA's striving for establishment of world hegemony (from V.V.Putin's speech at the recent Munich conference), Russia needs the processes of integration and consolidation with other countries aimed at its strengthening. The unified countries have a lot of dame. Now we can observe the stronger split in the CIS as a consequence of energetic and territorial policy of Russia that uses economical instruments of pressure upon "unfriendly and opposing" countries. Is it good or not? It's more likely that it‘s bad. But there are some positive tendencies: the role of the EurAsEC as a community which's built not on the basis of "strange brotherhood" and the role of Russia in it are increasing. Go is an ideological and spiritual base making us related to the countries of Asia-Pacific region. Go teaches how to see and distinguish creative and destroying processes.

The sixth aspect is psychological. The game develops thinking, in particular such processes as analysis and synthesis. It develops the ability of seeing the whole board and its details, the ability of seeing processes proceeding at global and local levels.

The seventh aspect is verbal and lexical or even philosophical. Through studying of the game theory we realize such categories as life and death, territory and influence, reliability, stability, the whole and the parts etc.

So, what is the Go meaning on the country scale? I assume that Go, as philosophy (an ideological and spiritual base), is a very important instrument of upbringing of strategic leaders, those who make decisions at high economical and political levels that influence the country's fate. Because in Go the idea of peaceful co-existence shows the way to harmony. The most pleasant is the fact the "Go way" doesn't have an end and there sky's the limit.


Wolfgang Utesch    (2007-04-30 17:32:08)
Rules and morals

Rules just have to be clear before a tournament starts – whether this rules are bad or good will be defined by the individual sight of everyone, so never mind because the rules are known and accepted by all members. Just a bad looser is searching his lost by the rules! Another thing is the abuse of rules – you can play in accordance with the rules and nevertheless break moral fundamentals. I.e. definitely lost or drawn games (known by both opponents) will not finished (by resign or draw offer/accept) because of the hope that the opponent will have a heart attack before the time control is coming. Or taking care of your rating, it will be done in next rating period later on. Perhaps it is purely a matter of taste!


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-04-30 18:45:25)
Cochrane Gambit

Thanks ! .. By the way, the waiting list for the next chess thematic tournament is open (Cochrane gambit, of course ;))

Best wishes, Thibault


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-05-01 04:15:25)
Chinese thoughts championship :)

Always looking for new funny quotes, Don just told me this nice one : "Man with more than one clock never know what time it is" :>

Do you have your own chinese thoughts ? .. or do you know websites like this one :

http://www.chine-informations.com/mods/dossiers/index.php?lg=en&action=fiche&id=253


Wolfgang Utesch    (2007-05-01 08:28:28)
Rules

@Achim: It is just your failure to start in a tournament without knowing the rules! @Thibault: I think, in our match we need not the use of the special rule. :-) A problem in corresponding game is, that rating is showing the right strongness seldom. By the way, you should put the rules on the home page!


Dan Rotaru    (2007-05-03 00:32:46)
sb tie breaks

I believe that Garvin’s idea regarding the tie break makes sense. The higher rated player in a group is not always the best player, especially in correspondence chess where it takes time to achieve one’s real rating or players can get an established equal rating from ICCF or IECG. I also believe that games will be spectacular and exciting even with new rules. I played to win in both my games against the highest rated players in my group and wouldn’t have played different no matter the rules. In the end the rules are rules and equal for everybody so we must obey. However from the number of replies it seems that the topic is hot and maybe it is worth debating for the next WCH. I don’t want to play in the ICCF & IECG world championship tournaments because I enjoy FICGS too much :-)


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-05-03 02:13:44)
Go championship cycle

1st FICGS go WCH will start in a few months, but I'm still not really satisfied with current rules :

"FICGS world Go championship is first a round-robin tournament, involving 11 players including the 6 players who won or lead most Go tournaments started during the previous year and the 5 highest rated players, among players who entered the waiting list. If more than 2 players win (or lead) a tournament with equal score, no win is granted. A win in a "pro" tournament is worth 9 "kyu" wins. A win in a "dan" tournament is worth 3 "kyu" wins. In case of equality, the next places will be taken in account.

The winner of this tournament is the challenger for FICGS world champion title. In case of equality, the winner is the player with the highest tournament entry rating (TER), If this rule can't designate a unique challenger, current ratings will be considered. If current world champion defends his title, they will play a 6 games match. In case of equality (3-3), the winner is the former world champion.

All games are played in 30 days + 1 day / move. Komi is 7.5 points. Rules for Go are chinese rules, as defined by the Chinese Weiqi Association."


Not clear enough, quite complicate and strange, even if I like the idea of a 2-stages tournament (round-robin tournament then challenger vs. champion match) and to give the opportunity to the best rated Go players to enter it without playing tournaments before... Other questions, double round-robin or not, should it be open to all players.. Feel free to suggest your ideas for a nice Go WCH cycle ! :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-05-08 23:03:28)
Herrstroem gambit, 1.Nf3 g5

What do you think about this gambit (new thematic tournament) ? .. Very critical. Is it lost for Black already ?


Nicola Lupinacci    (2007-05-09 10:04:10)
suggestion

What about Dory defense?
1. d4 Nf6, 2. c4 e6, 3. Nf3 Ne4

or (in italian language) Attacco Aculeo?
1. g4 d5, 2. Bg2 c6; 3 g5 (I don't know if Black can make the first move in thematic tournament)


Nicola Lupinacci    (2007-05-09 17:54:04)
Re: Re: Suggestion

Becuose same gambits or critical openings start whit a white move,
i.e. King gambit: 1.e4 e5 2.f4
and now black can play 2. ... exf4 or 2. ... d6 or 2. ... Nc6 ecc. ecc.
I think that in certain thematic tournament whit opening like this 1st move would be made by black...

but i don't know how thematic tournaments work... :)



Nick Burrows    (2007-05-10 00:04:13)
Mike Surtees

If you are ever short of ideas for thematic tourney's check out the openings of Mike Surtees...always interesting!?


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-05-10 03:21:12)
Thematic tournaments

Nicola, there's no rule for thematic tournaments.. every mad opening is welcome :)

Nick, what are these famous openings played by Mike Surtees !?


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-05-12 15:44:08)
Money chess and Go tournaments

FICGS money chess & Go tournaments will be open today !

At last, after the next update (in a few hours) including legal informations (home page / rules) and the 'My account' page, the money chess & Go games can start.

Players interested are invited to read rules (updated) in its entirety, particularly 04. Entry fees, 05. Prize money, 06. Warranties, 07. Money transfer ...

http://www.ficgs.com/membership.html


Feel free to discuss rules for entry fees and prizes in this thread, some points may have to be clarified yet. It's a long time I think about these rules to make them most interesting at the same time for the players and the server, according to french taxes & laws.

Of course, all free tournaments will remain free. As FICGS becomes a commercial server, the more players will enter money tournaments, the more ads on the internet so the more players :)

Time controls for money chess games & tournaments are 30 minutes + 1 minute / move (lightning), 2 hours + 2 hours / 40 moves (blitz), 30 days + 1 day / move (rapid), 40 days + 40 days / 10 moves (standard). Thematic chess money games will be played at blitz time control.

Time controls for money Go games & tournaments are 30 minutes + 1 minute / move (lightning) and 30 days + 1 day / move (standard).


Nick Burrows    (2007-05-12 22:10:28)
rake

For each 100 euro ticket, ficgs takes 25 euros as a rake?
The standard poker rake for a 100 euro heads up match would be 5 euro only.
This makes it very difficult to only break even.
Thanks, nick.


Ilmars Cirulis    (2007-05-13 12:44:12)
Finally!

Hi, Thibault!
Congratulations! ;)

I am interested in money thematic games. :)
I can play in evenings at 6 on clock (server time).

- Traxler counterattack with white (Nxf7 and Bxf7)
- Evans gambit with black
- Latvian gambit with white (I like Svedenborg very much :) )

I offer 30 EUR money stakes. If I win I get some money. If not, then money goes to my opponent.

Can I transfer 30 EUR to FICGS account in moneybookers.com?


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-05-13 14:04:07)
Thematic tournaments

Hi Ilmars :)

Yes, you can now transfer money to FICGS account. (see "My account")

It is not possible to choose your opening in the money thematic tournaments in waiting lists, but I can create the games handly. If you don't find an opponent, I'll play it.

Best wishes.


Ilmars Cirulis    (2007-05-13 18:36:17)
Thematic money games

I transfered money to FICGS account. Now I must wait only.

I can play every day at 18 o'clock. But not two days in row. :)
If I am in FICGS at that time it means that I want to play.
Does anyone want to play it?


Wolfgang Utesch    (2007-05-15 16:23:04)
Fighting against Tablebases

#3724 : I would be surprised at any engine, which cannot see the mate (in 37) after few seconds (with installed 5-pieces Tablebases)!


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-05-15 18:37:06)
Tablebases 5-pieces

Well, quite strange.. Shredderchess.com tablebases don't give a result anymore for the current 7-pieces position !? .. Was it a bug or...

Indeed it is mate in about 37 moves, but my engine with 5-pieces tablebases can't see it. If the game is not finished in a while (before the next rating calculation), you can call referee for adjudication.


Wolfgang Utesch    (2007-05-15 20:46:59)
Tablebases 5-pieces

Thibault: Not about, but accurate mate in 37! What is wrong with your installation - I'm not longer wondering, why you can't win against me! ;)


Don Burden    (2007-05-17 00:45:25)
Fighting against Tablebases

Needing over a terabyte of disk space, I doubt if anyone actually has the 6 piece tablebase installed on their computer, though a position can be queried at:
http://www.shredderchess.com/online-chess/online-databases/endgame-database.html

BTW, I've played endgames here where I had to play the game out to checkmate where my opponent had just a king and a few locked pawns, while I had an advantage of a queen, rook, and several extra pawns.


Robert Mueller    (2007-05-20 10:19:40)
Opponent dragging out lost game

Hi, Is it possible to get a game adjudicated, if the opponent just does not resign. It is game #5664, where my opponent ist in a hopeless situation. We are already in the six men tablesbases and he is lost with check mate in 34 moves. From his original 100 days time he already used 57. He seems to be determined to drag this out as long as possible. Do I have to wait another 43 days for the win :(


Don Groves    (2007-05-22 06:40:38)
Dragging out lost game

Just playing devil's advocate here: If a forced mate can be demonstrated, should this be sufficient for a win? On the other hand, should the losing player have the right to play on in hopes of an error by his opponent? It seems one of these questions should be answered with a "yes." That said, what is the rationale for the one month rule? It seems logical that either (a) the game ends immediately upon demonstration of a forced mate, or (b) the game ends normally, most likely when the loser's clock drops or he finally resigns.


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-05-22 15:16:16)
Dragging out lost game

"If a forced mate can be demonstrated, should this be sufficient for a win?" .. the answer is yes, BUT the opponent should have the right to continue the game in a limited time, so that he can eventually see the mate and he can't last the game too much.


Catalin Ionescu    (2007-05-27 13:52:21)
Candidates Matches 2007

The matches started today. You can see them live at: http://globalchess.eu/games.php.

The top match of round 1 is Carlsen against Aronian.

Who do you think will qualify for the WC?


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-05-27 19:13:09)
Candidates Matches 2007

I just read the Chessbase news :

http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=3886

I was first surprised to learn that Etienne Bacrot (after Grischuk) turned to poker also...

Levon Aronian (ARM) - Magnus Carlsen (NOR)
Alexei Shirov (ESP) - Michael Adams (GBR)
Ruslan Ponomariov (UKR) - Sergei Rublevsky (RUS)
Alexander Grischuk (RUS) - Vladimir Malakhov (RUS)
Peter Leko (HUN) - Mikhail Gurevich (TUR)
Judith Polgar (HUN) - Evgeny Bareev (RUS)
Boris Gelfand (ISR) - Rustam Kasimjanov (UZB)
Etienne Bacrot (FRA) - Gata Kamsky (USA)


In this round my favourites are : Carlsen, Shirov, Ponomariov, Grischuk, Leko, Polgar, Kasimjanov, Kamsky.

Hard to say who will win this knockout tournament...


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-05-29 21:30:18)
Round 3

Another loss for Etienne Bacrot, score is now 0,5 - 2,5 against Gata Kamsky.. Kamsky was my favourite in this match but not with such a score.

Great game from Carlsen who equalizes against Aronian !

GM Carlsen (2693) - GM Aronian (2759)

1.Nf3 Nf6 2.c4 b6 3.g3 c5 4.Bg2 Bb7 5.0-0 e6 6.Nc3 Be7 7.Re1 d5 8.cxd5 Nxd5 9.d4 Nxc3 10.bxc3 Be4 11.Ne5 Bxg2 12.Kxg2 0-0 13.e4 Qc8 14.Qg4 Bf6 15.Nf3 Kh8 16.h4 Nc6 17.Bg5 cxd4 18.Bxf6 gxf6 19.cxd4 e5 20.Qxc8 Raxc8 21.d5 Na5 22.h5 Nc4 23.Nh4 Nd6 24.h6 Rc3 25.Rac1 Rfc8 26.Rxc3 Rxc3 27.Nf5 Nxf5 28.exf5 Kg8 29.Re4 Kf8 30.Rg4 Rc7 31.Rg7 b5 32.Rxh7 Kg8 33.Rg7+ Kh8 34.d6 Rd7 35.Kf3 b4 36.Ke4 Rxd6 37.Rxf7 Ra6 38.g4 Kg8 39.h7+ Kh8 40.g5 fxg5 41.f6 1-0

To be continued.


Svante Carl von Erichsen    (2007-06-01 12:26:32)
Go championship

I think that the current rules are quite good. For the current user base, 9 players round robin is enough.

If the user base gets bigger and stronger, you could introduce preliminary stages. Example: sort all players who entered the waiting list by rating, then the final league consists of the 5 strongest players plus 4 players who placed first in the preliminary (which might be a knockout, or another league).

One thing I would change in the current system: the usual custom for multi-game matches between two players is to determine colours randomly for the first game, then alternate. If an uneven number of games is played, then in the last game, colours are chosen randomly again.

As I interpret the rules in that way that all five final games are played simultaneously, I would propose that one of those games is played with random colours.


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-06-01 17:56:58)
Final match

Hello Svante Carl, thanks for sharing your views !

I agree about the round-robin tournament, it could evolve according to the rating list...

About the final match, I have good reasons for not introducing any chancy factor in tournaments (anyway I think it's better this way), I finally agreed with players about the 5-games match but it was hard for me to consider this non symmetrical schedule... Making it different is not a problem IMO, a (2xn)-games final match with equality favourable to former champion - like FICGS chess WCH - was ok for me but 6 games may be too few, giving a too big advantage to the former winner of the tournament.

Anyway, there will be no final match in this 1st championship, it will be probably discussed again & again :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-06-01 18:05:21)
Vladimir Kramnik interview

An interesting interview with Vladimir Kramnik on the current world of chess in Chessbase news, speaking of the chess world championship in Mexico, the current format, the place of Topalov in it, also his illness and married life... Very clear, looks like his chess :)

http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=3894
http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=3899


Garvin Gray    (2007-06-04 11:41:42)
Wch 3 in rating order


KAZ Balabaev, Farit 2580

FRA de Vassal, Thibault 2512

USA Ingersol, Harry 2502

NZL Noble, Mark 2497

DEU Schuster, Peter 2480

POL Ostrowski, Leszek 2458

ARG Brunsteins, Daniel 2452

CAN Zubac, Marius 2415

ROU Mathe, Iosif 2414

UKR Khokhlov, Igor 2370

MLT Sammut, Ronald 2362

ROU Helmer, Janos 2343

PRT Pires, Miguel 2270

LKA De Silva, Dinesh 2235

POL Sanner, Zdzislaw 2219

RUS Dyakov, Alexander 2217

DEU Schiller, Wilfried 2217

DEU Koslowski, Volker 2204

DZA Ould Ahmed, Samy 2195

FRA Appendino, Jérome 2192

GBR Taylor, William 2182

GRC Bleker, Frits 2171

DNK Jorgensen, Poulerik 2168

DEU Kesselheim, Peter 2149

CAN Repa, Jason 2144

PRT Louro, Eugénio 2123

USA Kotlyansky, Edward 2114

DEU Markus, Roland 2103

FRA Czekaj, Christophe 2098

AUT Dudulec, Konstantin 2084

CAN Plante, Marc-Eric 2079

LVA Borisovs, Leonids 2078

AUT Mueller, Robert 2069

DEU Unger, Peter 2065

AUT Riha, Josef 2019

POL Skwarczylo, Marek 2018

MUS Stephenson, Andrew 2000

CZE Stanislav, Musil 1990

SCG Vidanovic, Djordje 1966

USA Burden, Don 1959

DEU Haluschka, Rainer 1950

CAN Rotaru, Dan 1937

GBR Wyborn, Graham 1890

GBR Burrows, Nick 1884

POL Broniek, Mariusz Maciej 1879

BIH Dautovic, Dzenan 1875

AUS Gray, Garvin 1863

USA Minkin, Alexander 1850

GBR Josse, Mark 1806

ARM Khachaturov, Vadim 1803

USA Kotlyanskiy, Ilya 1800

DEU Krueger, Karsten 1800

PRT Vasquez, Fernando 1775

DZA Toutaoui, Khaled 1763

DEU Wosch, Arkadiusz 1746

TUR Yuvarlak, Ugur 1732

ROU Hrubaru, Mircea 1726

ARG Carrizo, José 1724

USA Phillip, Lennox 1700

ROU Kondort, Mihai 1700

ROU Ioan, Bucsa 1700

BRA Miranda, Marcus 1691

VEN Flores, Luis 1680

RUS Ruzin, Mikhail 1639

DEU Faust, Dieter 1627

MYS Behrmann, Klaus 1617

FRA Bellanger, Michel 1606

POL Bester, Kazimierz 1600

DEU Nent, Alexander 1593

PRT Oliveira, Carlos 1586

HUN Nagy, Attila 1549

ROU Ionescu, Catalin 1535

HUN Kis-Kos, Laszlo 1512

ITA Lupinacci, Nicola 1492

BEL De Groof, Pieter 1465

DEU Odendahl, Marcel 1462

USA Hendricks, Richard 1459

BRA Queiroz, Florencio 1444

CZE Pech, Jaroslav 1433

USA Goodwin, Adam 1415

HUN Csoma, Robert 1400

USA Gillz, Nicolas 1400

BGR Toktas, Ibrahim Ugras 1400

IND Veeraiah, Karuppaiah 1400

MEX Ortiz Durán, Esteban 1400

TUR Ilhan, Alper 1400

CHE Margot, Alain 1400

TUR Erdonho, Erdinç 1400

USA Lipsits, Sasha 1400

BRA B. Lima, Edmilson 1400

DEU von Buttlar, Paul 1386

HUN Fenyves, Adam 1330

BGR Stoianov, Stoian 1316

GRC Serd, Than 1300

TUR Ak, Murat 1300

GBR Willoughby, Peter 1294

ARG Orden, Jorge 1264

GBR Neil, Charlie 1212

NLD Oldenhof, Dwight 1203

USA Greer, Stephen 1200

BRA Barradas, Anderson 1194

IND Malvankar, Vikrant 1188

BEL Tuteleers, Bruno 1145

DEU Bothe, Matthias 1143

BGR Stoyanov, Zdravko 1136



Thibault de Vassal    (2007-06-04 17:15:54)
Candidates Finals

Only 4 of my favourites qualified : Kamsky, Leko, Bareev, Grischuk, Shirov, Gelfang, Rublevsky & Aronian won their matches...

New pairings for the Candidates Finals are :

Aronian - Shirov
Leko - Bareev
Rublevsky - Grischuk
Gelfand - Kamsky

Any ideas for the next round ? :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-06-05 18:45:25)
Predictions :)

Ok, I take some risks ! :o)

My favourites are Shirov, Leko, Grischuk & .. Kamsky !

I feel these ones may want to reach the final match 'simply' more, for some different reasons.. (Shirov had a match to play against Kramnik in the past, Leko for a revenge, Grischuk for the challenge and Kamsky because he's the K who was not :))


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-06-06 19:12:00)
Rybka: $100,000 challenge to FIDE

The author of Rybka - undoubtly the strongest chess engine (Rybka 2.3.1), Vasik Rajlich challenges FIDE for a $100,000 match between Rybka and the winner of the "Ultimate Computer Chess Challenge 2007" between Deep Junior and Deep Fritz, that just started (first game drawn) :

http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=1126


Also the match offer to grandmasters is more and more interesting :

http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=794;pg=1


I doubt Chessbase or FIDE would accept to organize & play such a match, even if Fritz 11 or 12 can beat the next Rybka... The war of engines is not on the chessboard nowadays but that's quite interesting to follow anyway :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-06-06 19:42:12)
Game 1

Well, the first game was a draw... to be continued.

Deep Junior - Deep Fritz
Fritz vs Junior Match Elista, 2007

1.Nf3 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 d5 4.d4 c6 5.e3 Nbd7 6.Qc2 Bd6 7.Bd3 0-0 8.0-0 dxc4 9.Bxc4 b5 10.Bd3 Bb7 11.e4 e5 12.dxe5 Nxe5 13.Nxe5 Bxe5 14.h3 Qe7 15.Be3 Rfe8 16.Ne2 Rad8 17.Bxa7 c5 18.Bxc5 Qc7 19.Be3 Qxc2 20.Bxc2 Bxe4 21.Bxe4 Nxe4 22.Rfd1 Bxb2 23.Rxd8 Rxd8 24.Rb1 Be5 25.f4 Bc7 26.Rxb5 Rd3 27.Bd4 f6 28.h4 g6 29.a4 Ng3 30.Nxg3 Rxd4 31.Ne2 Rxa4 32.g3 1/2-1/2


Dirk Ghysens    (2007-06-07 08:13:30)
Ehlvest

Rybka's GM challenger will be Ehlvest (again); in an earlier match, Ehlvest (Elo 2643) received Pawn odds and lost.


Wolfgang Utesch    (2007-06-13 09:33:55)
Rating list

Rating of new players is very uncertain before they have finished a limit of rated games. After i.e. 30 games it is stabilized, so you can say more about the real strength. In the WC cycle (k.o. matches) rating has an anormous importance. Now is it often accidentally whether someone is high rated or not.


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-06-13 14:55:34)
The battle of Elista

The last part of the interview, Vladimir Kramnik on game 5 in his match against Veselin Topalov, when he didn't appear at the board :

http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=3912


Dirk Ghysens    (2007-06-13 16:55:29)
schach.de chatroom

In my opinion, the matter they are discussing is not very important. It is about a Mr. Holger Lieske, a person unknown to me, who is an administrator or moderator of the schach.de chatrooms, who _allegedly_ kicks out participants of the chatrooms without good reason. Some of the discutants announced that they will start a campaign against ChessBase on English-speaking forums.


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-06-14 02:43:48)
Go with handicap

Well, it is possible to organize casual matches or simultaneous games with a strong player (any volunteer ? :)) .. but it looks quite hard to organize such tournaments automatically.


Wolfgang Utesch    (2007-06-14 10:04:00)
Figlio - Schuster

Before champion a last match has to be played between the final winner of this KO match and the over all winner of the round robin tounaments.


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-06-14 18:14:03)
Rybka 2.3.2

Just after President's cup "Ultimate computer challenge" finished, Vasik Rajlich threw a new Rybka 2.3.2 in the chess engines arena... (partly explains the $100,000 challenge to Ilyumzhinov a few weeks ago)

Once more, Rybka 2.3.2 seems stronger than her predecessors with indcredible results (blitz time control) against Hiarcs 11.1, Zap chess Zanzibar, Shredder and so on... Maybe +35 elo points compared to Rybka 2.3.1 !

http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=1264#fp

http://www.rybkachess.com


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-06-14 20:38:14)
Figlio - Schuster

It has just been updated. Anyway in this list both players are winners of the match, but according to the WCH rule, Peter qualifies for the next round.


Wolfgang Utesch    (2007-06-14 22:45:22)
Figlio - Schuster

Have a look into the WCH tournament rules: "The knockout tournament is played into 8 games matches. The special rule (avoiding short draws) is that in case of equality (4-4), the winner is the player with the strongest tournament entry rating if all games are draw, the player with the lowest tournament entry rating if not all games are draw. The winner is qualified for the next stage." Any questions?


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-06-14 23:54:31)
WCH rules

Why to imitate ICCF or IECG, they do it well already... So, quite unusual but interesting IMO. The special rule for 8-games matches is a bit complicate but I think it's fair for both players this way (suggestions are welcome). Actually the more 8-games matches, the more I like this knockout format ;-)


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-06-15 14:32:49)
Strelka 1.0

Some interesting readings in Talkchess & Rybka forums about this new engine : Strelka 1.0 x32

http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?pid=9297

http://216.25.93.108/forum/viewtopic.php?p=117821


http://computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/404/

http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/40_40%20Rating%20List/40_40%20BestVersion/rangliste.html


Is Strelka only a joke about Rybka (and a clone of an earlier version) or the 'little arrow' (Strelka in russian) that will catch Rybka in future...

I don't know much about this one but its first ratings are "not bad" ! .. Any informations more ?


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-06-15 17:12:39)
Online chess today

A few links to discussions at TCCMB (The Correspondence Chess Message Board) on chess servers nowadays, future of ICCF, correspondence chess [once more] and so on...

http://ancients.correspondencechess.com/index.php?topic=105.0

http://ancients.correspondencechess.com/index.php?topic=109.0


In the second discussion I tried to answer on the future of correspondence chess & chess engines :

1) Like the 'tour de France', it is impossible to organize a "bicycle race" at chess without doping today IMO. Also there are so many 'products' : Various books, databases, engines, human help.. so it seems to me that it is a non-sense to try to make it like an OTB tournament. Online chess is "motorcycle races" & freestyle, nothing else.

2) The ratio of wins does not decrease much in computer games & advanced chess (blitz), and correspondence chess games will never be all drawn IMO. We just have to follow the horizon line... Engines still have difficulties when there are 32 pieces on the board... Make the position more and more complex & critical, play Benoni structures, East indians and English openings... There will probably be more and more draws but when looking at CC 2500+ games, the ratio is still quite good. The problem at CC is mainly the style of play with humans 'humanly' trying to remain in known positions where they can win and can't lose.

'The good fighters of old first put themselves beyond the possibility of defeat, and then waited for an opportunity of defeating the enemy', 'Opportunities multiply as they are seized' (Sun Tzu)

A solution is to make rules that motivate players to avoid draws, particularly when playing against a higher rated opponent. (ie. the rule for FICGS 8-games matches)

3) We feel that engines play almost perfect chess because of our poor human's level of play (I should say ratings)... But engines & computers have to improve a lot yet - not obvious they can do it in a more or less near future -, the horizon line is not so far, each version of Rybka wins about 30 elo points... We'll see engines at level 3200, 3300 maybe much more... (4000 ?)

4) If too many players have their CC rating between 2750-2800 in future, we can make new rules : Ratings wouldn't be calculated on the basis of each game, but on the basis of ie. 8-games matches... Then strategy would be more important & we would see rating gaps again between the best players...

Finally if I'm completely wrong, play Big Chess ;D


Wolfgang Utesch    (2007-06-15 21:09:10)
Figlio - Schuster

Initial rating (before starting the match) is deciding!


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-06-16 02:23:50)
Dead Man's Defense

Ok, that's an interesting topic.. and should be discussed for sure !

Once more, there are 6 pieces on the board and even if it is an obvious win, my engine doesn't say Mate in # moves (so your opponent may not see the mate too).

How to react ? .. No hypocrisy, IMO there's no perfect way to answer this problem. If the DMD doesn't work after tablebases, it will work well before, so players will last the game earlier. Of course it's a way to manage rating and so on... Is it really possible to avoid this ?

Any suggestions ?


Be patient anyway... :)


Nick Burrows    (2007-06-16 04:01:51)
DMD

I think it is still valid to play on in a 'lost position'. People play for different reasons. Some to improve their over the board play. If you always resign in losing positions, you may never learn how to fight when you still have practical chances.
if he is just managing his rating, this is different, but can you ever force someone to resign over a matter of etiquette?


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-06-16 14:05:02)
WCH rules

Hello Hannes.

You're right, undoubtly ! .. Also, a new cycle every 6 months is a lot. But I can't see any interest to make one more round-robin cycle championship. This format is interesting & very challenging IMO, maybe it can be improved yet but let's see in a few years :) .. 'Think different'


Mircea Hrubaru    (2007-06-16 14:12:43)
More on Strelka

Hello all, Well, it seems that all the fuss on wether Strelka is a clone has ended. Strela by Yuri Ostripov (St. Petersburg, Russia) is his original work and this was strongly tested by trustful persons in computerchess. Yet its status (a very materialistic engine, with very few endgame knowledge) makes this engine a very goo future hope. Yuri is currently improving Strelka so we must expect spectacular progress very soon (at least I hope that). Regards, Mircea


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-06-16 15:45:46)
FICGS 3.0 , novelties & advanced chess

Dear chessfriends, the new FICGS version is installed :) ... Improvements :


- New random design (see preferences) after each login, great IMO :)

- Correspondence chess established, preliminary & complete rating lists (user mode)

- Big chess rating list
- http://www.ficgs.com/membership.html#rating_big_chess
- Rated big chess tournaments (no more unrated)

- Advanced ches rating list
- http://www.ficgs.com/membership.html#rating_advanced_chess
- Rated advanced chess tournaments (money blitz & lightning games)

- New advanced chess games category : CHESS MONEY BRONZE (entry fee 0,2 E-Point)

Advanced chess games are chess games played at Lightning (30 minutes + 1 minute / move) or Blitz (2 hours + 2 hours / 40 moves) time control. Computer assistance is encouraged. See rating rules for advanced chess, everyone gets a rating (first estimated from your correspondence chess rating) after you played your first game.

Every member now has 2 free E-Points to play 10 free CHESS MONEY BRONZE (advanced chess) games. Consequently the FICGS advanced chess server is not free of charge after this free trial.


This is a major improvement, so there will be some adjustments during the next days, particularly to reorganize money tournaments.

Feel free if you have any comment or suggestion...


Have good games :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-06-16 15:56:50)
Chess tournaments with an entry fee

All chess tournaments with an entry fee are now RATED (also 2 games matches), but thematic tournaments.


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-06-16 22:00:18)
FICGS vs. IGAME.RU

Hello to all.

I'm glad to announce a new match between chess servers, that should start in about 10 days to 2 weeks. The previous match was FICGS vs. GAMEKNOT (we lost :))

The opponent is the russian server - http://www.igame.ru , an opportunity to meet new chessfriends from eastern countries :)

Here is the agreement :


1. Teams should consist of 25 players maximum (an exact number should be agreed later);
2. Number of games on each board equals 2 (one for White and one for Black);
3. Time control is 30 days + 3 days/move;
4. Leaves are provided, 30 days/year;
5. The match is played on www.ficgs.com;
6. Start date of the match should be agreed by both sides after squads are completed;
7. ICCF rules of play are applied.


In this match chess engines are allowed, it goes without saying we need a strong correspondence chess team, but anyone who wish to play may email me (or use the 'message to webmaster' form in "My account"), or just respond to this post.

Best wishes.


Edmilson B. Lima    (2007-06-17 07:16:44)
Match

I would like to play for ficgs in this team.


Charlie Neil    (2007-06-17 13:03:53)
Me as well

I did win both my games against Gameknot! So I'd gladly volunteer my services again. (Thibault, is it a "computer assistance allowed" match? Because all my moves are Carbon-based.)


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-06-18 02:18:32)
Translations / UTF-8

The reason why the home page can only be traduced in the FICGS wiki-encyclopedia is that it is the only part of the site (and chat bar) that accepts UTF-8 format, so ie. russian, chinese, japanese letters.


Wayne Lowrance    (2007-06-18 04:04:57)
World Computer Chess Championship (wccc)

Rybka does not need to pretend to be the best. Matey it is the best, period. Wayne


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-06-18 05:32:40)
WCCC

Hi Wayne.

I mean, WCCC is a tournament like any other (no federations or whatever...), it is a big event and program authors come to play, that's great. But the format with so few interesting games can't provide accurate results :/

I agree that Deep Fritz & Junior are not the strongest chess engines today, but they are a good test for other ones and a way to improve the results of a tournament. IMO a World Computer Chess Champion should be ie. the SSDF 1st ranked program, which is continuous tournament with many games played, or maybe the games played at SSDF should be organized like a continuous swiss tournament.


Dirk Ghysens    (2007-06-18 06:11:14)
Top programs

According to the CCRL rating list, the top programs today are: 1 Rybka 2 Zap!Chess 3 Hiarcs 4 Naum 5 Loop 6 Deep Shredder Fritz (7th) and Junior (8th) are so weak, that they cannot play a significant role in a world championship. The latest version of Rybka (2.3.2) can be estimated at more than 200 Elo points above Deep Fritz and Deep Junior. The SSDF rating list is unreliable IMO, as they are using antiquated hardware, and several of the best programs are missing.


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-06-18 15:19:55)
FICGS vs. IGAME.RU

Thanks for joining us Janos, we'll need you undoubtly :)

It will be a great match, just looking like Russian vs. The World... About 30 russian players registered these last 2 days, with several FIDE / ICCF masters (GM/IM). We need more 2300+ players !! :)


Alexander Shalamanov    (2007-06-18 17:02:08)
FICGS vs. IGAME.RU

Hello Thibauld, You can surely count on me, in case you might need a guy rated -2300 in your team. Anyways, good luck to you in the upcoming match. I know a lot of the igame team players; it's true that they are pretty strong, but they are as much arrogant and highbrow about their chess skills. It might stand them in bad stead in the long run. Lol!


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-06-18 20:50:23)
Big chess theory : "Queens opening"

The first rated Big Chess tournament started a few days ago... I like this game more and more, no theory, no databases, no chess engines, many strategies & many queens captured already ;)

Every opening seems ok, we still don't know if taking pawns with the queen during the first moves is worth something or not, the value of the pieces is quite unpredictable... Many players now play 1.Nh4 to threaten 2.Qo7 then 3.Qc7 if needed, winning a pawn. What is the best response if you want to keep the same material ? .. Anyway that's very interesting to see a side with 1 or 2 pawns more, giving some rooks activity to the opponent.. Still looks like a draw theorically.

My main line is : 1.Nh4 Nh13 2.Qo7 No14 3.Qc7 Ql13

Any other suggestion ?


See Big Chess waiting list in Chess Special Tournaments.


Robert Mueller    (2007-06-18 21:09:21)
Lightning and Blitz Time Controls

Question: Let's say I subscribe to a lightning or blitz time control (30 min or 2 hours) match and I am the first one, when does the game start? As soon as another player signs up? That could be hours or days later. I could be asleep and lose on time. Or am I missing something here?


Wayne Lowrance    (2007-07-12 18:24:02)
game 8029

Responded in international chat, but it is rather cumberson. My thoughts. White still has 10 days on his clock, so I would think he has the right to slow play it here. In addition white has winning chances, that should be considered. Lastly if you do adjudicate it Thibault I guess you would award a draw. If white is holding up progress it would seem to me the fault is not his but in the selection of match time controls. White has every right to expect to use all of his clock, do you not agree Thibault. :) Wayne


Ivan Poddubnyi    (2007-06-19 00:17:45)
Hello from igame

Glad to create an account on this cite. On igame I am Mobutu Sese Seco, but here I play under Russian name. On behalf of Russian amateurs I wish you good luck in this match. :-)


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-06-19 07:29:28)
Chatter robot

The robot works... You may try it by entering a CHESS LIGHTNING BRONZE tournament (1 game match). It should be a bit easier to find an opponent now...


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-06-19 08:46:02)
UTF-8

Sorry Andrey, this part of the site is not in UTF-8 format... It is possible to write in russian in the chat bar !


Viktor Savinov    (2007-06-19 15:01:22)
FICGS vs. IGAME.RU

Thibault, If you plan to win this match that it is necessary to expose structure: 1 board-2580.... 25 board-2350


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-06-19 17:57:07)
GM_FICGS__CHESS__RAPID

Hello Viktor.

Well, it would be great to organize such a tournament :) .. But GM Atalik did not connect for at least 1 year.

See active players list - http://www.ficgs.com/user_page.php?page=rating_lists

Anyway, if the other players agree, why not (prize would be inf. to 800 E-Points with 8 players)... Also I'm sure that many players would be interested to play a 2, 4 or 8-games match with an entry fee / prize with you.


Albert Popov    (2007-06-20 07:20:00)
Hello Thibault and all!

Hello to anyone in the community! I feel like playing for the FICGS team in the match versus the Russians, if you, folks, really need my participation. Cheers, Albert


Albert Popov    (2007-06-20 12:40:06)
We are in need of a good challenge!

I don't think Rybka could win in the same overwhelming manner, if Deep Junior the Horrible took part in the tournament. Why, it might be a well-thought move on the Junior team's part. Aren't we in for another Rybka - Junior thrilling match challenge soon? I would bet on Junior in that chess brain war as Junior's long-standing loyal customer.


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-06-20 15:03:22)
Rybka vs. Deep Junior

We'll have to wait & see :) .. I would be surprised if Junior beats Rybka in a 6-games match or so. In my opinion Junior is the old generation already, playing psychology while Rybka simply plays good chess. But let's wait the next versions, Junior most probably has an excellent software basis to make a very strong engine.


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-06-20 15:46:39)
Players for FICGS team (by rating)

Here is the complete list of players who registered for the FICGS vs IGAME.RU match. Unfortunately, a few players couldn't play :( .. I think our team is strong enough, as rating rules are quite hard at FICGS and some ratings are still provisional.

I don't know how players will be distributed on "tables", if it's freestyle I think Wolfgang should play at table 1.

I am also surprised to see players coming from IGAME.RU or russian forums who entered FICGS team !? .. Anyway, I'm sure there are no spies :)


Thibault de Vassal (2512)
Mark Noble (2496)
Wolfgang Utesch (2466)
Albert Popov (2463)
Michael Aigner (2354)
Janos Helmer (2343)
Miguel Pires (2270)
Leszek Tymcio (2270)
Alexander Shalamanov (2252)
Heinz-Georg Lehnhoff (2246)
Silviu Nenciulescu (2194)
William Taylor (2182)
Poulerik Jorgensen (2168)
Wayne Lowrance (2124)
Edward Kotlyansky (2114)
Christophe Czekaj (2098)
Konstantin Dudulec (2084)
Polina Romanova (2000)
Dan Rotaru (1937)
Nick Burrows (1884)
Garvin Gray (1863)
Vadim Khachaturov (1803)
Janusz Kepinski (1599)
Alexander Nent (1593)
Graham Cridland (1406)
Edmilson B. Lima (1400)
Sasha Lipsits (1400)
Ilmars Cirulis (1305 ~ >2100)
Than Serd (1300)
Charlie Neil (1212)
Phil Cook (1132)


Alexander Shalamanov    (2007-06-20 16:34:00)
Hello Thibault and all!

First of all, thanx for letting me defend the colours of FICGS Team. Oh, no, no spies on the parts the Russian players in our team. We will play fair and at our strongest. And I want to warn you that the IGAME team is really pretty strong and made of tough titled Russian players: GM, IM or GM, although they didn't feel like exposing their correct data or rating. You know, they feel they can win that match, on the one hand, and want to obtain some advantage in case we underestimate their chess strength, on the other hand. After all, honesty is not their best feature, alas. So be on guard, folks! The foe is at our gateway! Lol! Anyways, I want this match to be a fair play one and run with the ICCF motto: Amici sumus! (We are friends!). Good luck to anyone and interesting and exciting games to you! Remember, this match is a good point to win new friends over the globe behind the game of correspondence chess! Play at your strongest but bear in mind your match opponents are likely your partners in chess masterpieces than bitterest enemies. Be happy and have a fine day!


Nick Burrows    (2007-06-20 16:58:24)
'the foe is at our gateway' !

Thankyou Alexander! I share your sentiments with regards to the match. Lets set the boards on fire and create some great games. I await Thibaults rousing team speech before battle commences, be always ready for his call of 'Fall back to the keep!' I eagerly anticipate this event. nick.


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-06-20 22:54:33)
Internet chess

Well, the discussion with Tryfon Gavriel continues at TCCMB. As I had to explain the way I make FICGS, I copy my responses here :

http://ancients.correspondencechess.com/index.php?topic=109.15


Hello again Tryfon !

That's a very interesting discussion...

Actually I have to explain FICGS in its whole to respond :) .. To be continued for sure..

While registering a new member wrote to me a few months ago "Thanks for creating this ultimate chess challenge" or so... That's exactly what I try to do, mostly with the FICGS championship knockout & round-robin rules... Players just want challenge, that's the only assumption I start with, so I try to create interesting challenges. About the intellectual part, you're right but I'm quite sure that top level correspondence chess players still consider their game as an intellectual challenge, much more than a brute force or computer skills one. That's not the case for Advanced chess with fast time controls.

Let's take a look at the bicycle races again... The "Tour de France" is dying IMO.. because everyone understood we "don't know" if the champion is ok.. If doping was allowed (it would be a scandal for health of course), I'm sure the interest would raise again ! I think it is the same for chess & for everything else... The "Tour de France" syndrom happened in Elista with the match Kramnik vs. Topalov... It will have consequences. We need champions and we want true champions, every means are ok for this ! .. So the "engines allowed" rule is the only one possible or reasonable in my opinion.

Of course, chess & correspondence chess are changing, because these "walls" are nearer & nearer... maybe chess will die, maybe not.. The main problem is that in 1997, a super computer became World Champion... this year a "simple" computer Deep Fritz became world champion, soon Rybka on a cellular phone... :) Who is really interested to be a champion in "human category" ? FIDE world chess championship will continue to progressively lose its interest IMO...

Correspondence chess is just starting to grow in popularity and is told to be dying already. Surely correspondence chess will ask more & more time at a high level to win a few points, but it is possible to create more challenge by ie. changing the rating rules (the "design" of Elo rating system will become a problem).. Then, if it is not enough, we'll look for other challenges... It's told for years that Go (Weiqi) will replace chess in western countries... why not Big chess as the "brain only" game if there can't be doping in it.. just trying, as there's no other solution :)

A word about Poker of course, as it's probably the fastest growing game in popularity : IMO this game is at a stade like chess in year 1900, but the same problem will happen, even quicker. At a high level the game will be just more and more boring (if you wish to win real money) or chancy (in a wch tournament), or you'll have to always find weak players (well, not very challenging).

About the simultaneous exhibition against Alekhine or Capablanca, I'm not sure at all they would crush everyone at our chess servers, they are undoubtly more talented than all of us, but I feel it wouldn't be enough in all cases to win against correspondence chess style of play & knowledge accumulated for 50 years... A few players rated OTB 2000-2200 could draw against them IMO...

At last, yes I'm a fan of Sun Tzu's "The art of war" :) .. I strongly believe that correspondence chess will not die in the next few years because players will follow its principles more and more, as the only way to win ! .. Big chess follows the same principles... and Go is the most challenging game because of it too !

Tryfon, I'm not sure that we're opposite in our vision of chess ! .. Our servers have obviousy different goals, nothing more.. I do enjoy playing mad blitz games without chess engines... I just believe that the future of internet chess is "serious (engines allowed, rated) correspondence chess" on one hand and "human chess for fun (no engines, unrated)" on the other hand... The other ways look like nonsense to me.

I hope it responds.


Best wishes, Thibault


Garvin Gray    (2007-06-21 01:22:46)
FICGS vs. IGAME.RU


I don't know how players will be distributed on "tables", if it's freestyle I think Wolfgang should play at table 1.
I would imagine it will be freestyle format. How can it be any different?


Alexander Shalamanov    (2007-06-21 08:13:31)
Nick, your stand is shared!

Jo, Nicky! Thanx for your comment. It's always nice to be appreciated.:) Yeah, I believe tha match gonna be very interesting and breath-taking, but the fair play concern should be the priority. No insult, no arrogance, but high esteem for a chess friend all the way along! Cheers, Alex


Alexander Shalamanov    (2007-06-21 08:46:21)
The rating principle is a must

Hi, mates! I sincerely believe the rating principle should be a concern when arranging the team members in a match challenge. That way we would provide for the fair play principle. It doesn't make any sense to try gaining cheap wins. Remember, honesty is the best policy. Cheers, Alex


Alexander Shalamanov    (2007-06-21 11:00:16)
I've got your point, Andy :)

Why no, noone's trying to push you or anyone else in your team how to line-up. I was just saying we in our team should keep to the rating line-up principle one way or the other. And, yes, it was how I do feel about it. Anyways, it's up to Thibault to decide on the matter. Cheers, Alex


Denis Stork    (2007-06-21 22:11:39)
from Russia with love

Greetings to all! So here we are, fresh new Russian players, to participate in FICGS vs. IGAME match. I'd like to give a short explanation of our "disguising identities". The thing is that mostly our names really won't say anything to you. iGame is just an amateurs' site and with the upcoming match we have a good chance to find out which material we really made of. :) So show us maser-class. And let the strongest win! :) Good night and good luck ! :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-06-21 22:49:13)
Real names

Hello Denis.

Well, almost everyone here uses his real name, "amateur" or master. The aim is only to build a friendly atmosphere ! .. and it works quite well IMO :) .. That's why real names are really appreciated. Your choice my friends ;)


Nick Burrows    (2007-06-22 00:13:53)
name change

Could i play under the name of Donald Duck in the forthcoming match to neutralise my opponents stratgey? ;-)


Denis Stork    (2007-06-22 10:07:59)
Donald Duck :)

I get your point. But I'm Stork on iGame as well as some other sites. So if someone interested in my past games he/she can easily look through them. I don't think Donald Duck has any finished games statistics. :) BTW, as I see, FICGS team has adopted some iGame players, so it's gonna be "FICGS+iGame vs. iGame" match. It's just a joke. lol :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-06-22 17:36:50)
Russian players or not in FICGS team ?

Well, that's very hard to decide. Actually at a first sight I agree with Garvin too, the real fun and the sense of such a match is players from western countries meeting russian players IMO, but no "rule" forbid it.

Whatever the decision, there will be deceived players :/ .. My suggestion is that all russian players who just registered at FICGS should play with IGAME.RU team but it's up to Sergey (for Igame.ru team). I'd like more opinions about this issue, also from Sergey Pligin, who organizes the match for Igame.ru


Alexander Shalamanov    (2007-06-22 20:00:58)
L'histoire de la verite, Thibauld :)

En bonne justice, les invitations pour entrer dans l'equippe ont envoiee aux participants d'IGAME choisie. Alors beacoup de gens qu'ont vraiment voulee jouer le match n'ont pu le faire.


Michael Aigner    (2007-06-22 21:27:50)
Re: Rybka's strength at CC time controls

I think you are right with your Elo approximation (2200 to 2300). There is just a little problem. In the case everybody would know he/she is playing against the latest Rybka version this would be a big problem for the program. In this case Rybka should loose almost every game because everybody would know Rybkas response to any move and could build wonderful traps. Did you hear about the so called "Planetenmatch" (match of the planets) where correspondence Chess GM Arno Nickel played against several Programms of unknown identity (the alias was the name of a planet). I think the engines had 24 hours per move and no chance - a desaster for the programs. That was of course before Rybka appeared, on the other hand he won also against Hydra!


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-06-22 22:35:34)
GM Arno Nickel vs. engines

I heard about this match (that happened on the Chessfriend server if I remember well)... but it seems that actually the engines won 3,5 - 2,5 ! .. A quite surprising result. Hydra was everything but designed to play at correspondence chess time controls, so let's wait for a more interesting experience, most probably with Rybka.


Glen D. Shields    (2007-06-23 00:14:24)
Chess Engine Strength

Thibault - I've been following the TCCMB discussion. I think it's impossible to answer the question what rating Rybka can achieve under the uncontrolled circumstances we play. If Rybka were playing only against humans, it would achieve a 2600+ rating. Since it plays mostly against itself and other top engines (with little human intervention), the typical results are win a few games, lose a few games and draw a lot.

Since tournaments are mostly set up so that players face opponents with similar ratings, a 2220 rated player using Rybka enters a tournament against other 2200 players. That player wins a few games, loses a few, draws a lot and leaves the tournament at approximately 2200. We conclude from that pattern that Rybka can achieve a 2200 rating.

Conversely, a player (like Uri Blass) who enters tournaments at 2600 and plays other 2600 rated opponents using Rybka wins a few games, loses a few games and draws a lot. He leaves the tournament rated approximately 2600. We conclude for that situation Rybka is rated 2600.

IMHO, it is impossible to answer the Rybka rating question under our typical tournament circumstances.

I think an even better question than worrying about Rybka's strength is "does anyone REALLY enjoy CC anymore?" Today's CC's is a race to buy the fastest hardware and make sure SSDF's top rated programs are installed. I'm playing beginners who can't explain what "en passant" is, but by parroting Rybka they compete in top tournaments and claim to hold titles that once upon a time had to be earned through hard work. After passing through the opening, it doesn't take much effort to figure out what program your opponent is using. At that point one can predict with high probablitlty every move your opponent will make for the rest of the game. Rarely do I see a move that I can can beat. The games are boring and pedictable. Those blunders and surprises that we once wrote funny stories about are long gone. IMO so is the fun.

Sorry to sound so "pessimistic," but until these problems are addressed and the fun is restored I find it just as easy to play against my computer. I can play at my pace, chose the engine I want to play, and unless my computer crashes I no longer have to worry about DMD :-)

Thanks for such a well run place to play chess. You do a great job maintaining it.

My best,

Glen


Ivan Poddubnyi    (2007-06-23 00:55:24)
2 Thibault de Vassal:

Unfortunately, IGAME players are not understood here in correct way. Let me clear our position about names.

Of course I respect your idea of creating a friendly atmosphere on your cite by giving real names. If I will decide to stay here, I will play under my real name. But now I am your guest and would like to play under a nick-name. I hope, you can respect our IGAME customs. If you do not like my IGAME nickname Mobutu, let me play as Ivan.

By the way, a lot of information about IGAME players is available on our cite www.igame.ru: games, results, IGAME ratings and so on. Come and see, we do not hide. :-)


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-06-23 01:20:45)
2 Ivan Poddubnyi

Hello Ivan :)

You are understood in a correct way ! .. Only rules aren't. As I said to Sergey while discussing the match, there's no problem with nicknames, as long as it is "a" real name, not a famous name !

Of course you can understand that I can't register ie. Iosif Stalin or Andrei Chikatilo ;) .. But any "common" russian name is ok.


In example, your first name is ok, your last name is ok, but both could have been avoided :)

Best wishes, Thibault


Wolfgang Utesch    (2007-06-23 07:48:30)
FICGS vs. IGAME.RU

Nicknames are o.k., but the real name behind should be known for the opponent! Otherwise there would be an advantage on nicknames because their former games couldn't investigated. And this would be the normal process in correspondence chess (and OTB) before match.


Wolfgang Utesch    (2007-06-23 09:50:48)
Nicknames

Nicknames are o.k., but the real name behind should be known for the opponent! Otherwise there would be an advantage on nicknames because their former games couldn't investigated. And this would be the normal process in correspondence chess (and OTB) before match.


Wolfgang Utesch    (2007-06-23 09:53:47)
time for a different thread

maybe - but it is also interesting for the match FICGS vs. IGAME.RU, which is this threat's matter.


Wolfgang Utesch    (2007-06-23 09:58:11)
Nicknames

...and this threat is also very important for our match FICGS vs. IGAME.RU in my opinion!


Viktor Savinov    (2007-06-23 15:09:26)
Who organizes this match?

Who organizes this match from Russian party? Sergey Pligin? There Is no such chessplayer. This nickname. If at "Sergey Pligin" of the right to represent site Igame?


Wolfgang Utesch    (2007-06-23 17:18:23)
confusion game

I know, nicknames are very usual in internet age - but why. There is no information from me what I have to cover up. But for others it may be different?!


Wolfgang Utesch    (2007-06-23 17:54:20)
Names

I hope our russian friends will remember their real names by themselves until our match will begin.


Sergey Pligin    (2007-06-23 19:18:53)
FICGS vs. IGAME.RU

Dear chessfriends! My name is Sergey Pligin and I am the co-organizer of this match, representing igame.ru. Originally this match was planned as a friendly rivalry of 2 servers which are igame and FIGCS. The 1st one is Russian, the 2nd one is western. The main idea was to make new foreign friends. This match caused a big avalanche of interest at our server. Unfortunately, not each player can play this match for the teams consist of 25 players only. Some players of igame who are not in have decided to play for your team. I don’t know their motives, but it is their right to play for any team they are willing to play for. Their honest play is the main item to be discussed. On the other hand, several permanent players of the FIGCS have lost an opportunity to participate in this match, as, for instance, was pointed out by Mr. Garvin Gray. I sincerely wish to organize this friendly match with no misunderstanding and beg you to pay attention to Russian players whom you’d like to be in your team.


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-06-23 19:27:53)
Startdate

Hello Sergey and thanks for this presentation :)

The startdate of the match has been decided : 2007 june 27, Wednesday.

It has been also decided, for more fun and to favourize meetings between players from different parts of the world, that russian players just coming from Igame.ru and russian forums these last days couldn't play for FICGS team. I would like to thank them anyway, I'm sorry about that but that's the way this friendly match was thought first.

All the best to IGAME.RU team and good luck :)


Wolfgang Utesch    (2007-06-23 19:31:56)
FICGS vs. IGAME.RU

If you want to have a fair and friendly match so discover the nicknames of your team and show their real names! I'm not interested to play against Donald Duck or other figures of virtual life!


Nick Burrows    (2007-06-23 20:50:58)
chess match theatre

This is becoming more like theatre than a chess match. All we need now are some hypnotists & parapsychologists ;-)


Wolfgang Utesch    (2007-06-23 21:20:13)
chess match theatre

Nick, you are right!


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-06-24 01:35:19)
Reminder : Rules !

11. General rules - 11.1. Netiquette : "No player may post in forums or send to another member any voluntary message that contains abusive, insulting, provocating, advertising, vulgar, foul, racist, sexist or other discriminatory or politically sensitive content that may violate any applicable laws. Doing so may lead to being immediately and permanently banned. You agree that the webmaster, administrator and moderators have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic, comment or message at any time should they see fit."


Thanks everyone not to provocate or insult other players anymore !


Sergey warned me before the match that some players from Igame.ru wouldn't like to play under their real names, I said they could register with other names (not famous names), a few players did it, this is not so important IMO.

Players who absolutely want to play in this match against players using their real name can send me a private message and I'll arrange that.


Thanks in advance :)


Alexander Shalamanov    (2007-06-24 07:12:04)
Hello, chess friends!

Yeah, I've read the polemics, but don't feel like doing that, coz whatever I say would be misinterpreted by Serge & Co. Lol! I've got nothing to do with IGAME now. I've left it forever and explained the reasons behind my move on the IGAME forum. Thibault, I do respect your decision that only western-based FICGS players join your team for the match. I thaink, that is quite right to do in the current situation. Cheers, Alex


Garvin Gray    (2007-06-24 08:20:06)
suggestion


If I understand the current situation, igame have already decided their 25 players and so the ones who have missed out from igame are looking to play for ficgs, which Thibault has said wont be happening.

Since it looks like ficgs will be able to allocate 25 ficgs only players, perhaps a second division needs to be created?

The top 25 from both sites still play each other, but then the ones who missed out from both sites get to compete against each other in Division B.

I believe this would help to stop igame players from trying to join ficgs with the only intention of playing in the team match.



Alexander Shalamanov    (2007-06-24 09:55:59)
Hello, Garvin!

Nope, that's only half-truth. I've no idea of the others' motivation but my signing-up on here has nothing to do with an attempt to play versus the IGAME team. The reasons were somewhat different. I didn't come here solely to play in that match, I just love the friendly atmosphere here on FICGS. Cheers, Alex


Wolfgang Utesch    (2007-06-24 17:58:56)
FICGS vs. IGAME.RU

Because of dubious circumstances I resign from my promise of participation the match. Nevertheless all the best for all participants! Best regards, Wolfgang


Albert Popov    (2007-06-25 07:20:58)
Using nicknames or fake names

I presume, it's disgusting to use nicknames or fake names in a friendly match. I find it impossible to shake hands or salute people who hide themselves behind nicknames or fake names. That's not fair play and if it takes place, I'm not into it! It runs counter to the ICCF rules of conduct. Amici sumus! Albert


Andrey Sumets    (2007-06-25 08:20:09)
subject

As far as I understood, it will be only a friendly match between two servers, one of which (ours) is not official. Thus I don't see the reasons why our players can't play under those names which they will find necessary. On igame.ru I also play under an assumed name, however it does not cause any discussions or any other problems from other participants. Moreover, if the person will name Donald Duck or I_can't_play, their skills and opportunity won't change. So considering the friendly status of this match I do not see the reasons to make great problem from this matter.


Sergey Pligin    (2007-06-25 10:13:05)
to Wolfgang Utesch

Wolfgang, it is a pity such a strong player as you are resigns playing this match for the reason you are giving up this opportunity is insignificant, IMO. Several players of our team use nicknames, but not all of them. You may play vs me. I am expected to play on 3rd or 4th board. My games are available on ICCF web server. I hope you will change your mind and play FICGS team. Best regards, Sergey


Charlie Neil    (2007-06-25 14:45:39)
Ficgs vs Igame.ru

Is this the most replied to forum in Ficgs history? Regarding nicknames so what? It's a friendly match. Amici Sumus. (And psychology in chess still can win the game before the first move!) As far as I am aware you must give your real name to the administrators on the site before you can use nicknames. So there you go. Now play the board and not the man.........Look at my rating very very low but I have fun! it's only a game.


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-06-25 15:17:50)
Rybka's book

Sure the secret of Rybka is not its/her opening book ! .. But that's very important matter anyway.


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-06-25 15:25:58)
Ficgs vs Igame.ru

Undoubtly the most replied in this forum :)

I think that's not so important matter. A few IGAME.RU players registered with other names and were honest by admitting it. Of course a few players here used nicknames before that, that's not a big deal and that's internet chess. The only way to be sure (actually that's wrong, I saw some cases a long time ago in team championships) of your opponent's identity is to play over the board.

Finally, if some players in IGAME.RU team use nicknames, let's say that's a small advantage we give to them :) .. On the other hand, we play at home !

Not a big deal... really.


Amici sumus !


Garvin Gray    (2007-06-25 15:29:23)
to Wolfgang Utesch


Wolfgang,

Please read below regarding your participation and this issue of nicknames.

Thibault de Vassal (2007-06-24 01:35:19) Players who absolutely want to play in this match against players using their real name can send me a private message and I'll arrange that.

Continuing on with my comment- This means that since you have a real issue playing against someone using just a nickname, Thibault de Vassal will pair you against someone using their real name.

This seems a fair compromise to me.
By the way, I would like to play against someone using their real name as well.


Robert Mueller    (2007-06-25 16:57:08)
Ficgs vs Igame.ru

With all the discussion about nicknames we seem to be a bit off topic: when does the match start and who is playing?


Wolfgang Utesch    (2007-06-25 17:48:40)
FICGS vs. IGAME.RU

Let me explain – I don’t want to have any exception rules for me! It’s a principle thing: about 35 years ago I played some few correspondence chess tournaments by postcard (naturally with my real name). After a long period of abstinence (since 1999) I played correspondence chess by Email (IECG/Playchess-Server and ICCF/ICCF-Webserver) – new transport medium but with old real name. So everybody can see my chess history: I’m standing (with my real name) to all my many bad or neutral games as same as to my some very good chess performances. I’ve always used tools (first just books and later also engines), but I’ve always played my games alone (without help by any other person). I think there are many other players with FICGS (i.e. Peter Schuster, Hannes Rada, Harry Ingersol or others more) who have done it similar like me. In contrast, if DONALD DUCK wins and has played a very good game, he likes it to say his real name, if he loses or has played poorly, he is just staying DONALD DUCK. He wouldn’t have to fear to disgrace himself, but there is a real chance for him to gleam! Sorry, but this is not my idea from a friendly match between two serious teams.


Garvin Gray    (2007-06-25 18:53:46)
next rating list


Robert Mueller (2007-06-25 16:57:08) Ficgs vs Igame.ru With all the discussion about nicknames we seem to be a bit off topic: when does the match start and who is playing?

I believe that the ficgs team will be confirmed once the new rating list is released on July 1st.



Thibault de Vassal    (2007-06-25 19:14:57)
Startdate

See above ;) .. "The startdate of the match has been decided : 2007 june 27, Wednesday."

Of course, the games will be unrated, this is a friendly match and our opponents ratings are provisional. I'll post the teams and pairings wednesday.


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-06-26 01:35:03)
A guide to Endgames Tablebases

Endgames tablebases fully explained, a great page :

http://horizonchess.com/FAQ/Winboard/egtb.html


* [A.1] What is a endgame tablebase? How do they work? How much stronger will it make my chess program play?
* [A.2] What are the different endgame tablebases formats out there? What are the differences?
* [A.3] Where can I learn more about the endgame table formats?
* [A.4] What are the Chess programs that support endgame tables? Which format do they support?
* [A.5] Where can I get endgame tablebase?
* [A.6] Where can I buy tablebases?
* [A.7] Where can I download tablebases?
* [A.8] How do I generate tablebases on my computer?
* [A.9] How large are the tablebase files? Can I put then all into one directory? Do I have to use a complete set of 5 men tablebases?
* [A.10] Questions about 6 men endgame tablebases. Which are the most useful?
* [A.11] How do I find out which tablebase is corrupted? How do I know the endgame tablebases are working?
* [A.12] What is datacomp.exe? Where can I get it?
* [A.13] How do I get Crafty to work with Endgame tablebases?
* [A.14] How can I get Fritz to use Endgame tablebases?
* [A.15] What is the difference between tablebases download from Dr Hyatt's ftp site and those on the Chessbase endgame turbo CD? Can they be used together?
* [A.16] What are the files ending with .tbs? What about those with nbb and nbw? Do i need both?
* [A.17] Help, the endgame tablebases are not working properly!
* [A.18] Can I use tablebase files in zipped form?
* [A.19] Where can I get a useful graphical browser to view endgame tablebases? What about an online searchable database?
* [A.20] Misc questions


Alexander Shalamanov    (2007-06-26 11:33:47)
Good, good...

Nice to hear that the match gonna take place under any weather! Lol! Great that the nicks stuff is fading into the background. Anyways, nicks or fake names are minor issues compared to a good inter-server challenge match! Good luck to anyone and especially to the IGAME team! Pardonnes-moi, Thibault, mais je suis Russe, n'est-ce pas? Cheers, Alex


Wolfgang Utesch    (2007-06-26 16:06:08)
Ratings

The discussion of ratings is very problematic. Ratings on different sites are depending on different premises. What entry level was accepted? How long did you playing there – how often? How much thinking time did you spent per move? Is the basic rating you earned over years to be caused by old tournaments with postcards (maybe without any help of engines – and your opponents did it the same way)? How much care did you spent ratings (i.e. Norm tournaments?!)? Are you a member of the exclusive cycle of an organisation, getting invitations to closed high-level rating tournaments? Engines (also Rybka) are playing own styles and it depends on whether you can play better or worse against their special styles (knowing their potencies and weaknesses). Old fashioned players (independent from their ratings) will have much more problems to win or to hold draw against engines than players which have positioning themselves at actual situation. In my opinion today Rybka alone with one week thinking time per every move without any other help will reach a rating of about 2.400 at FICGS SM-tournament with an average rating of 2.450. In an ICCF anniversary tournament (average rating of about 2.600) same Rybka under same conditions will reach a rating about 2.550. I for myself wouldn’t play longer correspondence chess, if I would have the feeling that any engine is playing better without my command. How long will it still take? My engine handling is not in this way, that I am waiting for longer times which move is offer by the engine. I have own ideas and I’m trying their possibilities, investigating positions in depth over many moves in all directions. But sometimes engines have the better ideas and I have to accept this!


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-06-27 04:12:14)
Predictions ? :)

In less than two weeks, this promising 8-games match will start... Any predictions ? .. How many pawns will Peter give to his opponent to find beautiful attacks ? :) .. He'll probably have to avoid draws anyway. I think Gino has good chances in this match.


Dinesh De Silva    (2007-06-27 07:26:44)
Re:

It seems someone is trying to force issues by always trying to be confrontational. Any player who tries to be high & mighty & aggressive is surely unstable. What people like I & Miguel Pires were doing is just making a suggestion & making friendly debate. Maybe there should be a poll to determine if the vacation period should be increased or not. It's all upto Thibault, of course. Whichever way he decides, we as players would accept it in a friendly, calm, peaceful manner, unlike a very few who try to impose their will on matters by thinking they are ALWAYS correct..


Christophe Czekaj    (2007-06-27 13:33:55)
What a mess !

Hi everybody ! I'm totally agree with Charlie Neil ! What a mess for a friendly match ! I know "chess is life" but before it's a friendly game. So let's just play chess !


Rodolfo d Ettorre    (2007-06-27 14:52:24)
Ficgs vs Igame.ru

I am looking forward for this match, of course as a humble spectator. Maybe we should have cheer leaders ...


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-06-27 21:18:36)
FICGS vs. IGAME.RU, the games

Hello to all.

The friendly match between FICGS & IGAME.RU teams just started :)

http://www.ficgs.com/tournament_FICGS__CHESS__FICGS_VS_IGAME_RU_MATCH.html


I'd like to thank Sergey Pligin for organizing this match and all players who registered to play. I apologize to the players who couldn't play :/ .. 25 boards was not enough this time. To build FICGS team I selected players with the highest ratings but one cause his rating should be clearly >2000 already. Also IM Mark Noble plays at table 6 because his opponent is another FIDE IM.

I wish good games to everyone, this is a great opportunity for us to meet russian chessfriends.

Amici Sumus !


... quote of the day : "Top boards make the show, last ones win matches." :-)


Here are the complete teams :


FICGS :

1. Thibault de Vassal # 1
2. Michael Aigner # 139
3. Peter Schuster SM # 323
4. Janos Helmer # 47
5. Miguel Pires # 83
6. Mark Noble IM # 1991
7. Leszek Tymcio # 2151
8. Heinz-Georg Lehnhoff # 142
9. Silviu Nenciulescu # 1319
10. William Taylor # 1232
11. Poulerik Jorgensen # 940
12. Wayne Lowrance # 135
13. Edward Kotlyansky # 1140
14. Christophe Czekaj # 1193
15. Konstantin Dudulec # 1329
16. Robert Mueller # 1233
17. Josef Riha # 157
18. Dan Rotaru # 1394
19. Garvin Gray # 1363
20. Nick Burrows # 1643
21. Vadim Khachaturov # 1078
22. Daniel Khayman # 1032
23. Gaetano Laghetti # 138
24. Alexander Nent # 1411
25. Ilmars Cirulis # 533



IGAME.RU :

1. Sumets Andrey, Member # 2137, GM
2. Pljusnin Ivan, Member # 2147
3. Pligin Sergey, Member # 2189
4. Doinikov Owl, Member # 2191
5. Romitsin Nikolay Sergeevich, Member # 2159
6. Vovk Andrey, Member # 2144, IM
7. Yunusov Adkham, Member # 2124
8. Pavlikov Andrey Nikolayevich, Member # 2157
9. Leskiv Miroslav, Member # 2133
10. Domanov Dmitry, Member # 2130
11. Kragujevcanin Stole, Member # 2148 12. Silkin Aleksey, Member # 2198
13. Orlov Sergei, Member # 2207
14. Kim Vladimir, Member # 2139
15. Gerasimov Vladimir, Member # 2190
16. Larin Igor, Member # 2193
17. Zarullin Ivan, Member # 2203
18. Filimonov Evgeny, Member # 2176
19. Pezikov Evgeny, Member # 2174
20. Stork Denis, Member # 2180
21. Mancubov Boris, Member # 2156
22. Ilyuschenko Yury, Member # 2168
23. Prokopenko Alex, Member # 2182
24. Basiliev Iouri, Member # 2205
25. Shpakovsky Alexander, Member # 2185


Edit : There was a mistake while building the games, I had to make a replacement at board 23.


Dan Rotaru    (2007-06-28 03:30:01)
IGAME team

Apart from Member # can the ratings be revealed for each player: IGAME rating, FIDE / ICCF ratings if available? It would be fair at least to know the strength of our oponents. The rating registered on FICGS for some players is provisional and it doesn't tell anything. IGAME players have free access to this information so it has to be reciprocal.


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-06-28 04:07:04)
IGAME team

I don't think IGAME team has to provide more information... The match started, once more that's internet chess, we have to accept this part of uncertainty. You may search ratings for players mentioned above (using their real name), but anyway IMO at least 1 player (not me :)) in FICGS team does not use his real name too, moreover a few players in our team still have a provisional or under-estimated rating... Any player can start with a 1600 rating here if he does not mention his FIDE rating, so the same for IGAME players. This is part of the challenge, so let's just play :)


Garvin Gray    (2007-06-28 06:10:18)
board orders


Hello,

I have a real problem with the board orders that igame have put in.

Why is a 2200 elo player on board 25 for igame.

I was not aware that this team match was going to be played in this fashion. I thought it was a simple principle that both sides play in roughly rating order.

Not impressed at all!

If igame wants to win that badly that they are playing one of their best players on the bottom board, they can have two wins right now as far as I am concerned.



Andrey Nikolayevich Pavlikov    (2007-06-28 08:51:32)
the beginning

Thanks God, Tibault and Sergey the match has been begun. I wish all the participants good luck and brilliant games! Amici Sumus.


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-06-28 13:56:08)
Thinking in decades of moves

You mean it would be great to have a 2400+ rapid tournament ?! :)

I think we should keep both formats (standard & rapid) anyway.


Robert Mueller    (2007-06-28 17:08:46)
WCH_00002

On a remotely related matter: when will stage 2 of the second WCH start?


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-06-28 23:24:29)
FICGS vs. IGAME.RU

You can find our opponents nicknames at IGAME.RU on this page :

http://www.caravan.ru/~stork/zoo/matches/ficgs.htm


Dan Rotaru    (2007-06-29 00:20:31)
FICGS vs. IGAME.RU

Thanks Vadim, My opponent already provided me this information which is very nice of him. So let's forget about all the fuss in this thread and let's play some good games.


Charlie Neil    (2007-06-30 09:26:19)
Cheering on Ficgs!

Hi, go to Tournaments, then Special Tournaments, then Ficgs Special Events and there is the Ficgs vs IGame match. There is one King's Gambit already! This is brave play in a strong match or not? Who needs sites covering matches and tournaments elsewhere when we can stay here and cheer on our own players against this strong team. "C'mon Ficgs! Check every move twice and again before sending. Take your time. Good luck!" Unfortunately we cannot pass comment of any kind on any of the games in progress. Rules forbid it...There must be somehow home advantage can count.


Garvin Gray    (2007-07-11 16:15:47)
formula on here for norms

Yeah, it was the formula etc that I was after. I had already seen the information in the link before I asked the question


Sergey Pligin    (2007-07-08 19:16:04)
Link

Dear chess friends!
You may view all games of the match (scrolling is available) at:
http://igame-ficgs.styleindustry.ru/
All the games are renewed every 5 minutes.


Nick Burrows    (2007-07-09 09:21:28)
link

Yes, thanks for the link Sergey! It makes it much easier to skim through the games.
Also thanks for creating such a great match, it's nice in such an individual game to play for a team...


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-07-14 02:57:01)
Rybka vs. Ehlvest (2nd)

A new 6-games match occured during july 2007 between the latest version of Rybka and GM Ehlvest with some "advantages" given to the human. One more time, Rybka convincingly won the match : 4,5-1,5

http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=1614


Well, not so bad after Kramnik's 4-2 loss vs. Deep Fritz... Help, we need help :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-07-14 14:10:43)
Rybka vs. Human

That's a quite pessimistic vision of chess today, but maybe I'm too optimistic yet :)

In my opinion it would be interesting to see this kind of match with longer time controls... maybe 30 minutes + 30 minutes / move. The human play could be much more organized and secure, with less time pressure.


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-07-15 14:17:47)
Rybka vs. Human

Hello Jason.

You are right, but I doubt this "war" will end soon. Unlike pure calculation, chess is a symbol of intelligence, even if it's said to be pure calculation since Deep Blue won the match over Kasparov 10 years ago. It will be always possible to draw against the best computers, so there will always be challengers to try to equalize in a match against the king Rybka or any other super-calculator. Some will succeed, undoubtly... That's a question of time. And they will be chess heroes :)

About Go, the same cars on another circuit are not so successful, so why not to continue the race championsip anyway ? .. There is life, so there's hope... :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-07-15 19:33:36)
Go ratings

Hello William.

Yes, quite hard to find a design with enough place to display all informations :)

The main problem is it wouldn't be coherent with other games tournaments.


Jason Repa    (2007-07-15 19:45:58)
Rybka vs. Human

"I am low graded. I don't have a degree. I am a little character, pretending to be educated. i can't spell. I need my hand holding. i have no attention span. i make sill comments."

All of those statements are true, and in fact most of them can be proven by the information contained in this thread. The one exception, the low grade, can be confirmed by a simple google search showing all the under 100 bcf (under 1700 uscf).

I wasn't the one trying to prop myself up with alot of psuedo-intellectual psychobabble burrows....you were. I never said a word about myself here so don't start telling lies again. We were discussing Fischer. Unlike you, I don't need to drop pop psych. terms in internet forums to try to impress people. I know what my level of intelligence and education is.


Jason Repa    (2007-07-15 20:12:13)
Bobby Fischer's IQ

"In previous writings I have cited Fischer's I.Q. as in the range of 180, a very high genius. My source of information is impeccable: a highly regarded political scientist who coincidentally happened to be working in the grade adviser's office at Erasmus Hall - Bobby Fischer's high school in Brooklyn - at the time Fischer was a student there. He had the opportunity to study Fischer's personal records and there is no reason to believe his figure is inaccurate. Some critics have claimed that other teachers at Erasmus Hall at that time remember the figure to be much lower; but who the teachers are and what figures they remember have never been made clear."
The Chess of Bobby Fischer (c) 1975 by Frank Brady

http://bobbyfischer.net/bobby02.html


Nick Burrows    (2007-07-15 20:29:03)
IQ vs Multple Intelligence

Are there other forms of intellingence independant of having a high IQ? Or are they simply 'skills'?
How about...
1. Linguistic intelligence involving sensitivity to spoken and written language, the ability to learn languages, and the capacity to use language to accomplish certain goals. This intelligence includes the ability to effectively use language to express oneself rhetorically or poetically; and language as a means to remember information. Writers, poets, lawyers and speakers are among those that
2. Logical-mathematical intelligence consisting of the capacity to analyze problems logically, carry out mathematical operations, and investigate issues scientifically. This entails the ability to detect patterns, reason deductively and think logically. This intelligence is most often associated with scientific and mathematical thinking.
3. Musical intelligence involving skill in the performance, composition, and appreciation of musical patterns. It encompasses the capacity to recognize and compose musical pitches, tones, and rhythms.
4. Bodily-kinesthetic intelligence entailing the potential of using one's whole body or parts of the body to solve problems. It is the ability to use mental abilities to coordinate bodily movements.
5. Spatial intelligence involving the potential to recognize and use the patterns of wide space and more confined areas.
6. Interpersonal intelligence is concerned with the capacity to understand the intentions, motivations and desires of other people. It allows people to work effectively with others. Educators, salespeople, religious and political leaders and counsellors all need a well-developed interpersonal intelligence.
7. Intrapersonal intelligence entails the capacity to understand oneself, to appreciate one's feelings, fears and motivations.


Nick Burrows    (2007-07-15 20:57:58)
IQ vs Multple Intelligence

I believe that autistic savants or chess geniuses such as Fisher have an exremely advanced logical-mathematical intelligence, often to the detriment of other skills and forms of intelligence
I believe that great human beings who positively affect the lives of millions - such as Gandi - have a morerounded intelligence, rather than one that is exclusively focused in one narrow field.


Jason Repa    (2007-07-15 21:12:20)
My Opinion

I certainly do have an opinion. My opinion is that you have a very low IQ burrows, and don't have a clue how to do research. You like to make things up as you go along and change the subject when you're cornered and proven wrong. Very poor form!

It seems I have to talk to you as I would a very young child. It should go without saying that the opinion of 52 professionals in a given area should have some value when they're commenting in the area they have expertise in. If 52 mechanics told you that your car needs a new alternator would you argue and tell people to have their own opinion on the matter? This is what you're doing here.


Rodolfo d Ettorre    (2007-07-19 06:43:54)
DMD / DMA

Imagine a DMA / DMD thematic tournament ...


Jason Repa    (2007-07-24 03:29:32)
.pgn vs .cbh

The modern chessbase format is .cbh. It has special formatting to provide extra indexing functionality and information such as timestamps. The old chessbase format is A .pgn file is simply a text file that contains a header and a chess game in standard modern algebraic notation. Remove the formatting from a .cbh, save it as *.pgn and, viola you have a .pgn file.


Polina Stefanova    (2007-08-02 16:13:21)
Threatened to kill the person

...in Moskow.

Unfortunately I inform, that --- [moderator : name deleted] from Ukraine promised to employ killers and to kill in Moscow the strongest chess player Igame - Sex God (2 place in rating Igame).

Sex God should play for command Igame against ficgs on the third board.

Sex God was against participation --- [moderator : name deleted] in match Igame – ficgs, because he supports addicts and played for a command which captain is the sick person and addict R2.

In Russia against a narcotism, including this illness a harm, however the command headed by addict R2, exists on Igame till now :(

As a result captain Igame, being afraid for a life and health Sex God has been compelled to exclude Sex God from a command.

Best wishes, Polina Stefanova (the leader of rating Igame)


Dinesh De Silva    (2007-08-03 09:51:36)
Re:

Really? So a serious situation has arisen then? A matter for the police in Moscow to investigate probably.


Ivan Pljusnin    (2007-08-03 14:06:28)
My offer

I offer to play some interesting chess matches between strong igame player Sex_God and his enemies.

1. Sex_God - --- [moderator : name deleted], his would-be killer.

2. Sex_God - Sergey Pligin, who did not let him play in the igame team because of the conflict with --- [moderator : name deleted].

3. It is also interesting to see the match Sex_God - some strong player from ficgs. If Sex_God had stayed in the igame team, this match would have already started.

Best wishes, Mobutu (on igame) aka Ivan Pljusnin (here)


Mladen Jankovic    (2007-08-03 17:59:45)
Algorithm

It provides the algorithm for best play in any position.

An ultra-weak solution is not really a solution, it's only a proof that a solution exists and what properties it must have (draw, first player win most commonly). Such solutions tend involve the strategy stealing argument.

It is essentially proving a mathematical theorem.


Wayne Lowrance    (2007-08-04 17:42:51)
Rated

Are the match games with russia rated ? Wayne


Robert Mueller    (2007-08-04 18:40:11)
Are the match games with russia rated?

No, they are not.


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-08-05 13:12:04)
Unrated

Cause many strong players from Igame started with a 1600 rating... (it would have been unfair to play rated 2 games matches IMO)


Dwight Oldenhof    (2007-08-06 15:05:52)
future rating

What happens when I win a game (e.g. game 11686) and nothing changes the number of games calculated or my future ELO rating? That number was 3 before I won the match and unfortunately stayed 3. Consequently, future ELO and performance rating didn't change either.


Rodolfo d Ettorre    (2007-08-08 15:45:00)
Re

Most of us are very far from Russia, so there is nothing we can do about it. If the threat has been made in public, the local police should be able to act. So, really I think discussing this here is useless, it just gives material for silly jokes.


Ivan Pljusnin    (2007-08-09 01:49:06)
Igame ratings

In order to make this topic more exiting I give the igame ratings of the opponents:

Sex_God: 2463 (+111, =63, -3)
RODINKA (aka ---): 2369 (+69, =29, -3)

Polina is our rating-leader (2536; +173, =1, -1), but most of igame players consider her rating unfair because she have played many games with weak opponents. Some people also say that she is another nickname of Sex_God but I don't believe it.

There was a conflict between Sex_God and RODINKA (aka ---). They have abused each other, and our cap decided to expel Sex_God from the team in spite of his higher rating. Unfortunately, this strong igame chessplayer does not take part in our great match.


Ivan Pljusnin    (2007-08-10 01:06:34)
2 Dinesh De Silva

As an IGAME player I express my opinion. Everything is not so simple!

1. Some strong chessplayers like Morozevich on ICC would not like to show their real names. Should they all be driven away from all chess cites? I am not sure. :-)

2. Your rating-leader is Viktor Savinov, he have not played a single game here. Our rating-leader is Polina. Are you sure that they should be the captains of our teams?

3,4. Legendary chessplayers like Viktor Kortchnoj or Bobby Fischer are sometimes abusive. But I am not sure that they should be driven away.

5. There is no any titles on IGAME. We are anonymous Russian amateours.

In general, I think that chess cites of all kinds are necessary and useful. And a chessplayer must have a choice: FICGS, IGAME, ICCF, GAMEKNOT, PLAYCHESS.DE, CHESSHERE and so on. Each cite has its own customs and traditions.

By the way, it makes matches between them more interesting. I believe in IGAME anonymous fighters. :-)

Best wishes, Mobutu (my IGAME nickname)


Artur Saigakov    (2007-08-10 07:54:07)
Re

Eto i est polnaia 4uw. Dokazatelstv nikakix - krome virezok iz foruma i po4ti. --- [moderator : name deleted] slu4aino natknulsa (possorilsa) na gruppu ludei v internete, kotorie svoe delo znaiut: 1/ Oni umelo podtasovivaiut fakti 2/ Zadevaiut 4eloveka za zgivoe 3/ S celiu vigodi na4inaiut luboi konflict 4/ Megdu soboi obwaiutsa na otdelnom skritom forume 5/ Vsia4eskii podrivaiut reputaciy IGAME iz za togo 4to im ne nravitsa administracia igame i mnogie igroki igame. 6/ Oni zanimaiutsa priamim vreditelstvom na igame. Zabivaiut pustimi soobweniami forum. Zavodiat mnogo nikov i tormaziat turtiri. Zavodiat temi na forume 4to-bi posorit ludei. Izdevaiutsa nad slabimi waxmatistami i MNOGOE drugoe. 7/ Sami oni narkomani i alkogoliki i NE imeiut waxmatnix zvanii FIDE - igraiut tolko v advancechess. No nesmotria na etu malo4islennuiu gruppu zlonravnix ludei - IGAME.RU zame4atelnii sait s UIMOI zame4atelnix ludei. Za plusami igame mogno zaprosto ne zametit minusov, a negativnaia reklama - toge REKLAMA.


Artur Saigakov    (2007-08-10 07:58:10)
Re

Eto i est polnaia 4uw. Dokazatelstv nikakix - krome virezok iz foruma i po4ti. --- [moderator : name deleted] slu4aino natknulsa (possorilsa) na gruppu ludei v internete, kotorie svoe delo znaiut: 1/ Oni umelo podtasovivaiut fakti 2/ Zadevaiut 4eloveka za zgivoe 3/ S celiu vigodi na4inaiut luboi konflict 4/ Megdu soboi obwaiutsa na otdelnom skritom forume 5/ Vsia4eskii podrivaiut reputaciy IGAME iz za togo 4to im ne nravitsa administracia igame i mnogie igroki igame. 6/ Oni zanimaiutsa priamim vreditelstvom na igame. Zabivaiut pustimi soobweniami forum. Zavodiat mnogo nikov i tormaziat turtiri. Zavodiat temi na forume 4to-bi posorit ludei. Izdevaiutsa nad slabimi waxmatistami i MNOGOE drugoe. 7/ Sami oni narkomani i alkogoliki i NE imeiut waxmatnix zvanii FIDE - igraiut tolko v advancechess.


Sergei Ivanov    (2007-08-10 10:49:31)
Translit

Soobwenie --- [moderator : name deleted] chto on ub'et Dmitrija, bylo razmeweno na forume:
http://igt.forum24.ru
JEto forum komandy Igejm, on zakrytyj.
Dannoe soobwenie videla vsja komanda Igame.
Posle soobwenija ob ubijstve - kapitan Igame, zaprosil u cheloveka, kotoryj obewal ubit' Dmitrija, podtverzhdenie, chto dannoe soobwenie napisal imenno --- [moderator : name deleted] i poluchil svidetel'stvo mastera FIDE na imja --- [moderator : name deleted].
Tak chto net nikakih somnenij, chto l'vovskij shahmatist --- [moderator : name deleted] ugrozhal ubit' Dmitrija.


Ivan Pljusnin    (2007-08-10 14:29:54)
IGAME and FICGS are cyber-nations?

It sounds very promising. I guess, the most respectable citizens are Fritz, Shredder, Rybka and some other engines who have dual citizenship. :-)

If FICGS intends to extradite --- [moderator : name deleted] please do it after he finishes his match games. :-)


---    (2007-08-10 22:34:03)
to Thibault de Vassal

Hello, Thibault. 1) Thibault, I am a professional chess-player. I do not have a necessity to put to death anybody! :-) You can talk with a captain is Sergey Pligin &#8211; he will confirm. You can talk with the administrator of site http://igame.ru/ &#8211; Dmitriy Matrosov &#8211; he will confirm. You can talk with the representatives of Chess Federation of Ukraine &#8211; they will confirm also! I only want to play a chess - on Your beautiful site! Do not I know, who such Sergei Ivanov!??? Do not I know, who such Polina Stefanova (or Romanova)!??? It is obvious impostors which have the fictitious names. I only want to notarize these people, that I am a chess-player, in place of killer! --- [moderator : name deleted] gets victories in chess games, and does not kill people! :-) 2) Do not I understand also, what these people want &#1086;&#1090; the site of http://www.ficgs.com/? Did they create this theme, to slander me? It seemed to me the page of humour at the beginning. But I see that it tired me already. I ask you to take measures! thanks a lot


Ivan Pljusnin    (2007-08-12 01:41:19)
2 Andrew Stephenson

In fact there is a database of IGAME games in pgn format, about 400000 games. Formally speaking, it is not free: you have to register and buy membership and then you can download it. But somewhere it can be downloaded for free, I remember. If you wish I can give you a link, but I have to find it.

Our administrator does not send our games to MEGA Corre or any other chess databases, I am sure. From this point of view FICGS is much better.


Marc Lacrosse    (2007-08-13 11:53:27)
(Unfair) partial withdrawal


A few weeks ago IM Andrey Vovk had a discussion in the forum with Thibault regarding the fact that he did not wish to play in the new WCH although he had formerly enrolled on the waiting list.

As Thibault confirmed that he had to play in tournament FICGS__CHESS__WCH_STAGE_1_GROUP_M_01__000003, IM Vovk announced that he would forfeit all his games in this tournament.

That's what he seemed to do for more or less 30 days as he let his clock run and so lost five games on time.
Then he seemed to change his mind and began to play in his three remaining games where his flag had not yet fallen.

Although I admit that anybody may decide to play or to resign whenever he wishes, this seems a bit problematic in a qualification tournament : five players got a full point whereas three have to fight one more opponent (and presumably a very strong one)...

For what regards myself I am very happy to play a game against IM Volk but I feel that three of us have not the same chances anymore as the five other ones for qualification ...

I think this situation calls for establishing new rules for qualification tournaments : if a player clearly forfeits a given number of games, then all his games in this tournament should be withdrawn.


Your opinion ?

Marc



Thibault de Vassal    (2007-08-13 16:46:22)
:)))

Is "pig" offensive in your opinion ? :)


Reminder : "The site reserves the right to terminate any account or decline or limit your participation in any site activity for any reason, including, but not limited to, harassment of other participants, posting of offensive material, making libelous statements, or any breach of the terms of the agreement between you and the site."

http://www.ficgs.com/membership.html#membership


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-08-13 17:20:46)
Go Search Engine

From IGN Goama newsletter - http://gogame.info


Go Search Engine, created by Alexander Dinerchtein

There are many sites on the Internet dedicated to Go. The majority are non-profitmaking. They were created by people who enjoy playing Go strictly as amateurs. As a result, they don't invest much money or effort in making their sites popular among search engines, so it's hard to find their sites using Google, Yahoo! or other common tools.

Of course, it's not easy for them to compete with online gaming stores and gambling sites, which spend thousands of US dollars monthly on advertising and optimizing their sites for search engines. The verb "to go" makes the situation even more difficult. If we search for "go magazines" or "go news" on Google, we may find only a few Go-related resources on the first few pages. It's terrible!

The situation with Asian Go masters who have short and common names is also confusing. It's almost impossible to find their games, biographies and photos on the main search engines. We have decided to solve this problem! We have made a special search engine, based on Google Custom Search, which searches information only on Go-related sites.

Right now there are more than 500 sites in our database (99% of all Go-related resources) and we are trying to increase this number daily. We allow people to suggest new sites to crawl. Each site passes moderation, so you can be sure that each side is relevant to the subject of your search. We exclude non-Go related sites, doorways, sites with hidden text and dishonest competitors.

Dear Go-lovers, we hope that our system will be helpful for you!

You can find it here: http://find.gogame.info


Garvin Gray    (2007-08-13 20:51:16)
further information


Let me think about it and I will get back to you. I do think that I am on the right track though.

My train of thought had been that in most round robin competitions, if a person withdraws from the tournament before they have played 50% of their games, all their results are wiped for the tournament and the tournament is decided with one less participant.

Secondly, if a player does not appear at the board within one hour of the starting time, they lose (fide otb rule), so I had just extended that to a ficgs equivalent, which is timing out.

As has been said by Marc, Vovk did not play in any of the five games that he timed out in, so he did not 'appear at the board' so to speak.

Thirdly, ficgs does not rate games which last less than ten moves.

What I had done was combined these three areas into a quantifable rule that is 'easy' to enforce.

I was specific about saying 50% or more, instead of over 50%, because all the tournaments here have odd numbers, so each person potentially players an even number of games in each tournament.

This all being said, I think it really only applies to the World Champ sections and maybe to norm tournaments.



Thibault de Vassal    (2007-08-14 03:22:05)
General comments

Hi Don.

I fully agree with this... The same problem may happen in OTB swiss tournaments when a few strong players agree results in advance to share the money prizes. That's probably very hard to avoid it, that's why I prefer knockout tournaments. And after all, according to the current rules, nothing prevents to ban systematic abusive players, which is probably enough...


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-08-14 23:51:04)
Quite true

Well, you may be right... This kind of information is somewhat out of topic, let's forget it. Sorry about that...


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-08-15 22:28:39)
Mode d'emploi

Bonjour Daniel.

Il est possible de jouer pour le plaisir (pas d'enjeu, pas de classement) en participant aux tournois "unrated", notamment dans 'Waiting lists' puis 'Chess special tournaments' : les tournois thématiques et de chess 960 ne sont pas classés !

Tous les autres tournois sont joués pour les classements 'échecs par correspondance', 'advanced chess' ou le classement du 'Go'. Parmi ceux-ci, certains ont un droit d'entrée et des prix.

Pour le fonctionnement du site une fois qu'un tournoi a commencé, voir la section 'Help'.

Bonnes parties !


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-08-15 23:29:33)
SGF Result field

Well, I suppose it would help... I'll add this information in a few hours (ie. B+T), maybe the same for chess games.

About scoring, do other servers score all games automatically ?? .. How is it possible, as it may be quite hard to know dead groups ?


Michael Aigner    (2007-08-17 13:37:22)
My try

Optimism is a variety of information deficit. Sometimes especially true for CC games ;-)


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-08-28 12:42:38)
Who is chess champion in your country ?

Maxime Vachier-Lagrave just won the France chess championships in Aix-Les-Bains, after a great tournament (other players in National A tournament were Vladislav Tkachiev, Andrei Sokolov, Christian Bauer, Josif Dorfman, Robert Fontaine, Laurent Fressinet, Jean-Marc Degraeve, Anatoly Vaisser, Igor Nataf, Olivier Renet, Laurent Guidarelli)... Thal Abergel won the National B tournament.

Now the question is :

Do you know who is champion in your country ? .. Not only to know who is champion, but to see if this information is well known or not...


Graham Woodcock    (2007-08-29 17:57:43)
Quote

"They say in chess you've got to kill the queen, and then you mate it... Oh I, do you?" ~ Red Hot Chili Peppers, Fortune Faded


Charlie Neil    (2007-08-29 23:18:50)
Trust

I know this is a site for the computer search engine. There are sites elsewhere on the net that don't allow/frown on such assistance. Good idea to try it here though. Good luck everybody. It will be a matter of trusting your oppoenent.


Ilmars Cirulis    (2007-09-01 00:39:47)
2 variations

Two variations of translation.

"That's the way we lose our slipping away youth - chasing incorporeal demons of the information through the wires." - by friend.
"Youth is slipping away, during we are driving demons of information through wires." - by me.

Said by Andris Jaunbergs - someone from Latvian University (LU).


Ilmars Cirulis    (2007-09-01 00:41:00)
correction

"Youth is slipping away, during we are driving unbodily demons of information through wires."


Garvin Gray    (2007-09-01 10:39:31)
offer


Ilmars offered to swap credits again, but as I had less than ten e points, so couldnt do it.

Obviously Ilmars would have to confirm this offer.

I believe that you can see all the previous chat bar messages, so you can at least follow our conversation about this matter from there.



Christophe Czekaj    (2007-09-01 12:43:09)
Free of chess engine

Thanks Thibault for reconducing me to this past forum. Very interesting. The part about "real" elo and correspondance elo is edifying. I know correspondence players could have a huge better elo than their real life one (if they have any) : more time to think, no stress, no pressure (or less) but I believe players who play without engines have a coorespondence rating approximately equal to their over the board one. Personnaly, I play coorespondence chess to try new opening, to train generally since I cannot play over the board so often since 2 years. I often play from the office, wtih sometimes a couple of minutes on a move, or sometimes I go home with the moves to think about my response in over the board conditions (30 minutes maximum on one move). My correspondence elo is around 2000 (with a good start with a peak to 2098, but declining since ;-D) and my over the board rating is now 1990 (with a peak to 2040 last year, and a rapid elo around 2100). So I sometimes feel a bit fed up with playing against chess engines, notably, but perhaps I'm wrong I have remarked that since I got an advantage, often opponents defend very very well, like computers in fact. Ok it's part of the game, and I know t could be a good training, fight hard to win a game, display a good technique, etc. but it could be disappointing to have the impression of play with a human opponent and have to finish with an another, i.e. the computer. Perhaps could we compare over the board elo, with correspondence elo to know if there is computer help or not ? Anyway, a special category of tournament will be great, and I'm eager to play with other ficgs "OTB-correspondence" players.


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-09-02 14:21:35)
China, chess and Go champion ?

The match between chinese and russian chess teams just ended in Nizhniy Novgorod. Both russian men and women teams lost to chinese by, respectively, a 24.5-25.5 and 23-27 score. Finally, China beat Russia by 52.5-47.5 points.

More details - http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=4084


Chess seems to be much less played than Xiangqi in China, the chinese are probably able to take the crown in every board game, soon a chinese world champion for chess ? Practice, practice and practice... Their only secret ? :)

... or was the russian team simply not strong enough ?


Still waiting for more chinese friends here at FICGS, but internet seems to have its own limits too :/


Christophe Czekaj    (2007-09-03 12:53:52)
no chess engines

Hello Thibault, I play here without chess engine. Anyway, recently I tried to play "hippopotamus defence", (with no good result yet, I have to admit) so a computer is no use, it doesn't understand anything, but perhaps it's hippopotamus which is wrong, not the computer ;-D. Anyway a difficult defence in correspondence play). I began on this site with 2000, and so my elo was too high to play against human only ? I don't see how it's possible a sofware detect computer use ? Ok we see strange, computer-like moves sometimes, but... Perhaps two players, at the beginning of the game can agree to not use computer. Again about chess engine, I use a computer to record the moves (chessbase),to gain time, and replay fast the moves to get to the actual position, but my chess engines (an old fritz (5) and chess tiger (14) all that on a old PC) would certainly suffer a lot use against more recent chess engines ;-D Like Philip, I like to play on ficgs and it would be nice to plmay against more human opponent. I play one tournament on itsyourturn since last year, and I saw a lot more human mistakes than on ficgs. So, how explain it, I sometimes feel more comfortable on itsyourturn, but still I do like the spirit of ficgs, match against RU, the tournaments, forum, nice people to meet on the board, and so on


Andrew Stephenson    (2007-09-03 18:25:05)
Ajudication

Thibault is there any way for the sever to link to table bases and automatically give a result? I face playing 39 moves to give mate in a queen v R + P ending


Philip Roe    (2007-09-03 18:59:27)
CC without engines

Thibault, Christophe, All I did was to pass on that ICC CLAIMS to be able detect computer use. They dont say how they do it. Maybe they are just bluffing, or maybe they have an algorithm that kind of works and they dont want people to work around it by knowing how it works. The reason I dont use engines is because I want to take full credit for any wins I get. I can imagine using an engine and telling myself that I will just use it to prevent oversights. But I cant control what the engine will tell me. It might recommend a move that tells me that I am planning to attack the wrong target. If I then switch plans and win, what is left for me to feel proud of? But I can understand that others may feel differently, and there is much to be said for a site where everything is allowed because it gets around the issue of making a rule that is certainly very hard to enforce. But just because that rule does not exist on FICGS, it seems to me that if somebody on FICGS says that they are not using an engine, then you can probably believe them. The problem with other sites is that if a player with an umimpressive rating fires back a series of accurate moves very quickly in a difficult situation then you suspect that he is using an engine (although he promised not to) and there is not much you can do about it. If the same thing happens on FICGS you are pretty sure that he is using an engine, but you have already agreed that he can, so it doesnt irritate you. For that reason, I think that a computers-barred tournament might actually make sense on FICGS because those who want to use engines can legitimately do so. But for me, it would need to be chess that means something, with at least rating points at stake. Interestingly, Christophe and I are drawn in the same tournament, so we can declare at least that one game computer-free!


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-09-03 23:27:30)
Adjudication

Hello Andrew.

That's an idea, but your opponent is not supposed to use tablebases, he may just want to see how you'll checkmate him and learn from the game. Correspondence chess shouldn't be more computerized IMO, so only 'obvious' endgames will be adjudicated.

You may call the referee in a few more moves.


Andrew Stephenson    (2007-09-05 05:04:29)
Adjudication

Thibault I understand that to some players it might be unacceptable to have the game suddenly declared lost or drawn in a Q v Q+P ending or R+P v N+p ending. In my view these players should opt for the non computer tournaments you are going to set up. To cover the point raised: yes there can remain a need for a referee which should be human. Linking to table bases does not affect the beauty of an endgame Thibault its just a small range at the moment of 6 piece endings. There is no aesthetic value in following the moves advised by the tablebase the value is in getting there. Every strong player is consulting the tablebases when analysing positions leading to 6 piece situations so automating table base adjudications in say A M and WCC tournaments seems completely logical. Yes strong tournaments are played only for the sporting result Thibault I dont think anyone would choose an inferior move for the beauty they might try it to take a risk to win by complicating the game. I have seen 30+ moves games of yours of absolute poisened pawn Najdorf theory leading to a dead draw ..... I guess what I am trying to avoid is opponents dragging out games which are table base won. In the case of reasonable strong opponents 2100+ in my view this is because they just dont want to resign. by the way how do you call for the referee?


Jason Repa    (2007-09-05 15:11:44)
HAL9000: "I think you missed it Dave"

The fact of the matter is that you'll never be able to tell for certain if someone is consulting a program or not in corr. chess, so why fret about it?
You have several options:

1) There is otb chess. Unless your opponent is pulling out his palm computer with pocket fritz in the washroom, you can be reasonably certain it's a mano e mano game.
2)There is also fast internet chess on a secure server such as playchess.com. I'm not sure how secure ICC is these days. If the games are 3 min or shorter you can be pretty certain it's human chess at least 99.9% of the time.

If you want to play corr. chess, fine, but why play a game called "let's worry about whether or not my opponent is making good on his promise to not look at the rybka engine suggestions". Just use it for what modern corr. chess really is...which is an excellent form of group study to prepare for REAL chess, ie, OTB chess.


Glen D. Shields    (2007-09-06 04:20:15)
Engine Use - My Take

The switch from postcard to server chess has been a wonderfully positive experience.

The transition from human chess to silicon chess on the otherhand has left me bored and wondering if there's still a purpose to the game.

Every tournament is the same. The tournament starts with 6 to 10 players. The moves transition out of the opening at lightning speed, then "Fritz and Rybka time" begins. Turn on your favorite engine and there's a >95% probablitity that your opponents' moves mimic the top engines. There are no surprises, nothing interesting, just boring repetition.

Only a few percent of the chess world can outplay the top engines on fast hardware. Human intervention is like adding a drop of water to a bucket of water and thinking you've made a difference. Most matches are one computer versus another computer and the results are predictable: 1-2 wins, 1-2 losses, most of the games drawn.

I don't oppose engine use. There's no way to enforce it, so there's hardly a reason to forbid it. I do question, however, its purpose. It's just as easy and entertaining for me to play against my computer as it is to play your computer ... and I can do it on my timeline not yours.

I played a friendly young man earlier this year in the ICCF. He was vocal and proud of his high rating and good reults. He'd been playing for less than a year. He eventually admitted through our friendly chat that he hardly knew the moves and rules. He had no idea what "en passant" was or the basic theory of the openings. It took everything I had to save my position and earn a draw from him. That game was "my epithany." I made up my mind to take a break and reconsider what CC is all about. Engine use has been a great technical accomplishment, but has it made CC more enjoyable? Not for me. I hope most of you feel differently.

Good luck and good chess to all :-)


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-09-06 23:45:06)
Chinese counting

The counting is the main and best point of the Go game IMO. With chinese counting, Go looks to me less material, more abstract and is probably most difficult to understand and program (Go engines). That's the only reason why I chose this counting.

By the way, does anyone know some statistics : How many players use chinese counting, japanese counting or another one ?

Do you agree with this point of view ?


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-09-08 04:00:17)
Who will win?

South Africa is a serious candidate for sure... France just lost his first match to Argentina (17-12) :/


Mladen Jankovic    (2007-09-09 06:09:10)
Scan

You're using Courier Mail Server, other than that I found no information worth reporting, other than that you probably have a firewall, and a relatively decent one.


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-09-09 15:28:33)
FICGS update & wish list

Hello to all.

You probably noticed a new extension to the chat bar, it delivers some random messages and news (forum, problems, public comments, entries, login). It also automatically warns a player if he started an advanced tournament [bullet, lightning or blitz games], which is more convenient... As it refreshes every minute, you shouldn't log out automatically anymore until you close the chat bar.


Other changes :

- Serbia & Montenegro (SCG) has become Serbia (SRB) and Montenegro (MNE).
- New players will start with a 1800 chess rating.
- Lightning tournaments become Advanced tournaments (blitz, lightning, bullet)
- New quotes added from the forum :)
- Some Google optimizations...
- Waiting list for unrated no-engines tournaments is open !
- Minor bugs corrected.


I did not implement the private messages facility yet... I feel it could create some problems (not technically), I still have to think about it.


This is probably a good moment to open a wish list and discuss all changes you'd like to see on the site...

Best wishes, Thibault


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-09-09 16:59:52)
2 games matches

In this "case", you may also choose rapid or standard silver tourneys that are 2-players 2-games matches :)


Mladen Jankovic    (2007-09-10 01:54:09)
Confessions of a Magic 8 Ball ;)

Well, first off I started with the provisional rating of 1200, then I signed up for a bunch of tournaments and started playing 60+ games. Next, add irregular Internet access with no conditions to perform any reasonable analysis of games in progress and the pressing requirement to answer 40 moves in one go, only to go trough the same at the next soonest opportunity.

I "solved" the problem by not playing and forgetting about the server for about a month (needed that). For that reason I lost more than 250 points (254 to be exact).

Needless to say, the recovery of my rating to any decent level is slow, as, in the meantime I have gone trough periods when I played little chess here, or even none, with games in progress.

Your speculated reasons for my supposed intrusion here (it might be argued that your first post here is the real intrusion) are just plain wrong.

I also don't find ELO ratings to be a valid measure of a man. The real reason I "intrude" in the matter is that I like the general atmosphere here. I am also quiet aware that I am probably the lowest rated poster here, but, before few minutes ago, I was not aware of your rating (good job, while we're on the subject) or Garvin's, for that matter.


Jason Repa    (2007-09-10 03:14:13)
[moderator : partly deleted]

"I also don't find ELO ratings to be a valid measure of a man."

Of course you don't. (...)

Your "supposed" intrusion? (...) Garvin was way out of line and posted pure harassment that had nothing to do with the thread, or my post. I replied and gave it right back to him. It could have, and should have ended there, as Thibault pointed out. (...)

My post was indeed topical and perfectly legitimate for this thread. It was a valid question to ask what the reason for scanning the server might be.

(...)


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-09-10 22:42:32)
chess engines

First of all, every chess engines is a choice, ie. about selectivity, and has consequences & weaknesses in particular positions. Fruit/Toga algorithm is really good but it has probably still much less chess knowledge than Rybka. I think Rybka's algorithm is really better also, Vasik Rajlich added some "human features" while other programs still think about chess like mathematics.

Rybka changed correspondence chess because Fritz or Junior (very strong chess machines) added to a good chess player makes a good centaur while Rybka is "almost" a centaur itself... Consequently a weak chess player can reach quite easily a 2100/2200 rating. That's the main reason...

Of course Rybka will always make some bad moves, but it/she builds an advantage move after move against other engines in most cases in 'calm' positions. HIARCS, that was told during a long time to think most like a human, was not a strong 'chess machine'. I don't know much about Hiarcs 11/12, but Rybka is a major improvement in this way IMO.


Viktor Savinov    (2007-09-11 17:22:39)
Games

There are no all games in a format with headings


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-09-12 11:48:27)
Latvian, Russian ...

Thanks to all for quick answers :)

Hi Ilmars, some languages (including Latvian) need UTF-8 format, so I can't include them in the 'real' home page (yet).


Gene Sensabaugh    (2007-09-12 16:18:56)
Gene Sensabaugh

I am still trying to make a decision to use a chess engine or not.If for example my moves are the majority of the time according to Fritz10 are inferior I can't see how it's going to help me accept to gain rating points.Say during a game I consult Fritz and for example I have overlooked a mate in 10.Which move would you choose?I have serious doubts that many people on here can beat Fritz10 unless they are grandmaster class.In a game you consult your engine select between it's choices and select one of"it's" choices.You receive a move and the process repeats.So why compete against human players most likely inferior to engine analysis?


Ilmars Cirulis    (2007-09-12 14:11:13)
Respect to Christophe Czekaj

No matter - are He only human player or not. :)


Philip Roe    (2007-09-14 17:53:56)
Andrew Stephenson

Thanks for your explanations. They were helpful. Let me try to say what I meant by unsynchronised rating systems (maybe I could have found a better word)

The difference between your rating and mine is a measure of how likely you are to beat me, and that relationship between rating difference and percentage score is similar for any system I have come across.

However, the absolute numbers mean little if anything. There was a widespead belief for some time that US players were overrated, even though the system worked fine internally. My understanding is that from time to time organisations check to see if they have drifted too far from FIDE standards.

This sort of calibration works fine for human OTB games, but for anything else it is not easy to see how to "set the zero", and that possible mismatch is what I called "unsynchronised".

I think that standard CC practice is to try to give each player a rating similar to their OTB rating. I do not know how the engine ratings quoted were tied down, and I imagine that centaur ratings are very difficult to calibrate.




Sergei Ivanov    (2007-09-13 09:49:38)
!!!

On Russian Internet it is a lot of information - [moderator : name deleted]


Hannes Rada    (2007-09-15 20:01:39)
Surprise, Surprise

Thibault or David :-) As far as I remember: several years ago I received a challenge for a 2 game match at the chessfriend server from a movie director where he mentioned some of these video-links. (I had to decline the match offer, because I had too much games at the same time) I really liked the dull ambience of the clips. I am also a big fan of Stanley Kubrick and I consider his Clockwork Orange a masterpiece. The trailer of the PSI - Movie looks really good and interesting. What kind of movies are these ? Public Domain movies :-) Or commercial movies produced to earn big money :-)


Wolfgang Utesch    (2007-09-16 05:14:27)
IECG WC 2006 final

Perhaps some day I can tell my grandchildren: I've beaten the World Champion in a 8-games-match before. :) All the best for your final!


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-09-16 12:41:31)
Ok :)

Ok, I'll make very soon an update to download a tournament's games in PGN format.


Wolfgang Utesch    (2007-09-16 15:59:15)
Figlio - Schuster

Two white losses by Peter in one match - I can't believe it. Why he took so high risk in this special situation (he just has to hold draw in all games)?


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-09-18 15:55:07)
Major update : New interface !

Hello to all.

You may have noticed that the way to send moves has changed, at least the way by default (you still can choose to play through the old - HTML only - interface by clicking "slow moves" in My games).

Please note that there are no more confirmation pages when using the new Javascript interface, meaning your moves will be sent as soon as you press the Send button. Also Javascript should be activated in your browser, that is generally the case.

Other changes :

- My games display only games where it's your turn, you can change it by clicking 'display all games'.

- It is now possible to download all chess games (PGN format) in a particular tournament, see the bottom of the page.

- To avoid massive forfeits, the number of running games is now limited to 60.


... and hundreds of other small improvements :)

Feel free to report possible bugs or if you have any suggestions. Thanks in advance !


Gino Figlio    (2007-09-16 19:32:15)
Schuster-Figlio

If you think for a moment that I would have pretended to win a match with 8 draws then you don't know me well.

That would have been a dishonor...

The match is not over anyway.


Gino Figlio    (2007-09-17 03:24:19)
Schuster-Figlio

I wasn't trying to come up with a quote :)

But again, the rules are created to allow the game to progress to its end without difficulties, prevent conflict and in our case to break a tie.

Obviously, in this case I'm in advantage from the start given the tournament rules.
That's why if Peter evens the score and it looks like the match will end in a tie, I will resign the last game even if it is a draw.

These methods to break ties are ok in blitz or OTB games but in our type of matches where we want the superior player to qualify, it would be a dishonor to take advantage of them. At least I could not do it.


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-09-17 05:35:42)
To tie or not to tie

Hi Gino !

"I'm in advantage from the start given the tournament rules" : Untrue IMO, according to the current situation (not all games are draw), if the match ends at tie, you'll lose it - at least qualification - in all cases ;)

In 8-games matches, like every WC round-robin tournament, fighting for the score and (&&) for ratings looks quite normal, there's no dishonor to tie, winning or losing the right to move to the next round. Definitely rules have something to do with honor, at least with victory. Is there no honor to win a chess game with White pieces and its small advantage ?

What about ICCF WC tournaments and Sonnenborn-Berger ? .. Somewhat more complex, but ratings decide according to the situation also. What about FIDE World Championship ? .. Did Kramnik win his title / tie his match against Leko without honor ? .. FICGS rules are not more unfair than FIDE WCH ones, I'm playing an 8-games match against Farit Balabaev, his strategy is clearly to draw the 8 games and it may work, there's no dishonor in it, only good strategy IMHO.

But, of course, that's more a question of human feeling than mathematics, so only my point of view :)


Gino Figlio    (2007-09-17 06:32:59)
Schuster-Figlio

Hi Thibault, Thanks for clarifying the current situation, however it does not make it less true that I was in advantage at the start of the tournament. According to tournament rules I would have won with 8 draws.

Regarding wins with white, in a round robin you must try to win with white and draw with black. That's normal. In a match, only wins should be counted and not draws. Any other tournament rule intended to break a tie will fall short. A tie is a tie. You try to break it there will always be controversy one way or the other.

Have you considered a "blitz" match to break ties in future 8-game matches? 2-4 simultaneous games at 10/10 or 10/15 would be better than a coin toss...




Thibault de Vassal    (2007-09-17 16:18:47)
Schuster-Figlio

I have... Definitely I don't like the "speed up" formula, that happened ie. in the Kramnik vs. Topalov match, it changes the nature of the match and adds some more 'random' factors, up to sudden death - White must win - which is no more chess. In our case this wouldn't be correspondence chess anymore (added to potential difficulties to play blitz games).

Anyway no rule can break the tie "properly", at least this rule allows the strongest player by rating (in case of 8 draws) to move to the next stage, which is quite logical IMO.


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-09-17 18:56:04)
Forfeits

Yes, it was the games of Miguel. Anyway, the match is not over yet :)


Rodrigo Jaroszewski    (2007-09-18 06:20:30)
Hmm...

Wouldn't it be better to ask Peter what he thinks about this? I know some people that would actually be offended if the opponent withdrew, even if they took the upper hand because of that. This is an issue that should be discussed between Peter and Gino only, IMHO.

And for the next championship (and I'm just one guy rambling here, with hardly any chance of getting there), perhaps it could be arranged that the opponents just played 8-game matches until one of them is won. It'll take more time, but it it seems the only way it won't look fishy for one side or the other. (And sorry if fishy is a strong word.)


Gino Figlio    (2007-09-18 06:53:43)
Tie breaks

Rodrigo, I agree there must be better ways of doing this.

As far as the current match, the rules cannot be changed and I guess I will not have to withdraw since I will lose with the tie. I can see the challenge for the tournament organizer but we have to also realize that FICGS is relatively new and its ratings do not necessarily reflect player strength.

How can we decide a match based on something less than representative even if we don't have anything better?. I believe for the future ties must be broken playing chess even if it's "blitz" cc.

I also would like to stop making comments on this unfinished match, I don't want to get distracted nor distract Peter from our competition.


Hannes Rada    (2007-09-18 12:29:07)
Round robin Tournaments

FICS champion should be crowned by a round robin tournament. This seems to be more fair than these KO matches. Just my humble opinion.


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-09-18 14:38:19)
Knockout matches

FICGS champion will be crowned by a knockout match, the best rated player has few more chances to reach the final, this is fair and his result in each match do not depend on results he's not involved in (like round-robin tournaments), which is the most interesting point IMO.

Another interesting discussion about this issue :

http://www.ficgs.com/user_page.php?page=forum_read&id=2584


Matt Lasley    (2007-09-18 18:11:18)
Love it

Love it. This answers my old question about skips and sequence stuff too. Very nice. Thanks.


Andrew Stephenson    (2007-09-20 13:58:05)
chessfriends

I remember that chessfriends.com used to have the opposite rule ie the player with the lower elo advanced in the knockout. I guess their reasoning was if your better rated you should be able to prove it. As Thibault mentioned he may be a victim of the FICGS rule in his match against Farit Balabaev. He has the higher TER and his opponent as taken 4 draws as white by repeating the same 15 move sequence in his 4 white games (1 e4 c5 2 Nf3 d6 3 d4 cxd 4 Nxd Nf6 5 Nc3 a6 6 Bg5 e6 7 f4 Qb6 8 Qd2 Qxb2 9 Rb1 Qa3 10 f5 Nc6 11 fxe6 fxe6 12 Nxc6 bxc6 13 Be2 Be7 14 0-0 0-0 15 Rb3 Qc5+ 1/2 1/2) Not the greatest advert for cc games! It requires cooperation for this to happen although its dangerous for black to deviate after 9 Rb1. Still there are perfectly viable alternatives IMO in the Najdorf against 6 Bg5 other than this line. I suggest going to a 2 game mini match play off series at 5 days reserve and 1 day per move increment until there is a win. This would provide incentive to go for a result for the higher rated player in the main match. I would retain the lower rated player wins rule for decisive games (but overall draw) for the main match but leave it equal for the playoffs.


Garvin Gray    (2007-09-20 15:38:22)
comments?

is anyone going to comment? Or does this match the total level of interest in this event?


Andrew Stephenson    (2007-09-20 19:32:38)
chessfriend

I dont think its plausible that the rule inspired anyone to lose Thibault -it was for a memorial tournament and although there were (supposedly) cash prizes (which never trasnpired)I think it just inspired the people with the higher rating to try to win. As for your explanation as to why you just bailed out on 4 games its difficult to respond other than to say it doesn't show you supporting your own concept of an 8 game match or the importance of the FICGS "world championship" stage that you had reached. I guess you will take the IECG "world championship" more seriously. I think having 2 game play offs at a fast time rate to a decision is a better way to go.


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-09-20 20:39:56)
chessfriend

As far as I can remember, this way to break the tie was used in most Chessfriend round-robin money tournaments. I have no doubt that some players would have sacrificed their ratings for more chances to win cash prizes... Highest rated players were attracted anyway because they were invited.

About my match, I was simply glad to get these 4 draws easily with the black pieces, it gave me more time to try to win with White (I was in time trouble at this moment). GM Farit Balabaev is a strong correspondence chess player, even if I lose the match, I have no regret about it. Surely I won't play my FICGS WCH games less seriously than my IECG WCH ones :) .. By the way I still hope to play the first candidates final against Gino or Peter :p


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-09-20 21:54:21)
WCH knockout vs. round-robin

I don't know about finished money tournaments at Chessfriend, this was just the available rules I read.

About FICGS & IECG WCH, the point is one don't play the same way a knockout or a round-robin tournament, this is not a question to play seriously or not. In every FIDE WCH (knockout) final match, Kramnik and maybe even Kasparov would accept an easy draw with Black, simply because they have to save energy, as chances of win are generally defended with White (actually Kasparov even offered a short draw with White against Kramnik's Berlin defence). In IECG or ICCF WCH round-robin tournaments, draws are to be avoided at any price but many strong players think the same way: White must win, Black must draw. That's very different in matches, so the strategy. I did not play drawish openings in IECG WCH, and I'll accept short draws if I can't expect more, but it doesn't mean I take it more seriously. According to the situation, these 4 draws were quite a good choice for both Farit & me... in a way :)


Andrew Stephenson    (2007-09-20 23:11:48)
chessfriend

Yes tournaments are different from matches but to take 50% of the match games as identical 15 move draws seems extreme and without parallel. Again it can only have been good for Farit to give up all his white games because his higher TER means he can get through by drawing his 4 black games so its really a 4 game match where black wins if he draws the 4 games. Anyway I just think it devalues the event to do that and the tie break rules encourage it - but lets agree to differ!


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-09-21 00:09:15)
Knockout

Surely knockout format (FICGS rules or not) is not perfect, like round-robin. In this case ratings are important and a new cycle starts every 6 months. Let's agree to differ :)


Farit Balabaev    (2007-09-21 13:07:01)
Figlio - Schuster

Dier Chessfriends Thank you for the discussion. Please don't forget, that I've just suffered in the match with Schuster. The match with Thibault is an attempt to draw everybody's attention to this rule. Best wishes, Farit


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-09-21 14:52:53)
60 minutes + 15 seconds

Ok Garvin, you convinced me :) .. Finally it will be play on 2 consecutive days (october 20 & 21 - 14 pm, 17 pm, 20 pm)

This format is longer but definitely more interesting.

I'll start (at last) to promote it today, feel free to announce it in forums & websites :) .. Now FICGS account at Paypal is available to send & receive money.

I'll start a new topic about Freestyle cup... Too many out-of-date informations in this one.

Thanks for your help !


Wolfgang Utesch    (2007-09-21 16:10:20)
Figlio - Schuster

I think there is no perfect way to do it right for everyone. Thibault's rule is a compromise (as others) and his special way for matches. There is no reason to cry or to be crazy about - it's just a rule. Thibault by himself just has been victim of his own rule!


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-09-21 18:32:12)
Break the tie

I don't consider "I'm a victim" of this rule :) .. Actually if my match finishes with 8 draws, I'll have simply failed to qualify. Farit's semi-final match with Peter shows this rule is not so unfair, they both won one game. That's probably one reason why he used this strategy against me, which may work but may not work every times. To draw all games is not so easy, it's often quite a losing strategy. Due to the fast time control, the advantage given to the highest rated player is not so big IMO.


Andrew Stephenson    (2007-09-21 18:52:24)
Tie Breaks

Farit just to clarify things, you lost your drawn match against Peter Schuster (despite being the higher rated player) because of the rule that the lower rated player wins in the event of a drawn match, where there has been at least one win by the lower rated player. So the 4 draws by you are drawing attention to the problems with the tie break by rating approach (albeit the higher rated player wins if all games drawn part of the rule) Well at least we understand your side of it - that you were actually making a point. Wolfgang I understand the rule is a compromise no need to cry however surely its right to review the experience and see if we can improve? The problem I have, based on the experience, is that it just makes the site look bad and silly to have 4 identical 15 move games. Thats not chess - in my view its absurd. So lets examine the experience and refine the process. A 2 game play off series at a very fast cc time rate ( 1-5 day reserve + 1 day increment)would, I believe, get a result. Its still a compromise because the time for cc is very short. At the same time lets re -think having the championship every 6 months idea - I think thats a big factor behind Thibault's tie break by rating rule. Its leading to overcrowding and its pretty hard to follow perhaps 1 every 9 months or year? Incidentally Thibault how do you break the tie if both have the same TER? Just a thought!


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-09-21 19:57:01)
Tie Breaks

A 2 game play off series at a very fast cc time rate ie. 1 day + 1 day / move would delay the next stages by up to 6 months (by stage)... I think that players would prefer to defend their chances - as you understood it - more often, and simply would prefer to play !

In case of equal TER : "If tournament entry ratings are equal, ratings when the next stage begins will be taken in account."

Finally, draws usually happen more often in matches, that's a fact. The special rule, at least, force one player to avoid it. We'll see if these short draws happen again and what are the consequences. At last, as Wolfgang said, the tie break rule is not "unfair", it is only a rule.


Andrew Stephenson    (2007-09-21 20:34:37)
Tie Breaks

Thansk for the reply Thibault. on the delay front I think it would be less than 6 months maybe 1 or 2 months. First the effect of this delay would impact on only very few top players in completing the final stages. Overall the quantity of chess games and opportunities would be unaffected as new championships start every 6 months so the amount of playing is the same. Second "If tournament entry ratings are equal, ratings when the next stage begins will be taken in account." Ok this will be rare but you cannot really be saying that a match would be decided perhaps 1 or 2 months after completion when the next rating is done? Third "The special rule, at least, force one player to avoid it." yes but it didn't did it? You took the 4 draws in 15 moves because you had too many games and your opponent was a strong player! My point is not about the unfairness of the rule Thibault its the effect of it - in this case 4 identical 15 move draws is not a good advert for the site, the World Championship FICGS or the players.


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-09-21 22:00:03)
Tie Breaks

There are 8-games matches since the very first round, so this extra delay would happen each round (1d+1d/move means at least 4 months, also add vacation) :/ I think too long cycles is a problem. With the current formula a complete cycle (including the final match against previous winner) lasts 2 years and a half. If we add tie breaks, it could last between 4 & 5 years and more players may forget to play next rounds... I don't feel it, definitely.


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-09-22 01:36:25)
Rybka vs. Zappa Mexico

While Anand, Kramnik and the other top chess players fight for the FIDE crown, it seems that another match is taking place in Mexico : Rybka vs. Zappa "Mexico".

http://www.chessvibes.com/?p=1239#more-1239


More info at Rybka forum - http://rybkaforum.net


Wayne Lowrance    (2007-09-22 04:51:57)
Tough match for Rybka (n/t)

no text


Garvin Gray    (2007-09-22 06:25:41)
walk in the park


Tough match for Rybka

Are you sure about that? Zappa programmers have only worked on upgrading the engine for eight days and before that they were in 'retirement' with no major updates coming out since Zanzibar. Zappa has admitted that 'Zappa Mexico' wont be much of an upgrade from Zanzibar.

Rybka has been upgraded and tuned many times since Zappa won the WCC. I think Rybka should win this match 6-4 or 7-3 with no losses.



Andrew Stephenson    (2007-09-23 13:23:38)
Log out

Thibault I get logged out of the site automatically after a certain time is there anyway I can extend the time before the sysytem logs me out forcing me to log back in?


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-09-24 01:04:39)
Rybka vs. Zappa

What a surprise... Zappa now leading the match 3,5-1,5

http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=2228

Even if Rybka plays without tablebases, the point is "The match will be played on two identical 8-cores computers"... So it probably means that Zappa's author Anthony Cozzie did it really well while implementing multi-processors engine. It would be interesting to know the performance of both engines compared to single processor version. Can Rybka be improved significantly this way ?! .. We'll see it soon, anyway nice to see a "real match" :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-09-24 01:10:45)
50 moves rule

Hi Wolfgang !

Yes, quite ridiculous to adjudicate a draw while tablebases show a mate in 63 moves IMO... So I broke the rule (with great pleasure :))


Andrew Stephenson    (2007-09-25 10:28:20)
Match

I have to say guys having worked quite a bit now with Rybka (single procesor version) it has some flaws defending against attacking positions - sometimes underestimating the attackers chances and not just in irrational or very complex positions. So whatever the role of opening books (obviously big) I am not surprised at the result so far. Thats to take nothing away from Rybka - great program.


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-09-25 22:00:51)
4,5 - 2,5

Another draw today (I read "wild draw and missed win from Zappa"). It seems that Zappa is going to win the match... but is this result significant as the engines worked on 8 cores ?! .. Hard to say, I just wonder if/how Rybka's performances can be improved on such computers...


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-09-26 12:46:06)
Mexico, round 11

Unless an earthquake, Anand should win the FIDE WCH tournament... now leading with 7,5 / 11, by one point and a half, after another great game against Morozevich. That's a very impressive performance but not a real surprise, as he's always been able to play very well... and less sometimes (unlike Kasparov).

What could happen in a 12-games match against Kramnik if he plays at this level ?!


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-09-28 03:43:36)
Zappa wins the match

Finally Zappa beats Rybka 5,5-4,5, which is quite an enormous surprise !

Many interesting discussions followed in forums about chess engines programming, Zappa & Rybka strengths and weaknesses, how search & evaluation functions influence each other... and luck :

http://64.68.157.89/forum/viewtopic.php?topic_view=threads&p=147594&t=16732

http://www.hiarcs.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=254&start=105


Gregory Ross    (2007-09-29 01:01:39)
2-player match?

Is there no way to play a simple two-player match here for free?


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-09-29 13:37:42)
2-player match?

Hello,

It is possible, but limited... With the 2 free E-Points, you may play 20 bullet (10 min+ 20 s.) or lightning (30 min+ 30 s.) bronze games.

There are no 2-player match without entry fee & prize at standard & rapid time controls.


Garvin Gray    (2007-09-30 11:31:11)
new entrant


A third entrant to the freestyle cup
:)
Was starting to think it was
going to be a six game match between Thibault and myself :P
Welcome to the tournament Michael

Will Ilmars be entering?



Thibault de Vassal    (2007-10-01 05:20:50)
Tablebases : Mate in 517+

While I was checking some positions in 6-pieces tablebases, I was wondering what was the longest win found in tablebases so far...

I found the answer here (new record established in May 2006) :

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Endgame_tablebase#Endgame_theory

"For some years, this position held the record for the longest computer-generated forced mate. (Otto Blathy had composed a mate in 292 moves problem already in 1889.) However, in May 2006, Bourzutschky and Konoval discovered a KQNKRBN position with an astonishing DTC of 517 moves. This was more than twice as long as Stiller's maximum, and almost 200 moves beyond the previous record of DTC = 330 for a position of KQBNKQB_1001."

What I just can't understand is how is it possible not to know the DTM (Distance To Mate) while knowing the DTC (Distance To Conversion) ?!

Anyway, amazing ! .. Any taker ? :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-10-01 19:43:30)
Kasparov CC

I wonder what would look like a Kasparov correspondence chess game !? .. I think he would feel frustrated quite quickly :)

By the way, I remember that Peter Leko played some correspondence chess games at ICCF... Well, a first Google search "Peter Leko correspondence chess games" gives a thread at FICGS without the information.. those spammers are annoying :) .. Also this page with a CC game (unfinished) of Bobby Fischer :

http://www.uschess.org/cc/dunne/alexjul01.html


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-10-01 23:32:17)
Kasparov vs. CC champion

That's a good question and it would be very interesting to see such a match.

Quite hard to say, it was probably true a few years ago, nowadays I'm not sure anymore...


Hannes Rada    (2007-10-02 21:16:11)
GMs + engine vs amateur + engine

However it would be interesting to know if Kasparov or any other strong OTB GM + strong engine would play significant better chess than an amateur + strong engine at cc time control.


Viktor Savinov    (2007-10-03 12:13:26)
CC Kasparov and other OTB GM's

Hannes, I do not have information.


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-10-05 17:04:41)
Match

It is still possible for our team to win... Let's wait & see :)


Sergey Pligin    (2007-10-15 12:27:24)
match

My opponent Peter Schuster has made a blunder in a game he plays for White, playing with the other knight. Having made this mistake he resigned in both games. I should note the result in the second game is unclear now. Taking into consideration the match is friendly, understanding my opponent's mistake I ask Thibault permission to cancel results of my finished games and recover a position in the Schuster-Pligin game after 23rd Black's move, i.e. one full move back.
I hope the players of the iGame team will understand me and accept my decision.
It's important for me to continue playing the both games, especially the one I am playing for White.
Best regards, Sergey


Peter Schuster    (2007-10-15 14:05:23)
match pligin-schuster

Dear Sergey, Thank you very much for your very friendly offer. After my mistake (quick move input) I resign both games because I was so anger about myself. If Thibaut and your team was agree with your suggestion, we continue both games. Best wishes Peter


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-10-15 14:51:38)
pligin-schuster

That's great fair play, Sergey. Well, this is an unrated & friendly match, so if your team is ok with that, I'll restore the games.

Best wishes, Thibault


Adkham Yunusov    (2007-10-15 21:57:52)
Sergey Pligin

I support your decision. It is the a friendly match and I see nothing wrong here.


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-10-15 22:15:50)
slippery slope

Garvin, I fully agree with that, generally speaking. Well, this is a friendly team match where such behaviour makes things even more friendly and games more interesting, everything is quite clear in this case, Peter asked nothing & Sergey offered it of his own, no player of any team is supposed to do the same...


Miroslav Leskiv    (2007-10-15 22:43:09)
match Pligin-Schuster

The game Pligin-Schuster is one of the most interesting games in match. So, it would very unpleasant, if this game will finish with result unequal to the end position on board. Recover both positions is the best way.


Andrey Sumets    (2007-10-16 14:00:03)
....

I have no any objections to allow recovering of both Pligin - Schuster games. Moreover, I think that this fair play will comletely corespond to the frienly status of this match. Both games between our captain and the finalist of your world championship are extremely interesting and wish them to be recovered a.s.a.p.


Don Groves    (2007-10-18 04:40:54)
Feynman on Go

Hi, Philip -- I don't know of any specific details on that sort of progress but Richard Feynman was one of my heroes. I was blessed to get to attend a lecture of his on a field trip to Caltech for high school math and science seniors and have never forgotten the experience.


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-10-21 01:36:54)
Kasparov on Bill Maher

After Kasparov's win on Colbert, Bill Maher was checkmated also :)

http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=4194
http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=4191


Don Groves    (2007-10-21 04:46:54)
Garry Kasparov

One the video guests on Friday night's US television program, Real Time with Bill Maher, was Garry Kasparov who had been in New York (his family is still there for a while longer). Maher is a political comedian and most of his show revolves around anti-Bush humor. Everyone (including myself) was amazed at the knowledge (particularly of Middle East politics) and political maturity shown by Kasparov! In addition, he easily outdid Bill when it came to comedy, saying at one point that he was aiming quite a bit higher than simply being better than Bush. I wish we had him running for our president!


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-10-25 01:17:16)
Go freestyle cup

Hi Edwin, this topic is about the Go (another game) freestyle cup. See both chess & Go freestyle cups in Waiting lists. Anyway, I'm already thinking about faster chess freestyle tournaments :)

Knockout format could be lots of fun too, but players will probably prefer to play all the games to try to catch the best ones.

Let's discuss about the chess freestyle tournaments in the other thread :

http://www.ficgs.com/user_page.php?page=forum_read&id=3987


Don Groves    (2007-10-26 07:45:43)
Stolen elections

There is much evidence that the vote count was manipulated in favor of Bush both in 2000 and 2004. The states of Florida and Ohio were suspected both times. In Ohio, the president of the company that makes most of the US voting machines said in 2000 that he would do everything he could to insure that Bush was elected. His voting machines leave no paper trail, so recounting votes manually is impossible -- we are left to trust the machines! Such is the state of political affairs in our so-called democracy. One of Hitler's minions, I forget which one, said "it doesn't matter who votes, it matters who counts the votes."


Wayne Lowrance    (2007-11-02 00:20:53)
remove me please

okey dokie, please remove me, as I posted I think it is a lousy change. The higher that class the less the response, what is suprizing about that. It is not a matter of interest. Wayne


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-11-04 03:51:27)
Thematic tournaments #38, #39

Thematic tournament #38 just started, line is sicilian poisoned pawn variation (10.e5), the next thematic tournament will be about this complex line also.

Games to follow !


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-11-04 15:32:57)
Swiss tournaments

Hello Michael, more rounds probably means less players and less tournaments (freestyle cups), it is a quite hard format, also for the organizer :)

By the way, why 20 players ? An advantage of swiss system is it doesn't depend on the number of participants.


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-11-09 01:05:28)
Chess sponsorship

An interesting discussion about chess sponsorship started on ChessDiscussions.com (Susan Polgar forums)

http://www.chessdiscussion.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=504

Several issues : "How to bring chess to the masses ?", "How to make chess a show ?", "What kind of sponsorship is possible ?"

Susan obviously thinks that OTB chess still has a great potential and that organizations could do much better to promote it... Here's my last response in the thread (reminds some old threads here) :

<<<

In other words, you say that chess has a show-potential like any other sport that could be used and that isn't...

For sure traditional marketing methods could help to promote OTB chess, and chess organizations could do much better... but is chess "bankable", just like an actor ? .. I just saw one more comparison between chess & poker in the thread "How to bring chess to the masses", but there's a major problem in chess that doesn't exist in poker or soccer : "everything can't happen", at least at a first sight, actually the way people can see it...

FIDE tried to change some things, ie. time controls, wch cycle but that's not enough, obviously. Anyone can win a lost hand at texas hold'em against any professional player, like any 2nd division soccer team can beat the Real Madrid once... Of course long-time statistics will be always favourable to the best players, but it takes a much longer time... Everything can happen in any event in these games (poker wch, soccer world cup). The probability for a real surprise that makes buzz is much lower at chess, the same best players invariably play the best tournaments, won statistically (ie.) 20% by Anand, 19% by Topalov, 18% by Kramnik and so on... quite boring.

The only interesting chess events follow the same scheme : David vs. Goliath, the buzz-genius 12 boy vs. Kramnik, mystery-Deep Blue vs. Kasparov, Anna Kournikova vs. Fischer & so on... nowadays the man vs. machine match is no more interesting since any home computer is stronger than HAL 9000 or Kramnik and there's no clear world champion (too many FIDE wch, different cycles..)

Chess needs real events and I'm curious to see the ones "that could bring chess to the masses" in the future... Maybe I'm a bit pessimistic, at least for OTB chess, but I'm very interested to see how good marketing methods will be able to transform our chess world... Just wait, hope & see :)

Best regards, Thibault

>>>


I'm now working again on SEO (Search Engines Optimization) for FICGS, more and more players find us via Google... Of course one next step is to sponsor the FICGS WCH & freestyle tournaments but it is a hard task for sure... All comment and suggestions on this issue are welcome :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-11-12 00:51:23)
Number of games limitation

Hello Lincoln and welcome to the forum :)

Of course you're right, there may be better rules and an optimized system to reduce the effects of this problem in both directions... My philosophy so far for this server is "make it simple" and to keep the rules as short as possible (well, the rules & conditions page size is quite huge already), moreover it is not obvious to detect forfeits automatically but I'll try to think about such improvements later.


Andrew Stephenson    (2007-11-14 20:32:07)
New Category

I agree with Garvins point completely. I think there are crossover probs. I like Thibaults suggestion for the display of Rapid tournaments - people can then choose there category - great idea. There is plenty of scope for sub 2000 to progress under this format and I dont see any downside.


Don Groves    (2007-11-20 23:21:28)
Life imitates chess

It's interesting how we humans invent things and then begin to to behave like our own inventions, or let them run our lives. Money, time, ..., chess. Is the Matrix coming or is it already here in a more subtle form?


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-11-21 04:14:33)
19-7

IGAME.RU team now leads by 19-7

I just drew my King's gambit against Andrey Sumets, a hard game... I saw that Peter won his mini-match against Sergey, congrats to you Peter and once more it was great fair play from Sergey and Igame team !


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-11-24 04:23:35)
Next thematic tournament

We need five more players to start the next thematic chess tournament, then we could organize a few ones on Traxler again !


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-11-24 16:13:26)
:P

Ilmars tries to prove that Traxler counter-attack is dead for Black... Anyway the only to play White only is thematic silver games :)

Graham, did you have a look at Ilmars analysis in Wikichess ? See http://www.ficgs.com/user_page.php?page=wikichess&article=611

You can analyze some lines with other players...


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-11-24 16:33:54)
SC. von Erichsen is FICGS Go champion !

Svante Carl von Erichsen 4d is the first FICGS Go world champion, congratulations :)

According to the rules : "In case of equality, the player with the strongest tournament entry rating (TER) is qualified for the next stage."

As Svante Carl now leads the tournament by 7/7, even if he loses his last game and another player also finishes with 7/8, the TER decides. And as there's no previous winner to defend his title...

After the second championship (the level should increase), we may have the first 5 games match between two very strong players :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-11-26 22:16:01)
Utesch - Ingersol

Yeah, it will be an interesting match !

I have my favourite, but chht :)


Graham McGrew    (2007-11-26 22:33:50)
Wilkes-Barre Furor

Thanks for this wealth of responses, all. Thanks too for the tip on Ilmars' analysis. I will check it out. Thibault, what is the next thematic tournament for which you need five more players? Ilmars, I would love to play a game with you as white, me as black. Being new to FICGS, I'm not exactly sure how to start a game with you . . . ?


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-11-26 23:36:46)
Wilkes-Barre Furor

The next thematic tournament is a very interesting line of the Sicilian poisoned pawn variation : 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 a6 6.Bg5 e6 7.f4 Qb6 8.Qd2 Qxb2 9.Rb1 Qa3 10.e5

See in Waiting list >> Special chess tournaments

If you want to play a "one-game" match with Ilmars, you may try in Advanced chess tournaments >> Bronze lightning .. and play Traxler, if you don't care about your blitz chess rating :) .. or Thematic lightning but with entry fee & prize (10 E-Points) & White must win rule.


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-11-27 22:37:57)
Baduk and chance : 1dan in LG cup final

A Go player ranked 1 dan is about 800 elo points below a 9 dan player (whatever the ranking system ?!), meaning about no chance to win a game against such an opponent, right ?! .. How is it possible to see a 1 dan player at this level in one of the main Go tournaments in the world ?

Of course everything can happen in a Go game, but I suppose it is not the case during a whole tournament...


From IGN Goama newsletter - http://gogame.info

"An interview with Han Sanghoon, 1-dan, the first 1-dan in Go history, who entered the final match of the World Go Championship (LG cup)

- Congratulations! What was the most difficult game in this tournament?
- The last one with On Sojin, 4-dan. It was really close finally and I think, that I was slightly behind until the endgame stage
- You became a professional about 1 year ago. Did you think that you can reach the final match of the World Go Championship so quickly?
- I remember that it was very hard to become a professional. I was almost 18 and it was my last chance to win the qualification among inseis. Of course, I did not think, that I can show good results quickly. I was surprised, that professional tournaments are not much harder than the insei league :)
- What are your weakest and strongest parts in Go?
- I am weak at the opening, but I feel myself confident in middlegame fights. Usually I try to defend my groups solidly, before fighting
- Who is the hardest opponent for you?
- Yun Junsang, 6-dan. I lost him twice and feel that he is much stronger than me. Also his Go style is very impressive
- What do you think about your final match with Lee Sedol, 9-dan. How big are your chances?
- I never played him before, but I saw lot of his game records and I know that Lee Sedol, 9-dan is much stronger than me. Any way, I will try to win the match! Usually I am not afraid of the star opponents at all!"


Pekka I. Turakainen    (2007-11-27 22:44:48)
Can u figure this out?

Some time ago we played a game of chess with my friend and after 66. move reached the following position: 6k1/5b2/8/4q3/1K6/8/1RR5/8 w - - 0 1 We agreed that it's a draw. No it isn't! It's white's move and the material looks balanced, but black will have his win after 53 moves (if white has an ideal defence). This is what the almighty Nalimov says. Don't bother to check this out with your multiprocessor chess software...it'll probably take months before it finds the right combination. What to speak of the poor human brain. Feeling humble now....


Svante Carl von Erichsen    (2007-11-30 02:00:56)
attempt at clarification

First, the professional ranks cannot be compared to amateur ranks. A few years ago, the general assumption was that a difference of one professional rank was equal to about one third of a stone. The EGF assumes 30 ELO points between pro ranks. Recently, however, especially in Korea, there are many aspiring young players trying to become a professional, but only a handful are promoted each year. As a result, the competition for _becoming_ pro has become so fierce that any player who passes these tests is all but guaranteed to be already able to give the established players a run for their money. Another point to note is that while amateur ranks try to depict the _strength_ of a player, professional ranks are based on _merit_.


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-12-01 15:02:34)
time counting

Hello Ulrich.

Yes, this is the only tournament where this problem happened, simply because the thematic opening starts at Black move number 10 :/ .. So the program added time to player Black when playing his first move, not to player White (at move eleven). I did not think about that when the tournament started, but anyway this advantage or disadvantage is shared (3 games with, 3 games without). Sorry about that.


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-12-03 03:04:56)
"Chess is like" series

Just tried a Google search on "chess is like" :


- Chess is like life (Spassky, Kasparov, Polar or so.. Fischer said Chess IS life :))

- A game of Chess is like a sword fight ! You must think first, before your move...

- To some extent face to face chess is like poker in that it can help to "read" your opponent's body language.

- Chess is like a box of choclates, once you start a game you never know what your gonna get.

- Chess is like body-building. If you train every day, you stay in top shape.

- Chess is like marriage. You cannot have a mate without a check. (Brian Wood)

- To me chess is like a patient and faithful lover; I may not always be there for her - er, it - but it is always there waiting by the phone for me to call and start up with the affair all over again. (Graham Moore)

- Chess is like snooker: once you slip a little it is very hard to get back because there are so many good young players fighting their way up.

- Chess is like golf, 50 percent mental, 50 percent physical.

- Chess is like the saxophone. You can pick it up and learn it, but it takes a lifetime to become any good.

- Chess is like tug-of-war, but it's also like "a cork bobbing up and down."

- Playing chess is like looking out over a limitless ocean; playing checkers is like looking into a bottomless well.

- Chess is like a symphony. The first phase of this piece was a furioso, leading to a quiet second movement, a positional struggle between two very different personalities. (about a Fischer's game)


... and so on. Finally anything's like everything :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-12-04 21:11:33)
1st round robin final

Yes, a very hard tournament, at least for me :) .. It seems to be between Alberto, Gaetano & Xavier but many games are not over yet ! We will see...

Congratulations to Gino and Peter for a nice match !


Rodolfo d Ettorre    (2007-12-04 13:03:37)
More...

This is something I read in a SF short story from the writer Ursula K. Le Guin:

Our difference is our beauty ... together we could build a splendid harmony.

It could be interpreted as something against prejudice or the fact that in FICGS race, religion or politics do not matter, only chess.


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-12-17 02:42:31)
FIDE world cup / WCH

Gata Kamsky (2714) just won the FIDE world cup final match against Alexei Shirov (2739) : 2.5 - 1.5 in Khanty-Mansiysk (Russia).

According to a recent FIDE rule, he should challenge the former world champion : Veselin Topalov. So he may play the reigning world champion after that (if he wins of course, if Anand keeps his title until there and if I understood well, not sure). Okokok...


Dinesh De Silva    (2007-12-19 12:01:29)
Re:

My esteem gratitude to brave soldier Wolfgang for enlightening me on relevant matters. As thou spoke the truth, thou art bestowed with many titles, lands & fair maidens. For good measure, thou gets the chopping block too, free of charge."


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-12-20 00:26:09)
FICGS World Ch.

Hi Dan, It's only a way to separate the final matches (candidates final or current champion vs. challenger) from the first stages tournaments, but I'll probably reorganize some things in a while as it is not so easy yet to find a particular WCH tournament...


Thibault de Vassal    (2007-12-20 18:44:21)
Kramnik vs. Anand 2008

Vladimir Kramnik, Viswanathan Anand, FIDE & UEP (Universal Event Promotion) have come to an agreement : The next FIDE World Chess Championship will take place from October 11 to 30, 2008 in the National Art Gallery in Bonn (Germany). Reigning world champion Viswanathan Anand will play challenger Vladimir Kramnik in a twelve-game match. The prize fund is 1.5 Million Euro, the main sponsor is an industrial enterprise, Evonik Industries, located in Essen (Germany) which was the exclusive sponsor of the 2006 World Chess Challenge between Vladimir Kramnik and the most famous chess program distributed by Chessbase, Deep Fritz.

Any predictions ? .. (may Anand lose his title before that date ?)


Mladen Jankovic    (2007-12-25 21:37:22)
re:

FEN used in encoding the starting position does not include castling information. You can add manually "KQkq" in the FEN line at the end, in the PGN file.

Fritz uses a non-standard encoding of the castling rights for Chess 960, with starting positions of Rooks not on A and H files.

Fritz should recognize castling rights, but the information is not included in the file. This is most likely an accidental omission, or it might have been done to avoid messing with X-FEN and the non-standard Fritz solution.

At this rate I'm becoming a helpdesk. :?


Andrew Stephenson    (2007-12-29 13:31:04)
New Category

ok Thibault look forward to the changes perhaps in a few months time we can revisit the matter ......


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-01-06 20:27:23)
IGAME wins the match !

Congratulations to IGAME.RU team for winning the match ! :) They scored over than 25 points out of 50 already...

Thanks also for the great fair play !


Hannes Rada    (2008-01-07 20:04:20)
Stop the clock

I agree. It does not make sense to get a win without playing. Because we are here to play chess .... :-) However I saw that the game with H. Ingersol is already over ... So I would stop the clock, if every participant in this group agrees. But we need a more simple solution concerning the reflection time. I would propose: After 10 days without playing a single move: 1st warning, after 20 days: 2nd warning, afer 30 days: the game is automatically lost for that player. Warnings should be sent to both involved players be email. During 30 or 40 days holiday during a year the refelection time will be stopped. That's how it worked at chessfriend.com and this is in my opinion the best and simplest solution.


Robert Mueller    (2008-01-03 09:38:38)
Great Article, but ...

Yes, a good article, which is missing similar information about Rybka, Zappa and maybe a few others. But copying the article here is strictly speaking illegal (© 2007, Steven A. Lopez. All rights reserved.). A link would have been enough.


Wolfgang Utesch    (2008-01-08 18:35:22)
When will start ...

... the WC-2-final match Ingersol vs Utesch?


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-01-08 19:04:50)
Today...

... most probably ;)

By the way, more accurately the "WC-2 knockout final"..

In the WC-1, it seems Gaetano is now in good place to win the round-robin final and to play Gino, who won the knockout final, let's see how the last game Pichelin-Laghetti will finish, then the first final match will start :

http://www.ficgs.com/game_13145.html


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-01-09 05:42:09)
4th FICGS chess championship

The 4th FICGS chess championship just started, it is now much easier to find tournaments (quarter finals, stage 2...) in the Tournaments page.

Quarter finals this time are :

1 - Harry Ingersol vs. Mark Noble
2 - Hannes Rada vs. Farit Balabaev
3 - Eros Riccio vs. Marius Zubac
4 - Peter Schuster vs. Thibault de Vassal

As a reminder, in case of equality the highest TER in each match qualifies if all games are drawn, the lowest TER qualifies if not all games are drawn.

The next stages of the previous championships will start as soon as possible...

Have good games !


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-01-11 17:30:04)
width, game number

Hello Mladen, you mean because of the scrolling bar ? (feel free to send me a screen shot)

Patrick, you're right... There's no place enough, that's a problem :/ .. Did you try to put the mouse over "Move : " and over the last move ? There are informations about the game there also, but that's not a perfect solution, I agree...


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-01-15 05:13:17)
"No games to display"

Did anyone notice a strange bug, ie. "Sorry, there's no game to display" (when actually that's wrong) in My games, while other pages, ie. the forum, work correctly.. this bug looks like to happen after a long time without loading a new page.. (so only the message box automatically refreshes regularly)

I'm not sure where's the problem yet... Thanks for feedback.


Peter Unger    (2008-01-16 18:55:43)
Strange rules

Hi Thibault, my chessbase says this: FICGS__CHESS__WCH_STAGE_2_GROUP_04__0000 2007 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 Unger,Peter 2086 +181 * 1 ½ 1 ½ 0 1 4.0/6 11.00 2 Mueller,Robert 2194 +55 0 * 1 ½ ½ 1 1 4.0/6 9.75 3 Benitez,Ryan 2106 +158 ½ 0 * ½ 1 1 1 4.0/6 9.25 4 Johansson,Mats 2309 -140 0 ½ ½ * ½ 1 1 3.5/6 5 Repa,Jason 2232 -109 ½ ½ 0 ½ * ½ 1 3.0/6 6 Moreira,Jose 2327 -278 1 0 0 0 ½ * 1 2.5/6 7 Toutaoui,Khaled 1715 -306 0 0 0 0 0 0 * 0.0/6 Where can I be informed about the rules? And what meaans "TER" (see the post from A. Stephenson)? I have won against Mueller!! I think I must be qualified for Stage 3!!! Best regards Peter Unger


Andrew Stephenson    (2008-01-17 14:04:20)
Result

TER stands for tournament entry rating ie the rating you had when the tournament starts. It is shown in the tournament crosstable along with the current rating. This TER is what decides in the event of a tie. However there is a slight contradiction when this rule is applied in matches. In this situation in the event of a tie the higher TER wins EXCEPT if there has been a result on both sides ie not all games were drawn then the lower TER player goes through. By analogy with Peters situation I think the rule might be ammended so that the higher TER goes through except when one of the tied players has beaten another tied player and in this situation is deemed to have a higher TER (as between them)for the purpose of the tie break. The point of this ammendment is that it still gives a tie break winner BUT it reflects the result bewteen individuals for tie break purposes as the result might indicate that the entry TER is not reflective of current relative strength. To late for you Peter I am afraid but worth a thought.


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-01-21 04:29:10)
Bobby Fischer in the news

Quite impressive to hear so much about Fischer's death in the medias taking his past into consideration... Fischer was a living legend whatever his thoughts & life after the century match in Reykjavik 1972 against Boris Spassky (actually the whole world already).

FICGS statistics from search engines and particularly Google exploded these last days.. "Robert James Fischer", "Fischer Spasski", "Fischer champion du monde", "La partita del secolo", "Fischer random chess", "Fischer Palma de Majorque" ... and so on... sometimes stranger (even quite frightening) keywords associated to him.

Anyway, Bobby continues to promote the chess game all over the world !


Wayne Lowrance    (2008-01-21 05:06:18)
Making a database of my Ficgs games

can this be done in the fritz format ? if not may I make this a suggestion for next up date Wayne


Gaetano Laghetti    (2008-01-22 09:00:36)
congratulations

Dear Philip, it is very kind of you. Thank you also to Thibault for giving me the chance to play in this match. Ciao Gaetano


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-01-22 18:30:35)
FICGS vs. IGAME.RU

My pleasure, Gaetano :)

This match was really interesting, and the result quite surprising even if our "team" is quite young yet, some forfeits, and some of our strongest players did not play. The russian team played good chess and logically won the match. Moreover, I'm to lose my second game against GM Sumets who did it very well since the opening... Gaetano's result, once more, is not just luck ;)


Don Groves    (2008-01-25 09:45:36)
Logged out!

Hi, Thibault -- I'm being logged out rather quickly again. I log in, take a few minutes to decide on a move but when I make the move, I am told to try again. I thought the practice of being logged out automatically had ended a while back.


Christophe Czekaj    (2008-01-25 13:04:00)
In Fischer's honour

Hello everybody ! What about a special Fischer tournament ? Or thematic tournaments, on line he used to play, for example : spanish exchange, or sozin against sicilian... And yes, thanks for your wonderful play, Bobby.


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-01-25 16:20:55)
10 moves rule

Hi Wolfgang, of course the 10 moves rule applies to the winner (the withdrawing player will lose points in all cases) !

"Games are not rated for the winner if less than 10 moves have been played by his opponent (most probably forfeit, silent withdrawal or obvious cheating) or in global forfeit cases against the same opponent, ie. 8-games matches, but games where an advantage is obvious."

http://www.ficgs.com/membership.html#withdrawals


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-01-25 16:34:10)
Fischer's defense

The next thematic tournament could be Fischer's defense in the King's gambit...


Don Groves    (2008-01-26 00:04:01)
Logged out!

Hi, Thib -- it just happened again. It's been happening regularly just in the past few days. I use Firefox on a Mac with OS X, which shouldn't matter, but I know sometimes does ;-)


Ivan Pljusnin    (2008-01-27 16:43:11)
Team complectation

FICGS team could be much stronger, I think. Some of your players have lost their games by time. Imagine, you replace them with winners of FICGS World Championship and other strong tournaments of FICGS. FICGS result would be much better...

In fact I do not believe neither in official correspondence chess titles nor in ratings. They do not show real strength very often. On IGAME the best part of our team is anonymous players, I think. Their achievements in this match are just fantastic. 9 members of IGAME team who play under imaginary names have now 14.5 of 17! Owl (here he is "Dojnikov") is going to win his last game. Probably he is our best fighter.

P.S. If I was allowed to play as Mobutu, I'd play stronger!:-)


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-01-29 02:20:16)
Teams

Maybe, maybe... One thing only is sure, IGAME team results in this match are really great ! :)


Hao Nhien Nguyen    (2008-01-30 10:04:16)
Under-10-move checkmate

What about under-10-move checkmate? Will the winner get the point?


Nicola Lupinacci    (2008-01-30 12:18:55)
Under-10-move checkmate

I think checkmate under 10 moves will be counted in rating variations, becouse if you checkmate a player you do not win automatically the game: he has to resign.

I don't now perfectly how rating works but in my opinion rating variation is not cuonted only in games that endend before the 10th move with one player losing on time

Is it correct?


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-01-30 19:31:12)
Under-10-move checkmate

To resign or not to resign, is that the question ? :) .. Such case is quite unlikely to happen : If a player resigns in less than 10 moves, it is most probably a forfeit, if the game is lost anyway his rating is 'most' probably 350 points below his oppoent's rating, at least it should, so this game won't be rated for the winner, too easy :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-02-01 15:49:49)
Bobby Fischer Goes to War

Kevin Macdonald will direct "Bobby Fischer Goes to War", a movie that should focus only on the match against Boris Spassky in Reykjavik 1972. Fischer to become the new american heroe ?! .. could be funny (or not)

http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=4424


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-02-04 19:33:56)
CCT 10

Rybka and Naum win the CCT10, Rybka finished 2nd in the IPCCC 2007, scoring 5.5/7, behind of Hiarcs. Rybka won another match against GM Joel Benjamin... and Rybka 3.0 should be available soon.

Some interesting threads in Rybka forum (Anthony Cozzie about Zappa, Strelka, Rybka 3)

http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=3172
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=3119


Andrew Stephenson    (2008-02-06 21:07:47)
WCH candidates final tie break rule

Thibault I noticed on reading the rules for the candidates final that "the knockout tournament winner is qualified for stage 5 if all games are draw, the round-robin cycle winner if not all games are draw." Why did you not just stick with the tie break rule that applies for all other matches? Namely the higher TER (tournament entry rating)goes through on even score if all games drawn or lower TER on even score if not all drawn? Why have you made a special different tie break rule for the candidates final match?


Andrew Stephenson    (2008-02-07 02:59:03)
Tie break rules

Yes knock out winner likely to have higher rating. However the round robin winner might have increased rating in getting to the candidate final. For example in 000002 Harry Ingersol could draw all his games in the knockout final and drop from his rating of TER 2555 and go through to candidate final (his future rating at the moment predicted at 2493)The other contestant Wolfgang has a predicted rating at 2489. Whereas Daniel Brunsteins could put in a strong showing winning the round robin final and improve his TER of 2476 (future rating estimated at 2487)Its quite possible that he could go into a candidates match with the higher TER and lose where all the games are drawn under the present rule. Why not just keep to the higher TER winner for an even result with draws and the lower TER tie break winning in a tie where the ganes were not all drawn


Andrew Stephenson    (2008-02-07 09:33:55)
cycle entry rating??

Thibault now your really confusing me?? I do not think there is any concept of cycle entry rating being followed in your WC system! In the knockout stages players ratings change so there entry rating changes in different stages. eg Wolfgang entered the quarter finals for 000002 with a TER of 2460 he was successful (against you)and played the semi final with improved TER 2523 and for the the knockout TER was the same 2523 with Harry had TER with 2456 for quarters but went to semis with TER 2459 and for knockout final his TER changed again to 2555. Now if CER is operating Thibault, the knockout final match should contain entry ratings at the start of the cycle ...this is extremely important because that would have wolfgang on 2460 and Harry on 2456 which will make a difference as it reverses the TER at present showing in that match leading to opposite results in the event of a tie. The same occurs for the stages and round robin finals - updated ratings are used for tie breaks at each stage. Anyway for the next cycle why do you not just change the candidate tie break rule to make it consistent with all the other tie break rules ie based on TER at the time the stage commences. It does not make any sense to give an advantage to say the no 8 rated player at the start of the cycle who goes into knockout over the no 9 rated player going into the stage and round robin. Both players will benefit from improved TER during the course of the cycle before they meet in the candidates final where there strength at that entry point should be a tie breaking factor and not where there rating was 1 year or more years earlier- the more so as their changed ratings since will/may have been used as tie breakers along the way anyway. Either that or introduce cycle entry ratings concept and keep ratings fixed for the duration of the cycle for tie break purposes for all matches and stages!


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-02-07 17:05:08)
WCH candidates final tie break rule

I understand your point of view but I see no problem with this "CER rule" at stage 4. It looks 'logical' to me, firstly because this stage is not included in what is called the knockout cycle (just like stage 5, with another rule), then because the round-robin winner still appears like the challenger in this match.

Now we may have a poll on this issue and continue to discuss it, why not...

Should the same TER rule apply at stage 4 like in the first 3 stages of the knockout cycle ? Who is favourable to the current rule ?


Andrew Stephenson    (2008-02-07 18:50:03)
Candidates final tie break rule

I vote for 1 consistent single tie break system for all matches and round robins: player higher TER at the start wins if all games drawn loses if not all games drawn. The tie break rule is complex enough without suddenly switching. To answer your 2 points Thibault: 1) The round robin winner is a sort of "challenger" to the knock out winner thus its right to give the knock out a tie break win if all games drawn and require the round robin winner to win a game to go through on a tie. But the whole process is a method of determining a challenger for the WCC not a challenger to one of the top eight. 2) Tie break system is different for WCC challenger ie champ keeps title in the event of a draw. Well this isdifferent and its easy to understand that its necessary to beat the champ to take the title. This difference does not explain having a different tie break system in the candidates - there is no challenge here and no title at stake. Each cycle is a challenger selection process and we need 1 consistent tie break method for each stage.


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-02-11 02:07:18)
Next thematic tournaments

Any suggestion for the next chess thematic tournament(s) ? The full list of all thematics played at FICGS is available here :

http://www.ficgs.com/wiki_en-thematic-tournaments.html

Thanks for your ideas :)


Rodolfo d Ettorre    (2008-02-11 02:39:18)
Next thematic tournaments

Caro kann panov attack?


Nicola Lupinacci    (2008-02-11 09:20:50)
Next thematic tournament

Icelandic gambit?

1. e4 d5 2. exd5 Nf6 3. c4 e6


Keres defense?

1.d4 d5 2.c4 Bf5


Iouri Basiliev    (2008-02-11 14:15:32)
Next thematic tournaments

I would propose to play Sicilian Dragon or so in memory of Robert Fischer.


Charlie Neil    (2008-02-11 23:09:38)
Robert J Fischer Goes to War.

Lets cast this movie. Nicholas Cage or Woody Harleson as R J Fischer. Colin Firth could be Boris Spassky. I think Stephen Fry could get by as Lothar Schmid the match arbiter. Max Euwe, the then president of FIDE .... Well can anyone else cast the movie for me.


Rodolfo d Ettorre    (2008-02-12 13:32:16)
Icelandic Gambit ...

i have an old opening book, semi open openings written by Ludek Pachman, and it does not mention the Icelandic Gambit, so there must be plenty of "unexplored country" in it, so ... I am in!!!

Can we one day have a Centre Opening thematic ? I used to play it very often when I was young, happy and unemployed.


Iouri Basiliev    (2008-02-12 19:54:37)
match is close to the end

Very nice win by GM Andrey Sumets. Positional exchange sacrifice 22. Rxd5! was very impressive.


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-02-13 00:34:44)
match is close to the end

I agree :)


Garvin Gray    (2008-02-14 19:02:16)
re-ratings

Hello Thibault, In these cases, cant you re-rate these 'type of players when you receive further information regarding their standard of play?


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-02-15 00:56:58)
draw claims

Thanks for pointing out this rule, Garvin. The server detects threefold repetition, and the game IS automatically adjudicated as a draw when it happens. I think it is reasonable for internet chess, but it is not specified in the FICGS rules yet, so I may have to change this.


Amir Elnemr    (2008-02-15 11:31:11)
How to edit GO games on FICGS

Hello all, I am just starting my first Go tournament, I still struggle to understand the so much alien game to myself, anyway, I like to edit and review my chess games externally with winboard, but I don't seem to be able to do the same with GO games, It seems as if the notation used is different than of that used by my software, I use PANDA-gIGo, so if anyone can help me by suggesting another program that can read the game format on FICGS or give me directions on how to edit it with PANDA-gIGo I will be very grateful. Thank you and have a good day.


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-02-15 14:36:07)
Kamsky vs. Topalov 2008

FIDE has announced its decision to accept the US $150,000 bid made by the Bulgarian Chess Federation, unless a country comes up with a US $250,000 bid by April 11th. The Kamsky vs. Topalov match is scheduled for the end of year 2008, after the Anand vs. Kramnik match.

http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=4448


Now, a small test : Who is the current chess world champion ?

(you could also ask to 5 people who don't necessarily play chess around you and leave the results here.. could be interesting :))


Iouri Basiliev    (2008-02-16 00:16:43)
2 Philip

Sorry Philip, but it's MY opinion. Kramnik got his title when he won WC match against Garry. Nobody got it from him. It was "No rematch" and Leko was not a legitime pretendent. So unfortunately.


Nicola Lupinacci    (2008-02-16 14:30:28)
Unfortunately, Kramnik

Unfortunately I think Kramnik is the current champion, and if he lose his title against Anand or the winner of topalov-kamsky match, i think he will continue to proclame that he is the world chess champion...


Gino Figlio    (2008-02-16 18:11:58)
It's Kramnik

But I am waiting for Carlsen to mature a bit more and take over


Garvin Gray    (2008-02-17 11:43:54)
Anand


The official answer is Anand after winning Mexico.

This has even been admitted by Kramnik.

The match between Anand and Kramnik is for the official world championship, so once again the crown in on the line, this time in the 'right' format of a match. Only 12 games though with rapid tiebreaks.



Iouri Basiliev    (2008-02-18 17:11:12)
Anand

Winning Mexico is great achievment, but for me is nothing to do with chess WC title. It(title) should be taken in the MATCH, not tournament. Waiting for the Kramnik-Anand battle.


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-02-27 12:55:45)
Morozevich on FIDE Grand Prix

An interesting interview of Alexander Morozevich in Sport-Express (russian) translated in Chessbase.com

http://www.sport-express.ru/art.shtml?154431
http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=4477

Morozevich shares his views about the new FIDE WCH cycle, its length (that can be compared to a correspondence chess championship) & the lack of informations around it. Anand, Kramnik & Topalov wouldn't play FIDE Grand Prix also. One more call to get back to the original chess world championship format...


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-03-15 12:43:07)
Unfought draws & rating calculation

An interesting article at Chessbase.com on unfought draws (mathematical, logical and practical considerations), also called "grandmaster draw" in the article, and ways to avoid it, by mathematician and logician Kung-Ming Tiong, Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia.

http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=4513

I notice that the main solution proposed just looks like FICGS rules for advanced chess (Performance +/- delta according to the color) :-D .. Anyway I still have to take some time to make this part of the server more attractive.

This thread may be a good place to ask for a feedback about FICGS current rating rules (for both chess & Go), what do you think ? :)


Mark Hailes    (2008-03-17 13:17:00)
Garvin & Admins

Thanks Garvin. That is very useful information and I now see why there is no withdraw option. However, I wonder if an exception could be made in this case - maybe a confused newbie might be allowed to screw up once? If not I'll try to manage all 8 games. M


Mark Hailes    (2008-03-20 17:56:40)
Voting for best game

Woops screwed up again. I inadvertantly pressed "vote for best game" on a game in my tournament and immediately got a confirmation of the vote. Sadly i don't think it was one of my own games :-) and in any case the tourney has only just started! I think it might be an idea to have a confirmation dialog with the game information that you are voting for, to make it harder for dense people to screw up. BTW is this option for voting for best game in a tournament or some other criteria?


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-03-20 18:27:02)
Voting for best game

A confirmation dialog is a good idea... but voting will be just more "difficult", so I'm not sure. Any opinion ?

There's no criteria... 'best' game, according to each player :)


Mark Hailes    (2008-03-20 23:23:16)
Voting For Best Game

Hi thibault------ I’m a bit envious of those carriage returns you manage to get in your posts... >>>> Voting will be more difficult <<<< I do tend towards laziness in my daily life (I can’t imagine life without a dish washer for instance). But even so the fractional mouse movement & additional click would not I think cause me such effort as to eschew voting, but it might make it more likely that I’d vote for what I consider to be the best game rather than a random one :-). So that’s one vote for the confirmation! >>>> There's no criteria... 'best' game, according to each player :) <<<< I assume then (from this somewhat enigmatic comment!?) that voting is for the best game in the tournament. Perhaps it might make sense not to allow voting on a game until it is finished? It may be that after playing well in the early part of the game, the player/s collapse later and mess it up. BTW. If I vote again for another game, is my vote removed from the first game I voted for? or not counted? Or can I in fact claim that multiple games are the best game in the tournament? What happens if I vote for the same game more than once?


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-03-24 01:37:15)
voting

Votes are removed after 50 new votes, voting for running games allow to follow interesting games before and whatever the end... Well, I suppose players don't make the error twice about votes but you are probably right about this confirmation dialog, I may change it soon.


Garvin Gray    (2008-03-27 15:38:36)
??

What were the ratings of your opponents. It is your performance rating that matters, not your win loss record.


Dirk Ghysens    (2008-04-02 10:50:03)
Joke?

All information seems correct.

The only upsetting thing is that Judit Polgar is missing from the Players list.


Lincoln Tomlin    (2008-04-06 10:53:43)
Also...

Why you have to wait over 30 days for someone to resign a position in which they are checkmated(!) is also beyond my comprehension. Allowing a time period is fair enough but there should also be a limit.


Lincoln Tomlin    (2008-04-06 11:47:44)
...

Julien. If games miss the next rating cycle because 1) someone cannot be polite enough to resign a game they clearly no longer have any interest in or 2) resign a game they have already lost because they are in Checkmate and 3) because these games are not included in the next cycle you are 1 or 2 games short of a rating allowing you to participate against stiifer opposition then 4) yes it is a problem and as mentioned above unsporting behaviour. ;-)


Garvin Gray    (2008-04-06 14:02:58)
not a fan


Now that the tournament has been cancelled, I have a couple of comments regarding what was the proposed format of 6 rounds of 30 + 10 in one day.

Players on here previously objected to this type of 'fast' time control as
it gave too much advantage to engine only players over freestylers. This point was also discussed heavily when 45 + 5 was used in a playchess freestyle tournament.

I will not be participating again in a tournament under this time control when for me play starts at 9pm and will finish at about 7am with 6 rounds in one sitting.

I would find it much easier to play one round per day at 90 + 30 over a few days, with play starting at 1300 server time.

While this may seem like a big commitment, I would think that more players can make a few hours commitment each day, than a 12 hour or so commitment on one day. Especially when trying to run a tournament across 24 time zones.



Thibault de Vassal    (2008-04-06 20:39:41)
Unsporting behaviour

Hello Lincoln. Of course this issue has been discussed here before, in my opinion it is not possible to avoid every unsporting behaviour. This is "included" in correspondence chess rules... If a rule says "checkmate -> game is over", a player would just have to last the game one move before checkmate.. If a rule says "one move before checkmate -> game is over", a player would just have to last the game when his engine says +1.87 .. and so on :/


Andrew Stephenson    (2008-04-06 23:50:54)
checkmate

Hi Thibault I think in the case of checkmate the system should end the game there and then. I say that not because it would necessarily reduce players spinning out games but because playing on a server this should be automated. Isn't checkmate always the end eg in email (ie non server cc)chess?? I had no idea it wasnt here it is on other servers I have played on. actually I think many players dont know that checkmate does not end the game here and that they have to wait for time to elapse so I dont think players would all stop the move before checkmate abd it would reduce time in some games. Incidentally stalemate should also be an automated draw


Julien Coll    (2008-04-07 12:02:41)
Hi Lincoln :)

OK for checkmates. ... --Does 1 or 2 games really change sthg about the rating? -Taking into account the rating is very often updted here- -- -- Is it really sthg about politeness/unsporting behaviour? I don't think so: for example, is it unsporting and not polite to lack time?-- --It's just a game after all.-- Friendly ;-)


Lincoln Tomlin    (2008-04-07 13:07:31)
...

Hi Julien. Each cycle requires that you play at least 9 games otherwise you will have an 'estimated' rating. This could prevent you entering certain tournaments for another couple of months because of games hanging in the air through no fault of your own. Yes, it should be a friendly game and people leaving games hanging is not really solveable. However, games that have checkmate positions when the ratings are calculated every 2 months should automatically be ended, imo.


Heinz-Georg Lehnhoff    (2008-04-07 15:56:48)
Call referee

Hi Lincoln,

there is one of the FAQs:

Question - My opponent is checkmated, why the game isn't finished ?

It's a more friendly way and your opponent can send a last message to you. If he does not resign, he will lose on time anyway. (you can call referee if it takes too much time)

So in case of a checkmate you can call referee.


Andrew Stephenson    (2008-05-01 13:42:03)
time controls

The server is accessed on the site, you can tick the box on log in and then your password will come up automatically, once in you go to waiting lists and enter a tournament that your starting rating permits, the time controls are described under the categories (world championship is the same as the rapid time control), check the my games to see when you have games click on the game and you can play with the server keeping all the records. Hope that helps


Marc Lacrosse    (2008-05-01 18:03:17)
to Andrew

"I don't se much benefit to letting the computer think for hours frankly wants it gets to 20 + ply. There all sorts of horizons in positions that letting the computer run for a year wont sort out."

There are other ways to use engines than letting simply one of them run for hours.
You may interactively walk along the various branches of the tree going from current position with one or several engines running.
You may also have engines playing some kind of test matches against each other from the current position or from any critical position that you identify along the possible continuations.
You can use Rybka randomizer against itself or against other engines for more exhaustive evaluation through test games
And so on ...

"Marc why are you playing this c3 stuff against the sicilian with such great kit? You play the same openings all the time and I thought it was because you had not much time!!!"

1. I never played this disreputed c3 stuff against the 2..d6 sicilian (with or without the 4.Be2 pawn offer) before january 2008 in my 140+ former serious correspondence games
Indeed I did choose it because I erroneously enrolled in three new tournaments simultaneously and I feared to miss time for serious analysis due to heavy workload at that time.
Results are a bit disappointing with it : five draws so far and two unfinished games that I should win (one win is sure and the other one is probable).
This should lead to a 64% result and a 2333 elo performance. Not shining but not that bad insn't it ?

2. I like playing unorthodox openings in correspondence play.
I do not see any interest in beginning my games with 30 moves of overanalysed theory.
Most often I decide for a side variation and I do play it in as many games as possible simultaneously : I do the analysis job once for all while being fully "in the mood" of a similar set of positions.
Then I change for something else
I won't probably ever play any more game with the line I played against you.

3. An exception is the Basman-Sale Sicilian (2..e6 4..Bc5).
I like it a lot and even have a web site devoted to it (http://chessbazaar.mlweb.info/basmansale/index.html)
I am in a running series of more than twenty corr. games without a single loss with it and decided not to stop using it until defeat happens
I probably analysed it more than anybody : I have several thousands of analysed lines in my files.
I am just busy to consider switching to something more agressive for cases where I need to play for a win as Black.

Regards

Marc


Andrew Stephenson    (2008-05-01 19:50:21)
Marc

Thanks for the informative reply! I do the interactive walk thing you mentioned its very useful though you need reasonable power to have several engines running at once - this you have! I am afraid I dont know how to organise test matches but sounds good. same with Rybka randomiser I have the engine but no idea how to use the randomiser and get it to play itself. 2 wins from the c3 is good as I think it gives white nothing ..but in the line I chose I noticed that after Gelfand (as black) got a draw against Adams with this line Adams repeated it aginst Kasparov who varied. So I guess Adams had an improvement perhap it was what you played? - as black has to find some very accurate moves . Incidentally I very nearly played 5..g5!!? which is really interesting but as my other games were promising decided to settle for taking a draw I like the Basman-Sale and although I have given up e4 in cc will play e4 if we play again as I have some ideas against it. Thanks for the reply


Rodolfo d Ettorre    (2008-05-02 01:31:20)
Test matches ....

Hi, I use ARENA, a free user interface compatible with most chess engines. With it is possible to organize matches and tournaments between engines.


Wolfgang Utesch    (2008-05-02 15:59:02)
Showdown time

It seems we should have a (deeper!) look at WC-Quarter Final Riccio-Zubac - it is showdown time! The both last games are equal for all the 33 moves and Riccio has just to draw for the match win - easy? I'm not sure.


Josef Riha    (2008-05-03 15:48:18)
Arena

Hello Andrew, try out the following:
Open the Engine-Paramter dialogue of Rybka and then:
Display PV Tips...on
Win Percentage to Hash Usage...on
Display Current Move...on
Preserve Analysis...on
For more information look at www.rybkachess.com and click on Parameters FAQ on the left side of the screen.
With best wishes, Josef.


Andrew Stephenson    (2008-05-05 12:50:53)
From here to eternity

Yes there might be some variations that are survivable especially OTB but at cc its tough to give up a pawn so early on. I think f4 is a perfectly ok first move (like b4) I just think it does not give any prospect of an opening advantage at cc because there is no surprise value and the black player has the time to research and find a response that equalises fairly quickly. That is why very few GM's have F4 as a main white weapon - it does not give enough prospects for an advantage - at the highest levels. Please note that qualification. I quite agree real chess is between people in real time and cc is a form of research competition. Getting experience for real world chess is a great reason to play a line at cc. There are exceptions OTB I often play the exchange french and have had good success (played by Kasparov Tal Morphy and others) I would not play it at cc though! In fact OTB I always play e4 but at cc gave it up because I see no way to get any adavantage against the caro kahn. Just relaying the moves the computer suggests does not, I think, give much chance of success against good players at cc. As for the From I do not believe in g5 white has to avoid the tricks and develop and is a pawn up. Not so easy otb!! - but at cc not so much of a problem. As for Nc6 yes I was talking about this move after 5 g3 and you are probably right I will try to look at the game you gave and do some analysis. As for the Mestel variation I thought black would get the pawn back unless e3 and d4 are played but again that was based on a quick look. Anyway perhaps the thematic tournament wil provide some answers.


Jason Repa    (2008-05-06 03:59:45)
Bird's Opening

Comparing 1.b4 to the Bird's Opening is just revealing your lack of chess knowledge. There have been many books written about the Bird's Opening. It has it's own discrete chapter in MCO, and its played in serious games in professional chess still today, as I've already mentioned to you. I wasn't making an argument that it should be someone's "main weapon", and I don't use it as a "main weapon" myself. Your original statement that I was contesting was: "1 f4 at cc seems a waste of white".

I'm significantly higher rated than you are on this site, and I beat you quite easily when we played last year (only took me 33 moves if I recall), so I don't think you're any authority in cc either.

And you shouldn't equate a lack of an "opening advantage" with winning potential. Chess is a complex game, and its not about simply trying to make the best theoretical move all the time. It's about defeating your opponent. Theory suggests that 3.Nc3 is the strongest objective continuation for White against the French Defense, yet you still see 3.Nd2 quite regularly and even 3.e5 sometimes. There is more to think about than trying to get an opening advantage when it comes to winning a chess game. There is positional maneuvering and jockeying, as well as psychological factors to consider.

Additionally, trying to win the most games on an online correspondence chess server isn't everyone's goal. Some of us play real chess and use the information garnered here to assist us in our over the board play.


Pablo Schmid    (2008-05-06 14:33:19)
Jason,

I would like to know how you refute the line which begin with 10..Bf5 instead of your opponent's move 10..Qe7. It usually continues with 10..Bf5 11.e4 Qe7 12.Bg2 0-0-0 and now what? And when you say that after 4..Nf6 you don't see how Black can get the pawn back, I want to say that chess is not all about material but activity. So it might be possible that with best play, even if Black can't get the pawn back, they could reach a dynamical equality.


Jason Repa    (2008-05-06 21:54:09)
Bird Brain loses in 33 Moves!

"Obviously playing the From or the approach adopted by black in these games is not an accurate response!"

That's not obvious at all. What's obvious is that I beat you quite easily when you and I played cc so you're far from being any kind of authority whatsoever!

"1f4 does not lose or lead to a worse gane for white - it just allows black to get equality very quickly and easily"

I just finished trying to explain to you, in the way a young child should be able to understand, that there is more to think about in chess than trying to play what current theory considers to be the best try for an opening advantage. Yet here you are rambling on about the same nonsense you were in your previous posts. Was Fischer's 2.d3 against the French the objectively strongest move? Even against (and perhaps especially against) computers, it can sometimes be better to play sidelines or moves which may serve to confuse an opponent. Is the King's Indian Attack the best try for an opening advantage for White? Probably not. But it was used by Kasparov to defeat Deep Blue. If you still can't understand the concept I've been trying to teach you, after several posts, I don't know what more I can do for you. Just keep mindlessly playing what established theory tells you are the strongest lines,(without having even the incipience of an understanding as to why) and keep mindlessly trusting the evaluations your program gives you, and you'll keep getting CRUSHED by guys like me.

"1 f4 doesnt develop any piece (except the king!) and is a bit committal and slightly weakening of the king side."

After this statement, if I didn't know better, I would have thought you were someone who just learned how to set up the pieces. It might be one of the dumbest things I've ever heard anyone say. Does 1.e4 develop a piece? How about 1.d4? I suppose those moves are "a waste in cc" as well. We should all be playing 1.Nf3 and 1.Nc3 according to you, lol.

1.f4 grabs space. It stakes out influence both in the center and on the kingside. It effectively prevents 1...e5 (lest White goes into a dubious gambit system) as an alternative to other moves which achieve this. There are also other intangibles that are part of the picture, such as the psychological effect the move may have, the lack of preparation an opponent may have against it, etc. If you ever began to understand chess at a level beyond just plugging moves into a program, you might start to appreciate that allowing concessions (such as the slight weakening of the White kingside resulting from 1.f4) is all part of the game. Fischer's famous quote: "you gotta give squares to get squares" is a famous example. If allowing static liabilities were something to be avoided at all cost, you'd never see a Sicilian Scheveningen. It allows all sorts of weaknesses.

As for your so called "analysis". It's a complete joke! For starters, you're "analyzing" a game resulting from the Leningrad Variation of the Bird's Opening. I line I've never played in my life, let alone here on FICGS. Is this how you try to win an argument/debate? By misrepresenting the facts? An intelligent person who genuinely felt that their argument had a leg to stand on, would simply take one of the 4 games I provided to you and do some analysis from there. Showing where Black could have improved. Then finally, after trying to "score points" with examples of the Leningrad Variation of the Bird's Opening, which I have never played, you post a game where White played poorly and lost to a lower rated player. As if that's never happened before in chess, lol. You don't even know enough to post the date of the game. I couldn't find this game on any of my databases(totally over 4,000,000 games), so if you didn't just make it up out of thin air, perhaps you got more wrong, such as the actual moves that were played, in addition to incorrectly stating:

"Look what happened to Evgeny Alexseev as black - a very strong 2600+ GM at the time - he continued 6 ..b6 7 h3 c5 8 Qe1 Bb7 9 g4 and lost to IM Sengupta."

Is it Black that lost here or White?

I took a brief look at the game, and it's hardly representative of proper play by White. 7.h3 was dubious at best. I prefer 7.Ne5. White then misses another opportunity to play the knight to e5 after 7...c5. Then 9.g4? is a gross thematic mistake. The only thing this game proves is that you're completely incapable of discussing chess in an intelligent way. Real chess players look for games that illustrate the critical lines for both sides, and try to arrive at some actual insights.

There is a reason I crushed you when we played cc last year.


Jason Repa    (2008-05-06 22:07:42)
From's Gambit

"And when you say that after 4..Nf6 you don't see how Black can get the pawn back, I want to say that chess is not all about material but activity"

I realize that Pablo, probably a lot better than you do. I didn't state, nor imply that White was up an entire pawn or that Black didn't have some compensation (albeit probably not enough) for the pawn. If you re-read both my thread and the one I was responding to, you will see that we weren't discussing the amount of dynamic compensation that Black gets for sacrificing the pawn. We were discussing whether or not Black gets his pawn back. End of story.


Jason Repa    (2008-05-06 23:08:30)
Bird Brain loses in 33 Moves!

"I think comparing f4 to b4 is quite reasonable"

You would. But we all know what happened to you when you and I played chess. I beat you in 33 moves. And we can see how not only do you not provide a game that's at least somewhat representative of the critical lines of the opening, but you can't even figure out when the supposed game was played, or whether or not White or Black won, and you only post a tiny fraction of it to boot. So evidently, what YOU think is not exactly to be regarded in high esteem here. Most people wouldn't have required my explanation where I described quite clearly how there have been many books written about the Bird's Opening. It has it's own discrete chapter in MCO, and its played in serious games in professional chess still today. They would already understand on their own, or would at least be intelligent enough to look up the information without having to have their hand held and have it spoon fed to them. But even after all this, you STILL don't understand. And you mention Christian Bauer who only pissed around with 1.b4 when he was playing opponents 400 elo LOWER RATED! One of his fabulous wins this year, that you were alluding to, was against 1861 rated Jacques Decamps, lol. The rest of the time they were 2100-2300. Has he ever played 1.b4 against another GM? (never mind super GM, as 1.f4 has many times been played against)

An opening move like 1.b4 might be fairly compared to something such as 1.g4. You won't see any dedicated chapter in MCO to either of those openings, but they're at least interesting enough to warrant some discussion in the "misc flank openings" chapter. 1.f4 might better be compared to something like Larsen's 1.b3. A sound sideline.

You want to talk about ratings? I've had to build up my rating from starting at the default of 1700, by winning 117 games (one of them against you), because I wasn't aware when I opened the account that the admin would let you start with your established elo. It's not surprising I played Sandor Porkulab a lot of times, as we both were very active playing a lot of games. Unlike you who started with the advantage of an inflated rating, which was somewhat tempered after that beating I gave you last year.

Sometimes in correspondence chess people abandon games and don't log in again. This was the case with Sandor Porkulab, although I had already beaten him a few times in games that were played to completion, and he wasn't better in any of the games that were abandoned. You're lying through your teeth there, or perhaps you're just too incompetent and dishonest to assess the games objectively. Why would Porkulab have 7 games against me where he was "level or better" when I had already beaten the guy every time we played before that? Did you even look at those games? Or is this just your pathetic way of trying to "score points" by using lies and deception? Additionally, the way the elo system works is that even if you do get a few easy points from say a win from an abandoned game that perhaps might have ended in a draw, that gain is quickly diluted and your rating naturalized as you play more games, because you win less points when you win,(or draw a higher rated opponent) and lose more when you lose (or draw a lower rated opponent), than you would have if you didn't receive those points. I've played many games since then and my rating here is probably where it would have been If I had not played Porkulab at all. Or if not already will soon be. So this is a pretty weak argument from you. A better argument is the fact that I CRUSHED you in 33 moves when we played. Porkolab at least gave me a decent fight when I played him. That's more than I can say for you. I felt like all I had to do was outsmart a machine when you and I played. I didn't have to worry about any human judgment from a real chess player getting in the way of my victory!

As for me getting a lost position after 17 moves against someone? For starters, I've played about 190 games here. What have you played.....32? And I think that's a testament to the fact that, unlike you, I'm a REAL chess player, so my goal here isn't to simply try to win the most online CC games to try to give myself some artificial illusion of ability. I don't always play what I consider to be the objectively best moves because I like to experiment and LEARN SOMETHING from the time I spend here. But having said that, I STILL outperform you greatly, and crushed you when we played last year. I'm also higher rated with a higher future rating, even though you had the advantage of started with a boosted initial rating. So much for what you "think" you know about the strongest moves in cc, lol. And your future rating is only 2247, not 2300+. If you want to discuss what might happen after some of your current games are resolved, don't sell me short at 2316, which is already a given. Talk about the 2370+ I expect to have after some of MY current games are resolved. If you want to argue/debate with someone, learn to do it in an intelligent and fair way. So far all you've accomplished is to lose the paltry amount of credibility you once had.


Pablo Schmid    (2008-05-07 00:34:11)
...

"Actually you're wrong once again Pablo. I know that you're only a 1912 rated player on this site" Yeah, on this site... I began here as a 1700 (the first rating here) and I lost many games on time or because I was very busy and in a hurry to play a move without checking seriously to not lose on time. And corr rating does not mean everything. I play OTB too. Do you? I would be happy to play with you, even if you seems a bit arrogant when I see the way you speak in general. And still, when I read that: "FYI, 5...Nc6 doesn't "put up more of a fight". It loses immediately to 6.Bxg5. I rarely have anyone play that badly against me in an online bullet game, let alone a cc game. and in the line with 4...Nf6 (called the Mestel Variation), there is no clear way for Black to win his pawn back. " There is not discussion about material, you seems to judge the position on the fact that Black could not regain the pawn, so they are worse...


Jason Repa    (2008-05-06 23:41:40)
Pablo

"I realize that Pablo, probably a lot better than you do. 'What? How do you know? You know nothing about me and you say that...'" Actually you're wrong once again Pablo. I know that you're only a 1912 rated player on this site. And I also know that you have difficulty understanding the difference between a discussion of dynamic compensation for material, and one of simply whether or not material can be recovered. Only in your mind is there the implication that "chess is all about material". Material is one parameter, and that is the parameter that was being discussed. You need to learn to understand that. Nobody was saying that was the only parameter to consider, or that it was the most important parameter to consider.


Jason Repa    (2008-05-07 01:09:36)
Step up, or shut up!

"I know that you're only a 1912 rated player on this site" Yeah, on this site... I began here as a 1700 (the first rating here)"

Join the club. I started as a 1700 player also. You've lost over 25% of your games. And to weak opponents at that. So I'm quite justified in assuming that I'm a better chess player than you, and by a very wide margin also. The fact that you couldn't figure out on your own why 10...Bf5 is no improvement over 10...Qe7 is just icing on the cake.

But anyway, I've had enough of you whining about your low rating and making excuses for your poor performance in chess. Excuses are for losers.

And there was nothing "arrogant" in any of my statements. The problem here is your stupidity and incapability at understanding what has been said to you. I've already explained to you TWICE that you were wrong in assuming that there was an implication that "material is everything" when I was discussing the recovery of material. That was not said nor implied. What part of this isn't sinking into your skull? How many more times does it need to be repeated for you to be able to understand???

I don't normally give free chess lessons to insolent patzers like you, but I'd be willing to have you a few bullet games on a secure server like playchess.com where in bullet time controls you won't be able to use your chess program to do the thinking for you like you do here. I've already had this type of thing go down with another motormouth on this site. I beat him 100% of the games and posted a link to them. At least he was man enough to step up to the plate and play me. You made the challenge so don't back down with any excuses, like the excuses you used to explain your paltry 1912 rating. And obviously if we're going to play real-time chess with the assumption is that its going to be human mind vs human mind chess, it's going to have to be fast bullet games. Not standard blitz where you have time to see what rybka running on your other computer suggests. Let me know what your playchess.com account name is and when you're able to play.


Jason Repa    (2008-05-07 06:46:43)
Bird Brain loses in 33 moves!

I guess I shouldn't be surprised at the behavior of this lowlife. After all, I beat him in chess and beat him in debate. I also caught him RED-HANDED telling lies and exposed him for what he is. What else is a sniveling coward to do but dig up old flame wars on the internet from four years ago, that have not an iota of relevance to any of the topics being discussed here. I bet his parents are real proud of him, LOL!

"Black's ...f5 stakes a serious claim to the e4 square and looks towards an attack on White's kingside in the middlegame. However, it weakens Black's own kingside somewhat, and does nothing to contribute to Black's development" My point exactly about 1 f4"

Another typical tactic from a chronic liar....to change the very premise of what was being argued. I'll refresh your memory since you don't have the mental capability of remembering your own words. The statement you made was: "1 f4 at cc seems a waste of white". That is what I contested. I never disputed that there is some weakening of the kingside involved here. But some weakening of the kingside doesn't mean it's a poor opening choice. You're trying to win an argument with lies and misrepresentation. Try being honest and sticking to the facts for once in your life.

My otb tournament rating is currently 2010, but my active rating is not anywhere near what you're suggesting. I'm actually much stronger in both 30 minute active and blitz chess. I won more blitz tournaments in 2007 AND 2008 than anyone else in my region, ahead of 2 FM's. And my performance in active events is in the mid 2100's based on all the otb active events I've played in over the last 5 years.

In the region I play in we don't have many active events. So I've only played in 2 that were rated, and that was over a decade ago. The provisional ratings used were far below what everyone was worth (not just me). We had a strong FM who was competing at 1800 and change, while both his FIDE and national rating were in the neighborhood of 2300. Stranger things have happened in small clubs.

Did anyone notice how the coward won't discuss what HIS national otb rating is? We don't hear a word from him about that. Very telling indeed!

Then the little weasel reposts a game that he already posted in this thread earlier. Could it be that the poor loser whom I CRUSHED in chess, has run out of ammunition with which to compensate for the fact that he lost to me? I've lost 6 games, drew 59 and won 117 on FICGS, including the beating I gave to you. I beat you EASILY and I'm HIGHER RATED than you. Keep crying about that. Its entertaining.

Again, crybaby, if 1.f4 is a waste at cc, why did I gain rating points here playing 1.f4. And why did I beat you so easily at chess? I think I proved on the chess board, that you don't know what you're talking about. All you have is lies, slander, and random usenet group flame wars from 4 years ago. I have FACTS:

I BEAT YOU IN CHESS AND I'M HIGHER RATED THAN YOU ARE.

""Look what happened to Evgeny Alexseev as black - a very strong 2600+ GM at the time - he continued 6 ..b6 7 h3 c5 8 Qe1 Bb7 9 g4 and lost to IM Sengupta." Alexseev lost and the criticisms of IM Sengupta's moves by Mr Repa are quite funny "

You're copying and pasting the same nonsense you posted earlier. Did you even read the words you typed? You're saying "look what happened to Evgeny Alexseev as Black", as if he's the one who lost. Then You switch it around and suggest that Evgeny Alexseev was White and say that he played 9.g4. Are you pretending to be this stupid or is this really how you are? As I said earlier, you're probably making the whole game up, or at least changing moves around, etc, because it doesn't appear anywhere that I could find, and you're still not bright enough to figure out how to post the whole game as you were asked to do earlier. It's a pretty sad state of affairs of that's the ONLY game you can think of to try to smear a legitimate and recognized opening such as Bird's Opening. Whoever played White played very poorly. I spelled out for you the moves that White played that were very poor. Did I use any words too complex for you to understand?

" 1 f4 has been championed by GM Jakubiec who is the only GM who has played it regularly"

This is also pure nonsense. There are MANY strong GM's (and super GM's)who haved played 1.f4 in serious games. GM Henrik Danielsen used it as a MAIN MOVE for many years also.

Keep posting lies, slander, and irrelevant 4 year old flame wars from the internet little man. I defeated you in chess and in debate. I proved that what you said is pure nonsense. All you have is hot air!


Jason Repa    (2008-05-07 06:57:07)
Bird Brain loses in 33 moves!

I guess I shouldn't be surprised at the behavior of this lowlife. After all, I beat him in chess and beat him in debate. I also caught him RED-HANDED telling lies and exposed him for what he is. What else is a sniveling coward to do but dig up old flame wars on the internet from four years ago, that have not an iota of relevance to any of the topics being discussed here. I bet his parents are real proud of him, LOL!

"Black's ...f5 stakes a serious claim to the e4 square and looks towards an attack on White's kingside in the middlegame. However, it weakens Black's own kingside somewhat, and does nothing to contribute to Black's development" My point exactly about 1 f4"

Another typical tactic from a chronic liar....to change the very premise of what was being argued. I'll refresh your memory since you don't have the mental capability of remembering your own words. The statement you made was: "1 f4 at cc seems a waste of white". That is what I contested. I never disputed that there is some weakening of the kingside involved here. But some weakening of the kingside doesn't mean it's a poor opening choice. You're trying to win an argument with lies and misrepresentation. Try being honest and sticking to the facts for once in your life.

My otb tournament rating is currently 2010, but my active rating is not anywhere near what you're suggesting. I'm actually much stronger in both 30 minute active and blitz chess. I won more blitz tournaments in 2007 AND 2008 than anyone else in my region, ahead of 2 FM's. And my performance in active events is in the mid 2100's based on all the otb active events I've played in over the last 5 years.

In the region I play in we don't have many active events. So I've only played in 2 that were rated, and that was over a decade ago. The provisional ratings used were far below what everyone was worth (not just me). We had a strong FM who was competing at 1800 and change, while both his FIDE and national rating were in the neighborhood of 2300. Stranger things have happened in small clubs.

Did anyone notice how the coward won't discuss what HIS national otb rating is? We don't hear a word from him about that. Very telling indeed!

Then the little weasel reposts a game that he already posted in this thread earlier. Could it be that the poor loser whom I CRUSHED in chess, has run out of ammunition with which to compensate for the fact that he lost to me? I've lost 6 games, drew 59 and won 117 on FICGS, including the beating I gave to you. I beat you EASILY and I'm HIGHER RATED than you. Keep crying about that. Its entertaining.

Again, crybaby, if 1.f4 is a waste at cc, why did I gain rating points here playing 1.f4. And why did I beat you so easily at chess? I think I proved on the chess board, that you don't know what you're talking about. All you have is lies, slander, and random usenet group flame wars from 4 years ago. I have FACTS:

I BEAT YOU IN CHESS AND I'M HIGHER RATED THAN YOU ARE.

""Look what happened to Evgeny Alexseev as black - a very strong 2600+ GM at the time - he continued 6 ..b6 7 h3 c5 8 Qe1 Bb7 9 g4 and lost to IM Sengupta." Alexseev lost and the criticisms of IM Sengupta's moves by Mr Repa are quite funny "

You're copying and pasting the same nonsense you posted earlier. Did you even read the words you typed? You're saying "look what happened to Evgeny Alexseev as Black", as if he's the one who lost. Then You switch it around and suggest that Evgeny Alexseev was White and say that he played 9.g4. Are you pretending to be this stupid or is this really how you are? As I said earlier, you're probably making the whole game up, or at least changing moves around, etc, because it doesn't appear anywhere that I could find, and you're still not bright enough to figure out how to post the whole game as you were asked to do earlier. It's a pretty sad state of affairs of that's the ONLY game you can think of to try to smear a legitimate and recognized opening such as Bird's Opening. Whoever played White played very poorly. I spelled out for you the moves that White played that were very poor. Did I use any words too complex for you to understand?

" 1 f4 has been championed by GM Jakubiec who is the only GM who has played it regularly"

This is also pure nonsense. There are MANY strong GM's (and super GM's)who haved played 1.f4 in serious games. GM Henrik Danielsen used it as a MAIN MOVE for many years also.

Keep posting lies, slander, and irrelevant 4 year old flame wars from the internet little man. I defeated you in chess and in debate. I proved that what you said is pure nonsense. All you have is hot air!


Jason Repa    (2008-05-07 12:45:03)
Pablo BACKS DOWN!

Your OTB rating is NOT stronger than mine, liar. If it were you'd step up to the plate and play me, instead of backing down as you're doing. You're probably a 1500-1700 elo OTB player. Considering your rather beginnerish question about the Lasker From, I might be giving you too much credit at that. You know as well as I do that you'd be lucky to get a single draw in ten games against me. I'd probably just win all ten.

Do you always run around challenging people to a chess match on the internet, then retreat like a frightened animal, with your tail between your legs, when they accept your challenge? How pathetic is that? I was looking forward to playing some human mind vs human mind chess with you, but the idea of actually having to THINK and use your own mind to come up with the moves was too much for you to deal with, so you BACKED DOWN like a little girl!


Jason Repa    (2008-05-07 12:50:12)
Pablo BACKS DOWN!

And you're the one who started with the insults Pablo. You don't run around calling people "arrogant" because you're frustrated at your own inability to comprehend what

"and in the line with 4...Nf6 (called the Mestel Variation), there is no clear way for Black to win his pawn back."

means. And challenging someone to a chess match then backing down as you have done is BEYOND PATHETIC!


Jason Repa    (2008-05-08 03:13:22)
Pavasovic vs Baklan

This game was played a couple weeks ago in the 2008 European Individual Championship in Plovdiv.
http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1491774

It's hard to believe a GM would play this in a real game. It's an old cheapo line of the Tarrasch French where White gives up two pieces, then dangles a third, for an attack. Black's defense is simple and intuitive. He gives back one piece to diffuse the attack and wins a relatively simply endgame. I first came across this when someone tried it against me in a bullet game on playchess.com. Even at bullet time controls I was able to come up with 13...Ndxe5 (not too difficult to find) and consolidate the material advantage.


Jason Repa    (2008-05-12 10:14:41)
Rating changes

1) There was never a "rule" stating that a player has carte blanche to drop as many rating points as they want and still enter a tournament for which they do not meet the rating criterion.

2) Thibault has already manually removed players from rating lists for this reason. Nobody is being "penalized" except the players who are legitimately qualified to play in that category and who must play with the lower category player. The rating average is being erroneously brought down. The player who's rating was lowered is free to enter the correct waiting list for which his rating qualifies.

3) Your "C" class rating category is hardly comparable to the "M" class category where this has been an issue, so your opinion, even if it did have a shred of merit, which I proved it doesn't, is moot anyway.


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-05-13 09:08:53)
Provocation

Hi Jason,

If you think anyone here provokes you by posting he disagrees with you (no matter the past, everyone here can express an opinion), feel free to ignore him or just do the same... That's not a problem for us as long as it is 'transparent'.

Provocation is just ridiculous when alone.


Jason Repa    (2008-05-13 12:32:23)
Repa vs Stephenson 1-0

What's clear, Stephenson, is that you're a very sad and pathetic individual. You obviously have no life whatsoever. You've been harassing me and trying to provoke me nonstop. First you start this troll behavior in the other thread....now you're doing it here as well. Is this what you do to everyone who outsmarts you and beats you in chess, as I have done?

It's one thing to follow me around from thread to thread and harass me, but the brown-nosing and whining to the admin you've been doing has made me lose all respect for you entirely. Not that I had much to begin with.

You even go so far as to obsessively comb through all of my games, just to try to find one that you think will someone embarrass or offend me. You even start a thread featuring one of my games. Obviously none of your own games are worthy of mentioning, so you focus on me and my chess games, lol. Well I have news for you Stephenson, I'm not embarrassed at all about my correspondence chess game losses (or any losses in chess for that matter). I've learned a lot more from my losses than my wins. My 6 losses on FICGS have taught me more than my 118 wins here, including the easy win against you and your chess program.

Perhaps others can benefit from my 6 losses as well. Do the FICGS community a favor and post my other five losses, not just the French Defense I played against Bucsa Ioan, that you felt warranted starting a thread to discuss.

Unlike you, I'm a real chess player. I enjoy learning and wish to take my OTB game to the next level and I believe that correspondence chess is helping me to do just that.

What is YOUR OTB chess rating? Interestingly you didn't respond to that question when it was asked of you more than once previously, lol. Big surprise!


Andrew Stephenson    (2008-05-13 13:57:40)
Databases and books

Well I dont think a book should ever be trusted for cc no matter who has written it. It should always be critically examined - playing 18 moves from the book without switching on the engine seems very risky. I think the position is lost after 13..0-0 14 Rb3 Qa5 15 Qd3 and I see no defence here. The only Dreev game I have in this line continued .. Nb6 16 Qg3 Nc4 and a draw was agreed.(Ivanchuk-Dreev 1993) Chess engines were not as good then and 17 f5 wins as was later discovered. Where are these GM games from 2003?? Its strange that your database does not have Rechlis (2525) - Zueger (2448) 2001 In fact an earlier game Ernst - Grigutavicus (1999)had seen white crash through with 15 Qf2 Nb8 16 f5 - although Nb8 does not look a very good move. Whats the date of this Psakhis book? I hope its not after 2001!


Andrew Stephenson    (2008-05-13 14:33:15)
Opening books

I think the truth is that a lot of opening books are not always objective and someimes do not give the best lines or give assessments that are not always accurate. Active GM's someimes keep things back for there own use .. which is understandable I suppose. John watson seems to be an exception to this and produces very high quality opening work. The bottom line is you have to check them all IMO. Incidentally I am not sure there is much need to keep databases up to date - I suppose that refers to downloading games from TWIC. Most databases are up dated automatically.


Andrew Stephenson    (2008-05-13 15:47:39)
Mr cfc

Frankly I have alway taken someone saying they have an ELO rating to refer to having a FIDE rating and not a national rating I understand that you need to deduct about 35 points from sub 2200 ratings to get a FIDE equivalent. Well I have never met anyone before who thought that FIDE 2000 was such a high rating I dont mean that in a bad way I am just surprised that you think this is high. As for beating me at chess I thought this was not real chess? Well like I said there is a sense in having it both ways. Look we could easily organise a money match at cc say for Euro 1000 6, 8, 10 games whatever you want, rapid time limit you can have white in every game and I can give you 3 to 1 odds. You win 1 game you get Euro 3000 you fail to win a game I get Euro 1000. All you have to do is win a game you can even lose all the other games. Well like I said it does not prove anything - its a research competition. I dont want to hustle you but you have been making a lot of statements so if you are interested ....... But please dont challenge me to bullet games on playchess......


Jason Repa    (2008-05-13 21:36:18)
Repa vs Stephenson 1-0

What a <1500 player like yourself "has always taken" is meaningless. What is objectively true and factual is what counts. As has been explained to you repeatedly, elo is not exclusive to FIDE ratings, not even to chess in fact. Are you beginning to understand or still confused?

Also, there is no simple (deduct x) formula to get a FIDE equivalent. Sometimes a national rating is worth more than a FIDE rating. There are various factors to consider.

There is no "magic" about a FIDE rating. You just need to play in FIDE rated events. I've beaten many FIDE rated players otb, including FMs. It's really no big deal.

I never said 2000 was some sort of "high rating", so don't start with the lies again Stephenson. But compared to a guy like you who is rated under 1500, I'm like a more evolved being. Is that why you're so frustrated to the point of stalking me as you're doing? Is it a combination of that and the fact that I CRUSHED you in chess? When are you going to get over that? When are you going to stop whining and crying?

Why don't we play fact to face otb chess, if you have lots of Euro to throw around as you're claiming. Fly to Canada and I'll play you a match for 5000 euro. First to win 6 games or something like that. I'd probably have to spot you 5/6 just to make the match somewhat competitive.

I never challenged you to bullet chess, my <1500 rated acquaintance, but that would be the only other way to play human mind vs human mind chess. I'm certainly not about to fly to the third world country you live in, just to beat some "C" class chess player in person.

Let's take a little tally here. I've already beaten you at correspondence chess, and you've made it clear you want no part of playing chess at time controls that doesn't allow you to consult your program, so I've effectively won that as well. What is left? Arm wrestling? I kinda like my chances there too!


Andrew Stephenson    (2008-05-15 23:36:07)
IECG

Hi Hannes Your right Hectors Benoni didn't draw blood but I guess its playable. Actually I dont like to play against it as it provokes a crisis very early on and the hard work starts quickly! On FICGS I think queen side openings are preferred by the top players eg WCH knockout matches - the exception is Peter Schuster who seems to play e4 a lot and is successful with it. Thanks for telling me about Van Osteroom's e4 preference I am keen to see what he plays against c6! - I mean the classical variation. Sorry I dont know too much about the IECG server.


Don Groves    (2008-05-16 06:03:34)
Erm...

Hi, Lincoln -- You learn quickly here to save long postings. That has happened to me more times than I care to admit ;-) The timeout for automatic logging off seems to vary considerably -- sometimes minutes, other times hours.


Ilmars Cirulis    (2008-05-18 12:58:25)
One more...

What about seeing score of white and black in thematic tournaments?


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-05-24 16:36:19)
Tournament winner in WCH

This is true in WCH round-robin tournaments only !

I explained why I've chosen this rule in previous threads, ie. :

>>

As you noticed, rating is quite important in FICGS world championship cycle (particularly established ratings, obtained from IECG / ICCF or after 9 games finished in FICGS) !

I think these rules are really the best choice in order to designate a world champion. It's more logical IMO to favour players who obtained previously the best results at FICGS and recognized organizations, and consequently a high rating. It takes time, of course. Even very strong players starting with a 1700 rating won't achieve a 2300 established rating before months !

Criterias in FICGS wch are (from most important to least) :

1) Winner of the previous cycle (qualify for the final match)
2) The eight best established ratings (play the KO tournament)
3) Points obtained in the wch tournaments
4) The tournament entry rating (TER)

<<


Don Burden    (2008-06-01 18:50:35)
Problem....Problem

"Find a Grave" site says he was cremated and his ashes scattered in the Pacific Ocean:

http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GRid=3476


Jason Repa    (2008-06-02 09:13:06)
Go game (weiqi) in films

An excellent movie called "Pi" that was written and directed by Darren Aronofsky features scenes in which a mathematical prodigy visits his former professor to discuss math and play Go.


Garvin Gray    (2008-06-02 19:14:39)
response


Wayne, this is an enternal problem and while you complain about it for the rating group 2100-2300, saying that only 2100 will benefit from it.

No matter what the rating bracket, it has been shown on this site many times that very few players will enter a waiting list when their entry is just below the cut off.

So changing the rating limits to 2200-2400 will not change this behaviour, all it will do is move the 'problem'.



Thibault de Vassal    (2008-06-02 21:03:24)
Leagues ?

If this tournament is a multi-stage one, I suppose it looks like the leagues(?) system (kind of championship like in soccer), where the 2 top players in each tournament could replace 2 players in the tournament above :/

Disadvantages:

1) Players will not know which division they'll play.

2) Harder to organize automatically.

Interesting to discuss anyway !


Jason Repa    (2008-06-03 08:06:37)
Poker

There's a bit more to the game than just knowing when to bluff. Poker is all about exploiting mistakes and minimizing both the frequency and magnitude of the mistakes that you make. Mistakes can take various forms, ranging from tells, to lack of or too much aggression, to letting your emotions get the better of you, making mathematical errors, etc.

Money management is meaningless if you're making -EV decisions.


Don Groves    (2008-06-04 06:13:07)
Poker

--- Jason Repa wrote: "There's a bit more to the game than just knowing when to bluff. Poker is all about exploiting mistakes and minimizing both the frequency and magnitude of the mistakes that you make. Mistakes can take various forms, ranging from tells, to lack of or too much aggression, to letting your emotions get the better of you, making mathematical errors, etc." -------- I should have said my statement was about those who know the mechanics of the game. Once someone can play technically correct poker, as you would find in any high-level game, then bluffing and money management become paramount.


Jason Repa    (2008-06-04 06:48:23)
Poker

"I should have said my statement was about those who know the mechanics of the game"

Actually, you've just confirmed that you don't know anything at all about the game of poker. As is the case for you with chess. And you obviously didn't understand the expression "-EV" , so I'll explain it to you. EV means expected value. It is the sum of the probability of each possible outcome of the event multiplied by the outcome value (or payoff). Thus, it represents the average amount one "expects" as the outcome of the random trial when identical odds are repeated many times. Obviously if this value is a negative number, money-management is completely meaningless as you will lose money in the long run. Money management is actually the easiest thing to figure out. It's a no-brainer for anyone who knows anything about money gaming. It has to do with ensuring that you have enough cash on hand to keep the risk of ruin down to a comfortable level, to account for standard deviation (bad luck). If you're a losing poker player, ie, one in which the net result of all your decisions results in a negative expected value, money management is clearly totally meaningless. This simple concept is quite obvious to most people. I've never before met an adult who required it to be explained to them like this.

People who's minds go beyond the superficial understand that there is much more to poker than working out the simple arithmetic of the game, such as how many outs for a flush/straight.... pot odds, implied pot odds, etc, which is probably what you mean by "knowing the mechanics of the game". Playing that kind of mindless, one-dimensional game might work OK at microlimits, but beyond that you'll need to learn that poker is much more of a game of psychology than it is a game of math. A mathematician by the name of Barry Greenstein, who incidentally has won more than $10,000,000 playing poker, once said that also. I've got a feeling he knows a bit more about the game than you do, lol.


Don Groves    (2008-06-04 07:18:03)
Poker

As usual, Mr. Repa, you eventually turn every disagreement into a personal attack. I'm surprised you didn't mention how much higher your chess rating is than mine. You prove my point about bluffing when you say that poker is more a psychological game than a mathematical one. That is one thing we can agree on. Yes, I'm quite sure Barry Greenstein knows a bit more about the game than I do, and I'm just as sure he knows at least that much more about it than you.


Jason Repa    (2008-06-04 09:11:18)
Poker

As usual, Groves, you're returning to your trolling ways once again. You're the one who started with the personal attack here, not me. I simply stated that that there is more to poker than mere bluffing and money management, as you contended. You seriously don't know anything at all about the game of poker. That's not an attack, that's a fact. I was studying the value of inflection points and stack to pot ratios when you were struggling to learn the difference between a straight and a flush.

Just as you're a 1600 chess player, so you're showing your mediocrity where poker is concerned by grossly oversimplifying what the game is about. Saying that poker is more a game of psychology than math is hardly saying that all there is to poker is bluffing, as you repeatedly and mindlessly keep stating. For starters, bluffing is just one tool in a strong poker player's toolbox, and it is both a psychological, as well as a scientific/mathematical tool at that. In no limit poker, for example, sometimes a player will spend hours trying to create a certain image just to set up one single play in order to win a large pot. There are all kinds of relevant intangibles that are so far beyond your comprehension it's not funny.

And I really couldn't care less what you agree or disagree with. I know what I'm talking about. You don't. I have a proven track record over the last two decades as a winning player. I'd be surprised if you're not in the hole overall. And FYI, everything I've said is consistent with what guys like Greenstein, Skansky, Harrington, etc have been saying for years.

Do yourself a favour, Groves.....go read a poker book and learn some basics. Then perhaps you'll be able to make a contribution to a discussion about poker.


Don Groves    (2008-06-04 19:59:07)
Poker

Your definition of "objective facts" is a bit weak, Repa. You state that I'm not intelligent enough to get my Chess rating higher yet I just told you I don't play Chess anymore. Besides that, my meager rating was achieved without the use of computers. One of the reasons I switched to Go is because Go is not yet dominated by computer programs. Why don't you try Go yourself and see how high a rating you can achieve without the aid of a computer? Also, in my second post, I agreed with you there is more to poker than just bluffing, etc. I said my comments were meant for players who already had mastered the mechanics and mathematics of the game. Rather than acknowledging this, you commenced with an ad hominem attack so typical of you. I stand by my original statement that the stakes in poker must be high enough to make bluffing possible or the game becomes nothing but chance where the best hand wins every pot. The best psychological game of poker is five-card draw with pot-limit and table-stakes. Playing with cards dealt face-up as in stud or hold-em (which is a form of 7-card stud) is for those who can't handle the uncertainty of not knowing for sure when they have a lock or at least that the odds are heavily in their favor.


Jason Repa    (2008-06-04 20:22:20)
Poker

No, your ability to understand simple concepts is what is weak here groves. You keep whining that your paltry 1600 chess rating shouldn't matter because you haven't played chess in a couple of years, but what difference does that make? Are elo points easier to obtain now? And what about Go? You play that game regularly, yet you have a pathetic 1300 rating at that as well. You better open a window before you think up another lame excuse....I wouldn't want you to die from smoke inhalation.

I don't know how many times I need to keep repeating myself in order for the point to penetrate your skull, but your comment about "mastering the mechanics" of the game is pure nonsense. You speak as if the entirety of poker theory can be equated to memorizing basic strategy in blackjack. You seem to think the discussion of calculating EV is based purely on figuring out pot-odds and how that relates to the number of outs, etc, but if you had the incipience of a clue about the game you'd realize that there is much MORE involved than that. Poker is an information game and all the information you have at your disposal, such as the temperament and mood of your opponent(s), your perceived table image (or at least your interpretation of it), the history of the action that has occurred so far, the tells that you pick up and the false tells that you may be sending to your opponents, etc, goes into the calculation of the EV on any given play. The better a player is able to conduct these evaluations and convert them into value, at least intuitively....the better a poker player they are. Even online poker has some tell/false-tell action as the response time can be varied.

Re-read my previous post where I mentioned that mistakes can take various forms. I clearly state, and in simple terms such that even you should be able to grasp, that there is more to the game than straightforward arithmetic calculations.

And I realize that you don't work, but geez, can you not find something better to do with your time than try to provoke people on the internet? Why don't you use all that free time you have on your hands to learn how to play Chess or Go beyond the level of a rank beginner?


Wayne Lowrance    (2008-06-08 06:24:35)
Rapid chess entry rating

Jayson Repa has a point but I think he is missing my point. If Engine help was not allowed, I would agree 100%. But with engine help, in practice mostly Rybka, a 2100 player is grossly under rated, I mean gross. So that is a huge barrier to overcome for a 2200+ rated player. It is not obvious that a 2300 player climbing the ranks against 2400 players has a larger barrier than a 2200 player reaching 2300. \The point I am making is: It matters little the ratings in correspondence chess with very very long time controls. Rybka does not know or care, the lil girl just makes best moves anyhow. The skill comes in when the human selects the best opening and is the most capable of steering his engine consistant with his chess knowledge. Heck Mr Repa I would love to play 2400 players, my chance of loosing is no greater than losing to a 2100 player, both would be using Rybka or engine of their choice. With respect sir Wayne


Wayne Lowrance    (2008-06-08 22:59:52)
Rapid chess entry rating

Sorry for mispelled name, not my intention. This my last post here with you, I do not wish to engage in insults. I have never claimed to not use a engine. of course I do. I do not know your rating, not bothering to look it up. I am so very busy with my tourny games I have no time for you. I will not forget your last post my friend. After I get a little free time from games I will challenge you to some match games. I doubt you will accept, but I will do it. So long my friend, good c hess, good luck with your problems Wayne p.s. do not bother with a follow. I thank you


Jason Repa    (2008-06-09 00:22:32)
Rapid chess entry rating

If you're not bright enough to figure out how to look up someone's rating, you better stick to "engine-assisted" chess. I'd probably beat you blindfolded in chess where you have to come up with the moves using your own mind. You're not even intelligent enough to figure out how to spell someone's name, when the spelling of it is right in front of you.

And for someone who doesn't want to engage in insults, you sure are doing a good job of insulting. Nice of you to "claim" I wouldn't accept your "challenge" of playing match games, before you even make the challenge. Obviously it's YOU who's backing down from match games with me, under the pretense of not having any time to play. What sheer nonsense. You seem to have a lot of free time on your hands....enough to blabber away with numerous forum posts where you whine about not being able to make it to 2300.

I'm challenging YOU to some human mind vs human mind chess on the playchess server right now. You can get a free trial account there (if you don't already have an account) in about 2 minutes. For a guy who's incessantly bickering about Rybka hurting your performance, you should love having the opportunity to prove to everyone reading this that you're not the spineless hypocrite coward I'm claiming you are and step up to the plate to play me some fast (so rybka or other engines cannot be consulted) online games.

Nice of you to tell us you have problems, but it was already obvious.


Jason Repa    (2008-06-09 08:12:28)
Brackets - both Chess and Go

" -- allow the winner of a tournament to qualify for the next higher classification regardless of his/her rating."

This idea seems interesting, on the surface, but on closer inspection it's not feasible. The FICGS tournament categories are dependent on certain rating averages that determine the level of points required in order to achieve norms for various FICGS titles, starting at class "M" and higher. Throwing in lower rated players would dilute the rating average of the entire tournament. It's also unfair to the rest of the players in that tournament who are legitimately qualified to be there. They are forced to play a lower rated opponent artificially and now THEY are at a big disadvantage in their attempt to gain the points required to get to the next level.

Additionally, I don't think groves thought about this long enough to realize that there is no guarantee that each "A" level tournament will end precisely as each "M" level tournament does. What if two "A" level events are completed in the time it takes for one "M" level event to finish, which isn't an unreasonable possibility as the "M" level players generally take the game more seriously and tend to use their time more? Should we then throw in TWO players into an "M" level event that don't deserve to be there? At any rate, it's a poor idea. If someone is winning tournaments, they're definitely gaining rating points and will qualify legitimately for the next rating level soon enough.


Jason Repa    (2008-06-09 11:05:13)
Brackets - Chess and Go

"Thanks for your reasoned response"

Somehow I don't think you know the meaning of the word "reason", groves.

"(1) Having one lower rated player in a group of seven does not seem to me to be much of a dilution"

It is very much a dilution. As I just finished explaining to you, it will not only make it more difficult for the other players in the tournament who legitimately qualify to be there by rating, to acquire the rating points necessary to get to the next level, but it will lower the overall rating average and effect the awarding of norms.

"Also, remember that this player is at or very near the top of the next lower rated group"

Total rubbish. You just finished saying, in your previous post, that you propose to allow the winner of a tournament to qualify for the next higher classification REGARDLESS of his/her rating. There is no certainty that the winner of the tournament will be near the top of the next lower rated group. They could very well be at the bottom of the next lower rated group, as I often was, as were many others, when I won tournaments.

"and again, this doesn't seem like a large enough disparity to be of concern."

And AGAIN, As I just finished explaining to you, it will not only make it more difficult for the other players in the tournament who legitimately qualify to be there by rating, to acquire the rating points necessary to get to the next level, but it will lower the overall rating average and effect the awarding of norms.

"Thibault instituted a rule that losing to a lower rated player only counts as a loss to someone a maximum of 150 ELO below"

Where did you get the 150 ELO figure from? I was under the impression it was a 200 ELO ceiling. Not that this has any relevance in terms of supporting your position anyway.

"The new rule could easily specify that no more than one lower rated player may enter any given tournament."

I just finished explaining to you that there is no guarantee that the "M" class tournaments will end at the same time as the "A" class tournaments. Not only do "M" class players tend to take the game more seriously and move slower, but there are more "A" class players than "M" so it takes longer to fill an "M" class list, hence less "M" class tournaments are played. If you propose to have only one "A" class player sent to an "M" class tournament at a time, then you'll quickly accumulate a waiting list backlog of "A" class players waiting to be seeded into a tournament they don't legitimately qualify for, stretching for decades. The other reasons I mentioned are MORE than enough reason to ditch this suggestion. This is just gravy.

Additionally, and once again, as I just finished explaining to you, if someone is winning tournaments, they're gaining rating points and will soon be able to qualify for the new rating category through legitimate means. So there is no reason at all to provide such "handouts".

I hope I don't have to repeat myself a third time here. It seems quite silly that you don't yet understand the simple and logical truth of what has been explained to you.


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-06-09 23:37:39)
Alekhine's defence

Hello all,

The waiting list for the next chess thematic tournament is open : Alekhine's defence (1.e4 Nf6).

Feel free to make suggestions for the next thematic tournaments :)


Rodolfo d Ettorre    (2008-06-10 08:45:20)
Thematics ...

It would be nice to have the Ponziani opening, I know, it is unsound, but it is a nice opening.


Rodolfo d Ettorre    (2008-06-12 15:12:47)
More thematics ...

Also the old indian defence or janowskey indian thematic tournament would be nice, Tal used the latter occasionally. They are solid, a bit passive. I played a few times the janowskey indian and I felt like I was playing a Philidor with steroids.


Garvin Gray    (2008-06-17 08:25:59)
conditional thematic tournament

I agree with this Marc and would like to see it trialled in a non rated tournament just like the thematic tournaments. That being said, I have seen Thibault express some concerns regarding conditional move use.


Marc Lacrosse    (2008-06-20 08:04:12)
Why ?

One of my opponents rated 2300+ continues to play even though there is an announced forced checkmate in eleven moves (no possible miracle : any engine finds the mate).
His game has been completely lost for weeks but the road to mate is long in this minor pieces ending.
Is it correct?
OK this does not infringe any rule but in OTB play this would be considered very bad manner.
Does it happen frequently here?
what is your opinion?
Marc


Xavier Pichelin    (2008-06-20 18:00:51)
Why?= Pourquoi?

Bonjour,Marc, Je vous réponds en Français car je ne suis pas habile du tout pour écrire en anglais. . J'ai cru comprendre que vous vous posez la question pourquoi un joueur continue de jouer quand on lui annonce mat en 11 coups? . Bien parce que le joueur en question n'a pas de logiciels assez puissant pour voir qu'il est mat en 11 coups et que peut-être il ne le voie pas ce mat! . Donc si vous êtes sûr de votre mat peut-être juducieux de lui mettre en message la combinaison de joli mat et il abandonnera surement sans tarder?? . Mon opignion personnel c'est peut-être ne lui pas dévulger le mat car il peut être fustrer que vous lui annoncer un mat en n coups. . Maintenant si il le joueur prend le plaisr de durer cette partie en sachant que l'issue est fatale, si il reste beaucoup de temps de réfléxion en avertir le directeur du tournoi donc Thilbaut pour qu'il fasse adjuger ce résultat pour ne pas perdre du temps sur une éventuelle qualification au niveau supérieur! . Amicalement Xavier.


Khaled Toutaoui    (2008-06-24 17:38:50)
un match contre ould ahmed samy..:)

salut samy si tu me lis je voudrais faire un match contre toi en deux manches gagnantes si tu le veux bien...fais moi savoir ta reponse par le biais du forum si c possible...mes salutations les plus amicales...


Samy Ould Ahmed    (2008-06-25 23:24:54)
Salut

Salut Khaled, je ne pense pas qu'on puisse jouer un match (en deux parties) de parties longues sur ce site, Thibault me contredira si j'ai tort. Joue tu sur d'autres sites ?


Garvin Gray    (2008-07-02 13:36:39)
Closing of old topics


Making a recommendation: Can old topics please not be closed after 60 days?

On a couple of occasions now I have wanted to revive an old thread as it might be relevant now and I get the message that the thread is closed.

Two reasons for wanting to revive an old thread:

1) The past conversation is relevant to current matters and so having the old conversation would reduce people repeating themselves

2) Helps to reduce the number of threads talking about the same item(s).



Please change the current policy.



Marc Lacrosse    (2008-07-05 19:36:23)
Qualification information ?

Because i did not realise that I had qualified for two WCh tournaments I recently enrolled for a third one and had three tournaments beginning almost simultaneously in january, which proved to be too much for me.
And now the deadline for the next Wch (005)is approaching and it just seems that i will win WCH_STAGE_1_GROUP_M_01__000004.
So I am hesitating : when will Wch-004 next stage begin ?
I do not wish anymore to have more than one tournament starting almost at the same time.

More generally speaking, I wish I could get the following infos permanently updated on my "My messages" page :

* I enrolled for a tournament of type X on date Y. Presently there are already Z players enrolled for this tournament.
* I registered for championship X on date Y. this is supposed to start on date Z.
* In tournament Wch-X my present result ensures (or leaves the possibility open) that I will be qualified for next stage tournament that is supposed to begin on date Y.

Your opinion ?

Marc


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-07-05 21:58:53)
Qualification information

Hi Marc, next stages of previous championships will start at the same time, or a few days/weeks after, actually as soon as possible.

Your idea is interesting, not much time right now but let's see what other players think about that.

Anyway, anyone who wants to retire from the waiting list may send a message to me before the start of the tournaments.


Don Groves    (2008-07-06 09:49:32)
I second this

It is easy to begin a new thread and quote material from a previous thread. I see no reason to change anything and I know Thibault likes to avoid changes ;-)


Normajean Yates    (2008-07-10 03:11:53)
3x3 chess

for those who don't know or don't have the link; 3x3 has been completely solved for some years now. [it cannot really be a game; there is no good starting position; but it can have good mate-in-n problems.]
Link:
http://kirr.homeunix.org/chess/3x3-chess/


Oksana Krylova    (2008-07-11 08:45:14)
Why is not fixed mate?

Game 18928 Krylova - Denchev Why is not fixed mate? http://www.ficgs.com/game_18928.html


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-07-11 13:51:34)
Checkmate

Hello,

The game has now ended, but in all cases the checkmated player has to resign (or lose on time).


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-07-11 23:13:29)
FICGS Go championship final match

The first FICGS Go championship 5 games final match (in WCH Go 000002) just started !

Svante Carl von Erichsen (2478, 4 dan) vs. Ke Lu (2591, 5 dan)

http://www.ficgs.com/tournament_FICGS__GO__WORLD_CHAMPIONSHIP__000002.html

Nice & instructive games to follow :)

Best of luck to both.


Wolfgang Utesch    (2008-07-14 18:30:38)
Luck or Knowledge?

WCH-KO-Final 2: Ingersol - Utesch I'd just lost all my hope for winning the last game and the match - but now (after 89....g5??) !? In my opinion is chess a game of luck!!! Harry had been much better in most games of the match, but failed in last game - I won't be very proud on this match win.


Rodolfo d Ettorre    (2008-07-15 09:16:50)
Good idea!

We could use it, especially in Thematic Tournament!


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-07-17 02:36:56)
Mirroring moves

If you understand well how mirroring moves are done, it is very (very very..) unlikely that all moves dates prove it by coincidence in a whole game... Maybe 3 or 4 consecutive moves are possible in the opening, no more.

It is possible to mirror any move, so check or checkmate.


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-07-17 04:40:24)
Quotes added from House M.D.

The quotes file grow :) .. a few nice ones from Gregory House (House M.D.), ie:

- You can think I'm wrong, but that's no reason to quit thinking.

- I take risks, sometimes patients die, but not taking risks causes more patients to die - so I guess my biggest problem is I've been cursed with the ability to do the math.

Applies also to chess & Go :)

BTW this TV series is an enormous - deserved - success in France (too).


Wolfgang Utesch    (2008-07-17 04:57:26)
In example ....

... Both players of a match decide to play Sveshnikov with white and black, so it is normal that the first 8 moves are mirrored, may be that both players decide to play a special way in this opening with white and black, it can be that 20 moves are mirrored. Where is the problem? What can be wrong?


Jonathan Willis    (2008-07-18 00:52:18)
Ending a game of Go

Thank you Thibault for the information. I shall be calling a referee now as we are about to enter our fourth round of passes in this game.


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-07-18 14:15:56)
how did member's name change?

According to the terms & conditions, the site can keep players informations and games, however if it's a "real" problem for a player who wants to close his account to have his name remaining on the site, an admin may change it (at his own discretion, the player can't register under his previous name though), but the games remain.


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-07-23 14:00:26)
MoGo vs. Human

In 1997 Janice Kim (1 dan) beat Handtalk, then the strongest Go program, despite giving the program a 25-stone handicap.

On Thursday, August 7, Kim MyungWan 8p will play MoGo, probably the world's strongest computer Go program. MoGo will be running on a supercomputer boasting over 3,000 processor cores !! The game will be broadcast live on KGS - http://www.gokgs.com/download.xhtml

The human is "8p", meaning 8-dan professional; not quite 3 stones stronger than a 1d pro player, who in turn would give an amateur 1d at least 6 stones. Edward Lasker said that 3 stones handicap at Go is comparable to knight odds at chess.


Svante Carl von Erichsen    (2008-07-23 17:33:36)
Janice Kim

Janice Kim was a 1 Dan professional in 1997, she is 3 Dan professional now. Is there more information available somewhere, e.g. regarding handicap and time settings?


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-07-23 18:40:31)
1 dan Pro

Thanks for correcting me :)

I did not find more information about the match yet.


Mark Hailes    (2008-07-24 01:59:53)
same sex relationships

Ahh - but perhaps Nash would have related to your sexuality:

To make the matter more succint:
Suppose my fellow man extinct.
Why, who would not approve the plan
Save possibly my fellow man?



Normajean Yates    (2008-07-24 04:41:27)
on another note: absence of term for..

We [English] have a saying - "The French have a word for it"...
Now, I am lesbian in a partnership [call it 'common law/uncommon law marriage if you like :)] that is 24-year long now; but the sexual part of it is over for 8+ years now. I am asexual now. I know of a few similar gay-asexual males, including a close friend.
Also in a poll 1% of fellow britishers [or was it resrticted to englanders?] reported that they were asexual.

So, French wo/men; do you have a word for gay-asexual? [i prefer to use the term gay for both gay females and gay males. For one; not every inhabitant of Lesbos is or was 'lesbian' or for that matter female! :)]


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-07-25 21:44:40)
Caire - Utesch

The only running games of François right now are the ones of your match, so I assume he left just before the start of the tournament... Not a real problem yet but definitely I'll have to add more informations in 'My messages' about the start of the next WCH stages.


Normajean Yates    (2008-07-26 14:27:09)
Rodolfo ... I am playing that song ..

right now on this computer - can you hear it? :)

Andrew, the woman who said all that you cited [Martha Stewart?] is in the ultimate analysis a victim of social programming.


Marc Lacrosse    (2008-07-27 19:36:41)
The specifics of match play ...

Tanks to FICGS championships interesting formula I just entered Wch 005 in a quarter final 8-games match (against GM Balabaev).
This is the first time I have to play several simultaneous games against the same opponent in correspondence play.
There are interesting questions related to this unusual kind of tournament.
First of all, what kind of opening(s) should you play, and more precisely is it better to vary or to go for the same opening in several games?
Having had a look at my opponents former games I had prepared quite a few options.
As Black I decided to rely on my favorite Bc5 sicilian defence
Four identical games developped and very soon it appeared that these games should be decisive for the whole match
For long I was afraid that my opponent could come with some decisive prepared analysis leading to a 4-0 lead ...
But the opposite happened and all four games ended (draw by position repetition) before I had left my opening prep, after less than one month of play.
Thus I am left with four games where I am white
A considerable advantage IMHO ...

On this precise topic I wonder what is the opinion of top players here : is it better to be the one who vary early or should you go along your favorite analysis as long as your opponent won't diverge himself in case of match play

I have never read anything on this topic anywhere ...

Marc


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-07-28 00:27:32)
The specifics of match play ...

Hi Marc.

There was discussions about the 8 games match format already... and you may have seen that I used this strategy without success before with Farit as my opponent :)

http://www.ficgs.com/tournament_FICGS__CHESS__WCH_QUARTER_FINAL_3__000003.html

Anyway, the choice of openings and to vary the lines is a very complex (and interesting) question IMO, that depends on too many factors, so I probably may change my view in certain cases, whatever the results.


Marc Lacrosse    (2008-07-28 15:59:14)
I see ...

Hi Thibault

OK I see : you were happy (as I am) with four draws in one single well-prepared line as Black but went on missing the qualification as your four white games were also drawn (and Farit's rating was superior to yours).
Maybe I will suffer the same fate ...
But as i have to win at least one game I feel this is easier to achieve with white ...
As white I am busy varying the positions a little and trying to play more actively ...
We will see...

By the way I think that the rule according which the highest rating is qualified in case of eight draws is really a significant advantage ...
... but i agree that we need a way to adjudicate drawn matches.

Marc


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-07-28 18:18:20)
8 games matches

"But as i have to win at least one game I feel this is easier to achieve with white ..."

Theorically (only ?). Anyway I made this choice during my match because I had about 80 running games at that time (quite inhuman :)) so I managed my rating :/

You know that this time control 30 days + 1 day / move is quite different from classical 40 days + 40 days / 10 moves, the pressure in the 8 games may be important, also the psychological factor [playing White feels more (sometimes too much) secure ie(?): Xavier won his 2 games with Black in the first Candidates final] and I'm convinced that every game counts these ways. The tie break rule (highest rating is qualified in case of eight draws) did not apply so often by the way.


Don Groves    (2008-08-02 23:45:46)
The future of chess...

Claude Shannon, who died in 2001, is known as the father of information theory and also wrote the first paper on computer chess in 1950. If anyone was qualified to make such a statement, it was him.


Normajean Yates    (2008-08-03 03:16:24)
but that is obvious...

2-person finite game of complete information, so ... obviously true. [just stipulate that a repetition of a FEN is an auto-draw and it becomes a finite game without changing anything..]

The proof is trivial if you think about it. Writing it down formally is rather a pain but introduces useful concepts like solution trees. John von Neumann wrote it down isnt it.. [and not Claude Shannon...]


Marc Lacrosse    (2008-08-03 20:34:52)
No extra qualification required!

Hi all

To Andrew : I really did not ask for this invitation: i am already unable to face all tournaments for which I qualified.

- I just won WCH-04-group M01
- At the same time I just began to play my quarter-final match in Wch-05
- and if I am not wrong I am not far from winning WCH-03-stage2-group02 (possibly ex aequo with you)...

... so really I do not need to get extra qualifying opportunities !

Marc

PS If I remember correctly you had some critical comments on my recent opening choices. It seems that they did not work too miserably so far.


Normajean Yates    (2008-08-06 02:50:15)
re strategy stealing...

What I meant was to try and define 'strategy stealing' formally you have to define 'strategy' - which is a solution subtree of your game tree -- etc etc :) A combinatorial 2-person complete-information game being a quintuple blah-blah-blah ...


Normajean Yates    (2008-08-06 03:30:00)
where does strategy stealing come in?

What is 'obvious' but provable is: "A finite combinatorial 2 person game of complete-information is deterministic [ie has a pure srategy, considered as a 'pure game-theory' 2-person game]. To prove that, one needs to define a 2-person complete-info combinatorial game, and strategies in that context [which come out to be "solution subtrees"]

I dont see where strategy stelaing comes in - it does come in eg for the trivial but nonconstructive proof that nxn hex is a win for the first player ...


Andrew Stephenson    (2008-08-07 16:00:12)
Longest game

I just wondered whats the longest game game ever played on FICGS - in terms of moves? Potentially it could be very long as the 50 move draw rule does not apply automaticaaly on this site.


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-08-08 13:19:10)
MoGo wins ! (estimated 2 dans)

I just read it in the American Go E-Journal, MoGo computer program defeated Myungwan Kim 8P by 1.5 points in a 9-stone game billed as “Humanity’s Last Stand?”

The professional player estimated MoGo’s current strength at “two or maybe three dan”, “made some 5-dan moves” (the program used 800 processors, at 4.7 Ghz, 15 Teraflops on a borrowed European supercomputer)

Strangely, Kim easily won two blitz games with 9 stones and 11 stones and lost one with 12 stones and 15 minutes by 3.5 points before this one hour game.

http://senseis.xmp.net/?MoGo

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_Go


Andrew Stephenson    (2008-08-08 20:05:20)
Marshall fest

We have 4 marshall gambits in Caire Utesch match....


Don Groves    (2008-08-10 00:32:11)
Komi

Yes, Andrew, the second player is compensated with some number of stones, usually between 5.5 and 7.5 (ties are eliminated). This is called komi. I don't know what the komi was in the MoGo match.


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-08-14 18:56:37)
:o)

Thank you... Maybe we'll know about poker in a while :) I feel my Go rating is over estimated though, my first Go games here prove that I really started from zero... anyway, always learning, as a webmaster also :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-08-16 12:29:32)
Questions to Xavier Pichelin

Xavier Pichelin is 1st FICGS chess champion after beating IM Gino Figlio in the first candidates final, he accepted to talk about his match, the tournament, his views around correspondence chess, chess engines and so on... The most important part may be he'll defend his title against the winner of the 2nd candidates final :)

Unfortunately, the complete interview is in french only as he doesn't speak english, but if someone finds a good translator (if possible better than Babelfish), he may post it in this thread. Thanks !


- Bonjour Xavier et tout d'abord félicitations pour ta victoire dans le match qui t'opposait au MI (ICCF) Gino Figlio [Pérou] dans la finale des candidats. Tu devais éviter à tout prix la nulle dans toutes les parties, finalement les noirs t'ont porté chance, comment expliques-tu ce résultat ?

Xavier : Bonjour, merci pour les félicitations. C'est vrai qu'en cas de nulles pour toutes les parties, le règlement indique Figlio Vainqueur en cas d'égalité avec victoire(s) et défaite(s) je remporte le match. Donc il fallait que je prenne des risques en attaquant et c'est avec les noirs que je l'ai fait car je pensais que Gino, dans ces parties, attendrait sans prendre de risques pour assurer les nulles.

- Peux-tu nous décrire la manière dont tu as abordé ce match contre Gino et son déroulement au fur et à mesure des différentes phases du jeu ?

X : C'est assez simple, dans ce match je n'étais pas du tout favori car avec plus de 200 points ELO FICGS en ma défaveur, et Gino titré Maître International avec plus de 2480 point ELO ICCF, je pensais que je n'allais pas résister sur 8 parties simultanées car sur une partie tout est possible mais sur 8 parties... c'était pour moi un grand défi ! Pour le déroulement du jeu j'ai joué la diversité sur mes débuts avec les blancs 4 parties 4 coups différents : 1.e4 1.d4 1.c4 1.Cf3. Gino a fait de même : 1.e4 1.d4 1.Cf3 1.Cc3. Ce qui m'a fait douter aussi car 1.Cc3 m'a surpris, je pensais qu'il avait prévu un début tonitruand et c'est là que je me suis dit qu'il fallait que je prenne des risques avec les noirs. Au fur et à mesure des différentes phases du jeu j'ai assuré les nulles des positions équilibrées pour me concacrer a deux parties avantageuses dont une avec les blancs et une avec les noirs pour au moins faire la différence dans une partie pour assurer la victoire. Et en fin de compte c'est 3 victoires qui me reviennent, ce qui me paraissait impossible étant donnée la qualité du jeu de Gino joué sur ce site pour arriver à la finale des candidats du championnat.

- Tu as réalisé pendant le championnat un parcours sans faute, aucune défaite à signaler, tu affiches également des statistiques stratosphériques à 78% contre une moyenne elo à près de 2200, quel est ton secret ?

X : Mon secret? Je n'ai pas de secret. Si j'avais un secret je ne le dévoilerais pas sinon je ne gagnerais plus ! Je pense que j'ai eu un petit peu de chance car il s'en est fallu de peu que je ne sois pas qualifié au stage 3 (robin-round final) car il y avait 3 joueurs à égalité et j'ai eu l'avantage du classement du départ de ce tournoi comme l'indique le règlement. Quant à mes statistiques, c'est aussi grâce aux erreurs de mes adversaires qui m'ont permis de gagner des parties équilibrées.

- Que penses-tu du système mi-ko, mi-toutes-rondes du championnat FICGS et de ses départages inédits lors des matchs en 8 parties ? Quelles modifications y apporterais-tu ?

X : Très bonne question ! Le système mi-ko pour moi est un peu trop rapide car un coup par jour c'est des heures d'analyses pour exploiter une position compliquée, ce qui est difficile quand on à plusieurs parties en cours. Surtout quand on travaille. C'est peut-être aussi grâce à cette cadence que mes adversaires, faute de temps, ont fait des imprécisions sur certaines postions ou exploité mes erreurs. Mais cette cadence a un avantage par rapport aux cadences ICCF qui est de 5 jours par coup, c'est que les parties durent 5 fois moins longtemps ! Le départage inédit des matchs en 8 parties est excellent, obliger le favori à assurer tous les matchs nulles pour gagner ce duel et sinon d'obtenir une victoire supplémentaire contre le challenger est un mode très bien pensé. La modification que je pourrais y apporter est peut-être la gestion du temps qui est rapide pour un système de jeu par serveur. Peut-être augmenter l'horloge de départ de 15 jours, soit de commencer avec 45 jours contre 30 en ce moment. Et aussi la possibilité des prendre des vacances uniquement sur le tournoi en cours afin de gérer les autres parties du site. Par exemple prendre 7 jours de vacances sur un tournoi d'échecs du championnat et pouvoir jouer un tournoi de Big Chess, de Go ou un autre tournoi d'échecs pendant ces vacances. Pouvoir choisir une date de début de vacances à l'avance serait également appréciable.

- Pourquoi t'être investi dans les échecs par correspondance ? T'apportent-ils d'autres satisfactions par rapport aux échecs classiques et au blitz ?

X : Je préfère les échecs par correspondance par rapport au temps. Car les échecs classiques se jouent souvent le week-end, à une heure précise et souvent en déplacement pour effectuer un tournoi. L'avantage, pour moi, des échecs par correspondance est que je puisse me connecter à n'importe quelle heure pour jouer mes coups, ce qui me permet, par exemple, de faire des repas de famille le week-end et le soir tard de jouer un coup, ce qui n'est pas possible aux échecs classiques.

- Tu as su ne pas céder à la tentation et te limiter à jouer un nombre très raisonnable de parties sur le site tout le long du championnat, penses-tu néanmoins que les échecs par correspondance soient addictifs et à quel point ? Ont-ils des répercussions sur ta vie de tous les jours ?

X : Oui ! Limiter mon nombre de parties en cours est pour moi essentiel pour essayer d'avoir des parties de qualité plutôt que de quantité. Avoir beaucoup de parties en simultanée est quand même une chose très difficile à gérer ! C'est peut-être la clé de ma victoire contre Figlio, j'ai regardé ses parties en cours, il en avait pas loin de 90 sur le site de l'ICCF, cela a pu se ressentir sur son temps d'analyse consacré à nos 8 parties sur FICGS. Sur la vie de tous les jours les répercussions sont familiales car il est vrai que je passe plus de temps à analyser les parties et moins temps avec ma famille, ce qui est assez difficile pour moi. Mais quand les résultats sont là je ne regrette pas !

- Que penses-tu de la place actuelle des moteurs d'analyse (Rybka, Shredder, Fritz et autres) dans les échecs par correspondance ? Quelles sont pour toi les qualités complémentaires essentielles du joueur par correspondance, devenu centaure avec la machine pour jambes ?

X : Les moteurs d'analyses dans les échecs par correspondances sont utilisés par 95% des joueurs... Maintenant il faut s'adapter et savoir utiliser ces machines à calculer. Car jouer simplement le meilleur coup de Rybka 3, de Fritz 12 ou Hiarcs 12 sans réfléchir mentalement mène à la nulle si l'adversaire fait de même ou possiblement à perdre si l'adversaire se donne la peine de réfléchir en les utilisant également. En sachant que lorsqu'on est dans le milieu de partie ces logiciels vous donnent souvent 4 à 5 coups evalués de manière semblable, et c'est là qu'il faut choisir le bon coup alors que celui-ci n'est même pas forcément cité par le moteur d'analyse...

- Tu joues désormais au Big Chess sur le site, curiosité ou intérêt ? Que penses-tu de cette version étrange des échecs ?

X : Par curiosité et par amusement et je pense que Rybka 3 ne joue pas encore au Big Chess ! Cette version est quasiment inédite je ne connaissais pas cette forme de jeu d'échecs auparavant donc celui qui a inventé ce jeu a très bien fait ! A propos c'est moi qui vous pose une question sur le Big chess... Y a t-il possiblité de roquer avec ce jeu si oui comment? (NDLR : Non, il est impossible de roquer au Big Chess)

- Et enfin la question que tout le monde se pose, particulièrement François et Wolfgang qui disputent la deuxième finale des candidats, penses-tu pouvoir défendre ton titre l'an prochain ? :)

X : Bien sûr ! Je défendrai le titre ! J'aimerais si possible savoir la date et la cadence du match. Et je souhaite à François et Wolfgang une belle finale ! Je dois faire honneur à cette compétition qui est bien organisée !

- Le match devrait pouvoir débuter durant la première semaine de janvier 2009, la cadence sera à nouveau de 30 jours et 1 jour supplémentaire par coup. Merci pour tes réponses, et encore bravo pour cette belle performance !

X : Merci ! Et à bientôt ! Bonne continuation à tous et bonnes parties !


Benjamin Block    (2008-08-18 08:52:18)
Try to translate!

I think it is something like that?
Hello Xavier and first congratulations on your victory in the match which t'opposait the MI (ICCF) Gino Figlio [Peru] in the final candidates. You should avoid at all costs void in all parties, finally brought blacks t'ont chance, how do you explain this result? X
avier: Hello, thank you for the congratulations. It is true that in case of zero for all parties, the regulation states Figlio winner in the event of a tie with victory (s) and defeat (s) I won the match. So I had to take risks in attacking and it is with blacks that I did it because I thought Gino, in these parts, expected without taking risks to ensure the void.
-- Can you tell us about how you approached this match against Gino and his conduct as different phases of the game?
X: It's pretty simple, in this match I was not at all favorite because with more than 200 ELO points FICGS to my disadvantage, and Gino titled Master International, with more than 2480 ELO ICCF point, I thought I n ' not resist going on 8 simultaneous games as a part everything is possible but on 8 parts ... it was for me a great challenge! In the course of the game I played diversity in my beginnings with white 4 parts 4 different strokes: 1.e4 1.d4 1.c4 1.Cf3. Gino did the same: 1.e4 1.d4 1.Cf3 1.Cc3. What made me doubt also because 1.Cc3 surprised me, I thought he had planned an early tonitruand and this is where I said that I should take risks with blacks. As the different phases of the game I assured the zero positions balanced for me concacrer deal has two parts, one with blanks and one with the black for at least make a difference in part to ensure victory. And ultimately it 3 victories me back, which seemed impossible given the quality of the game Gino played on this site to reach the final of the championship candidates.
-- You have made during a championship course without fault, no losses to report, you also posters statistics stratospheric to 78% against an average elo to about 2200, what's your secret?
X: My secret? I have no secret. If I had a secret I do not dévoilerais if I do win more! I think I got a little lucky because he is required by little I am not qualified to stage 3 (round-robin final) because there were 3 players equally and I had l 'advantage classifying the departure of this tournament as indicated by the regulation. As for my statistics, it is also thanks to the errors of my opponents who allowed me to win parts in balance.
-- What do you think the system mid-ko, semi-all-round championship FICGS and its new départages in matches in 8 parties? What changes would it be?
X: Very good question! The system mid-ko for me is a little too fast since a coup by day is overtime analyses to operate a complicated position, which is difficult when several parties in progress. Especially when you work. It is perhaps also through this pace that my opponents lack of time, made some uncertainty regarding postions or exploited my mistakes. But the pace has an advantage over the cadences ICCF which is 5 days a coup is that the parties had to 5 times less time! The départage new games to 8 parts is excellent, forcing the favorite to ensure all matches to nil win this duel and otherwise obtain an additional victory against the challenger is a very well thought out. The amendment that I could make is perhaps time management which is fast for a game system per server. Perhaps increase the clock starting 15 days, starting with 45 against 30 days at this time. And also the possibility of taking a vacation only on the tournament underway to manage other parts of the site. For example, take 7 days vacation on a chess tournament championship and be able to play a tournament Big Chess, Go or another chess tournament during the holidays. Being able to choose a start date of holidays in advance would also be appreciated.
-- Why t'être invested in correspondence chess? T'apportent there are other rewards compared to traditional chess and blitz?
X: I prefer chess match over time. For the classical chess is often play the weekend at a specific time and often on the move to make a tournament. The advantage for me, correspondence chess is that I can connect at any time to play my shots, which allows me, for example, making family meals on weekends and late at night to play a coup, which is not possible chess classics.
-- You knew not to succumb to the temptation and you only play a very reasonable number of parties on the site throughout the championship, do you think nevertheless that the correspondence chess are addictive and at what point? Did they affect your everyday life?
X: Yes! Limiting my number of games in progress is essential for me to try to have parts of quality rather than quantity. Have a lot of parts simultaneously is still something very difficult to manage! This is perhaps the key to my victory against Figlio, I watched its games in progress, it had nearly 90 on the site of the ICCF, it has been felt on his time devoted to analysis our parties on FICGS 8. On the everyday life impacts are family because it is true that I spend more time to analyze the parts and less time with my family, which is quite difficult for me. But when the results are there I do not regret!
-- What do you think about the current position of engines for analysis (Rybka, Shredder, Fritz and others) in correspondence chess? What are the qualities you complementary core player by correspondence, now centaur with the machine for legs?
X: The engines of analyses in chess matches are used by 95% of players ... Now we must adapt and learn to use these machines to calculate. Car simply play the best shot of Rybka 3, Fritz 12 or Hiarcs 12 mentally without thinking leads to zero if the opponent does the same or possibly lose if the opponent gives himself the trouble to consider using them as well. Knowing that when you're in the middle part of these programs give you often 4 to 5 strokes assessed similarly, and that is that we must choose the right time when it is not even necessarily cited by the analysis engine ...
-- You get the Big Chess now on the site, curiosity or interest? What do you think of this strange version of chess?
X: For curiosity and fun and I think Rybka 3 is not yet the Big Chess! This version is almost unprecedented I did not know this form of chess before therefore the one who invented this game was very well done! About I'm the one who asks you a question on the Big chess ... Is there possibility of castle with this game if so, how? (Editor's note: No, it is impossible to castle the Big Chess)
-- And finally the question that everyone arises, especially Francis and Wolfgang disputing that the second final candidates, think you can defend your title next year? :)
X: of course! I will defend the title! I would like if possible to know the timing and pace of the match. And I wish Francis and Wolfgang a beautiful final! I must honor in this competition which is well organized!
-- The match should be able to start during the first week of January 2009, the pace will again 30 days and 1 additional day by coup. Thank you for your answers, and even congratulations for this excellent performance!
X: Thank you! And see you! Bonne continuation to all and good parties!


Andrew Stephenson    (2008-08-18 16:06:16)
translation

I will have a go off the top of my head at giving a sense of the interview in english (I dont know the phrase tonitruand but I am guessing it means dynamic!)?: Hi Xavier and first of all congratulations on your success in the candidates final match against IM (ICCF) Gino Figlio [Peru] You had to avoid drawing all the games and finally you succeded with the black pieces. How did that happen? Xavier: Hi thank you. Its true that if all the games had been drawn then under the rules Figlio would have won whereas if the match was drawn but with a win and loss I would win. Because of this I had to take risks and attack. It was with Black that I did this because I thought that Gino would play safely to be sure of a draw. - Tell us how you approched the match and how the different phases of the game went x: Its quite simple, I was not the favorite I have 200 ELO less on FICGS and Gino is an IM on ICCF with a 2480 rating. I did not think I could survive 8 games at once - in a single game anything is possible but 8 games .... it was a big challenge for me! In the openings I chose 4 different moves 1 e4 1 d4 1 c4 1 Nf3 Gino chose 1 e4 1 d4 1 c4 1 Nc3 I was surpised by 1 Nc3 because I was expecting dynamic openings and it was then that I decided I must take some risks with black. I kept most of the games balanced with a draw in hand and concentrated on 2 games 1 white and 1 black to get a result. In the end I got 3 wins which seemed an impossibility given the quality of the games Gino had played on this site to reach the final. - you have not lost any games in the championship and you have fantastic statistics 78% against an average elo of about 2200. What is your secret? x: My secret? I havent any secret and if I did I would not say because I would not win anymore! I think I have been a bit lucky because in the the Round Robin final there were 3 of us on the same score and I went through under the rules because of my rating. As for my statistics I was helped by mistakes by opponents who allowed me to win some drawn games. - What do you think of the system for the FICGS championship (round robin and knock out matches)and what changes would you make? x: Very good question. The matches are a bit too fast for me - 1 day per move when there are hours of analysis needed to exploit a complicated position its difficult when you have several games running Particularly if you are working. Perhaps that is why my opponents have made errors or failed to exploit my mistakes. But this time limit has an advantage over ICCF where it is 5 days per move the games here are 5 times quicker! Having 8 game matches is an excellent idea and obliging the favorite to draw all the games and the challenger to get a at least 1 victory is very well thought out. The change that I would suggest is to have 15 days extra starting time that is 45 days at the start instead of 30 and also the possibilty to take holidays for tournaments for example take 7 days for championship games and to be able to play big chess go or another chess tournament during the holiday. To be able to choose the start of a holiday in advance would also be good. - Why do you like cc and how does it compare to blitz and normal chess? x: I prefer cc because of the time factor. Classical chess is often played at the week end at a fixed time and you have to travel to the tournament. The advantage for me at cc is that I can connect at any time to play a move which allows me for example to have meals with the family at the weekend. Late night moves for example are not possible at classical chess. - You limited the number of your games on the site to a reasonable amount throughout the championship. Do you think nonetheless that cc is addictive? Does it affect your daily life? x: Yes! Limiting the number of my games is essential to try to have games of quality not quantity. Having a lot of games going at the same time is something very difficult to handle. It is perhaps the key to my victory against Figlio - I looked at his games - he had not less than 80 games going on at ICCF this must have affected the amount of time he could spend analysing his 8 games at FICGS. The effects on daily life are felt by the family because the reality is if I spend more time analysing the games I spend less time with the family. Thats difficult for me. But when the results come I dont regret it! - What do you think of the role of chess engines (Rybka Fritz etc)in cc. What are for you the important skills of a cc player - to supplement the machine? x: Chess engines are used in cc by 95% of players. You have to adapt yourself and know how to use the engines. To play just the best move of Rybka 3 Fritz 12 or Hiracs 12 without thinking leads to a draw if your opponent does the same or to a loss if your opponent is thinking. You have to choose bewteen 4 or 5 moves with a similer evaluation from the engine during a game and sometimes the best move is not among these. - You play Big chess. Interest or curiosity? What do you think of this strange version of chess? X : Curiosity and amusement and I think Rrybka 3 cannot yet play Big Chess! This version is new and I did not know it and the inventor has done a good job! By the way I would like to ask is it possible to castle at Big Chess? [No its not possible] - Finally the question that everyone is asking particularly Francois and Wolfgang who are contesting the 2nd candidates final. Do think you will be able to defend your title next year? :) x: Definitely I will defend the title I would like to know if possible the date and time limits for the match. I wish Francois and Wolfgang a great match! I would also like to express my appreciation for this tournament which has been well organised! - the match should start in the first week in January next year the time limit will be 30 days plus 1 day per move. Thank you for your answers and once again congratulations on a great performance. x: Thank you. Cheers. Best wishes to everyone and good games!


Andrew Stephenson    (2008-08-19 02:16:39)
Its a win !!!!

You must be joking!! Thibault its a definite win it will be over in a few moves!! If anyone thinks black can survive please suggest some moves. The key to the win is that the best black can do is reach the position in a) below with Bishop and 2 pawns v R and 1 pawn. White wins becuse his king has access to e4, the Bishop is restricted by his pawns on a7 and e5 and most importantly his passed a pawn is not advanced. It has been completely lost since move 63 ...Kxf4 Janos should have taken with the pawn 63..exf4 would have allowed him to reach a table base draw. On 66 Kd3 I had the win completely worked out and have been replying instantly since then. Adjudicating this is a draw is just plain wrong. Anyone who spends time on this position will see the win I have outlined and that there is no defence. The winning method is to force an exchange of rooks by Rc4-g4 with mating threats against the Black king - black cannot allow this and must play Rd4 allowing exchange of a pair rooks when the resulting R+P v B+P+P is won. Before playing Rc4 white checks with the other rook to cut off the f file. The only way to avoid the rook exchange is to allow the white King access to e4 - at the moment the black rook cuts off d3 and the bishop if it goes to b6 will cut off e3. If the king gets to e4 either the e5 pawn drops or the king gets to d5 and e6 either result is fatal Here are the main lines: a) 72..Bb6 73 Rg8+ Kf5 (73..Kh5 74 Rc1 Rd4 75 Rh1+ wins the rook) 74 Rf8+ Kg5 75 Rc4! Rd4 (see below a1 for 75..Bd4)76 Rxd4! exd4 77 Kd3 (This ending is completely won the white king penetrates through e4, the black bishop is useless - remove pawn at d4 and its a table base win) Here are the main lines 77... Bc5 78 Rc8 Bb6 79 Ke4 Kf6 80 f4 Kf7 81 f5 Kf6 82 Rc2 Kf7 83 Ke5 a5 84 Rc6 Bd8 85 Bc7+ Kxd4 Table base win Or 77 ...Kg6 78 Ke4 Kg7 79 Rc8 Kf6 80 f4 (if the pawn on d4 falls eg 80 ..Ba5 81 Kxd4 its a table base win) Ke7 81 f5 Kf6 82 Rc2 Ke7 (82 ..d3 83 Rc6+ Kg5 84 Rg6+ and Kxd3 = TB win) 83 Ke5 Kf7 84 Rb2 d3 85 f6 with a simple win a1)..75..Bd4 (instead of Rd4) 76 Kd3 Ba1+ 77 Ke4 Ra5 78 Rg8+ Kf6 79 Rc6+ Kf7 80 Rgc8 Ra4+ 81 Rc4 Rxc4+ (black cannot avoid exchanging) 82 Rxc4+ and this ending like the one above is completely won. eg 82... Ke6 (82...a5 83 Rc5 a4 84 Ra5 x a4 = TB win) 83 Rc6+ Kd7 84 Kd5 Bd4 85 Rh6 a5 (any Bishop moves loses a pawn = TB win) 86 Rh7+ Kd8 87 f4 x e5 = TB win b) If the Bishop does not go to b6 the white king gets via e3 to e4 and then penetrates through the white squares d5 and e6 and its over. Sample lines: b1) 72 ..Kf4/f5 73 Rf8+ Kg6 74 Ke3 Rd1 75 Ke4 Re1+ 76 Kd5 Be7 77 Re8 Bf6 78 Ke6 e4 79 Rc5+ and the bishop is lost b2) 72..Ba5 73 Ke3 Rb5 74 Rg8+ Kf5 75 Rf8+ Kg5 76 Ke4 Rb4+ 77 Kxe5 with a simple win b3)72 ..Rd7 73 Rxe5+ (take a pair of rooks off = TB win) Kf4 74 Rcc5 Rg7 75 Re4+ Kg3 76 Rc1 Bb6 77 Rh1 a5 78 Rhh4 - Reg4+ exchanges rooks = TB win


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-08-20 18:40:41)
PGN format

If I remember, PGN format allows zero-zero, O-O, o-o ... so


Ilmars Cirulis    (2008-08-21 13:05:12)
sorry, Normajean...

I am in team "Dead LG, good LG". :D

I entered into that thematic only to found someone who will draw with black (in long time control).
For fun too, of course. :)


Normajean Yates    (2008-08-21 14:46:27)
Ilmars, you don't realise it but...

In marxian terms, *objectively* you are in the 'try to keep latvian alive' team, though 'subjectively' you think are in the opposite team :)

Because by participating in a latvian thematic, you are helping to try to keep it alive ;)


Ilmars Cirulis    (2008-08-21 15:12:17)
Re

In marsian terms, my goal is to get to final and win all white games. And probably get first place in LG thematic. :)


Rodolfo d Ettorre    (2008-08-21 17:43:41)
Latvian ...

I hope I am not asking too much, but can we have a Latvian gambit thematic tournament?

Since there are good players here, after such a tournament the theory about the Latvian gambit will have to be rewritten.


Normajean Yates    (2008-08-21 21:31:44)
Rodolfo I second that proposal!

I second Rodolfo's proposal of a latvian thematic here at ficgs.


Normajean Yates    (2008-08-21 21:57:07)
Latvian thematic: white must win.

I propose a latvian thematic where white must win (ie a draw will be counted as loss for white).


Marius Zubac    (2008-08-21 22:32:59)
Attention Thibault! Bug related to WCH2

Hi Thibault There is a bug related to entering my 11th move 11Bd2 in both games 22676 and 22678 from our match played in FICGS__CHESS__WCH_QUARTER_FINAL_2__000005. In slow move selection after I enter the move I get the message "Incorrect move : 7.0-0 , from player white". If I try to send the move I get the message that the move is not sent. Can you please look into this matter? Thanks Marius


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-08-21 22:53:36)
Castling bug

Hi Marius, this follows the update for the PGN format castling bug. Are you sure you entered O-O (with "Ooh" letter, not zero or o-o, which is incorrect) ?


Gino Figlio    (2008-08-22 06:19:53)
Congratulations Xavier

I did not have a chance to properly congratulate Xavier after losing a match against him.

While it's true the number of ongoing games affects performance in correspondence chess, in our case this was not a factor.

Xavier played better and did not give me a chance to find significant advantage in any of our games.

He simply outplayed me.

Long live the Champion!


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-08-22 14:43:52)
Latvian thematic

Ok, we'll have another Latvian thematic tournament soon ;)


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-08-22 17:50:17)
Team challenge : Latvian gambit

Based upon an idea by Ilmars, let's try to create a special Latvian thematic tournament that could start at the beginning of september, consisting in two teams : Latvian gambit "defenders" and latvian gambit "refuters" (that will play either Black or White), this could be interesting to improve the theory in this opening.

Any player who wishes to play this tournament may post in this thread "I am in as White (or Black)" and I'll make pairings in a few days/weeks.


Thibault de Vassal    (2017-05-29 21:41:37)
Ultimate Challenge Tour 2017, USD 20k

Looks like the tournament finished a few days ago... one recognize "Zor" as winner (again), but the crosstable shown seems to be a small part of it!?

http://infinitychess.com/Page/Public/Article/DefaultArticle.aspx?id=322


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-08-23 11:43:19)
Rules change

All members are invited to comment on these points :

1) "Should all groups in WCH tournaments consist in 7 players at least, several players being invited if necessary at the tournament director's discretion" ? I'll change the rules this way if a majority agrees. In all cases the 3rd round-robin final must continue this way IMO but I may add a new rule :

2) "Referees are not error free and are not supposed to change the rules anytime they estimate it is a better choice, players accept the view that a tournament should be modified or any error corrected in all cases." (this is not irony, I'm not sure such a rule wouldn't bring some problems but we may try it if a majority agrees with that).


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-09-02 15:09:28)
Rating update

Ciao Wayne !

Ratings and games database have been updated (the rating list will be updated automatically in a few hours)

My best,
Thibault


Peter Unger    (2008-09-08 00:54:05)
a game ended with mate

my Game vs. Sharma ended with Mate. Why isn't it finished? And tournament-table isn't adapted?! Here is the game: [Event "FICGS__CHESS__WCH_STAGE_1_GROUP_04__000005"] [Site "FICGS"] [Date "2008.07.08"] [Round "1"] [White "Sharma,Kirti"] [Black "Unger,Peter"] [Result "*"] [WhiteElo "1365"] [BlackElo "2187"] 1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. c3 Nf6 4. Qc2 Qc7 5. Be2 e5 6. O-O Be7 7. Na3 O-O 8. Nc4 Be6 9. Ng5 Bd7 10. Ne3 h6 11. Nf3 Be6 12. c4 b6 13. Nd5 Qb7 14. Qd3 a5 15. a4 Nc6 16. Qc2 Nb4 17. Nxb4 axb4 18. d3 Nd7 19. b3 Nb8 20. h3 Nc6 21. Qd1 f5 22. Nd2 fxe4 23. dxe4 Nd4 24. Bg4 Bxg4 25. Qxg4 Bg5 26. Rb1 Rf6 27. h4 Rf4 28. Qd1 Rxh4 29. g3 Bxd2 30. Bxd2 Qxe4 31. gxh4 Ne2+ 32. Kh2 Qxh4+ 33. Kg2 Qg4+ 34. Kh2 Rf8 35. f3 Qg3+ 36. Kh1 Qh3+ 37.* regards retep1


Don Groves    (2008-09-08 04:45:56)
Game ended with mate

Hello Peter, On FICGS, the losing player must resign. There is no automatic ending to a game here. If the other player doesn't resign soon, ask Thibault to adjudicate the game and it will be finished.


Normajean Yates    (2008-09-08 14:41:49)
not playing...team game i meant diff.

when I wrote 'team game is okay' I meant consultation-game - team decides on a move.

too busy to play individual games as part of team, even unrated - dont want to spoil latvian reaserch by my bad games.

So, one contestant less. Have a good latvian match! [without me - at present I'd only have bad games to contribute so repeat I am NOT playing]


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-09-09 18:27:21)
Kramnik vs. Rybka / Zhukov

Posted by Larry Kaufman in Rybka forum : "According to GM Roman Dzindzichashvili quoting GM Sosonko who says he was present, a two game minimatch was held recently between former World Champion Vladimir Kramnik and Russian Chess Federation President Alexander Zhukov, at a serious time limit, with the following condition: Every fourth move, Zhukov was allowed to consult with Rybka for three minutes."

The complete discussion :
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=7270


Around cheating in OTB chess, interesting...


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-09-09 18:35:22)
Evans Gambit in Wikichess

I'll connect Wikichess to games played at FICGS soon.. so we'll have more informations due to thematic tourneys ;)


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-09-09 23:29:51)
Latvian gambit team match

Here we are.. the teams :

Defenders : Michael Aigner, Rodolfo d'Ettorre, Denis Ivanchenkov
Refuters : Ilmars Cirulis, Iouri Basiliev, Scott Nichols

I'll create the games tomorrow if everything's ok :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-09-09 23:39:07)
Rybka forum

You may support or discuss the idea of a correspondence chess match between Rybka and a centaur (human + engines) here :

http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=7307


Denis Ivanchenkov    (2008-09-10 17:50:43)
I'm ready as well.

Just looked ratings: Defenders: Michael Aigner, 2561 Rodolfo d'Ettorre, 1900 Denis Ivanchenkov 1741 Refuters: Ilmars Cirulis, 1628 Iouri Basiliev, 2154 Scott Nichols 1980 Looks like team match will be quite interesting


Denis Ivanchenkov    (2008-09-10 21:01:07)
It depends upon

what my team-mates think. I'll be playing WITHOUT chess engine. If Michael Aigner and Rodolfo d'Ettorreare are OK with it then I'm in. If they think I should use chess engine (to avoid giving an advantage to opponents) then I leave.


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-09-12 14:39:49)
Rybka 3.0 about 2300 at FICGS ?

According to Larry Kaufman from Rybka team in the discussion linked above :

"If we assume that both sides have the same opening book, then I think two things are fairly safe to say: 1. A good human chessplayer (or even a bad one with good centaur skills) + same Rybka will win a long match from unassisted Rybka. 2. In any individual game, the chance of a draw is fairly high. (...) I mean more than half the games, but not way more. The actual draw percentage depends very heavily on the opening book used."

I agree with that, so I assume that Rybka 3.0 thinking at least 24 hours per move would have a correspondence chess rating of about 2300 at FICGS.

Any opinion ?


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-09-13 13:45:25)
Correction

Hi Wayne, yes I mean Rybka unassisted and playing with the best book possible. But this assumption of rating was based on games played with a ~2450-2500 centaur... But in my opinion, Rybka would not outplay a centaur rated 2200 as well, so her rating may be closer to 2200-2250.

Finally, maybe the most interesting part would be a match between Rybka 3.0 and a correspondence chess player rated 1900 :)


Iouri Basiliev    (2008-09-15 20:49:44)
IGAME.RU

Hi Ilmars, I've the honor to play in igame vs FICGS match :) nucler on igame.


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-09-20 03:29:51)
MoGo - Rematch

According to the AGA E-Journal : "Myungwan Kim 8P will take on Mogo in a rematch set for this weekend's Cotsen Tournament in Los Angeles."

Good news :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-09-22 17:07:19)
Big Chess ratings

They are because "provisional big chess ratings" are correspondence (classical) chess ratings minus 300 points. I estimated this was a good idea because Big Chess was quite different but I'm not sure anymore... What do you think ?


William Taylor    (2008-09-22 18:33:42)
Big Chess ratings

Hmm. As you say, the game is quite different from ordinary chess, and as we can't use engines and very little research has been done into Big Chess we might all be 300 points or so weaker at it than at real chess. It might be quite nice to have the ratings over a similar range to ordinary chess ratings, but that doesn't really matter. Presumably once you have determined the provisional ratings you then use the same algorithm as you do for normal chess ratings? It's hard to suggest a format without an estimate of how many people would play, but we don't necessarily have to have an accurate and established Big Chess rating system to hold a championship.


Iouri Basiliev    (2008-09-25 11:58:00)
Andrew Stephenson

Hey Andrew, why You don't playing in the match black or white? For me 4.d4 is the best whites move. Developing, space, defence - all in one :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-09-26 20:31:40)
Statistics by country

Hi Alexis, Denis & all.. Here are current statistics by country :

USA 1066 FRA 363 GBR 261 CAN 189 DEU 160 RUS 130 ITA 126 IND 120 ROU 93 TUR 89 BRA 79 BEL 75 AUS 70 ESP 63 PHL 55 POL 53 SWE 51 NLD 50 ARG 45 MEX 43 ZAF 43 GRC 39 BGR 38 UKR 37 HUN 36 CZE 33 CHE 32 ISR 31 FIN 30 IDN 30 IRL 29 PRT 29 VNM 25 AUT 24 VEN 24 CHL 23 DZA 23 EGY 21 SGP 21 CHN 20 DNK 20 COL 19 LTU 18 NOR 18 MAR 17 NZL 17 SVN 17 HRV 16 IRN 16 MYS 16 PER 16 SRB 16 PRI 14 SVK 13 THA 13 HKG 12 JPN 12 EST 11 GEO 9 PAK 9 KOR 8 LVA 8 ARM 7 BIH 7 ISL 7 TUN 7 TWN 7 BLR 6 CYP 6 LKA 6 MLT 6 ALB 5 CUB 5 KAZ 5 URY 5 ARE 4 ASM 4 BOL 4 CRI 4 ECU 4 GHA 4 LBN 4 LUX 4 MKD 4 NGA 4 BGD 3 DOM 3 FRO 3 GTM 3 JOR 3 MDA 3 MMR 3 MNG 3 PRY 3 SAU 3 ZWE 3 ATG 2 BHS 2 CMR 2 ERI 2 HTI 2 IRQ 2 KEN 2 KGZ 2 KHM 2 MDG 2 MNE 2 MUS 2 NIC 2 NPL 2 PNG 2 TTO 2 UGA 2 UZB 2 AIA 1 ALA 1 ANY 1 AZE 1 BHR 1 BRB 1 GLP 1 GMB 1 GRD 1 GUM 1 HND 1 JAM 1 LBY 1 LSO 1 MOZ 1 MRT 1 NCL 1 PRK 1 QAT 1 SHN 1 SYR 1 TKM 1 UMI 1 VUT 1

All players in each country :

http://www.ficgs.com/directory_countries.html


There's a french version of FICGS - see home page - you may change the language in Preferences (English, French, Deutsch, Spanish).

By the way, I'll open chess & Go forums in every languages very soon, if anyone wants to be a moderator in his own language, please look at the next threads in this forum for more information.


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-09-28 21:51:45)
Big Chess Championship

18 months is so long :/ .. In my opinion, the scheme could be the same than the Go championship :

"FICGS world Go championship is a 2 stages tournament. First stage is a single round-robin tournament, involving the 9 highest rated players who entered the waiting list. The winner of this tournament is the challenger for FICGS world champion title. In case of equality, the player with the strongest tournament entry rating (TER) is qualified for the next stage. If tournament entry ratings are equal, ratings when the next stage begins will be taken in account. If current world champion defends his title, he will play a 5 games match against his challenger."


Michael Aigner    (2008-10-02 13:15:00)
No draw

Hello Thibault, my opinion is, we do not have a forced draw in this position. White can easily avaoid it (propably by loosing the game but this does not matter). Time is part of the game, it is the same in OTB chess. So three possibilitys are popping up. No1. The game is going on, just like normal. No2. White offers a draw and hopes his opponent is accepting it (it is of course fully acceptable when black keeps playing). No3. Black offers an draw because he is convinced the position is a draw and he did not want to play for time. Best regards Michael


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-10-02 20:15:08)
Game 22676, towards a new rule ?

Once again, an unusual case that may lead to an enforcement of FICGS rules. In our match, Marius lost 3 games on time and continues to play the other ones : FICGS__CHESS__WCH_QUARTER_FINAL_2__000005

Games 22676, 22678 and 22679 have been lost in an equal position.

Currently, the rules specify : 11.6 "Games are not rated for the winner if less than 10 moves have been played by his opponent (most probably forfeit, silent withdrawal or obvious cheating) or in global forfeit cases against the same opponent, ie. 8-games matches, but games where an advantage is obvious."

Of course, it is up to the referee to estimate an 'advantage' which is quite hard to define accurately, but the real problem is there's no real silent withdrawal in this case, as Marius had about 1 day only to play his last move. It is fair to cancel my wins in these games IMO but the question is how to make the rules fair enough in all cases.

My suggestion : "...or in global forfeit cases, including losses on time whatever the context, in at least 2 games in a 2 players tournament, ie. chess championship's 8-games matches, but games where an advantage is obvious."

What do you think ? Also does anyone see another unusual case that this rule wouldn't envisage ?

Thanks in advance.


Andrew Stephenson    (2008-10-03 09:06:04)
Rules

I think you are right Thibault ie amend the rule as you suggest. However maybe change the wording put EXCEPT instead of BUT ("except games where an advantage is obvious")otherwise the english is difficult to understand (but so much better than my french!!)In this case though perhaps Marius is not going to play anymore moves at all in which case it could be classified as silent withdrawal?? At the level he is at it he surely does not need the time to get the positions the fact is that Marius (probably because he has got lot of games/commitments elsewhere) is not playing much at all in FICGS - looks like he will forfeit in the Round Robin final for example.... The existing rules make a distinction between matches and other tournaments. if you follow the other posters then it seems that they are saying that you should not have the rule for silent withdrawals or even losses under 10 moves?? So I vote for the extension proposed by Thibault it seems logical to me for matches - they are not primarily about rating. The idea is that it is too distorting to have a rating that shows a 6-0 win over a similer high level opponent when they just stopped playing and it has nothing much to do with relative playing strength. On the other hand Thibault it will give you a cool rating!! :) Both view points are valid - its true time is a part of the game - but rules involve compromise and the proposed amendment just extends the principle already there........


Michael Aigner    (2008-10-03 13:28:09)
Makes sense!

I agree with you that Thibaults suggestions makes sense in the context of matches where many games are played against the same opponent. For normal tournaments a loss on time should just be a loss (after 10 moves played) - even when the player is loosing all his games in this tourny because of time. Maybe there is some space for exeptions in case of illness or somethink like that - but on the other hand how is the player going to proof such things?


William Taylor    (2008-10-03 14:43:56)
Big Chess Championship

I like the idea of making it like the Go championship because it's simple. As for excluding players, I'm not sure there are many more than nine who would want to play anyway. If there are lots of players outside the top 9 who would want to play in the championship, perhaps there could be two stages of tournament. For example, if 21 people entered, we could have 3 groups of 7, with the top 2 from each group advancing to the next stage. Then there would be a six-player tournament to determine the challenger, followed by a match challenger vs previous champion. For the 1st championship the champion could either be the winner of the 2nd-round tournament, or the winner of a match between the top 2 finishers in the 2nd-round tournament.


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-10-03 21:46:16)
Anand vs. Kramnik

While the match Kamsky vs. Topalov still seems uncertain, the match Anand vs. Kramnik for the FIDE world chess championship is quickly approaching... After many good & bad results recently for both players, any favourite ? :)

As for me, I have no idea... chess just looks like lotery sometimes.


Andrew Stephenson    (2008-10-03 22:42:17)
Psychology

I give an edge to Kramnik not in terms of chess ability or strength but he seems stronger psychologically more able to take the pressure. On the other hand the match is a bit short 8 games which I think is good for Anand. Finally Anand is favourite in the tie break games. For me the key opening questions are: Whats kramniks e4 defence? my bet is at least 1 outing for the Marshall which Anand has performed badly against and the Caro Kahn (which Kramnik has hardly ever played) and no Petroff at all! I think Anand will stick with his semi slav. After his problem in the Leko match Anand will not be able to surprise Kramnik with 1 d4! My prediction: either 1 win and the rest drawn for Kramnik in the classical games or an Anand win in the rapid tie breaks.


William Taylor    (2008-10-04 12:49:16)
Very hard to pick

It's very hard to say who will win, but I'd slightly favour Kramnik - I just can't imagine him being beaten in a match.


Andrew Stephenson    (2008-10-04 14:01:29)
12 games

Of course the match is 12 games dont know why I said 8??


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-10-04 19:35:26)
re : In response to Don

You wouldn't be penalized in that case. All this is about 8 games match, as Andrew said "The idea is that it is too distorting to have a rating that shows a 6-0 win over a similer high level opponent". The whole problem is just to know where to put the limit.

Well, as it is possible to win elo points this way (loss on time in equal or winning position) in round-robin tournaments, it should be possible in 8 games matches too, but 8 wins this way shouldn't be taken in consideration.

Consequently, I propose a new rule, quite reasonable, that could satisfy everyone (finally even my rating :)), here is :

"11.6 "Games are not rated for the winner if less than 10 moves have been played by his opponent (most probably forfeit, silent withdrawal or obvious cheating) or in global forfeit cases, including losses on time whatever the context in a 2 players tournament, ie. chess championship's 8-games matches, except games where an advantage is obvious, in this case at most 2 of these games will be rated."


Don Groves    (2008-10-04 22:43:54)
I withdraw my suggestion

Had I known this was about 8 game matches only, I would not have responded.


Andrew Stephenson    (2008-10-05 20:04:28)
Slight amendment

Thibault thinking about your point that "as it is possible to win elo points this way (loss on time in equal or winning position) in round-robin tournaments, it should be possible in 8 games matches too" I suggest the follwoing "Rating changes will occur, in 2 player matches, for losses on time (whatever the reason) within the following constraints: the game(s) is at least 10 moves, only 1 time loss game will be rated unless there is a game where the winner is clearly better in which case a maximum of 2 games may be rated" My idea is that if someone forefeits all their games on move 11 in a match there should be 1 game rated (as in a tournament) so there is a price to pay but not too distorting. If in the 8 games say 5 are level and 3 (or 2 or 1) are clearly advantageous then 2 games could be rated. Alternatively just give 1 rated game as a max irrespective of advantage or not (ie just the first loss) provided it at least 10 moves. I am thinking of 2 situations a 6-0 result over 10 moves dead equal positions there should be some rating penalty (like tournaments) On the other hand soemone could let the clock run out in 6 games just before being mated in each game to avoid heavy rating penalty they should take a 2 game hit.


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-10-05 20:22:01)
Re: Slight amendment

I'm not sure to see the point, all games are rated for who forfeits or loses games on time, in 8 games matches just like any rated tournament. So what "price" do you mean ? The rule is about the winner's rating only.


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-10-05 20:30:11)
Go ratings, rule update

In order to limit the inflation of Go ratings, I've updated the rules for ratings superior or equal to 2000. The idea of the original rule was to help players to find their rating range more quickly only.

"Go ratings are first estimated from Go ranks (n kyu give a 2100 - 100 * n rating, n dan give a 2000 + 100 * n rating, n dan pro give a 2630 + 30 * n rating), then adjusted in real time after each result :

Performance = Opponent Current Rating + 350 if the game is won, -350 if the game is lost.

Case of a win (rating > 1999) : New Rating = ((9 x Current Rating) + (1 x Performance)) / 10
Case of a win (rating < 2000) : New Rating = ((8 x Current Rating) + (2 x Performance)) / 10

Case of a loss : New Rating = ((9 x Current Rating) + (1 x Performance)) / 10

The rating calculation does not take account of wins obtained by a stronger player when the Elo difference is superior to 350 points, the same with losses by a weaker player.

In case of a loss against a player rated more than 350 points less, the opponent's rating considered in calculation is : Current Rating - 350."


Andrew Stephenson    (2008-10-05 21:50:02)
Sorry

..I must have misunderstood I thought if games were forfeit on time in matches even after 10 moves they were not rated only rated if the games were better ie the foreited party was clearly worse?? So in the case of a an 8 games match 11 moves completed all lost on time in dead equal positions there would be no rating effect ie no price paid?? In a tournament game they would be these losses would be rated. I thought your proposal was to rate the losses in matches up to a max of 2 games ONLY if it was 10+ moves AND the position was clearly better.


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-10-09 11:42:51)
Promotion

(Kevin, maybe we'll launch another tournament in a while)

Iouri, I don't think there's such a pop up window here :) .. Scott, please read the F.A.Q. in the help section... all explained. In bried, you just have to use the PGN format.


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-10-14 16:21:25)
Kramnik vs. Anand

The first game of the match for the Fide WCC started !

You may see the games live at this french site :

http://www.imineo.com/wcc2008


Andrew Stephenson    (2008-10-14 22:01:56)
exchange slav

Difficult to know what Kramnik was up to in this game. 8 Qb3 has been regarded as pretty harmless and is not much played at GM level - he must have had some new idea - apparently 15 Qxb7 is new but black was always going to get the pawn back. After 6 months preperation and 3 full time seconds a bit strange! I am sure Anand will go full power for the point tomorrow - I still cannot quite believe that Kramnik will play the Petroff he avoided it against Kasparov and I am sure he will avoid it in this match also.


Denis Ivanchenkov    (2008-10-20 18:00:30)
Iouri Basiliev

Do you mean that there is checkmating sequence?


Iouri Basiliev    (2008-10-20 20:14:27)
2 Denis

Not yet, but mat will come soon. About next 12-15 moves if you play best.


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-10-21 17:54:17)
Pre-arranged or not

... that's the eternal question. Let's see how the match finishes, I doubt to see Anand winning by +2 or more with no ambiguity, unlike the last Kramnik versus Deep Fritz match. We will see.


Garvin Gray    (2008-10-23 23:22:31)
change as good as a holiday

Are you able to provide the new link now, so we can change our information and then just wait for the site to come up?


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-10-24 09:59:15)
Revenge ?

I think it will be even more interesting to have another team match in a while, any player who wish to try to defend the Latvian gambit may post here to play.


Michael Aigner    (2008-10-24 19:38:43)
The only draw wa a lucky one!

Unfortunately I have to say that my draw against Ilmars was lucky becaus he mixed two moves. Until that White was clearly better. I played my games without any information about the openeing theory of the lavtian gambit - only brief analysis. Now I can say this is not enough to defend this opening. On the other hand there might be ways to survive with black if one knows ideas, plans, opening theory .... Is there any good book with more or less reliable analysis of this opening? Next time better opening preparation is definately needed ;-)


Normajean Yates    (2008-10-29 18:23:20)
to Iouri Basiliev

But we agree with you! Only, it is not mathematically proven, and we do NOT hope to prove it, so we want to increase the likelihood that the statement is true :) Or, at least we want to reduce the margin of error [all in the Bayesian paradigm] Bayesian because - if you talk of conventional probability P rather than likelihood, then if P is the probability that the position after 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 f5 is a win for white, then either P=0 or P=1 [as chess is a complete information game], only we do not know whether P=0 or P=1.


Scott Nichols    (2008-10-30 10:06:18)
Quick chess?

I would like to see a new time format of game in 10 days with a 4 hour increment per move. A lot of players like to play fast but need more than one day, but do not need 30 or more days. Would anybody else be interested? Any thoughts?


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-10-30 12:12:34)
10 d + 4 h / move

Hi Scott,

A strange format, very stressful and difficult to play.. I think many players would try it but it would cause forfeits (losses on time) and rating problems quite quickly IMO :/ .. 30 days + 1 day per move is very fast already. Then, the "correspondence blitz" format seems a good choice to me.


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-10-30 12:22:04)
Games 10 and 11

GM Kramnik (2772) - GM Anand (2783) [E21]
WCh Bonn GER (10), 27.10.2008

1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.Nf3 c5 5.g3 cxd4 6.Nxd4 0-0 7.Bg2 d5 8.cxd5 Nxd5 9.Qb3 Qa5 10.Bd2 Nc6 11.Nxc6 bxc6 12.0-0 Bxc3 13.bxc3 Ba6 14.Rfd1 Qc5 15.e4 Bc4 16.Qa4 Nb6 17.Qb4 Qh5 18.Re1 c5 19.Qa5 Rfc8 20.Be3 Be2 21.Bf4 e5 22.Be3 Bg4 23.Qa6 f6 24.a4 Qf7 25.Bf1 Be6 26.Rab1 c4 27.a5 Na4 28.Rb7 Qe8 29.Qd6 1-0


GM Anand (2783) - GM Kramnik (2772) [B96]
WCh Bonn GER (11), 29.10.2008

1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 a6 6.Bg5 e6 7.f4 Qc7 8.Bxf6 gxf6 9.f5 Qc5 10.Qd3 Nc6 11.Nb3 Qe5 12.0-0-0 exf5 13.Qe3 Bg7 14.Rd5 Qe7 15.Qg3 Rg8 16.Qf4 fxe4 17.Nxe4 f5 18.Nxd6+ Kf8 19.Nxc8 Rxc8 20.Kb1 Qe1+ 21.Nc1 Ne7 22.Qd2 Qxd2 23.Rxd2 Bh6 24.Rf2 Be3 1/2-1/2


The game and the match are over, Anand will play the final match for the FIDE World Chess Champion title against Veselin Topalov or Gata Kamsky.


Normajean Yates    (2008-10-30 14:53:51)
I agree w/Benj.,even more so w/Thibault

10 d + 4 h / move??? that's not correspondence, except technically, IMO.

But if enough ppl want to play it, and M. Thibault is willing to arrange it, who am I to complain :(

So long as no one forces *me* to play that format... ;)


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-10-30 17:09:52)
Is Vishy Anand world champion ?

I do not understand anything anymore to the FIDE World Chess Championship cycle :( .. Is Anand the FIDE world champion 2008 as I can read it or was this match the semi final in the cycle ? The other match was (maybe in my mind only) Kamsky vs. Topalov .. and as far as I can remember there was some sponsors problems or so... What happened to this match ? Simply cancelled ??


Normajean Yates    (2008-10-30 21:27:23)
what I *really* miss is 1 move/month...

Wish there was a site with one move / month, one week increment after every move, max 400 days vacation every decade...

It will have health benefits also - I mean you may be a B up in the middlegame and opp may have no counterplay, but you have to maintain good health to live long enough to deliver checkmate! :)

Preferably, resignation should not be allowed in such a format :)


Normajean Yates    (2008-10-30 21:54:44)
.to Iouri Basiliev

I dont play poker, but contract bridge is NOT a complete information game, and I am a better contract-bridge player [both at team-of-4 and at pairs] than a chess or bigchess player :)

And at contract bridge, even duplicate [i mentioned team-of-4 and pairs - both are duplicate bridge] one can talk meaningfully of 'conventional' probabilities, not only of bayesian likelihoods...


Normajean Yates    (2008-10-30 22:46:54)
Scott Nichols - hahahahaha :):):)

mate[*], chess site comments/anecdotes have occasionally made me smile, but yours is the first really funny enough that I cant't stop laughing for 2 whole minutes ans still counting!

I am going to shamelessly plagiarise an retell it orally - my version will be -- 'when *I* used to play postal chess back in the '70s-'80s [I did actually], <your anecdote will go here> and after 6 months I recieve this postcard with "j'adoube" written on it! ' :)

[*]if a woman may address a man thus - but why not?


Normajean Yates    (2008-10-31 03:17:50)
replies to thibault's question..

1. No, computers cannot yet. Not even near. Afaik not even 'strongly conjectured to be a white win' or 'strongly conjectured draw' (3x3 chess has been strongly solved - it is not really a game because there is no suitable starting position - but there are complete tablebases for every legal placement of chess pieces on a 3x3 board. I posted the links in a forum thread a few months ago...)

2. Why this variant is special -

if you think about it, 5x5 chess is the smallest notrivial *natural* contraction of 8x8 chess.

Plus - or that is why - it was thought of many decades ago - as far as I remember, when Martin Gardner mentioned it about 25 years ago in his column 'mathematical games' in the USA-based science magazine 'Scientific American', he was merely mentioning it, he hadn't invented it...

I am waiting for one bigchess opponent to time out before going on 15-day chess-leave -- [she (Nicola) would have timed out on 27 Oct but it got extended because of the 7-day addition to clocks owing to server change] --- then I plan to find out the current state of 5x5 - whether some university etc. is researching it, etc. If there are results that indicate forced draw (or win) then I agree that there is not much point in doing it here...


Normajean Yates    (2008-11-02 02:36:49)
to Iouri Basiliev - extra tempo..

Loss of tempo? I claim that after 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 the unique move that puts white into *zugzwang* is 2..f5!!. Disprove the statement mathematically if you can! :D


Normajean Yates    (2008-11-06 16:22:19)
what about a sokolosky thematic ?

What about a sokolosky (1.b4) thematic? Let's put 1.b4 to test, specially in view of 1.b4 e5 2.b5 - let's expand the theory!

No hurry, I mean say some time next year?


Normajean Yates    (2008-11-07 07:21:06)
Thanks thibault - I have entered!

So fast! Thibault, thank you - so nice!

I have entered the 1.b4 thematic.


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-11-07 14:59:07)
Kamsky vs. Topalov

"Kamsky vs. Topalov" to sell...

Roustam Kamsky, father of world championship candidates Gata Kamsky had hard words against FIDE president Kirsan Ilyumzhinov : "I do not have any faith in FIDE and Mr. Ilyumzhinov who in front of the whole world breached his word, which is not the first time. Also, I do not have much faith in Mr. Makropoulos, a personal friend of Mr. Danailov."

More surprising, he said a few words about the former match Anand vs. Kasparov : "I would like to use this opportunity to congratulate Vishy Anand on his true victory. This is his third victory at the world championship. I think he could have achieved even more success if during his match against Kasparov he did not have as his trusted seconds grandmasters from the former Soviet Union. I was very impressed by the organization of Anand’s match in Bonn, Germany, except that the match should have been played between Kamsky and Anand. It was unjust to allow Russian GM Kramnik to play three world championship matches, in 2006, 2007, 2008, without a proper selection, just so Russia can maintain the world championship title."

The whole open letter is intersting to read...


Chessbase news :

http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=5002
http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=5000


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-11-09 00:08:30)
Fire on board...

Open letter by Gata Kamsky :

"Dear President, gentelmen, Susan,

When I first saw Bill's letter I was happy, because finally USCF has been showing strong support for their representative. Whether there could be a better solution or a more diplomatic one is a good question, but the reality is that there is no time to negotiate and given FIDE's strong-arm history of negotiating, it is not likely to succeed.

When I spoke with FIDE Vice President Mr. Makropoulos in Greece, it was decided that both my team and Mr. Topalov's team would meet during the rest day at the Olympiad in Dresden to negotiate and discuss everything, including technical details. With their last public statement, Mr. Illumjinov not only attempted to revoke his personal guarantee of the match, but he also imposed the time limit of one week for the players to acceed to his demands and at the same time re-awarded the bid to the Bulgarian Federation, which was the original FIDE's intention in the first place. You all are aware of the clause in the FIDE regulation for this "special" match that gave the Bulgarian Chess Federation a privilege of matching any bid that is coming from my side, which effectively ruined any attempt to find and submit a bid from the United States.

Throughout the negotiations with my managers, FIDE did nothing to find a sponsor on their own, despite the fact that it was solely FIDE's decision to create this match, and thus to allow Mr. Topalov a backdoor into the final steps of the qualification proceedings for the world championship title, quite unfairly, I might add.

FIDE's entire purpose, for chess players, for fairness, has been changed into a special interest group organization and I personally believe that any negotiations with FIDE rulers or tsars, or whatever you like to call them, will be unsuccessful.

The time for the negotiation is over and the only way to fight FIDE is to expose their mistakes, and perhaps fight them in a court of law if and when FIDE broke the law. Therefore, I would respectfully request all USCF Board members to unite and find ways to make sure that justice and fairness will prevail.

Sincerely,
Gata Kamsky

Saturday, November 8, 2008"


More informations on Chessbase news :
http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=5004


Rodolfo d Ettorre    (2008-11-09 23:13:52)
All the games ...

Hi Thibault,
Maybe the games could be compressed, in zip format perhaps, so it will save bandwidth


Normajean Yates    (2008-11-11 12:32:58)
God is elsewhere... maybe...

I dont see any god, I am concerned with epistemology. If there is/are a/_ God/s, he/she/it/they are busy elsewhere... I dont see it/them (God/Gods), just like I don't see the forced mate in chess's opening position ;)


Denis Ivanchenkov    (2008-11-13 22:19:23)
wrszzzzzyrdybooom

>"do you blieve in the wrszzzzzyrdybooom! ?"
God is Who gives sense to man's life.
God (either existing physically or just as guiding idea in head of a man) is who/what struggles against destruction forces of material world.
God is the force that raises man up, that leads man to perfection in both material and spiritual world.
this is my definition of God


Ilmars Cirulis    (2008-11-14 19:07:51)
'Experimented players' still here :)

'Experimented players' still aren't corrected.

I look at the right upper corner of site (when I am not logged in yet). And what I see?
Imho, I see some flash animation with rotating sentence (in purple colour under line in blue "Wikichess, open chess repertoire") - "Chess moves explained by experimented players"

It was what I meant previous time. :D


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-11-16 21:09:54)
Kamsky vs. FIDE

The match continues... Only the board changed, and the "prize" may increase whatever the way.

http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=5015


Don Burden    (2008-11-18 01:02:26)
p2p

I use eMule. It's very slow, but seems to be the only way you can get some files. There are very few high quality DVD images and lossless (flac format) music files available. The vast majority are of low quality avi/mpg movies and mp3 music files.


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-11-19 00:51:01)
Poker Holdem at FICGS !!!

Finally, one of the biggest update this year !

Poker Holdem (or Poker Texas Hold'em) is available at FICGS !

This should be a start for long discussions... It was quite complicated to implement so I hope there will be no bug (please report if necessary). Please do not forget to read the complete rules here :

http://www.ficgs.com/membership.html#poker_holdem

If you estimate you're an experienced player, please just let me know (through the form in My account) and I'll update your "poker holdem ELO" to 1800.


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-11-22 13:22:52)
Poker Holdem Championship

Hello all !

The next chess & Go championships waitings lists are now open, this is a good time to share our views for an interesting Poker Holdem world championship scheme (before to open the waiting list)...

It may look like the FICGS Go championship (one round robin tournament involving the 9 highest rated players, then a match between the winner & title holder), or it may be a multi-stages round-robin tournament (with or without a final match).. and so on. What do you think ?

The idea of a cycle looking like the Go championship is that the standard tournaments are in a way also preliminary tournaments of the championship.


Michel van der Kemp    (2008-11-24 12:57:14)
Another request

Since you are obviously not busy at all, Thibault: would it be possible to show the betting history just for a specific hand? I understand it can be seen from the 'moves', but it's not in a human-friendly format. It's difficult to see where an old hand ended and a new hand starts, for example, or just the numbers is hard to decipher what was going on. It would be great if we could get a history something like this, perhaps on the right of the board?: Player 1: raises with 3 (Pot: 4) Player 2: checks (Pot:6) Dealer: deals flop (Pot: 6) Player 1: checks (Pot: 6) Player 2: raises with 4 (Pot: 10) etc. This way it's easy to see the history of the hand.


Don Groves    (2008-11-24 23:43:22)
To Michel & Thibault

I am thinking of doing something to have that information readily available -- possibly a spreadsheet. I agree it's something we need but, as Thibault says, it will very likely be up to our own brains to provide it ;-)

So, Thib, it would help to create a spreadsheet if we could download our games in a format that provides the info in raw form, similar to PGN. Is this asking too much?


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-11-25 13:41:50)
Spreadsheet

What do you mean a spreadsheet ? I did not find a standard format for Poker games, nor Poker games "viewers".


Don Groves    (2008-11-26 05:11:13)
Spreadsheet

I'd like to design my own "poker viewer" using Excel (or the equivalent) by reading in a file of plays and displaying the data in a useful format.

If you could just make the plays and the cards dealt at each turn available as a downloadable file, I'll do the rest.

It doesn't matter that there is no standard file format yet. Who knows, yours could eventually become the standard!

Clearly, fame and fortune are only two steps away ;-)


Michael Sharland    (2008-11-26 20:32:17)
Time controls for Holdem

It seems clear that most holdem tournaments are going to require 200-600 moves to complete. This seems to indicate that the time control probably needs to be accelerated from 1 move / day in order to finish these in a reasonable time. Given that the thinking time needed for poker is only a few seconds rather than hours or days, the time needed for a move should be much less than for Chess or Go.

Some ideas might be to:

1) reduce the time control further to 1 move / 12 hours or even less.

2) cap the maximum days at 30 or so.

3) change the format to 2 out of 3 rather than 3 out of 5.

Anyway, just some thoughts.


Wolfgang Utesch    (2008-11-30 18:48:14)
Caire - Utesch

Thibault, in accordance to your rules I have to avoid any loss in all games of the match. So I decided to play defences with Black where the risk is lower, because general endgame ideas are more important than tactical play with many figures.


Andrew Stephenson    (2008-12-01 08:15:20)
Marshall to win..

At cc no real chance for a black win but not easy for white to get much chance either. Although I dont know if many cc players want to go through the extended end game suffering Wolfgang seems to enjoy :)15...a5!? looks like a simpler less masochistic way to get the draw rather than Wolfgangs 15...Rae8 Still why Caire plays exactly the same variation of the Marshall in all 4 white games????? - against a higher rated opponent it makes no match sense at all. I suppose your not going to lose games on time playing the same variation:):)


Marc Lacrosse    (2008-12-01 08:45:01)
To Andrew

"(...)why Caire plays exactly the same variation of the Marshall in all 4 white games????? - against a higher rated opponent it makes no match sense at all. I suppose your not going to lose games on time playing the same variation:)"

Hi Andrew in my FICGS__CHESS__WCH_QUARTER_FINAL_3__000005 playing the exact same variation in my four black games was the key to win the match: all four were drawn whereas I managed to win 3.5/4 in my four white games (with four variations of one of these silly sideline sicilians you seem not to praise too much).

... what is the optimal strategy for these matches remains to be determined. The "all-draws-favors-higher-rating" rule is very interesting. I like it very much.

Marc


Andrew Stephenson    (2008-12-01 15:34:03)
cant argue...

..with your results Marc. However the current champion won FICGS with exactly the strategy I favour and exactly the opposite to your strategy. So thats powerful evidence in favour of the varying openings approach. Well done on winning your match - lets see how far you get with your strategy. As for these side line sicilians I never called them silly Marc your being over sensitive. I thought that it was easy to equalise against them and get a draw at cc. I still believe that and proved it in our game. However I do think your opponent (as black) was playing ambitiously to win! Now thats a different story .....


Andrew Stephenson    (2008-12-01 15:37:40)
cant argue...

..with your results Marc. However the current champion won FICGS with exactly the strategy I favour and exactly the opposite to your strategy. So thats powerful evidence in favour of the varying openings approach. Well done on winning your match - lets see how far you get with your strategy. As for these side line sicilians I never called them silly Marc your being over sensitive. I thought that it was easy to equalise against them and get a draw at cc. I still believe that and proved it in our game. However I do think your opponent (as black) was playing ambitiously to win! Now thats a different story .....


Wolfgang Utesch    (2008-12-01 21:31:30)
15...a5!?

May be easier! Are there known any games? My idea was it to show, that white endgame ressources (neither by material nor by development) are not big enough for a win! Would be a fundamental investigation of this opening's worth. But Hannes is right - better to name it Marshall defence.


Andrew Stephenson    (2008-12-02 16:21:04)
Drugs in chess

I have read views of players who claimed that there are prescription drugs (eg modafinil) that enhance concentration and thus performance in chess tournaments - significant improvement but not dramatic. However even small improvements could prove extremely useful at the top levels. Of course no one would ever admit it but I assume if there is some effectiveness then some top players will definitely be taking them. Drug testing at the higher levels is quite reasonable if chess is seeking olympic status.


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-12-03 11:30:29)
Chess olympiads, Tkatchiev "forfeits"

After the case of Ivanchuk on doping, a new unexplained and undercovered (actually completely missed by the official websites - FIDE, federations, olympiads site...) case at the Olympiads !

France just lost 1,5-2,5 to Azerbaijan, Vladislav Tkatchiev just did not arrive to the board !! .. while the France team has 5 players for 4 boards... One full point lost. No explanation, nothing, maybe a conflict in the team. I hope there will be more information about it. To be continued.


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-12-04 17:53:58)
Fixed !

Thanks Ilmars ;)

If you see this bug within 15 days in other articles, this is normal.. all articles will have been corrected automatically after this period.


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-12-05 01:06:02)
FIDE Grand Prix & WCH

Magnus Carlsen withdraws from the FIDE Grand Prix 2008-2009

From Magnus Carlsen chess blog - http://blog.magnuschess.com

"We have just informed FIDE by e-mail that Magnus withdraws from the Grand Prix series due to the dramatic change to these regulations approved by the General Assembly. (...) Magnus is simply not motivated to continue the GP series with the dramatically changed conditions approved in Dresden, and the uncertainty related to any future changes that may be decided by FIDE."

Just another 'Grandmaster attack' to the Federation Internationale Des Echecs...


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-12-07 01:27:59)
.. looks like not

Hi Wolfgang, it looks like Marius had about 1 day left at his clock, so he resigned. I asked for a confirmation.


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-12-08 19:33:05)
Levon Aronian's open letter

Now Levon Aronian comments the latest FIDE's decisions in an open letter :

"(...) With the GA's recent actions, it seems that there is a democratic deficit within FIDE. The GA did not consult the players currently taking part in the Grand Prix in their decision processes. Please keep in mind a very important point – these players, including myself, have a legally binding agreement with FIDE regarding the World Championship cycle and the Grand Prix. Therefore it is FIDE's duty to consult the other party of the contract – the participants.

Does this mean that the chess players have lesser rights than others? The GA appears to act with no concern for the players. The decision to suddenly change the World Championship cycle has damaging effects on the career plans of leading chess players. It is also reasonable to ask: why should we go through several tournaments over several years and fight for a place in a tournament that another player gets by losing a match? The GA's decisions remove the motivation for players like myself to take part in the World Championship cycle."

http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=5059


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-12-10 19:39:04)
Rune Vik-Hansen's article on Chessbase

Chessbase just published a long article by the Norwegian philosopher Rune Vik-Hansen (graduated from the University of Tromsø in 1999 with a thesis on Heidegger's concept of Dasein) on consciousness and development of chess skills.

"Conscious memory", "Pattern recognition", "Pattern vs. Structure", "Exformation", "Chess Improvement", "Conceptual problems"...

http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=5055

What do you think about it ?


Don Groves    (2008-12-13 00:15:45)
My €0.02

I greatly appreciate the "exformation" concept -- but the person who coined the term got it backwards! In a human communication, "in-formation" should refer to inner (unstated) data and "ex-formation" (from the Greek prefix 'exo-') should refer to outer (stated) data. Now we are stuck forever with yet another mis-defined term.

The author didn't cover the importance of visualization, i.e., the ability to "see" how the board will look after a series of future moves. For me, this is the biggest stumbling block to improvement in OTB chess. This type of visualization seems to me to be a conscious function as opposed to subconscious.

In discussing blunders, the author failed to point out time pressure as a primary cause. Again, this is a problem created by conscious awareness.


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-12-13 23:42:25)
FICGS poker holdem championship

The waiting list for the 1st FICGS poker holdem championship is open, as all ratings are not established, the rating limit has been changed to 1600.

Only the 9 highest rated players at the beginning of the tournament (february 1, 2009) will play it, consequently the best way to improve your rating before the deadline is probably to play POKER HOLDEM BULLET BRONZE games (you may use the challenge function in My games).

The current rules :

"FICGS world poker holdem championship is a 2 stages tournament. First stage is a single round-robin tournament, involving the 9 highest rated players who entered the waiting list. The winner of this tournament is the challenger for FICGS world champion title. In case of equality, the player with the strongest tournament entry rating (TER) is qualified for the next stage. If tournament entry ratings are equal, ratings when the next stage begins will be taken in account. If current world champion defends his title, he will play a 5 games match (3 games with White, 2 games with Black) against his challenger.

All games are played in 30 days + 1 day / move. Rules for poker holdem are official rules. You may find more information about the FICGS betting structure in FICGS rules. Both players must play until one resign or game is adjudicated. One game is played in 3 winning rounds of 100 chips by player played in no limit mode. The minimal bet is always 1 chip and does not depend on the blind's value. The small blind's value is doubled after the 50th hand, then after the 70th, 80th, 90th and 100th hand (the big blind then is 64 chips) of each round."


Normajean Yates    (2008-12-15 23:55:15)
how about a fun thematic with foll pos

starting position:

RNBQKBNR/PPPPPPPP/8/8/8/8/pppppppp/rnbqkbnr. [this is offered on fics i.e. freechess.org as 'chess wild-5']

Note that all pawns of both sides are ready to promote, but because of self-blockade the only legal first moves are knight moves!

Engines fluctuate wildly on this because they are not designed for such positions!


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-12-16 11:18:59)
Wild chess

Good idea, we may try such thematics soon :)

But I have to find a line leading to this position.....


Normajean Yates    (2008-12-16 15:39:59)
no no it is legally reachable..

This is much easier to reach than many much more impossible-looking positions.

If I gave it to one person who plays on chess.com and fics, he would give a proof-game in 10 minutes: [the 16-queens mate-in-4 problem i posted a few months back - see problems - he gave a proof game in 10 minutes. Then I asked him to construct a position with 18 Qs, he did it in 5 more minutes.]

But I have had severe political differences with him - I am not on talking terms with him now.

The trick is do not try retroanalysis. construct from the beginning!


Normajean Yates    (2008-12-16 20:17:42)
oh sorry, it is obviously impossible!

Since no captures have been made, the pawns could not have legally crossed each other. you cannot even have a white pawn on e5 and a black pawn on e4 if no captures have been made.

Since the position is unreachable, it must be considered a chess variant, not a 'thematic'.


Normajean Yates    (2008-12-16 20:20:46)
about game... (to llmars)

llmars, with or without engine help? I'd prefer with engines.

Meanwhile, you can discover the various "fool's mates" in this variant... - a knights will give a smothered mate if one is not careful!


Normajean Yates    (2008-12-17 04:15:15)
Game 26099 - fit case for adjudication?

Game 26099 Salinas - Yates 13...Qe1# {mate} - more than 50 hours ago. On my checkmating move I had sent request to resign.

Salinas posted this in international chat: [I am pasting:]

"salinas marcelo : congratulation ..nice victory Norma. (2008-12-16 00:31:15)"

So he has sent 'final friendly message' also. But in international chat, *not* with resignation! He has *still* not resigned.

If you click 'more messages' and scroll down international chat, you'll see that I had - immediatety after his message, politely explained that he had to resign.

Salinas has blocked private messages.

I feel that all this is annoying and unfriendly, so the game should be adjudicated. (since the purpose of NOT having automatic checkmate-recognition is NOT being served, but the feature is being abused by opponent.)

What do you people think? What is the precedent/convention for such a case on ficgs?

Thibault, adjudicate?


Normajean Yates    (2008-12-17 05:15:54)
another point..

3-fold repitition is automatic draw here I see --- doesnt opp want to make 'last freindly comment in case of draw?' [the same logic why checkmate is not automatic win here]


Normajean Yates    (2008-12-17 18:05:42)
anyway, about the 16-queens mate-in-4:

Svante Carl von Erichsen showed it was possible to solve without computer help:

http://www.ficgs.com/user_page.php?page=problem_read&id=311

As for proof game, The foll is from my rec.games.chess.analysis post [it *was* .analysis I think - feeling too tired to search usenet]

" This one is mine:

1. 4k3/qqqqqqqq/8/8/8/8/QQQQQQQQ/4K3 w - - 0 109: [pos. 1]

White to play and mate in 4.

There are no duals - only one moves mates in 4. [there is no mate in 3 or less.]

Move given at end of post, with sample continuation.

These two were posed by me and solved by likesforests [see fics (www.freechess.org) or chess.com] in 20 minutes total!

2. Give a proof game for pos. 1, ie Show that the position in prob. 1 is legally reachable by giving a game that leads to the position.

3. Okay, so you can reach a position where you have 16 queens on board. Can you construct a game which reaches a position with 18 queens? If so, do so! [the last part carries 99% of the credit - it is to pre-empt the answers "yes" and "no".

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(note: these can be more conveniently viewed at chess.com in the thread "advantage of moving first - mate in 4 in symmetrical position" in the forum-category "more puzzles")

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Solution to 2: by likesforests

[Event ]
[Site ]
[Date ..]
[White likesforests]
[Black likesforests]
[Result 1-0]
1. a4 b5 2. a5 b4 3. a6 Bb7 4. axb7 Nc6 5. Na3 bxa3 6. b8=Q a2 7. Rb1 a1=Q 8. Qb3 Qa6 9. Qa2 Qb7 10. b4 a5 11. b5 a4 12. b6 Qa6 13. b7 a3 14. Qb3 a2 15. b8=Q a1=Q 16. Qh3 Q1a5 17. Qbb3 Ne5 18. Qbg3 c5 19. Rb3 c4 20. c3 cxb3 21. c4 b2 22. c5 b1=Q 23. c6 Qba2 24. c7 Qb8 25. Bb2 f6 26. Bc3 Kf7 27. c8=Q d5 28. Qc4 Nc6 29. Qch4 d4 30. d3 dxc3 31. d4 c2+ 32. Qd2 Ra7 33. f3 Q5a4 34. Kf2 c1=Q 35. d5 Qca3 36. d6 e5 37. e4 Nge7 38. d7 Kg8 39. d8=Q Qa8 40. Qb6 Nb4 41. Qbe3 Nbd5 42. exd5 e4 43. Ne2 f5 44. Qeh6 f4 45. Kg1 e3 46. Nd4 e2 47. d6 e1=Q 48. d7 Qea1 49. d8=Q Nd5 50. Nc2 Nc3 51. Ne3 fxe3 52. Qdg5 e2 53. Qdf4 e1=Q 54. Qfg4 Qeb1 55. f4 g6 56. Qc5 g5 57. f5 Bg7 58. Qgc4+ Rf7 59. f6 Bf8 60. Q5b4 g4 61. Qe5 g3 62. Qe1 Ne4 63. Qcb3 Nd2 64. Qhc4 Nf3+ 65. gxf3 g2 66. Be2 Bg7 67. Kf2 Bf8 68. Ke3 g1=Q+ 69. Kf4 Qgb6 70. Qcc3 Be7 71. Kg4 Qe6+ 72. Kg3 Rf8 73. fxe7 Rf7 74. e8=Q+ Rf8 75. Qeb5 Qf7 76. f4 Re8 77. f5 Re6 78. fxe6 Qff8 79. e7+ Qf7 80. Rf1 Qaf8 81. e8=Q Qa8 82. Qbb2 Q4a7 83. Qed2 Q3a6 84. Rf3 Q8b7 85. Qcc2 Qac4 86. Q4b3 Qad6+ 87. Kg2 Qdc7 88. Q3a2 Qce6 89. Qhe3 Qed7 90. Q8e4 Q8e7 91. Qb2b3 Qag7+ 92. Qg3 Qbb2 93. Bc4 Qbf6 94. Kf1 h5 95. Rf5 Qfxf5+ 96. Ke1 Rh6 97. Qxh6 Qfh7 98. Qhxh5 Qfxc4 99. Qee2 Qcf7 100. Qbb2 Kf8 101. Qgf2 Ke8 102. h4 Kf8 103. Qhg4 Qhxh4 104. Qgg2 Qhh7 105. Qbh5 Ke8 106. Qhh2 Qfe6 107. Qff3 Q6f6 108. Qff2 Qff7 1-0

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

solution to 3: by likesforests

Event "?"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "????.??.??"]
[White "likesforests"]
[Black "likesforests"]
[Result "1-0"]
1. a4 b5 2. a5 b4 3. a6 Bb7 4. axb7 Nc6 5. Na3 bxa3 6. b8=Q a2 7. Rb1 a1=Q 8. Qb3 Qa6 9. Qa2 Qb7 10. b4 a5 11. b5 a4 12. b6 Qa6 13. b7 a3 14. Qb3 a2 15. b8=Q a1=Q 16. Qh3 Q1a5 17. Qbb3 Ne5 18. Qbg3 c5 19. Rb3 c4 20. c3 cxb3 21. c4 b2 22. c5 b1=Q 23. c6 Qba2 24. c7 Qb8 25. Bb2 f6 26. Bc3 Kf7 27. c8=Q d5 28. Qc4 Nc6 29. Qch4 d4 30. d3 dxc3 31. d4 c2+ 32. Qd2 Ra7 33. f3 Q5a4 34. Kf2 c1=Q 35. d5 Qca3 36. d6 e5 37. e4 Nge7 38. d7 Kg8 39. d8=Q Qa8 40. Qb6 Nb4 41. Qbe3 Nbd5 42. exd5 e4 43. Ne2 f5 44. Qeh6 f4 45. Kg1 e3 46. Nd4 e2 47. d6 e1=Q 48. d7 Qea1 49. d8=Q Nd5 50. Nc2 Nc3 51. Ne3 fxe3 52. Qdg5 e2 53. Qdf4 e1=Q 54. Qfg4 Qeb1 55. f4 g6 56. Qc5 g5 57. f5 Bg7 58. Qgc4+ Rf7 59. f6 Bf8 60. Q5b4 g4 61. Qe5 g3 62. Qe1 Ne4 63. Qcb3 Nd2 64. Qhc4 Nf3+ 65. gxf3 g2 66. Be2 Bg7 67. Kf2 Bf8 68. Ke3 g1=Q+ 69. Kf4 Qgb6 70. Qcc3 Be7 71. Kg4 Qe6+ 72. Kg3 Rf8 73. fxe7 Rf7 74. e8=Q+ Rf8 75. Qeb5 Qf7 76. f4 Re8 77. f5 Re6 78. fxe6 Qff8 79. e7+ Qf7 80. Rf1 Qaf8 81. e8=Q Qa8 82. Qhc1 ( 82. Qbb2 Q4a7 83. Qed2 Q3a6 84. Rf3 Q8b7 85. Qcc2 Qac4 86. Q4b3 Qad6+ 87. Kg2 Qdc7 88. Q3a2 Qce6 89. Qhe3 Qed7 90. Q8e4 Q8e7 91. Qb2b3 Qag7+ 92. Qg3 Qbb2 93. Bc4 Qbf6 94. Kf1 h5 95. Rf5 Qfxf5+ 96. Ke1 Rh6 97. Qxh6 Qfh7 98. Qhxh5 Qfxc4 99. Qee2 Qcf7 100. Qbb2 Kf8 101. Qgf2 Ke8 102. h4 Kf8 103. Qhg4 Qhxh4 104. Qgg2 Qhh7 105. Qbh5 Ke8 106. Qhh2 Qfe6 107. Qff3 Q6f6 108. Qff2 Qff7 ) h5 83. Qhc8 h4+ 84. Kg4 h3 85. Bf3 Rh5 86. Bg2 hxg2 87. h3 Rh4+ 88. Kxh4 g1=Q 89. Rf6 Qga7 90. Qec6 Q8b8 91. Q8a6 Q8e7 92. Kg4 Kf8 93. h4 Qbe8 94. Rd6 Qg8+ 95. Kf3 Qbg6 96. h5 Q6g7 97. h6 Qad7 98. h7 Qa5 99. h8=Q Qdxd6 1-0

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

solution to 1: 1. Qaxf7+!

Sample continuations:
1... Kd8 2. Qexe7+ Kc8 3. Qdxd7+ Kb8 4. Qdd8#
1... Qxf7 2. Qh8+ Qxh8 3. Qxh8+ Qf8 4. Qfxf8#

"


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-12-24 14:19:19)
Pichelin - Utesch

Hi Wolfgang. Congratulations... Two very different styles to meet in a marathon 12 games match ! .. I'm impatient to see it.

Have a nice preparation :)

Merry Christmas to you all.


Matteo Tognela    (2008-12-25 16:56:46)
Small Linux script - pgn to clipboard

I know it's not of vital importance... but looking for some more automatic way to copy to clipboard the moves from a game window, say to be pasted into db software, I I've written this little bash script. (this requires xclip to be installed; for the rest I make reference to gnome&firefox, but it should work also in other environments)

#!/bin/bash
#content of grabpgn
xclip -i -selection clipboard $1
exit

...chmode +x grabpgn, and then associate the extension pgn to be opened with it (in gnome it's quite easy, but for sure there's some conf file where you can do it manually)
Then from a game window, click the "download" button, and in the dialog box, select "open" and check "always perform this action on similar files".
Done! now when you hit "Download" you end up with the game in your clipboard, ready to be pasted wherever you want.
(you can still download it with a right click on the link)


Matteo Tognela    (2008-12-25 17:01:11)
Small Linux script - pgn to clipboard

ps: this method obviously could be useful just if you don't need an automatic association of the pgn extension with other applications. [TODO: try to develop a firefox addon that does the same with a ToolbarButton.]


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-12-26 20:03:03)
Game score

Hi Garvin, what do you mean ?! What kind of information would you like to see & where ?


Thibault de Vassal    (2008-12-26 20:26:06)
Pichelin - Utesch

Hi Hannes, as far as I experienced, Xavier is an excellent chess player, beyond Rybka & chess engines, with a very good understanding of the game and very efficient ideas, also in quiet positions. Wolfgang is able to make very deep & accurate analysis in complex or strange positions while playing fastly, really hard to play. Moreover both have a coherent, maybe different, global match strategy.

In my opinion, we may see quite surprising and long games, that could be decided in a way since the opening, I mean psychology could be the key in such a match. The way the pieces will be dealt may show some things.

50 / 50 :)


Gultekin Gumusyazici    (2008-12-30 17:18:11)
I am full concerned about it that

Chess is an Statistical game not mathematical. . As, However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the results. (Wind stone at Church hill) say. That is why bot players need statistical image databases.


Bradley Small    (2008-12-30 21:20:28)
RTFM I guess

Blaming it on the layout is probably a lame excuse, but it is all I can use. I really must have overlooked that page. As for what is allowed, I will let that be my guide. However, for what is expected, what do most people do as a matter of strategy? For instance, when it is one's time to move... Do you go to the databases and research each move, or simply play from your own head unless you just don't feel like you see a good move? Or somethign else?...


Don Groves    (2009-01-01 05:21:01)
Small problem?

Salut, Thibault!

When I tried to enter the Hold'em World Championship, this was what I was presented with:

"You can't enter this tournament: Your chess rating : 1597, is out of the restrictions."

Should my chess rating matter, and, if it does, could we use my correct rating ;-)


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-01-03 19:02:44)
A world champion with no privilege ?!

... finally, looks like even the top GM are decided to kill the show in the FIDE WCH cycle :

http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=5129

>> Address by Mr Henrik Carlsen on behalf of GM Magnus Carlsen

"(...) In a future Magnus would like to see a world championship cycle with a minimum of privileges, or no privileges at all.

(...) What about the privileges of the reigning World Champion? This is a difficult question but we see strong arguments for reducing the privileges drastically or even abolishing them outright. In the past, with the right to a re-match, a reigning world champion had about 75% chance of retaining the title against an evenly strong opponent, leaving only 25% chance for all the remaining chess players in the world. It was ridiculous. Even without rematches, the 50% chance of today strongly favours the reigning champion. This may have made sense in the past when there were few serious contenders for the title, but today, with about 30 top players within 100 rating points of the top, this is no longer fair."


There are many good points but I'm not sure the game will win at the end. Any opinion ?!


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-01-04 14:14:38)
Rybka 4

Vasik Rajlich wrote a few comments on what can be expected from the Rybka engine/team in 2009 :

http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=9199

Three engine releases are planned in 2009:

* Rybka 3+ - Rybka 3 playing strength, with bugfixes and cosmetic improvements, for Rybka 3 customers
* Pocket Rybka 3 - published by Convekta/ChessOK, packaged with their Pocket Champion interface, conforms to S. Tsukrov's Pocket-UCI protocol
* Rybka 4 - better search, better eval, new analysis features

"Our tournament goal for 2009 is to win a top freestyle event in 100% automated mode. (...)"

Very interesting, a new challenge for Eros :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-01-05 16:34:12)
Rybka 3 alone ?

You mean Rybka 3 playing by itself ? Could be a very interesting test match...


Wayne Lowrance    (2009-01-05 17:51:35)
NO,

I am not sure if I understand your conditions. do you mean moves by your opponent must be made at depth 23 (don't know how you propose enforce that). Anyhow I have not time for such a match. Wayne


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-01-05 20:47:24)
I don't think so...

Of course in such a match the full analysis by the engine should be published at the end of the games.


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-01-06 14:14:28)
How to beat Rybka 3 ?

Hi Ben, the main -enormous- advantage you have over Rybka 3 is of course that you know by advance what she may play at least in "some" cases. At correspondence chess, you have to create a trap according to the horizon's effet (don't remember if this is the correct term) or analysis depth. Well, it may represent several weeks of analysis though, to understand such engine's weaknesses, then to incitate her to follow you in a good line, knowing the book she uses.

Playing against Rybka 3 in a freestyle chess tournament will be even harder, only someone who perfectly knows the engine & has a very good understanding of the game may hope to have a good score (over 60%) against the engine IMO.

Finally a good centaur would have quite good chances to win this match in my opinion.


Wayne Lowrance    (2009-01-06 17:52:36)
Norms

Good grief! Thank you, i can just sit back for a couple of years before those 3 norms I expect to materialize. It is ok though, no problem, but i cannot agree with with the reasoning. The Tournament info, for example said norm requirement for, example FEM is a resutt of " ". so if a player has achieved the required points, why should that player wait until some ding dong, uninterested guy finish his games. I don't want to make waves Thibaut. Wayne


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-01-08 21:42:49)
Halasz gambit

A new chess thematic tournament !

The very hard Halasz gambit : 1.e4 e5 2.d4 exd4 3.f4

What do you think ? Ilmars ? ;)


Ilmars Cirulis    (2009-01-11 15:59:53)
Quote from information theory

"Why have sex? Because sex is good for your bits!"
(Information Theory, Interference, and Learning Algorithms" by David J.C. MacKay)


Rodolfo d Ettorre    (2009-01-12 14:02:15)
Gambits ...

Gambits are a form of gambling. A few religions forbid gambling, so playing this thematic tournament would be a sin.


Normajean Yates    (2009-01-14 14:57:51)
goood sensible answer...

interesting, llmar's opinion that QGA is 1/2-1/2. So, QGA is maybe better than QGD ... interesting opinion. [seriously. I am not rejecting it.] QGA thematic sometime is needed.


Normajean Yates    (2009-01-20 07:19:07)
nicola [nicola lupinacci ansered it]

nicola lupinacci posted in the international chat in june last year that:

In bigchess, P=1, N=3, B=5, R=8, Q=11.

One of the points is, bigchess is a bigger board, so compared to chess, long-range pieces (B, N, Q)are much more powerful than short-range ones - specially, B is significantly more powerful than N.

I followed nicola's implicit advice, and as you can check, I've won all 6 of my games in one of the two only bigchess tournaments I am playing: FICGS__BIG_CHESS__TOURNAMENT__000025.

And I have won all 4 of my completed games in the other one. [ FICGS__BIG_CHESS__TOURNAMENT__000030: all games are in early stages by bigchess standards ]
my two incomplete bigchess games are keenly contested.

In one of them, opp has exchanged two Bs for my two Ns and 2-Pawns: so, that game puts Nicola's idea to test.

Waiting for the top bigchess players to comment on Sophie's and my posts...

Nicola was so good at chess and bigchess, but she stopped playing.


I have pasted her reason (her profile) below: (so why did she stop playing bigchess is what I do not understand. I mean no one has bigchess engine!)


Lupinacci, Nicola (ITA) [member # 1307]

Nicola Lupinacci

I am a chess amateur, playing only for fun! I do not have any chess engine. Good game to everyone!


Normajean Yates    (2009-01-20 07:22:04)
oops forgot quotation marks !

To make my prev post absolutely clear:

I did NOT say 'I am a chess amateur, playing only for fun! I do not have any chess engine. Good game to everyone!'

Nicola said it.


Ilmars Cirulis    (2009-01-20 16:26:07)
ancient quote

"Animated gif is worth one mega-word" - Old Chinese saying


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-01-21 10:58:22)
4 members

Heheh ! Matteo, Tano-Urayoán & Bob (but who's Bob ? :)) are in !


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-01-24 14:51:22)
Chess computers & nodes by seconds

What about a thread on chess dedicated computers... dual-core, quad-core or even 10 years old tired processor ?

It could be interesting to gather some informations here on hardware evolution by comparing the speed of chess engines [nodes by second], specifying the operating system & the program that runs the engines (Arena, Chessbase, Fritz 11 interface & so on...)


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-01-29 12:33:51)
FICGS

Hi Francisco, these important points need to be discussed for sure.

1) As it has been said here on another point, I shouldn't try to protect players from themselves, but I've to protect players from other players (speaking of the quality of the games, general forfeits & so on - or the posts of Garvin & Josef in this thread). You can play poker all over the internet, it's up to you only. I'm not sure I should feel responsible of players addictions, the whole world (commercial issues) is about addictions that exist anyway. In my experience, I was not really addicted to poker as a gambling game, I never played it in casinos but I like competition and that's the way I introduced poker here, quite different from the casino games (by the way a few "pro" poker players here do not even understand it).

2) "Play poker heads-up one to one, is bored, the winner is not always the best", so chess, so Go... of course. I may be wrong on the poker games format (3 winning rounds / 100 chips), we'll see it in a few months as the rating list will evolve.

3) "Poker insults chess", I don't agree with this but I understand & respect this opinion (that could probably be "Poker insults" in some cases). Only 1 player cancelled his membership because of this at the moment. I'm sorry about this, I can't satisfy everyone when making updates but be sure I'm working for FICGS firstly as a chess place and thanks to poker (even with no money), we welcome more players & the prizes (for chess tournaments) will increase a lot in the next months. That's quite good for the site in my opinion. Anyway if I realize I'm wrong, no doubt I'll change it.

Anyway, that's an interesting & important discussion and I'll listen to all your points.


Normajean Yates    (2009-02-01 10:15:31)
thanks Mr R.-Román, and I am *Ms* Yates.

Mr Russi-Román, I am Ms Yates, not Mr Yates.

I thank Mr Russi-Román for the valuable info and link: (and others too) : I'll update myself whenever I have free time [not only from chess play, but from higher-priority things...]

So, what is the state of the art in noticing drawish nodes (blockade, repitition etc) during search? [remember: 'false positives' are as bad as 'false negatives'] Offhand here is one area where significantly good new heuristics would be much more important than hardware..

Another example: at present, has any program - however highly parallel - delivered mate from a suite of mate-in-60+ troitski positions (NN v P) *without* using tablebases? (ignore the 50-move rule for this question. Anyway this site doesnt have the 50-move rule...) I dont know the answer...


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-02-01 15:14:58)
The fact is...

... ratings should be in accordance (as much as possible) with ELO rating system : if player A is rated 1800 and player B is rated 2000, player B should win about 3 games out of 4. So the question isn't first to make ratings "accurate" (by the number of games), but to be "significant" .. eg. in a 1 round games system (30 hands max.), all players would be rated from 1600 to 1700, this has absolutely no interest.

Don's statistics are interesting and actually (imo) justify 3/5, it is probably possible to estimate the best average number of hands [btw the no-limit is not the best way, but more fun] but in my experience 2/3 is not enough. The longest game reached 1000 moves already (maybe about 400 hands), some games lasted about 35 moves only (of course the chancy factor is bigger there), it is hard to "calculate" anything one thing is sure, the longer the games, the more significant are ratings... then of course, the more games, the more accurate are ratings.


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-02-02 21:54:00)
Poker championship : New rules, deadline

Finally, a 2 stages single round-robin tournament (no ratings limit, everyone can play) seems a better choice for the poker holdem championship !

The deadline is now february 8, 2009... Join the fun !

Here are the new rules :

"FICGS world poker holdem championship is a 2 stages single round-robin tournament. All games are played in 30 days + 1 day / move.

Round-robin tournaments are groups of at least 7 players. The winner of each group is qualified for the next stage. In case of equality, the player with the strongest tournament entry rating (TER) is qualified for the next stage. If tournament entry ratings are equal, ratings when the next stage begins will be taken in account. Groups are built grading all players by rating and distributing them to obtain similar elo averages. Players may be invited to complete a group or to replace a forfeiting player.

Rules for poker holdem are official rules. You may find more information about the FICGS betting structure here. Both players must play until one resign or game is adjudicated. One game is played in 3 winning rounds of 100 chips by player played in no limit mode. The minimal bet is always 1 chip and does not depend on the blind's value. The small blind's value is doubled after the 50th hand, then after the 70th, 80th, 90th and 100th hand (the big blind then is 64 chips) of each round."


Don Groves    (2009-02-04 06:03:19)
The next chess computer champion?

http://www.informationweek.com/news/hardware/supercomputers/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=213000842&subSection=News


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-02-04 13:47:29)
Roadrunner vs. Jaguar

I found these informations on Roadrunner but I must admit I'm unable to compare it with a typical 2GHz processor, any idea on this ?

System Name Roadrunner
Site DOE/NNSA/LANL
System Family IBM Cluster
System Model BladeCenter QS22 Cluster
Computer BladeCenter QS22/LS21 Cluster, PowerXCell 8i 3.2 Ghz / Opteron DC 1.8 GHz , Voltaire Infiniband
Installation Year 2008
Operating System Linux Interconnect Infiniband
Processor PowerXCell 8i 3200 MHz (12.8 GFlops)


http://top500.org/


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-02-14 13:29:46)
Topalov vs. Kamsky

The match between Veselin Topalov & Gataulla Kamskiy (Gata Kamsky) is about to start, a former challenger of Vladimir Kramnik and a former challenger of Anatoly Karpov in the FIDE World Championship, quite surprising.

Both usually make amazing performances in top chess tournaments, but not exactly as regularly as Garry Kasparov. Who do you expect to win such a match ?

The prize fund is $250,000, the winner should play current FIDE world champion Viswanathan Anand later this year.

More to read in an interview with Veselin Topalov in Chessbase news, particularly on the Lvov bid, originally of $750,000.

http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=5207


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-02-18 14:45:13)
23x23

Are you sure ? Looks like it is not only a question of calculation anymore. In my opinion, if new algorithms can significantly improve computer play on 19x19, at the end it may work on any goban size. This will be the real match to follow during the next years or decades :)


Philip Roe    (2009-02-20 14:36:04)
Complexity of Go

Don, I think the extra complexity may be more than your calculation shows.

On a Go board with 39 extra points, I think you are assuming that each extra point could be occupied by either a white stone or a black stone, giving 2 to the power 39 extra possibilities. Actually, since the extra stones need to be equally of each color, the possibilities are not quite so great. (about 2 to the power 36)

Anyway, what that calculation gives is the number of additional POSITIONS, but in calculating the number of additional GAMES the order of playing the stones must matter. On a board with n points, the number of possible games seems to be just factorial(n). In that case, going from a 19 x 19 board to a 20 x 20 board increases the number of possible games by a factor factorial(400)/factorial(361), which my computer gives as about 2 to the power 334.

I don't know enough about Go to judge how significant these numbers are, and surely various heuristics will cut them down a lot. But I thought that this observation might be worth making.


Robert Mueller    (2009-02-21 06:30:07)
Norms and Titles

For obtaining a title (e.g. FEM) you need three FEM norms. Does winning a FIM norm automatically give you a FEM norm too? In other words: if I have two FEM norms and then get a FIM norm, do I get the FEM title?


Arsenis Selalmazidis    (2009-02-21 11:43:32)
wise words

`` You cannot know the meaning of your life until you are connected to the power that created you `` H.H. Shri Mataji Nirmala Devi


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-02-25 14:52:12)
Risky opening

The games played with Black by Tomas Civin are worth a glance, nice to see this opening at this level (quite hard to play for sure)

http://www.ficgs.com/user_page.php?page=viewer&game=29043

Maybe a thematic tournament to follow :)


Normajean Yates    (2009-02-26 05:07:20)
to Arsenis Selalmazidis

Arsenis Selalmazidis wrote: "`` You cannot know the meaning of your life until you are connected to the power that created you `` H.H. Shri Mataji Nirmala Devi"

Sorry, but I'd rather stay away from this: it sounds like an invitation to electrocute oneself ;)


Ulrich Imbeck    (2009-02-27 01:21:58)
Modern isn't the Hippopotamus

Modern isn't the Hippopotamus.

Only Hippopotamus is a system of the Modern.

I'll never play a thematic tournament Hippopotamus


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-02-27 16:23:19)
Topalov beats Kamsky

The bulgarian super GM Veselin Topalov won his candidates match against Gata Kamsky 4.5 - 2.5

So we'll have a match Anand vs. Topalov for the FIDE world championship final match, right ? Any favourite ?!


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-02-28 03:35:14)
Svante Carl wins FICGS Go WCH (again)

Congratulations to Svante Carl von Erichsen who keeps the FICGS Go champion title by beating Ke Lu 5d on an impressive 5-0 score, also reaching a rating of 2653 !

A rematch just started between our two top Go players, as Ke Lu convincingly won the 3rd FICGS Go WCH preliminary tournament by 7/7

You can follow the games here :

http://www.ficgs.com/user_page.php?page=tournament&tournament=FICGS__GO__WORLD_CHAMPIONSHIP__000003

Svante Carl kindly accepted to answer a few questions on his match :


FICGS - Hello Svante Carl, first of all congratulations for your win in the FICGS correspondence Go championship final. Your opponent was Ke Lu 5 dan, you won 4 games out of 5 already (the last game is not finished yet), how do you explain such a result?

Svante Carl - Hello! Thank you very much! It is certainly astonishing for me that I was able to hold my own in these games. I believe that the main factor that helped me in getting on even terms with such a strong player was that I could spend much more time analyzing each move than in a face-to-face or online direct playing situation.

FICGS - Did you have a particular preparation or plan before to start the games?

Svante Carl - The only things I planned beforehand was to really give my best, and to make the games as distinct as possible.

FICGS - The site will now try to attract more correspondence Go players from Asia (with a few chinese, japanese or korean words on the home page already), what do you think about the games format played at FICGS (30 days + 1 day / move, chinese rules komi 7.5 points) and the championship rules?

Svante Carl - I like the format. I am also interested in the rules of Go as well as the rules that surround Go, like tournament rules and time settings. My current conviction is that the "real, pure" Go rules are area rules with superko, and territory rules should be seen as a shortcut which should give the same result. I have come to think that the "Taiwan rule", i.e. White gets a point of compensation if Black got the last play (before the first pass), is a sensible part of the rules. FICGS has taken a very easy route by declaring the rule set and leaving negotiation of the result to the players. While in the end, it is only important who won, I think that showing a result as e.g. "White+3", "Black+Resign" adds a lot of flavour. As a time system, I think that bonus time (a.k.a. Fischer time), like on FICGS, is a very general and sensible approach to timing a game like Go. I think that many "real-world" tournaments and internet servers will switch to that in the future, for all, blitz, speed, normal, slow, and correspondence games. The championship format is quite nice. I like the title holder/challenger way of tournament series. The only thing I would like to see is some sort of nigiri to determine the colours in the odd game. Attracting players from Asia is really a worthwhile goal. I look forward to playing players from all over the world.

FICGS - Does correspondence Go bring you something more than real time Go? What is more addictive according to you?

Svante Carl - Since I think that analyzing is a forte of mine, I might be a bit stronger at correspondence Go than at "real time" Go. I don't think that one is more addictive than the other.

FICGS - Do you often play real time Go online? What servers do you prefer?

Svante Carl - I usually play on KGS, but not too much, perhaps one or two games per week on average, often in "bursts". KGS is quite nice, but not perfect. Sometimes I play at CyberOro, but there is much less communication; I like to watch pro games there.

FICGS - Do you use softwares that assist you in your games (FICGS rules allow this)? What do you think about computer Go in general nowadays?

Svante Carl - I only use a board or a simple SGF file viewer for analyzing. There are no playing programs that could help me. The programs have advanced quite much recently, but I think that it will still be a long time before they can beat me in an even game. Currently, most tests of these programs are against professional players with high handicaps, and I think that this is a good situation for the bots, since they get exponentially weaker the further the game is from the end -- high handicap practically eliminates the opening, their weakest spot. I would like to see more tests against amateur players at the bots' own level.

FICGS - Do you play other games (board games, video games...), what is your favourite one?

Svante Carl - Go is certainly my absolute favourite. I also know chess, although I am really weak at that. I also like "german board games", there are some really nice pearls there. In video games, well, there are also some pearls, but they get drowned by a mass of ... not so good games..., I don't waste time looking at that scene any more. I also played some online poker, but it wasn't able to keep me interested.

FICGS - Will you defend your title again against Ke Lu who also won the 3rd wch tournament?

Svante Carl - Of course, I am looking forward to that!

FICGS - Could you give us your impressions on the games, how it went from the beginning to the end, do you think that time pressure were a non-negligible factor in the result (the clocks of Ke Lu were quickly near 1 or 2 days left)?

Svante Carl - I was a bit surprised that he let his time drop to such a low level right at the beginning, perhaps he was not familiar yet with the vacancy feature at FICGS. I can't see his reasons for this, or how much time he actually could spend on his games. I was ahead in each game when it timed out, though.

I think that game 2 was quite even from the start. The skirmish in the lower left resulted in me capturing a little group, but he got a nice framework on the lower side. My prospects of reducing this were a bit hampered by the fact that my right side group was not completely settled. I found a way to sacrifice some stones to settle my group while fixing the framework's extent and keeping sente to secure my top side, at which time, the game was still almost even, but I think that I was a few points ahead then. Later, I could seal the top side with some extra points through some rather blunt forcing moves.

In game 3, my opponent made an approach with White 24 that is usually regarded as bad in this situation, because the pincer Black 25 works out very well in conjunction with the stone on the left side. He tried to settle with White 26, but I refused to make things so easy, even though the result from the usual joseki would not have been bad. He resisted Black 27, but I think that White 28 is an overplay. The resulting fight left me with nice profit in that corner and sente, while he made some centre thickness. I then tried to carefully neutralize this thickness, but I may have played some slack moves in the course. Later, I was able to keep a little moyo in the lower right centre, and then I poked into his right-side territory where he had left a serious weakness earlier.

Game 1 started out with an interesting fight in the upper right. After White 42, both the three captured black and the two almost captured white stones retain some serious aji, which I came back to fix on my side a few moves later. When I could set up a splitting attack with Black 77, he was able to connect his two weak groups, but in bad shape. I continued to keep this dragon separated from the top, planning to invade the top side afterwards. However, with White 110, instead of connecting by playing B6, he saved some centre stones, and I proceeded to separate and kill the dragon. He may have overlooked that my upper left side group was still able to live after 110 and 111.

In game 4, after White 22, Black's stones on the left side have a strange relation. The three stones in the corner are a bit far from C10, but putting another move here is way too slow. He tried to remedy this situation with the following moves. After Black 27, there are weaknesses left in both sides' shape. When I entered with White 32, I thought that his weakness at F13 would let me settle easily, but he attacked very hard. After White 60, there are some weaknesses in my shape, but he also has a weakish group in the centre. Playing at K10 with White 76 before taking the two stones with H2 felt very important to me. At move 94, I couldn't find a good move to complete my moyo at the top, but I thought that I had found a good point to invade. This was much harder than I thought, since after Black 95, the 3-3 point fails to live. With 96 and 98, I thought that I would get a ko, but he played a line that I had excluded earlier on account of too many cuts in Black's outside shape. However, with Black 107, he made things very difficult for me, since cutting at P16 doesn't work out too well -- my inside group doesn't have enough liberties. I cut at Q14 instead with the hope to at least get some outside forcing opportunities that might have been able to keep me in the game. I think that Black 115 should have been at R12, because after White 116, R12 and N16 have become miai. Black 117 just doesn't work at all. I really got lucky in the end here. These impressions are naturally one-sided, and I would be really interested what stronger players might say about these games.

FICGS - Thank you very much and have good games !

Svante Carl - Thank you!


Garvin Gray    (2009-03-03 00:39:37)
Order of games, chess, poker etc


When displaying games being played, would it be possible to show them by type of game?

As in all the chess games in order, then poker games in order etc. while still maintaining the oldest created game in that game format.

I would prefer the game display this way, rather than having the poker and chess games clumped in together.



Michael Aigner    (2009-03-07 20:34:56)
Unrated Tournaments

Sometimes I would like to experiment with some more or less unserious openings (e.g. to "improve" my OTB opening repertoire). I would not like to this in serious rated tournaments, therefore I would be happy if we could have some unrated tournaments (special tournaments area) similar to thematic tournis. What do you think about this?


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-03-07 23:56:15)
Unrated games

Hi Michael, that's a very good idea ! (why didn't I think about it before :))

Now thinking about this : If it is unrated, shoult it be a tournament ?! .. or a 2 players 1 or 2 game match ?

Also we may find a funny category name to suggest that this is a place to test new or unusual openings...

Any ideas ? :)


Marc Lacrosse    (2009-03-09 16:19:53)
Unserious openings in serious games!

"Sometimes I would like to experiment with some more or less unserious openings"

For what regards myself I do it all the time in rated games !

For example in my wch-05 semifinal match against D. Ghysens I am busy trying the Hampe-Algaier gambit (not a real success so far) and a Alekhine-Chatard one (much more promising) ... :)

So no need for special unrated tournaments for experimenting IMHO ...

Marc

PS you should have a look : this match will win the price for the most excentric openings in high-level correspondence chess (well I hope so).


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-03-10 18:25:31)
Topalov vs. Anand

Veselin Topalov vs. Viswanathan Anand [reigning FIDE world champion] is the final match in the current FIDE world championship cycle, but it is now official that FIDE postponed the match already, from September 2009 to (at least) April 20th, 2010, and opened a new bidding process.

Where will the match take place ? To be continued.


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-03-10 18:28:08)
Big Chess WCH

Yes, I agree... 2 rounds would be enough. If the current champion plays a final match against a challenger, it would take one more year at least. That's a pity.


Marc Lacrosse    (2009-03-15 15:35:28)
a problem with tournament scheduling.

This is the third time I find myself enrolled in a tournament at a completeley inapproppriated time with regard to my professional duties and leisure time possibilities.

Thibault, you should do something. At least when a tournament start has been delayed for months (or more) like this one please do send a mail or message to all players announcing the date of beginning and asking for confirmation of their participation.

For what regards myself and this wch-4 round-robin final I am in the complete impossibility to free the required amount of time by now : so I regret but I have no other choice than announcing my forfeit for all these games. Please do take my name off.

By the way I won't enroll in any other championship qualifications as long as there are no better rules regarding scheduling and announcements of tournaments start date

It's completely unacceptable to stay without any news for months and then to suddenly discover that you have a new set of games running.

Marc


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-03-15 17:55:32)
a problem with tournament scheduling

I agree, Marc.

Well, to summary the situation is :

1. It actually happens that tournaments start up to two months late in wch cycles.

2. It would take too much time (compared to the wch tournaments duration) to ask for a confirmation to all qualified players (+ spamfolder & other problems), particularly when a few players may suddenly be invited in a tournament.

3. Players can only withdraw their participation before the wch tournament starts.

IMO, to keep this rapid format, the rules should evolve to : "A player may withdraw from a wch tournament up to 15 days after it started, if he did not play a single move. In this case a player will be immediately invited in replacement. As it is not possible to wait for all confirmations, this player may withdraw from the tournament by following the same rule."

This may at least partly solve the problem. By following this new rule, you may be replaced without any penalty.

What do you think ?


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-03-15 18:17:32)
Anand vs. Computer

I don't remember Anand playing a match against a computer like Deep Blue, Deep Fritz, Junior, Rybka & so on... But it is quite possible to find a few games like Anand vs. Fritz 3, 4 or other old programs in chess databases IMO.

Anyway, it is quite hard for me to answer your question as I still think the world is divided into 2 categories, Garry Kasparov and those who dig :) (The Good, The Bad & The Ugly, of course) .. More seriously, Anand is probably one of these 4 or 5 best players of all times, but who may be quite irregular (or just human), unlike Kasparov. Tal was another genius, maybe more a gambler, but none (Topalov, Anand, Kramnik...) ever reached the level of Garry Kasparov in my opinion.

I'm not sure Anand will be interested in losing to a chess computer, particularly as even Fritz is getting stronger & stronger.


Marc Lacrosse    (2009-03-17 13:02:10)
Anand vs computer

Back in 1998 Anand was the first top player to lose a match (5-3) against a PC program (Rebel 10).
Rebel played on a PC equipped with an AMD K6 450 Mhz processor (something similar to present-day smartphones!)
The match consisted of four blitz games, two rapid ones and two slow games. It is noticeable that Anand still managed to win 1.5/2 the slow games part of the match. And if I remember correctly Anand's win in the final game was a brilliant one, one of the last convincing human wins against modern programs.



Thibault de Vassal    (2009-03-17 20:50:44)
Epoints with a SMS or phone call

Now it is possible to buy Epoints (thus also supporting FICGS & sponsorize tournaments - the prizes have just increased in most categories) by entering a code after sending a SMS or with a phone call.

More informations in "My account" page, see the window on the right of the chat bar.

Here is a free code for 3 Epoints : X358F876 , let's see who will be the first one to try Allopass :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-03-17 22:53:06)
Rules updated

I just made this change in the general rules & chess wch rules :

"11.6 There is no withdrawal, from any tournament, however in the case of multi-stages e.g. world championship tournaments, the games won't be rated if a player warns the referee before the tournament starts and at most 15 days after a new stage started but the first one, then a replacement will occur if possible. (this special rule is particularly dedicated to players surprisingly invited to an advanced wch stage, as it would take too much time to wait for confirmations from all qualified players)"

Don't hesitate to make suggestions if you think it can be better formulated. Thanks in advance.


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-03-21 19:26:53)
Slower time controls

Hello Robert,

Well, in a perfect world I would like to create another multi-stages tournament ("Cup" or something) with 40+40 days/10 moves time control. Maybe we can start it already but I'm not sure we have enough players... The same about the format. Any opinions ?

I think we should keep a fast multi-stages tournament anyway.


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-03-23 15:55:15)
Checkmate detection (finally)

A few improvements to come today !

Checkmate detection : Finally I implemented it even if I like the idea that a player should resign by himself (just like for Go). It will be in test for a few days/weeks so it may not work for everyone during this time.

A few informations more in players statistics (number of advanced chess, Go & poker games won, lost, running...)

In Go games, a reminder will appear when a player "pass" (one player has to resign or call referee to end the game, with a link to the Go scorer)

Thank you all for making suggestions that help to improve the site, I know there are many others to implement (e.g. challenges option & so on...), be patient :)


Wayne Lowrance    (2009-03-24 16:51:19)
another suggestion

My thinking is not favourable for slower time controls. There are already tournament classes that are very thin and increasing the number of tournament options only delutes the base of tournaments. By the way, Tribault if you want to increase participation, open up some faster tournament bases. Not like blitz or such, but faster. I think that would be a better improvement than slowing down. Holy cow some of my games have gone on close to a year, or seems that way anyhow. I am content with the classes/timers as they are. By the way, hardy congratulations on auto rersign on mate . :) (about time hehehehe) kidding of course. Wayne


Nick Burrows    (2009-03-27 19:34:33)
Claymation Chessgame

A game of chess animated in clay!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6bS0ow3mmAM


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-03-31 19:45:22)
Claymation Chessgame

Hi Nick, Very nice video :) The fights are really well made !


Nick Burrows    (2009-03-31 23:52:18)
beauty

Yes it's a nice change to see the aesthetics of chess utilised in an artistic project.
After all, it's such a beautiful game ;-)
Thibault, can you incorporate the animation onto the boards for each time we make a capture?!!


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-03-31 23:52:44)
Rating lists

Hi Don, I agree.. rating lists also show players who entered a provisional rating, actually I didn't think so many players would estimate themselves as advanced players when filling the registration form. Anyway this update should slowly solve the problem, question of weeks/months, 1800 is the same provisional rating as in chess, strong players should be able to reach 2000-2100 in a while.


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-03-31 23:54:37)
Flash animations

Heheh, it would be nice ... maybe one day, nothing is impossible, but it always takes time :/


Nick Burrows    (2009-04-01 20:01:57)
ratings

It's good that Anand & Topalov will play a match - they have both been in the top 3 or 4 for many year, and right now are the best 2 players in the world

Surely within 2 years Magnus will be unstopable!?

I very much like the play of Aronian, plays with great creativity...


Scott Nichols    (2009-04-06 23:31:40)
Very good point

I agree, lets keep the passion in chess, what's a little wait. It took me forever to even switch to Algebraic notation. All of my old books are in the old notation. I was just going over the first Lasker-Steinitz match. Excellent fighting chess. Whatever you decide Thibault, it will be well received.


William Taylor    (2009-04-08 20:54:57)
Missed this thread...

I was just thinking of nagging you again for a Big Chess Championship when I stumbled upon this thread. Seems I don't check the forum often enough. Any start date decided on yet? Regarding the format, in general I prefer championships to be decided by a match, though of course it would take longer.


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-04-11 17:08:18)
3rd FICGS chess wch candidates final

For the second time (out of 3), the winner of the round-robin tournament won the candidates final, congratulations to Edward Kotlyanskiy and Peter Schuster for a nice match !

Here is the spectacular game which decided the result :

http://www.ficgs.com/user_page.php?page=viewer&game=28292


William Taylor    (2009-04-12 20:04:06)
I still like the idea

I still like the idea of country teams and an Olympiad-like format. I've read Marc's post and can't imagine nationalism would be a problem on a friendly site like FICGS. However, it would be a shame for countries which only have one or two players at FICGS not to be able to play. How about a team championship along the lines of other chess team championships such as the Russian one which has just finished? i.e. teams are made up of invited players from all over the world. Anyone could be a team captain and enter a team if they could get one together. There could be an entry fee and captains might even then pay a fee to top FICGS players to be on their team in an effort to win the FICGS team trophy and prize money. ;) I'm not saying an entry fee would be a good idea - just mentioning it as a possibility. Anyway, I think a team championship of some kind, Olympiad-format or not, or both, would be interesting, exciting, and good for building the sense of community on FICGS.


Nick Burrows    (2009-04-12 21:16:56)
Olympiad

I think it's a good idea also

I am alligned with Marc's anti-nationalistic thinking in a political sense, but here it is simply a 'construct' to initiate some camaraderie and interest.
after all we still all enjoy the olympiad, and playing for club teams can be fun, because chess is such an individualistic pursuit that any opportunity to play in a team, is really just an opportunity to socialise with people that you have a shared interest with.

Pitting players from different countries against each other, has no ultimate meaning - but at least it's an idea that will initiate interest and is therefore positive.
For the people without enough countrymen for a team, why not a UnitedNations team? so all can be included.


Nick Burrows    (2009-04-14 17:45:59)
draw

The reason i ask is that this would give the players to capability to fix matters themselves without referee intervention, though i can see that it may cause more problems than it solves.

I think no.1 is the better ruling. On the rare occasion that this occurs, the player truly did offer a draw but simply didnt know the correct way to offer it. If his opponent consults the rules and calls the referee, the draw is binding, if he plays a move then the game continues...


Michel van der Kemp    (2009-04-15 00:38:58)
Ticking box should be only valid way

I also think that checking the box is the only valid way to make a draw offer, written statement should not be accepted. At best it could be a possibility that if someone receives a written request for a draw offer, he could goto the referee (in this case Thibault), and ask how to do with an (invalid) draw offer.

I don't think Thibault should go through logs of games everytime (even if that can be automated), to see if a players have offered a draw.


Normajean Yates    (2009-04-15 13:34:38)
shortest possible bigchess checkmates?

Experienced bigchess players please respond!

What are the shortest checkmates in bigchess, for white and for black (e.g. in 'normal' 8x8 chess they are the "fool's mates" - 3 moves = 5 half-moves for white; 2 moves = 4-half-moves for black..)

So which are the bigchess "fool's mates" (shortest mates)?


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-04-15 13:48:07)
shortest possible bigchess checkmates

Good question & good idea to develop the bigchess theory :)

I don't know, no time to think about it today but it may be not so easy to do it in less than the obvious 11 half-moves checkmate for White.


William Taylor    (2009-04-15 15:24:11)
shortest possible bigchess checkmates

I like the 13 half-move mate where black pushes an edge pawn or something while white hops his knight all the way over to l15. :) May have a lookk for other ones later.


Normajean Yates    (2009-04-15 21:22:03)
11 half-moves: decent uper bound..

Thanks for the posts so far - So, we made progress (in the pure math sense) - we have a 'small enough' upper bound now - 11 half-moves for white, so by symmetry 12 (or 10?) half moves for black...

I can't say 12 or 10 (above) because I havent though about the answer at all - the question came to mind; I posted it; went to sleep... will think later..


William Taylor    (2009-04-15 23:17:37)
Paragraphs

Forgive the brief off-topic post... How do you write in paragraphs in this forum? My blank lines are always automatically deleted when I click post or preview...


William Taylor    (2009-04-17 20:39:20)
Ambiguous draw offers

Don, 'Draw offered' or 'Would you like a draw?' might not be ambiguous, but how about any of the following: 'I guess it's just a draw after all.' 'Hmm, looks like I'll have to settle for a draw.' 'Well, looks like a draw then?' 'Draw' 'Any strangely-worded message that looks like it could be a draw offer but is written by somebody who doesn't speak very good English.' While my initial reaction was that such cases should be adjudicated, I now see that it could be problematic.


Normajean Yates    (2009-04-18 00:53:38)
Don, why is the tick box there, then?

Don (Groves), I don't see that someone who can clearly say 'I offer draw' can find ticking the 'draw offer' box *in addition* so difficult.

Some people are *not* courteous, (remember, we both had this common chess-opponent who just would not resign days after being checkmated; Thibault adjudicated both our games?) that's why I prefer unambiguous rules. I dont mean I prefer legalese everywhere; far from it; I just think that, say in the case under discussion, ticking the 'draw offer box' (in addition to courteous remarks on the position etc if any) is unambiguous and simple, so why make it complicated?

If only people were all showed a certain minimum level of niceness; if only people didn't retract verbal draw offers (without draw box ticked) on ficgs; if only people didn't kill; if only people didn't run concentration / extermination camps, if only people didn't drop nuclear bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and so on - it would be a much more beautiful world. But sadly, things are not so...




Normajean Yates    (2009-04-19 04:41:26)
But thibault, you already have them!

Thibault, you say: About rule 11.2 and this issue, the aim is [...] only to build accurate & understandable rules.

But, on this issue, you already *have* a very easily understandable rule - tick draw offer box and make move and send it (for making draw offer). That is very accurate and easy, isn't it. So what is the problem?

And in general, for rules of games, [except in mathematics :)] it is understood that what is not mentioned is not true (if the situation is such that this is expected by common use of language). For example, about move of the knight, we say that it moves fom one end to the diagonally opposite end of a 2x3 rectangle, and can jump over pieces while doing so. Since nothing else is mentioned about knight moves, it is understood that the knight cannot move legally except in this way. [In mathematics, we would have to explicitly say: 'the knight moves in the above way AND IN NO OTHER WAY.']




Normajean Yates    (2009-04-24 00:33:24)
me too: I just ignore the draw offer..

It has happened three times here in *one* game: an ongoing chess game of mine here on ficgs. :)

[The first time *I* offered the draw. Opponent moved, thereby automatically declining and cancelling the draw offer. The other two times *opponent* offered the draw and I moved.]

(btw I declined the offers not out of spite but because I have a win: all lines I tried give me a win. It is a most interesting game: since the annotations will not appear on the record; I'll just say that opponent returned my early exchange-sacrifice setting a trap: I could have reached Q and 3 pawns v Q, but opponent would then draw by perpetual! The [probable] winning line has Q and 2 pawns v Q and P, but my centralised Q and promotion threats win!)

It does look to me like a mountain is being made out of less than a molehill.. (not by me - I didn't start this.)

This post was to illustrate how there is *no* problem at all[1]; and neither me nor my opponent (both were playing their first games when the game began) saw any problem at all.

this is my last post on this topic.

[1] If there is at all a problem here, it is of the same level as the 'problem' that the following rule is not mentioned in ficgs-rules:

. 'gn is not allowed in chess unless n is an integer between 1 and 8 inclusive, where 1 and 8 are to interpreted as the standard numerals standing for integers in the ordered real-closed field R, with the *canonical* ordering. (As opposed to, say, an integer in the domain Z[2+i*sqrt(5)] or an integer in some exotic Grothendieck topos).
;)


Normajean Yates    (2009-04-25 06:12:32)
senility creeping up on me too, and..

Don, senility is creeping up on me too - whatever made me write Z[2+i*sqrt(5)] instead of Z[i*sqrt(5)]? - that is like writing 2 + 1/1 -1/1 without realising that that is 2 !

Thib, you can read the great *french* mathematician A. Grothendieck's seminal algebraic-geometry work EGA - it is in french, of course ;)


Normajean Yates    (2009-04-26 17:51:27)
to Don: re courtesy(contd.)

This is a continuation - to be precise, completion - of the post of mine earlier in this thread; the post titled 'Don, why is the tick box there, then?'.

I said in that post 'Some people are *not* courteous': and something stirred in my memory and I remember it now so It has to be said.

In the international chat box some months ago, I posted something about Goerge Orwell fighting in the Spanish civil-war - the anti-fascist-Iberian-uprising part of it, to wit - as part of P.O.U.M. - a marxist but independent-of-moscow (and soon crushed by Moscow) party which co-operated closely with the anarchists (CNT-FAI)(Confederación Nacional del Trabajo - Federación Anarquista Ibérica).

Well I only reached as far as the P.O.U.M. when *you* (Don Groves) interrupted by posting (in the international chat box) "what are you smoking, Normajean?"

Now, Mr Groves, I leave it to you to decide whether it is not *extremely* discourteous, not to say downright bloody rude, to innuendo that someone who [in fact] posted something above your intellectual level is therefore not making sense and is in fact on street drugs.

What I smoke or not smoke is my bloody business; the point here is that you are free to take the view find that all string-theory papers (just visit http://arxiv.org/) and so on are nonsense and therfore the authors and the referees are all on street drugs; and Hawkins and Penrose are, and Einstein was, on street drugs likewise (for it is commonly cranky *engineers* who tend to equate general relativity with its weak-field-limit/approximation);

But;

Since I haven't yet heard anything from you that has a hint of a modicum of apology for that *insulting* (or, on the least worst construction, extremely *partonising*) remark of yours; so:

People playing chess against you would be well advised to have clear rather than informal rules, because the evidence suggests that you are part of the 'be-gratuitously-rude' club.

In my opinion.

Thank you for reading this.


Normajean Yates    (2009-04-26 18:11:42)
I think Thib's IS the shortest...

To spell it out, white moves Nh2-j4-h6-j8-h10-j12, while black helps by g15-g14,Nj15-h13-g15,Ng16-j15, (and one irrelevant move e.g. moving an edge pawn). That is 5 moves ['half-moves'] by each side, and the 11th half-move is white's Nj12xh14 mate (the black K is smothered and the h14-pawn is unprotected).

You need five [half-]moves for a N to reach the opposite king; so: black can mate white (helpmate ie white co-operates) in 10 half-moves.


Normajean Yates    (2009-04-26 22:30:43)
re thib: from my other-thread post

from my post on the *other* 'draw offer' thread: (Thib youmised that one I think :))

<<Thib, you can read the great *french* mathematician A. Grothendieck's seminal algebraic-geometry work EGA - it is in french, of course ;)>>


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-04-27 14:29:37)
Normajean,

Once more, I do not know you well of course, but I could have said it also *because* IMHO there's no need of great reasonings to make one's own idea about you by reading this forum, your verve helps a lot and you said many things about yourself.

As far as I know Don (mostly through this forum - noone knows how you actually know him [point 1, btw "I don't really know him" and "Don Groves is obviously..." is quite ambitious :)]), you're totally wrong in your point 2, of course I may be wrong myself but by reading his posts in this forum, I have a very different idea.

Finally everyone makes his own opinion, no matter, but whatever this sentence was familiar or insulting, noone but yourself can approve or disapprove here so I don't see the point to respond in this thread indeed, a private discussion would have been ok to disentangle all this, I suppose :)


Philip Roe    (2009-04-27 20:32:11)
Nine half-moves

1. e2-e4 m15-m13 2. Bf1-a6 Bl16-n14 3. Nj2-h4 j14-j13 4. Qh1-k3 helps 5. Qk3xk13 mate

with many minor variations.


Normajean Yates    (2009-04-28 09:34:38)
To Thib: the purpose of my point 2

Thib, of course you are right when you say that I am *wrong* about point 2 [of to be precise, there is *no* evidence for my point 2]; but:

The point of my point 2 was the english proverb 'What is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander'.

That is, if someone asks "what are you smoking" he is asssuming that I am smoking something the smoking of which is generally socially disapproved. If that is fair, the it is fair for *me* to make assumptions, however unfounded, about that person; specially since I was careful to make those assumptions which are in fact generally (if in my opinion regrettably) socially *approved* !

Finally, you (Thib.) did not as a matter of fact say it; and if you had, I would hardly have noticed or minded; because you are young and *provenly* liberal. It would *not* be an insult if *you* had said it.


Normajean Yates    (2009-04-28 12:25:12)
PhilipRoe+SophieLeClerc - wonderful!

PhilipRoe+SophieLeClerc (Sophie should get joint credit I think because she first posted in 'international chat' (2009-04-16 08:31:15-25) that a Q+N mate would be even shorter) - that's wonderful - congratulations!

But Sophie had posted that 'it can be done in 8 half-moves with the Q and N' (she didn't give the line). Philip's line, if reversed so that *black* checkmates white, will need 10 half-moves because the mating side in this process needs to free the f-Bishop, free the Q, move the f-bishop once and move the Q twice - a total of 5 [half-]moves. So if black mates by Roe's method it on black's 5th move - which means 10 half-moves.

So, is there a shorter way [specially, with *black* mating]?

Waiting for more posts..


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-04-30 12:16:34)
Xavier Pichelin wins the 2nd FICGS WCH

First of all, congratulations Xavier !

That's a real performance to beat Wolfgang in a match (whatever the score..).

These games will have to be analyzed, Xavier has good positions but the FICGS withdrawals rule 11.6 may apply in a few games (otherwise basically Xavier's future rating is 2682 !!).

Any opinion on each game is welcome.


Hannes Rada    (2009-04-30 19:16:18)
Wolfgang's retirement

Wolfgang, I am really shocked about your decision.
However I can understand, that from time to time someone needs a break from the daily chess analysis routine.
Although some of the positions look favourable for Xavier, I think that most of them could be defended.
I thought that according the rules games will not be rated if less then 10 moves are played.
So imho this match should be rated and we should not have any problem with Xavier's 2682 rating.

And we know also now the next WC:

Xavier Pichelin - Edward Kotlyanskiy !


Scott Nichols    (2009-04-30 23:58:53)
Rated or unrated?

I would play either way. Usually, I only will play rated, but I would think this format would work just as well unrated.

The theme I think is fun here, with fun names. I was thinking of all kinds of bizarre openings to try, but would need to think twice about opening choice if it was rated. It sorta goes back to Michael Aigner's point on unrated tournaments IMHO. Thank you for having this new style.

The incentive in rated games is simply not to lose points if you lose, or to gain points if you win. In team chess, this incentive is not needed. The incentive is that you do not want your teammates to beat you up if you lose. ;-)


Sophie Leclerc    (2009-05-01 01:23:07)
Thanks

While I thanks for the credits, I'll tell you that I am not a woman, ( why i have that name, you doN,t want to know kay. I got a wrong name, but I like it. )

I saw to real way for black to check mate white. But to get a queen take the weak pawn. And white does it faster.

1 e4 j13 2.Ba6 h14 3. Nh4 m14 4. Qk3 Bm15 5. Qxk5 mate. was the lines I poster in the internationnal chat. ( I am not a girl. )


Normajean Yates    (2009-05-01 04:06:00)
sorry+thanks Sophie - but: its still 9..

but it is still 9 [half-]moves because the mate is on white's 5th move, so 5 white-moves + 4 black-moves, = 9 [half-]moves.

If you see, yours and Philip's solutions are essentially minor variants of each other...

In Sophie's solution, 2..h14 is of couse an easily repaired mistype [2..h14 is not possible, you see]- one can just replace it by say 2..a14.


Normajean Yates    (2009-05-01 04:18:45)
Sphie's soln is a tad more interesting..

arguably. Because, the L16-B instead of moving away, comes to k15 to be captured..

Interestingly, (very minor point) both Philip and Sophie mistype the checkmating move 5.Q(k3)xk15 mate: Philip gives 5.Qk3xk13, Sophie gives 5.Qxk5... (I just noticed it because I was reading what was meant, not what was written..)

Finally, by 'she' I meant 'she or he': I sometimes do...


Sophie Leclerc    (2009-05-01 05:09:37)
8 moves

I am man....


The presence of knight around the king protect him from worst idiocy, I don,t think a lone queen can mate sooner


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-05-01 20:57:25)
Applying FICGS rules

I just had a deeper look at the 12 games and I applied FICGS rules only (just like in the match Lacrosse-Ghysens).

According to me, Xavier has an advantage in game 28302, it is not so clear in game 28305 but IMO this game should be rated also. As a result, 4 games will be rated in this match, Xavier's future rating is now 2577.


Don Groves    (2009-05-03 00:21:39)
Team tournament ethics

Should each player on a team play his/her game in isolation, or is asking one's teammates for advice permitted?


Don Groves    (2009-05-03 06:30:36)
I agree...

... with that, William, and the only way to prevent it is to not allow any coaching during the games. Can we all agree on that?

However, before a game begins, team members may share information they may have on an opponent's prior games and tendencies.


Daniel Parmet    (2009-05-11 03:02:30)
thoughts

oh also the reason I don't play more big chess is cause the average game goes over 200 moves and that assumes they resign once its clear they are lost... I can see games going to 600 moves if you play to mate.


Normajean Yates    (2009-05-11 03:52:01)
Daniel, I think you underestimate Rs...

you give B=4, R=4.5 but in the endgame specially, the Rooks pull their weight..15th ('7th' file), escorting Ps to promotion, ...

About people playing on to mate after being a Q down or so without counterchances, well a bigger player-pool is needed ... plus I understand some newbie players not being so sure that mate is easy in a given pos (though much lengthier than in chess) - so, we need *more* non-newbie players!

And a non-newbie begins as a newbie: however, I agree that's not the whole story -- some people *will* play on to mate...one sees that in chess (8x8) too -

lets see: my bigchess record: 17/17 - wow! (with 1 pending: it is still in the gambit-opening stage)


Normajean Yates    (2009-05-12 01:02:03)
long bigchess .. and chess games..

from the english wikipedia: "in May 2006, Bourzutschky and Konoval discovered a KQNKRBN position with an astonishing DTC of 517 moves." That is distance-to-conversion! (and that was 2006!) So, you can figure out distance-to-mate and the overall length of a game that reaches this endgame ;)


Normajean Yates    (2009-05-12 01:15:30)
bigchess thoughts+tips, #3: R v B

[re Daniel Parmet's valuation in his post] - both are longrange pieces but:

1. a Bishop can reach only 128 squares, a Rook can reach all 256. (and all the other standard reasons why the R is [in general] much more powerful than the B, they carry over to bigchess eg a R can confine the opp's K to an edge; K+R v K is standard easy mate, etc.)

2. In 8x8 chess, once you have a semi-open file, one tries to 'boost' a rook up that file (even if one cannot reach the 7th file). This is much more common, and much more commonly advantageous, in bigchess, because one easily creates a 'quasi-semi-open' file by pushing a pawn 4-5 squares ahead, and boosts a Rook up this 'quasi-semi-open' file.

Hence, I feel that just as in 8x8 chess, the Rook is nearly twice as powerful as the Bishop in bigchess.


Daniel Parmet    (2009-05-12 02:04:56)
Queen trap

yes I must say these are quite common in bigchess. I trapped my opponents queen in 2 games and I think if I recall I used the threat of trapping in one game to win massive material.


Ranganathan Raman    (2009-05-16 02:32:37)
how many team are they?

1st team match with which team?


Normajean Yates    (2009-05-21 02:36:57)
to summarise: interesting!

I read the ficgs chess WCH rules: interesting!

In short,

stages 1a-3a: the top-8 rated players play a (3-stage obviously!) *knockout* (each match consisting of 8 games; so that is 56 top-rated games!)

stages 1b-3b. In parallel, the rest of the contenders play a 3-stage round-robin (groups of 5, 7, 9, 11 or 13 players.) - as William Taylor posted, only the *winner* of each round-robin stage goes to the next stage - (or if rated above 2300, directly from stage 1 to stage 3 - see rules for detatils)

stage 4: the knockout winner plays the round-robin in an 8-match candidate-finals; to decide who the challenger will be.

stage 5: the challenger v the current WCh -12 game match.

for pairing and tie-break rules (and all the above), just follow the link above [William Taylor's post]; search the page for "FICGS CHESS WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP :": it will probably be faster than scrolling down ;)


Normajean Yates    (2009-05-27 05:02:24)
Thank you Thib: and I am so relieved!

First, about the 'thank you' to Thib.: that is for responding :) Now, to business:

>Thib said: Speaking of the server, I'm not afraid of crisis or whatever, the statistics are just better and better now..

I am so relieved! Seriously.

>Thib. said: FICGS grew very slowly during 2 or 3 years but IMO it was based on realistic views..

Exactly! That was one of the first things I noticed when I discovered this site (early June last year, I think) - I phoned my partner [she and I were in different countries on that day; coincidentally, this month also..] - told her this site *will* survive, and chess.com will *not* survive [too much money wasted by Eric of chess.com even then] - [It was only in in May last year that I had noticed chess.com in its present incarnation (earlier it did *not* offer chess-*playing*, it was a chess-reference-material site only)

(My partner doesn't play chess but of course one doesn't have to be a chess-player to be interested in issues like this!)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(beginning of digression about chess.com (as a contrasting example):)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

well chess.com has *technically speaking* survived; but there is a graded level of paying members [silver-gold-diamond-platinum-what not] - each year paying membership has to be renewed [I am a free member there; I don't play games there now except on special request :) ] -- and..

Guess what, chess.com in a few months intoduced a system that gave a *playing advantage* to paying members: the more expensive grade you are in, the greater the paying advantage. So, as far as correspondence chess is concerned, can chess.com be now considered a chess site?

(In fact I posted a thread there last year suggesting that they should introduce auction: at any time any of the opponents in a game can bid to win a game. [even if they have lone K against K+Q+Q+R :}] - then if opponent doesn't make a bigger bid then the bidder wins the game. Minimum bid € 20,00 :) (chess.com is a US site ;) )There was some heated discussion over it.. Eric (the site owner - he is a decent chap, all said and done) prudently stayed away from that discussion :)

I posted in various threads there also directly saying that chess.com is probably the only *chess* site where the more you pay, the greater advantage you have in a *game*. Is that chess?

None of the above is defamatory: it is obviously true for anyone to check - and clearly Erik silently agrees - well good luck to him...

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(end of digression about chess.com)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



>Thib. said: so don't worry, the site will survive after both of us, I'll take care of that :)

:)
I am sure now that you will :) (but not because both of us will suddenly die tomorrow, I hope ;))



Normajean Yates    (2009-05-28 03:40:31)
Thib, my auction suggestion was sarcasm!

Thib. please read it again (the part where I suggested auction at chess.com - or you can loook at my thread on this there - it is called 'the best chess money can buy' ;)

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/community/the-best-chess-money-can-buy

(I am not sure whether the link works for members only or for everyone; anyway free membership is a 5-minute process..)

That was sarcasm! I meant this: suppose you are left with K+Q v K. Sure win for you, no? At least you can't lose, even on time (insuff. material) ? Now my sarcastic suggestion was that: opponent bids €20 for the game, now if you cannot bid higher then opponent *wins* the game automatically!

Of course I thought until yesterday that no chess site will offer *that* kind of auction! but you said:

>Speaking of auction at chess.com, that's a funny idea and I just wonder why I did not think about a system where you can bet some epoints at any time in any game...

Surely *you* don't want *that* kind of auction here, do you? ;)


Normajean Yates    (2009-06-03 19:35:22)
Thib. excellent point re human nature...

"The problem is that human nature make us reproduce known positions much more than unknown ones" - excellent point! So many opening variations, you will still find no mention, or something abou 'there is little match-experience with this position'.


Normajean Yates    (2009-06-04 08:40:10)
another suggestion: draw offer+timeout

another suggestion: suppose *I* make a draw offer and then *opponent* runs out of time; in such a case *my* draw offer is automatically deemed accepted by *opponent*: the result is recorded as a draw.

Or maybe this: giving a disadavtage only to repeated-draw-offerers:

Above rule, but only applied if it is *not* my *first* draw-offer in the game: i.e.:

In a game between player A and player B; if player A make a draw offer and in response player B runs out of time; and further, if there have been two draw offers in the game by player A such that player B has *not* made a draw offer between the said two draw offers by player B; then the draw offer of player A is automatically deemed accepted by player B: the result is recorded as a draw (instead of player B losing on time).


Garvin Gray    (2009-06-04 10:27:27)
hmm

This seems odd and if the server does automatically award the draw in this situation you describe, then it goes against the fide laws of chess.

The player has to agree to the draw for the game to be concluded as such. If the player runs out of time before agreeing to a draw, then they have lost.

It seems pretty cut and dried to me.


Hannes Rada    (2009-06-04 21:56:51)
Dead Endgames

Thibault, you are talking about endgames in this connection.
Do you mean for instance the famous rook endgames, which are always a draw according to Tarrasch :-)
And it is true, there are so many rook endings which cannot be won, with extra material. Even with 2 extra pawns ....
I had 2 times a position with K + R + f+h Pawn, against K + R which is a theoretical draw. Sometimes chess can be really unfair. You are playing much better than your opponent, you manage to to achieve material advantage of 1 or 2 pawns, but the rook endgame is still a draw ...
Here is a proposal against the broad draw corridor
http://hem.passagen.se/melki9/reformedchess.htm
http://www.iccf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=3618&page=5


Normajean Yates    (2009-06-05 03:07:37)
oh then minor technical change...

instead of the game having been drawn automatically, referee *adjudicates* it as a draw.

This ensures that fide rules are not violated, because a game result *can* be changed by adjudication: for example:

Suppose OTB, immediately after a game is over, the winning player is found to have a hidden transciever with a *log* showing that moves *were* transmitted and move-suggestions *were* recieved. And the player breaks down in tears and admits to cheating: pleading for leniency - not in re that particular game, but for a shorter ban-from-tournaments than s/he expects to get. In this case, at the very least the game would be readjudicated as a loss for said player, no?

Also, on ficgs the 50-move rule is not implemented; so a game won here which would otherwise be drawn under the 50-move rule - wouldn't *that* violate fide rules? For corr chess, it is more iecc/iccf than fide - fide will come around :)


Normajean Yates    (2009-06-05 14:17:11)
no no 50-move rule shouldnt be there..

in correspondence chess - Thib. you were right not to implement the 50-move rule - please don't!

Hey people, don't you want to announce tablebase-mate in 132 with distance-to-conversion 98? If the 50-move rule is implemented, you'll never get that chance!


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-06-08 14:55:49)
1.f4 d6 2.c4 Nf6 3.Nc3 g6 4.Nf3 Bg7

We'll try it in a thematic tourney soon...


Normajean Yates    (2009-06-09 00:40:56)
Thanks a lot! Much appreciated!

30 days / year can be exhausting. Specially, then, there is a tendency not to take unrated games seriously, so e.g. quality of thematics (and hence opening theory development) suffers.


Normajean Yates    (2009-06-14 12:22:10)
serious researching the Kings Gambit!

at ficgs. Three consecutive thematics: #81, 82, 83 are King's Gambit!

That is very welcome!


Ulrich Imbeck    (2009-06-14 22:30:33)
5.0-0 g5 6.g3

What's the matter with
1.e4 e5 2.f4 exf4 3.Nf3 d6 4.Bc4 h6 5.O-O g5 6.g3
If g4 then 7.Nh4 f3 8.Nxf3 gxf3 9.Qxf3


Normajean Yates    (2009-06-15 00:50:12)
Ulrich, enter and try it!

Enter and try it in a KG thematic, as I said! We are all trying kg lines in the thematics, instead of posting them to be answered here ;) We get a much more convincing answer by playing it!


Robert Gally    (2009-06-17 18:17:09)
First!

Thibault, that would be great actually!

Don, All he has to do is check 'last logged in timestamp' if there is a 2nd e-mail after that time, don't send it! Doesn't matter if I read it, just that I have too many in my inbox without having come here to make a move!


Daniel, I have no idea how to configure a filter to accept 1 message of a certain subject, but not any others until the first is deleted... sounds way to complicated for gmail to attempt!


Michael Aigner    (2009-06-21 22:44:42)
Suggestion for thematic tourny

I am interested in the Cochran Gambit (1.e4 e5 2.Sf3 Sf6 3.Sxe5 d6 4.Sxf7)
and would be happy if we could play a thematic tourny with this opening - some day.

All the best,
Michael


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-06-21 23:02:23)
Cochrane gambit

It is now planned to be the 86th thematic tourney !

By the way it has been played before, see :

FICGS__CHESS__THEMATIC_TOURNAMENT__000031
FICGS__CHESS__THEMATIC_TOURNAMENT__000030


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-06-22 16:41:00)
Discussion at Rybkachess

That's an interesting discussion... Once more, the confusion reigns between Freestyle chess (commonly played at classical & blitz time controls) and Correspondence Chess, particularly for centaur players who did not experience correspondence chess at a 2500+ level.

IMO (in brief) on several points :

1) All these made-for-engines books have no other interest than to "manipulate" chess engines & other made-for-engines books, actually this has almost nothing to do with correspondence chess (where they are completely useless at a high level, let's say 2300+) or even chess.

2) Many players do not realize the multitude of factors that appear to be more important that the basic strength of centaurs once the correspondence chess 2400 mark is reached and that still increases at 2500 and 2600... The higher the level, the more "opening books" depend on the recent games played by the opponent (and his level), the number of current games played, the score to reach in 8 games matches, the importance of rating, the goal in life, even the month/season for a few players and many other things according to the persons... Actually these "openings books" just live the time to use it one time, so a better term is preparation, actually opening books do not exist anymore in correspondence chess at a very high level, at most it may be useful against weaker players.

3) The previous point is enough to explain the rating changes of most 2400+ players ! In example...

- GM Farit Balabaev is a very experienced player who constantly has(had) more than 100 running correspondence chess games at several places for years, he's also a fast player, it is quite logical to me that he looks for quiet games and fast draws (or lose sometimes to very strong players who want to win more)

- Wolfgang Utesch, FICGS WCH finalist, like many players at one time in their life, decided that other things were more important and that correspondence chess was too time consuming, particularly once the 2500 mark has been reached...

- Eros Riccio obviously decided to win every correspondence chess competition at FICGS while playing a high number of games at several places AFTER having topped the FICGS rating list with the highest rating so far (which he did), so it is natural to look for a few quick draws in matches if 8 draws mean a victory for him (and a few rating points lost, that is quite inhuman anyway :))

- Michael Aigner tops most FICGS rating lists by playing only games at 40 days + 40 days / 10 moves time control, which is an enormous performance as obviously the longer the time control, the higher the rate of draws. I do not know how many current games he's playing at ICCF or IECG and other organisations but I suspect he plays a quite reasonable number of games.

- Xavier Pichelin may top the FICGS rating list this year as he's an incredibly dangerous player with White and Black and with a reasonable number of running games.

Many strong players also choose to play some tournaments for "fun" or to experiment openings and may lose some points while their real strength is over 2500 or more... so it is quite hard to make the difference between the real strength and correspondence chess ratings. So many parameters... It is likely that we'll see one day a 12 games match between Eros and Xavier (Michael do not play fast correspondence chess time control, yet I hope), we all wonder what rating could achieve Vasik Rajlich (Rybka's creator) and other very strong freestyle players but it is very hard to predict only by knowing their results in freestyle tournaments. Correspondence chess is a mirror of real life.


Nick Burrows    (2009-06-23 16:39:02)
Candidates Matches Regulations

http://www.chessvibes.com/reports/candidates-matches-regulations-published-who-will-qualify/


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-06-24 19:06:32)
Future thematic tournaments

Thanks everyone for your nice suggestions, so we'll have :


Anti-Moscow gambit, 1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.Nf3 e6 5.Bg5 h6 6.Bh4 dxc4 7.e4 g5 8.Bg3 b5 :

FICGS__CHESS__THEMATIC_TOURNAMENT__000088


Sicilian Dragon, 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 g6 :

FICGS__CHESS__THEMATIC_TOURNAMENT__000087


Daniel Parmet    (2009-06-24 21:53:18)
thematics rock

I'm down for 86 and 88!!

I would also suggest Alekhine's and Benko for future ones


Rodolfo d Ettorre    (2009-06-25 04:38:46)
Thematics ...

Also if it is possible I would like the Ponziani and the 4 horses


Normajean Yates    (2009-06-25 06:01:09)
Benko, definitely!

After KG thematics (#81-83) there was supposed to be benko gambit thematic, no?

#89 - benko gambit: I second Daniel's proposal (actually the original Banko suggestion was made by someone between 20-24 May I think.. if it was not Daniel then I am the third person to request Benko.)


Tano-Urayoan Russi Roman    (2009-06-25 20:42:58)
About thematic Volga

We had recently one: FICGS__CHESS__THEMATIC_TOURNAMENT__000059


Normajean Yates    (2009-06-25 21:39:33)
Oh ! Thanks!

Thanks for pointing it out, Mr/Ms Russi Román!

I should have just search for benko/volga games (in the standard move-order) to check if a benko thematic has been held... Thematics #3, #58 and #59 were benko (volga) gambit thematics.


Wayne Lowrance    (2009-06-29 23:19:38)
dad blame it Thibault

I want to enter, it says deadline nov 1 2009, but it says's closed. whats's up mate ?. (second request)
Wayne


Hannes Rada    (2009-07-03 13:52:10)
Match vs. Scheming Mind

Maybe we should try a FICGS vs. Scheming Mind match :-)


Normajean Yates    (2009-07-03 14:03:22)
ficgs v 'the scheming mind' ..

well 'the scheming mind' seems to be a no-engines no-tablebases site. But, for ficgs v 'the scheming mind' engine-use a matter of negotiation..


Nick Burrows    (2009-07-04 07:55:18)
Minimum rating idea

A common problem encountered in correspondance chess is that of strong players forefitting several games and their rating dropping by hundreds of points

This spoils the tourny for lower rated players who often have a 2200 rated player in their group with a misleading rating of 1600.
It also de-stabilises the ratings across the whole site as many players grades are false.
Lastly, and of least concern because players who made the drop deserve some handicap - the artificially low-graded player has a whole year of uncompetitive matches as he waits to regain points.

In o.t.b tournaments in England, a method employed to stop rating cheats is that a player who has won a certain class of tournament previously, cannot re-enter at that level.
The equivalent here would be that your rating has a minimum value, equal to the highest rating requirement of a tournament class you have previously won.

This seems to solve the problems experienced by many on this site.

It may be said that the rating drop is a necessary deterrent to prevent players from doing this. My experience is that it occurs from factors out of one's control (illness) and any deterrant is irrelevant - just as a death penalty doesn't stop heroin addicts from stealing!

What d'yall think?


William Taylor    (2009-07-08 00:04:04)
Shatranj

Shatranj is offered at live time controls on ICC (www.chessclub.com) and I've played quite a few games of it there.
The match vs igame.ru was fun so a match vs Scheming Mind could be too.


Daniel Parmet    (2009-07-08 05:02:57)
mine!

My blog: http://chaoschess.blogspot.com/

I actually run a blog where i've plugged ficgs several times:) However, I doubt the material is going to be of much interest to corr players but check it out anyways!


Iouri Basiliev    (2009-07-13 14:59:09)
1st team tournament

I'm lost. Where we can see the 1st team tournament reglament? Would be team match points counted or just all players points? Sorry, i can't scan all the messages.


Klearchos Loukopoulos    (2009-07-14 21:47:18)
withdraw, me too!

Would it be possible to be removed from

FICGS__CHESS__THEMATIC_TOURNAMENT__000086

thematic chess, first moves : e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nxf7.

Just this one, not the other one that is currently on nor the other, for which I'm still in the waiting list.


Wayne Lowrance    (2009-07-23 17:29:16)
Rybka tablebase work qround bug

Thanks to Kullberg of Rybka forum fame. This long known bug has a work around that works. Just set max cpu to N-1, then exit and go back to engine paramaters and reset it to N where of course N is equal to max cpu's of your computer. then exit. That is all there is too it. It works, no one knows why, save Vas who said "it is now clear".
Wayne


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-07-24 11:56:27)
Draw offers

Hi William, quite true. Don's proposal is ok but not automatic... I do not remember if PGN notation includes this case, but if it does, I may envisage this change.


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-08-04 19:20:34)
Karpov vs. Kasparov rematch

You are probably aware of this promising rematch between former world chess champions Anatoly Karpov and Garry Kasparov. (Valencia - Spain, september 21-24, 2009)

What do you think about the possible games ? Is Karpov now too old, is Kasparov able to concentrate on chess only again ? What can be their state of mind during such a match, 25 years after their first match that became legendary... It should be a great event anyway, maybe even more interesting than the last FIDE chess championships. (By the way I don't know if there will be sponsors and/or prizes)


Nick Burrows    (2009-08-05 13:13:03)
quotes

"Don't get set into one form, adapt it and build your own, and let it grow, be like water.
Empty your mind, be formless, shapeless — like water.
Now you put water in a cup, it becomes the cup; You put water into a bottle it becomes the bottle; You put it in a teapot it becomes the teapot.
Water can flow or it can crash. Be water, my friend."
- Bruce Lee

"I fear not the man who has practiced 10,000 kicks once, but I fear the man who has practiced one kick 10,000 times." - Bruce Lee

"It's not the size of the dog in the fight, it's the size of the fight in the dog."-Mark Twain

No one should allow his mind to be a vehicle for others to use; He who does not direct his own mind lacks mastery. Ono who is looking for a reward is smaller than the reward; One who has renounced a thing has risen above it. So long as one has a longing to obtain any particular object, one cannot go further than that object.
- Hazrat Inayat Khan

Be who you are, and say what you feel because those who mind don't matter, and those who matter don't mind. -Dr. Seuss

Watch your thoughts; they become words. Watch your words; they become actions. Watch your actions; they become habits. Watch your habits; they become character. Watch your character; it becomes your destiny.
- Frank Outlaw


Nick Burrows    (2009-08-05 13:17:24)
flying phallus

Maybe a secret weapon for Karpov if he's losing the match!


William Taylor    (2009-08-06 15:09:54)
Nice

I hadn't heard about that - I look forward to it. Is there a website dedicated to the match?


Rolf Staggat    (2009-08-06 18:20:56)
Valencia-match

I did not find a site about that match, but
<previews.chessdom.com/kasparov-karpov-valencia-2009>
is a report about it, also to find on the <fide.com> site


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-08-08 11:26:55)
MoGo vs. Many Faces Of Go

Just read in the AGA newsletter (American Go E-Journal vol. 10) on the rematch between Myeong-Wan Kim 8p vs. Computer :

"Many Faces was very different, it behaved more like a human, while MoGo was pure computer and very unpredictable. It was easier to play Many Faces -- though it may be the stronger program -- because I could predict what it was going to do. Many Faces made better shape, but MoGo had better reading. I’d really like to see both programs play each other and see what happens."

I never played MoGo, but it may be instructive...


Tano-Urayoan Russi Roman    (2009-08-08 12:58:15)
News about the match (spanish)

http://www.marca.com/2009/07/07/mas_deportes/ajedrez/1246987804.html

http://www.marca.com/2009/07/30/mas_deportes/ajedrez/1248963069.html

http://www.marca.com/2009/07/31/mas_deportes/ajedrez/1249059832.html


William Taylor    (2009-08-10 16:16:54)
Poker engine

I've played poker against a computer before (several computer opponents). I think the program I used was called 'Tik's Texas Hold'em', but I've no idea what the best poker program is. I seem to remember reading something in either a poker magazine or a poker website a while ago about a match between top pros and top programs, and I don't think it was a one-sided encounter.


Don Groves    (2009-08-10 22:56:13)
One for the file

"Whoever said the pen is mightier than the sword obviously never encountered automatic weapons." -- US General Douglas MacArthur


Nick Burrows    (2009-08-10 23:58:37)
automatic weapons

The pen is mightier than the sword, just as the printing press is mightier than automatic weapons!


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-08-11 11:56:16)
Poker engine

[William] Yes, I think I've read also an article on a computer beating a pro player in heads up. Maybe the chancy factor ?

[Benjamin] I think it is possible, maybe easy, to code an engine to play here, but maybe it's not so easy to code a good engine able to play well in a 3 winning rounds match. Dunno...


Daniel Parmet    (2009-08-11 20:08:24)
Quotes!

The following 11 quotes are all by me:
1- "Experiences are the keys to life."
2- "Happy endings are just stories that haven't finished yet."
3- "If you expect nothing then the following will happen: either 1) you will receive nothing and thus can be happy your expectations were met or 2) You will receive something and thus be happy you have received something. And.... Happiness ensues..."
4- "Step up and face your fear or you will never be what you should be."
5- "A mistake is only a mistake if you let it happen twice. Otherwise it is a learning experience. your experience."
6- "Life is painting a picture over many years with different paints and tools."
7- ""Horney concluded that love was at least a temporary escape from all her anxiety and insecurity" - Karen Horney
Does anyone else think that someoe named 'Horney' shouldn't be talking about love?"
8- "Take each event in a singularity and say if time passes will any of this matter?"
9- "Plans are ideas that never come to fruition."
10- "You should only get upset about the little things cause you have no control over the big things."
11- "Causing another problem without fixing the initial problem just makes the initial problem worse as time continues"

The following are classic quotes:
11- "If you lose the game you should win the analysis!"
12- "Every passing minute is a chance to turn it all around." - Vanilla Sky
13- "Life is pain my dear and anyone who says otherwise is selling something." - Princess Bride
14- "The 7ps: Prior Proper Planning Prevents Piss Poor Performance" - U.S. Military
15- "Water water everywhere but not a drop to drink!" - Rhyme of the Ancient Mariner
16- "You can get in way more trouble with a good idea than a bad idea cause you forget the good idea has limits" - Warren Buffet
17- "Teach a child to be polite and courteous and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to merge his car onto the freeway."
18- "Experience is the thing you have left when everything else is gone."
19- "There is no tomorrow without the pains and pleasures of today" - Gabriel
20- "If life weren't this complicated, it would be nowhere near as fun. Why? WHY NOT!" - Catch-22
21- "When you've done things right people won't know you've done anything at all." - Futurama
22- "The right perception of any matter and a misunderstanding of the same matter do not wholly exclude each other." - Kafka's the trial
23- "the Trausi follow the normal practices of Thracians in general, except in one particular- their behaviour, namely, on the occasion of a birth or a death. When a baby is born the family sits round and mourns at the thought of the sufferings the infant must endure now that it has entered the world, and goes through the whole catalogue of human sorrows; but when somebody dies, they bury him with merriment and rejoicing, and point out how happy he now is and how many miseries he has at last escaped." -Herodotus Viv
24- "When a Persian herald demanded the surrender of arms, the king shouted back 'come here to get them'; and when he had seen that he was surrounded, he commanded his men to have a good breakfast since their dinner would be served in hell." - Herodotus
25- "I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it"
26- "Why, we don't even know what living means now, what it is, and what it is called? Leave us alone without books and we shall be lost and in confusion at once. We shall not know what to join on to, what to cling to, what to love and what to hate, what to respect and what to despise." - Fyodor Dostoyevsky Notes from the Underground
27- "Creativity is allowing yourself to make mistakes. Art is knowing which ones to keep." - Scott Adams
28- "Nobody is always a winner and anyone who says otherwise either is a liar or doesn't play poker."
29- “The darkness immutable tranquility holds sway.” - Jun’ichiro Tanizaki
30- “People who are constantly asking 'why' are like tourists who stand in front of a building reading Baedeker and are so busy reading the history of its construction, etc., that they are prevented from seeing the building.” - Ludwig Wittgenstein
31- “Either move or be moved.” - Ezra Pound
32- "The real meditation is the meditation of one's identity..... You try finding out why you're you and not somebody else. And who in the blazes are you anyhow??" - Ezra Pound.
33- “The image is more than an idea. It is a vortex or cluster of fused ideas and is endowed with energy.” - Ezra Pound
34- “The thought working its way towards the light.” - Ludwig Wittgenstein
35- “There are always two people in every picture: the photographer and the viewer.” - Ansel Adams
36- “When words become unclear, I shall focus with photographs. When images become inadequate, I shall be content with silence.” - Ansel Adams
37- "Wanting to think is one thing; having a talent for thinking is another." - Ludwig Wittgenstein
38- “Philosophers use a language that is already deformed as though by shoes that are too tight” - Ludwig Wittgenstein
39- “Nothing is more important for teaching us to understand the concepts we have than constructing fictitious ones” - Ludwig Wittgenstein
40- “don’t for heaven’s sake, be afraid of talking nonsense! But you must pay attention to your nonsense” - Ludwig Wittgenstein
41- “In a conversation: One person throws a ball; the other does not know: whether he is supposed to throw it back, or throw it to a third person, or leave it on the ground, or pick it up and put it in his pocket, etc” - Ludwig Wittgenstein
42- “I really do think with my pen, because my head often knows nothing about what my hand is writing” - Ludwig Wittgenstein
43- “What I am writing here may be feeble stuff; well, then I am just not capable of bringing the big, important thing to light. But hidden in these feeble remarks are great prospects.” - Ludwig Wittgenstein
44- “I ask countless irrelevant questions. If only I can succeed in hacking my way through this forest!” - Ludwig Wittgenstein
45- “Even to have expressed a false thought boldly and clearly is already to have gained a great deal” - Ludwig Wittgenstein
46- “Don’t concern yourself with what, presumably no one but you grasps!” - Ludwig Wittgenstein
47- “when you are philosophizing you have to descend into primeval chaos and feel at home there” - Ludwig Wittgenstein
48- "You cannot step into the same river twice." - Heraclitus
49- "Eternity is a child playing, playing checkers; the kingdom belongs to a child." - Heraclitus
50- "Nothing endures but change." - Heraclitus
51- "For a guest remembers all his days the hospitable man who showed him kindness." - Odyssey Book 15 Line 75
52- "Watching [GM Nigel] Short peruse the photos of young women, I had a fanciful notion that the development of specialized skills and character traits in early childhood is like a country fair in which you are alotted a fixed number of tickets to spend on the various concessions. This particular fixed number of tickets to spend on the various concessions. This particular fair is of short duration and happens only once in a lifetime. Nigel took the chess roller-coaster a dozen times, and rode the honesty ride twice, and so he had insufficient tickets left to take the Train Beyond Adolescence more than a stop or two. I myself missed the athletic concession, and I should have ridden -damn it- the chess coaster three or four times." - King's Gambit: A Son, A Father, and the World's Most Dangerous Game by Paul Hoffman page335
53- “I don’t know, but I do know with great precision why nobody else knows either.” - John H. Cochrane
54- "One must have chaos within oneself, to give birth to a dancing star." - Friedrich Nietsche
55- "I created chaos on the chess board and my strength lay in finding hidden harmonies. I always cultivated being at peace in chaos. manifest your unique character on the chess board." - Josh Waitzkin
56- "Leave numbers behind and ride the wave of the game." - Josh Waitzkin
57- "The weakness of an artist is dogma." - Josh Waitzkin
58- "Everything i've learned, i've eventually unlearned. I spend more time unlearning than learning. You must challenge your own micro thought constructs." - Josh Waitzkin
59- "It is like a tunnel, the deeper you get into the more you see there is to learn." - Josh Waitzkin
60- "Your emotions are there for a reason. Observe their ripple." - Josh Waitzkin
61- "The same mold, teachers have learned a certain way. great teachers should listen first." - Josh Waitzkin
62- "Change from psychology and technical errors, transition from opening prep to first middlegame decision or tactical to strategical." - Josh Waitzkin
63- "There is some part about any discipline that should appeal to any person." - Josh Waitzkin
64- "Identify thematic connections by breaking down the walls between different disciplines." - Josh Waitzkin
65- "You know your country is dying when you have to make a distinction between what is moral and ethical, and what is legal." - John de Armond
66- "In times of universal deceit, telling the truth will be a revolutionary act." - George Orwell
67- "When you stop learning you start dying." - Scott Adams
68- "If you could buy some people for what they are worth, and sell them for what they "think" they are worth, there would always be a profit margin."
69- "Don't compare your life to others. You have no idea what their journey is all about."
70- "Life is too short to waste time hating anyone."
71- "When in doubt, just take the next small step."
72- "When it comes to going after what you love in life, don't take no for an answer."
73- "Frame every so-called disaster with these words 'In five years, will this matter?" - Ellis
74- "If we all threw our problems in a pile and saw everyone else's, we'd grab ours back."
75- "Envy is a waste of time. You already have all you need."
76- "There are three sides to every story: your side, their side and the truth." - Bablyon 5
77- "Better than a thousand days of diligent study is one day with a great teacher." - Japanese Proverb


My apologies if some of the classics are in the ficgs quote file already as I just keep my own (and pull quotes from everywhere). I tried to cull out the duplicates.


Ralf Mulde    (2009-08-18 00:24:11)
DESC corr. chess Open 2009 invitation

Dear chessfriends,

German e-mail Correspondence Chessclub (DESC) invites everyone to
join the DESC Open. Join with uns and have fun playing chess!

Everyone in the world who can play chess (and has the possibility to
use an e-mail-system) is invited herewith to take part at this tournament.

It's a cost-free tournament, no one has to pay any fees.

Please register per e-mail at [ turnierbuero@desc-online.de ] until
Sept. 19th 2009.

Your registration has to include

a) your family name
b) your first-name
c) your e-mail-address
d) and the remark < Anmeldung zum DESC-Open 2009 >.


The tournament will start at Oct. 1st 2009.

Reflection-time will be 30 days per 10 moves,
first time-exceed forfeits the game.

Moves will be transmitted by e-mail in the well known pgn-format.

During this pre-tounament, every player will have four to eight
games in groups with five to nine players.
The best three of them will reach the next round.

More informations are shown at DESC's homepage:

http://www.desc-online.de/turniere/open/2009/

Take part, have fun! You and your friends will be welcome!

Best regards, IM Joerg Kracht, Michael Schirmer, and Ralf Mulde


Daniel Parmet    (2009-08-19 01:53:58)
Idea: Unr, No Comp, Match

I was wondering if it was possible to setup a new competition option for chess.

Just a 2 game unrated match where both players agree no computer. Each person has W&B.

This is more appealing to me than No engine tournament where the ratings/pairings are from people that have played rated corr w/comps. We can agree to play friends in 2 games.

Thoughts?


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-08-22 15:16:12)
Unrated (no computer) matches

Hi Daniel, this has to be discussed. This would be on another path than the "competitive" way the server followed until there, particularly to avoid the "just for a glance" games that are just thrown and lost on time after a few moves like on most other correspondence chess servers... But after all maybe most players here wouldn't do it because they also play rated tournaments.

The other point is "confusion" because of too many tournaments... Many new players are still lost when arriving here and I feel I have some work to make it clearer before to add such new categories... To be continued.


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-08-22 22:30:34)
Slow moves & chat bar at Poker

Hello everyone,

You may have noticed that the chat bar disappeared during your poker "moves"... In my opinion poker moves are usually played so fast that it is useless to display it but it may be a problem for players who write long messages with their moves and can be disconnected (the small message box keeps players connected as it refreshes automatically). Is it a problem for many players ?

The other question is : Should the "slow moves" process be kept for poker moves as it is (IMHO) not necessary to confirm such moves in most cases ?

Your feedback is welcome, thanks :)


Michel van der Kemp    (2009-08-25 19:47:10)
Mistake in ELO calculation?

I got this email from an advanced match.

Game 27857


[Event "FICGS__CHESS__BULLET_BRONZE__000132"]
[Site "FICGS"]
[Date "2009.8.23"]
[Round "1"]
[White "van der Kemp,Michel"]
[Black "Goršek,Gregor"]
[Result "1-0"]
[WhiteElo "1966"]
[BlackElo "1623"]

1.e4 g6 2.d4 Bg7 3.Nc3 d6 4.Nf3 Nf6 5.Be2 O-O 6.O-O c6 7.a4 a5 8.h3 Na6 9.Be3 Nb4 10.Qd2 Qc7 11.Rac1 Rd8 12.Rfe1 d5 13.exd5 Nbxd5 14.Nxd5 Nxd5 15.Bh6 Be6 16.Bxg7 Kxg7 17.c4 Nb4 18.Bd3 Nxd3 19.Qxd3 Qd6 20.Re3 Rd7 21.Qe2 Re8 22.Rd1 R7d8 23.Re1 Rd7 24.b3 b6 25.Ng5 Bf5 26.g4 1-0



Move sent : 2009.8.23 - 17:54:11
Move replied : 2009.8.23 - 19:10:44


Player resigned.




WhiteELO : 1966 ... 1961
BlackELO : 1623 ... 1627


This email was generated automatically by http://www.ficgs.com/
My rating went down after winning a game :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-08-26 19:21:42)
Stan Vaughan vs. Varuzhan Akobian (WCF)

Many of you probably saw this strange banner in a Chessbase news article, with this title :

"THE WORLD CHESS CHAMPIONSHIP"
World Chess Federation, Inc.

WCF "WORLD CHESS CHAMPION" Stan Vaughan
vs. WCF official challenger Varuzhan Akobian in WCF TITLE MATCH 2009 (starting on December 1st, 2009 at Riviera Hotel Casino, Las Vegas)

http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=5717

The Chessbase article says that when FIDE stripped Fischer of the title in 1975, he set up the WCF which sanctioned his "World Championship" rematch with Spassky in 1992 (with a record of five million dollars prize). After winning the event, Fischer was scheduled to play WCF official challenger Stan Vaughan, but he retired.

Well well... I cannot even find a page on Wikipedia on Stan Vaughan, but the article on Chessbase also mentions that Vaughan would have been 29 time US Champion of the American Chess Association, retaining the title at 2008 Robert Fischer Memorial and also, but not least :

* 1988 US Correspondence Chess Champion
* 1989, 1995 Mensa World Correspondence Chess Champion
* 1995-2007 WCCF World Correspondence Chess Champion
* WCF “The World Chess Champion 2001-present 2009
* Retained the title in 2007 with an 11-0 title match victory over Francisco Metz, an International Master from Mexico and former 1975 USCF's US Amateur Chess Champion

To finish, Garry Kasparov would have turned down the opportunity to play him in a match for 5 million dollars in 2008 - not a big surprise.

Does anyone have more information on all this and eventually games played by this un-unknown correspondence chess champion ?


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-08-28 01:06:17)
S.C. von Erichsen is FICGS Go champion !

Svante Carl von Erichsen is FICGS Go champion, for the 3rd time... after winning 2 more games in the 5 games final match which looked like in some ways to the previous one with Ke Lu.

Congrats again Svante Carl ! Definitely we need more strong players to try to rivalize :)

Here is the 4th game that just finished :


( ; FF[1] GM[1] SZ[19] AP[Ficgs] RU[Chinese] GN[von Erichsen,Svante Carl-Lu,Ke] HA[0] KM[7.5] WR[2653] PW[von Erichsen,Svante Carl] BR[2483] PB[Lu,Ke] DT[February 28 3:6:11 CET 2009] RE[W+T] ; B[pd] ; W[dc] ; B[pp] ; W[eq] ; B[pj] ; W[nq] ; B[lq] ; W[no] ; B[pn] ; W[kp] ; B[lp] ; W[lo] ; B[kq] ; W[jp] ; B[jq] ; W[ip] ; B[hq] ; W[hp] ; B[gq] ; W[gp] ; B[fq] ; W[fp] ; B[er] ; W[dr] ; B[dq] ; W[ep] ; B[fr] ; W[cq] ; B[cj] ; W[ch] ; B[co] ; W[cn] ; B[bn] ; W[dn] ; B[cm] ; W[nc] ; B[kd] ; W[ne] ; B[pf] ; W[ng] ; B[gc] ; W[ic] ; B[id] ; W[jd] ; B[jc] ; W[je] ; B[ib] ; W[kc] ; B[hc] ; W[de] ; B[lc] ; W[ph] ; B[oh] ; W[qe] ; B[pe] ; W[pg] ; B[og] ; W[of] ; B[pi] ; W[qf] ; B[rh] ; W[qd] ; B[pc] ; W[qc] ; B[qg] ; W[pb] ; B[ob] ; W[qb] ; B[nb] ; W[nh] ; B[qh] ; W[pl] ; B[om] ; W[qo] ; B[po] ; W[qp] ; B[qn] ; W[pq] ; B[oq] ; W[pr] ; B[or] ; W[rq] ; B[mj] ; W[mc] ; B[kb] ; W[lf] ; B[lh] ; W[jg] ; B[ji] ; W[mb] ; B[oc] ; W[ie] ; B[he] ; W[hf] ; B[gf] ; W[hg] ; B[mf] ; W[me] ; B[mg] ; W[ke] ; B[ld] ; W[le] ; B[nf] ; W[eh] ; B[hi] ; W[kh] ; B[ki] ; W[rn] ; B[rm] ; W[ro] ; B[ql] ; W[bk] ; B[bj] ; W[cl] ; B[dm] ; W[bm] ; B[bo] ; W[dl] ; B[dp] ; W[br] ; B[em] ; W[en] )




Thibault de Vassal    (2009-08-28 13:37:50)
Zeitnot & Go Wch #4

The clock is an important part of the game, even at this correspondence time control. Thanks for your comments, obviously the match was much more intense than the score let it appear. Congrats to Ke Lu for giving you such difficulties :) .. One more reason to read these games with attention.

By the way, the 4th Go Wch preliminary tournament seems to be discussed between the very dangerous & surprising Huayong Yang (with 6/6 until now), Simon Billouet and Thomas Connor !


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-08-31 13:46:24)
WCH 4 Candidates Final

Eros is ok to start as soon as possible also. So the match should start today in the evening !

The WCH 3 Final match between Xavier Pichelin & Edward Kotlyanskiy should start today also...

Many games to follow before the start of the next championship :)


Don Groves    (2009-09-01 00:53:16)
No bug?

According to the showdown rules I've seen on the Internet, if no one takes aggressive action (bet or raise) on the round of betting preceding the showdown, then the showing of hands begins to the left of the dealer, no matter who has the better hand.


Don Groves    (2009-09-05 00:09:13)
Too much French wine?

CHENNAI, India (Reuters) - A leading French chess player turned up drunk and dozed off after just 11 moves in an international tournament in Kolkata, losing the round on technical grounds, domestic media reported Friday.

Grandmaster Vladislav Tkachiev arrived for Thursday's match against India's Praveen Kumar in such an inebriated state that he could hardly sit in his chair and soon fell asleep, resting his head on the table, Hindustan Times newspaper reported.

Indian papers carried pictures of the world number 58 sleeping and the organizers' futile attempts to wake his up.

The game was awarded to the Indian on the technical ground of Tkachiev being unable to complete his moves within the stipulated time of an hour and 30 minutes, the paper said.

The player was warned and reprimanded by the organizers afterwards but has been allowed to take part in the remainder of the competition, the paper said.


William Taylor    (2009-09-07 14:57:28)
Good news

I'm glad to hear that. Hopefully Carlsen will be World Champ in a few years, and then Kasparov will take up competitive chess again to challenge his former pupil in a match! ;) Well, I can dream anyway.


Wayne Lowrance    (2009-09-07 23:52:52)
A Big Mouth on Rybka Forum

Howdy Thibault & all.
There is a poster on the Rybka forum who has sort of a big mouth. He claims that Rybka IA feature is not best for CC games, claims it is too time consuming and at any rate he blubbers and brags that those who use IA are not able to defeat him. I am using my own language here in a jist of the conversation of his. He further says that he never spends more that a matter of hours cogitating his move using a 3 tear "long game" approach to working his moves. Timers such at 60' 40 moves @ 1st tier etc (don't remember his 2nd tier timer. In any case he claims he can get to depth 40 in mid game situations using a "long game" three tier mode. and finds moves that are superior to IA running a day or more (he doesn't seem to understand that most CC players use IA in a special Centaur way and the Program is a tool. He gives little respect for 2500 CC rated Centaur players using the feature IA. He beats such players all of the time, he say's with his Rybka usage with his very modest hardware against 2500 players using IA. I am skeptical. I asked where he plays CC (out of courosity) and he will not tell where. a Poster in response to his post believe he plays CC where computers are not allowed, I have no idea in this regard. I told him that I play at FICGS where computers are welcome and a 2500 rating on this server is very high. There are many well known players held in high regard playing at FICGS that would "clean his clock" with him playing as he say's he does. So what is my point. I am wondering if I can invite this guy to join FICGS and that his lofty rating can be accepted. I shall invite him to Join our SM #11 tourney. Wayne


Daniel Parmet    (2009-09-17 07:38:06)
The real reality

The real reality is there is no reason to play rated chess when i'm facing lower rated opponents. I can enter thematics and unrated events where I can play experts and masters (who cares if its unrated?). I'm not gonna play a rated event where i'm top seed.

So the rating bands have eliminated playing options not created them.


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-09-24 14:43:00)
Kasparov wins 3-1

Oops, actually Kasparov won the match already.

The final score: 3-1, quite logical and a nice promotion for chess in the world !


Iouri Basiliev    (2009-09-25 09:17:51)
Team points

Some of the matches have been finished already. Time to make the teams table :)


William Taylor    (2009-09-27 12:14:34)
Fritz 12

I haven't tested it, but I'd be surprised if it was a match for Rybka.


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-09-28 17:31:29)
Final score 9-3

Kasparov beats Karpov 9-3 (as their ratings predicted).

Nice match, with quite few draws compared to their previous World Championship matches :)


John Smith    (2009-09-28 22:32:58)
Human only games/Centaur

Hi all,

Initially when I registered I was under the impression that (e.g. like RHP) engines are not allowed. Then I saw a flag NO_ENGINES, which seems to imply that in other tournaments engines are allowed.

I would like to ask which types of tournaments are for Centaurs and which are human-only. Stepping into a Centaur tournament would not be a good idea as I don't think any amateur stands a chance vs a 2800+ Centaur.

So obviously NO_ENGINES are normal tournamets, are thematic tournaments normal tournaments as well? which ones are for Centaurs?


Garvin Gray    (2009-09-29 17:34:56)
Moneybookers warning

I have just received a warning email telling me that my moneybookers account has been suspended and to click on the link provided in the email to confirm my records.

The email does look legit, but from my understanding of these things, a proper site with this information would ask you to go to moneybookers.com and sign in, rather than provide a link. Clicking the link option is what scammers provide to get your information.

Thibault, are you able to confirm anything on this matter?


Michel van der Kemp    (2009-10-10 09:26:50)
Weekend

I agree the weekend will be better for most people, so I vote for the Friday, Saturday, Sunday option.

But maybe the c option is viable as well. From my experience freestyle is more a matter having better opening books and then a faster computer, and faster time controls is not necessarily a bad thing.

But I like to hear Eros Riccio's opinion on that.


Benjamin Block    (2009-10-18 21:36:58)
I agree

Thibault you make a really good work. I hope you take some money self from the google ads you are really worth it. It is hard to think any person that can take over this site when you do not want or can. I really hope that my grandchild will play on this site and have that fun as i have and always will have (i´m still i child). PS: Please stop smoke we don´t want you to die in prematurly. You really work hard. Do you ever sleep?


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-10-22 20:41:56)
Huayong Yang is the new Go WCH finalist

Congrats to Huayong Yang who made it in the Go WCH 4 preliminary tournament with an outstanding 8/8 !

http://www.ficgs.com/user_page.php?page=tournament&tournament=FICGS__GO__WCH_TOURNAMENT__000004

He will play Svante Carl von Erichsen in the next Go WCH final match...

Huayong started with the minimal authorized rank (10 kyu) without an official rating but obviously he's much much stronger ... His current rating is 2334 (3 dan) already, so the question is : do his opponents have an idea on his real strength ? :)


Lazaro Munoz    (2009-10-26 11:15:01)
Crazyhouse

You would need some special rules to prevent long boring clock time out waits, such as when one side is mated on the move. He will sit out and wait for the events on the other game. Typically what happens is that it will be mate on the move in the reverse direction. So either have adjudicated a win for the side with more time on their running clock or force them to move at least every 10 days say.

By the way if you try crazy house, you might want to also introduce shogi where pieces become the property of the opponent and can be dropped in. You won't need special char set since you can use the chess set with mods such as inverting them like the rook for the lance, golds can be queen, silvers inverted queens, etc and promoted pieces, the piece with a circle surrounding it.


Daniel Parmet    (2009-10-30 05:42:14)
Coming Thematics?

What are the next thematics? I forgot how to see the list of the ones that are after the current waiting one...

I would like to suggest
1) Alekhine
2) Grunfeld
3) Caro Kann


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-10-30 17:44:53)
Coming Thematics

Thanks again for the suggestions ;) Any other idea ?


John Smith    (2009-11-02 02:23:14)
coming thematics

I second the Grunfeld thematic, other ideas:

* Tarrasch variation - Queen's Gambit Declined.

* Slav & Semi-Slav (all in one, 1.d4 d5. 2.c4 c6 being the starting position).

* Nimzoindian thematic.

* King's Indian thematic


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-11-05 11:19:28)
Is Poker holdem a game of chance ?

I'm always surprised when a poker player tells me that (in brief) Poker holdem is a game of chance...

You probably know that quotes (in FICGS file) saying that "Statistics are often overestimated", "98% of statistics are made up", "There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics. (Mark Twain)", it is often used as an argument.

So the question : Do you think that Poker holdem is a game of chance (in what measure & why) ?


Lazaro Munoz    (2009-11-06 05:09:02)
Is Poker holdem a game of chance ?

The "luck" factor bears no part in the long run since good and bad hands will eventually equally one's "luck".

As a programmer myself I see hold'em poker as a state game as opposed to a stateless game such as roulette where the next roll is independent of the previous. The state is important in the past history of cards having been played. Of course too much knowledge of state in Blackjack will get you booted out of the casino :)

There are two sets of skills that a player possesses, probability and human nature assessment, it terms of detecting patterns of bluffing. In hold'em as opposed to other types of poker where there is less shared information, knowledge of probability becomes the more prominent skill as opposed to other types of blind pokers.

So "chance" is a part of the game but the open nature of hold'em brings more skill to table than other poker games.


Garvin Gray    (2009-11-13 17:50:34)
can't view team mates results.

I have just tried viewing results from other tables via the links provided and am still having problems opening the links in a new window. I know I have mentioned this before, but thought I would point out that the issue still exists.


Wayne Lowrance    (2009-11-13 18:42:00)
Centaur Chess

Howdy John, I will try and give maybe a little more detail to the best my ability.
1) Rybka is probably best up to "end game" and in end game I like Naum and Zappa.
2) Stonewall: , do not know best engine, but probably not Rybka
3.) Not enough information and again it depends on Engine Tactics. But in general, probably is worth looking into deep P.V.
4) Have no idea
5) No idea.
6) Out of book move "repeat/improvement recognition" as far as I know is not a feature. You as the Centaur of course should recognize this.
7) Well, you will get big arguments here. Many will tell you Aquarium (if you can master it).
8) NO In CC chess, the book is probably the most important thing to study and improve.As mentioned, experience is number one. Dont know if this post is of any value Wayne


Garvin Gray    (2009-11-15 04:35:02)
team play

The reason I ask is that I would like to know how my team is going in a particular match just in case I wish to offer a draw or am offered one.

Having to wait till a few more results are in does not work because the above information is required asap.


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-11-16 22:28:27)
Results !

Finally, according to my calculations :

- Finished matches [Team (Points)]

Knights who say Ni (1) - Dark knights (1)
Knights who say Ni (2) - Happy pawn (0)
Knights who say Ni (2) - Ghost knights (0)
Dark knights (2) - Happy pawn (0)
Dark knights (0) - Yellow blue warriors (2)
Dark knights (2) - Ghost knights (0)
Happy pawn (2) - Ghost knights (0)
Yellow blue warriors (2) - Ghost knights (0)

- Unfinished matches

Knights who say Ni vs. FSF : 1-1
Knights who say Ni vs Yellow blue warriors : 2-1
Knights who say Ni vs. Our team king : 2-0
FSF vs. Dark knights : 1.5-1.5
FSF vs. Happy pawn : 1-0
FSF vs. Yellow blue warriors : 3-0
FSF vs. Our team king : 2-0
Dark knights vs. Our team king : 2.5-0.5
Happy pawn vs. Yellow blue warriors : 1-2
Happy pawn vs. Our team king : 1-0
Yellow blue warriors vs. Our team king : 1.5-1.5
Ghost knights vs. Our team king : 0.5-2.5


I hope I didn't make mistakes for the unfinished matches. Nice victory by Yellow blue warriors against The dark knights !

So Garvin, in your match against FSF (Koslowski), FSF leads by 1-0


Daniel Parmet    (2009-11-17 00:33:40)
Scores very confusing...

these results confuse me... if the match is 2-0 then its not finished and could still be drawn 2-2. If the match is finished then its either 1-0 0-1 or .5-.5
Explain?!


John Smith    (2009-11-17 04:11:40)
thanks!

Nothing wrong with your English!, it was just a matter of definition :) I am not familiar with advanced chess so it was the first time I came across the term "critical points" in chess.


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-11-17 08:50:48)
Team scoring

That's it, sorry Daniel I should have specified it. So when a team has 2 points, it means that the team won the match by 4-0, 3.5-0.5, 3-1 or 2.5-1.5


John Smith    (2009-11-17 09:54:56)
engine styles

I would be thankful if I had a little more information on engine styles:

- Which is the most positional engine(s) (has positional knowledge+plays more positionally)?

- Which is the most solid engine(s)?

- Which engine(s) that goes for wild complications most often (and is strong in complex/unclear positions)?


John Smith    (2009-11-17 10:25:12)
so

So which engine is good to co-consult given Rybka?
In order to be useful it should have a different style, as an engine with style similar to Rybka's is unlikely to provide significantly additional information.

I am guessing Deep Junior is somewhat old (?), Shredder is also solid+positional so possibly not too useful to co-consult, Naum & Zapa have been discontinued and in Fritz the focus has shifted more to training features in the interface.

Is it only Rybka these days? What about the open source & free engines that exist?


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-11-17 12:15:57)
One engine vs. several engines

Naum discontinued ? Really ? That would be bad news...

In my experience, other engines do not really give "additional informations". One chess engine give informations, several chess engines give odds. Other (weaker) chess engines may give bad odds as well and actually quite often. Only your analysis will give you true informations, you just have to explore not only the best variant provided by your engine.

Finally most important is to NOT trust chess engines IMO. In most cases at correspondence chess against strong players, in some ways "I" won some games (by analysis and ideas) and "engines" made me lose some others, that's correspondence chess... (hear me, of course it was my entire responsibility in all my losses & I wouldn't have been able to get good results without the help of engines :))


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-11-17 18:35:09)
Shocking news..... Marc Lacrosse is dead

I just discovered the news when searching the web, as I had no answer from Marc by any way.....

http://www.enaos.net/P1230.aspx?IdPer=129725&IdAN=70997

Marc Lacrosse is dead in Profondeville on august 13, 2009. He was aged of 48. I have very few doubts, he is the Marc Lacrosse we played and enjoyed with... The dates & informations match.

My thoughts go to his family of course, that's appalling :(


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-11-17 18:44:19)
Marc Lacrosse vs. Eros Riccio

His match with Eros Riccio is canceled of course. We will remember him here by his fantastic & original games, with an outstanding rating of 2557... He lost only one beautiful game to Marius Zubac at FICGS in 2007 :

http://www.ficgs.com/game_12869.html


More games by Marc :

http://www.chessgames.com/player/marc_lacrosse.html

We'll miss him.


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-11-25 22:53:34)
Cards shown at showdown

Okay, so no change at the moment, thanks for the information :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-11-27 19:30:34)
Ivanchuk may quite professional chess

What's wrong with Vassily Ivanchuk ? In his interview in Chessbase news, he says he may quit professional chess because of this match lost to an unknown player... Not only a match, a "crucial" match he said (like any other?), but it seems to me that there are a lot of things hidden behind the words. Maybe it's just time for him to change his life, at least I hope it is so simple.

End of the interview : "I only feel that the world has crashed down around me. Everyone is against me, and I don't see the way out…"

Strange...

http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=5941


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-11-29 17:18:44)
Viktor Korchnoi and castling

Just noticed this funny story in a Wikipedia article :)

"Viktor Korchnoi, in his 1974 Candidates final match with Anatoly Karpov, famously asked the arbiter if castling was legal when the castling rook was under attack. The answer was in the affirmative, and Korchnoi ended up winning the game."

Most probably a psychological attack, like often at this time and particularly during the matches Karpov vs. Korchnoi ;) Everybody knows the yoghourt story...


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-12-02 14:21:48)
Marc Lacrosse memorial

Dear chessfriends, the waiting list for the next chess thematic tournament is open, this thematic #100 will be named the Marc Lacrosse memorial in honor of our lost chessfriend, we will play one of his favorite openings, the Basman Sale sicilian : 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 e6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Bc5

Best wishes,
Thibault


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-12-02 18:28:19)
Major update : Chess openings & endgames

A major update just occured, finished FICGS chess games (Go & poker as well) are now analyzed by the server that gives the name of each known opening & classifies the games by endgames, castlings & promotions !

Best, now you can find games by material on the board (like Chessbase) for endgames with less than 10 pieces. Just click "Search games" in the menu, eg. enter KRPP vs. KRP (whatever the order of the letters & colors), and you'll find among others this game (see the description of the game at the bottom of the page) :

http://www.ficgs.com/game_3724.html
http://www.ficgs.com/user_page.php?page=viewer&game=3724

Note : Finished games are not analyzed in real time, but this update clearly opens new perspectives :)

Please do not hesitate to comment this update or to report any bug you may see.


William Taylor    (2009-12-05 17:22:48)
Opening theory

I remember Marc publishing some material about this opening on his website. Unfortunately it seems like the material was not transferred when his website moved. He had accumulated a lot of knowledge on this opening and it would be a shame to lose all his work on it - I don't suppose anyone knows if the material is available anywhere do they?


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-12-06 15:50:16)
Multiple nicknames

It is not authorized, particularly to use several accounts at the same time in order to try to cheat (that is detected in most cases)... Anyway the system discouraged the few attempts.

I also know that a few players do not use their real name (eg. that was authorized for the match Igame.ru), generally they do not find motivation enough to stay and reach the top ratings, that seems quite logical and consequences are negligible.

You may send a private message to me if you think that there is cheating in a tournament.


Philip Roe    (2009-12-08 05:21:27)
Marcs notes

Thibault,

Presumably if these notes do come to light you will put them where all of the participants in Thematic 100 (and any subsequent sections) can see them.

Perhaps if they form the basis for a monograph, somebody might be prepared to edit it.


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-12-08 21:58:39)
Magnus Carlsen vs. Pat Cash

Great idea, a chess champion plays with a tennis legend to promote the tourney (and the player).. way to go !

http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=5969

Too bad, I did not find the result of the tennis match :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-12-11 21:32:06)
40 days increment

Hi Wayne, I see no problem with the clocks, I can see in the logs that 40 days have been added after move 10, you can see it in our game at least where you have more than 40 days remaining. About the other games, your opponents played fast, that may be a reason, by the way you also take several days per move in our 8 games match. Too many running games may be another reason (I know that :))

Time flies away, definitely !


Gino Figlio    (2009-12-16 02:34:16)
benefit for FICGS

Hi Thibault,

The main benefit for FICGS would be that if you ever have team matches against other organizations that use XFCC, your players may be able to make their moves from your server even if the event is hosted elsewhere.

Best wishes and happy holidays,

Gino Figlio


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-12-16 09:17:57)
XFCC & team matches

Hi Gino.

That's right... Thanks for pointing out this!

Happy holidays to you :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-12-20 14:23:36)
Boris Spassky vs. Viktor Korchnoi

Entitled the "Battle of the Giants", a match just started in Elista (Kalmykia) between the 10th World Champion Boris Spassky (aged of 72), and Viktor Korchnoi (now aged of 78, multiple World Championship challenger mainly during the Karpov era, but still active in competitive play).

Korchnoi won the first game, game two ended in a draw. This kind of match is always a pleasure to follow for long time chess fans :)

Here is the first game !




Thibault de Vassal    (2009-12-23 21:08:35)
Curious opening

What do you think about this opening (by Luc Olivier Leclerc in Wikichess) ?

http://www.ficgs.com/user_page.php?page=wikichess&article=8732

1.f4 d5 2.Nf3 c5 3.c4 d4 4.b4

Complex.. may be a future thematic ;)


Rodolfo d Ettorre    (2009-12-24 14:19:42)
Merry Christmas

Merry Christmas
Feliz navidad
Buon Natale
Akuna Matata
Alecta jacta est
Delenda est cartago
To Thibault and all chess friends


Pablo Schmid    (2009-12-26 22:21:54)
Rating calculation

Hello Thibault, j'aurais préféré parler en français mais puisque je suis sur le forum...

Could you explain how exactly chess rating's calculation works in ficgs?

And I think games with 10 moves or less should be counted, maybe not every games but sometimes 8 or 9 moves can be sufficient to punish someone (nice miniatures or quick mates are possibles) and it enables the loser to resign (or be mated) without losing points. An example of an abusive situation: imagine I play the Traxler and I resign before 10 moves if I see a good choosed line by my opponent which I don't like to play as Black because I know I might suffer or even lose...

J'espère que je t'aurai convaincu et que mon exemple ne donnera pas de mauvaises idées! Sur ce, bonnes fêtes, Pablo


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-12-27 14:13:04)
Final result

The match ended on a 4-4 score.

All details - http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=6013


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-12-27 20:20:33)
Bergmann - Schuster

One of these matches we like to watch :) .. many interesting games and many wins, but I'm afraid it is a good advertisement for the sicilian defense once more, Hannes please help ;)

http://www.ficgs.com/user_page.php?page=tournament&tournament=FICGS__CHESS__WCH_QUARTER_FINAL_3__000007


Luc-Olivier Leclerc    (2009-12-28 05:07:00)
I'm jalous

Seeing match like that, make me want to play in one of those match, I like the idea of playing 7 match with the same opponent.


Hannes Rada    (2009-12-28 21:45:47)
Sicilian ?

I see only 1 Sicilian in this match.
And I see many different openings. That's good - That's more entertaining than 8 times Najdorf ....
So no need to advertise for this Sicilian. It will be anyway played to much for my taste :-)

Originally it was very doubtful for me to play 8 times the same opponent. But then I realized that it can be quite interesting. At least when you're rating is better than those of your oppoent .... :-)


William Taylor    (2009-12-29 18:46:30)
Rybka demise

I wasn't suggesting that Stockfish was a Rybka clone - I was talking about RobboLito.

My testing of Stockfish vs Rybka was not serious - just a 12-game blitz match (4 minutes with 2 seconds increment). Rybka won 6.5 - 5.5, so not a bad performance by Stockfish, but we can't draw any real conclusions from such a test.


Thibault de Vassal    (2009-12-29 19:50:45)
RobboLito vs. Rybka 3

What are RobboLito, Ippolit and Igorrit ? It looks like these names are invading computer chess forums... As you may have read in the discussion mentioned below, the Rybka 3's source code may have been compromised and these engines "may" be clones of Rybka 3 (everyone does not agree on this). Good or really bad news, anyway this open source chess engine may have many consequences on the computer chess world, and correspondence chess as well...

http://www.ficgs.com/user_page.php?page=forum_read&id=8031


From the wikispace mentioned below :

IPPOLIT : Intellectual Persons Promotion Of Leninist International Tradesunions (!??)

Q. What is RobboLito?
A. RobboLito is the version of IPPOLIT that now contains endgame tablebases, the RobboBases.

A few links on RobboLito 0.085f1a, Ippolit & Igorrit (says it all IMO) :

http://ippolit.wikispaces.com/
http://ippolit.wikispaces.com/RobboLito
http://ippolit.wikispaces.com/Igorrit
http://ippolit.wikispaces.com/FAQ

see also : ippolit.wikispaces.com/Clone+(Question)

http://ippolit.wikispaces.com/News
-> IPPOLIT banned from chessprogramming wiki!
PlayChess banned IPPOLIT from use online also.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2r_V_QkmHjo
http://www.chesslogik.com/robbolito.htm
http://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/free-chessengine-robbolito-is-1-at-swisstest-rybka-2?lc=1
http://www.cyclonechess.com/rybka3.htm

"RobboLito is an open-source UCI chess engine by: Yakov Petrovich Golyadkin, Igor Igorovich Igoronov, and Roberto Pescatore."

RobboLito does not yet support: multiPV, own book, egbbs, tablebases, multiple CPUs/cores, chess variants

Estimated rating: ~ 3300 ELO

Available versions:

RobboLito 0.085g3 w32 (optimized windows 32-bit executable and source code)
RobboLito_0.085g3_w32_no_SSE2 (optimized windows 32-bit executable - for older CPUs that don't support Intel SSE2 instruction set)
RobboLito 0.085g3_x64 (fast windows 64-bit PGO executable compiled by peterpan)
RobboLito 0.085g3l_x86 (optimized linux 64-bit executable and source code ported to linux by unisky)

http://www.cyclonechess.com/robbolito.htm
http://www.cyclonechess.com/rybka3.htm

http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1261597025/4
http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1258991841
http://queenchess.blogspot.com/2009/11/fritz-12-vs-robbolito-e2-latest-version.html
http://lefounumerique.xooit.com/next?t=663 (french)


Sebastien Benoit    (2009-12-30 17:22:55)
On reverse enginerring

I'v read some of the arguments for and against the theory that RobboLito is a Rybka clone and I must say that I'm more inclined to beleive it is not. But for those who think that the reverse engineering of a software as complex as Rybka is not possible... sorry but it is possible! A team ( don't know how many guys would be needed) of good computer scientists would certainly be able to reverse engineer enough of it to get a global picture of what kind of optimisations it has. And remember that computer chess is not new and a lot of knowledge is available trough books and of course, the web.

Some are claiming that a reverse engineered clone of Rybka would have the same level of functionality as the original. They say that, because they don't really understand the process. Reverse engineering doesn't necessarily lead to an approximate clone of the origninal source code. It is more a process of understanding how it works. Once you got this understanding you can write from scratch and add incrementally whatever functionnality you desire.


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-01-05 07:40:22)
Poker Software?

There was several discussions on poker engines, one is there :

http://www.ficgs.com/user_page.php?page=forum_read&id=7510

I can't find the thread where someone talked about a match between a poker engine & a world champion but as far as I can remember, the poker engine won! Anyway I'm quite sure that a program may play quite good poker now. The question is how it could "understand" a complete situation like here with 3 winning rounds and so on...


Gino Figlio    (2010-01-07 05:51:27)
Fed Up

It does not really matter in my opinion.
Players will always use the best engine.
Players will always prefer the engine that shows consistent improvement version after version.
You just need to find out what engine fits this description on your own.



Wayne Lowrance    (2010-01-07 18:45:05)
Fed Up

Thib you missed my point. It is the forbidden, hush hush, "dont you dare mention that name here" that bugs me the most. I have always been a strong supporter of the Vas "lil girl", followed her tournaments etc etc.
Oh well it is not worth my concern anyhow. As I said I owe no loyality to Vas any more, If his continued Rybka programing yields the best engine, I will buy it. Results is what matters.
Wayne


Wayne Lowrance    (2010-01-11 21:33:11)
Fed Up

Howdy Thibault. Clone or no Clone. Technically I am not qualified to check source etc. But I will say this. The evals are very very often identical after checking .
Also, in some brief eng-eng matches, I find that Rybka is stronger, at least for longer timers which would suggest favorable CC play. Wayne


Don Groves    (2010-01-24 00:36:29)
Problem with auto-refresh in My games ?

I use "pending games" and it happens every time I have only one pending game. Whether it's Poker or Go doesn't matter. Two or more pending games -- it works fine.


Svante Carl von Erichsen    (2010-01-27 21:06:17)
Go chinese rules: should pass count?

The question is not posed very clearly, and it seems that more explanation is required. Passes do not count in "chinese rules" per se. I think that maybe some confusion arose because there are some rule sets that put some value on all or specific passes.

Anyway, you should read e.g. this very nice write-up of the matters to consider, "On the rules of Go" by Ikeda Toshio, which you can find at gobase:

http://gobase.org/studying/rules/ikeda/


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-01-27 23:23:10)
Go chinese rules : should pass count?

I must say that the case encounted was not clear at all to me as I had very few informations on how this program scores Go games, anyway I should have written "passing MAY change the score"... The document is very interesting, thanks !

I think I'll specify in the rules that "The score is not influenced by which player passes first or last", which looks like more conventional & logical, unless anyone can explain why this decision should be avoided.

Thanks again.


Zholy Zhou    (2010-01-29 03:22:40)
make cool 3D flash banners for website

Recently I've been asked by a friend who wants to make a 3D flash banner for his website of wedding business. Many people included me thought that making a 3D flash banner is a very difficult thing for those who don't know flash skills, but I should say it's not like what you think if you have got a 3D flash banner making software Aneesoft 3D Flash Gallery.

This article will show you how to create a cool 3D flash banner without Adobe Flash. A viewer can click on the banner to be transported to your website. You can use it on your own website to present your products or services. Also flash banners can be used to market your website as a banner ad on another website. A flash banner is much more attractive than still images. I bet you'll be agree with me if you see the 3D flash banner.

What you'll need:
1. Digital photos and background music for 3D flash banner
2. Aneesoft 3D Flash Gallery(http://www.aneesoft.com/win-3d-flash-gallery.html)

Step 1: Download & install Aneesoft 3D Flash Gallery
We'll be using a very nice 3D flash banner making software 'Aneesoft 3D Flash Gallery' to making a cool flash banner for wedding websites, head over here and download the free trial version(http://www.aneesoft.com/download/win/aneesoft-3d-flash-gallery.exe). Next step is to install the program.

Step 2: Import wedding photos, add captions, edit photos
You can add up to 500 photos that you want to use in your flash banner, type in caption and arrange the photos here. 3D Flash Gallery supports a wide range of file formats for images, such as .jpg, .bmp, .gif. You're able to add hyperlink for each photo of your flash banner to be transported to your website.

Step 3: Choose from a variety of flash banner templates
3D Flash Gallery offer you an easy way to make a cool flash banner by choosing from variety of flash banner templates. A flash banner template automatically put preset decoration to your flash banners. When you select a preset banner template, you're able to enhance it by customizing some additional settings, such as background, thumbnail effects, playback options and scrolling actions. For the adventurous users, explore the powerful advanced features and tools that gives you total control over how you compose your flash banners.

Step 4: Add some background music files to flash banner
In this step, you can add background music files to play along with your flash banner. To do so, click Add Music button to browse and add your music files. You can add, remove and edit the music files. And you may check the option to control the background music looping or not.

Step 5: Preview and publish your cool 3D flash banners
It is advisable that you preview the 3D flash banner at least once, before your publish it. Click and drag mouse for scrolling and tilting the 3D flash banner. Click on the thumbnail to zoom in and out the photos. You have several options to share and publish your 3D photo gallery. It depends on your needs.


Lazaro Munoz    (2010-01-29 06:21:52)
Go chinese rules : should pass count?

AGA rules use passing stones, that is when you pass your opponent gets a stone. It does not matter too much at the end of the game when you get two passes in a row by alternate players.

Actually in AGA, The white player must always end the game so he may have to due a third pass (costing a real stone).

It sort of penalizes the player that chooses to try to end the game before all points have been taken.


Daniel Parmet    (2010-01-29 15:52:43)
Quote festival, part 6

"Chess is stupid. I'm a war historian. You never have all the facts in life or real war as in chess. Napoleon didn't waste his time on chess. Napoleon knew luck was more important than any genius. Chess hasn't been played since IBM solved it back in 2000 when Kas- err Karm I mean Kapov couldn't... beat it. No human has ever even drawn a computer since that match when chess was solved." - Dave Daring


Scott Nichols    (2010-01-30 02:02:34)
Quote festival, part 6

Chess wasn't "solved", anymore than the mysteries of the universe are "solved". Obviously, Dave Daring doesn't play chess. All that happened was that a human lost to a computer at the game of chess. Did we think when calculators came out way back when, and could out calculate humans that mathematics was "solved"?


Lazaro Munoz    (2010-01-31 11:54:48)
SuperGMs watch Corr?!

The Vidalina-Kabachev games goes:

[Event "WC-2006-F-00005"]
[Site "LSS"]
[Date "2007.9.12"]
[Round ""]
[White "Vidalina, Franjo"]
[Black "Kabachev, Andrey"]
[Result "0-1"]
[Eco ""]
[Annotator ""]
[Source ""]

1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 e5 6.Ndb5 d6 7.Bg5 a6 8.Na3 b5 9.Bxf6 gxf6 10.Nd5 Bg7 11.Bd3 Ne7 12.Nxe7 Qxe7 13.c4 f5 14.O-O O-O 15.Qh5 Rb8 16.exf5 e4 17.Rae1 Bb7 18.Qg4 Rfe8 19.cxb5 d5 20.bxa6 Bc6 21.b3 Kh8 22.Nc2 Bc3 23.Be2 Qf6 24.Rd1 Rg8 25.Qf4 d4 26.Bc4 d3 27.Ne1 Be5 28.Qe3 Rg5 29.g3 Rxf5 30.Ng2 Rg8 31.Rc1 Bd4 32.Qd2 Rf3 33.Rce1 Rgxg3 0-1

Interestingly Shirov played 23. Qh3 in his game. Rybka thought the move absolutely sucked and would have responded with the material grab: 23...Bxe1 24. Rxe1 Qc5 25. Bf1 Qxc2 giving it +0.11. It thought that white was much better before 23. Qh3 with the simple 23. Be2 (as was played by Vidalina).

Vidalina may have resigned prematurely since after 34. hxg3 Rxg3 35. Re3, Black is better and has some attacking chances there does not seem to be knock-out move.


Scott Nichols    (2010-02-05 22:05:29)
Advanced games : Problems & solutions

If you could figure a way to automatically remove the player from the waiting list if he signs off. Of course some players stay signed on, even if they are not at computer. That solution eludes me I'm afraid.


Garvin Gray    (2010-02-09 16:08:18)
Advanced games : Problems & solutions

An idea might be set a time period that challenges are valid for ie after a person sends out challenges or joins the waiting list, if no one has accepted inside a certain time period (say 15 minutes) the challenge automatically expires.

If the challenger wants to keep their challenge going, they have to re-send, helping to ensure that they are online, or at least near the computer.


Dinesh De Silva    (2010-02-14 07:06:24)
Accept Draw and resign......

It's an act of confused consciousness, which might be made out of generosity or curiosity, but which ultimately leads to a loss of half a point for oneslf plus a loss of rating points for oneself which through the law of 'a reaction for every action' guarantees the opponent some gains, thereby making the initial decision maker a "bad clicker!".


Scott Nichols    (2010-02-22 22:03:31)
E-point tournament

I like this idea also. I would like the Rapid format. Also, maybe give 45 points for first and 20 for second.


Iouri Basiliev    (2010-02-25 10:55:16)
mate in N moves. Game is going on :)

Could someone explain to me the reason to play a game for monthes, when there is mate in 7 moves for example? Any engine will found it in a seconds. Any player above 1200 elo understand immediately...


Hannes Rada    (2010-02-25 13:50:31)
mate in N moves. Game is going on :)

Dear Iouri

This is the so called Dead Man Defense(DMD) ....
There are various reasons to play that defense:

1.) Your opponent does not like you
2.) Your opponent does not find the 'resign checkbox'
3.) Your opponent does not want to risk his rating and therefore delays his loss until the next rating calculation period
4.) In good old correspondenc chess times, a player had to write down the words 'I resign' on a postcard - nowadays modern technolgy helps a lot - the player has only to tick a 'resign checkbox' and click a 'send-button' - but this seems task seems still to hard ....


Benjamin Block    (2010-02-25 14:07:21)
mate in N moves. Game is going on :)

...

5.)Your opponent want you to lose on time. You maybe stop playing because it is too boring.
6.)Your opponent want you to lose on a blunder.


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-02-25 14:56:37)
mate in N moves. Game is going on :)

I couldn't say it better than you guys :)

Hi Iouri, if you want to stop the game, you may use the rule 11.5 : You may call the referee a first time, after one month, just call the referee again & the game should be adjudicated.

"11. 5. Adjudications

In some cases, the game continues but the result is obvious.

If time control is superior to 1 day and if a player doesn't want to resign (or accept draw) and obviously last the game, his opponent may report to referee a first time. If the player takes 30 days more to finish the game, his opponent may call referee another time, then the game will be adjudicated. An analysis submitted by a player should contain sufficient information so that no doubt is possible. This may include a sequence of moves, but in some circumstances it may be sufficient to claim a win or a draw on the basis of material or positional advantage. Final decision belongs to referee."


Iouri Basiliev    (2010-02-25 17:17:37)
mate in N moves. Game is going on :)

Thank you, guys! I got the point(s)!


Lazaro Munoz    (2010-02-26 05:07:19)
mate in N moves. Game is going on :)

Hannes, you forgot the most important reason for the DMD, Dead Men make no moves! Your opponent is hoping you will kick the bucket before he runs out of time. In some correspondence organization does not work since death only brings on an adjudication, and with a mate in 7, you will be the winner before grass begins to grow over your opponent.


Alexander Blinchevsky    (2010-02-26 12:29:28)
E-point tournament

I like this idea too. Agreed with Scott on Rapid format and 1st and 2nd place prizes as well


Garvin Gray    (2010-02-26 19:13:30)
mate in N moves. Game is going on :)

I thought it was a rule on this site that as soon as a tablebase win appears it can be claimed.

I certainly remember this being discussed in the forum and being agreed to.


Iouri Basiliev    (2010-02-26 21:00:23)
mate in N moves. Game is going on :)

It is mate in 7 but 8 pieses :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-02-27 00:14:28)
mate in N moves. Game is going on :)

I can't remember such a rule, but this has been discussed for sure... It seems to me that we concluded that any player (so a player without engines as well) should be able to "see" the end of the game -particularly difficult endgames- if he does not last it for any DMD purpose.


Don Groves    (2010-02-27 01:49:27)
mate in N moves. Game is going on :)

Reason #9: There are many players out there with zero integrity. Unfortunately, some of these players also find their way to FICGS...


Lazaro Munoz    (2010-02-27 16:46:21)
Hosting tournaments

Would FICGS be able to host a closed group tournament? For instance lets say some chess club, or group wants to have a tournament. Could they, after getting themselves an id on FICGS send you a request to create a tournament for that group?

As an enhancement for the future you might want to create a group(s) concept that can be stored in each users profile, so that one can in the future create group tournaments that are open to that group. Since this site is built in the spirit of openess it need not be enforced but people should understand that some groups many not want to be so open so they should request it from someone, so maybe the group info should have the user and email of the moderator for that group who will give the ok to join the group.

For instance some groups may want specific language so they converse in their native language in the chat box, or geographic area. Or even opening specialist can create thematic openings (although it could get tricky there if someones enters one these thematic groups and decides to play a different opening).

There really isn't anything like it for free anywhere, ICCF will host tournaments however they charge a fee, for instance.


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-03-03 14:29:25)
Hosting tournaments

Sure it is possible, I would even create such tournaments for free (if not too many ones) but it would be played with FICGS rules which are slightly different from FIDE rules. About players able to create their own tournaments, closed or not, I would have to think about this, I'm not sure it is really necessary as e.g. I always add thematic chess tournaments that I'm suggested, and "private" tournaments may be not so easy to start, but if there is a strong demand, I could arrange that.


Ralph Deline    (2010-03-12 19:36:04)
Rating calculation

Hi Thibault,
Thanks for your earlier explanation. I wanted to respond sooner but then when I was at the FICGS site, I saw another player, also confused about his chess rating, questioning you about it so I threw in my two cents. In my situation, my opponent was rated about 80 points higher so when I drew, I thought I would actually go up in ratings points instead of down. That is still confusing to me.
Maybe my age is catching up with me, but for fifty years or more, using the formula for establishing ratings in Canada, I was always under the impression that your score and your opponents ratings, with a bit of math thrown in, determined your rating. I know at one time it was possible to win a tournament and lose rating points but I believe that was corrected about a decade or so ago. I wasn't playing for over a decade so I'm not certain on dates.
However, let me acknowledge the fact that I understand what you are saying, play less, win more, and your rating will improve. But I still have a hurdle to overcome. When a lower rated player ties with a highed rated player, regardless of colour, why does he get penalized instead of rewarded for achieving a result that is performing above his present rating? It doesn't seem logical.
You are probably busy and I've taken enough of your time. I don't think I will understand any explanation, you know, can't teach an old dog new tricks, so you don't have to try to explain any further. I just wanted my voice to be heard.
I have had three gross blunders in the last half year so maybe I am playing too many games. I hate to do it, but maybe I will try playing less.
Thanks for listening.
Ralph


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-03-16 10:37:01)
Interview with E. Kotlyanskiy

Congrats again to Edward Kotlyanskiy, new FICGS chess champion after beating Xavier Pichelin (2577) in the 12 games final match of the 3rd cycle.

Edward kindly accepted to answer a few questions on his match and correspondence chess in general :

_________________________


> Hi Edward, first of all congratulations for winning this 12 games match against the former FICGS chess champion, Xavier Pichelin. You had to score at least one point more than your opponent, what was your strategy when the games started?

Knowing that I had to score at least +1 against Xavier, I had to try to get the games into complex positions where there are many options to play for both sides. At the point when the games started, I was the underdog to Xavier (mainly due to the face that I was rated about 200 points lower). In part, I think that one of the reasons why Xavier allowed the games to reach such complex positions is due to the fact that his rating was undoubtedly higher than mine and therefore he probably assumed that he could “outplay” me. Although this was simultaneously a brave and admirable choice, I think an option that many other players would have pursued would have been to play “drawish” lines with the hope of having all of the games ending in draws. I have great respect for Xavier due to the fact that he didn't choose such a path and allowed us to put on a hard fought show that was worth watching.

> What could you say on the hot moments of the match?

The first game in which I thought I had very good chances to win was game 34739. In this game (particularly on move 18) Xavier played the move Nb8?? Looking back at the move, I realized that the game was lost for him. I assumed that Xavier probably underestimated the threat of f5. There were no good responses and/or countermeasures for the move f5. For example, if 19) gxf5, I have 20) Nxh5 Nc6 21) Rc3! Bxh4 (Qd8 was also possible) 22) Qf4 Be7 23) g4! His king is just clearly caught in the attack! 19) exf5 also fails to 20) e6 f6 (trying to keep the king safe) 21) Bxh5!! gxh5 22) Nc6 Rc3 and therefore it’s easy to see that it is just a matter of time. Xavier did try something better although even that failed due to some nice moves. I believe that 21) g7 came as a surprise to Xavier (or that at least he hadn't seen this move when playing Nb8). After Nxh5 (another neat move), another line that I thought Xavier would enter (which is also losing) is 22) Qxc2 23) Qxc2 Rxc2 24) Nf6+! Bxf6 25) exf6. Clearly my pawns are just too strong! Knowing that I am winning after the mentioned alternatives, the other games (although I won three others) were just necessary to hold without falling for any tactics/tricks.

A second game I want to briefly comment on is game 34729. I played a very nice (although I am not sure if it is winning just yet) move known as 17.a4! It was a very nice way to open the position on both of our kings. In all honesty, the move that I think was winning in this situation 25) Rd3, I did not even consider too highly until the position reached that very move. After a relatively short analysis, I was indeed pleasantly surprised to see that; overall, it was completely winning for me.

> What could you say on the advantages and inconveniences of this 12 games match format played at a quite fast time control?

From the days when I first starting playing correspondence chess, I have always been accustomed to making moves rather quickly. In fact, when I first started playing, in some games I made moves within 10 minutes of looking at the position. Although I take a lot more time to analyze now-a-days, I still consider the speed of my play to be relatively faster compared to most other correspondence players. Playing 12 games simultaneously can have drawbacks as not having enough time to properly analyze; however, I didn't have such a problem. With the exception of a few games that I was playing on IECG at the start of the FICGS Championship, the 12 game series was my main concern.

> Without revealing your secrets, how would you define modern correspondence chess as a centaur (playing with chess engines)?

These days, it is impossible to play correspondence chess on a high level without consulting the engine. It is also unlikely that one can achieve a lot of success just by following the engine blindly (even after a long analysis). Personally, I know that some of my friends believe that in correspondence chess you are just following the engine but I believe that most “high level” correspondence players know that it just doesn't work that way.

In my opinion, one of the most important skills that a correspondence player should have is having some sense of where the engine he is analyzing with is faulty. To give a well known example, many people know that there are certain endgame positions that an engine alone can't be trusted in (a simple case is the wrong color bishop). In essence, knowing the strengths and weaknesses of whatever engine you are analyzing with is critical to playing correspondence chess at a “high level”.

> Why did you choose to play correspondence chess, do you play OTB (over the board) chess as well?

Before starting correspondence chess, I played OTB chess for quite a few years. When my schedule became busy, I realized that I wouldn't have much time to play OTB in clubs. I came across correspondence chess and got hooked on it very quickly. Also, I began to enjoy more of the subtleties of the game; something that is just lacking in OTB blitz games. I imagine that some people prefer to play practical chess (OTB) in which a move order wouldn't make much of a difference; however, I guess I am a perfectionist and believe the game should be played on as high of a level as possible.

> How many correspondence games do you usually play at the same time (on different chess servers or by email)? Would you say that it is an addiction?

Usually, I played about 5 to 10 games on average on all different sites. I did play via email on IECC but wasn't fond of playing by email therefore I went back to server only sites (IECG, FICGS, Schemingmind).

I can definitely say that correspondence chess is an addiction. All too often, I catch myself analyzing games when I really should be doing something much more time sensitive. Well, at least I can say that this addiction paid off in that I am the new FICGS champion!

> Are you interested in other games?

As far as board games go, chess is primarily the only game I play. At times I do play games like monopoly and scrabble with my friends. Another interest that I have is billiards.

> The next challenger for the FICGS chess champion title is SM Eros Riccio (winner of several PlayChess PAL freestyle tournaments). Do you think that you'll play him? What does this perspective inspire in you?

I can't wait to play Eros! I believe that he would be my toughest opponent yet (although I have played GM Leitão, Rafael (fide elo: 2619) and managed to draw). Eros is like an unstoppable juggernaut in corr chess. That said, I look forward to our games and I am certain that they will simultaneously be challenging and entertaining.

> Thanks and best of luck in your future games!


Ralph Deline    (2010-03-17 07:27:30)
Rating calculation

Thanks for the helpful comments. I feel much better now that I understand how ratings are derived. I made the assumption that since my rating changed after the conclusion of every game, that the past games had no influence on my future rating, that is, within the two month rating period. It is the same type of rating system I'm accustomed to; results, strength of opponents, a little math thrown in, and presto, a new rating. I can now go on living. Cheers.


Iouri Basiliev    (2010-03-17 11:33:52)
1st team tournament : games & results !

Thibault, you can resign in the game 32204 :) This is 6p Nalimov's TB.
Yellow-Blue Warriors geting 1 extra match point! Could someone udate the tournament status?


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-03-17 14:42:57)
1st team tournament : games & results !

Hi Iouri... Well, my old computer can't even see it (just realized that modern computers are about 40x faster :/) , but I just checked the shredder bases online, this is checkmate in 21 moves indeed. It was predictable anyway :) .. I just resigned.

Table 1 : 4 unfinished games remaining (Iouri leading)
Table 2 : 0 unfinished games remaining (Volker won)
Table 3 : 2 unfinished games remaining (Ostap leading)
Table 4 : 0 unfinished games remaining (Yura won)

One thing is sure already, our yellow-blue chessfriends did it very well !

So...

"Team 1" - "Team 2" : points (score)

"Ni" - "FSF" : FSF leads by 1 point
"Ni" - "Dark" : 1-1 (2-2)
"Ni" - "Happy" : 2-0 (3-1)
"Ni" - "YB" : 1-1 (2-2)
"Ni" - "Ghost" : 2-0 (3.5-0.5)
"Ni" - "No" : 2-0 (leads by 2 points)
"FSF" - "Dark" : 1-1 (2-2)
"FSF" - "Happy" : FSF leads by 1 point
"FSF" - "YB" : 2-0 (2.5-1.5)
"FSF" - "Ghost" : 2-0 (leads by 3 points)
"FSF" - "No" : 2-0 (3.5-0.5)
"Dark" - "Happy" : 2-0 (2.5-1.5)
"Dark" - "YB" : 0-2 (1.5-2.5)
"Dark" - "Ghost" : 2-0 (3.5-0.5)
"Dark" - "No" : 2-0 (3-1)
"Happy" - "YB" : YB leads by 1 point
"Happy" - "Ghost" : 2-0 (3.5-0.5)
"Happy" - "No" : 2-0 (3-1)
"YB" - "Ghost" : 2-0 (2.5-0.5)
"YB" - "No : 2-0 (2.5-1.5)
"Ghost" - "No" : 0-2 (1.5-2.5)


Total :

Knights who say Ni : 8 points (-)
FSF en passant : 7 points (++)
Dark knights : 8 points
Happy pawn : 4 pawns (--)
Yellow Blue warriors : 7 points (+)
Ghost knights : 0 points
Our team king (knights with no name) : 2 points

(+) meaning : leads in a match yet, (-) meaning : is leaded in a match yet

Nothing is decided yet... but it looks like Yellow-Blue have good chances, which is particularly impressive with a player who made 0/6 !


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-03-20 22:24:31)
Firebird, Ivanhoe vs. Rybka

Of course, since the free open source chess engine Ippolit is available, clones have appeared, starting with RobboLito & Igorrit, now Ivanhoe & Firebird, and some may be even stronger...

It seems that we still do not have any clue to know if Ippolit is itself a clone of Rybka or not, anyway it would interesting to compare these new engines.

Does anyone have any informations, tournament results or something for these new engines?


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-03-21 01:13:54)
Freestyle Cup: April 2010

Dear chessfriends, the next FICGS chess freestyle cup waiting list is open until april 3. This 6 rounds swiss tournament will start on april 3, 13:00 server time (first three rounds, every 2 hours) and on april 10, 13:00 server time (last three rounds, every 2 hours). Prize is 100% of the entry fees in E-Points + 100 E-Points. FIDE GM & IM, FICGS / ICCF GM, SM & IM are invited to enter the waiting list for free, please just send a message to webmaster through My account page to register.

To enter the waiting list :

http://www.ficgs.com/user_page.php?page=entry_tournament&tournament=ficgs_chess_cup

Feel free to reply here if you have any suggestions, I hope that this format (2 consecutive saturdays, 3 rounds per day) will be ok for the most !


Garvin Gray    (2010-03-19 08:34:38)
Blitz time controls

Hello all,

I was wondering what others thought about this. I have just finished a match with Scott Nichols at blitz time controls ie 40 moves in 2 hours followed by 40 moves in 2 hours etc.

In my opinion, the second time period would be improved if it was 20 moves in 1 hour. The classical time control for the last 100 years or so has been 40 moves in (insert time here) followed by 20 moves in (insert time here).

In my match with Scott, it was quite common for the games to go only 50 moves or so, which meant we had 2 hours available for just ten moves or so.


Garvin Gray    (2010-03-24 15:37:26)
Blitz time controls

Are there any further opinions on this matter?


Garvin Gray    (2010-03-25 04:29:33)
Blitz time controls

Hello Thibault,

I am not asking for a significantly shorter time control. I am not proposing or asking for a shorter time control for moves 1-40. Moves 1 to 40 can stay at 40 moves in 2 hrs if you wish.

My request is for a change to the second time control from the current 40 moves in 2 hrs to 20 moves in 1 hr continuous.

Following others comments, I used examples of the time controls for major tournaments.

As I said in my first post, In my match with Scott, it was quite common for the games to go only 50 moves or so, which meant we had 2 hours available for just ten moves or so.


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-03-28 04:01:07)
Vasily Smyslov dies at 89

Vasily Vasiliyevich Smyslov (born March 24, 1921) was the 7th chess world champion, he beat Mikhail Botvinnik in the world championship match in 1957 and lost the title one year later.

He died on March 27, 2010.

(I must say I was surprised to learn he was still alive, another proof that chess is good for the health)


Daniel Parmet    (2010-03-28 22:01:08)
Remove me from waitinglist

I need to be off the two chess special waiting list (thematic) and (unrated). Thanks.


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-03-30 14:48:36)
Affiliate link

Sure, players coming from these links are identified thanks to their internet address that are stored in a file then compared with their internet address when they register. There could be easier ways but that's the best way I found in matter of SEO (& to avoid duplicate pages).


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-03-31 10:01:23)
Poker dealing algorithm

I mean that there is no card generated 'randomly' [without any control] like on many poker sites that can e.g. give better cards to super players and say "it was just luck"). I can prove that all cards come from the same algorithm, but of course if I reveal it, I'll have to change at least some parameters of the algorithm for the next games.

Anyway I can make a study and generate billions of hands (would it be enough, I'm not even sure) automatically to see accurate statistics but really, I would be surprised to see any problem.


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-03-31 20:24:34)
Poker dealing algorithm

It seems that I like to do everything by myself :)

The main difference (if I understood what I just read) is that this algorithm (e.g. Durstenfeld's algorithm) uses a different randomly generated number for each hand, so it is theorically possible to change the cards because there is no mathematical way to prove the cheating. With my algorithm, cards are pseudo-randomly generated but it is also possible to verify every card of every hand. And after all, even random functions are pseudo-random. (I hope that pseudo means the same in french & english)

Anyway, I'm curious and if someone knows a statistical way to know if an algorithm is good or not, I'll apply it to my method.


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-03-31 22:03:34)
Improvement to watch games

It will be now much more convenient to follow bullet lightning, blitz & freestyle games (in other words fast games) with the viewer.. The top informations (name, tournament details) will be removed until the game ended.


Andres E. Leon    (2010-04-01 14:45:00)
Difference between class A / rapid A

Thank you very much for your answer. And someone knows when FICGS__CHESS__WORLD_CHAMPIONSHIP waiting list is going to be open, and when is the estimated date to start the games? Thank you in advance.


Michel van der Kemp    (2010-04-03 16:58:45)
Weird technical problem

Thibault, thanks for organising this nice tournament. Lot of fun. I lost my first game against Xavier Pichelin, which I will totally accept, Xavier played excellent. However I do have a weird question.

About the game I receive this email:

[Event "FICGS__CHESS__FREESTYLE_CUP__000002"]
[Site "FICGS"]
[Date "2010.4.3"]
[Round "1"]
[White "Pichelin,Xavier"]
[Black "van der Kemp,Michel"]
[Result "1-0"]
[WhiteElo "2405"]
[BlackElo "1921"]

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 4.Ba4 Nf6 5.O-O Be7 6.Re1 b5 7.Bb3 O-O 8.c3 d5 9.exd5 Nxd5 10.Nxe5 Nxe5 11.Rxe5 c6 12.d4 Bd6 13.Re1 Qh4 14.g3 Qh3 15.Be3 Bg4 16.Qd3 Rae8 17.Nd2 Re6 18.a4 Qh5 19.axb5 axb5 20.Qf1 Bh3 21.Bd1 Qf5 22.Qe2 c5 23.Nf3 Bf4 24.Qd2 Nxe3 25.fxe3 Bh6 26.Qf2 Rfe8 27.Bc2 Qh5 28.e4 Rf6 29.Bd1 Bg4 30.Rf1 g6 31.e5 Rf5 32.Ra5 cxd4 33.cxd4 Rc8 34.Ra3 Rc1 35.Qe2 Rb1 36.d5 Bh3 37.Qe4 Bxf1 38.Qxb1 Qh3 39.Qc2 Bc4 40.Be2 Rxf3 41.Rxf3 Bxd5 42.Bf1 Qg4 43.Rc3 Qd4+ 44.Qf2 Qxe5 45.Bg2 Bc4 46.Kh1 Bg5 47.h3 Kg7 48.Bf1 Bd5+ 49.Kh2 h5 50.Qe2 Qd6 51.Rd3 h4 52.Bg2 hxg3+ 53.Kh1 Bxg2+ 54.Kxg2 Qc6+ 55.Kxg3 Qc7+ 56.Kg2 Qc6+ 57.Rf3 f5 58.b3 Bf6 59.Qd3 1-0



Move sent : 2010.4.3 - 16:34:26
Move replied : 2010.4.3 - 16:34:55


Last move sent : g7-h7




WhiteELO : 2405 ... 2405
BlackELO : 1921 ... 1921


This email was generated automatically by http://www.ficgs.com/

It says last move send g7-h7. How did I actually lose this game if the server still received my move? The result of the game came as a little shock to me, because I thought I had about 10 seconds left when I send the move, and the server did receive it as well, and somehow registered it.

Anyway I should have been faster and accept my loss.


Daniel Parmet    (2010-04-05 04:41:09)
Chess is...

Chess is the ultimate test. Your parallels are never ending to the battles you will face all through out life. The same skills are needed... effort, hard work, concentration, memory and research abilities.


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-04-05 13:03:41)
How to check tablebases integrity

Thanks for all these informations Wayne! Actually I'm not sure if I will start to download it before a few months/years more, but it may be useful for others meanwhile.


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-04-05 13:52:12)
Chessbase april fool's joke

http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=6232

Worth to read... among the April 1st three stories, "Fischer’s remains to be exhumed?", "Magnus Carlsen's cousin in America (Matt Damon)" & "LHC goes online – chess grandmasters worried" on the Large Hadron Collider at CERN, it looks like the trap worked quite well (I thought it was Fisher's also), what story did you think it was the april fool's joke ? :)


Garvin Gray    (2010-04-05 16:49:53)
Blitz time controls

Has a decision been made on this? Awaiting to start a match, so want to play the same time control in each game.


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-04-06 15:41:33)
Ratings calculation

Hi Lazaro, correspondence chess ratings are not calculated in real time, it is calculated every 2 months, see the complete rules :

http://www.ficgs.com/membership.html#rating_chess

You may see an estimation of your future rating (taking account of the games played after the last rating calculation) at :

http://www.ficgs.com/players/munoz_lazaro/history.html

A 1885 rating should look like more logical to you :)


Robert Mueller    (2010-04-11 09:12:03)
Match Against Rybka Forum

Thibault, I see there is going to be a match Rybka Forum vs FICGS. They are recruiting eight players to play individual games against FICGS members. Who is going to play for FICGS? Do you still need a player? I would be interested in playing, but I will be on vacation from May 8 to May 15.


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-04-11 15:20:48)
Match Against Rybka Forum

Hi Robert, I'm not sure yet if there are so many members at Rybkaforum interested to play (actually it looks like the most are FICGS players until there), but if it can motivate them, let's try to build a team already :)

Vacation would not be a problem as a long time control should be the option but there is no rule well defined yet. However the rules will probably look like the ones used in FICGS vs. Igame.ru

The thread at Rybkaforum is there :

http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=16132

Do not hesitate to post here and there if you're interested to play such a match!


Garvin Gray    (2010-04-11 16:18:23)
Freestyle Cup: April 2010

It may or may not lead to more draws, this I do not know. But what it will do is allow more time for analysis and human decisions ie centaur play, which I think is the main part of freestyle and one of the main reasons we all participate in these competitions.

If the time control is too fast to allow decent analysis, then each game is just engine v engine with different computing speeds as a variable.

This whole issue could be viewed also as each freestyle comp will have slightly different paramaters to try and satisfy most people's taste.


Robert Mueller    (2010-04-11 16:21:54)
Match Against Rybka Forum

Actually, it seems they already have seven players:

http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=16195

If you build a team, please count me in.


William Taylor    (2010-04-11 17:48:52)
Match Against Rybka Forum

I'd be interested in playing, and I also like the suggested rule of Rybka forum members only being assisted by Rybka, and us only being assisted by other engines.


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-04-11 20:59:51)
Match Against Rybka Forum

Oh ok, thanks Robert, I didn't see this discussion at Rybkaforum before...

The idea discussed with "Vytron" is : Half players would play their game here at FICGS, and the other half would play their game at the Rybka forum... Of course there would be a kind of time control there but this would be a friendly match before all!

So please post here if you're interested to play in the FICGS team and specify if you would be ok to play your game at the Rybkaforum.

I'm in, of course (if my new rating allow me to play :)), and I'm ok to play at the Rybkaforum.


Wayne Lowrance    (2010-04-11 22:47:43)
Match Against Rybka Forum

I am in if you need me. I think you will have many volunteers. I will play my games at either server, just as long as I am a FICGS member
Wayne


William Taylor    (2010-04-11 23:43:06)
Match Against Rybka Forum

I'm in if my rating's good enough, and am happy to play at Rybka forum if necessary. If you get too many people volunteering I'm happy not to play.


Robert Mueller    (2010-04-12 05:14:47)
Match Against Rybka Forum

> So please post here if you're interested
> to play in the FICGS team and specify
> if you would be ok to play your game
> at the Rybkaforum.

Thibault, I would like to play for the FICGS team. I would prefer to play here at FICGS.


Garvin Gray    (2010-04-12 05:57:57)
Match Against Rybka Forum

I would like to know about how boards are going to be decided? Will it in rating order for both teams.

If so, then I am interested. If teams are able to put their players in any order, then I will pass.


Mircea Hrubaru    (2010-04-12 20:58:37)
Match Against Rybka Forum

I'm interested. On behalf of FICGS, of course.


Michel van der Kemp    (2010-04-13 11:00:06)
Match Against Rybka Forum

I would be interested to play also.


Xavier Pichelin    (2010-04-13 12:59:03)
RYBKA 4 UCI available in May

Forum Rybka :De Vasik Rajlich Date 2010-04-11 07:47 Some information about Rybka 4:

- Rybka 4 will be a normal UCI engine, without copy protection, and will be available in the first part of May.
- There will be separate single-processor and multi-processor versions.
- Full chess analysis packages which include Rybka 4 will be made by ChessBase (www.chessbase.com) and Convekta/ChessOK (www.chessok.com).
- Plain Rybka 4 UCI without GUI for download only will be available from RybkaChess (www.rybkachess.com).
- All of these versions of Rybka 4 will be identical and can be used in any UCI-compliant GUI.
- The Rybka 4 book by Ji&#345;í Dufek will be available as a separate item from both ChessBase and Convekta. The two versions of the book will be 'essentially identical', although in different formats.
- Rybka 4 book compatibility will work as follows:
* ChessBase software users will require the ChessBase version of the book.
* Aquarium users can use either version of the book.
* Other software users are encouraged to upgrade their chess software.


Mircea Hrubaru    (2010-04-13 14:08:25)
Match Against Rybka Forum

OK Thibault.


Michel van der Kemp    (2010-04-13 14:19:59)
Match Against Rybka Forum

Yes I can play on their forum also, though I prefer the FICGS interface here :)


Mircea Hrubaru    (2010-04-13 15:58:44)
Match Against Rybka Forum

I think I want to play at FICGS.


Garvin Gray    (2010-04-13 16:14:50)
Match Against Rybka Forum

If the pairings are going to be arbitarly, which I take it mean that players can be paired in any order, then I am OUT.


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-04-13 17:06:16)
Match Against Rybka Forum

Okay Garvin! So we still need one more player, anyone?


Garvin Gray    (2010-04-13 17:22:52)
Match Against Rybka Forum

I have a proposal though. We could ask the organisers from the Rybka team if they would be willing to play their team in 'rating order' or whatever they are going to use.

The reason I am against having players play in any order is that it will lead to more mis-matches and does not tell much about the players of either forum.


Robert Mueller    (2010-04-13 17:38:51)
Match Against Rybka Forum

Another subject that should be discussed is that of names (real or otherwise). It is my understanding that some members of the Rybka team will start an account at FICGS. I assume they will have to sign up using their real names? How will we know who is who on the Rybka forum? Or do we need to know that?


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-04-13 18:03:22)
Match Against Rybka Forum

True, Garvin. I just made the suggestion at Rybkaforum.

Robert, Rybkaforum members who will play at FICGS will enter a real name for sure, just like other members. We do not have to specify our real name at the Rybkaforum, just following their rules.


Peter Marriott    (2010-04-13 21:56:25)
Firebird, Ivanhoe vs. Rybka

All I know is that Firebird is dang strong. When I did a match of FireBird vs. Rybka 3 the results were 36/50 for FireBird.


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-04-13 22:30:46)
Big chess ratings

Hi Lazaro!

"Big chess ratings are first estimated from current correspondence chess ratings (current rating -300 points, with at least 1400), then adjusted in real time after each result (...)"

http://www.ficgs.com/membership.html#rating_big_chess

When you entered your first big chess tournament, the TER was not specified but your current correspondence chess rating was used (minus 300) to calculate your first big chess rating with your first result, so a rating of 1609 seems ok taking account of your opponents ratings. The first results may look quite arbitrary but some rules prevent to lose too many points when losing against a strong opponent with a low rating. Anyway there should be more class categories to get more chances to improve ratings (to be continued), we needed more players but maybe we can do it now.


Garvin Gray    (2010-04-14 05:35:49)
Match Against Rybka Forum

Ok stick me in anyways :) Which will make the eight players.


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-04-17 21:34:42)
Match Against Rybka Forum

We need a 10th player for the match vs. Rybkaforum, this player would play his game at Rybkaforum... Anyone interested ?

Our current team :

Wayne Lowrance 2479 (will play at Rybkaforum)
Harvey Williamson [2425 ICCF] (will play at Rybkaforum)
Thibault de Vassal 2376 (will play at Rybkaforum)
William Taylor 2110 (will play at Rybkaforum)
??? (will play at Rybkaforum)

Robert Mueller 2383 (will play at FICGS)
Michel van der Kemp 2226 (will play at FICGS)
Garvin Gray 2133 (will play at FICGS)
Kamesh Nookala 2126 (will play at FICGS)
Mircea Hrubaru 1988 (will play at FICGS)


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-04-17 22:54:30)
Match Against Rybka Forum

Our almost definitive team :

Wayne Lowrance 2479 (will play at Rybkaforum)
Harvey Williamson [2425 ICCF] (will play at Rybkaforum)
Thibault de Vassal 2376 (will play at Rybkaforum)
Sebastian Boehme 2288 (will play at Rybkaforum)
William Taylor 2110 (will play at Rybkaforum)

Robert Mueller 2383 (will play at FICGS)
Michel van der Kemp 2226 (will play at FICGS)
Garvin Gray 2133 (will play at FICGS)
Mircea Hrubaru 1988 (will play at FICGS)
Samy Ould Ahmed 1889 [ICCF 2418] (will play at FICGS)

Stéphane Legrand 2222 (will play at (?))
Kamesh Nookala 2126 (will play at (?))


Kamesh Nookala    (2010-04-18 05:53:45)
Match Against Rybka Forum

I will play anywhere on this planet via internet Thib :p


Gaetano Laghetti    (2010-04-20 09:29:54)
Match Against Rybka Forum

Dear my 'old' chessfriend Thibault,
if you need another player I'd be happy to join you.
Regards
Gaetano


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-04-21 15:15:22)
Match Against Rybka Forum

Here are the pairings (games started at RybkaForum & are to start here)

Games at Rybka Forum:

Bobby C (RybkaForum) Vs. Harvey Williamson (FICGS)
Kamesh Nookala (FICGS) Vs. Mark Eldridge (RybkaForum)
omprakash (RybkaForum) Vs. Sebastian Boehme (FICGS)
Thibault de Vassal (FICGS) Vs. SpiderG (RybkaForum)
Weirwindle111 (RybkaForum) Vs. Wayne Lowrance (FICGS)
William Taylor (FICGS) Vs. Vytron (RybkaForum)

Games at FICGS:

Garvin Gray (FICGS) Vs. burch_michael (RybkaForum)
clement_george (RybkaForum) Vs. Michel van der Kemp (FICGS)
Mircea Hrubaru (FICGS) Vs. Gaetano Laghetti (RybkaForum)
Ivan Trajkov (RybkaForum) Vs. Robert Mueller (FICGS)
Samy Ould Ahmed (FICGS) Vs. José Sanz (RybkaForum)
Plant_Kevin (RybkaForum) Vs. Stéphane Legrand (FICGS)


Let's have fun :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-04-21 15:20:31)
Match Against Rybka Forum

About the rules :

Time control 20 days + 20 days / 10 moves at FICGS... for the games played at RybkaForum it is 24/48 hours per move in average & in relax mode, there will not be "losses on time"...

It seems to me that there is no other special rule, I just asked Vytron to confirm.


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-04-21 15:22:13)
Final Match details

It is not so clear yet indeed, I just asked Vytron to confirm, if there's a special rule, I'll specify it as soon as possible in the original discussion :

http://www.ficgs.com/user_page.php?page=forum_read&id=8422


George Clement    (2010-04-21 19:58:54)
Match Against Rybka Forum

Thibault, how do we access a match on FICGS in this tournament? Will you set it up?


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-04-21 20:36:45)
Match Against Rybka Forum

Yes, within hours, most probably.


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-04-21 23:53:02)
Final Match details

Well, the only rule is "getting any kind of help from a different player is forbidden, players are meant to play alone"

Now we can start :) I'm to create the games.


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-04-22 00:14:03)
Match Against Rybka Forum

All games started !

You can see all boards for games played at FICGS here :

http://www.ficgs.com/user_page.php?page=tournament&tournament=FICGS__CHESS__FICGS_VS_RYBKAFORUM_MATCH&boards=1

The other games played at Rybkaforum :

Bobby C Vs. Harvey Williamson
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=16385

Kamesh N. Vs. Mark Eldridge
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=16389

omprakash Vs. Sebastian Boehme
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=16388

Thibault d.V. Vs. SpiderG
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=16383

Weirwindle111 Vs. Wayne Lowrance
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=16384

William T. Vs. Vytron
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=16390


Have nice games :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-04-20 15:59:34)
Match Against Rybka Forum

Hi Gaetano! Very nice to see you in, by the way even in the opposite team as Rybkaforum needed one player more... :)

Thanks to you both teams are complete now, the match should start very very soon!


Wayne Lowrance    (2010-04-20 17:58:10)
Final Match details

Thibault would you post the final match conditions ? I do not know for sure game timer, match format etc etc.
Thank you
Wayne


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-04-21 02:46:14)
Final Match details

Hi Wayne,

You mean the match FICGS vs. RybkaForum, right?


Robert Mueller    (2010-04-21 04:36:04)
Final Match details

Somewhere in the discussions about this match it was suggested that the Rybka forum members only use Rybka and that FICGS members may not use Rybka. Is this an actual rule agreed upon or was it just a suggestion?


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-04-24 00:08:44)
GoDiscussions & LifeIn19x19

FICGS Go players may have read this article in the latest AGA newsletter on the 2 Go forums... So there is a new Go forum called lifein19x19.com , but what happens with GoDiscussions?

Like many other members I experienced some problems regularly for a few months but what is behind the technical problems?

Does anyone have more informations on this?

http://godiscussions.com
http://www.lifein19x19.com


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-04-23 15:47:05)
Anand vs. Topalov, world championship

So it seems that a FIDE world championship match is to start between current FIDE world champion Viswanathan Anand and former world champion Veselin Topalov...

I'm not even sure if this is a kind of "semi-final" or if this is a final match in the cycle... In my memory, Veselin Topalov beat Gata Kamsky and V. Anand beat Vladimir Kramnik, right?

Anyway a first problem occured with Anand asking FIDE to postpon the start of the match by one day because of the lack of airplanes as a consequence of the icelandic volcano (yes, Bobby Fischer stroke again! :)), the psychological war started and Silvio Danailov already threatened to sue FIDE. What do you expect to happen during this match? Who is your favourite?


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-04-23 00:26:49)
Wider rating range tournaments

The problem is either it would ask a big update to make it automatic or an action from a tournament director each time... If I make an update, it should probably work for all class tournaments. This is the system used by IECG but I'm not sure if it is best, and what if several players share first place & so on... Ratings move faster than at IECG to avoid that and allow players to reach higher categories in a shorter time. Simple rules are often best IMO.


Mircea Hrubaru    (2010-04-24 10:01:04)
Anand vs. Topalov, world championship

I hope that the whole mess will stop after this WCC match and things will come back to the normal cycle, even if the whole logic behind the cycle seems fuzzy...
I think Vishy will win, but I'm afraid of attempts to repeat the "toiletgate" in any variant. It started already with the transportation issue...


Mircea Hrubaru    (2010-04-25 13:51:18)
Anand vs. Topalov, world championship

We must credit our mate Dmitry Domanov for the 16...Qd6!? move (1/2-1/2 Stephenson, Andrew (2256) - Domanov, Dmitry (2202) / FICGS__CHESS__WCH_ROUND_ROBIN_FINAL__000003 (1), FICGS 2008 and 0-1 Agustin, Santos (2010) - Domanov, Dmitry (2181) / FICGS__CHESS__WCH_STAGE_1_GROUP_09__000006 (1), FICGS 2009).


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-04-27 12:27:54)
Interview with E. Kotlyanskiy

The next final match "Edward Kotlyanskiy vs. Eros Riccio" in the FICGS chess championship should start in about 2 months from now! As always, I'm impatient & excited in advance :)

The next cycle should start on july 1st as well, the waiting lists will be open on may 1st, a few days more to wait!


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-04-28 08:55:53)
Game 3 is a draw




Thibault de Vassal    (2010-04-28 21:22:41)
Game 4: Anand wins again

How to explain so many wins in this match? Let's hope it can continue like this as a way to promote chess as a still living & not drawish game. Do you think that the players took many risks so far? Nice game anyway.




Mircea Hrubaru    (2010-04-28 22:14:49)
Anand vs. Topalov, world championship

I think we should put aside the first game. In my view black played allright until the blunder 23...Kf7? which gave white the chance to blow away black's position with 23. Nxf6!! (Anand saw the pawn in f6 under the threat Nxf6 and that's why he defended with the king, but I think he didn't consider the immediate capture).
In games 2 and 4 Anand showed a superb preparation in an opening that haunts Topalov since his match against Kramnik. Game 2 showed a Topalov looking for deadly attacks and ignoring the lack of sufficient force in the attack. Until now the game with the highest quality is surely game 4, where 10. Na3!? caught Topalov offguard. Between them Anand showed in game 3 that he can chill out and play for safety.


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-04-30 21:08:53)
Game 5, draw




Thibault de Vassal    (2010-05-02 16:17:36)
Game 6 draw, Anand still leads




Thibault de Vassal    (2010-05-03 23:33:36)
Game 7, draw again




Thibault de Vassal    (2010-05-05 15:41:56)
Topalov wins Game 8

Topalov strikes back in Game 8, now the score is 4-4, and as Mircea noticed it, the game follows a line until move 18 in another game played here "de Vassal vs. Leemans 1/2-1/2", I'm not sure if 18.a5 is a real improvement but it worked well against a world champion, at least!




Thibault de Vassal    (2010-05-08 20:50:45)
Games 9 & 10 ended in a draw






Don Groves    (2010-05-08 23:23:15)
How many games at once?

With some talking about so many games, I did not know there was still a rule for 50 games maximum. Those other games must be on other servers then and FIGCS has no control over that.

As for the proper length of correspondence games, I would not willingly play if I knew a game would take more than three months. It's not a matter of patience, it's a matter of reasonableness. A two-year game is simply unreasonable to me. I've never had a postal game last nearly that long.


Don Groves    (2010-05-09 05:01:36)
How many games at once?

Vacations take care of life getting too busy to play. The other stuff is a matter of opinion. Ours are different.

I have no problem with taking 10 days for a juicy decision, but some here take several days for almost every move! That becomes too much.

Another thing that happens is that when a new tournament begins, one player may let his clock go red before he starts to move in a game. Then he will play one move per day to avoid losing on time, but the other player must wait for several weeks before the game begins. Is this fair?


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-05-09 23:02:05)
Rybka 4, news, tests & results

It looks like Rybka 4 is to be released, this discussion could gather the news, tests & results in matches of this new version against Rybka 3 and other engines (thinking about Stockfish 1.7.1, Naum 4.2, Fritz 12, Shredder 12, Hiarcs & engines that are "possible" clones of Rybka: Firebird 1.2, Ivanhoe, RobboLito, Ippolit & so on)...


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-05-09 23:24:12)
How many games at once?

Of course it is laughable, I took the extreme opposites but while everything goes faster & faster on the internet and everyone MUST become more & more addicted so that the world runs fine (just meaning more money), my choice is definitely not to follow that way, also because this system will not work so long IMO. People will slowly quit Facebook after a time or at least will not use it the same way, and many already started to stop to play all these thousands stupid applications. Maybe it cannot be really a good comparison but the idea is there.

Correspondence chess was much slower before email chess & server chess, and it is now fast enough IMO. I don't know how other players feel it, some ones have time for sure, as for me I have some time to play but a 14 days limit per move would be really stressful to me though... I cannot imagine how many games more I would have lost with such a rule.

I know that a few players would like faster moves, however I feel that most players are fine with the current rules and I really want everyone to be cool here. We've lost a bunch of good players because of the previous rules such as unlimited number of games.

Now we should debate it game after game as most players who would like faster moves at chess still play in class tournaments (while rapid category was designed for them). Go is a game of patience definitely, but I have some work to do to accelerate some games (something towards automatic adjudication), and the major problem will be for poker games.

So, what are we talking about? :)


Don Groves    (2010-05-10 02:13:36)
How many games at once?

I've had my say, I'll stop now. I'm still cool with FICGS, no fear of that ever changing :D

No matter what system of rules is in place, there will always be those who find a way to take advantage of it.


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-05-11 18:01:16)
Entry fee for higher class tournament

Hi Michel! Thanks again for discussing it.

> What's next? Next FIDE world championship challenger is going to be the one that brings the largest bag of money to the table?

I don't know if this was designed to be humor (I guess, but maybe you meant FICGS instead of FIDE?) but in the context of current FIDE rules I find it very funny :) .. by the way if the same rules were applied at FICGS, anyone could challenge the champion for the title for $500,000 or something like this. Of course that would be great for FICGS and the current champion may appreciate such a prize as well, but that's not the point here.

However yes this FIDE rule may be compared to my suggestion, at a very different level though (the basic idea is the same: to build prizes for more interesting [free?] competitions), in my opinion an entry fee of 10 Epoints is quite different from what I suggested before already. Note that even if FICGS was not free, it would not justify such special entry fee more (not saying it cannot be justified!), after all there's an entry fee in the vast majority of OTB tournaments, if you don't pay it (but GM/IM that are generally invited to play for free - and most often take the prize), you cannot improve your rating, the problem is that the entry fee depends on the tournament, and the entry fee for closed tournaments (the main/only way to get norms) is often much higer.

I agree that things are somewhat different here as the main idea of FICGS is to be completely free. So the real question is : "Is FICGS still 'free' if a tournament's winner can choose to pay an entry fee in a virtual money (by the way it is quite easy to get Epoints without having to pay anything) to enter the next tournaments category".

- If despite of all the answer is "no", then FICGS is NOT free right now anyway as any player can play a rated 2 games match RAPID SILVER with an entry fee against a higher rated player to have more chances to win elo points. This way even IECG was not free (chessfriend), and even if something is really 100% free, it still doesn't mean fair, which is the main point here. Even if a tournament's winner could enter the next tournament's category for free, such a rule would NEVER be completely fair, as I described the particular cases.

Quite complex :)

Finally I'm not saying you're wrong in any way. Free or not free is a really complex question IMO, in my point of view, FICGS will remain free as noone needs to pay to become champion or to achieve the highest ratings (unlike FIDE). But if it is 99% free only while offering money prizes, I'd choose it anyway for sure.


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-05-11 19:13:45)
Anand is new world champion

30... f5 !




Thibault de Vassal    (2010-05-12 16:51:21)
Entry fee for higher class tournament

Not exactly a vote Garvin, anyway a few opinions are much better than nothing and still matter to discuss.

My answer to Scott & Tano-Urayoán : I agree that none of these proposals is more fair than the current rules, but here is why at least choice #1 has also many advantages, for FICGS but also for the players : Of course, those who made it the hardest way like Wayne may feel that this is unfair to change the rules, but rules constantly evolve & this would be really a minor change (in the case of choice #1). The point is that while e.g. IECG uses this promotion system, it is unfair the same way that a player from IECG can register at FICGS with his IECG rating that benefited of this rule. From the start FICGS rules were harder than IECG rules when registering, but as ratings move faster here I thought that it would be a compensation, but it is not a reason enough not to improve the rules again if possible.

The reality according to me : choice #1 is less fair than current rules, and choice #4 is even more unfair, but the current rules aren't so fair either. Rules that would be completely fair may exist but would have too many bad consequences for sure, and at least FICGS would not have been a success by using it. Anyway, I will not take any decision today, let's wait for some more arguments, the whole discussion is actually even more interesting than the point that is discussed in. Finally, I'm quite favourable to try (as Garvin suggested) the choice #1 and discuss the consequences after a few months.


Tano-Urayoan Russi Roman    (2010-05-13 03:25:06)
Rybka 4, news, tests & results

This was posted in the Hiarcs forum by Harvey Williamson:" Now it is all over it is time to share a little secret. The day before the World Championship final in Sofia started I had a conversation with Vishy's team. For the duration of the match they have had access to my fast 8/16 core machine as well as all my databases and Hiarcs opening books. Also, of course, all the engines on my machine. I Hope this managed to negate slightly the fact that Topalov had access to the latest Rybka on its Cluster for a few months leading up leading up to the final."


Daniel Parmet    (2010-05-14 10:41:15)
Rybka 4, news, tests & results

you know an interesting thing i've noticed by listening to these post match interviews with Anand...

He is saying he expected Topalov to switch openings alot and not be so persistent. I wonder if Topalov was so persistent because he had Rybka 4 and he knew Anand did not.


William Taylor    (2010-05-14 13:01:56)
Big chess world championship

It seems there is no final match phase for this. Do you plan to have a match between defending champ and challenger in future editions of the championship, and if not, why not?


Wayne Lowrance    (2010-05-16 21:42:34)
Quick review Chess Engines

Howdy, Rybka 4 Beta 5 is out for beta testing. It is much too early to draw conclusions regarding elo strength. So far it is not looking great.
Many of the bugs from R3 are at present in R5 beta. For example the tablebase bug, bishop under promotion still not fixed, 5.04/5.12 bug tree search is reportedly still there.
In addition It is said to have severe time problem.
This is a summary of what I have been reading. But, these reports are beta remember. So R4 may still be top program after release.
In the mean time Stockfish and fire are 2 programs that are right there with rybka3 and maybe a little stronger. On my computer testing R3 is still tops.
Now, there is a new program, Houdini is available. I downloaded it this morning and have been running eng-eng matches with R3, 2 threads. So far Houdini is holding it's own. You can download the program here.
http://www.cruxis.com/chess/houdini.htm
I think CC players now have many equally strong engines available to help with their Centaur abilities and should be interesting to see the progressions Wayne


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-05-17 21:20:21)
Topalov used Rybka 4 before the match

"(...) the team of Veselin Topalov would have spent 100,000 Euros to secure a 112 core computer cluster, with the latest Rybka 4 program exclusively reserved for their use until the end of the match."

http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=6340

Wow...


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-05-17 23:18:18)
Question

Still thinking about the last Garvin's idea... the real question is IMO: can one estimate that it is fair that a player who is 50 elo points below the rating cutoff, let's say a player rated 2150, have the same right than the winner of a previous class A tournament to buy a ticket for the next class M tournament?

There are advantages to this idea of course, a problem is that there will be even less possibilites for tournaments winners to have a ticket... (well, it goes in the other way also)

I like the idea though... My personal answer to this question would be probably: All this is far too complicated to be summarized this way to this question, winning a tournament IS a matter of chance also, winning a game IS a matter of chance (we prefer to call it statistics) also, and this rule, whatever the details, IS unfair anyway. So there is no clear answer IMHO, but if someone has one, please share it now :)


Richard Doughty    (2010-05-21 07:55:23)
Blitz Games

it would help if the animation speed was a little slower


Richard Doughty    (2010-05-21 08:09:13)
pawn promotions

is there an option to change pawn promotions from automatic queen while in touch move


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-05-21 14:03:11)
Blitz Games

Hmm, actually there's no "animation", the piece disappears from a square, appears to another... dunno if I can change that without a flash anim.

About the highlighted square, this is on the wishlist, sorry for the delay :/


Wayne Lowrance    (2010-06-02 01:57:19)
Rybka 4!

I am not trying to discourage anyone from buying R4, not at all, I purchased it.
I am just going by my quick blush testing, and I am not very impressed. I ran a 50 game match with fire 3.1.1 and the results were about equal.
You know guys, I would rate at R3+ as it has some of the annoying bugs fixed. BTH. I have not yet able to get"large Pages to work" should add up to 10 elo, but not on my comp which will be somewhat less. I will be happy to put the engine up for bronze games for evaluation, Wayne


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-06-02 03:03:10)
Fire 1.31 vs. Rybka 4

It seems that the forthcoming match between the top chess engines will be Rybka 4 (just released) versus Fire 1.31 (a new free engine from the Ippolit/Ivanhoe/Robbolito series that may be a clone of Rybka but we still have no clue about this). By the way does anyone know the differences between Fire 1.31 and Firebird 1.2, it seems to me that only the name changed.

Of course Stockfish & Naum are in the race but it will be interesting to see if the creator of Rybka has found a way to keep its great engine above its supposed clones.


Wayne Lowrance    (2010-06-02 16:23:43)
Rybka 4!

Fire = Firebird Thibault, my bad. I am running a match, R4-SF 50 games Nunn2 TB. interesting so far after 33 of 50 games score is +12=15-6. +64 elo strength over stockfish.
Not too bad. This Firebird engine needs looking into. I will run a Nunn2 match next.
Oh, BTW, R4 is not running with default paramaters. I have modified them. This quite fun.
Wayne


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-06-02 17:57:22)
Rybka 4 wins ICT10

Oh ok, thanks for the information... I didn't see that. Now I understand :)


Wayne Lowrance    (2010-06-04 00:39:43)
Fire 1.31 vs. Rybka 4

! implied that 1.3.1 is stronger than 1.3.0 But maybe not. I have some testing results using Nunn2 database, eng-eng.
R4- Fire: 9-6=15 I terminated match.
R4-Stockfish: 15-11=24
Not making claims for strength just my short results thus far. But I like R4, lots of settings to play with. BTW R4 settings were not default.


Lazaro Munoz    (2010-06-04 19:12:14)
V. Anand is new chess world champion

This is the news that Thibault provided recently. However Anand has been world champion since 2007 so he is not the "new" world champion. He was defending his title in this match.


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-06-11 19:36:43)
FIFA world cup 2010, predictions

Hi all, I guess that this FIFA world cup 2010 is worth a discussion :)

So there are now 32 teams in the race... Any predictions on who will reach the 1/8 finals, 1/4 finals, 1/2 finals and final match?

Full list of teams:

South Africa, Ghana, Côte d’Ivoire, Nigeria, Cameroon, Algeria, Australia, Japan, Korea Republic, Korea DPR, Brazil, Paraguay, Chile, Mexico, Argentina, Honduras, Uruguay, England, Netherlands, Spain, Germany, Denmark, Serbia, Italy, Switzerland, Slovakia, Greece, Slovenia, Portugal, France, United States, New Zealand

A way for me to see how many chances you give to France for this one (at least we can do better than in the Eurovision contest :))

By the way, why there are 2 Korean teams this time? I couldn't believe that "Korea DPR" is North Korea !?? Do you know something on this?


Francisco Gramajo    (2010-06-15 01:44:15)
10 moves rule for Poker

My oponent CALLED ALL-IN with better cards than me in three times.

He had top pair 1st.
Better pair
and A-K
<CR>
We are playing one to one poker (Heads Up) In the real life I saw many Heads Up matches end up in the 1st hand.
<CR>
This Rule must be voided for poker.


Don Groves    (2010-06-17 01:25:53)
10 moves rule for Poker

I agree with Francisco on this. The length of a poker match should be decided by the cards that are dealt and the players' betting decisions with those cards. To make an artificial limit opposes this basic idea.

Poker is not like Chess and Go where games normally never end in less than ten moves. In those games, the ten move rule makes sense for the cases of silent withdrawals and players who never even begin a game.


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-06-28 20:44:06)
Encyclopedia of gambits

I guess that many of you read the interesting Chessbase article by Kavalek :

http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=6460

The link to the encyclopedia of gambits by Marco Saba was a surprise to me... really interesting, and a huge work!

http://studimonetari.org/edg/

I picked up a few ideas for the next chess thematic tournaments, so there may be the next ones in the future :

Aasum [Van Geet: Hector Gambit] 1.Nc3 d5 2.e4 de4 3.Bc4 Nf6 4.f3
Abonyi-Tennison [Reti: Tennison Gambit Accepted] 1.Nf3 d5 2.e4 de4 3.Ng5
[KGA: Allgaier Gambit] 1.e4 e5 2.f4 ef4 3.Nf3 g5 4.h4 g4 5.Ng5 h6 6.Nf7
"Anti-Stonewall" [Dutch: Alapin] 1.d4 f5 2.Qd3 d5 3.g4
[Budapest: Alekhine, Balogh Gambit] 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e5 3.de5 Ng4 4.e4 d6
Banzai-Leong [French] 1.e4 e6 2.b4
Batavo [Bird: Batavo Gambit] 1.f4 d5 2.Nf3 c5 3.e4
Beyer c.g. [Blackmar-Diemer: Beyer Countergambit] 1.e4 e5 2.d4 d5
Birmingham [Polish: Birmingham Gambit] 1.b4 c5
Blackburne - I [Scandinavian: 2.exd5] 1.e4 d5 2.ed5 c6
Böhnke [Scandinavian: Böhnke Gambit] 1.e4 d5 2.ed5 e5
Breyer [KGA: Breyer Gambit] 1.e4 e5 2.f4 ef4 3.Qf3
De Smet [Nimzowitsch Defence: 2.d4 e5 3.dxe5] 1.e4 Nc6 2.d4 e5 3.de5 d6
[Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG) vs. Slav/Caro-Kann] 1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.e4
Gaga [King's Gambit Accepted (KGA)] 1.e4 e5 2.f4 ef4 3.g3
Halasz - II [Sicilian: Halasz Gambit] 1.e4 c5 2.d4 cd4 3.f4
Hickmann [English: Anglo-Dutch] 1.c4 f5 2.e4 fe4 3.d3
Hjoerring c.g. [Benko Gambit] 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 c5 3.d5 b5 4.e4
Jerome [Giuoco Piano: Jerome Gambit] 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bf7
Krejcik [Dutch: Krejcik Gambit] 1.d4 f5 2.g4
Lasa [Open Game: Lopez/Mcleod, Lasa Gambit] 1.e4 e5 2.c3 f5
Lasker - III [Bird: From Gambit Accepted] 1.f4 e5 2.fe5 f6
Omega [Indian: Omega Gambit] 1.d4 Nf6 2.e4
Vector [English: Vector] 1.c4 d5 2.cd5 c6
Wheeler [Nimzowitsch Defence: Wheeler Gambit] 1.e4 Nc6 2.b4
Zilbermints - III [Queen's Gambit] 1.d4 d5 2.c4 b5
"Zurigo" [Queen's Pawn Game] 1.d4 d5 2.g4

If you notice more interesting openings, do not hesitate to suggest it here...


Ilmars Cirulis    (2010-06-29 11:23:20)
Encyclopedia of gambits

Fried Liver attack is good for thematics, imo


Gino Figlio    (2010-08-03 04:39:59)
Match vs. ICCF

I am not involved in ICCF management anymore but my suggestion would be to ask the ICCF President if he would be interested in promoting such a match, hosted in the ICCF webserver.

Make it ICCF rated and free. Maybe 10-20 boards.
Suggest that only players rated 2500 or more participate in the ICCF team.
Mention that FICGS will play with their top players.
Mention the total number of members in FICGS and how some of them may decide to play in ICCF events in the future if promotional events like this are created.

ICCF needs to see FICGS as a potential partner and not a competitor otherwise this match will not happen.

My personal view since I do not represent ICCF in any way.


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-07-06 17:25:10)
FIFA world cup 2010, predictions

At the moment, Russi Roman's predictions were quite good :) Now let's see if "Paul" will be right again for the upcoming match Germany-Spain (I was told he chose Spain)...


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-07-07 13:33:08)
Round-robin stages in the chess WCH

Just a word on stage 1 & stage 2 for the chess WCH round-robin tournaments: I understand the disappointment of players who share 1st place but do not qualify while some others do... Sometimes we need a few more players to build 7 players tournaments, in this case most often players who share 1st place are ordered by place in the tournament, then by current rating. As there are many special & complex cases though, the official rule is "Players may be invited to complete a group or to replace a forfeiting player".

I know that the round-robin system may be quite frustrating (that's why I wanted the knockout in parallel that I'm sure now it's more interesting & fair) for the players who share 1st place, particularly in the round-robin final (Alberto Gueci knows that..... he shared many first places before to play the knockout matches), but the round-robin is the only way so that everyone can play and once again the idea is: "if you share first place but you didn't qualify, at least you won rating points for the next cycle". I have no idea of a better system...


Garvin Gray    (2010-07-22 01:04:18)
Match Against Rybka Forum

One result:

Gray 1-0 Burch.

How are the other results going?


Kamesh Nookala    (2010-07-28 15:38:18)
Match vs. ICCF

Dear Friends,

Why not we have a match vs. ICCF. I think, we have players who can shake the hell out of any opponent on board and highly qualified corr. chess players.

Thib, let's do it. Try and induce them for a battle to take REVENGE (if at all FICGS lost previously).

What you guys say?


Scott Nichols    (2010-07-28 15:43:49)
Match vs. ICCF

I think it would be a good chance to show them we are definitely worthy of respect.


Kamesh Nookala    (2010-07-28 15:47:07)
Match vs. ICCF

Dear Scottie,

That's why i felt the need to make this post to prove that no longer FICGS is for only weak players :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-07-28 15:56:50)
Match vs. ICCF

Did ICCF play such a match in the past? I would be surprised... anyway it would be great, and a real challenge for sure...


Kamesh Nookala    (2010-07-28 16:00:14)
Match vs. ICCF

Hello Thib,

I am not sure. Somewhere from within my 1kb memory, i vaguely remembered that FICGS played with ICCF in the past and lost. I may be wrong too.

But, that's a real challenge and we got players who have nothing to lose. They know the tricks of trade and can grill the ICCF players. I suppose they will come up with weaker players, but not the top level. Once we show our mettle, only then will they know that FICGS means Real Business.


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-07-28 16:21:55)
Match vs. ICCF

No, there were no FICGS vs. ICCF match yet. We lost our two previous matches against IGAME.RU (with engines, against a very strong team mainly from Ukraine! the site died since that time) & GAMEKNOT (without engines).

I doubt that ICCF will be interested in playing such a match (maybe Gino or anyone involved can say it), but maybe someone can throw the idea in the ICCF forum, like I did in RybkaForum... who knows after all.


Kamesh Nookala    (2010-07-28 16:26:42)
Match vs. ICCF

Exactly Thib,

A person with some repo at ICCF, who also plays here can do the job. We can shield the names of our top players to induce them


Sebastian Boehme    (2010-07-28 19:56:33)
Match vs. ICCF

Hello there,

great idea indeed. Facing the 2600 elo giants of ICCF.

Maybe even J. van Osteroom would play (although I doubt it a little bit ;-) )

I am looking forward to future matches and would feel honoured to be a part of the FICGS team in these.

Go FICGS Go! ;-)


Kamesh Nookala    (2010-07-28 20:11:59)
Match vs. ICCF

Dear All,

I think if Edward, Alberto, Wayne, Thib, few others and also two guys whom i know (sorry, forgot their names), we will become a mighty force. Let's start figuring out as to who would make a new post in the forum at ICCF, any NAMES?


Kamesh Nookala    (2010-07-28 20:49:27)
Match vs. ICCF

Dear Thib,

I think Riccio, Eros (Italian guy) is also an active member at ICCF. Let's see if he can oblige your request and create a post at the ICCF forum. I do not know how well you know him, but you can ask :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-07-28 21:28:52)
Match vs. ICCF

Well, no hurry... let's see how this discussion evolve before to do anything. But your ideas are worth a try, undoubtly.


Kamesh Nookala    (2010-07-28 21:37:36)
Match vs. ICCF

Unfortunately, I have this tendency of getting carried away too far in minutes.. Perhaps i was born a Rocket last birth. I just gave an idea, which will develop further (i hope atleast) and for the time being, I will try to control myself :)


Ruben Comes    (2010-07-29 07:43:42)
Match vs. ICCF

Seems like a good idea.
But Thib said I do not think they are interested, at least institutionally.
Perhaps they can form a team of ICCF private.
Of course, I would play for Ficgs team, I'm not sure if I have the strength you need.


Xavier Pichelin    (2010-08-01 11:03:51)
Match vs. ICCF

Bonjour,
Pourquoi pas?
Je peux lancer l'idée avec le président de ICCF car j'ai son email perso et que je communique souvent avec puisque c'est un français et membre actif de AJEC (association francaise des jeux echecs par correspondance).
Maintenant,
ici il y a beaucoup de fort joueur qui joue FICGS et fort joueur à ICCF (Eros, Peter qui joue la Finale du WC 26 Word Champion ICCF) etc...
Ces joueurs vont t-il jouer pour FICGS?


Daniel Parmet    (2010-07-31 13:33:58)
Match vs. ICCF

I'd play :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-08-01 15:50:59)
Match vs. ICCF

Salut Xavier ! Merci pour la proposition, et en effet (mis à part le fait que j'aie du mal à trouver de bonnes raisons à l'ICCF de jouer un tel match - à part la passion de la compétition) l'un des problemes majeurs dans l'idée est que quasiment tous les meilleurs joueurs du site sont également actifs à l'ICCF... A chacun de choisir peut être, ou bien seuls les joueurs actifs sur un site seulement pourraient jouer, pas de choix simple :/

________

Well, Xavier may submit the idea directly to the ICCF president, but one more obvious problem is that most of the best FICGS players are also active members at ICCF... If such a match would happen, the selected players would have to choose... Or only players active at one server only may be included in a team... no easy choice :/

Or maybe FICGS, ICCF and players wouldn't care about all this and only want a nice match that wouldn't mean anything, why not :)


Wayne Lowrance    (2010-08-02 05:06:18)
Match vs. ICCF

Howdy. I think this would be fun. I would suggest some sort of mechanism that will prevent more than 2 to 3 days response with normal TC of 1 move/day. Maybe no increment.
I would be very pleased to represent FICGS team. Lastly I think the players should play tables starting at table 1 highest rank and so forth.
Just my view point. I am really overloaded with games but would add this to my list.
Wayne


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-08-03 11:49:16)
Match vs. ICCF

Hi Gino, thanks for your precious advices... Good ideas, and indeed ICCF could host the whole event (if they wish).

Still thinking about it... another idea (among others) : if only FICGS players who are not members of ICCF could enter the FICGS team, maybe the experience could be interesting as well as I feel that many 2200-2300 players here are getting stronger [maybe also due to the increasing level of engines] and will probably reach 2400 in a while, so they would have a chance to play a match against very strong ICCF players... The idea would be to see the real strength difference between these 2 categories of players (ICCF would be almost sure not to lose but for us the challenge would be even greater).

The other idea behind this is that ICCF may see an opportunity to make discover their server to these new players.

Finally we may suggest several ideas to ICCF, Gino's one, this one & maybe others... Whatever they choose, it could be interesting for the players, what do you think?


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-08-03 12:46:54)
Congratulations to "FSF en passant"

Finally here are the final results !!!

"FSF En passant" won this very interesting tournament by 1 point ahead of 2 teams !! The suspense was until the very last games to know the final team ranks.

The fact to note: Yellow Blue warriors finish second while they were actually 3 players in the team, Yura Lemekhov played an amazing tournament (5.5/6 , perf 2456) ... (the last player stopped to play :/)

Thanks to all players, it was lots of fun! I'll try to make the things clearer in the tournaments pages for the next edition...


10 points for : FSF En Passant

Heinz-Georg Lehnhoff (2270)
Volker Koslowski (2264)
Sebastian Boehme (2175)
Roland Markus (2096)

9 (tot: 15.5) points for : The knights who say "Ni"

Michael Aigner (2602)
Xavier Pichelin (2577)
Hannes Rada (2559)
Thibault de Vassal (2473)

9 (tot: 13.5) points for : Yellow-Blue Warriors

Iouri Basiliev (2173)
Dmytro Romaniuk (1937)
Ostap Hladky (2176)
Yura Lemehov (2171)

8 points for : The Dark Knights

William Taylor (2140)
Scott Nichols (2089)
Don Groves (1991)
Josef Riha (1989)

4 points for : Happy Pawn

Stephane Legrand (2209)
Garvin Gray (2125)
Daniel Parmet (1961)
Ilmar Cirulis (1805)

2 points for : Our team King

Alexander Blinchevsky
Stanimir Denchev
Benjamin Block
Ranganathan Raman

0 point for : The Ghost Knights

Vadim Khachaturov
Yugi Inving
Sophie Leclerc
Jorge Orden


Ni FSF Dark Happy Blue Ghost King

Aigner 1 = = = = =
Pich 0 = = 1 1 1
Rada = = 1 = 1 =
DeVas = = 1 0 1 1

0 Lehnh = = = = =
1 Koslo = = 1 1 1
= Boehm = 1 = 1 1
= Marku = 1 = 1 1

= = Taylo = = = =
= = Nicho = 1 1 1
= = Grove = 0 1 =
= = Riha 1 0 1 1

= = = Legra = = =
= = = Gray 1 1 1
0 0 = Parmet 0 1 =
0 0 0 Ciruli 0 1 1

= = = = Basili = 1
0 0 0 0 Romani 0 0
= = 1 1 Hladky 1 =
1 = 1 1 Lemekh 1 1

= 1 = = = Khacha =
0 0 0 0 1 Inving 0
0 0 0 0 0 Lecler 0
0 0 0 0 0 Orden 1

= = = = 0 = Blinch
0 0 0 0 1 1 Denchev
= 0 = = = 1 Block
0 0 0 0 0 0 Raman


"Team 1" - "Team 2" : points (score)

"Ni" - "FSF" : 1-1 (2-2)
"Ni" - "Dark" : 1-1 (2-2)
"Ni" - "Happy" : 2-0 (3-1)
"Ni" - "YB" : 1-1 (2-2)
"Ni" - "Ghost" : 2-0 (3.5-0.5)
"Ni" - "King" : 2-0 (3-1)
"FSF" - "Dark" : 1-1 (2-2)
"FSF" - "Happy" : 2-0 (3-1)
"FSF" - "YB" : 2-0 (2.5-1.5)
"FSF" - "Ghost" : 2-0 (3.5-0.5)
"FSF" - "King" : 2-0 (3.5-0.5)
"Dark" - "Happy" : 2-0 (2.5-1.5)
"Dark" - "YB" : 0-2 (1.5-2.5)
"Dark" - "Ghost" : 2-0 (3.5-0.5)
"Dark" - "King" : 2-0 (3-1)
"Happy" - "YB" : 0-2 (1.5-2.5)
"Happy" - "Ghost" : 2-0 (3.5-0.5)
"Happy" - "King" : 2-0 (3-1)
"YB" - "Ghost" : 2-0 (2.5-0.5)
"YB" - "King" : 2-0 (2.5-1.5)
"Ghost" - "King" : 0-2 (1.5-2.5)


Definitely, even if the "Knights who say Ni" team decided before the match to play unusual openings in most games, this tournament shows again that the strength gap between top players and players rated 2150-2300 is not big at all as many of these players tend to reach the 2400 barrier...


Jorma Hakkinen    (2010-08-07 22:45:53)
Match vs. ICCF

Why not? But there are players at both sites; can I play against me;-))


Mladen Jankovic    (2010-08-08 00:24:02)
Re: PGN files

There is a link at the bottom of the page for each game with a link to an automatically generated PGN file.


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-08-08 01:33:05)
PGN files

Several ways :

- Click the printer icon in My games then copy/paste the games in PGN format. (I still have to add a filter for the chess games)
- Save the complete FICGS database (click 'Search games' in the menu), then filter by your name in eg. Chessbase.


Sebastian Boehme    (2010-08-19 01:29:35)
Speeding up Poker games

Maybe bringing up another idea related to speed up poker games.

What about creating an "upper time limit" for each poker game?!

Say 90 days per player for the entire game or another more suitable number. (matter of discussion and wishes of the community of course)

Just my 50 bucks added. ;-)


Daniel Parmet    (2010-08-27 09:42:06)
Quote festival, part 6

-Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.
-Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.
-We live in a society where pizza gets to your house before the police.
-The last thing I want to do is hurt you. But it's still on the list.
-If I agreed with you we'd both be wrong.
-Knowledge is knowing a tomato is a fruit; Wisdom is not putting it in a fruit salad.
-Politicians and diapers have one thing in common. They should both be changed regularly, and for the same reason.
-Evening news is where they begin with 'Good evening', and then proceed to tell you why it isn't.
-I thought I wanted a career, turns out I just wanted pay checks.
-A bank is a place that will lend you money, if you can prove that you don't need it.
-A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing.
-God must love stupid people. He made SO many.
-The sole purpose of a child's middle name, is so he can tell when he's really in trouble.
-The voices in my head may not be real, but they have some good ideas!
-You do not need a parachute to skydive. You only need a parachute to skydive twice.


Daniel Parmet    (2010-09-14 00:15:47)
Quote festival, part 6

Modern chess is too concerned with things like pawn structure. Forget it, checkmate ends the game. - Nigel Short


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-09-16 13:01:23)
Chess WCH knockout final #6

Alberto Gueci beats Peter Schuster 7.5-0.5 in their match in FICGS__CHESS__WCH_KNOCKOUT_FINAL__000006

http://www.ficgs.com/user_page.php?page=tournament&tournament=FICGS__CHESS__WCH_KNOCKOUT_FINAL__000006

As this is a general forfeit at the end, according to the rule 11.6 it seems to me that all games should be rated for the winner except Game 45571 where the advantage is not obvious.

The score looks severe but Peter's play is always interesting & risky (look at game 45574)...

Alberto's future rating is now 2620, congrats you're the man to catch now :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-09-17 00:29:38)
Svante Carl von Erichsen on Go WCH #4

As you probably read in the news, Svante Carl von Erichsen won the 4th FICGS Go WCH, beating his challenger Huayong Yang 3-2, Svante Carl wins the Go championship for the 4th time in a row!

http://www.ficgs.com/user_page.php?page=tournament&tournament=FICGS__GO__WORLD_CHAMPIONSHIP__000004

Svante Carl kindly accepted to answer a few questions on his match & computer Go:

FICGS - Hello Svante Carl, congratulations once again for winning this match against a surprising challenger who started here a few months ago with a 10 kyu rank, Huayong Yang, now rated 2438 after scoring 2 points in your 5 games match (which is a great achievement for sure). What did you think about his play & yours in these games?

Svante Carl - I think that he greatly underestimated his rank initially. As far as I know, he had not played for a long time and believed that his ability had therefore deteriorated. I do not think that you can drop more than one or at most two stones, though -- it is like cycling or swimming, you never unlearn it. I had the impression that we were quite evenly matched in summa, but our strengths are in different aspects of the game; I cannot really put my finger on the difference, though.

FICGS - After a previous win, you said that you spend a quite long time to analyze, which probably helps you to reach a higher level than 2 dan (your EGF rating) compared to OTB play... It looks obvious to me that correspondence chess moves generally ask for much more time than Go moves at a high level but I may be wrong, how much time did you spend on your longest analysis during the match? Do you remember for which move?

Svante Carl - I usually spend at least a few minutes on each move, except when the continuation is obvious. I often use more, and if I do not find a satisfactory move then, I will even postpone the move to another day, so that I can sleep over it and let my subconcious work on it.

FICGS - Do you watch other games played by your future opponent before starting your match? Do you think that this is really important in preparation like it can be in Correspondence chess?

Svante Carl - I sometimes glance over the games in the championship qualification tournament, but I do not try to prepare this way. I do not think that such preparation has any value in Go, especially in correspondence Go, since you have time during the game to do deep analysis. I usually try to take each game out of standard fuseki patterns pretty quickly, anyway. Of course, I know that my opponents in these title matches are always very tough and demand my utmost respect.

FICGS - Do you still follow the recent developments in computer Go? What do you think about the latest Go engines? How much time do we have yet before the best Go players are caught by computers according to you?

Svante Carl - I have the impression that the currently most promising technology (Monte Carlo/UCT) has the potential to achieve a rank of about 2 or 3 dan (EGF/KGS). I think that the next fundamentally new idea or breakthrough might add 2 stones, to get to 4 or 5 dan. I do not have any idea where it might go from that, but I think that it gets always harder.

What I would find interesting is having more intermediate board sizes. The best bots are almost on par with the best professionals on 9x9 now. I would propose to try to achieve a similar level on 11x11, then 13x13, then 15x15 etc.. Regarding 9x9, I think that the currently predominant komi of 7.5 points is too big, and that this has a negative impact on the experiments because the bots do not play in a balanced environment. It might be worthwhile to introduce the Taiwan rule (last move compensation) to get more fine-grained scores.

FICGS - What programs did you use this year to analyze? (just trying, of course it may be part of your secrets ;))

Svante Carl - It is not a secret. I just use an editor, usually EidoGo or CGoban3, to visualize the variations I imagine.

FICGS - Finally, what thoughts would you like to share on your 5 games, that could help us not to miss the best times or to help us to understand the most complex moves...

Svante Carl - I cannot give a detailed commentary, but I can try to summarize my impressions.

I think that Game 5 was quite balanced until move 21, but I think that the white invasion was a bit ambitious then. Of course, White did not need to die there, but after moves 32-33 I think that Black had a good result anyway (move 32 should go out faster in my opinion; note how E14 helps Black in enclosing White).

In Game 3, I think things got quite difficult for White in the lower left, but I let him take the initiative by backing off at move 35 (I should have simply closed off F10 then). White gained control of the centre as a result, and in the large endgame, I lost too many points there.

In Game 4, I fell behind in the opening through some slow moves (there was some discussion on the Life-in-19x19 forum about this, see the link in the comments of that game). In the endgame, Black then lost some points in the centre, so that I was a bit ahead when the game timed out.

In Game 1, I made some bad decisions on the left side, and never managed to turn things around. I think I was behind by about 5 points in the end.

In Game 2, I think that Black should not have ignored move 24. After I got quite some territory from my moyo and also reduced his top side, I could play it safe.

I look forward to the games with Olivier Drouot that recently started, but I also hope that Yang Huayong will re-enter the championship cycle.


Sebastian Boehme    (2010-09-17 19:25:48)
Corr. Chess Maxims

Good idea Scott!

Here comes my 50 Pence about this.

# A short welcome message at the start of the game is matter of politeness and shows respect to your opponent, the way you would want to be respected.

Sadly used by not all players.


Daniel Parmet    (2010-09-19 00:57:47)
Corr. Chess Maxims

upon looking through my games I found only one instance where I went overboard on draw offers and my opponent asked me to stop at which point I did (it should also be noted I managed to lose the drawn position in the end though I was playing way too many games at once close 150).

Anyways, I know to some Corr ratings are the end all be all of life but to me they are the most meaningless rating I have. Even my blitz ratings are more meaningful. Because, corr is where I test ideas and see if they work or not. I'm never playing seriously and I really don't care about the results hence you see me in way more thematics and unrated events than rated events.

But I will say this, the difference in strength between a 1800 and 2100 is almost zilch. OTB that difference is HUGE. Corr it is meaningless. 80 pts? This difference is less zilch, you might as well be the same rating. So when you talk about "the right" to offer draws based on rating, I have to laugh at you. These are certainly unacceptable "maxims" and if you want maxims to be followed they have to be acceptable otherwise they will simply be ignored.

I played OTB two weekends ago against a player who outrated me by 400 pts. I was crushing him. In his lost position, he offered me 7! Draws. After I beat him, several players came up to me stated I should have called the TD over the repeated draw offers. Being a TD myself, I replied the ambiguity of the situation. It is his RIGHT to offer those draws. I was by no means forced to accept them (and did not). But there is a gray area in the rules that repeated draw offers (in the rule book it says LITERALLY every single move for 10 moves) the td could rule as distraction and issue nothing more than a warning. A second offense also the punishment is only a warning. ONLY on a third offense can the td actually do anything punitive.

So the real answer is, if you don't want a draw. Turn it down. If you don't want to be offered two draws, tell your opponent so. Each person is different and views their scenarios differently. But trying to make up a rule that no one will follow is beyond silly. I will offer a draw to someone whether they are 1000 pts above or below me if I think the position is drawn.


Paul Valle    (2010-09-19 01:36:36)
Suggestion

Something that I do:

If I suddenly realize that I'm lost to a tactical mating attack, I will play the position out till the bitter end.

You might say that I'm just wasting both mine and my opponents time, but I disagree. If your opponent has outplayed you, and you are mate in 5-10 moves to a tactical beauty... then in my book the honorable thing is to play it out. You owe it to the game and your opponent.

I'm not talking about K+Q vs. K, but about positions that could be given as a mating problem. By playing it out you also etch into your head.


kind regards, Paul


Scott Nichols    (2010-09-19 23:26:52)
Corr. Chess Maxims

Of course you don't get it, and by this point I am sure you never will. In the analogies, we all have met "these" type of people. Sometimes they get punished, sometimes not. I think anyone playing in your tournaments could get away with most anything.

AGAIN, in my system as you call it, it is just a GENERAL rule of conduct. Of course players rated 1 point apart do not fall into this category. The main point I make is that most players take their rating seriously. Players work their whole life to achieve a Master or Grandmaster title. They are titles awarded players as a token of respect for their accomplishment from their peers. Maybe we aren't IM's or GM's, but our rating has been EARNED.

So for one player who is a good deal lower rated than the other to offer a draw, especially in the early part of the game, is showing a lack of respect for what that person has accomplished. If fact one draw offer is not bad at all, no matter what, it happens, but to keep at it again and again is bad form.


Daniel Parmet    (2010-09-20 01:22:07)
Corr. Chess Maxims

Haha you're psycho, you call me the bull head yet you're the one who has managed to make 7! posts without a single point. All insults. Obama this Obama that. What the f does Obama have to do with anything? You brought up and you keep bringing him up for god knows what reason.

Your lack of logic is astounding. You admit 1 rating point is enough that the lower rated should still be allowed to offer a draw but not at 80pts. What about 2 pts can he offer a draw here or is it still illegal? Where do you draw the line? Can't you see how stupid this is? You know ratings are considered on 200 pt bands right and anything within 200pts is always considered comparable skill levels hence why terms such as Class B( 1600 1799) and Class A 1800 (1999) developed in the first place. Guess what, 80 pts is less than 200 so its the same skill band hence why they were in the same tournament in the first place.

I know exactly what a maxim is and what a rule is. I know the damn difference. You seem to not understand that your proposition is not acceptable as either. In no circumstance should rating ever matter when a player is thinking about whether he/she wants to offer a draw. It is irrelevant as I've proved to you time and time again.

I do care about my OTB rating yes because I try my hardest there when I have time. But my corr rating nope. Its meaningless. I've given draws in winning positions many times because I don't care. What you describe is utter insanity (must be your philosophy). You realize whether your 2084 or 2240 or 2300 or 2400 you're just a fish right? Trying to brag like its an accomplishment is a joke beyond all measure. There is ALWAYS someone better. As IM William Hartson aptly put it, "playing chess badly is where the growth is."

And don't worry you don't have to check for my tournaments as TD because I wouldn't permit you in my tournament anyways. I don't want known trouble makers.

oh well: " If I agreed with you we'd both be wrong."


Daniel Parmet    (2010-09-27 21:38:34)
Quote festival, part 6

"The beginning is the most important part of the work" - Plato
"Nothing is more unpleasant than virtuous person with a mean mind" Walter Bagehot
"Most of the important things in the world have been accomplished by people who have kept trying when there seemed to be no hope at all." - Dale Carnegie
"Necessity never made a good bargain" Benjamin Franklin
"Good People are good because they've come to wisdom through failure. We get very little wisdom from success, you know" William Saroyan
"In the absence of clearly defined goals, we become strangely loyal to performing daily trivia until ultimately we become enslaved by it." - Robert Heinlein
"A satirist is a man who discovers unpleasant things about himself and then says them about other people." Peter McArthur


Garvin Gray    (2010-09-30 20:37:21)
WCH Stage 1 groups (new players)

I wish to propose that the stage one groups starting from the next WCH tournament be paired differently.

Currently, from my understanding, all the players who have not qualified for the high rated round robins or elimination matches are paired into separate round robins of about seven players in each group.

Seed number 1 is in group 1 and so forth until all groups have been allocated.

The idea of this being to try and ensure that each of the groups is of equal strength.

Where I think this falls down is the issue of players with provisional ratings ie players with new ratings of 1800, 1500.

I have had the experience of having one or more of these 1800's in my group and after the group is finished, it is clear that the 1800 player has achieved a rating of 2100 plus, meaning that my group had three players with playing ability over 2100, meaning my qual group was unfairly disadvantaged.

How I would like the stage one qualifying to work from now is:

1) All players with recognised ratings are paired as per normal.
2) All the provisional rated players are put into groups by themselves.

Then normal qualification rules apply for getting to stage 2.

It is highly unlikely that a low rated player will qualify from the provisional rated groups as someone from each of those groups will be about 2100 or so by the end of the first qualifying stage.

I do ask for this to be endorsed for the next WCH.


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-10-01 17:39:15)
WCH Stage 1 groups (new players)

I only meant that it is an advantage to play a 2100 player actually rated 1800 rather than 2100 in his group... Gives more chances to qualify but of course, a few Elo points will probably be lost in the process. There is a matter of luck there of course, just like when a player loses on time or forfeits his games in a group, that's why I try to launch almost 2 new cycles per year, it is not possible to avoid the lucky factor in a championship but it is possible to give more chances to everyone...

Anyway I don't think it is possible to build groups of perfectly equal strength (btw many players rated 2000-2100 after 50+ games are actually worth 2400 and more, but lost many games on time) while we need clear rules (if those players are in special groups, do they qualify the same way?).

Another option would be to prevent players who have not finished a certain number of games to enter the WCH waiting list... :/ I don't think it would be appreciated.


Sebastian Boehme    (2010-10-05 04:13:26)
Match Against Rybka Forum

Just finished my game against Omprakash at Rybkaforum.

Result is a draw. See here for more, PGN included:

http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=16388


Daniel Parmet    (2010-10-05 19:13:39)
WCH Stage 1 Tiebreaks

Well you said was "when it is possible, 2 players per group (the second one is chosen according to his number of points in the tournament and his rating compared to all other players in the same case in the same cycle) may play the next round. "

SO you're saying its possible the tiebreaker may never matter because you might need another player to continue to even your numbers in one of the other stages.


Daniel Parmet    (2010-10-05 19:16:44)
Match Against Rybka Forum

darn I was interested in playing in this! Oh well maybe next time! Good luck guys, win!!!! Go ficgs :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-10-05 19:32:33)
WCH Stage 1 Tiebreaks

"the tiebreaker may NEVER matter" is strange or wrong cause it may matter... but more simply a few players may be invited to play stage 2, according to their results & rating. The same occurs in e.g. IECG championship (until the very last tournament if I remember well).


Garvin Gray    (2010-10-06 01:37:29)
Colour allocation change in WCH round robins

Currently in the WCH Stage 1 groups (new players) thread, there has been a side discussion occurring about allocation of colours in round robins on this site.

Since Thib has said that he is open to discussing it in a new thread, this is a new thread.

I have made mention of the berger pairing tables, which is the accepted format in otb round robins for how to pair round robins fairly.

The Berger pairing table for seven and eight player round robin is now provided:


Round
1 1:8 2:7 3:6 4:5
2 8:5 6:4 7:3 1:2
3 2:8 3:1 4:7 5:6
4 8:6 7:5 1:4 2:3
5 3:8 4:2 5:1 6:7
6 8:7 1:6 2:5 3:4
7 4:8 5:3 6:2 7:1


Daniel Parmet    (2010-10-10 05:17:34)
Road to Grandmaster

Good luck! I am rooting for you. I believe age does not matter - maybe for professional or world champion it does - but not for the title! People get PhDs or become doctors in their nineties!


Daniel Parmet    (2010-10-12 01:40:51)
Road to Grandmaster

You know this little blog and chessbase article has sparked a debate on whether people believe in whether its possible for a 1900 21 yearold to ever make GM.

Despite the fact I've constantly said it is. I've been told i'm flat wrong again and again by every person i've talked to. But I don't understand why, Kasparov said Talent is all a matter of time and effort. I don't see why not. The reason kids excel at chess is because they have no responsibilities. They have PURE time and when a kid gets attached to something... their effort is also unwavering.

I have offered the answer that the problems with adults improving is mostly the fact they have too many demands on their time already (work, family, school, other hobbies) or lack proper motivation (getting too easily discouraged or not wanting to work on their weaknesses).

However, I've noticed the naysayers tend to fall into three camps. 1) The camp that says talent is genetic and you can't make up for it regardless of how much you work. 2) People that say 21 is too old, only kids can improve. These people irk me the most. I have only been playing chess for 2 years and I went from 1000 to 1900 in under a year because I spent alot of time on it. I see no reason why any other adult can't do the exact same. Granted 1000 to 1900 is not 1900 to 2500 + 3 norms... but the point remains the same: time and hardwork. I think here multiple studies about the 10,000 hours required to master an activity is relevant. 3) People that are flat out freaking jealous. They know they themselves won't make GM or maybe even IM so they decry anyone else that wants to try.

Anyways, curious what others peoples thoughts are?


Don Groves    (2010-10-12 09:35:00)
Road to Grandmaster

I'm not a naysayer but I do think it takes a certain inborn talent to excel at Chess, quite similar to Math in that respect. Both subjects require the ability to both analyze and generalize at a high level.

If a 21-year-old has those abilities and puts in the work, s/he could become a grandmaster. The biggest problem I see is that s/he is competing against a great many with equal skills who started a lot younger...


Wayne Lowrance    (2010-10-15 23:37:53)
Serious new Virus

Subj: Confirmed by SNOPES: Important - read immediately



VERY IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ THIS - These e-mails are floating around currently in HP


Anyone-using Internet mail such as Yahoo, Hotmail, AOL and so on. This information arrived this morning, Direct from both Microsoft and Norton Please send it to everybody you know who has Access to the Internet. You may receive an apparently harmless e-mail titled "Here you have it" If you open either file, a message will appear on your screen saying: 'It is too late now, your life is no longer beautiful....'

Subsequently you will LOSE EVERYTHING IN YOUR PC, And the person who originated it will gain access to your Name, e-mail and password. This is a new virus which started to circulate on Saturday afternoon.

AOL has already confirmed the severity, and the anti virus softwares are not capable of destroying it.

The virus has been created by a hacker who calls himself 'life owner'.

PLEASE SEND A COPY OF THIS E-MAIL TO ALL YOUR FRIENDS, And ask them to PASS IT ON IMMEDIATELY!

THIS HAS BEEN CONFIRMED BY SNOPES.
http://www.snopes.com/computer/virus/hereyouhave.asp


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-10-20 12:43:13)
Connected players :

Hello Brian!

This issue was discussed a few months ago, a problem is that players may use this information to play only when their opponents are not connected.

Scott, you mean smilies in the forum?


Scott Nichols    (2010-10-20 20:06:33)
Freestyle Fun

Freestyle tournament is only 11 days away and already it promises to be an exciting event. Hopefully more will join, especially our friend from India, :)

We have an exciting array of players already though...,

Yuriy Perikov-a new player from Russia who has raised his rating almost 100 points in just two games.

David Evans-Last years winner. I am sure he will be looking to repeat. A definite threat.

Uh-Me-I'll be trying, :)

Marcel Jacon-I don't know anything about Marcel, but I'm sure he will be a tough opponent!

Garvin Gray-A longtime player with much experience. He seemed to improve dramatically after his computer went into the "shop" for a week towards the end of our 24 game drawn match. He will have to be watched out for.

Ruben Comes-What can I say? He is a definite favorite in this event. With his powerful openings, middlegame and unerring endings, he will be hard to beat.

Robert Mueller-I don't know Robert, but I hope to one day if I can ever get up to his level. Another strong favorite here. With an 80% win rate against top level competition, how could anybody bet against him!

Jose Moreira-Another strong unknown to me. Very experienced and I am sure a threat.

Thibault de Vassal-Our glorious leader! If his connection can hold out, we all know Thib is as strong as anybody. It would be nice to see him pull this off.

Sebastion Boehme-Don't be fooled by Sebi's relatively low Advanced rating. He is very strong, experienced Freestyle player. Another shaky connection cost him last year. I consider him to be right in with the favorites of this event.

So there it is "so far". Exciting huh?


Jimmy Huggins    (2010-10-22 10:25:55)
Strong Tournament at Rybka Forum

Hi to all the FICGS players! In the last few days there has been in the works a strong tournament on the Rybka Forum. I know that most of you play a lot of games not only here but on others sites. I have been looking into the interest of having a type of World Chess Corr Blitz Championship. With the time controls being 2 to 3 days per move. There will be a time out or some kind of extra time system in place to get you a chance to AN critical positions. As of now there are discussions on the Rybka Forum for a Tournament Format that would be comfort to most of the players who play. I have been talking to the person who does the web design there and would are working out a new sub forum to keep this tournament organized and working a clock system so everyone can keep track of there time. I'm also having a prize fund organized to the top 10 finishers. Not so much for give money to the players, but as more a means to keep all the players interested and not have any problems with aborted games. This tournament will have 3 TD's to help with any problems that may come up. We are planing on having the tournament just after the new year. I have the interested of Wayne Lowrance and Ruben Comes has said he will play. If any are interested in playing in a World Chess Corr. Blitz Championship or if you have any questions or comments. Let know on here or your can leave a message on the rybka forum my user name is "thehug"


Jimmy Huggins    (2010-10-22 20:56:57)
Strong Tournament at Rybka Forum

Hi,

Gary- Thanks for your interest, I do remember to some of your replies to the FICGS vs Rybka Forum match. As you are a guy who likes some order in the matches. When I make the the pairings for the tournament I will be taking into account of ratings. And will make them fair. There are a couple of people who may not have official rating on the rybka forum, but I have a good idea of there strength :) One of them is actually playing reben a great game in the B90 a variation.

Daniel Parmet- Thanks for your interest I have you down.


Jimmy Huggins    (2010-10-23 02:39:34)
Strong Tournament at Rybka Forum

Just after the new year, It will be flexiable as I will give all the players a chance to make it the games. It will be something like a 1 to 1 1/2 week window to get all the players sign in and know what the groups would be. As of now I'm still working on how many games will be played. I will be caping it around 30 people or so give or take a couple. So I will update you on how many games. For rounds Im going to say right now it will 2 rounds as I know most don't want to drag it out to long.(If there is interested I will look into having a semi final, and championship match if people would want it.) The number of games will be flexiable for the FICGS players. As I know most of you have a lot games going on.


Jimmy Huggins    (2010-10-23 23:57:41)
Strong Tournament at Rybka Forum

I have the interest of Gino Figlio and a couple of other strong FICGS players Im still trying to find out witch ones they are. The FICGS side is starting to look very strong if all players will play. The tournament format is coming a long. And when I have an update I will post.


Wayne Lowrance    (2010-10-24 22:57:48)
Strong Tournament at Rybka Forum

Jimmy I am following your progress. I continue my interest in the Tournament. We have discussed my thoughts via PM, but to review here are the things of concern to me. First I do not want to overload my chess obligations in Tournaments I am involved with at FICGS now. I have a hunch that a Start date at or shortly after the year will work out provided it is possible to have no more than one (1) game running at a time.
Other features of interest to a lesser degree are management/monitoring of matches to make sure that excessive time outs are infrequent. A player should not be allowed to go on vacation so to speak during a match. In the event of hardware problems a player should have to live with the timer obligations and not making a unfair match delay.
Player ratings could be considered in pairings. Somewhat like board seeds. Top rated sits at board #1 etc.
I think this can be sorted out easily. Your have excellent inputs from others such as Vytron etc regarding timer details. 2 days/move sounds good to me Jimmy.
So continue your good work, I would be proud to participate god willing.
Wayne


Jimmy Huggins    (2010-10-25 01:30:27)
Strong Tournament at Rybka Forum

Thanks for your continue interested Wayne! Yeah as of now. I think we are doing a two game per round(1 white and 1 black) set. And I think there are players who will being playing a one game at time approach. And to help with the time difference we are working on a quicker format to help offset the time difference. I still believe that Havery Williamson will still consider playing if the gameload is not that great. Even if he still declines I think with yourself I have 3 or 4 players that are inside the top 25 on this site. I'm hopeful that devassal thibault can help me get the word to the other top players in a effort to get a couple more of the top 50. It will help when I finally can have a 100% idea of the format. I'll you posted on here or on the Rybka Forum. When we finally have more or all the details worked out.
Jimmy


Jimmy Huggins    (2010-10-25 08:28:18)
Strong Tournament at Rybka Forum

Thanks Thibault, My hope is to finish the details within the next 2 weeks. No not a round-robin, because that would simply be to much and to long. So I have gone with Vytron idea of a type of Elimination/Knockout tournament that is currently being discuss. As you are good about getting tournaments formed if you can read the current discussion and give some feedback on here or the rybka forum I would be grateful! It is in the corr chess section on the rybka forum.

Here are some of the key points and some interesting ideas that are being thrown around.

As I know most of the FICGS players play a lot of games so I have made a system that you play a 2 game match per round (One white and One Black). This would usually be a bad idea because of CC high draw rates. But we are thinking of using a unique draw odds system. Thought to many this may sounds a little strange its actually a great idea to inspire fighting chess for both sides. The idea was given by FICGS player Gino Figlio

"The scoring system idea- to draw with white (0.4), draw with black (0.6), win with white (1.0), win with black (1.1), loss with white (-0.1), loss with black (0.0)"

Another thing we are working on is the pairing system. As of now the only idea is to use a swiss pairing system after the first round.

Time Control- Since this is going to be called a "World Blitz Correspondence Chess Championship" The time controls are going to be a little faster than normal corr chess. It will be 48hr per move. But there will be a bluff time in here to help AN critical positions. This is also being debated. Right now we are looking at something between 1 weeks to 2 weeks(168 hours to 336 hours).

I had announce on the Rybka Forum in the last couple of days that a prize fund was being offer. I haven't had all my sources comeback to me yet. But as of know the fund is $1500 USD. It could be more, but I'll make official amount known before the tournament will start. I would say the winners share will be between 500 to 750. It all depends on what info I get back. I'm going to try and make all the prizes reasonable. And try and make it for the top 8 or 10 players. Also the winner will be announced the "World Blitz Correspondence Chess Champion"

I will be trying to finalize the details of the tournament in a quick fashion so I can figure out if the players interested would want to play or not. The tournament will begin just after the new year. It will be flexiable so get all the players in and know who they are playing.

The final details are that we are working hard to make the Rybka Forum really to play this kind of tournament. There is a new sub forum that will be made to help with out the traffic that would be going on with all the games. There is almost plans on getting a clock system work out. As at these time controls that would be critical.

Thanks in advance for any feedback form Thibault de Vassal and any other FICGS player!

Jimmy


Scott Nichols    (2010-10-25 21:07:25)
Strong Tournament at Rybka Forum

Hi Jimmy, I left a message on your forum. That format very new to me, :)


Garvin Gray    (2010-10-26 18:53:19)
Strong Tournament at Rybka Forum

I am not a fan of the Double Elimination concept for this. Does not mean that I would not participate. But since DE is being used, why not just have it as an open swiss instead?

With an open swiss, those that do not want to continue can just withdraw, instead of being eliminated. Those that want to finish the tournament can keep playing all rounds to enjoy the experience.

A couple of issues with DE that need to be explained further:
1) After round one, are the first round losers seeded to the other half of the draw so they can not meet their first round opponents again till the preliminary final.
2) For the person who gets to the Grand Final without losing a match, do they stil have to be beaten twice to be eliminated ie the winner of the preliminary final has to beat them twice to win the competition.

I have wondered how long an open swiss would actually take in competition like this and would prefer to play in that rather than a DE.


Garvin Gray    (2010-10-26 19:37:21)
Strong Tournament at Rybka Forum

TDV- An open swiss would take just as long as a DE.

In regards to your comment about not understanding how this tournament will be run, are you asking about the concept of double elimination formats as a general idea, or you do understand about DE formats and are wanting more information about this tournament specifically?


Jimmy Huggins    (2010-10-26 19:38:21)
Strong Tournament at Rybka Forum

Thanks to Thibault, who has what given his input into the tournament. As to the last two replies. The tournament format is an on going process. But I think the time control that has been stated by myself in just the last few hours. Is pretty reasonable to have a blitz control. 25 days per side + 10 days after move 40. That would be 60 days total. So that would be within 2 months. To be honest even if you see the games I post on there. You see even if you don't have serious tournament conditions all games were very close to finishing within 30 to 60 days.


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-10-26 21:28:08)
Freestyle Fun

We cannot change the format now... 6 rounds is a lot in 2 days already, 9 rounds would kill most of the participants (IMHO) :)

It is always hard to guess the final number of players until the very last moment as registrations are authorized whenever. All I can say is that one new player is to enter the waiting list, maybe two. (ah, finally one player entered it before I can finish my message :))


Garvin Gray    (2010-10-27 03:06:00)
Freestyle Fun

Does not matter much now anyways as an eleventh person has joined.


Garvin Gray    (2010-10-27 03:10:37)
Strong Tournament at Rybka Forum

Now Thib sees why 6 or so round swiss would not be any longer than Double Elimination :)

Also with the DE format, the player from the winner's side has to wait a full round while the two remaining losers play their preliminary final two games.

In regards to tie breaks from second round onwards, the person who has the better score from previous rounds could have draw odds.

To explain- lets say in round one Player A wins 2-0 and Player B wins 1.5-0.5. In round two Player A and B meet. In this scenario Player A would advance if their match was drawn.

This method of tie break would count no matter what round it was. So in the Grand Final, who ever had scored the most amount of points previously would have draw odds.


Jimmy Huggins    (2010-10-29 11:40:25)
Strong Tournament at Rybka Forum

The tournament format has been decide. It will be a 2 game a round swiss tournament. Now my working on a pairing system as we spoke. I've been told by garvin gray that he is an official FIDE arbiter who has the latest programs to be used on swiss tournaments. I'll keep that in mind going forward. As everyone here has official rating. It will be my job to work something out with the other players on my forum who don't have ratings. This being a Swiss tournament with having a chance to play with both colors. I should be about to just do subjective pairings and be fine. I have a pretty good idea of were the players stand rating wise. I hope everyone is really for an competitive and enjoyable tournament!

Jimmy


Garvin Gray    (2010-10-29 12:50:29)
Strong Tournament at Rybka Forum

With it being two games and a swiss, the initial ratings do not matter so much.

Players will get sorted pretty quickly. With using total game points as the first pairing criteria, each score group will have less players, meaning that most of the time there will only be two or three players in each score group, rather than 10 or twelve like in an over the board tournament.


Jimmy Huggins    (2010-10-29 14:33:16)
Strong Tournament at Rybka Forum

I've trying to look at the other players games for the Rybka Forum match. I got the feeling that most players made there moves fairly quickly. I would say there are players who think that 5 days a moves isn't blitz time controls.


Garvin Gray    (2010-10-31 12:00:44)
Freestyle Fun

The crosstable link has opened to a new page with a different looking format.

Robert's link still presents the same issues, no matter if I try and open it in new window, new tab or by copying link to either same or different browser.


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-10-31 12:10:44)
Freestyle Fun

"new page with a different looking format", yes that's normal, if you see the crosstable (you may enlarge the window so that it appears perfectly) that's ok.

The problem with the other link is ununderstandable to me :/ looks like your browser does not manage cookies/sessions with several tabs.


Garvin Gray    (2010-11-02 10:20:43)
Eros Riccio wins the 3rd Freestyle Cup !

With the 30 mins plus 15 secs time control, more rounds on two days becomes problematical.

With a 1300 ficgs starting time, those from the Americas were starting at about 5am and I was starting at 10pm on the second day.

So adding an extra round would mean either play starts early, or goes later.

The only other solution would be to add an extra day and play 9 rounds.

In part, the time zone issue is another reason why I think a longer time control might be better.


Garvin Gray    (2010-11-02 10:28:10)
Strong Tournament at Rybka Forum

At 30 days plus 1 days, I think about 3 months is a fair average.

I am not sure if I am a fast player or not. I do use most of my time across all games, but that does not mean I am looking at all games all the time.

For just a two game match, I would have no issues with 30 days plus 1 day increment and it would not feel fast to me.

14 days plus 2 days per move I think is a better time control for a few reasons.

It will let the organisers know for certain early who will lose their games on time ie two weeks from when the round starts, so decisions about whether to let them continue or kick those players out can be made earlier.

With a 2 day increment, it does give some opportunity for players to analyse for a bit of time in endgames.

If you are wanting to avoid unnecessary delays, the easiest way to it to have rule that as soon as a game reaches a 6 man tablebase position, the result will be declared.


Garvin Gray    (2010-11-02 10:46:48)
Strong Tournament at Rybka Forum

Its alright. Sometimes I just like to clarify matters. In this example, I was not sure if you meant me or Jimmy as you had replied straight after my post and so could have been directing the YOU at me, instead of Jimmy.

Probably the best course of action to avoid confusion in multiple person replying topics is to refer to people by name, rather than just using you or he.

:)


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-11-06 15:00:19)
Strong Tournament at Rybka Forum

Hi Jimmy, good news! I'm sure that this format will attract more players.


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-11-06 15:08:49)
FREESTYLE CUP POKER

Hi all, yes I was to post something on that topic... I'm not sure if we have poker players enough, but it would be interesting to already know who would play such a "live" poker tournament with about the same format than the chess Freestyle -> 6 games (swiss system) played in 10 mins + 10 seconds per move, one game every 2 hours or so.

Of course the number of moves may vary from ~10 to ~1000, some games may be quite long but it's worth a try anyway :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-11-24 14:26:24)
If you plan on playing in the WBCCC

Hi Rolf :)

WBCCC stands here for "World Blitz Correspondence Chess Championship"

See this forum at Rybkaforum.net for all informations:

http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/board_show.pl?bid=32


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-12-06 20:53:07)
Eros Riccio vs Eros Riccio in WCH 5 ?

He did it... Eros Riccio qualifies for the 5th chess WCH final match (all games drawn against Alberto Gueci in the candidates final, knockout/round-robin rule decides, not TER here), and obviously he has "some chances" to meet himself at the top !! (of course he will not have to play the 12 games match in this case)

The crown will be probably very... very hard to take these next years, but I can predict that the winner, whoever he is, will have very tough matches to play to defend the title in the 6th (Alberto's revenge?), 7th and 8th edition... so many exciting games :)

http://www.ficgs.com/user_page.php?page=tournament&tournament=FICGS__CHESS__WCH_CANDIDATES_FINAL__000005

Congrats Eros!


Gino Figlio    (2010-12-06 22:35:39)
Eros Riccio vs Eros Riccio in WCH 5 ?

Draws are becoming more frequent. I also drew all my games in a recent match with Dan Rotaru.
Thib have you considered "blitz or bullet cc" as a tiebreak method?. Game in 7 days perhaps?


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-12-06 23:02:56)
Eros Riccio vs Eros Riccio in WCH 5 ?

I saw several wins in a few other matches so I'll look at the whole results of this cycle... I hope we'll not have to change the current system but if necessary we'll discuss it for sure.


Sebastian Boehme    (2010-12-07 20:10:10)
Who's the favorite in the WBCCC?

Seriously do not underestimate Ruben Comes. Although he is still quite new to correspondence chess, I really think he has chances too to win this event.

Cheers,
Sebi


Jimmy Huggins    (2010-12-07 20:33:27)
Who's the favorite in the WBCCC?

One note I forgot to mention... I can bet this will add some spice to this tourney. I'm going to talk to the rybka team about a chance for the winner of the tournament a chance to play a 2 game match against the rybka cluster. You can call it some kind of Centaur Champion vs Cluster Grand Championship. Of course there is still work to be done for this to happen. By I thought the players would be interested to know that.


Wayne Lowrance    (2010-12-08 01:05:03)
Thib can you make this more clear

Eros seems confused, and for sure I am. is this the quality statement ?

Knockout tournament winner will play round-robin cycle winner in a 8 games candidates final match (stage 4). In case of equality (4-4), the knockout tournament winner is qualified for stage 5 if all games are draw, the round-robin cycle winner if not all games are draw.
Wayne


Jimmy Huggins    (2010-12-08 01:20:40)
Who's the favorite in the WBCCC?

Its interesting. When I talked to Wayne about playing in this tournament. He said he could play if it was faster controls and the game count was low. I manage to do both. It seems he has played at this time control before.

To me the player with the lowest draw rate will win. And with the format winning with white will be a premium. Of course a long with Wayne. There are some dark horses to. With the elements of both Advance chess and CC play. David Evans and of course Ruben will both have to get some consideration.


Wayne Lowrance    (2010-12-10 04:17:30)
Eros Riccio vs Eros Riccio in WCH 5 ?

(1) The winner of KO matches is the highest TER in the event of 4-4 from all draws

(2) The winner of KO match is the lower TER entry if games are 4-4 but with wins/loss involved.

(3) If the score is 4-4 with all draws in the KO & RR match then highest TER player wins.

(4) If the score is 4-4 with win/loss then the lower TER player wins.

MY understanding is this correct. Is it more undertandable ? to me it is
Wayne


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-12-13 18:52:48)
Improvements to score Go games

Salut Patrice! Merci, même s'il y a encore beaucoup à faire...

Le mode "fast move" nécessiterait une petite explication dans l'aide, en effet... On a le choix entre envoyer un coup en 1 étape (en visualisant la position finale avec javascript) avec le mode "fast moves" ou en 2 étapes (en visualisant la position finale en HTML uniquement) avec le mode "slow moves".

Si "slow moves" est indiqué dans la page My games, c'est que l'on est en mode "fast moves", mode par défaut pour les nouveaux joueurs. Dans ce mode on peut également envoyer le coup automatiquement (sans avoir à presser le bouton Send) avec l'option "touch move" dans Preferences.


Josef Riha    (2010-12-16 09:49:07)
Chess positions too complex for engines

Exactly, don't forget the engines got informations about any given position in the endgame and at some point in the middlegame from the endgame tablebases whether it's a win, draw or lose.


Thibault de Vassal    (2010-12-22 14:50:42)
7 players tournament with fee & prize

There are GO tournaments (2 players matches) with entry fee & prize, not really (or really not) popular yet, so we probably do not have Go players enough for such 7 players tournaments :/


Garvin Gray    (2011-01-05 02:13:43)
WBCCC Pairings for Round 1 will be here

Click on this link if you wish to see the pairings in a more user friendly format: http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?pid=300666;msg=ReplyPost No Name Rtg Total Result Name Rtg Total

1 LOWRANCE, Wayne (1) 2488 [0] : RALUNGER, (18) 2122 [0]
2 VYTRON, (19) 2120 [0] : LOBOESTEPARIO, (2) 2438 [0]
3 MOZ, (3) 2345 [0] : DEKA, (20) 2110 [0]
4 PARMET, Daniel (21) 2087 [0] : BOEHME, Sebastian (4) 2327 [0]
5 NATIONAL12, (5) 2290 [0] : MARRIOTT, Peter (22) 2079 [0]
6 SCHACHMATT, (23) 2063 [0] : OMPRAKASH, (6) 2285 [0]
7 ELDRIDGE, Mark (7) 2271 [0] : WEIRWINDLE111, (24) 2050 [0]
8 STEPHANIE, (25) 2000 [0] : CÓMES, Rubén (8) 2260 [0]
9 BALABACHI, (9) 2257 [0] : JITAN, (26) 1900 [0]
10 NATMAKU, (27) 1900 [0] : CUMNORCHESSCLUB, (10) 2246 [0]
11 KEOKI010, (11) 2209 [0] : TOMSKI1981, (28) 1900 [0]
12 WIGHT054, (29) 1855 [0] : SEKOS, (12) 2200 [0]
13 NICHOLS, Scott (13) 2199 [0] : INDRAJIT_SG, (30) 1800 [0]
14 DONKASAND, (31) [0] : EVANS, David (14) 2197 [0]
15 PPIPPER, (15) 2160 [0] : FULCRUM2000, (32) [0]
16 MARGE, Anne (33) [0] : SCHACHPROFI, (16) 2150 [0]
17 NOOKASH, Kamesh (17) 2147 [0] : THEHUG, (34) [0]

No Name Rtg Total Result Name Rtg Total

1 DEKA, (20) 2110 [0] : LOWRANCE, Wayne (1) 2488 [0]
2 LOBOESTEPARIO, (2) 2438 [0] : PARMET, Daniel (21) 2087 [0]
3 RALUNGER, (18) 2122 [0] : MOZ, (3) 2345 [0]
4 BOEHME, Sebastian (4) 2327 [0] : VYTRON, (19) 2120 [0]
5 WEIRWINDLE111, (24) 2050 [0] : NATIONAL12, (5) 2290 [0]
6 OMPRAKASH, (6) 2285 [0] : STEPHANIE, (25) 2000 [0]
7 MARRIOTT, Peter (22) 2079 [0] : ELDRIDGE, Mark (7) 2271 [0]
8 CÓMES, Rubén (8) 2260 [0] : SCHACHMATT, (23) 2063 [0]
9 TOMSKI1981, (28) 1900 [0] : BALABACHI, (9) 2257 [0]
10 CUMNORCHESSCLUB, (10) 2246 [0] : WIGHT054, (29) 1855 [0]
11 JITAN, (26) 1900 [0] : KEOKI010, (11) 2209 [0]
12 SEKOS, (12) 2200 [0] : NATMAKU, (27) 1900 [0]
13 FULCRUM2000, (32) [0] : NICHOLS, Scott (13) 2199 [0]
14 EVANS, David (14) 2197 [0] : MARGE, Anne (33) [0]
15 THEHUG, (34) [0] : PPIPPER, (15) 2160 [0]
16 SCHACHPROFI, (16) 2150 [0] : DONKASAND, (31) [0]
17 INDRAJIT_SG, (30) 1800 [0] : NOOKASH, Kamesh (17) 2147 [0]


Thibault de Vassal    (2011-01-12 21:01:31)
Eros Riccio is the new FICGS chess champ

Congratulations to SM Eros Riccio who made it in the 4th FICGS correspondence chess championship, beating FICGS WCH Edward Kotlyanskiy 6.5-5.5

As he already won the candidates final match in the 5th FICGS chess WCH, we'll have the next final match "Eros Riccio vs. Eros Riccio" :) .. just joking, means that Eros just won the 5th FICGS championship as well... 2 titles at once, an amazing performance!

Sure that we'll need veeeery strong players to try to move the new FICGS king (who also won 2 FICGS freestyle cups) in the next WCH cycles! :)

Congrats also to Edward who was really near in this match, maybe the players will explain what happened in the only game that didn't finish into a draw... Finally many thanks to both players for a nice show!


Jimmy Huggins    (2011-01-12 21:10:14)
Edward Kotlyanskiy vs Eros Ricco

That may have been the most beautiful tactical and combative match. I have ever seen, its says a lot since I've followed a lot of Wch matches on different sites.

Both players who have very similar artistic styles of play. Both made a lot of interesting problems for there opponent to solve. In truth one got the feeling the Edward Kotlyanskiy tired to hard at times in the match to beat Eros. But such a statement can be seen as an insult to him. But its not true at all because. Not many will have the resolve to play Eros Ricco that way.

Congrats to both for a match I won't soon forget.


Edward Kotlyanskiy    (2011-01-13 01:29:48)
Eros Riccio is the new FICGS chess champ

I'd like to congratulate Eros on a very well played match. He had a very good match strategy coming into our games where he would try to put as much pressure on me as possible and hope for me to make a mistake. And it worked! A few mental slips on my part and before I knew it, I was lost. Just to re-emphasize what everyone already knows: Eros is undoubtedly one of the best corr players in the world. He deserved to win the championship. I thank him for making the games exciting, although maybe more for him than me :), and I look forward to playing with him again in the future.


Vjacheslav Perevozchikov    (2011-01-13 05:08:59)
Eros Riccio is the new FICGS chess champ

Hi! Thank you both for the great match. Congratulations to the winner!!!

I have a question. What happened in the only game that not finished in a draw?
24... Rxc2!? wasn't a better choice for black? Or I missed something?


Thibault de Vassal    (2011-01-13 14:53:17)
Eros Riccio is the new FICGS chess champ

Two great players, a great match, much fairplay at the end, thank you... it will be hard to wait for about 10 months before the start of the next 12 games match in the 6th cycle (and yes I verified, Eros will not play himself this time :))


Daniel Parmet    (2011-01-14 08:01:36)
Eros Riccio is the new FICGS chess champ

in the case of Riccio winning the challenger match shouldn't the previous Champ get a rematch just so there is a 5th title bout?


Sebastian Boehme    (2011-01-14 08:35:58)
Eros Riccio is the new FICGS chess champ

The most things having been said already, I would like to add a quote, which originally was about Bobby Fischer.

"Against Eros Riccio it does not matter if you win or lose. It matters whether you can survive."

Congrats Eros once again! Well done!

Cheers,

Sebi


Paul Campanella    (2011-01-14 23:50:23)
Eros Riccio is the new FICGS chess champ

I agree with Daniel. Edward should get a rematch against Eros in the next championship.


Thibault de Vassal    (2011-01-15 00:34:20)
Eros Riccio is the new FICGS chess champ

Should be great, unfortunately things do not work that way (at least the current rules)... anyway Eros deserves those 6-8 months of "rest", at least to win his future matches in the 7th & 8th cycles :)


Paul Valle    (2011-01-17 21:44:53)
Eros Riccio is the new FICGS chess champ

Thanks to both players for a very entertaining match!


Thibault de Vassal    (2011-01-18 15:24:39)
Houdini 1.5 leads TCEC comp. chess tourn

Advanced chess "centaur" players should be interested by the following:

A "super" tournament for computers, named TCEC, just started. Premier Division finals started with the participation of the world's top engines.

Tournament format: double round robin

The participants:

1 Houdini 1.5
2 Rybka 4.0
3 Shredder 12.0
4 Stockfish 2.0.1
5 Naum 4.2
6 Ivanhoe B47cB
7 Hiarcs 13.2
8 Critter 0.9

I don't know much on this tournament, actually it may be a CCRL/SSDF system-like but as a tournament (and without rating list?), anyway thus it was able to reach the chess news in Chessdom & Susan Polgar blogspot.

The point is that the supposed "possible" Rybka-clones Ivanhoe & Houdini (both based on Ippolit, just like Firebird) entered the race... and Houdini is leading already, ahead of Rybka.

It is announced that Rybka 4 is playing, does anyone know who's behind this version of Rybka and what is the hardware? Does Vasik Rajlich know about that?

http://susanpolgar.blogspot.com/2011/01/houdini-15-leads-tcec-computer-super.html

http://www.chessdom.com/news-2011/computer-chess-live-2011

http://www.tcec-chess.org/


Jimmy Huggins    (2011-01-18 21:11:52)
Following the WBCCC games Round 1

With less than 3 hours to go for the WBCCC Round 1 to begin. I will help everyone out here to follow what games they want to follow. Here are all the links for games.

B=Board, this is so you know who is at the top table and so on.

()=There real name on here if its needed.

B1-Wayne Lowerance vs ralunger(Ramil Germanes)
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=20187

B2-Uly(Vytron) vs Loboestepario(Gino Figlio)
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=20188

B3-Moz vs deka
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=20191

B4-parmetd (Daniel Parmet) vs Sebastian Boehme
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=20192

B5-National12 vs SpiderG (Peter Marriott)
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=20193

B6-Schachmatt (Matt O'Brein) vs Omprakash
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=20194

B7-Mark Eldridge vs Weirwindle
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=20195

B8-stepanie vs Ruben Comes
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=20196

B9-Balabachi vs jitan
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=20197

B10-Natmaku vs CumnorChessClub (Kevin E. Plant)
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=20198

B11-Keoki010 (George Clement) vs Tomski1981
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=20199

B12-CumnorChessClub(Kevin E.Plant) vs wight054
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=20215

B13-Scott Nichols vs indrajit_sg
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=20201

B14-donkasand vs David Evans
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=20202

B15-ppipper vs Fulcrm2000
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=20203

B16-Anne-Marge vs SchachProfi (Alex)
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=20204

B17-Kamesh(Kamesh Nookala) vs TheHug(Jimmy Huggins)
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=20225

Everyone plays 2 games in our Swiss style format per round. This is everyone's 2nd game.

B1-deka vs Wayne Lowrance
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=20206

B2-Loboestepario(Gino Figilo) vs parmetd(Daniel Parmet)
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=20207

B3-ralunger(Ramil Germanes) vs Moz
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=20208

B4-Sebastian Boehme vs Uly(Vytron)
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=20209

B5-Weirwindle vs National12
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=20210

B6-Omprakash vs stephanie
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=20211

B7-SpiderG(Peter Marriott) vs Mark Eldridge
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=20212

B8-Ruben Comes vs Schachmatt(Matthew O'Berin)
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=20213

B9-Tomski1981 vs Balabachi
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=20214

B10-CumnorChessClub(Kevin E.Plant) vs wight054
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=20215

B11-jatin vs keoki010(George Clement)
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=20217

B12-Sekos vs natmaku
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=20219

B13-Fulcrum2000 vs Scott Nichols
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=20220

B14-David Evans vs Anne-Marge
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=20221

B15-TheHug(Jimmy Huggins) vs ppipper
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=20222

B16-SchachProfi (Alex) vs donkasand
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=20223

B17-indrajit_sg vs Kamesh(Kamesh Nookala)
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=20224

This should make it easier for everyone to follow the games. Please leave comments for the players. They will would very much like it. I will try to update the forum as games go on and finish.


Thibault de Vassal    (2011-01-30 21:07:31)
Eros on his win in the 4th chess WCH

Eros Riccio kindly accepted to answer a few questions on his win in the 4th FICGS chess WCH, and explained how one particular game influenced another one that he finally won:

- Hi Eros, first of all congratulations for your latest outstanding results at FICGS, you won the Freestyle tournament, now two chess championships in a row... When the privilege of the champion is to defend his title without playing the preliminary tournaments, you are involved in all championship cycles & a few regular tournaments, do you plan to avoid that anyone can even reach the championship final in the future? :-)

Thanks! I must admit that this is really a magic moment for me in chess... if you consider that despite my recent ICCF Grand Master Title, probably I will also soon win my third italian Correspondence Champion Title out of three participations in the Italian Final Tournaments. And now also this huge satisfaction of being the FICGS Champion! I look forward to seeing a new challenger soon, I wonder who he will be, but let me enjoy the next few months for now ;-)

- What are your impressions on the games? Did you have any strategy from the beginning to the end? Finally did it work or was there another factor? (without revealing your secrets, of course :))

The games in the opening were as I expected, all Najdorf Sicilians except one game where I played 1.d4. My goal was to win at least one game, so I tried different aggressive variations as White (6.Bg5, 6.f3, 6.Be3 and 6.h3) with the hope of catching Edward unprepared on at least one of these, but uff, he was very well prepared on each one of them! A curious thing is that my biggest chance of winning happened in a game where I had the Black pieces! So Edward had to take some risks in one of his games where he had Black (the games where he had White were already finished or all very drawish) he was forced to avoid an easy draw he had (the 6.h3 game) and eventually he lost that game. Happy of having reached my goal of winning at least one game, I accepted his draw offer in that other game (6.f3 e5 7.Nb3 Be6 8.Be3 Be7 9.Be2) where I had good winning chances.

- You probably noticed, like many correspondence chess players, that the hardware still fastly improves while chess engines are continuously getting stronger, particularly since that "supposed" clones of Rybka (some may be even stronger than Rybka herself) appeared in the race. Do you think that the rate of draws will be so high soon that it may definitely kill correspondence chess? Do you have any opinion on these new engines?

I think that despite the big improvement of Hardwares and engines, we are still very far (and we will still be in the next 5 years, hopefully) from a situation where all the games will most probably end in a draw. So I think we can enjoy correspondence chess for many more years in the future, even if of course the Draw percentage at the highest levels will be higher and higher.

- I remember that you were surprised to win your match against Alberto in the Candidates Final of the 5th cycle (the reason why you do not even have to defend your title this time), the WCH rules (particularly the co-existence of the round-robin tournament & knockout tournament) are obviously not well understood by all players, what do you think about this system and the tie in 8 games matches? Are there changes you'd like to see in the future?

Yes, I really was! We were both convinced that with all draws, the higher rated player would have won (Alberto was higher rated than me in that match). Anyway it was our fault, as we didn't read the rules carefully. I am not sure what changes could be done in the future... maybe this is anyway the best setup, no new ideas are coming to my mind right now.

- Do you have a few more words for Edward after these nice games? Maybe also for your future opponents? :)

It was a real pleasure for me to play him, not only for the interesting games we played, but also for the friendly chats we had during the exchanges of the moves. I hope to play him again in the future for a rematch.

- Thanks for your answers and congratulations again!

Welcome, and thanks ;-)

_________

It is very interesting to see that a even a player like Eros prefered to minimize the risks (avoiding mouse drops or whatever) as much as possible by accepting a draw in a game where he had winning chances. Correspondence chess is definitely not all about chess, that's probably the lesson.

Also it is reassuring to read that correspondence chess is NOT dead yet, nor soon :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2011-02-02 19:50:00)
Update for BigChess & Poker rating rules

Hi all, it was a long time there wasn't any update in rating rules.

First of all, as the number of results at Poker Holdem is quite high, I feel that a change should be tried so that ratings move less fast.

Case of a win (rating > 1999) : New Rating = ((39 x Current Rating) + (1 x Performance)) / 40
Case of a win (rating < 2000) : New Rating = ((38 x Current Rating) + (2 x Performance)) / 40

Case of a loss : New Rating = ((39 x Current Rating) + (1 x Performance)) / 40

As for Big Chess, the ratings deflate because there isn't the same rule than in Poker or Advanced Chess, this is now fixed :

If there's a winner and if his rating is below 2000, his new rating his :

New Rating = ((18 x Current Rating) + (2 x Performance)) / 20

Otherwise :

New Rating = ((19 x Current Rating) + (1 x Performance)) / 20

This rule may look strange from a mathematical point of view, but combined to the other rules that provoke deflation, it gives really good results IMHO. Let's see how it works here.


Juri Eintalu    (2021-09-04 17:22:19)
ICCF ratings

Hello. I am new here. I see that my ICCF rating has been converted into a FICGS rating. However, I have not found here any information about whether the FICGS rating influences the ICCF or ELO ratings.


Michael Aigner    (2011-02-04 08:18:41)
Houdini 1.5 leads TCEC comp. chess tourn

It´s not over - it is a close match

1 Houdini 1.5a + 6 = 17 - 4
2 Rybka 4.0 + 4 = 17 - 6

and 13 games to go....


Josef Riha    (2011-02-04 08:21:04)
Creating an Opening book

Click on engine-tab and then enginematch. A dialogue appears. Chose engines you like and don't activate any book. Then click on button Opening DB and chose the one you want. This DB contains only opening moves.
You can create this by entering moves only with few opening moves and save in a DB you want.
For more info click the help-button.


Josef Riha    (2011-02-04 18:11:29)
Creating an Opening book

No matter, Scott :-)


Josef Riha    (2011-02-04 22:37:18)
Creating an Opening book

A little correction: Click on tournament not on enginematch!


Jimmy Huggins    (2011-02-12 04:18:32)
WBCCC Round 1 Update

This is the first update for the WBCCC, I guess some of you have been following some of the games there. There have been a lot of interesting games and some surprises a lot the way. As I'm reporting on the FICGS forum I will make most of this about the FICGS side. Here are some results so far and starting at the top boards.

B2 Uly(Vytron) vs Gino Figlio- Gino does a good job of defending a ..2.e6 line of the Sicilian. And both players agree to a draw after 34 moves.

B4 Daniel Parmet vs Sebastian Boehme- This was a Poison Pawn line of the Sicilian. The game ended before it even got out of book. A short draw, I think both people agreed that it was a good result for each player.

B6- Matt O'Brein vs Omprakash- A surprise if only for how short the game was. Matt shows his tactual muscles when his higher rated opponent much of had and oversight in this defense. As 23.g6! h6 24.Bxh6! and it looks like black has burned his bridges in this game.

B8-Stephanie vs Ruben Comes- This maybe the biggest surprise in round at least in terms of the bigger name on the FICGS side. Stephanie what looks to be a prefect opening all of the B90 lines and everyone agrees 32.Bc3! to be a new novelty and a very good one at that. Stephanie went on to grind Ruben down to a lost endgame. I very interesting game that has be to be seen to believe, I guess this going to show, that not all B90 lines lend to draws.

B13-Scott Nichols vs indrajit_sg- This was a long fought draw. When looking at the game early I thought white may have some chance to take advantage of his open g-file. But not a lot materialize later in the endgame(form the engines point of view).

B14-donkasand vs David Evans- David enter into dangerous territory with this B90 line. At move 19 he played ..Rb8 which looks to be a move to get out of book, because the other moves didn't look so good. Credit to David for finding a draw line in this game. Its another game with a look.

Kamesh Nookala vs Jimmy Huggins- What can I say I played an experimental opening and it backfired :) A well played game by Kamesh. Thanks for the chance to have a good fight with you.

Now on the 2nd set of games(Each player has 2 games in each round)

B3 Ramil Germanes vs Moz- Ramil here played a safe line in the B90 form the white side. So this looked like and easy draw.

B4 Sebastian Boehme vs Uly(Vytron)- Vytron plays and interesting side line of the Crao-Kann and play was very shape, but I got the feeling black played to ambitiously and had the worse of the position. He found a good defensive sacrifice and the good was hold to a draw. I think Sebi had winning chances, but I will have to look over the game to come up with an idea on that one. Anyway a great game to look over.

Ruben Comes vs Matthew O'Berin- Maybe the sharpest and most ambitious game in round 1. This goes in the the B97 lines, but Ruben goes for the Qf3 side line and produces a complex position after Rd3. I love this game so much I want to post the link again for everyone to please watch this game and post a comment about it.

http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=20213

B13 Fulcrum2000 vs Scott Nichols- Scott tries his luck to be ambitious and backfires with his Bh4 idea. Even when looking at the game. I was thinking it to be a good idea, but as it turns out. It goes as just losing a tempo. I thought this was one of the more instructive games of the round. I liked the way white played the endgame.

And the last result I have for the round for the FICGS players is

B17-indrajit_sg vs Kamesh Nookala- This was an interesting draw were white plays and early sideline in the Sicilian that tends to be drawish unless black forces the play. Another well played game by both sides.

I just want to say there are a lot of games one should look at. As more results come in on the FICGS side I will posted. In my opinion one should follow Wayne's games I have enjoyed his play so far. He had to comeback some in his wild game with black vs deka, but I get the feeling this game will ended in a draw. I would also follow the underrated Matt O'Berin in games to come. He has proven to be a great player so far.


Scott Nichols    (2011-02-17 00:38:10)
request again tour

Hi Thib, I thought I'd take another stab at this. I would like to request a new tournament format. It would be UNRATED WITH entry fee using E-points. Time control a total of 10 days with NO INCREMENT. Winner gets all the points.

This is working very well at the WBCCC. People use their time more wisely with no increment, instead of always waiting till the end and playing fast using just the increment.

And since it is unrated WITH entry fee, your argument about time losses from before seem irrevelant.

Thanks, Scott.


Kamesh Nookala    (2011-02-17 08:37:45)
request again tour

Dear Scott,
That's a nice suggestion. But its implementation as of now with the WBCCC already underway is something which, at least for me, is a bit stressful. I am not at pc, and cannot be, 24x7. Of course, for people like you and many others, this will be an interesting factor. Thumbs up for such a suggestion!!

In the present scenario, I would highly recommend hosting of Freestyles at regular intervals BUT WITH WIDE PUBLICITY in all possible forums. With the WBCCC Format and given the fact that Freestyle at FICGS finishes in just 2 days or can even be 4 days (two Saturdays and two Sundays depending on the number of rounds we can increase keeping in view the Number of Players), I put my thrust upon another Freestyle event soon. Many can feel comfortable with a freestyle than a 10 days (no increment) battle, where the guys at home can have full advantage of and those at work under constant pressure :)

This is just my opinion :)
PS:: I am, not for a single moment, saying what you suggested is bad. That can help people like you. I believe it is awesome. But, for the present situation at WBCCC


Thibault de Vassal    (2011-02-17 12:15:42)
request again tour

Stressful, for the least... In my opinion such tournaments are quite inhuman but I'm not sure if I could resist to play it myself :)

Anyway there may be a few points to discuss yet... With the use of the current vacation system, such tournaments may last a few months in the worst case.

I agree with Kamesh that Freestyle tournaments should probably be the priority, by the way I'll open a new thread for the next one soon. Finally the main difference is that round-robin tournaments don't ask any work (or so few) from my own, but I just wonder how many players are ready to play this format.


Scott Nichols    (2011-02-17 15:21:36)
request again tour

Gee, the response is better than I expected. After giving it a little more thought, an increment of maybe 4 to 8 hours could be added to accomodate people with commitments other than Chess, :) It would also take into account connection problems, etc. The E-point entry fee could be varied like the Bronze, Silver and Gold formats. Also, since it is unrated, anybody could enter if they dared, :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2011-02-17 16:46:15)
Silver chess games, W/B balance

Just an idea... as the Epoints balance for White and Black may be not fair enough (as a reminder the current rule for e.g. bullet/lightning/blitz is: "1 game match (regular) - In case of a draw, the prize is divided, however player Black will fully get back his E-Points whereas player White will get the rest."), what would be a better system according to you?

On the basis of 19.8 Epoints at the end of the game, maybe we could try:

If result is 1-0, W+ 19.0 / B+ 0.8
If result is 1/2-1/2, W+ 9 / B+ 10.8
If result is 0-1, W+ 0 / B+ 19.8

or...

If result is 1-0, W+ 18.0 / B+ 1.8
If result is 1/2-1/2, W+ 8 / B+ 11.8
If result is 0-1, W+ 0 / B+ 19.8

Any idea?


Kamesh Nookala    (2011-02-17 19:13:14)
Friends, let's revolutionaize FICGS!!!!

Hi Guys,

FICGS is a great place. Atleast for me. I am very much attracted to the style of play. For more competitive play and attracting more correspondence chess players, while maintaining the purpose of correspondence chess, I think we all can help contribute in making FICGS the greatest server of all times to come.

I know what matters is real stuff, like the ICCF, but why not strengthen the identity of FICGS itself. We can have some games with various other servers (for e.g. the Rybkaforum match we had)
This way, in a calendar year we can have our tours fixed with each server, be it German or anything else.

As far as Thib is concerned, he is too much preoccupied maintaining the server. So, I request each and every member of this Server to throw some of their valuable inputs.

Warm Regards,
Kam


Daniel Parmet    (2011-02-17 20:10:42)
Friends, let's revolutionaize FICGS!!!!

I think this is a great idea. I would love to play some of these matches too despite my weaker strength. Let me know how I can help. I love FICGS!


Daniel Parmet    (2011-02-17 20:14:59)
Silver chess games, W/B balance

question.. if black is getting back .8 no matter what, would it be easy just to code that black's entry fee is .8 less? Perhaps this might be the better way to go that you have to pay less to enter a game as black.


Thibault de Vassal    (2011-02-23 16:59:20)
How long does it take?

Hello David. Did your friend click the confirmation link or answered the email he received to confirm his email? If not, it may take a while...


Garvin Gray    (2011-02-23 17:22:21)
FICGS chess World Championship #9

Topic is about the upcoming WCH.

I am wondering, are there any format changes in general?

And specifically in how provisionally rated and new players are handled in the group stages?


Jimmy Huggins    (2011-02-24 19:25:52)
WBCCC Round 1 Update

Wayne Lowerence has drawn both of his matches in round 1 today. When the round is over I will give a final in depth recap and post a link for the PGN for round 1.


Thibault de Vassal    (2011-02-26 22:44:09)
FICGS chess World Championship #9

Okay, I'm really thinking about a solution but right now I'm not completely satisfied with this option of having these groups of provisionnaly rated players. I really think that it just moves & postpons the problem while losing some advantages, by the way many established ratings are still underestimated...

I would like to try to explain again my whole point of view on the current wch rules. The way I've been thinking this championship is purely statistical, the idea was to find the best chances to see ALL the best players in the final rounds about each 2 years. It worked quite well so far IMO, actually my main regret is not to be able to extend the knockout tournament of 1 round (we would have 16 players instead of 8), that's why it is not possible anyway to have less than 5 rounds for the whole cycle. Each one is 30 to 40 months long, it could be worse. So the whole cycle's aim is not only to find the best player of the cycle but to give chances enough as quickly as possible to the new underrated players for the next cycles!

On this point, I'm quite glad to see players like Wayne who made it the very hard way, starting from ELO 1400 (!) to reach 2540 in about 3 years only. The WCH cycle helped many other players to find their place quite quickly in the rating list, also over 2400, and I have no doubt that the best players of the round-robin cycle play the round-robin final. Usually none of these new underrated players play the RR final, they have less chances than 2200 ones to play the 2nd round because of the TER rule but they win some elo points during the 1st round. That is fair IMO, some logical improvements now protect the ratings of 2200-2300 players but I agree that it is still hard to cross certain rating ranges because ratings do not inflate the same way than advanced chess, Go or poker ones.

In summary, let's say that it is unfair that 2200 players play 1 or 2 underrated players + one player rated about 2000 who may be worth 2100 or 2200, 2300 & more... He will probably lose some rating points during round 1. However he has more chances to reach round 2 with few chances to win but more chances to get some/many elo points back.

I do not say that there is no "problem" with the current WCH rules set (there will always be border effects, whatever the rules) but my point is that I'm not sure that any change that will have heavy consequences will have good effects enough.

Finally, if the most is favourable to such a change, it looks more logical to me to forbid the provisionnaly rated players to enter the wch waiting list. By the way we will have less forfeits during round 1, so the quality of the results may be improved. What do you think?


Thibault de Vassal    (2011-02-27 21:34:13)
FICGS chess World Championship #9

Hi Garvin, sure there might be a language issue... sorry about that :/ I think I only try to interpret what you say in terms of consequences on the whole thing but I may be wrong at some points, be sure I'm not trying to avoid anything deliberately.

The provisional rating already takes account of if the player uses an engine or not (at least I try to make an estimation on what the new member says in the registration form).

As I just said in the other discussion, maybe we could try to extend the M groups to the 2200-2300 players, it may satisfy everyone as it is probably easier to cross the 2000 barrier than the 2200's, what do you think?


Jimmy Huggins    (2011-02-28 04:38:07)
FICGS chess World Championship #9

Thib I feel for you :) Making a good tournament format is very hard. I know I pulled teeth to try and make my format. I had to do two things for my. 1.Make few games as possible and 2.Make it a reasonable time table for a blitz world championship. I believe Garvin did a great job with this in the parings. Lucky we didn't have a lot of unrated players. So Thib I would like to help, but can I ask a favor to you. Is it possible to get a breakdown of the ratings of the players for the last Wch? I think this would be helpful to maybe coming up with a solution. So maybe like..

What was the number of.

2300's+
2200's
2100's
2000's
1900's
1800's
below 1800's
provisional's

I know this maybe some work, but this breakdown can give us a picture of what you have. Personally speaking I think Garvin's idea is decent. Were you can put the highest advance provisional player in the lower stage round 2 bracket and the same for the lowest provisional player to go to the higher round 2 bracket, by performance of stage 1. I guess when you talk about statistical merits for your Wch tournament. You are trying to get the lowest error rate, but get the best value to it.


Don Groves    (2011-03-02 23:52:04)
The most common mistake in chess

I thought it was letting your King get checkmated ;-)


Thibault de Vassal    (2011-03-05 13:43:30)
FICGS chess World Championship #9

There is no similar issue for 2000's IMHO, it is probably easier to cross the 2000-2100 barrier than the 2100-2200 and of course 2200-2300. And once again they would lose much less rating points against these new 2000 provisionally rated players (that's mathematical).

On provisional ratings depending on if players declare if an engine is used, even ICCF (as far as I know) grants a 2000 prov. rating to some players, I was not convinced so far but finally... Of course new players can "lie" or change their mind on using an engine, they'll not be kicked out of any tournament but such a rule is surely better than nothing to get ratings more coherent, btw it is just an improvement of the current rule (new players who have no rating anywhere can choose their first rating between 1200 & 1800, and of course I fix it if e.g. the player declares to play with an engine with a new rating of 1200).

Anyway the idea of players needing to have an established rating before being able to enter the WCH is also fine to me. Let's just try to have more opinions on this.


Alexander Blinchevsky    (2011-03-05 14:40:26)
Strange game

I wonder to see that at such level someone will continue playing in that position: http://www.ficgs.com/user_page.php?page=viewer&game=41015
The game was completely decided over 1 year ago, for now it's even force mate shown by any engine.
The only reason to continue playing that I see for the black is waiting for the opponent's (me) death. Sorry, Mariusz, I am not planning to do that in nearest future. :)


Eros Riccio    (2011-03-05 18:28:33)
Strange game

sadly some players continue (almost) until mate thinking all their time.
That is allowed in the rules, (I am not sure if a game can be forcedly adjudicated if the position has 6 or less piecees, if you can prove you have the 6 man tablebases) even if it is considered (very) unfair to common sense. All you can do is try not to lose your patience and try to avoid such opponents in the future.


Heinz-Georg Lehnhoff    (2011-03-06 15:03:21)
FICGS chess World Championship #9

I do not like this special treatment of players from a certain rating (no matter whether 2000, 2100, 2200, 2300) already from the beginning of the WCHs. And I don't like that the TER is decisive in the case of equal points.

I think it's bad luck if in a group are players with a provisional rating or a small rating (and the player starts to use engines now). But in my opinion all members should be allowed to play the WCH without restrictions.

Maybe games should not be rated for a player with an established rating, if the rating of his opponent is provisional only. But that's another theme.


Thibault de Vassal    (2011-03-07 21:45:17)
FICGS chess World Championship #9

Well, I see that the idea of "equal chances for everyone" is still in the debate, that's quite strange as I thought it was obvious & accepted that such a thing cannot exist in correspondence chess.

No correspondence chess championship format can give equal chances to everyone because there is no time for this, and to try to do it only gives less chances to the best player to win it.

The way IECG & ICCF do it has probably as many advantages & inconvenients as we do it at FICGS but at the end the efficiency is quite similar to find as accurately as possible the best player among the highest rated ones IMO & everyone have NOT equal chances (either you have to play a few rounds more or there is a TER rule or whatever).

I'm not saying that one format is better than others, some will like the FICGS format, some will prefer other formats, that's all IMO. Do not think that the WBCCC format solves all problems, it tries to avoid the time problem but the number of players is very limited in the running edition.

Finally, why to play another ICCF/IECG championship here?

I think that there is no argument that can justify that all players (including the 8 players of the knockout after all) should play in regular groups, as well as no argument can justify the opposite. It was just a choice to make it different and somewhat looking like the old FIDE championship.

That's why choices 2) & 4) are really best to me. 2) may be better because the range 2100-2400~ may be too large for M groups, but another solution may be to build M (2250-2400)& N (2100-2250) groups like it was done in one WCH cycle, where the number of qualified players were different. Actually the idea of class groups with different numbers of qualified players is really interesting but of course, the chances are not the same for everyone once again.

Whatever the choice, surely it will not be ok for some players for any reason, but I'm now quite sure that a change should be done.


Wayne Lowrance    (2011-03-08 06:19:02)
FICGS chess World Championship #9

Howdy all. I have stayed out of this discussion. I am biased for sure. Garvin I can see your side, it is tough. But I believe in the existing format. Maybe a few minor tweaks are ok, we will see I guess. Garvin if your good enough, in time you will climb the ladder. If that is your goal. I have played at ficgs for what seems like forever. I started out at 1400.I came here with a previous 4 year record at another side with a rating of 2300.
I did not think I would ever get past 2200. In fact a member told me face to face via ficgs I would never go higher. I got all the more determined. This does not help you but I just wanted to tell you it can be done.
Maybe it is not fair.
Another personnel observation of apparent unfairness. aboard a ship in the navy first class petty officers get to jump ahead in the chow line. It is not fair, but that is the way it was. Man when I promoted to first class I had no compulsion to jump in ahead of long chow line.
So Thibault I ask for no drastic step to ficgs rating posture.
Wayne


Garvin Gray    (2011-03-10 02:46:05)
FICGS chess World Championship #9

I think I understand the changes Daniel, so lets see how this goes.

The top eight rated players who have to nominate to play in this section participate in knockout matches (that is still the same).

Stage 1.

All players rated above 2150+ are placed in their own round robin groups, these groups are called Group M and Group N.

For players in the M group, the top two point scorers progress through to the round robin final.

The lowest point scorer from these groups is eliminated.

Those who finish from 3rd to second last just move to stage 2.

For players in the N group, only the winner qualifies for the round robin final and at most half the players from this group will qualify for stage 2, the others are eliminated.


Garvin Gray    (2011-03-10 02:49:48)
FICGS chess World Championship #9

Let's say that there are 33 players over 2150 in the waiting list. 8 will play the knockout, 7 (over 2300) will play the M group and 18 will play in two N groups of 9 players. From the M group, 2 will qualify for the round-robin final (round 3), and 4 will play round 2. From the N groups, 1 from each one will qualify for the round-robin final (round 3), and 4 from each one will play round 2. So from these 33 players, 12 will play in the round-robin groups stage 2.

I think this should be slightly changed.

1) The top eight rated players will play the knockout matches.

2) The next seven highest rated will play the M group round robin

3) Players 16 to 33 will play in 2 groups, called group N.

and then so forth.

The reason I offer this as a re-wording/change is that it is a little more flexible and it could be that more than 7 players above 2300 nominate, or that less than 7 players above 2300 nominate.

So in effect it just makes it clear that players will be allocated purely in rating order, rather than specifying a particular rating cut off.


Jimmy Huggins    (2011-03-11 21:49:16)
WBCCC Round 2 Pairings

Time has finally come for Round 2 to come and the long a waited pairings are out. Just for notes B=Board #

B1-Loboestepario (Gino Figilo) vs CumnorChessClub (Kevin E.Plant)

B2-Moz vs Sekos

B3-Mark Eldridge vs David Evans

B4-Stephanie vs Fulcrum2000

B5-NATIONAL12 vs Kamesh

B6-ppipper vs jitan

B7-Wayne Lowrance vs tomski1981

B8-Uly vs indrajit_sg

B9-Balabachi vs Sebastian Boehme

B10-Schachmatt (Matt O'Brein) vs Weirwindle

B11-donkasand vs Ruben Comes

B12-natmaku vs ralunger (Ramil Germanes)

B13-Scott Nichols vs Omprakash

B14-Keoki010 (George Clement) vs deka

B15-parmetd (Daniel Parmet)vs SpiderG (Peter Marriott)

B16-Banned for Life vs TheHug(Jimmy Huggins)

2nd game of Round 2

B1-CumnorChessClub (Kevin E.Plant) vs Moz

B2-jitan vs Loboestepario (Gino Figilo)

B3-Fulcrum2000 vs Mark Eldridge

B4-Kamesh vs Stephanie

B5-David Evans vs National12

B6-Sekos vs ppipper

B7-indrajit_sg vs Wayne Lowrance

B8-tomski1981 vs Uly

B9-Sebastian Boehme vs Schachmatt (Matt O'Brein)

B10-Weirwindle vs donkasand

B11-Ruben Comes vs Balabachi

B12-ralunger (Ramil Germanes) vs keoki010 (George Clement)

B13-Omparakash vs natmaku

B14-deka vs Scott Nichols

B15-TheHug (Jimmy Huggins) vs parmentd (Daniel Parmet)

B16-SpiderG (Peter Marriott) vs Banned for Life

I will post links in the next post. I still have to move the game threads over to the WBCCC Forum. Good Luck to everyone in Round 2! :)


Jimmy Huggins    (2011-03-12 06:13:27)
WBCCC Round 2 Pairings

Oh ok here are the links to the games threads for Round 2!

B1-Loboestepario (Gino Figilo) vs CumnorChessClub (Kevin E.Plant)
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21163

B2-Moz vs Sekos
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21164

B3-Mark Eldridge vs David Evans
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21165

B4-Stephanie vs Fulcrum2000
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21166

B5-NATIONAL12 vs Kamesh
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21167

B6-ppipper vs jitan
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21168

B7-Wayne Lowrance vs tomski1981
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21169

B8-Uly vs indrajit_sg
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21170

B9-Balabachi vs Sebastian Boehme
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21171

B10-Schachmatt (Matt O'Brein) vs Weirwindle
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21172

B11-donkasand vs Ruben Comes
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21173

B12-natmaku vs ralunger (Ramil Germanes)
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21174

B13-Scott Nichols vs Omprakash
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21175

B14-Keoki010 (George Clement) vs deka
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21176

B15-parmetd (Daniel Parmet)vs SpiderG (Peter Marriott)
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21177

B16-Banned for Life vs TheHug(Jimmy Huggins)
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21178


2nd set of Games

B1-CumnorChessClub (Kevin E.Plant) vs Moz
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21180

B2-jitan vs Loboestepario (Gino Figilo)
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21181

B3-Fulcrum2000 vs Mark Eldridge
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21182

B4-Kamesh vs Stephanie
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21183

B5-David Evans vs National12
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21184

B6-Sekos vs ppipper
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21185

B7-indrajit_sg vs Wayne Lowrance
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21186

B8-tomski1981 vs Uly
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21187

B9-Sebastian Boehme vs Schachmatt (Matt O'Brein)
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21188

B10-Weirwindle vs donkasand
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21189

B11-Ruben Comes vs Balabachi
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21190

B12-ralunger (Ramil Germanes) vs keoki010 (George Clement)
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21191

B13-Omparakash vs natmaku
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21193

B14-deka vs Scott Nichols
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21194

B15-TheHug (Jimmy Huggins) vs parmentd
(Daniel Parmet)
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21195

B16-SpiderG (Peter Marriott) vs Banned for Life
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21196


Thibault de Vassal    (2011-03-15 14:08:19)
ChessVibes openings (get 10 issues free)

For correspondence chess fans who like to follow the openings theory, I just received an interesting offer from ChessVibes that I copy/paste here:
__________

Dear correspondence chess lovers,

First, we'd like to thank the administrator of this forum for giving us the opportunity to showcase our product which is especially interesting for this audience, we think. So, here we go:

Subscribe to ChessVibes Openings and get ten issues for free!

Which openings are hot in top level chess? Which are not? Receive the latest opening novelties right in your mailbox with ChessVibes Openings, a weekly PDF magazine (+ PGN!) covering the latest openings news, co-authored by International Masters Merijn van Delft and Robert Ris and published by ChessVibes since January 2009. If you subscribe and mention 'ficgs' in an email to us, you'll receive the last ten issues for free!

What is it?

Every issue consists of a PDF Magazine and the accompanying PGN file. The PDF consists of four pages (A4 size) with the following contents:

- What’s hot? A round-up of this week’s important opening developments, with statistics about the frequence and score of the week’s most important opening novelty (page 1)
- What’s not? Which openings are not recommended at the moment, according to the top players? And why not? (page 1)
Game of the week Each week you’ll find the theoretically most important game analysed by our two IMs, with a detailed survey of the opening phase (page 2).
- This week’s harvest Four more new important opening ideas from this week (page 3) revealed and described with explanation of the opening and early middlegame (page 3).
- It’s Your Move An interactive element: every week two exercises, of which the solutions/explanations will follow one week later. This will improve your understanding of certain opening, middlegame or even endgame themes even further.

Which opening variations have been discussed so far?
You can download an index in PDF here.

http://www.chessvibes.com/plaatjes/cvo/CVO_index_114.pdf

More info & subscribe: You can find more information about ChessVibes Openings, and subscribe, at:

http://www.chessvibes.com/openings/

By subscribing you would join several GMs and IMs, who have responded very positively to our relatively new chess magazine!

Best regards,

Peter Doggers
Editor-in-chief,
ChessVibes

P.S.
If you subscribe and mention 'ficgs' in an email to us at info {at} chessvibes.com, you'll receive the last ten issues for free!


Thibault de Vassal    (2011-03-24 15:36:57)
5th Go WCH, analysis by SC. von Erichsen

Svante Carl von Erichsen is FICGS Go champion... for the 5th time! After his win in the match that opposed him to Olivier Drouot, here are his analysis on the games:

_______________________


- Congratulations for this 5th win in the FICGS Go championship! By seeing the score you give less and less chances to your opponents who seem stronger each time though... Several games may look quite mysterious to weaker players. What happened during these games?

- Svante Carl von Erichsen:

Hi!

I do not have the impression that my opponents have less and less
chances. I also make many mistakes, and was in a clearly bad position
in at least one game. Olivier made many very unusual moves in the
opening, which were difficult to handle in a calm manner.

http://www.ficgs.com/user_page.php?page=viewer&game=47578

In game 3 (47578), this is apparent at move 18. White has gone for a
very centre-oriented game, while Black has made more direct profit.
It is difficult to say who got the better deal. Move 18 itself is
very unusual, and I am not sure whether the result was satisfactory
for me. I think that moves 41 and 43 were important, as stabilizing
the group in the centre takes priority when the centre is dominated by
White like this. At move 53, it is clear that Black needs to stabilize
the top group, but D18 seems more important in retrospect. Move 62 is
a bit odd---I think that living with S16 instead would be better. I
think that Black got a territorial advantage here. Since White got
additional central strength, Black turned to make his central group
safe again, which should be enough to win now. White 94 tries to
shake up things again, but getting separated on the lower side makes
it very hard for him.

http://www.ficgs.com/user_page.php?page=viewer&game=47580

In game 5 (47580), Olivier chose a very unusual move again at move 8.
I think that the outcome until move 17 favours Black, however. At
move 36, it looks like Black will have to live in the corner, but the
white enclosure does have its holes. Alas, White's response to the
forcing move at P10 was a severe blunder, as Black can take back the
right side. Move 55 was big, but I had not anticipated that the fight
after move 56 would be so hard for me. I think that after move 93,
White put too much emphasis on hollowing out what once seemed like
prospective black territory. The ponnuki in the centre was worth much
more than what White made on the second line. With that strength,
reducing the white framework on the left was no question. I think
that White then tried too hard in the centre.

http://www.ficgs.com/user_page.php?page=viewer&game=47576

Game 1 (47576) was characterized by a big fight starting from the
joseki in the lower right corner. I guess that a stronger player
could point out several mistakes by both sides. It resulted in a big
exchange, where quite some aji remained in both positions. Move 90 is
an unusual idea, it would be more normal to extend on the side. 91
and 95 were intended as forcing moves to give some support to the top
side. I think that Black has good prospects after move 99 and
especially after 113. White started an interesting invasion on the
left then, which was however stopped by the blunder at 138.

http://www.ficgs.com/user_page.php?page=viewer&game=47579

Game 4 (47579) again featured some unusual moves in the opening,
namely moves 7 and 9. I think that immediately plunging through at 10
was not good. It was quite difficult for me to keep territorial
balance afterwards. I think that my invasion at the top was
premature, but it seemed like I could not keep up without it. The
attack at L13 was severe. I got lucky that Black kept back a bit, so
that I could get the cut at E7, which was more important than the six
stones around N13. It would have been possible to save them at move
98, but at the cost of letting Black break through L10. Sacrificing
them allowed me to cement the centre to put me comfortably ahead. L9
was then the start of a desperate attempt to reduce the centre. I was
quite sure that I could capture it, even though simply connecting
would most likely have been enough. I then made a big blunder again
with move 130 (I had to double hane), allowing a game-deciding ko.
Black had a lot of threats against the lower right corner, and I think
that this exchange would have put him ahead. However, he thought he
had an internal threat at D10, which I think was not one, as there was
no additional eye in the centre yet.

http://www.ficgs.com/user_page.php?page=viewer&game=47577

In game 2 (47577), he got me in the opening with another of his
experiments (move 7). I think that I could have been satisfied if I
simply played the keima to P2 at move 14. However, I activated the
central stone instead, which led to Black getting solid positions on
both sides, while I lived small in the corner and struggled in the
centre. I then succeeded in making him overconcentrated on the lower
side, but at the expense of a quite large corner and not making many
points myself. Move 80 tries to stir things up more. I think that if
Black had secured O13 with move 97, the game would have been over.
However, things only began to look good for White after move 127,
which had to be played at R8 (it is sente against the middle group
then, so Black can live with S5). It is still not over, however, as
White has two weak groups to take care of. The lower side group can
live locally with a ko at G1, but the other group has to struggle---it
would be nice to find a clean sacrifice plan here, because it is hard
for the two groups not to compete for eye space. This was the last
game to end, and my opponent seems to have chosen to resign all when
he did not see a way to win the overall match anymore.

All in all, these were very interesting games where I think I learnt a
lot. I wish to thank my opponent, who played very well.

Thanks!

Svante


Thibault de Vassal    (2011-04-05 23:34:02)
Major update : Wikichess / hashtables

Finally....

Wikichess now supports hashtables, with some advantages :

- The program detects & manages transpositions by itself.

- If both players are rated over 2000, their moves will be automatically added in Wikichess if the move before is already in the database and if the line is not a transposition (still some work).

- By clicking "W" in the fast interface, the search is done by hashtable and no more by line, which returns better results.

So in a few months Wikichess should be much more useful than now :)


Please report any bug if you find ones... Thanks!


Thibault de Vassal    (2011-04-13 14:07:34)
CHESS__WORLD_CHAMPIONSHIP__000009

Hi Peter. It should be closed in 2 days from now, all replacements and/or new groups will be done then.

I must say I am quite surprised to see several very strong players entering the waiting list after the tournaments started. Too bad that other matches cannot start in the knockout tournament :/

So I may include you in another group M in the round-robin tournament, if you wish!?


Daniel Parmet    (2011-04-17 20:53:43)
CHESS__WORLD_CHAMPIONSHIP__000009

The fact that all 2150+ were automatically seeded into round2. Making it completely pointless for anyone in the 2000-2149 rating range to play.


Thibault de Vassal    (2011-04-24 12:03:10)
Active rating lists

Hello Harshil.

It is mathematical, actually. Your rating cannot reach 2000 if you play only class D tournaments (players rated 1400-1600), which is your case. By the way you played only 3 chess rated tournaments, that is still quite few...

High correspondence chess ratings take always 1 full year to be reached, every strong player knows that.


Harshil Meraiya    (2011-04-26 05:42:10)
Active rating lists

And that is not only for chess! Go I had Zero. Now its 322 and provisional rating for people just joining-700! I don't need your stupid mathematical explanations. Just tell me how to delete account. And don't mail me ever!


Thibault de Vassal    (2011-04-27 12:40:42)
Active rating lists

Obviously such changes are not good, but not doing these changes would be just worse... for Poker this is different, new players can estimate their level, existing players with no rating start at 1600, but it is quite easy to reach 1800.

For chess, maybe it should have been possible to start at 2000 from the start of the site (as it is possible in some cases at other sites), but by experience I thought it was too much, and engines are stronger today. Well, actually better would be to have a test to estimate a provisional rating... Still it wouldn't be perfect and not sure it would be appreciated :)


Jimmy Huggins    (2011-04-29 14:45:26)
WBCCC-New stuff and Round 2 Update

The last round was very exciting! And this round has had some great games as well. To speak of there is just 4 games left. Here is the report of the most important games this round.

Starting at the top boards. We have have...

B1-Loboestepario (Gino Figilo) vs CumnorChessClub (Kevin E.Plant)
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21163-

This game followed a Catalan. Gino makes ambitious choice to go with 5.Nbd2! I gave this move a ! Not because of its theoretical standing. But because it will lead to a position were white will give up a whole pawn for rapid development. Never the less, black is equal to the task and managers to hold on to the pawn for most of the game and keep the game balanced. With my human eyes, I thought for sure white had an advantage! After move 20.Be4, It looks like white has 2 racking bishops. While black has one black locked in! But in depth analysis shows, that black can hold on. And shows great defensive technique. Down the stretch. Well played by Gino and Kevin. On of my favorite games to follow.

B3-Mark Eldridge vs David Evans
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21165-

David has gotten tested in both his black games in this tournament. And this game was no different. We had another B90 line in this game. And ...8.h5 was used. This is becoming a common line in this tournament. Mark's treatment on the white side was great! I think his future opponents will think twice before trying this line again. At move 22, the game reaches the sharpest point. After move 22.fxe5! I thought that Mark had a chance vs David. But David founds some good moves to exchanges pieces and hold for a draw. The best of which was the combo of ...33.Rf3 and ...36.Rxg3! This was a nice find by him. Great job to David and Mark! I look forward to seeing both these players again.

B4-Stephanie vs Fulcrum2000
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21166-

I would normally just post FICGS member games here. But this maybe one of the top 2 or 3 most important games of this round. In what turns out to be the most exciting game of the round IMO. White has shown that they are quite good in the opening phase. At move 18 they choose 18.b3 which was suggested as being the novelty move. White gets a very strong game and after a king tour to capture the pawn. It looked like a win for sure!, but it seems a mistake was made at move 38. Instead of 38.Qc1!? the move 38.Qe8! seems to be a near winner. I thoughts on why this move was missed is because, White was in time trouble in both games. I have to believe this was a favor. As we speak Stephanie is close to defeat in the other game that I will talk about shortly. I would watch her for the reminded of the tournament. I think they will learn form this experience and be even stronger going future. Well done by both players.

B5-NATIONAL12 vs Kamesh
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21167

Two of my good friends battling here. This was a B90 battle. The novelty move was the straight forward looking 27.h4, but after some exchanges. White has to settled for equality. A good match to follow, the one other note made was this was a line pioneered by Eros Riccio.

B7-Wayne Lowrance vs tomski1981
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21169-

Wayne plays a good line vs the french vs tomski. In fact by the database expert, it was in a 100% win line!! But after the queens come off the board. It burns out to a quiet draw. Wayne has had good opening results, but has yet to get in the winners column. I have faith that Wayne will win a game very soon. Good game to both in this one.

B8-Uly vs indrajit_sg
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21170-

This was a nice game to follow. A french defense was chosen. The point in which it gets interest is the choice to play 19.bxc3!? Which leads to 21.Nh6+!? I loves this sires of moves! 27.Rh3! was also a good move here. But its seems black has just enough resources to hold the balance. ..54.Bxg6! was a good finally touch. Well played by both players.

B9-Balabachi(William Fuller) vs Sebastian Boehme
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21171

What was talked about as a drawish Ruy position. I found to be quite a game with all the early fireworks. I also liked the material imbalance in this game. Sebi has a rep of being very difficult to beat with the black pieces. This helps when you have the Ruy and the Posion pawn line of the Sicilian. As two of your best weapons. ;)

B10-Schachmatt (Matt O'Brein) vs Weirwindle
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21172-

This was an interesting Richter-Rauzer game. 15.Qf4 was the novelty move, Form there it got crazy. 21.Nb3 seems to invite a pawn race. Which in the end white loses. This was a tough game for white. I think he should have been able to hold it. But it was still a good game to follow.

B11-donkasand vs Ruben Comes
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21173

This was a nice positional game by Mike (Donkasand), This was a 6.h3 Sicilian. And we get the usually good defense here. ..7.h5 White gets great positional pressure for the whole game and even gets a pawn, but Ruben wholes for a draw.

B12-natmaku vs ralunger (Ramil Germanes)
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21174

This game was a Petroff with 5.Nc3. This kind of move gives white rapid development. Its seems black equalize pretty quickly. And on move 21 a draw was agreed on.

B13-Scott Nichols vs Omprakash
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21175

This was an interesting King's Gambit game. I think Scott didn't study his opponents rep. :) The King's Gambit is Om's specialty. So this was an easy draw for black.

B14-Keoki010 (George Clement) vs deka
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21176-

In this game black returns to his pet line of the Sicilian with 2.a6(Which he played in the last round) I believe this is called the O'Kelly variation. This time around he goes for ..7.Qb6 which looks a little better than ..7.Bb5!? A draw probably should have been possible, but George was able to grid out a win. Well played by both players.

B15-parmetd (Daniel Parmet)vs SpiderG (Peter Marriott)
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21177

This was a King Indian by black. And white does a good job of out playing his opponent in this game. Unfortunately it seems Peter has gotten busy in his life. This game was decide by time.

B16-Banned for Life vs TheHug(Jimmy Huggins)
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21178

I face off against Alan who has the white pieces. And is consider to be one of the best players when playing 1.b3. It was a difficult game for me as I decide before hand to play a dangerous line. Needless to say I lose this game after a few small mistakes on my part. I am founding that all the players in the WBCCC are good, I maybe better off being a commentator lol, but no one would have that.

This was the first set of games.

Here is the 2nd game of the 2nd round in the next post.


Jimmy Huggins    (2011-04-29 18:36:20)
WBCCC-New stuff and Round 2 Update

B1-CumnorChessClub (Kevin E.Plant) vs Moz
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21180

Kevin makes an interesting choice here with 2.a4!? vs the Silicon Defense. Not exactly sure what he wanted out of the opening. I can only guess he wanted to mix it up here. Anyway, black equalizes fairly quickly and is better. But after 18.a5! He finds the best way to equalize and both agree to a draw.

B2-jitan vs Loboestepario (Gino Figilo)
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21181-

The somewhat unknown Jitan has had a good tournament. And is given his ICCF SM opponent all he can handle. In a game that is still going. Gino is down a pawn, but it appears to be a draw and I would guess the game is about to finish. This was an interesting approach by Gino who gets in b5 and h5 very early in this game. And Jitan plays the most naturally looking sac. 13.Nbxd5! it looked like for a long time Gino was in trouble, but he has found enough resources IMO. A well played game by both players.

B3-Fulcrum2000 vs Mark Eldridge
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21182

This was a nice French game to watch. The novelty move was ..11.Na5, OTB I would like white in this game and I had a feeling that white possibly could have risked an attack, but this game came down to endgame play and White was able to outplay black in the end.

B4-Kamesh vs Stephanie
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21183-

In my opinion this is the most important game the round and it is reaching its fianlly stages. I believe Stephanie to be one of the top players in this event. She has been doing well, but Kam has played the near perfect opening and got her in trouble. If you remember my previous post you remember I talk about Stephanie was in time trouble. Which has not help the cause. The one move I enjoyed the most so far in this game was 36.Ra5!, this was a nice exchange sac. And its given Kam nice pass pawns on the Queen-side. I would guess this game will be over soon. It has been a nice game to watch.

B5-David Evans vs National12
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21184

A battle of the English Countryman here. :) This was the Open Defense of the Ruy. Form the comments I got, it seems that the opening was played about as perfectly as you can get. David posed some problems to Paul(National12), but it ends in a fairly easy draw. One finally note ..10.d4 IMO is a very difficult move to beat.

B6-ppipper vs jitan
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21168-

This is one of the finally 4 games still playing. What looks like to be a draw here. The white black has been dancing for a few moves now, but blacks back rank is weak. That equals a drawish game. :)
This game started out form B90 and so has a ton of theory.

B7-indrajit_sg vs Wayne Lowrance
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21186

I fairly quiet B90 game. I don't think white got much out of the opening. Well played by Wayne here.

B8-tomski1981 vs Uly
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21187

A battle of good friends here. IMO I thought white played the this Queens pawn opening passively. And so we had an early draw at move 26.

B9-Sebastian Boehme vs Schachmatt (Matt O'Brein)
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21188-

This is one of the 4 last games. And I have to say its been a good game. We had an interesting Sicilian position. I had thought black was in trouble. But after he tripled up on the d-file. Then got massive exchanges. He looks like its headed toward a draw.

B10-Weirwindle vs donkasand
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21189-

This was a nice positional Sicilian game. Although it ends in a draw. Its a must see game! Watching the drawing combo at the end is very beautiful. It starts with ..27.e4! and you can watch it form there.

B11-Ruben Comes vs Balabachi(William Fuller)
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21190

Ruben opened up this rep with 3.h3!? and we ended up with a closed type of Sicilian. But his opponent stayed strong. Though out the game. Even if it looked like Ruben had some pressure. In the finally position.

B12-ralunger (Ramil Germanes) vs keoki010 (George Clement)
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21191-

This game saw the Exchange variation in the Queen's gambit. It has a high rate rate. But to Ramil credit he manage to give George a couple of weak pawns in the endgame, but not enough for any real advantage.

B13-Omparakash vs natmaku
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21193-

I would have hoped for more in this game. As I'm a lover of the 6.Bc4 (Sozin) Sicilian. After 14.e5!? this forces unneeded exchanges. After which, the game looked like a draw. And that is how it ended.

B14-deka vs Scott Nichols
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21194

Usually the Exchange Slav is pretty drawish. And this game was no different. But both players did try to mount some kind of advance. Both had good posts on each others side of the board. But a drawish opening is a drawish opening.

B15-TheHug (Jimmy Huggins) vs parmentd
(Daniel Parmet)
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21195

I tried my luck in an opening that was not something with e4. And it didn't go as well I had hoped, Daniel was able to get a equal position fairly quickly. In my try at making new theory in a very uncommon line vs the King's Indian Defense.

And finally we have this last game.

B16-SpiderG (Peter Marriott) vs Banned for Life
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21196

This would have promised to be a nice Larson Attack game. By alas Peter timed out in this game as well. I would have loved to seen this attacking game with both sides castled on opposite sides.

Well that would do it for my reports for this round. This was a great round, and the next promises to be great as well. I will post info for the next round after the last game is over with.

Any feedback is welcome!


Thibault de Vassal    (2011-04-30 01:28:03)
Amateur player beats Rybka 4 !?

What do you think??

http://susanpolgar.blogspot.com/2011/04/amateur-player-defeats-rybka-in-match.html

Last but not least: "He knows by heart 20,000 books and 30 million digits of the pi number."

April 28, is this april fool joke in another country?


Philip Roe    (2011-04-30 01:34:38)
Amateur player beats Rybka 4 !?

The description of the play is not precise, but for sure what this guy did was to pull some version of the old trick of pitting Rybka White versus Rybka Black (Oh look, I can beat TWO computers!)


Paul Valle    (2011-05-03 23:40:03)
Starting Rating

First of all: This is a great site, and love the fact that the Thib interacts with users to improve the site. Many decent chess sites out there, but this is rare.

When it comes to starting ratings, I would like to add some ideas for improvement:

The point of ratings is that they should reflect playing strength.
Likewise, the goal with starting ratings is that it should reflect actual playing strength.
Rules for both should be as equal and fair as possible.

Assumption:
I) the composition of «Active Players» and their ratings here on FICGS, are a valuable source in guesstimating a new players rating. Most players here play aided by an engine and the site is free, so players here should reflect what comes in the door.
(BTW My minimum definition of an «Active Player», is someone who has made at least one move in the period leading up to the official rating list.)
II) Lightning rating is a good estimate of Correspondence Rating.

I further believe that any choices or complications made to the FIDE rules of one starting rating fits all, should mostly be done to aid good Advanced Chess Players, and good OTB-players. Such complications might not be fair, but essential for FICGS to be relevant to the elite.

My proposal:

«Newly Regs» have a choice of THREE options upon starting to play correspondence CHESS on FICGS:

A) Start with a set rating. I would suggest this be set at the average or median off all Active players. Or a fixed numerical constant times this average. You could of course set up all kinds of formulas, but the main point in should reflect the current composition of FICGS members and not estimates based on unverifiable data given by the player.

Some players might feel that they are way better than this and might be discouraged to join and fight for a long time to reach the top tournaments they feel they are entitiled to play. The seccond option is created to encourage these players to join, and give them a choice to prove their skill relativly quickly and accurately.

B) Play 10 preliminary lightning games (starting with the same rating as in A), and then using the end lightning rating as the starting rating for normal tournaments. These players will get a much more accurate starting rating, and may be well motivated to put in the effort if they care. (If all the 10 games went close to 60 moves, and both players used all their time, the playing time would be around 16 hours)

Then there are the top international correspondence or Over-The-Board players. Why bother these with 10 lightning games?

C) Titled players can start in Master with a higher fixed rating (same as in option A, but multiplied with a higher constant), but must register by credit card to prove identity.

Possible drawbacks and problems
1) Assumption I and/or II is flawed
2) A poor player might be highly overrated choosing option A)
3) Players can dump lightning rating points to a friend
4) Implementation cost – development

-What ya think folks?
reg, Paul


Paul Valle    (2011-05-04 00:00:05)
Amateur player beats Rybka 4 !?

The guy seems to be a complete charlatan:
http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=7183
http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=7190
http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=7194
http://www.chessvibes.com/reports/ukrainian-beats-rybka-4-blindfolded/

reg, Paul


Thibault de Vassal    (2011-05-10 12:38:23)
Active rating lists

Hi guys, sorry for the delay for this one... :/

@Don : it may take a while, but I don't feel it's so hard for a good poker player... but it's kind of hard to say anyway.

@Paul : thanks for such a post with many ideas & questions! this issue is really complex of course but I made some observations during these years and my conclusions were:

- in average, self-estimated ratings are best. during the first years all players with no FIDE/IECG/ICCF ratings started at 1400 or 1700 and it quite distorted the list as many strong centaurs started from the bottom. your idea makes sense but it looks more "esthetic" for a centaur with no official rating to start with a 1900 or 2000 rating than e.g. 1937 :/

- your idea of 10 lightning games is very interesting! but not many players are involved in these games (I guess because of the time they spend on corr. games) and not many would accept to play unrated or low-rated players. I'll think about that though...

- about option C, there were early general forfeits by players FIDE rated over 2200, that's a pity and it distorted (not so much) a few ratings temporarily [actually it also helps to maintain a small inflation of ratings, which is logical] but in the other hand FIDE/ICCF ratings given as provisional ratings help to build a rating list with ratings that "tell" something... such choices are not obvious, obviously :)


Jimmy Huggins    (2011-05-15 13:08:49)
WBCCC Round 3 links and more

Here are the links for Round 3. Plus I have a quick announcement. I have talked to Garvin and I'm in the running to consider adding a 2nd tournament to the WBCCC. Probably called the WBCCC Inv. -> Invitational. This will be more of the standard style of blitz tournament. Something like 14d+1d per move, I don't want to set exact time control yet, I will probably open this discussion up after WBCCC 1 is over. What details I will give is this. What over the prize is next year will split with the other tournament plus a plaque to the winner. My hope is to have another drawing card for the WBCCC and I know this will probably bring more top players in.

Anyway here are the links for you to follow the games you wish to watch this round.

As always we will start at the top boards and work are way down. This time I will just do both of each board at the same time.

B=Board

B1- CumnorChessClub (Kevin D. Plant) vs Fulcrum2000- http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21828

B1- ppipper vs CumnorChessClub (Kevin D. Plant)- http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21814

B2- Kamesh vs ppipper- http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21829

B2- Fulcrum2000 vs Kamesh- http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21815

B3- jitan vs Sebastian Boehme- http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21830

B3- National12 vs jitan- http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21816

B4- Loboestepario (Gino Figilo) vs WeirwindleX- http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21817

B4- David Evans vs Loboestepario (Gino Figilo)- http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21831

B5- Sebastian Boehme vs David Evans- http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21818

B5- Weirwindle vs Banned for Life- http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21832

B6- ralunger (Ramil Germanes) vs National12- http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21833

B6- donkasand vs ralunger (Ramil Germanes)- http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21819

B7- tomski1981 vs donkasand- http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21834

B7- parmetd (Daniel Parmet) vs tomski1981- http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21820

B8- Banned for Life vs Ruben Comes- http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21821

B8- indrajit_sg vs parmetd (Daniel Parmet)- http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21835

B9- Keoki010 (George Clement) vs Indrajit- http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21822

B9- Mark Eldridge vs Balabachi- http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21837

B10- Wayne Lowrance vs Stephanie- http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21838

B10- Balabachi vs Wayne Lowrance- http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21823

B11- StephanieX vs Mark_Eldridge- http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21824

B11- Omprakash vs Keoki010 (George Clement)- http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21839

B12- natmaku vs Scott Nichols- http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21825

B12- Ruben Comes vs deka- http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21840

B13- deka vs Omprakash- http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21826

B13- Scott Nichols vs Schachmatt (Matt O'Brien)- http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21841

B14- Schachmatt (Matt O'Brien) vs TheHug (Jimmy Huggins)- http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21827

B14- TheHug (Jimmy Huggins) vs natmaku http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=21842

Before I get off, I would like to thank Thib for letting me ask his great players to play in my tournament. Best wishes to all and enjoy this next year!

Jimmy


Jimmy Huggins    (2011-05-15 13:34:12)
WBCCC Round 3 links and more

After 2 rounds FICGS has 5 of the top 10 places in the standings in the WBCCC 1. With Kevin #1 and Kamesh #4 at the top with 3 points and Gino #6, David #7, and Sebi #10. Well Rybka Forum has 4 of the top 10. Fulcrum2000 #2, ppipper #3, WeirwindleX #8, National12 #9.

Many of these players are facing off against each other. Here are just a few games you that are must watch for this round.

Banned for Life vs Ruben Comes- Banned for Life (Alan) is one of the best with 1.b3. It should be interesting to see how Ruben combats this expert with the Larson System.

Sebastian Boehme vs David Evans- These two have crossed paths before on the freestyle field before. I took great interest in this match because Sebi has 1 on the highest winning % with the white pieces in the field and hasn't last a white game on FICGS. That I have seen. I can bet on some fireworks in this game.

Kamesh vs ppipper- Kam put on a good show with the white pieces vs one of the toughest opponents in the field (with my human eyes) and ppipper has done great with the black pieces. With both of his wins coming with the black pieces! O_o Should be fun :)

jitan vs Sebastian Boehme- Jitan is showing to be one of the top tier players in this event. I truly enjoy the tactical opening he played in his only win in the tournament so far in round 1 vs George. And gave Gino all he could handle in Round 2 (With my human eyes again) :)

A lot of the other games speak for themselves. Also keep on eye on Board 1 with Kevin. :)


Wayne Lowrance    (2011-05-26 01:23:39)
I am exhausted

Thibault Eros & friends.
I am exhausted. At 81 years I cannot play chess to my standards. Recent events have drained me and I do not know what to do. I dearly love this site, it has been good to me, I met a lot of friends but I cannot any longer function at the level I expect of myself. Please forgive me. May I drop out of current WBCCC matches with Eros.
Thanks to all for being my friend
Wayne


Eros Riccio    (2011-05-28 08:06:21)
I am exhausted

Wayne... don't worry about the match against me, it's not important, and it can be resumed later... now only focus on playing the most important match, which can't be delayed, with life. Fight Wayne, and I am sure you will be the winner.

Eros.


Jimmy Huggins    (2011-06-22 06:54:36)
The rise of freestyle chess again.

Hello to all my FICGS friends! I was wanting to post here to let people know about a live broadcast later today. Me and ICCF GM Arno Nickel will be having a match later to help promote freestyle chess. In truth this is another practice match to try and test a server for freestyle chess. He had own 1st match yesterday. And it was nice to see it being followed. I hope some of you come watch the event. Comments are welcome! :) The match will be at 6:30am Central Standard Time/7:30am Eastern Standard Time/12:30 GMT/ 11:30 Rybka Forum time. Look for a thread in the Rybka Forum/ Computer Chess subforum. The thread will be up several minutes before the match. The time control will be 60min+15sec, which is a common time control for freestyle chess.

For those of you who don't know ICCF GM Arno Nickel. He is in the top 10 in the ICCF and is one of the leading people to promote and bring freestyle chess to the fore front.

I hope to see you today and I'm sure there will be other matches to follow in the future. This will all lead up to a great tournament later on this year. :)


Jimmy Huggins    (2011-06-23 05:04:22)
The rise of freestyle chess again.

Yes this was what we was hoping for. The results of the match were not as important to me. The broadcast was good, there will be a tournament later on this year. And I will invite my FICGS friends to play. :) My hope is the that system will support all the games for the broadcast and we get good commentary (I will most likely be one of them :) ). My aim for a date is between Nov-Dec. As this will be in between the first WBCCC and the next. The server is easy to handle once you have a first games under your belt. You are able to run everything though the server. So you can run your engines and books in there. The first freestyle event will be probably be a smaller tournament around 30 people maybe. But my hope is by the 2nd or 3rd edition the we will have good size tournament.

Anyone wishing to try the server and play a game let me know and we will work something out.


Daniel Parmet    (2011-07-09 15:39:26)
Active rating lists

No matter my complaints, I am still *VERY* happy with FICGS and Thib. This site is the best correspondence site I've ever seen.


Don Groves    (2011-07-10 05:00:20)
Active rating lists

And that's what matters most, that Thib keeps working hard to improve an already terrific site!


Thibault de Vassal    (2011-07-13 22:42:29)
More statistics for every player

I've just added a new feature to see more statistics on every player, see in Preferences >> (statistics)

You can see such informations for every player by typing in example this link:

http://www.ficgs.com/players/devassal_thibault#stats

(wow, that's really not glorious :))

Any suggestion is welcome...


Garvin Gray    (2011-07-16 18:02:39)
Case of resignation in WCH tournament

Thibault- I think I can offer you a solution to this from the fide laws of chess, tournament rules section.

These types of situations are already covered: http://www.fide.com/fide/handbook.html?id=20&view=category

11. Where not all games are played

(c) When a player withdraws or is expelled from a round-robin tournament, the effect shall be as follows:

(d) If a player has completed less than 50% of his games, his score remains in the tournament table (for rating and historical purposes), but the points scored by him or against him are not counted in the final standings. The unplayed games of the player and his opponents are indicated by (-) in the tournament table and those of his opponents by (+). If neither player is present this will be indicated by two (-).

(e) If a player has completed at least 50% of his games, his score shall remain in the tournament table and shall be counted in the final standings. The unplayed games of the player are shown as indicated as above.

(g) Articles 10(e) and (f) also apply to team events; both unplayed matches and unplayed games must be clearly indicated as such.


Thibault de Vassal    (2011-07-18 13:04:52)
Case of resignation in WCH tournament

@Don: The rules try to make tournaments (particularly championships) & ratings coherent as much as possible (to "protect" results & ratings), in other words if a player resigns several games in a tournament without giving a valid explanation, even the games he won or drew in these tournaments may be adjudicated as losses in this aim. The only question is: should it be extended to games (in these tournaments only) finished before the first resignation...

@Garvin (& Gino): Thanks for the information! Would you know what ICCF says about it?


Thibault de Vassal    (2011-08-02 15:04:21)
A strong Opening Surprise

Could be an interesting future thematic tournament...


Thibault de Vassal    (2011-08-03 20:29:36)
@Gino

Hi Gino, you understand the semi-final tie break rules! Congratulations for another win in the knockout cycle. That will be another interesting match (the 8th FICGS knockout final) to follow! :)


Alvin Alcala    (2011-08-10 11:30:23)
Ideas for a Freestyle tournament

In free style cup section why not make an option of a freestyle tour so anyone online can immediately arrange a tour with entry fee of say 10 e-points or even bronze. Then the format would be minimum 2 players or even number of players. Money prizes will be broken down accordingly. I loved to play advance chess a lot but it will be more exciting if you will play more people.


Garvin Gray    (2011-08-10 11:40:07)
Ideas for a Freestyle tournament

Alvin, this is going to be hard enough to organise with only one concept and a few straight forward ideas to sort out.

It will not help if we start talking about a whole lot of different formats and other ideas.

I just do not want to see this thread branching off into tangets and variations and the few ideas that Jimmy has raised not being discussed much.


Garvin Gray    (2011-08-13 18:07:21)
Ideas for a Freestyle tournament

With so many competing interests and ideas, I think the best idea is for Jimmy to just set the format, time control and all other conditions way in advance and then let all players decide if they want to play.

If then quite a few players start flagging the same issue for non-participation, then that issue alone could be looked at.


Thibault de Vassal    (2011-08-19 11:43:45)
Rybka banned from ICGA

Clone or not clone, I'm not sure if this question is worth something in computer chess but ICGA did it: Rybka was banned and stripped of titles...

I just partly read RybkaInvestigation document, a few points are particularly ridiculous (like 2.2 "Sudden Strength Increase"), I have no idea on the other ones and I'm not sure if this is really important in the real world.

Finally, the punishment:

- to strip Rajlich of all ICGA Tournament Titles and,
- force the return of trophies and prize funds to the ICGA and,
- ban his programs from future competitions until he can satisfy the ICGA that they are no longer derivatives and that he has satisfied the conditions of any other penalties the ICGA imposes.
- encourage other tournaments (Leiden, Paderborn, CCT, TACCL, etc.) to disallow the entry of Rybka until it is proven “clean”.


ICGA Panel Members

The Secretariat members:
Robert Hyatt - (Crafty, Cray Blitz, World Computer Chess Champion in 1983 and 1986)
Mark Lefler (author of Now)
Harvey Williamson (part of Hiarcs Team)
Panel members:
Albert Silver (software designer for Chess Assistant (1999-2002); currently editor of
Chessbase News (2010-present))
Amir Ban (author of Junior: World Champion 2002, 2004, 2006, World microcomputer
Champion 1997, 2001)
Charles Roberson (author of NoonianChess)
Christophe Theron (author of Chess Tiger)
Dariusz Czechowski (author of Darmenios)
Don Dailey (author of Cilkchess, Star Socrates, Rex, Komodo)
Eric Hallsworth (part of Hiarcs Team, Publisher of Selective Search magazine)
Fabien Letousky (author of Fruit)
Frederic Friedel (Chessbase.com)
Gerd Isenberg (author of IsiChess)
Gyula Horvath (author of Pandix, Brainstorm)
Ingo Bauer (Shredder team)
Jan Krabbenbos (Tournament Director of Leiden tournaments)
Kai Himstedt (author of Gridchess and Cluster Toga)
Ken Thompson (creator of Belle Chess Machine, World Computer Chess Champion
1980, Turing Award winner 1983, creator of B and C programming languages,
Unix and Plan 9 developer).
Marcel van Kervinck (author of Rookie)
Maciej Szmit (assistant professor at Technical University of Lodz)
Mark Watkins (MAGMA Computer Algebra Group, School of Mathematics and
Statistics, University of Sydney)
Mark Uniacke (Hiarcs, World Microcomputer Champion 1993)
Mincho Georgiev (Pawny)
Olivier Deville (Tournament Director of ChessWars)
Omid David (author of Falcon)
Peter Skinner (Tournament Director of CCT--the major annual online computer chess
tournament)
Ralf Schäfer (author of Spike)
Richard Vida (author of Critter)
Richard Pijl (author of The Baron)
Stefan Meyer-Kahlen (author of Shredder, multiple world champions from 1996-2007)
Thomas Mayer (author of Quark)
Tord Romstad (author of Stockfish, Glaurung)
Tom Pronk (ProChess, Much)
Vladan Vuckovic (Axon, Achilles)
Wylie Garvin (game Programmer at Ubisoft Montreal)
Yngvi Björnsson (The Turk)
Zach Wegner (author of ZCT and Rondo, an upgraded version of Anthony Cozzie’s
Zappa program, which was world champion in 2005)
ICGA Board
President - David N.L. Levy
Vice-President: Yngvi Björnsson
Secretary-Treasurer: Hiroyuki Iida
Programmers Representative: Rémi Coulom
WCCC Tournament Director
Jaap van den Herik

http://www.chessvibes.com/plaatjes/rybkaevidence/RybkaInvestigation.pdf

http://www.chess.com/news/rybka-banned-and-stripped-of-titles-3798

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cQshTNJ4pSM


Stephane Legrand    (2016-01-14 15:21:36)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

In fact, thibault answers in forum :
Rules are rules Pablo, if the 8 games are draw... then the lowest TER is qualified
so I answer that I read in rules that it was the highest only to know what it is really.
Only that.


Philip Roe    (2011-09-18 05:19:36)
Phantom ficgs

When I am in the ficgs site, a second tab opens spontaneously in the ficgs format, and bearing some random message from the real site. The message scrolls across the page from right to left. I kill this tab and it returns after about a minute. It carries a label in the tab box "Message box 1"

Does this happen to anyone else? how do you get rid of it?


Philip Roe    (2011-09-20 19:11:01)
Phantom ficgs

Hi Thibault,

Thanks for trying to think about this.

I was just about to post that it had disappeared as mysteriously as it arrived, but as I was typing it came back!!

It must be something odd that only happens to me. Perhaps a side effect of some automatic upgrade. Who knows??


Thibault de Vassal    (2011-10-11 11:37:09)
Go Komi 7.5, advantage for Black/White?

A topic on the game of Go.

Someone suggested that the current FICGS Go champion should be able to decide the color of the 1st game (the WCH final match is played in 5 games) because the komi may be an advantage for White.

I'm not favourable to this idea because IMO the komi "may be" an advantage for White or Black according to the players level, and it should be about equal for top players (9p, theorically). Anyway, I guess that the champion has quite an advantage already by playing the final match only.

Any opinion on this?


Thibault de Vassal    (2011-10-12 12:28:43)
Go Komi 7.5, advantage for Black/White?

IMO the format shouldn't depend on a player's decision. And one never know what can happen, if the champion is unreachable during a while then the games could start late or a color should be chosen by default. Doesn't look great to me.


Thibault de Vassal    (2011-10-28 22:16:09)
4th FICGS freestyle cup

Hi all,

The 4th FICGS freestyle tournament may happen on december 3 & 4 (2011) - three rounds each day at 13:00, 15:00, 17:00 server time. The format should be the same (30 minutes + 15 seconds per move) than the previous one.

That's quite a good moment IMO, just before the start of the next championship cycle.

What do you think? Any suggestions?

Thank you,
Thibault


Thibault de Vassal    (2011-11-11 22:22:05)
ficgs Server time

Yes, that's strange as it should be corrected regularly automatically... I just changed it. Thanks!


Thibault de Vassal    (2011-11-12 23:38:39)
World Championship

Hello Des,

It has been discussed many times when the server was created. The aim here was to "find" the best player while avoiding the chancy factor (as much as possible) and by the shortest way. It was also to look like the old classical FIDE championship, that was much more spectacular than the current one.

Anyway it will always be matter of discuss :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2011-11-13 19:52:28)
List ordered by rating

Here is, but as usual the new ratings (january 2012) will be taken in account...

Erwin Thiering 2515
Michael Bergmann 2475
Xavier Pichelin 2454
Thibault de Vassal 2449
Herbert Kruse 2436
Pavel Háse 2332
Ljubomir Tsenkov 2314
Rubén Cómes 2300
Wayne Lowrance 2266
Dariusz Fraczek 2261
Ramil Germanes 2255
Miroslav Gazi 2255
Alexander Blinchevsky 2253
Michael Sharland 2251
Sergey Kokoryukin 2251
Andrey Razumikhin 2250
Valery Nemchenko 2245
Lubos Fric 2241
Kevin D. Plant 2237
Christoph Schroeder 2236
Viktor Shishkin 2234
Slobodan Ilic 2218
Dmitri Mamrukov 2211
Vitaly Rudenko 2203
Alvin Alcala 2203
Carlos Sánchez 2203
Garvin Gray 2200
Scott Nichols 2189
Peter Unger 2181
Martin Zeman 2181
Christian Koch 2167
Stephen Hamby 2163
John Schutte 2136
David Evans 2132
Nelson Bernal Varela 2130
Darren DiAlfonso 2123
Ardiantez Polkwitzauer 2123
Thomas Dineen 2118
Peter W. Anderson 2112
Steve Lim 2110
Yu Ming Hoe 2100
Arkadiusz Wosch 2093
Djordje Kasabasic 2093
Luis Flores 2084
Daniel Parmet 2083
Lalit Kapoor 2080
Erik L. van Dijk 2074
Bernd Wolf 2072
Jose Lopez 2071
Sergey Uzdin 2064
Rodolfo d Ettorre 2064
Janos Helmer 2063
Om Prakash 2053
Mykola Simashkevitch 2043
Alexis Duenas 2037
Ireneusz Kasznia 2036
Mihail Larsky 2028
Joop Simmelink 2026
Pan Hardfeldt 2020
Henri Muller 2000
Jaroslav senior Pech 2000
Jaroslaw Gibas 2000
Bogoljub Teverovski 1997
Willy De Waele 1996
Fernando Vasquez 1992
Jose Moreira 1979
Andrew Endean 1975
Henri-Louis Muller 1972
Jose Maria Velasco 1972
Jordi Domingo 1969
Janeen Walden 1958
Andy Richard 1956
Roberto Migliorini 1949
Erika van Dijk 1943
Daniel Reboredo 1938
Coco Maceda 1938
Michael Rogers 1933
Aleksandr Aksenov 1927
Mariusz Maciej Broniek 1923
Robert Wilhelm 1901
Kieran Moore 1900
John Dyson 1889
Catalin Nita 1888
Daniel Jabot 1878
Johanes Suhardjo 1875
Mikhail Ruzin 1871
Benjamin Block 1863
Ilmar Ambos 1859
Vyacheslav Shchelykalin 1859
Jan Peter Lommler 1844
Stanislas Gounant 1840
Mircea Hrubaru 1838
Sasha Lipsits 1833
Nilson Pereira 1833
Aleksey Payzansky 1804
Jai Prakash Singh 1800
Fredi Brumec 1800
Gleen Duran 1800
Josef Strohmeier 1800
Ryszard Sternik 1776
Stepan Pech 1767
Dieter Faust 1764
Dmitriy Malish 1760
Dimitrios Ropokis 1743
Hasan Kirali 1715
Eddit Moreul 1700
Behzad Shahmiri 1700
Jaimie Wilson 1684
Dinesh Bhandarkar 1682
Philip Roe 1667
Olli Ylönen 1660
Graham Cridland 1655
Juan Alvar 1653
Jeremy Banta 1644
Luís Gonzaga Grego 1643
Pablo Siciliano 1623
Mariusz Jandula 1600
Sergey Biryukov 1598
Alejandro Canovas 1589
Jimmy Huggins 1577
Matthew O Brien 1575
Pablo Ruano 1565
Khaled Toutaoui 1528
Stanimir Denchev 1505
Leo Malagar 1500
Richard Hendricks 1479
Eric Price 1469
Antonio Pereira 1456
Angelo Piantadosi 1420
Simon Huxtable 1388
Peter Krakovsky 1326
Marc-Antoine Leurette 1243
Jorge Orden 1204
Hana Pechova 1204
Jorma Häkkinen 1192
Des Jefferis 1186
Deon Whittaker 1111
Matej Pech 1074
Jiri Mach 1022
Cédric Cavaillé 1003
Jay Melquiades 0909
Jaroslav Pech 0697


Garvin Gray    (2011-11-14 10:16:07)
New Blitz Silver Match

I am now looking for a new player to have a blitz silver match with.

If you are interested, just reply to this post and then we can discuss further.


Garvin Gray    (2011-11-15 06:54:19)
New Blitz Silver Match

No interest hey?


Alvin Alcala    (2011-11-15 18:34:37)
New Blitz Silver Match

Guy you will have a fun and exciting match if you play garvin. :)


Jimmy Huggins    (2011-11-28 10:40:12)
WBCCC 2 sign up and WBCCC 1 review

I should also add to the people who haven't read some of my material in the past. The tournament as a 6 man tablebase rule. If a position is reach that is a in a 6 man tablebase. They can claim a draw or win to the TD. This was a great rule that only got used a few times. But is a good way to prevent people of trying to expand games that are clearly over.


Jordi Domingo    (2011-12-03 09:51:42)
Latvian gambit World Champion chess

Next year, in January, it will start the e-mail 7th. Latvian gambit World Champion chess. If you want to play it or you need more information, please send an e-mail to Alejandro Melchor.
amelchormunoz@gmail.com.
Kind regards
Jordi


Garvin Gray    (2011-12-13 10:09:29)
From Gambit Thematic Tournament

Thib,

Do you really mean f6 or d6 as black's second move?

Cheers,

Garvin


Bogoljub Teverovski    (2025-02-25 22:56:30)
Next thematic tournament

It is time for the next thematic: 1.e4 d6 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3 e5


Thibault de Vassal    (2011-12-13 22:39:42)
From Gambit Thematic Tournament

f6 ... just another tough line to try :)


Garvin Gray    (2011-12-14 08:52:43)
From Gambit Thematic Tournament

Thanks Thib. Was hoping for d6, but ahh well.


Garvin Gray    (2011-12-14 08:57:09)
5 player double round robins

I am wondering if tournaments would be easier to start if instead of needing 7 players to enter to get a tournament going, this could be reduced to 5 players and be offered as a double round robin.

This would mean that everyone would have to play 8 games instead of 6, but I think that would be ok in return for getting tournaments started more often.

This change would also mean that colours are now irrelevant, so your starting position in the field does not matter.

Entries do slow up across Christmas, as I am noticing by being the only person to enter the Standard M tournament for over a fortnight now.


Thibault de Vassal    (2011-12-14 15:39:33)
5 player double round robins

Hi Sebi, sure it's an interesting system! I've explained why I was not favourable to this here though (I did not find the discussion, quite old one). In brief less excitement (IMO), games influenced by each other result, this is just too confusing & different.

Same for double roound robins, I like this format much but it would slow down even more the other tournaments... Be patient guys, let's play bullet games :)


Garvin Gray    (2011-12-14 16:25:12)
5 player double round robins

Thib: Same for double roound robins, I like this format much but it would slow down even more the other tournaments...

Garvin: Can you please expand on this? I am not sure how it would slow down other tournaments.


Garvin Gray    (2011-12-16 12:06:21)
5 player double round robins

I think it could be trialled in one of the two sections we have atm. So all divisions in either standard or rapid moves to 5 player double round robin.

Could give some useful information.

Btw, changing the SM tourneys does nothing for me at this stage, which was one part of the reason for suggesting this change. It would also have to apply to the M class tournaments too.


Daniel Parmet    (2011-12-17 00:29:00)
From Gambit Thematic Tournament

I would love a From with d6 but if f6 bloody well forget it.


Thibault de Vassal    (2011-12-18 19:04:45)
From Gambit Thematic Tournament

There will be one soon for sure :)


Garvin Gray    (2011-12-21 16:51:54)
5 player double round robins

DRR's are especially important in the thematic tournaments where sometimes the thematic is not a good one and one side gains a guaranteed advantage.

The current thematic of f4 e5 fxe5 f6 could be a good case in point.


Garvin Gray    (2011-12-23 00:24:35)
5 player double round robins

Thib, the proposal is only talking about the general standard/rapid and other all entry tournaments (thematic for instance).

My proposal is not about changing tournaments like the ficgs world champs to 5 player drr's as they have no issues with getting players to join.


Garvin Gray    (2011-12-23 17:05:47)
5 player double round robins

To try and accommodate a few concerns of some, I think there are three possible options.

1) Change both standard and rapid divisions to 5DRR.

2) Change just one of standard or rapid to 5PDRR and leave the other as 7SRR.

3) Create an entire new division with 5DRR and leave the current standard and rapid as they are.

I think option 2 would be the most useful in providing information on whether the change is successful.

Option 1 is the most committal, as it is changing everything.

Option 3 is worth consideration, but it could lead to insufficient numbers across all three divisions. It could also 'suffer' and not provide useful feedback if the time control and rating bands chosen are not suitable.

If Option 3 was considered, it would need to be something between standard and rapid, perhaps 14 days initial plus 3 days increment.


Thibault de Vassal    (2011-12-24 18:29:54)
From Gambit Thematic Tournament

Okay, I just changed the From gambit line for the next thematic. Now it is with d6 !!


Daniel Parmet    (2011-12-24 19:33:09)
From Gambit Thematic Tournament

awesome! Thanks!


Garvin Gray    (2011-12-25 02:20:10)
From Gambit Thematic Tournament

And have entered this one too


Garvin Gray    (2011-12-29 10:30:09)
WBCCC 2012 Binding Poll:

Over at www.rybkaforum.net, World Blitz Correspondence Chess Championship begins in a couple of weeks.

There is now a poll out at http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=23854 which is to decide how many rounds will be played (10 or 12) and also when round times will be announced (start of tournament or near end of a round).

For those players who are thinking of entering, played last year or are interested and knowledgeable spectators, you can vote as per the instructions below.

The four options are:

1) 10 games, 30 days initial time plus 1 hr increment AND all scheduled round times are confirmed before the start of the tournament
2) 10 games, 30 days initial time plus 1 hr increment AND all scheduled round times are confirmed a few days before the end of a round
3) 12 games, 30 days initial time plus 1 hr increment AND all scheduled round times are confirmed before the start of the tournament
4) 12 games, 30 days initial time plus 1 hr increment AND all scheduled round times are confirmed a few days before the end of a round

As this preferential poll covers both options and will be binding, as in the final vote will be what format we will be using for WBCCC 2012, I am going to ask all voters to write in their votes.
As a write in system is be used, everyone has the option of choosing only one option if they want, or can allocate as many preferences as they want, up to 4 numbers in total.

So if a person only wants to vote for one number and does not want to allocate a preference, that is acceptable.

The reason for using write-in votes is three-fold:

1) All twenty four different options are evenly allocated
2) A voter can choose to allocate only one preference
3) It gives me the opportunity to see if all votes are genuine, rather than possibly the results being skewed by people who have no interest in playing in the tournament.

If a person does not feel comfortable posting their vote in public, but does want to record a vote, they can send me a private message, which will be counted in the total votes.

Voting will close Thursday January 5.


Garvin Gray    (2011-12-29 16:11:44)
Different tournament format

Thibault has touched on an issue that I have thought about for a while, so time for a new thread.

Regularly it is discussed about the issues regarding the rating bands, getting to play different players and all sundry similiar issues.

In my opinion I think what this site really needs is more events run under the correspondence style format (not freestyle cup style), where players of significantly different ratings are playing against each other.

Here is what I envisage:

Qualification Stage:

All players of all ratings enter. Groups are divided up similar to Ficgs, except that no players are segregated, so the highest rated player is in Group A, second highest rated player in Group B and so forth.

Even numbers in each group, with a maximum of nine players in a group. There are no substitutes after a group begins.

There are no special groups for the highest rated players or knockout matches. (this is most important to distinguish this event from the WCH)

Final Stage(s):

The winners of each qualification group advance to the final stages, everyone else is eliminated. If there is a tie for first, then all tied players advance. If only one group is required, then this is the final.

If two groups are required, then it would be semi finals and normal round robin pairings would be used and the cycle repeats to get a final group of .... players.

To encourage the highest rated players to enter and to give everyone else a chance to win something substantial, e point entry fee would be 10 epoints.


Thibault de Vassal    (2011-12-30 20:27:13)
Different tournament format

Well, let's see if the rated double round-robin tournament with entry fee works well, it will be a good start to discuss it.

I think this is a very good idea in theory, but it is quite hard to predict how many non-titled players (who would pay an entry fee) and how many titled players (invited or paying an entry fee as well) would play...

Maybe I can create a waiting list later and see how it goes, without the guarantee that the tournament can really start.


Garvin Gray    (2011-12-31 12:22:16)
Different tournament format

I think if it is advertised, then it needs to run. If it is not a success after a couple of tries, it can be not be held again.

If there is a proviso that it might not be run, then that makes it so much harder to get people to commit.


Thibault de Vassal    (2012-01-01 20:12:07)
On rules & players who lost 300 pts

Hi,

I've been told about a recurrent problem: is it fair to play against a stronger player who just lost 200 or 300 elo points because of many games lost on time (or whatever)?

IMO it is. Because as usual correspondence chess is not a matter of chess only. Of course such games may be harder for his opponents but there are good chances to see those games lost on time again (by experience).

Losing points is the only way to keep those games serious and protect players against this repeated again and again. So I don't think that rules should be changed, but any opinions & arguments are welcome here.


Garvin Gray    (2012-01-02 02:05:43)
On rules & players who lost 300 pts

I do not agree at all. I think there needs to be consequences for a person's actions, not just let off with no consequences, perhaps even get an advantage.

If there are mass time-outs, their rating should be returned to where it was (that is their correct playing standard), which means they can not enter the lower waiting list.

The idea that losing on time is part of the game only applies if the game was about 100 moves long and the game was short of time and someone used too much time on one or more moves.

But mass timing out of games is not a general part of the game at all. It is poor form and disrespectful to the site and the other opponents in the tournament and should be punished as such.

If they remain on the same rating, then they should certainly not be allowed to play in the event where they previously entered.

If a player has a legitimate reason for timing out so many games, they can take it up with the site administrator. That option always exists.


Thibault de Vassal    (2012-01-02 14:08:37)
On rules & players who lost 300 pts

Statistically playing 1 game in a tournament against an underrated player is not so much while losing 200 or 300 pts means a lot... And once again, quite often underrated players because of a mass forfeit will forfeit again! There are well known examples (very strong players rated 1900-2000) here. IMO it's the only way to prevent mass time outs!

I played at IECG and I was very disappointed to see games with an advantage simply cancelled after 30 moves or so, because of a time loss or just "forfeit". That is a non-sense to me. Rated games have to be rated!

So you suggest to simply punish players by not allowing them to play tournaments anymore (during 1 year or so)!? On the other hand, if players do not lose rating points what to do if a player has recurrent problems and has to resign his games once every year. Then many ratings will be hustled.

At last what will be a legitimate reason? It is so... so complex.


Garvin Gray    (2012-01-03 15:12:04)
Different tournament format

I am surprised Daniel Parmet has not replied to this topic considering my proposal should be much more acceptable to him than the current ficgs world championship design/format.

Where are you Daniel?


Thibault de Vassal    (2012-01-10 11:28:44)
Ratings UpDates

Hello George,

That's a very good question... actually I have no clear answer on this (anyone?), but I did not invent this method used in all major correspondence chess organizations.

All I can say is that I "feel" that the results are quite good with this. The aim is to avoid rating peaks I guess. On the other hand ratings move a little faster (more points, not more often) at FICGS than in other organizations, I hope it balances.

Best is to learn to manage one's rating, sometimes best is to lose as fast as possible, sometimes not. Correspondence chess is matter of patience anyway...


Garvin Gray    (2012-01-11 07:26:44)
5 player double round robins

how is this matter going in terms of changing one of the standard/rapids to 5PDRR?

No progress seems to have been made on changing it.


Garvin Gray    (2012-01-20 17:45:57)
Standard open : DRR with entry fee/prize

I do not think a few e points either way are going to make a difference to the 2400 players. What most likely matters to them is winning tournaments and titles.

So either way they were not going to enter these events.

Just to start stratching the record ;) my original idea was for these double round robins was for one of the divisions to be replaced with them, not to create a whole new division.

As it currently stands, I really do not see the point of this change as it feels like duplications of other areas of the site.


Rodolfo d Ettorre    (2012-02-04 12:16:56)
From Gambit Thematic Tournament

After the From gambit, what is next ?


Thibault de Vassal    (2012-02-04 14:54:47)
From Gambit Thematic Tournament

Let's go for the Lasa gambit (1.e4 e5 2.c3 f5) :) we'll try a more classical opening after that


Mario Andreoni    (2012-02-07 13:53:02)
From Gambit Thematic Tournament

Thibault,

could a player start (or propose) new tournaments (especially thematic ones)? If so, how?

Sorry if I cause you to reply to these questions for the one-millionth time :-)


Thibault de Vassal    (2012-02-07 14:51:01)
From Gambit Thematic Tournament

Hello Mario,

Sure, feel free to suggest new thematic tournaments in this discussion or by email, we always need good ideas :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2012-02-12 19:47:17)
annotated games

That's not the right place IMO. The game would not be visible enough. See Wikichess, just follow the moves and enter the new moves if needed. That's quite long though, sorry it surely needs an update.

Why not posting it in the forum as well? We could see it more easily. Just enter [ PGN ] (without the spaces) followed by the complete game in Portable Game Notation format, then finish with [ /PGN ]


Thibault de Vassal    (2012-02-12 21:58:53)
annotated games

What move did you enter? You have to enter it in PGN format.


Thibault de Vassal    (2012-02-16 19:06:33)
Folding in Poker

Hmm, I didn't change anything... the color doesn't matter (it just means that it is probably not the best move), the button should work. Did you really try it?

Is it the same for other players?


Thibault de Vassal    (2012-02-18 21:42:26)
Folding in Poker

Yes I agree. I mean, the player called must always show his cards (this is the case at FICGS), but the player who call must show his cards only if one player is all-in, otherwise he's free not to show it even if he has the better hand (here this is automated, so the rules are not fully fullfilled but this is so rare).


Scott Nichols    (2012-02-24 20:56:24)
Folding in Poker

I don't know what you did or why with the rating formula, and it doesn't matter anymore. I took some time off from poker, but now I resolve to be back on top by the end of the year, :) At least my peak of 2258 has never been approached.


Scott Nichols    (2012-02-24 23:13:08)
Folding in Poker

Go for it, :) Make it as easy as possible. And while were at it make some poker silver and gold matches.


Garvin Gray    (2012-02-25 13:57:13)
Folding in Poker

Ok, the main question to me is-

Which system is more able to predict the rules of a match before it begins?

If it was the first system, then that should return. If it is the current system, then keep it.

A more responsive system is usually better, but in the case of ficgs, this may not be good for two reasons:

1) While in otb chess/poker, there are very few mass time outs by a player, online this can occur, as is seen 'regularly' on here.
2) In otb chess, players do not have any kind of official rating until they have played a certain number of games.

This then means those early games to not affect all the other players ratings, which is not the case on here.

In terms of predictive accuracy, which is more accurate? That is the only consideration for me.

When I said that the ratings should be re-run, I did not mean we should start the ratings from scratch and begin from day one.

What I was saying is that ALL the previous results should be re-fed back into the system with the new rating formula and the ratings adjusted accordingly.

Then this would give information to compare as it would contain one set of ratings all measured by the same rating formula.


Paul Campanella    (2012-02-26 19:44:53)
New Player Ratings

I started at a 1600 rating. Personally, I find it completely UNACCEPTABLE that new players start at 1800 because it is a misrepresentation of their poker skills.

I started playing poker approximately a year ago on this site and I had to work exceptionally hard to make it into the top 20. As a past low ranked 1600 player... it was not easy to advance my elo to 1800+. It took considerable time and dicipline to hone my skills and get to the B-Level Tournaments. Playing those lower ranked players developed my skill because it taught me to expect the unexpected and learn all about odds and player styles.

Allow me to present some examples of players in relation to starting point and current rating:

A) I started out as a 1600 player... there were many people that were low ranked. As of now, the only 2 players that I recall advancing from a low rank to the top 20 are Paul Campanella (#16) and Dmitriy Panov (#17).

B) Slobodan Ilic (#6) and Trond Amile (#11) are both high rated good players but the reality is that it is much easier for people like them who entered in as 1800 elo to advance to the top compared to people who entered in at 1600 elo.

Now it seems that all new players get a "free ride" to the B-Class Tournaments and 200 elo points for doing absolutely nothing!

Starting at 1600 elo and advancing through the ranks is the true definition of skill. In order for players' ratings to accurately represent their skills, EVERYONE should start at 1600 and WORK their way up!


Thibault de Vassal    (2012-02-27 02:22:02)
Folding in Poker

Well, mathematically poker ratings below about 1900 mean something of a different nature (level of course but also the number of games played) than ratings over 1900 because it is much easier to win points below 2000 (see rules) and it was even easier before february 2011, so it would be much easier after the change asked by Scott. A player who starts at 1600 will need to play more games than a player who starts at 1800 to reach 2000, but not necessarily to make more efforts. In addition there are ways to manage ratings to enter certain waiting lists more quickly. Also, considering the slow inflation that exists the contrary of what you say is true in a certain measure as well, new players will have to play more games than you to reach the top, actually the whole thing is really complex.

But... anyway I'll try not to change the rules again/too many times to avoid such (logical) reactions and that's why I take time to think about this one again.

I think that this change would make the poker ratings more attractive but less realistic and accurate so...... any other opinions? :)

Also, new players DO NOT get a free ride to the B class tournaments, many still start with 1600 according to the level they pretend when registering. So the difference is not so much, actually it may help you to climb the scale faster if you can beat a 1800 player easily... Really complex as I said but anyway I think that ratings are more accurate when players can start at different levels, because more players in the different categories mean more games in each one (players will find their rating faster) and because everybody do not lie every time. Everybody will not agree with this but I have a certain experience with the chess ratings now and I'm quite certain that most changes were good ones, so probably for poker.


Jimmy Huggins    (2012-02-27 04:35:15)
Folding in Poker

The different between rated player 1-30 or so is probably very little friend, is it really worth all this talking for a few rating points? You can be a head for 4 cards and play your best and get rivered and there is almost nothing you can do. In chess mate is mate and its over.


Jimmy Huggins    (2012-02-27 05:33:45)
Folding in Poker

We should also not forget this is basically free poker, I remember playing Nelson once and was playing some good poker. We he started call me a lot of my raise with moderate at best hands and then beat me in the match. And if I remember right I heard him say the calls were made because it was free poker. So this is a whole other animal in itself. :)


Paul Campanella    (2012-03-05 03:29:32)
FICGS poker ratings

Thank you for the compliment, Scott!

I consider you to be one of the top players and have great respect for you: as both top poker and as a person. You're also a very worthy adversary and our matches are almost always 3-2 (on either side)! :)

Thank you, Thibault, for recognizing my point that it is possible to climb the ladder quite quickly using the current rating system.

I would like to note that it is also possible to climb the ladder without using any strategy. Throughout all of my poker matches on FICGS, I always finished my games (both the winning games and the losing games). I could have easily waited a long time (like some players obviously do on this site) to finish my losing games, but I refuse to do that out of respect for my opponents.

Although poker is a game that requires a combination of luck and skill, I believe that respect belongs here as well. Out of my overall record of 202 completed games, I have won 120 and lost 80. During each game, I was always honorable. For instance, if it is my turn and I know that I am 4 chips away from losing a match 3-0, I will refuse to delay the game and deny my opponent his victory for the next two months even though I have 60 days left on the clock.

Besides, it is my philosophy that the best thing to do when opponent outplays me is to accept the loss, learn from it, and then try to win in a rematch! :)


Heinz-Georg Lehnhoff    (2012-03-07 18:27:21)
50+ Poker Games

I like Paul's idea of special counting the number of running game. This eliminates 5 of my games.

But I hope, that the idea to estimate poker games, will not be implemented. That is not a solution of the problem.

In some of my games my opponent and I can move only once per day, because we have a different rhythm of life. My opponents are playing in the morning and I at night. So we are online rarely at the same time. Furthermore, my games often last longer than 1000 moves. Therefore, it is only natural that these games take a long time. I don't like that these games will be estimated after a year.


Scott Nichols    (2012-03-20 17:39:19)
Slow tournament entries

3 days increment! It would be more fun to watch paint dry or grass grow. Some players, and we all know there are plenty of them out there, could keep a totally lost endgame going for over a year, just out of spite.

Which brings up another subject that would help immensely to speed up games without hurting quality.Install the 6-man tablebases on here, or at least let a player claim a win, draw etc when 6-man is reached. In this age of computer chess, if you have the equipment to even sign on to ficgs, you have the ability to go to a tablebase site and see the result. Plus, even the oldest computers, (like mine, :), can find the mate in under a minute in 6-man positions. So for someone to be able to drag the game out just for spite, for me, is a reason not to sign up in the first place.


Alvin Alcala    (2012-03-30 19:47:38)
Thematic request- Sicilian Dragon

Good idea! The chinese dragon (a6 idea) facinates me.


Garvin Gray    (2012-03-30 08:30:05)
Thematic request- Sicilian Dragon

I would like to request a SD Yugoslav Attack thematic.

I have found that this opening is rarely played on here, especially compared to its Najdorf and Schev cousins.

The starting position would be:
r1bq1rk1/pp2ppbp/2np1np1/8/3NP3/2N1BP2/PPPQ2PP/R3KB1R w KQ

1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 g6 6. Be3 Bg7 7. f3 O-O 8. Qd2 Nc6


Thibault de Vassal    (2012-03-31 23:49:14)
Thematic request- Sicilian Dragon

Should be the next one :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2012-03-31 23:54:49)
Vladimir Kramnik interview by Tkachiev

A very interesting interview of Vladimir Kramnik by Vladislav Tkachiev, on chess, Anand, politics (russia, france), himself and so on... His views on Russia's politics may be not shared by the most but look like very mature in some ways.

http://www.whychess.org/node/1605


Thibault de Vassal    (2012-04-12 14:25:46)
poker tournaments

I'm not sure... a game is a game, a round is a round, a hand is a hand (the following justifies :)) if we consider that winning 2-0 (rounds) or 3-2 is a question of luck more than the result of the full game itself (like a hand is a question of luck more than the result of a full round), the tie break would be matter of chance more than e.g. the TER that is the result of many games.


Garvin Gray    (2012-04-20 15:24:51)
Slow tournament entries

Thib: I do apologise in advance if this reply is regarded as too strong, it is not meant to offend, but could be taken by yourself or someone else as too strong.

In my opinion, creating ANOTHER division is possibly the worst decision that could be made. Leaving the time control as is would be a better decision.

We have three divisions classical rating sections, plus an advanced rating list and multiple thematic, unrated, epoint and other options.

I think adding another division would just spread things out wayyy too far.

It is not like we have an over abundance of players and need to offer more options to satisfy a wide market.


Thibault de Vassal    (2012-04-21 02:21:24)
Slow tournament entries

"Why only tournaments?" : Because rated 2 players matches may lead to easy cheating (silver/gold ones makes it possible). I'm not sure if unrated 2 players matches would be interesting...

About Daniel's main reason for not playing anymore at FICGS, I'm working on and I'll let everyone know when it's solved!


Garvin Gray    (2012-04-21 16:42:15)
Slow tournament entries

I am a fan of the ficgs wch and I think it has many positives. One negative I am starting to notice is that since I am now above 2200, I am getting exactly the same opponents (give or take one or two) who I play in the normal tournaments.

So the groups start to blend into one and it can be difficult to remember if I am playing a wch game, or a normal game, against the same opponent.

I think it would be an interesting exercise to see if the same person can win both events.

The ficgs wch could be held twice a year, and this idea could be held in the other quarter of the year (twice a year also).

Then after some time, see which format gets the most entries and positive reviews.


Thibault de Vassal    (2012-04-21 19:35:42)
Slow tournament entries

I agree about the draw rate... unfortunately there's no solution there :-/

On the cup format, you may be right after all. I'll have to think about it again, if a CUP cycle starts 4 months after each WCH (between 2 WCH cycles), with 2 rounds of 11 or 13 players tournaments (rapid time control, only 1 qualified for next round), this would be ok for 121 to 169 players, but it is a lot of rapid games (as for me I couldn't play it) and we may have less players for the next WCH... Anyway, thinking about it, it will be worth to open another discussion.


Daniel Parmet    (2012-04-22 06:50:06)
LSS is the worst Corr server

I was not discussing with my opponent. I feel like corr issues in general are something the corr community should be aware of so I do not share Garvin or Don's opinion. I obviously can't post this on lss forums as I have been banned there. Clearly, posting on forums of a site that is so wildly out of control is a waste of one's time and breath anyways.
Frankly, I am most ashamed of Scott's response above all else. His only problem with 20 games being forfeited is that it wasn't 21 so he could claim an illegitimate win as well - disgusting. Frankly the more I see of the correspondence chess world the more inclined I am to leave it permanently behind.


Daniel Parmet    (2012-04-22 17:08:16)
Slow tournament entries

It is my fault that I don't get to play stronger players? Interesting... logically impossible but I'm curious how you drew such a wrong conclusion.

Of course, whether or not you accept my argument is irrelevant because my argument is why I don't play. It is why others don't play. It is also why many don't sign up. I showed my roommate this site when he wanted to start corr chess and he saw he would be forced to play weak players for years before he'd get ONE decent game. He decided to join chess.com instead.


Thibault de Vassal    (2012-04-22 18:49:49)
Answer from Ortwin

Well, here is the answer from Dr. Ortwin Paetzold (LSS/IECG) that he asked me to post here. I'm glad to do it of course so that we can hear from both sides and make our own opinion with:

>>>>>>>>>>

Daniel Parmet is twisting the reality a bit. I take the right to quote my full answers, however as I do not have the permission to do so, I will not post the notes from Daniel to me, unless he quoted it here himself already.

Fact 1 is that Daniel has not read the rules of LSS or forgot about them. There is a function in LSS which lets the webmaster check this esp. in case of rule questions. Therefore he might not have known about the rule, however, when registering on LSS each player is asked to study the rules and to play according to them. I am sure, the same holds for FICGS and any other server.

Fact 2 is that on 4th April Daniel Parmet has lost a game on time by violating the 30-days-rule. The server automatically stopped the game and awarded the point to the opponent, independent from the position. The server also imposed the two week suspension to start a new tournament. The 30-days-rule was installed at IECG more than 10 years ago and I had included it into LSS right from the beginning. Daniel Parmet asked politely why the admin has cancelled his game (which I had not).

Fact 3 is that in my answer about the query why the game was finished, I have answered with reference to the rules:

“Your game was forfeited, because you did not move for 30 days. This is the maximum number of days to be used per individual move, independent of the total amount of time you have left. See the Rules and Usage Section under "Violation of Time Control". This is also the reason of your two-week-suspension. “

In his response Daniel Parmet called the LSS “a joke of a site”.

Fact 4 is that I answered to this insultation:

“Well, it is not my fault that you have not read the rules during the past five years you have played here! To be honest, this is impressing!”

I do not think this is more rude than insulting me/LSS because one has made a mistake!

Fact 5 is that I did not remove him from the waiting list of the LSS Anniversary 2012 as requested, because I thought that – once Daniel thinks reasonably about the case – he might want to continue, esp. as he wanted to continue all other games. Furthermore LSS has a feature where each player can remove himself from the waitinglist of this tournament. This all happened on 5th April! I then forgot about the matter.

Fact 6 is that on 19th April the LSS Anniverary groups were created including Daniel Parmet to one of the groups. As he was no longer suspended that time I missed that he still was on the waitinglist. I would otherwise have tried to get a replacement, which I did in other cases . When he claimed not to play in the anniversary on 20th April, I decided to remove him from all tournaments he was playing. As the tournaments were in an early stage (start date 15th Feb, Parmet finished only 3/10 and 1/12 games in them), I believe it makes less impact to withdraw a player then letting him influence the outcome, esp. as e.g. he would not use a potential qualification to the LSS WC Semi-Final or the Consolation Finals. I commented that action with the following message:

‘I have withdrawn you from this "joke of a site" (your own - wrong - words. It is not my fault that you have not read the rules!)

Thanks for playing here.’

The answer was unfriendly so I decided to cancel the membership permanently.

I would like to thank Thibault for the opportunity to express my view. I do not intend to comment anyfurther in this matter, as I think the two different versions are speaking for themselves.


George Clement    (2012-04-22 19:19:23)
LSS Move Rule

" violating the 30-days-rule. The server automatically stopped the game and awarded the point to the opponent, independent from the position. The server also imposed the two week suspension to start a new tournament. The 30-days-rule was installed at IECG more than 10 years ago and I had included it into LSS right from the beginning."

I like the idea behind this rule on LSS, IMHO it would solve some of the slow entry problems by making players move faster, which is a big part of the entry problem. I think anyone can make a least 1 move in 10 days, using todays hardware/software and communications. What do you think fellow members? I have no problem with players using time off thier clock but why wait 30 days make 10 moves then wait another 30 days?


Daniel Parmet    (2012-04-22 19:59:50)
LSS is the worst Corr server

In general, I could make many points to Ortwin's diminutive response. However, his lying aside - he has admitted to his disgusting actions and given specious reasoning for it. At this point, I think its best to let the topic drop. Others know LSS is not a safe place to play now and that was my only point. It is clear there can never be any proper resolution in my case personally.

On to the topic of the 60 day rule which is the real reason for my response. I think many people are forgetting that not everyone is retired with little to do with their time but chess. Many of us work and/or go to school. And when you have a complicated position, it is very very unreasonable to expect a response in 10 days time out of someone that works 80 hour weeks. I recognize that most of my opponents these days respond within 24 hours or less no matter what the move or how complicated the position... but this is because I am playing in general a lower caliber of player that just blindly follows the computer. I have the privilege of knowing GM Tansel Turgut and he tells me he never plays more than 10 games at once and generally doesn't make a move before 25 days of thought. I would others to stop for a moment and consider that not *everyone* is like you. They have other demands on their time and other analysis methods.


Scott Nichols    (2012-04-24 04:32:03)
Do the cards really matter?

I hope this doesn't sound to dumb, but I was thinking about this. I've played poker for about 40 years from penny ante with the family to no limit games where if you don't win, the rent don't get paid.

Some people try to calculate the odds, the number of "outs" etc. Play the game scientifically, others play by the feel of the game. I've seen and believe that when the stakes are up there, the cards don't really matter.

Imagine like in a movie, you were put in a position that you had no choice but to play a game of hold-em for your life. A lot of people dream to play in the million dollar tourney's in Vegas, but for 99% of them, the dream shatters, and it ends up being their life for a great many of them. So the question is, could you call his "all-in" knowing what happens if you lose?


Garvin Gray    (2012-04-24 13:45:31)
Do the cards really matter?

In an attempt to get this conversation out of the chat bar and to here-

Bluffing on here is so much harder because everyone is playing many games at once, so you just move through each game and quite often do not even notice which opponent it is, or even something what has been played before.

So in all probability, it is almost impossible to remember if one of your individual opponent made a move on you 10 hands ago and is trying it again.

Or whether they have the nuts and are slow playing you, hoping to check raise.

I wonder if four handed poker would work on here? Might be worth a go between some who have records for playing quickly.


Garvin Gray    (2012-04-24 15:01:32)
Ficgs World Cup

Following discussions about slow tournament entries, bracket and band rating issues and many other topics, a common item that came out of those discussions is that trying a modified version of the ficgs world championship is worth a trial.

So Ficgs World Cup sounds like a good name.

Format:

In the Ficgs world championship, there are many different qualifying stages, depending on your finishing position from the last cycle, your rating at the time of entry and the strength and total number of the other entrants.

While this format is very good for the concept envisaged when it was created, I think a ficgs world cup, with a format that will be explained below is required to cover a few gaps that are in the ficgs world championship.

The ficgs world cup will work as follows.

1) Everyone enters before a certain date, say June 1st 2012.
2) As soon as entries close, that is it. Entries are not taken after this date and there are NO replacements. The groups are meant to be of equal strength. Adding a new player can distort this.
3) Entrants are then divided into groups of roughly equal strength. Highest rated person is seed 1 in Group A, 2nd highest rated person is seed 1 in Group B. Serpentine pairings are used to allocate all players to each group.
4) How many players and how many groups is determined after the entries have closed. I would think that there will be probably 11 groups of 11 players (121 entries in total). It might be likely that we have to have three stages, depending on total number of entries.
5) 1 person from each group qualifies for the final stage. This is determined by total score, total wins and then TER. This does differ from the tie break formula of the FicgsWCH.

Pros:

1) Everyone gets a game against players of different ratings, no segregated groups or players
2) Everyone starts from stage one
3) The format is clear to understand

Cons:

1) May not be as tempting to the highest rated players (fear of loss of rating points)
2) Might take longer to finish

In my opinion, this is a format that deserves a couple of trial events to see if it is successful


Thibault de Vassal    (2012-04-24 16:32:49)
Do the cards really matter?

I agree with Garvin that it is harder to play well at correspondence poker... well it leaves some space to "rain man"-like guys :) It is possible to identify some repeating behaviours after a while though...

What do you mean exactly "four handed poker"?

@Scott: no-limit poker is not poker anymore... money is king and the richest will always win at the end if the stakes are too high. And the higher the stakes, the less it will take time.


Scott Nichols    (2012-04-24 16:58:02)
Do the cards really matter?

Yes no-limit is not good. What I meant is starting with a set amount (like here), but there is no limit on betting, actually just like here.


Garvin Gray    (2012-04-24 17:05:22)
Do the cards really matter?

What I meant by four handed poker is everyone plays with four hands ;)

I was meaning that instead of games starting from heads up with even chips, the games would have four players starting with even chips.

Scott: would you like your reply again?


Thibault de Vassal    (2012-04-24 17:06:41)
Do the cards really matter?

Ah, okay. So to answer your first question: yes, I guess I could call it cause I wouldn't have entered such a tournament without envisaging to lose (and I may lose without calling as well)...


Thibault de Vassal    (2012-04-24 17:07:48)
Do the cards really matter?

(my previous post was an answer to Scott)

@Garvin: okay, I see :)


Garvin Gray    (2012-04-24 17:08:34)
Do the cards really matter?

Who are you replying to Thib, and which question or point?


Don Groves    (2012-04-24 18:17:47)
Do the cards really matter?

The term you guys are looking for is "table stakes." There is no limit on betting but you can't go in for more than you have in front of you at the start of the hand.


Scott Nichols    (2012-04-24 18:38:51)
Do the cards really matter?

My original idea was born after watching 2 "pros" in a heads up match on TV. The way they were betting, and seeing the hole cards, the commentator said the cards didn't matter, it was a lot of posturing etc.


Garvin Gray    (2012-04-25 01:52:44)
Ficgs World Cup

Seen a few ideas, some that I thought would not be popular are been suggested as to give it a go. Good:)

There is a simple solution to keeping it to 2 stages. Just announce there will be 11 groups and leave the number of players in each group till when you know the final numbers.

So 220 players would be 11 groups of 20 players. That might be too much for some people, but you get the general idea.

Perhaps with 20 player groups (hypothetical of course), a slightly longer time control would be a good idea, perhaps 30 days initial plus 3 day increment ;)

Thib: I was thinking about the issue of the number of groups and I think it has to be eleven groups in the first stage. Then each of the 1st place group winners go through to final stage.

I am against any concept of rating bands, or even the mention of the concept. That is totally against the principle, design and point of this format.


Thibault de Vassal    (2012-04-25 17:29:59)
Anand-Gelfand, FIDE World Championship

The next FIDE World Championship will be held in Moscow from May 10 to May 30, 2012.

Looks like reigning World Champion Viswanathan Anand is ultra-favourite... what do you think about Boris Gelfand's chances in this match?


Garvin Gray    (2012-04-25 18:04:47)
Ficgs World Cup

To simplify the activity requirement, it can be that all players must have an established rating. No provisionals and no estimated ratings.

An issue regarding number of groups is, what if we 50 or so entries. 11 groups of 5 seems rather silly, so I think it would have to be 5 groups of 11, with 2 players qualifying for the final stage.

While having 2 players qualify is not ideal, it is better than having 11 groups of 5 players, which defeats one of the purposes of giving more games across different rating groups.


George Clement    (2012-04-25 18:41:11)
Ficgs World Cup

To simplify the activity requirement, it can be that all players must have an established rating. No provisionals and no estimated ratings.

That would be really good! As far as the groups I think it would really depend on the number of entries. It will be tough to predict ahead of time.


George Clement    (2012-04-25 18:43:08)
Anand-Gelfand, FIDE World Championship

Very slim. I don't think he can match Anand.


Peter W. Anderson    (2012-04-25 08:59:48)
Ficgs World Cup

Either 2 stages of 20 or 3 stages of 11-13 would work for me. 20 is my personal limit for the number of games I play at once, but for this format I would make an exception and take on the group of 20 even if I had a few games running.

Like Garvin I am against banding on this, as it is against the original objective. I guess you could put a lower limit in, but I think it should be much lower than 2000. Maybe 1800 or even 1700.

One way of dealing with casual players and minimising the likelihood of drop outs is to only open the tournament up to someone who has already completed (a much better test than started) a certain number of games on FICGS. Perhaps 30 games which equates to 5 normal tournaments, (or even higher, at the risk of me not being eligible!).


Don Groves    (2012-04-26 03:00:35)
Do the cards really matter?

I agree the cards matter less with expert players.


Thibault de Vassal    (2012-04-26 09:36:36)
Do the cards really matter?

And at one point the expert players matter less than their stacks :)


Scott Nichols    (2012-04-26 23:11:47)
Do the cards really matter?

Agree! It is the same with girls! :D


Thibault de Vassal    (2012-04-26 23:26:00)
Do the cards really matter?

Eeeh... :o)


George Clement    (2012-04-27 20:42:54)
Ficgs World Cup

Again I agree. No replacements! Let matters fall as they may when someone forfiets.


Thibault de Vassal    (2012-04-29 23:59:06)
Slow tournament entries

Hi Scott! Of course I thought about it, but swiss system is really too slow for correspondence tournaments, and it is difficult to automatize (I don't even know if this would be possible to figure all cases).


Thibault de Vassal    (2012-05-01 01:36:08)
Slow tournament entries

Well, sure swiss system is great (FICGS freestyle cup is a swiss tournament too) but IMHO it is quite bad for the correspondence chess format (because of the number of rounds and the human factor)... Of course it would have some advantages but I think that inconvenients are more important, added to the fact such tournaments couldn't be 100% automatized.


Garvin Gray    (2012-05-02 18:46:59)
Slow tournament entries

So would I Scott, but unless it was to be played at a time control and format similar to WBCCC, it is not possible, unless it was run over 3 years :o


Garvin Gray    (2012-05-03 04:23:36)
Slow tournament entries

Gino: That is because you are high rated and so play only other high rated players.

Which is good for you, but I am not sure if that is in the best interests of the site as a whole when it is one of the only formats offered.

Scott: I would like to use swiss pairings and have one game paired a time with a time control of something like 20 days plus 1 hour increment. It short, fast and with only one game, the time control should be long enough.

It will take more than 1 year, but that is not so much of a concern here.

I proposed the group and final idea to fit in with existing arrangements on here.

I would also be willing to do swiss pairings on here, like I do on WBCCC.


Daniel Parmet    (2012-05-03 04:38:02)
Slow tournament entries

That doesn't matter... there was an IMMENSE drop in the quality of games from 30+1 day to 30 +1h now imagine the drop from 30+1h to 20+1h. The game quality would probably not even be better than an over the board tournament at that point.

You have two major problems 1) the poor time control driving the quality of games to utter crap and 2) the increment is not even enough to cover your sleep/work zone. So you are actually losing massive amount of time that had nothing to do with your number of games but rather your daily functions of survival.

If you think about 20+1h you are effectively saying the entire game should be played in 23 days per side.


Peter W. Anderson    (2012-05-03 18:28:20)
Slow tournament entries

Of course there is no perfect time limit. What is too slow for one person will be too fast for some others. The current Rapid speed seems to get the balance about right - quick enough to allow a sensible length to the tournament but slow enough to allow some real thought even if you are working or have significant family commitments.

But perhaps the acid test is how many people are prepared to play at that speed. It does not seem to put people off playing in the current WCH, so whilst it will not be everyone's favourite, it does seem to have a broad enough appeal.

In terms of format, I think large groups (say 11+ people in each group) work well and I think better serve the idea of giving people a chance to play stronger players better than a Swiss, which is fine for a game or two and then flattens out.

In summary, I think Garvin's original suggestion works well.


Viktor Shishkin    (2012-05-07 19:56:11)
Thematic request- Sicilian Dragon

good idea!


Thibault de Vassal    (2012-05-09 01:46:02)
Xiao Tong on his win in 6th FICGS Go WCH

Xiao Tong, winner of the 6th FICGS Go championship, kindly accepted to answer a few questions, here is the first part:


FICGS - Hello Xiao, congratulations once again for winning this nice match. Svante Carl von Erichsen was FICGS champion from the start of the site, after winning 5 championships. What did you think about his play & yours in these games?

Xiao Tong - Mr. Svante Carl von Erichsen is the strongest player I have met on this site. The games are so tough. In the middle of this match I thought I would lose in at least two games. At last I am lucky to have a 4-1 winning.

FICGS - Would you like to tell us a few words about you (where you live, other games you play, Go servers you play on...) so that we know you better?

Xiao Tong - I live in China but when I started to play Go on this site I was visiting France. In China when we play Go face to face, generally it takes 2 or 3 hours. But when we play on the ineternet, we always choose 30sec/move. I always play on TYGEM site, which is a China/Korea cooperated site. Before playing we need to install a client software. You can visit this address http://www.tygembaduk.com

FICGS - Unfortunately you are one of the rare chinese players at FICGS, but obviously they do very well. We all know many chinese Go champions names, could you tell us your opinion on the state of Go in China and in the world nowadays?

Xiao Tong - The past 10 years can be called Korea decade. They won more world championships than Chinese players, because before 1990 few Chinese children studied Go. But when China won several matches between China and Japan in late 1980s, more and more children started to study and play go. And then these millions of Go children grew up. Now Chinese players can get more world champions than Korea. I think besides the several world champions there are 30 young players in China who may win world championships in the future. They aged from 16-25.

FICGS - The best Go engines would now reach a level of 4 or 5 dan, is computer Go something that helps in such a correspondence Go championship according to you (and without revealing your secrets of course)? Do you think it is becoming a danger as it is for chess?

Xiao Tong - I don’t think computer Go engines can do anything. They are too weak.

FICGS - Do you watch other games played by your opponents before starting your games? Do you think that preparation is really important like it is in Correspondence chess?

Xiao Tong - I don’t take much time to analyze my opponents. But I will watch their games to get a first evaluation. World champions need to prepare before the game, because preparation can save their time in game. For me, preparation mean nothing.

FICGS - This FICGS Go championship is still young, what did you think about it? Would you change something, any rule, to improve it?

Xiao Tong - 1, Encourage players to play live games. One game can be finished in 2 hours when they play at 30sec/move. The more they play, the higher the site level will be. 2, when the world champion match is live on net, encourage player watch the games through your site. Let the watcher can bet on the live games. It will be more funny.


Many thanks to Xiao for these instructive answers, to be continued...


Thibault de Vassal    (2012-05-09 02:23:25)
Thematic request- Sicilian Dragon

now you can enter the waiting list ;)


Garvin Gray    (2012-05-09 04:21:49)
Thematic request- Sicilian Dragon

i asked for the SD thematic, so should probably enter.


Garvin Gray    (2012-05-09 18:52:44)
Thematic request- Sicilian Dragon

hehe six entries already, one more to go. Good judgement on my part for what thematic would be popular :)


Paul Campanella    (2012-05-12 16:56:57)
Thematic request- Sicilian Dragon

I remember hearing in the past that the sicilian dragon was refuted?


Paul Campanella    (2012-05-16 16:56:51)
Faster Refresh Time

Automatic refreshing would still be better!


Don Groves    (2012-05-16 21:18:49)
Faster Refresh Time

I don't understand how automatic refresh is better than refresh whenever you want it.


Garvin Gray    (2012-05-19 15:24:06)
Second match v Rybka Forum

Hello all,

I have been thinking about this for a while, but I was wondering how many ficgs players would be interested in participating in a match vs Rybka Forum.

We tried this concept once before with limited success from an organisational point of view. From a playing pov, ficgs had little success :o

I am thinking something like this for a format:

1) Time control 30 moves initial plus 1 day increment
2) All individual matches are two games
3) Players are to play in rating order. - RF now does have some kind of rating system, at least for WBCCC participants. I think more of their players have also come over to here, so have ratings here.
4) We possibly could use xfcc play, which would allow conditionals to be used, but might mean all the games are played and shown at RF. - Might be possible to have them shown here somehow 'live'.

So, time to get some interest. Who would be willing to participate?

I am going to post this over at RF as well.


Garvin Gray    (2012-05-19 15:31:54)
Advanced challenges, time out expiry

I think time has come to implement a time out expiry on advanced games challenges.

If an advanced game challenge has not been accepted by someone with 1 hour of its posting, that challenge expires and is automatically removed from the system.

The challenge would then need to be re-issued.

This would help prevent the issue of players accepting challenges many hours after it was posted and then waiting around for a time out.

It would also help to ensure that the challenger was around to accept their own challenge.


Michael Rogers    (2012-05-20 22:16:17)
Second match v Rybka Forum

Garvin,

Would we be using the FICGS interface?


Neel Basant    (2012-05-21 15:38:16)
Second match v Rybka Forum

sir
I am very interested in the team match.
Pls give me chance.

Neel Basant


Garvin Gray    (2012-05-21 15:45:11)
Second match v Rybka Forum

Neel, Planning is only in its infancy and there are many hurdles to overcome.

So stay tuned.

Some of these hurdles include:

Interest from both sites?
Whether we use Rybka Forum's playing client?
If that will be available to all or just RF members?
What the time control will be?
Will players have to play their games on here as well as RF?
Whether conditional moves will be used?
How many players per team?
Is it possible to use the RF playing client, but have games transmitted live on both sites, so all members of both sites can follow the action as it happens?
Will chat be allowed in the games? This could be a sticking point as the two forums run very differently on this issue.
Who plays for which team?

And the list goes on.


Scott Nichols    (2012-05-21 19:06:41)
Second match v Rybka Forum

MY list is short, it would have to be played on here under strict time limit of 30 days + 1 day increment. And I would play for the home team. I think the RF players need to give this server a chance.


Thibault de Vassal    (2012-05-22 19:07:40)
Second match v Rybka Forum

Hi guys, sorry for the delay... I should be able to discuss all recent forum topics within days!


Don Groves    (2012-05-23 07:08:22)
Members who never played

The rating lists are full of people who joined FICGS, then left after not playing even one game. What purpose does it serve to have these people in the rating lists? The lists would be more informative if these names were dropped.


Garvin Gray    (2012-05-27 08:36:57)
Second match v Rybka Forum

It has been confirmed that we can use xfccplay for all the games, if we wish.

Xfccplay is a playing client where players can make their moves and they are transmitted live to the Rybka Forum sub forum where these games will be shown live. Hopefully it will be possible to also show them here live.

To pursue using xfccplay further, I need to know if anyone who is considering playing would be not willing to play if the whole match is held using xfccplay, rather than making moves on here.

I certainly do want the second match to be very different to the first. To start with, that no games end with time outs.

Likely format:

Time control: 30 days initial plus 1 day increment.
Format: Each player plays two games against a single opponent
Number of players for each team: As many players as we can get for both teams
Board Order: By rating for those who have ratings on the site they are playing for. Others can be placed at captain’s discretion.


Sebastian Boehme    (2012-05-27 20:53:48)
Second match v Rybka Forum

Basically interested. Get the stuff rolling guys. ;-)

Cheers,

Sebi


Thibault de Vassal    (2012-05-28 16:32:40)
Second match v Rybka Forum

How do we avoid time outs? :/

Well, games may be played on RF (using Xfcc or not) or here, or on both sites (players choice).

Garvin, I'm afraid that games played through Xfcc cannot be shown here but that's not so important if it is viewable at RybkaForum.


Wilhelm Schuett    (2012-05-28 20:25:27)
Thematic request- Sicilian Dragon

i am trying 9.0-0-0


Garvin Gray    (2012-06-01 20:20:07)
Second match v Rybka Forum

I have been informed that the conditional move system of xfccplay can not be removed just for one tournament, so if we use xfccplay for at least half the games, conditionals will be in operation.

I still think we can go ahead with using xfccplay, just that the half of the games that are played using xfccplay will have conditionals, and the ones played here will not.

While it is an issue, it is not a big issue, or a showstopper.

Everyone will still be playing two games against the same opponent. One here and one with xfccplay at RF. I will give a couple of days for feedback. If there is no discussion, I will formalise details and then we will move on to official collection of entries, getting players familiar with xfccplay and then on to the games proper.


Garvin Gray    (2012-06-06 13:53:31)
Second match v Rybka Forum

Hello all,

Current discussion here: http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=24942

Following discussions on RF and now what looks like a completely different format to what I was proposing and ideas I had in mind and seeing what looks like a no compromise situation from the RF side, it looks almost certain that I will not be having anything to do with organising this event, or participating for either side.

When I first came up with this idea of trying to get a second match going, one of the main ideas was to help promote both forums and playing clients to a wider audience, and especially to the better players for both sites.

Now that I see what RF seems to have in mind, or at least what they are willing to accept for playing conditions, I find them wholly unacceptable and contrary to the ideas and purposes originally intended.

The current proposed design really does have a pro RF feel about it, in that FICGS players will have to learn how to use xfccplay to play on here, plus possibly sign up an account, but RF players will not have to do the same at FICGS. I am also wondering, what happens if the high majority of players from both sites say they only want to play on their own forum. This whole competition falls over.

RF 'bosses' have been kind enough to allow xfccplay to be used for these games to make them a better product. I do not think it is unreasonable for RF players to play some of their games on FICGS.

Secondly, the current proposed design also goes competely against another original idea, which was to have the top player from RF competing against the top player from FICGS. And so on down the boards. This current design will most likely result in random board pairings and henceforth likely mis-matches, rather than having showpiece games and at the same time having the bottom players from both sides games counting as much as the top board. Potentially it could now be the top player from FICGS against the two bottom players from RF and vice versa. That is ridiculous.

So all in all, I have proposed a format originally on both sites. I do not see the current proposed format as achieving anything substantial and certainly not in the vein of the original ideas. Had I known the current structure was going to be proposed, I never would have bothered proposing this in the first place.

Unless the current structure changes, I hereby resign as overall organiser and go between for both forums and also as a participant in the second match.


Kind regards,

Garvin Gray


Nick Burrows    (2012-06-07 15:30:53)
Second match v Rybka Forum

How about a match vs LSS?


Garvin Gray    (2012-06-08 11:07:00)
Second match v Rybka Forum

Following on from my post above, we will now be going with the format originally posted, which is:

1) Time control 30 moves initial plus 1 day increment
2) All individual matches are two games
3) Players are to play in rating order. - RF now does have some kind of rating system, at least for WBCCC participants. I think more of their players have also come over to here, so have ratings here.
4) Xfccplay will be used for the games played at RF
5) Conditional move system will be used for the games played at RF. Games played here will be using the standard interface.

Both sides are going to have to make compromises. Ficgs players who are not already familiar with xfccplay are going to need to learn how to use it and will also need to join RF.

RF players, who are not members of here already, will need to sign up to here and learn how to use this interface.

I can not give a definite sign up by this date yet as some of the nuts and bolts are still being worked out.

Can everyone start saying if they are going to play? I hope this will be more than just the players who already play in WBCCC as I do hope it is the best players from both sites participating as well.


Thibault de Vassal    (2012-06-08 18:05:51)
Second match v Rybka Forum

@ Nick : why not, I'd be glad to organize such a match with LSS but I will not propose it, many players here came from IECG/LSS.

@ Garvin : just tell me when I can announce the match in a newsletter, we'll create a new forum topic (and/or if you have a public email) for registrations.


Daniel Parmet    (2012-06-09 05:36:02)
Second match v Rybka Forum

As far as a Rybka Forum match goes, as long as the time control is 30 days + 1 day increment then I would love to play.

As far as LSS match goes, I would only agree to play if it was on FICGS whree Thib would have control rather than the insane man that runs LSS.


Garvin Gray    (2012-07-29 03:24:12)
Second match v Rybka Forum

I think we are now finding out which players would be most likely to represent ficgs in a ficgs v Rybka match.


Garvin Gray    (2012-07-29 03:24:47)
Second match v Rybka Forum

I am intending to try and get this going again, but will wait a week till everything settles down and we are certain that the website is working as it should.


Nick Burrows    (2012-07-29 04:23:08)
Second match v Rybka Forum

I would like to play if needed.


Garvin Gray    (2012-07-29 05:04:52)
Second match v Rybka Forum

Everyone is needed :)

Read the conditions at the top of the page to see if you are comfortable with them.


Neel Basant    (2012-07-29 08:29:22)
Suggestion.

Dear Thib

As light is faster than bullet so my suggestion is to change match titled silver ( 30 sec ) to Bullet and Bullet ( 15 sec) to Silver.

Thanks
Neel


Thibault de Vassal    (2012-08-11 17:33:23)
Premium site?

Hi Garvin, it is true that during the first years a few players and an automatic checker were able to contact me anytime on my phone by email, unfortunately this was not the case anymore this last year but it should be possible again very soon, I'll let you know.


Juri Eintalu    (2022-07-13 09:45:36)
RUSSIA AND BELARUS NOT SUSPENDED?

The ICCF Statutes webpage provides a new Statute, valid from 9th May 2022.

www.iccf.com/message?message=449

Article 17 contains a new sentence now:

"The Executive Board is empowered by Congress to propose suspension or dismissal of member federations for non-financial reasons."

Thus, the ICCF has also made a decision to suspend Russia and Belarus.

Thus, it seems that the ICCF Congress has calculated as follows:

34/(34 + 13) = 34/47 = 0.72 = 72%

It means that the "abstained" 13 voters have not been taken into account.


But who voted how, who remained neutral, who was missing, etc.?

Article 12 says the following:

"Amendments to the statutes require a vote of the general assembly, called the Congress, and a majority of two thirds of the members present or represented."

However, that Extraordinary Congress was online.

Finally, the downloadable table has other pages providing more detailed information. Thus, there is information that Estonian representative Jüri Kuusik did not "attend" the online congress.

The meanings of the terms "present", "represented", "attended", and "abstained" have remained unclear, which makes the manipulations possible.

Clarity is missing around that issue and on the ICCF homepage.


Vadim Khachaturov    (2012-08-19 22:32:38)
This is Russia :(

Rolf, pussies arent the matter. The matter is that its possible in Russia today to be prosecuted as criminal and adjudged that without commiting a crime. Today its PR, tomorrow it will be anybody who cares about freedom and says "wrong" words about putin.It is a pure political case and Kasparov just says about that. And , of course, Kasparov and many others, who there were at the court on Friday, know, Rolf, the bitter russian reality far and far better, than You can imagine.


Dmitri Mamrukov    (2012-08-19 23:12:08)
This is Russia :(

EURO: I would like to move from chess to politics. What do you think about the proclamations of Garry Kasparov, do you see the Russian political reality in a similar light?

KRAMNIK: I disagree with him. It seems to me that his political opinions are empty. Garry is too destructive for my liking. According to him, everything in Russia is wrong, Putin did everything wrong. But that is simply not true. I am convinced that if Kasparov wants to be in politics he needs to offer something positive too, something constructive. Even in the field of human rights protection in Russia there are a number of people doing a lot. Apart from criticising, they create something positive too, by helping some people. Garry’s approach to everything is just demagogic and destructive. I disagree with his opinion that the situation in Russia is as critical as he sees it. I go there often, my brother and my parents live there, so I think I have a pretty good insight. If you want to judge the current situation in Russia you must not take single aspects of it out of the general picture. It is the same as judging a position during a chess game – you need to bear in mind an entire chessboard.

Of course Russia is not a democracy on the same level as countries such as Germany or France, but you cannot judge today’s situation without taking in the historical context. Russia had never been a democratic country in the past, so that is why the transition is not easy. Nevertheless, nowadays eighty percent of the Russian population is not forced to fight for their existence, as they had to, some ten, fifteen years ago.

http://www.kramnik.com/eng/interviews/getinterview.aspx?id=178


Dmitri Mamrukov    (2012-08-19 23:33:36)
What happened to Boris Spassky?

I don't think there is any political case. Most likely, it's purely a personal matter (complicated by his 3 marriages) as Spassky suggested in his version.

I'm sure both brainwashed or paid liberals in Russia must be upset that Spassky fleed to Putin's Russia. :)


David Ward    (2012-08-21 18:19:46)
Faster Refresh Time

I would like to turn automatic refresh off so that my popup blocker is not triggered. I do not play fast games here; I play blitz on a live server.


Thibault de Vassal    (2012-09-20 12:07:21)
Limit number of poker games

Don, I'm afraid that's mathematically wrong... compare 5 single games and a 5 games match (that counts for 1 game), a score of 4-1 does not have the same impact on ratings than a score of 1-0, the chancy factor is not the same. The aim of the whole thing was to have ratings not too close from each other, in other words significant (and I think they are).


Don Groves    (2012-09-20 13:06:22)
Limit number of poker games

But if games were shorter, then far more than 5 single games could be played in the same time as a 5-game match is now. So you might be comparing 15 single games against one match. I feel this would be just as good for the ratings and a lot more fun for the players.


Thibault de Vassal    (2012-09-27 23:39:12)
Eros Riccio wins 6th and 7th chess WCH

By beating Alberto Gueci in the final match of the 6th chess championship & Ostap Hladky in the candidates final of the 7th chess championship, Eros Riccio will remain FICGS chess champion for at least 16 months! After this huge performance, Eros accepted to answer a few questions:

----------------------------------

- Hello Eros and congratulations again for winning your 3rd and 4th (respectively 6th and 7th cycles) FICGS chess championships in a row, beating Alerto Gueci in the 12 games match of the final match and Ostap Hladky in the 8 games match of the candidates final so that you meet yourself in the last round that thus will not happen for the 3rd time of the championship (first time was during the first cycle because there was no champion yet). All games of the two matches were drawn, but it does not say much on the intensity of the match as we all know your strategy since your win in your first final match vs. Edward Kotlyanskiy when you explained that your preferred a draw that guarantees the victory than a possible win where a mouse slip is still possible. Obviously your strategy works very well but one can add that you had an impressive number of running games at the rapid time control, so very much pressure... How did you live these last months of correspondence chess and these two matches?

Hi Thib! And thanks once again for the congratulations. These 28 games (let's not forget also the 8 games match against Gino Figlio) probably started in the worst moment for me, just a few months after the very important European Team Championship on ICCF had started. When I told my captain that I was starting another 28 games... he was very disappointed and worried, as he had repeated a lot of times to every player of our team not to start new tournaments and to focus only on this tournament. Also for this reason I had decided not to join the new Italian Championship and other tournaments and to withdraw from the Champions League, but unfortunately I had no control on when to start my FICGS games. So... my priority was for my ICCF games, and fortunately for me all I needed to do in my FICGS Matches to win was to make draws, and that's what I tried to do in most of my games as fast as possible, and to my surprise my opponents accepted to draw many games quite quickly, not trying to fight each game "to death" like I would have done if I would have been them. This of course only created quick boring games, but I didn't see the point in putting energy in trying to win games myself.... I think my opponents should have done that!

- We all know that you and Alberto are good friends from long time, did it influence your match in the 6th WCH in any way according to you?

Well, it's a good think knowing your opponent's habits... you can send your moves as soon as you know he goes to bed :-)

- Ostap Hladky is undoubtly one of the strongest players at FICGS, was this match (7th WCH candidates final) very different from the other one?

Hladky was the strongest player I had ever played on FICGS, he is very unpredictable, he simply plays unexpected moves that engines don't suggest, but if you show them those moves, they slowly realize those are very good moves. I risked to lose more than one game vs him, even as White. Luckily I still managed to draw, and in my opinion he also accepted some draws too quickly.

- With the last evolutions of chess engines, playing better & better chess, would you say that you now spend less time on each game or not at all?

I don't spend less time on my games, I still try to use (almost) all the time on my "clock". Trying to analyze as many variations as possible with the time you are given has little to do with engines improvement, who still are far from being able to always suggesting the best move by simply letting them run for hours on a static position. You need to analyze going "forward" in the position in order to be able to find the best moves.

- By the way, it is said sometimes (again) that correspondence chess will not survive the decade, what do you think? Do you envisage to change for Go or poker like many players? :)

Wins and Losses still happen even at the highest levels at the present time. I think that many years still have to pass before having all draws in high level tournaments. When that happens... and it will probably happen sooner or later as chess in my opinion is a draw with perfect play... then probably new rules will be introduced, maybe the board will be enlarged and even new pieces with new movements might be invented.

- You now are ICCF GM with an impressive 2624 rating, how are going your other correspondence chess competitions? Do you have any goal to reach yet?

All my ICCF tournaments are going good, and very soon I will be Italian Champion once again (just waiting my last opponent to resign a lost position). I still haven't reached the first place in the italian elo rating list though. That would be a goal I would surely have pleasure in reaching, and of course I would like to win the ICCF's World Championship at least once. After that I can retire :-)

- Thank you Eros, also for this great correspondence chess lesson.

Welcome Thib! A pleasure for me.


Garvin Gray    (2012-10-06 17:21:33)
WCH Final match

After having read Eros Riccio's answers to the interview questions on his defending his title twice, I am proposing a few changes to the final match.

I wish to make it clear that this is not in any way an attack on any person. They can only play to the rules set and try to use those rules to their advantage.

My issue is with the rules themselves.

I would like to propose a new format for the final match, because I think it is ridiculous that any player can defend their title with short draws and make no real attempt to prove that they are superior than their opponent.

Of course if the challenger is happy to draw all eight or twelve games, then that is their 'fault' as well.

My proposal is the following:

After eight games, if neither player has won a game, then the match continues for another four games.

In the first eight games, if both sides have won at least one game each, then the result is a drawn match and the champion keeps their title.

In the tie breaking four games, as soon as one player wins a game, the match is over.

I think the current rules are weighted way too much in favour of the champion, which as we have seen from these two games, the champion does not even have to try to prove that he is better than the challenger, but can just draw all eight/twelve games and retain the title.

Thib, please change the rules for this upcoming cycle.


Jose Carrizo    (2012-10-07 01:43:48)
WCH Final match

Very interesting proposal Garvin,and I see the point, but I think there is a problem with: "In the tie breaking four games, as soon as one player wins a game, the match is over." A lost position may be continued to avoid the first loss.
Maybe the tiebreak games must be played in faster time controls, and so on, like tiebreaks in OTB chess.


Garvin Gray    (2012-10-07 19:13:36)
WCH Final match

>A lost position may be continued to avoid the first loss.

I had carefully considered this possibility. I will take an example from transfer/bughouse. When one player is about to be mated, they will stop playing that game, allowing their time to run out, in the hope that their partner will be able to mate the opposition before their own time runs out.

If both games in transfer reach a mate in one position, the side with less time on their clock with their turn to move loses as they will run out of time first.

How does this apply to the WCH?

Well, yes a player could stall on a game they think is lost, but then they would also be required to win another game to make up for it.

This could be a bit silly, but better than other options.

At least there is a sufficient reward for trying to win a game, which is the main objective of all this, to try and get the players to try and win as many games as possible.


>Maybe the tiebreak games must be played in faster time controls, and so on, like tiebreaks in OTB chess.

Not realistic on here. The faster the game , the more it becomes like freestyle/advanced chess and less like correspondence. Also, as is shown in otb, some players would prefer to try and win in rapids, so the solution of having rapid games could in fact increase the short draw odds because the players think, I would rather play a few rapid games, rather than a years worth of long correspondence games.


Thibault de Vassal    (2012-10-07 19:16:15)
WCH Final match

I'm not sure if there can be a real debate on this issue (but we can try of course)... all opinions are in the nature, when I created FICGS I had in mind the original FIDE WCH and I'm still a huge fan of this system. Now fact is FIDE WCH does not mean anything anymore (its champions as well) after numerous bad changes and I feel FICGS chess WCH makes sense more and more.

12 games is enough to fight for a win IMO and I'm sure that there are a few players able to beat Eros in such a match (doesn't mean it would happen anytime though :)), I'm just too impatient to watch the next ones. Eros is building his name in correspondence chess in multiple places at the same time, and the fact that it happened here so quickly after he joined us makes me think that the system is good! I see nothing to change, the result of his match with Alberto was fully explained by Eros, the score has no importance at the end... and he deserves his other title in the other cycle even more by not having to play the final match... just my opinion of course, as I can understand all systems (ICCF etc.), just a question of personal taste at the end.


Garvin Gray    (2012-10-09 16:33:26)
WCH Final match

Thib: I think your analysis or love with the old style world champ format contains a flaw in relation to playing on here.

In the old style world champs, games are played one at a time. On here, all the games start at the same time.

Secondly, with the old style world champs, the matches were over 24 games, so the equivalent would be to play the final match over 24 games.

The current world champ cycle suffers from the same effect as the ficgs final match does, the match is too short, resulting in lots of draws because one loss is devastating.

If you do not want to change the rules to encourage players to try for wins, then lengthen the match to 24 games.

Otherwise you are just like quite a lot of organisers who just love the past (tradition) and are not prepared to make the players actually try to win games, rather than bore their viewers to death with short draws.


Thibault de Vassal    (2012-10-09 18:52:25)
WCH Final match

Of course this correspondence chess championship is very different from FIDE WCH, but it seems to me that 12 games is still enough (24 games would be quite inhuman by the way), the score in the latest final matches was not significant on the draws issue, particularly now that we all know how Eros deals with it (in a smart way that can be compared to Kramnik's strategy in his match vs. Kasparov: draw with Berlin's defence, fight with White if no risk). IMO the champion has nothing to prove as he made it in a whole cycle and by beating the previous one, while a challenger should at least be able to win one game out of 12.

Actually the real evolution should have been towards freestyle chess, but it has no success enough to organize a whole cycle and it looks like Eros is the king as well. Also I don't like the idea to melt different time controls like FIDE does. The whole challenge is about one thing, not 3 or 4 differents kinds of games.

I love the past tradition not because it is a tradition, but because I really think it is the best system so far! If a new system proves to be better to me (there will always be a question of taste though, of course) then we would have to discuss it here.

The only way to encourage players to try for wins is to go towards the ICCF format, that has other issues that I wanted to avoid at any price. And why to do the same?


Garvin Gray    (2012-10-09 18:59:35)
WCH Final match

I would like to apologize for some of my over-heated comments from my previous post. I get rather annoyed when I see any format that encourages short draw chess as I believe short draw is anti-sport and not in the best interests of chess in general.

What is the iccf format, for those not in the know? ;)


Thibault de Vassal    (2012-10-09 19:16:42)
WCH Final match

No problem, I understand your concern... well I believe that these short draws are just a problem instead of another, at least we have a clear champion! What will happen when round-robin WCH tournaments (ICCF format) will be decided by Soderborn or whatever because of several winners with 6,5 or 7 out of 12 points, as it seems to happen in some tournaments... Though there is no better way to encourage players to win than RR tournaments.


Jay Melquiades    (2012-10-11 06:39:37)
for 2013 poker tourneys

that after 50 hands in a poker match deduct 10 hours from both players
after 60 hands deduct 20 hours from both players
after 70 hands deduct 30 hours from both players
and so on

imo it will cut down on those 100 plus poker handed matches i see when i check out poker tourneys


Neel Basant    (2012-10-11 20:48:44)
WCH Final match

Certainly both the challenger and the defender should have equal ..
In this context i like Garvin's proposal..
The defender should not have draw odd..


Garvin Gray    (2012-10-13 12:49:22)
WCH Final match

Neel, I have no particular issue with draw odds. Being corro, it is not possible to organise anything that might be still decent corro, but is at a more rapid time control to get a tie break going.

My issue is that as Eros's comments have shown, he was not even slightly forced to try and win any of the games.

So I think the rules should be made more attractive to try and get players to win games (and yes put on a show too).

Another idea could be to start eight games, if the champion is ahead, the match is over and if still tied, start games 9 to 16.

If the challenger is ahead after game 8, games 9 to 16 are still played, and now the champion would have to go all out to win a game to at least draw level.


Daniel Parmet    (2012-10-15 05:45:36)
WCH Final match

I don't want to enter the Wch due to rating bias in the groups. So until that is fixed I am only interested in FICGS World Cup.


Don Groves    (2012-10-15 11:40:54)
WCH Final match

Ratings bias? The total ELO in each group is probably as close to the same as possible. Naturally groups are seeded. Is this what you mean by bias?


Thibault de Vassal    (2012-10-15 12:50:09)
Ficgs World Cup

Hi Garvin, I still have doubts on launching what would look like another championship based on ICCF WCH format when we don't have players enough... I'm afraid we have other priorities before that :/


Thibault de Vassal    (2012-10-15 12:58:54)
for 2013 poker tourneys

The idea is to have less time to finish a poker game, particularly when we play many moves a day... But mathematically the 1 move per day problem will probably remain :/

Don is right, the longest poker game so far here is more than 3300 moves (probably more than 500 hands), it can take a while to play it.


Garvin Gray    (2012-11-03 02:02:48)
Eros Riccio wins 6th and 7th chess WCH

Under the system we have at the moment, for a person to become Ficgs world champ, do they need to beat Eros Riccio in two consecutive matches to become champion?


Michael Aigner    (2012-11-06 15:34:52)
The very unofficial World Championship

Hello everybody,
the computer chess enthusiast of the CSS forum are trying to organise a match "Houdini 3 versus Rybka Cluster".

The initiative came from the maintainer of the renowned IPON rating list. His estimation for two long games is 864 ducats. There more the better. I didn't observe how much was donated already, but quite a lot, and there is big enthusiasm about it. It seems that very good hardware for the Houdini side, and a way to collect the ducats at Playchess, have already been organized.

For details, see http://forum.computerschach.de/cgi-bin/mwf/topic_show.pl?tid=5093

(I guess Google translation can help if required, with the usual quirks.)

If somebody likes the idea it would be easy to participate there too.

All the best, Michael


Thibault de Vassal    (2012-11-27 18:16:07)
How do I stop the pop-up message boxes?

Sure, by the way it is a general advice whatever the matter...

eg. "Ouch, it's hot - Don't use IE" :)

That said and more seriously, if I remember well, it also happened once on Firefox or Chrome for 1 player and I never understood why.


Thibault de Vassal    (2012-12-01 23:09:11)
Houdini 3.0

It seems that Houdini 3.0 is available as a commercial program for a few weeks at Cruxis website.

The 64-bit 4CPU would have reached a 3334 elo rating on the CCRL 40/4 list. This is about 90 points more than the free version Houdini 1.5a which seems to be a great improvement!

I just read on Wikipedia that Houdini was used by Viswanathan Anand [FIDE world champion]... It seems that it beats Rybka 4 in every match. In brief, Houdini is by far the best chess engine nowadays...


Neel Basant    (2012-12-02 05:22:24)
Houdini 3.0

Not in every match .
Although it is better than all engines in all term , none has confirmed it's superiority in correspondent chess.
May come users forwards who are using it in Correspondent chess.


Garvin Gray    (2012-12-02 12:48:21)
Problem with new groups for the chess WC

I agree with Don. Whilst not liking it, I understand for norm purposes and 'fairer' qualification chances between different groups, replacements are required.

I really do hope that the replacements are of similar rating to the player who forfeited their games.

But I certainly do not agree with adding new groups or players. All these players have entered the waiting list because they entered after the deadline.

If they get a run, they have been fortunate. To those who miss out, the message should be enter on time next time to guarantee your spot.

So Thibault, I think you are complicating matters way too much. Make the replacements to counteract the forfeits and that is it.


Don Groves    (2012-12-03 03:24:28)
Problem with new groups for the chess WC

To clarify my position on this matter: I was not implying I don't like adding new groups after the deadline, I was simply asking for the rationale for doing so. My view is that we are all better off if these kinds of things are written in the rules so there are no surprises of this sort.


Robert Knighton    (2012-12-05 21:34:02)
Problem with new groups for the chess WC

Wayne Lowrance said: "Robert Knighton. You dont understand me. I was saying it is unfair for the two strong player having to compete against a much weaker player. It would have cost him point 4 sure. "

Yeah I see what you mean there. Even if I could compete at that level then those players at a higher rating would suffer for it.

Also, no offense taken. We can peacefully agree to disagree on issues and perhaps we can settle it with a game one day :)

Seems like there should be a provisional tournament that new players coming to FICGS enter into automatically to determine rating, but that is a discussion for another place.


Garvin Gray    (2012-12-13 16:52:12)
WBCCC 2013

This information is in regards to the World Blitz Correspondence Chess Championship for the year 2013.

It is held on Rybka Forum www.rybkaforum.net.

There is a full sub forum located on that forum that explains a lot of the rules, current list of players and specifics of information.

For a general run down, read on:

My name is Garvin Gray and I am the organiser and arbiter for this event. This event attempts to bring as many strong correspondence and freestyle players together from all the different playing sites, such as iccf, ficgs, playchess, lss and many other sites.

As the title says, this is a blitz event, meaning the time controls are short compared to normal correspondence play. This requires players to devote a greater share of their focus to these games than would normal correspondence play.

This event has been held for two years now, with the 2012 version still in progress. Feel free to browse the 2012 sub forum to see the games and how the structure works.

In the two years of this event, I feel that many new discoveries have been made and advanced freestyle chess knowledge has certainly been increased, to the benefit of all. Those who have participated in both events have gained a lot from their participation and I want to see this continue.

To allow this event to start and finish in one calendar year, we start in mid January and for 2013, it will finish in mid December. The format requires that you will play one game as white and one game as black in each round. There are 10 games in total.

Each round is paired as an individual swiss using the dutch pairing rules, but accommodations are made because each person must have one white and one black game per round.

Kibitizing is allowed and encouraged, but discussions about future positions, game analysis or anything else that could affect the result of the game is not allowed. Feel free to read the thread on game commentary.

There will also be a thread for each round that allows discussion of events during the round, general discussion about games or other general chit chat.

We do seek to provide a friendly, but competitive environment for those who want to advance their freestyle skills, or test themselves against other players from the different sites. This event will take up quite a bit of your time as the time control is fast, the play is difficult and the enjoyment factor high.

This is not meant to be a deterrent, but I feel I should make it clear that you need to be dedicated and willing to play each and every game/round.

Withdrawing or timing out mid game is not acceptable and will see you removed from the event. If you think you can not complete a particular round, it is better to contact me and have you withdrawn from that round. You are free to rejoin the event in these circumstances, but will receive zero points for those two missed games.

I hope to see more entries and good freestyling to everyone.

Cheers,

Garvin Gray
WBCCC 2013 Organiser


Thibault de Vassal    (2012-12-21 00:56:41)
Chess Server Team Tournament

Dear chessfriends,

I just received this proposition to play a "Chess Server Team Tournament" that would be played on ICCF web server:

Any opinion? Who would be interested to play such a tournament?

____________________________

Dear Thibault!

In recent years many friendly matches between different chess servers have been played. It has become a good tradition to organize such matches. A very good idea is to organize a round-robin tournament to find out the strongest team of a chess server.

We invite a team of your server to take part in the first unofficial correspondence chess championship for chess servers.

The championship is unofficial, because ICCF Officials do not head it.

The Organizer and Tournament Director is Pavlikov Andrey Nikolaevich who is experienced in organizing and directing both domestic (Russian) and international correspondence chess tournaments.

Invitations have been sent to administrators of the following chess servers:

Bestlogic – http://www.bestlogic.ru/
Chesshere – http://www.chesshere.com/
FICGS – http://www.ficgs.com/
GameKnot – http://gameknot.com/
LSS – http://www.chess-server.net/
SchemingMind – http://www.schemingmind.com/

Chess Planet – http://chessplanet.ru/pages/game-zone (to play chess on this server one must have a client program which is free to download at main page of the site)


If you have a proposal to add any chess server, it will be taken in consideration.

Regulations of the event
http://www.mocorrchess.narod.ru/wccstc/en/regen.html

Information on the event may be seen at http://www.mocorrchess.narod.ru/wccstc/wccstc.html


Best wishes, Andrey Pavlikov,

Russian Correspondence Chess Association Vice-President,

The Organizer of the event


Nick Burrows    (2012-12-21 18:19:55)
Chess Server Team Tournament

Hi guys, I would like to play if I qualify.

I noticed from previous conversations I had with members of other servers about a match, that longer time controls are usually preferred. Personally I would prefer quicker limits, but will happily play at any control. A slow match is better than no match!


Thibault de Vassal    (2012-12-29 22:46:10)
Chess Server Team Tournament

Well, actually many answers are in the tournament regulations...

If I understand well, each player should play from 8 games (!) to 16 games according to the number of servers participating (from 4 to 8), which is a lot...

- Is this ICCF rated? It seems that it is.

- How many boards in the teams? I read 30, which is a lot! Maybe too much.

- Will the teams play in rating order? I have no idea.


If we have players enough to enter this tournament then we can vote for a captain if several players want to be. As for me, I won't be able to play it.

The real question is who will be able to play 8 to 16 games on the ICCF server... As far as I can remember, we never found 30 players for a team event so far, without counting the forfeits.

So far, it seems that 2 servers accepted to participate while Chess.com declined the invitation.


Regulations:

http://www.mocorrchess.narod.ru/wccstc/en/regen.html

5.1. No less than 4 and no more than 8 teams to play the event. The teams represent chess servers. No one server is allowed to enter the event with no more than 1 team. Teams play each other in an each-to-each round-robin tournament.

5.2. Each team plays each team in a team match on 30 boards. Each player of a team plays 2 games (one with White pieces, one with Black pieces) with one player of the other team. Reserve players are prohibited to begin the games.

5.3. The team consists of 30 players. No more than 5 reserve players may be added in a team squad.

5.4. The games are rated for ICCF rating.

5.5. Time control is 30 days for 10 moves (with duplication after 20 days is used for a single move).

5.6. 30 days of leave per year are available for each player.

5.7. The team mates and captain can see the games live. Live transmission for public is delayed by 5 moves.

5.8. ICCF Playing rules are applied for the event. The playing rules may be seen at special page


Mathaios Vardoulakis    (2013-01-10 13:18:55)
Chess Server Team Tournament

"I'm interested to play".Count me in please.

Happy new year to all!


Neel Basant    (2013-01-10 14:40:30)
Chess Server Team Tournament

Confirmed( Interested) Players according to replies.


1.Daniel Parmet
2.Alvin Alcala
3.Bogoljub Teverovski
4.Nick Burrows
5.Wayne Lowrance
6.Neel Basant
7.Ostap Hladky
8.Niklas Hallqvist
9.Arkadiusz Wosch
10.Daniel Blike
11.Josef Zmolil
12.Jiri Mach
13.Jose Moreira
14.Om Prakash
15.John Worthington
16.Garvin Gray
17.Arnab Sengupta
18.Ray Downs
19.Valery Nemchenko
20.Dinesh Bhandarkar
21.Shih-Chu Liao
22.Frits Bleker
23.Thomas Hasyn
24.Sergey Demchenko
25.Maxim Genchev
26.Mathaios Vardoulakis
27.Claudio Cabrera
28.Kieran Moore
29.
30.

Wow..
What a response!!!!!
sure Within 2/3 days will be more than 100 players.
Thib will have a headache while selecting 30 players..


Daniel Parmet    (2013-01-10 18:11:49)
Chess Server Team Tournament

I volunteer to be team captain. But we now have 31 players wanting to play. Also I would point out that we will probably get slaughtered on the lower boards as things stand right now. I saw at least one person wanting an ICCF team average of 2300. I would point out that I think a 2000 player here is 2300 over there but as things stand our FICGS rating average is 1964 based on the top 30 players ratings. For the 9 players that do have ICCF ratings our rating average is 2235.

Here is what information I could collect on our team so far:
Name FICGS Rating ICCF ID ICCF Rating TITLE Comment
1 Ostap Hladky 2527 941012 FIM
2 Valery Nemchenko 2521 940836 2465
3 Frits Bleker 2313 220159 2395
4 Garvin Gray 2281 30503 1993
5 Alvin Alcala 2237 896046
6 Wayne Lowrance 2194 FIM
7 Maxim Genchev 2187 940752 2309 Wants ICCF average of 2300
8 Arkadiusz Wosch 2169 89923 2307
9 Neel Basant 2138 280279
10 Daniel Parmet 2098 514938 2300
11 Om Prakash 2091 280243
12 Bogoljub Teverovski 2083 862003
13 Niklas Hallqvist 2082 451419
14 Kieran Moore 2042 260252
15 William Fuller 2033 514688 2350
16 Dmitry Tsimbalenko 1959 142268
17 Sergey Demchenko 1955 142224 2077
18 Nick Burrows 1944 212164
19 Rich Pinkall Pollei 1900 515095
20 Daniel Blike 1874 515250
21 Jose Moreira 1831 Are you the IM Jose Moreira id#399007, Rating 2390?
22 Thomas Hasyn 1808 865001 1922
23 Mathaios Vardoulakis 1800
24 Dinesh Bhandarkar 1707
25 Shih-Chu Liao 1660
26 Josef Zmolil 1632
27 Ray Downs 1536
28 John Worthington 1510 515287
29 Claudio Cabrera 1462
30 Arnab Sengupta 1340 280192
31 Jiri Mach 1010


Dmitriy Malish    (2013-01-12 16:17:34)
Progressive Chess

In progressive chess, every move is a series-move. White starts with a series of 1 move, black answers with a series of 2 moves, white answers with a series of 3 moves, etc.
White starts the game by playing one move, Black answers with two and so on, always increasing by one the length of the series. Check may only be given with the last move of a series and must be defended with the first one.
Example.
1. e4
2. e6 Bb4
Bb4 seems to be ineffective.
3. a3 axb4 Nh3
Nh3 protects f2.
4. b5 c5 d6 Kd7
At first sight Black's moves seem valid but
they leave too much room for White to operate.
5. d4 dxc5 Bg5 Bxd8 Qxd6+
White has a strong position. First, Black must move the
King, and then he needs a least three moves to eliminate
White's Queen.
6. Ke8 Nf6 Nxe4 Nxd6 Kxd8 Kc7
There were not too many possibilities left.
7. Ra6 Rxd6 Bxb5 Ba6 Na3 Nb5++
A nice mate.

What about making this game on site?


Thibault de Vassal    (2015-08-03 02:34:42)
Improving netiquette rules

Well, after a few days thinking about a complaint, I finally decided to open a topic about this public remark in game 86290 (no need to name the players again here in the forum, by the way best would probably be that they do not intervene in this discussion) :

"my engine has said ckmate in 19,but black player,maybe,prefers passing by 51 days to lose on time"

Context most probably hasn't to be known, rules have to say if it fits netiquette or not (is it insulting or not, is it subjective or not) and of course this is the question.

In other servers, this may lead to a suspension or it may not IMHO, so I'd like to gather opinions on this case, any suggestion to improve FICGS netiquette rules will be appreciated.

In my opinion, we'll have to determine if any PUBLIC remark on the use of the clock is acceptable or not and if not, what measurement to apply.


Thibault de Vassal    (2013-01-16 01:07:41)
FICGS admin scam me

Hello again Horatiu,

Sorry to see that you do not accept to realize that FICGS rules have always been clear on that point (it is specified that it is required for you to read and understand it before using this site), also that this site is not a bank, which is true for all similar websites - at least in France but most probably everywhere.

So here is the continuation of our conversation in the chat room (you have to read it from bottom to top). We can continue it here if you wish, this way we'll not bother everyone with this. By the way, maybe other players who experienced the epoints thing will be able to confirm all this.

Do not worry, I will not delete this discussion, at least this will be informative for everyone (I hope).


______________________



petrescu horatiuadrian :
[Remove this comment] of course ,I just open a topic to see everybody who are you
(2013-01-16 01:00:12)

devassal thibault :
[Remove this comment] I have no problem with this.
(2013-01-16 00:58:59)

devassal thibault :
[Remove this comment] anyway, we can continue this discussion in the forum...
(2013-01-16 00:58:49)

devassal thibault :
[Remove this comment] insults are unnecessary...
(2013-01-16 00:58:28)

petrescu horatiuadrian :
[Remove this comment] and fraud
(2013-01-16 00:58:23)

petrescu horatiuadrian :
[Remove this comment] yes i lost 4 ,is not mistake ?you are a mistake
(2013-01-16 00:53:06)

devassal thibault :
[Remove this comment] ... a bank just by saying it
(2013-01-16 00:51:34)

devassal thibault :
[Remove this comment] because it explains that it's not possible to be...
(2013-01-16 00:51:20)

petrescu horatiuadrian :
[Remove this comment] no gipsy,but then why you told me about L511 code?
(2013-01-16 00:49:44)

devassal thibault :
[Remove this comment] There's no mistake, obviously...
(2013-01-16 00:49:14)

devassal thibault :
[Remove this comment] Then you won 1 & lost 4 silver games...
(2013-01-16 00:49:09)

devassal thibault :
[Remove this comment] I know exactly how many epoints you bought/ when and how...
(2013-01-16 00:47:47)

devassal thibault :
[Remove this comment] What do you expect? finding FICGS rules in french laws?
(2013-01-16 00:44:05)

petrescu horatiuadrian :
[Remove this comment] you are a charlatan
(2013-01-15 23:46:58)


Horatiu Adrian Petrescu    (2013-01-16 01:34:58)
FICGS admin scam me

petrescu horatiuadrian :
is the reality,are you forgot who talking?
(2013-01-16 01:33:16)

devassal thibault :
Okay, just do it... :)
(2013-01-16 01:32:52)

petrescu horatiuadrian :
defaimation,ahahahah ,are you child? is not defaimation this
(2013-01-16 01:32:31)

devassal thibault :
I will not hesitate to use it if necessary...
(2013-01-16 01:30:56)

petrescu horatiuadrian :
boehme this site is scam as long as not pays its members
(2013-01-16 01:30:15)

devassal thibault :
But we have a law in France on "defamation"...
(2013-01-16 01:29:54)

devassal thibault :
I allow you to say what you want here on this story...
(2013-01-16 01:28:55)

...continuation
petrescu horatiuadrian :
and I will post on others forums on internet ,and on WOT too
(2013-01-16 01:26:40)

boehme sebastian :
You seem to forget what this site contributes to chess!


Thibault de Vassal    (2013-01-16 14:11:49)
FICGS admin scam me

continuation of the chat... for archives :)


devassal thibault :
[Remove this comment] I resend it... with another email...
(2013-01-16 14:04:13)

petrescu horatiuadrian :
[Remove this comment] term
(2013-01-16 14:03:20)

devassal thibault :
[Remove this comment] yours are included in.... :)
(2013-01-16 14:03:12)

petrescu horatiuadrian :
[Remove this comment] I told you send that emails which you told me about your
(2013-01-16 14:03:10)

petrescu horatiuadrian :
[Remove this comment] hey admin are you really stupid??you sent all yours emails??
(2013-01-16 14:02:09)

devassal thibault :
[Remove this comment] but I can publish all emails in the forum if you want
(2013-01-16 13:59:08)

devassal thibault :
[Remove this comment] obviously Yahoo blocks when too many messages
(2013-01-16 13:58:38)

devassal thibault :
[Remove this comment] now I have: Remote host said: 554 Message not allowed
(2013-01-16 13:49:41)

devassal thibault :
[Remove this comment] did you receive the first ones?
(2013-01-16 13:49:28)

petrescu horatiuadrian :
[Remove this comment] terms I will shut up
(2013-01-16 13:44:44)

petrescu horatiuadrian :
[Remove this comment] if you realy found some email that you told me about your
(2013-01-16 13:44:23)

devassal thibault :
[Remove this comment] no problem
(2013-01-16 13:41:18)

petrescu horatiuadrian :
[Remove this comment] yahoo email
(2013-01-16 13:39:38)

petrescu horatiuadrian :
[Remove this comment] what message you found in your arhive ,send it to me to my
(2013-01-16 13:39:29)

devassal thibault :
[Remove this comment] Please use the forum if you have something to add...
(2013-01-16 13:12:13)

petrescu horatiuadrian :
[Remove this comment] game ,set and scam devassal
(2013-01-16 13:05:46)

burrows nick :
[Remove this comment] Game, Set & Match Devassal
(2013-01-16 12:57:23)

devassal thibault :
[Remove this comment] before registering, maybe we can now end this discussion
(2013-01-16 12:51:03)

devassal thibault :
[Remove this comment] added to the fact that you had to understand terms & cond
(2013-01-16 12:50:40)

devassal thibault :
[Remove this comment] the clear conclusion is that I did not lie to you...
(2013-01-16 12:50:14)

devassal thibault :
[Remove this comment] I found a very interesting email in my archives :)
(2013-01-16 12:30:28)

devassal thibault :
[Remove this comment] You should read the last message in forum, Horatiu...
(2013-01-16 12:30:05)


Thibault de Vassal    (2013-01-16 17:14:06)
FICGS admin scam me

Well, obviously you do not have any idea about what computer chess is... there are thousands of fans all over the world, full forums only about that, even the very best chess players in the world like to play it (Kasparov, Anand, Polgar, Ivanchuk...)

You still do not understand that this has nothing to do with avarice. Noone here wants to see such a system to be implemented.... first of all because it cannot be 100% sure (it would be very easy to cheat anyway), then everyone would suspect everyone to cheat... FICGS is a peaceful place (without counting 2 or 3 players out of hundreds/thousands) so this is fine like it is. For information we also offer NO_ENGINES_TOURNAMENTS for those who want to play with their brain only, but it is not rated... for the same reasons.

We have no problem that a few players cannot understand it at the end, but we do not need to hear again and again that computer chess is "lazy" or "dishonest", that is just untrue and insulting.

About your 7 euros, all has been said, I've nothing to add. This is not a bank, if you want a money prize, you know what to do (starting to read the terms & conditions).


Dmitriy Malish    (2013-01-16 19:22:36)
Progressive Chess

Progressive chess is a chess variant in which players, rather than just making one move per turn, play progressively longer series of moves. The game starts with White making one move, then Black makes two consecutive moves, White replies with three, Black makes four and so on.
A check must be escaped from on the first move of a series--if this cannot be done, it is checkmate and the game is lost.
En passant captures of pawns are allowed if the pawn in question moved two squares in one move, but no further, at some point during the last turn, but the capture must be made on the first move of a series.
If ten consecutive turns are played with no captures and no pawn moves, then the game is declared a draw unless one of the players can force a checkmate (this is the progressive chess equivalent of the fifty-move rule in orthodox chess).
If at any stage a player has no legal moves but is not in check, the game is a draw by progressive stalemate.


Garvin Gray    (2013-01-25 12:30:04)
Show opponents time

@Don: I did not say it was the first time.
@Thib: The last time a user generated forum idea was modifying the groups, which lead to the idea of the highly successful standard open format :o lol


Don Groves    (2013-01-25 18:25:10)
Show opponents time

I suggest one more slight change in the My Games page: clicking on a player's name shows that player's "information" page.


Garvin Gray    (2013-03-12 16:15:46)
Vacation: change for 3 days minimum?

I think the main question here is: What is vacation meant to be used for?

The original premise for vacation time is that it is in place for people who go away on vacation or are sick and need some time off without having to risk timing out to do so.

This means they can still enter a tournament without having to worry about timing out or being at such a time disadvantage.

This is the purpose of vacation time.

It is not meant to be used to allow players who have chosen through their own choice of time management to avoid timing out games.

Therefore the rules should be changed to match the intention of vacation time.

Hence the proposal of a minimum of 3 days vacation and that it can not be used at all once a player gets under 3 days initial time.

Also, I would probably add that there should be a limit to how many times a player can take vacation blocks, but this might be hard for the server to calculate for each game a player is involved in.


Thibault de Vassal    (2013-03-13 13:12:49)
Announcement

Hi all,

The 5th FICGS freestyle tournament will happen on april 6 & 7 (2013) - three rounds each day at 13:00, 15:00, 17:00 server time. The format will be the same (30 minutes + 15 seconds per move) than for the previous edition.

Entry fee : 10 Epoints, prize : 100% Fees + 70 Epoints
Deadline : 2013 april 6 - 12:00 server time

This time, just like other players, IM, SM & GM will have to enter the waiting list by themselves (entry fee : 10 Epoints), but they will recover their Epoints if they play all rounds.

Best regards,
Thibault


Dann Corbit    (2013-04-05 04:16:58)
Thematic tournaments?

Do you hold thematic tournaments here?

I am interested, specifically, in the Orangutan:
1.b4


Jaimie Wilson    (2013-04-06 17:04:44)
Thematic tournaments?

Hi Dann,

Yes, under waiting lists - special tournaments. It seems the last Sokolsky tourney was back in 2010. I'm sure there will be another one day - 'good things come to those who wait' could be the motto of this site.


Thibault de Vassal    (2013-04-06 21:50:39)
Thematic tournaments?

Hello Dann, thanks for the suggestion... we can play another one soon, sure. Just check the home page from time to time!


Wilhelm Schuett    (2013-04-11 01:04:47)
Thematic tournaments?

Marshall Attack


Garvin Gray    (2013-04-16 17:55:17)
How to change password?

Can not seem to find this information, how do I change my password to something that I can actually remember?


Charlie Neil    (2013-04-21 19:54:30)
Thematic tournaments?

Yes, Gambits please. Benko, Budapest, Latvian and (my favourite) Evans as a suggestion for future unrated tournaments.


Wilhelm Schuett    (2013-04-23 17:31:15)
Thematic tournaments?

It doesn't have to be Gambits all the time.
For example less played like in the third move of Ruy Lopez, Old Benoni, Modern Defence, 1.d4 e6 2.c4 with 2. ... Lb4+ or 2. ... b6, 1. ... Sc6, Old Indian, Morra Gambit , Ponziani.


Daniel Parmet    (2013-04-27 01:54:31)
Thematic tournaments?

We've had just about every single suggestion so far at some point in time (not that a rehash isn't a welcome thing).


Thibault de Vassal    (2013-05-07 13:17:57)
Eros Riccio on his win in 8th chess WCH

As you may know, Eros Riccio won the 8th FICGS chess championship by beating Jeroen Van Assche (who remains undeafeated though, he did not lose a single chess game at FICGS yet) in the candidates final, preventing him to play Eros again in the final.

Eros kindly accepted to answer a few questions:


- Hello Eros. First of all, congratulations for winning this 8th FICGS correspondence chess championship. Once again, you did not even have to play the 12 games match to defend your title as you won the qualifying tournament. In these conditions, the challenge was really tough for Jeroen Van Assche, in despite of his prodigious chess. He had to beat you consecutively in the candidates final (8 games match), then in the final (12 games match). How did things go in this candidates final?

Eros: Hi Thibault, thanks again! I was also worried to have to play a very strong player like Van Assche, but fortunately I had again the advantage that all draws were enough to win, and so my strategy was again not to take risks in all my games. As White it was easy... and surprisingly also as Black. The only game where I had to be more careful than others was this one: 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 a6 6.Bg5 e6 7.Qf3 h6 8.Be3 Qc7 9.0-0-0 Nbd7 10.Qg3 b5 11.a3 Rb8. Here Jeroen surprised me with an interesting novelty, 12.Kb1. The two times I had played this position I was White against Gueci and Kruse, and in both games I continued with 12.Bxb5 but couldn't get more than a draw. The idea of 12.Kb1 is to sacrifice a Pawn for the initiative after 12...b4 13.axb4 Rxb4 14.Nb3 Nxe4. The White Bishops are very strong after 15.Nxe4 Rxe4 16.Bd3 Ra4 17.Bd4 and fully compensate the Pawn less. Anyway I managed to defend, and when I was finally able to trade the Queens we agreed for the Draw.

- You also won the ICCF Umansky Memorial a few weeks ago, the italian correspondence chess championship (again) as well, obviously you played numerous games last year, what do you plan for the next months? By the way, Jeroen already qualified for the candidates final of the 9th cycle, meaning that he may play you in the final match next year if you defend your title again, is there a chance that we can see a revenge?

Eros: Yes, like in the past, also last year I have played a lot of games... anyway for the future I am planning to reduce my games a lot. At the moment, except a few games in minor tournaments, I am only playing for the italian colors at the Olympiads and European Championship, for ICCF. I didn't register for the new Italian Championship this time... I prefer to wait that another individual top ICCF Tournament starts. And of course I am also waiting to meet my next challenger for the FICGS Final! Maybe it will be Van Assche again, we have to see if he beats his opponent in the semifinal (actually next candidates final).

- It looks like a few chess engines reached a certain maturity, I mean algorithms. As a consequence, the computer speed may become the major evolution factor during the next years, that is generally slower than the program's improvements (but the future may have surprises, of course). What do you expect from the computer chess world in the next few years and its impact on correspondence chess?

Eros: As I have already said in a previous interview, being chess probably a draw with perfect play, the more engines get stronger, the more draws we will see. That's quite obvious.

- You probably do not play chess over the board so often, yet you have a quite good ELO! (about 2200, while many correspondence chess masters are rated below 2000 or not rated at all) By the way, I can certify that you are a strong blitz player after we met a few years ago. Do you still play tournaments?

Eros: I am not playing otb chess for a few years, my peak was 22... and a few points, I don't remember exactly. One of the main reasons why I stopped is because later, when analyzing my games with an engine... every time I got frustrated a lot seeing all the blunders I was making.

- Do you estimate that playing OTB chess is good to improve at correspondence chess?

Eros: Yes, it's useful especially if you develop a strategical style, then also in your corr. games you can see more easily "long-term-strategy" plans, which is still the "weakest strenght" in all engines.

- Do you feel that you're still improving at correspondence chess? If yes, is it mainly a question of opening book or something else?

Eros: Improving at corr. chess... hmm... I will surprise you with my thought about this matter! I think I can evaluate my strenght according to the speed of the computer I am analyzing my games with. When I bought this computer, 3 years ago, I felt like I could beat the corr. World Champion. Now... as my computer is becoming older and older, I feel like my play is getting weaker each day it passes. So my answer is that I am still getting worse at corr. chess, not improving.


Bogoljub Teverovski    (2013-05-09 13:37:52)
Thematic tournaments?

(1) French: (a) Winawer, (b) McCutcheon;
(2) Sicilian: (a) Kalashnikov, (b) O'Kelly;
(3) Slav: (a) Chebanenko, (b) Morozevich;


Wilhelm Schuett    (2013-05-10 00:20:52)
Thematic tournaments?

Sicilian 2.Nf3 Nf6
Sicilian Labourdonnais


Garvin Gray    (2013-05-10 04:42:58)
Thematic tournaments?

I think one idea that could be worth exploring with these thematics is to set up some kind of opening position that is topical, or could help to explore a bit more.

I think just saying lets have a french, or sicilian does not mean much as players get them in their normal games.

These thematics should have some goal more than just more games, like contributing to expanding opening theory.

Some kind of endgame thematic could be worth exploring as well.

This being said, I do fear that we could have too many options, so playing resources are spread too thin and very few can get regular corro games.


Attila Ba    (2013-05-10 14:50:30)
Thematic tournaments?

Good point. Thematic tournaments would help to find out whether some radical ideas like Brooklyn defense ( 1.e4 Nf6 2.e5 Ng8 ) can be defended against engine play.


Alvin Alcala    (2013-05-10 16:55:50)
Eros Riccio on his win in 8th chess WCH

Thanks for sharing this information and the other one in RF (very old stuff). It's a very good model in every CC player's tool box.


Alvin Alcala    (2013-05-11 17:06:49)
Eros Riccio on his win in 8th chess WCH

Eros answers are always very informative. I have not seen any other person who shares at this level.


Thibault de Vassal    (2013-05-15 13:39:14)
PGN notation for forfeit, loss on time

Thank you Attila. I think I'll add this {time} information very soon.


Attila Ba    (2013-05-15 17:41:52)
Deep analysis - can it be improved?

The idea behind deep analysis is to store engine evaluations of chess positions in a permanent way and build an analysis tree out of them. Deep analysis is an improvement over simple engine analysis in two ways:

1) Permanent storage of analysis results makes them reusable. You don't have to analyse the same position from scratch over and over again (which is a waste of valuable CPU resources) rather you can build and improve upon your earlier results.

2) The search is configurable. You have control over which positions are examined and in what way. This gives you freedom to tailor the analyis to your own needs not having to rely on the defaults provided by your engine.

This idea is presented in a revolutionary way in the Deep Rybka Aquarium GUI. However using this framework I have encountered some problems. The lesser one and non lethal one is that draws by repetition are not handled correctly. This is for a reason: moves in the transposition table should be valued in an absolute way (regardless of the line which lead to them) in order to preserve the integrity of the tree. Since Aquarium has no means to incorporate lines, it simply ignores them

My other problem is that though the search is configurable I'm not absolutely certain about what is going on. It is not entirely clear to me exactly which nodes are selected for analysis.

These problems made me to try to come up with a deep analyis program of my own. After several failed attempts finally I have on my hand a solution which is not only capable of performing deep analysis but overcomes some of the difficulties of Interactive Deep Analyis (IDeA) provided by the Aquarium framework.

First I introduced a mechanism that can handle repetitions. In order to achieve this I attribute not one but two scores to each move and re-define the concept of root position already present in IdeA. The first score which I call 'idea' score is the same as presented in IdeA. The second is what I call 'alpha' score is calculated by minimaxing the tree from the root position taking into account repetitions.

Consider the following game:

1. Nf3 Nf6 2. Ng1 Nf8

The value of move 2. ... Nf8 at depth 18 by Houdini 3.0 is -19 centipawns. So the idea score of this move at depth 0 should be -19. Yet 2. ... Nf8 repeats the starting position. Therefore its alpha score with respect to a root equaling the starting position should be 0 centipawn which is exactly what my program calculates for it. ( For the sake of simplicity I don't require threefold repetition, since you would never allow your opponent to repeat a position if you have better ideas. )

So when my programs lists the tree it will present both scores for every move (which in most of the cases are equal of course - therefore this is mostly an aesthetic improvement rather than being a substantial one).

The improvement which I'm most interested in is that having full control of node selection now I have freedom to shape the tree search.

In order to keeps things simple I have only three parameters characterising the search:

1) engine depth
2) move distance (centipawns)
3) search depth

Engine depth means a fixed depth at which each move is analyzed. After long experimenting I have arrived at depth 18 as a good default for Houdini 3.0.

Move distance is a tolerance up to which moves are allowed into the analyis. For each position first the best move is determined. The search for alternative moves is continued until a move is found that has a valuation less than the valuation of the best move by 'move distance' centipawns (it is this 'distance' away from being the best move). The tree is then expanded for moves within 'move distance'.

To compensate for exponential growth of analyzed nodes I use a simple technique: at each ply after ply 1 the move distance is halved. So if the move distance at ply 0 and ply 1 is 20 centipawns, it will be 10 centipawns for ply 2, 5 centipawns for ply 3 and so on. This means that at greater depth less and less moves are allowed per position. So the analysis with greater depth slowly evolves into 'autoplay' rather than 'tree search'.

The other method to reduce exponential growth is the well known beta cut provided by alphabeta search. In order that all candidate moves in the root position and all candidate responses to them get proper values, I only allow beta cuts with ply 2 and deeper.

Once an alphabeta search of certain depth is carried out, the whole tree is mimimaxed out for the root. Now the initial evaluations of the root moves may change. This may make moves which initially fall out of the 'move distance' to become viable. So the search has to be repeated for those moves as well. This has to be done at every ply level.

My iterative search at a certain depth only ends when no new nodes are added by the alphabeta search (the tree is 'settled' for this depth). Only then the program is allowed to deepen the search (this I call 'refined' search).

With engine depth of 18 and move distance of 10 centipawns an average position can be analyzed to depth 10 within a matter of hours. This means a couple of hundred (possibly a couple of thousand) positions are analyzed to depth 18. Depth 10 deep analyis means an ultimate depth of 28 if you take into account that the engine depth is 18.

Whether this method has added ELO value over simple engine search is yet to be tested.


Mladen Jankovic    (2013-05-16 08:33:48)
PGN notation for forfeit, loss on time

There is no such notation in the standard. The standard specifies that a checkmate move should end with '#', instead of '+', as is standard here for other reasons. So if someone wins without checkmating it would be easy to understand what hapened.

You have another problem, any draw would, due to the mechanics of the site, be a draw accepted, as the server does not track 3-fold repetition and such (I might be mistaken).

You have another problem, as the moves are contained in a single line, while the standard specifies 255 character maximum (including newline), and recommends 80 character maximum, for compatibility with older software.

While I have not encountered any problems with that, and nobody so far complained, it still is a break from the standard.

The best place to look for how PGN should work is the standard itself: http://www6.chessclub.com/help/PGN-spec


Michael Aigner    (2013-05-16 21:57:51)
PGN notation for draw offers

Hi everybody!
As it is nowadays mandatory to document draw offers in the notation of otb games I would find it a good idea (and an interesting piece of information during a later study of the games )to do so in our correspondence games too.

What do you think about it?


Tom Kuge    (2013-05-21 23:14:18)
isn't this game over?

http://www.ficgs.com/user_page.php?page=viewer&game=71164

position on board is mate-this game is still in my running games list more than a week


Alvin Alcala    (2013-06-03 02:42:18)
Playing activity top 20 players

Will you change the WCH format to end eros domination?


Garvin Gray    (2013-06-04 14:56:48)
Wch cycles possible changes?

With some discussion once occurring about the format of the Ficgs wch, time for a new thread with a different slant.

Some posters have given their opinions on pros/cons of the wch cycle and changes they would like to see happen.

Most though are not incorporated because Thibault is against them, or thinks they will not work.

So time for a new question so it might be possible to get some changes or refinements.

Thibault, on what items in regards to the wch would you be willing to see some changes, or at least incorporate well thought out proposals from the members?

This could at least lead the discussion on where to head for a discussion on these matters.

Because quite frankly if Thibault does not agree with your proposal, it will not happen.

If someone wants to know my opinion on this whole matter. Feel free to ask and I will post in a later post, or possibly a whole new thread as I do have quite a bit to say. Be warned, some may not like it ;)


Robert Knighton    (2013-06-05 20:16:22)
Vacation: change for 3 days minimum?

If you

1. Prevent people from logging in and viewing their games while on vacation then they cant use vacation time to analyze changes in their games. This may not stop vacation abuse but it would make it less convenient.

2. Garvin Gray said "Instead of changing the minimum days for vacation ... how about there is a maximum cap for the number of times a person can take vacation"

I like this suggestion better than all others i read here.

So limit vacation to 45 days to be split as chosen by users into a maximum of maybe 20 blocks? So you could take 1 day or 5 but you cant take 1 day at a time 45 times. I suspect that 99.99% of legitimate vacation needs would not be negatively impacted by this sort of system.

I know this is a couple months old now.. just catching up. :)


Robert Knighton    (2013-06-06 22:58:06)
Vacation: change for 3 days minimum?

@Thibault: a 2 day minimum is bad because what if I only need 1 day this time? I must lose 2. Maybe I need 1 day only 5 seperate times and I need 40 days straight around christmas/new years.

this scenario my/Garvin's suggestion works (20 blocks split however) and yours leaves me with only 30 days for christmas/new years; just as an example.

I dont think this is complex at all.

You may take vacation up to 20 more times this year.
You have a total of 45 days of vacation you may use.

20/45
No more complex than a chess clock ;)



@Michael: I think the specific complaints were probably sent privately but I can use my imagination to come up with some possibility.

Lets say you're playing a difficult opponent in a close game in some major tournament maybe.

In order to get a time advantage your opponent goes into vacation mode immediately after you make your moves.

While in vacation mode he can still view and analyze the game without running down his clock which effectively gives him 45 extra days of clock time. This can be a significant advantage (more time = more analysis)

People can argue that it works both ways but what if the victim in this story has used his/her vacation for legitimate reasons?

Maybe the person exploiting this technique only plays a few tournaments a year to make sure he has that 45 extra days if he runs into a hard game?

As for how to solve this issue... well that is the topic of the discussion. How to prevent vacation abuse without hurting legitimate vacation needs.


Garvin Gray    (2013-06-08 04:30:30)
Vacation: change for 3 days minimum?

I think Robert Knighton has explained one of the issues regarding this issue very well. In that a player can use the vacation time to gain a time advantage, and another player who had to take vacation legitimately ie this would normally involve taking a few days to 14 days with no game analysis.

The legit vacationer gains no advantage from having taken vacation time, except they avoided timing out, which is of benefit to everyone in the long run.

The second reason why the current situation is undesirable is that it encourages players to not get on with their games. They can run their clocks down to almost zero, knowing they can use an unlimited amount of 1 day vacations to save their games. Playing inside the allocated time controls is part of the game.
Vacation time is for a reason and is not there to be abused to allow players to avoid timing out.


Robert Knighton    (2013-06-08 23:57:02)
Vacation: change for 3 days minimum?

I'm not creating a problem. I'm agreeing with a point of view already expressed by others on this forum and trying to clarify that point of view as I understand it.

Also, unless we are discussing the rules of mathematics for example, then pretty much all rules that exist are someone's opinion of how things should be right?

So what I understand you to be saying is that you want to be able to use vacation time to buy more time for your games and you believe this is acceptable behavior even if it gives you an advantage over other players who use their vacation time to go on vacation. It isn't called "performance boost time" or "buy a way out of a difficult position time"; it's called vacation time.

I think the topic here was started because there are a lot of people who disagree with you and believe vacation time is not intended to be used to buy an advantage against your more challenging opponents.


Philip Roe    (2013-06-11 14:08:13)
Vacation: change for 3 days minimum?

There are players, who I could name, who always run their clocks very low and use vacation a day or two at a time to avoid loss. I have absolutely no idea why they do that. They gain no advantage, and in fact frequently lose on time. In consequence they are greatly underrated. Paired against one of them, you may in fact lose (against a low-rated player) or gain an unsatisfying forfeit. This behavior is legitimate under the current rules but extremely irritating.

It is true that all rules can be abused, but it is not unreasonable to set up rules so that abuse is less likely.


Garvin Gray    (2013-06-23 03:33:23)
Anyone play Semi Slav Botvinnik as black

I have had quite a few Semi Slav Botvinnik's on here. I play the SSB as black, but then when I am white I can not find anyone who plays it as black.

So I am wondering, are most cc'ers considering the SSB unsound for black?

I have a few ideas I would like to try as white, but never get the chance.

Maybe this could be a thematic, but would need to start after 10. Bxg5


Garvin Gray    (2013-07-01 13:35:39)
Wch cycles possible changes?

I guess no one else wants any changes.

Oh well I am proposing a small change in regards to the TER rule.

As it stands=

The winner of each group is qualified for the next stage.

In case of equality, the player with the strongest tournament entry rating (TER) is qualified for the next stage. If tournament entry ratings are equal, ratings when the next stage begins will be taken in account.

I would like to see these reversed, so it is the rating at the end of the event that decides who goes through. The logic of this is based on the theory being used. The theory is that the reason for highest rating moves forward is that it helps to ensure that the next group is as strong as possible. Well surely then that the most current information is the best guide to strength of play, so in my opinion the TER criteria should change to reflect this.

So the new rule would read:

The winner of each group is qualified for the next stage. In the case of equality, the player with the highest rating when the next stage begins will be qualify. Should their ratings be equal, then the strongest tournament entry rating (TER) is qualified for the next stage.


Thibault de Vassal    (2013-07-02 19:29:35)
Wch cycles possible changes?

I chose the TER so that every player know what result to achieve in a tournament... with the current rating, the result of a match or tournament may change if a player uses the dead man defence. It would be quite terrible IMO :/


Robert Knighton    (2013-07-03 19:02:38)
Wch cycles possible changes?

TER is the only fair way to decide other than tie breaker matches (time consuming) or pushing forward to the next round every player with the same score.

I can see where TER could be frustrating though.

If PlayerA TER 2049 and PlayerB TER 2050 both score 5.5/6 in round 1 then this does seem fairly unjust for player A because playerB only had to fight for a draw to win the round where PlayerA must get a win.

this gives PlayerB a strong advantage over a measly 1 elo.

1 elo also says nothing meaningful about which of the two players has a better chance in the tournament.

Factors such as number of games played or percentage of loss on time would be far better indicators than a single ELO point.


Thibault de Vassal    (2013-07-15 14:16:39)
Interview with new FICGS Go champion

Yen-Wei Huang, winner of the 8th FICGS Go championship, kindly accepted to answer a few questions for this very interesting interview!

_______________________


- Hello Yen-Wei and congratulations for winning the FICGS Go championship! Xiao Tong was obviously a tough opponent, yet you won 5-0, what happened during this match?

Hi Thib. Thanks again for your kind invitation. Xiao is definitely one of the strongest Go players on FICGS, and I was really, really lucky to have won all five games. In fact, I was behind in three of them until Xiao made some mistakes late in the games: in game 69092, I forced a tough ko fight which jeopardized my lower group. Xiao made a mistake at P2 as he missed my T3 could force another ko. Game 69093 was very close towards the end but I think the move at C13 caused him the game. Game 69096 was even closer that I won by half a point thanks to the big 7.5 komi. The other two games were not easy either and I am glad I could have hung on to the lead. Overall I really enjoyed our match and I would love to have a rematch with Xiao in the future.

- You're from Taiwan, could you tell us a bit more about you? At what age did you learn Go? Do you have any other ranks (e.g. at other sites)?

I learned Go when I was 5 and I have always enjoyed playing all my life. I used to play on servers like KGS and Tygem and I was around 6-7 dan on these sites. Recently I don't have that much time to play so that's why turned to turn-based server like FICGS.

- What do you think about the world of Go these days? Who is the very best player in the world according to you?

I think the past two years were the "warring period" in the world of Go. I would say Lee Sedol was the best player two years ago, but he seems to have lost his dominant position recently. There are many rising stars that are winning the world champions. I am especially keeping an eye on Yuta Iyama, who I think is No. 1 in Japan and has started to threaten the dominance of Chinese and Korean players.

- What about computer Go and its future? How many years do you give to the human before losing to the machine?

As a software engineer I foresee the computer Go beats the world's No. 1 player in two decades. Crazy Stone already beat Yoshio Ishida with four handicap stones earlier this year, and I believe it wouldn't take long for computers to beat pros in two handicap stones. The real challenge will come when computers need to go from handicap games to even games since they need to advance from defensive mode to attack mode. I am really excited to see how Artificial Intelligence can surprise us with its "creative" moves when the time comes.

- Do you use engines or databases? What advice would you give to beginners (and to your future challengers :))?

I know there are many useful Go engines and databases that are being developed these days, unfortunately I don't really know much about them. I do use http://ps.waltheri.net/ if I need to look something up, and I go to http://tom.com for commented games (they're in Chinese, nonetheless). Advice to beginners: just go to any search engine and you can easily find all the free resources you want. Advice to my future challengers: just try the new variations since I know none of them :)

- What new features would you like to see at FICGS?

Firstly I'd like to thank Thib for maintaining such a wonderful site. I enjoy playing Go and Poker here and maybe I'll start playing Chess sometime (I really suck so I'm not ready to embarrass myself yet). The ability to play different games is what makes FICGS unique. As Thib mentioned earlier, we need much more players, and I think FICGS simply needs to host much more tournaments, probably some with shorter time settings. With more games and more player engagement, more people will stick around. Another feature I'd really like to see is FICGS client for cellphones/tablets. The main advantage of turn-based servers is that it allows people to play wherever for whatever period of time: a 1-min ride in the elevator, a 10-min wait at the bus stop, or a couple of hours at home. If playing on FICGS is made easier, I know I will be more addicted to it :)

- Thank you very much and good luck in the next final match...

Thanks! And please go easy on our Poker match...


Alvin Alcala    (2013-07-15 17:51:28)
Invi. to play freestyle/centaur Chess

We can arrange a sponsored match over there. Just contack Kevin or William for details :)


Robert Knighton    (2013-07-18 06:32:23)
A player goes on inviting me

Also I don't think it's intentional. I think when they join the waiting list for advanced games it automatically challenges all available players at the same time.

He is not trying to annoy you :)


Jose Carrizo    (2013-07-19 23:13:11)
Anyone play Semi Slav Botvinnik as black

Hi Garvin, I play Semi Slav Botvinnik as black. A thematic tournament is a nice idea.


Ilmars Cirulis    (2013-07-29 10:17:42)
Thematic tournaments?

"... Latvian and (my favourite) Evans as a suggestion for future unrated tournaments." (Charlie Neil)

If you want to experimentally verify that Latvian gambit is unsound then why not? :P

Also I like suggestion of Evans gambit. (giggle)


Thibault de Vassal    (2013-07-30 23:34:39)
Thematic tournaments?

Okay, let's try Evans gambit again as a thematic! Always a success :)


Mladen Jankovic    (2013-07-30 23:54:17)
Thematic tournaments?

How about
1.e4 e5 2.f4 exf4 3.Nf3 g5 4.Bc4 g4 5.Bxf7+ Kxf7

It makes for some weird play.


Thibault de Vassal    (2013-07-31 00:02:01)
Thematic tournaments?

Ah, that's a nice one too... does it have a name?


Dann Corbit    (2013-07-31 00:51:10)
Thematic tournaments?

"The unsound gambit". Black wins.
rnbq1bnr/pppp1k1p/8/8/4Ppp1/5N2/PPPP2PP/RNBQK2R w KQ - acd 35/52; acs 1558 ; acn 7330987122; ce -165 ; bm Ne5+; pv Ne5+ Ke8 Qxg4 Nf6 Qxf4 d6 Nf3 Rg8 0-0 Qe7 d4 Qg7 Rf2 Ng4 Re2 Nc6 c3 Be7 Na3 Bd7 Bd2 Kd8 Nc4 Kc8 Rf1 a6 e5 dxe5 dxe5 Bc5+ Kh1 Qg6 Ng5 Qd3 Qe4 Qxe4 Nxe4 Be7 Nf6 Rf8 Bg5 b5;


Peter W. Anderson    (2013-07-31 09:54:45)
Thematic tournaments?

1.e4 e5 2.f4 exf4 3.Nf3 g5 4.Bc4 g4 5.Bxf7+ Kxf7 is the Lolli Gambit.


Thibault de Vassal    (2013-07-31 11:34:54)
Thematic tournaments?

Thanks a lot Peter, indeed I knew the name :)

Sorry Dann, I tried to include this FEN in a PGN in the discussion but it doesn't work well :/


Ilmars Cirulis    (2013-07-31 12:41:09)
Thematic tournaments?




Ilmars Cirulis    (2013-07-31 12:42:58)
Gossip about Evans gambit

Damn, and now I don't know if I may discuss my thoughts because of Evans gambit thematic tournament. :) May I? :D


Thibault de Vassal    (2013-07-31 14:21:45)
Thematic tournaments?

That's your own analysis of the line Ilmars?


Ilmars Cirulis    (2013-07-31 14:31:28)
Thematic tournaments?

<< Sorry Dann, I tried to include this FEN in a PGN in the discussion but it doesn't work well :/ >> (Thibault)

I included it as PGN. At first try I started it from FEN (after 5th move), but then I thought that all moves from start position are better.


Mladen Jankovic    (2013-07-31 19:14:38)
Thematic tournaments?

I encountered it playing here, the interesting part is that it enables the black king to go on the attack early.


I've played it in game 2032, where I withdrew my king from the center even though pressing on did not seem impossible.

https://ficgs.com/user_page.php?page=viewer&game=2032


Dann Corbit    (2013-07-31 20:22:59)
Thematic tournaments?

It takes guts to play that opening as white, because it looks like a serious disadvantage to me. Of course I like the Orangutan, which is theoretically weak for white as well. I will examine game 2032 to see how it came out


Ilmars Cirulis    (2013-08-01 17:00:15)
Gossip about Evans gambit

So about the thematic tournament: with black I am going to play 4... Bxb4 5.c3 Ba5 and hope to get to this position/variation:


With white I plan to play
or check my skill/luck against other retreats of bishop from b4.


Scott Nichols    (2013-08-07 21:21:54)
Next WCH Stage start

It could be done easy, just like wbccc. Get rid of the increments and limit games to 25 days which is more than enough. But as the saying goes, "you can't teach an old dog new tricks." Thib is hardly ever here since he started that other project, but it doesn't matter. This site just kind of runs itself. I doubt if it will grow though, what you see is what you get.


Thibault de Vassal    (2013-09-04 00:46:10)
Withdraw from a waiting list?

Hello Joerg,

I can do it manually... but not systematically.

I removed your name from the list!


Bogoljub Teverovski    (2013-10-03 13:04:46)
Thematic tournaments?

I offer 2 further tematics: Sicilian Labourdonnais or French McCutcheon


Lazaro Munoz    (2013-10-14 15:43:45)
Tablebases and no-engines tournaments

But most endgame books (I assume books are allowed) these days use tablebase results, for that matter so do many opening books on computer analysis results.


Bogoljub Teverovski    (2013-10-18 12:08:10)
Kasparov candidate for FIDE president

Garry has a chance. My estimation is 50/50.


Garvin Gray    (2013-10-18 14:37:25)
Kasparov candidate for FIDE president

Money has nothing to do with it at all. It all has to do with the votes of the dodgy african nations. You know. The ones who have one vote, the same number of votes as federations that have thousands of fide rated players, but do not have a single fide rated player.

One vote per federation, no matter how many fide rated players or members you have. So is it all a matter of how much you can bribe or offer the african nations.


Charlie Neil    (2013-11-19 00:24:58)
World chess championship Anand / Carlsen

No one has anything to say about this match? Strange days indeed. As I write the score is +2 for Carlsen and game 8 starts tomorrow, 19th November. Let's get excited . . .


Peter W. Anderson    (2013-11-19 09:04:17)
World chess championship Anand / Carlsen

When the match started I thought that if Anand got ahead it would be a tough match but if Carslen got ahead there would be no way back for Anand. I have not seen much to change that view.

I admire Carlsen greatly and particularly his endgame ability but this has not been the most interesting match so far. Yes he set challenging problems where others would have given up, but Anand's mistakes have been too serious to make the wins seem really deserved.


Garvin Gray    (2013-12-20 15:18:41)
WBCCC 2014 Entries Open

Entries are now at seventeen. More ficgs players wanted. If you know someone from another site who might be interested, please contact me.

1. Garvin GRAY GARVIN GRAY
2. Om PRAKASH MASTER OM
3. Scott NICHOLS SCOTT
4. George CLEMENT KEOKI010
5. Nikolaos SARAKENIDIS TRANDISM
6. Djordje KASABASIC ARMAGEDDON
7. Paul WATSON NATIONAL12
8. Matt O'BRIEN SCHACHMATT
9. Carlo ALTIERI ITACA2
10. Mark ELDRIDGE MARK ELDRIDGE
11. David EVANS DAVID EVANS
12. Neel BASANT NEELBASANT
13. Timothy COOKSON WEIRWINDLE
14. Ruben COMES RUBEN COMES
15. Erik VAREND DEKA
16. Jose SANZ PPIPPER
17. Michael GLATTHAAR DONKASAND


Alvin Alcala    (2013-12-24 01:11:27)
Withdrawal from all standard time events

Agree Thib, less pressure you have with the standard events while in the rapid I most of the time feel the pressure of the fast time control. Its a matter of taste actually.


Thibault de Vassal    (2014-01-01 21:38:29)
Thematic tournaments?

Let's go for a McCutcheon :)


Bogoljub Teverovski    (2014-01-01 22:25:10)
Thematic tournaments?

New year and new thematics!


Charlie Neil    (2014-01-01 22:44:54)
Thematic tournaments?

McCutcheon good idea! And Steinitz Petroff 3. d4


Wilhelm Schuett    (2014-01-03 01:15:04)
Thematic tournaments?

Sicilian: (a) Kalashnikov, (b) O'Kelly;


Joerg Moormann    (2014-01-22 15:08:06)
Bug? Mate but game not finished

Hi

I played 29.... Re3# at 18. Jan. 2014.

http://www.ficgs.com/game_77611.html

It's checkmate, but the server did not finish the game. What went wrong?


Thibault de Vassal    (2014-01-24 19:41:31)
Bug? Mate but game not finished

The game has now ended! Thanks...


Scott Nichols    (2014-02-15 15:42:10)
Standard time control abusers

I share your sentiments Garvin. I have, and still am playing many of these guys. It seems that they want to win points by extending the game as long as possible and hope to win by the other player either quits, gives gup chess, or dies. Another problem is players who reach a dead lost position, even one move before mate and then just quit moving altogether.


Thibault de Vassal    (2014-02-26 15:19:34)
Withdrawal from all standard time events

Just a matter of taste... As for me, I really enjoy it. Rapid tournaments are probably a good compromise, no need to make standard tournaments look like it too much.


Garvin Gray    (2014-02-28 17:15:22)
Standard time control abusers

ICCF code of conduct 2: Extremely slow play in a clearly lost position is not proper behaviour in CC play, and is subject to a warning from the TD, and will result in disciplinary action if it continuous or is repeated in other games

Playing Rules- Server

3) Failure to Reply- a. The ICCF Webserver system will automatically generate an Email reminder when a player has not
made a move for 14 days and another, after 28 generated after 35 days of silence by a player.
b. When a player is sent a final reminder after 35 days of response time, he/she must either move or report to the Tournament Director and to his/her opponent, the intention to continue the game, within 5 days of that
reminder. If a player does not move or otherwise report his/her intention to continue, during the 40 days of response
time for the same move, the game may be scored as lost by the Tournament Director.

My own words- The number of days set above are based on 10 moves in 50 days, so for our site we would use a much shorter time period.

I can not answer what happens in practice on iccf as I do not play there.


Garvin Gray    (2014-03-02 04:03:47)
Standard time control abusers

I see the idea of a vote as ridiculous and a waste of time. What it could lead to is people voting to keep the class A, M and SM tournaments open because they do not want to deprive the opportunity of someone to play in them, but the status quo remains that no one is joining them.

And what happens if you only get a couple of responses, which is exactly what could happen because of general site apathy?

If you want knowledge of how people feel about these matters, but do not want to publicly speak about the matter because they are afraid to offend the site administrator because they are afraid.

I have given you the absolute 'rounds of the kitchen' repeatedly and often on this issue and have not let up over a number of weeks.

It is natural on the internet that when someone is pushing that hard against the efforts of a volunteer site admin that there will be blowback and the 'pusher (me)' will cop criticism in return.

So far there has been little to none. In fact some of the regulars have been stating that there is an issue as well.

Instead of calling for votes that could just leave all of us in the same ridiculous situation, take the feedback I have provided, and also the inactivity of the groups as the votes that really count ie the marketplace has decided that they do not want those groups, and close the class SM, class M and class A groups immediately.


Thibault de Vassal    (2014-03-03 11:14:15)
Standard time control abusers

Not "any" player though, Heinz-Georg :) You know like me that Garvin has some experience and knowledge on all these topics and I respect it, even if I disagree with him sometimes or often.

In this case, I estimated that either I had to prove some things, or something good could comes out (if I'm wrong). We all know that we miss new players for about 2 years, so it sounds important to do something that can be seen even if the real game is behind the server itself...


Garvin Gray    (2014-03-04 01:15:06)
Standard time control abusers

FWIW, seems like at least one person thinks I 'got my way'. This is incorrect, I did not 'get my way'.

I wanted Thibault to take action against standard time control abusers, which he has not done.

Btw, in one of my games I am now on move 70 and have mate 13 and I think my opponent is going to make another move and then try and sit on the position for another 35 days.

Will Thibault step in then?

The closing of the three standard class divisions was a response to this issue and the fact that they have not started for a long time and that something needed to be done.

It is only after a decision had been made one way or another that some comments have started to come. I gave, some days, between replies, for others to comment, so others had an opportunity to cast their opinion, disagree, give alternative opinion and also to add new rules if they wish.

Then as nothing was happening with the discussions and my opponents were continuing with their actions, the need become more pressing. I have never said for a second that there is anything wrong at all with a person who moves at a rate of one move every five days.

It is with players who are so arrogant they believe it is their right to waste their opponents lives when they clearly can play at a faster rate. If they can not move at a faster rate, how come they can make 9 moves in 3 days, then not move for 35 days?

A person who is legitimately time poor will make one move every few days to make the time control.


Gintautas Stulgis    (2014-03-17 15:40:09)
Bug? Mate but game not finished

movies 30 K:c3 !! no checkmate


Thibault de Vassal    (2014-03-18 22:32:05)
Bug? Mate but game not finished

What game please?


Thibault de Vassal    (2014-03-25 23:05:39)
Thematic tournaments?

Let's go for a Sicilian O'Kelly :)


Bogoljub Teverovski    (2014-03-26 11:43:37)
Thematic tournaments?

Good choice, I'm in.


Wilhelm Schuett    (2014-04-02 16:19:15)
Thematic tournaments?

Me too


Alvin Alcala    (2014-04-11 16:26:41)
Alvin Alcala in Freestyle Battle 2014

I had my chance on the penultimate (round 28). Anson was leading by 1/2 point, however, he managed to win his game while my game was a draw thus at the end of the tour he was 1 point ahead of me.


David Fierry Fraillon    (2014-04-23 09:09:36)
Standard time control abusers

Hi all,
I am suffering a player abusing of time control ... he has waiting for 29 days for playing one move and then alternating one move / one day of vacation.
I read all comments on this post and i do agree with both of you (Garvin and Thibault) on main points.
Basically thibault you're wright but maybe you will reconsider your position by looking at it with new eyes :
- In the current WCH at least 6 players are using this ''technic'' : the Pech family (Stepan, Matej, Jaroslav and Jarsolav senior), Pechova and Mach
- They all coming from Czech Republic

So what i think : it is only one player (and i am sure you can check that with IP connection). That player is not interrested in winning elo and is stupid by using the same country.
It is not a person interested by chess it is only someone who want bad on FICGS : and that the point you can use for banning him.

Obviously, I am not sure of what i wrote and in theory i do not agree with writing names of the guilty ... but in that case i think you should consider that guy like a hacker and not like a chess player using a stupid technic for winning elo.


David Fierry Fraillon    (2014-04-23 13:20:16)
Standard time control abusers

okidoki ...
Reasons for ban can be fuzzy i do agree, and i think not in a ''fair play spirit''.
I should have spoken about withdrawal or something else ... whatever i am intersting in playing chess and i always intend to play my Pech's game normally.
It can even be fun to play like that : the challenge is to win by time !!! :-)

In fact i wanted to pointed out that there is maybe different ways than changing rules to avoid time abusers. It's been a long time that i did not seriously play chess, and i am not an expert in cc ... but i am thinking that the actual time rules (combined to the moves interface) are simply really good ...
As a server manager you can find out material evidence of time abusing ( even if it is not as simple as i say ) and a cheater will always find a way to cheat on new rules.


Michael Sayers    (2014-05-12 15:57:25)
undetected checkmate

Hej,

The 20.Qd6# in this game hasn't been detected as checkmate by the server:

http://www.ficgs.com/game_80090.html

Thanks for any attention to this!


Mvh,
Michael


Jing Huang    (2014-05-25 11:44:03)
Class A, class M & class SM closed

To attract the new players, I have some suggestions:
(1) A league format might be interesting. (e.g. littlegolem)
(2) The way of displaying the tournament results matters a lot. You can try something different and see the effects:)


Gregory Kohut    (2014-06-04 15:57:28)
Thematic tournaments?

For the next Thematic tournament I suggesst Double Fischer Random. Double Fischer Random for when Fischer Random is not random enough for you.


Garvin Gray    (2014-06-24 05:17:57)
FICGS WCh results summary updated

Sorry to bring up an old topic, but it does show again that Eros Riccio has not actually won the World Championship match since the 4th cycle. All he has done is drawn the match.

The final match rules really do need to be re-written to make it more of a contest so the winner actually has to win the match.

It is thoroughly ridiculous that any one person is still champion after four drawn matches, without having won any of them. In some of them, not even winning a single game, IIRC.


Timofey Denisov    (2014-07-03 00:37:10)
FICGS WCh results summary updated

Maybe just increase number of games in final match, for sample, to 24? (as in old live chess championships)?


Garvin Gray    (2014-07-05 04:33:02)
Call referee button, response time

This comes from the chat bar.

Currently a player has thirty days to make a move when their opponent has used the call referee button.

An opponent will usually only hit the button in situations of forced mate (DMD) and are seeking that the game be adjudicated in their favour.

I stated that the time period is too long.

Thibault responded that not all players play at the same rhythm.

This is irrelevant in my opinion. The issue is quite simple. One player in the game has hit the call referee button.

In these situations, the rules can quite easily be changed to state that after the call referee button has been hit and the other player contacted, the other player has a maximum seven days to make a move.


Timofey Denisov    (2014-07-08 08:19:31)
FICGS WCh results summary updated

Maybe, "revolving system"? For sample, first simultaneously start 12 games, but next game will start after end one of these games, etc until all games of this match started.

It will not huge load of work, but will give much more concurrency :)


Garvin Gray    (2014-07-08 17:01:05)
FICGS WCh results summary updated

Timofey: That format could result in more short draws as the players see it as a way to get through the early games faster.

The better format would be to have it as 12 games, but if one player is ahead after eight games have been concluded, the match is over.

The second idea would be to play an eight game match, and then if the result is 4-4, another four games are played.

That would encourage both players in the first eight games to try and win more games as they would know that agreeing to short draws does not shorten the match length, in fact it could lengthen it.


Garvin Gray    (2014-07-08 17:04:32)
FICGS WCh results summary updated

Thib, I know you are going to defend the status quo on everything. That is what you do. You do it on everything, so I have pretty much lost interest in trying to change or improve things around here.

The site with either live or die as is. I am finishing up my games and then seeing what happens. My participation is coming to an end. I am finding it has stagnated overall in terms of site progression, ideas and overall administration.

It has become stale for ideas and the format is dead. Time to move on me thinks.


Timofey Denisov    (2014-07-08 18:48:30)
FICGS WCh results summary updated

Timofey: That format could result in more short draws as the players see it as a way to get through the early games faster

Really? Why people in Final match will do short draws, when if result of match is draw Champion keeps his title?
This is very nonprofitable to Candidate.


Peter W. Anderson    (2014-07-13 10:54:56)
FICGS WCh results summary updated

I have given the question of the format of the WCh matches a lot of thought.

There is no doubt that having the advantage of the draw is a huge advantage at correspondence chess, much more so than at normal chess, simply because the draw rate is so high amongst strong correpondence players.

However, there are disadvantages to other formats. It is true that a tournament final gives a better chance of having a new champion. But the outcome is dependent upon the results of players who are not necesarrily fighting hard for the prize (perhaps they have an early loss, perhaps other parts of their lives become too busy). You might hope that in the final this would not happen, but if you look closely at the games in the round robin finals you will see some strange results, clearly drawn games being lost etc. If it can happen in the round robin final it could happen in a championship final.

Having more games in the final is a very logical option. However, as Thib has pointed out, this will create a big workload. It would make it almost impossible for a serious challenger to enter consecutive championships without having to withdraw from later ones if they reached the final (this is already very difficult witouht more games!).

Another option would be an advanced chess play-off. I would be concerned that this would be too dependant on who had the biggest hardware with less chance for human skill.

Finally, there is the chance to decide a tied match with a toss of a coin. Not a great way of picking a champion.

This problem is not so much an issue with the format as with the game itself - chess is almost certainly drawn with sensible play and as engines get stronger it is going to become harder and harder to win games.

All in all, I think the current format is very reasonable, perhaps the best.

One final observation re Neel's comment that a top player can draw a game if he wants. Perhaps, and if this is 100% true then the draw problem is realy severe. However, I am a little more hopeful. Eros Riccio sometimes beats even very strong players playing the same openings he plays - it is not as if the openings he plays are guaranteed draws in practice. He finds ways of putting them under pressure and sometimes they make a mistake. Perhaps eventually he will do so too (we may have to wait for him to get old!). Or to put another way, chess is almost certainly drawn but it is not an easy draw even at correspondence if white plays really well!


Bogoljub Teverovski    (2014-07-25 19:29:12)
Thematic tournaments?

It's time for new thematic. Let's play Budapest Gambit


Joerg Moormann    (2014-08-01 00:47:42)
Thematic tournaments?

Budapest with reversed colours:

1. e4 c5 2. f4 d5 3. Nf3 dxe4


Ilmars Cirulis    (2014-08-15 17:02:41)
Friendly thematic games or discussions

Does anyone want to play Sokolsky-Orangutan opening (1.b4) with white? For any theoretical, practical or other reasons - without any prizes, just friendly game for purposes of exploration.

Also I want to explore such variation of Traxler counterattack: 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6 4.Ng5 Bc5 5.Nxf7 Bxf2+ 6.Kxf2 Nxe4+ 7.Ke3 Qh4 8.g3 Nxg3 9.hxg3 Qd4+ 10.Kf3

Two will be enough for me now.

P.S. Sorry for disappearance some time ago with lots of unfinished games.


Nick Burrows    (2014-08-25 13:11:47)
Ficgs is a money trap * BEWARE *

Here is a heads up, so you can avoid the same mistake I made.
I saw there was an available "gold" chess match against a player I thought I could beat, so I bought the required e-points and began the match. My opponent then played no moves and lost on time. I asked to cash-out my winnings. Thibault pointed out a rule in the small print that allows himself to claim the money that I had won.

I then asked for a refund of my money. Thibault refuses, because he is greedy and wants to earn 200 Euros for doing F*ck all. Now my money is trapped inside Ficgs.

*Buyer beware*


Thibault de Vassal    (2014-08-26 22:33:41)
Friendly thematic games or discussions

So Ilmars... after all these years, is Traxler definitely losing? :)


Ilmars Cirulis    (2014-08-27 15:27:33)
Friendly thematic games or discussions

Definitely enough that I wouldn't play it with black but in thematic games for fun.
But I can't say that it's "definitely losing". Maybe I'm too old for fast, unfounded judgements. And too busy for too frequent and big analysis. :D

Sokolsky opening is just a nice opening which I would play with white too, actually.


P.S. I wrote this post during sad mood, it wasn't claim of Traxler refutation but invitation to, probably, small talk about chess.
In these 12 days the situation has radically changed and everything is okay, even very good. :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2014-08-28 01:47:20)
Friendly thematic games or discussions

Great then :) About Traxler counter-attack as well...


Garvin Gray    (2014-08-28 12:39:55)
Ficgs is a money trap * BEWARE *

So Nick, just to clarify what happened if this two game match:

Player A (opponent) enters Gold Waiting List

Player B (Yourself) joins Gold Waiting List sometime later.

The two games start.

Both games time out with no moves being made in either game and you never heard anything from Player A.

Is that correct?

I do have an opinion, or a couple of opinion on what I think should occur here, but it is dependant on the timeline of events. So I want to get them in the right order before stating my opinion.


Garvin Gray    (2014-08-28 12:50:46)
Standard time control abusers

Alexis Alban: I dont you have read the whole thread and the comments from other posters who have talked about the habits of other players.

There is even a term for this behaviour. It is called DMD- dead mans defense.

And it is described very well.

They sit on their games for 35 days, make no moves, then suddenly are able to make 9 moves in 5 days, then make no more moves for 35 days and then make another 9 moves in 35 days and then it is rinse and repeat, time control and time control.

Meanwhile this is being done in positions where they are in dead lost positions ie mate in 30. They idea is solely to just piss off their opponents, nothing more.

So please do not just try and make this about one player. Standard time control abusers are a cancer on this and other corro chess sites and they should be gotten rid of as fast as possible.

They spread misery and suffering everywhere they go and the only person that really suffers is the opponent, who has to wait and wait for the games to finish, whilst the site admin sits back, does nothing and is just as guilty and the person doing the action.

At the end of the day, the person in charge who sits back and does nothing when they know of poor conduct under their watch is taking place is just as guilty, if not more so, than the original offender. This is because they create the culture that says it is permissable and says to everyone else that this behaviour is tolerated and the site is not to be taken seriously.


Garvin Gray    (2014-08-30 07:46:33)
Ficgs is a money trap * BEWARE *

Had some more time to think about this. Read the rules, read them again. Especially about where if a person asks for a financial payout from e points to Euro (and then converted to their currency.

They receive 75% of the stated e point amount.

So by my calculations-

David Evans paid 100 euro to enter the waiting list.
Nick Burrows paid 100 euro to enter the waiting list.

The advertised prize for winning the match is 196 e points.

So lets say that this match was played on merit and Nick won 2-0. He would receive 196 e points in his account. That is already 4 e points that FICGS is keeping for itself.

Then if Nick decided to 'cash out' those 196 e points, he would receive 75% of that- so 147 EURO.

This means that FICGS has received 200 EURO originally from these two entries, and paid out 147 EURO to Nick for his win.

Now, in the circumstance that has occurred here, the rule mentioned is more designed for multiple player tournaments to stop rating manipulation (sandbagging and the like), not for this circumstance.

Also, this rule states- For example if a participant obviously lost quickly one or several games only to allow his opponent to get the money prize (and particularly if it happens several times). This would then be saying that David Evans deliberately lost both games on purpose to attempt to give Nick the prize (even though David paid the money out of his own pocket). Why wouldn't David just give the money straight to Nick?

If FICGS really does believe that part rule I have quoted has been violated and that David has engaged in game fixing, will FICGS be taking strong against David Evans, including suspensions or banning him from this site. It would be the logical conclusion for game fixing. Since this is the rule being quote to deny a payout.

Now the only other circumstance that I can think of why FICGS has attempted to deny a payout if that FICGS believes that Nick only entered the GOLD match, believing that David would not play the two games. That is a risky strategy for Nick to take, considering David is an active player, especially for 100 euro and 2 games.

Considering that even if FICGS pays out the money on this two game match, the site still makes 53 euro from a 2 game match, and I do not see a rule that justifies not paying it out, this money should be paid out.

A further question now is- Are these fees fair? A 53 euro profit from a 2 game match?


Alexis Alban    (2014-08-30 17:18:00)
Ficgs is a money trap * BEWARE *

Nick should get the prize money, it was David's responsibility to be present when he entered the advanced chess match.


Thibault de Vassal    (2014-08-30 22:44:50)
Ficgs is a money trap * BEWARE *

I have to specify here that the rule mentioned is absolutely not about rating manipulation (by the way, there is already another rule for this), it is about money prize in 2 players matches only, maybe with 3+ players in unlikely cases! It was added when a player got a money prize after getting a few free Epoints and without playing any move... Of course, that was not acceptable (the prize was paid though, following the rules) as games recorded -especially silver/gold tournaments- should be worth to watch. So these are the reasons for this rule: To avoid empty games, to punish the player who didn't play (by taking Epoints, which is a obviously strong act in this particular case) and to redistribute Epoints to players who deserve it. Just like the rating rule, why a player should get a money prize by winning games without fighting?

I don't think that suspension or banning is necessary here (it would be really hard according to me, anyone can have good reasons for a long absence, but I'll consider this option if many players complains on this point).

To answer the last point, I don't and I cannot know if Nick entered this match believing that David would not play and I don't think that should be the point. As always, we need undisputable rules, as fair as possible, and I do think this one is a good one.

One important thing: The site does not make 53 Euro from this match, at most the site makes Epoints (on the other hand, most are offered by the site, by far). That makes a big difference!

Finally, if I understand Nick's point well, the way to understand "if a participant obviously lost quickly one or several games only to allow his opponent to get the money prize" may be ambiguous so it could be not possible to make the decision (who can know if David really wanted to play these games, wanted that Nick or anyone else get the prize?). So I probably should make it more clear to avoid such situation - even if I doubt that players realize about this rule before entering a silver tournament.


Garvin Gray    (2014-08-31 10:34:50)
Standard time control abusers

Players are ok with the time control, that is not in dispute, it is this behaviour and behaviours like it.

Any arbiter feels that actions during a game are against the general spirit of the game and bring the game of chess in disrepute, they can always use the fide laws of chess PREFACE:

PREFACE
The Laws of Chess cannot cover all possible situations that may arise during a game, nor can they regulate all administrative questions. Where cases are not precisely regulated by an Article of the Laws, it should be possible to reach a correct decision by studying analogous situations which are regulated in the Laws. The Laws assume that arbiters have the necessary competence, sound judgement and absolute objectivity. Too detailed a rule might deprive the arbiter of his freedom of judgement and thus prevent him from finding a solution to a problem dictated by fairness, logic and special factors. FIDE appeals to all chess players and federations to accept this view.
A necessary condition for a game to be rated by FIDE is that it shall be played according to the FIDE Laws of Chess.
It is recommended that competitive games not rated by FIDE be played according to the FIDE Laws of Chess.
Member federations may ask FIDE to give a ruling on matters relating to the Laws of Chess.

And:

Article 11: The conduct of the players

11.1 The players shall take no action that will bring the game of chess into disrepute.

Whilst this is rather broad and rather vague, surely DMD type actions fall under this heading.


Garvin Gray    (2014-08-31 10:53:40)
Ficgs is a money trap * BEWARE *

From what I have read here from your response Thibault- I see no grounds AT ALL to not pay the prize.

The rating rule is there for the best interest of the site, because ratings are meant to be the way we all judge what standard of play we are and what divisions we can enter.

So comparing a rating argument with this argument is drawing a rather long bow indeed.

Just like the rating rule, why a player should get a money prize by winning games without fighting?

Already answered about ratings. About winning games without fighting (or playing), Nick entered under the conditions believing the match would take place.

If he entered the match believing it to not take place and David did play, then Nick has taken a risk that has backfired.

The point is that it is not Nick's fault the match did not take place. From my reading of the rules, there is nothing clear that says you can not pay out the prize.

Remember, you are making an absolute ruling here that applies FOREVER. This means that in effect you have taken 100 epoints at least out of Nick's account, his original stake, for just entering a match.

I would ask as site admin. Why would ANY player on this site want to support paid matches after this event and circumstances?

When the site admin can in effect, I was not happy with your match conditions that it was played under, I don't really have anything to point towards, but I did keep your cash anyways.

I for one will not be supporting any matches or tournaments from now on whilst this practice remains in place. I do not want to enter a match, have it not take place and then the site admin say, tough luck, not your fault the match did not take place, but I am keeping your cash.

The more I look at this and type, I am finding it hard to not say that Nick Burrows has been robbed of his cash. These events are real.


Thibault de Vassal    (2014-08-31 13:13:23)
Ficgs is a money trap * BEWARE *

Garvin, If I follow your thinking, there is no reason why Nick shouldn't get the rating points as well, for the exact same reasons.

Please note that I did not take Nick's original stake from his account, he keeps all his Epoints involved in the match, just like if the match did not happen. Maybe there was confusion there. Only David's Epoints are in question (as specified in the rule). I hope this answers the 2nd question and rest of the message.


Nick Burrows    (2014-08-31 14:40:39)
Ficgs is a money trap * BEWARE *

If the conditions that FICGS operates under were explicit, why would any player ever buy e-points?
Pay 100 euros for a match that you may get to play after a long wait of many months. If you get an opponent, but he doesn't play moves; Ficgs keeps his 100 Euros. At no time can the e-points you bought be converted to cash unless you enter the above process, and win, when Ficgs will take 25% of your winnings.

Like a bad joke isn't it!

Perhaps a better business model would be one that gave attractive and fair conditions to the players; so that rather than stripping bare every victim you trick into the system, you have take less money from each player but with many, many more participants?


Thibault de Vassal    (2014-08-31 16:36:03)
Ficgs is a money trap * BEWARE *

Once again Nick, you didn't buy a particular match, you bought Epoints without any certitude to play this match (that could have started without you, then you'd have asked a refund, I guess)...

And saying FICGS keeps Euros on this case is not exact, FICGS keeps Epoints just like those that are distributed in free tournaments prizes.

You seem not to realize that FICGS is not a casino and cannot be one. When you participate at a tournament over the board and cannot play the opponent you wanted to play, there is most probably no refund. If there is no other participant showing, there could be a refund (because no other match would be possible) but I doubt that you get the whole prize, nevertheless the tournament would probably keep some fees. That's quite the same spirit with this rule.

Finally, I think that players may want to buy Epoints to really play games and casually win and get a money prize. As explained in the rules, the 25% rake should be balanced with the results after a certain number of games. Things can go very fast with bullet or lightning games. If you really want to get a money prize, it can take a few hours after you find an opponent... Didn't you think about it?

About business models, believe me: FICGS is not a good one in France. I did not make it and I don't run it for money. By the way, as far as I know, even poker sites have difficulties under french laws.


Nick Burrows    (2014-08-31 18:11:33)
Ficgs is a money trap * BEWARE *

I bought E-points believing they would be instantly purchased, and I could instantly start the match. There was no warning it would take several hours - so I did buy them for the specific match.

It may not be "exact" or "technically correct" to say that Ficgs (you) keeps Euros; but it is "essentially" true, although you "technically" cannot admit that you are actually running a casino under a different name due to French law.
These games are NOT modeled on any o.t.b chess tournament in existence, but they ARE modeled EXACTLY on a heads-up poker match. Which are run by CASINO companies and who ALWAYS pay the winner (me) and pay your money back, when you request it.

No I did not consider playing bullet for money, as that is a pure hardware contest.


Thibault de Vassal    (2014-08-31 20:50:58)
Ficgs is a money trap * BEWARE *

That's wrong, it is specified in the My account page (within days):

"Please send us a message through the form below after any payment on FICGS account, mentioning your name, address, country, account (email) at Moneybookers, the number of tickets you bought and the amount transfered. Your account in E-Points at FICGS will be updated within days."

Anyway, definitely I do not have to know that you bought it for this specific match or to act according to this view.

On the casino-like point, I invite you to contact the french government like I did, they will explain you why it is either the same or different in so many ways that it is impossible to know for sure at the end. At least I'm sure that the part of random is not the same in poker than in chess and that I have no right to act like a casino: all prizes must be related to tournaments, there's no possible "cash out" there.


Nick Burrows    (2014-08-31 21:45:24)
Ficgs is a money trap * BEWARE *

Whether I read every single aspect of your terms and conditions is not really the point is it?
Whether you believe me or not - I DID purchase the points for that one specific match. If I buy some virtual currency for a particular tournament, then that tournament (after a 2 month wait) becomes unavailable, why can the money not be returned?


Bogoljub Teverovski    (2014-11-30 22:05:00)
Thematic tournaments?

Yes, let's play reversed Budapest since January 2015


Thibault de Vassal    (2014-09-10 16:38:26)
Ficgs is a money trap * BEWARE *

You could also look for a player by using the chat bar and start the match if you estimate that he's not too strong (or sleepy) for you...


Thibault de Vassal    (2014-09-13 23:04:25)
Thematic tournaments?

Still waiting for the waiting list to be filled before to start this Budapest.


Bogoljub Teverovski    (2014-10-12 21:04:33)
Thematic tournaments?

Stop O'Kelly! Start Budapest!


Thibault de Vassal    (2014-10-12 21:48:52)
Thematic tournaments?

The Budapest Gambit is on (at last)... next one will be Budapest with reversed colours!

Have fun :)


Garvin Gray    (2014-10-28 23:51:08)
July 1 2014 Fide laws of chess

With the next ficgs wch approaching, I assume this event will now be held under the new rules for the fide laws of chess that began July 1 2014.

Where is the new information contained that states how the new rules will be applied to this event as some of the fide laws chess have had some significant changes and could be make a large change for how some rules are applied on here.


Garvin Gray    (2014-11-01 22:51:23)
July 1 2014 Fide laws of chess

There was no context other than a very simple request. With the new rules now in operation, I was asking where do we find a copy or further information on what changes have taken place for this event that flow on from the changes to the laws.

The areas I was mainly concerned with are in relation to:

5 consecutive repetition of moves and 75 moves without a pawn move or capture. The arbiter can now step and force the draw, there does not need to be a player claim.

So will the server be updated to match this? There are quite a few other changes as well where current server practices do not match the new rules.

But as I said, it is your responsibility to make sure that the competition complies with the new rules if you advertise that your tournament follows the fide laws of chess where possible.

The reason for my stance is a very simple one. Over the years, on almost every single occassion, when I have made suggestions or recommendations to you, you have gone in the opposite direction in pretty much 100 percent of cases. Or even when you have claimed to 'agree' with my recommendation, you have then given the trial period such a short time to make it practically worthless.

The last saga in relation with Nick Burrows said to me that, except for the wch, I will no longer be playing on this site.

I can tell you directly, your handling of that issue lost you a long time member.

On the format of the wch, if I actually thought this format was fair and even gave me a shot of winning it, rather than being so heavily biased in favour of Eros Riccio winning it every time, to the point of being fixed, then I would use that as sole motivation to win it.


Timofey Denisov    (2014-11-04 05:21:48)
July 1 2014 Fide laws of chess

Old FIDE cycle in championship match contained 24 games, not 12 :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2014-11-05 23:00:39)
July 1 2014 Fide laws of chess

We already envisage this option, but a cycle would be too long and even worst it would delay next final by 6 months more at least (each round must be 8 months long) and it would be the same for each next final match.


Thibault de Vassal    (2014-11-09 18:21:41)
How is the WCH challenger decided?

Ah, if you decided not to enter the waiting list because you thought you were qualified for the final match in the 11th cycle, then yes I understand... :/


Thibault de Vassal    (2014-12-01 01:17:16)
Thematic tournaments?

The waiting list is open :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2014-12-01 01:20:17)
Magnus Carlsen beats V. Anand again

Any thoughts on the recent FIDE world championship final match?

Magnus Carlsen beats Viswanathan Anand with 2 points more before the last game, but a few games were not so clear...


Bogoljub Teverovski    (2014-12-01 12:51:13)
Thematic tournaments?

I mean 1.Nf3 d5 2.b3 c5 3.e4


Thibault de Vassal    (2014-12-01 15:56:08)
Thematic tournaments?

Ah, the "famous" Norfolk Gambit of Nimzovich Attack, right?

Very interesting opening, indeed... So, next time!


Charlie Neil    (2014-12-01 23:43:42)
Thematic tournaments?

I have lived in Norfolk UK for 26 years. So let's have that Norfolk gambit as I have never known anyone from Norfolk to give anything anyway! . . . B-)


Peter W. Anderson    (2014-12-20 10:26:14)
FICGS chess WCh summary updated

https://onedrive.live.com/view.aspx?cid=AFB49FE3A5961D46&resid=AFB49FE3A5961D46!294&app=WordPdf

One hard fought game remaining in the 9th World Championship match. Well worth a look.

http://www.ficgs.com/user_page.php?page=viewer&game=80633


Thibault de Vassal    (2014-12-20 23:21:25)
Thematic tournaments?

Norfolk Gambit of Nimzovich Attack is in place... a very funny opening :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2014-12-22 18:20:59)
FICGS chess WCh summary updated

The link does not appear the right way because of "https" and exclamation mark in parameters, sorry about that :/

Thanks Peter!


Thibault de Vassal    (2015-01-09 20:46:20)
Eros Riccio on his win in 9th chess WCH

Eros Riccio kindly accepted to answer a few questions after his win in the 9th FICGS correspondence chess championship. Once again, his answers are worth to read... including probably a few surprises and valuable informations for most of us!

_____________________________


- Hello again Eros. Congratulations for this new win! So you played Jeroen for the second time in a row, this time in the 12 games format. There were 12 draws but it does not mean a lot. How did things go?

--> Hi Thibault! Nice to answer your questions again :-) I managed to resist again Van Assche's assaults, this time he was well-determined to win, as he made me really suffer in a couple of games. The first game was a semislav, me as Black. He played a rare variation (starting with 14.Be2 followed by 15.Qd3) that was new to me. At first the engines were giving 0.00 evaluations, but after the move 22.Qg3 they started to realize that Black's position was difficult, and they kept increasing their evaluation in White's favor move after move. That was quite a scary thing to see, and I really thought that I could have lost the game. I had to use all the thinking time (leave included) to be able to resist. This new variation impressed me so much that I decided to use it as White myself as a surprise weapon, and in fact it allowed my engine on autoplay on my old I7 980x to win a lot of games as White and a 500 dollars prize getting first place in a strong tournament on Infinity Chess. The second game was a Spanish, me as White. After his 7...0-0 I decided to avoid the Marshall (that would have probably happened if I had played 8.c3) trying the AntiMarshall variation 8.d4. I am now convinced that this variation gives nothing good to White, but I didn't know that yet when I played it! Already after the rare strong move 11...c5! things were starting to get difficult for me. He simply continued with c4 and d5, getting space advantage with his Pawns on the Queenside, while I could find no attack at all on the Kingside. Again I had to be very careful to escape with a draw.

- What can you tell about your other results this year, particularly at ICCF where you're now ranked #9 with an outstanding rating of 2639 ?

--> My ICCF elo in the past few years has raised. Slowly, but it has raised. I had no defeats and a couple of wins in the Olympiads and European team tournaments started in 2012. I am satisfied of that, as winning nowadays in top correspondence tournaments is very difficult. Important is to remain undefeated.

- Last year, you said that you felt like your play was getting weaker each day because your machine was getting older, did you finally upgrade it? But maybe this is a secret...

--> No. As I wrote earlier, I haven't updated my machine. Fortunately cpu's general speed has kept increasing not as quickly as in the past, so my I7 980x can still compete.

- Did your vision of computer chess evolve after these last 18 months? What do you expect for the next years? Do you plan to become a chess cyborg? ^^

--> Fortunately for our hobby, computer chess isn't rushing towards the "all draws" situation that I talked about a couple of years ago. That's because, fortunately, increasing cpu's power and engine's strenght is getting more and more difficult. Yes, some main lines already lead to all draws often, but chess gives so many openings options that to avoid that, you can simply play subvariations. When played a lot, also subvariations will become main variations. Then again, when the draws rate gets too high, you just pick another less played opening. It will take many years to cover every opening to a high draws rate.

- Your next challenger is Peter W. Anderson, who made a convincingly path through the round-robin cycle before to defeat SM Igor Dolgov 5-3 in the 10th candidates final (by the way he's also playing the 11th candidates final). It seems that you never played him before. How do you feel this match? Do you have any words for your opponent before that the games start?

--> I am happy to play a new player! We have just started our match, again, all my first moves as White were 1.e4. What to say... it's up to him to avoid main lines as Black (he already did it answering with 1...g6 in three games) if he wants to try to win with the black pieces. But the real challenge for him of course will be to try to win with the White pieces. It will be interesting to see if he can find holes in my Black repertoire like Van Assche was able to do. Let's wait and see!


Alexis Alban    (2015-01-27 00:37:48)
Eros Riccio on his win in 9th chess WCH

Thanks for answering these questions Eros, it was a very interesting read. I hope someday I will be able to play for the FICGS Championship. For now I hope you two enjoy your match.


Maurice Ellis    (2015-03-27 17:34:51)
Thematic tournaments?

What about my gambit: 1.e4,e6 2.d4,d5 3.Nc3(Nd2),dxe4 4.Nxe4,e5 the Ellis Gambit in the French Defense


Thibault de Vassal    (2015-03-28 22:10:17)
Thematic tournaments?

Seems tough :) Ok, let's do this.


Bogoljub Teverovski    (2015-04-01 15:56:05)
Thematic tournaments?

I'd prefer Noteboom


Charlie Neil    (2015-04-01 18:48:59)
Thematic tournaments?

Yes, good idea. The Noteboom was played at the last Super GM tourney.


Wilhelm Schuett    (2015-04-13 01:24:39)
Thematic tournaments?

I prefer the triangle setup with the knight on c3: 1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 c6 . It can lead to noteboom, but offers more choices.


Bogoljub Teverovski    (2015-04-14 14:28:18)
Thematic tournaments?

Triangle setup is fine because it offers a very wide range of options to play, but this circumstance means that it is not good for thematic tournament. A series of Slav thematics might be reasonable: (a) Winawer gambit 1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nc3 e5, (b) Slav gambit 3...e6 4.e4, (c) Noteboom 4.Nf3 dxc4, etc.


Thibault de Vassal    (2015-04-15 14:17:15)
FICGS__GO__WORLD_CHAMPIONSHIP__000010

Hello Andrew.

Well, just like Eros Riccio in a few chess championships, Yen-Wei Huang won both preliminary tournament and previous final match, so he didn't have to defend his title (he should have played against himself).


Wilhelm Schuett    (2015-04-18 01:12:14)
Thematic tournaments?

But I would play 4.e3


Wilhelm Schuett    (2015-04-18 01:16:57)
Thematic tournaments?

I always play 1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nf3 or perhaps 3.e3. After 2. ... e6 I play 3.Nc3!


Thibault de Vassal    (2015-04-24 23:38:09)
Thematic tournaments?

Noteboom will be the next thematic tournament (once this waiting list is filled).


Angus James    (2015-05-01 14:38:48)
Problems with FICGS automated email?

My opponent made a move on 27.04.15 but I didn't receive an automated email telling me until 30.04.15, 3 days later. Has anyone else experienced any issues with delayed FICGS automated notifications recently? Thanks


Josef Riha    (2015-05-02 12:41:45)
Problems with FICGS automated email?

I have the same problem but it's solved now.


Thibault de Vassal    (2015-05-03 00:07:17)
Problems with FICGS automated email?

Yes, I had to deal with a server problem... it took about 2 days, now everything should be ok.


Bogoljub Teverovski    (2015-05-04 14:04:57)
Thematic tournaments?

Current thema (French) has no entries. It's time to replace it and to announce Noteboom (or Winawer gambit).


Thibault de Vassal    (2015-05-04 23:59:05)
Thematic tournaments?

New thematic tournament: Noteboom variation (after move 4).


Ilmars Cirulis    (2015-05-17 21:39:26)
Thematic Suggestion: Traxler

Omfg, I was so young... :D


Thibault de Vassal    (2015-05-18 01:14:14)
Thematic Suggestion: Traxler

... almost 9 years ago, do you believe it? :)


Ilmars Cirulis    (2015-05-19 16:37:59)
Thematic Suggestion: Traxler

Yes, time flows fast. Damn. :)

Sometimes still analyzing it. I wouldn't want to play Traxler against myself. Black usually has to find draw (they can hope) in some boring endgame.


Peter W. Anderson    (2015-06-14 17:52:04)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

I recently played in an Infinity Chess freestyle event and was impressed by one of their tiebreak rules. If scores were tied a player got a bonus if he had stalemated an opponent.

I would like to suggest this is adopted in the matches (not tournaments) in the FICGS world championship and that is it the first tiebreak rule applied, i.e before ratings and whether wins or only draws have been played. I would also suggest it is adopted for the title matches too. Perhaps it could be introduced from the 15th cycle onwards or even in existing cycles (11 to 14) where a match has not begun.

This seems a very fair tiebreak rule to me, which would normally reflect who overall played better (came closer to winning) in a drawn match, especially where all games are drawn.

The only disadvantage I can see to this rule is that it would prolong games as some that would currently be agreed drawn would in future be played through to stalemate.

On the other hand it would get us thinking hard about which drawn endgames lead to stalemate and which don't and that in itself is quite interesting.


Thibault de Vassal    (2015-06-19 02:16:28)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

Ah... I must say this is an interesting idea. Actually it changes many things! This is a deep change in the whole game after all (in my view).

Any opinion?


Peter W. Anderson    (2015-07-02 16:20:58)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

Yes, this could be a small but deep change. Perhaps some drawing opening lines would be less attractive because they will lead to stalemate. I see that as a good thing as it will lead to more fighting chess.

As nobody has objected perhaps it should be implemented :)


Alvin Alcala    (2015-07-02 17:18:46)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

This will convince Thib! :)

http://en.chessbase.com/post/correspondence-chess-the-draw-problem


Pablo Schmid    (2015-07-02 20:32:45)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

I am against that rule. Giving a bonus for stalemate is almost like playing for stalemating your opponent, which is not the aim of the game and this would change the game deeply.


Thibault de Vassal    (2015-07-05 14:07:35)
Team tournment

There used to be (e.g. server matches)... Well, no such opportunity at the moment but we'll see.


Thibault de Vassal    (2015-07-05 14:22:20)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

Thanks for the article Alvin, I read it entirely. My feeling is still about the same than Pablo's: This is deeply changing the game. Doesn't it mean restarting from zero while at the end (which may be not so far), the same problem will appear again... maybe slightly weaker, but still?

On the other hand, I concede that I made a (less) deep change in the rules when I started FICGS, by not adopting the 50 moves rule, so I'm still hesitating.

My position would be first to wait and see what ICCF will decide on this point, meanwhile I'll try to have more opinions here on this.


Thibault de Vassal    (2015-07-05 14:49:03)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

Also, Arno Nickel suggests:

"Therefore, I specifically suggest enhancing the score system to include a ¾ point for a performance with an added value as compared to a regular draw:

a) stalemating the opponent;
b) being a piece up against the naked king."


What about King vs King + 2 Knights?

I'm not sure if this b) point is really "natural" (and clear enough).


Pablo Schmid    (2015-07-05 15:07:19)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

King + 2 knights = forced stalemate. I was wondering if a king + bishop or king + knight can stalemate by force a lone king.


Peter W. Anderson    (2015-07-05 17:16:00)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

The suggestion that Arno put forward in the article goes much further than what I was suggesting.

Under his suggestion a win could be outweighed by several stalemates. I am not in favour of this.

However, in my suggestion, stalemates would only be taken into account when a match is tied, so stalemates would never outweigh wins.


Jan Ohlin    (2015-07-05 21:14:44)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

I think you overlooking a little that a good defense leading to stalemate means showing great skill. It´s not all about luck...


Thibault de Vassal    (2015-07-05 23:34:17)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

True Peter!

And one other thing, if King vs. King + Knight is not draw, why King + Knight vs. King + 2 Knights would be draw?


Pablo Schmid    (2015-07-06 00:03:04)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

If we think about the stalemate logic, 2 knight vs 1 knight would be a draw by repetition or move limit if there is no stalemate or knight exchange. But can one bishop or one knight + king force a stalemate vs king alone? Anyway this is not chess anymore, many endings would be artificially become lost, for example king vs king + pawn, pawn a c f h vs queen, and many 1 piece vs 1 piece + pawn.


Jan Ohlin    (2015-07-06 04:59:02)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

And stalemating gamepoints definitely will favour stupid engine playing and not human thinking with endgame skill


Pablo Schmid    (2015-07-06 09:05:09)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

@ Ohlin quite the opposite if the human adapt to this rule and if the computer is not "reprogrammed" for the new rule.


Jan Ohlin    (2015-07-06 09:34:18)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

http://www.ficgs.com/user_page.php?page=viewer&game=78874
Stalemate points as favour for black´s good opening play or white´s strong middle and endgame play?


Pablo Schmid    (2015-07-06 09:48:34)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

I don't see the link between your game and the stalemate!?


Jan Ohlin    (2015-07-06 10:17:40)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

As Peter Anderson write: "It reflect who overall played better (came closer to winning) in a drawn match..."


Thibault de Vassal    (2015-07-06 13:48:10)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

It seems to me that it's still a point of debate: According to me, stalemating an opponent (or having King + Bishop vs. King) reflects who played better ONLY IF rules say it before the game.

In some cases, it actually reflects a better play, but in some others, it only shows that the stalemated player (or naked king) found a clever way to draw the game by giving the opponent the illusion of an advantage. Isn't it quite subjective after all?


Pablo Schmid    (2015-07-06 18:03:33)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

I agree with Thibault.


Jan Ohlin    (2015-07-07 12:35:58)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

Maybe the games become more interesting if instead give small extra score for win with black!? Encourage black to play for a better score, just as UEFA do in football.


Scott Nichols    (2015-07-07 14:39:48)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

I agree with Jan.


Thibault de Vassal    (2015-07-08 01:26:17)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

Yes, we agree on that point, it could be more interesting... but this is not chess anymore, this is a new game. So we could even add more new rules like this one to make it even more interesting :)


Jan Ohlin    (2015-07-08 06:49:01)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

A new game, no. Correspondence chess will become more like it was for some decades ago when top players dared to play Kingsindian and Benko gambit.


Jose Carrizo    (2015-07-08 17:17:22)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

If a player want to win with Black today, he can play Kingsindian and the Benko Gambit without new rules.


Peter W. Anderson    (2015-07-09 09:35:12)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

I have avoided commenting further on this idea because I wanted to see what other people had to say. But now I will reply to the points made.
“Giving a bonus for stalemate is almost like playing for stalemating your opponent, which is not the aim of the game and this would change the game deeply.”
As I said I am against a points bonus, but am in favour of using stalemates for tie breaks. The real question is would someone start a game aiming for stalemate as opposed to start the game trying to win? I am not sure how you would do that – either way you have to try to build up an advantage and if it gets big enough it will lead to mate and if it is not quite big enough it might lead to stalemate. Anyone who gets the choice between a win and stalemate will presumably always take the win.
The one way I think this will really affect the game is by discouraging some very deeply analysed defences that are known to drawn or close to drawn but will almost certainly lead to stalemate. Personally I think this is a good thing, but I accept that the opposite view could be taken :)

“I think you overlooking a little that a good defense leading to stalemate means showing great skill. It´s not all about luck.”
Reaching stalemate as the defending side can be very simple (e.g. king and pawn vs king) or can indeed show great skill. It is almost never down to luck. In the case where great skill is shown that skill earns you half a point instead of no points. Nonetheless, the very fact that you needed great skill to save the game shows how close you came to losing, so I see no reason not to use this as a tiebreak rule.

“And stalemating gamepoints definitely will favour stupid engine playing and not human thinking with endgame skill”.
Like Pablo, I think quite the opposite is true. In fact one of my motivations for suggesting the change was to increase the human element in the game.

“According to me, stalemating an opponent (or having King + Bishop vs. King) reflects who played better ONLY IF rules say it before the game. In some cases, it actually reflects a better play, but in some others, it only shows that the stalemated player (or naked king) found a clever way to draw the game by giving the opponent the illusion of an advantage. Isn't it quite subjective after all?”
I have some sympathy for this viewpoint. If we could play perfect chess and at the start of the game someone decided to take the draw by allowing themselves to be stalemated then that would be a very good example supporting that view. However, I think the reality is different. In most cases when someone gets stalemated (or would be stalemated if the game was played through to its conclusion) it is because they have got a worse position and have little choice if they want to save the game.
If the defending side could achieve a draw by stalemate or by other means, then under today’s rules they could choose either way. Under my proposed rules they might be wise to choose the other method, unless of course they were confident of achieving more wins in the match.

“Maybe the games become more interesting if instead give small extra score for win with black!? Encourage black to play for a better score, just as UEFA do in football.”
This might be helpful for tournaments but I don’t think it helps at all for match play. In reality, if you can win just one game in a match you will most likely win the match. Therefore you don’t need a bonus to play for a win with black in a match situation.
However, I think this point indirectly touches on an issue with match play and how hard people try to win, and I do think the stalemate tiebreak rules would help a little with this.
The problem as it stands is that the higher rated player (or the champion in the case of the tile match) knows that if all games are drawn he will win the match. The higher rated player (or champion) can therefore take a low risk approach to the match, with both black and white (actually I think the low risk approach with white is just as much a problem).
If the higher rated player (or champion) was not certain that all draws would win them the match then they would probably try harder to win. This would give a better chance of decisive games in matches.
One way of a achieving this would be through a toss of a coin if the match is tied with all draws. Personally I would not find this satisfactory.
Whilst the likelihood of stalemate is quite low, it will nonetheless be there, so this rule might encourage the higher rated player or champion to try harder for a win.
I will speak from personal experience on this matter. In most of my recent matches I have been the higher rated player. I still play some relatively risky defences as black (e.g. the modern against 1.e4) and I always try to win with white. However, I have to be honest, if I am the higher rated player, I do not always play the very sharpest lines as white and I do not often play some of my riskier defences to 1.d4. If the stalemate tiebreak rule was in place, I would be taking more chances with both white and black.
So whilst I accept that it is not perfect, I still think the stalemate tie-break rule is a good idea. However, as nobody else has spoken out in favour of it I accept that it is very unlikely to be implemented and I won’t write any more on this matter unless someone asks me a direct question. It is time to concentrate on my matches under the existing rules! :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2015-07-09 15:59:02)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

Thanks for this long answer Peter. We'll have an occasion to discuss it again very very soon, I think.


Alvin Alcala    (2015-07-10 14:46:26)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

Hi everyone. GM Arno wants to post in this thread as he has trouble logging in.
Introducing a 3/4-1/4 score for stalemate does not mean changing the whole game. Lasker and Réti, the fathers of this idea, knew quite well what they did, when they said, it's only a minor change (btw following the ancient chess, when mates were rare and a stalemated player had to pay half of his stake).
Some people on ChessBase argued and feared that the game might become bloodless as players would fear to sacrify material. But that's a wrong assessment.
Here is a "normal" classical GM game with a Morra Gambit, that could have happened the same way under the new rule:
E.Berg - S. Rocha (POR 2013)
1.e4 c5 2.d4 cxd4 3.c3 dxc3 4.Nxc3 Nc6 5.Nf3 d6 6.Bc4 a6 7.0–0 Nf6 8.Bf4 Bg4 9.h3 Bxf3 10.Qxf3 e6 11.Rfd1 Qc7 12.Rac1 Be7 13.Bb3 Rc8 14.Nd5 exd5 15.exd5 Ne5 16.Qe3 Qd7 17.Rxc8+ Qxc8 18.Bxe5 0–0 19.Bf4 Qd7 20.Rc1 Bd8 21.Qd4 Re8 22.Qb4 Be7 23.Ba4 b5 24.Bb3 Rc8 25.Rxc8+ Qxc8 26.a4 Qc5 27.Qe1 Kf8 28.Be3 Qc7 29.axb5 axb5 30.Qb4 Qb7 31.g4 h6 32.Qd4 Nd7 33.Qe4 Bf6 34.Qb4 Qa6 35.Bc2 Ne5 36.Kg2 Nc4 37.Bc1 g5 38.Bd3 Qa1 39.Bxc4 bxc4 40.Qxc4 Bxb2 41.Be3 Bf6 42.Qc8+ Kg7 43.Qf5 Qc3 44.Qe4 Qb2 45.Qf5 Qc3 46.Qe4 Qb2 47.h4 gxh4 48.Qf4 Qe5 49.Qxh6+ Kg8 50.Kg1 h3 51.Qxh3 ½–½
Follow the comments in the MegaBase.
White sacrifies a pawn at move 3. He regains it at move 18 by a typical piece sacrifice. Later White, who is pressing a lot, while Black defends quite well, could have won a pawn by 38.b3 (instead of 38.Bd3?): e.g. 38...Qa1 39.Bxg5 hxg5 40.bxc4 bxc4 41.Qxc4.
Berg argues he might have had practical winning chances. Either 1-0 or 1/2. So what is the big difference, if we would say: either 1-0, 3/4 or 1/2? It's just making the game more exciting, more fair and a bit less drawish, what is badly needed for correspondence chess. The basic wrong assessment is that it might be significantly easier to achieve a stalemate advantage. But it isn't (and that's why only a small percentage of games will end like that). Last but not least, players who achieve a clear endgame advantage deserve a 3/4 point instead of 1/2. K+P, K+B, K+N vs. K should be a difference to K vs. K." Thanks again, Arno


Jan Ohlin    (2015-07-10 20:47:49)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

But white can´t find the winning plan / move and yet rewarded with an extra score. Meanwhile Black defends quite well but get no additional bonus for his skills. If we compare with football, then Italy had hardly been able to become world champions, just as Tigran Petrosjan never would have been in chess.


Scott Nichols    (2015-07-10 20:56:39)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

IMO the only true tiebreak is a playoff with the time controls shortening after each 2 games until one side wins. I know this is not possible with most tournaments. Certainly someone who "tied" for first, but lost the prize on tiebreaks is not going to tell people they finished second. Lots of sports have playoffs, golf, football etc. Because for the romantic, a tie is like nothing, it's not a true win.


Thibault de Vassal    (2015-07-11 01:43:15)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

I hope the "test" tournament will occur at ICCF, it should be more pertinent than any opinion after all.

@ Scott: I agree, this should probably be the best option, particularly over the board... but I always feared that a match be decided on a computer or internet issue, like it regularly happened during freestyle tourneys.


Thibault de Vassal    (2015-07-11 02:18:11)
E. Riccio on his win in the 10th CC WCH

Once again, Eros kindly answered a few questions after his win in the 10th FICGS correspondence chess championship. His answer on tie break rules meets the discussion in this thread:

http://www.ficgs.com/user_page.php?page=forum_read&id=11773

____________________________


- Hello Eros and congrats again for this new win in the FICGS correspondence chess championship! This time, your opponent was Peter W. Anderson and you're playing him once again in the next final match. Actually, all games finished in less than 3 months, which looks like superfast, how did it happen?

Hello once again Thibault! Yes, the match with Anderson was very quick. The reasons are that he moves very fast, and like me, I don't seem to remember that he took any day of leave.

Also, our games were not played until the very end; many draws were agreed with many pieces on the board, as soon as we thought that none of us had winning chances.


- For many players, it is quite impossible to beat you in such a 12 games match (probably because of the tie rule). After all these won matches do you start to think that the advantage is too big?

It's a fact that a very high percentage of correspondence games played at the top level ends up in a draw... (and that percentage is even higher in my case, as my strategy is to avoid taking risks) so yes, talking against my interests, I think that something in the rules should be changed.


- By the way, your opponent suggested an interesting tie rule in the forum ( Chess, Poker & Go forum - Topic 11773 ), in the context of more general new ideas for correspondence chess rules (e.g. article by GM Arno Nickel - Correspondence Chess – the draw problem ) in order to increase the interest of the game. Do you have any opinion on all this?

The idea GM Nickel launched could be interesting, even if before we can say for sure if it can be applied in serious tournaments, it needs to be tested.

If I understood correctly, having a piece more in a draw endgame, after the game is over, a little plus on the score would be given to the player who had the small advantage.

I always thought like: How unfair! That player had King and two Knights against a lone King of his opponent... still he only got a half point anyway! Or even worse, in theory, one player could have this position: King in e1, Bishop in h1 and 6 Pawns from h2 to h7. (Black King in h8) Counting the value of pieces that would be a a +9 advantage, like a Queen more, but still it would be a draw. Another crazy scenario, more common, are those blocked positions were 16 pawns block the center (or more simply any fortress position) and not rarely it happens that a color has a huge material advantage but can't break through in any way. In this last case the player with material disadvantage could have found a genial idea to reach that blocked position, should his opponent with extra pieces still be given an advantage after the game?

Another important consideration is that this rule could discourage attacking players to play gambits or make sacrifices, as if the attack fails, their efforts to try to win would be punished! This last case would even increase the draw rate.

Probably Nickel didn't talk about giving a plus after games finished with advantage but still many pieces on board, anyway those positions (except the 16 Pawns one) could very well be played on until only one piece would be left.

After these examples we can see that there are so many different ways that a position with material advantage can be reached... but it's not always fair that the player with the advantage should be given a plus after the game. As a paradox, an advantage should be given to the opponent if he smartly managed to sacrifice one or more pieces in order to reach a draw endgame which he would have lost if he didn't give away material.


- Of course, the level of chess programs is for much in it. Do you feel that high level correspondence chess and centaur chess evolved much this year, or did it reach a kind of peak?

The level of correspondence chess increases in a parallel way as computers, databases and chess programs improve. Slowly everything keeps improving. Of course, due to the more thinking time, correspondence chess will always have a higher draw percentage than blitz games played by computers.


- Finally, what can you tell us about your correspondence chess path this year, particularly at ICCF where you're currently ranked #13?

On ICCF I am fighting with the Italian Team (I am playing in second board behind the World Champion Finocchiaro) in the 9th European Team Championship.
---> https://www.iccf.com/event?id=44123


Thibault de Vassal    (2015-07-11 02:24:37)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

Eros Riccio just gave his opinion on all this when answering a few questions on his win in the 10th corr. chess WCH, you may have a look here:

http://www.ficgs.com/user_page.php?page=forum_read&id=11811


Jan Ohlin    (2015-07-11 07:14:05)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

We all agree about that the drawing problem occur when top players playing matches against one another they avoids taking risks, and overall that the likelihood of stalemate is quite low in chess?
Then maybe we should play more risky openings and as well more closed positions also. I see we don´t do that now.


Thibault de Vassal    (2015-07-12 01:04:29)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

I'm afraid Jan is right... and Eros says it himself, he takes no risk! So it's not only a question of a drawish game in the context of chess engines, but also of a drawish behaviour. Unless starting playing Go, we'll probably have to change many important rules in chess to make it really exciting again.


Pablo Schmid    (2015-07-12 02:09:18)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

Here is most examples of my ficgs practice (corr and Advanced chess). This represent a low percentage of my games. These games are food for thought from my own assisted experience against that rule that I call "+1 decisive advantage chess". I believe you could already burn a lot of chapters in ending's book. Most of my games show balanced games until the end, sometime, the "punished guy" could have played another drawing defense, sometimes not, unfairly to me. The game would be more safe, with less sacrifices of piece vs 2 or 3 pawns and things like that because of fearing an ending with king vs king + piece or king vs king + pawn even if the sacrifice was sound and well played. Game 22895 and 84758 I would probably have been punished by the rule in the ending of game 22895 (and my opponent in the other game), and that type of ending in general (piece + pawn up vs piece when the king cannot block the pawn). Game 37122 Shame on me, my advantage in that ending was not sufficient to force my opponent to sacrifice his bishop for my last pawn. This is why I only deserve 0,5!
Game 37920 That king of pawns vs piece + pawn would become lost for the player without the piece, what a way of punish some balanced sacrifices for pawns!
Game 54907 and 20704 That kind of opposite bishop ending would be "lost" for the guy pawnless even if the transition into an inferior but drawn ending was the intention of the "inferior guy".
Game 74870 The ending is perfectly balanced but my opponent couldn't finish the game the way he did because of the rule.
Game 74875 I would have been half-losing in the pawn ending after a nice defense in an interesting unbalanced material line.
Game 74880 the ending knight + h pawn would have been "half losing" for me even if we can't say that I was clearly worse overall.
Game 76734 and 76764 Technichally this game is not directly concerned by the rule but it is very close. I was on the verge of defeat but I have managed to defend stubornely. If he have played well to get a winning position and then the win disapear because of bad play but still finish with a draw, he would get a bonus because he played better overall? The way I managed to defend would not be rewarded?
Game 77809 In this game the whole deep opening line would probably be "half losing" for Black in the ending because of the new rule.
Game 80954 Suddenly it seems that I would have been punished for my defense in the final position.
Game 85106 I did not play specially badly but... I would have been punished for my way of finishing the game!


Jan Ohlin    (2015-07-12 07:58:10)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

Thank you Pablo showing these concrete examples. The tecnical problem occur more often than I expected.


Jan Ohlin    (2015-07-12 08:40:47)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

Thibault, the good point is that it´s also a drawish behaviour... :-)


Thibault de Vassal    (2015-07-13 01:44:43)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

Thank you Pablo... also many thanks to Peter, Jan & all participants in this discussion that is not ended for sure :)


Ilmars Cirulis    (2015-07-15 15:57:00)
Thematic Suggestion: Traxler

This is my best try against Traxler counterattack, today.

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6 4.Ng5 Bc5 5.Nxf7 Bxf2+ 6.Kf1 Qe7 7.Nxh8 d5 8.
exd5 Nd4 9.d6 Qxd6 10.Nf7 Qc5 11.d3 Bh4
( 11...e4 12.b4 $1 Qf5 13.dxe4 Nxe4 14.g4 $1 Qg6 15.h3 $1 Be6
( 15...Qc6 16.Ng5 $1 Qxc4+
( 16...Nxg5 17.Kxf2 )
17.Kg2 Nxg5 18.Bxg5 Ne6 19.Nd2 Qxb4 )
)
12.b4 $1 Qe7 13.Nd2 $1 e4
( 13...b5 14.Bb3 Bb7
( 14...e4 {Different transpositions of 13...e4} )
( 14...Bg4 15.Nf3 e4 {Transpositions of 13...e4} )
( 14...Nxb3 15.axb3 )
( 14...a5 15.Nf3 a4 16.N7xe5 axb3 17.Nxd4 Qxe5 18.Qe2 Qxe2+ 19.
Kxe2 {Endgame} )
15.Nf3
( 15.Bb2 Nxb3 16.axb3 Kxf7
( 16...Qxf7 )
( 16...Nd5 )
17.Nf3 Nd5 18.Qe2 )
15...Nxf3 16.gxf3 Nd5 17.Nxe5
( 17.Qe2 )
( 17.Rg1 )
17...Qxe5 18.Qe2 {Long endgame, maybe draw} )
( 13...Bg4 14.Nf3 Bxf3
( 14...e4 15.dxe4 {Transposition of 13...e4 14.dxe4 Bg4} )
15.gxf3 b5 16.Bb3 Nxb3 17.axb3 Kxf7 {Easy endgame} )
14.dxe4 b5
( 14...Bg4 15.Nf3 Nxf3 16.gxf3 Bh3+ 17.Kg1 Qxb4 18.Qe2 Qc5+ 19.Be3 Qh5
20.f4 Qxe2 21.Bxe2 Kxf7 {Endgame} )
15.Bb3 $1 Nxb3
( 15...Bg4 16.Nf3 Nxf3 17.gxf3 Bh3+ 18.Ke2 Nxe4 19.Qd3 Nc5+ 20.Qe3
Nxb3 {Long endgame, maybe draw} )
16.axb3 Qxf7 17.Nf3 $1 Nxe4 18.Qd3
{Long endgame, maybe draw}

Lot's of endgames. :)


Ilmars Cirulis    (2015-07-15 15:57:20)
Thematic Suggestion: Traxler

* Lots


Thibault de Vassal    (2015-07-16 17:48:44)
Thematic Suggestion: Traxler

Lots of work!


Bogoljub Teverovski    (2015-08-03 09:43:29)
Thematic Suggestion: Traxler

Let's play Traxler thematic since September


Garvin Gray    (2015-09-26 11:36:01)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

I see this topic is being discussed again, or was. I notice that Eros has not actually won a game against an opponent since match 4.

This means, unless results are missing, that he has not beaten successive opponents the matches since. All this shows is that he is the equal of the players he is put up against and it is the champion retains the title that allows him to stay where he is.

This then results in the nature of play we see, which is defensive.

I proposed back quite a whilst ago that the format should be changed for the final match to 8 games, and then if the result is 4-4, the remaining 4 games are played.

Disclaimer- I come from a position that I believe that Eros should be made to show that he is the best player on this site.

He has drawn too many matches with all drawn games for this to continue and I do not believe this is a healthy situation for the site and it needs to change.


Scott Nichols    (2015-09-27 01:43:01)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

I agree, 59 draws, 1 win = 5 world ch's

Does not compute...


Jan Ohlin    (2015-09-27 12:31:32)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

As in fotboll once in a time, to many corner kicks gave a penalty... :)


Garvin Gray    (2015-09-27 12:55:00)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

I will carry this point on a bit. Thibault defense for the current system is that it maintains the old classical system of the world championship.

But even fide has recognised that the draw odds to the champion gave too much advantage, and that is in over the board play, never mind in engine chess.

The defending champion already receives two advantages- the right to be in the final match, and if that match is lost, then is in the next qualifying match.

And then the champion in the championship match also receives draw odds.

When you see it written like this, do you now see how much of an advantage the defending champion actually does receive?

And this all goes back to when the site was first set up.

It is not like Eros had to play through from the first stage against all the beginners and fight his way and defeat the previous defending champion to win the title.


Garvin Gray    (2015-09-30 23:29:09)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

Btw, to respond to Scott Nichols. I would have no issue at all if the champion had won each match 6.5-5.5. He defeated each opponent on merit and proved under the format used that he was the better player.


Thibault de Vassal    (2015-09-30 23:46:19)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

And I'll say it once more :) FIDE made a choice that may have given more chances to everyone, I agree with that, but it seems to me that the chess world championship lost its aura & legend, just like world champions (IMHO). Also, results are a direct consequence of rules, it does not mean that Eros does not deserve his place (IMO), he certainly would have played differently in a round robin. Finally, FIDE WCH is round robin, ICCF WCH is round robin, why everything should be round robin?


Garvin Gray    (2015-10-01 01:01:15)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

The Fide World Championship Match is NOT round robin and has NOT been round robin since 2007. Carlsen defeated Anand last year.

The full cycle is shown here:

http://www.fide.com/FIDE/handbook/regulations_match_2016.pdf


Thibault de Vassal    (2015-10-01 01:50:23)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

Oh, right... big mistake, sorry :) I was probably influenced by your comment "But even fide has recognised that the draw odds to the champion gave too much advantage" (heard "that's why they changed the format to RR")

Anyway, ok I also recognize that the draw odds to the champion gives too much advantage... but this system still looks better than any other one to me. I also remind that even Eros agrees with this draw issue. Finally, yes I'm open to any suggestion for a change, but we really have to find something strong.


Jan Ohlin    (2015-10-01 07:00:57)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

While we wait for the solution, we can consider that engines do not tell the truth in closed positions with any pieces left. The question is also how much they understand openings as Benko-gambit? We have too much respect for the engines evaluations. And it counts in me too...


Jan Ohlin    (2015-10-01 07:02:11)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

With ALL pieces left...


Garvin Gray    (2015-10-01 09:07:08)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

Keeping the discussion solely to this issue of World Championship Tie break rule and draw odds, I have already made one proposal, which is that the final match be split into two parts. The first eight games be started, and then if tied, then the remaining four games are played.

A defensive strategy in the first eight games is not so well rewarded, because the champion has the knowledge that if the first eight games are drawn, then they have to play another four games.

Yes, after 12 games, I am still stating that the champion retains the title if the match is tied 6-6, unless someone can propose how to break the tie with more games, but at least this way, the two players have more to gain by trying to win a game, especially the champion and concluding the match in the first eight games.


Scott Nichols    (2015-10-01 14:55:14)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

It's pretty simple IMO. Make each year unique, no seeding. Everybody has to play from the start, prelims, semi's and finally a RR final. One thing I would add is a under 2000 and over 2000 ch's.


Alvin Alcala    (2015-10-02 18:37:50)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

In case of a tie let them play a tie-breaker game with accelerated time control.


Thibault de Vassal    (2015-10-08 18:11:38)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

Your idea is attractive Garvin! But, it is a question of time also, and organisation of championships cycles... I don't see a satisfying solution with this one.

Scott's idea looks like the original FICGS cup's idea... and ICCF WCH. Just one more correspondence chess RR championship.

Alvin's idea is exactly what a correspondence chess champ. should avoid (IMHO), I mean server or internet provider problems... It would be a shame that it decides a winner (like it may have happened in freestyle tournaments). Also, this is just not correspondence chess anymore.


Thibault de Vassal    (2015-10-08 18:14:00)
Alvin Alcala wins Ultimate Chess Champ.

Alvin just won another freestyle tournament, congrats :)

http://www.chessclub.com/ucc

PGN available!


Alvin Alcala    (2015-10-08 18:16:29)
Alvin Alcala wins Ultimate Chess Champ.

Thanks Thib!


Garvin Gray    (2015-10-09 16:57:51)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

Thib: I have not replied to this topic since my last comment for two reasons. 1) Nothing new to add 2) I had seen Scott's comment and was rather upset by it as I saw the danger in it. This discussion, in my opinion, is about one topic only.

We have discussed the ficgs world cup and other formats before, and can again, but this discussion is for one item only, so I did not want to contribute in any way to derailing the discussion. So I decided to refrain from comment as I had nothing to add.

To respond to your comments Thib- timing of the championship cycles will always be an issue, no matter the format. Regardless if you use 12 straight games, my format, or Alvin's. Or any other version.

We already have different groups starting at different times, and the final starting at different times to the other groups. This is just how things happen. It is possible that the final could be over in 8 games and in a shorter time period and time gained.

I think this format is worth trying for at least one cycle. That is also what happens with the otb world championship. There are format changes from time to time. Some are successful, some are not. Matches used to be 24 games in length. Now they are 12 games. One was played as an 8 player double round robin.

Things change as the environment changes.


Garvin Gray    (2015-10-09 17:00:06)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

A second proposal to reduce the effect of draw odds- increase the total number of games that start at the same time from 12 to 16.


Scott Nichols    (2015-10-09 20:04:30)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

"Also, this is just not correspondence chess anymore." Times and technology have changed dramiticaly, why can't we change with it?


Thibault de Vassal    (2015-10-14 02:29:41)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

Garvin's last idea is actually really interesting in my opinion. I always thought that 12 games should be enough, but I would be ready to change it to 16 if a majority approves... Any opinions on this (and on Scott's remark as well)?


Jan Ohlin    (2015-10-14 07:08:13)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

If playing a lot more games it is like forcing mistakes instead of good games?! Social life will become ruined... Whom will bother about become a "world champ"? Not me who also have small kids to take care of.
And the opposite, if instead play fewer games it will force the challenger to play even more risky openings. The games will become more exciting to watch.


Garvin Gray    (2015-10-14 15:17:26)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

Jan: Eros has clearly stated that he has used the advantage of draw odds by playing defensively and by playing for draws, knowing he only needs to draw all the games to retain the title.

So he knows he does not need to win the match to retain the title and has used the rules to their full effect. Of course this is his right and well done to him, but it is also the organisers and rule makers duty to change the rules when the circumstances are no longer in the interest of the event as a whole.

If all 12 games in each match had been blood and guts affairs, and a few games had been won, but the eventual score was 6-6, then this whole conversation would probably not be happening.

But when only ONE, I REPEAT ONE, game has been won in the last eight matches, and Eros has managed to retain the title each title, it is clear that the rules need to change.

I have made two clear proposals. As illustrated above, it is not a case in the previous matches that all the games were hard fought, so your argument that adding four extra games would be onerous in the final match.

Yes, it could produce an effect of more drawn games from short draws, but then if this the case, then all players should be warned the organisers will be forced to seriously consider introducing no draw agreements before move 30 without the agreement of the arbiter.

Again, this is what occurs when the players make it clear they are determined not to win their games.


Jan Ohlin    (2015-10-14 17:12:18)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

Garvin: I´m maybe the crazy one who wants to play less or equal (!) games as now and think it then will be acceptable for the challenger to play openings as Benko gambit, closed Spanish etc. I see that we have not been sufficiently clever at exploiting engines weaknesses.


Thibault de Vassal    (2015-10-16 01:12:10)
FICGS chess cup : proposal

Hi all,

The recent discussions on FICGS chess wch tie break rules just gave me an idea...

Obviously, there are no satisfying solution (for everyone I mean) for a change in the wch rules. In my opinion, wch rules are great already, even if there are too many draws in matches.

The idea of a cup tournament is here for years but I didn't see any way to include it, in a several rounds version at least, in our calendar because of the wch cycle, the slowly decreasing number of active players, and so on...

But what do you think about this cup format:

An enormous round robin tournament with the 33 (1 player for each piece on the board, it's a symbol but the number is to be discussed) highest rated players who entered the waiting list. It is 32 games per player for 1 round only, duration of games could be the standard one (because there is one round only), longer but maybe fits more the number of games and additional games in other tournaments.

Looks like a great challenge and a real alternative, with very few risks of draw odds, cheating or whatever... It may be the biggest correspondence chess round robin tournament on the internet.

Any opinion? Would you play such tournament?


Thibault de Vassal    (2015-10-16 01:12:57)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

Finally, this discussion inspired me an idea on a possible FICGS cup:

http://www.ficgs.com/user_page.php?page=forum_read&id=11877


Peter W. Anderson    (2015-10-16 10:17:47)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

I will comment more on the suggestions in this thread when my current match against Eros is finished.

However, I would like to respond now to Thib's request for views on Garvin's suggestion of moving to a 16 game final match. I would be fine with that but equally I am fine staying with a 12 game match.


Clodomiro Ortiz    (2015-10-21 09:47:50)
FICGS chess cup : proposal

I agree with the ten days+one day per move format,but if considered too rapid i suggest a 20 days+one day per move time control..as you know, several players tend to extent games almost endlessly when fall into unfavorable positions,,


Jan Ohlin    (2015-10-23 12:09:23)
FICGS chess cup : proposal

Should there be any sense of self-torture like this should it be ten days+one day per move format which makes it difficult for people to use computers in full. I hope...


Garvin Gray    (2015-10-23 13:11:56)
FICGS chess cup : proposal

I think this whole discussion has missed the original point of why I made the original proposal for the ficgs world cup.

It was to give players who were in the 2100 to 2200 and below more opportunities against players rated 2300 and above, whilst still also giving the top players something to play for ie the tournament win.

So the original concept was that there was no knockout groups, or starting final match, but instead that all players started from round one, and then everyone had to qualify for round two from there, with only the winners to advance at each stage.

The format above could have even taken over from the waiting lists we currently have, which struggle to be filled, as they give more purpose.

Instead, what is being proposed now, is just one big round robin. As someone who has just organised a round robin event, I can assure you, soon after the games have started, the players will soon forget which games are for the world cup, and which are their World championship games, and which are their Rapid SM, or Rapid M games.

Next, the strength of the field. For this event to work with the monster round robin, it really does need most of the top players competing. How can this be ensured to make it a worthwhile event?

Related to this- the time control. Very few serious correspondence chess players are going to sign up to a time control of 10 days initial time when they potentially have 31 games.

Remember, this is meant to be one of FICGS main events on the calendar. That is at least how I view it.

The time control should be 30 days plus 3 days per move if the format is single round robin with 32 or so players.

I still believe the original proposal of mine is the one that should be adopted, not the single round robin that is being discussed now.

I will not be playing in the single round robin.


Bogoljub Teverovski    (2015-11-01 12:25:11)
Thematic tournaments?

It's time to switch from Noteboom thematic to Traxler or to King's Gambit


Jose Carrizo    (2015-11-02 18:07:27)
Thematic tournaments?

King's Gambit


Wilhelm Schuett    (2015-11-05 01:27:39)
Thematic tournaments?

Modern Defence, Sicilian Kalashnikov or Sicilian 2.Nf3 g6


Wilhelm Schuett    (2015-11-05 01:28:56)
Thematic tournaments?

Old Benoni, Modern Defence, 1.d4 e6 2.c4 with 2. ... Lb4+ or 2. ... b6, 1. ... Sc6, Old Indian, Morra Gambit , Ponziani


Thibault de Vassal    (2015-11-10 01:41:18)
Thematic tournaments?

Let's go for a King's gambit for now :)


Garvin Gray    (2015-11-10 01:50:55)
FICGS chess cup : proposal

I really do believe the first question that needs to be asked is. What is the purpose of this event?

Then after that question has been asked and the answer gotten, then the format is rather automatic.

I believe the purpose of the event should be to have all players start from round one in different round robin groups, and then the winners of these groups progress to the next stage (This could even be the final of 11 players if there is eleven groups).

So in all it could be just two stages.


Ian Zimmerman    (2015-11-18 16:59:23)
Feature request

Something still missing on this site, is the ability to sort games by time of last move. This is very useful for players who keeps their own records of games offline, as almost all experienced correspondence players do. All of the following sites have the feature: ICCF, SchemingMind, ChessWorld.

Alternatively, if you want to be innovative, here is something that would do the same job even more efficiently: have an extra flag (call it ACK) stored with each game, and allow filtering by ACK. Display ACK next to each game as a checkbox. Set ACK automatically in one and exactly one situation: when the *opponent* moves.

This way, when I turn on the filter, I can see at a glance all the games where my opponent *just* moved, and I clear ACK by clicking on the checkbox as I update my offline database for each game.


Thibault de Vassal    (2015-12-02 02:48:10)
FICGS chess cup : proposal

Finally... after a way too long thought on this FICGS cup idea and FICGS wch format, I think that Garvin's idea for this new tournament should be tried.

1) Eros just won the latest WCH with all games drawn again, but not all games in the knockout tournament are draws (e.g. latest candidates final). I think that we must keep this original format because it doesn't exist elsewhere and because it is a real challenge (and it must be possible to beat Eros in 1 game... one day :)) ! Of course, the other reason is that I didn't find any other acceptable way in case of equality.

2) I still think that there are problems in both my cup idea and Garvin's idea in the current context, but this cup will be different enough from the WCH, so the two formats should probably coexist so that each player can choose (or play both).


Garvin Gray    (2015-12-02 09:32:52)
FICGS chess cup : proposal

In regards to point 1) I have never made any comments in regards to any of the other knockout matches other than the final match involving Eros.

I have made no proposals to change the format of those matches.

My only proposal is in regards to Eros's final match.

2) The ficgs world cup concept in my original format- if fully implemented, is in fact, dramatically different from the ficgs wch, and has little similarity to it.

What I could see it do though, if popular, is it might make some of the division groups less enticing to enter.

In my opinion, that would just be site evolution. If the high majority of the site prefer- ficgs wch, ficgs world cup and some of the divisions (or one style of the divisions), then an important discovery has been made that is beneficial to the membership.


Thibault de Vassal    (2015-12-03 01:55:06)
FICGS chess cup : proposal

I forgot to add: One of the reasons I finally chose your format is that most players chose it (I also received a few private comments on the discussion).

Anyway, let's try it. To be continued very soon.


Scott Nichols    (2015-12-07 17:34:23)
FICGS chess cup : proposal

The entry fee changes everything for the better IMO. That cuts out the non-serious players. The time controls to me make a difference simply because of advanced age. (will I die before this is finished?) Of course for me, none of it matters since I already retired from CC. Zero games going, yay. What did it for the me was the constant arguing for longer time controls. In the old days of snail mail, that had a point, but not now.


Herbert Kruse    (2015-12-14 10:48:02)
TER rating calculation

ok, i formula is not really good, but i can deal with it.
the reason for all of this is, that in a match someone has the advantage of winning with 8 draws, if his TER is higher


Garvin Gray    (2015-12-16 11:39:44)
TER rating calculation

You have now changed the conversation.

Originally it was about ratings and how rating changes are made and why TER and current ratings are used, and I answered part of that conversation, which was not fully explored.

Now you have changed the topic to talking about matches and TER's. That is a different conversation altogether. And then you are debating the format of the ficgs world championship knockout system, which has been debated so often on here.

It is contained in about every tenth thread.

Please choose a topic to discuss. Which is it?


Thibault de Vassal    (2015-12-16 21:09:20)
TER rating calculation

Not all games were drawn in this match (yes, it happens :)), so rules apply this way:

"Knockout tournament winner will play round-robin cycle winner in a 8 games candidates final match (stage 4). In case of equality (4-4), the knockout tournament winner is qualified for stage 5 if all games are draw, the round-robin cycle winner if not all games are draw." Arkadiusz is the round-robin cycle winner.


Francois Caire    (2015-12-17 05:12:26)
Thematic tournaments?

1.e4 d6 2.d4 Nf6 3.f3 e5 4.dxe5 dxe5 5.Qxd8+ Kxd8 6.Bc4 Be6 7.Bxe6 fxe6

1.f4 d5 2.c4!? e5!?


Bogoljub Teverovski    (2016-01-04 22:44:52)
Thematic tournaments?

Any offers for new thematic?
I'd play 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 d6 3.Nc3 e5


Thibault de Vassal    (2016-01-05 17:51:06)
Thematic tournaments?

I'll try to change the next thematic soon... if players do not register too quickly for another king's gambit :)


Charlie Neil    (2016-01-07 00:21:12)
Thematic tournaments?

You know 1. b4 would be fun. But how about some "madness"? BDG! 1. d4 d5 2. e4
why not?


Ilmars Cirulis    (2016-01-07 14:29:37)
Thematic tournaments?

1.b4 e5 2.a3 d5 3.e3 - I suggest this. :D

Positional fun.


Dann Corbit    (2016-01-07 22:20:18)
Thematic tournaments?

May as well advance one full move to get variety. Everyone will respond:
3. .. Nf6
followed by:
4. Bb2

That is quite an interesting opening and much more rarely played than the standard
1. b4 e5 Bb2 Bxb4 Bxe5 Nf6 e3 d5


Dann Corbit    (2016-01-07 23:52:11)
Thematic tournaments?

Analysis for BDG:
rnbqkbnr/ppp1pppp/8/3p4/3PP3/8/PPP2PPP/RNBQKBNR b KQkq - acd 37; acs 2548; bm dxe4; cce 35; ce 30; id "gentest-5125"; pm dxe4 {2629} e6 {408} c6 {293} Nc6 {16} c5 {16} Nf6 {14} a6 {1} e5 {1}; pv dxe4 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 c6 Nge2 h6 Bxf6 exf6 Nxe4 f5 Nd2 Bd6 g3 O-O Bg2 Be6 O-O Nd7 c4 Nf6 Qb3 Rb8 Qc3 Re8 Rfe1 Qd7 Rac1 Rbd8 Nf3 Ne4 Qe3 b5 cxb5 cxb5 Ne5 Bxe5 dxe5 Bxa2 Bxe4 fxe4 Qxe4; white_wins 1092; black_wins 1345; draws 800; Opening Blackmar-Diemer Gambit: Fritz Attack. ; CaxtonID: 197 ECO: D00;


Ilmars Cirulis    (2016-01-11 23:10:13)
Thematic tournaments?

Yes, it's good idea to add 3... Nf6 and 4.Bb2.

About 1.b4 e5 2.Bb2 ... - I believe that 2.a3 is better choice and that after 2.Bb2 have more problems. It's only an opinion, of course.


Thibault de Vassal    (2016-01-12 18:44:16)
Thematic tournaments?

Before all, let's give a try to François Caire's suggestion: 1.f4 d5 2.c4!? e5!? :)


Garvin Gray    (2016-01-13 23:57:16)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

Stephane Legrand: Can you repeat your question here from the chat bar, so it can be answered properly.

And also it is not lost in the future.


Alexis Alban    (2016-01-17 15:37:10)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

I disagree with the idea that a champion should have to start over from the beginning each year and have to work his way up to retain the title every year.

I however think that it is wrong for a champion to only need to play one match to defend his title. I think the 2015 champion should have to play in the 2016 quarterfinals and work his way up from there.

If that seems unfair then just make the champion play in the semifinals.


Garvin Gray    (2016-01-17 15:44:55)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

Alexis Alban: I apologise if my reply seems a little bit harsh, but are you entering the conversation half way through and have not read the entire thread and preceding discussions?

This thread deals solely with the FICGS World championship and its format, mainly in particular with what happens with drawn matches in the knockout stages.

No one has suggested AT ALL, that the champion has to start again from the beginning (from round one).

That format, what I really wish Thibault would get started on with starting, is from the FICGS world cup, which is a different tournament entirely. It is a completely different structure, with different aims. If you wish to debate that tournament, please move your discussion to that thread.

I am really am trying to work hard to try and prevent thread drift.


Thibault de Vassal    (2016-01-17 23:29:35)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

By the way Alexis, starting from the knockout quarter final is actually starting from the beginning (stage 1 for highest rated players). Anyway starting from the semi final or knockout final has nothing to see with "defending" title as it is now, it's just a completely different scheme.


Garvin Gray    (2016-01-18 09:53:00)
FICGS chess cup : proposal

I take you mean if in Ficgs World Cup 1 (FWC1) we got 73 players, then in Ficgs World Cup 2 we got 103 players?

Is that correct?

If that is correct, then in FWC1, using a number of 73 players, it would be 4 groups of 10, 3 groups of 11.

For the second stage (finals)= I know this might be a bit controversial, but I think the TER rule should be dropped and those who tie for first should progress. Since we have seven groups, that should mean at the most eleven players in the final.

This will have the by-product in the round robin games of everyone knowing that if they can finish outright first, they knockout everyone from their group immediately.

In FWC2- With 103 players, same format, just more groups.


Thibault de Vassal    (2016-01-20 22:22:59)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

Answering Stéphane Legrand's question:


If the 8 games are draw: the highest TER advances in the cases of knockout quarter, semi & final. In the candidates final, it is the player from the knockout tournament who advances.


Stephane Legrand    (2016-01-20 22:27:45)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

Ok. So, nether the lowest TER as you said ?


Thibault de Vassal    (2016-01-21 02:25:52)
Wch Match Tie Break Rules

Okay, I get it now! :) I said this in the chat bar, too quickly of course... This was wrong indeed. Thanks!


Thibault de Vassal    (2016-02-03 19:19:05)
AI beats a professional Go player

Yes, well... Obviously Fan Hui is not as strong as Lee Sedol but a first match between the champ. and this almost-AI would be interesting to watch :)


Scott Nichols    (2016-02-06 01:45:40)
FICGS chess cup : proposal

There is one fair way, sets of 2-game matches with time shortening with each tied match. (better for spectators also) That way, no luck is involved.


Thibault de Vassal    (2016-02-06 02:59:07)
Alvin Alcala wins Ultimate Chess Champ.

In the news again :)

http://www.bworldonline.com/content.php?section=Sports&title=Draw-death-Not&id=122530


Scott Nichols    (2016-02-06 18:08:50)
Alvin Alcala wins Ultimate Chess Champ.

No doubt about it, you are #1 my friend. Congrats!!


Francois Caire    (2016-02-08 02:30:12)
Thematic tournaments?

I must admit I was drunk when I suggested this. Nevertheless, I think this will be fun.


Garvin Gray    (2016-02-09 03:24:17)
FICGS chess cup : proposal

And then you will just have more complaints about the faster time control and the title being decided by speed of the computer, superior engine.

Also there will be issues of trying to find an acceptable time for all participants. How do you find an acceptable time if players live in USA, Europe, Middle East, Asia, and Oceania region.

If the games are all held at the same time for an accelerated time control, similar to the freestyle concept, then that is dramatically different to the original format.

Rapid playoffs are not ideal in OTB chess, but at least they are played at the same time of day as the original games, and some of the players are not forced to play at 3am, where others get to play at 3pm.

Also, all this requires extra organisation on Thibault's part, unless he writes into the original rules about when the finals will be, but still the playoffs will be still be unfair for the stated reasons.

A different idea could be to have a third round involving those who tied from the second stage. So if three players tied, they would play each other four times.

1 v 2
2 v 3
3 v 1

2 v 1
3 v 2
1 v 3

1 v 2
2 v 3
3 v 1

2 v 1
3 v 2
1 v 3


Garvin Gray    (2016-02-12 01:21:48)
Thematic tournaments?

I believe there is a bit of discussion in the chat bar about Traxler Counterattack for the next thematic. Is that correct?


George Jempty    (2016-02-12 06:16:15)
Thematic tournaments?

I suggest the O'Kelly Sicilian: 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 a6


Dann Corbit    (2016-02-12 06:19:46)
Thematic tournaments?

Anand plays O'kelly Sicilian:
http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1315128


Ilmars Cirulis    (2016-02-12 12:21:10)
Thematic tournaments?

Traxler Counterattack was mentioned because I remembered about our (me and Thibault) thematic silver games long time ago.

I don't want to play Traxler CA with Black, probably.


George Jempty    (2016-02-12 13:12:38)
Thematic tournaments?

Actually Anand was White in that O'Kelly game -- Morozevich was Black. And anyway it transposed into a Paulsen by move 6.


Francois Caire    (2016-02-19 21:40:52)
Thematic tournaments?

The theme of tournaments 179 to 183 was the O'Kelly sicilian.


Thibault de Vassal    (2016-02-19 23:40:40)
Thematic tournaments?

Let's give a small try to 1.b4 e5 2.a3


George Jempty    (2016-02-20 14:34:47)
Thematic tournaments?

OK I will have to search for those O'Kelly games. 3.d4 is not as bad as everybody thinks, if White follows up 3...cxd4 with 4.Bc4. Probably drawish in correspondence but better for OTB


Wilhelm Schuett    (2016-02-25 03:32:10)
Thematic tournaments?

1.e4 d6 2.d4 Nf6 3.f3 e5 4.dxe5 dxe5 5.Qxd8+ Kxd8 6.Bc4 Be6 7.Bxe6 fxe6 8.Be3! ;
3. ..c6 means that 1.e4 d6 2.d4 Nf6 3.f3 is enough.
1.d4 d6 offers much possibilities.


Scott Nichols    (2016-02-26 23:26:02)
Ficgs is a money trap * BEWARE *

If the match wasn't played and he wants a refund, he should get a refund. Sometimes the tournaments take a long time to start so there should be a "withdraw" button to all events. Sometimes a person's situation changes and he can't play, so he should be able to withdraw instead of being paired and not be able to play any moves. This is bad for both players.


Garvin Gray    (2016-03-04 10:09:34)
Chess960

I am surprised we do not have a chess960 format of some sort considering engines can play it.


Mladen Jankovic    (2016-03-09 14:35:13)
AI beats a professional Go player

And that first match has happened. AI won.


Thibault de Vassal    (2016-03-13 02:21:04)
AI beats a professional Go player

... and the match is already over (3-0). Looks like the machine definitely overplays humans at Go as well.


Ilmars Cirulis    (2016-06-08 04:50:34)
Bugs after the server crash

Can't reproduce the problem from this computer. It was fallen off lower row of chess board and some more problem with h1 square.

Today at the evening or tomorrow I will return to the computer where that happened and try to get some screenshot and more information.

Everywhere else it works okay. Yay for FICGS, nay for exploring this strange thing/bug. :)


Bogoljub Teverovski    (2016-06-14 10:56:14)
Thematic tournaments?

it's time for new thematic, say, Trompovsky


Thibault de Vassal    (2016-06-15 01:52:14)
Thematic tournaments?

Trompowsky attack, why not... as soon as the current waiting list is full!


Nilson Pereira    (2016-07-02 20:43:19)
Chess World CHAMPIONSHIP

I do not consider winner if draws in the final of the chess world, there must be one winner even if a match of the final so I think Eros Riccio did not win tournaments on many occasions. If there are draws have to decide on thematic games or chess 960. It would be fair !!


Nilson Pereira    (2016-07-03 01:21:19)
Chess World CHAMPIONSHIP

Champions was legitimate until the fourth tournament, I see the hall of fame from 5 tournament no simple champions but draws no point who highlight, hurting the challenger who has not lost even 1


Jan Ohlin    (2016-08-13 07:50:52)
Chess World CHAMPIONSHIP

So far, yes! ;-) I look at all games and also follow Anderson - Strömberg, a match very interesting from an advanced chess view. The strongest computer win against best player, when will that scenario begin to happen...?


George Jempty    (2016-09-12 15:22:36)
Thematic tournaments?

How about the Four Knights Game?


Bogoljub Teverovski    (2016-09-12 23:18:32)
Thematic tournaments?

Yes, 4 Knights or Belgrade Gambit


Peter Brodie    (2016-09-13 17:51:28)
Missing chat

You should only be able to delete your own chat..it shouldn't effect others..if you are posting offensive material and won't delete the site moderator(s) should be able to delete..it's s site glitch that should be fixed..otherwise it makes chat meaningless.I only come here to play not yack so it's a small thing but my sense of justice and fair play came into effect..


Bogoljub Teverovski    (2016-11-01 11:53:06)
Thematic tournaments?

It's time for new thematic, say, Belgrade Gambit in 4-Knights


Thibault de Vassal    (2016-11-07 19:15:35)
Poker Poll

Bernal & Nichols :)

Well, I quite agree with Scott, the fairest test may be a 12 (or more) game advanced poker match.

2400 will be very hard to reach but with some optimization, it may be possible. But to stay over 2400 while finishing games that go wrong would be much much harder IMHO.


Scott Nichols    (2016-11-07 21:57:16)
Poker Poll

My idea was just a heads up match between 2 players who both feel they are the best:) No ratings, no money, everything just stays the same. The reason I offer this is because I'm 99% mathematically sure with this rating system, reaching 2400 would be next to impossible with everyone so much lower rated.

On the other hand, all I have to do is win a dozen or so games quickly and there it is. I feel it is an unfair advantage to me.


Scott Nichols    (2016-11-07 22:15:35)
Poker Poll

One last caveat before we agree. If I reach 2225 or higher first, I will know in my mind it will just be a matter of time IMO. Then I will have to rescind my offer and let things go on as they are. Sorry if I am rambling...


Scott Nichols    (2016-11-11 14:01:20)
Do the cards matter?

Dear Yeturu Aahlad, I have thought long about your inquiry. This is the best scenario I can come up with.

You are at a 9 player real money game. You know all the players. You all have decided to see who is the best.

You have been playing for many, many hours. All that is left is you and Him. Lets call him Eros. Last hand.

You are dealt pocket Black Aces. Eros acts first and checks. You feel you can just take the ante's now and move on, but you decide to slow play them and just call. The flop is 3clubs, 6hearts and Qhearts. Again Eros checks and you decide to bet a little again and he calls.

Now through all the hours of playing, you have gotten to know each other well. He is the type who talks and laughs, makes fun of people, belittles them and acts in a generally arrogant manner. (We all know the type). The KEY is to study all of this and, this is maybe the most important, study his microexpressions. Some people call them tells. But most all pros know how not to give away tells. But I have learned that microexpressions are involuntary. Let's get back to the hand.

The "turn" is a Jspades. He decides to bet, a good bet and of course you call. (slow playing). Now comes the moment of truth, "the river". It is an Ace of hearts. You are thrilled, and your face gives the microexpression for a tenth of a second. You now have 3 Aces, but there is 3 hearts on the board.

All of the sudden, Eros goes all in and walks away from the table. In my experience, the odds of him having 2 hearts in the hole is 23/1. HERE is the point if the cards matter. You can beat anything except a Heart flush. And the odds of him having that are 23/1. This is a real money, no limit game. If you call and lose, you lose 90% of all you hold near and dear.

WHAT DO YOU DO?


Thibault de Vassal    (2016-11-11 19:15:18)
Do the cards matter?

As for me, I'm not sure if the answer is in the question or not?! You wrote "Last hand. " What decides who is the best if there's no winner after the last hand?


Scott Nichols    (2016-11-11 21:07:34)
Do the cards matter?

The way I came up with the cards don't matter theory was watching a World Series of Poker heads up match between two of the players who came up the hard way and fought their way to the highest echelon of poker pro's.

They got dealt a hand, I don't remember the cards except they were shit cards that anybody would just throw in.

The host commenting on the match was a multi-time world champion. <br
To everyone's surprise, the first player bet big on his lousy cards. Of course, I and I am sure, everybody else thought player 2 would just throw in his lousy hand and go on to the next one. But noooo, he took his time, a long time, and re-raised. This went on and I can't even remember who actually won the hand, but the host said, "when you get to this level, the cards don't matter." That enlightened me in a profound way i had never thought of before.


Scott Nichols    (2016-11-11 21:13:06)
Do the cards matter?

Not to be-labor the point, when I suggested a match, without points or money or even spectators. Mano a mano. Play in a dark, dingy dungeon with two players. No one needs to know who won except the 2 players involved.


Francois Caire    (2016-11-12 16:48:17)
Stockfish fixes memory leak in Syzygy

I tested it and after a 24 hour analysis in an endgame position, stockfish was using only 2.6 Gb of ram with 2Gb hash size.

http://abrok.eu/stockfish/

Author: Marco Costalba
Date: Sat Nov 5 07:55:08 2016 +0100
Timestamp: 1478328908

Rewrite syzygy in C++

Rewrite the code in SF style, simplify and
document it.

Code is now much clear and bug free (no mem-leaks and
other small issues) and is also smaller (more than
600 lines of code removed).

All the code has been rewritten but root_probe() and
root_probe_wdl() that are completely misplaced and should
be retired altogheter. For now just leave them in the
original version.

Code is fully and deeply tested for equivalency both in
functionality and in speed with hundreds of games and
test positions and is guaranteed to be 100% equivalent
to the original.

Tested with tb_dbg branch for functional equivalency on
more than 12M positions.

stockfish.exe bench 128 1 16 syzygy.epd

Position: 2016/2016
Total 12121156 Hits 0 hit rate (%) 0
Total time (ms) : 4417851
Nodes searched : 1100151204
Nodes/second : 249024

Tested with 5,000 games match against master, 1 Thread,
128 MB Hash each, tc 40+0.4, which is almost equivalent
to LTC in Fishtest on this machine. 3-, 4- and 5-men syzygy
bases on SSD, 12-moves opening book to emphasize mid- and endgame.

Score of SF-SyzygyC++ vs SF-Master: 633 - 617 - 3750 [0.502] 5000
ELO difference: 1

No functional change.


Garvin Gray    (2016-11-17 07:36:41)
FICGS chess cup : proposal

With ficgs now back up and running and seemingly most of the back end issues sorted out, I am now bringing up the topic of the FICGS World Cup and when will it start.

We had a format, a concept and almost a start date, then the whole site collapsed.

With now that WCH has started, the very first Ficgs World Cup could start in early January, with possible plans to hold one every six months (rough schedule).


Garvin Gray    (2016-11-30 02:01:25)
Future penalties for games lost on time

I know this topic comes up for discussion from time to time, but seeing the results from Rapid A 192, I think a more thorough discussion needs to take place about what should be done about players who lose multiple games on time.

I know on ICCF, they have very strict rules in this matter, and I believe that FICGS should follow the same procedure.

Players should be made aware before entering a tournament that they are expected to complete all their games, not just time out some of their games without consequence.

If players do not want to continue their games and feel that it is ok to let their games time out, then FICGS should take the position that their services are no longer required on this site for a stated period.

The ICCF rules should be followed in this matter.


Garvin Gray    (2016-11-30 08:33:54)
Future penalties for games lost on time

Herbert Kruse- Policies and procedures can be changed at any point in time as situations change, or as events occur.

Where in my post did I say that I was changing the rules after the beginning the game. In fact, I think you would find that the game had ended. That was the point.

The rule I was bringing up is what to do in the future for players who lose games on time. ICCF is generally seen as the standard practice for most rules and procedures, and their policies on this matter is very clear.

So if their policy was to be adopted here, it would start from (insert date), which would hopefully be January 1st 2017.


Peter W. Anderson    (2016-11-30 09:19:39)
Future penalties for games lost on time

Yes, too many losses on time.

I generally tend to give people the benefit of the doubt re personal circumstances, health etc but a few observations:

- I have yet to see anyone lose on time in a winning position

- I have yet to see anyone lose on time when they had a level game in a match or tournament they could win

- It only takes a minute to resign a game if you really cannot continue: it is only good manners.


Garvin Gray    (2016-11-30 11:16:28)
Future penalties for games lost on time

Since I have referred to the ICCF policies on the matters of players losing on time, I should directly quote their policy:

It is under section 5 of Code of Conduct:

Types of disciplinary action available are as follows:
(i) Formal Written Warning – for breaches in behaviour incompatible with ICCF statutes, principles, or rules. Continuing or repeated misbehaviour will result in (ii) being implemented
(ii) Disciplinary Action with Penalty/Sanctions – for serious or recurring breaches in behaviour
incompatible with ICCF statutes, principles, and/or rules. Immediate penalties/sanctions should be imposed, the degree of which should be related to the severity of the misdemeanour.
The following scale of penalties/sanctions should be used:
(a) A serious behavioural issue, e.g. silent/unacceptable withdrawal from a tournament, unacceptable, or abusive behaviour to players/officials/ICCF as a first offence – ban from all international CC tournaments and activities for a period of 2 years, from the date of decision.
(b) A repeated serious behavioural issue, e.g., repeated silent/ unacceptable withdrawal from a tournament, repeated abusive behaviour to players/officials/ICCF – ban from all international CC tournaments and activities for a period of 5 years, from the date of the latest decision.
(c) Outrageous behaviour or further repeated behavioural issue, e.g., theft, belligerent action towards ICCF or any of its officials, assault, etc. – ban from all international CC tournaments and activities for life duration. Appeal for remission of sentence is available after 10 years.
(d) Extremely slow play in a clearly lost position is not proper behaviour in CC play, and is subject to a warning from the TD, and will result in disciplinary action if it continues or is repeated in other games.
When dealing with disciplinary matters and considering penalties/sanctions, care should be taken to ensure consistency and those penalties are commensurate with the “crime†committed.
In all cases of disciplinary action, an individual has a basic right to express his/her case, with reasoning, before a decision is taken by an official/tournament director or tournament office, etc.


Garvin Gray    (2016-11-30 14:04:30)
Future penalties for games lost on time

Ilmars, did you actually bother to read the ICCF sections I quoted? Or did you just say, I am against any penalties as a blanket statement and stuff the rest?

If you had read the ICCF rules, in all cases of disciplinary action, an individual has a basic right to express his/her case, with reasoning, before a decision is taken by an official/tournament director or tournament office, etc.

So any player in 'question' would be given the opportunity to answer why they lost their games on time and it would be up to the Tournament Committee, or Thibault alone to decide on what action to take.

And I do not believe it is appropriate to discuss individual players when discussing this rule. If we start mentioning individual players, then the potential for a lot of hurt feelings, defamation and arguments can ensue.

People will just start going through everyone's records who might be a 'suspect'. That serves no purpose except to upset everyone.

The topic is a simple one. At least it is to me.

Peter Anderson defined the issue well.


Herbert Kruse    (2016-11-30 15:53:22)
Future penalties for games lost on time

11. 5. Adjudications

In some cases, the game continues but the result is obvious.

If time control is superior to 1 day and if a player doesn't want to resign (or accept draw) and obviously last the game, his opponent may report to referee a first time. If the player takes 30 days more to finish the game, his opponent may call referee another time, then the game will be adjudicated. An analysis submitted by a player should contain sufficient information so that no doubt is possible. This may include a sequence of moves, but in some circumstances it may be sufficient to claim a win or a draw on the basis of material or positional advantage. Final decision belongs to referee.


George Jempty    (2016-12-23 13:06:42)
Thematic tournaments?

Belgrade Gambit is good. The only reason I would have preferred the Four Knights proper is to try 4...h6!?


Herbert Kruse    (2017-01-06 17:03:49)
Future penalties for games lost on time

only if "in a rated chess tournament"

other games are private matter


Scott Nichols    (2017-01-07 15:20:42)
Defeating Draw Death

Maybe some new ideas can be shared here. Here is one, 2 players play a 2 game or even more game match where Black gives up the f7 Pawn. Or a set of the first 6 moves very wild in nature and then each player will have to play the same first six moves. They alternate colors of course, :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2017-01-11 15:28:01)
Adjudications & 7 pieces tablebases

Hi all,

Just a reminder about reasons why some games may be not adjudicated even when the result is announced thanks to 7 pieces (or 6 pieces, 5 pieces...) tablebases:

- FICGS chess rules are slightly different from FIDE rules (no 50 moves rule), so an announced draw may not be a draw here.
- According to the rules, any player (who may not use engines or tablebases) has the right to see the game going until a "quite" clear position.

But any player who estimates that the result of the game is known can call the referee to shorten the game.

http://www.ficgs.com/membership.html#adjudications


Thibault de Vassal    (2017-01-11 15:38:14)
Defeating Draw Death

The wild 6 first moves idea should be possible with thematic tournaments... Maybe the f7 pawn is possible this way as well. Why not... Scott's 2nd idea reminds me the silver thematic chess (now Traxler).

Jan, I did not miss your ideas in the chat on wins / draws... It may be very interesting and funny to try but it changes really everything, the game is not the same according to me, and the code should be rewritten in good part. And well, isn't it a question of taste before everything? As for me, I'm quite sure I would play it like atomic chess, then would come back to the original game.


Jan Ohlin    (2017-01-11 17:05:09)
Defeating Draw Death

I think it´s reasonable with extra elo points for a win. I take high risks playing some opening variations. And I do play chess with a World Champ in every match. Stockfish with some kind of human alias... :-)


Thibault de Vassal    (2017-01-18 03:32:56)
GM Eros Riccio 12th WCH & chess

Finally, here is a new interview with FICGS correspondence chess champion GM Eros Riccio, who gives us his (surprising?) impressions on his latest win in the championship, his current match and correspondence chess nowadays... A good matter to think about!

http://www.ficgs.com/user_page.php?page=tournament&tournament=FICGS__CHESS__WORLD_CHAMPIONSHIP__000012

____________

- Hi again Eros... Once more, congratulations for winning this final match in the 12th FICGS correspondence chess championship. This time, it seems that things went quite differently than in your previous matches (you scored 9 out of 12, which is a huge performance at this level), could you tell us what happened in these games?

--> Hi, yes, finally we have seen some wins after a very long series of draws. I was surprised too, I didn't risk to lose any game and I could even win one as Black... What to say, my opponent was simply not as challenging as the previous ones.

- It's a long time since you won the previous match, would you like to tell us about your other results this year, particularly at ICCF where you now rank #9 with an outstanding 2643 rating?

--> My latest final on FICGS were my only games of 2016. On ICCF I have taken some rest, the too high draw rate didn't incentive me to start new tournaments, also because drawing all games with a high rating means losing points.

- In the next final match (13th cycle), you play Peter W. Anderson for the 3rd time... so you probably know each other's opening book quite well. What do you expect for in this match?

--> Anderson is a very tough opponent, it's not a coincidence that he reached the final for the third time. I tried to win at least one game as White, but he's incredibly hard to beat. I experimented with almost anything possible against his modern defence, but I could never find a single weakness in his repertoire. I will see what to invent this time against his terrific 1...g6.

- As you probably know, another Go champion (Lee Sedol) lost a 5-games match to AlphaGo this year, while chess engines (now Stockfish 8, Houdini 5 Komodo 10...) slowly but surely continue to improve... Still waiting for the quantum computers. How do you feel things should go in the next years? Did your way of playing advanced chess or correspondence chess change these last years?

--> I have said a lot already about the very high draw rate of the recent years... I am surprised that some changes haven't been done already, like switching to chess 960, even modifying some chess rules, or at least giving 1,5 points for one win. Otherwise a lot of players will lose interest in seeing a series of all draws in the tournaments they play. I am one of those players who lost interest in correspondence chess, and even in blitz chess, engine vs engine, as we can see the extremely high draw rate situation there too.

- Finally, what can we wish for you for the next year? :)

--> Wish me to lose the match with Anderson :-) even I got bored of seeing myself there over and over in the final! That will bring some new air and that way I can take some total rest in corr. chess.

- Many thanks for your time, have a great match!

--> Welcome, and thanks.


Thibault de Vassal    (2017-01-18 03:39:48)
GM Eros Riccio 12th WCH & chess

Well, I must say that these words (combined to the many debates we had & still have here) make me think about serious changes, maybe not only around the championship format... so let's open the debate one more time: how to bring some fresh air in correspondence chess according to you?


Roger Llull    (2017-01-18 04:33:20)
GM Eros Riccio 12th WCH & chess

I have an idea. Make it more of an spectator sport like engine vs engine is, by letting people offer Epoints to the winners of thematic tournaments in the openings they choose. Let others interested in the same opening add to those Epoints and discuss changes in time controls, starting position and Elo limit. Those studying openings can this way effectively pay for great line analysis, and if this is done well and takes traction, it could even be a source of income for the best players.


Pablo Schmid    (2017-01-19 13:16:24)
GM Eros Riccio 12th WCH & chess

Maybe a thematic match with some risky opening in the same match for elite players?


Thibault de Vassal    (2017-01-19 21:33:23)
GM Eros Riccio 12th WCH & chess

Hmm... I didn't think about a FULL THEMATIC CHAMPIONSHIP before, that's an interesting idea from Pablo IMO (that would invite us to play -still classical chess- romantic style chess).

And last but not least, it would be possible here (while solutions with fractions of points are much more complicated to code & organize).


Pablo Schmid    (2017-01-19 22:22:11)
GM Eros Riccio 12th WCH & chess

Not necessarily, as I said the thematic would be the final test to test that the best corr player is the most complete one, but the qualification would still be by free chess where you need to be at least 2300 level in this site.


Pablo Schmid    (2017-01-19 22:38:48)
GM Eros Riccio 12th WCH & chess

And it could be the occasion for Thibault to see own Black would do at elite level in the line e4 Nh6 d4 Ng8 (not sure of the moves exactly but Thibault invented a thematic in this one where the Black side is rewarded for a draw)


Thibault de Vassal    (2017-01-19 23:40:00)
GM Eros Riccio 12th WCH & chess

:) Yes... I understand the idea, but it should be unrated IMO, just like thematic tournaments.


Pablo Schmid    (2017-01-19 23:45:28)
GM Eros Riccio 12th WCH & chess

Why unrated? The rating would add a real motivation, if you see, there is probably rarely any good game on thematic tournament in this tournament because either a too high level difference or maybe because the unrated game don't gives enough motivations ("no problem if I lose or if I lose interest, it doesn't count")...


Jan Ohlin    (2017-01-20 09:55:19)
GM Eros Riccio 12th WCH & chess

Obviously, every game need to be rated. It must also be possible to keep a high rating even if you play matches against the World Champ Mr. Stockfish disguised with a lowrated aliases. Playing many games should be rewarded, not punished.


Roger Llull    (2017-01-20 17:29:03)
GM Eros Riccio 12th WCH & chess

No, you can't mix thematic Elo with classic Elo because you are more likely to lose as black in thematic chess. What you can do is to create a separate Elo for thematic chess. Also I don't think it's good to mix thematic and classic in a championship. I stand by my suggestion to create a system to allow site users to "create" thematic tournaments using our Epoints.


Thibault de Vassal    (2017-01-20 17:31:22)
Thematic with lowest chances of draw

Poll! :)

According to you, what are the most interesting chess thematics that are the less drawish (with the lowest chances of draw)...

Of course, this is in the idea of a possible future championship that would keep the historical part of chess & chess openings (chess 960 is another game IMO). But this is only an option for now.

As for me, I'll start with King's gambit, that is not only chess, but (IMHO) the most romantic & beautiful part of chess...

Your opinion?


Pablo Schmid    (2017-01-20 18:05:27)
GM Eros Riccio 12th WCH & chess

Why would a thematic disfavour Black? That's not logical, it just depends of the thematic! If we take the King's gambit accepred as example, Black is not worse and may be the opposite! Even if you lose as Black because of the thematuc, you have chance to win the game where you have White against it... At least the idea would be interesting to play very interesting lines and games that fear does not allow in normal time and to contribue to chess theory in wild opening.


Roger Llull    (2017-01-20 19:00:04)
GM Eros Riccio 12th WCH & chess

My point is that your chances are not the same, so Elo mixing is not appropriate. And you can't count on your game with the opposite color because it may be against a different oponent depending on the tournament format.

We have separate Elo for freestyle, so what's the problem with having separate Elo for thematic?


Pablo Schmid    (2017-01-20 19:20:36)
GM Eros Riccio 12th WCH & chess

Llull this is why I have said this would be only for the wch final 1vs1 while tournaments must remain free chess to be fair. Thematic on 1v1 with reverse color is fair and I believe the elo could be the normal one.


Jan Ohlin    (2017-01-20 19:46:00)
Thematic with lowest chances of draw

Benoni without 7.f4, Kingsindian (especially variations where both players attacking on different wings (computers are not so good at calculating when all pieces are behind pawns), Spanish with d5 closing center. 1.Nf3 d5 2.c4 d4 3.b4 and 1.d4 d5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.c4 c6 4.Nc3 e6 5.g3


Jan Ohlin    (2017-01-20 19:52:35)
GM Eros Riccio 12th WCH & chess

If enough of games is thematic then elo could be the normal one, yes. The opportunity for winning games equalizes the drawbacks of computer related chess


Roger Llull    (2017-01-20 21:29:00)
GM Eros Riccio 12th WCH & chess

Pablo, changes to the WCH wouldn't make a difference for many years because the rules of each running event can't be changed now without sacrificing site credibility.

But I don't think this is about fixing the WCH final. This is about getting rid of the big frustration that represents the almost total impossibility of winning at the top level.

You can't mix thematic and classic CC Elos for the same reason you can't mix the Elo of classic time controls and the Elo of bullet time controls.

Thibault has an opportunity to bring new life to correspondence chess, but we need to see things from a different perspective. Let's make the most of what's already in place, -like Epoints- and introduce ways to add and influence new events even before they start. Because connecting with others and participating in more ways would bring new interest and benefit a lot more people than tring to fix what's already perfect -sort of- but stale.


Thibault de Vassal    (2017-01-20 22:22:36)
GM Eros Riccio 12th WCH & chess

Herbert is probably right...

But well, as we'll have a CUP championship soon, all games could be played on King's gambit for example (or another thematic - see the other thread)


Roger Llull    (2017-01-21 06:23:47)
Thematic with lowest chances of draw

This Russian line:
1.e4 e5 2.Bc4 Nf6 3.Nf3 Nxe4 4.Nc3 Nxc3 5.dxc3 f6 6.Nh4 g6 7.f4 Qe7 8.f5 c6
It's incredibly sharp. I'd tell my experience with it, and what makes it so unique, but I don't wanna give hints on how to play it, in case it's selected. Suffice it to say that engines do get it wrong.


Jan Ohlin    (2017-01-21 07:41:13)
Thematic with lowest chances of draw

Gaw Paw-variation 1.e4 c5 2.Sf3 e6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Sxd4 Sf6 5.Sc3 Db6.
1.e4 g6 2.d4 Nf6 3.e5 Nh5
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_Defense,_North_Sea_Variation


Scott Nichols    (2017-01-21 14:55:01)
Thematic with lowest chances of draw

King's Gambit gets my vote, :)


Ilmars Cirulis    (2017-01-21 14:55:42)
Thematic with lowest chances of draw

+1 for King Gambit
(it's time to analyze it to the end :P)


Guillermo Munoz Portugal    (2017-01-21 23:01:56)
Thematic with lowest chances of draw

King´s Indian, The Russian Line of above, King Gambit. King Gambit gets my vote.


Thibault de Vassal    (2017-01-22 03:11:36)
FICGS chess cup : proposal

As you can see, earlier was probably too early...

Garvin & all who participated into this discussion, what do you think about making the Cup tournament a thematic chess (e.g. King's gambit) championship?


Garvin Gray    (2017-01-22 10:00:16)
FICGS chess cup : proposal

Absolutely bloody not. There has already been a long discussion and a lot of work put into getting a somewhat agreed format.

Thibault, this is exactly what I expected you to do with this ficgs world cup, try and renege on the agreement at the last minute and attempt to change the format.

And with this concept of some kind of thematic championship, no one is going to agree on which opening to play.

We have an agreed format for the ficgs world cup and all you have to do is open the entry list for it, which starts February 1st for play beginning March 1st.

You renege from this and I will almost certainly walk from this site.


Jan Ohlin    (2017-01-22 15:07:19)
FICGS chess cup : proposal

FICGS WM will be matches where half of the games is different thematic, every player choice two, and the Cup will be really many games with short time, awoiding draws that way? Is this the discussion!?


Herbert Kruse    (2017-01-22 18:18:32)
Thematic with lowest chances of draw

Czech Benoni is long and not drawish
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 c5 3.d5 e5 4.Nc3 d6 5.e4


Thibault de Vassal    (2017-01-22 18:46:13)
Thematic with lowest chances of draw

This Benoni is probably an interesting choice. After all, maybe we can change from time to time... Maybe even that the thematic should remain a secret before the tournament starts ^^ But it may be less "prestigious" than King's gambit.


Thibault de Vassal    (2017-01-22 19:00:28)
FICGS chess cup : proposal

Hi Garvin! I'm just still open to ideas and was curious about your opinion (it could have been different after all)...

This discussion is still fresh, so let's see how it evolves, let's start this cup as it was decided and maybe we'll have a change in the WCH format or maybe we'll have later a kind of "King's championship" on the King's gambit with a different format, to be sure to try everything ^^


Pablo Schmid    (2017-01-22 20:29:46)
Thematic with lowest chances of draw

King's gambit accepted. Probably most of White's gambit too, Schara-Hennig gambit as Black.


Stanislas Gounant    (2022-11-23 20:17:39)
I did not win a game since 3 years

The problem with the starting positions in FICGS thematic tournaments, one of the player can open the position and it will be draw. Some years ago, someone show me a youtube video about a game played on TCEC between leela chess zero and Stockfish.
https://tcec-chess.com/#div=sf&game=61&season=15
The engines start to play at move 7, white had more space and black can't open the position


Scott Nichols    (2017-01-23 17:11:33)
Thematic with lowest chances of draw

Kruse's line also good for me...


Garvin Gray    (2017-01-23 17:12:46)
FICGS chess cup : proposal

If the WCH format changes, and becomes something like this, or incorporates elements of the current FICGS World Cup two stage format, then of course a different concept for the world cup 'could/should' be considered.

That being said, if the Ficgs WCH format changed to something similar to the current ficgs world cup, especially if it involved a final stage being a round robin of some number of players, then it would start to look like the format that is used at ICCF.


Thibault de Vassal    (2017-01-24 02:39:37)
FICGS chess cup : proposal

I started to change the waiting lists page... Most probably, the WCH will not change (for the moment at least), the CUP waiting list will be open next week (rules page should be visible tomorrow), and possibly a "KING supertournament" thematic event may happen from time to time (later) with rules still to be defined (later)... To be continued.


Garvin Gray    (2017-01-25 09:18:35)
FICGS chess cup : proposal

I have read the formatted rules. The only difference between what is in this thread and what is in the entry conditions is how ties for first will be broken.

If you read back through this thread, I said:

Garvin- For the second stage (finals)= I know this might be a bit controversial, but I think the TER rule should be dropped and those who tie for first should progress. Since we have seven groups (this was based on this discussion at the time- Garvin insert 25/1/17), that should mean at the most eleven players in the final.

This will have the by-product in the round robin games of everyone knowing that if they can finish outright first, they knockout everyone from their group immediately.

--------------------

And we continued discussing the rules and it was agreed to remove the TER and other 'tie' rules have those who finish equal first all progress.

So that rule needs to be changed.

As quite a few of the entrants will not have seen this thread, or any of the other discussions, perhaps a slight explanation for round one of how this event is different to the FICGS world champs would be helpful to 'sell' the event.

As in. For the FICGS World Chess Cup, The Highest Rated Player will be seed 1 and placed in Group A, Second Highest Rated Player will be seed 2 and placed in Group B and so forth for seed 3, seed 4 etc till all players have been allocated to their respective groups.

All players start from the first round and there is no knockout stage.


Pablo Schmid    (2017-02-04 12:48:35)
Thematic with lowest chances of draw

The Frankenstein-Dracula Variation in the Vienna game :)


Alvin Alcala    (2017-03-31 18:27:51)
Ultimate Challenge Tour 2017, USD 20k

Details:

http://infinitychess.com/Page/Public/Article/DefaultArticle.aspx?id=298


Thibault de Vassal    (2017-04-01 20:47:35)
Ultimate Challenge Tour 2017, USD 20k

Quite sure you'll be in Alvin :) Good luck!


Arturas Drozdovas    (2017-04-02 11:42:04)
Ultimate Challenge Tour 2017, USD 20k

50 USD to enter, it's like burning your money if you are positive that you can't win :)


Alvin Alcala    (2017-04-02 14:23:20)
Ultimate Challenge Tour 2017, USD 20k

If you finish the tour fair and square then your eligible to get $100 as fair play prize.


Alvin Alcala    (2017-04-14 23:18:29)
Ultimate Challenge Tour 2017, USD 20k

Some updates from the sponsors:

http://www.infinitychess.com/Page/Public/Article/DefaultArticle.aspx?id=299


Thibault de Vassal    (2017-04-15 00:26:03)
Ultimate Challenge Tour 2017, USD 20k

Looks like an all-star... or almost.


Scott Nichols    (2017-04-18 19:32:39)
Ultimate Challenge Tour 2017, USD 20k

A lot of the old stars are in it. I still have the same equipment as I had last time which was good for the bottom 1/4 of the results, :) I see Dave and Al IMO will be among the favorites.


Peter W. Anderson    (2017-04-19 08:29:26)
Ultimate Challenge Tour 2017, USD 20k

Good luck Alvin - I may come and watch a few game.


Peter W. Anderson    (2017-04-19 08:46:20)
Thematic with lowest chances of draw

One possibility would be to take a selection of openings from the last TCEC final. These were deliberately unbalanced to reduce the drawing chances. They were a superb set of openings. To make it fair people would have to play both sides of an opening.

I could also provide you with some hard to hold positions from the modern defence (I won't be playing, so there will no unfair advantage).

Re the previous suggestions:
- benoni with early Bf4 is a good choice
- czech benoni is definitely overscored by engines but will be a tough hold nonethless; I would watch these games with interest
- Hennig Schara is great fun and I have never lost with it on FICGS, but it really is awful if white plays the best line (but I am not going to say what that is!).
- KID would depend on which line was chosen; some lines have been analysed almost to death, others have plenty of scope left.

One other possibility - a Breyer Lopez. Quite a tough hold IMO and therefore a good choice if everyone plays both sides.


Peter W. Anderson    (2017-04-19 13:42:06)
WCh and other ramblings

Congratulations to Eros for retaining his FICGS world title again. A casual glance at our 36 games might give the impression that I did not put him under much pressure apart from in game 95512. Actually it is more a case of him making it look easy. He generally plays extremely accurately in the opening and avoids deeply hidden pitfalls in the middle game – I always get the feeling that I am playing someone who understands the game well rather than someone purely reliant on engines.

I have decided to give up playing normal correspondence chess. Engines have simply become too strong and the amount of human input into my games has decreased over time. Human input remains (games 95516, 95512, 93727/87343 being good examples), but there is far too much hard work with engines these days for my liking. I am sure a GM would add a lot more value but I am a mere mortal! I will probably play some big chess instead. I tried this a couple of times and really enjoyed it. I just hope nobody writes an engine for it.

With regards to the format of the world championship, we need to recognise that with engines getting stronger the draw odds is a bigger and bigger advantage for the champion. Despite that I personally think the current format is fine. I generated a significant advantage in 2 games – in addition to game 95512, I believe game 87337 offered real chances if I had not forgotten to play 25.Nb4 as intended (I could barely look at a chess board for a month after screwing that game up, but that is another story). If people keep trying they may eventually beat Eros. The bigger issue to my mind is Eros’s own statement of boredom with defending the championship. So time for a change when the current cycles are finished?


Thibault de Vassal    (2017-04-21 22:54:00)
WCh and other ramblings

Thanks for these words & analysis Peter! Yes, I don't know yet if Eros will fight one more time to retain the title but obviously he did it very well during these last years... the strongest engine alone would certainly not have been able to achieve this. Anyway, Herbert (& others) looks like to be ready for the challenge and this could be very interesting to see such a match! Well, let's see how this tough candidates final with Pablo finishes before :)

Well, the cup format was a first step towards a championship with more chances for everyone... the future "King's supertournament" will be another one with a thematic bigger round-robin that should definitely avoid the drawish problem & a new attempt to give sense to correspondence chess. To be continued...


Ilmars Cirulis    (2017-04-23 13:52:47)
Thematic with lowest chances of draw

What about 1.g4? (At the moment I believe that white loses.)


Pablo Schmid    (2017-04-23 14:10:27)
Thematic with lowest chances of draw

1.g4 is ugly and not theoretically important. An interesting but quite rare in practice but important theoretically would be preferable in my opinion.


Ilmars Cirulis    (2017-04-23 14:19:14)
Thematic with lowest chances of draw

The Frankenstein-Dracula, then. :)


Pablo Schmid    (2017-04-23 14:27:11)
Thematic with lowest chances of draw

Yes I have proposed it in the forum as one of the interesting line!


Thibault de Vassal    (2017-04-23 15:11:50)
Thematic with lowest chances of draw

Pablo said it all...

Thanks for these advices Peter! To be more accurate, we may discuss the full lines added to the opening names from now... One move can change everything :)

I'm particularly interested in important King's gambit lines for this first edition. The maddest, shortest, non-linear line from engines point of view but still theorical may be the best :-) (yes, not so easy to find) Maybe one with the queen to be trapped, that produced numerous incredible games...


Scott Nichols    (2017-05-01 01:05:29)
Ultimate Challenge Tour 2017, USD 20k

This was absolutely the worst tournament atmosphere I have ever saw. I would not only not recommend, I wholeheartedly discourage anyone from this site. But to each his own.


Herbert Kruse    (2017-05-01 01:24:25)
Ultimate Challenge Tour 2017, USD 20k

details please


Pablo Schmid    (2017-05-07 18:22:38)
Ultimate Challenge Tour 2017, USD 20k

Why do you mean by worst atmosphere?


Thibault de Vassal    (2017-05-13 19:50:31)
Ultimate Challenge Tour 2017, USD 20k

By the way, why "this was"? The tournament is scheduled to end not before May 20th, but I cannot find any news about it on the site.


Sergey Zemlyanov    (2017-07-03 22:02:59)
My new match with GM Eros Riccio

Hi all! I just transfer 100 euros to the site in hope to play with GM Eros Riccio in Standart Tournament with 100 e-points as entry fee. I know him as one of the strongest corrchess players of the world, but I'll try to survive in two games. And I'm not going to purposely shut out the game.


Ilmars Cirulis    (2017-07-04 14:29:42)
My new match with GM Eros Riccio

Have great games! :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2017-07-08 19:02:00)
My new match with GM Eros Riccio

One draw already... That's really fast! I couldn't play this way :)


Ilmars Cirulis    (2017-07-24 12:16:40)
My new match with GM Eros Riccio

Second game (98791) is still going.


Paul Larwinski    (2017-09-21 18:00:52)
WCh and other ramblings

how many cpu cores has the computer of GM Eros and Kruse in their wch match ? interesting


Paul Larwinski    (2017-09-21 18:03:53)
WCh and other ramblings

and it looks like the wch match between them 2 are all games draw, the opinion of Stockfish engine now . still 4 games running


Thibault de Vassal    (2017-09-28 22:32:00)
WCh and other ramblings

Yes... according to Eros latest words after the previous match, I might have given 50%-50% chances on this match, but maybe Eros still has much more energy & will under the hat than we think :)

In a way, any result will be quite a surprise to me.


Sergey Zemlyanov    (2017-10-09 00:29:29)
Ficgs is a money trap * BEWARE *

Dear admin! I just played the second pair of games with GM Riccio, Eros.
All the 4 games ended with a draw result. So, my entry fee was 100 euros for this match. That’s a great money for me!
When I bought e-points for euro I didn’t know about how can I refund my money in future.
I have read the forum thread by Nick Burrows, so I have a question to you:
Could you refund my money to my credit card (by Paypal, for example)?
Or are there any troubles with this?


Thibault de Vassal    (2017-10-09 02:21:20)
Ficgs is a money trap * BEWARE *

Hello Sergey,

First of all, my congratulations for this score in such a tough match. I understand your concern, but FICGS cannot be a bank and/or a casino, there's no refund or "epoint conversion/cashout"... FICGS organizes chess games with entry fee & money prizes, but players have to win a tournament/match to justify and get a money prize.

My suggestion is to find an advanced chess opponent so that the games do not last days/weeks/months. Surely a few ones would play you!


Sergey Zemlyanov    (2017-10-09 08:11:36)
Ficgs is a money trap * BEWARE *

Hello, Thibault,

Well. I hear you. This is a real scam ("lohotron")! However, from a legal point of view, you are right. Because the text of the rules was written in a small font somewhere on the site. And still, such important moments should be in a visible place, so that beginners can immediately familiarize themselves with the site rules. From the point of view of morality it is a fraud. Similarly, I will give an example: often, when a person, which is a pensioner or disabled (by health), comes to the Bank, then the Bank offer to him to make a loan at high interest rates. Then the bank's employers give him a document in which you can see (only having good eyesight!) a rule written in a very small font and in future that document will eventually bankrupt this poor person! Very unpleasant incident, Thibault! 100 euros is a big money for me! I am disabled for health reasons and my pension is about 250 euros, most of this money goes to expensive medications. When I agreed to the match with Eros, I didn’t know all the tricks and traps on you site.

Okay, I'm ready to agree with you if you spend my money on charity. There are so many unfortunate people in the world now!


Sergey Zemlyanov    (2017-10-09 21:55:57)
Ficgs is a money trap * BEWARE *

Hi, Thibault
A few words about the match with Riccio Eros. It seemed to me that Eros played too reliably, with a reserve of durability! However, now top-ranking OTB chess grandmasters, like Karjakin or Caruana, often play reliably too. The drawish tendencies are now visible in correspondence chess, unfortunately. To win Eros was very difficult, because of his debut choice and a power of the game, of course. Top grandmasters ICCF usually lose when they risk playing, for example, the Old Indian defense for Black.
Okay, then I donate e-points to the site and the question will be closed.
Sorry for my bad English. I do not have enough communication with foreigners.


Thibault de Vassal    (2017-11-15 17:10:55)
7 pieces tablebases

Wow, fascinating informations from 7 pieces tablebases in here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Endgame_tablebase

More than 540 moves are necessary to checkmate in some situations!

It would only take 1 To for 7p Syzygy Endgame Tablebases while Lomonosov takes 140 To


Thibault de Vassal    (2017-11-25 21:05:20)
The older rating lists

At last, all correspondence chess rating lists (from the server start, march 2006) are available by clicking "Rating lists" and following "The older rating lists"... 1 year of ratings by page.

As it was asked by a few players for a long time, only players who were REALLY active (who finished at least one game at most 1 year before or 1 year after the period) are listed in.

Many informations and good memories :) The worst part is that I can see clearly the reality: About 50% players left in about 4 or 5 years. The peak was about 900 players, there are now only 261 active correspondence chess players. Time to find new ideas, definitely.


Thibault de Vassal    (2017-12-08 03:47:56)
AlphaZero stronger than Stockfish

According to Chessbase, there was 24 hours of self-learning before the match.

Also, "AlphaZero was calculating roughly 80 thousand positions per second, while Stockfish, running on a PC with [32-cores, was calculating] about 70 million positions per second.", about 900 times slower that is quite significant.

https://en.chessbase.com/post/the-future-is-here-alphazero-learns-chess


Garvin Gray    (2017-12-08 15:07:01)
AlphaZero stronger than Stockfish

Thanks for the extra information Thibault about processing speed available to both engines.

Also, I wonder how AlphaZero would go against the latest Houdini and Komodo with equal equipment?

The question is not one of curiousity, but is more that I have a suspicion that also the AlphaZero programmers had the opportunity to gain quite an advantage because Stockfish is open course and so they could really work out how the engine 'works'.

This process would be much harder against Houdini or Komodo. So a long time control match against either of those engines with equal processing power would be a fairer test.


Ilmars Cirulis    (2017-12-08 21:12:35)
AlphaZero stronger than Stockfish

Btw, AlphaZero and the match is proof of concept, for research purposes. And that was done excellently.

If one remembers that Deepmind priorities isn't being computer chess or Go champion, but advancing Artificial Intelligence research (and earning money for Google - using those advances and gained experience) then any accusations of cheating or not participating in CCRL seems meaningless.


Ilmars Cirulis    (2017-12-08 21:23:22)
AlphaZero stronger than Stockfish

There will be some more matches, I hope. I expect that at least some criticism about settings and machine of chess engine will be heard.

Also more serious paper about AlphaZero (chess/shogi/go) will be publised.

And then Deepmind are going to leave chess in the past, in the same way as it did with go. At the best, it will be used for testing some of next research ideas, and we will get few more games to look at.

And then it will make a superhuman Starcraft player, then maybe some AI that can do math research like the humans do (I would like to live so far :D), then maybe computer will learn languages properly... :)

Chess is just random checkpoint for Deepmind. We will have to make our own AlphaZero to play with, anyway. :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2017-12-09 00:08:28)
AlphaZero stronger than Stockfish

Many thanks.

With all these informations, and now that I've seen the games, I must say that I have more and more doubts about the significance of this match... To be continued.


Ilmars Cirulis    (2017-12-10 00:51:56)
AlphaZero stronger than Stockfish

For 6000$ one can buy necessary hardware for running AlphaZero. :)
(In reddit comments there were recomendation of Titan-V: https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/titan/titan-v/
Buy two and you supposedly have about the same big machine as AlphaZero used for playing match games.)

If I had the money, I would buy. Probably wouldn't use for chess, anyway, but that's option for true chess lovers (who already have fully trained AlphaZero somehow :D).


Thibault de Vassal    (2018-01-10 22:29:48)
1st King Supertournament

Dear chessfriends, FICGS Android apps are now bringing a really different playing experience!

All 4 apps are now dedicated to either chess, Go or Poker Holdem (or all games) with specific features that make it easier and compliant with laws in more countries, that's why it is now useful to install them all and use it according to your taste at the moment.

Of course, it is more dedicated to "chess for fun", that's why it's a good time to start the very 1st FICGS chess King Supertournament:

- No engines or databases allowed
- Unrated thematic tournament: King's gambit
- Marathon tournament : unlimited number of players / games
- Flash deadline: The tournament will start on January 17th, 2018

Will you dare to enter this much fun and challenging waiting list? :)


Finally, these apps are very good news for FICGS as new players are coming again... It was really time, particularly after the last server crash! Now I'll make my possible to make FICGS great again, or even greater :)


Christoph Schroeder    (2018-01-11 00:29:15)
1st King Supertournament

A King's gambit thematic would be great, but as a no engine version? No.

It is fun to search for truth in ancient openings like the King's Gambit, but that obviously requires the use of books, databases and engines.

Moreover, experience on other servers shows that in the so-called "no-engine tournaments" the majority of the players use engines, anyway.


Thibault de Vassal    (2018-01-11 03:13:36)
1st King Supertournament

Hi Christoph,

I agree that engines may be there anyway (I added a permanent warning in the "move_express" page), and also that King's Gambit needs to be analyzed again and again :)

There are several reasons for this choice for this particular tournament...

1. The tournament's format: The number of games may be huge and practically impossible to manage with databases & engines analysis. At least, it could be dissuasive! By the way, there are regularly King's gambit thematic in the Special Chess Tournaments category.

2. The "applications friendly" idea: Unlike most other tournaments, this one will be particulary playable just for fun from anywhere with a phone.

And before everything, this is just an experiment...

Let's try something new :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2018-01-16 16:43:40)
Conditional chess moves (again)

Hi all,

Before everything, let's make it clear: Absolute priority (for years actually, but particularly since the launch of the Android apps) right now is to increase the popularity of the server, that slowly went down for more than 5 years. Now it's going better for the first time since, but I'm still working on and have much to do there.

Well, let's say this would be the right thing to do after all (which is another debate, with questions like what if a player does not want his opponent to use this option that by the way he cannot or does not want to use himself because it goes too fast and/or gains time on clock - case that I saw at another server).

Don't misunderstand me: I already used conditional moves at other servers and I liked it too, but I did not find it essential. Also, we all know that all opinions are in nature. And as a reminder, one goal of this server was to offer the simpliest & lightest (HTML or HTML & few javascript) interface.

Kim, one question to think about the work to do in your step 1:

How do you imagine the communication between a Javascript interface & php server? Well, I know how to implement Ajax (which I chose not to use at FICGS), this is not the point here. But it is not enough that moves are verified by javascript - that is a big work if you do it from zero - , it must be validated by the server itself, then confirmed or not to the player, meaning casually one more step. Means more php jobs from the server (which is not a big deal) so new codes that would be compatible between that Javascript UI (that must fit to site's design) & FICGS (that is not obvious if you know the small possible differences in terms of PGN format), a new field in database, the way to handle it after few conditional moves & so on.

Once more, it is feasible, of course. But there are obvious difficulties: it is not possible to add such code without being completely in FICGS codes, that are not object-oriented.

Anyway, if the number of active players grows again, I'm quite sure we'll have a good occasion to discuss it (with some more pressure ^^).


Kym Farnik    (2018-01-17 02:35:24)
Spice up chess? More members

OTB and online chess have moved to faster format games.
The use of rapid, blitz, bullet, and even Armageddon (tie break) games are very common.

An idea to get more involved... 'Super rapid' say 10 days + 12hours / move

Thoughts?


Garvin Gray    (2018-01-17 03:45:40)
Conditional chess moves (again)

Problems to identify and solutions:

As a starting point for the games:

Conditional moves would be restricted to the classical chess style. We have to start somewhere and this is the tried and tested format and most well known. So there are already sites out there using conditional moves in classical chess.

As for draw offers. If a player wants to offer a draw, the linear conditional move line stops at that move. They have to input their move and the draw offer by ticking the box.

Then the move passes to player B with the draw offer and they have to accept or decline the draw offer and play their move.

And then play resumes as normal with linear conditional moves.

This is how linear conditional moves worked when I ran the WBCCC events.

I am not sure what you mean by messages?


Clodomiro Ortiz    (2018-01-18 10:55:56)
FICGS chess cup : proposal

Dear chessfriends,as someone nicely said,I am now at the clubhouse.i like that..On that account,i think legitimate to extend my congratulations,in advance,to the winner or winners of this first CHESS CUP,no matter who might be,because they are not responsible that anything can happen..what a lesson..Thanks for letting me be part of this event..Yesterday i was only ringing the bells before DEATH KNOCKS AT THE DOOR..WAKE UP my family,WAKEUP LEGITIMACY,that is my wife name,GET VACATION if necessary those who may feel tired at the final stage,,,SPECIAL THANKS FROM MY HEART TO THIBAULT,for keeping on,although not everyone is always satisfied,chess is beautiful but men not so much..What a wonderful world anyway..finally,i want to point out that nobody gave me one single point.What is not too bad...GOOD LUCK..Now i go silent until the end...


Garvin Gray    (2018-01-22 01:08:34)
Conditional chess moves (again)

The rules of the site already permit players to claim 6 man tablebase positions, when they appear on the board, as either a win or draw, even if the position is above 50 moves.

That rule is standard across all webserver sites.

Also, even though a position might say mate in 75 and the claim is granted, this does not mean it is outside of the 50 move rule as there maybe a capture or pawn move between the initial position and mate.


Thibault de Vassal    (2018-01-23 00:08:33)
Conditional chess moves (again)

The exact rule is "The 50 moves rule is not implemented, please call referee if an obvious draw is not accepted by your opponent. Please note that a forced checkmate in more than 50 moves won't be considered as a draw."

Consequently, if tablebases say there is a draw, it is not always a draw here, e.g. if this is a draw because of the 50/60 moves FIDE rule.


Kym Farnik    (2018-01-24 09:33:59)
Chess engines in no engines tournaments

Most of that Article above is taken from the writings of C (Cecil) J S Purdy, the first Correspondence Chess World Champion [1950-1953] (a fellow Australian).

His games http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessplayer?pid=31309

More information...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cecil_Purdy


Kym Farnik    (2018-02-16 09:21:20)
Stockfish 9 released

FYI Development builds now have dynamic contempt.

Author: Stefano Cardanobile
Date: Fri Feb 9 19:07:19 2018 +0100
Timestamp: 1518199639

Introduce dynamic contempt

Make contempt dependent on the current score of the root position.

The idea is that we now use a linear formula like the following to decide
on the contempt to use during a search :

contempt = x + y * eval

where x is the base contempt set by the user in the "Contempt" UCI option,
and y * eval is the dynamic part which adapts itself to the estimation of
the evaluation of the root position returned by the search. In this patch,
we use x = 18 centipawns by default, and the y * eval correction can go
from -20 centipawns if the root eval is less than -2.0 pawns, up to +20
centipawns when the root eval is more than 2.0 pawns.

To summarize, the new contempt goes from -0.02 to 0.38 pawns, depending if
Stockfish is losing or winning, with an average value of 0.18 pawns by default.


Garvin Gray    (2018-02-26 02:50:10)
Norm qualification criteria, incorrect?

ICCF is the FIDE way. As all events are round robin, each player is told the score they need to achieve to get a Norm before the event begins.

Almost any item can be easily understandable if kept simple, but does this mean it is the best system if it does not produce the most accurate results for player performances?

For Comparison with ICCF: Here you have the point total for all players to get a norm in norm tournaments.

At ICCF: In the Points table, they have columns which show what score each player needs to reach to get that particular norm.

So that information is included in the cross table.


Thibault de Vassal    (2018-02-27 20:01:33)
Norm qualification criteria, incorrect?

Thank you very much for information! (I must have forgotten... It's about 20 years I didn't play in a FIDE tournament ^^)

I'll have to think about this but I'm not sure it would be easy to keep coherence here. In all cases, you're right, that's the best theorical way.


Thibault de Vassal    (2018-03-03 20:37:38)
World Championship Groups

Maybe not an advantage according to the point of view, but certainly "different". An occasion to reach stage 3 directly or to to play stage 2 as seed 1 in any group (kind of stage 1 and a half if you like fractals :)). An occasion to play more interesting games (and more chances to gain elo points). It is quite complex to balance all differences IMO. Anyway, there is not much interest for 2200+ players to checkmate 1300-1700 players, particularly when playing without engines I guess.


Thibault de Vassal    (2018-03-14 23:12:38)
A few questions to Nelson Bernal Varela

Nelson Bernal Varela is an early FICGS correspondence chess player, now rated 2277 but also rated 2359 at ICCF (Correspondence Chess Master - CCM).

Last but not least, and as all poker holdem players here probably noticed, he is also our ranked #1 for years, who just reached an outstanding poker rating of 2382, while number two is now rated "only" 2212. A good occasion to ask him a few questions, that he kindly accepted to answer.

-----------------------

- Hello Nelson! You are the 2nd most active player at FICGS for years now. Everyone here probably noticed your incredible results in poker tournaments. "Correspondence poker holdem" was probably a strange idea as it is very unusual and very different from "Internet poker". What's your opinion on this and on the presence of a card game (played without money) at FICGS?


NBV: There are more important things than money and one of those is HONOR; It is honorable to be a chess master, international master, grandmaster, world chess champion at ICCF and at FICGS and to be number one in the ranking. It is honorable to be a FICGS world champion at Go and to be first in the ranking, it is honorable to be poker world champion at FICGS poker and in my case, it is an honor to be number one at poker here at FICGS during the last years, understanding that our general level of play has improved remarkably. None of these activities produces money, but to achieve any of the mentioned titles, it is necessary to have extraordinary abilities.

When I was about 18 years old, I had the opportunity to meet a person with immense material wealth, we spent whole evenings playing chess and then I told him my perceptions about each movement of the game. He thanked me for my chess explanations and paid me with good money. That wealthy man in his turn told me about life and recommended that I should always be proud of the gifts I had, since he knew, with all the money he had and being able to hire the best grandmasters in the world, that it could hardly come at the level of chess master. That person told me that the intellect can be turned into money whenever you want.

Now, by playing poker without money at FICGS, I understood that it was my extraordinary and wonderful opportunity to study-learn-perfect and test my poker theories without costing me a single dollar. In FICGS there is no money, but thanks to the knowledge I gained playing poker in FICGS, today I can go after the money in online poker rooms and probably in OTB poker tournaments. I am studying the possibility of becoming a professional poker player.


- The understanding of your opponent's behaviour is usually quite important at Poker. Do you manage to establish some profiles while playing so many simultaneous hands & games? Did you build any method?


NBV: Today I am sure that the most important thing to raise, and keep raising my level in poker, has been to build a psychological profile of mine, to get to know Nelson Bernal Varela in depth and above all to understand me, accept me, love me and be work every day eliminating my technical errors, strategic, psychological that make me play badly. I am aware that in poker I can play perfectly and still lose, what I can not forgive me is playing badly, which is why I work hard correcting my wrong decisions.

Of course, there is a space in my brain where I have built a psychological profile of each contender, that profile I have been able to elaborate with all the information that is provided to me in each hand we play. The way each of us plays, gives reliable information about our personality.

About my method I can write the following: A few years ago, I created a table in excel, where I had all the games with each contender, I identified them with the FICGS numeration and each movement in each hand (preflop, flop, turn, river ) it I was writing and studying; I started to add technical-psychological variables that seemed important to me, resulting in 20 variables that I had to qualify in each movement. With the passage of time and my effort, I no longer needed the excel table and I did not use it again (it was exhausting and time consuming) because I was assimilating things faster and with greater depth. Today I can say that I evaluate these 20 variables in a natural way, as if I was breathing and that when I am at a poker table, online or real, after a few minutes I get the psychological profile of the table and each of my opponents. In the pocket of my shirt I keep a small paper with the list of variables, periodically reread it and I wonder if I should modify, remove or add something.


- You won 1007 poker games, and lost only 380, with a ratio usually going from 57% to 80% according to your best opponents. Undoubtly you know the mathematics hidden behind poker but that may not explain everything. How did you learn to play?


NBV: Mathematics is an ingredient in poker, in the same way that my psychological aspects and of my opponents (I recommend reading-studying about four times the book “The Poker mindset†of Ian Taylor and Matthew Hilger), it is vital to understand the Law of Large Numbers. Next I make a list of topics that I consider important to raise the level of poker; compete with EV+ cards, you have to know the small ball theory of Negreanu (but not apply it, hahaha) you have to always look at the texture of the board, you have to evaluate your reality and your future, also that of your opponents (act and power), the position to talk is important, the stack, the personality of the table, know who has the panic button on. All these and other variables must be evaluated in the few seconds they have to make a move and the only important thing is to make the right decision according to the circumstances. There is a good list of poker books to read... it is mandatory to have read about 15 poker books.


- As for me, I may be wrong but I can't imagine that you reached such a rating without special techniques & maybe by optimizing it in some ways... Of course, "rating management" is not a problem, and it is only one thing with a limited impact, but maybe you have some other secrets? What about this "+1" technique that I noticed in many of our games, if this is not a secret? :)


NBV: In these years I have used different techniques that I had to read, study, learn, repeat, modify, invent and sometimes eliminate. Poker is a sport that seems easy, with time one manages to understand that it has an amazing complexity, today I consider poker to be as complex as chess and I study them in a "similar" way. As an example, I have tried to create "openings in poker"; based only on probabilities I invented something that I called mirror theory and another "opening" that I called opposite outs. I am fascinated by mathematics and from the mathematical perspective they are perfect "theories-openings", but I have lost tournaments and a lot of money for applying such theories in mistaken emotional moments. In poker it is important to never lose sight of the Law of Large Numbers and be aware that this LAW likes to make fun of each one of us... I am working on giving an emotional nuance to my theories "mirror" and "opposite outs". There are moments when perfect mathematics becomes an unforgivable psychological error...

For the last few months I have modified my way of playing and my results have improved; Today it must be much more difficult to win a game me, thanks to small and imperceptible adjustments that of course only I know, because I have followed my mistakes-successes-evolution in the game over several years.


- Isn't it too frustrating for you to play heads up only (here at least) ? Of course it is a way to improve this important technical case but we know that many complexities come with 3 to 8 players on the table, which is the most common case in professional poker tournaments.


NBV: Currently I spend little time every day playing heads-up in FICGS, thanks to the fact that I have the profile of each contender. The 4-5 hours that I study poker daily, include practice in micro limits in cash tables of 6 players and tournaments in tables of 8-9 players. I think I'm covering the whole range of possibilities, experiencing game situations between 1 and 8 contenders.


- What do you think about computer analysis in poker? Do you think it could make a difference here just like the way we play advanced chess?


NBV: I think the algorithms are ready to be written in machine language and the question is where are those algorithms? Well, in the brains of the best players in the world and in their games compiled in huge databases. But programming language can be accelerated with artificial intelligence brains, making A.I. studying databases of the best professionals, playing with itself millions of games and building an invincible TACTIC-STRATEGIC SYSTEM, similar to chess software and GO... I think preflop and flop play would be very similar between humans and artificial intelligence, but on the turn and on the river artificial intelligence would take considerable advantage, but in the short time the level of human poker would rise because artificial intelligence would teach us to play poker, this event that would diminish the profits of the professionals. It will always be said in favor of poker that because it is an incomplete game of information, to make computer algorithms are quite complicated, but despite that, I am sure that artificial intelligence will far surpass the best human poker player. It is possible that an artificial intelligence that plays a perfect poker already exists, but unlike GO and chess, poker does produce a lot of money. Due to the money factor, in today's world, it is very difficult that there is a Prometheus willing to steal fire from the gods and give it to mankind...


- How would you describe your relation to games in general?


NBV: I can summarize it in one of the first chess books I had the fortune to read, by the great Danish master Bent Larsen, "I play to win"


- When did you start to play chess & poker? Do you play other games?


NBV: My first contact with chess was at the age of nine, it was love at first sight and until death separates us; I must confess that for some years we have been separated, due to my stupidity and my erroneous decisions. I have always been self-taught in any subject, my method is to buy about 10 to 15 books of the subject that interests me and I read them thoroughly, sometimes 3 or 4 times; already with that information in my head and thanks to the constant practice, I build MY SYSTEM (Nimzowitch) according to my personality, my dreams, my desires, my anguish, my fears... I was youth champion of Bogotá, for 4 years , my OTB level was strong, but I had to abandon chess because I had to work and survive; Being an athlete in Colombia is an absolutely difficult thing, but being a chess player is extremely complicated since there is no support or respect from society and you can not live by chess, because it does not produce money.

I met poker in 2009 in FICGS, at that time I was in a terrible emotional situation, trying to get away from a relationship with a woman that I should never approach and where I wasted valuable time and energy. In that context, looking for my thoughts to be occupied, I ended up playing the FICGS C-24 poker tournament and tied the first place with three more players; I kept playing, without understanding what was happening with the cards and obviously, losing, until in 2010 I won the FICGS D-21 tournament with perfect score, 6 out of 6. I had already bought-read my first beginner book: Poker for Dummies of Harroch and Krieger, but my poker was coarse, wild, street, intuitive, amateur, without dedication or study. In the background of this paragraph, the affection and gratitude that I have for FICGS is condensed, a place where I have been able to build-practice-study-test MY SYSTEM in poker.

I play Backgammon, I do not care that it may sound pretentious-petulant, but I have a very strong level and I have not read my first book yet. Hahaha. Any year I register as a participant in the world championship and I will cause disgust to more than one professional. Hahaha. Unlike chess and poker, backgammon does not cause me stress, on the contrary, I feel a lot of joy and pleasure when I play backgammon. I feel something similar with math, reading and music. It's true and I'm proud, I've always been a NERD.


- We all know how difficult it is to reach a number 1 rank but it is even more difficult to keep it during a long time. What is your motivation? Do you have more goals to achieve (chess & other games included) ?


NBV: My motivation in any activity I undertake in my life is to do it with absolute passion (passion is everything you would do to get a breath of air, in the second before dying by drowning or suffocation).

I have several goals to accomplish before December 2021; In the ICCF correspondence chess I must reach the 2400 elo and get the titles of International Master, SIM and Grand Master, also perform outstanding performances in world championships. In FICGS Chess I must complete my Master and International Master titles and overcome the 2450 elo, also snatch the title from our eternal champion Eros Riccio. You're warned Eros, hahaha. On the LSS site where I also play, www.chess-server.net I want to be a world champion.

In POKER I find myself playing micro limits bets in several online sites; in June 2018 I hope I have built some bankroll. In July of 2018 I must be evaluating my poker to know if my immediate goal is to become a professional poker player, that would completely change my chess goals and I would have to dedicate myself to OTB poker. At the moment I study and practice poker every day, about 4-5 hours a day. At this moment my poker is full of errors that I am eliminating one by one. MY SYSTEM needs to win and raise money in the micro limits, so that it can succeed in professional poker.
In chess OTB I should become a great master, but that topic should be left as a goal for after 2021. I could achieve the record of being the oldest human in getting the title of Grand Master OTB. Hahaha.

In backgammon I would like to play some important tournaments in USA and Europe and maybe to be OTB world champion, but at the moment I do not have clarity on how to do it. I must mature that idea.
I hope they invent immortality before I die and that I have enough money to buy it, because time is what I need to realize all these and other dreams...


- Finally, playing so many games on several websites (obviously with serious ambitions in each game & place) may look quite inhuman and exhausting, does your body or brain say "stop" sometimes? Do you train by melting sports and brain games just like Kasparov did in the past?


NBV: It's true, it takes willpower and a lot of resistance to sustain the pace that I carry. To take care of my body, I am doing daily exercise for 60 to 90 minutes, including routines of strength, elasticity, speed and endurance. I also practice table tennis to preserve the agility of my body. I'm also divorced and I do not have a girlfriend... Hahaha


- By curiosity, do you consider playing Go in the future, even after... 2021? (which would surely be an enormous charge more, but the game is really interesting)


I have a kind of commitment with the best Colombian GO player, exchange of classes, he makes me a competitive player of GO and I turn him into a competitive player of backgammon. But the truth is that I do not have time... it could be after 2021...


- Do you confirm that you are not (entirely or partly) AlphaZero or any kind of A.I. (yet) ? :-)


NBV: Hahaha, of course I would like to be a real centaur, human with machine power, I do not care what physical form I should adopt. I offer myself publicly as a guinea pig in projects of technological singularity. Hahaha


- Many thanks for your detailed and instructive (impressive as well) answers! My best wishes of luck in all your games and future tournaments.


Thibault de Vassal    (2018-03-21 20:37:41)
FICGS chess cup : proposal

[a few posts before & after were edited or deleted]

As I just said in the game thread, that's why I always prefered the knockout format :/ Such suspicions are a cancer in round-robin championships and a pity as this was a real tough & interesting tournament (initiated by Garvin, for the memories).

Of course, this comment is not a judgement in any matter. Systems are the problem, not the problems caused by the systems.

Anyway, let's wait the end of the tournament, then I'll tell and explain my decision, that will eventually open a new debate to change the rules if necessary (I would be surprised though).


Thibault de Vassal    (2018-03-31 19:39:34)
FICGS chess cup : proposal

Well, in all cases I think that it shouldn't be allowed to designate anyone publicly as a (possible/probable) cheater. This would certainly lead to a terrible climate of suspicion and unfriendship. So, this has been added to the FICGS rules (11.1):

"To maintain a friendly community, any cheating complaint should be addressed to the referee and should not be made publicly in games comments or in the forum, otherwise with the same consequences."

Some comments in this thread will now be moderated this way.


Thibault de Vassal    (2018-04-07 03:09:02)
Harold Moye, man of arts... and chess

I'm very sad to announce here that we just lost a chess friend, Harold Moye, who played chess with us while he was involved in a much more difficult battle. My condolences to his family.

Here is the first part of the obituary:

"Harold Anthony Moye, age 62, died on March 4, 2018, wife Linda (Polhemus) Moye at his side. They were devoted to each other for 17 years since vowing their love on a mountain in Wyoming. For 13 of those years, Harold endured bone marrow cancer (Multiple Myeloma) with grace, unusual resilience, and quiet courage.

He loved poetry, languages, art, music, history, philosophy, astronomy, cinema, flying airplanes (actually and with flight simulator) and coffee. Some of his favorites were Shelley, Blake, Rilke, Shakespeare, Norse sagas, VanGogh, Mahler, Bach, Beethoven, and Sumatran and Guatemalan beans. Harold said that Blake taught him the most about art; Shelley was his brother; VanGogh his first cousin; and coffee a major food group (along with pizza and cookies). Above all, he valued imagination, compassion, and generosity of spirit in others. He played Shogi and Chess with friends all over the world online and in person, reaching the distinction of Chess Master when he coordinated tournaments in Wyoming. (...)"

http://www.ficgs.com/moye_harold.htm


Aniruddha Duttagupta    (2018-04-07 12:07:17)
unable to play my move!

Now I have observed that there are mismatch in the moves played in the game and recorded in the server.Will Mr Thibault kindly look into the matter urgently so that I can move in the game??


Peter W. Anderson    (2018-05-15 11:29:42)
Leela Chess Zero

Hello everyone :)

I guess most people here will be aware of the Leela Chess Zero project.

I was interested in whether anyone here is already using Leela? I have run a few of my old FICGS games through it quickly and it gives very different evaluations to the standard engines in some positions - I am not sure if they are better or worse at a quick glance but they are different!

For those who aren't familiar with Leela it is an attempt to recreate something like Alpha Chess Zero for the PC. It is not yet as strong as Stockfish etc but is as strong as most grandmasters and some weaker engines and is gradually increasing in strength as it is trained. It comes in two versions: one to run on the CPU and one to run on a graphics card. A high end graphics card gives the best results, but it runs OK on CPUs.

Leela is nowhere near as tactically strong as the best engines (whether it ever will be on "normal" hardware is an open question). However, to my eyes, it generally exhibits pretty good positional judgement, and so I am figuring it could provide a useful alternative view for correspondence games.

You can contribute to this really interesting project by helping to train it by donating computer time. Helping with the training is pretty straightforward. A guide of how to help is at

https://github.com/glinscott/leela-chess/wiki/Getting-Started

A forum and progress chart is at

http://lczero.org/

I found getting it to run under GUI's as an analysis tool a little more fiddly as it not yet fully UCI compliant. However, I have got it to run OK under Chessbase, Shredder, and Arena OK for analysis. For running matches Arena or something like Cutechess may be best.

I would interested to know your thoughts on this.


William Taylor    (2018-06-02 14:31:46)
Order games load in

Hi Thib,

Currently when we make a move in a game, another loads automatically afterwards which may or may not be of the same type. Personally I like to make moves in all of my Go games (for example), followed by all of my big chess games, rather than switching between games. What do you think about changing the algorithm which determines which game loads next to facilitate this?

Cheers,

Will


Thibault de Vassal    (2018-06-30 20:22:16)
Interview with 15th chess WCH finalist

For once, as Eros & I couldn't find much more to say after all his consecutive wins, I asked Ramil Germanes these few questions around his match & correspondence chess (with what may look like a quite surprising conclusion).

_______________________


- Hello Ramil, many thanks for answering those few questions! This is a first time with the WCH finalist, as the winner (Eros again) agreeded this could be an interesting experiment for a change, so we'll probably have a quite different point of view this time! You just finished your games to score 6-6 (12 draws), Eros retaining the title again. I guess this was the first time you played such a correspondence chess match, what are your impressions on this knockout format?

Yes this is the first time I've played a world championship match although I played before in earlier editions of this world championship but not reaching the challenger level. My impression? Its great playing for the world championship but I know its nearly impossible to beat the world champion.


- Let's rewind a few months backward, would you make other choices, in openings or anything?

I don't know. Tbh, I'm not very good on chess theory and not very updated as well. So I'm just playing basic moves hoping for opportunities to come up.


- So, is Eros beatable in this final match according to you? (please give us some hope) ^^

With how quickly you can search information and the strength of chess engines nowadays, its almost impossible to beat him unless you have access to alpha zero (haha). Though maybe Herbert Kruse can pull it off.


- What can you tell us about yourself and your relation to chess & correspondence chess?

I'm just an ordinary guy from the Philipines who happens to love playing chess. But my love of computers is what brought me to correspondence chess and to ficgs.


- Do you play other games, e.g. Go, Shogi, cards games?

No I don't know how to play those games.


- Could you tell us how these 12 games went from your own point of view?

For me, the games went through their normal course. Both of us didn't made any major mistakes so all games were drawn. That's just how it went. Though there were new moves on some the games it doesn't really changes result of the older games played before.


- Would you share a few tips to play good correspondence chess in 2018, or at least to beat the best chess engines? :)

Sorry but i dont know. I will be the new world champion by now if i know, hehehe.


- You told me that your computer configuration was basically a quad-core i5 3570 / 4gb on Fritz GUI (about 10,500 kn/s) / Windows 10, and we know that many of us (Eros included) still use such configs or even dual-core, would an octa-core have brought a significant advantage to you to win this match according to you?

Oh I don't know they still have those configurations. But I've already encountered opponents in Infinity Chess with 18-22 cores configs. Anyways, an octa-core or faster cpu would definitely be going to speed up my analysis and will let me analyze more lines and variations which may improves my overall play.

Honestly, I don't have that much time these days for correspondence chess. In my match against Eros, I had only about 1 hour of analysis time before work and about another 1 hour after work. Since I already have a family and 2 kids, they have to be my priority first. And I think somebody also can relate to this. So a faster cpu would be very helpful in the match and maybe will give a better chance than a slower cpu.


- As far as I know, you love to build computers, did you use or think about using several ones at the same time for analysis?

No. I only used one computer in my match against Eros. I have 2 other computers but both are slower.


- How much time you've been playing correspondence chess & how do you feel the way the game changed over the years?

I've been playing correspondence chess since 2010 and I have observed that its easier to win games in the past when chess engines were still weaker. Because you notice some players depend only on engine moves and engines still commit mistakes and you can exploit those mistakes if you "investigate" further.

Unlike now, engines are very strong that even players who rely solely on engines moves will be very hard to beat. It lessens the gap of players that know how to "use" the engines and the ones who do not.


- Finally, what makes you love correspondence chess in 2018?

I will always love chess and correspondence chess but what makes it exciting now is the rise of the new kind of engines.

Engines like Leela chess zero that has a different approach in playing chess. Maybe more of these kind of chess engines will be seen in the future. Because of its use of monte carlo analysis and neural networks, we are starting to see moves that we have never seen before. Very aggressive attacks and moves defying opening principles can now be seen. Correspondence chess is getting exciting again!


Thibault de Vassal    (2018-07-29 18:27:22)
On (almost) global forfeits in WCH

Thanks Gabriele for sharing your point of view (we always need more :-))... that's a part of the problem IMO, even a balanced percentage may/will not satisfy everyone as soon as any percentage below can suddenly decide the winner of the tournament. And of course, there are many reasons to lose only one game on time (or to have to resign it for personal matters).


Christoph Schroeder    (2018-08-17 17:37:38)
7 pieces tablebases

According to the ICCF rules, a game is won if the tablebase gives it as a win - no matter how many moves to mate are necessary.

The 50 moves rule was designed to stop playing on forever without making any winning tries. It is a logical development to set it out of order in these cases where a forced win can be proven.


Garvin Gray    (2018-09-09 02:43:30)
Netiquette reinforcement

4, 5 and 6 need to be read together.

4 and 5 are where the arbiter declared the game lost for the player who breached the rules. The arbiter then needs to decide what score to award the opponent.

So 4 is to increase the points scored in the game to the maximum available for that game. This usually is 1 point.

5 is reducing the offenders score to zero.

What these two provisions also cover is where an offence is found out later in the tournament. So for here on ficgs, the arbiter found out that late in a tournament that one player had been abusing opponents regularly.

4 and 5 allows you to adjusts the scores of those completed games.

6 declares lost the game by the offending player. But the reason for the provision of 'deciding the opponents score' is that a position on the board might arise where the non-offender might not be able to construct a checkmate position with the material they have (lets say just a bare king). Then the score would be (0 - 0.5). The offender scores zero and the non offender, who can not win the game because they can not checkmate their opponent, receives 0.5

7 and 8 should be 'self explanatory'.


Thibault de Vassal    (2018-09-24 00:15:43)
Some questions to H. Kruse, WCH finalist

After that the last FICGS chess WCH final match finished, the choice was made again to ask a few questions to Eros Riccio's challenger: Herbert Kruse, for the 2nd time. He kindly accepted to answer it so let's learn a bit more on our top-ranked correspondence chess player.

______________________________


Hello Herbert, you're not really a player to introduce as you're very active here and at several chess websites for years, with outstanding ratings in each one (as far as I know), you're the 1st FICGS CUP winner & several times FICGS WCH challenger, each time facing "the wall" Eros Riccio, what could you tell us about yourself particularly as a chess & correspondence chess player?

- i began late with 16 to play my first tournament game, but with 18 i already was kicked out of a night club in company with tony miles ;) (dresscode) had vlastimil hort as trainer for a short time and played in teams with gutman, michalchisin, klovans, gipslis and some other GMs. corr chess i began, because i love to find the truth and because of freestyle, where i began to build very strong computers


What kind of computers do you build? Is it all dedicated to chess?

- i have several dual xeon e5 computers with 64gb ddr3 and 16 to 20 real cores and they all play chess ;)


Once again, GM Eros Riccio managed to draw the 12 games of the match. What are your feelings on these games? How did you estimate your chances to destabilize your opponent in the openings and to create complications enough with White (or Black)?

- this time my feelings were neutral. 1% chances to win, but i hoped he would lose his concentration if i began more games with him (we played 6 other games at the same time)


Doesn't "1% chances to win (the match)" mean about 0.17% to win only one game with White, even when losing one with Black? Isn't it a bit pessimistic after all, or is it the new so called Riccio-effect? :)

- if the strongest players face each other there is no win possible, except some has a mouse slep or forgot something during human interfacing


When did you start playing correspondence chess and what changed since that time? What attracted you most in the game?

- 2004 and evaluation of the position is the key point of improvement since then. attractive was to be better than actual world class players :)


Could you tell us anything on the way you work chess and play your correspondence games? Any tip or secret? (nothing to lose to ask :))

- with black i play for fastest way to 0.00 and with white i try every promising way to make a game for a longer time complicated


Do you use several ones at the same time when analyzing a game? (still grabbing some tips)

- i only use the newest stockfish versions of brainfish and corchess because the other engines are not so good. because i have many games i decide which one gets the most cores and time and let them run in infinity mode until i am happy that can be after 1 week or more sometimes.


You're not far to rank 2nd as a poker player at FICGS, you obviously started to take on Big Chess as well. What other games do you play? Did you consider to play Go already?

- i played go against the german champion and lost so i quit :)) played backgammon money game and internet (in fibs with kit woolsey i played over 100 matches) in bridge i was best bidder in germany 1994 to 1995, but dont play much nowadays


Do you have specific goals to achieve as a player?

- 2 goals, since a long time: be ficgs world champion and win one german bridge championship


How do you imagine correspondence chess evolution within a decade? What kind of engines/computers do you expect to use and what will look like centaur chess according to you? (in other words, what part will remain to the human player in the decision?)

- i think the engines today are already unbeatable, so in 20 years the would still not lose and chess is dead since about 4 years


What did you think about Google Deepmind's Alpha Zero performance vs. Stockfish?

- it was a joke because they let a bad version of stockfish play. i would not have lost one game against az0 and maybe won 2 til 5 out of 100


Conditions of this AlphaZero vs. Stockfish match were very specific (opening books, unbalanced hardware...) What weaknesses did you detect in AlphaZero play?

- it was the lack of precision, what would let it lose against stockfish in its tuned newest version but i look from a view of a player who is used to play with deep 60 :)


It seems that computers did not completely take on Bridge yet, what do you expect within a decade?

- i have not seen bridge programms, but the game is so easy that it must be already mastered by computers


Wilhelm Schuett    (2018-09-29 03:47:25)
How to pass in the game?

And if both are passing the system will count automatically?


Thibault de Vassal    (2018-09-30 03:16:01)
How to pass in the game?

Yes, prisoners are not counted, only area. Games are not adjudicated automatically but you can use the scorer to help (just click "$" below the goban then click dead groups and submit), then one player will have to resign.


Thibault de Vassal    (2018-10-20 03:06:28)
No engine tournaments, no, no

I understand but in my opinion we have to accept this... This kind of tournament is a question of fun (to make mistakes as well) and honor (not to win but to play it by the rules!), no need to shame anyone publicly or to bring a climate of suspicion as everyone can make an opinion by watching/analyzing the games. But yes, it is possible/probable that a few players use engines even there... why, this is quite a mystery but it is always possible to cheat in this kind of tournaments.

As there's no prize or rating points to win, best is to ignore it IMO.


Christoph Schroeder    (2018-10-22 18:18:29)
Resigning in poker

Resigning in poker is absolutely uncommon. I cannot imagine any situation in which resigning a match or a round would be a reasonable option. Even if a player is trailing 0-2, he still has chances to win the match. So why would anybody consider to resign?

Moreover, the "resign" button is irritating, because it is unclear if resigning means resigning the current round or the current match.

Therefore, I propose to remove the "resign"-button completely.


William Taylor    (2018-10-27 12:03:10)
World Championship Tie-breaks

For many years, the reigning classical world chess champion had draw odds. The chess world eventually realised this was both unfair to the challenger and uninteresting for the spectators, and introduced a rapid and blitz playoff match for use in the event that the players remained tied after the classical portion of the match. There have always been, and will continue to be grumbles about this system (mostly that the classical WC should be decided by classical games), but overall it is popular (as I imagine can be seen from online viewing figures from the Carlsen-Karjakin match, for example) and, to my mind at least, fairer than the alternative. I propose something similar for the FICGS WC match: an advanced chess tie-break match. Granted, there is the same objection as for the classical WC match - advanced chess is not the same as correspondence chess. However, the combatants will already have had ample opportunity (12 games) to decide matters in that format. An advanced chess tie-break would provide much more sporting interest, as the current system is becoming a bit predictable (this is not in any way a dig at the incumbent, Eros Riccio, who is just doing what he has to do, and doing it very well). I think the match would also be great for promoting FICGS - you could stream it live on Twitch, for example, perhaps with commentary. I look forward to hearing your thoughts.


Zack Stephen    (2018-10-30 13:14:19)
World Championship Tie-breaks

agree with William, eros can draw these matches with his eyes closed at this point, he can easily be champion for the foreseeable future unless a format change is made.

Some other ideas for consideration: Force specific opening thematics in the final (ie each has to play black/white of a kings gambit, or other speculative openings

Don't provide the +1 day for each move. Make the games a set amount of time say 45 days for 60 moves

Make each side play BIG, random, or other variants as tie breaker until a winner is determined


Thibault de Vassal    (2018-10-31 03:04:21)
World Championship Tie-breaks

Well, the 1 day per move rule has several reasons to remain (including avoiding more forfeits/losses on time), and coherence is really important IMO. I do not agree that Eros cannot be beaten (I couldn't do it by myself though ^^), I trust Murphy's law :) I see several reasons to all these consecutive victories, Eros explained many by himself, and I don't think it's enough to change the format, by the way we now have the CUP format for all players who prefer other parameters (thanks Garvin!).

As for Twitch & other good ideas like this, truth is that there should have been many Freestyle tournaments these last years but I couldn't organize it anymore and still can't at the moment :/ But most important is that despite of computers supremacy in correspondence chess, now Go & poker holdem, I'm convinced that the best years of FICGS are to come, and it will bring more competition, new champions & good things. Let's wait & see!


Paul Larwinski    (2018-11-13 19:20:12)
Carlsen Caruana wch match

4th game draw again ,

hope not all games draw


Thibault de Vassal    (2018-11-14 03:21:23)
Carlsen Caruana wch match

At least I saw one real fight! Still hard to predict what can happen then.


Paul Larwinski    (2018-11-14 21:44:07)
World Championship Tie-breaks

no , there should be nothing changed , the ficgs.com chess Champion must be beaten to by new champion.

when you look at last match , they have played mostly same openings, not even taking openings chances is it


Paul Larwinski    (2018-11-15 23:01:14)
Carlsen Caruana wch match

do you all think the wch matches between Kasparov and Karpov were more exciting ? not the first long match


Herbert Kruse    (2018-11-17 00:40:42)
World Championship Tie-breaks

so what i did in the match 1 year before, where my chances were even lower, you are really not into chess, paul!


Paul Larwinski    (2018-11-17 16:05:09)
Carlsen Caruana wch match

this endgame in game 6 was really draw ? wow


Thibault de Vassal    (2018-11-17 18:56:30)
Carlsen Caruana wch match

As for me, I was not able to follow the 1st Kasparov-Karpov match, but well, it was a complete different context, with probably other kinds of excitement added to the chess thing. I can't really compare but a fact is that about noone is aware of this Carlsen-Caruana event. Finally, I'm not sure if it can be compared in any way.


Paul Larwinski    (2018-11-08 22:25:26)
Carlsen Caruana wch match

tomorrow starts wch match between Carlsen and Caruana ?

this is the best and most interesting now

who will win this time ? we will know it after 12 games


Ilmars Cirulis    (2018-11-09 12:13:51)
Carlsen Caruana wch match

Friendship! :)


Paul Larwinski    (2018-11-17 19:28:43)
Carlsen Caruana wch match

i meant the exciting chess games between Kasparov and Karpov in wch matches, they have both played other openings and mostly main famous lines.

everyone can see Kasparov-Karpov games in chess database

first game of Carlsen - Caruana wch match was exciting too , winning chances


Paul Larwinski    (2018-11-09 19:15:54)
Carlsen Caruana wch match

i hope they decide this match in 12 games

fast games after 12 games are much boring and useless


Paul Larwinski    (2018-11-10 08:57:05)
Carlsen Caruana wch match

Carlsen could win first game ? i have not checked it yet


Thibault de Vassal    (2018-11-18 01:32:48)
Carlsen Caruana wch match

At least the openings are interesting... games 5 & 6 are good examples. This Petroff line could be a thematic tournament soon here.


Paul Larwinski    (2018-11-19 16:39:10)
World Championship Tie-breaks

herbert! i hope we play soon here a chess match together , maybe your strong computers will help you :)


Paul Larwinski    (2018-11-19 21:04:26)
World Championship Tie-breaks

http://www.ficgs.com/player_5438.html

kruse lost 12 games somehow

no matter this


Thibault de Vassal    (2018-11-30 00:38:11)
AlphaZero 2.0

Looks like a new version of AlphaZero is to be "released"... don't know much about it, all links are welcome. It would reach about 3600 elo, to compare with its previous version and with the last Stockfish (I guess that we will never see a human/computer match again ^^).

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/lczero/bRlSX5nYqv8


Thibault de Vassal    (2018-12-02 19:14:19)
Stockfish 10 is available

That is probably the most famous chess engine nowadays, Stockfish 10 is now available at https://stockfishchess.org/ (for its 10th birthday)

Any thoughts, testing, news or information are welcome here.


William Taylor    (2018-12-06 22:50:39)
AlphaZero 2.0

The result seems very conclusive again. For those who were concerned about the time control last time, that has been addressed. A couple of news articles:
https://www.chess.com/news/view/updated-alphazero-crushes-stockfish-in-new-1-000-game-match
https://chess24.com/en/read/news/alphazero-really-is-that-good


Wilhelm Schuett    (2018-12-18 04:34:05)
Thematic request- Sicilian Dragon

1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 g6 6. Be3 allows Dragodorf.


Wilhelm Schuett    (2018-12-18 04:36:46)
Thematic tournaments?

1. d4 d5 2. Nc3 offers choices for both


Wilhelm Schuett    (2018-12-20 23:27:38)
Thematic tournaments?

Did we ever had the French Burn Variation?


Thibault de Vassal    (2018-12-21 03:38:54)
Thematic tournaments?

I don't think so... now in the todo list :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2018-12-21 03:41:08)
Thematic request- Sicilian Dragon

A very old thread... 6 years after, @Paul: yes, I heard that too, but still hard to prove :)

@Wilhelm: another one in the todo list.


George Jempty    (2019-01-19 22:33:44)
Thematic tournaments?

I propose Bishop's Gambit. If you play 1.e4 e5 as Black you probably need to know it. And if you play the same as White, it could be a good surprise weapon.


Ilmars Cirulis    (2019-01-24 10:19:24)
Thematic tournaments?

Najdorf Poisoned pawn - did we have that already?


Wilhelm Schuett    (2019-02-09 14:49:16)
Thematic tournaments?

I don't know. A good question. Sicilian offers a lot of possibilities.


Garvin Gray    (2019-02-12 03:37:36)
James Romig

Unfortunately, I have experience in this area of attempting to find out what had had happened to a regular correspondence chess player who suddenly stopped playing mid event.

After a lot of internet searching and looking up country records, I was able to find some family information and contacted them in Spain.

They wrote back about two weeks later to confirm that the player in question had passed away about two months previously at aged 36.


Jukka Joutsi    (2019-02-26 11:40:40)
delete my account

Please, delete my account - I can't find any information of how to do it. I will not continue my chess in FICGS so DELETE my account - "Jukka Joutsi".


Abdulsamad Sujas    (2019-03-02 17:54:14)
AlphaZero 2.0

What you posted is not Alpha zero. It is Leela zero, which is same as alpha zero in terms of using neural networks.
It learns by playing itself

Google Leela zero to get info. It is free engine, and need some software knowledge to install. There are YouTube videos and some sites. Find by yourself
. I was using it in my system but problem it is losing on time. Don't know why. But it is now rated no.2 in cc engine matches. Just neck to neck with stockfish.


Thibault de Vassal    (2019-03-27 21:05:13)
Leela Chess Zero & neural networks

... and I'm afraid that legislation advances much slower than research in A.I. fields :)

By the way, Gary Kasparov talking about artificial intelligence:

https://www.information-age.com/kasparov-and-ai-123481118/


Herbert Kruse    (2019-03-30 08:08:38)
What is the longest game of Big Chess?

how can i end a game if i already mated my opp 2 days ago?


Thibault de Vassal    (2019-09-24 21:33:24)
World Championship Groups

This is specified in the WCH rules (2nd paragraph):

"The knockout tournament is played into 8 games matches. The special rule (avoiding short draws) is that in case of equality (4-4), the winner is the player with the strongest tournament entry rating if all games are draw, the player with the lowest tournament entry rating if not all games are draw. The winner is qualified for the next stage."

I hope it is clear enough, maybe I should rewrite it.


Thibault de Vassal    (2019-11-09 00:57:30)
Fat Fritz vs. Stockfish

Few months ago, Chessbase announced "Fat Fritz", then few days ago it was alive with a finished 100 games match against Stockfish 8 and another one with the engine playing Stockfish 10. It won both matches by a quite good score... but just like the event AlphaZero-Stockfish, conditions may be discussed.

Any thoughts on the event and Fat Fritz qualities & strength?

https://en.chessbase.com/post/fat-fritz-defeats-stockfish-match
https://en.chessbase.com/post/fat-fritz-defeats-stockfish-match-2
https://en.chessbase.com/post/fat-fritz-what-on-earth-is-that


Garvin Gray    (2019-11-10 12:08:50)
Fat Fritz vs. Stockfish

Interesting this post has been made. I was about to ask what people think of Komodo 13 and how many cpu's do they think it requires to get the full value of Komodo 13.

When AlphaZero 'won' against Stockfish, I think I was one of the first posters that I saw who criticised the conditions and that Stockfish was almost handicapped out of the match.

This match between Fat Fritz and Stockfish seems to have had more even conditions, but I do wonder if the Stockfish 10 engine, was just the one straight off the download, or whether the Stockfish designers were consulted and allowed to tune their engine for the match, just like Fat Fritz would have been.

Those items I think are most important in making any conclusions about how much better Fat Fritz is in front of Stockfish.

And I am always left to wonder about two items when I hear about the results of these matches:

1) Stockfish feels like a very good engine to analyse your correspondence chess games with, but when it is put against some of the other top engines in head to head competitions, it competes well, but loses by a small amount.

So it feels to me like Stockfish has been designed for a purpose, to assist people with their correspondence chess analysis, rather than just being a brute force engine killer.

I would like to see Komodo and Houdini against Fat Fritz or any other contender, with equal conditions and both of those engines having being tuned for the match before hand.


Clodomiro Ortiz    (2019-11-15 11:38:01)
Fat Fritz vs. Stockfish

Key words are equal conditions,alphazero runs in gpu supercomputers so it is not matchable,,up to now i see only marketing strategies in favor of stockfish competitors...


Zeljko Cirovic    (2020-01-16 12:36:22)
IECG chess-server.net

STILL NOT START...FICGS__CHESS__KING_SUPERTOURNAMENT__000006
(type : unrated round-robin, time : 30 days, increment : 1 day / move)


Deadline : 2019 september 1st
Thematic chess, first moves : e4 e5 f4


Thibault de Vassal    (2020-02-07 19:06:41)
Go ratings, rule update

Players can auto-estimate their rating from 0 to 1100 (10 kyu). By default it is 0 (if not specified) or 100 (20 kyu).


Charles Bovary    (2020-02-19 14:24:54)
Rated Chess960 matches on the serveur

On FB? Never, as too many accounts have been snapped some time ago. Moreover I won't let my personal data be known by the whole wide world.


Charles Bovary    (2020-02-19 17:09:29)
Game decided by tablebase

At ICCF the tournament director is the one whom you'll have to address your request to.All 6 and recently 7 pieces endgame tablebases positions are arbitrated automatically. If your request is correct.


Thibault de Vassal    (2020-02-20 18:45:53)
Rated Chess960 matches on the serveur

There are other ways than Facebook to play chess 960... on Android or on your browser, e.g.

https://ficgs.com/scripts/chess_board/chess.php?frc=960


Charles Bovary    (2020-02-21 17:59:00)
Game decided by tablebase

As part of the ICCF rules:
7-piece tablebase:5.1.3. A data set or program that indicates forcible outcomes (with best play) when there are 7or fewer pieces remaining on the board.
Referring to in your players feature the game comes to a forced end, if your claim is correct. The TD is the one confirming that your claim is correct. Adjudication is done automatically by the server.


Wilhelm Schuett    (2020-02-28 05:34:25)
Thematic tournaments?

two english ideas: 1.c4 Nf6 2.Nc3 c5 3.g3 d5 (and e6 4.Nf3 b6 5.Bg2 Bb7) 4.cd5 Nxd5 5.Bg2 Nc7


Bogoljub Teverovski    (2020-02-28 12:00:41)
Thematic tournaments?

Norfolk 1.Nf3 d5 2.b3 c5 3.e4 or Noteboom


Thibault de Vassal    (2020-02-28 21:35:34)
Thematic tournaments?

Let's try Wilhelm's first english line... thanks!


Daniel Parmet    (2020-04-28 22:59:06)
The State of correspondence chess

I have played correspondence chess now for 13 years. During that time, I have played 983 correspondence games. These days I mostly play at ICCF and some of these issues may be ICCF specific... but since ICCF has no forum and I want to get a sense of the health of correspondence chess in general... I posit my thoughts here.

First of all, I think the number of correspondence players and the number of correspondence games are decreasing across the board on all correspondence websites due to the things I want to talk about.

Second, I primarily shifted my playing to ICCF years ago for two reasons: 1) The higher level of competition available; 2) The norms available. Although I was concerned with their fees which are usually minor but, in many cases, certain organizers do construct outlandish tournaments that you need to be wary of (looking at you Venezuela).

On the first point, I think ICCF is a little more open to high caliber players competing up until a point (they really try to prevent you from playing a 2450+ player until you are 2450+ yourself). And the rating protections get tougher and tougher the further you go but they make it easy to play 2300 players. While most websites outside of ICCF, usually have one annual Cup / WCH or Thematics, these other websites usually make it impossible to play anyone more than a few hundred points above you no matter your rating outside of these few events.

On the second point, I think ICCF norms are somewhat of an illusion. They’ve always been hard and much harder to achieve than OTB norms which received a watering down of requirements of decades ago. In fact, ICCF norms are so much harder than FIDE norms that one actually needs to achieve two norms to receive the prerequisite title in ICCF vs the standard three norms required by FIDE. In the US, for example, there are 116 ICCF Titled players in history (13 GMs, 25 SIM, 78 IMs) vs 828 FIDE Titled players in present (101 GMs 166 IM 561 FMs) [https://ratings.fide.com/topfed.phtml]. Now however, there is a proposal, for the ICCF GM Title only, proposed by Dennis Doren, ICCF Rules Commissioner who really does a lot for correspondence chess, and SIM Uwe Staroske, ICCF Qualifications and Ratings Commissioner, to remove the requirement to have to play GMs to get the GM Title [leaving IM and SIM untouched] [https://www.iccf.com/Proposal.aspx?id=1280]. This proposal states, “A search of the ICCF data indicates that 21 players obtained at least 2 GM norms across 24 games but failed to get the GM title because of the requirement of "5 GM" opponents. (Only 5 of those players are currently active).†Leaving aside the fact that this proposal violates the very definition of the GM Title, one must beat the club in order to join it, the proposal further outlines the real problems without addressing them, “The GM Title has already become far harder to earn than it used to be, due to the rating suppression caused by the increase in draws.†Wow, let’s unpack that one line because it is a doozy!

Really, this one line, that is easily overlooked, is two huge problems that correspondence is facing: 1) death by one thousand draw paper cuts and 2) rating deflation. I will argue later that there is a third huge problem but let’s start with the ones acknowledged by ICCF itself. Every correspondence player knows the draw rate is going up. As engines and hardware get stronger, players are able to save positions that in the past would have been lost and we are finding ever easier ways to head straight towards 0.00 as Black. I would love to see a detailed analysis that describes how much harder it has become to win as Black against a decent correspondence player (let’s say someone 2300+). In the last five years, I have beaten three 2300+ players as Black without counting mouseslips (one in 2015, one in 2016 and one any day now in 2020) despite playing extremely aggressive openings like the KID (for the record that’s three Black wins out 103 Black draws or 2.91% Win rate). That may be part of the draw problem, but I have witnessed my own draw rate skyrocket 2014: 82.4% 2015: 86.7% 2016: 90.2% 2017: 90.6% 2018: 91% 2019 is still in progress. Often for these norms, you need to score +2, +3, +4 or +5 despite the fact that +1 usually wins the event… and with the draw rate North of 90% in a 12-13 game event that means you are likely to win 1 game on average… but in many events the entire cross table often sees one to three entire wins (look at a recently completed tournament here where I scored my first IM norm that required +0 and I scored +1). My win was one of five wins in the entire tournament 100/105 = 95.2% draw rate! [https://www.iccf.com/event?id=73482]. People love to tell me that’s fine because we are talking about such a weak event as Category 8 [2449 was the rating average]. Fine, I do not accept your argument but let’s look at the World Championship then shall we? Let’s look at the most recently concluded World Championship 30 which finished on 10/2/2019, Category 13 [2562 was the rating average]. This event was won by the new World Champion SIM Kochemasov, Andrey Leonidovich 2540 [https://www.iccf.com/event?id=66745]. Congrats to the new World Champion on his two wins! The event had 8 decisive games out 136 or a draw rate of 91.2% (not far off my own). But wait did I say SIM? I did. In fact, congratulations to the World Champion on scoring his final GM norm as well! This World Championship saw 5 SIMs compete in a field with 12 GMs. While 3 of the SIMs finished 1st 2nd and 3rd, only our new World Champion scored a GM norm. The problem is with all the draws that norms are not just becoming hard, but maintaining or increasing one’s rating is becoming hard. And one’s rating is how one receives any decent invites to have a chance at a norm in the first place.

The draws are a death by one thousand cuts as I recently played one of the ICCF’s proposal’s outlined “21 players that could have obtained a GM norm.†My rating is 2389 and his rating is 2504 (although SIM, he is recognized by all his peers as a GM caliber player). As Black, I obtained an easy draw without ever being in any trouble at all. The player had a rather angry initial discussion with me post mortem about how he felt it was wrong that a 2504 should have to play a player as weak as 2389 where the draw would kill his rating. He felt that his rating was being destroyed by these draws with weaker players and that ICCF should protect him from us. He felt I have it easier as a lower rated player because I can gain rating from these draws. Let’s look at his argument that one is causing the other and it is only happening to those 2500+. At the time that draw occurred, I gained exactly 1.17915 rating points from it (and he lost the same); however, this was the first draw in over 40 games in which I *gained* rating points (this statement is no longer true as a few higher rated players have since given me draws but at the time of the game’s conclusion this was the case). Yes, that’s right, ICCF already does such a good job of protecting higher rated players that it actively hands out advice to new players to be very particular about what invites and events they play because the draws could kill their initial rating. I too have experienced a net negative loss of rating points from draws and still seen my rating going up only due to the fact that wins are easier and ever so slightly more common to come by at my level. However, it means I am not exempt from the draw problem. It is patently false that this problem is limited to those 2500+ as in my last 43 draws, I lost rating in 42 of them and gained rating from 1 of them. Therefore, it appears draws are causing rating deflation and this is the real problem in both norms and correspondence in general. With the exception of matches, perhaps there is a way to have draws not count against one’s rating since there are so many of them? It kind of blends the Chess rating concept with that of Bridge where one cannot lose rating points once earned. What we can see is that the player’s argument that draws are causing rating deflation is probably true. One problem is at least partly causing the other one.

There is a third more devious problem worse than the two outlined above in my opinion. While rating deflation, draws, less players and norms are real issues… they are dwarfed by the change in behavior caused by these issues. I know it is a bit overdramatic to talk about such issues in a time of COVID, but there has been a great increase in the number of players playing Dead Man Defense (often shortened by correspondence players to DMD+ and DMD=). It is important to note that the death rate in COVID for those in the elderly category is markedly higher and the correspondence community in general is also markedly higher. I have heard estimates of the average age of correspondence player being 70-75 range though I haven’t seen any data. Back to DMD, what is DMD and why is it such awful behavior? The players are hoping you die before you win so they can claim either a win on time or if it goes to adjudication then at least claim a draw. The other hope is that you might mouse slip by being forced to play more moves which while that would never happen over the board does surprisingly account for a large portion of wins in ICCF correspondence high-level play. One of the main problems this issue causes is that if someone takes an early draw against a player who then goes on to die, the entire rest of the field gets a free half point and you are punished for playing your game quicker than your peers. Often, players over the board resign once mate is unstoppable or a simple endgame is reached in which the result is known to players of all levels. In correspondence, often even sooner than these players will resign or offer draws, knowing that perpetual check is unavoidable should we play another 10 moves past the piece sac against a bare king? How about when the engine reads +25 +30 or +40? So, for the most, correspondence players draw or resign much earlier than one might over the board due to engine and tablebase assistance. On that note, depending on the tournament, players can outright claim wins and draws either on the 6-piece tablebase (always allowed) or the sometimes allowed on an event by event basis the 7-piece tablebase. It is considered out right rude to make a player play all the way to the 6-piece tablebase to claim. I recently claimed one win in a six piece tablebase up an entire piece where my jolly opponent wanted to discuss the game in a post mortem (rarely done in correspondence in general anyways). I declined to even respond to him even though I was already having a very lively and fun post mortem with a Venezuelan on our extremely interesting draw. A worse example is the 92 move game I played with opposite colored bishops where I had two extra pawns. I offered a draw as white and the higher rated player to my lower rated opponent who declined it, forcing me to play to a 7-piece tablebase claim to end the game. This kind of behavior used to be quite rare. In the past, I would say it happened in 1 out of every 100 games… these days it seems to happen in every other game (1/2!). I have seven different opponents right now that are DMD+ against me where the engine reads +148 (or in some cases even sees mate! The 2504 player that complained about my rating earlier also complained someone was DMD+ him… I remarked that I have no less than 7 players DMD+ me and if they would resign? My rating would be about 2450 right which sort of eliminates his claim about our “giant†rating difference). The issue is that due to rating deflation these players need to artificially keep their rating high as long as they can because that’s how they will get their next invite. With the new terrible time control that is not yet Official (although there is a proposal to make it Official: https://www.iccf.com/Proposal.aspx?id=1282), players only need to make a move once every 50 days to pointlessly extend the game. I have a DMD= draw currently going on 16 months now where the player is just moving Kg1 Kf1 Kg1 every 50 days. This time control exasperates the DMD problem. When I contacted ICCF Officials to point out the severity of this problem, I was told that I should report it to the TD on a case by case basis only if it is DMD+ as they will not look at DMD= at all. However, it is usually the TDs that are the biggest offenders (6 of the 7 players described above were TDs). In fact, it is usually the same general casts of characters which allows for an easy black list to be created that bars these players from play until they can fix their atrocious behavior. This behavior needs to be punished. These players need to be reprimanded. In the end, lack of norms, rating deflation and the draw death will not make me quit correspondence chess. It is DMD+/DMD= that will make me quit. This experience is my personal experience with high level correspondence over thirteen years and I would love to hear from other correspondence players concerning these problems.


Thibault de Vassal    (2020-05-06 01:41:10)
AlphaGo, the movie (Deepmind)

Actually, the story ends with the defeat 4-1 of Lee Se-dol, but it is really great to see more of the way the match was conducted (and how this incredible champion lived that huge challenge). Great archive IMO.


Ilmars Cirulis    (2020-05-08 01:01:32)
Thematic Suggestion: Traxler

When I was younger I was embarrassingly enthusiastic about refuting this opening. :D

Remembering youth, still believing that white wins (with Bxf7) and having 11.16 epoints, I challenge those who disagree to the Silver thematic game. :)


Bogoljub Teverovski    (2020-05-13 15:29:45)
Thematic tournaments?

Once again: Norfolk 1.Nf3 d5 2.b3 c5 3.e4, or Noteboom, or Traxler


Wilhelm Schuett    (2020-05-19 11:14:21)
Thematic tournaments?

1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nc3 Slav gambit 3...e6 4.e4


Roberto Battaglia    (2020-06-04 09:55:29)
chess archives in pgn

A few days ago, in the chat, I put some questions regarding the existence or not of archives of chess games and their organization. The chat doesn't allow many words so I take advantage of the forum for explaining the matter.
For example on the ICCF website I find for each player a file with all his chess games, I also find archives of all the games played year by year. This allows me to create excellent databases, using for example SCID.
I also would like to add the games played on FICS but, perhaps for my limit, I was able to find only one way to access the pgn. that is: I type the name of a player in the search box and press go. If, for example, I write Fric (Fric Lubos is a friend of mine who attends both ICCF and FICGS) I find all his PNGs but there are mixed games of poker and chess and this creates a problem because I have to separate them by looking at them one by one.
I hope I was clear. Obviously it is possible that I have not seen some functions of the site that allow to access to archives where could be stored games divided by year, by player and by type of game. I thank all those who want to answer me and wish everyone good and winning games.
Roberto


Thibault de Vassal    (2020-06-04 13:04:11)
chess archives in pgn

Hello Roberto,

Thanks for detailing your question here.

Yes, the "Go" function below the menu is very general and does not help much for what you would like to do.

The "Search games" option in the menu (below "Waiting lists" and "Tournaments") brings more specific ways:

Years ago, I considered that the complete PGN database was enough to build easily specific databases (player or any criteria, combinations of it, etc.) by using a database software.

Then I added a few search options, per player & per game (chess or Go), per opening, per rating (black or white) and per material for endgames... Of course, this will not replace a serious database like Chessbase.

I hope I was clear too... Does this help?


Wilhelm Schuett    (2020-06-18 01:20:36)
Game 122565

now i see that the thematic chess tournament has a other increment than the kings gambit chess tournament and the go tournament.


A. T. S. Broekhuizen    (2020-07-02 19:58:50)
Chess WCH #22 (march 1st, 2020)

Dear Thibault,
Today I got an automatically generated email saying that I had won the first round of this years WCH (in group 3). However there is another player with the same score and a higher TER. So can I just ignore this email?


Thibault de Vassal    (2020-07-30 01:28:33)
Chess engines levels from 1985 to 2020

What do you think about these elo estimations for chess engines, from Mephisto to DeepBlue, then AlphaZero and Stockfish, Komodo & so on?

Old names surfacing: Rybka of course, all Chessbase engines (Fritz, Junior, Hiarcs & Shredder) but also older but well known names like Fruit, Crafty, Chess Tiger, Chess Genius, Chessmaster, Rebel, Saitek, Nimzo and many others... Those graphics are always funny to watch :)


Graham Kerr    (2020-08-02 00:34:05)
Chess engines levels from 1985 to 2020

would have been a whole lot better if it used a
rating based on performance rather than just someone's estimate...


Bogoljub Teverovski    (2020-08-26 16:49:41)
Thematic tournaments?

i'm ready for Slav gambit 3...e6 4.e4 or Slav triangle


Wilhelm Schuett    (2020-08-26 22:48:44)
Thematic tournaments?

Brooklyn defense 1.e4 Nf6 2.e5 Ng8 or Alekhine Nd5. 1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nc3 a6 or Slav gambit 3...e6 4.e4. Kalashnikov or Nc6 3.d4 cd4 4.Nxd4 Dc7


Wilhelm Schuett    (2020-08-26 23:48:53)
Thematic tournaments?

1.e4 e5 2.Bc4


Bogoljub Teverovski    (2020-08-28 13:06:04)
Thematic tournaments?

yes, i'm ready for any of these themes


Thibault de Vassal    (2020-09-02 21:54:05)
Thematic tournaments?

Already two players in the waiting list for the current one... but I'll change it next time.


Wilhelm Schuett    (2020-09-05 16:32:24)
Thematic tournaments?

i can wait and will play another English Rubinstein.


Paul Brand Lyard    (2022-03-01 21:58:09)
bullet corrospondence

"Centaurs bullet match" is a right term.


Bogoljub Teverovski    (2020-11-19 07:56:21)
Thematic tournaments?

Endless English Rubinstein?


Thibault de Vassal    (2020-11-19 12:15:31)
Thematic tournaments?

Let's go for the Bishop's opening...


A. T. S. Broekhuizen    (2020-11-20 14:36:34)
Thematic tournaments?

QID, Petrosian variation: 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 b6 4. a3 Bb7
5. Nc3 d5 6. cxd5 Nxd5


Garvin Gray    (2020-12-06 13:57:56)
Repeated draw offers

I have noted over quite a period of time where players complain that their opponents keep offering draw after draw after draw.

At this point in time, the only avenue to try and get this stopped is to press 'call referee' and complain to Thibault.

ICCF has a different solution to this matter and I believe it should be incorporated here:

If a player offers a draw in a single game, and that draw offer is declined by the opponent, the server will incapacitate the player's ability to make a second draw offer until at least 10 more moves have been made, with one exception.

If the opponent offers a draw during a player's 10-move count (that is, within 10 moves subsequent to the player's having made a draw offer), then the player's 10-move count is terminated at that time such that the player can again offer a draw with any move. This "10-move" rule does not include claims of a draw related to 3-position repetition, 7-piece tablebase claims, 50-move rule claims, or adjudication-related claims.


Heinz-Georg Lehnhoff    (2020-12-12 18:39:05)
What happened to all the players?

And this is the reason why I will not start any tournaments at LSS after finishing my last game. It should not be the server's job to estimate and finish a game.


Thibault de Vassal    (2020-12-13 11:59:19)
What happened to all the players?

That is a tough choice from Ortwin, obviously... I agree with him on the idea that any rule can/will be enforced, but I'm not sure I can agree with this "unknown" rule, indeed. But it may work.

Thanks to Daniel for the quote and to all for the comments on this difficult issue. That's matter to think about.


Rotom Monotua    (2020-12-23 13:29:25)
FAIR PLAY

It´s not but do not worry it´s checkmate in four ;-)


Don Groves    (2020-12-27 06:11:07)
Anyone up for a Chess Rapid Silver match

I'm waiting...


Thibault de Vassal    (2021-01-05 20:48:45)
K+B vs. K

Yes, I still resist to avoid to test draw positions automatically, still thinking that humans should be able to accept a draw, but well... ^^


Thibault de Vassal    (2021-03-19 23:53:22)
Berlin Defense

Hmmm, it could be a nice thematic tournament soon :)

You're right actually! I searched games at FICGS, when white elo & black elo > 2300 there is no win for White since 2012 ! (and Black won regularly since then)

That's a good score for Berlin defense. To be continued.


Wilhelm Schuett    (2021-03-26 18:23:14)
Berlin Defense

the Berlin Wall as a thematic tournament


Thibault de Vassal    (2021-03-29 01:20:13)
Poker Rating

It is not a question of "fault". It is a rule, nothing more. And yes, it does make sense in poker as well, exactly the same way (and it is possible to checkmate in less than 10 moves).


Vadrya Pokshtya    (2022-02-17 08:52:23)
Grand Dice Chess

Hello,
I am the author and inventor of chess variants. My chess variants are published on chessvariants.com and some of them can be played on Game Courier.
I would like to present to you a variant of chess with dice that I invented relatively recently and which can already be played on two sites on the Internet.

Grand Dice Chess
The Rules

The game uses a 12x12 board.

Each player has:

4 Kings
24 Pawns
8 Knights
8 Bishops
8 Rooks
4 Queens

White and black occupy the 1st-6th and 7th-12th ranks, respectively, as shown in the diagram.
Unfortunately I can't post an image here, but you can always find it here:

https://granddicechess.blogspot.com/2022/01/grand-dice-chess.html
https://www.chess.com/blog/Pokshtya/grand-dice-chess-battle
https://www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-variants/grand-dice-chess

White starts the game first.
The game uses four dice.
Opponents make moves alternately, throwing 4 dice. The piece to move is determined by a die:
1 = pawn, 2 = knight, 3 = bishop, 4 = rook, 5 = queen and 6 = king.

The player makes four moves at the same time based on the indications of the dice and has the right to refuse (pass) any move that does not suit him, unless it is a pawn move. Unlike in regular dice chess it's allowable to pass moves. And this rule was already applied about a thousand years ago in old variant of Shatranj (Shatranj al-Mustatîla or Oblong Chess), the Arabic pre-decessor of modern chess. However it's not allowed to pass on pawn-moves, except when they are blocked.

Chess pieces move across the board as they do in ordinary chess - according to the standard rules of move and capture.
The only minor exception is for a pawn that is not allowed to move forward two squares from its starting position.
Upon reaching the last rank, the pawn can be promoted to any piece except the king and itself.
There is no castling, check and checkmate in the game.
The goal of the game is to capture four enemy kings.

The first test tournament was held on the site http://abstractgames.ru/index.php
The tournament is attended by 10 people and I received the most positive feedback from them.
The game has proven itself so well that regular tournaments have already been launched.
Yesterday the game was added to Dagaz server https://games.dtco.ru/map
And it's a great place to test the game in person, as registering on the site is very easy and doesn't require any personal information.

The game turned out to be extremely interesting and exciting, replete with puzzling combinations. Surprisingly, with this size of the board and the number of pieces, the average game lasts no more than 30 turns.


Wilhelm Schuett    (2021-04-02 14:33:17)
Suggestion for thematic tourny

The Armenian Variation 1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.e5 c5 5.a3 Ba5 is not my interest anymore. 1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.e5 c5 5.a3 is enough. Perhaps 1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.e5 b6 or 1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.e5 Qd7.
Did we had 1.e4 Nc6 2.d4
Did we had 1.d4 d6 or 1.e4 e5 2.d4 ed4


Christoph Schroeder    (2021-04-06 08:53:31)
Poker Rating

In OTB chess I once lost a tournament game in 10 moves, blundering a winning combination by my opponent. Was my resignation at move 10 non-sportsmanlike?

The reason for losing quickly is most probably a lack of skill or an oversight by one player. Both things happen every day and are part of the game. No reason not to rate the game.

The consequence of this rule is outright ridiculous: a player who has the chance to mate his opponent before move 10, would have to refrain from mating and intentially play weaker moves, hoping that his opponent will resign only after move 10. I think noone really wants to see games like that.


Yeturu Aahlad    (2021-04-12 19:10:42)
Poker Rating

At big chess, it is fairly common for one side - typically Black - to be down a pawn early in the game. I have had at least one opponent immediately resign. At Go, a player may blunder in a corner and immediately resign.

On the other hand, I have won many games on time and in many of those cases, the opponent didn't make any moves at all.

Perhaps a subjective challenge deserves a subjective response - I am seeing sound arguments on both sides. Suggestion - if a game concludes under 10 moves, and the winner thinks she has a genuine grievance, she can appeal for the ELO grant and a referee will adjudicate. Herbert's case is very strong. If the losing side didn't make any moves, adjudication need not be allowed, or may be automatically denied. Too many frivolous appeals from a player can lead to disciplinary action including a loss of this privilege. (I don't expect that to happen in this community)


Thibault de Vassal    (2021-04-13 01:04:44)
Poker Rating

This rule was added when, more than 10 years ago, players asked for a non-subjective system, as automatic as possible (more algorithm, less human referees)... it looks like the debate is still open :)


Garvin Gray    (2021-04-13 09:25:24)
Wch 22 Stage 2 ended

In terms of games management, I do not think there is any 'perfect' solution.

The only way a player could have any way of being able to predict when the next stage would start is if a full pdf calendar was published, which is not the case for this site.

With what we have to work with so far, the best way a player can predict game load is to monitor the remaining games in the cycle in progress and estimate when they are going to end.

And then a rule could be implemented that states something like: Once all games from the previous stage have been completed, the next stage will begin as of the 1st of the next month.

Which would mean that for Wch 22 Stage 2, the Round Robin group would start 1/5/2021.

And then once the last two games from the Semi Final knockouts are completed, the knockout final starts on the 1st day of the next month.


Garvin Gray    (2021-04-18 17:28:11)
Wch 22 Stage 2 ended

I do not disagree with your general sentiment, but as someone who has been on this site a long time, I have experienced a lot of negotiations and discussions like this, where the discussions end up going nowhere, or some kind of 'change' is promised , and then after a while, those format changes are walked back.

Therefore, I have become rather jaded by this entire process and I am now of the opinion that Thibault just offers these discussions in an attempt to make it look like he is entertaining differing opinions, when really he TRULY can not bring himself to make the changes that some of these discussions are asking for as he already believes that the site is perfect as it is.

So, you are then treating the forum posters like mugs if you are saying, lets discuss the topic and come up with new ideas, if you have no genuine intention of embracing any of the ideas proposed.

I have now said my last post on this matter for quite a while.

I have made it clear what I think of these forum discussions and their purpose, so there is now no further requirement for me to reply.


Thibault de Vassal    (2021-04-20 13:42:49)
Thematic tournaments?

This one is now running... thanks for the suggestion :)


Wilhelm Schuett    (2021-04-21 19:26:07)
Thematic tournaments?

Systems of the Alekhine like Nd5 3.d4 d6 4.Nf3 or 4 Pawns


Garvin Gray    (2021-05-04 12:14:16)
Wch 22 Stage 2 ended

I decided to leave this discussion for a while for two reasons. 1) I genuinely believed that whatever would be agreed to in this discussions would be unwound at a later date and

2) That my involvement in the discussions was not a helpful factor for others to become involved in the discussions

I will now explain what issues made me go public with my frustrations with this site and with the site owner in particular.

Over a long period of time, I had a to beg, plead and convince that the FICGS World Cup was an event that would be supported, despite Thibault's regular protests to the contrary.

Once the event and the format was finally decided to 'give it a go', the numbers was huge for this site and the general format had two primary goals:

1) No preferential treatment for high rated players. Everyone started from round one and the groups for round one would be divided up to make sure that each group would be of roughly equal strength

2) In previous discussions with the WCH, I had regularly protested that when there were groups of 5, that these groups should be double round robin, ensuring that all players got eight games and that colour allocation for the top two seeds would not play a role in the final results.

Then the latest groupings for the World Cup were released and everything that had been previously agreed had been violated:

1) Groups of 5 were used and all groups were only single round robin (breaking of a previous agreement)
2) The entire purpose of the World Cup was to have large first round groups and a small number of groups, ensuring that only about 9 or so players made it through to the final round. As it stands now, about 19 players will make it to the final round. The entire format has been advertised as a two round event. Therefore, there can not be a third stage. This is a clear condition of entry and it can not be violated. (breaking of another previous agreement).

I can go on and on, but I think this is sufficient as to highlight why I come to the conclusion that the site owner has no issue at all with breaking previous agreements.

I busted my ass for a number of years to convince everyone that the World Cup was a good event worth supporting. And when it was first run, it was well supported.

To now see it so corrupted makes me just think, why bother. Another deal broken. Time to move on from this site.


Thibault de Vassal    (2021-05-07 01:34:51)
Wch 22 Stage 2 ended

I understand your frustration Garvin, thanks for explaining your views once again and I'll try to answer each point (even if you do not answer anymore):

a) You were right on the Cup format Garvin, obviously. Probably on (many) other ideas... I just can't say.

b) I always thought & said that stable rules were important in many ways (that I explained), which is frustrating, I understand that.

c) As far as I remember, I added the possibility of double round-robin for 5-players groups after that discussion but indeed it was (probably) never used. Maybe the rule should be changed to "always double-robin for 5-players groups", that would be easy to do. A fact is that it is difficult to gather more than 3 or 4 opinions in this forum these times :/ By the way, if anyone can find this discussion where I agreeded something else than a possibility, then (my bad) I'll change it immediately.

d) I do think that a multi-stages tournament should have a pre-determined number of stages... (players should know what kind of engagement it represents) Maybe I just missed that point and a rule specifying that stage 1 groups will be built so that x to y players (no less, no more) will play round 2 could be added. Why not.


Garvin Gray    (2021-05-10 11:44:13)
Wch 22 Stage 2 ended

Groups with less than 7 players: https://ficgs.com/user_page.php?page=forum_read&id=13002

FICGS__CHESS__CUP_CHAMPIONSHIP__000004

FICGS chess cup championship is a 2 stages round-robin tournament.

My wording: The two stage tournament is the basic design of the event and is hard wired into the event. The whole event was designed to be a two stage event, with large groups in the first stage, to ensure that the first round groups are competitive and also that no players received byes through to a second round based on rating.

I had to plead for years for this format and garner support from other players before you would agree to even run it as a trial in it's first year. And then in its first year, it received over 100 entries, a lot of top players entered and was a complete success.

So, I believe I have every right to be pissed off at you directly that it really does seem like you are attempting to unwind the format of this event.

The format is clearly described in the published rules, so for the site owner to so flagrantly ignore them can only be described as one of two actions:

1) Negligent
2) Deliberant


Steven DuCharme    (2021-05-29 03:27:20)
ATTENTION USA PLAYERS

USA inmate D38967 awaits your move via jpay.com ...ENJOY


Garvin Gray    (2021-06-13 11:22:28)
Wch 22 Stage 2 ended

Now that my ficgs cup group has finished, I feel I can reply without feeling like I am pushing my own barrow.

When I highlighting the issue of when there is a group of 5, I was not intending it to be related to either championship.

This is because, in my view, the issue is the same, regardless of whether the group of view occurs in the WCH, the ficgs cup or a general group game.

I am aware that some people probably have read my replies as being rather strong on this topic, and in some cases, unhelpful, but if you look at it from the viewpoint of having engaged in genuine dialogue, exchanged viewpoints, debated back and forth, and gone over many topics again and again and finally after all that time, have gotten in writing and published rules that changes will be made, and then as soon as the situations come up again, the old rules are enforced again and nothing changes, then it becomes quite a bit more understandable why a negative tone and suspicion is underlaid in the discussions.

And as for why not walk away?

Had I been told that the entire format for the FICGS cup was going to be disbanded, that groups of 5 were going to be used and only single round robin was going to be used and three or four stages were going to be used, then YES, I probably would not have entered, and I would have made my feelings known as to why I was not entering.

And, I would have been looking to not enter any further World Championships as well. I have a Round Robin group coming up, as well as a Stage 2. These I will complete and do my best to advance, but if the old rules are maintained, then I will not be entering any future cycles.


Herbert Kruse    (2021-06-13 15:44:53)
What is the longest game of Big Chess?

i have 6 big chess mates now und no referee had made this a win :(


Herbert Kruse    (2021-06-13 17:23:37)
What is the longest game of Big Chess?

who resigns after a mate?


Herbert Kruse    (2021-06-13 23:03:42)
What is the longest game of Big Chess?

FIDE Laws of Chess:

5.1 The game is won by the player who has checkmated his opponent's king. This immediately ends the game, provided that the move producing the checkmate position was legal.


Thibault de Vassal    (2021-06-15 15:36:44)
What is the longest game of Big Chess?

The checkmated player should resign to end the game (and to see it deleted from his list, that is more convenient anyway)

All FIDE chess rules apply at FICGS when there is no FICGS rule. Many rules here are different from FIDE (starting from 50 moves rule)... that is even more true about Big Chess.


Herbert Kruse    (2021-06-15 17:15:38)
What is the longest game of Big Chess?

Your own rules say:

"Big chess

Introduction

The object of the game is to checkmate the opponent. This occurs when no further move can prevent the king from being captured.

Rules are the same than in western chess, except castling is not possible"


Herbert Kruse    (2021-06-16 18:53:22)
What is the longest game of Big Chess?

b) When a player wins a tournament with an entry fee (not null) and prize, he can choose after the game(s) to keep E-Points (by default) instantly added in his FICGS account or, if he has E-Points enough in his account, a money prize. Entry fees and prizes in E-Points are published on the tournament page in "Waiting lists". If games in such a tournament have not been really played for a win, for example if a participant obviously lost quickly one or several games, these tournaments will not be considered as wins and the player showing this behaviour will lose his E-points involved in the tournament, that will be taken from the winner's account if necessary.

If you ask for a money prize, the tournament prize in E-Points will be taken from your account, then you'll be paid 70 % of the total entry fees in Euros, divided according to the number of winners in the tournament, ie. if you win your game(s) in a Gold 2-players tournament : 70 % of 200 = 140 Euros. This ratio may evolve anytime. (!!!)

is the last you are waiting for?
its 11 days since the first checkmate and my opponnet did not resign


Thibault de Vassal    (2021-06-19 11:19:01)
What is the longest game of Big Chess?

Yes, checkmate is the goal (in some way) of the game, but it doesn't say it automatically ends the game. Of course I can specify it.

Finally your opponent did resign... new players do not always get immediately how the site works.

And yes, the ratio may evolve, it happened once only since FICGS started.


Thibault de Vassal    (2021-07-09 02:02:20)
Big Chess theory?

I don't think a bishop is worth 2 knights... maybe 6 paws IMO, but bishops of opposite colors also matter.


Don Groves    (2021-07-11 02:25:26)
Next Ficgs World Championship Tournament

In my opinion, the first tie breaker should be the result of the head-to-head match between the tied olayers. This is how it's done in all major sports.


Thibault de Vassal    (2021-07-11 17:49:37)
Next Ficgs World Championship Tournament

Here we are, for the first time in the FICGS chess championship, we have 5 players double round robin groups (regular groups, not M / SM groups)... Of course, players are invited to share their impressions on this matter.


Christoph Schroeder    (2021-07-18 02:23:21)
3 times repetition not recognized ??

Game 131349 is a 3 times repetition. My opponent still declines my draw offer.

Why isn't there an automatic end of a game when a position is repeated for the third time?


Thibault de Vassal    (2022-02-27 13:47:40)
Ukrainian players clocks during war

This topic to discuss what should be done about ukrainian players clocks... Probably they do have other matter to think than to take vacation on FICGS while their country is under attack.

Garvin told me that ICCF decided to stop their clocks. What do you think?


Garvin Gray    (2021-09-11 11:56:08)
VENEZUELA HAS BEEN DISMISSED FROM ICCF

Juri - Quite a few of your questions contain quite a lot of accusations, or at least a tone of accusations, or that those who took actions in dismissing Venezuela has some kind of hidden motives.


The decision to dismiss Venezuela was made by the National Delegates of each Federation of ICCF, after considering all the evidence before them.

This included unpaid prize money, where entry fees were charged, over at least two years, unpaid affiliated fees to the ICCF (same time period) and the National Delegate of Venezuela was offered many opportunities to pay back the money.

The National Delegate ran the tournaments, handled the money through paypal and in the end was in debt to the ICCF and the players of their tournament to the tune of roughly 7 to 10 thousand euros.

So, yes, ICCF has provided plenty of evidence that the 'organiser' took off with the entry fees of the players and did not pay out the advertised prize monies.

Multiple attempts were made by the ICCF Executive Board to reach a satisfactory compromise with the National Delegate, but in the end the National Delegate cut off all communications and went completely silent to everyone.

All Federations pay an affiliation fee to be part of ICCF. This amount is levied in part based on the number of members a Federation has, and also that countries economic position (GDP).

After reading all this, what other option was there for the other National Delegates to vote for?

In another proposal, which you have not referenced, the ICCF Executive board has promised that the prize money that was not paid out by the Venezuelan National Delegate would be covered by the ICCF, which will cost roughly 10,000 euro and will be paid out to the players.

So, to answer your questions after all this information:

1) No. This issue and your question are not related at all. It is not even certain if the Venezuelan National Delegate lived in Venezuela.

2) Yes, plenty of evidence was provided. Players had also reported that they had not received their prize money. I can report this as fact as I got burnt as a player in one of their events. So I know first hand that this occurred.

3) This has nothing to do with 'sports'.

This is a common misunderstanding about how ICCF works. ICCF is an association of Federations ie ICCF only recognises Federations. Therefore, officially ICCF can only take action formally against Federations and only works with the National Delegate from that Federation.

How the Federation conducts their business 'behind the scenes' is up to them and is none of the business of ICCF. It would be highly improper for ICCF to have a say in how any individual Federation ran their Federation.

What now occurs is that the remaining Venezuelan players are treated as isolated players. They can not represent Venezuela in team events, by they are free to play in any individual events.

Some of these players might be picked up by other Federations, if another Federation wants them.

4) Money transfers - As I already alluded to, it is not clear if the Venezuelan ND was even in Venezuela, but anyways, he had no trouble receive the entry fees, so money transfers by paypal were no issue.

If there was an issue, then they should not have run prize money tournaments

5) No political motives - This was a straight up case of whether the Venezuelan ND had taken off with the entry fees of the players and failed to pay out the prize money from many tournaments, as well as the Federation failing to pay their affiliation fees, as well as being in debt for other fees as well.

These are basic responsibilities for all Federations. Even if you want to lay all the blame of the Venezuelan ND, a case can be made as to ask what happened to any oversight from anyone else?

Or was the Venezuelan ND just a rogue operator?

This experience has left a sour taste in everyone's mouth and remedy steps have been taken to try and avoid this occurring again.

See other proposals.

Garvin Gray
Australia ICCF National Delegate


Juri Eintalu    (2021-09-11 14:07:41)
VENEZUELA HAS BEEN DISMISSED FROM ICCF

"Juri - Quite a few of your questions contain quite a lot of accusations..." (Garvin Gray)

I just shared information about the decision of the ICCF. Garvin Gray demanded twice that I should ask some questions. Finally, I formulated some questions that can come to mind for the ordinary reader. Now, Garvin Gray declares that I have made a lot of accusations, but the questions are not accusations. Therefore, I do not participate in this conversation anymore.


Wilhelm Schuett    (2021-09-15 20:38:37)
Suggestion for thematic tourny

1.e4 d6 2.d4 Sf6 3.Sc3 Sbd7 could be very helpful!


Juri Eintalu    (2021-10-05 21:38:49)
How to Accept a Draw in Chess

Dear Thibault de Vassal, the other possibility is to add some informative remarks to the Rules or FAQ. This is a problem for the beginners on FICGS. There is also some probability of making a fictive and stupid move but somehow failing to accept a draw.


Juri Eintalu    (2021-10-06 12:35:34)
How to Accept a Draw in Chess

Garvin Gray, Here, I have accepted a draw in two games. In both cases, the procedure described by you worked neither on my PC nor on my mobile phone. I do not remember, but perhaps the warning box did not appear at all. In both cases, to access that confirmation box, I did the following: I marked the draw as accepted, then I made a move and then I confirmed it.


Thibault de Vassal    (2021-10-21 00:25:35)
Next Ficgs World Championship Tournament

Yes, I follow this game. Well, it had to happen :) But don't forget that there is no 50 moves rule at FICGS, the game can continue some longer... if there is a forced mate in (e.g.) 157 moves at some point, then it can go on. If the defender has a clear plan to ask for a draw, then he can call the referee to explain it. To be continued.


Garvin Gray    (2021-11-29 09:20:46)
Repeated draw offers

My first post on this matter already contained a very good solution for this issue that would never result in any bans:

ICCF has a different solution to this matter and I believe it should be incorporated here:

If a player offers a draw in a single game, and that draw offer is declined by the opponent, the server will incapacitate the player's ability to make a second draw offer until at least 10 more moves have been made, with one exception.

If the opponent offers a draw during a player's 10-move count (that is, within 10 moves subsequent to the player's having made a draw offer), then the player's 10-move count is terminated at that time such that the player can again offer a draw with any move. This "10-move" rule does not include claims of a draw related to 3-position repetition, 7-piece tablebase claims, 50-move rule claims, or adjudication-related claims.


Stanislas Gounant    (2022-01-18 22:12:07)
Chess engines in thematic tournaments

Are players using chess engibnes welcome in thematic tournaments?


Thibault de Vassal    (2022-01-18 23:59:07)
Chess engines in thematic tournaments

Yes, engines, databases & so on... everything is authorized in thematic tourneys.


Stanislas Gounant    (2022-01-19 02:39:00)
Chess engines in thematic tournaments

I know it's authorized, but is it welcome ?


Thibault de Vassal    (2022-01-19 11:13:44)
Chess engines in thematic tournaments

Theorically at least, it is encouraged :) I hope it is welcome in practice...


Stanislas Gounant    (2022-01-19 17:13:11)
Chess engines in thematic tournaments

ok i enter in the tournament


Vadrya Pokshtya    (2022-02-19 06:11:11)
Grand Dice Chess

Thank you, Mr. Thibault!
This was facilitated by reducing the distance between the two armies to zero. Each move is a roll of 4 dice or a movement of four pieces. As soon as the pawn chain is opened, events develop at lightning speed. It is also interesting that the right of the first move is not an advantage here for the beginning side. The first games in the test tournament on one of the Russian gaming sites showed this. The balance of white and black victories is kept strictly around 50%. The game turned out to be one of the most strategic among all dice chess variants.
You can try playing against the AI ​​here

https://glukkazan.github.io/checkmate/grand-dice-chess.htm?fbclid=IwAR1Tt6sFmrK8KYRxwPPZJnrGujGss7to2jzdV8GxSons7Pmjdk7udHoJ0PA

This is a direct link to the game with the bot. Registration is not required. The bot is very weak but perfect for understanding the game.
Mr. Thibault, I would be glad if you would consider the possibility of holding a test tournament on your site. It would be interesting to see how many people would take part and what would be their opinion about the game. In any case, everyone would get an unforgettable experience.
Since I am doing this for the game and not for the money, you are free to dispose of Grand Dice Chess as you see fit on your site.
Thank you!


Matt LaDuke    (2022-02-27 23:24:50)
Ukrainian players clocks during war

Agreed


Jan Talek    (2022-02-28 19:01:04)
FICGS support to Ukraine

I see there are many different opinions regarding flags. If it is such problematic issue let's remove flags on the website for the time of war.


Thibault de Vassal    (2022-02-28 21:22:28)
Ukrainian players clocks during war

Let's do this.

Ukrainian players in activity are now in vacation for 45 days. Of course they still have 45 days of vacation remaining. Even if the war ends shortly, I think this is the least time to recover from such dramatic events. If war should last, then this special vacation could be renewed.

Consequently this topic is closed.


Thibault de Vassal    (2022-03-02 19:50:53)
Russian flag replaced

I understand your point but it seems to be more complicated... At tennis, in example, Elina Svitolina (UKR) didn't want to play Anastasia Potapova (RUS) yesterday, but federation of tennis "removed" russian flag for individual players... the match finally happened (Svitolina won 6-2 6-1 by the way). All russians I know do not support this war, so I think it is a good sign of support from them to join this idea, kind of support for peace.

If any russian player is pro-Poutine or supports this war, of course he can talk to me and ask for his flag (not meaning he'll get it).


Thibault de Vassal    (2022-03-02 19:54:37)
FICGS support to Ukraine

Clocks for ukrainian players in activity have been stopped yesterday (45 days of special "vacation", can be renewed if necessary).

I don't hold any of this against russian players as well. As I said in the other post:

"(...) At tennis, in example, Elina Svitolina (UKR) didn't want to play Anastasia Potapova (RUS) yesterday, but federation of tennis "removed" russian flag for individual players... the match finally happened (Svitolina won 6-2 6-1 by the way). All russians I know do not support this war, so I think it is a good sign of support from them to join this idea, kind of support for peace.

If any russian player is pro-Poutine or supports this war, of course he can talk to me and ask for his flag (not meaning he'll get it)."


Ilmars Cirulis    (2022-03-11 21:45:09)
Suggestion for thematic tourny

What about 1.g3 d5 2.Nf3 h5 3.Bg2 h4 4.Nxh4 e5 :)


Wilhelm Schuett    (2022-03-12 03:26:07)
Suggestion for thematic tourny

1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.e5 c5 5.a3 or 1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.e5 is still interesting for me.
Also Dragon.
Did we ever had 1.e4 b6


Stanislas Gounant    (2022-03-21 18:33:33)
Suggestion for thematic tourny

1. g4
1. e4 c5 2. b4 cxb4 3. d4
1. e4 e5 2. Cf3 d5
1. e4 e5 2. Cf3 f5

des positions déséquilibrées qui ne donnent pas des parties nulles


Thibault de Vassal    (2022-03-22 21:32:39)
FIDE BANS KARJAKIN

This is tough matter anyway... I just wonder what would have happened if Ilyumzhinov was still FIDE president at that time :/ (fortunately he isn't anymore)


Thibault de Vassal    (2022-03-23 16:11:20)
FIDE BANS KARJAKIN

If FIDE punished Karjakin for politicizing chess according to its own rules, then this punishment may not be (is probably not) of politicizing matter... but I couldn't say this with certainty better than many other people around here.


Thibault de Vassal    (2022-04-13 23:37:52)
ICCF Extraordinary Congress

Thanks for information!


Thibault de Vassal    (2022-04-26 22:50:40)
Ukrainian players clocks during war

Yes, I made that stupid mistake to mix the 60 days / move & the 100 days max accumulated time in my mind... as a consequence, even that 2nd period of 45 days vacation more for Alexey did not help. As soon as I saw that result, I added some time to his other games. I'm now working on a script that will solve this very special case for our ukrainian friends (because these dramatic circumstances may last), in other words, I'll have to shift the last move time, possibly again & again.

Of course this result will be canceled within hours, by the way I specified in terms & conditions (soon uploaded) that such human intervention like this may only happen in case of war.


Thibault de Vassal    (2022-05-11 01:41:05)
Carlos Alcaraz y el ajedrez :)

Approximative translation ^^


Q. One of the most unknown aspects of you is that you like to take a nap and play chess before games. Can you explain it to me?

A. That's right. I was caught on camera at the Next Gen in Milan and in Rio I also slept because rest is important and even more so in such an intense week in which it rained and the games were delayed. Recovery was key and naps before games are for me. And chess helps me because you are focused, your head works...

Q. How does chess specifically help you to practice tennis?

A. It helps me to be faster mentally, to observe plays, to see the movement you want to make, the strategy... To be focused all the time. In chess, like tennis, you get lost for a moment and the game is already mixed up. In this aspect they are two quite similar disciplines.


Thibault de Vassal    (2022-05-15 16:39:20)
19th Go championship final match

Hello everyone,

The 19th Go championship final match just started... late, really late. It did not start before because the challenger obviously stopped to play at FICGS and lost games without making a move (cancelling his qualification), but when reading the rules again, I realized that nothing prevented to make a replacement by the 2nd best score.

Consequently Paul Dao (CAN) is the challenger in 19th & 20th Go championships. Of course he will not have to play the 20th final match if he wins the 19th...

(better late than never, sorry for the delay)


Juri Eintalu    (2022-07-10 19:05:13)
RUSSIA AND BELARUS NOT SUSPENDED?

It seems that Russia and Belarus have not been suspended from the international chess federation ICCF.

The ICCF Extraordinary Congress tried to suspend Russian and Belarus federations.

Online voting was carried on 27 April - 09 May 2022.

https://www.iccf.com/congresses

ICCF homepage does not provide a clear result. I do not see it. The link to THAT Congress disappeared today.

The downloadable table of the voting results does not show in detail, what country made what decision.

An excerpt from the results:

***

EC 2022-003 Suspend the Russian Federation - Void if EC 2022-001 is Defeated

For 33, Against 10, Abstain 14
(I calculate that FOR: 58%)

Amendment of ICCF Statute Article 17, EC 2022-01 required 2/3 votes. The result was:

For 34, Against 10, Abstain 13.
I calculate that FOR: 60% which is less than the required 2/3 or 67%.

***

It seems that the ICCF did not succeed to change its Statute so as to allow the suspension of Russia and Belarus based on majority voting.

Unfortunately, in my homeland, there is no information available on how our representative voted (if he voted) and based on what considerations. The national federation also has not responded to my question sent officially through the ICCF server. I also do not see any relevant news on the national federation's website.


Thibault de Vassal    (2022-07-11 01:00:06)
RUSSIA AND BELARUS NOT SUSPENDED?

Thanks for information. To be continued...


Juri Eintalu    (2022-07-16 14:28:11)
Unvaccinated correspondence chessplayers

It does not seem to be sufficiently exact information.


Thibault de Vassal    (2022-07-17 02:24:11)
Cancel vacations

This is not a simple matter at all actually... cause any player making any move then would provoke changes that are matter to discuss.


Yeturu Aahlad    (2022-08-18 22:12:06)
poker reflection time

Am I misunderstanding the math? I don't think that would make a meaningful difference. Against an opponent playing as slowly as possible, the new rule with 30-day max accumulated time would end the game 30 days sooner.


Garvin Gray    (2022-08-22 03:43:25)
RUSSIA AND BELARUS NOT SUSPENDED?

As I have just attended the in person 2022 ICCF Congress, and only just seen this thread, I will clarify some matters.

It is correct that before the matter of the situation in Ukraine, the ICCF statutes only allowed for a Member Federation to be suspended for financial reasons, and this could only be done at Congress ie by majority vote of the Federations.

Therefore, with the situation in Ukraine, the ICCF EB set up the Online Congress and proposals were arranged to deal with that situation. All proposals were designed only to last until the 2022 Congress in Glasgow ie they would be reviewed at the 2022 Congress and the Member Federations would vote again on whether to keep any sanctions, or not.

At the Extraordinary Congress- The Member Federations decided to vote to suspend both Russia and Belarus Federations, but not the individual players.

First of all, there needed to be a vote to change the Statutes, this is what required the 2/3 vote. And the count for the 2/3's is a simple 2/3 majority- For - Against, abstains don't count.

If abstains were to count, then the term would be an absolute majority. That is not the case here. It is a simple 2/3 majority to change the Statutes.

As is pointed out, 'However, that EC was online.' Hence why the Statues proposals vote was first.

If it did not receive the 2/3 simple majority and the Member Federations did not approve the change to allowing Member Federations to be suspended for non financial reasons, then all the other proposals would be null and void, no further voting would take place on the other proposals and no action could be taken against Russia or Belarus until the 2022 in person Congress in Glasgow.

And at the 2022 Congress, this suspension of the Russian and Belarus Federations were continued until the 2023 ICCF Congress in Amsterdam.


Rodolfo d Ettorre    (2022-09-27 15:28:37)
Next thematic tournament

Hi,
What is the theme of the next thematic tournament? Any change?


Thibault de Vassal    (2022-09-29 21:36:29)
Next thematic tournament

Change has been done:

Anti-Stonewall [Dutch: Alapin] 1.d4 f5 2.Qd3 d5 3.g4


Misha Allport    (2022-10-03 22:21:52)
Number of moves affect the ratng result?

If it has no effect, then the quality of play by the loser is unimportant. Scholar Mate=120 moves. Is that right?


Thibault de Vassal    (2022-10-03 22:36:19)
Number of moves affect the ratng result?

Yes, I understood about the 600+ points. Yes as well to the last question even if I'm not sure what you mean by "Scholar Mate=120 moves".


Patrycja Zerowska    (2022-10-06 09:54:59)
Threefold repetition

It seems that there is no way to claim a draw by threefold repetition on this site. In the game 136386, where I have Black, the position that occurred after my 50th move, is the same as that after my 58th move, and will be the same after my intended 60th move, namely 60... Bf7. I therefore claim a draw in this game.

Since apparently there is no "automatic arbiter" to process the claim, I called the "referee" on 1 October 2022 (5 days ago), explaining that I made a draw claim as described above (and mentioning my intended move), but I haven't received a reaction yet.

This particular game has been a dead draw at least since move 35. I offered a draw after my 35th move and on my 59th move. Both offers were declined.

1. Why is there no automatic arbiter which processes draw claims? If I am not mistaken, this site exists more than 15 years already, and yet the Laws of Chess are not yet fully implemented.

2. Why can't I stop my clock when I make such a claim? See art. 9.5 of FIDE's Laws of Chess.

3. Why doesn't the arbiter or the referee stop my clock? Without this, a player making a claim can timeout, or, when she is short on time, may be reluctant to make a draw claim.

4. Why doesn't the referee take action? Is there a referee at all?

In the rules section of this site I read: "Also, there is no way to stop the clocks, players cannot claim that they stopped to play after they called the referee for any reason..." This is a violation of the rules of chess; it implies that on this site it is not chess that is being played, but a weird chess variant. Of course I disagree with this corruption of the playing rules, and so should everyone who call themselves chess players!

Your strange rules also state that the referee will "act as soon as possible", but so far, after five days, no referee has shown up. So you are not even acting in agreement to your own rules.

Finally, I find in your rules the following statement: "All games are played until a player resign, accept draw, or lose on time." This is the most ridiculous "rule" I have ever encountered. Not only renders this farcical rule a win by checkmate illegitimate, it is a blatant ignoring of the Laws of Chess, which allow games to be ended by accepted draw claims, or for any other reason at the discretion of an arbiter.


Scott Ligon    (2022-10-07 01:20:05)
Threefold repetition

I don't think you have to claim the draw. When threefold repetition occurs (after you submit your next move), I believe the site software will automatically declare the game a draw. In a recent game of mine, that's what happened. I got the email notification that the game was a draw almost immediately after submitting the move that resulted in the third repetition, too quickly for my opponent to have accepted my draw offer. Maybe the draw offer is necessary for the draw to happen, I don't know about that, but if it automatically recognizes the repetition I see no reason why it would matter whether there was a draw offer.

As for when / if the arbiter should act in positions that seem obviously drawn, I don't know how that's handled and I have nothing to say about that.


Thibault de Vassal    (2022-10-07 02:58:17)
Threefold repetition

Hello Patrycja,

Sorry for the delay, I just saw the email indeed... As Scott says, you have to play the move anyway before to claim a draw (if the site does not recognize it automatically). It seems to me that's how work most chess websites.


1. Why is there no automatic arbiter which processes draw claims? If I am not mistaken, this site exists more than 15 years already, and yet the Laws of Chess are not yet fully implemented.

> The only way to claim a draw after a threefold repetition is to play the move.


2. Why can't I stop my clock when I make such a claim? See art. 9.5 of FIDE's Laws of Chess.

> FICGS offers (mainly) correspondence chess, that is not OTB chess, and some FIDE laws do not apply here.


3. Why doesn't the arbiter or the referee stop my clock? Without this, a player making a claim can timeout, or, when she is short on time, may be reluctant to make a draw claim.

> FICGS is an automatic place, mainly. Games continue even if the referee has to take action later.


4. Why doesn't the referee take action? Is there a referee at all?

> There is one. But he may take some time... the forum & chat are good alternatives to get answers to any question.


Patrycja Zerowska    (2022-10-08 00:56:47)
Threefold repetition

Mr. Thbault de Vassal, you say that this case is treated the same way on most chess websites. This is not true. At the ICCF website, which is the standard for correspondence chess, the draw must be claimed (this in agreement with the Laws of Chess):

" ICCF:
9.2.1 The game is drawn, upon a correct claim by a player having the move, when the same position for at least the third time (not necessarily by a repetition of moves):
9.2.1.1 is about to appear, declares to the tournament director (or the server) the intention to make this move, or
9.2.1.2 has just appeared, and the player claiming the draw has the move.

At other websites, the rule is also correctly applied:

chess-mail.com
"8. To check the draw ( threefold repetition ; the fifty-move rule ) : Click on "Send and offer the draw". "

Gameknot:
"To declare the draw in a game due to the threefold repetition rule, please use "Declare draw" link located directly below the game board."

None of these sites violates the correct rule.

The FICGS way of handling this case involves several violations of the rules. First of all, the draw must be claimed. This rule exists for more than 100 years, and the advent of server chess hasn't changed it. Secondly, you require me to make a move, thereby taking back my claim and my intended move. Every beginner is told that it is forbidden to take back a move, a draw claim or a draw offer. Thirdly, you refuse to stop the clocks, allowing a player to lose on time by your inaction. This "inaction" constitutes interference in the course of the game by a third party, which is forbidden. Fourthly, your bot wants to automatically end the game when there is threefold repetition (or 50-move rule). Again this is forbidden by the rules! A bot can only act upon a claim, and never when there is no claim. With all these violations, we are no longer talking about chess, but about an undesirable chess variant.

It would be so easy to add a button under the chess board, where a player can make a draw claim. Why isn't this done?

You or your referee still hasn't taken action, and a whole week has passed since my claim.

I have always - since 1972 - played according to the rules and I refuse to violate the rules here and now. Therefore I won't make a move; it is forbidden.


Bogoljub Teverovski    (2026-04-21 12:55:52)
Next thematic tournament

Yes, 1.b4 c6 is an option


Thibault de Vassal    (2022-10-29 23:55:22)
What about this position?

I think you are right, as far as I remember, there is no "insufficient material" rule applying here.


Scott Ligon    (2022-11-22 15:10:32)
I did not win a game since 3 years

In that case you'd need some way to address the possibility that a player could always draw their two game match by mirroring the moves their opponent plays in one game to the other game.


Scott Ligon    (2022-11-22 15:22:57)
I did not win a game since 3 years

Here's another idea. We start with two pools of starting positions. One pool where white has an advantage that may or may not be winning. Another pool where black has the advantage. First player picks a position from either pool. Let's say the first player picks from the white advantage pool (on the border between winning advantage for white and draw). Second player gets to choose which side of that position they want to play. They can either play white but then they have to win, or black but then all they need to do is draw. So no matter the outcome, each match will be decisive. We'd just have to populate the pool of opening positions first.


Scott Ligon    (2022-11-22 16:00:33)
I did not win a game since 3 years

Even the idea of having preset pools of starting positions isn't necessary. Going off my previous post, the first player selects any starting position they like (has to be a position that can be reached in an actual game of chess, so let's say the first player gives a sequence of opening moves that results in the position). First player wants to pick a position right on the border between win and draw, but they don't even need to stipulate which side is playing for the win, because a chess engine can run a quick search and determine that automatically. So the first player submits an opening sequence of moves, the FICGS server runs a quick evaluation with Stockfish or whatever just to decide which side has advantage, and the second player chooses between playing the advantaged side for a win or the disadvantaged side for a draw.


A. T. S. Broekhuizen    (2022-11-25 10:20:51)
I did not win a game since 3 years

I think you don't have to go as far as to play dubious variations, as long as the chosen variations (for a thematic tournament) still have some 'music' left in them. I also have two suggestions: the Rio gambit against the Berlin wall and the following transposition into the Rubinstein variation of the French defence: 1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.Bg5 dxe4 5.Nxe4. Besides, lately I still have won a game against the King's gambit with black. But this is much harder than holding a draw with white, so I would not define success for white as a draw and for black as a win in this case.


Scott Ligon    (2022-11-25 16:20:13)
I did not win a game since 3 years

The problem with the two opening you suggested is that they're too good. Neither side made a mistake, so the engines will hold the draw every time (barring human error). The King's Gambit is a step in the right direction for a thematic tournament (with engines), and as long as everyone has an equal number of whites and blacks that's fair enough. I still think it's too easy for white to draw in the KGA with Nf3. The KGA with Bc4 is a bit more treacherous though I've explored it enough to be confident that white holds the draw. Anyway, I do think the openings need to be somewhat dubious or it's too easy for engines to draw.


Scott Ligon    (2022-11-25 17:10:39)
I did not win a game since 3 years

What does it even mean to have an advantage? Engine analysis has changed my perspective on this issue. From a human perspective, we can say that white has an advantage at the start of the game, and the statistics support this. At the highest levels of human chess white wins more often than black, but it's more often a draw. So white has a slight advantage.

From the perspective of correspondence chess with modern engines, the advantage is shown to be an illusion. It's just a draw. The engine evaluation at the start might be +0.15 or whatever, but if both sides are using an engine and there's no severe time constraint, it doesn't mean anything. By move 20 or so of a competently played correspondence game the engine analysis will have converged to 0.00 and it will stay there for the rest of the game.

In the final analysis, there's no such thing as a slight advantage. Every position is either a forced checkmate for one side or the other, or it's a draw. Even modern engines haven't pushed things that far, but they're strong enough to obliterate our human concept of an advantage.


Stanislas Gounant    (2022-11-27 21:46:50)
I did not win a game since 3 years

I think it's better to play a position with players can't open the center. But i'm ok to play a thematic tournament with black and white on bishop's gambit. Rated if it's possible Thibault


Scott Ligon    (2022-11-27 22:06:35)
I did not win a game since 3 years

If you mean John Shaw's book on the King's Gambit, I have that book and he did say that the Bishop's Gambit is refuted. But he qualifies what he means: "In this context I define the term 'refutation' as Black being better in all variations, not winning by force." Not much of a refutation. If you search my game history, I have played the Bishop's Gambit several times and I haven't lost. That's why I'm confident white can hold the draw.

I'd be willing to play in that thematic tournament, and I'd be very well prepared.


Ilmars Cirulis    (2022-11-29 19:50:02)
I did not win a game since 3 years

Heh, the discussion reminds my efforts to refute Traxler (with Bxf7). :D We had some thematic games where draw counted as loss for white.


Thibault de Vassal    (2022-11-30 00:51:58)
I did not win a game since 3 years

I still believe that Traxler counter attack could bring really good matches, tournaments & championships :)


Ilmars Cirulis    (2022-11-30 01:06:20)
I did not win a game since 3 years

> I still believe that Traxler counter attack could bring really good matches, tournaments & championships :)

I'm currently using my e-points for Big Chess matches, but when I get enough of them (Big Chess matches), I would like to play white against Traxler (for e-points, draw counts as loss for white). :D


Thibault de Vassal    (2022-11-30 22:12:10)
I did not win a game since 3 years

Of course, it is rarely played (and maybe you count thematic tournaments)... but the aim is to find complex lines that decrease the rate of draws, right?


Ilmars Cirulis    (2022-12-03 21:58:05)
I did not win a game since 3 years

Maybe someone wants to play Bishop gambit thematic games/matches? I'm interested.

But not the fast time control... instead at least +1 day/move, if possible. To ensure greater quality of the games. :)

Right now I have almost no e-points, though. If that matters.


Stanislas Gounant    (2022-12-04 23:28:09)
I did not win a game since 3 years

Thibault, is it possible to have thematics tournaments, double round robin and in a starting position unbalanced ?


Thibault de Vassal    (2023-01-02 03:18:49)
poker reflection time

The prize is the one specified in the WCH waiting list page at the time it is awarded... it never changed so far so it will be 100 epoints.

Wow, different matter but I realize I never took the time to made the change discussed before. Thanks for the reminder.


Thibault de Vassal    (2023-02-05 20:53:53)
Advertising a win or a draw with 7th or

You found the right way (email or any way to contact webmaster)...

As of January 2023, rule is :

"11. 5. Adjudications

In some cases, the game continues but the result is obvious.

If time control is superior to 1 day and if a player doesn't want to resign (or accept draw) and obviously last the game, his opponent may report to referee a first time. If the player takes 30 days more to finish the game, his opponent may call referee another time, then the game will be adjudicated. An analysis submitted by a player should contain sufficient information so that no doubt is possible. This may include a sequence of moves, but in some circumstances it may be sufficient to claim a win or a draw on the basis of material or positional advantage. Final decision belongs to referee."


Thibault de Vassal    (2023-03-31 16:56:17)
RUSSIA AND BELARUS NOT SUSPENDED?

Hello Juri,

Thanks for taking time to develop...

I agree that justification is the (never easy) key.

After thinking about it, I may also agree that it is possible in a certain measure to compare russians ignorance during Ukraine's war to americans ignorance during Iraq's war. A difference is that Russia's government acts like a dictator (russians are condemned as soon as they show against this war)

I do agree that US should probably be punished for some wars (at least for the the announced reasons and what actually happened - number of civil deaths, etc.), by an International Court of Justice.

On this topic:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legality_of_the_Iraq_War

I quite agree that the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq were aggressions 'stricto sensu', but...

- I cannot agree that the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq were similar to what happens in Ukraine. The aim was probably partly oil-related but AFAIK it was not to introduce separatism, it was not to annex territories, it was not to spread a dictatorship, it was not to force people to change their culture & national identity (but yes, this may happen in Ukraine just like it happens in Russia, for the same reasons)...

- Saddam Hussein was a true & violent dictator who was probably a reason enough to move his regime, just like it is the case with talibans, IMHO.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saddam_Hussein

It seems to me that it is very possible to justify to fight &/or to remove some dictatorships.

Russia should obviously be punished for many reasons:

- Annexion of territories (that has no nothing to do with their nazis justifications... their argument is mainly "history").
- Numerous crimes of war (that will be documented)

Finally, there are nazis quite everywhere, even in France. The question is "how many" and what do they do? The Russia's argument does not try to be subtle or precise on this matter, it just looks like "europeans turned nazi cause Europe helps Ukraine", right?


Juri Eintalu    (2023-03-31 21:13:22)
RUSSIA AND BELARUS NOT SUSPENDED?

You are quoting me wrongly. And you are doing it intentionally.

Moreover, I was talking about whether FIDE and ICCF decisions were justified. My argument was that these decisions applied some important principles discriminatively, selectively.

Suddenly, you started to talk about whether the Russian invasion of Ukraine was justified. You also started to talk about war crimes.

Let me remind that the ICCF started a process of banning the Russian team just a few days after the Russian invasion began.Thus, your arguments about what happened months later might be pretty irrelevant.

Let me also remind you that you decided to talk ONLY about Russian war crimes in Ukraine. You dismissed the US war crimes in Afghanistan and Iraq, the war crimes committed during the Donbas civil war (both Ukraine and the separatists committed war crimes there), and, finally, you also dismissed the war crimes committed by Ukraine in the present war.

And now, before I answered to your mess, you managed to attack me personally.

My answer to your provocative questions is that if the political regime will go absolutely crazy, then I will not defend that regime against anyone. But I still hope that it will not go absolutely crazy.

Anyway, I will not discuss with you anymore, because you are systematically ignoring important relevant facts and you regularly change the context of discussion.


Ilmars Cirulis    (2023-06-18 18:59:07)
GUI for Big Chess?

One idea: maybe it is possible to automatically generate FEN for Big Chess game's current position?

It's would make analyzing ongoing games much easier. What do you think?


Thibault de Vassal    (2023-07-27 19:06:48)
FIDE rating change proposal

Maybe you heard about this strange proposal made by a mathematician to make FIDE ratings (<2000) more coherent against some deflation...

http://en.chessbase.com/post/fide-seeks-proposals-rating-changes

http://www.chess.com/news/view/fide-mathematician-proposes-changes-to-improve-rating-accuracy


I'm somewhat doubtful about this idea to change some data rather than the algorithm, what do you think?


Bogoljub Teverovski    (2023-08-09 13:46:12)
Next thematic tournament

I offer new thematic Fajarowitz d4 Nf6 c4 e5 de Ne4


Scott Ligon    (2023-08-10 00:48:11)
Next thematic tournament

The Budapest's less respectable cousin. Might just be losing for black but I'm not entirely sure. If engines are allowed, I'm interested.


A. T. S. Broekhuizen    (2023-08-18 14:32:53)
Next thematic tournament

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Nf6 4. d3 h6 5. c3 d6 6. Nbd2 g5

Two knights defence, pianissimo invitation, declined. Played by some top gm's like Caruana. Seems to give white an edge, but is it winning?


A. T. S. Broekhuizen    (2023-09-02 07:39:02)
Next thematic tournament

Smyslov Nimzo-Indian: 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 Bb4+ 4. Bd2 a5 5. a3 Bxd2+ 6. Nbxd2 O-O 7. e3 d6 8. Nb1 b6 9. Nc3 Bb7 10. Bd3

The knight manoeuvre on moves 8 and 9 is unexplored.


Thibault de Vassal    (2023-09-05 02:32:16)
Next thematic tournament

Thanks for the suggestions (will be applied for next tournaments).


A. T. S. Broekhuizen    (2023-09-10 13:00:12)
Looking for opponent in 1v1 match

see: https://ficgs.com/user_page.php?page=entry_tournament&tournament=ficgs_chess_rapid_silver


Ilmars Cirulis    (2023-09-18 20:19:57)
Looking for opponent in 1v1 match

Did you find it?


Vadrya Pokshtya    (2023-11-03 07:37:46)
Battle of Kings

As the inventor of many chess variants that can be played on the Internet, I want to share with you a mind-blowing chess variant.
I’m sure you’ve never seen anything like this before, and I’ll say without undue modesty that this is perhaps my best creation.

https://www.chessvariants.com/rules/battle-of-kings-
or more detailed here:
https://www.chess.com/blog/Pokshtya/battle-of-the-kings-is-a-chess-variant-that-drives-you-crazy

Give it a try against a bot (no registration required): https://dagazproject.github.io/checkmate/botk.htm

Feel free to implement it here if you see fit.
Regards,
Vadrya Pokshtya


Juri Eintalu    (2023-11-14 03:57:14)
A Public Appeal to Chess Organisations

Herbert Kruse:

"... our older generations did the holocaust, so for me its never again, so i am with jews always!"

"Holocaust" is the name of a historical event.
"Genocide" is a concept derived from that event.
Shortly after WWII, the first international conventions preventing genocide were adopted.

Today, we have:

Article 6 "Genocide" of the Rome Statute for the International Criminal Court

https://www.icc-cpi.int/sites/default/files/RS-Eng.pdf

Article 2 of the UN Genocide Convention (= Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide)

https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/documents/atrocity-crimes/Doc.1_Convention%20on%20the%20Prevention%20and%20Punishment%20of%20the%20Crime%20of%20Genocide.pdf

There is one serious problem that has arisen.

Israel's actions toward the Palestinians, particularly in the Gaza Strip, since October 2023 seem to match the definition of genocide exactly.

Israel's war crimes and crimes against humanity were sufficiently proven already in 2014.

https://www.russelltribunalonpalestine.com/en/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/TRP-Concl.-Gaza-EN.pdf

Jews are like all the other nations. In Israel, they have their state, government, and so on.

The problem is with the politics of that government, not with Jews.


Juri Eintalu    (2023-11-15 21:44:51)
A Public Appeal to Chess Organisations

Dear Herbert Kruse

My Public Appeal is about the sports sanctions, particularly about the chess sanctions, in the context of the Ukraine/Russia war and the more recent Israel/Palestine war.

My position is that it is wrong to politicise sports and, therefore, it was wrong to impose chess sanctions on Russia and Ukraine. The chess sanctions imposed on Russia and Ukraine should be lifted.

However, if these sanctions remain in force and politicising sports is regarded as a new normal, I think similar sanctions should be imposed on all countries that have seriously violated the international conventions.

Since October 2023, Israel has committed serious war crimes and crimes against humanity in the Gaza Strip (and elsewhere too).

Therefore, I suggest that if the chess sanctions imposed on Russia and Belarus will not be removed, then similar sanctions should be imposed on Israel.

For example, Israel should be excluded from the International Correspondence Chess Federation membership.

I explained all these points in my Public Appeal.

In your replies, you have actually not addressed my arguments presented in the Public Appeal.

First, you started to talk about the Jews in Germany. But the word "Jew(s)" appeared only once in my Public Appeal - to declare that the sanctions should be imposed on the states or the citizens of states and not based on ethnicity:

"As far as the Jews are concerned, collective punishment must not be applied to them. No one may be accused or discriminated against based on their nationality."

Finally, you started to talk about Israel's right to self-defence. Again, this distorts the content of my Public Appeal. I have nowhere and never denied Israel's right to self-defence. However, from the right to self-defence, it in no way follows that one has a right to commit war crimes and crimes against humanity.

Unnecessarily killing a large number of unarmed civilians is a war crime, and it cannot be justified by referring to self-defence or the war crimes the other side has earlier committed.

Unfortunately, I cannot continue discussing this with you, as you have systematically ignored the content of my Public Appeal.


Vadrya Pokshtya    (2023-11-17 20:38:28)
Battle of Kings

Thanks, but you are wrong about the engine being able to crush this chess variant ;)
Knowledgeable people, programmers with whom I had the opportunity to talk about this chess variant, argued that not a single engine would be able to adequately evaluate positions in the Battle of Kings due to the colossal combinatorial complexity of the game.
Please note that the server bot plays very, very weakly. The program does not understand the concept of the game and makes a superficial assessment of the position based on material balance.
Playing against a bot is very different from playing against a human.
At the moment you can play by correspondence against other players here https://www.schemingmind.com/default.aspx
or here
https://games.dtco.ru/

Thank you again for your positive feedback!


Thibault de Vassal    (2023-11-17 21:18:54)
Battle of Kings

I agree.

What were (how many moves approximately) the longest & shortest games you played until there?


Juri Eintalu    (2023-11-18 03:11:09)
A Public Appeal to Chess Organisations

Ilmars Cirulis:

"Both Netanyahu and Hamas should be in prison. :(

Poor civilians on both sides."

I have approximately the same opinion.

However, concerning chess sanctions, we can sanction only Israel.

We cannot impose chess sanctions on Hamas, as Hamas is not a state and it is not represented in the FIDE or ICCF.

We cannot expel Hamas from the ICCF because it has never been there.

My essay was about chess sanctions, not about such things as the International Criminal Court (ICC).

However, if to speak on that issue, my view is that both Hamas and Israel should be prosecuted in the ICCF.


Juri Eintalu    (2023-11-18 03:57:22)
A Public Appeal to Chess Organisations

to Thibault de Vassal:

"Recently, Hamas chose to attack civilians instead of Israel (this is a war crime, no ambiguity there), Israel now does everything to destroy Hamas, making many victims among civilians. But this may not be war crimes according to definition. Nothing obvious there, we'll see."

The 07 October attack is quite recent, and I would not say that all the circumstances are clear. For example, I am not sure that Hamas "chose" to kill civilians.

The only thing that is sure is that some number of civilians were killed by Hamas. It is sure, because Israel accuses Hamas of killing the civilians, and one of Hamas leaders has publicly admitted, that during that attack, Hamas killed some civilians "accidentally".

Killing civilians may make it a war crime. Intentionally killing civilians may make it an act of terrorism.

After the 07 October attack, Israel has killed awfully many civilians in the Gaza Strip. I totally agree with those experts who say that such a bombing of the sieged territory is not self-defence and it is a war crime - at the very least.

Note that during the 07 October attack, approximately 1200 people were killed, some of them were soldiers, and the others were civilians, many of them unarmed civilians.

Under Israel's bombs, in the Gaza Strip, during one month, more than 10,000 unarmed civilians were killed. Most of them were women and children. And it has not yet ended.

As of now, no one of the participants in the present discussion has said anything at all about the content of my Public Appeal. It seems that no one has even read it, despite I inserted the link into my initial post. I did not try to present the text directly here, on the Forum, as it was perhaps too lengthy for the Forum.

I shall provide the link to my Public Appeal again:

https://medium.com/@eintalu/a-public-appeal-to-chess-organisations-on-the-bombing-of-the-gaza-strip-be56afd3f5ca

Concerning civilian causalities of the Gaza bombing, and the comparison of the Ukraine war and the Israel war, I provided the following information in my Public Appeal:


<International organisations confirm that Israel has managed to kill more children in the Gaza Strip in one month in 2023 than were killed in all the war zones on the planet in the whole of 2022. In fact, significantly more children have been killed by Israeli bombs in one month than in two years of war in Ukraine. See also, e.g.:

“GAZA: 3,195 CHILDREN KILLED IN THREE WEEKS SURPASSES ANNUAL NUMBER OF CHILDREN KILLED IN CONFLICT ZONES SINCE 2019â€
Save the Children, 29 October 2023

https://www.savethechildren.net/news/gaza-3195-children-killed-three-weeks-surpasses-annual-number-children-killed-conflict-zones# >


Now, while talking about the attacks on civilians, you (as other participants of the discussion) simply ignore my Public Appeal.

Concerning your political views about the real intentions of Russia when starting a war against Ukraine, what you present dogmatically and without evidence - the only sober reply is that dogmatically and without evidence, one could as well assert whatever about the Israeli real intentions concerning the Gaza war.

However, we have direct evidence from the public speeches of Israel's leadership, that the intentions of the Gaza war are genocidal.

I conclude that you are trying to whitewash Israeli large-scale war crimes and crimes against humanity while ignoring the text of my Public Appeal.


Thibault de Vassal    (2023-11-18 19:42:16)
A Public Appeal to Chess Organisations

Juri, when you say << For example, I am not sure that Hamas "chose" to kill civilians. >>, I'm not sure if your topic is determinism or something else but obviously you cannot be sure of anything. Did you watch the videos? Anyway, any army killing or kidnapping civilians is a war crime for sure and that's most probably terrorism in this case.

On Israel response, many experts say different things, so it remains unclear yet to me. (it is important not to listen what one want to hear only)

About your text, you seem to neglict all contextual elements to compare Russia, Thaïland, Congo, North Korea, China or whatever situation in any country... No chess organization reacted much when Peng Shuai (chinese tennis star) disappeared, but tennis world reacted! For Rohingya, Karabakh or about war in Irak or Afghanisatan. How many chess players in these countries? That is not the same. Russia & Ukraine are among the most influential chess nations in the world. Russia is the biggest country, has the most nuclear weapons. That's why it seems pertinent that chess players and organizations take position towards not just peace (undermeaning "do what Russia wants"), but a fair and right peace.

You say : "Concerning your political views about the real intentions of Russia when starting a war against Ukraine, what you present dogmatically and without evidence"

The evidence is in Putin's speeches, "Russia defends its interests", obviously Ukraine (another country for a while) should not be free of his choices, in example to join an alliance to protect itself just like Finland or other countries... Obviously Ukraine is Russia's interest and should not join OTAN. Did ever OTAN attack Russia?

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Dgy4vYTp_Jo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gxS9YIBeJbY

Watching full speeches is even more instructive.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=akzr0K0CE0M

Putin's rhetoric remains both crude and manipulative, appealing to people's conservative reflexes. And it works on most people who get outraged at the slightest conspiracy theory, it's no coincidence.

Finally, the argument saying that there shouldn't be politics in chess or sports has no foundations other than a subjective point of view.

You say that these bans by FIDE were out of international laws and that the same restrictions should apply to israeli playesrs... well, so just prove it and make appeal I guess. Karjakin probably thought about that already!?

Meanwhile, these discussions are only point of views.


Juri Eintalu    (2023-11-19 00:58:48)
A Public Appeal to Chess Organisations

ARGUMENTS CONCERNING THE RUSSIA/UKRAINE WAR

None of the commentators explained why it was necessary and reasonable to politicise sports and to impose sanctions on Russia and Belarus. No one answered my corresponding arguments from my Public Appeal. No one explained why the sanctions were imposed on Russia for the invasion of Ukraine, while no sanctions were imposed on the US for the occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan.

HERBERT KRUSE PRESENTED THE FOLLOWING "ARGUMENT":

"like Ukraine Israel had its "Butcha" at the music festival, so who attacked?

and there were constant rockets on Israel from Gaza, should they just allow it?

and the hostiges should just given up?

if my state can not defend me, maybe u can help?!"

This emotional and psychological manipulation completely ignored all my relevant arguments and explanations.

Now, let us take only the first phrase of this mumbo-jumbo:

"like Ukraine Israel had its 'Butcha' at the music festival, so who attacked?"

My Public Appeal was about chess sanctions. Now, the data are as follows:

2022, February 24:
Russia started its invasion of Ukraine

2022, February 27:
An extraordinary meeting of the FIDE Council was held on the current situation and the urgent measures to be taken after the military action launched by Russia in Ukraine.
https://fide.com/news/1603

Thus, it seems that they waited for the beginning of the Russian invasion and had a plan for how to react, as they responded only a few days later.

Israel had occupied Palestinian territories for 55 years, but the chess federation FIDE had never reacted.

2022, March 16:
Russia and Belarus teams suspended from FIDE competitions.
https://fide.com/news/1638

2022, March 30:
Russian troops leave Bucha (near Kyiv).

2022, April 01:
The corpses in Bucha were discovered.

Now, the first obvious problem with Herbert Kruse's "argument" is that the timeline proves that the chess sanctions on Russia were imposed BEFORE the corpses in Bucha were discovered.

The second problem is that he does not know or pretends not to know the definitions of such terms as "war crime".

The third problem is that, as a matter of fact, we do NOT know WHEN these people were executed, and we do NOT know WHO executed them.

It is so because there were actually TWO massacres in Bucha.
The shelling killed some people, "The Guardian" reported. These people were lying on the streets. The satellite images proved that they were killed before the Russian Army left the town.
However, some people were executed in the cellars. Unfortunately, the satellite images cannot prove the time of the executions in the cellars.
There is one additional problem. Ukraine has not made public the names and personal data of the victims. Therefore, we do not even know what percentage of the victims were Ukrainians and what percentage were Russians.

THIBAULT THE VASSAL PRESENTED THE FOLLOWING SEQUENCE OF ARGUMENTS:

"Ukraine is attacked mainly because Poutine (at least) argues it historically belongs to Russia with no consideration of its recent history & international treaties (and among other reasons because he obviously sees nazis in every people open on what a man/woman/family could look like, meaning many europeans & americans)."

Thibault has no evidence whatsoever for one's claim that Putin "obviously sees nazis in every people open on what a man/woman/family could look like, meaning many europeans & americans)." There is even no evidence to the claim that the Russian administration thinks that the majority of Ukrainians were Nazis. The evidence might be the public speeches of Russian leaders. But I have seen no such speech with such theses. Indeed, Putin has said something else.

I believe that Thibault presents one's prejudices as "obvious facts".

Besides, it has nothing to do with the arguments of my Public Appeal.

"There are few doubts that war crimes have been committed there."

In the Ukraine/Russia war, BOTH sides have committed a lot of war crimes, and it is well documented and proven.

However, the chess sanctions on Russia were not imposed because of the war crimes, as can be seen from the schedule above. The motivation to impose those sanctions was, initially, merely the fact that Russia started a war (not a war crime but a crime against peace).

Moreover, in the Ukraine/Donbas domestic war too, both sides committed war crimes. Ukraine committed crimes against humanity, and there were clear genocidal elements of the behaviour towards the Russian-speaking minority of Ukraine. It is also well-documented and proven. At the beginning of my Public Appeal, I mentioned that Karyakin argued from the premise that Ukrainian ultra-nationalists murdered a lot of Russians in Ukraine.

However, I see that the responses to my Public Appeal have altogether ignored all my arguments, and everyone has preferred to talk about something else.


Thibault de Vassal    (2023-11-19 04:40:50)
A Public Appeal to Chess Organisations

Oh well, you surely cannot be sure of anything, but still it seems that you know many things... No, that's not a crime as far as I know. I just wonder what looks like your process to decide what the truth is. Maybe you "make your own researches".

I suggest you to watch the dozens of videos there:

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=october+7+hamas


Do you estimate it's all made by an AI? Hollywood? Israel studio? In a single day?

Anyway, your message was heard... If you want to read it, my opinion is that you awkwardly try to bring confusion where there are facts and on the nature of these facts.

Obviously you are not in a hurry to decide what actually happened on 07 October 2023, but you seem in a hurry to appeal chess organizations to treat Israel & Russia in another way than they do. Why not waiting for a few years to be sure?

I do not have to accept your attitude too, by the way. Are you one of these confusionist propagandists? Are you some kind of Qanon or Trumpist?

Finally I do not demand that you believe anything, that would be totalitarist & stupid, indeed. I just give my opinion on your comments as well.


Juri Eintalu    (2023-11-20 02:21:47)
A Public Appeal to Chess Organisations

"Israeli Security Establishment: Hamas Likely Didn’t Have Advance Knowledge of Nova Festival"
Haaretz, 18 November 2023

https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2023-11-18/ty-article/.premium/israeli-security-establishment-hamas-likely-didnt-have-prior-knowledge-of-nova-festival/0000018b-e2ee-d168-a3ef-f7fe8ca20000

"Hamas had not planned to attack music festival, Israeli report says"
Al Jazeera, 18 November 2023

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/11/18/hamas-had-not-planned-to-attack-israel-music-festival-israeli-report-says

'“An investigation into the incident revealed an [Israeli military] combat helicopter that arrived at the scene from the Ramat David base fired at the terrorists and apparently also hit some of the revelers there,†the Haaretz report cited an unnamed police official as saying.'

The funniest thing is that after Mr Herbert Kruse claimed that I should be in jail for not thinking that the official narrative on the 07 October attack was entirely true and proven - the very next day Israeli newspapers reported that some unspecified number of civilians were killed not by Hamas but by Israeli helicopter.

The sad thing is that the discussion of the 07 October events is absolutely irrelevant to my Public Appeal.

As I have explained above several times.

Suppose that all the 1200 people killed on 07 October were civilians. Suppose that Hamas is a terrorist organisation (I have not checked their background, I heard the name "Hamas" first time in my life on 07 October). Suppose that the 07 attack was a terrorist attack and all the civilians were killed intentionally.

ABSOLUTELY NOTHING can be inferred concerning my Public Appeal.

I have explained already several times that Israeli war crimes and crimes against humanity in the Gaza Strip are in no way justified by 07 October events.

It follows from the international conventions, from the entrenched definitions of "war crime", "genocide", etc.

I have also explained, already in my Public Appeal, that there is no need to impose sports sanctions on Hamas, as Hamas has been announced to be a terrorist organisation by the European Union, shortly after the 07 October events.

Moreover, I have explained above, that one cannot expel Hamas from the chess organisations like FIDE or ICCF, because it has never been there.

I do not want to talk to such demagogues as Herbert Kruse and Thibault de Vassal.

Among other things, both have completely ignored my arguments and the actual text of my Public Appeal.

There is an ongoing genocide in the Gaza Strip. Compared to the enormous crimes of Israel, the scale of killing unarmed civilians, the Russian Chess Federation has been sanctioned for small things, while the current racist, fascist Nazi-Israel has remained untouched, with impunity.


Thibault de Vassal    (2023-11-20 19:39:27)
A Public Appeal to Chess Organisations

Juri, you probably spread fake news:

___________________________

Social media users recently circulated video footage they claimed shows an Israeli helicopter killing Israelis at an Oct. 7 concert in Israel.

Stew Peters, a far-right radio host and the filmmaker behind the anti-COVID-19 vaccine films "Died Suddenly" and "Watch the Water," shared the 14-second video clip on X, formerly Twitter.

"VIDEO PROVES and ISRAEL ADMITS it slaughtered its own people on Oct. 7th," Peters wrote Nov. 9. "This attack was NOT made by goat herders on paragliders. Footage from Israeli helicopter shows the IDF killing many people at October 7 concert in Israel. IDF helicopters fired on civilians fleeing the PsyTrance Music Festival."

Other social media users shared Peters’ post, and it was flagged as part of Meta’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram.) We also found this video clip misrepresented on TikTok.

(...)

GeoConfirmed, a group that works to geolocate video footage, analyzed the Israel Defense Forces’ video, and concluded it was not filmed at the site of the Nova music festival.

We found no evidence to support Peters’ claim that the video clip showed Israeli forces killing people at an Oct. 7 concert in Israel. A group that works to geolocate video footage analyzed the Israel Defense Forces’ video and said it was not filmed at the music festival site.

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2023/nov/17/stew-peters/no-this-video-doesnt-show-israeli-military-killing/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57UQKWdZRco

_________________________


In doubt, such news (probably fake news) have no place here... Thanks in advance.

Now we heard your message (and I did respond to your public appeal), feel free to let chess organizations decide what they have to do, no need to discuss it more here.


Thibault de Vassal    (2023-11-20 19:41:39)
Battle of Kings

Thanks for information... I'll probably play it more when I have some time. And I really hope it will be investigated by chess programmers :)


Thibault de Vassal    (2023-11-25 23:15:04)
Referee Adjudication

The later is best :)

Do not forget that 50 moves rule does NOT apply at FICGS.

If there is a checkmate to come, according to the rules: after you ask, your opponent still gets 30 days to play a few moves more. Not everyone uses tablebases and some may want to see how it ends...


Bogoljub Teverovski    (2023-11-28 12:23:28)
Next thematic tournament

I offer new thematic - Scandinavian 1.e4 d5 2.exd5 Qxd5 3.Nc3 Qd6


Thibault de Vassal    (2023-11-30 01:19:44)
Next thematic tournament

Let's go for this... Thanks for your suggestions!


Zbigniew Szczepanski    (2023-12-11 11:50:09)
Referee Adjudication

In ICCF and LSS-Server, when 7 figures are reached, the game ends automatically. Some disadvantaged people are just malicious and continue playing the hopeless game. As a rule, these are people who do not know how to play chess, but only use powerful computers to challenge good chess players. They count on a mistake or the death of their rival. It's a waste of time. 99% of players use engines, databases and tables.


Thibault de Vassal    (2024-01-01 01:10:03)
Fried Liver analysis on rybkaforum.net?

Hmmm... should be a thematic tournament some time ;) Happy new year Ilmars!


Ilmars Cirulis    (2024-02-18 18:00:07)
Fried Liver analysis on rybkaforum.net?

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Nf6 4. Ng5 d5 5. exd5 Nxd5 6. Nxf7 Kxf7 7. Qf3+ Ke6 8. Nc3 Nb4 9. O-O c6 10. d4 Qf6 11. Qd1 Ke7 12. Re1 h6 13. Rxe5+ Kd8 14. Ne4 Qg6 15. a3 Bf5 16. Ng3 Bxc2 17. Qf3 Nd3 18. Rf5 Bd6 19. Bxd3 Bxd3 20. Qxd3 Kc7 21. Bd2 Rhf8 22. Rd1 b6 - still don't know for sure if this is a draw or maybe white can win somehow...

When is thematic tournament(s) happening? :sweat_smile:


Ilmars Cirulis    (2024-02-24 21:47:45)
Fried Liver analysis on rybkaforum.net?

Played thematic game with Bahadir Ozen at LSS, added it to Lichess study:

https://lichess.org/study/MYMU6aQ7/dA04utCi

It ended in interesting, imho, draw. :)


Bogoljub Teverovski    (2024-03-26 11:40:41)
Next thematic tournament

I'd like to offer an old Philidor Defence 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 d6 as the next thematic tournament.


Thibault de Vassal    (2024-03-27 02:33:38)
Next thematic tournament

Let's wait for the current waiting list to finish, then we'll try Fried Liver attack (e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 Ng5 d5 exd5 Nxd5), and then we'll try Philidor Defence...


Herbert Kruse    (2024-04-22 12:49:02)
Next Ficgs World Championship Tournament

but the last game in 17 doesnt matter, first place in that is also clear


A. T. S. Broekhuizen    (2024-05-06 10:42:34)
Looking for opponent in 1v1 match

Yes I played a couple of matches against Herbert Kruse. I tried out some ideas, but all games were drawn. Maybe in the first round of current WCC, I might win a game or two.


A. T. S. Broekhuizen    (2024-06-04 20:28:07)
Looking for opponent in 1v1 match

@Ilmars Cirulis, Most of my current games have run their course. If you want, I am ready for another 1v1 match.


Ilmars Cirulis    (2024-06-05 10:11:11)
Looking for opponent in 1v1 match

I have exactly 9.96 epoints, will have to wait a bit until I reach 10.


Bogoljub Teverovski    (2024-06-15 12:06:38)
Next thematic tournament

Yes, Philidor is upcoming


Wilhelm Schuett    (2024-06-22 20:23:39)
Next thematic tournament

Which way to Philidor? Or 1.e4 d6 2.d4 Sf6 3.Sc3 e5 for another thematic tournament?


A. T. S. Broekhuizen    (2024-09-10 14:05:28)
Group winners first stage of Ficgs WCH

For group 1 t/m 5 it is already clear as crystal who's going to win and for the last groups as well, but those are shared group wins. Sadly many players prolong their game. And for group 6 and 7 I can understand, since the rules are such that in case of a tie the group win goes to the highest TER and after that to the highest rating holder.
But wouldn't it be best to just start a second round ASAP with two groups of five players? Or will it really come down to TER's and most recent ratings?

I included an oversight of the group winners:

Group 1
Kireev, Sergey

Group 2
Hallqvist, Niklas

Group 3
Knittel, Martin

Group 4
Swiatek, Janusz

Group 5
LaDuke, Matt

Group 6
Gounant, Stanislas
Pech, Stepan

Group 7
DeBonis, Patrick
Broekhuizen, A. T. S.
Ward, David


Garvin Gray    (2024-10-04 00:19:15)
Chess Cup-1st Stage

Group 2's final game has finished in stalemate and Thibault has to now declare the game drawn by the laws of chess.

And then we can get on with the final


Scott Ligon    (2025-01-21 23:17:17)
Stockfish unbeatable at modest settings?

And now I have found a line that defeats Stockfish 17 at 10 million nodes, so that strategy is not safe to play as black. I won't post the line yet because I don't want to give away information that might be relevant for my opponents in games that are still running, but I intend to post it later.

I will continue to use the 10 million node strategy in the tournaments I had already started, but in my upcoming tournaments I will switch to the 15 million node version of this strategy, to test whether or not there's a line that defeats it. As mentioned in the first post, if Stockfish's recommended move gets to what appears to be a losing position, I will deviate from these strategies to try to avoid losing, and I will message my opponent to let them know this has happened. In my games so far, I have not deviated from the 10 million node strategy, unless it happened by mistake. But I'm not aware of any such mistakes.


Scott Ligon    (2025-02-16 21:19:28)
Stockfish unbeatable at modest settings?

Since I only won because you made a mistake entering the last move, I will give you a return match at 10 million nodes. You can play it however you want but if we reach a position where I can see that the 10 million node strategy takes me into a losing position, I will take over at that point. Other than that one game, I'm officially retiring the 10 million node strategy since I already know that white can win against it.

Check the waiting lists. I think there's a tournament where I'm first on the list and there's one other player. If you enter third, I believe you would have white against me. I think that's how it works.


Wilhelm Schuett    (2025-02-27 01:05:45)
Next thematic tournament

https://shop.chessbase.com/en/products/fernandez_the_modern_sicilian_surprise_in_60min?Ref=RF70-5OH0EFN840 5...h5!? in the 2…Nc6-Sicilian


Bogoljub Teverovski    (2025-03-10 15:15:34)
Next thematic tournament

Alternatively Caro: 1.e4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 de4 4.Nxe4 Nf6 5.Nxf6 exf6


Wilhelm Schuett    (2025-03-13 15:11:13)
Next thematic tournament

gxf6 was popular in the 80's. Nowadays it would be a surprise weapon


Bogoljub Teverovski    (2025-03-15 19:19:07)
Next thematic tournament

OK on gf6 got thematic


A. T. S. Broekhuizen    (2025-03-15 19:42:24)
Next thematic tournament

You mean exf6? I think I got something interesting against that Caro Kann line. I am in.


Bogoljub Teverovski    (2025-03-16 19:04:40)
Next thematic tournament

we can stay at 5.Nxf6 with a free choice exf6 or gxf6


A. T. S. Broekhuizen    (2025-03-17 10:20:41)
Next thematic tournament

That's fine by me.


Scott Ligon    (2025-03-29 18:03:58)
Stockfish unbeatable at modest settings?

I think there's a decent chance that the 15 million node strategy is unbeatable, but I can't say what that chance is. Maybe I overestimate it. I have spent considerable time looking for a winning line for white and I haven't been able to find one. But, I had that same opinion about the 10 million node strategy before I found evidence in my games that it loses. Specifically games in the Sicilian. I haven't found any other winning lines for white.

As for my opponents, I think mostly they enter tournaments and play their usual game. I'm just another opponent. My focus is on the experiment I'm running, but I wouldn't assume everyone else is focused on it. But if anyone cares to prove that the 15 million node strategy is beatable, exploitive play is clearly the way to go about it. This most recent game shows that even a move that fails to give white an objective advantage could still merit consideration as a possible exploit against the fixed node strategy.


Scott Ligon    (2025-04-23 02:27:39)
Stockfish unbeatable at modest settings?

At this point all of my games are safely past the point where they could transpose into the winning line I found against the Stockfish 17 @ 15 million nodes strategy, so I will post it now. At the end of the line Stockfish found mate in 15 for white.

1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 a6 6. Bg5 e6 7. f4 h6 8. Bh4 Be7 9. Qf3 Nbd7 10. O-O-O Qc7 11. Bd3 g5 12. fxg5 Ne5 13. Qe2 Nfg4 14. Bg3 hxg5 15. Kb1 b5 16. Rdf1 Bb7 17. a3 Nf6 18. Nf3 Nh5 19. Bxe5 dxe5 20. g3 f6 21. Na2 Bc6 22. Nc1 b4 23. axb4 Bxb4 24. c3 Be7 25. Nd2 a5 26. Bc4 Bd7 27. Rfg1 Kf7 28. Rg2 Rag8 29. Nd3 Bc5 30. Rd1 Ba7 31. Qg4 Ke7 32. Bb3 a4 33. Ba2 Ng7 34. Nc4 Be8 35. Qe2 a3 36. Nxa3 Ba4 37. Rf1 Bc6 38. Qg4 Rd8 39. Bc4 Be8 40. Qf3 Rf8 41. g4 Bg6 42. b3 Bb8 43. h4 gxh4 44. Kb2 Ne8 45. g5 f5 46. Qh3 Qc6 47. Re2 Ng7 48. Qxh4 f4 49. Nb4 Qb6 50. Bb5 Rh8 51. Nc6+ Qxc6 52. Qxh8 Qxc3+ 53. Kxc3 Rxh8 54. Rd2 Rc8+ 55. Kb2 Kf7 56. Rfd1 Bxe4 57. Rd8 Rxd8 58. Rxd8 Kg6 59. Rxb8 Kxg5 60. Nc4 Nf5 61. Nxe5 Nd6 62. Rb6 Kf6 63. Rxd6 Kxe5 64. Rd7 Bg2 65. Kc3 Be4 66. b4 Ba8 67. Bc4 f3 68. b5


Ulises Pineda    (2025-04-23 14:49:42)
Stockfish unbeatable at modest settings?

I'll request that if you ever play against me, jump at least to Stockfish 17.1 @ 20 million nodes, because a doubling of nodes is some 50 elo boost to the model, so a lot of games can be saved by increasing the nodes, as finding a winning line against such a thing isn't more difficult in reality, it just takes more time, so I guess those people don't think winning a game is worth the extra time used, or maybe they really don't know how, but if someone offered a million dollars for the line I'm sure they'd sit down and find it.
It's a matter of strength, someone with Stockfish 20 could find the line with a relative ease, and I don't think it'll play a perfect game already either, the blind spots just switch places.


Scott Ligon    (2025-05-01 04:14:23)
Stockfish unbeatable at modest settings?

After the harsh words of my previous post, I must now give Pineda some credit. He did exactly what he said he was going to do against Stockfish 17.1 @ 10 million nodes so now I can't use that strategy in any of my future games, it is retired. Since none of my opponents in the games I have running now with this strategy are playing the same opening that Pineda used (the Italian Game), I can post a winning line for white immediately. Our game followed the first 43 moves of this line, and as black I had to deviate from this strategy on move 43 to avoid certain defeat. So here is a winning line for white against Stockfish 17.1 @ 10 million nodes. At the end of the line, Stockfish found mate in 22.

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Nf6 4. d3 Bc5 5. c3 a6 6. O-O d6 7. a4 O-O 8. b4 Ba7 9. Re1 Ne7 10. Nbd2 Be6 11. Bxe6 fxe6 12. Ra2 Ng6 13. h3 Qe8 14. Nf1 h6 15. N1h2 a5 16. b5 Bc5 17. Bd2 Rd8 18. Qb3 Qf7 19. g3 d5 20. Kg2 b6 21. Bc1 Rc8 22. exd5 Nxd5 23. h4 Bd6 24. h5 Nge7 25. Nxe5 Qxh5 26. Nef3 c5 27. c4 Nb4 28. Rd2 Ng6 29. Qd1 Nf4+ 30. Kh1 Rcd8 31. Re3 Qh3 32. Ne1 Ng6 33. Qe2 Ne7 34. Nf3 Bxg3 35. fxg3 Nf5 36. Qf2 Nxg3+ 37. Kg1 Nf5 38. Bb2 Rf7 39. Bc3 Nxe3 40. Qxe3 Qg3+ 41. Kh1 Qh3 42. Qe4 Qf5 43. Qxf5 exf5 44. Ne5 Rf6 45. Nhf3 g5 46. d4 cxd4 47. Rxd4 Rfd6 48. Rxd6 Rxd6 49. Bxb4 Rd1+ 50. Kg2 axb4 51. c5 b3 52. Nc4 bxc5 53. b6 g4 54. b7 gxf3+ 55. Kxf3


Scott Ligon    (2025-06-14 02:43:46)
Stockfish unbeatable at modest settings?

While analyzing the game I'm currently playing as black against Pineda, I found a winning line for white against Stockfish 17.1 @ 20 million nodes. It follows the first 41 moves of that game, and white made a different 42nd move. Which may also lead to a winning line for all I know, but I will just post the one I found. At the end of this line Stockfish found mate in 23.

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Nf6 4. d3 Bc5 5. c3 d6 6. O-O a6 7. a4 O-O 8. b4 Ba7 9. Re1 Ne7 10. Nbd2 Be6 11. Bxe6 fxe6 12. Nf1 Ng6 13. h3 h6 14. N1h2 Qe8 15. Ra2 a5 16. b5 Bc5 17. Bd2 Rd8 18. Qb3 Qf7 19. g3 d5 20. Kg2 b6 21. Bc1 Bd6 22. Rae2 Bc5 23. Rc2 Rde8 24. Ra2 Bd6 25. Ba3 Rc8 26. c4 Kh7 27. Raa1 Kg8 28. Bb2 c6 29. Rac1 Bb4 30. Re2 d4 31. h4 Qc7 32. bxc6 Bc5 33. Rg1 Rf7 34. Qd1 Qxc6 35. Bc1 Rcf8 36. Rf1 Qd6 37. Rd2 Qc7 38. Ra2 Bb4 39. Rc2 Qb7 40. Rb2 Qd7 41. Bd2 Bc5 42. Qe2 Qc6 43. Rbb1 Nd7 44. h5 Nh8 45. Rb5 Bd6 46. Qd1 Qc7 47. Nh4 Nc5 48. Ng6 Nxg6 49. hxg6 Rf6 50. Qh5 Nxd3 51. Ng4 Qc6 52. Kg1 Qxe4 53. Nxf6+ Rxf6 54. Rxb6 Bf8 55. f3 Qe2 56. Qh2 Qxh2+ 57. Kxh2 e4 58. Bxa5 e3 59. Kg2 Ne5 60. c5 Rxg6 61. c6 Bd6 62. Bb4 Bc7 63. f4 e2 64. Rb1 Bxb6 65. fxe5 d3 66. a5 Rg4 67. Be1 Bxa5 68. Bxa5 Rc4 69. Rb6 Rc5 70. Bb4 Rc4 71. Kf2 Kf7 72. Rb7+ Ke8 73. Re7+ Kd8 74. c7+ Rxc7 75. Rxc7 Kxc7 76. Ke3 Kc6 77. Kxd3 e1=Q 78. Bxe1 Kd5 79. Bc3 Kc5 80. Ke4

Therefore I will be retiring the Stockfish 17.1 @ 20 million nodes strategy. For future games I will be using Stockfish 17.1 @ 50 million nodes.


Wilhelm Schuett    (2025-06-30 17:49:24)
Next thematic tournament

Did we ever had the Danish Gambit?


A. T. S. Broekhuizen    (2025-08-01 09:13:35)
50 moves rule

it's not important anymore. In this wch game the site doesn't recognize checkmate: 147445


Bogoljub Teverovski    (2025-08-06 16:14:12)
Next thematic tournament

I'm interested to play Advanced Caro 1.e4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.e5 with 3...c5


George Jempty    (2025-10-07 08:21:29)
Next thematic tournament

What about 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Nb5 4.Bf4!? it would be a way to test out a perfectly sound alternative that is almost never played


A. T. S. Broekhuizen    (2025-10-07 09:44:32)
Next thematic tournament

@George, I think it's a bit too tame. Maybe this is an idea: 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. f3 c5 5. d5 b5 after which black has several options. This is much more double-edged.


George Jempty    (2025-10-07 17:15:16)
Next thematic tournament

Yeah probably too tame for correspondence, interestingly I do intend to play 4.f3 for the most part, but I came up with the 4.Bf4 idea when investgating the Leningrad variation. After 4.Bg5 c5 now 5.d5?! which had been the standard is considered sub-optimal by the engine which prefers 5.e3, and after 5...h6, I concluded that White didn't have to play 6.Bxf6 or 6.Bh4, which is when I started investigating 4.Bf4. I actually may start playing this in FIDE tournaments where I will probably be much lower rated, exactly to get into such a tame line


A. T. S. Broekhuizen    (2025-10-08 11:44:36)
Next thematic tournament

In the Leningrad 5.d5 is indeed suboptimal, but the lichess engine prefers 5.Nf3. After 5.e3 black has a combination with 5...Qa5 6.Ne2 Ne4 7.Qd3 cxd4 8.exd4 Nxf2 9.Kxf2 Qxg5


George Jempty    (2025-10-08 17:21:57)
Next thematic tournament

Ah, right. In any case, tinkering around with the Leningrad, I came up with the idea of 4.Bf4


Thibault de Vassal    (2025-10-27 18:41:02)
Russian flag replaced

I don't intend to remake the whole debate here or anywhere else... I have other things to do. But in brief, IMO:

1. The situation was complex before oct.8
2. Hamas (terrorist org) started it.
3. More than 75% (!) of Gaza buildings were destroyed.
4. How many people killed, how many terrorists?
5. What are the limits of acceptability?

It seems possible to commit war crimes and/or a genocide after being attacked, right?

There can be absolutely no link between estimating that Israel commits a genocide and proving antisemitism, right?

There are other wars in the world, that's right (of different natures).

I'm not in a hurry to take any action... it will take time yet.


Bogoljub Teverovski    (2025-10-28 00:54:37)
Next thematic tournament

What about Norfolk gambit 1.Nf3 d5 2.b3 c5 3.e4? Just some fun


George Jempty    (2025-11-04 14:25:26)
Russian flag replaced

It's not a matter of being a "political expert". It's just a matter of knowing your history. "Between May 3 and 12, 1916, the British military executed 15 leaders of the Easter Rising for their roles in the rebellion" .... "The swift and public executions, conducted during the First World War, generated significant public outrage and sympathy for the rebel cause in Ireland. What was initially a mixed public reaction to the Rising turned into widespread support". And that was for killing 15 people, so my educated guess is there will eventually be retribution for Israel indisputably (again, not an opinion, or me being a "political expert") KILLING TENS OF THOUSAND OF PALESTINIAN CIVILIANS.


Bahadir Ozen    (2025-11-05 09:51:11)
Finished games - Gmail problem

Hello Mr. George,
Thank you for the information. Best regards.


Garvin Gray    (2025-11-10 05:48:20)
Clarification of Rating Groups

George:

As I stated in my original post:

The policy as I have known it has been that a player must win a lower division, and then can only enter the higher division when the field has gotten to the last two entries.

Has this policy changed?

Your reply would fit if the player had won the lower division and was then trying to enter the higher division.

This is the rule I was quoting.

Your justifications about where your rating sits, or where your rating maybe in the future does not matter. Many players can show this pattern.

I certain have and have been stuck just below a rating cut off and when I have attempted to enter a higher division when there are two spots left open, I have been told no as I not won a lower division.

Therefore, this is why I am seeking a clarification from Thibault.

And it is only Thibault that I want a public answer from.

Either the rule has changed and it should be told to everyone, or an exception has been made for you, which is then clearly wrong as that is favouritism.

I have been told no in the past.

So, which is it Thibault?


Bahadir Ozen    (2025-11-11 10:46:11)
Increasing the Number of Games in Progre

Hello,

First of all, I'd like to thank Mr. Thibault for his efforts. We can play regularly for free. FICGS and LSS are my favorite correspondence chess sites.

Is there a possibility of increasing the maximum number of matches from 50 in the future? For example, 200 matches at a time.

Players who forfeit too many matches will be penalized; perhaps such a system could be implemented. I'm just curious; is it possible?

Regards
Bahadir


Ulises Pineda    (2025-11-11 23:02:26)
Increasing the Number of Games in Progre

What about penalizing players that forfeit too many matches by disallowing them to start new games for a month, or something like that? Other kind of penalties would be problematic because they'd depend on how many games are already running, but a time out for forfeiting games seems reasonable.


George Jempty    (2025-11-12 16:02:43)
Increasing the Number of Games in Progre

hmm how about a reward system, based on how many matches somebody finishes, increase the number for them by 10, or 25, e.g. I have no stake in this though -- I forfeited a lot of games in the past


Bahadir Ozen    (2025-11-12 20:21:12)
Increasing the Number of Games in Progre

Hello,

Thank you. I love FICGS and would like to play more matches at once. But overall, if this system works, there's nothing to be done. Thank you.

Regards
Bahadir


George Jempty    (2025-11-17 23:38:29)
Next thematic tournament

Clodomiro Ortiz, feel better soon :(


Garvin Gray    (2025-11-18 02:57:20)
Clarification of Rating Groups

So, based on this, each time I have tried to enter a higher rated tournament and received a message saying, you are outside the rating range, this has been false.

The rules of this site have actually allowed me a method of getting in, but that automated message has not been updated.

That is extremely poor and has now left a very sour taste in my mouth.


Ulises Pineda    (2025-11-18 10:33:59)
Clarification of Rating Groups

I demand a button that buys a ticket automatically when a player is elegible for playing a higher rated tournament and the Epoints to pay it are available, because right now, I have no idea how to do such a feat, in that case, Jempty outsmarted us all, unironically.
Not that my demands have any weight, I think people's lives have gotten better since they ignored me, and perhaps it'd be better for everyone if these rules remained hidden and nobody ever used them again (except Jempty would continue to play a tier up when able), but it's worth a try.
I don't have a bad taste but this has caused me physical pain in the lower back part of my head, is it stressful?
It's nothing personal against George, it's just that climbing the rating ladder is one of the most difficult tasks one can do in life, so when one sees a 2400 player, one respects them, because of all the time and effort they had to put to get there, which, for all players below that tier is immeasurable, if we could measure it we could have that rating too.
But someone getting there by buying tickets that allowed them to face higher rated opposition and take shortcuts to avoid dealing with lower rated players does cheapen the meaning of the number.
I guess it's all about the money, pay to win iff someone buys the Epoints for this reason, and holds a higher rating to skip a tier (note I said iff, not if, not accusing anybody of doing that.)
It's like buying a car instead of running the marathon, and the rating doesn't actually reflect chess skill anymore.


Thibault de Vassal    (2025-11-22 00:12:16)
Next thematic tournament

Done, Clodomiro... best wishes to you. (please just send me an email for such inquiries)


Wilhelm Schuett    (2025-11-22 21:57:13)
Next thematic tournament

1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. f3


Yeturu Aahlad    (2025-11-25 23:27:25)
Poker ELO

Proposal: re-examine Poker ELO

Why? ELO is a heuristic designed for full information games involving no element of chance. In that space, it has stood the test of time. For games incorporating an element of chance, such as Poker, it is not ideal. As a data point, my evidence from FICGS is that a Poker player who goes all-in on every hand converges to an ELO of slightly over 2000. My last observation is from a long time ago, and one of these players (the much better one) has abandoned this strategy since then. There are many earnest players who deserve to out-rank such a simplistic strategy but don't.

Action: This subject has been studied, and the emerging recommendation is a simple change to the heuristic for games which incorporate elements of chance.

Research: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZXdehn029SaV6a5mxsn7WAMsxYNZPGHzZHKiBbeaxrw/edit?usp=sharing


George Jempty    (2025-11-27 20:40:26)
Maintaining the initiative s a matter of

Restricting your opponent's counterplay


George Jempty    (2025-11-27 20:41:31)
Maintaining the initiative s a matter of

crap i thought i was posting that to my blog


A. T. S. Broekhuizen    (2025-12-02 07:40:53)
Next thematic tournament

Feel better soon Clodomiro.


A. T. S. Broekhuizen    (2025-12-02 07:42:03)
Next thematic tournament

@Wilhelm your suggestion "1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. f3" is fine by me.


George Jempty    (2025-12-06 15:45:30)
Next thematic tournament

The Tchigorin French, 1.e4 e6 2.Qe2 .... this is a tourney I would *definitely* join ;)


Wilhelm Schuett    (2025-12-06 20:21:52)
Next thematic tournament

Would you like 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 e6 3.Qe2 too?


George Jempty    (2025-12-06 22:24:08)
Next thematic tournament

no i want something relevant to theory and is somewhat likely to be encountered OTB


Bogoljub Teverovski    (2025-12-17 12:55:02)
Next thematic tournament

1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. f3 would be good indeed


George Jempty    (2025-12-22 19:38:28)
Next thematic tournament

Yeah, just waiting for Thib to update the starting position, it's still open to entries for the CK/advance/...c5 variation. I hope nobody enters that one, otherwise who knows how long we'll have to wait


Ulises Pineda    (2026-02-21 04:35:44)
Is rating just a number on this site?

It became just a number after tickets were introduced.

I could easily have been 2400 if tickets were promoted from the beginning and I bought them whenever it was possible, even though I would have been playing at the same level.

For rating to matter you can't just let players play in the next tier, there's the strong 2400 players that got there beating others on their tiers or lower, but now there'll be 2400 players that bought tickets and drew their games of that tier, making it be just a number.


Stanislas Gounant    (2026-02-27 22:12:08)
Next thematic tournament

I amused myself by looking at the most frequently played lines at the top level, stopping at the first six moves. Then I used Stockfish to evaluate the resulting positions. I was surprised to find that Stockfish rated a Benoni line +0.91 at 40 half-moves deep. I suppose there must be a lot of theory surrounding this line, but with a rating of +0.91, there's certainly enough to work with. Here's the line in question (sorry for the Google translation):
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 c5 3.d5 e6 4.Nc3 exd5 5.cxd5 d6 6.e4 g6


Scott Ligon    (2026-03-01 19:25:51)
Next thematic tournament

It does look like black is skating on thin ice in this line. These are exactly the kind of lines that might still be interesting to play in the Stockfish era, where solid openings are trivially drawn. One side or the other needs to have misplayed the opening enough to be almost losing, or possibly losing already, but in a position where this isn't clear.


Thibault de Vassal    (2026-03-13 23:17:02)
Post-tickets FICGS

The long answer:

FICGS story is a quite simple & classic one, the reasons why it's declining are quite obvious, and unfortunately the solutions aren't. A bit of story:

1. Luckily, FICGS.com was created when there were a demand, just after IECG stopped... It grew very quickly, and I was in a rush to code it (FICGS was the very first dynamic website I ran from A to Z), there were ideas from everywhere. FICGS.com was the shortest domain name available, but not a so good one. Quite hard to remember, hard to tell, not clear for search engines (unlike chess.com which is a perfect one). Maybe it was a mistake to choose it, I can't tell. Either it meant "Free Internet Chess Games Server" or "Free Internet Correspondence Games Server", so I added another game, Go (Weiqi), to FICGS, which is a quite heavy decision: After that, FICGS is not only a chess server anymore.

2. A few years after, there are several thousands players (a few hundreds active). The number of new players slowly decreases month after month but a few sponsors come. Obviously, the way I coded FICGS made it more and more difficult to fully update from a PHP version to another one, or to change it in deep. Even now, I'm not sure to regret it though cause I couldn't have done it differently, so it is what it is. At this time, chess.com was less interesting than FICGS (my taste), but success is already here thanks to a perfect marketing formula: best domain name & pay for options. On the contrary, I chose to keep FICGS completely free.

3. Chess engines explode, correspondence chess continues its evolution (human's thinking decreases in moves decision), finally I add another game that is in a hype: poker texas holdem. New sponsors come, I still play correspondence chess myself but now I play another game even more: Google. FICGS also extends this way and it works in some ways. At its peak, FICGS is about the 32,000th most visited website worldwide. But the number of players continues to decrease, Android & phones started to change the landscape already. Chess.com released its app and added probably its best feature: a quick Stockfish analysis with evaluation & explanation for each move (which is excellent for blitz games but quite a non-sense for a correspondence chess website).

4. The number of players suddenly declines very quickly, I react by creating FICGS apps for Android, a dozen apps... On some apps, you can play against the machine, virtual opponents, chess 960, blindfold & so on. But the way to maintain it is not easy at all for many reasons, but the main one is that Google (Playstore) constantly change technical things & rules. After a few years, I even have to completely remake it, losing what was acquired. And some apps still fail to re-appear at Playstore, that's why I just made the APK files available to direct download. But these applications confirm something clear: blitz is more fun and attracts much more players. Changing rating ranges for correspondence chess tournaments or championships formats won't be a solution for this.

5. FICGS is now 20 years old! Internet completely changed over the years but it survived longer than Messenger, Skype & many other great services. If you look at many websites, new versions of their modern interfaces are often worst (bugs or options) than previous ones. FICGS was never perfect, maybe even clear, but at least it remained coherent. Now Google (just like all major services) is mainly governed by AI, sponsors left - that does not change anything, FICGS will continue to run. I created other websites, but none so far successfully helped in a way or another to solve the problem we encounter here: how to increase the number of correspondence chess, Go or poker players again? If FICGS becomes a pure correspondence chess site again with a brand new interface, I'm quite sure that wouldn't change anything or almost. I might be wrong of course, but according to me, this is a deep problem, connected to society evolutions, computers, phones, our attention, time, even health & so on... In my personal case, I wish to play correspondence chess again, but still cannot find the time to do it. Finally I have no idea what internet will look like within 5 years, but FICGS will be there. Maybe an AI will find a solution soon ^^ Meanwhile, I received many ideas to improve FICGS and I have to thank you very much for this. Few ideas were released for reasons I explained here (but new ones are always wecome), I hope you'll better understand it by reading this.


Have good games & take care!


George Jempty    (2026-04-15 14:03:30)
Next thematic tournament

Next thematic suggestion, esp. as there are not yet any entries for 1.e4 e6 2.Qe2, is .... 1.b4 c6


Paul Guralivu    (2026-04-16 10:46:43)
Cheating / Forfeiting

Matej Pech ... is in vacation until 2026 April 17 4:19:39


Wilhelm Schuett    (2026-05-03 03:40:36)
Berlin Defense

Did we had Berlin Defence or the Berlin Wall as a thematic tournament?


Wilhelm Schuett    (2026-05-27 16:45:31)
Next thematic tournament

1.e4 e6 2.Qe2 e5 3.f4 is a possibility


George Jempty    (2026-05-28 12:40:02)
Next thematic tournament

Glad somebody else likes the idea of 1.b4 c6, but Thib needs to change the line for the thematic tournaments right after a section fills up. Another line I'd like to suggest is the Schallop defense in the KGA: 1.e4 e5 2.f4 exf4 3.Nf3 Nf6


Wilhelm Schuett    (2026-06-06 12:02:17)
Next thematic tournament

Matthias Wahls calls the Schallop defense https://matthias-wahls.com/80-the-refutation-of-the-kings-gambit-part-11/
Did we had Albins Gegengambit 3.de5 d4 4.Sf3 c5


George Jempty    (2026-06-06 20:57:59)
Next thematic tournament

we all have suggested great options there are 3 people (including me) in the 1.e4 e6 2.Qe2 tourney right now, let's fill that section up and ask Thib to change the opening line.




There are 5880 results for mat in wikichess.


Thibault de Vassal    (2407)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5

The Ruy Lopez, generally called the Spanish Game outside of English speaking countries, is named after the 16th century Spanish priest Rúy López de Segura. He made a systematic study of this and other openings in the 150-page book on chess Libro del Ajedrez written in 1561 (which also included some more esoteric and what some would consider unfair suggestions, such as setting up the board so the sun shines in one's opponent's eyes).

However, although it is named after him, this particular opening was known earlier; it is included in the Göttingen manuscript, which dates from 1490. Popular use of the Ruy Lopez opening did not develop, however, until the mid-1800s when Jaenisch, a Russian theoretician, "rediscovered" its potential.

The opening is still in active use as the double king's pawn opening most commonly used in master play; it has been adopted by almost all players at some point in their careers and many play it from both the white and black sides.

According to Chessbase, white chances are about 58%

============

Contributors : Thibault de Vassal


Sebastien Marez    (2377)
d4 d5 c4 c6

The Slav is one of the primary defenses to the Queen's Gambit. Although it was analyzed as early as 1590, it wasn't until the 1920s that it started to be explored extensively. Many masters of Slavic descent helped develop the theory of this opening, including Alapin, Alekhine, Bogoljubov, and Vidmar.

The Slav received an exhaustive test during the two Alekhine–Euwe World Championship matches in 1935 and 1937. Played by 11 of the first 13 world champions, this defense was particularly favored by Euwe, Botvinnik, and Smyslov. More recently the Slav has been adopted by Anand, Ivanchuk, Lautier, Short, and other top grandmasters. Today the theory of the Slav is very extensive and well developed.

Black faces three major problems in many variations of the Queen's Gambit Declined (QGD).

- Development of the Black queen bishop is difficult, as it is often blocked by ...e6.

- The pawn structure offers White targets, especially the possibility of a minority attack on the queenside in the Exchange variation of the QGD.

- White often plays Bg5 to pin the black king knight on f6 against the black queen, and unpinning it is awkward for Black.

The Slav addresses all of these problems. Black's queen bishop is unblocked, the pawn structure remains balanced, and the move Bg5 is not yet threatening as the unmoved black pawn on e7 prevents the pin. Also, if Black later takes the gambit pawn with ...dxc4, the support provided by the pawn on c6 allows ...b5 which may threaten to keep the gambit pawn or to drive away a white piece that has captured it, gaining Black a tempo for queenside expansion.

On the other side, Black usually won't be able to develop the queen bishop without first giving up the center with ...dxc4, and moving this bishop may leave the Black queenside weak. White will try to dominate the center with e2-e4.

According to Chessbase, Black chances are about 43%

============

Contributors : Thibault de Vassal, Sebastien Marez


Thibault de Vassal    (2522)
e4 e6

The French defence has a reputation for solidity and resilience, though it can result in a somewhat cramped game for Black in the early stages. Black often gains counterattacking possibilities on the queenside while White tends to concentrate on the kingside.

The defence is named after a match played by correspondence between the cities of London and Paris in 1834 (although earlier examples of games with the opening do exist). In the early 20th century, Géza Maróczy was perhaps the first world-class player to make it his primary weapon against 1.e4. It is currently Black's third most popular reply to 1.e4, behind only 1...c5 and 1...e5. Players including Viktor Korchnoi, Mikhail Botvinnik, Wolfgang Uhlmann and Nigel Short have been particularly fond of it. More recently, the defence has featured strongly in the opening repertoires of Evgeny Bareev, Alexander Khalifman, Alexander Morozevich, and Teimour Radjabov.

According to chessbase, black chances are about 43%

============

Contributors : Thibault de Vassal, Toncho Tenev


Thibault de Vassal    (2407)
c4

The English Opening is the fourth most popular opening move in chess. White begins the fight for the center by staking a claim to the d5 square. Common responses are 1...e5 (which can lead to positions similar to the Sicilian Defence but with opposite colors), 1...c5 (the Symmetrical Variation), and 1...Nf6. Also perfectly playable are 1...e6 (often leading to a Queen's Gambit Declined after 2.d4 d5) and 1...c6 (often leading to a Slav Defence after 2.d4 d5, a Caro-Kann Defence after 2.e4 d5, or a Reti Opening after 2.Nf3 d5 3.b3).

The English is a very flexible opening. Although many lines of the English have a distinct character, it often transposes into other openings. If White plays an early d4, the game will usually transpose into either the Queen's Gambit or an Indian defence.

The English derives its name from the English (unofficial) world champion, Howard Staunton, who played it during his 1843 match with Amant. It fell out of favor (the opening was notably disdained by Morphy), but is now recognized as a solid opening that may be used to reach both classical and hypermodern positions. Botvinnik, Karpov, and Kasparov all employed it during their world championship matches. Bobby Fischer created a stir when he switched to it from the King's Pawn against Boris Spassky in 1972.

============

Contributors : Thibault de Vassal


Thibault de Vassal    (2407)
f4 e5

This opening is called From's Gambit. White can then transpose into the King's Gambit with 2.e4. If White wants to stay in the Bird's Opening play can continue 2.fxe5 d6 (2...Nc6 is also possible) 3.exd6 Bxd6. Now White must play 4.Nf3 (and if 4...g5, either 5.g3 g4 6.Nh4 or 5.d4 g4 6.Ne5) or 4.g3, avoiding 4.Nc3?? Qh4+ 5.g3 Qxg3+ 5.hxg3 Bxg3 checkmate.

This gambit can give Black an overwhelming attack if White goes wrong, but even if White plays accurately Black still has some attacking chances. From's Gambit is named after the Danish chess player Severin From (1828–1895).

============

Contributors : Thibault de Vassal


Thibault de Vassal    (2407)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4

The Scotch Game received its name from a correspondence match in 1824 between Edinburgh and London. Popular in the 19th century, by 1900 the Scotch had lost favor among top players because it was thought to release the central tension too early and allow Black to equalize without difficulty. More recently the Scotch has regained some popularity and it has been used by grandmasters Kasparov and Timman as a surprise weapon to avoid the well-analyzed Ruy Lopez.

According to Chessbase, white chances are about 57%

============

Contributors : Thibault de Vassal


Telmo Escobar    (2043)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Be3 Ng4 Bb5

Wins material (JC).

I think it's convenient to examine the possible continuation of the game in order to exclude the possibility that Black could get a reasonable compensation for the material, as many Dragon players are sooo happy when losing an exchange :) (TE)
============

Contributors : Julien Coll, Telmo Escobar


Thibault de Vassal    (2407)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d5

The Abbazia Defense has much the same idea as the Falkbeer Counter-Gambit, and can in fact be reached by transposition from it, e.g. 2.f4 d5 3.exd5 exf4. Black's forward pawn is less well placed on f4 than on e4, but material is even.

============

Contributors : Thibault de Vassal


Thibault de Vassal    (2407)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5

The Grünfeld Defence is named after Ernst Grünfeld, the player who first employed the defence in the 1920s. The defence was later adopted by a number of prominent players, including Vasily Smyslov, Viktor Korchnoi and Bobby Fischer. Garry Kasparov has often used the defence, including in his World Championship matches against Anatoly Karpov in 1986, 1987 and 1990, and Vladimir Kramnik in 2000. In more recent years it has been regularly employed by Loek Van Wely, Peter Svidler and Luke McShane among others.

The opening relies on one of the main principles of the hypermodern school, which was coming to the fore in the 1920s - that a large pawn centre could be a liability rather than an asset. This idea is seen most clearly in the Exchange Variation of the defence: 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 d5 4.cxd5 Nxd5 5.e4. Now White has an imposing looking centre - and the main continuation 5...Nxc3 bxc3 strengthens it still further. Black generally attack's White's centre with ...c5 and ...Bg7, often followed by moves like ...cxd4, ...Bg4, and ...Nc6. White often uses his big centre to launch an attack against Black's king, which generally ends up on g8 after Black castles king-side.

============

Contributors : Thibault de Vassal


Thibault de Vassal    (2407)
e4 c5 b4

Wing Gambit is the name given to the branches of several openings in which one player gambits a wing pawn, usually the b pawn).

Most common is the Wing Gambit in the Sicilian Defence. After Black takes with 2...cxb4, the usual continuation is 3.a3 bxa3 (3...d5 is also possible). It is also possible to decline (or at least delay acceptance of) the gambit with 2...d5.

For his pawn, White gets quicker development and a central advantage, but it is not generally considered one of White's better choices against the Sicilian, and is virtually never seen at the professional level (amongst amateurs it is more common, though still not so popular as other systems).

============

Contributors : Thibault de Vassal


David Grosdemange    (1912)
f4 e5 g4

this mistake allows black to play the quickest mate possible .

============

Contributors : David Grosdemange


Thibault de Vassal    (2425)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6

The Berlin Defence is logical and solid, although it can be hard for Black to generate winning chances. Arthur Bisguier played this line for decades, and it was later taken up by Alexei Shirov and other young grandmasters. Vladimir Kramnik used the Berlin Defence as a drawing variation against Garry Kasparov in their 2000 World Championship match.

After 4.0-0, Black can play either the solid 4...Nxe4 or the more combative 4...Bc5. After 4...Nxe4 5.d4 (5.Re1 Nd6 6.Nxe5 is also reasonable) Nd6 6.Bxc6 dxc6 7.dxe5 Nf5 8.Qxd8+ (8.Qe2?! Nd4! 9.Nxd4 Qxd4 favors Black. After 10.Rd1, Bg4!? 11.Rxd4 Bxe2 gives Black a pleasant endgame.) Kxd8 White is usually considered to have a small advantage in light of his somewhat better pawn structure and Black's awkwardly placed king, but Black, with a solid position and the bishop pair, has excellent drawing chances.

============

Contributors : Julien Baudement, Tim Bredernitz, Thibault de Vassal


Pablo Schmid    (1700)
e4 e5 Qh5 Nc6 Bc4

The normal continuation of the plan. White is threatening mate!

============

Contributors : Pablo Schmid


David Grosdemange    (1912)
f4 e6

The Fool's Mate.

* this mate can be reached with the from gambit , who is better than this e6 . (see f4 e5 g4?)

============

Contributors : Tim Bredernitz, David Grosdemange


Tim Bredernitz    (1100)
f4 e6 g4

Continuation of the Fool's Mate...

============

Contributors : Tim Bredernitz


Normajean Yates    (1858)
f4 e6 g4 Qh4

The fastest possible checkmate in chess.

Logically, but not idiomatically, *one* of the fastest checkmates in chess; because this is only *one* of the four mates on black's second move:

1. f(3/4) e(6/5) 2.g4 Qh4#, and the same with white's two moves transposed i.e. 1.g4 e(6/5) 2.f(3/4) Qh4#; making for 8 shortest mates :)

============

Contributors : Tim Bredernitz, Normajean Yates


Thibault de Vassal    (2407)
d4 f5

The dutch defense.

Black's ...f5 stakes a serious claim to the e4 square and looks towards an attack on White's kingside in the middlegame. However, it weakens Black's own kingside somewhat, and does nothing to contribute to Black's development. As of 2005, the defence is unpopular in top-level play. The Dutch has never been one of the main lines against 1.d4, though in the past a number of top players, including Alexander Alekhine, Bent Larsen and Paul Morphy, have used it with success. Perhaps its high-water mark occurred in 1951, when both world champion Mikhail Botvinnik and his challenger, David Bronstein, played it in their championship match.

============

Contributors : Thibault de Vassal


Alex Savu    (1350)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 Ng5 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxf7

The "Fried Liver" or "Fegatello" attack. By sacrificing his knight on f7, white causes the knight on d5 to become pinned. The next few moves revolve around exploiting this pin (for white) or defending the material advantage (for black). - Alex Savu
============

Contributors : Adrian Tan, Alex Savu


Normajean Yates    (1946)
e4 e5 Nf3 f6 Nxe5 fxe5 Qh5 Ke7 Qxe5 Kf7 Bc4 Kg6

this [6..Kg6??] allows white to mate in 11 starting Qf5+.
============

Contributors : Benjamin Aldag, Normajean Yates


Benjamin Aldag    (1822)
g4 e6 f3

Das Narrenmatt ;-)

============

Contributors : Benjamin Aldag


Thibault de Vassal    (2424)
e4 c5 f4 d5 Nf3 dxe4 Ng5 Nf6 Bc4 Bg4 Bxf7+ Kd7 Qxg4+ Nxg4 Be6+ Kc6 Bxg4 g6 Ne6

Still trying to gain activity against material.

============

Contributors : Thibault de Vassal


Kieran Child    (1600)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 c3

The ponziani opening.

Aims to grasp d4 early on, but is this possibly a premature aim?
============

Contributors : Dirk Jan Van Dijl, Kieran Child


Mark Carroll    (1700)
c4 Nf6 Nc3 e6 e4 d5 e5 Ne4 Nf3 Be7 Qc2 Ng5 Nxg5 Bxg5 cxd5 exd5 d4 Be7 Be3 O-O O-O-O Nc6 a3 Na5 Bd3 h6 Qe2 b5

Material is not as important as initiative and open files against the opposing king.

============

Contributors : Mark Carroll


Adam Goodwin    (1365)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O c3 d5

Frank Marshall analyzed this move for at least 9 years before he played it against Capablanca in 1918.

============

Contributors : Marshall Gambit
chess thematic tournament, Adam Goodwin


Terry Godat    (2155)
e4 e5 Nf3 f5 Nxe5 Nc6 Qh5+ g6 Nxg6 Nf6 Qh3 hxg6 Qxh8 Qe7 d3 fxe4 Nc3 exd3 Be3


============

Contributors : Terry Godat

White now has a decisive advantage--both in material and development.


Peter Marriott    (1816)
g4 d5 Bg2

Grob's Gambit

White aims to tear open the centre for an early material advantage on the queenside.

Notes by Peter Marriott:

The main gambit. White threatens to play 3.c4 if black takes the g4 pawn.
============

Contributors : Ron Keyston, Kieran Child, Kjetil Prestesaeter, Peter Marriott


Ron Keyston    (1522)
e4 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qd6 d4 Nf6 Nf3 a6

While normally a prophylactic move such as a6 is considered to be an "amateurish" type move, it is very thematic in the Qd6 line of the Scandinavian. This move prepares Nc6 while preventing the bishop pin at b5 and also prepares for an advance of the b-pawn in the case of Bc4.

============

Contributors : Ron Keyston


Dirk Ghysens    (2245)
a3

Not very impressing, but it was played by Adolf Anderssen against Paul Morphy in their 1859 match. Anderssen subsequently used the variation, with more success, against other adversaries.

Anderssen scored 1.5/3 with it against Morphy (DG).

============

Contributors : Telmo Escobar, Don Burden, Dirk Ghysens


Matthew Edwards    (1700)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 c3

turns a dull sicilian game on its head... if black accepts the gambit, white will develop rapidly whil black has yet to get going.

============

Contributors : Matthew Edwards


Matthew Edwards    (1700)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 c3 dxc3

accepts the material gain at the expense of development...

============

Contributors : Matthew Edwards


Gavin Wilson    (1400)
e4 e6 d4 f5 exf5 exf5 Nc3

Good move, but not the best, as White may want to place pressure on Black's d5-pawn (yes, it will get there!), via c4 and then Nc3 and then Qb3. This formation is particularly powerful for White if Black castles kingside and leaves his King on g8.

============

Contributors : Telmo Escobar, Gavin Wilson


Miguel Pires    (2143)
e4 e5 Bb5 c6 Ba4 Nf6 Qe2 Bc5 Nf3 d5


The ultimate challenge!!! With this line you can have beautiful and figthing games. Prepare your self to fight very hard
============

Contributors : Miguel Pires


Gavin Wilson    (1400)
e4 e6 d4 f5 Nc3 d5 exd5 exd5 Nf3 Be7 Ne5

This may be premature. The threat of Qh5+ g6 Nxg6 is enticing, but Black's natural reply stops this right away.

============

Contributors : Gavin Wilson


Kieran Child    (1600)
Nf3 d5 e4 d4 Bc4

An aggressive reply to black's premature pawn push. White prepares for quick castling and hits the f7 square. By controlling d5, this move also makes the d4 pawn look vulnerable.

============

Contributors : Kieran Child


Kieran Child    (1600)
e4 e5 Nf3 f5 Nxe5 Nc6 Qh5+ g6 Nxg6 Nf6 Qh4 hxg6

The most aggressive and risky move. Few draws emerge from this position. Black's aim is to get white's queen into the corner and out of the way so he can launch a mating attack on the white king, something he's willing to sacrifice the rook for. Taking the rook is sound though, as all of black's attacks can be easily seen off.

============

Contributors : Kieran Child


Kieran Child    (1600)
g4 d5 Bg2 Bxg4 c4 Nf6 Qb3

The move which keeps white momentum, looking at d5 and b7. They cannot both be defended and so black will need to concede a pawn, leading to equal material, but black has a very slight edge on position.

============

Contributors : Kieran Child


Kieran Child    (1600)
e4 e5 f4 Qf6

Norwald variation

An uncommon response as it brings out the queen (much too early) and blocks the g8 knight, but it does put black clear material up and with no obvious tactical flaws.

Chessbase considers this a 38% win for black, but it should be noted that it mostly just gets played experimentally by players expecting a loss.

============

Contributors : Kieran Child


Kieran Child    (1600)
e4 e5 f4 Qf6 Nf3

The typical, and arguably best way to counter the Norwalds gain in material is to seek a lead in development. Nf3 does just that, it brings the knight to a comfortable square and challenges e5, forcing black to move the queen again.

Chessbase considers this a 52% win for white.

============

Contributors : Kieran Child


Kieran Child    (1600)
h4 d5 h5 e5 h6 gxh6 d4 exd4 Qxd4 Nf6

The best move. White will recapture the pawn on h6, but black won't lose any more material than that.

============

Contributors : Kieran Child


Gavin Wilson    (1400)
e4 e6 d4 f5 exf5 exf5 Nf3 Be7 c4 c6 Ne5

This seems premature.

============

Contributors : Gavin Wilson


Gavin Wilson    (1400)
e4 e6 d4 f5 exf5 exf5 Nf3 Be7 c4 Nf6 Ne5

This seems premature, as Black can nudge it away immediately.

============

Contributors : Gavin Wilson


Gavin Wilson    (1400)
e4 e6 d4 f5 e5 Ne7 c4 c5 Be3 cxd4 Bxd4 Nbc6 Nf3 Ng6 a3

White seems completely lost. This move is entirely unthematic.

============

Contributors : Gavin Wilson


Gavin Wilson    (1400)
e4 e6 d4 f5 e5 Ne7 Bc4 a6 Nf3 b5 Bb3 Bb7 Bg5 c5 dxc5 Bxf3 Qxf3 Nbc6 O-O Nxe5

Black is materially ahead, and White has no compensation for the pawn.

============

Contributors : Gavin Wilson


Gavin Wilson    (1400)
e4 e6 d4 f5 exf5 exf5 Nf3 Be7 c4 c6 Ne5 Nf6 Nc3 O-O Bd3 d6 Nf3 Na6 a3 Nc7 O-O d5 Ne5 c5 dxc5 Bxc5 cxd5 Nfxd5

Keeping material equality.

============

Contributors : Gavin Wilson


Gavin Wilson    (1400)
e4 e6 d4 f5 exf5 exf5 Nf3 Be7 g3 Nf6 Bg2 O-O O-O Ne4

Looks premature. 7...d5 would be better, and achieve near-equality.

============

Contributors : Gavin Wilson


Gavin Wilson    (1400)
e4 e6 d4 f5 exf5 exf5 Nf3 Be7 g3 Nf6 Bg2 O-O O-O Ne4 Qd3

Looks premature. 7.d5 would be better.

============

Contributors : Gavin Wilson


Gavin Wilson    (1400)
e4 e6 d4 f5 e5 Ne7 g4 fxg4

Fritz advises ..Nbc6 instead, but thismove allows Black to stick to the thematic moves and pawn structure of the Kingston Defence.

============

Contributors : Gavin Wilson


Gavin Wilson    (1400)
e4 e6 d4 f5 e5 Ne7 g4 fxg4 Qxg4 c5

Slightly risky, but entirely thematic, and it frees up the queenside. If dxc5, ..Nbc6.

============

Contributors : Gavin Wilson


Gavin Wilson    (1400)
e4 e6 d4 f5 exf5 exf5 Nc3 d5 Qh5+

Seems to be seeking a quick refutation of the Kingston Defence. But the move is not as premature as it looks.

============

Contributors : Gavin Wilson


Gavin Wilson    (1400)
e4 e6 d4 f5 e5 Ne7 Nf3 c5 c3 Nbc6 Bd3 Ng6 Be3 cxd4 cxd4 Bb4+ Nc3 O-O O-O a6 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 b5

Fritz doesn't like Black's position (+0.91), but this move is highly thematic in the Advance variation of the Kingston Defence.

============

Contributors : Gavin Wilson


Gavin Wilson    (1400)
e4 e6 d4 f5 exf5 exf5 Bd3 Nc6 Ne2 d5

White has decided this is not going to be a highly tactical opening, so Black needs to decide what formation he will settle for, and where his minor pieces will go.

============

Contributors : Gavin Wilson


Gavin Wilson    (1400)
e4 e6 d4 f5 exf5 exf5 Bd3 Nc6 Ne2 d5 c4

This looks slightly premature. 0-0 is obvious and best, after which Fritz values the position as +0.47.

============

Contributors : Gavin Wilson


Gavin Wilson    (1400)
e4 e6 d4 f5 e5 Ne7 Nh3 c5

Black plays this thematic move, which doesn't make even Fritz's Top 8 list of moves.

============

Contributors : Gavin Wilson


Gavin Wilson    (1400)
e4 e6 d4 f5 exf5 exf5 Nf3 Be7 Bd3

This creates the classic formation for White. If Black plays ...d5, he creates a hole on e5 for the White night. But if he doesn't play ...d5, then White himself can play d5 and then feed the knight onto e6 via d4.

============

Contributors : Gavin Wilson


Gavin Wilson    (1400)
e4 e6 d4 f5 exf5 exf5 Nf3 Be7 Bd3 d5 Ne5

Premature. White should develop more pieces or castle before moving one piece twice. The kingside attack (initiated by Qh5) is not on.

============

Contributors : Gavin Wilson


Gavin Wilson    (1400)
e4 e6 d4 f5 e5 Ne7 Nc3 a6 Nf3 c5

Fritz does not like this move at all, rating it +1.06 to White, assuming he plays dxc5. But it is thematic.

============

Contributors : Gavin Wilson


Gavin Wilson    (1400)
e4 e6 d4 f5 e5 Ne7 Bg5 c5 dxc5

Black can win back the pawn right away, as he does here. Fritz rates this +1.06, badly overestimating the White position.

============

Contributors : Gavin Wilson


Yugi Inving    (0980)
g4 e6 f3 Bd6 h3 Bg3+

Nice mate
It is différant from the original way whit queen h4, but q4 would have done the same thing than bg3

============

Contributors : Yugi Inving


Telmo Escobar    (2048)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 e6 g4 e5 Nf5 g6 g5 gxf5 exf5 d5 gxf6 d4 Bc4 Qc7 Qd3 dxe3 O-O-O exf2 Bxf7+ Kxf7 Qd5+ Kxf6 Ne4+ Ke7 f6+ Ke8 f7+ Ke7 Qd2 Qb6 Qg5+ Kxf7 Rhf1 Bh6 Rxf2+ Ke8 Rd8+ Qxd8 Qxh6 Qe7 Nf6+ Kd8 Nd5 Qe6 Qg5+ Kd7 Qg7+ Kc6 Rf6 Kxd5 Rxe6 Kxe6 Qxh8 Nd7


A draw is the likely result as Black can't profit from his slight material advantage without being subjected to a perpetual check.

============

Contributors : Telmo Escobar


Graham Cridland    (1406)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Bg5 e6 f4 Be7 Qf3 Qc7 O-O-O Nbd7 g4 b5

Each side carries out their thematic pawn advance. Now White forces the issue; if now Bh4? Nxe4!

============

Contributors : Graham Cridland


Yugi Inving    (0914)
d4 e6 h3 Nf6 f3 d5 Bf4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 Nb5 e5 Bxe5 Nxe5 dxe5 a6 Nd6+ Bxd6 exf6 Qxf6 c3 Bg3+ Kd2 d4 Kc1 Bf4+ Kb1 Bf5+ e4 dxe3+ Kc1 e2+ Qd2 e1R+


There. white are mate.
============

Contributors : Yugi Inving


Telmo Escobar    (2055)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 e6 Be2 a6 O-O Nbd7 f4 b5 Bf3 Bb7 e5 Bxf3 Nxf3 b4 exf6 bxc3 f5 Qb6+ Kh1 cxb2 Bxb2 Qxb2 fxe6 fxe6 f7+ Kd8 Nd4 Nc5 Rb1 Qxa2 Qf3 d5 Qh3 Kd7 Nxe6 Nxe6 Rb7+ Kc6 Rfb1 Qxb1+


Only move (24...Nc5 25.R1b6 mate).
============

Contributors : Telmo Escobar


Yugi Inving    (0914)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 Nf6 d3 d5 e5 d4 Nb5 Qa5+ Bd2 Qxb5 Rb1 Ng4 c4 Qa6 Be2 Ngxe5 O-O Nxf3+ Bxf3 Qa3 bxa3 Kd7 Re1 f6 h3 Kd6 Bf4+ e5 Bd2 g5 Qe2 Bg7 Qe4 Ne7 a4 Rb8 a5 h6 a6 b6 Bh5 Bxa6 Bf7 Rhf8 Bd5 f5 Qf3 Kc7 g4 fxg4 Qxg4 Nxd5 cxd5 Rbd8 Qe6 Rd6 Qe7+ Rd7 d6+ Kc6 Qe6 Bxd3 Rb3 Rxd6 Qe7 Rd7 Qe6+ Rd6 Qg4 Bc4 Qe4+ Bd5 Qd3 Kc7 Rb2 Rf3 Qh7 Rd7 Qg6 Rxh3 Qe8 Rh1+

And thids is math. end of a horrible game.
============

Contributors : Yugi Inving


Riani Kiiari    (1800)
e4 h5

foolish, but dangerous if not stopped, h5 is an amateurs opening.
============

Contributors : Benjamin Block, Riani Kiiari


Benjamin Block    (1397)
f3 e5 g4 Qh4+

Grob's Opening, Fool's first Mate variation - the finish.

============

Contributors : Normajean Yates


Wilhelm Schuett    (1800)
Nh3

1/Played by French amateur chess player Charles Amar in the 1930s, this opening is also known as the Drunken Knight Opening, or the Ammonia Opening (NH3 is the chemical formula of the ammonia).

There is no particular interest in choosing to play NH3, and it is therefore considered as an irregular opening. It prepares for kingside castling, but so would NF3...


2/Here is the "Sodium Attack", an very rarely opening played in profssional tournaments,the interest of this
Non-orthodoxe opening,is to control cells g5
and f4 in One also move... to prépare the attack on column f, with bishop on c1 at thé 3th.move, and to prépare the casting, so of course!

Paul,Emma& Sandra Brand-Lyard. 2021/07/24th.


============

Contributors : Benjamin Block, Normajean Yates, Florian Cafiero, PaulSandra Brand-Lyard
aka "The Sandra Lyard13061975-03081997 Inventor
Chess variants Annapurna' séries., Wilhelm Schuett


Benjamin Block    (1397)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Bc5 O-O Nf6 d3 d6 Bg5 h6 Bh4 g5 Bg3 h5 Nxg5 h4 Nxf7 hxg3 Nxd8 Bg4 Qd2 Nd4 Nc3 Nf3+ gxf3 Bxf3 h4 Rxh4

And white can´t stop the mate on Rh1

============

Contributors : Benjamin Block


Terry Godat    (2088)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 g5 h4 g4 Ne5 Nf6 Bc4 d5 exd5 Bd6 d4 Nh5 O-O O-O Rxf4



============

Contributors : Terry Godat
I'm involved in a thematic King's Gambit tournament and came across this game (Boehme-Whitman) during my research. I'm astonished that no one ever considered this move before. Rybka considers this move to be at least as good as 10.Nxg4, which is known to be good for Black after 10...Qxh4 11.Nh2 Ng3!


Yugi Inving    (1557)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Be3 Ng4 Bb5 Bd7

White wins material?

Where? I think i drink too much, after all,this fact is not properly explained. could you just tell that playing Nd7 or Bd7 allow Qxg4

============

Contributors : Yugi Inving


Scott McGreal    (1700)
e4 c6 d4 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 Nd7 Qe2

White threatens Nd6 mate.

============

Contributors : Scott McGreal


Benjamin Block    (1711)
e4 c6 d4 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 Nd7 Qe2 Ndf6

Black stop the mate on d6

============

Contributors : Benjamin Block


Benjamin Block    (1711)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Bc4 c5 Ne2 Nc6 Be3 O-O O-O Bg4 f3 Na5 Bd3 cxd4 cxd4 Be6 d5 Bxa1 Qxa1 f6

Save the king from Bh6. If black did not played f6. White could play Bh6 and take the rook or Mate on Qg7.

============

Contributors : Benjamin Block


Ilmars Cirulis    (1632)
e4 e5 Nf3 f5 Bc4 fxe4 Nxe5 Qg5 d4 Qxg2 Qh5+ g6 Bf7+ Kd8 Bxg6 Qxh1+ Ke2 c6 Nc3 Kc7 Bf4 Qxa1 Nxd7+ Kd8 Qe5 hxg6 Qc7+ Ke8 Qxc8+ Ke7 Bg5+ Nf6 Bxf6+ Kf7 Ne5+ Kxf6 Qe8 Qg1 Qf7+ Kg5 Qxg6+ Kh4 Qxg1 Rg8 Qxg8 Bg7 Qxg7 Kh5 Qg6+ Kh4 Qg4+

Checkmate.
============

Contributors : Ilmars Cirulis


Sophie Leclerc    (1200)
e4 e5 Nf3 f6 Nxe5 Ne7 Qh5+ Ng6 Nxg6

White is up a pawn and a knight and preparing a dsicoory check to gain material, taking the knight result in losing the rook. This shown was a mistake does to black in damiano defense.
============

Contributors : Sophie Leclerc


Sophie Leclerc    (1200)
e4 e5 Nf3 f6 Nxe5 Ne7 Qh5+ g6 Bc4


This protect the white queen from being taked, because black is mate is he take, he king doesn't have enough space to live freely.
============

Contributors : Sophie Leclerc


Sophie Leclerc    (1200)
e4 e5 Nf3 f6 Nxe5 Ne7 Qh5+ g6 Bc4 Bg7 Bf7+ Kf8 Qf3 fxe5 Bxg6+

Forcing black to give back the knight and to endure the lost of a second pawn.

As Kg8 fails to Qf7 Mate
============

Contributors : Sophie Leclerc


Sophie Leclerc    (1200)
e4 e5 Nf3 f6 Nxe5 Ne7 Qh5+ g6 Bc4 Bg7 Bf7+ Kf8 Qf3 fxe5 Bxg6+ Kg8 Qf7+

mate, endgame aleready for black.

============

Contributors : Sophie Leclerc


Normajean Yates    (1946)
e4 e5 Nf3 f6 Nxe5 fxe5 Qh5 Ke7 Qxe5 Kf7 Bc4 d5 Bxd5+ Kg6 h4 h5 Bxb7 Bxb7

after this move black gets mated quickly after 10.Qf5+ Kh6 11.d4+ g5 12.Qf7!.

============

Contributors : Normajean Yates


Sophie Leclerc    (1242)
e4 f5 exf5 Nf6 g4 g6 g5 Ne4 d3 Nd6 fxg6 hxg6 Bg2 Nc6 Nc3 Nf5 Nf3 d6


This move help black to finished their developpement and to find an attack since they are behind in both material and developpement.


============

Contributors : Sophie Leclerc


Sophie Leclerc    (1242)
e4 f5 exf5 Nf6 g4 g6 g5 Ne4 d3 Nd6 fxg6 hxg6 Bg2 Nc6 Nc3 Nf5 Nf3 d6 Bd2 Bg7 h4 Qd7 Qe2 Ncd4 Qd1 Qe6+ Kf1 Qf7 Nxd4 Ng3+ Ke1 Bxd4


Black mate treath force white fo exchange queens, lose the rook for the knight and to have a bad pawn structure.
============

Contributors : Sophie Leclerc


Sophie Leclerc    (1242)
e4 f5 exf5 Nf6 g4 g6 g5 Ne4 d3 Nd6 fxg6 hxg6 Bg2 Nc6 Nc3 Nf5 Nf3 d6 Bd2 Bg7 h4 Qd7 Qe2 Ncd4 Qd1 Qe6+ Kf1 Qf7 Nxd4 Ng3+ Kg1 Bxd4 Qf3

Blocking the mate.
============

Contributors : Sophie Leclerc


Sophie Leclerc    (1242)
e4 f5 exf5 Nf6 g4 g6 g5 Ne4 d3 Nd6 fxg6 hxg6 Bg2 Nc6 Nc3 Nf5 Nf3 d6 Bd2 Bg7 h4 Qd7 Qe2 Ncd4 Qd1 Qe6+ Kf1 Qf7 Nxd4 Ng3+ Kg1 Bxd4 Qf3 Nxh1 Qxf7+ Kxf7 Bxh1 c6 Rb1 Rxh4 Ne2 Bh3

This cut away white retreat and instore a new mate treat.

============

Contributors : Sophie Leclerc


Sophie Leclerc    (1242)
e4 f5 exf5 Nf6 g4 g6 g5 Ne4 d3 Nd6 fxg6 hxg6 Bg2 Nc6 Nc3 Nf5 Nf3 d6 Bd2 Bg7 h4 Qd7 Qe2 Ncd4 Qd1 Qe6+ Kf1 Qf7 Nxd4 Ng3+ Kg1 Bxd4 Qf3 Nxh1 Qxf7+ Kxf7 Bxh1 c6 Rb1 Rxh4 Ne2 Bh3 Nxd4 Rg4+ Kh2 Rh8

White surrender since he can't stop Bf1 checkmate, he can only slow his death .

0-1.
============

Contributors : Sophie Leclerc


Telmo Escobar    (1929)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Bg5 e6 f4 Qb6 Qd2 Qxb2 Rb1 Qa3 f5 Nc6 fxe6 fxe6 Nxc6 bxc6 e5 dxe5 Bxf6 gxf6 Ne4 Qxa2 Rd1 Be7 Be2 O-O O-O Ra7 Rf3 Rd7 Bd3 f5 Qh6


Of course 21...fxe4?? is impossible now due to 22.Rg3+ Kf7 23.Qh5+ and mate soon.
============

Contributors : Telmo Escobar


Telmo Escobar    (1929)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Bg5 e6 f4 Qb6 Qd2 Qxb2 Rb1 Qa3 f5 Nc6 fxe6 fxe6 Nxc6 bxc6 e5 dxe5 Bxf6 gxf6 Ne4 Qxa2 Rd1 Be7 Be2 O-O O-O Ra7 Rf3 Rd7 Bd3 f5 Qh6 Rf7 Rg3+ Kh8 Ng5 Rg7 Nxe6 Rf7 Rf1 e4 Bxe4 fxe4 Rxf7 Rd1+ Rf1 Rxf1+ Kxf1 Qb1+ Kf2 Qxc2+ Kf1 Qb1+ Ke2 Qb2+ Kf1 Bb4

Wins! Now it is Black -not White- who is looking for mate, so White will be forced to swap queens, but-

============

Contributors : Telmo Escobar


Matthew Kirk    (1500)
c4 b6



============

Contributors : Matthew Kirk

After 2.d4 e6 we have the english defence.


Luc-Olivier Leclerc    (1800)
f4 d5 Nf3 c5 c4 d4 b4 b6 g3 Bb7 bxc5 bxc5 Bg2 e6 Na3 Qf6 Rb1 Be4 d3 Bc6 Ne5

Black developpement is so slow, mate would be possible whitout the knight on b8 and the bishop by Qa4 and Qd7, hoverer, we need this move.
Black is gone by now, as, he need to do Bd7, giving up his rook, to live.
============

Contributors : Luc-Olivier Leclerc


Luc-Olivier Leclerc    (1800)
f4 d5 Nf3 c5 c4 d4 b4 b6 g3 Bb7 bxc5 bxc5 Bg2 e6 Na3 Qf6 Rb1 Be4 d3 Bc6 Ne5 Bxg2 Rxb8+ Rxb8 Qa4+

End of my game, on Uchess, black resign, as he face mate,


The game AudreyxSophie-nadjdobar, end like that too.

============

Contributors : Luc-Olivier Leclerc


Luc-Olivier Leclerc    (1800)
f4 d5 Nf3 c5 c4 d4 b4 b6 g3 Bb7 bxc5 bxc5 Bg2 e6 Na3 Qf6 Rb1 Be4 d3 Bc6 Ne5 Bxg2 Rxb8+ Rxb8 Qa4+ Kd8 Qd7+


Mate
============

Contributors : Luc-Olivier Leclerc


Luc-Olivier Leclerc    (1800)
f4 d5 Nf3 c5 c4 d4 b4 Nf6 bxc5 e6 Ba3 Nc6 g3 Qa5 Qb3 Bxc5 Qb5 Qxb5 cxb5 Nb4 Bxb4 Bxb4 Nxd4 O-O Nc3 Rd8 e3 e5 fxe5 Ng4 Rc1


The pawn is lost, developping is better better then keeping it, white already has material advantage.
============

Contributors : Luc-Olivier Leclerc


Luc-Olivier Leclerc    (1800)
f4 d5 Nf3 c5 c4 d4 b4 Nf6 bxc5 e6 Ba3 Nc6 g3 Qa5 Qb3 Bxc5 Qb5 Qxb5 cxb5 Nb4 Bxb4 Bxb4 Nxd4 O-O Nc3 Rd8 e3 e5 fxe5 Ng4 Rc1 Nxe5 Be2 Bh3 Kf2 Rd6 Ne4 Rd7 Rc2 Re7 Rb1 Ba5 Rbc1

Doubling the rooks on the c-files has some mate treats.

============

Contributors : Luc-Olivier Leclerc


Luc-Olivier Leclerc    (1800)
f4 d5 Nf3 c5 c4 d4 b4 Nf6 bxc5 e6 Ba3 Nc6 g3 Qa5 Qb3 Bxc5 Qb5 Qxb5 cxb5 Nb4 Bxb4 Bxb4 Nxd4 O-O Nc3 Rd8 e3 e5 fxe5 Ng4 Rc1 Nxe5 Be2 Bh3 Kf2 Rd6 Ne4 Rd7 Rc2 Re7 Rb1 Ba5 Rbc1 Rd8 Kg1 Bb6 Nc5 Rd6 Bf1 Bg4 Bg2 h5 h3 Bd7 Be4 Bxh3 Nxb7 Rxd4 exd4 Bxd4+ Kh2 Ng4+ Kxh3 Rxe4 Nd6 Re2

Going for mate.

============

Contributors : Luc-Olivier Leclerc


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2003)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Bc5 c3 Nf6 d4 exd4 cxd4 Bb4 Nc3 Nxe4 O-O Bxc3 d5 Bf6 Re1 Ne7 Rxe4 d6 Bg5 Bxg5 Nxg5 h6 Qe2



============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2003)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Bc5 c3 Nf6 d4 exd4 cxd4 Bb4 Nc3 Nxe4 O-O Bxc3 d5 Bf6 Re1 Ne7 Rxe4 d6 Bg5 Bxg5 Nxg5 h6 Qe2 hxg5



============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2003)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Bc5 c3 Nf6 d4 exd4 cxd4 Bb4 Nc3 Nxe4 O-O Bxc3 d5 Bf6 Re1 Ne7 Rxe4 d6 Bg5 Bxg5 Nxg5 h6 Qe2 hxg5 Re1



============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2003)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Bc5 c3 Nf6 d4 exd4 cxd4 Bb4 Nc3 Nxe4 O-O Bxc3 d5 Bf6 Re1 Ne7 Rxe4 d6 Bg5 Bxg5 Nxg5 h6 Qe2 hxg5 Re1 Be6



============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2003)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Bc5 c3 Nf6 d4 exd4 cxd4 Bb4 Nc3 Nxe4 O-O Bxc3 d5 Bf6 Re1 Ne7 Rxe4 d6 Bg5 Bxg5 Nxg5 h6 Qe2 hxg5 Re1 Be6 Qd2



============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2003)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Bc5 c3 Nf6 d4 exd4 cxd4 Bb4 Nc3 Nxe4 O-O Bxc3 d5 Bf6 Re1 Ne7 Rxe4 d6 Bg5 Bxg5 Nxg5 h6 Qe2 hxg5 Re1 Be6 Qd2 c6



============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2055)
Nf3 Nf6 g3 c5 c4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2055)
Nf3 Nf6 g3 c5 c4 b6 Nc3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2055)
Nf3 Nf6 g3 c5 c4 b6 Nc3 Bb7 Bg2

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2055)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 g3 Ba6 b3 d5 Bg2

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2055)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 g3 Ba6 b3 d5 Bg2 Bb4 Bd2

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2055)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 g3 Ba6 b3 d5 Bg2 Bb4 Bd2 Be7 cxd5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2055)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 g3 Ba6 b3 d5 Bg2 Bb4 Bd2 Be7 cxd5 exd5 Nc3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2055)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 g3 Ba6 b3 d5 Bg2 Bb4 Bd2 Be7 cxd5 exd5 Nc3 Bb7 O-O

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matej Pech    (1202)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f5 exf5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1202)
e4 d6 h3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1202)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f5 exf5 e4 Qe2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2055)
Nf3 Nf6 g3 c5 c4 b6 Nc3 Bb7 Bg2 e6 O-O

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Florian Cafiero    (1519)
Nh3 d5 g3 e5 f4 Bxh3 Bxh3 exf4

End of the Paris Gambit, considered extremely dubious for the white, as it gives up both position and material.


============

Contributors : Paul Valle, Florian Cafiero


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2055)
Nf3 Nf6 g3 c5 c4 b6 Nc3 Bb7 Bg2 e6 O-O Be7 d4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2055)
Nf3 Nf6 g3 c5 c4 b6 Nc3 Bb7 Bg2 e6 O-O Be7 d4 cxd4 Nxd4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matej Pech    (1202)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 Bg4 Ne5 h6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2055)
Nf3 Nf6 g3 c5 c4 b6 Nc3 Bb7 Bg2 e6 O-O Be7 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Bxg2 Kxg2

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2055)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 g3 Ba6 b3 d5 Bg2 Bb4 Bd2 Be7 cxd5 exd5 Nc3 Bb7 O-O O-O Qc2

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2055)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O b5 Bb3 Be7 d4

Transpose to wikichess #9625#

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2055)
Nf3 Nf6 g3 c5 c4 b6 Nc3 Bb7 Bg2 e6 O-O Be7 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Bxg2 Kxg2 a6 e4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2055)
Nf3 Nf6 g3 c5 c4 b6 Nc3 Bb7 Bg2 e6 O-O Be7 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Bxg2 Kxg2 a6 e4 d6 f4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matej Pech    (1202)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 g6 c4 e5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1202)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f5 exf5 e4 Qe2 Qe7 Ng1

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2055)
Nf3 Nf6 g3 c5 c4 b6 Nc3 Bb7 Bg2 e6 O-O Be7 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Bxg2 Kxg2 a6 e4 d6 f4 O-O Qf3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matej Pech    (1202)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 Bg4 Ne5 h6 Nxg4 Nxg4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1202)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 Bg4 Ne5 h6 Nxg4 Nxg4 e4 e6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1202)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 g6 c4 e5 Nf3 Bb4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1202)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 g6 c4 e5 Nf3 Bb4 Nc3 Nf6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2055)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 g3 Ba6 b3 d5 Bg2 Bb4 Bd2 Be7 cxd5 exd5 Nc3 Bb7 O-O O-O Qc2 Nbd7 Rad1

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Mateia Benone    (1448)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 d4

============

Contributors : Francisco Gramajo, Mateia Benone


Matej Pech    (1202)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 g6 c4 e5 Nf3 Bb4 Nc3 Nf6 Bd3 d6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2055)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 g3 Ba6 b3 d5 Bg2 Bb4 Bd2 Be7 cxd5 exd5 Nc3 Bb7 O-O O-O Qc2 Nbd7 Rad1 Re8 Ne5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2055)
Nf3 Nf6 g3 c5 c4 b6 Nc3 Bb7 Bg2 e6 O-O Be7 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Bxg2 Kxg2 a6 e4 d6 f4 O-O Qf3 Ra7 b3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2055)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 g3 Ba6 b3 d5 Bg2 Bb4 Bd2 Be7 cxd5 exd5 Nc3 Bb7 O-O O-O Qc2 Nbd7 Rad1 Re8 Ne5 Nf8 Bg5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2055)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 g3 Ba6 b3 d5 Bg2 Bb4 Bd2 Be7 cxd5 exd5 Nc3 Bb7 O-O O-O Qc2 Nbd7 Rad1 Re8 Ne5 Nf8 Bg5 Ne6 f4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2055)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 b5 Bb3 d5 dxe5 Be6 Nbd2 Nxd2

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2055)
Nf3 Nf6 g3 c5 c4 b6 Nc3 Bb7 Bg2 e6 O-O Be7 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Bxg2 Kxg2 a6 e4 d6 f4 O-O Qf3 Ra7 b3 Rc7 Bb2

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2055)
Nf3 Nf6 g3 c5 c4 b6 Nc3 Bb7 Bg2 e6 O-O Be7 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Bxg2 Kxg2 a6 e4 d6 f4 O-O Qf3 Ra7 b3 Rc7 Bb2 Nbd7 Rad1

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2055)
Nf3 Nf6 g3 c5 c4 b6 Nc3 Bb7 Bg2 e6 O-O Be7 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Bxg2 Kxg2 a6 e4 d6 f4 O-O Qf3 Ra7 b3 Rc7 Bb2 Nbd7 Rad1 Qa8 Rfe1

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2055)
Nf3 Nf6 g3 c5 c4 b6 Nc3 Bb7 Bg2 e6 O-O Be7 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Bxg2 Kxg2 a6 e4 d6 f4 O-O Qf3 Ra7 b3 Rc7 Bb2 Nbd7 Rad1 Qa8 Rfe1 Ne8 e5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2055)
Nf3 Nf6 g3 c5 c4 b6 Nc3 Bb7 Bg2 e6 O-O Be7 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Bxg2 Kxg2 a6 e4 d6 f4 O-O Qf3 Ra7 b3 Rc7 Bb2 Nbd7 Rad1 Qa8 Rfe1 Ne8 e5 Qc8 Ba3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2055)
Nf3 Nf6 g3 c5 c4 b6 Nc3 Bb7 Bg2 e6 O-O Be7 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Bxg2 Kxg2 a6 e4 d6 f4 O-O Qf3 Ra7 b3 Rc7 Bb2 Nbd7 Rad1 Qa8 Rfe1 Ne8 e5 Qc8 Ba3 Nc5 exd6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2055)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 g3 Ba6 b3 d5 Bg2 Bb4 Bd2 Be7 cxd5 exd5 Nc3 Bb7 O-O O-O Qc2 Nbd7 Rad1 Re8 Ne5 Nf8 Bg5 Ne6 f4 c6 Rf2

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2055)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 g3 Ba6 b3 d5 Bg2 Bb4 Bd2 Be7 cxd5 exd5 Nc3 Bb7 O-O O-O Qc2 Nbd7 Rad1 Re8 Ne5 Nf8 Bg5 Ne6 f4 c6 Rf2 Rc8 Bxf6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2055)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 g3 Ba6 b3 d5 Bg2 Bb4 Bd2 Be7 cxd5 exd5 Nc3 Bb7 O-O O-O Qc2 Nbd7 Rad1 Re8 Ne5 Nf8 Bg5 Ne6 f4 c6 Rf2 Rc8 Bxf6 Bxf6 b4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2055)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 g3 Ba6 b3 d5 Bg2 Bb4 Bd2 Be7 cxd5 exd5 Nc3 Bb7 O-O O-O Qc2 Nbd7 Rad1 Re8 Ne5 Nf8 Bg5 Ne6 f4 c6 Rf2 Rc8 Bxf6 Bxf6 b4 a5 a3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2055)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Bg5 e6 f4 Qb6 Qd2 Qxb2 Rb1 Qa3 e5 h6 Bh4 dxe5 fxe5 g5 exf6 gxh4 Be2 Qa5 O-O Nd7 Rf4 h3 Qe3 Qg5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2055)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Bg5 e6 f4 Qb6 Qd2 Qxb2 Rb1 Qa3 e5 h6 Bh4 dxe5 fxe5 g5 exf6 gxh4 Be2 Qa5 O-O Nd7 Rf4 h3 Qe3 Qg5 g3 Bc5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2055)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Bg5 e6 f4 Qb6 Qd2 Qxb2 Rb1 Qa3 e5 h6 Bh4 dxe5 fxe5 g5 exf6 gxh4 Be2 Qa5 O-O Nd7 Rf4 h3 Qe3 Qg5 g3 Bc5 Ne4 Qd5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matej Pech    (1202)
d4 f5 c4 d6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1202)
e4 d6 h3 Nf6 d3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Gergely Matisz    (1600)
e4 e6 d4 d5 exd5 exd5 Nf3 Nc6

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1600)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Nc3 Nf6 Be2 Bc5

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1600)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nd2 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 Bd3

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1600)
e4 e6 Nf3 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 d4

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Matej Pech    (1202)
d4 f5 c4 d6 Nf3 g6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1202)
e4 d6 Nf3 Nf6 Bc4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1202)
e4 c5 Nc3 a6 Nf3 d6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1202)
e4 d6 h3 Nf6 d3 c5 Bg5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matias Remus    (1800)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nd2 h6 Bd3

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matias Remus    (1800)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nd2 h6 Bd3 c5 dxc5

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matias Remus    (1800)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nd2 h6 Bd3 c5 dxc5 Bxc5 exd5

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matej Pech    (1202)
d4 f5 c4 d6 Nf3 g6 Nc3 Bg7

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1202)
e4 d6 Nf3 Nf6 Bc4 Nxe4 Ng5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1202)
e4 c5 Nc3 a6 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1202)
e4 d6 h3 Nf6 d3 c5 Bg5 h6 Bh4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matias Remus    (1800)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nd2 h6 Bd3 c5 dxc5 Bxc5 exd5 exd5 Nb3

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matej Pech    (1202)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Be2 c5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1202)
e4 c6 d4 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 Bf5 Ng3 Bg6 N1e2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1202)
e4 d6 Nf3 Nf6 Bc4 Nxe4 Ng5 Nxg5 d3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matias Remus    (1800)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nd2 h6 Bd3 c5 dxc5 Bxc5 exd5 exd5 Nb3 Bd6 Nf3

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matej Pech    (1202)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Be2 c5 d5 O-O

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1202)
d4 f5 c4 d6 Nf3 g6 Nc3 Bg7 g3 c6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1202)
e4 c6 d4 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 Bf5 Ng3 Bg6 N1e2 e5 dxe5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1202)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Bc5 c3 Nf6 Nxc6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matias Remus    (1800)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nd2 h6 Bd3 c5 dxc5 Bxc5 exd5 exd5 Nb3 Bd6 Nf3 Nf6 Be3

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matej Pech    (1202)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Be2 c5 d5 O-O Bg5 a6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1202)
e4 c6 d4 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 Bf5 Ng3 Bg6 N1e2 e5 dxe5 Qxd1 Kxd1

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1202)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Bc5 c3 Nf6 Nxc6 bxc6 Nd2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1202)
e4 d6 h3 Nf6 d3 c5 Bg5 h6 Bh4 g5 Bg3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matias Remus    (1800)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Bb4 e5 c5 Bd2 Ne7 Nb5 Bxd2

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matej Pech    (1202)
e4 d6 Nf3 Nf6 Bc4 Nxe4 Ng5 Nxg5 d3 e5 h4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1202)
e4 d6 Nf3 Nf6 Bc4 Nxe4 Ng5 Nxg5 d3 e5 h4 Ne6 g4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matias Remus    (1800)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Bb4 e5 c5 Bd2 Ne7 Nb5 Bxd2 Qxd2 O-O

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matias Remus    (1800)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Bb4 e5 c5 Bd2 Ne7 Nb5 Bxd2 Qxd2 O-O f4 a6

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matias Remus    (1800)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Bb4 e5 c5 Bd2 Ne7 Nb5 Bxd2 Qxd2 O-O f4 a6 Nd6 cxd4

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matej Pech    (1202)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Be2 c5 d5 O-O Bg5 a6 a4 h6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1202)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 f4 Bg7 Nf3 O-O Bd3 Nc6 e5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1202)
d4 f5 c4 d6 Nf3 g6 Nc3 Bg7 g3 c6 Bg2 Nf6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1202)
e4 c6 d4 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 Bf5 Ng3 Bg6 N1e2 e5 dxe5 Qxd1 Kxd1 Nd7 Bf4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1202)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Bc5 c3 Nf6 Nxc6 bxc6 Nd2 O-O Bd3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1202)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d3 Nf6 Bg5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1202)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 Nf3 e6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1202)
e4 d6 Nf3 Nf6 Bc4 Nxe4 Ng5 Nxg5 d3 e5 h4 Ne6 g4 d5 Bb3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1202)
e4 d6 h3 Nf6 d3 c5 Bg5 h6 Bh4 g5 Bg3 Qb6 b3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1202)
e4 d6 Nf3 Nf6 Bc4 Nxe4 Ng5 Nxg5 d3 e5 h4 Ne6 g4 d5 Bb3 Nc6 Nc3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1202)
d4 f5 c4 d6 Nf3 g6 Nc3 Bg7 g3 c6 Bg2 Nf6 O-O O-O

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1202)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d3 Nf6 Bg5 Be7 Be2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1202)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 Nf3 e6 e3 b5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1202)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Be2 c5 d5 O-O Bg5 a6 a4 h6 Bf4 e6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1202)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 f4 Bg7 Nf3 O-O Bd3 Nc6 e5 dxe5 fxe5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1202)
d4 f5 c4 d6 Nf3 g6 Nc3 Bg7 g3 c6 Bg2 Nf6 O-O O-O d5 e5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1202)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d3 Nf6 Bg5 Be7 Be2 d5 exd5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1202)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 Nf3 e6 e3 b5 a4 Bd7

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1202)
d4 f5 c4 d6 Nf3 g6 Nc3 Bg7 g3 c6 Bg2 Nf6 O-O O-O d5 e5 dxe6 Bxe6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1202)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Bc5 c3 Nf6 Nxc6 bxc6 Nd2 O-O Bd3 d5 e5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1202)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 Nf3 e6 e3 b5 a4 Bd7 Ne5 Nc6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1202)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 Nf3 e6 e3 b5 a4 Bd7 Ne5 Nc6 Nxd7 Qxd7

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1202)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 Nf3 e6 e3 b5 a4 Bd7 Ne5 Nc6 Nxd7 Qxd7 axb5 Nb4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1202)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 Nf3 e6 e3 b5 a4 Bd7 Ne5 Nc6 Nxd7 Qxd7 axb5 Nb4 Bxc4 a6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1202)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d3 Nf6 Bg5 Be7 Be2 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Bd2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1202)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d3 Nf6 Bg5 Be7 Be2 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Bd2 O-O O-O

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1202)
e4 d6 h3 Nf6 d3 c5 Bg5 h6 Bh4 g5 Bg3 Qb6 b3 Bg7 Ne2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1202)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d3 Nf6 Bg5 Be7 Be2 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Bd2 O-O O-O Be6 c4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1202)
e4 d6 h3 Nf6 d3 c5 Bg5 h6 Bh4 g5 Bg3 Qb6 b3 Bg7 Ne2 Nxe4 Nbc3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1202)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f5 Nc3 fxe4 Nxe4 d5 Ng3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1202)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 f4 Bg7 Nf3 O-O Bd3 Nc6 e5 dxe5 fxe5 Nh5 Be2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1202)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f5 Nc3 fxe4 Nxe4 d5 Ng3 Bg4 h3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1202)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f5 Nc3 fxe4 Nxe4 d5 Ng3 Bg4 h3 Bxf3 Qxf3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1202)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f5 Nc3 fxe4 Nxe4 d5 Ng3 Bg4 h3 Bxf3 Qxf3 Qd6 O-O

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2097)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 e3 Bb7 Bd3 c5 O-O

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2097)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Bf4 Bg7

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2097)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 dxe4 Nxe4 Be7 Bxf6 gxf6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2097)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Bf4 Bg7 Qd2 c6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2097)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 dxe4 Nxe4 Be7 Bxf6 gxf6 Nf3 f5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2097)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 e3 Bb7 Bd3 c5 O-O Be7 Nc3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2097)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 dxe4 Nxe4 Be7 Bxf6 gxf6 Nf3 f5 Nc3 a6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2097)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 e3 Bb7 Bd3 c5 O-O Be7 Nc3 cxd4 exd4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2097)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 dxe4 Nxe4 Be7 Bxf6 gxf6 Nf3 f5 Nc3 a6 Qd2 Qd6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2097)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 dxe4 Nxe4 Be7 Bxf6 gxf6 Nf3 f5 Nc3 a6 Qd2 Qd6 O-O-O b5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2097)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 dxe4 Nxe4 Be7 Bxf6 gxf6 Nf3 f5 Nc3 a6 Qd2 Qd6 O-O-O b5 Qe3 Nd7

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2097)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 dxe4 Nxe4 Be7 Bxf6 gxf6 Nf3 f5 Nc3 a6 Qd2 Qd6 O-O-O b5 Qe3 Nd7 d5 Nb6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2097)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 e3 Bb7 Bd3 c5 O-O Be7 Nc3 cxd4 exd4 d5 cxd5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matej Pech    (1202)
d4 Nf6 c4 c5 d5 b5 cxb5 a6 bxa6 g6 Nc3 Bxa6 e4 Bxf1 Kxf1 d6 Nf3 Nbd7

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2097)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 dxe4 Nxe4 Be7 Bxf6 gxf6 Nf3 f5 Nc3 a6 Qd2 Qd6 O-O-O b5 Qe3 Nd7 d5 Nb6 dxe6 Qxe6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2097)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 e3 Bb7 Bd3 c5 O-O Be7 Nc3 cxd4 exd4 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Ne5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2097)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 e3 Bb7 Bd3 c5 O-O Be7 Nc3 cxd4 exd4 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Ne5 O-O Qg4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2097)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 dxe4 Nxe4 Be7 Bxf6 gxf6 Nf3 f5 Nc3 a6 Qd2 Qd6 O-O-O b5 Qe3 Nd7 d5 Nb6 dxe6 Qxe6 Qf4 Bd6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2097)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 e3 Bb7 Bd3 c5 O-O Be7 Nc3 cxd4 exd4 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Ne5 O-O Qg4 f5 Qe2

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2097)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 dxe4 Nxe4 Be7 Bxf6 gxf6 Nf3 f5 Nc3 a6 Qd2 Qd6 O-O-O b5 Qe3 Nd7 d5 Nb6 dxe6 Qxe6 Qf4 Bd6 Qd4 O-O

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2097)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Bf4 Bg7 Qd2 c6 O-O-O b5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2097)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 dxe4 Nxe4 Be7 Bxf6 gxf6 Nf3 f5 Nc3 a6 Qd2 Qd6 O-O-O b5 Qe3 Nd7 d5 Nb6 dxe6 Qxe6 Qf4 Bd6 Qd4 O-O Kb1 Re8

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2097)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 e3 Bb7 Bd3 c5 O-O Be7 Nc3 cxd4 exd4 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Ne5 O-O Qg4 f5 Qe2 Bf6 Bc4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2097)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 dxe4 Nxe4 Be7 Bxf6 gxf6 Nf3 f5 Nc3 a6 Qd2 Qd6 O-O-O b5 Qe3 Nd7 d5 Nb6 dxe6 Qxe6 Qf4 Bd6 Qd4 O-O Kb1 Re8 Bd3 Qg6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2097)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 e3 Bb7 Bd3 c5 O-O Be7 Nc3 cxd4 exd4 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Ne5 O-O Qg4 f5 Qe2 Bf6 Bc4 Re8 Rd1

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2097)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 dxe4 Nxe4 Be7 Bxf6 gxf6 Nf3 f5 Nc3 a6 Qd2 Qd6 O-O-O b5 Qe3 Nd7 d5 Nb6 dxe6 Qxe6 Qf4 Bd6 Qd4 O-O Kb1 Re8 Bd3 Qg6 Rhg1 Rb8

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2097)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 dxe4 Nxe4 Be7 Bxf6 gxf6 Nf3 f5 Nc3 a6 Qd2 Qd6 O-O-O b5 Qe3 Nd7 d5 Nb6 dxe6 Qxe6 Qf4 Bd6 Qd4 O-O Kb1 Re8 Bd3 Qg6 Rhg1 Rb8 a3 h5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2097)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 e3 Bb7 Bd3 c5 O-O Be7 Nc3 cxd4 exd4 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Ne5 O-O Qg4 f5 Qe2 Bf6 Bc4 Re8 Rd1 Nxc3 bxc3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2097)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 e3 Bb7 Bd3 c5 O-O Be7 Nc3 cxd4 exd4 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Ne5 O-O Qg4 f5 Qe2 Bf6 Bc4 Re8 Rd1 Nxc3 bxc3 Qc8 Bf4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2097)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 e3 Bb7 Bd3 c5 O-O Be7 Nc3 cxd4 exd4 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Ne5 O-O Qg4 f5 Qe2 Bf6 Bc4 Re8 Rd1 Nxc3 bxc3 Qc8 Bf4 Nd7 Nxd7

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2097)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 e3 Bb7 Bd3 c5 O-O Be7 Nc3 cxd4 exd4 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Ne5 O-O Qg4 f5 Qe2 Bf6 Bc4 Re8 Rd1 Nxc3 bxc3 Qc8 Bf4 Nd7 Nxd7 Qxd7 Re1

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2097)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 Qc2 O-O Nf3 c5 e3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2097)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 e3 Bb7 Bd3 c5 O-O Be7 Nc3 cxd4 exd4 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Ne5 O-O Qg4 f5 Qe2 Bf6 Bc4 Re8 Rd1 Nxc3 bxc3 Qc8 Bf4 Nd7 Nxd7 Qxd7 Re1 Bd5 Bb5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2097)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 Qc2 O-O Nf3 c5 e3 d5 cxd5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2097)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 Qc2 O-O Nf3 c5 e3 d5 cxd5 exd5 a3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2097)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Bf4 Bg7 Qd2 c6 O-O-O b5 f3 b4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2097)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 Qc2 O-O Nf3 c5 e3 d5 cxd5 exd5 a3 Bxc3 Qxc3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2097)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Bf4 Bg7 Qd2 c6 O-O-O b5 f3 b4 Nce2 a5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2097)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Bf4 Bg7 Qd2 c6 O-O-O b5 f3 b4 Nce2 a5 h4 Nbd7

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2097)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Bf4 Bg7 Qd2 c6 O-O-O b5 f3 b4 Nce2 a5 h4 Nbd7 g4 h5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2097)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Bf4 Bg7 Qd2 c6 O-O-O b5 f3 b4 Nce2 a5 h4 Nbd7 g4 h5 g5 Nh7

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2097)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Bf4 Bg7 Qd2 c6 O-O-O b5 f3 b4 Nce2 a5 h4 Nbd7 g4 h5 g5 Nh7 Be3 Qc7

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2097)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Bf4 Bg7 Qd2 c6 O-O-O b5 f3 b4 Nce2 a5 h4 Nbd7 g4 h5 g5 Nh7 Be3 Qc7 f4 Nb6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2097)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Bf4 Bg7 Qd2 c6 O-O-O b5 f3 b4 Nce2 a5 h4 Nbd7 g4 h5 g5 Nh7 Be3 Qc7 f4 Nb6 Ng3 Bg4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2097)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Bf4 Bg7 Qd2 c6 O-O-O b5 f3 b4 Nce2 a5 h4 Nbd7 g4 h5 g5 Nh7 Be3 Qc7 f4 Nb6 Ng3 Bg4 Be2 d5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2097)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Bf4 Bg7 Qd2 c6 O-O-O b5 f3 b4 Nce2 a5 h4 Nbd7 g4 h5 g5 Nh7 Be3 Qc7 f4 Nb6 Ng3 Bg4 Be2 d5 Bxg4 hxg4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2097)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Bf4 Bg7 Qd2 c6 O-O-O b5 f3 b4 Nce2 a5 h4 Nbd7 g4 h5 g5 Nh7 Be3 Qc7 f4 Nb6 Ng3 Bg4 Be2 d5 Bxg4 hxg4 h5 Nc4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2097)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Bf4 Bg7 Qd2 c6 O-O-O b5 f3 b4 Nce2 a5 h4 Nbd7 g4 h5 g5 Nh7 Be3 Qc7 f4 Nb6 Ng3 Bg4 Be2 d5 Bxg4 hxg4 h5 Nc4 Qf2 a4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2097)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Bf4 Bg7 Qd2 c6 O-O-O b5 f3 b4 Nce2 a5 h4 Nbd7 g4 h5 g5 Nh7 Be3 Qc7 f4 Nb6 Ng3 Bg4 Be2 d5 Bxg4 hxg4 h5 Nc4 Qf2 a4 Kb1 Qb6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Gergely Matisz    (1378)
e3 f5

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2125)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 c3 Bg7 d4 cxd4 cxd4 d5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2125)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 c3 Bg7 d4 cxd4 cxd4 d5 e5 Bg4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2125)
e4 e5 Nf3 d6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nf6 f3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2125)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 c3 Bg7 d4 cxd4 cxd4 d5 e5 Bg4 Bb5 Nc6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2125)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 c3 Bg7 d4 cxd4 cxd4 d5 e5 Bg4 Bb5 Nc6 Bxc6 bxc6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Gergely Matisz    (1378)
e3 f5 d4 Nf6

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2125)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Nf3 c5 Rb1 O-O Be2 Nc6 d5 Ne5 Nxe5 Bxe5 Qd2 e6 f4 Bc7 O-O exd5 exd5 Ba5 d6 Rb8 Ba3 Bf5 Rbd1 b6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Gergely Matisz    (1378)
e3 f5 d4 Nf6 Bd3 g6

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1378)
e3 e5 d4 exd4

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1378)
e3 f5 d4 Nf6 Bd3 g6 Nf3 d6

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2125)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 h3 e6 g4 h6 Bg2 Be7 Be3 Nc6 f4 Nd7

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2125)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Nf3 c5 Rb1 O-O Be2 Nc6 d5 Ne5 Nxe5 Bxe5 Qd2 e6 f4 Bc7 O-O exd5 exd5 Ba5 d6 Rb8 Ba3 Bf5 Rbd1 b6 h3 Bd7

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2125)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 h3 e6 g4 h6 Bg2 Be7 Be3 Nc6 f4 Nd7 O-O Nxd4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Gergely Matisz    (1378)
e3 f5 d4 Nf6 Bd3 g6 Nf3 d6 O-O Bg7

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2125)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 h3 e6 g4 h6 Bg2 Be7 Be3 Nc6 f4 Nd7 O-O Nxd4 Qxd4 O-O

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Gergely Matisz    (1378)
e3 f5 d4 Nf6 Bd3 g6 Nf3 d6 O-O Bg7 Nbd2 O-O

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1378)
e3 e5 d4 exd4 exd4 Nf6

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2125)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 h3 e6 g4 h6 Bg2 Be7 Be3 Nc6 f4 Nd7 O-O Nxd4 Qxd4 O-O Rad1 Rb8

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2125)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 h3 e6 g4 h6 Bg2 Be7 Be3 Nc6 f4 Nd7 O-O Nxd4 Qxd4 O-O Rad1 Rb8 Ne2 b5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2125)
e4 e5 Nf3 d6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nf6 f3 d5 e5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2125)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 h3 e6 g4 h6 Bg2 Be7 Be3 Nc6 f4 Nd7 O-O Nxd4 Qxd4 O-O Rad1 Rb8 Ne2 b5 Ng3 Bb7

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Gergely Matisz    (1378)
e3 f5 d4 Nf6 Bd3 g6 Nf3 d6 O-O Bg7 Nbd2 O-O c3 Qe8

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2125)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 h3 e6 g4 h6 Bg2 Be7 Be3 Nc6 f4 Nd7 O-O Nxd4 Qxd4 O-O Rad1 Rb8 Ne2 b5 Ng3 Bb7 Nh5 f6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2125)
e4 e5 Nf3 d6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nf6 f3 d5 e5 Nh5 Qd2

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Gergely Matisz    (1378)
e3 f5 d4 Nf6 Bd3 g6 Nf3 d6 O-O Bg7 Nbd2 O-O c3 Qe8 e4 e5

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1378)
e3 e5 d4 exd4 exd4 Nf6 Nf3 d5

Transpose to wikichess #9592#

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1378)
e3 f5 d4 Nf6 Bd3 g6 Nf3 d6 O-O Bg7 Nbd2 O-O c3 Qe8 e4 e5 dxe5 dxe5

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2125)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 h3 e6 g4 h6 Bg2 Be7 Be3 Nc6 f4 Nd7 O-O Nxd4 Qxd4 O-O Rad1 Rb8 Ne2 b5 Ng3 Bb7 Nh5 f6 a4 Qc7

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2125)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 h3 e6 g4 h6 Bg2 Be7 Be3 Nc6 f4 Nd7 O-O Nxd4 Qxd4 O-O Rad1 Rb8 Ne2 b5 Ng3 Bb7 Nh5 f6 a4 Qc7 axb5 axb5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2125)
e4 e5 Nf3 d6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nf6 f3 d5 e5 Nh5 Qd2 g6 Nc3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2125)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 h3 e6 g4 h6 Bg2 Be7 Be3 Nc6 f4 Nd7 O-O Nxd4 Qxd4 O-O Rad1 Rb8 Ne2 b5 Ng3 Bb7 Nh5 f6 a4 Qc7 axb5 axb5 g5 hxg5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2125)
e4 e5 Nf3 d6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nf6 f3 d5 e5 Nh5 Qd2 g6 Nc3 Be7 Nb3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2125)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 c3 Bg7 d4 cxd4 cxd4 d5 e5 Bg4 Bb5 Nc6 Bxc6 bxc6 Nbd2 e6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2125)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 c3 Bg7 d4 cxd4 cxd4 d5 e5 Bg4 Bb5 Nc6 Bxc6 bxc6 Nbd2 e6 O-O Ne7

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2125)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 c3 Bg7 d4 cxd4 cxd4 d5 e5 Bg4 Bb5 Nc6 Bxc6 bxc6 Nbd2 e6 O-O Ne7 h3 Bxf3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2125)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 c3 Bg7 d4 cxd4 cxd4 d5 e5 Bg4 Bb5 Nc6 Bxc6 bxc6 Nbd2 e6 O-O Ne7 h3 Bxf3 Nxf3 O-O

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2125)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 c3 Bg7 d4 cxd4 cxd4 d5 e5 Bg4 Bb5 Nc6 Bxc6 bxc6 Nbd2 e6 O-O Ne7 h3 Bxf3 Nxf3 O-O Bg5 h6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2125)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 c3 Bg7 d4 cxd4 cxd4 d5 e5 Bg4 Bb5 Nc6 Bxc6 bxc6 Nbd2 e6 O-O Ne7 h3 Bxf3 Nxf3 O-O Bg5 h6 Be3 Nf5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2125)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 c3 Bg7 d4 cxd4 cxd4 d5 e5 Bg4 Bb5 Nc6 Bxc6 bxc6 Nbd2 e6 O-O Ne7 h3 Bxf3 Nxf3 O-O Bg5 h6 Be3 Nf5 Rc1 Qb6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Mateia Benone    (1800)
Nf3 h6 c4 g5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1800)
Nf3 h6 c4 g5 d4 Bg7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2125)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 c3 Bg7 d4 cxd4 cxd4 d5 e5 Bg4 Bb5 Nc6 Bxc6 bxc6 Nbd2 e6 O-O Ne7 h3 Bxf3 Nxf3 O-O Bg5 h6 Be3 Nf5 Rc1 Qb6 Qd2 Rfc8

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Mateia Benone    (1800)
c4 c5 b3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone2...e7-e5


Mateia Benone    (1800)
Nf3 h6 c4 g5 d4 Bg7 e3 d6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1800)
c4 c5 b3 e5 g3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1800)
c4 c5 b3 e5 g3 Nf6 Bg2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1800)
c4 c5 b3 e5 g3 Nf6 Bg2 d5 cxd5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2125)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 c3 Bg7 d4 cxd4 cxd4 d5 e5 Bg4 Bb5 Nc6 Bxc6 bxc6 Nbd2 e6 O-O Ne7 h3 Bxf3 Nxf3 O-O Bg5 h6 Be3 Nf5 Rc1 Qb6 Qd2 Rfc8 Rc2 Rab8

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2125)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 c3 Bg7 d4 cxd4 cxd4 d5 e5 Bg4 Bb5 Nc6 Bxc6 bxc6 Nbd2 e6 O-O Ne7 h3 Bxf3 Nxf3 O-O Bg5 h6 Be3 Nf5 Rc1 Qb6 Qd2 Rfc8 Rc2 Rab8 Rfc1 Qa6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Mateia Benone    (1800)
c4 c5 b3 e5 g3 Nf6 Bg2 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Nc3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2125)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 c3 Bg7 d4 cxd4 cxd4 d5 e5 Bg4 Bb5 Nc6 Bxc6 bxc6 Nbd2 e6 O-O Ne7 h3 Bxf3 Nxf3 O-O Bg5 h6 Be3 Nf5 Rc1 Qb6 Qd2 Rfc8 Rc2 Rab8 Rfc1 Qa6 a3 Rb3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Gergely Matisz    (1378)
e3 e5 d4 exd4 exd4 d5

Transpose to wikichess #802#

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Mateia Benone    (1800)
c4 c5 b3 e5 g3 Nf6 Bg2 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Nc3 Be6 Bb2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1800)
Nf3 c5 c4 g6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1800)
Nf3 h6 c4 g5 d4 Bg7 e3 d6 Be2 Nc6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1800)
Nf3 c5 c4 g6 g3 Bg7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1800)
Nf3 c5 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 Nc6

Transpose to wikichess #37481#

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1800)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 g6 Be2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1800)
c4 c5 b3 e5 g3 Nf6 Bg2 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Nc3 Be6 Bb2 Nc6 d3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1800)
Nf3 h6 c4 g5 d4 Bg7 e3 d6 Be2 Nc6 O-O e5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1800)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 g6 Be2 Bg7 Be3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1800)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 g6 Be2 Bg7 Be3 Nf6 Nc3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1800)
c4 c5 b3 e5 g3 Nf6 Bg2 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Nc3 Be6 Bb2 Nc6 d3 Be7 Nf3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1800)
Nf3 h6 c4 g5 d4 Bg7 e3 d6 Be2 Nc6 O-O e5 d5 Nce7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1800)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 g6 Be2 Bg7 Be3 Nf6 Nc3 O-O O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1800)
Nf3 h6 c4 g5 d4 Bg7 e3 d6 Be2 Nc6 O-O e5 d5 Nce7 Nc3 Ng6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1800)
e4 c5 c3 Nf6 e5 Nd5 Nf3 d6 d4

Transpose to wikichess #17009#

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Gergely Matisz    (1378)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 Nc6 Nxc6 bxc6 Bc4

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1378)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 Nc6 Nxc6 bxc6 Bc4 e6 Bg5

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1378)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 Nc6 Nxc6 bxc6 Bc4 e6 Bg5 h6 Bh4

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Mateia Benone    (1800)
Nf3 Nf6 c4 b6 g3 Bb7 Bg2 c5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1800)
Nf3 h6 c4 g5 d4 Bg7 e3 d6 Be2 Nc6 O-O e5 d5 Nce7 Nc3 Ng6 Qa4 Bd7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1800)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 c3 Nxe4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matej Pech    (1074)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 f4 Bg7 Nf3 O-O Bd3 Na6 O-O c5 d5 Bg4 Kh1

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Mateia Benone    (1800)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 Nge2 e5 Ng3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1800)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 g6 Be2 Bg7 Be3 Nf6 Nc3 O-O O-O d5 exd5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1800)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 g6 c4 Nf6 Nc3 Nxd4 Qxd4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1800)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 g6 c4 Nf6 Nc3 Nxd4 Qxd4 Bg7 e5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1800)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 g6 c4 Nf6 Nc3 Nxd4 Qxd4 Bg7 e5 Ng8 c5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1800)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 Nf6 d4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1800)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 Nf6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4

Transpose to wikichess #207#

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1800)
Nf3 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 Nc6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1800)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Bc5 O-O Nf6 d3 O-O Nc3 d6 Bg5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1800)
Nf3 c5 c4 Nc6 Nc3 e5 g3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1800)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Bc5 O-O Nf6 d3 O-O Nc3 d6 Bg5 h6 Bh4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1800)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 c3 Nxe4 O-O d5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1800)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Bc5 O-O Nf6 d3 O-O Nc3 d6 Bg5 h6 Bh4 g5 Bg3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1800)
Nf3 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 Nc6 d4 O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1800)
Nf3 c5 c4 Nc6 Nc3 e5 g3 g6 Bg2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1800)
Nf3 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 Nc6 d4 O-O e5 Ne8

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1800)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 g6 c4 Nf6 Nc3 Nxd4 Qxd4 d6 Be2

Transpose to wikichess #44377#

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matej Pech    (1074)
c4 e5 Nc3 f5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1074)
c4 e5 Nc3 f5 d4 Bb4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Mateia Benone    (1800)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 Nge2 e5 Ng3 Nge7 Bc4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1800)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 c3 Nxe4 O-O d5 Bb5 Bd6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1800)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 g6 c4 Nf6 Nc3 Nxd4 Qxd4 d6 Bg5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1800)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 d3 Be7 O-O O-O Re1 d6 a4 Be6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1800)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 g6 O-O Bg7 Re1 Nf6 e5 Nd5 Nc3 Nc7 Bxc6 dxc6 Ne4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1800)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 g6 c4 Nf6 Nc3 Nxd4 Qxd4 d6 Bg5 Bg7 Qd2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matej Pech    (1074)
c4 e5 Nc3 f5 d4 Bb4 dxe5 Bxc3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1074)
e4 c6 d4 d5 e5 Bf5 f4

Transpose to wikichess #20386#

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1074)
c4 e5 Nc3 f5 d4 Bb4 dxe5 Bxc3 bxc3 Nc6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1074)
c4 e5 Nc3 f5 d4 Bb4 dxe5 Bxc3 bxc3 Nc6 Nf3 Qe7

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1074)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 a6 Nc3 Qc7 a3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2131)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f5 Nc3 fxe4 Nxe4 Nf6 Nxf6 Qxf6 Qe2 Be7 Bxc6 bxc6 Qxe5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2131)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f5 Nc3 fxe4 Nxe4 Nf6 Nxf6 Qxf6 Qe2 Be7 Bxc6 bxc6 Qxe5 d6 Qxf6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2131)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f5 Nc3 fxe4 Nxe4 Nf6 Nxf6 Qxf6 Qe2 Be7 Bxc6 bxc6 Qxe5 d6 Qxf6 Bxf6 d3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2131)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f5 Nc3 fxe4 Nxe4 Nf6 Nxf6 Qxf6 Qe2 Be7 Bxc6 bxc6 Qxe5 d6 Qxf6 Bxf6 d3 O-O O-O

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matthew O Brien    (1511)
e4 b6 d4 Bb7 Bd3 e6

============

Contributors : Matthew O Brien


Matthew O Brien    (1511)
d4 Nf6 Nf3 g6 Bg5 Bg7 Nbd2

============

Contributors : Matthew O Brien


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2131)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f5 Nc3 fxe4 Nxe4 Nf6 Nxf6 Qxf6 Qe2 Be7 Bxc6 bxc6 Qxe5 d6 Qxf6 Bxf6 d3 O-O O-O Re8 Re1

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2131)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f5 Nc3 fxe4 Nxe4 Nf6 Nxf6 Qxf6 Qe2 Be7 Bxc6 bxc6 Qxe5 d6 Qxf6 Bxf6 d3 O-O O-O Re8 Re1 Rxe1 Nxe1

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matthew O Brien    (1511)
d4 Nf6 Nf3 g6 Bg5 Bg7 Nbd2 d5 e3

============

Contributors : Matthew O Brien


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2131)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f5 Nc3 fxe4 Nxe4 Nf6 Nxf6 Qxf6 Qe2 Be7 Bxc6 bxc6 Qxe5 d6 Qxf6 Bxf6 d3 O-O O-O Re8 Re1 Rxe1 Nxe1 Be6 Nf3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2131)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f5 Nc3 fxe4 Nxe4 Nf6 Nxf6 Qxf6 Qe2 Be7 Bxc6 bxc6 Qxe5 d6 Qxf6 Bxf6 d3 O-O O-O Re8 Re1 Rxe1 Nxe1 Be6 Nf3 Rb8 c3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2131)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f5 Nc3 fxe4 Nxe4 Nf6 Nxf6 Qxf6 Qe2 Be7 Bxc6 bxc6 Qxe5 d6 Qxf6 Bxf6 d3 O-O O-O Re8 Re1 Rxe1 Nxe1 Be6 Nf3 Rb8 c3 h6 Nd2

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2131)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f5 Nc3 fxe4 Nxe4 Nf6 Nxf6 Qxf6 Qe2 Be7 Bxc6 bxc6 Qxe5 d6 Qxf6 Bxf6 d3 O-O O-O Re8 Re1 Rxe1 Nxe1 Be6 Nf3 Rb8 c3 h6 Nd2 g5 d4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matthew O Brien    (1511)
d4 Nf6 Nf3 g6 Bg5 Bg7 Nbd2 d5 e3 O-O c3

============

Contributors : Matthew O Brien


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2131)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f5 d3 fxe4 dxe4 Nf6 O-O d6 h3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2131)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f5 d3 fxe4 dxe4 Nf6 O-O Bc5 Bxc6 bxc6 Nxe5 O-O Nc3 Re8 Nd3 Bd4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matthew O Brien    (1511)
d4 Nf6 Nf3 g6 Bg5 Bg7 Nbd2 d5 e3 O-O c3 Nbd7 Bd3

============

Contributors : Matthew O Brien


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2131)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f5 d3 fxe4 dxe4 Nf6 O-O Bc5 Bxc6 bxc6 Nxe5 O-O Nc3 Re8 Nd3 Bd4 Ne2 Bb6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2131)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f5 d3 fxe4 dxe4 Nf6 O-O Bc5 Bxc6 bxc6 Nxe5 O-O Nc3 Re8 Nd3 Bd4 Ne2 Bb6 Bg5 h6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matthew O Brien    (1511)
d4 Nf6 Nf3 g6 Bg5 Bg7 Nbd2 d5 e3 O-O c3 Nbd7 Bd3 c5 O-O

============

Contributors : Matthew O Brien


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2131)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f5 d3 fxe4 dxe4 Nf6 O-O Bc5 Bxc6 bxc6 Nxe5 O-O Nc3 Re8 Nd3 Bd4 Ne2 Bb6 Bg5 h6 Bxf6 Qxf6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2131)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f5 d3 fxe4 dxe4 Nf6 O-O Bc5 Bxc6 bxc6 Nxe5 O-O Nc3 Re8 Nd3 Bd4 Ne2 Bb6 Bg5 h6 Bxf6 Qxf6 Ng3 a5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2131)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f5 d3 fxe4 dxe4 Nf6 O-O Bc5 Bxc6 bxc6 Nxe5 O-O Nc3 Re8 Nd3 Bd4 Ne2 Bb6 Bg5 h6 Bxf6 Qxf6 Ng3 a5 Rc1 d6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Gergely Matisz    (1430)
e4 b5 Bxb5 c6 Ba4

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2131)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f5 d3 fxe4 dxe4 Nf6 O-O Bc5 Bxc6 bxc6 Nxe5 O-O Nc3 Re8 Nd3 Bd4 Ne2 Bb6 Bg5 h6 Bxf6 Qxf6 Ng3 a5 Rc1 d6 c4 Ba6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Gergely Matisz    (1430)
e4 b5 Bxb5 c6 Ba4 Qa5 Nc3

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2131)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f5 d3 fxe4 dxe4 Nf6 O-O Bc5 Bxc6 bxc6 Nxe5 O-O Nc3 Re8 Nd3 Bd4 Ne2 Bb6 Bg5 h6 Bxf6 Qxf6 Ng3 a5 Rc1 d6 c4 Ba6 Re1 Rad8

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Gergely Matisz    (1430)
e4 b5 Bxb5 c6 Ba4 Qa5 Nc3 Nf6 Qf3

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2131)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f5 d3 fxe4 dxe4 Nf6 O-O Bc5 Bxc6 bxc6 Nxe5 O-O Nc3 Re8 Nd3 Bd4 Ne2 Bb6 Bg5 h6 Bxf6 Qxf6 Ng3 a5 Rc1 d6 c4 Ba6 Re1 Rad8 b3 Bc8

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Gergely Matisz    (1430)
e4 b5 Bxb5 c6 Ba4 Qa5 Nc3 Nf6 Qf3 e6 Nge2

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1430)
d4 h5 Nf3

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1430)
c4 h5 d4

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1430)
c4 h5 d4 Rh7 e4

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2131)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f5 d3 fxe4 dxe4 Nf6 O-O Bc5 Bxc6 bxc6 Nxe5 O-O Nc3 Re8 Nd3 Bd4 Ne2 Bb6 Bg5 h6 Bxf6 Qxf6 Ng3 a5 Rc1 d6 c4 Ba6 Re1 Rad8 b3 Bc8 Kh1 Bd4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2131)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 c3 Nf6 Bb5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2131)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 c3 Nf6 Bb5 Nc6 Qe2

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2131)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 a6 Nc3 b5 Bd3 Qb6 Nf3 Bb7

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2131)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 a6 Nc3 b5 Bd3 Qb6 Nf3 Bb7 O-O Qc7

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2131)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 a6 Nc3 b5 Bd3 Qb6 Nf3 Bb7 O-O Qc7 Re1 Be7

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2131)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 c3 Nf6 Bb5 Nc6 Qe2 Bg4 d4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2131)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 dxc4 a4 Bf5 e3 e6 Bxc4 Nbd7 O-O Bb4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2131)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 dxc4 a4 Bf5 e3 e6 Bxc4 Nbd7 O-O Bb4 Nh4 Bg4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Gergely Matisz    (1430)
h4 e5 c4 d5

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2131)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Nf3 c5 Rb1 O-O Be2 cxd4 cxd4 Qa5 Bd2 Qxa2 O-O Bg4 Bg5 h6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2131)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 c3 Nf6 Bb5 Nc6 Qe2 Bg4 d4 cxd4 cxd4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2131)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Nf3 c5 Rb1 O-O Be2 cxd4 cxd4 Qa5 Bd2 Qxa2 O-O Bg4 Bg5 h6 Be3 Nc6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2131)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Nf3 c5 Rb1 O-O Be2 cxd4 cxd4 Qa5 Bd2 Qxa2 O-O Bg4 Bg5 h6 Be3 Nc6 d5 Na5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Gergely Matisz    (1430)
h4 e5 c4 d5 cxd5 Qxd5

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1430)
h4 e5 c4 d5 cxd5 Qxd5 Nf3 f6

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2131)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Nf3 c5 Rb1 O-O Be2 cxd4 cxd4 Qa5 Bd2 Qxa2 O-O Bg4 Bg5 h6 Be3 Nc6 d5 Na5 Bc5 b6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2131)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Nf3 c5 Rb1 O-O Be2 cxd4 cxd4 Qa5 Bd2 Qxa2 O-O Bg4 Bg5 h6 Be3 Nc6 d5 Na5 Bc5 b6 Bxe7 Rfe8

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2131)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Nf3 c5 Rb1 O-O Be2 cxd4 cxd4 Qa5 Bd2 Qxa2 O-O Bg4 Bg5 h6 Be3 Nc6 d5 Na5 Bc5 b6 Bxe7 Rfe8 d6 Nc6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Gergely Matisz    (1430)
h4 e5 c4 d5 cxd5 Qxd5 Nf3 f6 Nc3 Qd7

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2131)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Nf3 c5 Rb1 O-O Be2 cxd4 cxd4 Qa5 Bd2 Qxa2 O-O Bg4 Bg5 h6 Be3 Nc6 d5 Na5 Bc5 b6 Bxe7 Rfe8 d6 Nc6 Bb5 Nxe7

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Gergely Matisz    (1430)
e4 b5 Bxb5 c6 Ba4 Qa5 Nc3 Nf6 Qf3 e6 Nge2 Be7 O-O

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1430)
c4 h5 d4 Rh7 e4 h4 h3

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1430)
e4 b5 Bxb5 c6 Ba4 Qa5 Nc3 Nf6 Qf3 e6 Nge2 Be7 O-O O-O d4

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1430)
h4 e5 c4 d5 cxd5 Qxd5 Nf3 f6 Nc3 Qd7 d4 Bb4

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1430)
h4 e5 c4 d5 cxd5 Qxd5 Nf3 f6 Nc3 Qd7 d4 Bb4 a3 Ba5

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1430)
a4 e5 e4 Nf6

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1430)
h4 e5 c4 d5 cxd5 Qxd5 Nf3 f6 Nc3 Qd7 d4 Bb4 a3 Ba5 e4 Nc6

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1430)
h4 e5 c4 d5 cxd5 Qxd5 Nf3 f6 Nc3 Qd7 d4 Bb4 a3 Ba5 e4 Nc6 d5 Nd4

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2131)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 c3 Nf6 Bb5 Nc6 Qe2 Bg4 d4 cxd4 cxd4 d5 Nc3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Gergely Matisz    (1430)
d3 e5 c4 f5

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1430)
a4 e5 e4 Nf6 Nc3 Bb4

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1430)
d3 e5 c4 f5 Nc3 Nf6

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1430)
b4 e5 a3 d5 c4 dxc4

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1430)
d4 h5 Nf3 Nf6 e3

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1430)
d4 h5 Nf3 Nf6 e3 a6 c4

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2131)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 c3 Nf6 Bb5 Nc6 Qe2 Bg4 d4 cxd4 cxd4 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Gergely Matisz    (1430)
d4 h5 Nf3 Nf6 e3 a6 c4 e6 Nc3

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1430)
e4 b5 Bxb5 c6 Ba4 Qa5 Nc3 Nf6 Qf3 e6 Nge2 Be7 O-O O-O d4 d5 Ng3

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1430)
d4 h5 Nf3 Nf6 e3 a6 c4 e6 Nc3 d5 c5

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1430)
a4 e5 e4 Nf6 Nc3 Bb4 Nf3 O-O

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1430)
b4 e5 a3 d5 c4 dxc4 e3 Be6

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1430)
d3 e5 c4 f5 Nc3 Nf6 g3 Be7

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1430)
d4 h5 Nf3 Nf6 e3 a6 c4 e6 Nc3 d5 c5 b6 b4

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Mathieu Bain    (1616)
e4 d5 exd5 Nf6 Nf3 e6 dxe6

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1616)
e4 d5 exd5 Nf6 Nf3 e6 dxe6 Bxe6 d4

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1616)
e4 d5 exd5 Nf6 Nf3 e6 dxe6 Bxe6 d4 Qe7 Be2

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1616)
e4 d5 exd5 Nf6 Nf3 e6 dxe6 Bxe6 d4 Qe7 Be2 Nc6 O-O

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1616)
e4 d5 exd5 Nf6 Nf3 e6 dxe6 Bxe6 d4 Qe7 Be2 Nc6 O-O O-O-O c3

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1616)
e4 d5 exd5 Nf6 Nf3 e6 dxe6 Bxe6 d4 Qe7 Be2 Nc6 O-O O-O-O c3 Bd5 b4

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1616)
c4 d5 g3

Transpose to wikichess #40972#

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1616)
e4 e6 d4 d5 exd5 exd5 h3

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1616)
e4 c5 Bc4 e6 Nf3 a6 d4 b5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1616)
e4 c5 Bc4 e6 Nf3 a6 d4 b5 Be2 cxd4

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1616)
e4 c5 Bc4 e6 Nf3 a6 d4 b5 Be2 cxd4 Nxd4 Bb7

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1616)
e4 d5 exd5 Nf6 c4 e6 d4

Transpose to wikichess #26901#

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1616)
e4 c5 Bc4 e6 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1616)
e4 c5 Bc4 e6 Nf3 a6 d4 b5 Be2 cxd4 Nxd4 Bb7 Bf3 Qc7

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Matej Pech    (1074)
d4 d5 Nf3 Nf6 e3 e6 Bd3 c5 b3 Nc6 O-O Be7 Bb2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Mathieu Bain    (1616)
e4 c5 Bc4 e6 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 d5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Gergely Matisz    (1430)
d3 e5 c4 f5 Nc3 Nf6 g3 Be7 Nf3 d6

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1430)
b4 e5 a3 d5 c4 dxc4 e3 Be6 Qc2 b5

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Mathieu Bain    (1616)
e4 c5 Bc4 e6 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 d5 exd5 exd5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1616)
e4 e6 d4 d5 e5 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Qb6

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1616)
e4 c5 Bc4 e6 Nf3 a6 d4 b5 Be2 cxd4 Nxd4 Bb7 Bf3 Qc7 g3 Nf6

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1616)
e4 e6 d4 d5 e5 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Qb6 Bxc6 bxc6

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1616)
e4 c5 Bc4 e6 Nf3 a6 d4 b5 Be2 cxd4 Nxd4 Bb7 Bf3 Qc7 g3 Nf6 Bf4 e5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1616)
e4 c5 Bc4 e6 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 d5 exd5 exd5 Bb5 Bd7

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1616)
e4 c5 Bc4 e6 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 d5 exd5 exd5 Bb5 Bd7 O-O Be7

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1616)
e4 c5 Bc4 e6 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 d5 exd5 exd5 Bb5 Bd7 O-O Be7 Re1 Qb6

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1616)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 c5 exd5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1616)
e4 e6 d4 d5 e5 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Qb6 Bxc6 bxc6 Nc3 Ba6

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1616)
e4 e6 d4 d5 e5 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Qb6 Bxc6 bxc6 Nc3 Ba6 Be3 Qxb2

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1616)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 c5 exd5 exd5 Nf3

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Gergely Matisz    (1430)
a4 e5 e4 Nf6 Nc3 Bb4 Nf3 O-O Nxe5 d5

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1430)
d4 h5 Nf3 Nf6 e3 a6 c4 e6 Nc3 d5 c5 b6 b4 a5 Qa4

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Mathieu Bain    (1616)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 c5 exd5 exd5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1616)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 c5 exd5 exd5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Bd6 dxc5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1616)
e4 e6 d4 d5 e5 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Qb6 Bxc6 bxc6 Nc3 Ba6 Be3 Qxb2 Na4 Qa3

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1616)
d4 d5 Nf3 c6 e3 Nf6 b3 Bg4

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1616)
d4 d5 Nf3 c6 e3 Nf6 b3 Bg4 Be2 Nbd7

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1616)
d4 d5 Nf3 c6 e3 Nf6 b3 Bg4 Be2 Nbd7 Bb2 e6

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1616)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 c5 exd5 exd5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Bd6 dxc5 Qe7 Be3

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1616)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 c5 exd5 exd5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Bd6 dxc5 Qe7 Be3 Bxc5 Nxd5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1616)
d4 d5 Nf3 c6 e3 Nf6 b3 Bg4 Be2 Nbd7 Bb2 e6 Ne5 Bxe2

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Gergely Matisz    (1430)
b4 e5 a3 d5 c4 dxc4 e3 Be6 Qc2 b5 Nf3 a5

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1430)
a4 e5 e4 Nf6 Nc3 Bb4 Nf3 O-O Nxe5 d5 Nd3 Bxc3

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Mathieu Bain    (1616)
e4 d5 exd5 Nf6 Bc4

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1616)
d4 d5 Nf3 c6 e3 Nf6 b3 Bg4 Be2 Nbd7 Bb2 e6 Ne5 Bxe2 Qxe2 Bd6

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Gergely Matisz    (1430)
d4 h5 Nf3 Nf6 e3 a6 c4 e6 Nc3 d5 c5 b6 b4 a5 Qa4 Bd7 Bb5

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1430)
a4 e5 e4 Nf6 Nc3 Bb4 Nf3 O-O Nxe5 d5 Nd3 Bxc3 dxc3 dxe4

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Mathieu Bain    (1616)
e4 d5 exd5 Nf6 Bc4 e6 dxe6

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Matej Pech    (1074)
d4 d5 Nf3 Nf6 e3 e6 Bd3 c5 b3 Nc6 O-O Be7 Bb2 O-O Nbd2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Gergely Matisz    (1430)
b4 e5 a3 d5 c4 dxc4 e3 Be6 Qc2 b5 Nf3 a5 bxa5 Nd7

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1430)
d3 e5 c4 f5 Nc3 Nf6 g3 Be7 Nf3 d6 Bg2 O-O

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1430)
a4 e5 e4 Nf6 Nc3 Bb4 Nf3 O-O Nxe5 d5 Nd3 Bxc3 dxc3 dxe4 Nf4 Qxd1

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1430)
c4 h5 d4 Rh7 e4 h4 h3 g6 Nf3

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Mathieu Bain    (1616)
e4 d5 exd5 Nf6 Bc4 e6 dxe6 Bxe6 Qe2

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1616)
e4 d5 exd5 Nf6 Bc4 e6 dxe6 Bxe6 Qe2 Qd7 Bxe6

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Gergely Matisz    (1430)
b4 e5 a3 d5 c4 dxc4 e3 Be6 Qc2 b5 Nf3 a5 bxa5 Nd7 d3 Nc5

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1430)
c4 h5 d4 Rh7 e4 h4 h3 g6 Nf3 Bg7 Nc3

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Matej Pech    (1074)
d4 d5 Nf3 Nf6 e3 e6 Bd3 c5 b3 Nc6 O-O Be7 Bb2 O-O Nbd2 b6 dxc5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Mathieu Bain    (1616)
e4 d5 exd5 Nf6 Bc4 e6 dxe6 Bxe6 Qe2 Qd7 Bxe6 fxe6 Nc3

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Gergely Matisz    (1430)
b4 e5 a3 d5 c4 dxc4 e3 Be6 Qc2 b5 Nf3 a5 bxa5 Nd7 d3 Nc5 dxc4 e4

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1430)
d3 e5 c4 f5 Nc3 Nf6 g3 Be7 Nf3 d6 Bg2 O-O b4 c6

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Matej Pech    (1074)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Nf3 c5 Be3 Qa5 Qd2 O-O

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Mathieu Bain    (1616)
e4 d5 exd5 Nf6 Bc4 e6 dxe6 Bxe6 Qe2 Qd7 Bxe6 fxe6 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1616)
e4 d5 exd5 Nf6 Bc4 e6 dxe6 Bxe6 Qe2 Qd7 Bxe6 fxe6 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 Nd4 Nxd4

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1616)
d4 d5 Nf3 c6 e3 Nf6 b3 Bg4 Be2 Nbd7 Bb2 e6 Ne5 Bxe2 Qxe2 Bd6 Nd2 O-O

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Gergely Matisz    (1430)
a4 e5 e4 Nf6 Nc3 Bb4 Nf3 O-O Nxe5 d5 Nd3 Bxc3 dxc3 dxe4 Nf4 Qxd1 Kxd1 Rd8

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1430)
c4 h5 d4 Rh7 e4 h4 h3 g6 Nf3 Bg7 Nc3 c5 dxc5

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1430)
d3 e5 c4 f5 Nc3 Nf6 g3 Be7 Nf3 d6 Bg2 O-O b4 c6 O-O Na6

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1430)
c4 h5 d4 Rh7 e4 h4 h3 g6 Nf3 Bg7 Nc3 c5 dxc5 Na6 Be2

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1430)
d3 e5 c4 f5 Nc3 Nf6 g3 Be7 Nf3 d6 Bg2 O-O b4 c6 O-O Na6 b5 Nc5

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1430)
c4 h5 d4 Rh7 e4 h4 h3 g6 Nf3 Bg7 Nc3 c5 dxc5 Na6 Be2 Nxc5 Ng5

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f5 Nc3 fxe4 Nxe4 Nf6 d3 Bb4

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathaios Vardoulakis    (1747)
d4 d5 c4 Nf6 cxd5 Nxd5 Nf3 Nc6 e4 Nb6 d5 Nb8 a4 Bg4 Qb3

============

Contributors : Mathaios Vardoulakis


Mathaios Vardoulakis    (1747)
d4 d5 c4 Nf6 cxd5 Nxd5 Nf3 Nc6 e4 Nb6 d5 Nb8 a4 Bg4 Qb3 g6 a5

============

Contributors : Mathaios Vardoulakis


Mathaios Vardoulakis    (1745)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 d6 d4 Bd7 Bxc6 bxc6 dxe5

============

Contributors : Mathaios Vardoulakis


Mathaios Vardoulakis    (1745)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 d6 d4 Bd7 Bxc6 bxc6 dxe5 dxe5 Nxe5

============

Contributors : Mathaios Vardoulakis


Mathaios Vardoulakis    (1745)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 d6 d4 Bd7 Bxc6 bxc6 dxe5 dxe5 Nxe5 Nf6 Bg5

============

Contributors : Mathaios Vardoulakis


Mathaios Vardoulakis    (1745)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 d6 d4 Bd7 Bxc6 bxc6 dxe5 dxe5 Nxe5 Nf6 Bg5 Bd6 Nxd7

============

Contributors : Mathaios Vardoulakis


Matej Pech    (1074)
d4 Nf6 e3 c5 Nf3

Transpose to wikichess #10097#

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f5 Nc3 fxe4 Nxe4 Nf6 d3 Bb4 c3 Nxe4

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f5 Nc3 fxe4 Nxe4 Nf6 d3 Bb4 c3 Nxe4 dxe4 Bd6

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f5 Nc3 fxe4 Nxe4 Nf6 d3 Bb4 c3 Nxe4 dxe4 Bd6 Ng5 O-O

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qd8 Nf3 Nf6

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f5 Nc3 fxe4 Nxe4 Nf6 d3 d5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qd8 Nf3 Nf6 Bb5 Bd7

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qd8 Nf3 Nf6 Bb5 Bd7 Bc4 e6

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qd8 Nf3 Nf6 Bb5 Bd7 Bc4 e6 Qe2 Bb4

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qd8 Nf3 Nf6 Bb5 Bd7 Bc4 e6 Qe2 Bb4 a3 Bxc3

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Bb5 c6

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Bb5 c6 exd5 cxb5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Bb5 c6 exd5 cxb5 dxe6 Bxe6

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qd8 Nf3 Nf6 Bb5 Bd7 Bc4 e6 Qe2 Bb4 a3 Bxc3 dxc3 O-O

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Bb5 c6 exd5 cxb5 dxe6 Bxe6 Qe2 Qxd4

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 e5 Bc4 Nf6 d3 d6 Nf3

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 e5 Bc4 Nf6 d3 d6 Nf3 Nc6 c3

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Bb5 c6 exd5 cxb5 dxe6 Bxe6 Qe2 Qxd4 Qxb5 Qd7

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Bb5 c6 exd5 cxb5 dxe6 Bxe6 Qe2 Qxd4 Qxb5 Qd7 Nc3 Nc6

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f5 d3 f4 d4

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Bb5 c6 exd5 cxb5 dxe6 Bxe6 Qe2 Qxd4 Qxb5 Qd7 Nc3 Nc6 Bf4 Nf6

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f5 d3 f4 d4 exd4 Bxf4

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1616)
e4 d5 exd5 Nf6 Nf3 e6 dxe6 Bxe6 Bb5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1616)
e4 d5 exd5 Nf6 Nf3 e6 dxe6 Bxe6 Bb5 c6 Ba4

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f5 Nc3 Nd4 Nxe5 Qf6

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 e5 Bc4 Nf6 d3 d6 Nf3 Nc6 c3 d5 Bb3

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f5 d3 fxe4 dxe4 Bc5 Bxc6

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Matus Tkac    (2000)
Nf3 c5 c4 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 e6

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f5 d3 fxe4 dxe4 Bc5 Bxc6 bxc6 Nxe5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f5 d3 f4 d4 exd4 Bxf4 Nf6 O-O

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
d4 d5 Nf3 Nf6 Bg5 Bg4 Nbd2

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 e5 Bc4 Nf6 d3 d6 Nf3 Nc6 c3 d5 Bb3 Bc5 O-O

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Matus Tkac    (2000)
Nf3 c5 c4 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 e6 Nb5 Nf6

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 e5 Bc4 Nf6 d3 d6 Nf3 Nc6 c3 d5 Bb3 Bc5 O-O O-O Bg5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f5 d3 f4 d4 exd4 Bxf4 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Matus Tkac    (2000)
Nf3 c5 c4 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 e6 Nb5 Nf6 Bf4 Bb4

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
d4 d5 Nf3 Nf6 Bg5 Bg4 Nbd2 e6 e3

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f5 d3 fxe4 dxe4 Bc5 Bxc6 bxc6 Nxe5 Qf6 Nd3

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d4 Nc6

Transpose to wikichess #20508#

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f5 d3 fxe4 dxe4 Bc5 Bxc6 bxc6 Nxe5 Qf6 Nd3 Qd4 O-O

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Matus Tkac    (2000)
Nf3 c5 c4 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 e6 Nb5 Nf6 Bf4 Bb4 N1c3 O-O

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 g3 Bc5 Bg2 e4 Nh4

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f5 d3 f4 d4 exd4 Bxf4 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Qe7 Nxd4

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
d4 d5 Nf3 Nf6 Bg5 Bg4 Nbd2 e6 e3 Nc6 Be2

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 Ng5 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxf7 Kxf7 Qf3 Ke6 Nc3 Ncb4 a3 Nxc2

Transpose to wikichess #8894#

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
d4 d5 Nf3 Nf6 Bg5 Bg4 Nbd2 e6 e3 Nc6 Be2 Be7 Ne5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 Qe7 d4 d6 Bf4 Nc6

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Matus Tkac    (2000)
Nf3 c5 c4 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 e6 Nb5 Nf6 Bf4 Bb4 N1c3 O-O Bd6 Bxd6

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
d4 d5 Nf3 Nf6 Bg5 Bg4 Nbd2 e6 e3 Nc6 Be2 Be7 Ne5 Nxe5 dxe5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 e5 Bc4 Nf6 d3 d6 Nf3 Nc6 c3 d5 Bb3 Bc5 O-O O-O Bg5 dxe4 Bxf6

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Nc3 Nf6 b3

Transpose to wikichess #26744#

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f5 Nc3 Nd4 Nxe5 Qf6 f4 Nxb5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 g3 Bc5 Bg2 e4 Nh4 Qe7 O-O

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Bd3 Nxd4

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
Nf3 d5 c4 dxc4 e4

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 e6 d4 b6 d5 Nf6

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Matus Tkac    (2000)
Nf3 c5 c4 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 e6 Nb5 Nf6 Bf4 Bb4 N1c3 O-O Bd6 Bxd6 Nxd6 Qb6

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2000)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Bc5 Nxc6 Qf6 Qf3 dxc6 Bc4 Qe7 Bf4

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 g3 Bc5 Bg2 e4 Nh4 Qe7 O-O g5 d4

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
Nf3 d5 c4 dxc4 e4 Be6 Ng5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 c5 exd5 exd5 dxc5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f5 Nc3 Nd4 Nxe5 Qf6 f4 Nxb5 Nxb5 Bd6

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Bd3 Nxd4 e5 Ng8

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
d4 d5 Nf3 Nf6 Bg5 Bg4 Nbd2 e6 e3 Nc6 Be2 Be7 Ne5 Nxe5 dxe5 Bxe2 Qxe2

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Bd3 Nxd4 e5 Ng8 Be3 Qa5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
Nf3 d5 c4 dxc4 e4 Be6 Ng5 Nf6 Nxe6

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Matej Pech    (1074)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 d4 f5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Bd3 Nxd4 e5 Ng8 Be3 Qa5 Nc3 Qxe5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Matus Tkac    (2000)
e4 c5 Nf3 Qc7 d4

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2000)
e4 c5 Nf3 Qc7 d4 cxd4 Nxd4

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 c5 exd5 exd5 dxc5 Bxc5 Bb5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1616)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 Bc4 e6 Nc3 Nf6

Transpose to wikichess #12050#

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f5 Nc3 Nd4 Nxe5 Qf6 f4 Nxb5 Nxb5 Bd6 Qe2 Bxe5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f5 Nc3 fxe4 Nxe4 d5 Nxe5 Qe7 d4

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Matej Pech    (1074)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Be7 Qe2 Nd6 Bxc6 bxc6 dxe5 Nb7

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1074)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 d4 f5 exf5 g5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1074)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 d4 f5 exf5 g5 fxg6 hxg6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f5 Nc3 Nd4 Nxe5 Qf6 f4 Nxb5 Nxb5 Bd6 Qe2 Bxe5 fxe5 Qh4

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 c5 exd5 exd5 dxc5 Bxc5 Bb5 Nc6 Qxd5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 Qe7 d4 d6 Bf4 Nc6 Nxc6 bxc6

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Matej Pech    (1074)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Be7 Qe2 Nd6 Bxc6 bxc6 dxe5 Nb7 Nc3 O-O

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1074)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 d4 f5 exf5 g5 fxg6 hxg6 Qe2 Qe7

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Bd3 Nxd4 e5 Ng8 Be3 Qa5 Nc3 Qxe5 O-O Nc6

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 g3 Bc5 Bg2 e4 Nh4 Qe7 O-O g5 d4 Bxd4 Nf5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 c5 exd5 exd5 dxc5 Bxc5 Bb5 Nc6 Qxd5 Qe7 Nge2

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Matus Tkac    (2000)
e4 c5 Nf3 Qc7 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 a6 Nc3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 c5 exd5 exd5 dxc5 Bxc5 Bb5 Nc6 Qxd5 Qe7 Nge2 Bd7 O-O

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 Qe7 d4 d6 Bf4 Nc6 Nxc6 bxc6 e5 dxe5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 Qe7 d4 d6 Bf4 Nc6 Nxc6 bxc6 e5 dxe5 dxe5 Ne4

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Matej Pech    (1074)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 d4 f5 exf5 g5 fxg6 hxg6 Qe2 Qe7 Nc3 Bh6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matus Tkac    (2000)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 e3 O-O Bd3 c5 Nge2 d5 a3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matej Pech    (1074)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 d4 f5 exf5 g5 fxg6 hxg6 Qe2 Qe7 Nc3 Bh6 Nd5 Qxe2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 e6 d4 b6 d5 Nf6 Nc3 Bb4

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 Qe7 d4 d6 Bf4 Nc6 Nxc6 bxc6 e5 dxe5 dxe5 Ne4 Qf3 Bf5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f5 Nc3 fxe4 Nxe4 d5 Nxe5 Qe7 d4 dxe4 Nxc6

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Matus Tkac    (2000)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 e3 O-O Bd3 c5 Nge2 d5 a3 dxc4 Bxc4

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 e6 d4 b6 d5 Nf6 Nc3 Bb4 Qd4 c5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 e6 d4 b6 d5 Nf6 Nc3 Bb4 Qd4 c5 Qe5 d6

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f5 Nc3 fxe4 Nxe4 d5 Nxe5 Qe7 d4 dxe4 Nxc6 Qe6 Ne5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Matus Tkac    (2000)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 e3 O-O Bd3 c5 Nge2 d5 a3 dxc4 Bxc4 Bxc3 bxc3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 e6 d4 b6 d5 Nf6 Nc3 Bb4 Qd4 c5 Qe5 d6 Qg3 exd5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 e6 d4 b6 d5 Nf6 Nc3 Bb4 Qd4 c5 Qe5 d6 Qg3 exd5 Qxg7 Rg8

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 e6 d4 b6 d5 Nf6 Nc3 Bb4 Qd4 c5 Qe5 d6 Qg3 exd5 Qxg7 Rg8 Bb5 Bd7

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Matus Tkac    (2000)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Bc5 Nxc6 Qf6 Qf3 dxc6 Bc4 Qe7 Bf4 Nf6 O-O

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Mateia Benone    (1448)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 h5 d4 g5 Bc4

============

Contributors : Joop Simmelink, Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1448)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 h5 d4 g5 Bc4 h4 Nc3

============

Contributors : Joop Simmelink, Mateia Benone


Matej Pech    (1074)
e4 c5 Bc4 e6 d4 cxd4 Nf3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matus Tkac    (2000)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 d4 g5 h3 h6 Nc3 Bg7

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2000)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 d4 g5 h3 h6 Nc3 Bg7 Qd3 Ne7

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f5 d4 fxe4 Bxc6 dxc6 Nxe5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f5 Nc3 fxe4 Nxe4 Nf6 Bxc6 dxc6 d3 Nxe4 dxe4

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f5 Nc3 fxe4 Nxe4 Nf6 Bxc6 dxc6 d3 Nxe4 dxe4 Qxd1 Kxd1

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Matus Tkac    (2000)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 d4 g5 h3 h6 Nc3 Bg7 Qd3 Ne7 Bd2 Nbc6

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Mateia Benone    (1448)
e3 e5 d4 e4 Nc3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1448)
e3 e5 d4 e4 Nc3 d5 f4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1448)
e3 e5 d4 e4 Nc3 d5 f4 Nf6 Nh3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matus Tkac    (2000)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 d4 g5 h3 h6 Nc3 Bg7 Qd3 Ne7 Bd2 Nbc6 O-O-O Ng6

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f5 d4 fxe4 Bxc6 dxc6 Nxe5 Nf6 Bg5

Transpose to wikichess #68387#

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f5 Nc3 fxe4 Nxe4 d5 Nxe5 dxe4 Qh5 g6

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mateia Benone    (1448)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 Bc4 h6 h4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1448)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 h5 d4 g5 Bc4 h4 O-O d6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1448)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 Bc4 h6 h4 Nf6 Nc3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2149)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Ndb5 d6 Bg5 a6 Na3 b5 Bxf6 gxf6 Nd5 f5 Bd3 Be6 c3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2149)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O Nc3 d6 Nf3 Nc6 O-O a6 Qd3 Bd7 d5 Nb4 Qd1

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Mateia Benone    (1448)
e3 e5 d4 e4 Nc3 d5 f4 Nf6 Nh3 Bb4 Bd2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1448)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 Bc4 h6 h4 Nf6 Nc3 Be7 d4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1448)
e4 c5 Bc4 Nc6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1448)
e4 c5 Bc4 Nc6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 g6 d4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1448)
e4 c5 Bc4 Nc6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 g6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1448)
e4 c5 Bc4 Nc6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 g6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Bg7 Nf3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1448)
e4 c5 Bc4 Nc6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 g6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Bg7 Nf3 O-O O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1448)
e4 c5 Bc4 Nc6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 g6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Bg7 Nf3 O-O O-O d6 Re1

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1448)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 Bc4 h6 h4 Nf6 Nc3 Be7 d4 Bg4 Bxf4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1448)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 Bc4 h6 h4 Nf6 Nc3 Be7 d4 Bg4 Bxf4 Nh5 Be3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matej Pech    (1074)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 Bxc6 bxc6 a3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2149)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Ndb5 d6 Bg5 a6 Na3 b5 Bxf6 gxf6 Nd5 f5 exf5 Bxf5 Bd3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2149)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Ndb5 d6 Bg5 a6 Na3 b5 Bxf6 gxf6 Nd5 f5 exf5 Bxf5 Bd3 Be6 Be4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Mateia Benone    (1448)
e3 e5 d4 e4 Nc3 d5 f4 Nf6 Nh3 Bb4 Bd2 O-O a3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matej Pech    (1074)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 Bxc6 bxc6 a3 d5 exd5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1074)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 Bxc6 bxc6 a3 d5 exd5 cxd5 O-O

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1074)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 e6 g4 Be7 g5 Nfd7 h4 a6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1074)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 e6 g4 Be7 g5 Nfd7 h4 a6 Be3 Nc6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1074)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 Bxc6 bxc6 a3 d5 exd5 cxd5 O-O Nf6 h3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Mateia Benone    (1448)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 Bc4 h6 d4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2149)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Ndb5 d6 Bg5 a6 Na3 b5 Bxf6 gxf6 Nd5 f5 exf5 Bxf5 Bd3 Be6 Be4 Bg7 c3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Mateia Benone    (1448)
e4 e5 f4 d5 exd5 e4 d3 Nf6 dxe4 Nxe4 Qe2 Qxd5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1448)
e3 e5 d4 e4 Nc3 d5 f4 Nf6 Nh3 Bb4 Bd2 O-O a3 Be7 Qe2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1448)
e3 e5 d4 e4 Nc3 d5 f4 Nf6 Nh3 Bb4 Bd2 O-O a3 Be7 Qe2 c5 O-O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matej Pech    (1074)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 Bxc6 bxc6 a3 d5 exd5 cxd5 O-O Nf6 h3 Bd6 d3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f5 Nc3 fxe4 Nxe4 d5 Nxe5 dxe4 Qh5 g6 Nxg6 hxg6

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1557)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f5 Nc3 fxe4 Nxe4 d5 Nxe5 dxe4 Qh5 g6 Nxg6 hxg6 Qxh8 Qd5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2149)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Ndb5 d6 Bg5 a6 Na3 b5 Bxf6 gxf6 Nd5 f5 exf5 Bxf5 Bd3 Be6 Be4 Bg7 c3 O-O Nc2

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2149)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Ndb5 d6 Bg5 a6 Na3 b5 Bxf6 gxf6 Nd5 f5 exf5 Bxf5 Bd3 Be6 Be4 Bg7 c3 O-O Nc2 Rc8 g3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2149)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Ndb5 d6 Bg5 a6 Na3 b5 Bxf6 gxf6 Nd5 f5 exf5 Bxf5 Bd3 Be6 Be4 Bg7 c3 O-O Nc2 Rc8 g3 Ne7 O-O

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matus Tkac    (2000)
e4 c5 Nf3 Qc7 Nc3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2000)
e4 c5 Nf3 Qc7 c3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matej Pech    (1074)
e4 Nf6 e5 Nd5 c4 Nb6 d4 d6 f4 dxe5 fxe5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matus Tkac    (2000)
e4 c5 Nf3 Qc7 Nc3 Nc6 d4

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2000)
e4 c5 Nf3 Qc7 Nc3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2000)
d4 Nf6 g3 c5 d5

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2000)
Nf3 c5 c4 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6

Transpose to wikichess #69185#

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2149)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Ndb5 d6 Bg5 a6 Na3 b5 Bxf6 gxf6 Nd5 f5 exf5 Bxf5 Bd3 Be6 Be4 Bg7 c3 O-O Nc2 Rc8 g3 Ne7 O-O Rc5 Ncb4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matej Pech    (1074)
e4 Nf6 e5 Nd5 c4 Nb6 d4 d6 f4 dxe5 fxe5 Nc6 Be3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1074)
e4 Nf6 e5 Nd5 c4 Nb6 d4 d6 f4 dxe5 fxe5 Nc6 Be3 Bf5 Nc3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2149)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Ndb5 d6 Bg5 a6 Na3 b5 Bxf6 gxf6 Nd5 f5 exf5 Bxf5 Bd3 Be6 Be4 Bg7 c3 O-O Nc2 Rc8 g3 Ne7 O-O Rc5 Ncb4 Nxd5 Bxd5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matej Pech    (1074)
e4 Nf6 e5 Nd5 c4 Nb6 d4 d6 f4 dxe5 fxe5 Nc6 Be3 Bf5 Nc3 e6 Nf3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matus Tkac    (2000)
e4 c5 Nf3 Qc7 c3 Nf6 e5

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2000)
e4 c5 Nf3 Qc7 c3 Nf6 e5 Nd5 c4

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2000)
d4 Nf6 g3 c5 d5 b5 Bg2

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2000)
e4 c5 Nf3 Qc7 c3 Nf6 e5 Nd5 c4 Nb4 Nc3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2000)
e4 c5 Nf3 Qc7 c3 Nf6 e5 Nd5 c4 Nb4 Nc3 N4c6 Nb5

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2000)
d4 Nf6 g3 c5 d5 b5 Bg2 d6 a4

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2000)
e4 c5 Nf3 Qc7 c3 Nf6 e5 Nd5 c4 Nb4 Nc3 N4c6 Nb5 Qa5 Be2

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Mateia Benone    (1448)
e4 e5 f4 d5 exd5 e4 d3 Nf6 dxe4 Nxe4 Qe2 Qxd5 Nd2 f5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1448)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 Bc4 h6 O-O g5 b4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matus Tkac    (2000)
d4 Nf6 g3 c5 d5 b5 Bg2 d6 a4 b4 c4

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Mateia Benone    (1448)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 Bc4 h6 O-O g5 b4 Bg7 d4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1448)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 Bc4 h6 d4 g5 O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matus Tkac    (2000)
d4 Nf6 g3 c5 d5 b5 Bg2 d6 a4 b4 c4 a5 b3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Mateia Benone    (1448)
e4 e5 f4 d5 exd5 e4 d3 Nf6 dxe4 Nxe4 Qe2 Qxd5 Nd2 f5 g3 Bd7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matus Tkac    (2000)
e4 c5 Nf3 Qc7 c3 Nf6 e5 Nd5 c4 Nb4 Nc3 N4c6 Nb5 Qa5 Be2 a6 Nc3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2000)
d4 Nf6 g3 c5 d5 b5 Bg2 d6 a4 b4 c4 a5 b3 Ra7 Bb2

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Mateia Benone    (1448)
e4 e5 f4 d5 exd5 e4 d3 Nf6 dxe4 Nxe4 Qe2 Qxd5 Nd2 f5 g3 Bd7 Bg2 Bc6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matus Tkac    (2000)
d4 Nf6 g3 c5 d5 b5 Bg2 d6 a4 b4 c4 a5 b3 Ra7 Bb2 g6 Nh3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matthew Thompson    (1800)
e4 e6 d4 Qe7 Nf3

============

Contributors : Matthew Thompson


Matthew Thompson    (1800)
e4 e6 d4 Bb4 c3

============

Contributors : Matthew Thompson


Matthew Thompson    (1800)
e4 e6 f4 Qh4 g3

============

Contributors : Matthew Thompson


Matthew Thompson    (1800)
e4 e6 d4 Bb4 c3 Ba5 Nf3

============

Contributors : Matthew Thompson


Matthew Thompson    (1800)
e4 e6 d4 Bb4 c3 Ba5 Nf3 Qf6 Nbd2

============

Contributors : Matthew Thompson


Matthew Thompson    (1800)
e4 e6 f4 Qh4 g3 Qh5 Qxh5

============

Contributors : Matthew Thompson


Matthew Thompson    (1800)
e3 c5 Bc4 d5

============

Contributors : Matthew Thompson


Matthew Thompson    (1800)
e4 e6 d4 Bb4 c3 Ba5 Nf3 Qf6 Nbd2 c6 e5

============

Contributors : Matthew Thompson


Mathieu Bain    (1462)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 f3 Nc6

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1462)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 f3 Nc6 Bb5 Qb6

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1462)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 f3 Nc6 Bb5 Qb6 a4 e5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1462)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 f3 Nc6 Bb5 Qb6 a4 e5 Nxc6 bxc6

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1462)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 f3 Nc6 Bb5 Qb6 a4 e5 Nxc6 bxc6 Bc4 Qb4

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Matthew Thompson    (1800)
e3 c5 Bc4 d5 Bb5 Bd7

============

Contributors : Matthew Thompson


Matthew Thompson    (1800)
e4 e6 d4 Bb4 c3 Ba5 Nf3 Qf6 Nbd2 c6 e5 Qf5 Nc4

============

Contributors : Matthew Thompson


Matthew Thompson    (1800)
e4 e6 f4 Qh4 g3 Qh5 Qxh5 g6 Qd1

============

Contributors : Matthew Thompson


Matthew Thompson    (1800)
e3 Nf6 Qf3 Nc6

============

Contributors : Matthew Thompson


Matej Pech    (1216)
e4 e5 Bc4 Bc5 b4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Carlos Almarza-Mato    (2073)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 e5 Nb3 Be6 f3 Be7 Qd2 O-O O-O-O Nbd7 Kb1 b5

============

Contributors : Carlos Almarza-Mato


Carlos Almarza-Mato    (2073)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 e5 Nb3 Be6 f3 Be7 Qd2 O-O O-O-O Nbd7 Kb1 b5 g4 b4

============

Contributors : Carlos Almarza-Mato


Carlos Almarza-Mato    (2073)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 h3 e5 Nde2 h5 Be3

============

Contributors : Carlos Almarza-Mato


Carlos Almarza-Mato    (2073)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 g3 Bb7 Bg2 Be7 O-O O-O Re1 d5 cxd5 exd5 Nc3 c5 Bf4

============

Contributors : Carlos Almarza-Mato


Carlos Almarza-Mato    (2073)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 Nc6 Bg5 Bd7 Nb3

============

Contributors : Carlos Almarza-Mato


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
e4 e5 Nf3 f5 Nxe5 Qf6 Nc4 fxe4 Qh5 g6

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
e4 e5 Nf3 f5 Nxe5 Qf6 Nc4 fxe4 Qh5 g6 Qe5 Qxe5

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
e4 e5 Nf3 f5 Nxe5 Qf6 Nc4 fxe4 Qh5 g6 Qe5 Qxe5 Nxe5 Nf6

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
e4 e5 Nf3 f5 Nxe5 Qf6 Nc4 fxe4 Qh5 g6 Qe5 Qxe5 Nxe5 Nf6 Bc4 d5

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
e4 e5 Nf3 f5 Nxe5 Qf6 Nc4 fxe4 Qh5 g6 Qe5 Qxe5 Nxe5 Nf6 Bc4 d5 Be2 Nbd7

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 e3 O-O Bd3 d5 cxd5

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 e3 O-O Bd3 d5 cxd5 exd5 Nge2

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 e3 O-O Bd3 d5 cxd5 exd5 Nge2 Re8 Bd2

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 e3 O-O Bd3 d5 cxd5 exd5 Nge2 Re8 Bd2 Ne4 Bxe4

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
e4 c5 Nf3 a6 c3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nxd4 cxd4 e6

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
e4 c5 Nf3 a6 c3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nxd4 cxd4 e6 Bc4 h6

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
e4 c5 Nf3 a6 c3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nxd4 cxd4 e6 Bc4 h6 O-O Be7

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Matej Pech    (1216)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 Bc5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1216)
e4 Nf6 e5 Nd5 Nf3 d6 exd6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1216)
e4 Nf6 e5 Nd5 Nf3 d6 exd6 cxd6 h3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Carlos Almarza-Mato    (2073)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 g3 Bb7 Bg2 Be7 O-O O-O Re1 d5 cxd5 exd5 Nc3 c5 Bf4 Nbd7 dxc5

============

Contributors : Carlos Almarza-Mato


Carlos Almarza-Mato    (2073)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 Nc6 Bg5 Bd7 Nb3 h6 Bxf6

============

Contributors : Carlos Almarza-Mato


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
e4 c5 Nf3 a6 c3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nxd4 cxd4 e6 Bc4 h6 O-O Be7 Qf3 Qc7

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
b3 e5 Bb2 Nc6 Nf3 e4 Nd4

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Carlos Almarza-Mato    (2073)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 Nc6 Bg5 Bd7 Nb3 h6 Bxf6 gxf6 Qd3

============

Contributors : Carlos Almarza-Mato


Carlos Almarza-Mato    (2073)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 g3 Bb7 Bg2 Be7 O-O O-O Re1 d5 cxd5 exd5 Nc3 c5 Bf4 Nbd7 dxc5 Bxc5 Rc1

============

Contributors : Carlos Almarza-Mato


Carlos Almarza-Mato    (2073)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 e5 Nb3 Be6 f3 Be7 Qd2 O-O O-O-O Nbd7 Kb1 b5 g4 b4 Ne2 a5

============

Contributors : Carlos Almarza-Mato


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 Bg4 Be2

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Carlos Almarza-Mato    (2073)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 e5 Nb3 Be6 f3 Be7 Qd2 O-O O-O-O Nbd7 Kb1 b5 g4 b4 Ne2 a5 g5 Ne8

============

Contributors : Carlos Almarza-Mato


Carlos Almarza-Mato    (2073)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 Nc6 Bg5 Bd7 Nb3 h6 Bxf6 gxf6 Qd3 Qc8 O-O-O

============

Contributors : Carlos Almarza-Mato


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
b3 e5 Bb2 Nc6 Nf3 e4 Nd4 Qf6 e3

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Matias Remus    (1822)
d4 Nf6 c4 c5 d5 g6

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Carlos Almarza-Mato    (2073)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 g3 Bb7 Bg2 Be7 O-O O-O Re1 d5 cxd5 exd5 Nc3 c5 Bf4 Nbd7 dxc5 Bxc5 Rc1 Ne4 Nxe4

============

Contributors : Carlos Almarza-Mato


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 Bg4 Be2 Nc6 d5

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
b3 e5 Bb2 Nc6 Nf3 e4 Nd4 Qf6 e3 Bc5 c3

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Carlos Almarza-Mato    (2073)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 g3 Bb7 Bg2 Be7 O-O O-O Re1 d5 cxd5 exd5 Nc3 c5 Bf4 Nbd7 dxc5 Bxc5 Rc1 Ne4 Nxe4 dxe4 Nd4

============

Contributors : Carlos Almarza-Mato


Carlos Almarza-Mato    (2073)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 Nc6 Bg5 Bd7 Nb3 h6 Bxf6 gxf6 Qd3 Qc8 O-O-O f5 Qe3

============

Contributors : Carlos Almarza-Mato


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 Bb5 Nd4 Bc4

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 Bg4 Be2 Nc6 d5 Nb4 a3

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Carlos Almarza-Mato    (2073)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 Nc6 Bg5 Bd7 Nb3 h6 Bxf6 gxf6 Qd3 Qc8 O-O-O f5 Qe3 Bg7 exf5

============

Contributors : Carlos Almarza-Mato


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 Bb5 Nd4 Bc4 Nf6 Nge2

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
b3 e5 Bb2 Nc6 Nf3 e4 Nd4 Qf6 e3 Bc5 c3 Nge7 Nxc6

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 Bg4 Be2 Nc6 d5 Nb4 a3 Qa5 Bd2

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Carlos Almarza-Mato    (2073)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 Nc6 Bg5 Bd7 Nb3 h6 Bxf6 gxf6 Qd3 Qc8 O-O-O f5 Qe3 Bg7 exf5 Kf8 f6

============

Contributors : Carlos Almarza-Mato


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 Bb5 Nd4 Bc4 Nf6 Nge2 b5 Nxd4

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
b3 e5 Bb2 Nc6 Nf3 e4 Nd4 Qf6 e3 Bc5 c3 Nge7 Nxc6 Nxc6 d4

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Carlos Almarza-Mato    (2073)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 g3 Bb7 Bg2 Be7 O-O O-O Re1 d5 cxd5 exd5 Nc3 c5 Bf4 Nbd7 dxc5 Bxc5 Rc1 Ne4 Nxe4 dxe4 Nd4 Nf6 Nb5

============

Contributors : Carlos Almarza-Mato


Carlos Almarza-Mato    (2073)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 Nc6 Bg5 Bd7 Nb3 h6 Bxf6 gxf6 Qd3 Qc8 O-O-O f5 Qe3 Bg7 exf5 Kf8 f6 Bxf6 Nd5

============

Contributors : Carlos Almarza-Mato


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
b3 e5 Bb2 Nc6 Nf3 e4 Nd4 Qf6 e3 Bc5 c3 Nge7 Nxc6 Nxc6 d4 exd3 Bxd3

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Matias Remus    (1822)
d4 d5 c4 Nc6 Nf3 Bg4 Nc3 e6 Bf4 Bd6

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Carlos Almarza-Mato    (2073)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 Nc6 Bg5 Bd7 Nb3 h6 Bxf6 gxf6 Qd3 Qc8 O-O-O f5 Qe3 Bg7 exf5 Kf8 f6 Bxf6 Nd5 Bg7 Kb1

============

Contributors : Carlos Almarza-Mato


Carlos Almarza-Mato    (2073)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 g3 Bb7 Bg2 Be7 O-O O-O Re1 d5 cxd5 exd5 Nc3 c5 Bf4 Nbd7 dxc5 Bxc5 Rc1 Ne4 Nxe4 dxe4 Nd4 Nf6 Nb5 Qe7 Bd6

============

Contributors : Carlos Almarza-Mato


Matias Remus    (1822)
d4 d5 c4 Nc6 Nf3 Bg4 Nc3 e6 Bf4 Bd6 Bg3 Nf6

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matias Remus    (1822)
d4 d5 c4 Nc6 Nf3 Bg4 Nc3 e6 Bf4 Bd6 Bg3 Nf6 e3 Na5

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Carlos Almarza-Mato    (2073)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 g3 Bb7 Bg2 Be7 O-O O-O Re1 d5 cxd5 exd5 Nc3 c5 Bf4 Nbd7 dxc5 Bxc5 Rc1 Ne4 Nxe4 dxe4 Nd4 Nf6 Nb5 Qe7 Bd6 Bxd6 Qxd6

============

Contributors : Carlos Almarza-Mato


Carlos Almarza-Mato    (2073)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nc6 Nc3 Qc7 Be3 a6 Qd2 Nf6 O-O-O Be7 f3

============

Contributors : Carlos Almarza-Mato


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 Bg4 Be2 Nc6 d5 Nb4 a3 Qa5 Bd2 Nf6 Nh4

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Matias Remus    (1822)
d4 d5 c4 Nc6 Nf3 Bg4 Nc3 e6 Bf4 Bd6 Bg3 Nf6 e3 Na5 Qa4 Nc6

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Carlos Almarza-Mato    (2073)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O h3 Bb7 d3 d6 a3 Qd7 Nc3 Rfe8

============

Contributors : Carlos Almarza-Mato


Matias Remus    (1822)
d4 d5 c4 Nc6 Nf3 Bg4 Nc3 e6 Bf4 Bd6 Bg3 Nf6 e3 Na5 Qa4 Nc6 Ne5 Qd7

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Carlos Almarza-Mato    (2073)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O h3 Bb7 d3 d6 a3 Qd7 Nc3 Rfe8 Ne2 d5

============

Contributors : Carlos Almarza-Mato


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 Bg4 Be2 Nc6 d5 Nb4 a3 Qa5 Bd2 Nf6 Nh4 Bxe2 Qxe2

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 Qc2 O-O e4 Nc6 e5

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
e4 e5 Nf3 d6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 Be7 Be2 O-O O-O c5

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 Bb5 Nd4 Bc4 Nf6 Nge2 b5 Nxd4 bxc4 Ndb5

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 Qc2 O-O e4 Nc6 e5 Ng4 Nf3

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Carlos Almarza-Mato    (2073)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 Nc6 Bg5 Bd7 Nb3 h6 Bxf6 gxf6 Qd3 Qc8 O-O-O f5 Qe3 Bg7 exf5 Kf8 f6 Bxf6 Nd5 Bg7 Kb1 h5 Bb5

============

Contributors : Carlos Almarza-Mato


Carlos Almarza-Mato    (2073)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O h3 Bb7 d3 d6 a3 Qd7 Nc3 Rfe8 Ne2 d5 exd5 Nxd5

============

Contributors : Carlos Almarza-Mato


Carlos Almarza-Mato    (2073)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 d6 O-O Bd7 c3 Nf6

============

Contributors : Carlos Almarza-Mato


Matej Pech    (1216)
e4 Nf6 e5 Nd5 Nf3 d6 exd6 cxd6 h3 Nc6 Bb5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Carlos Almarza-Mato    (2073)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 Nc6 Bg5 Bd7 Nb3 h6 Bxf6 gxf6 Qd3 Qc8 O-O-O f5 Qe3 Bg7 exf5 Kf8 f6 Bxf6 Nd5 Bg7 Kb1 h5 Bb5 Qd8 Rhe1

============

Contributors : Carlos Almarza-Mato


Matej Pech    (1216)
d4 f5 e4 fxe4 Nc3 Nf6 f3 d5 Bg5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1216)
e4 Nf6 e5 Nd5 Nf3 d6 exd6 cxd6 h3 Nc6 Bb5 Nc7 Nd4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1216)
e4 Nf6 e5 Nd5 Nf3 d6 exd6 cxd6 h3 Nc6 Bb5 Nc7 Nd4 Nxb5 Nxb5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1216)
d4 f5 e4 fxe4 Nc3 Nf6 f3 d5 Bg5 Nc6 Bb5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1216)
e4 Nf6 e5 Nd5 Nf3 d6 exd6 cxd6 h3 Nc6 Bb5 Nc7 Nd4 Nxb5 Nxb5 e5 O-O

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1216)
d4 f5 e4 fxe4 Nc3 Nf6 f3 d5 Bg5 Nc6 Bb5 Qd6 Bxc6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1216)
d4 f5 e4 fxe4 Nc3 Nf6 f3 d5 Bg5 Nc6 Bb5 Qd6 Bxc6 Qxc6 Bxf6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Carlos Almarza-Mato    (2073)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 d6 O-O Bd7 c3 Nf6 d4 Be7

============

Contributors : Carlos Almarza-Mato


Matej Pech    (1216)
d4 f5 e4 fxe4 Nc3 Nf6 f3 d5 Bg5 Nc6 Bb5 Qd6 Bxc6 Qxc6 Bxf6 exf6 Qe2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
e4 e5 Nf3 d6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 Be7 Be2 O-O O-O c5 Nf3 Nc6

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 Bb5 Nd4 Bc4 Nf6 Nge2 b5 Nxd4 bxc4 Ndb5 Ba6 Qe2

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
e4 e5 Nf3 f5 d3 Nc6 Nc3 Nf6

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
e4 e5 Nf3 d6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 Be7 Be2 O-O O-O c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bf4 Be6

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
e4 e5 Nf3 f5 d3 Nc6 Nc3 Nf6 d4 exd4

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
e4 e5 Nf3 f5 d3 Nc6 Nc3 Nf6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nxd4

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 Qc2 O-O e4 Nc6 e5 Ng4 Nf3 Bxc3 bxc3

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 Bb5 Nd4 Bc4 Nf6 Nge2 b5 Nxd4 bxc4 Ndb5 Ba6 Qe2 Bxb5 Nxb5

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 Qc2 O-O e4 Nc6 e5 Ng4 Nf3 Bxc3 bxc3 f5 h3

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
e4 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qa5 d4 c6 Bd3 Nf6

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Matias Remus    (1822)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 Nf3 Nf6 e3 Bg4 Bxc4 e6 h3 Bh5

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
e4 e5 Nf3 f5 d3 Nc6 Nc3 Nf6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nxd4 Qxd4 c5

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
e4 e5 Nf3 f5 d3 Nc6 Nc3 Nf6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nxd4 Qxd4 c5 Qe5 Be7

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Matej Pech    (1236)
e4 e5 f4 Bc5 Nf3 d6 fxe5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
e4 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qa5 d4 c6 Bd3 Nf6 Nge2 Bg4

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
e4 e5 Nf3 f5 d3 Nc6 Nc3 Nf6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nxd4 Qxd4 c5 Qe5 Be7 Qxf5 d5

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
b4 a6 Nf3

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
e4 e6 d4 d5 exd5 exd5 c4 Nf6 Nc3 Be7 b3 O-O

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
e4 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qa5 d4 c6 Bd3 Nf6 Nge2 Bg4 O-O e6

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 g3 Nf6 Bg2

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
e4 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qa5 d4 c6 Bd3 Nf6 Nge2 Bg4 O-O e6 f3 Bh5

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
e4 e6 d4 d5 exd5 exd5 c4 Nf6 Nc3 Be7 b3 O-O Bd3 Re8

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Matias Remus    (1822)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 Nf3 Nf6 e3 Bg4 Bxc4 e6 h3 Bh5 Nc3 a6

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 g3 Nf6 Bg2 e5 Nge2

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
e4 e6 d4 d5 exd5 exd5 c4 Nf6 Nc3 Be7 b3 O-O Bd3 Re8 Nh3 Bb4

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
b4 e5 Bb2 f6 b5 a6 e4

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
b4 a6 Nf3 Nc6 d4

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
e4 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qa5 d4 c6 Bd3 Nf6 Nge2 Bg4 O-O e6 f3 Bh5 Bd2 Nbd7

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
b4 e5 Bb2 f6 b5 a6 a4

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
e4 e6 d4 d5 exd5 exd5 c4 Nf6 Nc3 Be7 b3 O-O Bd3 Re8 Nh3 Bb4 Be2 Bxc3

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
b4 e5 e4 Nf6

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
b4 e5 e4 Nf6 Nc3 Bxb4

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
b4 a6 Nf3 Nc6 d4 d5 c3

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
b4 e5 Bb2 f6 b5 a6 e4 Bc5 Nf3

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Matej Pech    (1216)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Nf3 Bg7 Be2 O-O O-O Nbd7 e5 dxe5 dxe5 Ne8

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
b4 e5 e4 Nf6 Nc3 Bxb4 Bb2 d6

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
b4 a6 Nf3 Nc6 d4 d5 c3 a5 b5

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Gergely Matisz    (1470)
b4 e5 Bb2 Bxb4 Bxe5 Nf6 c4 d5 cxd5

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
b4 e5 Bb2 f6 b5 a6 a4 axb5 axb5

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
b4 e5 e4 Nf6 Nc3 Bxb4 Bb2 d6 a3 Ba5

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 g3 Nf6 Bg2 e5 Nge2 d6 h3

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
b4 e5 Bb2 f6 b5 a6 e4 Bc5 Nf3 axb5 d4

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
b4 a6 Nf3 Nc6 d4 d5 c3 a5 b5 Na7 e4

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 h3 Nf6 a3

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 h3 Nf6 a3 e5 Bc4

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
b4 a6 Nf3 Nc6 d4 d5 c3 a5 b5 Na7 e4 dxe4 Ne5

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
b4 e5 Bb2 f6 b5 a6 e4 Bc5 Nf3 axb5 d4 Bb6 Bxb5

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 g3 Nf6 Bg2 e5 Nge2 d6 h3 Be6 O-O

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
b4 e5 Bb2 f6 b5 a6 e4 Bc5 Nf3 axb5 d4 Bb6 Bxb5 Nc6 dxe5

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
b4 e5 Bb2 f6 b5 a6 e4 Bc5 Nf3 axb5 d4 Bb6 Bxb5 Nc6 dxe5 fxe5 Bxc6

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
b4 e5 e4 Nf6 Nc3 Bxb4 Bb2 d6 a3 Ba5 Bc4 O-O

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 h3 Nf6 a3 e5 Bc4 Be6 Bxe6

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
b4 e5 e4 Nf6 Nc3 Bxb4 Bb2 d6 a3 Ba5 Bc4 O-O Nf3 Bg4

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 h3 Nf6 a3 e5 Bc4 Be6 Bxe6 fxe6 O-O

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
b4 e5 e4 Nf6 Nc3 Bxb4 Bb2 d6 a3 Ba5 Bc4 O-O Nf3 Bg4 h3 Bd7

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
b4 e5 Bb2 f6 b5 a6 a4 axb5 axb5 Rxa1 Bxa1

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 h3 Nf6 a3 e5 Bc4 Be6 Bxe6 fxe6 O-O Nxe4 d3

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 h3 Nf6 a3 e5 Bc4 Be6 Bxe6 fxe6 O-O Nxe4 d3 Nf6 Bg5

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Matias Remus    (1822)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 Nf3 Nf6 e3 Bg4 Bxc4 e6 h3 Bh5 Nc3 a6 g4 Bg6

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Gergely Matisz    (1470)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 g3 Ba6 Qa4 Bb7 Bg2 c5 O-O cxd4 Nxd4 Bxg2 Kxg2 Qc7

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Matej Pech    (1236)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 e3 Bf5 Nc3 e6 Nh4 Be4 f3 Bg6 Qb3 Qc7 g4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1216)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Nf3 Bg7 Be2 O-O O-O Nbd7 e5 dxe5 dxe5 Ne8 e6 fxe6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Gergely Matisz    (1470)
b4 e5 Bb2 Bxb4 Bxe5 Nf6 c4 d5 cxd5 O-O a3

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Matias Remus    (1822)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 Nf6 Bd3 Nb4 O-O

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matias Remus    (1822)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 Nf3 Nf6 e3 Bg4 Bxc4 e6 h3 Bh5 Nc3 a6 g4 Bg6 Ne5 Nbd7

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matias Remus    (1822)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 Nf6 Bd3 Nb4 O-O Nxd3 Qxd3

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
b4 e5 e4 Nf6 Nc3 Bxb4 Bb2 d6 a3 Ba5 Bc4 O-O Nf3 Bg4 h3 Bd7 O-O a6

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 g3 Nf6 Bg2 e5 Nge2 d6 h3 Be6 O-O d5 exd5

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 g6 Bc4 e6

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2152)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O b5 Bb3 Bb7 Re1 Bc5 c3 d6 d4 Bb6 a4

Transpose to wikichess #32564#

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2152)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 g3 e5 Nde2 Be7 Bg2

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matias Remus    (1822)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 Nf6 Bd3 Nb4 O-O Nxd3 Qxd3 dxe4 Nxe4

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
b4 e5 Bb2 f6 b5 a6 a4 axb5 axb5 Rxa1 Bxa1 c6 e3

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2152)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 g3 e5 Nde2 Be7 Bg2 O-O O-O

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matias Remus    (1822)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 Nf6 Bd3 Nb4 O-O Nxd3 Qxd3 dxe4 Nxe4 Be7 Bg5

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2152)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 g3 e5 Nde2 Be7 Bg2 O-O O-O Be6 h3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matias Remus    (1822)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nd2 Be7 Bd3 c5 dxc5

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2152)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 g3 e5 Nde2 Be7 Bg2 O-O O-O Be6 h3 Nbd7 g4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2152)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 g3 e5 Nde2 Be7 Bg2 O-O O-O Be6 h3 Nbd7 g4 Nb6 b3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2152)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 g3 e5 Nde2 Be7 Bg2 O-O O-O Be6 h3 Nbd7 g4 Nb6 b3 d5 exd5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Gergely Matisz    (1470)
b4 e5 Bb2 Bxb4 Bxe5 Nf6 c4 d5 cxd5 O-O a3 Nbd7 Bb2

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Matias Remus    (1822)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nd2 Be7 Bd3 c5 dxc5 Nf6 Qe2

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2152)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 g3 e5 Nde2 Be7 Bg2 O-O O-O Be6 h3 Nbd7 g4 Nb6 b3 d5 exd5 Nbxd5 Nxd5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 e5 Nb3 Bg4 Be2

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2152)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 g3 e5 Nde2 Be7 Bg2 O-O O-O Be6 h3 Nbd7 g4 Nb6 b3 d5 exd5 Nbxd5 Nxd5 Bxd5 Ng3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 e5 Nb3 Bg4 Be2 Bxe2 Qxe2

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2152)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 g3 e5 Nde2 Be7 Bg2 O-O O-O Be6 h3 Nbd7 g4 Nb6 b3 d5 exd5 Nbxd5 Nxd5 Bxd5 Ng3 Bxg2 Qxd8

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Gergely Matisz    (1470)
b4 e5 Bb2 Bxb4 Bxe5 Nf6 c4 d5 cxd5 O-O a3 Nbd7 Bb2 Ba5 e3

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1470)
b4 e5 Bb2 Bxb4 Bxe5 Nf6 c4 d5 cxd5 O-O a3 Nbd7 Bb2 Ba5 e3 Nc5 Nf3

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Matej Pech    (1236)
b4 c6 Bb2 d5 d4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2152)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 g3 e5 Nde2 Be7 Bg2 O-O O-O Be6 h3 Nbd7 g4 Nb6 b3 d5 exd5 Nbxd5 Nxd5 Bxd5 Ng3 Bxg2 Qxd8 Rfxd8 Kxg2

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2152)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 g3 e5 Nde2 Be7 Bg2 O-O O-O Be6 h3 Nbd7 g4 Nb6 b3 d5 exd5 Nbxd5 Nxd5 Bxd5 Ng3 Bxg2 Qxd8 Rfxd8 Kxg2 Nd5 Ne4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2152)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 g3 e5 Nde2 Be7 Bg2 O-O O-O Be6 h3 Nbd7 g4 Nb6 b3 d5 exd5 Nbxd5 Nxd5 Bxd5 Ng3 Bxg2 Qxd8 Rfxd8 Kxg2 Nd5 Ne4 b5 c4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matias Remus    (1822)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nd2 Be7 Bd3 c5 dxc5 Nf6 Qe2 Nc6 Ngf3

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Azaz Mathakiya    (1400)
b4 a6 Nf3 Nc6 d4 d5 c3 a5 b5 Na7 e4 dxe4 Ne5 Be6 Be2

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Matej Pech    (1236)
b4 c6 Bb2 d5 d4 Bf5 h3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e6 e3 Nbd7 Bd3 dxc4 Bxc4 b5 Bd3 Bd6 O-O O-O Qc2 Bb7

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nc6 Nc3 Qc7 Be3 a6 Qd2 Nf6 O-O-O Bb4 f3 Ne5 g4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nc6 Nc3 Qc7 Be3 a6 Qd2 Nf6 O-O-O Bb4 f3 Ne5 g4 h6 h4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e6 e3 Nbd7 Bd3 dxc4 Bxc4 b5 Bd3 Bd6 O-O O-O Qc2 Bb7 a3 Rc8

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nc6 Nc3 Qc7 Be3 a6 Qd2 Nf6 O-O-O Bb4 f3 Ne5 g4 h6 h4 d5 Bf4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nc6 Nc3 Qc7 Be3 a6 Qd2 Nf6 O-O-O Bb4 f3 Ne5 g4 h6 h4 d5 Bf4 Bxc3 bxc3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nc6 Nc3 Qc7 Be3 a6 Qd2 Nf6 O-O-O Bb4 f3 Ne5 g4 h6 h4 d5 Bf4 Bxc3 bxc3 Qd6 Qh2

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nc6 Nc3 Qc7 Be3 a6 Qd2 Nf6 O-O-O Bb4 f3 Ne5 g4 h6 h4 d5 Bf4 Bxc3 bxc3 Qd6 Qh2 Qa3 Kb1

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nc6 Nc3 Qc7 Be3 a6 Qd2 Nf6 O-O-O Bb4 f3 Ne5 g4 h6 h4 d5 Bf4 Bxc3 bxc3 Qd6 Qh2 Qa3 Kb1 Nc6 Nxc6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nc6 Nc3 Qc7 Be3 a6 Qd2 Nf6 O-O-O Bb4 f3 Ne5 g4 h6 h4 d5 Bf4 Bxc3 bxc3 Qd6 Qh2 Qa3 Kb1 Nc6 Nxc6 bxc6 Bd6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nc6 Nc3 Qc7 Be3 a6 Qd2 Nf6 O-O-O Bb4 f3 Ne5 g4 h6 h4 d5 Bf4 Bxc3 bxc3 Qd6 Qh2 Qa3 Kb1 Nc6 Nxc6 bxc6 Bd6 Qxc3 Rd3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nc6 Nc3 Qc7 Be3 a6 Qd2 Nf6 O-O-O Bb4 f3 Ne5 g4 h6 h4 d5 Bf4 Bxc3 bxc3 Qd6 Qh2 Qa3 Kb1 Nc6 Nxc6 bxc6 Bd6 Qxc3 Rd3 Qe1 Kb2

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e6 e3 Nbd7 Bd3 dxc4 Bxc4 b5 Bd3 Bd6 O-O O-O Qc2 Bb7 a3 Rc8 b4 c5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e6 e3 Nbd7 Bd3 dxc4 Bxc4 b5 Bd3 Bd6 O-O O-O Qc2 Bb7 a3 Rc8 b4 c5 bxc5 Bxf3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e6 e3 Nbd7 Bd3 dxc4 Bxc4 b5 Bd3 Bd6 O-O O-O Qc2 Bb7 a3 Rc8 b4 c5 bxc5 Bxf3 cxd6 Nd5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2162)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O Be2 e5 O-O Nc6 d5 Ne7 Ne1 Nd7 Be3 f5 f3 f4 Bf2 g5 Rc1 Ng6 c5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2162)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O Be2 e5 O-O Nc6 d5 Ne7 Ne1 Nd7 Be3 f5 f3 f4 Bf2 g5 Rc1 Ng6 c5 Nxc5 b4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e6 e3 Nbd7 Bd3 dxc4 Bxc4 b5 Bd3 Bd6 O-O O-O Qc2 Bb7 a3 Rc8 b4 c5 bxc5 Bxf3 cxd6 Nd5 gxf3 Nxc3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2162)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O Be2 e5 O-O Nc6 d5 Ne7 Ne1 Nd7 Be3 f5 f3 f4 Bf2 g5 Rc1 Ng6 c5 Nxc5 b4 Na6 Nb5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e6 e3 Nbd7 Bd3 dxc4 Bxc4 b5 Bd3 Bd6 O-O O-O Qc2 Bb7 a3 Rc8 b4 c5 bxc5 Bxf3 cxd6 Nd5 gxf3 Nxc3 f4 Nf6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2162)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O Be2 e5 O-O Nc6 d5 Ne7 Ne1 Nd7 Be3 f5 f3 f4 Bf2 g5 Rc1 Ng6 c5 Nxc5 b4 Na6 Nb5 Bd7 Nxa7

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e6 e3 Nbd7 Bd3 dxc4 Bxc4 b5 Bd3 Bd6 O-O O-O Qc2 Bb7 a3 Rc8 b4 c5 bxc5 Bxf3 cxd6 Nd5 gxf3 Nxc3 f4 Nf6 Qb2 a6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e6 e3 Nbd7 Bd3 dxc4 Bxc4 b5 Bd3 Bd6 O-O O-O Qc2 Bb7 a3 Rc8 b4 c5 bxc5 Bxf3 cxd6 Nd5 gxf3 Nxc3 f4 Nf6 Qb2 a6 Bd2 Na4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2162)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 a3 Bb7 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qc2 Nxc3 bxc3 Nd7 e4 c5 Bd3 Qc7

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e6 e3 Nbd7 Bd3 dxc4 Bxc4 b5 Bd3 Bd6 O-O O-O Qc2 Bb7 a3 Rc8 b4 c5 bxc5 Bxf3 cxd6 Nd5 gxf3 Nxc3 f4 Nf6 Qb2 a6 Bd2 Na4 Qb1 Qd7

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 d5 e3 c5 Nd2 Nxd2 Qxd2

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 d5 e3 c5 Nd2 Nxd2 Qxd2 Nc6 Nf3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 d5 e3 c5 Nd2 Nxd2 Qxd2 Nc6 Nf3 cxd4 exd4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2162)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 a3 Bb7 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qc2 Nxc3 bxc3 Nd7 e4 c5 Bd3 Qc7 Qa2 Rc8

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 d5 e3 c5 Nd2 Nxd2 Qxd2 Nc6 Nf3 cxd4 exd4 Bf5 Ne5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 d5 e3 c5 Nd2 Nxd2 Qxd2 Nc6 Nf3 cxd4 exd4 Bf5 Ne5 Qb6 c3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2162)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 a3 Bb7 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qc2 Nxc3 bxc3 Nd7 e4 c5 Bd3 Qc7 Qa2 Rc8 O-O Be7

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2162)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O Be2 e5 O-O Nc6 d5 Ne7 Ne1 Nd7 Be3 f5 f3 f4 Bf2 g5 Rc1 Ng6 c5 Nxc5 b4 Na6 Nb5 Bd7 Nxa7 Rf7 Nb5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2162)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 a3 Bb7 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qc2 Nxc3 bxc3 Nd7 e4 c5 Bd3 Qc7 Qa2 Rc8 O-O Be7 Qe2 O-O

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2162)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O Be2 e5 O-O Nc6 d5 Ne7 Ne1 Nd7 Be3 f5 f3 f4 Bf2 g5 Rc1 Ng6 c5 Nxc5 b4 Na6 Nb5 Bd7 Nxa7 Rf7 Nb5 h5 a4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 c5 d5 b5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2162)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 a3 Bb7 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qc2 Nxc3 bxc3 Nd7 e4 c5 Bd3 Qc7 Qa2 Rc8 O-O Be7 Qe2 O-O Bd2 Rfd8

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 c5 d5 b5 cxb5 Bg7

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 d5 e3 c5 Nd2 Nxd2 Qxd2 Nc6 Nf3 cxd4 exd4 Bf5 Ne5 Qb6 c3 e6 Bd3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 c5 d5 b5 cxb5 Bg7 Nc3 O-O

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 c5 d5 b5 cxb5 Bg7 Nc3 O-O Bg2 d6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 d5 e3 c5 Nd2 Nxd2 Qxd2 Nc6 Nf3 cxd4 exd4 Bf5 Ne5 Qb6 c3 e6 Bd3 Nxe5 Bxe5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2162)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 a3 Bb7 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qc2 Nxc3 bxc3 Nd7 e4 c5 Bd3 Qc7 Qa2 Rc8 O-O Be7 Qe2 O-O Bd2 Rfd8 Rfe1 e5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 c5 d5 b5 cxb5 Bg7 Nc3 O-O Bg2 d6 Nf3 a6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 d5 e3 c5 Nd2 Nxd2 Qxd2 Nc6 Nf3 cxd4 exd4 Bf5 Ne5 Qb6 c3 e6 Bd3 Nxe5 Bxe5 Bxd3 Qxd3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 c5 d5 b5 cxb5 Bg7 Nc3 O-O Bg2 d6 Nf3 a6 bxa6 Nbd7

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 c6 Nf3 d5 b3 Bg7

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 d5 e3 c5 Nd2 Nxd2 Qxd2 Nc6 Nf3 cxd4 exd4 Bf5 Ne5 Qb6 c3 e6 Bd3 Nxe5 Bxe5 Bxd3 Qxd3 f6 Bf4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2162)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 a3 Bb7 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qc2 Nxc3 bxc3 Nd7 e4 c5 Bd3 Qc7 Qa2 Rc8 O-O Be7 Qe2 O-O Bd2 Rfd8 Rfe1 e5 d5 c4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2162)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 a3 Bb7 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qc2 Nxc3 bxc3 Nd7 e4 c5 Bd3 Qc7 Qa2 Rc8 O-O Be7 Qe2 O-O Bd2 Rfd8 Rfe1 e5 d5 c4 Bc2 Ba6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 d5 e3 c5 Nd2 Nxd2 Qxd2 Nc6 Nf3 cxd4 exd4 Bf5 Ne5 Qb6 c3 e6 Bd3 Nxe5 Bxe5 Bxd3 Qxd3 f6 Bf4 Bd6 Bxd6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 c6 Nf3 d5 b3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2162)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 a3 Bb7 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qc2 Nxc3 bxc3 Nd7 e4 c5 Bd3 Qc7 Qa2 Rc8 O-O Be7 Qe2 O-O Bd2 Rfd8 Rfe1 e5 d5 c4 Bc2 Ba6 Rf1 Nc5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2162)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 a3 Bb7 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qc2 Nxc3 bxc3 Nd7 e4 c5 Bd3 Qc7 Qa2 Rc8 O-O Be7 Qe2 O-O Bd2 Rfd8 Rfe1 e5 d5 c4 Bc2 Ba6 Rf1 Nc5 g4 h6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 c6 Nf3 d5 b3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O O-O dxc4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 d5 e3 c5 Nd2 Nxd2 Qxd2 Nc6 Nf3 cxd4 exd4 Bf5 Ne5 Qb6 c3 e6 Bd3 Nxe5 Bxe5 Bxd3 Qxd3 f6 Bf4 Bd6 Bxd6 Qxd6 O-O

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 d5 e3 c5 Nd2 Nxd2 Qxd2 Nc6 Nf3 cxd4 exd4 Bf5 Ne5 Qb6 c3 e6 Bd3 Nxe5 Bxe5 Bxd3 Qxd3 f6 Bf4 Bd6 Bxd6 Qxd6 O-O O-O f4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 d5 e3 c5 Nd2 Nxd2 Qxd2 Nc6 Nf3 cxd4 exd4 Bf5 Ne5 Qb6 c3 e6 Bd3 Nxe5 Bxe5 Bxd3 Qxd3 f6 Bf4 Bd6 Bxd6 Qxd6 O-O O-O f4 Rae8 Rae1

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 c6 Nf3 d5 b3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O O-O dxc4 bxc4 c5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 c6 Nf3 d5 b3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O O-O dxc4 bxc4 c5 Bb2 Qb6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 d5 e3 c5 Nd2 Nxd2 Qxd2 Nc6 Nf3 cxd4 exd4 Bf5 Ne5 Qb6 c3 e6 Bd3 Nxe5 Bxe5 Bxd3 Qxd3 f6 Bf4 Bd6 Bxd6 Qxd6 O-O O-O f4 Rae8 Rae1 Re7 h4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 c6 Nf3 d5 b3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O O-O dxc4 bxc4 c5 Bb2 Qb6 Qb3 Ne4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 g3 Be7

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 g3 Be7 Bg2 d5

Transpose to wikichess #1393#

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 c6 Nf3 d5 b3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O O-O dxc4 bxc4 c5 Bb2 Qb6 Qb3 Ne4 e3 Nc6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 c6 Nf3 d5 b3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O O-O dxc4 bxc4 c5 Bb2 Qb6 Qb3 Ne4 e3 Nc6 Ne5 Nd6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 c6 Nf3 d5 b3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O O-O dxc4 bxc4 c5 Bb2 Qb6 Qb3 Ne4 e3 Nc6 Ne5 Nd6 Nxc6 bxc6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 c6 Nf3 d5 b3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O O-O dxc4 bxc4 c5 Bb2 Qb6 Qb3 Ne4 e3 Nc6 Ne5 Nd6 Nxc6 bxc6 dxc5 Qxc5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 c6 Nf3 d5 b3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O O-O dxc4 bxc4 c5 Bb2 Qb6 Qb3 Ne4 e3 Nc6 Ne5 Nd6 Nxc6 bxc6 dxc5 Qxc5 Bxg7 Kxg7

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 c6 Nf3 d5 b3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O O-O dxc4 bxc4 c5 Bb2 Qb6 Qb3 Ne4 e3 Nc6 Ne5 Nd6 Nxc6 bxc6 dxc5 Qxc5 Bxg7 Kxg7 Nd2 Be6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 c6 Nf3 d5 b3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O O-O dxc4 bxc4 c5 Bb2 Qb6 Qb3 Ne4 e3 Nc6 Ne5 Nd6 Nxc6 bxc6 dxc5 Qxc5 Bxg7 Kxg7 Nd2 Be6 Rfc1 Rab8

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 f3 e5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 f3 e5 dxe5 Nh5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 f3 e5 dxe5 Nh5 Nh3 Nc6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 f3 e5 dxe5 Nh5 Nh3 Nc6 Bg5 Be7

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 f3 e5 dxe5 Nh5 Nh3 Nc6 Bg5 Be7 Bxe7 Qxe7

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 c6 Nf3 d5 b3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O O-O dxc4 bxc4 c5 Bb2 Qb6 Qb3 Ne4 e3 Nc6 Ne5 Nd6 Nxc6 bxc6 dxc5 Qxc5 Bxg7 Kxg7 Nd2 Be6 Rfc1 Rab8 Qc3 f6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 c6 Nf3 d5 b3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O O-O dxc4 bxc4 c5 Bb2 Qb6 Qb3 Ne4 e3 Nc6 Ne5 Nd6 Nxc6 bxc6 dxc5 Qxc5 Bxg7 Kxg7 Nd2 Be6 Rfc1 Rab8 Qc3 f6 Nb3 Qxc4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 f3 e5 dxe5 Nh5 Nh3 Nc6 Bg5 Be7 Bxe7 Qxe7 g4 Nxe5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 f3 e5 dxe5 Nh5 Nh3 Nc6 Bg5 Be7 Bxe7 Qxe7 g4 Nxe5 gxh5 d6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 f3 e5 dxe5 Nh5 Nh3 Nc6 Bg5 Be7 Bxe7 Qxe7 g4 Nxe5 gxh5 d6 Qb3 Bxh3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 f3 e5 dxe5 Nh5 Nh3 Nc6 Bg5 Be7 Bxe7 Qxe7 g4 Nxe5 gxh5 d6 Qb3 Bxh3 Bxh3 Qh4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 f3 e5 dxe5 Nh5 Nh3 Nc6 Bg5 Be7 Bxe7 Qxe7 g4 Nxe5 gxh5 d6 Qb3 Bxh3 Bxh3 Qh4 Kd1 Qxh3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 f3 e5 dxe5 Nh5 Nh3 Nc6 Bg5 Be7 Bxe7 Qxe7 g4 Nxe5 gxh5 d6 Qb3 Bxh3 Bxh3 Qh4 Kd1 Qxh3 Qxb7 O-O

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 f3 e5 dxe5 Nh5 Nh3 Nc6 Bg5 Be7 Bxe7 Qxe7 g4 Nxe5 gxh5 d6 Qb3 Bxh3 Bxh3 Qh4 Kd1 Qxh3 Qxb7 O-O hxg6 hxg6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 f3 e5 dxe5 Nh5 Nh3 Nc6 Bg5 Be7 Bxe7 Qxe7 g4 Nxe5 gxh5 d6 Qb3 Bxh3 Bxh3 Qh4 Kd1 Qxh3 Qxb7 O-O hxg6 hxg6 Qe4 Qg2

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 f3 e5 dxe5 Nh5 Nh3 Nc6 Bg5 Be7 Bxe7 Qxe7 g4 Nxe5 gxh5 d6 Qb3 Bxh3 Bxh3 Qh4 Kd1 Qxh3 Qxb7 O-O hxg6 hxg6 Qe4 Qg2 Re1 Rae8

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 f3 e5 dxe5 Nh5 Nh3 Nc6 Bg5 Be7 Bxe7 Qxe7 g4 Nxe5 gxh5 d6 Qb3 Bxh3 Bxh3 Qh4 Kd1 Qxh3 Qxb7 O-O hxg6 hxg6 Qe4 Qg2 Re1 Rae8 Nc3 Qf2

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 f3 e5 dxe5 Nh5 Nh3 Nc6 Bg5 Be7 Bxe7 Qxe7 g4 Nxe5 gxh5 d6 Qb3 Bxh3 Bxh3 Qh4 Kd1 Qxh3 Qxb7 O-O hxg6 hxg6 Qe4 Qg2 Re1 Rae8 Nc3 Qf2 Rc1 Re6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 f3 e5 dxe5 Nh5 Nh3 Nc6 Bg5 Be7 Bxe7 Qxe7 g4 Nxe5 gxh5 d6 Qb3 Bxh3 Bxh3 Qh4 Kd1 Qxh3 Qxb7 O-O hxg6 hxg6 Qe4 Qg2 Re1 Rae8 Nc3 Qf2 Rc1 Re6 Kc2 Rfe8

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Azaz Mathakiya    (1068)
e4 e5 Nf3 a6 Nxe5 Qe7

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1068)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 Bg4 Bd3 d5

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1068)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 Bg4 Bd3 d5 h3 Bxf3

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1068)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 Bg4 Bd3 d5 h3 Bxf3 Qxf3 Nf6

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Mateia Benone    (1186)
Nf3 d6 d4 h6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
Nf3 d6 d4 h6 e4 Bg4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 g6 Bb5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 g6 Bb5 Nf6 Nc3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 g6 Bb5 Nf6 Nc3 Bg7 Bxc6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 g6 Bb5 Nf6 Nc3 Bg7 Bxc6 dxc6 O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 g6 Bb5 Nf6 Nc3 Bg7 Bxc6 dxc6 O-O Nxe4 Be3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Azaz Mathakiya    (1068)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 a3 c5 Nc3

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1068)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 a3 c5 Nf3

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1068)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 Bg4 Bd3 d5 h3 Bxf3 Qxf3 Nf6 Nc3 Bb4

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Mateia Benone    (1186)
Nf3 d6 d4 h6 e4 Bg4 h3 Bh5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
Nf3 d6 d4 h6 e4 Bg4 h3 Bh5 c4 Nc6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
Nf3 d6 d4 h6 e4 Bg4 h3 Bh5 c4 Nc6 Be3 e6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
Nf3 d6 d4 h6 e4 Bg4 h3 Bh5 c4 Nc6 Be3 e6 Nc3 Nge7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
Nf3 d6 d4 h6 e4 Bg4 h3 Bh5 c4 Nc6 Be3 e6 Nc3 Nge7 Be2 Bxf3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
Nf3 d6 d4 h6 e4 Bg4 h3 Bh5 c4 Nc6 Be3 e6 Nc3 Nge7 Be2 Bxf3 Bxf3 Ng6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Bc5 b4 Bxb4 c3 Ba5 O-O Nf6 d4 O-O Ba3 d6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 g6 Bb5

Transpose to wikichess #53325#

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Bc5 b4 Bxb4 c3 Ba5 O-O Nf6 d4 O-O Ba3 d6 dxe5 Nxe4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Bc5 b4 Bxb4 c3 Ba5 O-O Nf6 d4 Nxe4 Ba3 d6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 Nf3 Bg7 Qb3 dxc4 Qxc4 O-O e4 a6 Be2 b5 Qb3 c5 dxc5 Bb7 e5 Nfd7 Be3 Nxe5 Rd1

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Azaz Mathakiya    (1068)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 a3 c5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1068)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 a3 c5 Nf3 d5 Nc3

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1068)
e4 e5 Nf3 a6 Nxe5 Qe7 d4 Nc6

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 Nf3 Bg7 Qb3 dxc4 Qxc4 O-O e4 a6 Be2 b5 Qb3 c5 dxc5 Bb7 e5 Nfd7 Be3 Nxe5 Rd1 Qc7 Nd5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 Nf3 Bg7 Qb3 dxc4 Qxc4 O-O e4 a6 Be2 b5 Qb3 c5 dxc5 Bb7 e5 Nfd7 Be3 Nxe5 Rd1 Qc7 Nd5 Bxd5 Qxd5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 Nf3 Bg7 Qb3 dxc4 Qxc4 O-O e4 a6 Be2 b5 Qb3 c5 dxc5 Bb7 e5 Nfd7 Be3 Nxe5 Rd1 Qc7 Nd5 Bxd5 Qxd5 Nbc6 Nxe5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 Nf3 Bg7 Qb3 dxc4 Qxc4 O-O e4 a6 Be2 b5 Qb3 c5 dxc5 Bb7 e5 Nfd7 Be3 Nxe5 Rd1 Qc7 Nd5 Bxd5 Qxd5 Nbc6 Nxe5 Bxe5 Bf3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Azaz Mathakiya    (1068)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 a3 c5 Nf3 d5 Nc3 Nc6 e3

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1068)
e4 e5 Nf3 a6 Nxe5 Qe7 d4 Nc6 Bf4 Nf6

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 Nf3 Bg7 Qb3 dxc4 Qxc4 O-O e4 a6 Be2 b5 Qb3 c5 dxc5 Bb7 e5 Nfd7 Be3 Nxe5 Rd1 Qc7 Nd5 Bxd5 Qxd5 Nbc6 Nxe5 Bxe5 Bf3 Rfc8 Qxc6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 Nf3 Bg7 Qb3 dxc4 Qxc4 O-O e4 a6 Be2 b5 Qb3 c5 dxc5 Bb7 e5 Nfd7 Be3 Nxe5 Rd1 Qc7 Nd5 Bxd5 Qxd5 Nbc6 Nxe5 Bxe5 Bf3 Rfc8 Qxc6 Qxc6 Bxc6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 g6 Be2 Bg7 Be3 Nf6 Nc3 O-O h3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Bc5 b4 Bxb4 c3 Ba5 O-O Nf6 d4 Nxe4 Ba3 d6 d5 Ne7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 g6 Be2 Bg7 Be3 Nf6 Nc3 O-O h3 d5 exd5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 Bb4 exd5 Qxd5 Qd3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Azaz Mathakiya    (1068)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 Be2 Nf6 O-O

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1068)
e4 c5 Bc4 e6 Nf3 Nc6 d4 Nf6 Nc3

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1068)
e4 e5 Nf3 a6 Nxe5 Qe7 d4 Nc6 Bf4 Nf6 Bd3 Nxd4

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1068)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 a3 c5 Nf3 d5 Nc3 Nc6 e3 Bd6 h3

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1068)
e4 e5 Nf3 a6 Nxe5 Qe7 d4 Nc6 Bf4 Nf6 Bd3 Nxd4 Nc3 d6

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Mateia Benone    (1186)
Nf3 c5 c4 Nf6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 d4 Nxc3 bxc3 cxd4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 Bb4 exd5 Qxd5 Qd3 Qxg5 Nf3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Azaz Mathakiya    (1068)
e4 c5 Bc4 e6 Nf3 Nc6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 d5 exd5

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1068)
e4 e5 Nf3 a6 Nxe5 Qe7 d4 Nc6 Bf4 Nf6 Bd3 Nxd4 Nc3 d6 Nf3 Nxf3

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1068)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 a3 c5 Nf3 d5 Nc3 Nc6 e3 Bd6 h3 O-O Be2

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1068)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 Be2 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1068)
e4 e5 Nf3 a6 Nxe5 Qe7 d4 Nc6 Bf4 Nf6 Bd3 Nxd4 Nc3 d6 Nf3 Nxf3 Qxf3 Bg4

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Mateia Benone    (1186)
Nf3 e6 c4 Qf6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
Nf3 c5 c4 Nf6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 d4 Nxc3 bxc3 cxd4 cxd4 e6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 Bb4 exd5 Qxd5 Qd3 Qxg5 Nf3 Qa5 Qb5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Azaz Mathakiya    (1068)
e4 c5 Bc4 e6 Nf3 Nc6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 d5 exd5 exd5 Be2

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1068)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 a3 c5 Nf3 d5 Nc3 Nc6 e3 Bd6 h3 O-O Be2 Qa5 Bd2

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1068)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 Be2 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Qb6 c4

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Mateia Benone    (1186)
Nf3 e6 c4 Qf6 Nc3 a6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Azaz Mathakiya    (1068)
e4 c5 Bc4 e6 Nf3 Nc6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 d5 exd5 exd5 Be2 cxd4 Nxd4

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1068)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 Be2 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Qb6 c4 cxd4 Qxd4

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1068)
e4 c5 Bc4 e6 Nf3 Nc6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 d5 exd5 exd5 Be2 cxd4 Nxd4 Bc5 Nxc6

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1068)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 Be2 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Qb6 c4 cxd4 Qxd4 Qc6 Nc3

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Mathieu Bain    (1506)
c4 e5 d4 Bb4 Bd2

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Azaz Mathakiya    (1068)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 Be2 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Qb6 c4 cxd4 Qxd4 Qc6 Nc3 Nxc3 Qxc3

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Mateia Benone    (1186)
Nf3 e6 c4 Qf6 d4 Bb4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mathieu Bain    (1506)
c4 e5 d4 Bb4 Bd2 Bxd2 Qxd2

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1506)
c4 e5 d4 Bb4 Bd2 Bxd2 Qxd2 d6 dxe5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 Bb4 exd5 Qxd5 Qd3 Qxg5 Nf3 Qa5 Qb5 Qxb5 Bxb5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
Nf3 e6 c4 Qf6 d4 Bb4 Bd2 Nc6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
Nf3 c5 c4 Nf6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 d4 Nxc3 bxc3 cxd4 cxd4 e6 e3 Bb4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 c5 d3 g6 Nf3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
Nf3 c5 c4 Nc6 Nc3 e5 e3 d6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 Bb4 e5 h6 exf6 hxg5 fxg7 Rg8 h4 gxh4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
Nf3 c5 c4 Nf6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 d4 Nxc3 bxc3 cxd4 cxd4 e6 e3 Bb4 Bd2 Bxd2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
Nf3 e6 c4 Qf6 Nc3 a6 d4 Bb4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
Nf3 e6 c4 Qf6 d4 Bb4 Bd2 Nc6 e3 a5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 Bb4 e5 h6 exf6 hxg5 fxg7 Rg8 h4 gxh4 Qg4 Qf6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
Nf3 e6 c4 Qf6 d4 Bb4 Bd2 Nc6 e3 a5 Bd3 e5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
Nf3 e6 c4 Qf6 Nc3 a6 d4 Bb4 Bg5 Bxc3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 g6 Bxc6 dxc6 h3 Bg7 O-O Nf6 d3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 g6 Bxc6 dxc6 h3 Bg7 O-O Nf6 d3 O-O Re1

Transpose to wikichess #77117#

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
Nf3 c5 c4 Nf6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 d4 Nxc3 bxc3 cxd4 cxd4 e6 e4 Bb4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
Nf3 c5 c4 Nf6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 d4 Nxc3 bxc3 cxd4 cxd4 e6 e4 Bb4 Bd2 Bxd2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d3 Nf6 Bg5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d3 Nf6 Bg5 Be7 Be2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d3 Nf6 Bg5 Be7 Be2 O-O O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
Nf3 e6 c4 Qf6 Nc3 a6 d4 Bb4 Bg5 Bxc3 bxc3 Qf5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 c5 Bc4 Nc6 Qh5 e6 d3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 Bb4 exd5 Qxd5 Nf3 Nc6 Bd2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
Nf3 e6 c4 Qf6 Nc3 a6 d4 Bb4 Bg5 Bxc3 bxc3 Qf5 e3 Qa5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
Nf3 e6 c4 Qf6 Nc3 a6 d4 Bb4 Bg5 Bxc3 bxc3 Qf5 e3 Qa5 Qc2 h6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 c5 Bc4 Nc6 Qh5 e6 c3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 c5 Bc4 Nc6 Qh5 e6 d3 Nf6 Qf3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
Nf3 e6 c4 Qf6 Nc3 a6 d4 Bb4 Bg5 Bxc3 bxc3 Qf5 e3 Qa5 Qc2 h6 Bf4 g5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d3 Nf6 Bg5 Be7 Be2 O-O O-O h6 Bxf6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 Bb4 exd5 exd5 Bd3 O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 c5 Bc4 Nc6 Qh5 e6 c3 Nf6 Qf3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nc4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mathieu Bain    (1506)
c4 e5 d4 Bb4 Bd2 Bxd2 Qxd2 d6 dxe5 Nc6 exd6

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1506)
c4 e5 d4 Bb4 Bd2 Bxd2 Qxd2 d6 dxe5 Nc6 exd6 Qxd6 Qxd6

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mateia Benone    (1186)
Nf3 e6 c4 Qf6 d4 Bb4 Bd2 Nc6 e3 a5 Bd3 e5 d5 Nce7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 c5 Bc4 Nc6 Qh5 e6 d3 Nf6 Qf3 Nd4 Qd1

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nc4 Nxe4 Qf3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 Bb4 exd5 Qxd5 Nf3 Nc6 Bd2 Qd8 a3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mathieu Bain    (1506)
c4 e5 d4 Bb4 Bd2 Bxd2 Qxd2 d6 dxe5 Nc6 exd6 Qxd6 Qxd6 cxd6 Nc3

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1506)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nf3

Transpose to wikichess #40819#

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1506)
c4 e5 d4 Bb4 Bd2 Bxd2 Qxd2 d6 dxe5 Nc6 exd6 Qxd6 Qxd6 cxd6 Nc3 Bf5 e4

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 Bb4 exd5 Qxd5 Nf3 Nc6 Bd2 Qd8 a3 Be7 Be3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 c5 Bc4 Nc6 Qh5 e6 d3 Nf6 Qf3 Nd4 Qd1 b5 Be3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matteo Alfieri    (2000)
e4 e5 Bc4 f5 d3 Nc6

============

Contributors : Matteo Alfieri


Mathieu Bain    (1506)
b4 d5 Bb2 Nc6 b5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1506)
e4 c5 Nf3 f5 exf5 Nc6 Ng5 Nf6

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1506)
b4 d5 Bb2 Nc6 b5 Na5 e3

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1506)
e4 c5 Nf3 f5 exf5 Nc6 Ng5 Nf6 Bc4 d5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1506)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 Bb4 e5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1506)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 Bb4 e5 f6 a3

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1506)
e4 c5 Nf3 f5 exf5 Nc6 Ng5 Nf6 Bc4 d5 Bb3 Bxf5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1506)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 Bb4 e5 f6 a3 Bxc3 bxc3

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1506)
e4 c5 Nf3 f5 exf5 Nc6 Ng5 Nf6 Bc4 d5 Bb3 Bxf5 O-O e5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1506)
e4 c5 Nf3 f5 exf5 Nc6 Ng5 Nf6 Bc4 d5 Bb3 Bxf5 O-O e5 Qf3 Nd4

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mateia Benone    (1186)
Nf3 e6 c4 Qf6 d4 Bb4 Bd2 Nc6 e3 a5 Bd3 e5 d5 Nce7 e4 d6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mathieu Bain    (1506)
e4 c5 Nf3 f5 exf5 Nc6 Ng5 Nf6 Bc4 d5 Bb3 Bxf5 O-O e5 Qf3 Nd4 Qg3 Ne2

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1506)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 Bb4 e5 f6 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 fxe5 dxe5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1506)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 Bb4 e5 f6 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 fxe5 dxe5 Nxe5 Nxe5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 Bb4 exd5 Qxd5 Bxf6 Bxc3 bxc3 gxf6 Nf3 b6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mathieu Bain    (1506)
b4 d5 Bb2 Nc6 b5 Na5 e3 Nc4 Bxc4

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1506)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 a6 exd5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1506)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 a6 exd5 exd5 Bd3

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mateia Benone    (1186)
Nf3 Nf6 c4 d6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 c5 Bc4 Nc6 Qh5 e6 d3 Nf6 Qf3 Nd4 Qd1 b5 Be3 bxc4 Bxd4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 c5 Bc4 Nc6 Qh5 e6 c3 Nf6 Qf3 Be7 Bd5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
Nf3 e6 c4 Qf6 d4 Bb4 Bd2 Nc6 e3 a5 Bd3 e5 d5 Nce7 e4 d6 O-O Qg6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mathieu Bain    (1506)
b4 d5 Bb2 Nc6 b5 Na5 e3 Nc4 Bxc4 dxc4 Nf3

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d4 Nxe4 dxe5 Bc5 Be3 Bxe3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mathieu Bain    (1506)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Bc5 Bc4 Bxd4 Qg4 d5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1506)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 a6 exd5 exd5 Bd3 Bb4 Bg5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1506)
b4 d5 Bb2 Nc6 b5 Na5 e3 Nc4 Bxc4 dxc4 Nf3 Bg4 O-O

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d4 Nxe4 dxe5 Bc5 Be3 Bxe3 fxe3 Qe7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d4 Nxe4 dxe5 Bc5 Be3 Bxe3 fxe3 d5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d4 Nxe4 dxe5 Bc5 Bc4 Nxf2 Bxf7 Kf8

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nc4 Nxe4 Qf3 Qe7 Be2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d4 Nxe4 dxe5 Bc5 Be3 Bxe3 fxe3 Qe7 Qd4 f5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d4 Nxe4 dxe5 Bc5 Be3 Bxe3 fxe3 d5 exd6 Nc6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d4 Nxe4 dxe5 Bc5 Be3 Bxe3 fxe3 d5 exd6 Nc6 Bb5 O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d4 Nxe4 dxe5 Bc5 Be3 Bxe3 fxe3 Qe7 Qd4 f5 Qc4 Nc6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Andrea Grammatica    (2236)
c4 Nf6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Nf3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 Bb4 exd5 Qxd5 Bxf6 Bxc3 bxc3 gxf6 Nf3 b6 g3 Qa5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d4 Nxe4 dxe5 Bc5 Bc4 Nxf2 Bxf7 Kf8 Qd5 Nxh1

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d4 Nxe4 Bd3 d5 Bxe4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d4 Nxe4 dxe5 Bc5 Bc4 Nxf2 Bxf7 Kf8 Qd5 Nxh1 Qxc5 Kxf7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d4 Nxe4 dxe5 Bc5 Be3 Bxe3 fxe3 Qe7 Qd4 f5 Qc4 Nc6 Nc3 Nxe5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d4 Nxe4 Bd3 d5 Bxe4 dxe4 Nxe5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d4 Nxe4 Bd3 d5 Bxe4 dxe4 Nxe5 c5 c3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nc4 Nxe4 Qf3 Qe7 Be2 Nc6 O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d4 Nxe4 dxe5 Bc5 Be3 Bxe3 fxe3 d5 exd6 Nc6 Bb5 O-O Bxc6 bxc6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nc4 Nxe4 Qf3 Qe7 Be2 Nc6 O-O d5 Ne3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d4 Nxe4 Bd3 d5 Bxe4 dxe4 Nxe5 c5 c3 Be7 O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nc4 Nxe4 Qf3 Qe7 Be2 Nc6 O-O d5 Ne3 Nd4 Qh5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d4 Nxe4 Bd3 d5 Bxe4 dxe4 Nxe5 c5 c3 Be7 O-O O-O Re1

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d4 Nxe4 dxe5 Bc5 Bc4 Nxf2 Bxf7 Kf8 Qd5 Nxh1 Qxc5 Kxf7 Nc3 d6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2212)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Be2 O-O Bg5 Nbd7 f3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2212)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Be2 O-O Bg5 Nbd7 f3 e5 d5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2212)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Be2 O-O Bg5 Nbd7 f3 e5 d5 h6 Be3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 Bb4 e5 h6 exf6 hxg5 fxg7 Rg8 h4 gxh4 Qh5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1384)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 Nc3 Nxc3 dxc3 Be7 Be3 O-O Qd2 c5 O-O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Andrea Grammatica    (2236)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O Nc3 d6 Nf3 Nc6 O-O e5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matus Tkac    (2154)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 a3 d5 Nc3 c5 e3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2154)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 a3 d5 Nc3 c5 e3 dxc4 Bxc4

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2154)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 a3 d5 Nc3 c5 e3 dxc4 Bxc4 a6 Nf3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2154)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 a3 d5 Nc3 c5 e3 dxc4 Bxc4 a6 Nf3 b5 Ba2

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Mateia Benone    (1384)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nc4 Nxe4 Qf3 d5 Ne5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matus Tkac    (2154)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 a3 d5 Nc3 c5 e3 dxc4 Bxc4 a6 Nf3 b5 Ba2 Bb7 h3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Mateia Benone    (1384)
Nf3 c5 c4 d6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matus Tkac    (2154)
e4 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qa5 d4 c6 Bc4 Bf5 Bd2 e6

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Mateia Benone    (1384)
Nf3 c5 c4 a6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matteo Alfieri    (2000)
e4 Nf6 Nc3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nf3 Bf5

============

Contributors : Matteo Alfieri


Matus Tkac    (2154)
e4 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qa5 d4 c6 Bc4 Bf5 Bd2 e6 g4 Bg6

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matteo Alfieri    (2000)
e4 Nf6 Nc3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nf3 Bf5 d4 Nb4

============

Contributors : Matteo Alfieri


Matus Tkac    (2154)
b4 d5 Bb2 Nf6 e3 e5 a3 Nbd7 Nf3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2154)
e4 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qa5 d4 c6 Bc4 Bf5 Bd2 e6 g4 Bg6 Qe2 Nf6

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2154)
b4 d5 Bb2 Nf6 e3 e5 a3 Nbd7 Nf3 e4 Nd4

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matteo Alfieri    (2000)
e4 Nf6 Nc3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nf3 Bf5 d4 Nb4 Bb5 c6

============

Contributors : Matteo Alfieri


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2212)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O Nc3 d6 Nf3 Nc6 O-O e5 d5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matteo Alfieri    (2000)
e4 Nf6 Nc3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nf3 Bf5 d4 Nb4 Bb5 c6 Ba4 e6

============

Contributors : Matteo Alfieri


Matteo Alfieri    (2000)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nxc6 bxc6 e5 Nd5 c4 Nb6 Bd3 g6

============

Contributors : Matteo Alfieri


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2212)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O Be2 e5 Be3 Ng4 Bg5 f6 Bh4 Nd7 O-O

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matteo Alfieri    (2000)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nxc6 bxc6 e5 Nd5 c4 Nb6 Bd3 g6 O-O Bg7

============

Contributors : Matteo Alfieri


Andrea Grammatica    (2236)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O Nc3 d6 Nf3 Nc6 O-O e5 d5 Ne7

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2212)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O Be2 e5 Be3 Ng4 Bg5 f6 Bh4 Nd7 O-O Nh6 Qd2

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matus Tkac    (2154)
b4 d5 Bb2 Nf6 e3 e5 a3 Nbd7 Nf3 e4 Nd4 a5 b5

Transpose to wikichess #55240#

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2154)
e4 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qa5 d4 c6 Bc4 Bf5 Bd2 e6 g4 Bg6 Qe2 Nf6 f4 Be7

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 Bb4 exd5 Qxd5 Bxf6 gxf6 Nge2 Nc6 a3 Bxc3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mathieu Bain    (1506)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 a6 exd5 exd5 Bd3 Bb4 Bg5 f6 Bf4

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1506)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Bc5 Bc4 Bxd4 Qg4 d5 Qe2 Nf6

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Matus Tkac    (2154)
e4 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qa5 d4 c6 Bc4 Bf5 Bd2 e6 g4 Bg6 Qe2 Nf6 f4 Be7 d5 cxd5

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Mathieu Bain    (1506)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 a6 exd5 exd5 Bd3 Bb4 Bg5 f6 Bf4 Qe7 Be3

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1506)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Bc5 Bc4 Bxd4 Qg4 d5 Qe2 Nf6 exd5 Ne7

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Matteo Alfieri    (2000)
e4 Nf6 Nc3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nf3 Bf5 d4 Nb4 Bb5 c6 Ba4 e6 O-O Be7

============

Contributors : Matteo Alfieri


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2212)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O Be2 e5 Be3 Ng4 Bg5 f6 Bh4 Nd7 O-O Nh6 Qd2 Nf7 Rad1

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matus Tkac    (2154)
e4 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qa5 d4 c6 Bc4 Bf5 Bd2 e6 g4 Bg6 Qe2 Nf6 f4 Be7 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qd8

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2154)
e4 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qa5 d4 c6 Bc4 Bf5 Bd2 e6 g4 Bg6 Qe2 Nf6 f4 Be7 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qd8 Nxf6 gxf6

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matteo Alfieri    (2000)
e4 Nf6 Nc3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nf3 Bf5 d4 Nb4 Bb5 c6 Ba4 e6 O-O Be7 Qe2 O-O

============

Contributors : Matteo Alfieri


Matteo Alfieri    (2000)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 Nce2 c5 c3 Nc6 f4 Qb6 Nf3

============

Contributors : Matteo Alfieri


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2212)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O Be2 e5 Be3 Ng4 Bg5 f6 Bh4 Nd7 O-O Nh6 Qd2 Nf7 Rad1 c6 h3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matus Tkac    (2154)
e4 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qa5 d4 c6 Bc4 Bf5 Bd2 e6 g4 Bg6 Qe2 Nf6 f4 Be7 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qd8 Nxf6 gxf6 O-O-O Qc7

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Mathieu Bain    (1506)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Bc5 Bc4 Bxd4 Qg4 d5 Qe2 Nf6 exd5 Ne7 Bb5 Bd7

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Matteo Alfieri    (2000)
Nf3 d5 b3 f6 d4

============

Contributors : Matteo Alfieri


Matteo Alfieri    (2000)
e4 e6 d4 d5 e5 c5 c3 Nc6 Nf3 Qb6 a3 Nh6 b4 cxd4 Bxh6

============

Contributors : Matteo Alfieri


Matus Tkac    (2154)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 g6 Bxc6 dxc6 d3 Bg4

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2212)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O Be2 e5 Be3 Ng4 Bg5 f6 Bh4 Nd7 O-O Nh6 Qd2 Nf7 Rad1 c6 h3 Re8 Qc2

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 Bb4 exd5 Qxd5 Bxf6 gxf6 Nge2 Nc6 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 e5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matteo Alfieri    (2000)
e4 e6 d4 d5 e5 c5 c3 Nc6 Nf3 Qb6 a3 Nh6 b4 cxd4 Bxh6 gxh6 cxd4

============

Contributors : Matteo Alfieri


Matteo Alfieri    (2000)
Nf3 d5 b3 f6 d4 Nc6 Bb2

============

Contributors : Matteo Alfieri


Matteo Alfieri    (2000)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Bc5 Nb3 Bb6 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 h6

============

Contributors : Matteo Alfieri


Matteo Alfieri    (2000)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 Nce2 c5 c3 Nc6 f4 Qb6 Nf3 cxd4 Nexd4

============

Contributors : Matteo Alfieri


Matteo Alfieri    (2000)
Nf3 d5 b3 f6 d4 Nc6 Bb2 Bf5 e3

============

Contributors : Matteo Alfieri


Matus Tkac    (2154)
e4 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qa5 d4 c6 Bc4 Bf5 Bd2 e6 g4 Bg6 Qe2 Nf6 f4 Be7 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qd8 Nxf6 gxf6 O-O-O Qc7 f5 exf5

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2154)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 g6 Bxc6 dxc6 d3 Bg4 Nbd2 Bg7

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrea Grammatica    (2236)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O Nc3 d6 Nf3 Nc6 O-O a6 Qd3 Bd7 d5 Nb4 Qd1 a5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2236)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O Nc3 d6 Nf3 Nc6 O-O a6 Qd3 Bd7 d5 Nb4 Qd1 a5 e4 Bg4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matteo Alfieri    (2000)
Nf3 d5 b3 f6 d4 Nc6 Bb2 Bf5 e3 Nb4 Na3

============

Contributors : Matteo Alfieri


Matteo Alfieri    (2000)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Bc5 Nb3 Bb6 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 h6 Bh4 O-O

============

Contributors : Matteo Alfieri


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2212)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O Nc3 d6 Nf3 Nc6 O-O e5 d5 Ne7 e4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2212)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 e5 Nb3 Be6 f3 Be7 Qd2 O-O O-O-O Nbd7 g4 b5 g5 b4 Ne2 Ne8 f4 a5 f5 a4 fxe6 axb3 cxb3 fxe6 Bh3 Nc7

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrea Grammatica    (2236)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O Nc3 d6 Nf3 Nc6 O-O e5 d5 Ne7 e4 Nd7

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2212)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 e5 Nb3 Be6 f3 Be7 Qd2 O-O O-O-O Nbd7 g4 b5 g5 b4 Ne2 Ne8 f4 a5 f5 a4 fxe6 axb3 cxb3 fxe6 Bh3 Nc7 Kb1 Kh8

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matus Tkac    (2154)
e4 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qa5 d4 c6 Bc4 Bf5 Bd2 e6 g4 Bg6 Qe2 Nf6 f4 Be7 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qd8 Nxf6 gxf6 O-O-O Qc7 f5 exf5 Nh3 Nc6

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrea Grammatica    (2236)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O Nc3 d6 Nf3 Nc6 O-O a6 Qd3 Bd7 d5 Nb4 Qd1 a5 e4 Bg4 Be3 Nd7

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2212)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O Nc3 d6 Nf3 Nc6 O-O e5 d5 Ne7 e4 Nd7 Ne1

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2212)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O Be2 e5 Be3 Ng4 Bg5 f6 Bh4 Nd7 O-O Nh6 Qd2 Nf7 Rad1 c6 h3 Re8 Qc2 Qc7 Bg3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matus Tkac    (2154)
e4 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qa5 d4 c6 Bc4 Bf5 Bd2 e6 g4 Bg6 Qe2 Nf6 f4 Be7 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qd8 Nxf6 gxf6 O-O-O Qc7 f5 exf5 Nh3 Nc6 Bf4 Qc8

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matteo Alfieri    (2000)
Nf3 d5 b3 f6 d4 Nc6 Bb2 Bf5 e3 Nb4 Na3 e6 Bb5

============

Contributors : Matteo Alfieri


Matteo Alfieri    (2000)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Bc5 Nb3 Bb6 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 h6 Bh4 O-O Qf3 g5

============

Contributors : Matteo Alfieri


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2212)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O Be2 e5 Be3 Ng4 Bg5 f6 Bh4 Nd7 O-O Nh6 Qd2 Nf7 Rad1 c6 h3 Re8 Qc2 Qc7 Bg3 a6 b4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2212)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O Be2 e5 Be3 Ng4 Bg5 f6 Bh4 Nd7 O-O Nh6 Qd2 Nf7 Rad1 c6 h3 Re8 Qc2 Qc7 Bg3 a6 b4 b5 a4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matteo Alfieri    (2000)
Nf3 d5 b3 f6 d4 Nc6 Bb2 Bf5 e3 Nb4 Na3 e6 Bb5 c6 Be2

============

Contributors : Matteo Alfieri


Matus Tkac    (2154)
e4 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qa5 d4 c6 Bc4 Bf5 Bd2 e6 g4 Bg6 Qe2 Nf6 f4 Be7 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qd8 Nxf6 gxf6 O-O-O Qc7 f5 exf5 Nh3 Nc6 Bf4 Qc8 Bh6 fxg4

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2212)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O Be2 e5 Be3 Ng4 Bg5 f6 Bh4 Nd7 O-O Nh6 Qd2 Nf7 Rad1 c6 h3 Re8 Qc2 Qc7 Bg3 a6 b4 b5 a4 a5 cxb5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2212)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Be2 O-O Bg5 Nbd7 f3 e5 d5 h6 Be3 Nc5 Qd2

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matteo Alfieri    (2000)
Nf3 d5 b3 f6 d4 Nc6 Bb2 Bf5 e3 Nb4 Na3 e6 Bb5 c6 Be2 Bd6 O-O

============

Contributors : Matteo Alfieri


Andrea Grammatica    (2236)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O Nc3 d6 Nf3 Nc6 O-O e5 d5 Ne7 e4 Nd7 Ne1 f5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2236)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O Nc3 d6 Nf3 Nc6 O-O a6 Qd3 Bd7 d5 Nb4 Qd1 a5 e4 Bg4 Be3 Nd7 Qd2 c6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2236)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 e5 Nb3 Be6 f3 h5 Qd2 Nbd7 O-O-O Rc8 Kb1 Be7 h3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2212)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Be2 O-O Bg5 Nbd7 f3 e5 d5 h6 Be3 Nc5 Qd2 Kh7 g4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2212)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O Be2 e5 Be3 Ng4 Bg5 f6 Bh4 Nd7 O-O Nh6 Qd2 Nf7 Rad1 c6 h3 Re8 Qc2 Qc7 Bg3 a6 b4 b5 a4 a5 cxb5 cxb5 Rb1

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2212)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Be2 O-O Bg5 Nbd7 f3 e5 d5 h6 Be3 Nc5 Qd2 Kh7 g4 Ne8 h4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2212)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Ndb5 d6 Bg5 a6 Na3 b5 Nd5 Be7 Bxf6 Bxf6 c4 b4 Nc2 Rb8

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrea Grammatica    (2236)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 c5 d5 O-O

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2212)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O Nc3 d6 Nf3 Nc6 O-O e5 d5 Ne7 e4 Nd7 Ne1 f5 Nd3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrea Grammatica    (2236)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 c5 d5 O-O Nc3 d6

Transpose to wikichess #53583#

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matus Tkac    (2154)
e4 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qa5 d4 c6 Bc4 Bf5 Bd2 e6 g4 Bg6 Qe2 Nf6 f4 Be7 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qd8 Nxf6 gxf6 O-O-O Qc7 f5 exf5 Nh3 Nc6 Bf4 Qc8 Bh6 fxg4 Nf4 Qf5

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2212)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Be2 O-O Bg5 Nbd7 f3 e5 d5 h6 Be3 Nc5 Qd2 Kh7 g4 Ne8 h4 a6 h5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrea Grammatica    (2236)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 e5 Nb3 Be6 f3 h5 Qd2 Nbd7 O-O-O Rc8 Kb1 Be7 h3 h4 f4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matus Tkac    (2154)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 g6 Bxc6 dxc6 d3 Bg4 Nbd2 Bg7 h3 Bxf3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2212)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Ndb5 d6 Bg5 a6 Na3 b5 Nd5 Be7 Bxf6 Bxf6 c4 b4 Nc2 Rb8 b3 Bg5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2212)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Be2 O-O Bg5 Nbd7 f3 e5 d5 h6 Be3 Nc5 Qd2 Kh7 g4 Ne8 h4 a6 h5 g5 b4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2212)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Be2 O-O Bg5 Nbd7 f3 e5 d5 h6 Be3 Nc5 Qd2 Kh7 g4 Ne8 h4 a6 h5 g5 b4 Nd7 a3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2212)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Ndb5 d6 Bg5 a6 Na3 b5 Nd5 Be7 Bxf6 Bxf6 c4 b4 Nc2 Rb8 b3 Bg5 g3 O-O

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2212)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Be2 O-O Bg5 Nbd7 f3 e5 d5 h6 Be3 Nc5 Qd2 Kh7 g4 Ne8 h4 a6 h5 g5 b4 Nd7 a3 c5 Kf2

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matus Tkac    (2154)
e4 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qa5 d4 c6 Bc4 Bf5 Bd2 e6 g4 Bg6 Qe2 Nf6 f4 Be7 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qd8 Nxf6 gxf6 O-O-O Qc7 f5 exf5 Nh3 Nc6 Bf4 Qc8 Bh6 fxg4 Nf4 Qf5 Rhe1 a6

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matej Pech    (1109)
c4 c5 Nc3 b6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2212)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Be2 O-O Bg5 Nbd7 f3 e5 d5 h6 Be3 Nc5 Qd2 Kh7 g4 Ne8 h4 a6 h5 g5 b4 Nd7 a3 c5 Kf2 b6 Bd3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2212)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Be2 O-O Bg5 Nbd7 f3 e5 d5 h6 Be3 Nc5 Qd2 Kh7 g4 Ne8 h4 a6 h5 g5 b4 Nd7 a3 c5 Kf2 b6 Bd3 Bf6 Nge2

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2212)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Be2 O-O Bg5 Nbd7 f3 e5 d5 h6 Be3 Nc5 Qd2 Kh7 g4 Ne8 h4 a6 h5 g5 b4 Nd7 a3 c5 Kf2 b6 Bd3 Bf6 Nge2 Qc7 Kg2

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2212)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Ndb5 d6 Bg5 a6 Na3 b5 Nd5 Be7 Bxf6 Bxf6 c4 b4 Nc2 Rb8 b3 Bg5 g3 O-O h4 Bh6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2212)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Ndb5 d6 Bg5 a6 Na3 b5 Nd5 Be7 Bxf6 Bxf6 c4 b4 Nc2 Rb8 b3 Bg5 g3 O-O h4 Bh6 Bh3 Be6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrea Grammatica    (2236)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 e5 Nb3 Be6 f3 h5 Qd2 Nbd7 O-O-O Rc8 Kb1 Be7 h3 h4 f4 b5 Bd3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2236)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O Nc3 d6 Nf3 Nc6 O-O e5 d5 Ne7 e4 Nd7 Ne1 f5 Nd3 h6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Gergely Matisz    (1650)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 d3 b5 Bb3 d6 a4 Bd7 Nc3

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2212)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O Nc3 d6 Nf3 Nc6 O-O e5 d5 Ne7 e4 Nd7 Ne1 f5 Nd3 h6 Bd2

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2212)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Ndb5 d6 Bg5 a6 Na3 b5 Nd5 Be7 Bxf6 Bxf6 c4 b4 Nc2 Rb8 b3 Bg5 g3 O-O h4 Bh6 Bh3 Be6 Kf1 Qd7

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrea Grammatica    (2236)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O Nc3 d6 Nf3 Nc6 O-O e5 d5 Ne7 e4 Nd7 Ne1 f5 Nd3 h6 Bd2 g5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2236)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 e5 Nb3 Be6 f3 h5 Qd2 Nbd7 O-O-O Rc8 Kb1 Be7 h3 h4 f4 b5 Bd3 Qc7 Rhe1

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Mateia Benone    (1384)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nc4 Nxe4 Qf3 d5 Ne5 Be6 Nc3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1384)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nc4 Nxe4 Qf3 d5 Ne5 Be6 Nc3 Nd7 Nxd7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1384)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nc4 Nxe4 Qf3 d5 Ne5 Be6 Nc3 Nd7 Nxd7 Qxd7 Bd3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1384)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nxf7 Kxf7 d4 c5 Nc3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2212)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O Nc3 d6 Nf3 Nc6 O-O e5 d5 Ne7 e4 Nd7 Ne1 f5 Nd3 h6 Bd2 g5 f3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrea Grammatica    (2236)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 e5 Nb3 Be6 f3 h5 Qd2 Nbd7 O-O-O Rc8 Kb1 Be7 h3 h4 f4 b5 Bd3 Qc7 Rhe1 O-O a3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2236)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O Nc3 d6 Nf3 Nc6 O-O e5 d5 Ne7 e4 Nd7 Ne1 f5 Nd3 h6 Bd2 g5 f3 f4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2212)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O Nc3 d6 Nf3 Nc6 O-O e5 d5 Ne7 e4 Nd7 Ne1 f5 Nd3 h6 Bd2 g5 f3 f4 a4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 Bb4 exd5 exd5 Bd3 O-O Nge2 h6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Andrea Grammatica    (2236)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O Nc3 d6 Nf3 Nc6 O-O e5 d5 Ne7 e4 Nd7 Ne1 f5 Nd3 h6 Bd2 g5 f3 f4 a4 h5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2236)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O Nc3 d6 Nf3 Nc6 O-O a6 Qd3 Bd7 d5 Nb4 Qd1 a5 e4 Bg4 Be3 Nd7 Qd2 c6 Nh4 Ne5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2212)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O Nc3 d6 Nf3 Nc6 O-O e5 d5 Ne7 e4 Nd7 Ne1 f5 Nd3 h6 Bd2 g5 f3 f4 a4 h5 Bh3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrea Grammatica    (2236)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O Nc3 d6 Nf3 Nc6 O-O e5 d5 Ne7 e4 Nd7 Ne1 f5 Nd3 h6 Bd2 g5 f3 f4 a4 h5 Bh3 c5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Mateia Benone    (1384)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nxf7 Kxf7 d4 c5 Nc3 cxd4 Bc4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2212)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O Nc3 d6 Nf3 Nc6 O-O e5 d5 Ne7 e4 Nd7 Ne1 f5 Nd3 h6 Bd2 g5 f3 f4 a4 h5 Bh3 c5 Kh1

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrea Grammatica    (2236)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O Nc3 d6 Nf3 Nc6 O-O e5 d5 Ne7 e4 Nd7 Ne1 f5 Nd3 h6 Bd2 g5 f3 f4 a4 h5 Bh3 c5 Kh1 Nf6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2212)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O Nc3 d6 Nf3 Nc6 O-O e5 d5 Ne7 e4 Nd7 Ne1 f5 Nd3 h6 Bd2 g5 f3 f4 a4 h5 Bh3 c5 Kh1 Nf6 Bxc8

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matus Tkac    (2154)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 g6 Bxc6 dxc6 d3 Bg4 Nbd2 Bg7 h3 Bxf3 Nxf3 Nf6

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 Bb4 exd5 exd5 Bd3 O-O Nge2 h6 Bh4 Re8

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1384)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Bd3 Nc6 Bb5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1384)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nxf7 Kxf7 d4 c5 Nc3 cxd4 Bc4 d5 Nxd5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Andrea Grammatica    (2236)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 e5 Nb3 Be6 f3 h5 Qd2 Nbd7 O-O-O Rc8 Kb1 Be7 h3 h4 f4 b5 Bd3 Qc7 Rhe1 O-O a3 Rfd8 f5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2236)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O Nc3 d6 Nf3 Nc6 O-O e5 d5 Ne7 e4 Nd7 Ne1 f5 Nd3 h6 Bd2 g5 f3 f4 a4 h5 Bh3 c5 Kh1 Nf6 Bxc8 Rxc8

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2236)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O Nc3 d6 Nf3 Nc6 O-O a6 Qd3 Bd7 d5 Nb4 Qd1 a5 e4 Bg4 Be3 Nd7 Qd2 c6 Nh4 Ne5 b3 Bc8

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Mateia Benone    (1384)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Bd3 Nc6 Bb5 Bd7 Bd3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1384)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Bd3 Nc6 Bb5 Bd7 Bd3 Bb4 c3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d4 exd4 e5 Ne4 Bd3 Nc5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
b4 d5 Bb2 Qd6 a3 a5 b5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2212)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O Nc3 d6 Nf3 Nc6 O-O e5 d5 Ne7 e4 Nd7 Ne1 f5 Nd3 h6 Bd2 g5 f3 f4 a4 h5 Bh3 c5 Kh1 Nf6 Bxc8 Rxc8 Rg1

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matus Tkac    (2154)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 g6 Bxc6 dxc6 d3 Bg4 Nbd2 Bg7 h3 Bxf3 Nxf3 Nf6 c3 Qc7

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2154)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 Bxc6 bxc6 d3 Ne7 Qe2 Ng6 h4 h5

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 Bb4 exd5 exd5 Bd3 O-O Nge2 h6 Bh4 Re8 O-O c6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d4 exd4 e5 Ne4 Bd3 Nc5 Nxd4 d5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Andrea Grammatica    (2236)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O Nc3 d6 Nf3 Nc6 O-O e5 d5 Ne7 e4 Nd7 Ne1 f5 Nd3 h6 Bd2 g5 f3 f4 a4 h5 Bh3 c5 Kh1 Nf6 Bxc8 Rxc8 Rg1 Kh7

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2212)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O Nc3 d6 Nf3 Nc6 O-O e5 d5 Ne7 e4 Nd7 Ne1 f5 Nd3 h6 Bd2 g5 f3 f4 a4 h5 Bh3 c5 Kh1 Nf6 Bxc8 Rxc8 Rg1 Kh7 a5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Mateia Benone    (1186)
b4 d5 Bb2 Qd6 a3 a5 b5 e5 Nf3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Andrea Grammatica    (2236)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O Nc3 d6 Nf3 Nc6 O-O e5 d5 Ne7 e4 Nd7 Ne1 f5 Nd3 h6 Bd2 g5 f3 f4 a4 h5 Bh3 c5 Kh1 Nf6 Bxc8 Rxc8 Rg1 Kh7 a5 Qd7

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Mateia Benone    (1186)
b4 d5 Bb2 Qd6 a3 a5 b5 e5 Nf3 e4 Nd4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1384)
c4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 g3 g6 Bg2 Bg7 Nf3 e6 O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d4 exd4 e5 Ne4 Bd3 Nc5 Nxd4 d5 Nc3 c6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1384)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nxf7 Kxf7 d4 c5 Nc3 cxd4 Bc4 d5 Nxd5 Be6 O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Gergely Matisz    (1650)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O c3 Bb7 d4

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1650)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 c3 d5 Qa4 f6 Bb5 Nge7 exd5 Qxd5 O-O e4 c4 Qh5 Re1

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Andrea Grammatica    (2236)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 d5 e3 c5 Nd2 Nxd2 Qxd2 Nc6 Nf3 cxd4 exd4 Bf5 c3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2212)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Ndb5 d6 Bg5 a6 Na3 b5 Nd5 Be7 Bxf6 Bxf6 c4 b4 Nc2 Rb8 b3 Bg5 g3 O-O h4 Bh6 Bh3 Be6 Kf1 Qd7 Kg2 Bxh3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d4 exd4 e5 Ne4 Bd3 Nc5 Nxd4 d5 Nc3 c6 O-O Nxd3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
b4 d5 Bb2 Qd6 a3 a5 b5 e5 Nf3 e4 Nd4 Nf6 e3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Andrea Grammatica    (2236)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O Nc3 d6 Nf3 Nc6 O-O a6 Qd3 Bd7 d5 Nb4 Qd1 a5 e4 Bg4 Be3 Nd7 Qd2 c6 Nh4 Ne5 b3 Bc8 h3 a4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2236)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 d5 e3 c5 Nd2 Nxd2 Qxd2 Nc6 Nf3 cxd4 exd4 Bf5 c3 e6 Bd3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Mateia Benone    (1186)
b4 d5 Bb2 Qd6 a3 a5 b5 e5 Nf3 e4 Nd4 Nf6 e3 Be7 c4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d4 exd4 e5 Ne4 Bd3 Nc5 Nxd4 d5 Nc3 c6 O-O Nxd3 Qxd3 Bc5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1186)
b4 d5 Bb2 Qd6 a3 a5 b5 e5 Nf3 e4 Nd4 Nf6 e3 Be7 c4 c6 Nc3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Gregory Kohut    (1420)
c4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 g3 g6 Bg2 Bg7 Nf3 e6 O-O Nge7 d3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone, Gregory Kohut


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2212)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Ndb5 d6 Bg5 a6 Na3 b5 Nd5 Be7 Bxf6 Bxf6 c4 b4 Nc2 Rb8 b3 Bg5 g3 O-O h4 Bh6 Bh3 Be6 Kf1 Qd7 Kg2 Bxh3 Rxh3 f5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrea Grammatica    (2236)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 e5 Nb3 Be6 f3 h5 Qd2 Nbd7 O-O-O Rc8 Kb1 Be7 h3 h4 f4 b5 Bd3 Qc7 Rhe1 O-O a3 Rfd8 f5 Bc4 Bg5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2236)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 d5 e3 c5 Nd2 Nxd2 Qxd2 Nc6 Nf3 cxd4 exd4 Bf5 c3 e6 Bd3 Bxd3 Qxd3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2236)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O Nc3 d6 Nf3 Nc6 O-O a6 Qd3 Bd7 d5 Nb4 Qd1 a5 e4 Bg4 Be3 Nd7 Qd2 c6 Nh4 Ne5 b3 Bc8 h3 a4 f4 Nd7

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2236)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 d5 e3 c5 Nd2 Nxd2 Qxd2 Nc6 Nf3 cxd4 exd4 Bf5 c3 e6 Bd3 Bxd3 Qxd3 Bd6 Bg3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Mateia Benone    (1384)
c4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 g3 g6 Bg2 Bg7 Nf3 e6 O-O Nge7 d3 d5 Bd2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Andrea Grammatica    (2236)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O Nc3 d6 Nf3 Nc6 O-O a6 Qd3 Bd7 d5 Nb4 Qd1 a5 e4 Bg4 Be3 Nd7 Qd2 c6 Nh4 Ne5 b3 Bc8 h3 a4 f4 Nd7 Nxa4 Bxa1

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2236)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 d5 e3 c5 Nd2 Nxd2 Qxd2 Nc6 Nf3 cxd4 exd4 Bf5 c3 e6 Bd3 Bxd3 Qxd3 Bd6 Bg3 h6 Rd1

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2236)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 d5 e3 c5 Nd2 Nxd2 Qxd2 Nc6 Nf3 cxd4 exd4 Bf5 c3 e6 Bd3 Bxd3 Qxd3 Bd6 Bg3 h6 Rd1 O-O O-O

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2236)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 d5 e3 c5 Nd2 Nxd2 Qxd2 Nc6 Nf3 cxd4 exd4 Bf5 c3 e6 Bd3 Bxd3 Qxd3 Bd6 Bg3 h6 Rd1 O-O O-O Rb8 Rde1

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2236)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 d5 e3 c5 Nd2 Nxd2 Qxd2 Nc6 Nf3 cxd4 exd4 Bf5 c3 e6 Bd3 Bxd3 Qxd3 Bd6 Bg3 h6 Rd1 O-O O-O Rb8 Rde1 b5 a3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matus Tkac    (2154)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 Bxc6 bxc6 d3 Ne7 Qe2 Ng6 h4 h5 e5 f6

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Mateia Benone    (1384)
Nf3 e5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matej Pech    (1109)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Bc5 c3 O-O

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Mateia Benone    (1384)
Nf3 e5 Nxe5 Bc5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Andrea Grammatica    (2236)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 e5 Nb3 Be6 f3 h5 Qd2 Nbd7 O-O-O Rc8 Kb1 Be7 h3 h4 f4 b5 Bd3 Qc7 Rhe1 O-O a3 Rfd8 f5 Bc4 Bg5 Nb6 Bxh4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2236)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 d5 e3 c5 Nd2 Nxd2 Qxd2 Nc6 Nf3 cxd4 exd4 Bf5 c3 e6 Bd3 Bxd3 Qxd3 Bd6 Bg3 h6 Rd1 O-O O-O Rb8 Rde1 b5 a3 a5 Ne5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2236)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O Nc3 d6 Nf3 Nc6 O-O a6 Qd3 Bd7 d5 Nb4 Qd1 a5 e4 Bg4 Be3 Nd7 Qd2 c6 Nh4 Ne5 b3 Bc8 h3 a4 f4 Nd7 Nxa4 Bxa1 Rxa1 Na6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matej Pech    (1109)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Bc5 c3 O-O d4 exd4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Andrea Grammatica    (2236)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 d5 e3 c5 Nd2 Nxd2 Qxd2 Nc6 Nf3 cxd4 exd4 Bf5 c3 e6 Bd3 Bxd3 Qxd3 Bd6 Bg3 h6 Rd1 O-O O-O Rb8 Rde1 b5 a3 a5 Ne5 Qc7 Nxc6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2236)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 d5 e3 c5 Nd2 Nxd2 Qxd2 Nc6 Nf3 cxd4 exd4 Bf5 c3 e6 Bd3 Bxd3 Qxd3 Bd6 Bg3 h6 Rd1 O-O O-O Rb8 Rde1 b5 a3 a5 Ne5 Qc7 Nxc6 Qxc6 Bxd6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matus Tkac    (2154)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 Bxc6 bxc6 d3 Ne7 Qe2 Ng6 h4 h5 e5 f6 Nbd2 Be7

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matej Pech    (1109)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Bc5 c3 O-O d4 exd4 cxd4 Bb6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1109)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Bc5 c3 O-O d4 exd4 cxd4 Bb6 e5 Nd5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Azaz Mathakiya    (1132)
e4 c5 Nf3 a6 a4 h6

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1132)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nge7 O-O d6 c4 a6

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1132)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nge7 O-O d6 c4 a6 Ba4 Bd7

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1132)
e4 c5 Nf3 a6 a4 h6 d4 cxd4

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1132)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nge7 O-O d6 c4 a6 Ba4 Bd7 d3 Na7

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1132)
e4 c5 Nf3 a6 a4 h6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 e6

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1132)
e4 c5 Nf3 a6 a4 h6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 e6 Nc3 Qf6

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1132)
e4 c5 Nf3 a6 a4 h6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 e6 Nc3 Qf6 b3 Bc5

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1132)
e4 c5 Nf3 a6 a4 h6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 e6 Nc3 Qf6 b3 Bc5 Be3 Ne7

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1132)
e4 c5 Nf3 a6 a4 h6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 e6 Nc3 Qf6 b3 Bc5 Be3 Ne7 Qd2 Bb4

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1132)
e4 Nc6 Nf3 a6

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1132)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 d6 c4 Bg4

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1132)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 d6 c4 Bg4 h3 Bxf3

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1132)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 d6 c4 Bg4 h3 Bxf3 Qxf3 Be7

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1132)
e4 Nc6 Nf3 a6 Nc3 e6

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1132)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 d6 c4 Bg4 h3 Bxf3 Qxf3 Be7 Nc3 Qd7

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1132)
e4 Nc6 Nf3 a6 Nc3 e6 g3 h6

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1132)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 d6 c4 Bg4 h3 Bxf3 Qxf3 Be7 Nc3 Qd7 Nd5 a6

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1132)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nge7 O-O d6 c4 a6 Ba4 Bd7 d3 Na7 Bb3 Be6

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1132)
e4 Nc6 Nf3 a6 Nc3 e6 g3 h6 Bg2 Bb4

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1132)
e4 Nc6 Nf3 a6 Nc3 e6 g3 h6 Bg2 Bb4 Na4 Qf6

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1132)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nge7 O-O d6 c4 a6 Ba4 Bd7 d3 Na7 Bb3 Be6 Ng5 Qd7

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1132)
e4 Nc6 Nf3 a6 Nc3 e6 g3 h6 Bg2 Bb4 Na4 Qf6 a3 Bd6

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1132)
e4 Nc6 Nf3 a6 Nc3 e6 g3 h6 Bg2 Bb4 Na4 Qf6 a3 Bd6 d4 Be7

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1132)
e4 Nc6 Nf3 a6 Nc3 e6 g3 h6 Bg2 Bb4 Na4 Qf6 a3 Bd6 d4 Be7 Bf4 g5

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1132)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 g6 c3 Bg7 d4

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Mateia Benone    (1384)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Nc3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1384)
Nf3 e5 Nxe5 Bc5 d4 Bd6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1384)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Nc3 Bb4 Bd2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1384)
Nf3 e5 Nxe5 Bc5 d4 Bd6 Nc4 Bb4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1516)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 c5 Bg5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1516)
e4 e5 f4 Bc5 Nf3 d6 d4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1384)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Nc3 Bb4 Bd2 Bxc3 Bxc3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1384)
Nf3 e5 Nxe5 Bc5 d4 Bd6 Nc4 Bb4 c3 Be7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1384)
Nf3 e5 Nxe5 Bc5 d4 Bd6 Nc4 Bb4 c3 Be7 e4 d5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1384)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Nc3 Bb4 Bd2 Bxc3 Bxc3 O-O Be2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1384)
Nf3 e5 Nxe5 Bc5 d4 Bd6 Nc4 Bb4 c3 Be7 e4 d5 exd5 Qxd5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Azaz Mathakiya    (1132)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 g6 c3 Bg7 d4 exd4 cxd4

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Mateia Benone    (1384)
Nf3 e5 Nxe5 Bc5 d4 Bd6 Nc4 Bb4 c3 Be7 e4 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Bf4 Qe4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1384)
Nf3 e5 Nxe5 Bc5 d4 Bd6 Nc4 Bb4 c3 Be7 e4 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Bf4 Qe4 Be3 Qd5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1516)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 c5 Bg5 cxd4 Nxd4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1516)
e4 e5 f4 Bc5 Nf3 d6 d4 exd4 Nxd4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1516)
e4 e5 f4 Bc5 Nf3 d6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nc6 Nxc6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1516)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 f4 e6 Nf3 d5 d3 d4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1516)
e4 e5 f4 Bc5 Nf3 d6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nc6 Nxc6 bxc6 Qe2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1516)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 c5 Bg5 cxd4 Nxd4 Nc6 Nxc6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1516)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 c5 Bg5 cxd4 Nxd4 Nc6 Nxc6 bxc6 e3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1516)
e4 e5 f4 Bc5 Nf3 d6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nc6 Nxc6 bxc6 Qe2 Nf6 Nc3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1516)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 c5 Bg5 cxd4 Nxd4 Nc6 Nxc6 bxc6 e3 d5 Nc3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
d4 Nf6 c4 d6 Nf3 Nbd7 Nc3 e5 g3 c6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nb6 Ne2 c5 d5 O-O

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nb6 Ne2 c5 d5 O-O O-O e6

Transpose to wikichess #70946#

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nb6 Ne2 c5 d5 e6 Nbc3 exd5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nb6 Ne2 c5 d5 e6 Nbc3 exd5 exd5 O-O

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
d4 Nf6 c4 d6 Nf3 Nbd7 Nc3 e5 g3 c6 Bg2 Be7

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
d4 Nf6 c4 d6 Nf3 Nbd7 Nc3 e5 g3 c6 Bg2 Be7 O-O O-O

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Bc4 c5 Ne2 Nc6 Be3 O-O O-O Qc7 Rc1 b6 Nf4 e6 Bb5 Rd8 Re1

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Bc4 c5 Ne2 Nc6 Be3 O-O O-O Qc7 Rc1 b6 Nf4 e6 Bb5 Rd8 Re1 Bb7 d5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
d4 Nf6 c4 d6 Nf3 Nbd7 Nc3 e5 g3 c6 Bg2 Be7 O-O O-O e4 a6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
d4 Nf6 c4 d6 Nf3 Nbd7 Nc3 e5 g3 c6 Bg2 Be7 O-O O-O e4 a6 a4 a5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Bc4 c5 Ne2 Nc6 Be3 O-O O-O Qc7 Rc1 b6 Nf4 e6 Bb5 Rd8 Re1 Bb7 d5 Ne5 c4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Bc4 c5 Ne2 Nc6 Be3 O-O O-O Qc7 Rc1 b6 f4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
d4 Nf6 c4 d6 Nf3 Nbd7 Nc3 e5 g3 c6 Bg2 Be7 O-O O-O e4 a6 a4 a5 h3 Re8

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Bc4 c5 Ne2 Nc6 Be3 O-O O-O Qc7 Rc1 b6 Nf4 e6 Bb5 Rd8 Re1 Bb7 d5 Ne5 c4 Rd6 Qe2

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
d4 Nf6 c4 d6 Nf3 Nbd7 Nc3 e5 g3 c6 Bg2 Be7 O-O O-O e4 a6 a4 a5 h3 Re8 Be3 Bf8

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 e5 Nb3 Be6 h3 Nbd7 g4 h6 Qd2 b5 Bg2

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Bc4 c5 Ne2 Nc6 Be3 O-O O-O Qc7 Rc1 b6 Nf4 e6 Bb5 Rd8 Re1 Bb7 d5 Ne5 c4 Rd6 Qe2 Qe7 f3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
d4 Nf6 c4 d6 Nf3 Nbd7 Nc3 e5 g3 c6 Bg2 Be7 O-O O-O e4 a6 a4 a5 h3 Re8 Be3 Bf8 Qc2 Qc7

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Bc4 c5 Ne2 Nc6 Be3 O-O O-O Qc7 Rc1 b6 f4 e6 dxc5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Bc4 c5 Ne2 Nc6 Be3 O-O O-O Qc7 Rc1 b6 Nf4 e6 Bb5 Rd8 Re1 Bb7 d5 Ne5 c4 Rd6 Qe2 Qe7 f3 R6d8 Kh1

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 e5 Nb3 Be6 h3 Nbd7 g4 h6 Qd2 b5 Bg2 Bc4 Nc1

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Azaz Mathakiya    (1132)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Bc5 d3 d6 Ng5

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Bc4 c5 Ne2 Nc6 Be3 O-O O-O Qc7 Rc1 b6 f4 e6 dxc5 Na5 Bd3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
d4 Nf6 c4 d6 Nf3 Nbd7 Nc3 e5 g3 c6 Bg2 Be7 O-O O-O e4 a6 a4 a5 h3 Re8 Be3 Bf8 Qc2 Qc7 Rad1 b6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 e5 Nb3 Be6 h3 Nbd7 g4 h6 Qd2 b5 Bg2 Bc4 Nc1 Be7 b3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Mateia Benone    (1516)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 f4 e6 Nf3 d5 d3 d4 Nb1 Bd6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Azaz Mathakiya    (1132)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Bc5 d3 d6 Ng5 Qf6 Bxf7

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
d4 Nf6 c4 d6 Nf3 Nbd7 Nc3 e5 g3 c6 Bg2 Be7 O-O O-O e4 a6 a4 a5 h3 Re8 Be3 Bf8 Qc2 Qc7 Rad1 b6 d5 cxd5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Azaz Mathakiya    (1132)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 e4 Bd7 Bxc4 e6 d5 exd5

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1132)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Bc5 d3 d6 Ng5 Qf6 Bxf7 Kf8 Bd5

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Bc4 c5 Ne2 Nc6 Be3 O-O O-O Qc7 Rc1 b6 f4 e6 dxc5 Na5 Bd3 Rd8 Qc2

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
d4 Nf6 c4 d6 Nf3 Nbd7 Nc3 e5 g3 c6 Bg2 Be7 O-O O-O e4 a6 a4 a5 h3 Re8 Be3 Bf8 Qc2 Qc7 Rad1 b6 d5 cxd5 cxd5 Ba6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
d4 Nf6 c4 d6 Nf3 Nbd7 Nc3 e5 g3 c6 Bg2 Be7 O-O O-O e4 a6 a4 a5 h3 Re8 Be3 Bf8 Qc2 Qc7 Rad1 b6 d5 cxd5 cxd5 Ba6 Rfe1 Nc5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
d4 Nf6 c4 d6 Nf3 Nbd7 Nc3 e5 g3 c6 Bg2 Be7 O-O O-O e4 a6 a4 a5 h3 Re8 Be3 Bf8 Qc2 Qc7 Rad1 b6 d5 cxd5 cxd5 Ba6 Rfe1 Nc5 Bg5 Be7

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Bc4 c5 Ne2 Nc6 Be3 O-O O-O Qc7 Rc1 b6 f4 e6 dxc5 Na5 Bd3 Rd8 Qc2 Bf8 cxb6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
d4 Nf6 c4 d6 Nf3 Nbd7 Nc3 e5 g3 c6 Bg2 Be7 O-O O-O e4 a6 a4 a5 h3 Re8 Be3 Bf8 Qc2 Qc7 Rad1 b6 d5 cxd5 cxd5 Ba6 Rfe1 Nc5 Bg5 Be7 Bf1 Bxf1

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Bc4 c5 Ne2 Nc6 Be3 O-O O-O Qc7 Rc1 b6 f4 e6 dxc5 Na5 Bd3 Rd8 Qc2 Bf8 cxb6 axb6 Bd4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
d4 Nf6 c4 d6 Nf3 Nbd7 Nc3 e5 g3 c6 Bg2 Be7 O-O O-O e4 a6 a4 a5 h3 Re8 Be3 Bf8 Qc2 Qc7 Rad1 b6 d5 cxd5 cxd5 Ba6 Rfe1 Nc5 Bg5 Be7 Bf1 Bxf1 Kxf1 Qd7

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Azaz Mathakiya    (1132)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 e4 Bd7 Bxc4 e6 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Bb4

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Bc4 c5 Ne2 Nc6 Be3 O-O O-O Qc7 Rc1 b6 f4 e6 dxc5 Na5 Bd3 Rd8 Qc2 Bf8 cxb6 axb6 Bd4 Ba6 Rcd1

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Azaz Mathakiya    (1132)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 e4 Bd7 Bxc4 e6 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Bb4 Bd2 Bxd2

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1132)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 e4 Bd7 Bxc4 e6 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Bb4 Bd2 Bxd2 Nxd2 Be6

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1132)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 e4 Bd7 Bxc4 e6 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Bb4 Bd2 Bxd2 Nxd2 Be6 Qxb7 Nd7

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Matus Tkac    (2202)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 c5 d5 Ne4 Bf4 Qb6 Bc1 g6 f3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2202)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 c5 d5 Ne4 Bf4 Qb6 Bc1 g6 f3 Nd6 e4

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2202)
e4 g6 d4 Bg7 Nc3 d5 exd5 Nf6 Bc4 Nbd7 Bb3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2202)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 c5 d5 Ne4 Bf4 Qb6 Bc1 g6 f3 Nd6 e4 Bg7 c3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2202)
e4 g6 d4 Bg7 Nc3 d5 exd5 Nf6 Bc4 Nbd7 Bb3 Nb6 Qf3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2202)
e4 g6 d4 Bg7 Nc3 d5 exd5 Nf6 Bc4 Nbd7 Bb3 Nb6 Qf3 Bg4 Qg3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2202)
e4 g6 d4 Bg7 Nc3 d5 exd5 Nf6 Bc4 Nbd7 Bb3 Nb6 Qf3 Bg4 Qg3 Bf5 Nf3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2202)
e4 g6 d4 Bg7 Nc3 d5 exd5 Nf6 Bc4 Nbd7 Bb3 Nb6 Qf3 Bg4 Qg3 Bf5 Nf3 a5 a4

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2202)
e4 g6 d4 Bg7 Nc3 d5 exd5 Nf6 Bc4 Nbd7 Bb3 Nb6 Qf3 Bg4 Qg3 Bf5 Nf3 a5 a4 Nbxd5 Nxd5

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2202)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 c5 d5 Ne4 Bf4 Qb6 Bc1 g6 f3 Nd6 e4 Bg7 c3 O-O h4

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2202)
e4 g6 d4 Bg7 Nc3 d5 exd5 Nf6 Bc4 Nbd7 Bb3 Nb6 Qf3 Bg4 Qg3 Bf5 Nf3 a5 a4 Nbxd5 Nxd5 Nxd5 O-O

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2202)
e4 g6 d4 Bg7 Nc3 d5 exd5 Nf6 Bc4 Nbd7 Bb3 Nb6 Qf3 Bg4 Qg3 Bf5 Nf3 a5 a4 Nbxd5 Nxd5 Nxd5 O-O c6 Re1

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2202)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 c5 d5 Ne4 Bf4 Qb6 Bc1 g6 f3 Nd6 e4 Bg7 c3 O-O h4 h6 a4

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2202)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 c5 d5 Ne4 Bf4 Qb6 Bc1 g6 f3 Nd6 e4 Bg7 c3 O-O h4 h6 a4 f5 a5

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2202)
e4 g6 d4 Bg7 Nc3 d5 exd5 Nf6 Bc4 Nbd7 Bb3 Nb6 Qf3 Bg4 Qg3 Bf5 Nf3 a5 a4 Nbxd5 Nxd5 Nxd5 O-O c6 Re1 O-O h3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 e5 Nb3 Be6 h3 Nbd7 g4 h6 Qd2 b5 Bg2 Bc4 Nc1 Be7 b3 Be6 N1e2

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matus Tkac    (2202)
e4 g6 d4 Bg7 Nc3 d5 exd5 Nf6 Bc4 Nbd7 Bb3 Nb6 Qf3 Bg4 Qg3 Bf5 Nf3 a5 a4 Nbxd5 Nxd5 Nxd5 O-O c6 Re1 O-O h3 e6 Ne5

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 g3 c5 d5 exd5 cxd5 b5 Nf3 Bb7

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 e5 Nb3 Be6 h3 Nbd7 g4 h6 Qd2 b5 Bg2 Bc4 Nc1 Be7 b3 Be6 N1e2 Rc8 Nd5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 g3 c5 d5 exd5 cxd5 b5 Nf3 Bb7 e4 Nxe4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 e5 Nb3 Be6 h3 Nbd7 g4 h6 Qd2 b5 Bg2 Bc4 Nc1 Be7 b3 Be6 N1e2 Rc8 Nd5 Nc5 Nxe7

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 g3 c5 d5 exd5 cxd5 b5 Nf3 Bb7 e4 Nxe4 Bxb5 Qa5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 e5 Nb3 Be6 h3 Nbd7 g4 h6 Qd2 b5 Bg2 Bc4 Nc1 Be7 b3 Be6 N1e2 Rc8 Nd5 Nc5 Nxe7 Qxe7 Ng3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 e5 Nb3 Be6 h3 Nbd7 g4 h6 Qd2 b5 Bg2 Bc4 Nc1 Be7 b3 Be6 N1e2 Rc8 Nd5 Nc5 Nxe7 Qxe7 Ng3 O-O g5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Bc4 c5 Ne2 Nc6 Be3 O-O O-O Qc7 Rc1 b6 f4 e6 dxc5 Na5 Bd3 Rd8 Qc2 Bf8 cxb6 axb6 Bd4 Ba6 Rcd1 Bxd3 Rxd3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 e5 Nb3 Be6 h3 Nbd7 g4 h6 Qd2 b5 Bg2 Bc4 Nc1 Be7 b3 Be6 N1e2 Rc8 Nd5 Nc5 Nxe7 Qxe7 Ng3 O-O g5 hxg5 Bxg5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 g3 c5 d5 exd5 cxd5 b5 Nf3 Bb7 e4 Nxe4 Bxb5 Qa5 Nfd2 Bxd5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matus Tkac    (2202)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 c5 d5 Ne4 Bf4 Qb6 Bc1 g6 f3 Nd6 e4 Bg7 c3 O-O h4 h6 a4 f5 a5 Qc7 e5

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2202)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 c5 d5 Ne4 Bf4 Qb6 Bc1 g6 f3 Nd6 e4 Bg7 c3 O-O h4 h6 a4 f5 a5 Qc7 e5 Nf7 f4

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2202)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 c5 d5 Ne4 Bf4 Qb6 Bc1 g6 f3 Nd6 e4 Bg7 c3 O-O h4 h6 a4 f5 a5 Qc7 e5 Nf7 f4 h5 Bc4

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2202)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 c5 d5 Ne4 Bf4 Qb6 Bc1 g6 f3 Nd6 e4 Bg7 c3 O-O h4 h6 a4 f5 a5 Qc7 e5 Nf7 f4 h5 Bc4 d6 e6

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2202)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 c5 d5 Ne4 Bf4 Qb6 Bc1 g6 f3 Nd6 e4 Bg7 c3 O-O h4 h6 a4 f5 a5 Qc7 e5 Nf7 f4 h5 Bc4 d6 e6 Nh6 Qa4

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2202)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 c5 d5 Ne4 Bf4 Qb6 Bc1 g6 f3 Nd6 e4 Bg7 c3 O-O h4 h6 a4 f5 a5 Qc7 e5 Nf7 f4 h5 Bc4 d6 e6 Nh6 Qa4 Ng4 Nh3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2202)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 c5 d5 Ne4 Bf4 Qb6 Bc1 g6 f3 Nd6 e4 Bg7 c3 O-O h4 h6 a4 f5 a5 Qc7 e5 Nf7 f4 h5 Bc4 d6 e6 Nh6 Qa4 Ng4 Nh3 Na6 Na3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 g3 c5 d5 exd5 cxd5 b5 Nf3 Bb7 e4 Nxe4 Bxb5 Qa5 Nfd2 Bxd5 O-O Qxb5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matus Tkac    (2202)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 c5 d5 Ne4 Bf4 Qb6 Bc1 g6 f3 Nd6 e4 Bg7 c3 O-O h4 h6 a4 f5 a5 Qc7 e5 Nf7 f4 h5 Bc4 d6 e6 Nh6 Qa4 Ng4 Nh3 Na6 Na3 b6 Nb5

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
e4 c5 c3 Nf6 e5 Nd5 d4 cxd4 Nf3 e6 cxd4 d6 Bc4 Nb6 Bd3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
e4 c5 c3 Nf6 e5 Nd5 d4 cxd4 Nf3 e6 cxd4 d6 Bc4 Nb6 Bd3 Nc6 O-O

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
e4 c5 c3 Nf6 e5 Nd5 d4 cxd4 Nf3 e6 cxd4 d6 Bc4 Nb6 Bd3 Nc6 O-O Nb4 Be2

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 g3 c5 d5 exd5 cxd5 b5 Nf3 Bb7 e4 Nxe4 Bxb5 Qa5 Nfd2 Bxd5 O-O Qxb5 Nxe4 Bxe4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
e4 c5 c3 Nf6 e5 Nd5 d4 cxd4 Nf3 e6 cxd4 d6 Bc4 Nb6 Bd3 Nc6 O-O Nb4 Be2 dxe5 Nxe5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matus Tkac    (2202)
e4 g6 d4 Bg7 Nc3 d5 exd5 Nf6 Bc4 Nbd7 Bb3 Nb6 Qf3 Bg4 Qg3 Bf5 Nf3 a5 a4 Nbxd5 Nxd5 Nxd5 O-O c6 Re1 O-O h3 e6 Ne5 Qb6 Rd1

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
e4 c5 c3 Nf6 e5 Nd5 d4 cxd4 Nf3 e6 cxd4 d6 Bc4 Nb6 Bd3 Nc6 O-O Nb4 Be2 dxe5 Nxe5 Be7 Nc3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 g3 c5 d5 exd5 cxd5 b5 Nf3 Bb7 e4 Nxe4 Bxb5 Qa5 Nfd2 Bxd5 O-O Qxb5 Nxe4 Bxe4 Nc3 Qc6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
e4 c5 c3 Nf6 e5 Nd5 d4 cxd4 Nf3 e6 cxd4 d6 Bc4 Nb6 Bd3 Nc6 O-O Nb4 Be2 dxe5 Nxe5 Be7 Nc3 O-O a3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
e4 c5 c3 Nf6 e5 Nd5 d4 cxd4 Nf3 e6 cxd4 d6 Bc4 Nb6 Bd3 Nc6 O-O Nb4 Be2 dxe5 Nxe5 Be7 Nc3 O-O a3 Nc6 Be3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 g3 c5 d5 exd5 cxd5 b5 Nf3 Bb7 e4 Nxe4 Bxb5 Qa5 Nfd2 Bxd5 O-O Qxb5 Nxe4 Bxe4 Nc3 Qc6 Nxe4 Be7

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matus Tkac    (2202)
e4 g6 d4 Bg7 Nc3 d5 exd5 Nf6 Bc4 Nbd7 Bb3 Nb6 Qf3 Bg4 Qg3 Bf5 Nf3 a5 a4 Nbxd5 Nxd5 Nxd5 O-O c6 Re1 O-O h3 e6 Ne5 Qb6 Rd1 Qc7 c4

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2202)
e4 g6 d4 Bg7 Nc3 d5 exd5 Nf6 Bc4 Nbd7 Bb3 Nb6 Qf3 Bg4 Qg3 Bf5 Nf3 a5 a4 Nbxd5 Nxd5 Nxd5 O-O c6 Re1 O-O h3 e6 Ne5 Qb6 Rd1 Qc7 c4 Nf6 Qf3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2202)
e4 g6 d4 Bg7 Nc3 d5 exd5 Nf6 Bc4 Nbd7 Bb3 Nb6 Qf3 Bg4 Qg3 Bf5 Nf3 a5 a4 Nbxd5 Nxd5 Nxd5 O-O c6 Re1 O-O h3 e6 Ne5 Qb6 Rd1 Qc7 c4 Nf6 Qf3 c5 Bf4

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
e4 c5 c3 Nf6 e5 Nd5 d4 cxd4 Nf3 e6 cxd4 d6 Bc4 Nb6 Bd3 Nc6 O-O Nb4 Be2 dxe5 Nxe5 Be7 Nc3 O-O a3 Nc6 Be3 Bd7 Rc1

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
e4 c5 c3 Nf6 e5 Nd5 d4 cxd4 Nf3 e6 cxd4 d6 Bc4 Nb6 Bd3 Nc6 O-O Nb4 Be2 dxe5 Nxe5 Be7 Nc3 O-O a3 Nc6 Be3 Bd7 Rc1 Rc8 f4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
e4 c5 c3 Nf6 e5 Nd5 d4 cxd4 Nf3 e6 cxd4 d6 Bc4 Nb6 Bd3 Nc6 O-O Nb4 Be2 dxe5 Nxe5 Be7 Nc3 O-O a3 Nc6 Be3 Bd7 Rc1 Rc8 f4 Be8 Bf2

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 g3 c5 d5 exd5 cxd5 b5 Nf3 Bb7 e4 Nxe4 Bxb5 Qa5 Nfd2 Bxd5 O-O Qxb5 Nxe4 Bxe4 Nc3 Qc6 Nxe4 Be7 Re1 O-O

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
e4 c5 c3 Nf6 e5 Nd5 d4 cxd4 Nf3 e6 cxd4 d6 Bc4 Nb6 Bd3 Nc6 O-O Nb4 Be2 dxe5 Nxe5 Be7 Nc3 O-O a3 Nc6 Be3 Bd7 Rc1 Rc8 f4 Be8 Bf2 Nxe5 dxe5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
e4 c5 c3 Nf6 e5 Nd5 d4 cxd4 Nf3 e6 cxd4 d6 Bc4 Nb6 Bd3 Nc6 O-O Nb4 Be2 dxe5 Nxe5 Be7 Nc3 O-O a3 Nc6 Be3 Bd7 Rc1 Rc8 f4 Be8 Bf2 Nxe5 dxe5 Bc6 Be3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 g3 c5 d5 exd5 cxd5 b5 Nf3 Bb7 e4 Nxe4 Bxb5 Qa5 Nfd2 Bxd5 O-O Qxb5 Nxe4 Bxe4 Nc3 Qc6 Nxe4 Be7 Re1 O-O Bf4 Na6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 g3 c5 d5 exd5 cxd5 b5 Nf3 Bb7 e4 Nxe4 Bxb5 Qa5 Nfd2 Bxd5 O-O Qxb5 Nxe4 Bxe4 Nc3 Qc6 Nxe4 Be7 Re1 O-O Bf4 Na6 Nd6 Bxd6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2241)
d4 f5 Nc3 d5 Bf4 a6 e3 Nf6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2241)
d4 f5 Nc3 d5 Bf4 a6 e3 Nf6 Bd3 e6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2241)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 e5 Nb3 Be6 f3 h5 Qd2 Nbd7 O-O-O Rc8 Kb1 Be7 g3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2241)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 e5 Nb3 Be6 f3 h5 Qd2 Nbd7 O-O-O Rc8 Kb1 Be7 g3 Qc7 Rg1

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2241)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 g3 c5 d5 exd5 cxd5 d6 Nc3 a6 a4 g6 Bg2 Bg7

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2241)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 e5 Nb3 Be6 f3 h5 Qd2 Nbd7 O-O-O Rc8 Kb1 Be7 g3 Qc7 Rg1 b5 Nd5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2241)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 e5 Nb3 Be6 f3 h5 Qd2 Nbd7 O-O-O Rc8 Kb1 Be7 g3 Qc7 Rg1 b5 Nd5 Bxd5 exd5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2241)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 e5 Nb3 Be6 f3 h5 Qd2 Nbd7 O-O-O Rc8 Kb1 Be7 g3 Qc7 Rg1 b5 Nd5 Bxd5 exd5 Bd8 f4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 g3 c5 d5 exd5 cxd5 b5 Nf3 Bb7 e4 Nxe4 Bxb5 Qa5 Nfd2 Bxd5 O-O Qxb5 Nxe4 Bxe4 Nc3 Qc6 Nxe4 Be7 Re1 O-O Bf4 Na6 Nd6 Bxd6 Qxd6 Qxd6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2241)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 e5 Nb3 Be6 f3 h5 Qd2 Nbd7 O-O-O Rc8 Kb1 Be7 g3 Qc7 Rg1 b5 Nd5 Bxd5 exd5 Bd8 f4 O-O Bh3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2241)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 e5 Nb3 Be6 f3 h5 Qd2 Nbd7 O-O-O Rc8 Kb1 Be7 g3 Qc7 Rg1 b5 Nd5 Bxd5 exd5 Bd8 f4 O-O Bh3 Re8 Rge1

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2241)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 e5 Nb3 Be6 f3 h5 Qd2 Nbd7 O-O-O Rc8 Kb1 Be7 g3 Qc7 Rg1 b5 Nd5 Bxd5 exd5 Bd8 f4 O-O Bh3 Re8 Rge1 Ng4 c3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 g3 c5 d5 exd5 cxd5 b5 Nf3 Bb7 e4 Nxe4 Bxb5 Qa5 Nfd2 Bxd5 O-O Qxb5 Nxe4 Bxe4 Nc3 Qc6 Nxe4 Be7 Re1 O-O Bf4 Na6 Nd6 Bxd6 Qxd6 Qxd6 Bxd6 Rfe8

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2247)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 g3 c5 d5 exd5 cxd5 b5 Nf3 Bb7 e4 Nxe4 Bxb5 Qa5 Nfd2 Bxd5 O-O Qxb5 Nxe4 Bxe4 Nc3 Qc6 Nxe4 Be7 Re1 O-O Bf4 Na6 Nd6 Bxd6 Qxd6 Qxd6 Bxd6 Rfe8 a3 c4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matthew O Brien    (1350)
e4 c5 Nc3 d6 f4 g6 Bb5

============

Contributors : Matthew O Brien


Matthew O Brien    (1350)
e4 c5 Nc3 d6 f4 g6 Bb5 Bd7 Bxd7

============

Contributors : Matthew O Brien


Matthew O Brien    (1350)
e4 c5 Nc3 d6 f4 g6 Bb5 Bd7 Bxd7 Qxd7 Nf3

============

Contributors : Matthew O Brien


Azaz Mathakiya    (1115)
d4 e6 e3

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1115)
e3 e5 d3 d5 g3 Nc6

Transpose to wikichess #84987#

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1115)
e3 d5 d3 e5

Transpose to wikichess #53616#

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Andrea Grammatica    (2218)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Ndb5 d6 Nd5 Nxd5 exd5 Nb8 c4 a6 Qa4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2218)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Ndb5 d6 Nd5 Nxd5 exd5 Nb8 c4 a6 Qa4 Nd7 c5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2218)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Ndb5 d6 Nd5 Nxd5 exd5 Nb8 c4 a6 Qa4 Nd7 c5 Rb8 Nxd6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2218)
d4 d5 c4 e6 Nf3 Nf6 g3 c6

Transpose to wikichess #8535#

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2218)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Ndb5 d6 Nd5 Nxd5 exd5 Nb8 c4 a6 Qa4 Nd7 c5 Rb8 Nxd6 Bxd6 cxd6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Azaz Mathakiya    (1115)
d4 e6 e3 d6 Be2

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1115)
d4 e6 e3 d6 Be2 Nd7 Nc3

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1115)
e3 e5 d3 c5

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1115)
d4 e6 e3 d6 Be2 Nd7 Nc3 b6 e4

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1115)
d4 e6 e3 d6 Be2 Nd7 Nc3 b6 e4 Ne7 f4

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Andrea Grammatica    (2218)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 a6 Bd3 g6 O-O Bg7 Be3 Ne7 c4 d5 exd5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matei Cornel    (2153)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e6 e3 Nbd7 Bd3 dxc4 Bxc4 b5 Bd3 Bb7 O-O a6 e4 c5 d5 Qc7 dxe6

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Andrea Grammatica    (2218)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 a6 Bd3 g6 O-O Bg7 Be3 Ne7 c4 d5 exd5 exd5 Nc3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Azaz Mathakiya    (1115)
d4 e6 e3 d6 Be2 Nd7 Nc3 b6 e4 Ne7 f4 Bb7 Nf3

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1115)
d4 e6 e3 d6 Be2 Nd7 Nc3 b6 e4 Ne7 f4 Bb7 Nf3 g6 Be3

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Matei Cornel    (2153)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e6 e3 Nbd7 Bd3 dxc4 Bxc4 b5 Bd3 Bb7 O-O a6 e4 c5 d5 Qc7 dxe6 fxe6 Bc2

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2153)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e6 e3 Nbd7 Bd3 dxc4 Bxc4 b5 Bd3 Bb7 O-O a6 e4 c5 d5 Qc7 dxe6 fxe6 Bc2 Bd6 Ng5

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2153)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e6 e3 Nbd7 Bd3 dxc4 Bxc4 b5 Bd3 Bb7 O-O a6 e4 c5 d5 Qc7 dxe6 fxe6 Bc2 Bd6 Ng5 Nf8 f4

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Andrea Grammatica    (2218)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 a6 Bd3 g6 O-O Bg7 Be3 Ne7 c4 d5 exd5 exd5 Nc3 O-O Nxd5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Azaz Mathakiya    (1115)
d4 e6 e3 d6 Be2 Nd7 Nc3 b6 e4 Ne7 f4 Bb7 Nf3 g6 Be3 Bg7 g4

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1115)
e3 e5 d3 c5 Nd2 d5

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Andrea Grammatica    (2218)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 a6 Bd3 g6 O-O Bg7 Be3 Ne7 c4 d5 exd5 exd5 Nc3 O-O Nxd5 Nxd5 cxd5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2218)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Ndb5 d6 Nd5 Nxd5 exd5 Nb8 c4 a6 Qa4 Nd7 c5 Rb8 Nxd6 Bxd6 cxd6 O-O Qa3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matei Cornel    (2153)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e6 e3 Nbd7 Bd3 dxc4 Bxc4 b5 Bd3 Bb7 O-O a6 e4 c5 d5 Qc7 dxe6 fxe6 Bc2 Bd6 Ng5 Nf8 f4 O-O-O Qe1

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2153)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e6 e3 Nbd7 Bd3 dxc4 Bxc4 b5 Bd3 Bb7 O-O a6 e4 c5 d5 Qc7 dxe6 fxe6 Bc2 Bd6 Ng5 Nf8 f4 O-O-O Qe1 e5 Nd5

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Azaz Mathakiya    (1115)
e3 e5 d3 c5 Nd2 d5 g3 Nc6

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Matei Cornel    (2153)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e6 e3 Nbd7 Bd3 dxc4 Bxc4 b5 Bd3 Bb7 O-O a6 e4 c5 d5 Qc7 dxe6 fxe6 Bc2 Bd6 Ng5 Nf8 f4 O-O-O Qe1 e5 Nd5 Bxd5 exd5

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Andrea Grammatica    (2218)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 a6 Bd3 g6 O-O Bg7 Be3 Ne7 c4 d5 exd5 exd5 Nc3 O-O Nxd5 Nxd5 cxd5 Qxd5 Rc1

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2218)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Ndb5 d6 Nd5 Nxd5 exd5 Nb8 c4 a6 Qa4 Nd7 c5 Rb8 Nxd6 Bxd6 cxd6 O-O Qa3 b5 Be2

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matei Cornel    (2153)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e6 e3 Nbd7 Bd3 dxc4 Bxc4 b5 Bd3 Bb7 O-O a6 e4 c5 d5 Qc7 dxe6 fxe6 Bc2 Bd6 Ng5 Nf8 f4 O-O-O Qe1 e5 Nd5 Bxd5 exd5 exf4 Bd2

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Azaz Mathakiya    (1115)
e3 e5 d3 c5 Nd2 d5 g3 Nc6 b3 f5

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Andrea Grammatica    (2218)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 a6 Bd3 g6 O-O Bg7 Be3 Ne7 c4 d5 exd5 exd5 Nc3 O-O Nxd5 Nxd5 cxd5 Qxd5 Rc1 Nd7 Bc4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Azaz Mathakiya    (1115)
e3 e5 d3 c5 Nd2 d5 g3 Nc6 b3 f5 Bg2 e4

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1115)
e3 e5 d3 c5 Nd2 d5 g3 Nc6 b3 f5 Bg2 e4 Ne2 Nf6

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Andrea Grammatica    (2218)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Ndb5 d6 Nd5 Nxd5 exd5 Nb8 c4 a6 Qa4 Nd7 c5 Rb8 Nxd6 Bxd6 cxd6 O-O Qa3 b5 Be2 b4 Qg3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2218)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 a6 Bd3 g6 O-O Bg7 Be3 Ne7 c4 d5 exd5 exd5 Nc3 O-O Nxd5 Nxd5 cxd5 Qxd5 Rc1 Nd7 Bc4 Qa5 b4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Azaz Mathakiya    (1115)
e3 e5 d3 c5 Nd2 d5 g3 Nc6 b3 f5 Bg2 e4 Ne2 Nf6 O-O Bd6

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1115)
e3 e5 d3 c5 Nd2 d5 g3 Nc6 b3 f5 Bg2 e4 Ne2 Nf6 O-O Bd6 Bb2 h5

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Andrea Grammatica    (2218)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Ndb5 d6 Nd5 Nxd5 exd5 Nb8 c4 a6 Qa4 Nd7 c5 Rb8 Nxd6 Bxd6 cxd6 O-O Qa3 b5 Be2 b4 Qg3 Nc5 Be3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2218)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 a6 Bd3 g6 O-O Bg7 Be3 Ne7 c4 d5 exd5 exd5 Nc3 O-O Nxd5 Nxd5 cxd5 Qxd5 Rc1 Nd7 Bc4 Qa5 b4 Qd8 Nf3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2218)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 a6 Bd3 g6 O-O Bg7 Be3 Ne7 c4 d5 exd5 exd5 Nc3 O-O Nxd5 Nxd5 cxd5 Qxd5 Rc1 Nd7 Bc4 Qa5 b4 Qd8 Nf3 Ne5 Nxe5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Azaz Mathakiya    (1115)
g3 Nf6 Bg2 c6

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Andrea Grammatica    (2218)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 a6 Bd3 g6 O-O Bg7 Be3 Ne7 c4 d5 exd5 exd5 Nc3 O-O Nxd5 Nxd5 cxd5 Qxd5 Rc1 Nd7 Bc4 Qa5 b4 Qd8 Nf3 Ne5 Nxe5 Bxe5 Qf3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2218)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Ndb5 d6 Nd5 Nxd5 exd5 Nb8 c4 a6 Qa4 Nd7 c5 Rb8 Nxd6 Bxd6 cxd6 O-O Qa3 b5 Be2 b4 Qg3 Nc5 Be3 Qxd6 Rc1

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Azaz Mathakiya    (1115)
g3 e5 Bg2 Nf6

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1115)
c4 d6 Nc3 b6 d4

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1115)
g3 e5 Bg2 Nf6 e3 Be7

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1115)
g3 h5 h4 d5

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1115)
g3 Nf6 Bg2 c6 e3 d5

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1115)
g3 Nf6 Bg2 c6 e3 d5 d3 d4

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1115)
g3 h5 h4 d5 e3 Nf6

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Andrea Grammatica    (2218)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 a6 Bd3 g6 O-O Bg7 Be3 Ne7 c4 d5 exd5 exd5 Nc3 O-O Nxd5 Nxd5 cxd5 Qxd5 Rc1 Nd7 Bc4 Qa5 b4 Qd8 Nf3 Ne5 Nxe5 Bxe5 Qf3 Qf6 Bd5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Azaz Mathakiya    (1115)
g3 Nf6 Bg2 c6 e3 d5 d3 d4 b3 dxe3

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1115)
g3 h5 h4 d5 e3 Nf6 Bg2 e5

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Mateia Benone    (1041)
d4 d5 Nf3 Nf6 e3 e6 g3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Azaz Mathakiya    (1115)
g3 Nf6 Bg2 c6 e3 d5 d3 d4 b3 dxe3 fxe3 e5

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1115)
e4 a6 Nf3 c5

Transpose to wikichess #95#

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1115)
g3 e5 Bg2 Nf6 e3 Be7 Ne2 O-O

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Andrea Grammatica    (2218)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Ndb5 d6 Nd5 Nxd5 exd5 Nb8 c4 a6 Qa4 Nd7 c5 Rb8 Nxd6 Bxd6 cxd6 O-O Qa3 b5 Be2 b4 Qg3 Nc5 Be3 Qxd6 Rc1 Ne4 Qf3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Azaz Mathakiya    (1115)
g3 e5 Bg2 Nf6 e3 Be7 Ne2 O-O b3 d5

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1115)
g3 Nf6 Bg2 c6 e3 d5 d3 d4 b3 dxe3 fxe3 e5 Bb2 Bd6

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Matei Cornel    (2153)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Bd3 Nc6 O-O Be7 c4 Nb4 Be2 O-O Nc3 Be6

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2153)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Bd3 Nc6 O-O Be7 c4 Nb4 Be2 O-O Nc3 Be6 h3 Re8

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matej Pech    (1202)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 e3 O-O Bd3 b6

Transpose to wikichess #30018#

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matei Cornel    (2153)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Bd3 Nc6 O-O Be7 c4 Nb4 Be2 O-O Nc3 Be6 h3 Re8 Be3 Bf5

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2153)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Bd3 Nc6 O-O Be7 c4 Nb4 Be2 O-O Nc3 Be6 h3 Re8 Be3 Bf5 Rc1 dxc4

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2153)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Bd3 Nc6 O-O Be7 c4 Nb4 Be2 O-O Nc3 Be6 h3 Re8 Be3 Bf5 Rc1 dxc4 Bxc4 Nxc3

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2153)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Bd3 Nc6 O-O Be7 c4 Nb4 Be2 O-O Nc3 Be6 h3 Re8 Be3 Bf5 Rc1 dxc4 Bxc4 Nxc3 bxc3 Nd5

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Azaz Mathakiya    (1115)
g3 h5 h4 d5 e3 Nf6 Bg2 e5 Ne2 Bd6

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1115)
g3 e5 Bg2 Nf6 e3 Be7 Ne2 O-O b3 d5 Bb2 Nc6

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1115)
c4 d6 Nc3 b6 d4 Bb7 Nf3

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1115)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 Ng5 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Bxd5 Qxd5 Nc3

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Matej Pech    (1202)
e4 c6 d4 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 Nd7 Bc4 Ndf6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Azaz Mathakiya    (1115)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 Ng5 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Bxd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qxg2 Rf1

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1115)
g3 Nf6 Bg2 c6 e3 d5 d3 d4 b3 dxe3 fxe3 e5 Bb2 Bd6 Nd2 Be6

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1115)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 c4 d5

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (1115)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 Ng5 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Bxd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qxg2 Rf1 Qxg5 Qf3

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Matei Cornel    (2153)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Bd3 Nc6 O-O Be7 c4 Nb4 Be2 O-O Nc3 Be6 h3 Re8 Be3 Bf5 Rc1 dxc4 Bxc4 Nxc3 bxc3 Nd5 Qb3 Be6

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Andrea Grammatica    (2218)
Nf3 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qa4 Bd7 Qb3 Nb6 d4 Be6 Qc2

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matei Cornel    (2153)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Bd3 Nc6 O-O Be7 c4 Nb4 Be2 O-O Nc3 Be6 h3 Re8 Be3 Bf5 Rc1 dxc4 Bxc4 Nxc3 bxc3 Nd5 Qb3 Be6 a4 c5

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Azaz Mathakiya    (1115)
c4 d6 Nc3 b6 d4 Bb7 Nf3 g6 e4

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Andrea Grammatica    (2218)
Nf3 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qa4 Bd7 Qb3 Nb6 d4 Be6 Qc2 Bg7 e4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matei Cornel    (2153)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Bd3 Nc6 O-O Be7 c4 Nb4 Be2 O-O Nc3 Be6 h3 Re8 Be3 Bf5 Rc1 dxc4 Bxc4 Nxc3 bxc3 Nd5 Qb3 Be6 a4 c5 dxc5 Nc7

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2153)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Bd3 Nc6 O-O Be7 c4 Nb4 Be2 O-O Nc3 Be6 h3 Re8 Be3 Bf5 Rc1 dxc4 Bxc4 Nxc3 bxc3 Nd5 Qb3 Be6 a4 c5 dxc5 Nc7 Rfd1 Bxc4

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Andrea Grammatica    (2218)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 g3 c5 d5 d6 Nc3 exd5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2218)
Nf3 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qa4 Bd7 Qb3 Nb6 d4 Be6 Qc2 Bg7 e4 c6 Be3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2218)
Nf3 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qa4 Bd7 Qb3 Nb6 d4 Be6 Qc2 Bg7 e4 c6 Be3 Bc4 h4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2218)
Nf3 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qa4 Bd7 Qb3 Nb6 d4 Be6 Qc2 Bg7 e4 c6 Be3 Bc4 h4 h6 O-O-O

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2218)
Nf3 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qa4 Bd7 Qb3 Nb6 d4 Be6 Qc2 Bg7 e4 c6 Be3 Bc4 h4 h6 O-O-O Na6 Kb1

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2218)
Nf3 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qa4 Bd7 Qb3 Nb6 d4 Be6 Qc2 Bg7 e4 c6 Be3 Bc4 h4 h6 O-O-O Na6 Kb1 Nb4 Qc1

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2218)
Nf3 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qa4 Bd7 Qb3 Nb6 d4 Be6 Qc2 Bg7 e4 c6 Be3 Bc4 h4 h6 O-O-O Na6 Kb1 Nb4 Qc1 Bxf1 Rhxf1

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2218)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 e3 Bg4 Qb3 Qb6 Nc3 e6 Nh4 Bh5 h3 Be7

Transpose to wikichess #94361#

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2218)
Nf3 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qa4 Bd7 Qb3 Nb6 d4 Be6 Qc2 Bg7 e4 c6 Be3 Bc4 h4 h6 O-O-O Na6 Kb1 Nb4 Qc1 Bxf1 Rhxf1 Nc4 Ne2

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2218)
Nf3 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qa4 Bd7 Qb3 Nb6 d4 Be6 Qc2 Bg7 e4 c6 Be3 Bc4 h4 h6 O-O-O Na6 Kb1 Nb4 Qc1 Bxf1 Rhxf1 Nc4 Ne2 Nxe3 fxe3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2218)
Nf3 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qa4 Bd7 Qb3 Nb6 d4 Be6 Qc2 Bg7 e4 c6 Be3 Bc4 h4 h6 O-O-O Na6 Kb1 Nb4 Qc1 Bxf1 Rhxf1 Nc4 Ne2 Nxe3 fxe3 O-O a3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Mateia Benone    (1041)
d4 Nf6 c4 e5 dxe5 Ng4 Nf3 Bc5 e3 O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 Nf6 Nc3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxd5 Qxd5 d4 Nc6 Be3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 Nf6 Nc3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxd5 Qxd5 d4 Nc6 Be3 Bf5 a3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
d4 Nf6 c4 e5 dxe5 Ng4 Bf4 g5 Bg3 Nc6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 Nf6 Nc3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxd5 Qxd5 d4 Nc6 Be3 Bf5 a3 O-O-O Nf3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
d4 Nf6 c4 e5 dxe5 Ng4 Nf3 Bc5 e3 O-O Qd5 d6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
d4 Nf6 c4 e5 dxe5 Ng4 Nf3 Nc6 Bf4

Transpose to wikichess #1115#

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
d4 Nf6 c4 e5 dxe5 Ng4 Bf4 g5 Bg3 Nc6 e4 Ngxe5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 Nf6 Nc3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxd5 Qxd5 d4 Nc6 Be3 Bf5 a3 O-O-O Nf3 e5 Be2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
d4 Nf6 c4 e5 dxe5 Ng4 Bf4 g5 Bg3 Nc6 e4 Ngxe5 Nc3 d6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 g6 Bxc6 bxc6 Nc3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
d4 Nf6 c4 e5 dxe5 Ng4 Bf4 g5 Bg3 Nc6 e4 Ngxe5 Nc3 d6 h4 g4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e5 Bxc6 bxc6 d3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
d4 Nf6 c4 e5 dxe5 Ng4 Bf4 g5 Bg3 Nc6 e4 Ngxe5 Nc3 d6 h4 g4 Be2 Be6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 g6 Bxc6 bxc6 Nc3 Bg7 O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e5 Bxc6 bxc6 d3 Qc7 O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 g6 Bxc6 bxc6 Nc3 Bg7 O-O Nh6 d3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
d4 Nf6 c4 e5 dxe5 Ng4 Bf4 Nc6 Nf3 Bb4 Nbd2 Qe7 a3 Bc5 e3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matej Pech    (1202)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 d5 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 c5 cxd5 exd5 e3 O-O Bd3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Mateia Benone    (1041)
d4 Nf6 c4 e5 dxe5 Ng4 Bf4 Nc6 Nf3 Bb4 Nbd2 Qe7 a3 Bc5 e3 a5 Nb3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e5 Bxc6 bxc6 d3 Qc7 O-O Nf6 Bg5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 g6 Bxc6 bxc6 Nc3 Bg7 O-O Nh6 d3 O-O h3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e5 Bxc6 bxc6 d3 Qc7 O-O Nf6 Bg5 Be7 Nc3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e5 Bxc6 bxc6 d3 Qc7 O-O Nf6 Bg5 Be7 Nc3 O-O a3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 g6 Bxc6 bxc6 Nc3 Bg7 O-O Nh6 d3 O-O h3 d5 Bxh6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
d4 Nf6 c4 e5 dxe5 Ng4 Nf3 Bc5 e3 O-O Qd5 d6 exd6 Bxd6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d3 Nf6 Be2 Nc6 O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d3 Nf6 Be2 Nc6 O-O Be7 c4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d3 Nf6 Be2 Nc6 O-O Be7 c4 O-O h3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d3 d5 Nxe5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d3 d5 Nxe5 dxe4 Nc3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d3 d5 Nxe5 dxe4 Nc3 exd3 Nxd3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d3 d5 Nxe5 dxe4 Nc3 exd3 Nxd3 Nc6 a3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d3 d5 Nxe5 dxe4 Nc3 exd3 Nxd3 Nc6 a3 Be7 h3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nc6 Nc3 Bc5 Nb3 Bb4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
Nf3 Nf6 c4 d5 cxd5 Nxd5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nc6 Nc3 Bc5 Nb3 Bb4 Bd2 Nf6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d3 d5 Nxe5 dxe4 Nc3 exd3 Nxd3 Nc6 a3 Be7 h3 O-O Be2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nc6 Nc3 Bc5 Nb3 Bb4 Bd2 Nf6 Bd3 a6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d3 Nf6 Be2 Be7 O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d3 Nf6 Be2 Be7 O-O O-O c4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d3 Nf6 Be2 Be7 O-O O-O c4 Bg4 h3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nc6 Nc3 Bc5 Nb3 Bb4 Bd2 Nf6 Bd3 a6 O-O O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 f4 e6 Nf3 a6

Transpose to wikichess #65553#

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
d4 d5 Nf3 g6 e3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 c6

Transpose to wikichess #26475#

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 Qa4 c6 Qxc4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 c5 c3 a6 d4 cxd4 cxd4 h6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 Qa4 c6 Qxc4 Nf6 e3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 Qa4 c6 Qxc4 Nf6 e3 Bf5 Nf3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 Qa4 c6 Qxc4 Nf6 e3 Bf5 Nf3 e6 g3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 c5 c3 e6 d4 cxd4 cxd4 d6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 Qa4 c6 Qxc4 Nf6 e3 Bf5 Nf3 e6 g3 Nbd7 Bg2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 c5 c3 e6 d4 cxd4 cxd4 d6 Nf3 Nf6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 c5 c3 e6 d4 cxd4 cxd4 d6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 Be7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 Qa4 c6 Qxc4 Nf6 e3 Bf5 Nf3 e6 g3 Nbd7 Bg2 Nb6 Qe2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 c5 c3 a6 d4 cxd4 cxd4 h6 Nc3 e6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 c5 c3 a6 d4 cxd4 cxd4 h6 Nc3 e6 Nf3 Bb4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 c5 c3 e6 d4 cxd4 cxd4 d6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 Be7 Bc4 a6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 c5 c3 a6 d4 cxd4 cxd4 h6 Nc3 e6 Nf3 Bb4 Bd2 Ne7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 c5 c3 a6 d4 cxd4 cxd4 h6 Nc3 e6 Nf3 Bb4 Bd2 Ne7 a3 Ba5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 c5 c3 a6 d4 cxd4 cxd4 h6 Nc3 e6 Nf3 Bb4 Bd2 Ne7 a3 Ba5 b4 Bc7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 c5 c3 e6 d4 cxd4 cxd4 d6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 Be7 Bc4 a6 O-O b5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
d4 Nf6 c4 e5 dxe5 Ng4 Nf3 Bc5 e3 O-O Qd5 d6 exd6 Bxd6 Nc3 Nc6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 c5 c3 e6 d4 cxd4 cxd4 d6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 Be7 Bc4 a6 O-O b5 Bd3 O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Bc4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Bc4 exd4 Qxd4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 Nc3 Nf6 e3 c5 Bxc4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
d4 Nf6 c4 e5 dxe5 Ng4 Bf4 Nc6 Nf3 Bb4 Nc3 Qe7 Qd5 O-O h3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 Nc3 Nf6 e3 c5 Bxc4 cxd4 exd4

Transpose to wikichess #38334#

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Bc4 exd4 Qxd4 Nc6 Qd3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
d4 d5 Nf3 g6 c4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
d4 Nf6 c4 e5 dxe5 Ng4 Bf4 Nc6 Nf3 Bb4 Nc3 Qe7 Qd5 O-O h3 Nh6 Bxh6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
d4 d5 Nf3 g6 c4 dxc4 Qa4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Bc4 exd4 Qxd4 Nc6 Qd3 Be7 Be3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 e5 dxe5 dxe5 Nf3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Bc4 exd4 Qxd4 Nc6 Qd3 Be7 Be3 O-O Nge2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Bc4 exd4 Qxd4 Nc6 Qd3 Be7 Be3 O-O Nge2 Nb4 Qd2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Bc4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 e5 Nf3 d6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Nc3 Nf6 Bb5 Bd7 Bf4 a6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 e5 Nf3 d6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Nc3 Nf6 Bb5 Bd7 Bf4 a6 Be2 b5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
d4 d5 Nf3 g6 c4 dxc4 Qa4 c6 Qxc4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Bc4 dxe5 Bd5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
d4 d5 Nf3 g6 c4 dxc4 Qa4 c6 Qxc4 Be6 Qc3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
d4 d5 Nf3 g6 c4 dxc4 Qa4 c6 Qxc4 Be6 Qc3 Bg7 e3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
d4 d5 b3 g6 c4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 Bb4 c3 Ba5 d5 Nd4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
d4 d5 Nf3 g6 c4 dxc4 Qa4 c6 Qxc4 Be6 Qc3 Bg7 e3 Nf6 Be2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
d4 d5 Nf3 g6 c4 dxc4 Qa4 c6 Qxc4 Be6 Qc3 Bg7 e3 Nf6 Be2 O-O O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nxd4 Qxd4 c5 Qe3 d6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
d4 d5 b3 g6 c4 c6 Nf3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nxd4 Qxd4 c5 Qe3 d6 Nc3 Ne7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Bc4 dxe5 Bd5 Nxd5 exd5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
d4 d5 b3 g6 c4 c6 Nf3 Bg7 e3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
d4 d5 b3 g6 c4 c6 Nf3 Bg7 e3 Nf6 Bd2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 Bb4 c3 Ba5 d5 Nd4 Nfd2 Qh4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 Bb4 c3 Ba5 d5 Nd4 Nfd2 Qh4 cxd4 Bxd2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Bc4 dxe5 Bd5 Nxd5 exd5 Qxd5 O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
d4 d5 b3 g6 c4 c6 Nf3 Bg7 e3 Nf6 Bd2 Bg4 Bd3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nxd4 Qxd4 c5 Qe3 d6 Nc3 Ne7 Bc4 Be6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nxd4 Qxd4 c5 Qe3 d6 Nc3 Ne7 Bc4 Be6 Bb5 Bd7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 Bb4 c3 Ba5 d5 Nd4 Nfd2 Qh4 cxd4 Bxd2 Nxd2 exd4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 c5 Nc3 a6 f4 Nc6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
d4 d5 e3 g6 c4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
d4 d5 e3 g6 c4 c6 c5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 Bb4 c3 Ba5 d5 Nd4 Nfd2 Qh4 cxd4 Bxd2 Nxd2 exd4 g3 Qf6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
d4 d5 e3 g6 c4 c6 c5 Bg7 Nf3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
d4 d5 e3 g6 c4 c6 c5 Bg7 Nf3 Nf6 h3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
d4 d5 e3 g6 c4 c6 c5 Bg7 Nf3 Nf6 h3 O-O Be2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
d4 d5 e3 g6 c4 c6 c5 Bg7 Nf3 Nf6 h3 O-O Be2 b6 b4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
d4 d5 e3 g6 c4 c6 c5 Bg7 Nf3 Nf6 h3 O-O Be2 b6 b4 a5 Bd2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Bc4 dxe5 Bd5 Nxd5 exd5 Qxd5 O-O Nc6 Nc3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
d4 d5 b3 g6 c4 c6 Nf3 Bg7 e3 Nf6 Bd2 Bg4 Bd3 O-O O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
d4 d5 b3 g6 c4 c6 Nf3 Bg7 e3 Nf6 Bd2 Bg4 Bd3 O-O O-O Nbd7 Ne5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 e5 f4 d5 exd5 c6 Qe2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Bc4 dxe5 Bd5 Nxd5 exd5 Qxd5 O-O Nc6 Nc3 Qd8 d3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
b4 e5 Bb2 Bxb4 Bxe5 Nf6 a3 Ba5 c4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 e5 f4 d5 exd5 c6 Qe2 cxd5 fxe5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 a3 b6 Nc3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
b4 e5 Bb2 Bxb4 Bxe5 Nf6 a3 Ba5 c4 d6 Bb2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 a3 b6 Nc3 Bb7 h3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1343)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Bd3 Nc6 O-O Be7 a3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1343)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Qe2 Qe7 Qb5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1343)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 g3 Bb4 Qb3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1343)
d4 d5 c4 e6 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 h6 Bxf6 Qxf6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1343)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 g3 Bb4 Qb3 Bxc3 Qxc3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1343)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Bd3 Nc6 O-O Be7 a3 O-O Be3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1343)
d4 d5 c4 e6 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 h6 Bxf6 Qxf6 cxd5 Bb4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1343)
d4 d5 c4 e6 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 h6 Bxf6 Qxf6 cxd5 Bb4 Qa4 c6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1343)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 g3 Bb4 Qb3 Bxc3 Qxc3 d6 d4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1343)
d4 d5 c4 e6 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 h6 Bxf6 Qxf6 cxd5 Bb4 Qa4 c6 Qxb4 cxd5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1343)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d3 d5 exd5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1343)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Qe2 Qe7 Qb5 c6 Qe2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1343)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 g3 Bb4 Qb3 Bxc3 Qxc3 d6 d4 exd4 Qxd4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1343)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 g3 Bb4 Qb3 Bxc3 Qxc3 d6 d4 exd4 Qxd4 Nc6 Qc3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1343)
d4 d5 c4 e6 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 h6 Bxf6 Qxf6 cxd5 Bb4 Qa4 c6 Qxb4 cxd5 e3 Nc6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 e5 f4 d5 exd5 c6 Qe2 cxd5 fxe5 Nc6 Nf3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1343)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 g3 Bb4 Qb3 Bxc3 Qxc3 d6 d4 exd4 Qxd4 Nc6 Qc3 O-O Bg2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1343)
d4 d5 c4 e6 Nf3 h6 cxd5 Qxd5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 a3 b6 Nc3 Bb7 h3 Be7 Nf3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 a3 b6 Nc3 Bb7 h3 Be7 Nf3 O-O e3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1343)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Be2

Transpose to wikichess #49800#

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1343)
d4 d5 c4 e6 Nf3 h6 cxd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qd8

Transpose to wikichess #99748#

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1343)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 g6 Nxc6 bxc6 Bd3 Bg7 Nc3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1343)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 g6 Nxc6 bxc6 Bd3 Bg7 Nc3 d5 exd5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 e5 f4 d5 exd5 c6 Qe2 cxd5 fxe5 Nc6 Nf3 Bg4 c3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1343)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 g6 Nxc6 bxc6 Bd3 Bg7 Nc3 d5 exd5 cxd5 O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1343)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Qe2 Qe7 Qb5 c6 Qe2 Bg4 Be3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
b4 e5 Bb2 Bxb4 Bxe5 Nf6 a3 Ba5 c4 d6 Bb2 O-O e3 Bg4 Nf3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 a3 b6 Nc3 Bb7 h3 Be7 Nf3 O-O e3 d5 Be2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 a3 b6 Nc3 Bb7 h3 Be7 Nf3 O-O e3 d5 Be2 c5 b3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 e5 f4 d5 exd5 c6 Qe2 cxd5 fxe5 Nc6 Nf3 Bg4 c3 Qc7 d4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1041)
e4 e5 f4 d5 exd5 c6 Qe2 cxd5 fxe5 Nc6 Nf3 Bg4 c3 Qc7 d4 O-O-O h3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1343)
d4 Nf6 Nf3 d5 e3 g6 Bd3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matei Cornel    (2182)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Qd2 b5 a3 Qa5 Be2 b4

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2182)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Qd2 b5 a3 Qa5 Be2 b4 Nd1 Rb8

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2182)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Qd2 b5 a3 Qa5 Be2 b4 Nd1 Rb8 c3 bxc3

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2182)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Qd2 b5 a3 Qa5 Be2 b4 Nd1 Rb8 c3 bxc3 Nxc3 cxd4

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2182)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Qd2 b5 a3 Qa5 Be2 b4 Nd1 Rb8 c3 bxc3 Nxc3 cxd4 Nxd4 Nxd4

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Mateia Benone    (1370)
e4 c5 c3 Nf6 d3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1343)
d4 Nf6 Nf3 d5 e3 g6 Bd3 Bg7 O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1370)
e4 c5 c3 Nf6 d3 e6 Nf3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1343)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 g3 Bb4 Bg2 O-O O-O Re8 Nd5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1343)
d4 Nf6 Nf3 d5 e3 g6 Bd3 Bg7 O-O O-O c3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1370)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 g6 b3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1370)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 g6 b3 Bg7 Bb2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1370)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 g6 b3 Bg7 Bb2 Nf6 Nxc6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matei Cornel    (2182)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 e6 g4 e5 Nf5 g6 Bg2

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matus Tkac    (1997)
c4 e5 g3 c6 Bg2 d5 cxd5

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (1997)
c4 e5 g3 c6 Bg2 d5 cxd5 cxd5 d4

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (1997)
c4 e5 g3 c6 Bg2 d5 cxd5 cxd5 d4 e4 Nc3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (1997)
c4 e5 g3 c6 Bg2 d5 cxd5 cxd5 d4 e4 Nc3 Nc6 f3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Mateia Benone    (1343)
d4 Nf6 Nf3 d5 e3 g6 Bd3 Bg7 O-O O-O c3 Bg4 Nbd2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matus Tkac    (1997)
c4 e5 g3 c6 Bg2 d5 cxd5 cxd5 d4 e4 Nc3 Nc6 f3 exf3 Nxf3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (1997)
c4 e5 g3 c6 Bg2 d5 cxd5 cxd5 d4 e4 Nc3 Nc6 f3 exf3 Nxf3 Nf6 O-O

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Mateia Benone    (1370)
e4 c5 c3 Nf6 d3 e6 Nf3 d5 exd5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1343)
d4 Nf6 Nf3 d5 e3 g6 Bd3 Bg7 O-O O-O c3 Bg4 Nbd2 Nc6 Qb3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1370)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 g6 b3 Bg7 Bb2 Nf6 Nxc6 bxc6 Nd2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1370)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 e4 e5 d5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1370)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 e4 e5 Nf3 exd4 Qxd4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1370)
e4 c5 c3 Nf6 d3 e6 Nf3 d5 exd5 exd5 Bg5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matej Pech    (1363)
c4 b6 Nc3 Bb7 d4 g6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1363)
c4 b6 Nc3 Bb7 d4 g6 e4 Bg7

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1363)
c4 b6 Nc3 Bb7 d4 g6 e4 Bg7 Nf3 h6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matus Tkac    (1999)
e4 c6 Nf3 d5 e5 Bg4 Be2 Nd7

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matej Pech    (1363)
c4 b6 Nc3 Bb7 d4 g6 e4 Bg7 Nf3 h6 Bd3 e6

Transpose to wikichess #106090#

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matus Tkac    (1999)
e4 c6 Nf3 d5 e5 Bg4 Be2 Nd7 d4 e6

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (1999)
e4 c6 Nf3 d5 e5 Bg4 Be2 Nd7 d4 e6 O-O Ne7

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2191)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O h3 e5 d5 Nh5 g3 Qe8

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2191)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O h3 e5 d5 Nh5 g3 Qe8 Be2 f5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2191)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O h3 e5 d5 Nh5 g3 Qe8 Be2 f5 exf5 gxf5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2191)
Nf3 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 O-O d4

Transpose to wikichess #4356#

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matus Tkac    (1999)
e4 c6 Nf3 d5 e5 Bg4 Be2 Nd7 d4 e6 O-O Ne7 Nbd2 c5

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2191)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 c5 d5 Ne4 Bf4 Qb6 Bc1 e6 f3 Qa5 c3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2191)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O h3 e5 d5 Nh5 g3 Qe8 Be2 f5 exf5 gxf5 g4 Nf6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2191)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O h3 e5 d5 Nh5 g3 Qe8 Be2 f5 exf5 gxf5 g4 Nf6 gxf5 Bxf5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2191)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 c5 d5 Ne4 Bf4 Qb6 Bc1 e6 f3 Qa5 c3 Nf6 e4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2191)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 c5 d5 Ne4 Bf4 Qb6 Bc1 e6 f3 Qa5 c3 Nf6 e4 d6 Bd2

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matus Tkac    (1999)
e4 c6 Nf3 d5 e5 Bg4 Be2 Nd7 d4 e6 O-O Ne7 Nbd2 c5 c4 cxd4

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2191)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O h3 e5 d5 Nh5 g3 Qe8 Be2 f5 exf5 gxf5 g4 Nf6 gxf5 Bxf5 Rg1 Kh8

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2191)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O h3 e5 d5 Nh5 g3 Qe8 Be2 f5 exf5 gxf5 g4 Nf6 gxf5 Bxf5 Rg1 Kh8 Be3 Na6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2191)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O h3 e5 d5 Nh5 g3 Qe8 Be2 f5 exf5 gxf5 g4 Nf6 gxf5 Bxf5 Rg1 Kh8 Be3 Na6 Nh4 Bd7

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matus Tkac    (1999)
e4 c6 Nf3 d5 e5 Bg4 Be2 Nd7 d4 e6 O-O Ne7 Nbd2 c5 c4 cxd4 Nxd4 Bxe2

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2191)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O Be2 e5 O-O Nc6 d5 Ne7 Ne1 Nd7 Nd3 f5 Bd2 fxe4 Nxe4 Nf5 f3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2191)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O Be2 e5 O-O Nc6 d5 Ne7 Ne1 Nd7 Nd3 f5 Bd2 fxe4 Nxe4 Nf5 f3 Nf6 Ndf2

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2191)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O h3 e5 d5 Nh5 g3 Qe8 Be2 f5 exf5 gxf5 g4 Nf6 gxf5 Bxf5 Rg1 Kh8 Be3 Na6 Nh4 Bd7 Qc2 Nh5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2191)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O h3 e5 d5 Nh5 g3 Qe8 Be2 f5 exf5 gxf5 g4 Nf6 gxf5 Bxf5 Rg1 Kh8 Be3 Na6 Nh4 Bd7 Qc2 Nh5 O-O-O Bf6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2191)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O Be2 e5 O-O Nc6 d5 Ne7 Ne1 Nd7 Nd3 f5 Bd2 fxe4 Nxe4 Nf5 f3 Nf6 Ndf2 c6 Nxf6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2191)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O h3 e5 d5 Nh5 g3 Qe8 Be2 f5 exf5 gxf5 g4 Nf6 gxf5 Bxf5 Rg1 Kh8 Be3 Na6 Nh4 Bd7 Qc2 Nh5 O-O-O Bf6 Nf5 Nb4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2191)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O Be2 e5 O-O Nc6 d5 Ne7 Ne1 Nd7 Nd3 f5 Bd2 fxe4 Nxe4 Nf5 f3 Nf6 Ndf2 c6 Nxf6 Bxf6 Ne4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2191)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O h3 e5 d5 Nh5 g3 Qe8 Be2 f5 exf5 gxf5 g4 Nf6 gxf5 Bxf5 Rg1 Kh8 Be3 Na6 Nh4 Bd7 Qc2 Nh5 O-O-O Bf6 Nf5 Nb4 Qb1 Nf4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2191)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 c5 d5 Ne4 Bf4 Qb6 Bc1 e6 f3 Qa5 c3 Nf6 e4 d6 Bd2 exd5 c4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matei Cornel    (2173)
d4 d5 c4 c6 cxd5 cxd5 Bf4 e6 e3

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2191)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 c5 d5 Ne4 Bf4 Qb6 Bc1 e6 f3 Qa5 c3 Nf6 e4 d6 Bd2 exd5 c4 Qd8 cxd5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2191)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 c5 d5 Ne4 Bf4 Qb6 Bc1 e6 f3 Qa5 c3 Nf6 e4 d6 Bd2 exd5 c4 Qd8 cxd5 g6 Bd3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matei Cornel    (2173)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Ndb5 d6 Bg5 a6 Na3 b5 Nd5 Be7 Bxf6 Bxf6 c3 O-O Nc2 Rb8 h4 g6 g3

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2191)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 c5 d5 Ne4 Bf4 Qb6 Bc1 e6 f3 Qa5 c3 Nf6 e4 d6 Bd2 exd5 c4 Qd8 cxd5 g6 Bd3 Bg7 Bc3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2191)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O Be2 e5 O-O Nc6 d5 Ne7 Ne1 Nd7 Nd3 f5 Bd2 fxe4 Nxe4 Nf5 f3 Nf6 Ndf2 c6 Nxf6 Bxf6 Ne4 cxd5 cxd5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2191)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O Be2 e5 O-O Nc6 d5 Ne7 Ne1 Nd7 Nd3 f5 Bd2 fxe4 Nxe4 Nf5 f3 Nf6 Ndf2 c6 Nxf6 Bxf6 Ne4 cxd5 cxd5 b6 a4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2191)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 c5 d5 Ne4 Bf4 Qb6 Bc1 e6 f3 Qa5 c3 Nf6 e4 d6 Bd2 exd5 c4 Qd8 cxd5 g6 Bd3 Bg7 Bc3 O-O Ne2

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2191)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O Be2 e5 O-O Nc6 d5 Ne7 Ne1 Nd7 Nd3 f5 Bd2 fxe4 Nxe4 Nf5 f3 Nf6 Ndf2 c6 Nxf6 Bxf6 Ne4 cxd5 cxd5 b6 a4 Bb7 Bc4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2191)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 c5 d5 Ne4 Bf4 Qb6 Bc1 e6 f3 Qa5 c3 Nf6 e4 d6 Bd2 exd5 c4 Qd8 cxd5 g6 Bd3 Bg7 Bc3 O-O Ne2 Nbd7 a4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2191)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 c5 d5 Ne4 Bf4 Qb6 Bc1 e6 f3 Qa5 c3 Nf6 e4 d6 Bd2 exd5 c4 Qd8 cxd5 g6 Bd3 Bg7 Bc3 O-O Ne2 Nbd7 a4 Ne5 Bxe5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2191)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 c5 d5 Ne4 Bf4 Qb6 Bc1 e6 f3 Qa5 c3 Nf6 e4 d6 Bd2 exd5 c4 Qd8 cxd5 g6 Bd3 Bg7 Bc3 O-O Ne2 Nbd7 a4 Ne5 Bxe5 dxe5 Qc2

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2191)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 c5 d5 Ne4 Bf4 Qb6 Bc1 e6 f3 Qa5 c3 Nf6 e4 d6 Bd2 exd5 c4 Qd8 cxd5 g6 Bd3 Bg7 Bc3 O-O Ne2 Nbd7 a4 Ne5 Bxe5 dxe5 Qc2 b6 a5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2191)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 c5 d5 Ne4 Bf4 Qb6 Bc1 e6 f3 Qa5 c3 Nf6 e4 d6 Bd2 exd5 c4 Qd8 cxd5 g6 Bd3 Bg7 Bc3 O-O Ne2 Nbd7 a4 Ne5 Bxe5 dxe5 Qc2 b6 a5 Bd7 Na3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matei Cornel    (2173)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Ndb5 d6 Bg5 a6 Na3 b5 Nd5 Be7 Bxf6 Bxf6 c3 O-O Nc2 Rb8 h4 g6 g3 Bg7 h5

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2191)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 a3 Bb7 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qc2 Nxc3 bxc3 Be7 e4 O-O Bd3 c5 O-O Qc7 Qe2 Nd7 a4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matei Cornel    (2173)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Ndb5 d6 Bg5 a6 Na3 b5 Nd5 Be7 Bxf6 Bxf6 c3 O-O Nc2 Rb8 h4 g6 g3 Bg7 h5 Ne7 Nce3

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2173)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Ndb5 d6 Bg5 a6 Na3 b5 Nd5 Be7 Bxf6 Bxf6 c3 O-O Nc2 Rb8 h4 g6 g3 Bg7 h5 Ne7 Nce3 Nxd5 Nxd5

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2173)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Ndb5 d6 Bg5 a6 Na3 b5 Nd5 Be7 Bxf6 Bxf6 c3 O-O Nc2 Rb8 h4 g6 g3 Bg7 h5 Ne7 Nce3 Nxd5 Nxd5 Be6 Bh3

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2191)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 a3 Bb7 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qc2 Nxc3 bxc3 Be7 e4 O-O Bd3 c5 O-O Qc7 Qe2 Nd7 a4 Rac8 Rb1

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2191)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 a3 Bb7 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qc2 Nxc3 bxc3 Be7 e4 O-O Bd3 c5 O-O Qc7 Qe2 Nd7 a4 Rac8 Rb1 Rfd8 Re1

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2191)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 a3 Bb7 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qc2 Nxc3 bxc3 Be7 e4 O-O Bd3 c5 O-O Qc7 Qe2 Nd7 a4 Rac8 Rb1 Rfd8 Re1 h6 Bd2

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2191)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 a3 Bb7 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qc2 Nxc3 bxc3 Be7 e4 O-O Bd3 c5 O-O Qc7 Qe2 Nd7 a4 Rac8 Rb1 Rfd8 Re1 h6 Bd2 Bd6 g3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2191)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 a3 Bb7 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qc2 Nxc3 bxc3 Be7 e4 O-O Bd3 c5 O-O Qc7 Qe2 Nd7 a4 Rac8 Rb1 Rfd8 Re1 h6 Bd2 Bd6 g3 Qb8 a5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2191)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 a3 Bb7 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qc2 Nxc3 bxc3 Be7 e4 O-O Bd3 c5 O-O Qc7 Qe2 Nd7 a4 Rac8 Rb1 Rfd8 Re1 h6 Bd2 Bd6 g3 Qb8 a5 Qc7 Bb5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matei Cornel    (2173)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 h3 e5 Nde2 h5 g3 Nbd7 Bg2 b5 O-O Bb7 Be3

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2173)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Ndb5 d6 Bg5 a6 Na3 b5 Nd5 Be7 Bxf6 Bxf6 c3 O-O Nc2 Rb8 h4 g6 g3 Bg7 h5 Ne7 Nce3 Nxd5 Nxd5 Be6 Bh3 Qg5 hxg6

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2173)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 h3 e5 Nde2 h5 g3 Nbd7 Bg2 b5 O-O Bb7 Be3 Be7 a4

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2173)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O h3 Bb7 d3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxe5 Nd4 Nd2 c5 Nef3 Nxb3

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2173)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O h3 Bb7 d3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxe5 Nd4 Nd2 c5 Nef3 Nxb3 Nxb3 Nb4

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2173)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O h3 Bb7 d3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxe5 Nd4 Nd2 c5 Nef3 Nxb3 Nxb3 Nb4 Nbd2 Qd7

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2197)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Bf4 dxc4 e3 b5 a4 Nf6 Nf3

Transpose to wikichess #91563#

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2173)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 h3 e5 Nde2 h5 g3 Nbd7 Bg2 b5 O-O Bb7 Be3 Be7 a4 b4 Nd5

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2173)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O h3 Bb7 d3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxe5 Nd4 Nd2 c5 Nef3 Nxb3 Nxb3 Nb4 Nbd2 Qd7 a3 Nd5

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2173)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O h3 Bb7 d3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxe5 Nxe5 Rxe5 c5

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2173)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O h3 Bb7 d3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxe5 Nd4 Nd2 c5 Nef3 Nxb3 Nxb3 Nb4 Nbd2 Qd7 a3 Nd5 Ne4 f5

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2173)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 h3 e5 Nde2 h5 g3 Nbd7 Bg2 b5 O-O Bb7 Be3 Be7 a4 b4 Nd5 a5 c4

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2173)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O h3 Bb7 d3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxe5 Nxe5 Rxe5 c5 Qf3 c4

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2173)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 h3 e5 Nde2 h5 g3 Nbd7 Bg2 b5 O-O Bb7 Be3 Be7 a4 b4 Nd5 a5 c4 h4 g4

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2173)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Qd2 b5 a3 Qb6 Ne2 c4 Ng3 b4

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2173)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Qd2 b5 a3 Qb6 Ne2 c4 Ng3 b4 axb4 Bxb4

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2173)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 h3 e5 Nde2 h5 g3 Nbd7 Bg2 b5 O-O Bb7 Be3 Be7 a4 b4 Nd5 a5 c4 h4 g4 O-O b3

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2173)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Qd2 b5 a3 Qb6 Ne2 c4 Ng3 b4 axb4 Bxb4 c3 Bf8

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2173)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O h3 Bb7 d3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxe5 Nd4 Nd2 c5 Nef3 Nxb3 Nxb3 Nb4 Nbd2 Qd7 a3 Nd5 Ne4 f5 Neg5 Rfe8

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2173)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O h3 Bb7 d3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxe5 Nxe5 Rxe5 c5 Qf3 c4 dxc4 Nf6

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2173)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Qd2 b5 a3 Qb6 Ne2 c4 Ng3 b4 axb4 Bxb4 c3 Bf8 Be2 Na5

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2173)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O h3 Bb7 d3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxe5 Nd4 Nd2 c5 Nef3 Nxb3 Nxb3 Nb4 Nbd2 Qd7 a3 Nd5 Ne4 f5 Neg5 Rfe8 c4 Nb6

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2197)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Qd2 Qb6 O-O-O Qc7 Kb1 b5 f5 c4 fxe6 fxe6 Be2 Nb6 Rdf1 b4 Nd1 Na4 b3 Nc3

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2197)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Qd2 Qb6 O-O-O Qc7 Kb1 b5 f5 c4 fxe6 fxe6 Be2 Nb6 Rdf1 b4 Nd1 Na4 b3 Nc3 Nxc3 bxc3

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2173)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O h3 Bb7 d3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxe5 Nxe5 Rxe5 c5 Qf3 c4 dxc4 Nf6 Qe2 Bd6

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2173)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Qd2 b5 a3 Qb6 Ne2 c4 Ng3 b4 axb4 Bxb4 c3 Bf8 Be2 Na5 Bd1 Nb3

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2197)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Qd2 Qb6 O-O-O Qc7 Kb1 b5 f5 c4 fxe6 fxe6 Be2 Nb6 Rdf1 b4 Nd1 Na4 b3 Nc3 Nxc3 bxc3 Qxc3 Bb4

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2197)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 e6 f3 b5 Qd2 Nbd7 a3 Bb7 g4 h6 O-O-O Rc8 h4 d5 Rg1 e5 g5

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2173)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Qd2 b5 a3 Qb6 Ne2 c4 Ng3 b4 axb4 Bxb4 c3 Bf8 Be2 Na5 Bd1 Nb3 Bxb3 cxb3

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2173)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Qd2 b5 a3 Qb6 Ne2 c4 Ng3 b4 axb4 Bxb4 c3 Bf8 Be2 Na5 Bd1 Nb3 Bxb3 cxb3 O-O g6

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2173)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 h3 e5 Nde2 h5 g3 Nbd7 Bg2 b5 O-O Bb7 Be3 Be7 a4 b4 Nd5 a5 c4 h4 g4 O-O b3 Nc5 Qc2

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2173)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 h3 e5 Nde2 h5 g3 Nbd7 Bg2 b5 O-O Bb7 Be3 Be7 a4 b4 Nd5 a5 c4 h4 g4 O-O b3 Nc5 Qc2 Bxd5 exd5

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2197)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Qd2 b5 Be2 Qb6

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2173)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O h3 Bb7 d3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxe5 Nxe5 Rxe5 c5 Qf3 c4 dxc4 Nf6 Qe2 Bd6 Re3 Bb8

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2173)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 h3 e5 Nde2 h5 g3 Nbd7 Bg2 b5 O-O Bb7 Be3 Be7 a4 b4 Nd5 a5 c4 h4 g4 O-O b3 Nc5 Qc2 Bxd5 exd5 Nfd7 f4

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2197)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 e6 f3 b5 Qd2 Nbd7 a3 Bb7 g4 h6 O-O-O Rc8 h4 d5 Rg1 e5 g5 exd4 Bxd4

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2173)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Qd2 b5 a3 Qb6 Ne2 c4 Ng3 b4 axb4 Bxb4 c3 Bf8 Be2 Na5 Bd1 Nb3 Bxb3 cxb3 O-O g6 Rfc1 a5

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2197)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Qd2 b5 Be2 Qb6 Nd1 Be7

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2173)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Qd2 b5 a3 Qb6 Ne2 c4 Ng3 b4 axb4 Bxb4 c3 Bf8 Be2 Na5 Bd1 Nb3 Bxb3 cxb3 O-O g6 Rfc1 a5 c4 Bb4

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2197)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 e6 f3 b5 Qd2 Nbd7 a3 Bb7 g4 h6 O-O-O Rc8 h4 d5 Rg1 e5 g5 exd4 Bxd4 hxg5 hxg5

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2173)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 e5 Nb3 Be6 f3 Be7 Qd2 O-O O-O-O Nbd7 g4 b5 g5 Nh5 Nd5 Bxd5 exd5 f6 h4 Ng3 Rg1 Nxf1 Rdxf1 a5 Qd3 f5 Qxb5

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2197)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 e6 f3 b5 Qd2 Nbd7 a3 Bb7 g4 h6 O-O-O Rc8 h4 d5 Rg1 e5 g5 exd4 Bxd4 hxg5 hxg5 Nh5 Bh3

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2173)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O h3 Bb7 d3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxe5 Nxe5 Rxe5 c5 Qf3 c4 dxc4 Nf6 Qe2 Bd6 Re3 Bb8 Nd2 Qc7

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2197)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Qd2 b5 Be2 Qb6 Nd1 Be7 O-O O-O

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2173)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O h3 Bb7 d3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxe5 Nxe5 Rxe5 c5 Qf3 c4 dxc4 Nf6 Qe2 Bd6 Re3 Bb8 Nd2 Qc7 Nf1 Qc6

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2197)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 e6 f3 b5 Qd2 Nbd7 a3 Bb7 g4 h6 O-O-O Rc8 h4 d5 Rg1 e5 g5 exd4 Bxd4 hxg5 hxg5 Nh5 Bh3 Bd6 Bg4

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2197)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Qd2 b5 Be2 Qb6 Nd1 Be7 O-O O-O c3 b4

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2197)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 e6 f3 b5 Qd2 Nbd7 a3 Bb7 g4 h6 O-O-O Rc8 h4 d5 Rg1 e5 g5 exd4 Bxd4 hxg5 hxg5 Nh5 Bh3 Bd6 Bg4 Ne5 Rh1

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2197)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Qd2 b5 Be2 Qb6 Nd1 Be7 O-O O-O c3 b4 dxc5 Bxc5

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2197)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Qd2 b5 Be2 Qb6 Nd1 Be7 O-O O-O c3 b4 dxc5 Bxc5 cxb4 Nxb4

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2197)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Qd2 b5 Be2 Qb6 Nd1 Be7 O-O O-O c3 b4 dxc5 Bxc5 cxb4 Nxb4 Nd4 a5

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2173)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O h3 Bb7 d3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxe5 Nxe5 Rxe5 c5 Qf3 c4 dxc4 Nf6 Qe2 Bd6 Re3 Bb8 Nd2 Qc7 Nf1 Qc6 Rf3 Re8

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2197)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Qd2 b5 Be2 Qb6 Nd1 Be7 O-O O-O c3 b4 dxc5 Bxc5 cxb4 Nxb4 Nd4 a5 a3 Nc6

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2197)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Qd2 b5 Be2 Qb6 Nd1 Be7 O-O O-O c3 b4 dxc5 Bxc5 cxb4 Nxb4 Nd4 a5 a3 Nc6 Nxc6 Qxc6

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2197)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Qd2 b5 Be2 Qb6 Nd1 Be7 O-O O-O c3 b4 dxc5 Bxc5 cxb4 Nxb4 Nd4 a5 a3 Nc6 Nxc6 Qxc6 Rc1 Bxe3

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2197)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Qd2 b5 Be2 Qb6 Nd1 Be7 O-O O-O c3 b4 dxc5 Bxc5 cxb4 Nxb4 Nd4 a5 a3 Nc6 Nxc6 Qxc6 Rc1 Bxe3 Qxe3 Qb7

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Mathieu Bain    (1361)
d4 b5 e4 Bb7 Nc3 b4

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1361)
d4 b5 e4 Bb7 Nc3 b4 Nd5 e6

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1361)
d4 b5 e4 Bb7 Nc3 b4 Nd5 e6 Nf4 Bxe4

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1361)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 e3 b5 a4 Bd7

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1361)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 e3 b5 a4 Bd7 axb5 Bxb5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1361)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 e3 b5 a4 Bd7 axb5 Bxb5 Nc3 Ba6

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1361)
d4 b5 e4 Bb7 Nc3 b4 Nd5 e6 Nf4 Bxe4 Bd3 Bb7

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1361)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 e3 b5 a4 Bd7 axb5 Bxb5 Nc3 Ba6 Qf3 Nf6

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1361)
d4 b5 e4 Bb7 Nc3 b4 Nd5 e6 Nf4 Bxe4 Bd3 Bb7 c3 Nf6

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1361)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 e3 b5 a4 Bd7 axb5 Bxb5 Nc3 Ba6 Qf3 Nf6 Qxa8 Nfd7

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1361)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 e3 O-O Bd3 d5 cxd5 Bxc3

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1361)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Bb4 e5 c5 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 Nc6 Qg4 g6 Bb5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1361)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 e3 b5 a4 Bd7 axb5 Bxb5 Nc3 Ba6 Qf3 Nf6 Qxa8 Nfd7 Qxa7 Nb6

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1361)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Bb4 e5 c5 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 Nc6 Qg4 g6 Bb5 Qa5 Bxc6

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1361)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 e3 O-O Bd3 d5 cxd5 Bxc3 bxc3 Qxd5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1361)
d4 b5 e4 Bb7 Nc3 b4 Nd5 e6 Nf4 Bxe4 Bd3 Bb7 c3 Nf6 Nge2 Nc6

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1361)
d4 b5 e4 Bb7 Nc3 b4 Nd5 e6 Nf4 Bxe4 Bd3 Bb7 c3 Nf6 Nge2 Nc6 O-O Be7

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1361)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 e3 O-O Bd3 d5 cxd5 Bxc3 bxc3 Qxd5 f3 e5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mateia Benone    (0990)
e4 c5 c3 Nf6 d4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0990)
e4 c5 c3 Nf6 d4 Nxe4 Nf3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0990)
e4 c5 c3 Nf6 d4 Nxe4 Nf3 d5 Be2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0990)
e4 c5 c3 Nf6 d4 Nxe4 Nf3 d5 Be2 Bg4 O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0990)
e4 c5 c3 Nf6 d4 Nxe4 Nf3 d5 Be2 Bg4 O-O Nc6 Be3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0990)
e4 c5 c3 Nf6 d4 Nxe4 Nf3 d5 Be2 Bg4 O-O Nc6 Be3 e6 Nbd2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0990)
e4 e5 f4 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qa5 fxe5 Qxe5

Transpose to wikichess #31431#

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0990)
b4 c6 Bb2 Qb6 a3 a5 c3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0990)
e4 c5 c3 Nf6 d4 Nxe4 Nf3 d5 Be2 Bg4 O-O Nc6 Be3 e6 Nbd2 Nxd2 Qxd2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0990)
b4 c6 Bb2 Qb6 a3 a5 c3 axb4 cxb4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matei Cornel    (2197)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Qd2 Qb6 O-O-O Qc7 Kb1 b5 f5 c4 fxe6 fxe6 Be2 Nb6 Rdf1 b4 Nd1 Na4 b3 Nc3 Nxc3 bxc3 Qxc3 Bb4 Qb2 Qa5

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Mateia Benone    (0990)
b4 c6 Bb2 Qb6 a3 a5 c3 axb4 cxb4 d5 Nf3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mathieu Bain    (1361)
e4 c6 d4 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 Bf5 Bd3 Qxd4 Qf3 Bxe4

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1361)
e4 c6 d4 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 Bf5 Bd3 Qxd4 Qf3 Bxe4 Qxe4 Qxe4

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1361)
e4 c6 d4 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 Bf5 Bd3 Qxd4 Qf3 Bxe4 Qxe4 Qxe4 Bxe4 Nf6

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mateia Benone    (0990)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 g3 g6 Bg2 Bg7 d3 Nf6 f4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mathieu Bain    (1361)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 e3 O-O Bd3 d5 cxd5 Bxc3 bxc3 Qxd5 f3 e5 e4 Qd6

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mateia Benone    (0990)
b4 c6 Bb2 Qb6 a3 a5 c3 axb4 cxb4 d5 Nf3 Bg4 Bd4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0990)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 g3 g6 Bg2 Bg7 d3 Nf6 f4 O-O Nf3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0990)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 g3 g6 Bg2 Bg7 d3 Nf6 f4 O-O Nf3 e6 e5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0990)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e5 d3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0990)
Nf3 c5 c4 Nc6 Nc3 h6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0990)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 g3 g6 Bg2 Bg7 d3 Nf6 f4 O-O Nf3 e6 e5 Ne8 Be3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0990)
b4 c6 Bb2 Qb6 a3 a5 c3 axb4 cxb4 d5 Nf3 Bg4 Bd4 Qd8 h3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0990)
g3 d5 Bg2 Nf6 b3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0990)
b4 c6 Bb2 Qb6 a3 a5 c3 axb4 cxb4 d5 Nf3 Bg4 Bd4 Qd8 h3 Bxf3 exf3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0990)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e5 d3 Nd4 Nxd4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0990)
Nf3 c5 c4 Nc6 Nc3 h6 d4 cxd4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0990)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e5 d3 Nd4 Nxd4 cxd4 a3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0990)
Nf3 c5 c4 Nc6 Nc3 h6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nxd4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0990)
Nf3 c5 c4 Nc6 Nc3 h6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nxd4 Qxd4 Nf6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0990)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e5 d3 Nd4 Nxd4 cxd4 a3 Nf6 Nd2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0990)
Nf3 c5 c4 Nc6 Nc3 h6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nxd4 Qxd4 Nf6 e4 Qc7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0990)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e5 d3 Nd4 Nxd4 cxd4 a3 Nf6 Nd2 a6 Bc4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0990)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nxc6 bxc6 Nc3 g6 Bd3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0990)
e4 c5 b4 cxb4 a3 d5 exd5 Qxd5 axb4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0990)
Nf3 c5 c4 Nc6 Nc3 h6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nxd4 Qxd4 Nf6 e4 Qc7 Nb5 Qb8

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0990)
Nf3 c5 c4 Nc6 Nc3 h6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nxd4 Qxd4 Nf6 e4 Qc7 Nb5 Qb8 e5 Ng8

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0990)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nxc6 bxc6 Nc3 g6 Bd3 Bg7 e5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0990)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e5 d3 Nd4 Nxd4 cxd4 a3 Nf6 Nd2 a6 Bc4 b5 Ba2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0990)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nxc6 bxc6 Nc3 g6 Bd3 Bg7 e5 Nd5 Nxd5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mathieu Bain    (1361)
e4 c6 d4 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 Bf5 Bd3 Qxd4 Qf3 Bxe4 Qxe4 Qxe4 Bxe4 Nf6 f3 Nxe4

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mateia Benone    (0990)
e4 c5 b4 cxb4 a3 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nf3 Nc6 c4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0990)
e4 c5 b4 cxb4 a3 d5 exd5 Qxd5 axb4 e5 c4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0990)
e4 c5 c3 Nf6 e5 Nd5 d4 cxd4 cxd4 Nc6 Bc4 e6 Nf3

Transpose to wikichess #83810#

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0990)
b4 e5 Bb2 Bxb4 Bxe5 Nf6 a3 d6 axb4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0990)
e4 c5 b4 cxb4 a3 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nf3 Nc6 c4 bxc3 Nxc3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0990)
e4 c5 b4 cxb4 a3 d5 exd5 Qxd5 axb4 e5 c4 Qe4 Ne2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0990)
b4 e5 Bb2 Bxb4 Bxe5 Nf6 a3 d6 axb4 dxe5 e3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0990)
e4 c5 b4 cxb4 a3 d5 exd5 Qxd5 axb4 e5 c4 Qe4 Ne2 Qxc4 Qa4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0990)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 g6 c4 Nf6 Nc3 Bg7 Bd3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0990)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 g6 c4 Nf6 Nc3 Bg7 Bd3 Nxd4 O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0990)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 g6 c4 Nf6 Nc3 Bg7 Bd3 Nxd4 O-O O-O Be3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0990)
Nf3 c5 c4 Nc6 Nc3 e6

Transpose to wikichess #38540#

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0990)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 a3 c5 Nf3 cxd4 Nxd4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0990)
b4 e5 Bb2 Bxb4 Bxe5 Nf6 a3 d6 axb4 dxe5 e3 O-O d3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0990)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 a3 c5 Nf3 cxd4 Nxd4 Nc6 Nxc6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0990)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 a3 c5 Nf3 cxd4 Nxd4 Nc6 Nxc6 bxc6 e3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0990)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 a3 c5 Nf3 cxd4 Nxd4 Nc6 Nxc6 bxc6 e3 d5 cxd5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0990)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 a3 c5 Nf3 cxd4 Nxd4 Nc6 Nxc6 bxc6 e3 d5 cxd5 cxd5 b4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0990)
e4 c5 d4 cxd4 Qxd4 Nc6 Qd1 Nf6 Bd3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0990)
e4 c5 b4 cxb4 a3 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nf3 Nc6 c4 bxc3 Nxc3 Qa5 Bc4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0990)
e4 c5 b4 cxb4 a3 d5 exd5 Qxd5 axb4 e5 c4 Qe4 Ne2 Qxc4 Qa4 Bd7 Qa5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0990)
e4 e5 Nf3 d6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 Be7 Bc4 O-O O-O c6 Be3 d5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0990)
e4 c5 d4 cxd4 Qxd4 Nc6 Qd1 Nf6 Bd3 g6 Nf3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0990)
b4 e5 Bb2 Bxb4 Bxe5 Nf6 a3 d6 axb4 dxe5 e3 O-O d3 Be6 Nf3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0990)
b4 e5 Bb2 Bxb4 Bxe5 Nf6 a3 d6 axb4 dxe5 e3 O-O d3 Be6 Nf3 Bg4 Be2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0990)
e4 e5 Nf3 d6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 Be7 Bc4 O-O O-O c6 Be3 d5 exd5 cxd5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0990)
e4 c5 b4 cxb4 a3 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nf3 Nc6 c4 bxc3 Nxc3 Qa5 Bc4 Nf6 O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0990)
e4 c5 d4 cxd4 Qxd4 Nc6 Qd1 Nf6 Bd3 g6 Nf3 Bg7 O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0990)
e4 c5 d4 cxd4 Qxd4 Nc6 Qd1 Nf6 Bd3 g6 Nf3 Bg7 O-O O-O Nc3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0990)
e4 e5 Nf3 d6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 h6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matei Cornel    (2223)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 h6 Be3 a6 Be2 e5

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Mateia Benone    (0990)
e4 c5 d4 cxd4 Qxd4 Nc6 Qd1 Nf6 Bd3 g6 Nf3 Bg7 O-O O-O Nc3 d6 Be3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matei Cornel    (2223)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 h6 Be3 a6 Be2 e5 Nb3 Qc7

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2223)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 h6 Be3 a6 Be2 e5 Nb3 Qc7 f4 Be7

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2223)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 h6 Be3 a6 Be2 e5 Nb3 Qc7 f4 Be7 O-O Nbd7

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 f3 O-O Bd3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 f3 O-O Bd3 e5 d5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 f3 O-O Bd3 e5 d5 Nh5 Nge2

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 f3 O-O Bd3 e5 d5 Nh5 Nge2 f5 O-O

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 f3 O-O Bd3 e5 d5 Nh5 Nge2 f5 O-O f4 Bd2

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O c3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxe5 Nxe5 Rxe5 c6 d4 Bd6 Re1 Qh4 g3 Qh3 Qf3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O c3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxe5 Nxe5 Rxe5 c6 d4 Bd6 Re1 Qh4 g3 Qh3 Qf3 Bg4 Qg2

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 f3 O-O Bd3 e5 d5 Nh5 Nge2 f5 O-O f4 Bd2 g5 Nc1

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O h3 Bb7 d3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxe5 Nd4 Nd2 c5 Ndf3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O c3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxe5 Nxe5 Rxe5 c6 d4 Bd6 Re1 Qh4 g3 Qh3 Qf3 Bg4 Qg2 Qh5 Be3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O c3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxe5 Nxe5 Rxe5 c6 d4 Bd6 Re1 Qh4 g3 Qh3 Qf3 Bg4 Qg2 Qh5 Be3 Rae8 Nd2

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O c3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxe5 Nxe5 Rxe5 c6 d4 Bd6 Re1 Qh4 g3 Qh3 Qf3 Bg4 Qg2 Qh5 Be3 Rae8 Nd2 Re6 f3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Gergely Matisz    (1792)
e3 e6 Nf3 Nf6

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1792)
d4 Nc6 d5 Ne5 e4 e6 dxe6 dxe6 Qxd8

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1792)
d4 Nc6 d5 Ne5 e4 e6 dxe6 dxe6 Qxd8 Kxd8 f4

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1792)
d4 Nc6 d5 Ne5 e4 e6 dxe6 dxe6 Qxd8 Kxd8 f4 Nd7 Nc3

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Matei Cornel    (2223)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 h6 Be3 a6 Be2 e5 Nb3 Qc7 f4 Be7 O-O Nbd7 a4 O-O

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O h3 e5 d5 Nh5 g3 f5 exf5 gxf5 Ng5 Nf6 g4 Qe7

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 f3 O-O Bd3 e5 d5 Nh5 Nge2 f5 O-O f4 Bd2 g5 Nc1 Rf6 Be2

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O h3 e5 d5 Nh5 g3 f5 exf5 gxf5 Ng5 Nf6 g4 Qe7 gxf5 Bxf5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matei Cornel    (2223)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Bd3 Nc6 O-O Be7 Nbd2 Nxd2 Bxd2 Bg4 c3 Bh5 Re1

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O h3 e5 d5 Nh5 g3 f5 exf5 gxf5 Ng5 Nf6 g4 Qe7 gxf5 Bxf5 h4 h6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O h3 e5 d5 Nh5 g3 f5 exf5 gxf5 Ng5 Nf6 g4 Qe7 gxf5 Bxf5 h4 h6 Bh3 Bxh3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matei Cornel    (2223)
e4 c6 d4 d5 e5 c5 Nf3 cxd4 Qxd4 Nc6 Qf4 e6 Bd3 Nb4 O-O Nxd3 cxd3 Ne7 Nc3 Ng6

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2223)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Bd3 Nc6 O-O Be7 Nbd2 Nxd2 Bxd2 Bg4 c3 Bh5 Re1 O-O Bf4

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2223)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 h3 g6 Be3

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e6 Bg5 h6 Bh4 dxc4 e4 g5 Bg3 b5 Be2 Bb7 O-O Nbd7 Ne5 h5 Nxd7 Qxd7 Qc1 Rg8 Rd1 h4 Be5 Qe7 h3 Rd8

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matei Cornel    (2223)
e4 c6 d4 d5 e5 c5 Nf3 cxd4 Qxd4 Nc6 Qf4 e6 Bd3 Nb4 O-O Nxd3 cxd3 Ne7 Nc3 Ng6 Qg3 Be7

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2223)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Bd3 Nc6 O-O Be7 Nbd2 Nxd2 Bxd2 Bg4 c3 Bh5 Re1 O-O Bf4 Bd6 Bg3

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 f3 O-O Bd3 e5 d5 Nh5 Nge2 f5 O-O f4 Bd2 g5 Nc1 Rf6 Be2 Rg6 Nd3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O h3 e5 d5 Nh5 g3 f5 exf5 gxf5 Ng5 Nf6 g4 Qe7 gxf5 Bxf5 h4 h6 Bh3 Bxh3 Nxh3 Qf7

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Gergely Matisz    (1792)
d4 Nc6 d5 Ne5 e4 e6 dxe6 dxe6 Qxd8 Kxd8 f4 Nd7 Nc3 a6 Nf3

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Matei Cornel    (2223)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 h3 g6 Be3 Bg7 g4

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O h3 e5 d5 Nh5 g3 f5 exf5 gxf5 Ng5 Nf6 g4 Qe7 gxf5 Bxf5 h4 h6 Bh3 Bxh3 Nxh3 Qf7 Be3 Nbd7

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e6 Bg5 h6 Bh4 dxc4 e4 g5 Bg3 b5 Be2 Bb7 O-O Nbd7 Ne5 h5 Nxd7 Qxd7 Qc1 Rg8 Rd1 h4 Be5 Qe7 h3 Rd8 Qe3 Nd7

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Gergely Matisz    (1792)
d4 Nc6 d5 Ne5 e4 e6 dxe6 dxe6 Qxd8 Kxd8 f4 Nd7 Nc3 a6 Nf3 b5 e5

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e6 Bg5 h6 Bh4 dxc4 e4 g5 Bg3 b5 Be2 Bb7 O-O Nbd7 Ne5 h5 Nxd7 Qxd7 Qc1 Rg8 Rd1 h4 Be5 Qe7 h3 Rd8 Qe3 Nd7 Bc7 Rc8

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matei Cornel    (2223)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 h3 g6 Be3 Bg7 g4 O-O Bg2

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e6 Bg5 h6 Bh4 dxc4 e4 g5 Bg3 b5 Be2 Bb7 O-O Nbd7 Ne5 h5 Nxd7 Qxd7 Qc1 Rg8 Rd1 h4 Be5 Qe7 h3 Rd8 Qe3 Nd7 Bc7 Rc8 Bh2 Nf6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matei Cornel    (2223)
e4 c6 d4 d5 e5 c5 Nf3 cxd4 Qxd4 Nc6 Qf4 e6 Bd3 Nb4 O-O Nxd3 cxd3 Ne7 Nc3 Ng6 Qg3 Be7 Ne2 O-O

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2223)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 h3 g6 Be3 Bg7 g4 O-O Bg2 Nc6 Qd2

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2223)
e4 c6 d4 d5 e5 c5 Nf3 cxd4 Qxd4 Nc6 Qf4 e6 Bd3 Nb4 O-O Nxd3 cxd3 Ne7 Nc3 Ng6 Qg3 Be7 Ne2 O-O Nf4 Bd7

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O h3 e5 d5 Nh5 g3 f5 exf5 gxf5 Ng5 Nf6 g4 Qe7 gxf5 Bxf5 h4 h6 Bh3 Bxh3 Nxh3 Qf7 Be3 Nbd7 Qe2 Qh5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 O-O a3 Bxc3 bxc3 Nh5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matei Cornel    (2223)
e4 c6 d4 d5 e5 c5 Nf3 cxd4 Qxd4 Nc6 Qf4 e6 Bd3 Nb4 O-O Nxd3 cxd3 Ne7 Nc3 Ng6 Qg3 Be7 Ne2 O-O Nf4 Bd7 Nxg6 fxg6

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 O-O a3 Bxc3 bxc3 Nh5 Nh3 f5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 f3 O-O Bd3 e5 d5 Nh5 Nge2 f5 O-O f4 Bd2 g5 Nc1 Rf6 Be2 Rg6 Nd3 Bf6 Rc1

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Gergely Matisz    (1792)
e4 Nc6 Nc3 e5 Bc4

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O h3 e5 d5 Nh5 g3 f5 exf5 gxf5 Ng5 Nf6 g4 Qe7 gxf5 Bxf5 h4 h6 Bh3 Bxh3 Nxh3 Qf7 Be3 Nbd7 Qe2 Qh5 Kd2 Qxe2

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 f3 O-O Bd3 e5 d5 Nh5 Nge2 f5 O-O f4 Bd2 g5 Nc1 Rf6 Be2 Rg6 Nd3 Bf6 Rc1 c5 a3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O h3 e5 d5 Nh5 g3 f5 exf5 gxf5 Ng5 Nf6 g4 Qe7 gxf5 Bxf5 h4 h6 Bh3 Bxh3 Nxh3 Qf7 Be3 Nbd7 Qe2 Qh5 Kd2 Qxe2 Kxe2 Nh5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matei Cornel    (2223)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 h3 g6 Be3 Bg7 g4 O-O Bg2 Nc6 Qd2 Nd7 O-O-O

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 O-O a3 Bxc3 bxc3 Nh5 Nh3 f5 e4 fxe4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 f3 O-O Bd3 e5 d5 Nh5 Nge2 f5 O-O f4 Bd2 g5 Nc1 Rf6 Be2 Rg6 Nd3 Bf6 Rc1 c5 a3 Ng7 b4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 f3 O-O Bd3 e5 d5 Nh5 Nge2 f5 O-O f4 Bd2 g5 Nc1 Rf6 Be2 Rg6 Nd3 Bf6 Rc1 c5 a3 Ng7 b4 b6 Nf2

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 O-O a3 Bxc3 bxc3 Nh5 Nh3 f5 e4 fxe4 Bg5 Nf6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 f3 O-O Bd3 e5 d5 Nh5 Nge2 f5 O-O f4 Bd2 g5 Nc1 Rf6 Be2 Rg6 Nd3 Bf6 Rc1 c5 a3 Ng7 b4 b6 Nf2 h5 bxc5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Gergely Matisz    (1792)
e4 Nc6 Nc3 e5 Bc4 Bc5 Nf3

Transpose to wikichess #26886#

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 f3 O-O Bd3 e5 d5 Nh5 Nge2 f5 O-O f4 Bd2 g5 Nc1 Rf6 Be2 Rg6 Nd3 Bf6 Rc1 c5 a3 Ng7 b4 b6 Nf2 h5 bxc5 bxc5 Rb1

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 O-O a3 Bxc3 bxc3 Nh5 Nh3 f5 e4 fxe4 Bg5 Nf6 Nf2 exf3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 O-O a3 Bxc3 bxc3 Nh5 Nh3 f5 e4 fxe4 Bg5 Nf6 Nf2 exf3 Qxf3 h6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matei Cornel    (2223)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Bd3 Nc6 O-O Be7 Nbd2 Nxd2 Bxd2 Bg4 c3 Bh5 Re1 O-O Bf4 Bd6 Bg3 Qf6 Be2

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 O-O a3 Bxc3 bxc3 Nh5 Nh3 f5 e4 fxe4 Bg5 Nf6 Nf2 exf3 Qxf3 h6 Bh4 Qe8

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matei Cornel    (2223)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Bd3 Nc6 O-O Be7 Nbd2 Nxd2 Bxd2 Bg4 c3 Bh5 Re1 O-O Bf4 Bd6 Bg3 Qf6 Be2 Bxg3 hxg3

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 O-O a3 Bxc3 bxc3 Nh5 Nh3 f5 e4 fxe4 Bg5 Nf6 Nf2 exf3 Qxf3 h6 Bh4 Qe8 Qe3 d6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 O-O a3 Bxc3 bxc3 Nh5 Nh3 f5 e4 fxe4 Bg5 Nf6 Nf2 exf3 Qxf3 h6 Bh4 Qe8 Qe3 d6 Bxf6 Rxf6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 O-O a3 Bxc3 bxc3 Nh5 Nh3 f5 e4 fxe4 Bg5 Nf6 Nf2 exf3 Qxf3 h6 Bh4 Qe8 Qe3 d6 Bxf6 Rxf6 Bd3 e5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O h3 Bb7 d3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxe5 Nd4 Nd2 c5 Ndf3 Nxb3 axb3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 O-O a3 Bxc3 bxc3 Nh5 Nh3 f5 e4 fxe4 Bg5 Nf6 Nf2 exf3 Qxf3 h6 Bh4 Qe8 Qe3 d6 Bxf6 Rxf6 Bd3 e5 O-O Rf8

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matei Cornel    (2223)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 h3 g6 Be3 Bg7 g4 O-O Bg2 Nc6 Qd2 Nd7 O-O-O Nb6 Bf1

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2223)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 h6 Be3 a6 Be2 e5 Nb3 Qc7 f4 Be7 O-O Nbd7 a4 O-O Qd2 Rd8

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2223)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Bd3 Nc6 O-O Be7 Nbd2 Nxd2 Bxd2 Bg4 c3 Bh5 Re1 O-O Bf4 Bd6 Bg3 Qf6 Be2 Bxg3 hxg3 Qd6 Qb3

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2223)
e4 c6 d4 d5 e5 c5 Nf3 cxd4 Qxd4 Nc6 Qf4 e6 Bd3 Nb4 O-O Nxd3 cxd3 Ne7 Nc3 Ng6 Qg3 Be7 Ne2 O-O Nf4 Bd7 Nxg6 fxg6 a3 Rc8

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O h3 e5 d5 a5 Be3 Na6 g4 Nd7

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 O-O a3 Bxc3 bxc3 Nh5 Nh3 f5 e4 fxe4 Bg5 Nf6 Nf2 exf3 Qxf3 h6 Bh4 Qe8 Qe3 d6 Bxf6 Rxf6 Bd3 e5 O-O Rf8 Ng4 Bxg4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 O-O a3 Bxc3 bxc3 Nh5 Nh3 f5 e4 fxe4 Bg5 Nf6 Nf2 exf3 Qxf3 h6 Bh4 Qe8 Qe3 d6 Bxf6 Rxf6 Bd3 e5 O-O Rf8 Ng4 Bxg4 Qe4 Bf5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O h3 Bb7 d3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxe5 Nd4 Nd2 c5 Ndf3 Nxb3 axb3 f6 Ng4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matei Cornel    (2223)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 h6 Be3 a6 Be2 e5 Nb3 Qc7 f4 Be7 O-O Nbd7 a4 O-O Qd2 Rd8 a5 b5

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O h3 e5 d5 a5 Be3 Na6 g4 Nd7 a3 Nb6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matei Cornel    (2223)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Bd3 Nc6 O-O Be7 Nbd2 Nxd2 Bxd2 Bg4 c3 Bh5 Re1 O-O Bf4 Bd6 Bg3 Qf6 Be2 Bxg3 hxg3 Qd6 Qb3 g6 Rab1

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 O-O a3 Bxc3 bxc3 Nh5 Nh3 f5 e4 fxe4 Bg5 Nf6 Nf2 exf3 Qxf3 h6 Bh4 Qe8 Qe3 d6 Bxf6 Rxf6 Bd3 e5 O-O Rf8 Ng4 Bxg4 Qe4 Bf5 Rxf5 Nd7

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O h3 e5 d5 a5 Be3 Na6 g4 Nd7 a3 Nb6 Rg1 Bd7

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O h3 Bb7 d3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxe5 Nd4 Nd2 c5 Ndf3 Nxb3 axb3 f6 Ng4 Qd7 d4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O h3 Bb7 d3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxe5 Nd4 Nd2 c5 Ndf3 Nxb3 axb3 f6 Ng4 Qd7 d4 cxd4 Qxd4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O h3 Bb7 d3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxe5 Nd4 Nd2 c5 Ndf3 Nxb3 axb3 f6 Ng4 Qd7 d4 cxd4 Qxd4 Rfd8 Bd2

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matej Pech    (1447)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e6 e3 Bd6 Bd3 Nbd7

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O h3 e5 d5 a5 Be3 Na6 g4 Nd7 a3 Nb6 Rg1 Bd7 Nd2 Nc5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O h3 Bb7 d3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxe5 Nd4 Nd2 c5 Ndf3 Nxb3 axb3 f6 Ng4 Qd7 d4 cxd4 Qxd4 Rfd8 Bd2 Qc8 Ba5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matei Cornel    (2223)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 h6 Be3 a6 Be2 e5 Nb3 Qc7 f4 Be7 O-O Nbd7 a4 O-O Qd2 Rd8 a5 b5 axb6 Nxb6

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2223)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 h3 g6 Be3 Bg7 g4 O-O Bg2 Nc6 Qd2 Nd7 O-O-O Nb6 Bf1 Na5 b3

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O h3 e5 d5 a5 Be3 Na6 g4 Nd7 a3 Nb6 Rg1 Bd7 Nd2 Nc5 Qc2 Qe7

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matei Cornel    (2223)
e4 c6 d4 d5 e5 c5 Nf3 cxd4 Qxd4 Nc6 Qf4 e6 Bd3 Nb4 O-O Nxd3 cxd3 Ne7 Nc3 Ng6 Qg3 Be7 Ne2 O-O Nf4 Bd7 Nxg6 fxg6 a3 Rc8 Be3 Re8

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2223)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Bd3 Nc6 O-O Be7 Nbd2 Nxd2 Bxd2 Bg4 c3 Bh5 Re1 O-O Bf4 Bd6 Bg3 Qf6 Be2 Bxg3 hxg3 Qd6 Qb3 g6 Rab1 Bg4 Nh2

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2223)
e4 c6 d4 d5 e5 c5 Nf3 cxd4 Qxd4 Nc6 Qf4 e6 Bd3 Nb4 O-O Nxd3 cxd3 Ne7 Nc3 Ng6 Qg3 Be7 Ne2 O-O Nf4 Bd7 Nxg6 fxg6 a3 Rc8 Be3 Re8 Qg4 Qa5

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2223)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Bd3 Nc6 O-O Be7 Nbd2 Nxd2 Bxd2 Bg4 c3 Bh5 Re1 O-O Bf4 Bd6 Bg3 Qf6 Be2 Bxg3 hxg3 Qd6 Qb3 g6 Rab1 Bg4 Nh2 Bf5 Rbd1

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2223)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 h6 Be3 a6 Be2 e5 Nb3 Qc7 f4 Be7 O-O Nbd7 a4 O-O Qd2 Rd8 a5 b5 axb6 Nxb6 Qe1 Be6

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2223)
e4 c6 d4 d5 e5 c5 Nf3 cxd4 Qxd4 Nc6 Qf4 e6 Bd3 Nb4 O-O Nxd3 cxd3 Ne7 Nc3 Ng6 Qg3 Be7 Ne2 O-O Nf4 Bd7 Nxg6 fxg6 a3 Rc8 Be3 Re8 Qg4 Qa5 a4 a6

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O h3 e5 d5 a5 Be3 Na6 g4 Nd7 a3 Nb6 Rg1 Bd7 Nd2 Nc5 Qc2 Qe7 Be2 Nba4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matei Cornel    (2223)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 h6 Be3 a6 Be2 e5 Nb3 Qc7 f4 Be7 O-O Nbd7 a4 O-O Qd2 Rd8 a5 b5 axb6 Nxb6 Qe1 Be6 Qg3 Kh8

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2223)
e4 c6 d4 d5 e5 c5 Nf3 cxd4 Qxd4 Nc6 Qf4 e6 Bd3 Nb4 O-O Nxd3 cxd3 Ne7 Nc3 Ng6 Qg3 Be7 Ne2 O-O Nf4 Bd7 Nxg6 fxg6 a3 Rc8 Be3 Re8 Qg4 Qa5 a4 a6 Bd2 Qb6

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matej Pech    (1447)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e6 e3 Bd6 Bd3 Nbd7 e4 dxe4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1447)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 a6 Nc3 Qc7 Bd3 Nf6 f4 Bb4 Nb3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matei Cornel    (2223)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 h3 g6 Be3 Bg7 g4 O-O Bg2 Nc6 Qd2 Nd7 O-O-O Nb6 Bf1 Na5 b3 Nc6 Nxc6

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O h3 e5 d5 a5 Be3 Na6 g4 Nd7 a3 Nb6 Rg1 Bd7 Nd2 Nc5 Qc2 Qe7 Be2 Nba4 Nd1 Nb6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matej Pech    (1447)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 a6 Nc3 Qc7 Bd3 Nf6 f4 Bb4 Nb3 Bxc3 bxc3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matei Cornel    (2223)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 h3 g6 Be3 Bg7 g4 O-O Bg2 Nc6 Qd2 Nd7 O-O-O Nb6 Bf1 Na5 b3 Nc6 Nxc6 bxc6 Be2

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Mateia Benone    (0865)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Bg7 Bc4

Transpose to wikichess #124061#

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matej Pech    (1447)
e4 c6 d4 d5 e5 Bf5 Nf3 e6 Be2 Nd7 O-O Ne7 Nbd2 Bg6 Nh4 c5 c3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O h3 e5 d5 a5 Be3 Na6 g4 Nd7 a3 Nb6 Rg1 Bd7 Nd2 Nc5 Qc2 Qe7 Be2 Nba4 Nd1 Nb6 Rg2 c6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O h3 e5 d5 a5 Be3 Na6 g4 Nd7 a3 Nb6 Rg1 Bd7 Nd2 Nc5 Qc2 Qe7 Be2 Nba4 Nd1 Nb6 Rg2 c6 Nb3 Nba4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matej Pech    (1447)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e6 e3 Bd6 Bd3 Nbd7 e4 dxe4 Nxe4 Nxe4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O h3 e5 d5 a5 Be3 Na6 g4 Nd7 a3 Nb6 Rg1 Bd7 Nd2 Nc5 Qc2 Qe7 Be2 Nba4 Nd1 Nb6 Rg2 c6 Nb3 Nba4 Nxc5 Nxc5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matej Pech    (1447)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e6 e3 Bd6 Bd3 Nbd7 e4 dxe4 Nxe4 Nxe4 Bxe4 Nf6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matei Cornel    (2223)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 h6 Be3 a6 Be2 e5 Nb3 Qc7 f4 Be7 O-O Nbd7 a4 O-O Qd2 Rd8 a5 b5 axb6 Nxb6 Qe1 Be6 Qg3 Kh8 Nd2 Rdb8

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Mateia Benone    (0865)
e4 c5 b4 cxb4 a3 e5 c4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matei Cornel    (2223)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 h6 Be3 a6 Be2 e5 Nb3 Qc7 f4 Be7 O-O Nbd7 a4 O-O Qd2 Rd8 a5 b5 axb6 Nxb6 Qe1 Be6 Qg3 Kh8 Nd2 Rdb8 Kh1 exf4

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Mateia Benone    (0865)
e4 c5 b4 cxb4 a3 e5 c4 bxc3 Nxc3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0865)
e4 c5 b4 cxb4 a3 e5 c4 bxc3 Nxc3 Nf6 Bc4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0865)
e4 c5 b4 cxb4 a3 e5 c4 bxc3 Nxc3 Nf6 Bc4 d6 Nf3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0865)
e4 c5 a3 g6 b4 Bg7 Nc3 cxb4 axb4 d5 exd5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0865)
e4 c5 a3 g6 b4 Bg7 Nc3 cxb4 axb4 d5 exd5 Nf6 Bc4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0865)
e4 c5 a3 g6 b4 Bg7 Nc3 cxb4 axb4 d5 exd5 Nf6 Bc4 O-O Nge2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0865)
e4 c5 a3 g6 b4 Bg7 Nc3 cxb4 axb4 d5 exd5 Nf6 Bc4 O-O Nge2 Nbd7 Bb3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2157)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O h3 e5 d5 a5 Be3 Na6 g4 Nd7 a3 Nb6 Rg1 Bd7 Nd2 Nc5 Qc2 Qe7 Be2 Nba4 Nd1 Nb6 Rg2 c6 Nb3 Nba4 Nxc5 Nxc5 Nc3 Rfc8

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Mateia Benone    (0865)
e4 c5 b4 cxb4 a3 e5 c4 bxc3 Nxc3 Nf6 Bc4 d6 Nf3 Nc6 Ng5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0865)
e4 c5 b4 cxb4 a3 e5 c4 bxc3 Nxc3 Nf6 Bc4 d6 Nf3 Nc6 Ng5 Be6 Nxe6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matei Cornel    (2223)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 h3 g6 Be3 Bg7 g4 O-O Bg2 Nc6 Qd2 Nd7 O-O-O Nb6 Bf1 Na5 b3 Nc6 Nxc6 bxc6 Be2 Nd7 Na4

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2223)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 h6 Be3 a6 Be2 e5 Nb3 Qc7 f4 Be7 O-O Nbd7 a4 O-O Qd2 Rd8 a5 b5 axb6 Nxb6 Qe1 Be6 Qg3 Kh8 Nd2 Rdb8 Kh1 exf4 Qxf4 Nbd7

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2223)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 h3 g6 Be3 Bg7 g4 O-O Bg2 Nc6 Qd2 Nd7 O-O-O Nb6 Bf1 Na5 b3 Nc6 Nxc6 bxc6 Be2 Nd7 Na4 Re8 h4

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2223)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 h3 g6 Be3 Bg7 g4 O-O Bg2 Nc6 Qd2 Nd7 O-O-O Nb6 Bf1 Na5 b3 Nc6 Nxc6 bxc6 Be2 Nd7 Na4 Re8 h4 Ne5 Bb6

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2223)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 h3 g6 Be3 Bg7 g4 O-O Bg2 Nc6 Qd2 Nd7 O-O-O Nb6 Bf1 Na5 b3 Nc6 Nxc6 bxc6 Be2 Nd7 Na4 Re8 h4 Ne5 Bb6 Qd7 g5

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Mateia Benone    (0865)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d5 exd5 c6 dxc6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 Bf5 Nc3 Nxc3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
e4 c5 b4 cxb4 a3 e5 Bb2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
e4 c5 b4 cxb4 a3 e5 Bb2 Nc6 Nf3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0865)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 c5 e3 d5

Transpose to wikichess #37914#

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0865)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 c5 f3 Nf6 dxc5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
e4 c5 d4 cxd4 Qxd4 Nc6 Qd1 Nf6 Bd3 g6 Nf3 Bg7 O-O O-O c4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 Bf5 Nc3 Nxc3 bxc3 h6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0865)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d5 exd5 c6 dxc6 Nxc6 d4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matus Tkac    (2111)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 g3 Bb4 Bg2 O-O d3 Bxc3 bxc3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Mateia Benone    (0865)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 c5 f3 Nf6 dxc5 Nc6 e4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0865)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 e5 dxe5 d5 Nf3 Bc5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0865)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d5 exd5 c6 dxc6 Nxc6 d4 Nf6 Bxf4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 Bf5 Nc3 Nxc3 bxc3 h6 Bd3 Qf6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 Bf5 Nc3 Nxc3 bxc3 h6 Bd3 Qf6 O-O Be7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nxd4 Qxd4 d6 Nc3 Be6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0865)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d5 exd5 c6 dxc6 Nxc6 d4 Nf6 Bxf4 Be7 Be2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0865)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 e6 e4 h6 Bxf6 Qxf6 Nc3 Bb4 Qd2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nxd4 Qxd4 d6 Nc3 Be6 Bf4 c5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0865)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d5 exd5 c6 dxc6 Nxc6 d4 Nf6 Bxf4 Be7 Be2 O-O O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nxd4 Qxd4 d6 Nc3 Be6 Bf4 c5 Qd1 Nf6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
e4 c5 b4 cxb4 a3 e5 Bb2 Nc6 Nf3 d6 axb4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matus Tkac    (2111)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 g3 Bb4 Bg2 O-O d3 Bxc3 bxc3 Re8 Nh3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2111)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 g3 Bb4 Bg2 O-O d3 Bxc3 bxc3 Re8 Nh3 c6 O-O

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2111)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 g3 Bb4 Bg2 O-O d3 Bxc3 bxc3 Re8 Nh3 c6 O-O d5 cxd5

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Mateia Benone    (1017)
e4 c5 d4 cxd4 Qxd4 Nc6 Qd1 Nf6 Bd3 g6 Nf3 Bg7 O-O O-O c4 d6 Nc3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
e4 c5 b4 cxb4 a3 e5 Bb2 Nc6 Nf3 d6 axb4 Nxb4 Bc4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nxd4 Qxd4 d6 Nc3 Be6 Bf4 c5 Qd1 Nf6 Bb5 Ke7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
e4 c5 b4 cxb4 a3 e5 Bb2 Nc6 Nf3 d6 axb4 Nxb4 Bc4 Be7 O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 g5 Bc1 e6 f3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
e4 c5 b4 cxb4 a3 e5 Bb2 Nc6 Nf3 d6 axb4 Nxb4 Bc4 Be7 O-O Nf6 Re1

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 g5 Bc1 e6 f3 Nd6 e4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
g4 d5 e3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 g5 Bc1 e6 f3 Nd6 e4 b6 c3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matus Tkac    (2111)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 g3 Bb4 Bg2 O-O d3 Bxc3 bxc3 Re8 Nh3 c6 O-O d5 cxd5 cxd5 Bg5

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Mateia Benone    (0865)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 e6 e4 h6 Bxf6 Qxf6 Nc3 Bb4 Qd2 O-O f4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 g5 Bc1 e6 f3 Nd6 e4 b6 c3 Bb7 e5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 g5 Bc1 e6 f3 Nd6 e4 b6 c3 Bb7 e5 Nf5 Bd3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matei Cornel    (2196)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e6 Bg5 h6 Bh4 dxc4 e4 g5 Bg3 b5 Be2 Bb7 h4 g4 Ne5 Nbd7 Bxg4 Nxe5 Bxe5 Rg8 Bf3 Nd7 Bg3 Qb6 a4

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2196)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e6 Bg5 h6 Bh4 dxc4 e4 g5 Bg3 b5 Be2 Bb7 h4 g4 Ne5 Nbd7 Bxg4 Nxe5 Bxe5 Rg8 Bf3 Nd7 Bg3 Qb6 a4 b4 a5

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Mateia Benone    (1017)
g4 d5 e3 c6 d4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
g4 d5 e3 c6 d4 Nf6 g5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matus Tkac    (2111)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 g3 Bb4 Bg2 O-O d3 Bxc3 bxc3 Re8 Nh3 c6 O-O d5 cxd5 cxd5 Bg5 Bf5 f4

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matei Cornel    (2196)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e6 Bg5 h6 Bh4 dxc4 e4 g5 Bg3 b5 Be2 Bb7 h4 g4 Ne5 Nbd7 Bxg4 Nxe5 Bxe5 Rg8 Bf3 Nd7 Bg3 Qb6 a4 b4 a5 Qa6 Na4

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Mateia Benone    (1017)
g4 d5 e3 c6 d4 Nf6 g5 Ne4 Bg2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matus Tkac    (2111)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 g3 Bb4 Bg2 O-O d3 Bxc3 bxc3 Re8 Nh3 c6 O-O d5 cxd5 cxd5 Bg5 Bf5 f4 e4 Bxf6

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matei Cornel    (2196)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e6 Bg5 h6 Bh4 dxc4 e4 g5 Bg3 b5 Be2 Bb7 h4 g4 Ne5 Nbd7 Bxg4 Nxe5 Bxe5 Rg8 Bf3 Nd7 Bg3 Qb6 a4 b4 a5 Qa6 Na4 c5 d5

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2196)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e6 Bg5 h6 Bh4 dxc4 e4 g5 Bg3 b5 Be2 Bb7 O-O Nbd7 Ne5 Bg7 Nxd7 Nxd7 Bd6 a6 a4 b4 Bxb4 Qb6 Ba3 Qxd4 Qc2 c5 Rad1

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2196)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e6 Bg5 h6 Bh4 dxc4 e4 g5 Bg3 b5 Be2 Bb7 O-O Nbd7 Ne5 Bg7 Nxd7 Nxd7 Bd6 a6 a4 b4 Bxb4 Qb6 Ba3 Qxd4 Qc2 c5 Rad1 Qe5 Bxc4

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Mateia Benone    (0865)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 e6 e4 h6 Bxf6 Qxf6 Nc3 Bb4 Qd2 O-O f4 Nc6 Nf3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (0865)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 e6 e4 h6 Bxf6 Qxf6 Nc3 Bb4 Qd2 O-O f4 Nc6 Nf3 d6 e5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matus Tkac    (2111)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 g3 Bb4 Bg2 O-O d3 Bxc3 bxc3 Re8 Nh3 c6 O-O d5 cxd5 cxd5 Bg5 Bf5 f4 e4 Bxf6 Qxf6 Qb3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2111)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 g3 Bb4 Bg2 O-O d3 Bxc3 bxc3 Re8 Nh3 c6 O-O d5 cxd5 cxd5 Bg5 Bf5 f4 e4 Bxf6 Qxf6 Qb3 Qc6 Ng5

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Mateia Benone    (1017)
e4 c6 d4 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 Nd7 Nf3 Ngf6 Nxf6 Nxf6 Ne5 Nd7 Nd3 g6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
g4 d5 e3 c6 d4 Nf6 g5 Ne4 Bg2 Nxg5 Qd3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Bc5 b4 Nxb4 c3 Nd3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Bc5 b4 Nxb4 c3 Nd3 Bxd3 Nf6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Bc5 b4 Nxb4 c3 Nd3 Bxd3 Nf6 Ba3 Bd6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Bc5 b4 Nxb4 c3 Nd3 Bxd3 Nf6 Ba3 Bd6 O-O O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
e4 c5 c3 Nf6 e5 Nd5 d4 cxd4 cxd4 d6 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 dxe5 dxe5 Be6 O-O Nc7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Bc5 b4 Nxb4 c3 Nd3 Bxd3 Nf6 Ba3 Bd6 O-O O-O Bc2 b6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nxd4 Qxd4 d6 Nc3 h6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
d4 Nf6 Nf3 d5 e3 g6 Bd3 Bg7 O-O O-O Nc3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bd2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1185)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Bg7 Be3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
d4 Nf6 Nf3 d5 e3 g6 Bd3 Bg7 O-O O-O Nc3 Bg4 h3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bd2 d5 Bf4

Transpose to wikichess #26894#

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 c5 e3 e6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1185)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 c4 c6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1185)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Bg7 Be3 Nf6 Nc3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 c5 e3 Qb6 Nc3 Qxb2 Nge2 cxd4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
e4 c6 d4 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 Nd7 Nf3 Ngf6 Nxf6 Nxf6 Ne5 Nd7 Nd3 g6 c3 Bg7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
d4 Nf6 Nf3 d5 e3 g6 Bd3 Bg7 O-O O-O Nc3 Bg4 h3 Bxf3 Qxf3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
d4 Nf6 Bf4 d5 e3 g6 Nf3 Bg7 Nbd2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 c5 e3 Qb6 Nc3 Qxb2 Nge2 cxd4 exd4 e6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 g6 c4 Nf6 Nc3 d6 Be3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 c5 e3 Qb6 Nc3 Qxb2 Nge2 cxd4 exd4 e6 Rb1 Qa3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matus Tkac    (2111)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Bd3 Bd6 O-O O-O c4 c6 Re1 Bf5 Qb3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2111)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Bd3 Bd6 O-O O-O c4 c6 Re1 Bf5 Qb3 Qd7 Nc3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2111)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Bd3 Bd6 O-O O-O c4 c6 Re1 Bf5 Qb3 Qd7 Nc3 Nxc3 Bxf5

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2111)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Bd3 Bd6 O-O O-O c4 c6 Re1 Bf5 Qb3 Qd7 Nc3 Nxc3 Bxf5 Qxf5 bxc3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Mateia Benone    (1017)
d4 Nf6 Bf4 d5 e3 g6 Nf3 Bg7 Nbd2 O-O c3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matus Tkac    (2111)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 g3 Bb4 Bg2 O-O d3 Bxc3 bxc3 Re8 Nh3 c6 O-O d5 cxd5 cxd5 Bg5 Bf5 f4 e4 Bxf6 Qxf6 Qb3 Qc6 Ng5 Re7 dxe4

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2111)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Bd3 Bd6 O-O O-O c4 c6 Re1 Bf5 Qb3 Qd7 Nc3 Nxc3 Bxf5 Qxf5 bxc3 b6 h3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2111)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Bd3 Bd6 O-O O-O c4 c6 Re1 Bf5 Qb3 Qd7 Nc3 Nxc3 Bxf5 Qxf5 bxc3 b6 h3 Nd7 cxd5

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2111)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Bd3 Bd6 O-O O-O c4 c6 Re1 Bf5 Qb3 Qd7 Nc3 Nxc3 Bxf5 Qxf5 bxc3 b6 h3 Nd7 cxd5 cxd5 Ba3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Mateia Benone    (1017)
g4 d5 e3 c6 d4 Nf6 g5 Ne4 Bg2 Nxg5 Qd3 g6 c4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matus Tkac    (2111)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Bd3 Bd6 O-O O-O c4 c6 Re1 Bf5 Qb3 Qd7 Nc3 Nxc3 Bxf5 Qxf5 bxc3 b6 h3 Nd7 cxd5 cxd5 Ba3 Bxa3 Qxa3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2111)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 g3 Bb4 Bg2 O-O d3 Bxc3 bxc3 Re8 Nh3 c6 O-O d5 cxd5 cxd5 Bg5 Bf5 f4 e4 Bxf6 Qxf6 Qb3 Qc6 Ng5 Re7 dxe4 dxe4 g4

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2111)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Bd3 Bd6 O-O O-O c4 c6 Re1 Bf5 Qb3 Qd7 Nc3 Nxc3 Bxf5 Qxf5 bxc3 b6 h3 Nd7 cxd5 cxd5 Ba3 Bxa3 Qxa3 Nf6 Re7

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2111)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 g3 Bb4 Bg2 O-O d3 Bxc3 bxc3 Re8 Nh3 c6 O-O d5 cxd5 cxd5 Bg5 Bf5 f4 e4 Bxf6 Qxf6 Qb3 Qc6 Ng5 Re7 dxe4 dxe4 g4 Bxg4 Bxe4

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2111)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 g3 Bb4 Bg2 O-O d3 Bxc3 bxc3 Re8 Nh3 c6 O-O d5 cxd5 cxd5 Bg5 Bf5 f4 e4 Bxf6 Qxf6 Qb3 Qc6 Ng5 Re7 dxe4 dxe4 g4 Bxg4 Bxe4 Qb6 Qxb6

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2111)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Bd3 Bd6 O-O O-O c4 c6 Re1 Bf5 Qb3 Qd7 Nc3 Nxc3 Bxf5 Qxf5 bxc3 b6 h3 Nd7 cxd5 cxd5 Ba3 Bxa3 Qxa3 Nf6 Re7 h6 Rae1

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2111)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 g3 Bb4 Bg2 O-O d3 Bxc3 bxc3 Re8 Nh3 c6 O-O d5 cxd5 cxd5 Bg5 Bf5 f4 e4 Bxf6 Qxf6 Qb3 Qc6 Ng5 Re7 dxe4 dxe4 g4 Bxg4 Bxe4 Qb6 Qxb6 axb6 Bxh7

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Mateia Benone    (1017)
g4 d5 e3 c6 d4 Nf6 g5 Ne4 Bg2 Nxg5 Qd3 g6 c4 Bf5 Qb3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 g6 c4 Nf6 Nc3 d6 Be3 Bg7 Be2

Transpose to wikichess #11555#

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 c5 e3 Qb6 Nc3 Qxb2 Nge2 cxd4 exd4 e6 Rb1 Qa3 Bd2 Nc6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1185)
e4 e5 Nf3 Qf6 Bc4 Qg6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1185)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 d4 cxd4 Qxd4 Nf6 Bc4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
d4 Nf6 Bf4 d5 e3 g6 Nf3 Bg7 Nbd2 O-O c3 Nc6 Bd3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 c5 e3 Qb6 Nc3 Qxb2 Nge2 cxd4 exd4 e6 Rb1 Qa3 Bd2 Nc6 Nb5 Qxa2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1185)
e4 Nf6 e5 Nd5 d4 d6 Nf3 Nc6 c4 Nb6 exd6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1185)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 d4 cxd4 Qxd4 Nf6 Bc4 Nc6 Qd3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1185)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 Qh5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1185)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Bg7 c3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1185)
e4 Nf6 e5 Nd5 d4 d6 Nf3 Nc6 c4 Nb6 exd6 exd6 Be2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1185)
e4 g6 d4 Bg7 Nf3 d6 c4 Nf6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1185)
e4 e5 Nf3 Qf6 Bc4 Qg6 Nc3 Bc5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1185)
e4 f5 exf5 e5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
d4 Nf6 Bf4 d5 e3 g6 Nf3 Bg7 Nbd2 O-O c3 Nc6 Bd3 Nh5 Bg3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
d4 Nf6 Nf3 d5 e3 g6 Bd3 Bg7 O-O O-O Nc3 Bg4 h3 Bxf3 Qxf3 c6 Bd2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1185)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Bg7 c3 Nc6 Be3

Transpose to wikichess #127131#

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1185)
e4 c5 Bb5 a6 Bc4

Transpose to wikichess #11393#

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 c5 e3 Qb6 Nc3 Qxb2 Nge2 cxd4 exd4 Qa3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 c5 f3 g5 Bxb8

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1185)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 d4 cxd4 Qxd4 Nf6 Bc4 Nc6 Qd3 Bg7 O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1185)
e4 e5 Nf3 d6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 h6 Bc4 Nf6 Nc3 a6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1185)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 d4 cxd4 Qxd4 Nf6 Bc4 Nc6 Qd3 Bg7 O-O Ne5 Nxe5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 c5 f3 g5 Bxb8 Rxb8 fxe4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1185)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 d4 cxd4 Qxd4 Nf6 Bc4 Nc6 Qd3 Bg7 O-O Ne5 Nxe5 O-O Nf3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 c5 e3 Qb6 Nc3 Qxb2 Nge2 cxd4 exd4 Qa3 Bd2 a6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 c5 f3 g5 Bxb8 Rxb8 fxe4 Bg7 c3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
d4 Nf6 Bf4 d5 e3 g6 Nf3 Bg7 Nbd2 O-O c3 Nc6 Bd3 Nh5 Bg3 Bg4 Qc2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1185)
e4 f5 exf5 e5 fxe6 Qe7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1185)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 Qh5 e6 e5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Bc5 Nb3 Bb6 Nc3 d6 a4 a6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 c5 f3 g5 Bxb8 Rxb8 fxe4 Bg7 c3 cxd4 cxd4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 c5 f3 g5 Bxb8 Rxb8 fxe4 Bg7 c3 cxd4 cxd4 Qb6 e3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Bc5 Nb3 Bb6 Nc3 d6 a4 a6 Bd3 Be6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1185)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 c4 c6 Nc3 Nxc3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1185)
e4 e5 Nf3 Qf6 Bc4 Qg6 Nc3 Bc5 O-O Nc6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1185)
e4 f5 exf5 e5 fxe6 Qe7 Nc3 Qxe6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
e4 g6 d4 Bg7 Nf3 d6 c4 Bg4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1185)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 Qh5 e6 e5 d6 Bb5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1185)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 c4 c6 Nc3 Nxc3 bxc3 Be6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
g4 d5 e3 c6 d4 Nf6 g5 Ne4 Bg2 Nxg5 Qd3 g6 c4 Bf5 Qb3 Qd7 h3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1185)
e4 f5 exf5 e5 fxe6 Qe7 Nc3 Qxe6 Qe2 Ne7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1185)
e4 f5 exf5 e5 fxe6 Qe7 Nc3 Qxe6 Qe2 Ne7 Nf3 Qf5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1185)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 Qh5 e6 e5 d6 Bb5 Bd7 Nf3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1185)
e4 f5 exf5 e5 fxe6 Qe7 Nc3 Qxe6 Qe2 Ne7 Nf3 Qf5 d4 h6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1185)
e4 f5 exf5 e5 fxe6 Qe7 Nc3 Qxe6 Qe2 Ne7 Nf3 Qf5 d4 h6 d5 d6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1185)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 Qh5 e6 e5 d6 Bb5 Bd7 Nf3 Nd4 Nxd4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1185)
e4 f5 exf5 e5 fxe6 Qe7 Nc3 Qxe6 Qe2 Ne7 Nf3 Qf5 d4 h6 d5 d6 Qe3 c6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1185)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 Qh5 e6 e5 d6 Bb5 Bd7 Nf3 Nd4 Nxd4 cxd4 Bxd7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1185)
e4 e5 Nf3 Qf6 Bc4 Qg6 Nc3 Bc5 O-O Nc6 Nd5 Bb6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 c5 e3 Qb6 Nc3 Qxb2 Nge2 cxd4 exd4 Qa3 Bd2 a6 Rb1 d5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 g5 Bc1 c5 f3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1185)
e4 e5 Nf3 Qf6 Bc4 Qg6 Nc3 Bc5 O-O Nc6 Nd5 Bb6 d4 d6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1185)
e4 e5 Nf3 d6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 Be7 Bc4 O-O O-O a6

Transpose to wikichess #65778#

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 c5 e3 Qb6 Nc3 Qxb2 Nge2 cxd4 exd4 Qa3 Bd2 a6 Rb1 d5 Rb3 Qd6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1185)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 c4 c6 Nc3 Nxc3 bxc3 Be6 cxd5 cxd5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1185)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 Qh5 e6 e5 d6 Bb5 Bd7 Nf3 Nd4 Nxd4 cxd4 Bxd7 Qxd7 Ne4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 g5 Bc1 c5 f3 Qa5 c3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1185)
e4 e5 Nf3 Qf6 Bc4 Qg6 Nc3 Bc5 O-O Nc6 Nd5 Bb6 d4 d6 Be3 Bh3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
e4 g6 d4 Bg7 Nf3 d6 c4 Bg4 Be3 Bxf3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1185)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 g5 Bc1 c5 f3 Qa5 c3 Nd6 d5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1185)
e4 c5 f4 d5 exd5 Nf6 c4 e6 dxe6 Bxe6 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
e4 g6 d4 Bg7 Nf3 d6 c4 Bg4 Be3 Bxf3 Qxf3 Nc6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1185)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 g5 Bg3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
e4 g6 d4 Bg7 Nf3 d6 c4 Bg4 Be3 Bxf3 Qxf3 Nc6 Qd1 Nf6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1185)
e4 c5 f4 d5 exd5 Nf6 c4 e6 dxe6 Bxe6 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 Bd6 d3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2146)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 O-O a3 Bxc3 bxc3 d5

Transpose to wikichess #58865#

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Mateia Benone    (1185)
e4 e5 Nf3 Qf6 Bc4 Qg6 Nc3 Bc5 O-O Nc6 Nd5 Bb6 d4 d6 Be3 Bh3 Ng5 Be6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1017)
e4 g6 d4 Bg7 Nf3 d6 c4 Bg4 Be3 Bxf3 Qxf3 Nc6 Qd1 Nf6 Nc3 O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1284)
Nf3 c5 c4 Nc6 Nc3 d6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1185)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 g5 Bc1 c5 f3 Qa5 c3 Nd6 d5 h6 e4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Andrea Grammatica    (2147)
c4 e5 g3 c6 Bg2 d5 cxd5 cxd5 d4 e4 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Mateia Benone    (1185)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 g5 Bc1 c5 f3 Qa5 c3 Nd6 d5 h6 e4 b5 h4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1185)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 g5 Bg3 c5 c3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2146)
Nf3 c5 c4 Nc6 Nc3 d6 d4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrea Grammatica    (2147)
c4 e5 g3 c6 Bg2 d5 cxd5 cxd5 d4 e4 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 Nbd7 e3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Mateia Benone    (1284)
Nf3 c5 c4 Nc6 Nc3 d6 d4 cxd4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2146)
Nf3 c5 c4 Nc6 Nc3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Mateia Benone    (1284)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nxd4 Qxd4 Nf6 Nc3 b6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1284)
Nf3 c5 c4 Nc6 Nc3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 g6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1284)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nxd4 Qxd4 Nf6 Nc3 b6 e5 Bc5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1284)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nxd4 Qxd4 Nf6 Nc3 b6 e5 Bc5 Qf4 Nh5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1284)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nxd4 Qxd4 Nf6 Nc3 b6 e5 Bc5 Qf4 Nh5 Qf3 O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2146)
d4 Nf6 c4 c6 Bf4 Qb6 Qd2 Ne4 Qc2 d5 f3 e5 Bxe5 Qa5 Nc3 Nxc3 bxc3 dxc4 e4 b5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Mateia Benone    (1017)
e4 g6 d4 Bg7 Nf3 d6 c4 Bg4 Be3 Bxf3 Qxf3 Nc6 Qd1 Nf6 Nc3 O-O Be2 Re8

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1185)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 g5 Bg3 c5 c3 Bg7 Nf3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1284)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nxd4 Qxd4 Qf6 Be3 Qxd4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1284)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nxd4 Qxd4 Qf6 Be3 Qxd4 Bxd4 b6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1284)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nxd4 Qxd4 Qf6 Be3 Qxd4 Bxd4 b6 Nc3 Nf6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1284)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nxd4 Qxd4 Qf6 Be3 Qxd4 Bxd4 b6 Nc3 Nf6 f3 d6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Andrea Grammatica    (2147)
c4 e5 g3 c6 Bg2 d5 cxd5 cxd5 d4 e4 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 Nbd7 e3 h6 Bf4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2146)
d4 Nf6 c4 c6 Bf4 Qb6 Qd2 Ne4 Qc2 d5 f3 e5 Bxe5 Qa5 Nc3 Nxc3 bxc3 dxc4 e4 b5 Ne2 Nd7

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2146)
d4 Nf6 c4 c6 Bf4 Qb6 Qd2 Ne4 Qc2 d5 f3 e5 Bxe5 Qa5 Nc3 Nxc3 bxc3 dxc4 e4 b5 Ne2 Nd7 Bf4 Be7

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Mateia Benone    (1284)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 Bd6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1185)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 g5 Bg3 c5 c3 Bg7 Nf3 cxd4 Nxd4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2146)
d4 Nf6 c4 c6 Bf4 Qb6 Qd2 Ne4 Qc2 d5 f3 e5 Bxe5 Qa5 Nc3 Nxc3 bxc3 dxc4 e4 b5 Ne2 Nd7 Bf4 Be7 g4 O-O

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Mateia Benone    (1284)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 Bd6 d4 b6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1185)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 g5 Bg3 c5 c3 Bg7 Nf3 cxd4 Nxd4 O-O Nf5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1185)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bc1 d5 f3 Nf6

Transpose to wikichess #5567#

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1284)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 Bd6 d4 b6 e5 Be7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1284)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 Bd6 d4 b6 e5 Be7 Bc4 Bb7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1284)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 Bd6 d4 b6 e5 Be7 Bc4 Bb7 O-O Bxf3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1185)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 g5 Bg3 c5 c3 Bg7 Nf3 cxd4 Nxd4 O-O Nf5 Nxg3 hxg3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1284)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 Bd6 d4 b6 e5 Be7 Bc4 Bb7 O-O Bxf3 Qxf3 g5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1284)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 Bd6 d4 b6 e5 Be7 Bc4 Bb7 O-O Bxf3 Qxf3 g5 Qxa8 a5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1284)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 f3 e5 d5

Transpose to wikichess #69997#

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1185)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 g5 Bc1 c5 f3 Qa5 c3 Nd6 Nd2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2146)
Nf3 c5 c4 Nc6 Nc3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 g6 e4

Transpose to wikichess #54701#

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2146)
d4 Nf6 c4 c6 Bf4 Qb6 Qd2 Ne4 Qc2 d5 f3 e5 Bxe5 Qa5 Nc3 Nxc3 bxc3 dxc4 e4 b5 Ne2 Nd7 Bf4 Be7 g4 O-O Rb1 Nb6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2146)
d4 Nf6 c4 c6 Bf4 Qb6 Qd2 Ne4 Qc2 d5 f3 e5 Bxe5 Qa5 Nc3 Nxc3 bxc3 dxc4 e4 b5 Ne2 Nd7 Bf4 Be7 g4 O-O Rb1 Nb6 Bg2 Qa4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrea Grammatica    (2147)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Nf3 c5 Be3 Qa5 Qd2 Nc6 Rb1

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Mateia Benone    (1017)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 g5 Bc1 c5 f3 Qa5 c3 Nd6 d5 h6 e4 Bg7 h4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Andrea Grammatica    (2147)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 e5 Nb3 Be6 f3 h5 Qd2 Nbd7 O-O-O Rc8 Kb1 Qc7

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2146)
d4 Nf6 c4 c6 Bf4 Qb6 Qd2 Ne4 Qc2 d5 f3 e5 Bxe5 Qa5 Nc3 Nxc3 bxc3 dxc4 e4 b5 Ne2 Nd7 Bf4 Be7 g4 O-O Rb1 Nb6 Bg2 Qa4 Qc1 a5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Mateia Benone    (1185)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 g5 Bc1 c5 f3 Qa5 c3 Nd6 Nd2 cxd4 Nb3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Andrea Grammatica    (2147)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Nf3 c5 Be3 Qa5 Qd2 Nc6 Rb1 a6 Rc1

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2147)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 e5 Nb3 Be6 f3 h5 Qd2 Nbd7 O-O-O Rc8 Kb1 Qc7 g3 Be7

Transpose to wikichess #100949#

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2146)
d4 Nf6 c4 c6 Bf4 Qb6 Qd2 Ne4 Qc2 d5 f3 e5 Bxe5 Qa5 Nc3 Nxc3 bxc3 dxc4 e4 b5 Ne2 Nd7 Bf4 Be7 g4 O-O Rb1 Nb6 Bg2 Qa4 Qc1 a5 O-O b4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrea Grammatica    (2147)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Nf3 c5 Be3 Qa5 Qd2 Nc6 Rb1 a6 Rc1 Bg4 d5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2147)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Nf3 c5 Be3 Qa5 Qd2 Nc6 Rb1 a6 Rc1 Bg4 d5 Rd8 Be2

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Mateia Benone    (1284)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 d4 c6 Bxf4 Nd7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Andrea Grammatica    (2147)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Nf3 c5 Be3 Qa5 Qd2 Nc6 Rb1 a6 Rc1 Bg4 d5 Rd8 Be2 O-O O-O

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2147)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Nf3 c5 Be3 Qa5 Qd2 Nc6 Rb1 a6 Rc1 Bg4 d5 Rd8 Be2 O-O O-O Bxf3 Bxf3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2147)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Nf3 c5 Be3 Qa5 Qd2 Nc6 Rb1 a6 Rc1 Bg4 d5 Rd8 Be2 O-O O-O Bxf3 Bxf3 e6 Rfd1

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2147)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O Re8 Nbd2 Bf8

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2147)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Nf3 c5 Be3 Qa5 Qd2 Nc6 Rb1 a6 Rc1 Bg4 d5 Rd8 Be2 O-O O-O Bxf3 Bxf3 e6 Rfd1 Ne5 Be2

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2147)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O Re8 Nbd2 Bf8 Re1 d6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Mateia Benone    (1284)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 d4 c6 Bxf4 Nd7 Bc4 Be7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Andrea Grammatica    (2147)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O Re8 Nbd2 Bf8 Re1 d6 d4 Bd7

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2147)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Nf3 c5 Be3 Qa5 Qd2 Nc6 Rb1 a6 Rc1 Bg4 d5 Rd8 Be2 O-O O-O Bxf3 Bxf3 e6 Rfd1 Ne5 Be2 exd5 exd5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2147)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nc6 Nc3 Qc7 f4 a6 Be2

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2147)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nc6 Nc3 Qc7 f4 a6 Be2 b5 Be3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2147)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Nf3 c5 Be3 Qa5 Qd2 Nc6 Rb1 a6 Rc1 Bg4 d5 Rd8 Be2 O-O O-O Bxf3 Bxf3 e6 Rfd1 Ne5 Be2 exd5 exd5 c4 Rb1

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2147)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nc6 Nc3 Qc7 f4 a6 Be2 b5 Be3 Bb7 Bf3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Mateia Benone    (1284)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 d4 c6 Bxf4 Nd7 Bc4 Be7 O-O h6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1185)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 g5 Bc1 c5 f3 Qa5 c3 Nd6 Nd2 cxd4 Nb3 Qd5 e4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1284)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 e5 d5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1284)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Bd3 e5 Nf3 exd4 Nxd4 Nc6 Nxc6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1284)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 d4 c6 Bxf4 Nd7 Bc4 Be7 O-O h6 Nc3 b5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1284)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Bd3 e5 Nf3 exd4 Nxd4 Nc6 Nxc6 bxc6 O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1284)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 d4 c6 Bxf4 Nd7 Bc4 Be7 O-O h6 Nc3 b5 Bd3 Ngf6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1284)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Bd3 e5 Nf3 exd4 Nxd4 Nc6 Nxc6 bxc6 O-O Be7 Nc3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1506)
f4 b6 Nf3 Bb7 e3 e6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Andrea Grammatica    (2154)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nc6 Nc3 Qc7 Be3 a6 a3

Transpose to wikichess #113346#

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Mateia Benone    (1506)
f4 e6 Nf3 d5

Transpose to wikichess #16901#

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1506)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 Bd3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1506)
f4 b6 Nf3 Bb7 e3 e6 Be2 Be7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Andrea Grammatica    (2154)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nc6 Nc3 Qc7 Be3 a6 Qd2 Nf6 O-O-O Be7 f3 b5 g4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2154)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nc6 Nc3 Qc7 Be3 a6 Qd2 Nf6 O-O-O Be7 f3 b5 g4 O-O g5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2154)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nc6 Nc3 Qc7 Be3 a6 Qd2 Nf6 O-O-O Be7 f3 b5 g4 O-O g5 Nh5 Nce2

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Mateia Benone    (1506)
f4 d5 Nf3 g6 e3 Bg7 d4 Nh6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Andrea Grammatica    (2154)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nc6 Nc3 Qc7 Be3 a6 Qd2 Nf6 O-O-O Be7 f3 b5 g4 O-O g5 Nh5 Nce2 Rd8 Ng3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Mateia Benone    (1506)
f4 d5 Nf3 g6 e3 Bg7 d4 Nh6 Be2 O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1506)
f4 b6 Nf3 Bb7 e3 e6 Be2 Be7 O-O Nf6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1506)
d4 Nf6 Nf3 d5 g3 g6 Bg2 Bg7 O-O O-O Nbd2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Andrea Grammatica    (2154)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O h3 e5 d5 a5 Be3 Na6 g4 Nd7 a3 Nac5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Mateia Benone    (1506)
f4 d5 Nf3 g6 e3 Bg7 d4 Nh6 Be2 O-O O-O Nd7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Andrea Grammatica    (2154)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nc6 Nc3 Qc7 Be3 a6 Qd2 Nf6 O-O-O Be7 f3 b5 g4 O-O g5 Nh5 Nce2 Rd8 Ng3 Nxd4 Qxd4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2154)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nc6 Nc3 Qc7 Be3 a6 Qd2 Nf6 O-O-O Be7 f3 b5 g4 O-O g5 Nh5 Nce2 Rd8 Ng3 Nxd4 Qxd4 Nf4 h4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2154)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nc6 Nc3 Qc7 Be3 a6 Qd2 Nf6 O-O-O Be7 f3 b5 g4 O-O g5 Nh5 Nce2 Rd8 Ng3 Nxd4 Qxd4 Nf4 h4 Bb7 Qb6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2154)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nc6 Nc3 Qc7 Be3 a6 Qd2 Nf6 O-O-O Be7 f3 b5 g4 O-O g5 Nh5 Nce2 Rd8 Ng3 Nxd4 Qxd4 Nf4 h4 Bb7 Qb6 Qb8 Kb1

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2154)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 c5 f3 Qa5 c3 Nf6 d5 Qb6 Bc1 d6 e4 g6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2154)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 c5 f3 Qa5 c3 Nf6 d5 Qb6 Bc1 d6 e4 g6 c4 Bg7

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2154)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nc6 Nc3 Qc7 Be3 a6 Qd2 Nf6 O-O-O Be7 f3 b5 g4 O-O g5 Nh5 Nce2 Rd8 Ng3 Nxd4 Qxd4 Nf4 h4 Bb7 Qb6 Qb8 Kb1 d5 Bxf4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2154)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O h3 e5 d5 a5 Be3 Na6 g4 Nd7 a3 Nac5 Rg1 a4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2173)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 e4 e5 Nf3 exd4 Bxc4 Nc6 O-O Be6 Bb5 Bc5 b4 Bb6 a4 a6 Bxc6 bxc6 Bb2 Nf6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrea Grammatica    (2154)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O h3 e5 d5 a5 Be3 Na6 g4 Nd7 a3 Nac5 Rg1 a4 Nd2 b6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2173)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Be3 Bg7 f3 O-O Qd2 Nc6 Bc4 Bd7 O-O-O Rc8 Bb3 Ne5 Kb1 Nc4 Bxc4 Rxc4 g4 b5 b3 b4 bxc4 bxc3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2173)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Be3 Bg7 f3 O-O Qd2 Nc6 Bc4 Bd7 O-O-O Rc8 Bb3 Ne5 Kb1 Nc4 Bxc4 Rxc4 g4 b5 b3 b4 bxc4 bxc3 Qxc3 Qc7

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrea Grammatica    (2154)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 c5 f3 Qa5 c3 Nf6 d5 Qb6 Bc1 e6 e4 exd5 exd5 Bd6 Na3 O-O Bd3 Re8

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2173)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 e4 e5 Nf3 exd4 Bxc4 Nc6 O-O Be6 Bb5 Bc5 b4 Bb6 a4 a6 Bxc6 bxc6 Bb2 Nf6 a5 Ba7

Transpose to wikichess #54347#

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrea Grammatica    (2154)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 c5 f3 Qa5 c3 Nf6 d5 Qb6 Bc1 e6 e4 exd5 exd5 Bd6 Na3 O-O Bd3 Re8 Ne2 Bf8

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2173)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Be3 Bg7 f3 O-O Qd2 Nc6 Bc4 Bd7 O-O-O Rc8 Bb3 Ne5 Kb1 Nc4 Bxc4 Rxc4 g4 b5 b3 b4 bxc4 bxc3 Qxc3 Qc7 g5 Nh5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2173)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Be3 Bg7 f3 O-O Qd2 Nc6 Bc4 Bd7 O-O-O Rc8 Bb3 Ne5 Kb1 Nc4 Bxc4 Rxc4 g4 b5 b3 b4 bxc4 bxc3 Qxc3 Qc7 g5 Nh5 Ka1 Be6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrea Grammatica    (2154)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 c5 f3 Qa5 c3 Nf6 d5 Qb6 Bc1 e6 e4 exd5 exd5 Bd6 Na3 O-O Bd3 Re8 Ne2 Bf8 Nc4 Qd8

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2154)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nc6 Nc3 Qc7 Be3 a6 Qd2 Nf6 O-O-O Be7 f3 b5 g4 O-O g5 Nh5 Nce2 Rd8 Ng3 Nxd4 Qxd4 Nf4 h4 Bb7 Qb6 Qb8 Kb1 d5 Bxf4 Qxf4 Qxb7

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matej Pech    (1391)
Nf3 Nf6 c4 b6 Nc3 Bb7 d3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Andrea Grammatica    (2154)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O h3 Bb7 d3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxe5 Nxe5 Rxe5 Qd6 Re1 Rae8 Nd2 c5 Ne4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2154)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 c5 f3 Qa5 c3 Nf6 d5 Qb6 Bc1 e6 e4 exd5 exd5 Bd6 Na3 O-O Bd3 Re8 Ne2 Bf8 Nc4 Qd8 Ne3 d6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2154)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O h3 Bb7 d3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxe5 Nxe5 Rxe5 Qd6 Re1 Rae8 Nd2 c5 Ne4 Qc6 c4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2154)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 c5 f3 Qa5 c3 Nf6 d5 Qb6 Bc1 e6 e4 exd5 exd5 Bd6 Na3 O-O Bd3 Re8 Ne2 Bf8 Nc4 Qd8 Ne3 d6 O-O Nbd7

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2154)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 c5 f3 Qa5 c3 Nf6 d5 Qb6 Bc1 e6 e4 exd5 exd5 Bd6 Na3 O-O Bd3 Re8 Ne2 Bf8 Nc4 Qd8 Ne3 d6 O-O Nbd7 Ng3 Qc7

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2154)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O h3 Bb7 d3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxe5 Nxe5 Rxe5 Qd6 Re1 Rae8 Nd2 c5 Ne4 Qc6 c4 Nb6 f3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2173)
e4 c5 c3 Nf6 e5 Nd5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nb6 Bb3 c4 Bc2 d6 O-O

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2173)
e4 c5 c3 Nf6 e5 Nd5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nb6 Bb3 c4 Bc2 d6 O-O dxe5 Re1

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matej Pech    (1391)
Nf3 Nf6 c4 b6 Nc3 Bb7 d3 c5 e4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Andrea Grammatica    (2154)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O h3 Bb7 d3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxe5 Nxe5 Rxe5 Qd6 Re1 Rae8 Nd2 c5 Ne4 Qc6 c4 Nb6 f3 Bh4 Re3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2154)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 c5 f3 Qa5 c3 Nf6 d5 Qb6 Bc1 e6 e4 exd5 exd5 Bd6 Na3 O-O Bd3 Re8 Ne2 Bf8 Nc4 Qd8 Ne3 d6 O-O Nbd7 Ng3 Qc7 c4 g6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2154)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O h3 Bb7 d3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxe5 Nxe5 Rxe5 Qd6 Re1 Rae8 Nd2 c5 Ne4 Qc6 c4 Nb6 f3 Bh4 Re3 Qc7 Qe2

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2154)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 c5 f3 Qa5 c3 Nf6 d5 Qb6 Bc1 e6 e4 exd5 exd5 Bd6 Na3 O-O Bd3 Re8 Ne2 Bf8 Nc4 Qd8 Ne3 d6 O-O Nbd7 Ng3 Qc7 c4 g6 a4 Ne5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2173)
e4 e5 Bc4 Nf6 d3 c6 Nf3 d5 Bb3 Bb4 Bd2 Bxd2 Nbxd2 Qc7 O-O

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrea Grammatica    (2154)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 c5 f3 Qa5 c3 Nf6 d5 Qb6 Bc1 e6 e4 exd5 exd5 Bd6 Na3 O-O Bd3 Re8 Ne2 Bf8 Nc4 Qd8 Ne3 d6 O-O Nbd7 Ng3 Qc7 c4 g6 a4 Ne5 Bb1 Bh6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2173)
e4 e5 Bc4 Nf6 d3 c6 Nf3 d5 Bb3 Bb4 Bd2 Bxd2 Nbxd2 Qc7 O-O O-O Re1

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matej Pech    (1391)
Nf3 Nf6 c4 b6 Nc3 Bb7 d3 c5 e4 d6 g3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2173)
e4 e5 Bc4 Nf6 d3 c6 Nf3 d5 Bb3 Bb4 Bd2 Bxd2 Nbxd2 Qc7 O-O O-O Re1 a5 a4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matej Pech    (1391)
Nf3 Nf6 c4 b6 Nc3 Bb7 d3 c5 e4 d6 g3 g6 Bg2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2173)
e4 e5 Bc4 Nf6 d3 c6 Nf3 d5 Bb3 Bb4 Bd2 Bxd2 Nbxd2 Qc7 O-O O-O Re1 a5 a4 Nbd7 d4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2173)
e4 e5 Bc4 Nf6 d3 c6 Nf3 d5 Bb3 Bb4 Bd2 Bxd2 Nbxd2 Qc7 O-O O-O Re1 a5 a4 Nbd7 d4 exd4 exd5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matej Pech    (1391)
Nf3 Nf6 c4 b6 Nc3 Bb7 d3 c5 e4 d6 g3 g6 Bg2 Bg7 O-O

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2173)
e4 e5 Bc4 Nf6 d3 c6 Nf3 d5 Bb3 Bb4 Bd2 Bxd2 Nbxd2 Qc7 O-O O-O Re1 a5 a4 Nbd7 d4 exd4 exd5 cxd5 Nb1

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2173)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 d3 b5 Bb3 d6 c3 O-O h3 Bb7

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matej Pech    (1391)
Nf3 Nf6 c4 b6 Nc3 Bb7 d3 c5 e4 d6 g3 g6 Bg2 Bg7 O-O O-O h3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2173)
e4 e5 Bc4 Nf6 d3 c6 Nf3 d5 Bb3 Bb4 Bd2 Bxd2 Nbxd2 Qc7 O-O O-O Re1 a5 a4 Nbd7 d4 exd4 exd5 cxd5 Nb1 d3 Qxd3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matej Pech    (1391)
d4 Nf6 Nf3 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O O-O d6 c4 Nbd7 Nc3 e5 dxe5 dxe5 b4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2173)
e4 e5 Bc4 Nf6 d3 c6 Nf3 d5 Bb3 Bb4 Bd2 Bxd2 Nbxd2 Qc7 O-O O-O Re1 a5 a4 Nbd7 d4 exd4 exd5 cxd5 Nb1 d3 Qxd3 Nc5 Qd4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2173)
e4 e5 Bc4 Nf6 d3 c6 Nf3 d5 Bb3 Bb4 Bd2 Bxd2 Nbxd2 Qc7 O-O O-O Re1 a5 a4 Nbd7 d4 exd4 exd5 cxd5 Nb1 d3 Qxd3 Nc5 Qd4 Bg4 Ne5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrea Grammatica    (2154)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O h3 e5 d5 a5 Be3 Na6 g4 Nd7 a3 Nac5 Rg1 a4 Nd2 b6 Qc2 f5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2173)
e4 e5 Bc4 Nf6 d3 c6 Nf3 d5 Bb3 Bb4 Bd2 Bxd2 Nbxd2 Qc7 O-O O-O Re1 a5 a4 Nbd7 d4 exd4 exd5 cxd5 Nb1 d3 Qxd3 Nc5 Qd4 Bg4 Ne5 Ne6 Qc3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2173)
e4 e5 Bc4 Nf6 d3 c6 Nf3 d5 Bb3 Bb4 Bd2 Bxd2 Nbxd2 Qc7 O-O O-O Re1 a5 a4 Nbd7 d4 exd4 exd5 cxd5 Nb1 d3 Qxd3 Nc5 Qd4 Bg4 Ne5 Ne6 Qc3 Qb6 Na3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2173)
e4 e5 Bc4 Nf6 d3 c6 Nf3 d5 Bb3 Bb4 Bd2 Bxd2 Nbxd2 Qc7 O-O O-O Re1 a5 a4 Nbd7 d4 exd4 exd5 cxd5 Nb1 d3 Qxd3 Nc5 Qd4 Bg4 Ne5 Ne6 Qc3 Qb6 Na3 Bf5 Nb5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrea Grammatica    (2154)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O h3 e5 d5 a5 Be3 Na6 g4 Nd7 a3 Nac5 Rg1 a4 Nd2 b6 Qc2 f5 gxf5 gxf5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2154)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O h3 e5 d5 a5 Be3 Na6 g4 Nd7 a3 Nac5 Rg1 a4 Nd2 b6 Qc2 f5 gxf5 gxf5 exf5 Nf6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2154)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O h3 e5 d5 a5 Be3 Na6 g4 Nd7 a3 Nac5 Rg1 a4 Nd2 b6 Qc2 f5 gxf5 gxf5 exf5 Nf6 Be2 Qd7

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2154)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O h3 e5 d5 a5 Be3 Na6 g4 Nd7 a3 Nac5 Rg1 a4 Nd2 b6 Qc2 f5 gxf5 gxf5 exf5 Nf6 Be2 Qd7 Nb5 Rf7

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2154)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O h3 e5 d5 a5 Be3 Na6 g4 Nd7 a3 Nac5 Rg1 a4 Nd2 b6 Qc2 f5 gxf5 gxf5 exf5 Nf6 Be2 Qd7 Nb5 Rf7 Bxc5 bxc5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2154)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O h3 e5 d5 a5 Be3 Na6 g4 Nd7 a3 Nac5 Rg1 a4 Nd2 b6 Qc2 f5 gxf5 gxf5 exf5 Nf6 Be2 Qd7 Nb5 Rf7 Bxc5 bxc5 Bd3 e4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matei Cornel    (2223)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e6 Bg5 h6 Bh4 dxc4 e4 g5 Bg3 b5 Be2 Bb7 O-O Nbd7 Nd2

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2223)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e6 Bg5 h6 Bh4 dxc4 e4 g5 Bg3 b5 Be2 Bb7 O-O Nbd7 Nd2 h5 h3

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2223)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e6 Bg5 h6 Bh4 dxc4 e4 g5 Bg3 b5 Be2 Bb7 O-O Nbd7 Nd2 h5 h3 g4 h4

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2223)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e6 Bg5 h6 Bh4 dxc4 e4 g5 Bg3 b5 Be2 Bb7 O-O Nbd7 Nd2 h5 h3 g4 h4 Qb6 Qc2

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2223)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e6 Bg5 h6 Bh4 dxc4 e4 g5 Bg3 b5 Be2 Bb7 O-O Nbd7 Nd2 h5 h3 g4 h4 Qb6 Qc2 Qxd4 Rfd1

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2223)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e6 Bg5 h6 Bh4 dxc4 e4 g5 Bg3 b5 Be2 Bb7 O-O Nbd7 Nd2 h5 h3 g4 h4 Qb6 Qc2 Qxd4 Rfd1 Qb6 b3

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2223)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e6 Bg5 h6 Bh4 dxc4 e4 g5 Bg3 b5 Be2 Bb7 O-O Nbd7 Nd2 h5 h3 g4 h4 Qb6 Qc2 Qxd4 Rfd1 Qb6 b3 cxb3 Qxb3

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2223)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e6 Bg5 h6 Bh4 dxc4 e4 g5 Bg3 b5 Be2 Bb7 O-O Nbd7 Nd2 h5 h3 g4 h4 Qb6 Qc2 Qxd4 Rfd1 Qb6 b3 cxb3 Qxb3 e5 a4

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2223)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e6 Bg5 h6 Bh4 dxc4 e4 g5 Bg3 b5 Be2 Bb7 O-O Nbd7 Nd2 h5 h3 g4 h4 Qb6 Qc2 Qxd4 Rfd1 Qb6 b3 cxb3 Qxb3 e5 a4 a6 axb5

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2223)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 dxc4 a4 e6 e3 c5

Transpose to wikichess #115641#

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matus Tkac    (2153)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e6 Bg5 h6 Bh4 dxc4 e4 g5 Bg3 b5 Be2 Bg7 e5 Nh5 a4 a6 Ne4 O-O Nfxg5 Nxg3 hxg3 hxg5 Qb1 f5

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2153)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e6 Bg5 h6 Bh4 dxc4 e4 g5 Bg3 b5 Be2 Bg7 e5 Nh5 a4 a6 Ne4 O-O Nfxg5 Nxg3 hxg3 hxg5 Qb1 f5 exf6 Rxf6

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2153)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e6 Bg5 h6 Bh4 dxc4 e4 g5 Bg3 b5 Be2 Bg7 e5 Nh5 a4 a6 Ne4 O-O Nfxg5 Nxg3 hxg3 hxg5 Qb1 f5 exf6 Rxf6 Nxf6 Qxf6

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matej Pech    (1514)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 g3 Bb4 Nd5 Bc5 Bg2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1514)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 g3 Bb4 Nd5 Bc5 Bg2 O-O O-O

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matei Cornel    (2223)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Bd3 Bd6 O-O O-O c4 c6 Qc2 Na6 a3 f5

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matus Tkac    (2153)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Bd3 Bd6 O-O O-O c4 c6 Qc2 Na6 a3 f5 Nc3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matej Pech    (1514)
e4 c5 a3 g6 b4 Bg7 Nc3 d6 g3 Nf6 Bg2 Nc6 Rb1

Transpose to wikichess #121707#

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matei Cornel    (2223)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Bd3 Bd6 O-O O-O c4 c6 Qc2 Na6 a3 f5 Nc3 Nc7

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matus Tkac    (2153)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Bd3 Bd6 O-O O-O c4 c6 Qc2 Na6 a3 f5 Nc3 Nc7 Be3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matei Cornel    (2223)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Bd3 Bd6 O-O O-O c4 c6 Qc2 Na6 a3 f5 Nc3 Nc7 Be3 Kh8

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matus Tkac    (2153)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Bd3 Bd6 O-O O-O c4 c6 Qc2 Na6 a3 f5 Nc3 Nc7 Be3 Kh8 Rae1

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matei Cornel    (2223)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Bd3 Bd6 O-O O-O c4 c6 Qc2 Na6 a3 f5 Nc3 Nc7 Be3 Kh8 Rae1 b6

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matus Tkac    (2153)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Bd3 Bd6 O-O O-O c4 c6 Qc2 Na6 a3 f5 Nc3 Nc7 Be3 Kh8 Rae1 b6 c5

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matei Cornel    (2223)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Bd3 Bd6 O-O O-O c4 c6 Qc2 Na6 a3 f5 Nc3 Nc7 Be3 Kh8 Rae1 b6 c5 bxc5

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matus Tkac    (2153)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Bd3 Bd6 O-O O-O c4 c6 Qc2 Na6 a3 f5 Nc3 Nc7 Be3 Kh8 Rae1 b6 c5 bxc5 dxc5

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matei Cornel    (2223)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Bd3 Bd6 O-O O-O c4 c6 Qc2 Na6 a3 f5 Nc3 Nc7 Be3 Kh8 Rae1 b6 c5 bxc5 dxc5 Bxc5

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matus Tkac    (2153)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Bd3 Bd6 O-O O-O c4 c6 Qc2 Na6 a3 f5 Nc3 Nc7 Be3 Kh8 Rae1 b6 c5 bxc5 dxc5 Bxc5 Bxe4

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matei Cornel    (2223)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Bd3 Bd6 O-O O-O c4 c6 Qc2 Na6 a3 f5 Nc3 Nc7 Be3 Kh8 Rae1 b6 c5 bxc5 dxc5 Bxc5 Bxe4 Bxe3

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matus Tkac    (2153)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Bd3 Bd6 O-O O-O c4 c6 Qc2 Na6 a3 f5 Nc3 Nc7 Be3 Kh8 Rae1 b6 c5 bxc5 dxc5 Bxc5 Bxe4 Bxe3 Bxd5

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matei Cornel    (2223)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Bd3 Bd6 O-O O-O c4 c6 Qc2 Na6 a3 f5 Nc3 Nc7 Be3 Kh8 Rae1 b6 c5 bxc5 dxc5 Bxc5 Bxe4 Bxe3 Bxd5 Bxf2

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matus Tkac    (2153)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Bd3 Bd6 O-O O-O c4 c6 Qc2 Na6 a3 f5 Nc3 Nc7 Be3 Kh8 Rae1 b6 c5 bxc5 dxc5 Bxc5 Bxe4 Bxe3 Bxd5 Bxf2 Qxf2

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matei Cornel    (2223)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Bd3 Bd6 O-O O-O c4 c6 Qc2 Na6 a3 f5 Nc3 Nc7 Be3 Kh8 Rae1 b6 c5 bxc5 dxc5 Bxc5 Bxe4 Bxe3 Bxd5 Bxf2 Qxf2 Nxd5

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matus Tkac    (2153)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Bd3 Bd6 O-O O-O c4 c6 Qc2 Na6 a3 f5 Nc3 Nc7 Be3 Kh8 Rae1 b6 c5 bxc5 dxc5 Bxc5 Bxe4 Bxe3 Bxd5 Bxf2 Qxf2 Nxd5 Nxd5

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matei Cornel    (2223)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Bd3 Bd6 O-O O-O c4 c6 Qc2 Na6 a3 f5 Nc3 Nc7 Be3 Kh8 Rae1 b6 c5 bxc5 dxc5 Bxc5 Bxe4 Bxe3 Bxd5 Bxf2 Qxf2 Nxd5 Nxd5 cxd5

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Andrea Grammatica    (2140)
c4 e5 Nc3 Bb4 Nd5 Bc5 e3 Nf6 d4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2140)
c4 e5 Nc3 Bb4 Nd5 Bc5 e3 Nf6 d4 Nxd5 cxd5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2140)
c4 e5 Nc3 Bb4 Nd5 Bc5 e3 Nf6 d4 Nxd5 cxd5 exd4 exd4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2140)
c4 e5 Nc3 Bb4 Nd5 Bc5 e3 Nf6 d4 Nxd5 cxd5 exd4 exd4 Bb4 Bd2

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matus Tkac    (2153)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d4 Nxe4 dxe5 Bc5 Bc4 Nxf2 Bxf7 Kxf7 Qd5 Kg6 Qxc5 Nxh1 Nc3 h6 Nd5 d6 Qc4 c6 Nf4 Kh7 Qd3 Kg8 exd6 Na6 Kf1

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrea Grammatica    (2140)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 Nc6 f3 Qb6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2140)
c4 e5 Nc3 Bb4 Nd5 Bc5 e3 Nf6 d4 Nxd5 cxd5 exd4 exd4 Bb4 Bd2 Qe7 Be2

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2140)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 Nc6 f3 Qb6 a3 e5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2140)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 Nc6 f3 Qb6 a3 e5 Nf5 Qc7

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matus Tkac    (2153)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d4 Nxe4 dxe5 Bc5 Bc4 Nxf2 Bxf7 Kxf7 Qd5 Kg6 Qxc5 Nxh1 Nc3 h6 Nd5 d6 Qc4 c6 Nf4 Kh7 Qd3 Kg8 exd6 Na6 Kf1 Qf6 d7

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2153)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d4 Nxe4 dxe5 Bc5 Bc4 Nxf2 Bxf7 Kxf7 Qd5 Kg6 Qxc5 Nxh1 Nc3 h6 Nd5 d6 Qc4 c6 Nf4 Kh7 Qd3 Kg8 exd6 Na6 Kf1 Qf6 d7 Bxd7 Qxd7

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrea Grammatica    (2140)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 Nc6 f3 Qb6 a3 e5 Nf5 Qc7 Qd2 Bxf5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2140)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 Nc6 f3 Qb6 a3 e5 Nf5 Qc7 Qd2 Bxf5 exf5 Ne7

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2140)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 Nc6 f3 Qb6 a3 e5 Nf5 Qc7 Qd2 Bxf5 exf5 Ne7 Bb5 axb5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2140)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 Nc6 f3 Qb6 a3 e5 Nf5 Qc7 Qd2 Bxf5 exf5 Ne7 Bb5 axb5 Nxb5 Qa5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matus Tkac    (2188)
e4 c6 Nf3 d5 exd5 cxd5 Ne5 Nc6 d4

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrea Grammatica    (2140)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 Nc6 f3 Qb6 a3 e5 Nf5 Qc7 Qd2 Bxf5 exf5 Ne7 Bb5 axb5 Nxb5 Qa5 Nxd6 Kd7

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matus Tkac    (2188)
e4 c6 Nf3 d5 exd5 cxd5 Ne5 Nc6 d4 e6 Bb5

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2188)
e4 g6 d4 Bg7 Nf3 d6 h3 Nf6 Bd3 Nbd7

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrea Grammatica    (2140)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 Nc6 f3 Qb6 a3 e5 Nf5 Qc7 Qd2 Bxf5 exf5 Ne7 Bb5 axb5 Nxb5 Qa5 Nxd6 Kd7 Nxf7 Qxd2

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matus Tkac    (2188)
Nf3 Nf6 c4 c6 Nc3 d5 e3 e6 Qc2 Bd6

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2188)
Nf3 Nf6 c4 c6 Nc3 d5 e3 e6 Qc2 Bd6 d4 Nbd7

Transpose to wikichess #9786#

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2188)
e4 g6 d4 Bg7 Nf3 d6 h3 Nf6 Bd3 Nbd7 c4 e5

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrea Grammatica    (2140)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 Nc6 f3 Qb6 a3 e5 Nf5 Qc7 Qd2 Bxf5 exf5 Ne7 Bb5 axb5 Nxb5 Qa5 Nxd6 Kd7 Nxf7 Qxd2 Bxd2 Rg8

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matus Tkac    (2188)
e4 g6 d4 Bg7 Nf3 d6 h3 Nf6 Bd3 Nbd7 c4 e5 Bg5 c6

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2188)
e4 g6 d4 Bg7 Nf3 d6 h3 Nf6 Bd3 Nbd7 c4 e5 Bg5 c6 Nc3 Qb6

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrea Grammatica    (2140)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 Nc6 f3 Qb6 a3 e5 Nf5 Qc7 Qd2 Bxf5 exf5 Ne7 Bb5 axb5 Nxb5 Qa5 Nxd6 Kd7 Nxf7 Qxd2 Bxd2 Rg8 Nxe5 Kc7

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matus Tkac    (2188)
c4 e5 g3 c6 d4 e4 Nc3 d5 Nh3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2188)
e4 g6 d4 Bg7 Nf3 d6 h3 Nf6 Bd3 Nbd7 c4 e5 Bg5 c6 Nc3 Qb6 Na4 Qa5

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrea Grammatica    (2140)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 Nc6 f3 Qb6 a3 e5 Nf5 Qc7 Qd2 Bxf5 exf5 Ne7 Bb5 axb5 Nxb5 Qa5 Nxd6 Kd7 Nxf7 Qxd2 Bxd2 Rg8 Nxe5 Kc7 g4 Nc6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matus Tkac    (2188)
e4 g6 d4 Bg7 Nf3 d6 h3 Nf6 Bd3 Nbd7 c4 e5 Bg5 c6 Nc3 Qb6 Na4 Qa5 Bd2 Qc7

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2188)
c4 e5 g3 c6 d4 e4 Nc3 d5 Nh3 Bb4 Qa4

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2153)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d4 Nxe4 dxe5 Bc5 Bc4 Nxf2 Bxf7 Kxf7 Qd5 Kg6 Qxc5 Nxh1 Nc3 h6 Nd5 d6 Qc4 c6 Nf4 Kh7 Qd3 Kg8 exd6 Na6 Kf1 Qf6 d7 Bxd7 Qxd7 Rd8 Qg4

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrea Grammatica    (2140)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 Nc6 f3 Qb6 a3 e5 Nf5 Qc7 Qd2 Bxf5 exf5 Ne7 Bb5 axb5 Nxb5 Qa5 Nxd6 Kd7 Nxf7 Qxd2 Bxd2 Rg8 Nxe5 Kc7 g4 Nc6 Nd3 Bd6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matus Tkac    (2153)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d4 Nxe4 dxe5 Bc5 Bc4 Nxf2 Bxf7 Kxf7 Qd5 Kg6 Qxc5 Nxh1 Nc3 h6 Nd5 d6 Qc4 c6 Nf4 Kh7 Qd3 Kg8 exd6 Na6 Kf1 Qf6 d7 Bxd7 Qxd7 Rd8 Qg4 Rd1 Ke2

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2188)
c4 e5 g3 c6 d4 e4 Nc3 d5 Nh3 Bb4 Qa4 Qb6 Bg2

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2188)
e4 g6 d4 Bg7 Nf3 d6 h3 Nf6 Bd3 Nbd7 c4 e5 Bg5 c6 Nc3 Qb6 Na4 Qa5 Bd2 Qc7 O-O O-O

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2188)
e4 g6 d4 Bg7 Nf3 d6 h3 Nf6 Bd3 Nbd7 c4 e5 Bg5 c6 Nc3 Qb6 Na4 Qa5 Bd2 Qc7 O-O O-O Re1 exd4

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2188)
c4 e5 g3 c6 d4 e4 Nc3 d5 Nh3 Bb4 Qa4 Qb6 Bg2 Nf6 Nf4

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2188)
e4 g6 d4 Bg7 Nf3 d6 h3 Nf6 Bd3 Nbd7 c4 e5 Bg5 c6 Nc3 Qb6 Na4 Qa5 Bd2 Qc7 O-O O-O Re1 exd4 Nxd4 Nc5

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2188)
c4 e5 g3 c6 d4 e4 Nc3 d5 Nh3 Bb4 Qa4 Qb6 Bg2 Nf6 Nf4 O-O O-O

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2188)
e4 g6 d4 Bg7 Nf3 d6 h3 Nf6 Bd3 Nbd7 c4 e5 Bg5 c6 Nc3 Qb6 Na4 Qa5 Bd2 Qc7 O-O O-O Re1 exd4 Nxd4 Nc5 Bc3 Nxd3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Bd2 Bg7 e4 Nxc3 Bxc3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Bd2 Bg7 e4 Nxc3 Bxc3 O-O Qd2

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Bd2 Bg7 e4 Nxc3 Bxc3 O-O Qd2 Nc6 Nf3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matus Tkac    (2188)
e4 g6 d4 Bg7 Nf3 d6 h3 Nf6 Bd3 Nbd7 c4 e5 Bg5 c6 Nc3 Qb6 Na4 Qa5 Bd2 Qc7 O-O O-O Re1 exd4 Nxd4 Nc5 Bc3 Nxd3 Qxd3 Bd7

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2188)
c4 e5 g3 c6 d4 e4 Nc3 d5 Nh3 Bb4 Qa4 Qb6 Bg2 Nf6 Nf4 O-O O-O Nbd7 cxd5

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Bd2 Bg7 e4 Nxc3 Bxc3 O-O Qd2 Nc6 Nf3 Bg4 Ne5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matus Tkac    (2188)
c4 e5 g3 c6 d4 e4 Nc3 d5 Nh3 Bb4 Qa4 Qb6 Bg2 Nf6 Nf4 O-O O-O Nbd7 cxd5 Bxc3 bxc3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2188)
c4 e5 g3 c6 d4 e4 Nc3 d5 Nh3 Bb4 Qa4 Qb6 Bg2 Nf6 Nf4 O-O O-O Nbd7 cxd5 Bxc3 bxc3 cxd5 f3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Bg5 e6 f4 h6 Bxf6 Qxf6 Qd2

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matus Tkac    (2188)
e4 g6 d4 Bg7 Nf3 d6 h3 Nf6 Bd3 Nbd7 c4 e5 Bg5 c6 Nc3 Qb6 Na4 Qa5 Bd2 Qc7 O-O O-O Re1 exd4 Nxd4 Nc5 Bc3 Nxd3 Qxd3 Bd7 Nf3 Rad8

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Bd2 Bg7 e4 Nxc3 Bxc3 O-O Qd2 Nc6 Nf3 Bg4 Ne5 Nxe5 dxe5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Bg5 e6 f4 h6 Bxf6 Qxf6 Qd2 Nc6 Nce2

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Bd2 Bg7 e4 Nxc3 Bxc3 O-O Qd2 Nc6 Nf3 Bg4 Ne5 Nxe5 dxe5 Qxd2 Kxd2

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matus Tkac    (2188)
c4 e5 g3 c6 d4 e4 Nc3 d5 Nh3 Bb4 Qa4 Qb6 Bg2 Nf6 Nf4 O-O O-O Nbd7 cxd5 Bxc3 bxc3 cxd5 f3 Qc7 Ba3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Bd2 Bg7 e4 Nxc3 Bxc3 O-O Qd2 Nc6 Nf3 Bg4 Ne5 Nxe5 dxe5 Qxd2 Kxd2 Be6 f4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matus Tkac    (2188)
c4 e5 g3 c6 d4 e4 Nc3 d5 Nh3 Bb4 Qa4 Qb6 Bg2 Nf6 Nf4 O-O O-O Nbd7 cxd5 Bxc3 bxc3 cxd5 f3 Qc7 Ba3 Re8 Qb3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Bd2 Bg7 e4 Nxc3 Bxc3 O-O Qd2 Nc6 Nf3 Bg4 Ne5 Nxe5 dxe5 Qxd2 Kxd2 Be6 f4 f6 exf6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matus Tkac    (2188)
e4 g6 d4 Bg7 Nf3 d6 h3 Nf6 Bd3 Nbd7 c4 e5 Bg5 c6 Nc3 Qb6 Na4 Qa5 Bd2 Qc7 O-O O-O Re1 exd4 Nxd4 Nc5 Bc3 Nxd3 Qxd3 Bd7 Nf3 Rad8 b3 c5

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2188)
e4 c6 Nf3 d5 exd5 cxd5 Ne5 Nc6 d4 e6 Bb5 a6 Nxc6

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2188)
c4 e5 g3 c6 d4 e4 Nc3 d5 Nh3 Bb4 Qa4 Qb6 Bg2 Nf6 Nf4 O-O O-O Nbd7 cxd5 Bxc3 bxc3 cxd5 f3 Qc7 Ba3 Re8 Qb3 Nb6 fxe4

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 c5 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 Nc6 e4 d6 Nh3 O-O

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Bd2 Bg7 e4 Nxc3 Bxc3 O-O Qd2 Nc6 Nf3 Bg4 Ne5 Nxe5 dxe5 Qxd2 Kxd2 Be6 f4 f6 exf6 Bxf6 Ke3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matus Tkac    (2188)
e4 g6 d4 Bg7 Nf3 d6 h3 Nf6 Bd3 Nbd7 c4 e5 Bg5 c6 Nc3 Qb6 Na4 Qa5 Bd2 Qc7 O-O O-O Re1 exd4 Nxd4 Nc5 Bc3 Nxd3 Qxd3 Bd7 Nf3 Rad8 b3 c5 Nd2 Bxa4

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2188)
c4 e5 g3 c6 d4 e4 Nc3 d5 Nh3 Bb4 Qa4 Qb6 Bg2 Nf6 Nf4 O-O O-O Nbd7 cxd5 Bxc3 bxc3 cxd5 f3 Qc7 Ba3 Re8 Qb3 Nb6 fxe4 dxe4 Bc5

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2188)
e4 g6 d4 Bg7 Nf3 d6 h3 Nf6 Bd3 Nbd7 c4 e5 Bg5 c6 Nc3 Qb6 Na4 Qa5 Bd2 Qc7 O-O O-O Re1 exd4 Nxd4 Nc5 Bc3 Nxd3 Qxd3 Bd7 Nf3 Rad8 b3 c5 Nd2 Bxa4 bxa4 Nd7

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2188)
c4 e5 g3 c6 d4 e4 Nc3 d5 Nh3 Bb4 Qa4 Qb6 Bg2 Nf6 Nf4 O-O O-O Nbd7 cxd5 Bxc3 bxc3 cxd5 f3 Qc7 Ba3 Re8 Qb3 Nb6 fxe4 dxe4 Bc5 Bg4 Rac1

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2188)
c4 e5 g3 c6 d4 e4 Nc3 d5 Nh3 Bb4 Qa4 Qb6 Bg2 Nf6 Nf4 O-O O-O Nbd7 cxd5 Bxc3 bxc3 cxd5 f3 Qc7 Ba3 Re8 Qb3 Nb6 fxe4 dxe4 Bc5 Bg4 Rac1 g5 Nh3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Bg5 e6 f4 h6 Bxf6 Qxf6 Qd2 Nc6 Nce2 Nxd4 Qxd4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Bd2 Bg7 e4 Nxc3 Bxc3 O-O Qd2 Nc6 Nf3 Bg4 Ne5 Nxe5 dxe5 Qxd2 Kxd2 Be6 f4 f6 exf6 Bxf6 Ke3 Bxc3 bxc3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matus Tkac    (2188)
c4 e5 g3 c6 d4 e4 Nc3 d5 Nh3 Bb4 Qa4 Qb6 Bg2 Nf6 Nf4 O-O O-O Nbd7 cxd5 Bxc3 bxc3 cxd5 f3 Qc7 Ba3 Re8 Qb3 Nb6 fxe4 dxe4 Bc5 Bg4 Rac1 g5 Nh3 Nbd7 c4

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 c5 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 Nc6 e4 d6 Nh3 O-O Nf2 Qe7

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matus Tkac    (2188)
e4 c6 Nf3 d5 exd5 cxd5 Ne5 Nc6 d4 e6 Bb5 a6 Nxc6 Qc7 Ba4

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 e5 Nb3 Be6 h3 Nc6 Qf3 Rc8 O-O-O Na5 Bg5 Be7

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 d3 b5 Bb3 d6 c3 Na5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 c5 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 Nc6 e4 d6 Nh3 O-O Nf2 Qe7 Bg5 h6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 c5 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 Nc6 e4 d6 Nh3 O-O Nf2 Qe7 Bg5 h6 Bh4 g5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 c5 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 Nc6 e4 d6 Nh3 O-O Nf2 Qe7 Bg5 h6 Bh4 g5 Bg3 cxd4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Bg5 e6 f4 h6 Bxf6 Qxf6 Qd2 Nc6 Nce2 Nxd4 Qxd4 Qxd4 Nxd4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 c5 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 Nc6 e4 d6 Nh3 O-O Nf2 Qe7 Bg5 h6 Bh4 g5 Bg3 cxd4 cxd4 e5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 e3 e6 b3 c5 Bb2 cxd4 Nxd4 Be7

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 c5 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 Nc6 e4 d6 Nh3 O-O Nf2 Qe7 Bg5 h6 Bh4 g5 Bg3 cxd4 cxd4 e5 d5 Nd4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 d3 b5 Bb3 d6 c3 Na5 Bc2 c5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Bg5 e6 f4 h6 Bxf6 Qxf6 Qd2 Nc6 Nce2 Nxd4 Qxd4 Qxd4 Nxd4 g5 g3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 e5 Nb3 Be6 h3 Nc6 Qf3 Rc8 O-O-O Na5 Bg5 Be7 Bxf6 Bxf6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 d3 b5 Bb3 d6 c3 Na5 Bc2 c5 Re1 O-O

Transpose to wikichess #88788#

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 h3 e6 g4 h6 Bg2 Be7 Be3 Nc6 Nxc6 bxc6 Qd2 d5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Bg5 e6 f4 h6 Bxf6 Qxf6 Qd2 Nc6 Nce2 Nxd4 Qxd4 Qxd4 Nxd4 g5 g3 gxf4 gxf4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 c5 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 Nc6 e4 d6 Nh3 O-O Nf2 Qe7 Bg5 h6 Bh4 g5 Bg3 cxd4 cxd4 e5 d5 Nd4 Bd3 Nh5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 e5 Nb3 Be6 h3 Nc6 Qf3 Rc8 O-O-O Na5 Bg5 Be7 Bxf6 Bxf6 Nd5 b5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Bg5 e6 f4 h6 Bxf6 Qxf6 Qd2 Nc6 Nce2 Nxd4 Qxd4 Qxd4 Nxd4 g5 g3 gxf4 gxf4 h5 Rd1

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 h3 e6 g4 h6 Bg2 Be7 Be3 Nc6 Nxc6 bxc6 Qd2 d5 O-O-O Rb8

Transpose to wikichess #133744#

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Bg5 e6 f4 h6 Bxf6 Qxf6 Qd2 Nc6 Nce2 Nxd4 Qxd4 Qxd4 Nxd4 g5 g3 gxf4 gxf4 h5 Rd1 Ke7 h4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matus Tkac    (2188)
e4 c6 Nf3 d5 exd5 cxd5 Ne5 Nc6 d4 e6 Bb5 a6 Nxc6 Qc7 Ba4 Bd7 c4

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Bg5 e6 f4 h6 Bxf6 Qxf6 Qd2 Nc6 Nce2 Nxd4 Qxd4 Qxd4 Nxd4 g5 g3 gxf4 gxf4 h5 Rd1 Ke7 h4 Bh6 f5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 c5 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 Nc6 e4 d6 Nh3 O-O Nf2 Qe7 Bg5 h6 Bh4 g5 Bg3 cxd4 cxd4 e5 d5 Nd4 Bd3 Nh5 O-O Qc7

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matus Tkac    (2188)
e4 c6 Nf3 d5 exd5 cxd5 Ne5 Nc6 d4 e6 Bb5 a6 Nxc6 Qc7 Ba4 Bd7 c4 Bxc6 cxd5

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 e5 Nb3 Be6 h3 Nc6 Qf3 Rc8 O-O-O Na5 Bg5 Be7 Bxf6 Bxf6 Nd5 b5 Nxa5 Qxa5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 e3 e6 b3 c5 Bb2 cxd4 Nxd4 Be7 cxd5 Qxd5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 c5 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 Nc6 e4 d6 Nh3 O-O Nf2 Qe7 Bg5 h6 Bh4 g5 Bg3 cxd4 cxd4 e5 d5 Nd4 Bd3 Nh5 O-O Qc7 Nh1 Nxg3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matus Tkac    (2188)
e4 c6 Nf3 d5 exd5 cxd5 Ne5 Nc6 d4 e6 Bb5 a6 Nxc6 Qc7 Ba4 Bd7 c4 Bxc6 cxd5 exd5 Nc3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 c5 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 Nc6 e4 d6 Nh3 O-O Nf2 Qe7 Bg5 h6 Bh4 g5 Bg3 cxd4 cxd4 e5 d5 Nd4 Bd3 Nh5 O-O Qc7 Nh1 Nxg3 Nxg3 b6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 e5 Nb3 Be6 h3 Nc6 Qf3 Rc8 O-O-O Na5 Bg5 Be7 Bxf6 Bxf6 Nd5 b5 Nxa5 Qxa5 Kb1 Bd8

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 e3 e6 b3 c5 Bb2 cxd4 Nxd4 Be7 cxd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qa5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matthew Gresham    (1800)
e4 g6 Nc3 c6

Transpose to wikichess #102398#

============

Contributors : Matthew Gresham


Matthew Gresham    (1800)
e4 c6 Bc4 d5 Bb3 dxe4

============

Contributors : Matthew Gresham


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Bg5 e6 f4 h6 Bxf6 Qxf6 Qd2 Nc6 Nce2 Nxd4 Qxd4 Qxd4 Nxd4 g5 g3 gxf4 gxf4 h5 Rd1 Ke7 h4 Bh6 f5 Bd7 Kf2

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 e3 e6 b3 c5 Bb2 cxd4 Nxd4 Be7 cxd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qa5 Bd3 O-O

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 c5 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 Nc6 e4 d6 Nh3 O-O Nf2 Qe7 Bg5 h6 Bh4 g5 Bg3 cxd4 cxd4 e5 d5 Nd4 Bd3 Nh5 O-O Qc7 Nh1 Nxg3 Nxg3 b6 Kh1 Bd7

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 e5 Nb3 Be6 h3 Nc6 Qf3 Rc8 O-O-O Na5 Bg5 Be7 Bxf6 Bxf6 Nd5 b5 Nxa5 Qxa5 Kb1 Bd8 Bd3 g6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 e3 e6 b3 c5 Bb2 cxd4 Nxd4 Be7 cxd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qa5 Bd3 O-O O-O Rd8

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Bg5 e6 f4 h6 Bxf6 Qxf6 Qd2 Nc6 Nce2 Nxd4 Qxd4 Qxd4 Nxd4 g5 g3 gxf4 gxf4 h5 Rd1 Ke7 h4 Bh6 f5 Bd7 Kf2 Rac8 c3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 e3 e6 b3 c5 Bb2 cxd4 Nxd4 Be7 cxd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qa5 Bd3 O-O O-O Rd8 Rc1 e5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 e3 e6 b3 c5 Bb2 cxd4 Nxd4 Be7 cxd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qa5 Bd3 O-O O-O Rd8 Rc1 e5 Nf3 e4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matus Tkac    (2188)
e4 c6 Nf3 d5 exd5 cxd5 Ne5 Nc6 d4 e6 Bb5 a6 Nxc6 Qc7 Ba4 Bd7 c4 Bxc6 cxd5 exd5 Nc3 Nf6 O-O

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 e3 e6 b3 c5 Bb2 cxd4 Nxd4 Be7 cxd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qa5 Bd3 O-O O-O Rd8 Rc1 e5 Nf3 e4 Nxe4 Nxe4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 e5 Nb3 Be6 h3 Nc6 Qf3 Rc8 O-O-O Na5 Bg5 Be7 Bxf6 Bxf6 Nd5 b5 Nxa5 Qxa5 Kb1 Bd8 Bd3 g6 Qe2 Kf8

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 e3 e6 b3 c5 Bb2 cxd4 Nxd4 Be7 cxd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qa5 Bd3 O-O O-O Rd8 Rc1 e5 Nf3 e4 Nxe4 Nxe4 Rxc8 Rxc8

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 e3 e6 b3 c5 Bb2 cxd4 Nxd4 Be7 cxd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qa5 Bd3 O-O O-O Rd8 Rc1 e5 Nf3 e4 Nxe4 Nxe4 Rxc8 Rxc8 Bxe4 Nc6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matus Tkac    (2188)
e4 c6 Nf3 d5 exd5 cxd5 Ne5 Nc6 d4 e6 Bb5 a6 Nxc6 Qc7 Ba4 Bd7 c4 Bxc6 cxd5 exd5 Nc3 Nf6 O-O Be7 Bg5

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matthew Gresham    (1800)
e4 c6 Bc4 d5 Bb3 dxe4 Qh5 g6

============

Contributors : Matthew Gresham


Matthew Gresham    (1800)
b4 c6 Bb2 d5 e3 e5 b5

============

Contributors : Matthew Gresham


Matus Tkac    (2188)
e4 c6 Nf3 d5 exd5 cxd5 Ne5 Nc6 d4 e6 Bb5 a6 Nxc6 Qc7 Ba4 Bd7 c4 Bxc6 cxd5 exd5 Nc3 Nf6 O-O Be7 Bg5 O-O Bxc6

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 e3 e6 b3 c5 Bb2 cxd4 Nxd4 Be7 cxd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qa5 Bd3 O-O O-O Rd8 Rc1 e5 Nf3 e4 Nxe4 Nxe4 Rxc8 Rxc8 Bxe4 Nc6 Qb1 g6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 e5 Nb3 Be6 h3 Nc6 Qf3 Rc8 O-O-O Na5 Bg5 Be7 Bxf6 Bxf6 Nd5 b5 Nxa5 Qxa5 Kb1 Bd8 Bd3 g6 Qe2 Kf8 c3 Bxd5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 e5 Nb3 Be6 h3 Nc6 Qf3 Rc8 O-O-O Na5 Bg5 Be7 Bxf6 Bxf6 Nd5 b5 Nxa5 Qxa5 Kb1 Bd8 Bd3 g6 Qe2 Kf8 c3 Bxd5 exd5 Rc7

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matus Tkac    (2188)
e4 c6 Nf3 d5 exd5 cxd5 Ne5 Nc6 d4 e6 Bb5 a6 Nxc6 Qc7 Ba4 Bd7 c4 Bxc6 cxd5 exd5 Nc3 Nf6 O-O Be7 Bg5 O-O Bxc6 bxc6 Rc1

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O a4 b4 d4 d6 dxe5 dxe5 Nbd2 Bg4 h3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 e3 e6 b3 c5 Bb2 cxd4 Nxd4 Be7 cxd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qa5 Bd3 O-O O-O Rd8 Rc1 e5 Nf3 e4 Nxe4 Nxe4 Rxc8 Rxc8 Bxe4 Nc6 Qb1 g6 Ba1 Ba3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matus Tkac    (2188)
e4 c6 Nf3 d5 exd5 cxd5 Ne5 Nc6 d4 e6 Bb5 a6 Nxc6 Qc7 Ba4 Bd7 c4 Bxc6 cxd5 exd5 Nc3 Nf6 O-O Be7 Bg5 O-O Bxc6 bxc6 Rc1 Qb7 Re1

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 e3 e6 b3 c5 Bb2 cxd4 Nxd4 Be7 cxd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qa5 Bd3 O-O O-O Rd8 Rc1 e5 Nf3 e4 Nxe4 Nxe4 Rxc8 Rxc8 Bxe4 Nc6 Qb1 g6 Ba1 Ba3 h4 Rc7

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O a4 b4 d4 d6 dxe5 dxe5 Nbd2 Bg4 h3 Bh5 a5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matus Tkac    (2188)
e4 c6 Nf3 d5 exd5 cxd5 Ne5 Nc6 d4 e6 Bb5 a6 Nxc6 Qc7 Ba4 Bd7 c4 Bxc6 cxd5 exd5 Nc3 Nf6 O-O Be7 Bg5 O-O Bxc6 bxc6 Rc1 Qb7 Re1 Rfe8 Rc2

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2188)
e4 c6 Nf3 d5 exd5 cxd5 Ne5 Nc6 d4 e6 Bb5 a6 Nxc6 Qc7 Ba4 Bd7 c4 Bxc6 cxd5 exd5 Nc3 Nf6 O-O Be7 Bg5 O-O Bxc6 bxc6 Rc1 Qb7 Re1 Rfe8 Rc2 h6 Bh4

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O a4 b4 d4 d6 dxe5 dxe5 Nbd2 Bg4 h3 Bh5 a5 Bxf3 Nxf3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matus Tkac    (2188)
e4 c6 Nf3 d5 exd5 cxd5 Ne5 Nc6 d4 e6 Bb5 a6 Nxc6 Qc7 Ba4 Bd7 c4 Bxc6 cxd5 exd5 Nc3 Nf6 O-O Be7 Bg5 O-O Bxc6 bxc6 Rc1 Qb7 Re1 Rfe8 Rc2 h6 Bh4 Ne4 Bxe7

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O a4 b4 d4 d6 dxe5 dxe5 Nbd2 Bg4 h3 Bh5 a5 Bxf3 Nxf3 Qxd1 Rxd1

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O a4 b4 d4 d6 dxe5 dxe5 Nbd2 Bg4 h3 Bh5 a5 Bxf3 Nxf3 Qxd1 Rxd1 Rfd8 Re1

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O a4 b4 d4 d6 dxe5 dxe5 Nbd2 Bg4 h3 Bh5 a5 Bxf3 Nxf3 Qxd1 Rxd1 Rfd8 Re1 Bc5 Ba4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O a4 b4 d4 d6 dxe5 dxe5 Nbd2 Bg4 h3 Bh5 a5 Bxf3 Nxf3 Qxd1 Rxd1 Rfd8 Re1 Bc5 Ba4 Nxa5 Nxe5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2219)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O a4 b4 d4 d6 dxe5 dxe5 Nbd2 Bg4 h3 Bh5 a5 Bxf3 Nxf3 Qxd1 Rxd1 Rfd8 Re1 Bc5 Ba4 Nxa5 Nxe5 Rac8 Nd3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrea Grammatica    (2165)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 Bc5 Be3 Bb6 Qd2

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Mathieu Bain    (1259)
e4 e6 g3 d5 Bg2

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1259)
e4 e6 d4 d5 e5 c5 Qg4 Nc6 Nf3

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1259)
e4 e6 d4 d5 e5 c5 Qg4 Nc6 Nf3 Qb6 dxc5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1259)
b4 e5 a3 Qf6 Bb2

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1259)
b4 e5 a3 Qf6 Bb2 c5 e3

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1259)
e4 e6 d4 d5 e5 c5 Qg4 Nc6 Nf3 Qb6 dxc5 Qxc5 Bd3

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1259)
e4 e6 f4 d5 exd5 exd5 d4 c5 Bb5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1259)
b4 e5 a3 Qf6 Bb2 c5 e3 d5 f4

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Andrea Grammatica    (2165)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 Bc5 Be3 Bb6 Qd2 Ng4 Nxc6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2165)
d4 g6 c4 c5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Mathieu Bain    (1259)
e4 e6 f4 d5 exd5 exd5 d4 c5 Bb5 Nc6 Nf3

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1259)
b4 e5 a3 Qf6 Bb2 c5 e3 d5 f4 d4 bxc5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1259)
b4 e5 a3 Qf6 Bb2 c5 e3 d5 f4 d4 bxc5 Bxc5 c3

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1259)
e4 e6 d4 d5 e5 c5 Qg4 Nc6 Nf3 Qb6 dxc5 Qxc5 Bd3 d4 Bf4

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1259)
b4 e5 a3 Qf6 Bb2 c5 e3 d5 f4 d4 bxc5 Bxc5 c3 dxe3 Qb3

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1259)
b4 e5 a3 Qf6 Bb2 c5 e3 d5 f4 d4 bxc5 Bxc5 c3 dxe3 Qb3 Qxf4 Qb5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1259)
e4 e6 f4 d5 exd5 exd5 d4 c5 Bb5 Nc6 Nf3 Bd7 O-O

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1259)
e4 e6 f4 d5 exd5 exd5 d4 c5 Bb5 Nc6 Nf3 Bd7 O-O cxd4 Bxc6

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Andrea Grammatica    (2165)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 Bc5 Be3 Bb6 Qd2 Ng4 Nxc6 bxc6 Bd4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Mathieu Bain    (1259)
e4 e6 d4 d5 e5 c5 Qg4 Nc6 Nf3 Qb6 dxc5 Qxc5 Bd3 d4 Bf4 Qb4 Nbd2

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1259)
d4 e5 dxe5 d6 exd6 Nf6

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1259)
e4 e6 f4 d5 exd5 exd5 d4 c5 Bb5 Nc6 Nf3 Bd7 O-O cxd4 Bxc6 Bxc6 Re1

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1259)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Bb4 e5 c5 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 cxd4 cxd4 Nc6 Qg4

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1259)
d4 e5 dxe5 d6 exd6 Nf6 dxc7 Qxc7

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1259)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Bb4 e5 c5 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 cxd4 cxd4 Nc6 Qg4 g6 Nf3

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Matei Cornel    (2207)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e6 e3 Nbd7 Qc2 h6 b3

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2201)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 Nbd2 O-O Bxc6 dxc6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matei Cornel    (2207)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e6 e3 Nbd7 Qc2 h6 b3 b6 Bd3

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Andrea Grammatica    (2165)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 e3 e6 b3 Nbd7 Bb2 b6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2201)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 Nbd2 O-O Bxc6 dxc6 Nc4 Nd7

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matei Cornel    (2207)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e6 e3 Nbd7 Qc2 h6 b3 b6 Bd3 Bb7 Bb2

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Andrea Grammatica    (2165)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 e3 e6 b3 Nbd7 Bb2 b6 Bd3 Bb7

Transpose to wikichess #131178#

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matei Cornel    (2207)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e6 e3 Nbd7 Qc2 h6 b3 b6 Bd3 Bb7 Bb2 Bd6 O-O

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2201)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 Nbd2 O-O Bxc6 dxc6 Nc4 Nd7 Ne3 a5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Mathieu Bain    (1259)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 c5 exd5 exd5 dxc5 Bxc5 Qxd5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2201)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 h3 e6 g4 h6 Bg2 Be7 Be3 Nc6 f4 Nd7 O-O Nxd4 Qxd4 O-O Qd2 Qc7 a4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2201)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 Nbd2 O-O Bxc6 dxc6 Nc4 Nd7 Ne3 a5 g4 Nf6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matei Cornel    (2207)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e6 e3 Nbd7 Qc2 h6 b3 b6 Bd3 Bb7 Bb2 Bd6 O-O O-O Rad1

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Mathieu Bain    (1259)
d4 e5 dxe5 d6 exd6 Nf6 dxc7 Qxc7 Nc3 Nc6

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2201)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 Nbd2 O-O Bxc6 dxc6 Nc4 Nd7 Ne3 a5 g4 Nf6 h3 Re8

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Mathieu Bain    (1259)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Bg5 Be7 Bxf6 Bxf6 e3 c5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2201)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 Nbd2 O-O Bxc6 dxc6 Nc4 Nd7 Ne3 a5 g4 Nf6 h3 Re8 a4 b5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matei Cornel    (2207)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e6 e3 Nbd7 Qc2 h6 b3 b6 Bd3 Bb7 Bb2 Bd6 O-O O-O Rad1 c5 cxd5

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2201)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 Nbd2 O-O Bxc6 dxc6 Nc4 Nd7 Ne3 a5 g4 Nf6 h3 Re8 a4 b5 Bd2 Bb6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2201)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 d3 b5 Bb3 d6 c3 O-O h3 Na5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrea Grammatica    (2165)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 d3 b5 Bb3 d6 c3 O-O h3 Na5 Bc2

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matei Cornel    (2207)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e6 e3 Nbd7 Qc2 h6 b3 b6 Bd3 Bb7 Bb2 Bd6 O-O O-O Rad1 c5 cxd5 exd5 Bf5

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2201)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 d3 b5 Bb3 d6 c3 O-O h3 Na5 Bc2 c5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Mathieu Bain    (1259)
d4 e5 dxe5 d6 exd6 Nf6 dxc7 Qxc7 Nc3 Nc6 e4 Bg4

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1259)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 c5 exd5 exd5 dxc5 Bxc5 Qxd5 Bxf2 Kxf2

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1259)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Bg5 Be7 Bxf6 Bxf6 e3 c5 Nf3 cxd4

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Matei Cornel    (2207)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e6 e3 Nbd7 Qc2 h6 b3 b6 Bd3 Bb7 Bb2 Bd6 O-O O-O Rad1 c5 cxd5 exd5 Bf5 cxd4 Nxd4

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2201)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 Nbd2 O-O Bxc6 dxc6 Nc4 Nd7 Ne3 a5 g4 Nf6 h3 Re8 a4 b5 Bd2 Bb6 Rg1 Nd7

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Mathieu Bain    (1259)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 c5 exd5 exd5 dxc5 Bxc5 Qxd5 Bxf2 Kxf2 Qf6 Nf3

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1259)
d4 e5 dxe5 d6 exd6 Nf6 dxc7 Qxc7 Nc3 Nc6 e4 Bg4 Be2 Rd8

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2201)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 Nbd2 O-O Bxc6 dxc6 Nc4 Nd7 Ne3 a5 g4 Nf6 h3 Re8 a4 b5 Bd2 Bb6 Rg1 Nd7 b3 Nf8

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matei Cornel    (2207)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e6 e3 Nbd7 Qc2 h6 b3 b6 Bd3 Bb7 Bb2 Bd6 O-O O-O Rad1 c5 cxd5 exd5 Bf5 cxd4 Nxd4 Rc8 Qb1

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2201)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 Nbd2 O-O Bxc6 dxc6 Nc4 Nd7 Ne3 a5 g4 Nf6 h3 Re8 a4 b5 Bd2 Bb6 Rg1 Nd7 b3 Nf8 Nf5 f6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Mathieu Bain    (1259)
d4 f5 c4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1259)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Bg5 Be7 Bxf6 Bxf6 e3 c5 Nf3 cxd4 exd4 O-O

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1259)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 c5 exd5 exd5 dxc5 Bxc5 Qxd5 Bxf2 Kxf2 Qf6 Nf3 Ne7 Qd1

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2201)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 h3 e6 g4 h6 Bg2 Be7 Be3 Nc6 f4 Nd7 O-O Nxd4 Qxd4 O-O Qd2 Qc7 a4 b6 e5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2201)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 h3 e6 g4 h6 Bg2 Be7 Be3 Nc6 f4 Nd7 O-O Nxd4 Qxd4 O-O Qd2 Qc7 a4 b6 e5 d5 Ne2

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2201)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 h3 e6 g4 h6 Bg2 Be7 Be3 Nc6 f4 Nd7 O-O Nxd4 Qxd4 O-O Qd2 Qc7 a4 b6 e5 d5 Ne2 Bb7 Nd4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2201)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 Nbd2 O-O Bxc6 dxc6 Nc4 Nd7 Ne3 a5 g4 Nf6 h3 Re8 a4 b5 Bd2 Bb6 Rg1 Nd7 b3 Nf8 Nf5 f6 h4 Kh8

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2201)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 h3 e6 g4 h6 Bg2 Be7 Be3 Nc6 f4 Nd7 O-O Nxd4 Qxd4 O-O Qd2 Qc7 a4 b6 e5 d5 Ne2 Bb7 Nd4 Rae8 a5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2201)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 h3 e6 g4 h6 Bg2 Be7 Be3 Nc6 f4 Nd7 O-O Nxd4 Qxd4 O-O Qd2 Qc7 a4 b6 e5 d5 Ne2 Bb7 Nd4 Rae8 a5 bxa5 Qxa5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2201)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 Nbd2 O-O Bxc6 dxc6 Nc4 Nd7 Ne3 a5 g4 Nf6 h3 Re8 a4 b5 Bd2 Bb6 Rg1 Nd7 b3 Nf8 Nf5 f6 h4 Kh8 h5 h6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2201)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 Nbd2 O-O Bxc6 dxc6 Nc4 Nd7 Ne3 a5 g4 Nf6 h3 Re8 a4 b5 Bd2 Bb6 Rg1 Nd7 b3 Nf8 Nf5 f6 h4 Kh8 h5 h6 Kf1 Ne6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2201)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O Be2 e5 O-O Nc6 d5 Ne7 Ne1 Nd7 Be3 f5 f3 f4 Bf2 g5 Rc1 Ng6 b4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrea Grammatica    (2165)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 d3 b5 Bb3 d6 c3 O-O h3 Na5 Bc2 c5 Re1

Transpose to wikichess #41568#

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2201)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O Be2 e5 O-O Nc6 d5 Ne7 Ne1 Nd7 Be3 f5 f3 f4 Bf2 g5 Rc1 Ng6 b4 Rf7 c5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2201)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 Nbd2 O-O Bxc6 dxc6 Nc4 Nd7 Ne3 a5 g4 Nf6 h3 Re8 a4 b5 Bd2 Bb6 Rg1 Nd7 b3 Nf8 Nf5 f6 h4 Kh8 h5 h6 Kf1 Ne6 Kg2 Kh7

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2201)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O Be2 e5 O-O Nc6 d5 Ne7 Ne1 Nd7 Be3 f5 f3 f4 Bf2 g5 Rc1 Ng6 b4 Rf7 c5 Nf6 a4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matus Tkac    (2205)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Qd2 b5 Nd1 Be7

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2201)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 h3 e5 Nde2 h5 Bg5 Be6 Bxf6 Qxf6 Nd5 Qd8 Nec3 g6 Bc4 Nc6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Mathieu Bain    (1259)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Bg5 Be7 Bxf6 Bxf6 e3 c5 Nf3 cxd4 exd4 O-O Bd3 d5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2201)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 h3 e5 Nde2 h5 Bg5 Be6 Bxf6 Qxf6 Nd5 Qd8 Nec3 g6 Bc4 Nc6 Ne3 Bh6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2201)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 h3 e5 Nde2 h5 Bg5 Be6 Bxf6 Qxf6 Nd5 Qd8 Nec3 g6 Bc4 Nc6 Ne3 Bh6 Ncd5 b5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matus Tkac    (2205)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Qd2 b5 Nd1 Be7 c3 b4

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2201)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 h3 e5 Nde2 h5 Bg5 Be6 Bxf6 Qxf6 Nd5 Qd8 Nec3 g6 Bc4 Nc6 Ne3 Bh6 Ncd5 b5 Bb3 O-O

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2201)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O Be2 e5 O-O Nc6 d5 Ne7 Ne1 Nd7 Be3 f5 f3 f4 Bf2 g5 Rc1 Ng6 b4 Rf7 c5 Nf6 a4 h5 cxd6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2201)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 h3 e5 Nde2 h5 Bg5 Be6 Bxf6 Qxf6 Nd5 Qd8 Nec3 g6 Bc4 Nc6 Ne3 Bh6 Ncd5 b5 Bb3 O-O c3 Kg7

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Mathieu Bain    (1259)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Bg5 Be7 Bxf6 Bxf6 e3 c5 Nf3 cxd4 exd4 O-O Bd3 d5 cxd5 g6

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2201)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O Nc3 d6 Nf3 Nc6 O-O e5 d5 Ne7 e4 Nd7 Ne1 f5 Nd3 h6 Bd2 g5 exf5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2201)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O Be2 e5 O-O Nc6 d5 Ne7 Ne1 Nd7 Be3 f5 f3 f4 Bf2 g5 Rc1 Ng6 b4 Rf7 c5 Nf6 a4 h5 cxd6 cxd6 a5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2201)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 h3 e5 Nde2 h5 Bg5 Be6 Bxf6 Qxf6 Nd5 Qd8 Nec3 g6 Bc4 Nc6 Ne3 Bh6 Ncd5 b5 Bb3 O-O c3 Kg7 g4 hxg4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matei Cornel    (2207)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e6 e3 Nbd7 Qc2 h6 b3 b6 Bd3 Bb7 Bb2 Bd6 O-O O-O Rad1 c5 cxd5 exd5 Bf5 cxd4 Nxd4 Rc8 Qb1 Re8 Bh3

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matus Tkac    (2205)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Qd2 b5 Nd1 Be7 c3 b4 Bd3 O-O

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2201)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O Be2 e5 O-O Nc6 d5 Ne7 Ne1 Nd7 Be3 f5 f3 f4 Bf2 g5 Rc1 Ng6 b4 Rf7 c5 Nf6 a4 h5 cxd6 cxd6 a5 Bd7 Nb5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2201)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 h3 e5 Nde2 h5 Bg5 Be6 Bxf6 Qxf6 Nd5 Qd8 Nec3 g6 Bc4 Nc6 Ne3 Bh6 Ncd5 b5 Bb3 O-O c3 Kg7 g4 hxg4 hxg4 Rh8

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2201)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O Nc3 d6 Nf3 Nc6 O-O e5 d5 Ne7 e4 Nd7 Ne1 f5 Nd3 h6 Bd2 g5 exf5 Nxf5 Ne4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matus Tkac    (2205)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Qd2 b5 Nd1 Be7 c3 b4 Bd3 O-O O-O a5

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2201)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 h3 e5 Nde2 h5 Bg5 Be6 Bxf6 Qxf6 Nd5 Qd8 Nec3 g6 Bc4 Nc6 Ne3 Bh6 Ncd5 b5 Bb3 O-O c3 Kg7 g4 hxg4 hxg4 Rh8 Qf3 a5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2201)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 d3 b5 Bb3 d6 Bd2 O-O

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matus Tkac    (2205)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Qd2 b5 Nd1 Be7 c3 b4 Bd3 O-O O-O a5 Qc2 g6

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2205)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Qd2 b5 Nd1 Be7 c3 b4 Bd3 O-O O-O a5 Qc2 g6 g4 bxc3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Mathieu Bain    (1259)
d4 f5 c4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Nf3 Nxg5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Andrea Grammatica    (2165)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 Nc3 Nxc3 dxc3 Be7 Be3 Nc6 Qd2 Be6 O-O-O Qd7 Kb1 Bf6 h4 O-O-O Nd4 Nxd4 Bxd4 Be5 Be2 Qa4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matus Tkac    (2205)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Qd2 b5 Nd1 Be7 c3 b4 Bd3 O-O O-O a5 Qc2 g6 g4 bxc3 bxc3 cxd4

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2201)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O Nc3 d6 Nf3 Nc6 O-O e5 d5 Ne7 e4 Nd7 Ne1 f5 Nd3 h6 Bd2 g5 exf5 Nxf5 Ne4 Nf6 Bc3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matus Tkac    (2205)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Qd2 b5 Nd1 Be7 c3 b4 Bd3 O-O O-O a5 Qc2 g6 g4 bxc3 bxc3 cxd4 Nxd4 Bb7

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matej Pech    (1634)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Bb4 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 dxe4 f3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Andrea Grammatica    (2165)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 Nc3 Nxc3 dxc3 Be7 Be3 Nc6 Qd2 Be6 O-O-O Qd7 Kb1 Bf6 h4 O-O-O Nd4 Nxd4 Bxd4 Be5 Be2 Qa4 b3 Qa5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Mathieu Bain    (1259)
d4 f5 c4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Nf3 Nxg5 Nxg5 e5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Matus Tkac    (2205)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Qd2 b5 Nd1 Be7 c3 b4 Bd3 O-O O-O a5 Qc2 g6 g4 bxc3 bxc3 cxd4 Nxd4 Bb7 Rf3 Rb8

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matej Pech    (1634)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Bb4 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 dxe4 f3 c5 Be3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1634)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Bb4 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 dxe4 f3 c5 Be3 Qa5 Bd2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Andrea Grammatica    (2165)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 Nc3 Nxc3 dxc3 Be7 Be3 Nc6 Qd2 Be6 O-O-O Qd7 Kb1 Bf6 h4 O-O-O Nd4 Nxd4 Bxd4 Be5 Be2 Qa4 b3 Qa5 Bxe5 Qxe5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matus Tkac    (2205)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Qd2 b5 Nd1 Be7 c3 b4 Bd3 O-O O-O a5 Qc2 g6 g4 bxc3 bxc3 cxd4 Nxd4 Bb7 Rf3 Rb8 Rh3 Nc5

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2201)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O Nc3 d6 Nf3 Nc6 O-O e5 d5 Ne7 e4 Nd7 Ne1 f5 Nd3 h6 Bd2 g5 exf5 Nxf5 Ne4 Nf6 Bc3 Bd7 Qd2

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matej Pech    (1634)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Bb4 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 dxe4 f3 c5 Be3 Qa5 Bd2 Nf6 fxe4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matus Tkac    (2205)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Qd2 b5 Nd1 Be7 c3 b4 Bd3 O-O O-O a5 Qc2 g6 g4 bxc3 bxc3 cxd4 Nxd4 Bb7 Rf3 Rb8 Rh3 Nc5 Nf2 Qd7

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2201)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 d3 b5 Bb3 d6 Bd2 O-O h3 Bb7

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Mathieu Bain    (1259)
d4 e5 dxe5 d6 exd6 Nf6 dxc7 Qxc7 Nc3 Nc6 e4 Bg4 Be2 Rd8 Bd2 Be6

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Matei Cornel    (2207)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Nf3 Bg7 Be2 O-O O-O c6 a4 Qc7

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2201)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 d3 b5 Bb3 d6 Bd2 O-O h3 Bb7 Re1 Nd7

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2201)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O Nc3 d6 Nf3 Nc6 O-O e5 d5 Ne7 e4 Nd7 Ne1 f5 Nd3 h6 Bd2 g5 exf5 Nxf5 Ne4 Nf6 Bc3 Bd7 Qd2 Nxe4 Bxe4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrea Grammatica    (2165)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 Nc3 Nxc3 dxc3 Be7 Be3 Nc6 Qd2 Be6 O-O-O Qd7 Kb1 Bf6 h4 O-O-O Nd4 Nxd4 Bxd4 Be5 Be2 Qa4 b3 Qa5 Bxe5 Qxe5 Bf3 Rhe8

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2165)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 Nc3 Nxc3 dxc3 Be7 Be3 Nc6 Qd2 Be6 O-O-O Qd7 Kb1 Bf6 h4 O-O-O Nd4 Nxd4 Bxd4 Be5 Be2 Qa4 b3 Qa5 Bxe5 Qxe5 Bf3 Rhe8 c4 a5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2201)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O Nc3 d6 Nf3 Nc6 O-O e5 d5 Ne7 e4 Nd7 Ne1 f5 Nd3 h6 Bd2 g5 exf5 Nxf5 Ne4 Nf6 Bc3 Bd7 Qd2 Nxe4 Bxe4 c5 dxc6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2201)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O Nc3 d6 Nf3 Nc6 O-O e5 d5 Ne7 e4 Nd7 Ne1 f5 Nd3 h6 Bd2 g5 exf5 Nxf5 Ne4 Nf6 Bc3 Bd7 Qd2 Nxe4 Bxe4 c5 dxc6 Bxc6 Bxc6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2201)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 d3 b5 Bb3 d6 Bd2 O-O h3 Bb7 Re1 Nd7 Bd5 Nf6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrea Grammatica    (2165)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 Nc3 Nxc3 dxc3 Be7 Be3 Nc6 Qd2 Be6 O-O-O Qd7 Kb1 Bf6 h4 O-O-O Nd4 Nxd4 Bxd4 Be5 Be2 Qa4 b3 Qa5 Bxe5 Qxe5 Bf3 Rhe8 c4 a5 Rhe1 Qc5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Gergely Matisz    (1691)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 g3 Be7 Nc3

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Mathieu Bain    (1259)
d4 f5 c4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Nf3 Nxg5 Nxg5 e5 dxe5 Qxg5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1259)
d4 e5 dxe5 d6 exd6 Nf6 dxc7 Qxc7 Nc3 Nc6 e4 Bg4 Be2 Rd8 Bd2 Be6 Bb5 Bc5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Matej Pech    (1634)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 e6 Be2 Nbd7 g4 h6 f4 b5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1634)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 d6 d4 h6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Gergely Matisz    (1691)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 g3 Be7 Nc3 O-O Bg2

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1691)
c4 e5 Nc3 a6 Nf3 Nc6 g3

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Matei Cornel    (2207)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Nf3 Bg7 Be2 O-O O-O c6 a4 Qc7 h3 Nbd7

Transpose to wikichess #89693#

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matej Pech    (1634)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 d6 d4 h6 dxe5 Nfd7

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Gergely Matisz    (1691)
c4 e5 Nc3 a6 Nf3 Nc6 g3 Nf6 Bg2

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Matei Cornel    (2207)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e6 e3 Nbd7 Qc2 h6 b3 b6 Bd3 Bb7 Bb2 Bd6 O-O O-O Rad1 c5 cxd5 exd5 Bf5 cxd4 Nxd4 Rc8 Qb1 Re8 Bh3 Be5 Rfe1

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Matei Cornel    (2207)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e6 e3 Nbd7 Qc2 h6 b3 b6 Bd3 Bb7 Bb2 Bd6 O-O O-O Rad1 c5 cxd5 exd5 Bf5 cxd4 Nxd4 Rc8 Qb1 Re8 Bh3 Be5 Rfe1 g6 Nce2

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Gergely Matisz    (1691)
d4 d5 c4 e6 Nc3 c5 cxd5 cxd4 Qxd4 Nc6 Qd2 Nf6

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Matej Pech    (1634)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 d6 d4 h6 dxe5 Nfd7 Bf4 dxe5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1634)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 d6 d4 h6 dxe5 Nfd7 Bf4 dxe5 Nxe5 Nxe5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matei Cornel    (2207)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e6 e3 Nbd7 Qc2 h6 b3 b6 Bd3 Bb7 Bb2 Bd6 O-O O-O Rad1 c5 cxd5 exd5 Bf5 cxd4 Nxd4 Rc8 Qb1 Re8 Bh3 Be5 Rfe1 g6 Nce2 Ne4 g3

============

Contributors : Matei Cornel


Gergely Matisz    (1691)
d4 d5 c4 e6 Nc3 c5 cxd5 cxd4 Qxd4 Nc6 Qd2 Nf6 dxc6 Qxd2

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Matej Pech    (1634)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 d6 d4 h6 dxe5 Nfd7 Bf4 dxe5 Nxe5 Nxe5 Qxd8 Kxd8

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1634)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 d6 d4 h6 dxe5 Nfd7 Bf4 dxe5 Nxe5 Nxe5 Qxd8 Kxd8 Bxe5 Nc6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Gergely Matisz    (1691)
d4 d5 c4 e6 Nc3 c5 cxd5 cxd4 Qxd4 Nc6 Qd2 Nf6 dxc6 Qxd2 Bxd2 Bc5

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1691)
d4 d5 c4 e6 Nc3 c5 cxd5 cxd4 Qxd4 Nc6 Qd2 Nf6 dxc6 Qxd2 Bxd2 Bc5 g3 bxc6

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Matija Sirk    (2000)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 Bb5 Nd4 Ba4

============

Contributors : Matija Sirk


Matija Sirk    (2000)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 Bb5 Nd4 Ba4 a6 Bb3

============

Contributors : Matija Sirk


Matija Sirk    (2000)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 Bb5 Nd4 Ba4 a6 Bb3 b5 d3

============

Contributors : Matija Sirk


Matija Sirk    (2000)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O Be2 Nbd7 O-O e5 Be3 exd4

============

Contributors : Matija Sirk


Matija Sirk    (2000)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 Bb5 Nd4 Ba4 a6 Bb3 b5 d3 e6 Nf3

============

Contributors : Matija Sirk


Matija Sirk    (2000)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O Be2 Nbd7 O-O e5 Be3 exd4 Nxd4 Re8

============

Contributors : Matija Sirk


Matija Sirk    (2000)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 Bb5 Nd4 Ba4 a6 Bb3 b5 d3 e6 Nf3 Nxb3 axb3

============

Contributors : Matija Sirk


Matija Sirk    (2000)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 Bb5 Nd4 Ba4 a6 Bb3 b5 d3 e6 Nf3 Nxb3 axb3 Bb7 O-O

============

Contributors : Matija Sirk


Matej Pech    (1634)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 e3 c5 Bd3 Nc6 Nf3 Bxc3 bxc3 d6 O-O e5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1634)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 Be2 Nc6 d4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1634)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 d4 exd4 e5 d5 exf6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1634)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 e3 c5 Bd3 Nc6 Nf3 Bxc3 bxc3 d6 O-O e5 Nd2 O-O

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1634)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 Be2 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1634)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 d4 exd4 e5 d5 exf6 dxc4 O-O

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1634)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 d4 exd4 e5 d5 exf6 dxc4 O-O Qxf6 Bg5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1634)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 Be2 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1634)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 d4 exd4 e5 d5 exf6 dxc4 O-O Qxf6 Bg5 Qf5 Re1

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1625)
e4 e5 Nf3 d6 d4 f5 Bc4 exd4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1634)
d4 d5 c4 e5 dxe5 d4 Nf3 Nc6 a3 Nge7 b4 Ng6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1634)
d4 d5 c4 e5 dxe5 d4 Nf3 Nc6 a3 Nge7 b4 Ng6 Bb2 Ncxe5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1634)
d4 d5 c4 e5 dxe5 d4 Nf3 Nc6 a3 Nge7 b4 Ng6 Bb2 Ncxe5 Nxe5 Nxe5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1625)
e4 e5 Nf3 d6 d4 f5 Bc4 exd4 O-O fxe4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1625)
e4 e5 Nf3 d6 d4 f5 Bc4 exd4 O-O fxe4 Nxd4 Nf6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1625)
e4 e5 Nf3 d6 d4 f5 Bc4 exd4 O-O fxe4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 c6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1625)
e4 e5 Nf3 d6 d4 f5 Bc4 exd4 O-O fxe4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 c6 Nxe4 Nxe4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1625)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 f5 d4 e4 d5 exf3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1625)
e4 e5 Nf3 d6 d4 f5 Bc4 exd4 O-O fxe4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 c6 Nxe4 Nxe4 Re1 Be7

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1625)
d4 Nf6 c4 c5 d5 e5 Nc3 d6 e4 Be7 Bd3 Nbd7

Transpose to wikichess #67440#

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1625)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 f5 d4 e4 d5 exf3 dxc6 fxg2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1625)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 f5 d4 e4 d5 exf3 dxc6 fxg2 cxd7 Qxd7

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1625)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 f5 d4 e4 d5 exf3 dxc6 fxg2 cxd7 Qxd7 Qxd7 Bxd7

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1625)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 f5 d4 e4 d5 exf3 dxc6 fxg2 cxd7 Qxd7 Qxd7 Bxd7 Bxg2 c6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O a4 b4 a5 d6 d3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Nc3 Nf6 Bb5 Nd4 Bc4 Bc5 d3 d6 Na4 b5 Nxd4 bxc4 Nf5 Bxf5 exf5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Nc3 Nf6 Bb5 Nd4 Bc4 Bc5 d3 d6 Na4 b5 Nxd4 bxc4 Nf5 Bxf5 exf5 cxd3 Nxc5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Nc3 Nf6 Bb5 Nd4 Bc4 Bc5 d3 d6 Na4 b5 Nxd4 bxc4 Nf5 Bxf5 exf5 cxd3 Nxc5 dxc5 cxd3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Nc3 Nf6 Bb5 Nd4 Bc4 Bc5 d3 d6 Na4 b5 Nxd4 bxc4 Nf5 Bxf5 exf5 cxd3 Nxc5 dxc5 cxd3 O-O O-O

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Nc3 Nf6 Bb5 Nd4 Bc4 Bc5 d3 d6 Na4 b5 Nxd4 bxc4 Nf5 Bxf5 exf5 cxd3 Nxc5 dxc5 cxd3 O-O O-O Qd7 Qf3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Nc3 Nf6 Bb5 Nd4 Bc4 Bc5 d3 d6 Na4 b5 Nxd4 bxc4 Nf5 Bxf5 exf5 cxd3 Nxc5 dxc5 cxd3 O-O O-O Qd7 Qf3 Rfd8 Be3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Nc3 Nf6 Bb5 Nd4 Bc4 Bc5 d3 d6 Na4 b5 Nxd4 bxc4 Nf5 Bxf5 exf5 cxd3 Nxc5 dxc5 cxd3 O-O O-O Qd7 Qf3 Rfd8 Be3 Qxd3 Rac1

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Nc3 Nf6 Bb5 Nd4 Bc4 Bc5 d3 d6 Na4 b5 Nxd4 bxc4 Nf5 Bxf5 exf5 cxd3 Nxc5 dxc5 cxd3 O-O O-O Qd7 Qf3 Rfd8 Be3 Qxd3 Rac1 e4 Qg3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Bxc6 dxc6 d3 Nd7 Be3 O-O Nbd2 a5 a4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 O-O a3 Bxc3 bxc3 b6 e4 Nc6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Bxc6 dxc6 d3 Nd7 Be3 O-O Nbd2 a5 a4 b6 Nc4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 b5 Bb3 d5 dxe5 Be6 Qe2 Nc5 Rd1 Nxb3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Nc3 Nf6 Bb5 Nd4 Bc4 Bc5 d3 d6 Na4 b5 Nxd4 bxc4 Nf5 Bxf5 exf5 cxd3 Nxc5 dxc5 cxd3 O-O O-O Qd7 Qf3 Rfd8 Be3 Qxd3 Rac1 e4 Qg3 Qe2 a4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 b5 Bb3 d5 dxe5 Be6 Qe2 Nc5 Rd1 Nxb3 axb3 Be7

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Nc3 Nf6 Bb5 Nd4 Bc4 Bc5 d3 d6 Na4 b5 Nxd4 bxc4 Nf5 Bxf5 exf5 cxd3 Nxc5 dxc5 cxd3 O-O O-O Qd7 Qf3 Rfd8 Be3 Qxd3 Rac1 e4 Qg3 Qe2 a4 Qxb2 h3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O h3 e5 d5 Nh5 g3 f5 exf5 gxf5 Ng5 Nf6 g4 Qe7 Qc2

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O h3 e5 d5 Nh5 g3 f5 exf5 gxf5 Ng5 Nf6 g4 Qe7 Qc2 h6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O h3 e5 d5 Nh5 g3 f5 exf5 gxf5 Ng5 Nf6 g4 Qe7 Qc2 h6 Ne6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 b5 Bb3 d5 dxe5 Be6 Qe2 Nc5 Rd1 Nxb3 axb3 Be7 c4 b4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O h3 e5 d5 Nh5 g3 f5 exf5 gxf5 Ng5 Nf6 g4 Qe7 Qc2 h6 Ne6 Bxe6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O h3 e5 d5 Nh5 g3 f5 exf5 gxf5 Ng5 Nf6 g4 Qe7 Qc2 h6 Ne6 Bxe6 dxe6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 b5 Bb3 d5 dxe5 Be6 Qe2 Nc5 Rd1 Nxb3 axb3 Be7 c4 b4 Nbd2 O-O

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O h3 e5 d5 Nh5 g3 f5 exf5 gxf5 Ng5 Nf6 g4 Qe7 Qc2 h6 Ne6 Bxe6 dxe6 f4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O h3 e5 d5 Nh5 g3 f5 exf5 gxf5 Ng5 Nf6 g4 Qe7 Qc2 h6 Ne6 Bxe6 dxe6 f4 h4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Bxc6 dxc6 d3 Nd7 Be3 O-O Nbd2 a5 a4 b6 Nc4 f6 Nfd2

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O h3 e5 d5 Nh5 g3 f5 exf5 gxf5 Ng5 Nf6 g4 Qe7 Qc2 h6 Ne6 Bxe6 dxe6 f4 h4 Nc6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O h3 e5 d5 Nh5 g3 f5 exf5 gxf5 Ng5 Nf6 g4 Qe7 Qc2 h6 Ne6 Bxe6 dxe6 f4 h4 Nc6 g5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 b5 Bb3 d5 dxe5 Be6 Qe2 Nc5 Rd1 Nxb3 axb3 Be7 c4 b4 Nbd2 O-O Nf1 Qd7

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O h3 e5 d5 Nh5 g3 f5 exf5 gxf5 Ng5 Nf6 g4 Qe7 Qc2 h6 Ne6 Bxe6 dxe6 f4 h4 Nc6 g5 Nd4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O h3 e5 d5 Nh5 g3 f5 exf5 gxf5 Ng5 Nf6 g4 Qe7 Qc2 h6 Ne6 Bxe6 dxe6 f4 h4 Nc6 g5 Nd4 Qg6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O h3 e5 d5 Nh5 g3 f5 exf5 gxf5 Ng5 Nf6 g4 Qe7 Qc2 h6 Ne6 Bxe6 dxe6 f4 h4 Nc6 g5 Nd4 Qg6 Qe8

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matus Tkac    (2244)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 O-O a3 Bxc3 bxc3 b6 e4 Nc6 e5

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Bxc6 dxc6 d3 Nd7 Be3 O-O Nbd2 a5 a4 b6 Nc4 f6 Nfd2 Nc5 f4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 b5 Bb3 d5 dxe5 Be6 Qe2 Nc5 Rd1 Nxb3 axb3 Be7 c4 b4 Nbd2 O-O Nf1 Qd7 Bg5 Rfd8

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O h3 e5 d5 Nh5 g3 f5 exf5 gxf5 Ng5 Nf6 g4 Qe7 Qc2 h6 Ne6 Bxe6 dxe6 f4 h4 Nc6 g5 Nd4 Qg6 Qe8 Bd3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 O-O a3 Bxc3 bxc3 b6 e4 Nc6 e5 Ne8

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O h3 e5 d5 Nh5 g3 f5 exf5 gxf5 Ng5 Nf6 g4 Qe7 Qc2 h6 Ne6 Bxe6 dxe6 f4 h4 Nc6 g5 Nd4 Qg6 Qe8 Bd3 Qxg6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O h3 e5 d5 Nh5 g3 f5 exf5 gxf5 Ng5 Nf6 g4 Qe7 Qc2 h6 Ne6 Bxe6 dxe6 f4 h4 Nc6 g5 Nd4 Qg6 Qe8 Bd3 Qxg6 Bxg6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Bxc6 dxc6 d3 Nd7 Be3 O-O Nbd2 a5 a4 b6 Nc4 f6 Nfd2 Nc5 f4 exf4 Bxf4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 b5 Bb3 d5 dxe5 Be6 Qe2 Nc5 Rd1 Nxb3 axb3 Be7 c4 b4 Nbd2 O-O Nf1 Qd7 Bg5 Rfd8 h3 h6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Bxc6 dxc6 d3 Nd7 Be3 O-O Nbd2 a5 a4 b6 Nc4 f6 Nfd2 Nc5 f4 exf4 Bxf4 Be6 Ne3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matus Tkac    (2244)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 O-O a3 Bxc3 bxc3 b6 e4 Nc6 e5 Ne8 Bd3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O h3 e5 d5 Nh5 g3 f5 exf5 gxf5 Ng5 Nf6 g4 Qe7 Qc2 h6 Ne6 Bxe6 dxe6 f4 h4 Nc6 g5 Nd4 Qg6 Qe8 Bd3 Qxg6 Bxg6 hxg5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matus Tkac    (2244)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 d3 b5 Bb3 d6 a4 b4 a5 O-O Nbd2

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 O-O a3 Bxc3 bxc3 b6 e4 Nc6 e5 Ne8 Bd3 Ba6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 b5 Bb3 d5 dxe5 Be6 Qe2 Nc5 Rd1 Nxb3 axb3 Be7 c4 b4 Nbd2 O-O Nf1 Qd7 Bg5 Rfd8 h3 h6 cxd5 Bxd5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Bxc6 dxc6 d3 Nd7 Be3 O-O Nbd2 a5 a4 b6 Nc4 f6 Nfd2 Nc5 f4 exf4 Bxf4 Be6 Ne3 Qd7 Kh1

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Bxc6 dxc6 d3 Nd7 Be3 O-O Nbd2 a5 a4 b6 Nc4 f6 Nfd2 Nc5 f4 exf4 Bxf4 Be6 Ne3 Qd7 Kh1 b5 b3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matus Tkac    (2244)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 O-O a3 Bxc3 bxc3 b6 e4 Nc6 e5 Ne8 Bd3 Ba6 Nh3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2244)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 d3 b5 Bb3 d6 a4 b4 a5 O-O Nbd2 Be6 Bxe6

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 O-O a3 Bxc3 bxc3 b6 e4 Nc6 e5 Ne8 Bd3 Ba6 Nh3 Qh4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 b5 Bb3 d5 dxe5 Be6 Qe2 Nc5 Rd1 Nxb3 axb3 Be7 c4 b4 Nbd2 O-O Nf1 Qd7 Bg5 Rfd8 h3 h6 cxd5 Bxd5 Ne3 Bxf3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Bxc6 dxc6 d3 Nd7 Be3 O-O Nbd2 a5 a4 b6 Nc4 f6 Nfd2 Nc5 f4 exf4 Bxf4 Be6 Ne3 Qd7 Kh1 b5 b3 bxa4 bxa4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Bxc6 dxc6 d3 Nd7 Be3 O-O Nbd2 a5 a4 b6 Nc4 f6 Nfd2 Nc5 f4 exf4 Bxf4 Be6 Ne3 Qd7 Kh1 b5 b3 bxa4 bxa4 Rfb8 h3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 b5 Bb3 d5 dxe5 Be6 Qe2 Nc5 Rd1 Nxb3 axb3 Be7 c4 b4 Nbd2 O-O Nf1 Qd7 Bg5 Rfd8 h3 h6 cxd5 Bxd5 Ne3 Bxf3 Qxf3 Qe6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matus Tkac    (2244)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 d3 b5 Bb3 d6 a4 b4 a5 O-O Nbd2 Be6 Bxe6 fxe6 c3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2244)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 O-O a3 Bxc3 bxc3 b6 e4 Nc6 e5 Ne8 Bd3 Ba6 Nh3 Qh4 Nf2

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 O-O a3 Bxc3 bxc3 b6 e4 Nc6 e5 Ne8 Bd3 Ba6 Nh3 Qh4 Nf2 Na5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matus Tkac    (2244)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 d3 b5 Bb3 d6 a4 b4 a5 O-O Nbd2 Be6 Bxe6 fxe6 c3 d5 Re1

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2244)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 O-O a3 Bxc3 bxc3 b6 e4 Nc6 e5 Ne8 Bd3 Ba6 Nh3 Qh4 Nf2 Na5 g3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matej Pech    (1669)
e4 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qd8 d4 c6 Be3 Nf6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matus Tkac    (2244)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 d3 b5 Bb3 d6 a4 b4 a5 O-O Nbd2 Be6 Bxe6 fxe6 c3 d5 Re1 Qd6 h3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 O-O a3 Bxc3 bxc3 b6 e4 Nc6 e5 Ne8 Bd3 Ba6 Nh3 Qh4 Nf2 Na5 g3 Qd8

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matus Tkac    (2244)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 O-O a3 Bxc3 bxc3 b6 e4 Nc6 e5 Ne8 Bd3 Ba6 Nh3 Qh4 Nf2 Na5 g3 Qd8 Qe2

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2244)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 d3 b5 Bb3 d6 a4 b4 a5 O-O Nbd2 Be6 Bxe6 fxe6 c3 d5 Re1 Qd6 h3 Rab8 d4

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2244)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 d3 b5 Bb3 d6 a4 b4 a5 O-O Nbd2 Be6 Bxe6 fxe6 c3 d5 Re1 Qd6 h3 Rab8 d4 Nd7 Qc2

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2244)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 d3 b5 Bb3 d6 a4 b4 a5 O-O Nbd2 Be6 Bxe6 fxe6 c3 d5 Re1 Qd6 h3 Rab8 d4 Nd7 Qc2 exd4 cxd4

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 O-O a3 Bxc3 bxc3 b6 e4 Nc6 e5 Ne8 Bd3 Ba6 Nh3 Qh4 Nf2 Na5 g3 Qd8 Qe2 c5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matus Tkac    (2244)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 d3 b5 Bb3 d6 a4 b4 a5 O-O Nbd2 Be6 Bxe6 fxe6 c3 d5 Re1 Qd6 h3 Rab8 d4 Nd7 Qc2 exd4 cxd4 e5 exd5

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2244)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 O-O a3 Bxc3 bxc3 b6 e4 Nc6 e5 Ne8 Bd3 Ba6 Nh3 Qh4 Nf2 Na5 g3 Qd8 Qe2 c5 dxc5

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O Nc3 d6 Nf3 Nc6 d5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 O-O a3 Bxc3 bxc3 b6 e4 Nc6 e5 Ne8 Bd3 Ba6 Nh3 Qh4 Nf2 Na5 g3 Qd8 Qe2 c5 dxc5 Nb3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matus Tkac    (2244)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 O-O a3 Bxc3 bxc3 b6 e4 Nc6 e5 Ne8 Bd3 Ba6 Nh3 Qh4 Nf2 Na5 g3 Qd8 Qe2 c5 dxc5 Nb3 Bxh7

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 O-O a3 Bxc3 bxc3 b6 e4 Nc6 e5 Ne8 Bd3 Ba6 Nh3 Qh4 Nf2 Na5 g3 Qd8 Qe2 c5 dxc5 Nb3 Bxh7 Kxh7

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matus Tkac    (2244)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 O-O a3 Bxc3 bxc3 b6 e4 Nc6 e5 Ne8 Bd3 Ba6 Nh3 Qh4 Nf2 Na5 g3 Qd8 Qe2 c5 dxc5 Nb3 Bxh7 Kxh7 Qc2

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2244)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 d3 b5 Bb3 d6 a4 b4 a5 O-O Nbd2 Be6 Bxe6 fxe6 c3 d5 Re1 Qd6 h3 Rab8 d4 Nd7 Qc2 exd4 cxd4 e5 exd5 Qxd5 Qc4

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 O-O a3 Bxc3 bxc3 b6 e4 Nc6 e5 Ne8 Bd3 Ba6 Nh3 Qh4 Nf2 Na5 g3 Qd8 Qe2 c5 dxc5 Nb3 Bxh7 Kxh7 Qc2 Kg8

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matus Tkac    (2244)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 O-O a3 Bxc3 bxc3 b6 e4 Nc6 e5 Ne8 Bd3 Ba6 Nh3 Qh4 Nf2 Na5 g3 Qd8 Qe2 c5 dxc5 Nb3 Bxh7 Kxh7 Qc2 Kg8 Qxb3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 O-O a3 Bxc3 bxc3 b6 e4 Nc6 e5 Ne8 Bd3 Ba6 Nh3 Qh4 Nf2 Na5 g3 Qd8 Qe2 c5 dxc5 Nb3 Bxh7 Kxh7 Qc2 Kg8 Qxb3 f6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O Nc3 d6 Nf3 Nc6 d5 Na5 b3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matus Tkac    (2244)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 O-O a3 Bxc3 bxc3 b6 e4 Nc6 e5 Ne8 Bd3 Ba6 Nh3 Qh4 Nf2 Na5 g3 Qd8 Qe2 c5 dxc5 Nb3 Bxh7 Kxh7 Qc2 Kg8 Qxb3 f6 Ne4

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 O-O a3 Bxc3 bxc3 b6 e4 Nc6 e5 Ne8 Bd3 Ba6 Nh3 Qh4 Nf2 Na5 g3 Qd8 Qe2 c5 dxc5 Nb3 Bxh7 Kxh7 Qc2 Kg8 Qxb3 f6 Ne4 fxe5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matus Tkac    (2244)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 O-O a3 Bxc3 bxc3 b6 e4 Nc6 e5 Ne8 Bd3 Ba6 Nh3 Qh4 Nf2 Na5 g3 Qd8 Qe2 c5 dxc5 Nb3 Bxh7 Kxh7 Qc2 Kg8 Qxb3 f6 Ne4 fxe5 O-O

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 d5 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 c5 cxd5 exd5 e3 O-O Ne2 Re8

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 O-O a3 Bxc3 bxc3 b6 e4 Nc6 e5 Ne8 Bd3 Ba6 Nh3 Qh4 Nf2 Na5 g3 Qd8 Qe2 c5 dxc5 Nb3 Bxh7 Kxh7 Qc2 Kg8 Qxb3 f6 Ne4 fxe5 O-O Qc8

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O Nc3 d6 Nf3 Nc6 d5 Na5 b3 c5 Bb2

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 d5 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 c5 cxd5 exd5 e3 O-O Ne2 Re8 g4 Nc6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 d3 b5 Bb3 d6 a4 Bd7 c3 Na5 Bc2

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 d5 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 c5 cxd5 exd5 e3 O-O Ne2 Re8 g4 Nc6 Ng3 c4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O Nc3 d6 Nf3 Nc6 d5 Na5 b3 c5 Bb2 a6 O-O

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matej Pech    (1669)
e4 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qd8 d4 c6 Be3 Nf6 Bd3 Ng4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 d5 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 c5 cxd5 exd5 e3 O-O Ne2 Re8 g4 Nc6 Ng3 c4 Ra2 Na5

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 d3 b5 Bb3 d6 a4 Bd7 c3 Na5 Bc2 c5 Re1

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matus Tkac    (2244)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O h3 Bb7 d3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 a4 Nd4 Nbd2 Nxb3 Nxb3 f6 Na5 Qc8 Bd2 c5

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 d3 b5 Bb3 d6 a4 Bd7 c3 Na5 Bc2 c5 Re1 O-O Nbd2

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O Nc3 d6 Nf3 Nc6 d5 Na5 b3 c5 Bb2 a6 O-O Rb8 a4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 d5 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 c5 cxd5 exd5 e3 O-O Ne2 Re8 g4 Nc6 Ng3 c4 Ra2 Na5 Bg2 Nb3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O Nc3 d6 Nf3 Nc6 d5 Na5 b3 c5 Bb2 a6 O-O Rb8 a4 e5 e4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 d3 b5 Bb3 d6 a4 Bd7 c3 Na5 Bc2 c5 Re1 O-O Nbd2 Qb6 Nf1

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 d5 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 c5 cxd5 exd5 e3 O-O Ne2 Re8 g4 Nc6 Ng3 c4 Ra2 Na5 Bg2 Nb3 O-O h6

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O h3 Bb7 d3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 a4 Nd4 Nbd2 Nxb3 Nxb3 f6 Na5 Qc8 Bd2 c5 Nh4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matus Tkac    (2244)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O h3 Bb7 d3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 a4 Nd4 Nbd2 Nxb3 Nxb3 f6 Na5 Qc8 Bd2 c5 Nh4 Rd8

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O Nc3 d6 Nf3 Nc6 d5 Na5 b3 c5 Bb2 a6 O-O Rb8 a4 e5 e4 Bh6 Bc1

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 d3 b5 Bb3 d6 a4 Bd7 c3 Na5 Bc2 c5 Re1 O-O Nbd2 Qb6 Nf1 b4 d4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O h3 Bb7 d3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 a4 Nd4 Nbd2 Nxb3 Nxb3 f6 Na5 Qc8 Bd2 c5 Nh4 Rd8 Qf3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O Nc3 d6 Nf3 Nc6 d5 Na5 b3 c5 Bb2 a6 O-O Rb8 a4 e5 e4 Bh6 Bc1 Bxc1 Rxc1

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 d5 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 c5 cxd5 exd5 e3 O-O Ne2 Re8 g4 Nc6 Ng3 c4 Ra2 Na5 Bg2 Nb3 O-O h6 e4 dxe4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matus Tkac    (2244)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O h3 Bb7 d3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 a4 Nd4 Nbd2 Nxb3 Nxb3 f6 Na5 Qc8 Bd2 c5 Nh4 Rd8 Qf3 Bc6

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 d3 b5 Bb3 d6 a4 Bd7 c3 Na5 Bc2 c5 Re1 O-O Nbd2 Qb6 Nf1 b4 d4 b3 Bb1

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O h3 Bb7 d3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 a4 Nd4 Nbd2 Nxb3 Nxb3 f6 Na5 Qc8 Bd2 c5 Nh4 Rd8 Qf3 Bc6 Nxc6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 d3 b5 Bb3 d6 a4 Bd7 c3 Na5 Bc2 c5 Re1 O-O Nbd2 Qb6 Nf1 b4 d4 b3 Bb1 cxd4 cxd4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matej Pech    (1669)
e4 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qd8 d4 c6 Be3 Nf6 Bd3 Ng4 Qd2 Nxe3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 d5 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 c5 cxd5 exd5 e3 O-O Ne2 Re8 g4 Nc6 Ng3 c4 Ra2 Na5 Bg2 Nb3 O-O h6 e4 dxe4 fxe4 Bxg4

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matej Pech    (1669)
e4 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qd8 d4 c6 Be3 Nf6 Bd3 Ng4 Qd2 Nxe3 Qxe3 g6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 d5 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 c5 cxd5 exd5 e3 O-O Ne2 Re8 g4 Nc6 Ng3 c4 Ra2 Na5 Bg2 Nb3 O-O h6 e4 dxe4 fxe4 Bxg4 Qe1 Nxc1

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Matej Pech    (1669)
e4 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qd8 d4 c6 Be3 Nf6 Bd3 Ng4 Qd2 Nxe3 Qxe3 g6 Qe5 Rg8

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 d3 b5 Bb3 d6 a4 Bd7 c3 Na5 Bc2 c5 Re1 O-O Nbd2 Qb6 Nf1 b4 d4 b3 Bb1 cxd4 cxd4 exd4 Nxd4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O Nc3 d6 Nf3 Nc6 d5 Na5 b3 c5 Bb2 a6 O-O Rb8 a4 e5 e4 Bh6 Bc1 Bxc1 Rxc1 Qe7 Nd2

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 d5 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 c5 cxd5 exd5 e3 O-O Ne2 Re8 g4 Nc6 Ng3 c4 Ra2 Na5 Bg2 Nb3 O-O h6 e4 dxe4 fxe4 Bxg4 Qe1 Nxc1 Qxc1 Nh7

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O Nc3 d6 Nf3 Nc6 d5 Na5 b3 c5 Bb2 a6 O-O Rb8 a4 e5 e4 Bh6 Bc1 Bxc1 Rxc1 Qe7 Nd2 g5 Rb1

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O Nc3 d6 Nf3 Nc6 d5 Na5 b3 c5 Bb2 a6 O-O Rb8 a4 e5 e4 Bh6 Bc1 Bxc1 Rxc1 Qe7 Nd2 g5 Rb1 Kg7 Qe1

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 d3 b5 Bb3 d6 a4 Bd7 c3 Na5 Bc2 c5 Re1 O-O Nbd2 Qb6 Nf1 b4 d4 b3 Bb1 cxd4 cxd4 exd4 Nxd4 Ng4 Ne3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O Nc3 d6 Nf3 Nc6 d5 Na5 b3 c5 Bb2 a6 O-O Rb8 a4 e5 e4 Bh6 Bc1 Bxc1 Rxc1 Qe7 Nd2 g5 Rb1 Kg7 Qe1 Bg4 Qe3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 d5 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 c5 cxd5 exd5 e3 O-O Ne2 Re8 g4 Nc6 Ng3 c4 Ra2 Na5 Bg2 Nb3 O-O h6 e4 dxe4 fxe4 Bxg4 Qe1 Nxc1 Qxc1 Nh7 Qf4 Qd7

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Andrea Grammatica    (2229)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 d3 b5 Bb3 d6 a4 Bd7 c3 Na5 Bc2 c5 Re1 O-O Nbd2 Qb6 Nf1 b4 d4 b3 Bb1 cxd4 cxd4 exd4 Nxd4 Ng4 Ne3 Bf6 Nxg4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrey Bakhmatov    (2200)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 O-O Nc3 d6 Nf3 Nc6 d5 Na5 b3 c5 Bb2 a6 O-O Rb8 a4 e5 e4 Bh6 Bc1 Bxc1 Rxc1 Qe7 Nd2 g5 Rb1 Kg7 Qe1 Bg4 Qe3 h6 h3

============

Contributors : Andrey Bakhmatov


Mateia Benone    (1144)
e4 c5 c3 d6 d4 cxd4 cxd4 a6

Transpose to wikichess #63414#

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1144)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nd4 Nxd4 exd4 O-O h5 d3 c6 Bc4 d5 exd5 cxd5 Bb5 Bd7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1144)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 f4 g6 Nf3 Bg7 d3 e6 Be3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1144)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 f4 g6 Nf3 Bg7 d3 e6 Be3 d5 exd5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1144)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 f4 g6 Nf3 Bg7 d3 e6 Be3 d5 exd5 exd5 d4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1144)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 f4 g6 Nf3 Bg7 d3 e6 Be3 d5 exd5 exd5 d4 Nh6 Bb5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1144)
b4 c6 Bb2 Qb6 a3 a5 c4 axb4 axb4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e5 O-O d6 c3 Qb6 Ba4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1144)
b4 c6 Bb2 Qb6 a3 a5 c4 axb4 axb4 Rxa1 Bxa1

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
e4 Nf6 e5 Nd5 d4 d6 exd6 cxd6 c4 Nb6 Nc3 g6 Bf4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1144)
b4 c6 Bb2 Qb6 a3 a5 c4 axb4 axb4 Rxa1 Bxa1 Qxb4 Qc2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e5 O-O d6 c3 Qb6 Ba4 Nf6 d4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e5 O-O d6 c3 Qb6 Ba4 Nf6 d4 Bd7 d5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
Nf3 d6 d4 Bf5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1144)
b4 c6 Bb2 Qb6 a3 a5 c4 axb4 axb4 Rxa1 Bxa1 Qxb4 Qc2 Na6 e3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e5 O-O d6 c3 Qb6 Ba4 Nf6 d4 Bd7 d5 Nb8 Bc2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
e4 Nf6 e5 Nd5 d4 d6 exd6 cxd6 c4 Nb6 Nc3 g6 Bf4 Bg7 Nf3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
e4 Nf6 e5 Nd5 d4 d6 exd6 cxd6 c4 Nb6 Nc3 g6 Bf4 Bg7 Nf3 Bg4 Be2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1144)
b4 c6 Bb2 Qb6 a3 a5 c4 axb4 axb4 Rxa1 Bxa1 Qxb4 Qc2 Na6 e3 Nc5 Nf3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
f4 d5 e3 Nf6

Transpose to wikichess #10421#

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
f4 d5 Nf3 Nf6 e3 e6 d4 Be7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nd3 Nxe4 Qe2 Qe7 Nf4 Nf6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nd3 Nxe4 Qe2 Qe7 Nf4 Nf6 Nc3 c6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nd3 Nxe4 Qe2 Qe7 Nf4 Nf6 Nc3 c6 d3 Qxe2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nd3 Nxe4 Qe2 Qe7 Nf4 Nf6 Nc3 c6 d3 Qxe2 Bxe2 d5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
f4 d5 Nf3 Nf6 e3 e6 d4 Be7 Bd3 O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d4 exd4 Qxd4 Nc6 Qc4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nd3 Nxe4 Qe2 Qe7 Nc3 Nxc3 dxc3 Nc6 Be3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nd3 Nxe4 Qe2 Qe7 Nc3 Nxc3 dxc3 Nc6 Be3 Be6 Nf4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d4 exd4 Qxd4 Nc6 Qc4 d5 exd5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d4 exd4 Qxd4 Nc6 Qc4 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Be2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
f4 d5 Nf3 Nf6 e3 e6 d4 Be7 Bd3 O-O O-O c5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nd3 Nc6 Qe2 Be7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
Nf3 d6 d4 Bf5 c4 b6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
Nf3 d6 d4 Bf5 c4 b6 Nc3 Nd7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
Nf3 d6 d4 Bf5 c4 b6 Nc3 Nd7 e4 Bg6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
Nf3 d6 d4 Bf5 c4 b6 Nc3 Nd7 e4 Bg6 Bd3 f6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d4 Nxe4 Bd3 d5 dxe5 Nc6 O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nd3 Be7 Nc3 O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
Nf3 d6 d4 Bf5 c4 b6 Nc3 Nd7 e4 Bg6 Bd3 f6 O-O e5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d4 exd4 Qxd4 Nc6 Qc4 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Be2 Be6 Qe4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
f4 d5 Nf3 Nf6 e3 e6 d4 Be7 Bd3 O-O O-O c5 c4 cxd4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d4 Nxe4 Bd3 d5 dxe5 Nc6 O-O Bg4 Re1

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
f4 d5 Nf3 Nf6 e3 e6 d4 Be7 Bd3 O-O O-O c5 c4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nc6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d4 exd4 Qxd4 Nc6 Qc4 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Be2 Be6 Qe4 Nf6 Qa4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nd3 Be7 Nc3 O-O Be2 Nc6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nd3 Nc6 Qe2 Be7 Nc3 O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nd3 Nc6 Qe2 Be7 Nc3 O-O b3 Bd7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nd3 Be7 Nc3 O-O Be2 Nc6 O-O Be6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
Nf3 f5 g3 Nf6 Bg2 g6 O-O Bg7 d3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nd3 Be7 Nc3 O-O Be2 Nc6 O-O Be6 b3 Nd4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
Nf3 f5 g3 Nf6 Bg2 g6 O-O Bg7 d3 d6 Nbd2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
Nf3 f5 g3 Nf6 Bg2 g6 O-O Bg7 d3 d6 Nbd2 e5 e4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
Nf3 f5 g3 Nf6 Bg2 g6 O-O Bg7 d3 d6 Nbd2 e5 e4 Nc6 Re1

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nd3 Be7 Nc3 O-O Be2 Nc6 O-O Be6 b3 Nd4 Bb2 a6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
Nf3 f5 g3 Nf6 Bg2 g6 O-O Bg7 d3 d6 Nbd2 e5 e4 Nc6 Re1 O-O h3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
f4 d5 Nf3 Nf6 e3 e6 d4 Be7 Bd3 O-O O-O c5 c4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nc6 Nxc6 bxc6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nd3 Nc6 Qe2 Be7 Nc3 O-O b3 Bd7 Bb2 Nd4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
Nf3 d6 d4 Bf5 c4 b6 Nc3 Nd7 e4 Bg6 Bd3 f6 O-O e5 Be3 c5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nd3 Nc6 Qe2 Be7 Nc3 O-O b3 Bd7 Bb2 Nd4 Qd1 c5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
Nf3 d6 d4 Bf5 c4 b6 Nc3 Nd7 e4 Bg6 Bd3 f6 O-O e5 Be3 c5 d5 Ne7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 e5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 e5 dxe5 dxe5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
e4 e5 d4 exd4 c3 d6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 e5 dxe5 dxe5 Qxd1 Kxd1

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 e5 dxe5 dxe5 Qxd1 Kxd1 Ng4 Ke1

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
e4 e5 d4 exd4 c3 d6 Bc4 Nf6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 e5 dxe5 dxe5 Qxd1 Kxd1 Ng4 Ke1 Nxe5 Nc3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
e4 e5 d4 exd4 c3 d6 Bc4 Nf6 Nf3 Be7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 e5 dxe5 dxe5 Qxd1 Kxd1 Ng4 Ke1 Nxe5 Nc3 c6 Bf4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 e5 dxe5 dxe5 Qxd1 Kxd1 Ng4 Ke1 Nxe5 Nc3 c6 Bf4 Ng6 Bxb8

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
e4 e5 d4 exd4 c3 d6 Bc4 Nf6 Nf3 Be7 e5 dxe5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
e4 e5 d4 exd4 c3 d6 Bc4 Nf6 Nf3 Be7 e5 dxe5 Nxe5 O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
e4 e5 d4 exd4 c3 d6 Bc4 Nf6 Nf3 Be7 e5 dxe5 Nxe5 O-O O-O dxc3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1139)
e4 e5 d4 exd4 c3 d6 Bc4 Nf6 Nf3 Be7 e5 dxe5 Nxe5 O-O O-O dxc3 Nxc3 Qxd1

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1363)
e4 e5 f4 Be7 Nf3 exf4

Transpose to wikichess #72#

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matija Sirk    (2134)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 d5 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 c5 cxd5 Nxd5 dxc5 f5 Nh3 Qa5 e4 fxe4 fxe4 Nf6 Be2 Qxc3 Bd2

============

Contributors : Matija Sirk


Matija Sirk    (2134)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 d5 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 c5 cxd5 Nxd5 dxc5 f5 Nh3 Qa5 e4 fxe4 fxe4 Nf6 Be2 Qxc3 Bd2 Qd4 Rc1

============

Contributors : Matija Sirk


Mateia Benone    (1363)
d4 d5 c4 e6 Nf3 Nf6 Bg5 Nbd7 Nc3

Transpose to wikichess #8685#

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matija Sirk    (2134)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 d5 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 c5 cxd5 Nxd5 dxc5 f5 Nh3 Qa5 e4 fxe4 fxe4 Nf6 Be2 Qxc3 Bd2 Qd4 Rc1 Nc6 Rc4

============

Contributors : Matija Sirk


Mateia Benone    (1363)
e4 e5 d4 d5 dxe5 Nf6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matija Sirk    (2134)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 d5 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 c5 cxd5 Nxd5 dxc5 f5 Nh3 Qa5 e4 fxe4 fxe4 Nf6 Be2 Qxc3 Bd2 Qd4 Rc1 Nc6 Rc4 Qd7 O-O

============

Contributors : Matija Sirk


Matija Sirk    (2134)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 d5 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 c5 cxd5 Nxd5 dxc5 f5 Nh3 Qa5 e4 fxe4 fxe4 Nf6 Be2 Qxc3 Bd2 Qd4 Rc1 Nc6 Rc4 Qd7 O-O O-O Rc3

============

Contributors : Matija Sirk


Matija Sirk    (2134)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 d5 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 c5 cxd5 Nxd5 dxc5 f5 Nh3 Qa5 e4 fxe4 fxe4 Nf6 Be2 Qxc3 Bd2 Qd4 Rc1 Nc6 Rc4 Qd7 O-O O-O Rc3 Qe7 Be3

============

Contributors : Matija Sirk


Matija Sirk    (2134)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 d5 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 c5 cxd5 Nxd5 dxc5 f5 Nh3 Qa5 e4 fxe4 fxe4 Nf6 Be2 Qxc3 Bd2 Qd4 Rc1 Nc6 Rc4 Qd7 O-O O-O Rc3 Qe7 Be3 Bd7 Qb1

============

Contributors : Matija Sirk


Mateia Benone    (1363)
e4 e5 d4 d5 dxe5 Nf6 exf6 Qxf6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1363)
e4 e5 f4 d5 exd5 exf4 c4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1363)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 d4 g5 h3 Bg7 g3 Qe7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1363)
e4 e5 f4 d5 exd5 exf4 c4 c6 Nf3

Transpose to wikichess #172268#

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1363)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d5 exd5 c6 d4 cxd5 Bxf4 Bd6 Bxd6 Qxd6 Nc3 Bg4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1363)
e4 e5 f4 d5 Bd3 exf4 e5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matija Sirk    (2134)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 e5 Nb3 Be6 f3 Nfd7

============

Contributors : Matija Sirk


Mateia Benone    (1363)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 d4 g5 h3 Bg7 g3 Qe7 Nc3 fxg3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1363)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 d4 Bd7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1363)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d5 exd5 c6 d4 cxd5 Bxf4 Bd6 Bxd6 Qxd6 Nc3 Bg4 Qe2 Ne7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1363)
e4 e5 d4 d5 dxe5 Nf6 exf6 Qxf6 Qxd5 Be6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1363)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 d4 Bd7 Bxf4 Nc6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1363)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 d4 Bd7 Bxf4 Nc6 d5 Nce7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1363)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 d4 Bd7 Bxf4 Nc6 d5 Nce7 Nc3 c6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1363)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 d4 g5 h3 Bg7 g3 f5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1363)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 d4 Bd7 Bxf4 Nc6 d5 Nce7 Nc3 c6 Bxd6 Nc8

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1363)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 d4 Bd7 Bxf4 Nc6 d5 Nce7 Nc3 c6 Bxd6 Nc8 Bxf8 Kxf8

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matija Sirk    (2134)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 e5 Nb3 Be6 f3 Nfd7 Qd2 Be7

============

Contributors : Matija Sirk


Matija Sirk    (2134)
e4 c5 c3 Nf6 e5 Nd5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nb6 Bb3 d5 exd6 Qxd6 O-O Be6 Bxe6

============

Contributors : Matija Sirk


Mateia Benone    (1363)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 d4 g5 h3 Bg7 g3 Qe7 Nc3 fxg3 Bxg5 Bf6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matija Sirk    (2134)
e4 c5 c3 Nf6 e5 Nd5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nb6 Bb3 d5 exd6 Qxd6 O-O Be6 Bxe6 Qxe6 a4

============

Contributors : Matija Sirk


Mateia Benone    (1363)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 d4 g5 h3 Bg7 g3 Qe7 Nc3 fxg3 Bxg5 Bf6 Bf4 c5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1363)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 d4 g5 h3 Bg7 g3 f5 gxf4 fxe4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1363)
e4 e5 d4 d5 dxe5 Nf6 exf6 Qxf6 Qxd5 Be6 Qxb7 Bc5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1363)
e4 e5 f4 d5 Bd3 exf4 e5 Qh4 Kf1

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1363)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 d4 g5 h3 Bg7 g3 f5 gxf4 fxe4 Nxg5 Nf6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1363)
e4 e5 d4 d5 dxe5 Nf6 exf6 Qxf6 Qxd5 Be6 Qxb7 Bc5 Nf3 O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1363)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 d4 g5 h3 Bg7 g3 f5 gxf4 fxe4 Nxg5 Nf6 Bc4 d5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1363)
e4 e5 f4 d5 Bd3 exf4 e5 Qh4 Kf1 Bc5 Nf3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1363)
e4 e5 d4 d5 dxe5 Nf6 exf6 Qxf6 Qxd5 Be6 Qxb7 Bc5 Nf3 O-O Qxa8 c6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1363)
e4 e5 d4 d5 dxe5 Nf6 exf6 Qxf6 Qxd5 Be6 Qxb7 Bc5 Nf3 O-O Qxa8 c6 Qb7 Qe7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matija Sirk    (2134)
e4 c5 c3 Nf6 e5 Nd5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nb6 Bb3 d5 exd6 Qxd6 O-O Be6 Bxe6 Qxe6 a4 Qd7 a5

============

Contributors : Matija Sirk


Matija Sirk    (2134)
e4 c5 c3 Nf6 e5 Nd5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nb6 Bb3 d5 exd6 Qxd6 O-O Be6 Bxe6 Qxe6 a4 Qd7 a5 Nd5 d4

============

Contributors : Matija Sirk


Matija Sirk    (2134)
e4 c5 c3 Nf6 e5 Nd5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nb6 Bb3 d5 exd6 Qxd6 O-O Be6 Bxe6 Qxe6 a4 Qd7 a5 Nd5 d4 cxd4 Nxd4

============

Contributors : Matija Sirk


Mateia Benone    (1486)
e4 e6 d3 d6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1486)
e4 e6 d3 d6 Nf3 g6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1486)
e4 e6 d3 d6 Nf3 g6 g3 Bg7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matija Sirk    (2134)
e4 c5 c3 Nf6 e5 Nd5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nb6 Bb3 d5 exd6 Qxd6 O-O Be6 Bxe6 Qxe6 a4 Qd7 a5 Nd5 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 e6 a6

============

Contributors : Matija Sirk


Andrea Grammatica    (2257)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 e3 Bf5 Nc3 e6 Nh4 Bg6 Be2 Nbd7 O-O Bd6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2257)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 e3 Bf5 Nc3 e6 Nh4 Bg6 Be2 Nbd7 O-O Bd6 g3 a6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2257)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Bd2 Bg7 e4 Nxc3 Bxc3 O-O Qd2 c5 d5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2257)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Bd2 Bg7 e4 Nxc3 Bxc3 O-O Qd2 c5 d5 e6 Bc4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2257)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Bd2 Bg7 e4 Nxc3 Bxc3 O-O Qd2 c5 d5 e6 Bc4 Bxc3 bxc3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2257)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Bd2 Bg7 e4 Nxc3 Bxc3 O-O Qd2 c5 d5 e6 Bc4 Bxc3 bxc3 exd5 Bxd5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Mateia Benone    (1486)
e4 e6 d3 d6 Nf3 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 Nd7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Andrea Grammatica    (2257)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Bd2 Bg7 e4 Nxc3 Bxc3 O-O Qd2 c5 d5 e6 Bc4 Bxc3 bxc3 exd5 Bxd5 Nd7 Nf3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2257)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Bd2 Bg7 e4 Nxc3 Bxc3 O-O Qd2 c5 d5 e6 Bc4 Bxc3 bxc3 exd5 Bxd5 Nd7 Nf3 Nf6 O-O

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2257)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Bd2 Bg7 e4 Nxc3 Bxc3 O-O Qd2 c5 d5 e6 Bc4 Bxc3 bxc3 exd5 Bxd5 Nd7 Nf3 Nf6 O-O Bg4 Ng5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2257)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 a6 O-O

Transpose to wikichess #165531#

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2257)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Bd2 Bg7 e4 Nxc3 Bxc3 O-O Qd2 c5 d5 e6 Bc4 Bxc3 bxc3 exd5 Bxd5 Nd7 Nf3 Nf6 O-O Bg4 Ng5 Qd7 f3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2257)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 e3 Bf5 Nc3 e6 Nh4 Bg6 Be2 Nbd7 O-O Bd6 g3 a6 Qb3 Qc7

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2257)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Bd2 Bg7 e4 Nxc3 Bxc3 O-O Qd2 c5 d5 e6 Bc4 Bxc3 bxc3 exd5 Bxd5 Nd7 Nf3 Nf6 O-O Bg4 Ng5 Qd7 f3 Be6 c4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2257)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Bd2 Bg7 e4 Nxc3 Bxc3 O-O Qd2 c5 d5 e6 Bc4 Bxc3 bxc3 exd5 Bxd5 Nd7 Nf3 Nf6 O-O Bg4 Ng5 Qd7 f3 Be6 c4 h6 Qb2

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2257)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 e3 Bf5 Nc3 e6 Nh4 Bg6 Be2 Nbd7 O-O Bd6 g3 a6 Qb3 Qc7 Nxg6 hxg6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2257)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Bd2 Bg7 e4 Nxc3 Bxc3 O-O Qd2 c5 d5 e6 Bc4 Bxc3 bxc3 exd5 Bxd5 Nd7 Nf3 Nf6 O-O Bg4 Ng5 Qd7 f3 Be6 c4 h6 Qb2 Nxd5 Nxe6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Mateia Benone    (1486)
e4 c5 d4 cxd4 c3 dxc3 Nxc3 Nc6 Nf3 Nf6 e5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matus Tkac    (2236)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 O-O a3 Bxc3 bxc3 b6 e4 Nc6 Bd3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Mateia Benone    (1486)
e4 c5 d4 cxd4 c3 dxc3 Nxc3 Nc6 Nf3 Nf6 e5 Ng4 Bf4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1486)
e4 e6 d3 d6 Nf3 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 Nd7 O-O Ne7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Andrea Grammatica    (2257)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 e3 Bf5 Nc3 e6 Nh4 Bg6 Be2 Nbd7 O-O Bd6 g3 a6 Qb3 Qc7 Nxg6 hxg6 Bd2 O-O

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Mateia Benone    (1486)
e4 c5 d4 cxd4 c3 dxc3 Nxc3 Nc6 Nf3 Nf6 e5 Ng4 Bf4 Qa5 h3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Andrea Grammatica    (2257)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 e3 Bf5 Nc3 e6 Nh4 Bg6 Be2 Nbd7 O-O Bd6 g3 a6 Qb3 Qc7 Nxg6 hxg6 Bd2 O-O c5 Be7

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Mateia Benone    (1486)
e4 c5 d4 cxd4 c3 dxc3 Nxc3 Nc6 Nf3 Nf6 e5 Ng4 Bf4 Qa5 h3 Ngxe5 Nxe5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1486)
e4 e6 d3 d6 Nf3 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 Nd7 O-O Ne7 Nc3 O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1486)
d4 Nf6 c4 c5 d5 b5 Qc2 Qa5 Bd2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1486)
e4 e5 Nf3 Bc5 Nxe5 Qh4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1487)
f4 c5 Nf3 d5

Transpose to wikichess #8729#

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1486)
e4 e6 d3 d6 Nf3 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 Nd7 O-O Ne7 Nc3 O-O Bd2 a6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1486)
d4 Nf6 c4 c5 d5 b5 Qc2 Qa5 Bd2 b4 e4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1486)
e4 e5 Nf3 Bc5 Nxe5 Qh4 Qf3 Nf6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1486)
e4 e5 Nf3 Bc5 Nxe5 Bxf2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1486)
d4 Nf6 c4 c5 d5 b5 Qc2 Qa5 Bd2 b4 e4 d6 Bd3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Andrea Grammatica    (2257)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 e3 Bf5 Nc3 e6 Nh4 Bg6 Be2 Nbd7 O-O Bd6 g3 a6 Qb3 Qc7 Nxg6 hxg6 Bd2 O-O c5 Be7 Qc2 a5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2257)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 e3 Bf5 Nc3 e6 Nh4 Bg6 Be2 Nbd7 O-O Bd6 g3 a6 Qb3 Qc7 Nxg6 hxg6 Bd2 O-O c5 Be7 Qc2 a5 a3 b6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Mateia Benone    (1486)
e4 e5 Nf3 Bc5 Nxe5 Bxf2 Kxf2 Qh4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Andrea Grammatica    (2257)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 e3 Bf5 Nc3 e6 Nh4 Bg6 Be2 Nbd7 O-O Bd6 g3 a6 Qb3 Qc7 Nxg6 hxg6 Bd2 O-O c5 Be7 Qc2 a5 a3 b6 b4 axb4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matus Tkac    (2236)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 b5 Bb3 d5 dxe5 Be6 c3 Bc5 Qe2 O-O

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2236)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 b5 Bb3 d5 dxe5 Be6 c3 Bc5 Qe2 O-O Be3 Re8

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrea Grammatica    (2257)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 e3 Bf5 Nc3 e6 Nh4 Bg6 Be2 Nbd7 O-O Bd6 g3 a6 Qb3 Qc7 Nxg6 hxg6 Bd2 O-O c5 Be7 Qc2 a5 a3 b6 b4 axb4 axb4 e5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Mateia Benone    (1487)
f4 Nf6 Nf3 g6 e3 d5

Transpose to wikichess #25490#

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matus Tkac    (2236)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 b5 Bb3 d5 dxe5 Be6 c3 Bc5 Qe2 O-O Be3 Re8 Bxc5 Nxc5

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2236)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 Ng4 Bg5 h6 Bh4 g5 Bg3 Bg7 h3 Nf6 Qf3 Bd7

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Mateia Benone    (1487)
d4 Nf6 f4 d5 e3 b6 Bd3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1486)
e4 e5 Nf3 Bc5 Nxe5 Bxf2 Kxf2 Qh4 g3 Qxe4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matej Pech    (1747)
d4 f5 c4 Nf6 Nc3 e6 e4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1747)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 g3 d6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matthew Eliphas    (1800)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 Qa5

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Mateia Benone    (1486)
e4 c5 d4 cxd4 Qxd4 Nc6 Qd1 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Be3 Bg7 Nf3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1487)
d4 Nf6 f4 d5 e3 b6 Bd3 c5 c3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matus Tkac    (2236)
c4 e5 g3 Nf6 Bg2 Bc5 d3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matej Pech    (1747)
d4 f5 c4 Nf6 Nc3 e6 e4 Nxe4 Nxe4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1747)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 g3 d6 d4 exd4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Mateia Benone    (1487)
c4 e5 g3 c6 Nf3 d6 Nc3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matus Tkac    (2236)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 Ng4 Bg5 h6 Bh4 g5 Bg3 Bg7 h3 Nf6 Qf3 Bd7 O-O-O Nc6

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2236)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 Ng4 Bg5 h6 Bh4 g5 Bg3 Bg7 h3 Nf6 Qf3 Bd7 O-O-O Nc6 e5 Nxe5

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Mateia Benone    (1486)
e4 e5 Nf3 Bc5 Nxe5 Bxf2 Kxf2 Qh4 g3 Qxe4 Bh3 Qxe5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matus Tkac    (2236)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 b5 Bb3 d5 dxe5 Be6 c3 Bc5 Qe2 O-O Be3 Re8 Bxc5 Nxc5 Nd4 Qd7

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Mateia Benone    (1486)
e4 e5 Nf3 Bc5 Nxe5 Bxf2 Kxf2 Qh4 g3 Qxe4 Bh3 Qxe5 Re1 Qxe1

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matus Tkac    (2236)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 Ng4 Bg5 h6 Bh4 g5 Bg3 Bg7 h3 Nf6 Qf3 Bd7 O-O-O Nc6 e5 Nxe5 Bxe5 dxe5

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Mateia Benone    (1487)
c4 e5 g3 c6 Nf3 d6 Nc3 Nf6 Bg2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1487)
d4 Nf6 f4 d5 e3 b6 Bd3 c5 c3 Nc6 Nf3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1487)
c4 e5 g3 c6 Nf3 d6 Nc3 Nf6 Bg2 Be7 O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matus Tkac    (2236)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 Ng4 Bg5 h6 Bh4 g5 Bg3 Bg7 h3 Nf6 Qf3 Bd7 O-O-O Nc6 e5 Nxe5 Bxe5 dxe5 Nf5 O-O

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matej Pech    (1747)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nd2 c5 exd5 exd5 Bb5 Bd7 Qe2 Be7 dxc5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Mateia Benone    (1486)
e4 c5 d4 cxd4 Qxd4 Nc6 Qd1 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Be3 Bg7 Nf3 O-O Bd3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matej Pech    (1747)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nd2 c5 exd5 exd5 Bb5 Bd7 Qe2 Be7 dxc5 Nf6 Ngf3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1747)
d4 f5 c4 Nf6 Nc3 e6 e4 Nxe4 Nxe4 fxe4 Ne2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1747)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 g3 d6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nxd4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1747)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nd2 c5 exd5 exd5 Bb5 Bd7 Qe2 Be7 dxc5 Nf6 Ngf3 O-O Nb3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Mateia Benone    (1487)
c4 e5 g3 c6 Nf3 d6 Nc3 Nf6 Bg2 Be7 O-O O-O e4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matus Tkac    (2236)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 b5 Bb3 d5 dxe5 Be6 c3 Bc5 Qe2 O-O Be3 Re8 Bxc5 Nxc5 Nd4 Qd7 Qe3 Na4

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2236)
c4 e5 g3 Nf6 Bg2 Bc5 d3 O-O Nf3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matej Pech    (1747)
d4 f5 c4 Nf6 Nc3 e6 e4 Nxe4 Nxe4 fxe4 Ne2 Bb4 Bd2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matus Tkac    (2236)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 Ng4 Bg5 h6 Bh4 g5 Bg3 Bg7 h3 Nf6 Qf3 Bd7 O-O-O Nc6 e5 Nxe5 Bxe5 dxe5 Nf5 O-O Qe3 Rc8

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matej Pech    (1747)
d4 f5 c4 Nf6 Nc3 e6 e4 Nxe4 Nxe4 fxe4 Ne2 Bb4 Bd2 a5 a3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1747)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 g3 d6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nxd4 Qxd4 Be7

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Andrea Grammatica    (2257)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 e3 Bf5 Nc3 e6 Nh4 Bg6 Be2 Nbd7 O-O Bd6 g3 a6 Qb3 Qc7 Nxg6 hxg6 Bd2 O-O c5 Be7 Qc2 a5 a3 b6 b4 axb4 axb4 e5 h4 bxc5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2257)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 a3 Bb7 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qc2 Nxc3 bxc3 Be7 e4 O-O Bd3 c5 O-O Qc7 Qe2 Re8

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matus Tkac    (2236)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 b5 Bb3 d5 dxe5 Be6 c3 Bc5 Qe2 O-O Be3 Re8 Bxc5 Nxc5 Nd4 Qd7 Qe3 Na4 Bxa4 bxa4

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matej Pech    (1747)
d4 f5 c4 Nf6 Nc3 e6 e4 Nxe4 Nxe4 fxe4 Ne2 Bb4 Bd2 a5 a3 Bxd2 Qxd2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1747)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 g3 d6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nxd4 Qxd4 Be7 Bg2 Be6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matus Tkac    (2236)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 b5 Bb3 d5 dxe5 Be6 c3 Bc5 Qe2 O-O Be3 Re8 Bxc5 Nxc5 Nd4 Qd7 Qe3 Na4 Bxa4 bxa4 Nd2 Rec8

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matej Pech    (1747)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 g3 d6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nxd4 Qxd4 Be7 Bg2 Be6 Bxb7 Rb8

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matus Tkac    (2236)
c4 e5 g3 Nf6 Bg2 Bc5 d3 O-O Nf3 Nc6 O-O

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2236)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 Ng4 Bg5 h6 Bh4 g5 Bg3 Bg7 h3 Nf6 Qf3 Bd7 O-O-O Nc6 e5 Nxe5 Bxe5 dxe5 Nf5 O-O Qe3 Rc8 Qxe5 Re8

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2236)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 Ng4 Bg5 h6 Bh4 g5 Bg3 Bg7 h3 Nf6 Qf3 Bd7 O-O-O Nc6 e5 Nxe5 Bxe5 dxe5 Nf5 O-O Qe3 Rc8 Qxe5 Re8 h4 g4

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2236)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 Ng4 Bg5 h6 Bh4 g5 Bg3 Bg7 h3 Nf6 Qf3 Bd7 O-O-O Nc6 e5 Nxe5 Bxe5 dxe5 Nf5 O-O Qe3 Rc8 Qxe5 Re8 h4 g4 Be2 Qc7

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2236)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 b5 Bb3 d5 dxe5 Be6 c3 Bc5 Qe2 O-O Be3 Re8 Bxc5 Nxc5 Nd4 Qd7 Qe3 Na4 Bxa4 bxa4 Nd2 Rec8 b3 Ne7

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2236)
c4 e5 g3 Nf6 Bg2 Bc5 d3 O-O Nf3 Nc6 O-O d5 cxd5

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2236)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 b5 Bb3 d5 dxe5 Be6 c3 Bc5 Qe2 O-O Be3 Re8 Bxc5 Nxc5 Nd4 Qd7 Qe3 Na4 Bxa4 bxa4 Nd2 Rec8 b3 Ne7 b4 c5

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2236)
c4 e5 g3 Nf6 Bg2 Bc5 d3 O-O Nf3 Nc6 O-O d5 cxd5 Nxd5 a3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2236)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 b5 Bb3 d5 dxe5 Be6 c3 Bc5 Qe2 O-O Be3 Re8 Bxc5 Nxc5 Nd4 Qd7 Qe3 Na4 Bxa4 bxa4 Nd2 Rec8 b3 Ne7 b4 c5 bxc5 Qa7

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2236)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 a3 Bb7 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qc2 Nxc3 bxc3 Be7 e4 O-O Bd3 c5 O-O Qc7 Qe2 Re8 Rd1

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrea Grammatica    (2257)
h3 d5 d4

Transpose to wikichess #79836#

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2257)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 e3 Bf5 Nc3 e6 Nh4 Bg6 Be2 Nbd7 O-O Bd6 g3 a6 Qb3 Qc7 Nxg6 hxg6 Bd2 O-O c5 Be7 Qc2 a5 a3 b6 b4 axb4 axb4 e5 h4 bxc5 bxc5 Rfb8

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2257)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nc6 Nc3 Qc7 Be3 a6 Qd2 Nf6 O-O-O Bb4 f3 Ne5 Nb3 b5 Qe1 Be7 f4 Ng6 e5 Ng4 Ne4 Nxe3 Qxe3 O-O h4 Bb7 Nd6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2257)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nc6 Nc3 Qc7 Be3 a6 Qd2 Nf6 O-O-O Bb4 f3 Ne5 Nb3 b5 Qe1 Be7 f4 Ng6 e5 Ng4 Ne4 Nxe3 Qxe3 O-O h4 Bb7 Nd6 f6 Nxb7

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2257)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nc6 Nc3 Qc7 Be3 a6 Qd2 Nf6 O-O-O Bb4 f3 Ne5 Nb3 b5 Qe1 Be7 f4 Ng6 e5 Ng4 Ne4 Nxe3 Qxe3 O-O h4 Bb7 Nd6 f6 Nxb7 fxe5 f5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Mateia Benone    (1487)
f4 d5 Nf3 Nf6 e3 Bg4 Be2 e6 d4 c5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Andrea Grammatica    (2257)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 a3 Bb7 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qc2 Nxc3 bxc3 Be7 e4 O-O Bd3 c5 O-O Qc7 Qe2 Re8 Rd1 Nd7

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matus Tkac    (2236)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 a3 Bb7 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qc2 Nxc3 bxc3 Be7 e4 O-O Bd3 c5 O-O Qc7 Qe2 Re8 Rd1 Nd7 e5

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrea Grammatica    (2257)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 a3 Bb7 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qc2 Nxc3 bxc3 Be7 e4 O-O Bd3 c5 O-O Qc7 Qe2 Re8 Rd1 Nd7 e5 Red8

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matus Tkac    (2236)
c4 e5 g3 Nf6 Bg2 Bc5 d3 O-O Nf3 Nc6 O-O d5 cxd5 Nxd5 a3 Be6 b4

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2236)
c4 e5 g3 Nf6 Bg2 Bc5 d3 O-O Nf3 Nc6 O-O d5 cxd5 Nxd5 a3 Be6 b4 Bb6 Bb2

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2236)
c4 e5 g3 Nf6 Bg2 Bc5 d3 O-O Nf3 Nc6 O-O d5 cxd5 Nxd5 a3 Be6 b4 Bb6 Bb2 f6 Nbd2

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2236)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 a3 Bb7 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qc2 Nxc3 bxc3 Be7 e4 O-O Bd3 c5 O-O Qc7 Qe2 Re8 Rd1 Nd7 e5 Red8 Be3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrea Grammatica    (2257)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 a3 Bb7 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qc2 Nxc3 bxc3 Be7 e4 O-O Bd3 c5 O-O Qc7 Qe2 Re8 Rd1 Nd7 e5 Red8 Be3 Nf8

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matus Tkac    (2236)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 a3 Bb7 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qc2 Nxc3 bxc3 Be7 e4 O-O Bd3 c5 O-O Qc7 Qe2 Re8 Rd1 Nd7 e5 Red8 Be3 Nf8 h4

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2236)
c4 e5 g3 Nf6 Bg2 Bc5 d3 O-O Nf3 Nc6 O-O d5 cxd5 Nxd5 a3 Be6 b4 Bb6 Bb2 f6 Nbd2 Qd7 Nc4

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrea Grammatica    (2257)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 a3 Bb7 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qc2 Nxc3 bxc3 Be7 e4 O-O Bd3 c5 O-O Qc7 Qe2 Re8 Rd1 Nd7 e5 Red8 Be3 Nf8 h4 h6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matus Tkac    (2236)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 a3 Bb7 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qc2 Nxc3 bxc3 Be7 e4 O-O Bd3 c5 O-O Qc7 Qe2 Re8 Rd1 Nd7 e5 Red8 Be3 Nf8 h4 h6 h5

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrea Grammatica    (2257)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 a3 Bb7 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qc2 Nxc3 bxc3 Be7 e4 O-O Bd3 c5 O-O Qc7 Qe2 Re8 Rd1 Nd7 e5 Red8 Be3 Nf8 h4 h6 h5 Kh8

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matus Tkac    (2236)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 a3 Bb7 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qc2 Nxc3 bxc3 Be7 e4 O-O Bd3 c5 O-O Qc7 Qe2 Re8 Rd1 Nd7 e5 Red8 Be3 Nf8 h4 h6 h5 Kh8 Nd2

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrea Grammatica    (2257)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 a3 Bb7 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qc2 Nxc3 bxc3 Be7 e4 O-O Bd3 c5 O-O Qc7 Qe2 Re8 Rd1 Nd7 e5 Red8 Be3 Nf8 h4 h6 h5 Kh8 Nd2 cxd4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matus Tkac    (2236)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 a3 Bb7 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qc2 Nxc3 bxc3 Be7 e4 O-O Bd3 c5 O-O Qc7 Qe2 Re8 Rd1 Nd7 e5 Red8 Be3 Nf8 h4 h6 h5 Kh8 Nd2 cxd4 cxd4

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrea Grammatica    (2257)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 a3 Bb7 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qc2 Nxc3 bxc3 Be7 e4 O-O Bd3 c5 O-O Qc7 Qe2 Re8 Rd1 Nd7 e5 Red8 Be3 Nf8 h4 h6 h5 Kh8 Nd2 cxd4 cxd4 f5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matus Tkac    (2236)
c4 e5 g3 Nf6 Bg2 Bc5 d3 O-O Nf3 Nc6 O-O d5 cxd5 Nxd5 a3 Be6 b4 Bb6 Bb2 f6 Nbd2 Qd7 Nc4 Rfd8 Rc1

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2236)
c4 e5 g3 Nf6 Bg2 Bc5 d3 O-O Nf3 Nc6 O-O d5 cxd5 Nxd5 a3 Be6 b4 Bb6 Bb2 f6 Nbd2 Qd7 Nc4 Rfd8 Rc1 a6 Qc2

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2236)
c4 e5 g3 Nf6 Bg2 Bc5 d3 O-O Nf3 Nc6 O-O d5 cxd5 Nxd5 a3 Be6 b4 Bb6 Bb2 f6 Nbd2 Qd7 Nc4 Rfd8 Rc1 a6 Qc2 Rac8 Rfe1

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2236)
c4 e5 g3 Nf6 Bg2 Bc5 d3 O-O Nf3 Nc6 O-O d5 cxd5 Nxd5 a3 Be6 b4 Bb6 Bb2 f6 Nbd2 Qd7 Nc4 Rfd8 Rc1 a6 Qc2 Rac8 Rfe1 Nde7 Nfd2

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2236)
c4 e5 g3 Nf6 Bg2 Bc5 d3 O-O Nf3 Nc6 O-O d5 cxd5 Nxd5 a3 Be6 b4 Bb6 Bb2 f6 Nbd2 Qd7 Nc4 Rfd8 Rc1 a6 Qc2 Rac8 Rfe1 Nde7 Nfd2 Rb8 Ne4

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2236)
c4 e5 g3 Nf6 Bg2 Bc5 d3 O-O Nf3 Nc6 O-O d5 cxd5 Nxd5 a3 Be6 b4 Bb6 Bb2 f6 Nbd2 Qd7 Nc4 Rfd8 Rc1 a6 Qc2 Rac8 Rfe1 Nde7 Nfd2 Rb8 Ne4 Nf5 Qb1

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2236)
c4 e5 g3 Nf6 Bg2 Bc5 d3 O-O Nf3 Nc6 O-O d5 cxd5 Nxd5 a3 Be6 b4 Bb6 Bb2 f6 Nbd2 Qd7 Nc4 Rfd8 Rc1 a6 Qc2 Rac8 Rfe1 Nde7 Nfd2 Rb8 Ne4 Nf5 Qb1 Ba7 Ncd2

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Andrea Grammatica    (2257)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O h3 Bb7 d3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxe5 Nd4 Nd2 c5 Ndf3 Nxb3 axb3 Bd6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2257)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O h3 Bb7 d3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxe5 Nd4 Nd2 c5 Ndf3 Nxb3 axb3 Bd6 d4 cxd4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2257)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O h3 Bb7 d3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxe5 Nd4 Nd2 c5 Ndf3 Nxb3 axb3 Bd6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Re8

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2257)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O h3 Bb7 d3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxe5 Nd4 Nd2 c5 Ndf3 Nxb3 axb3 Bd6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Re8 Nef3 Qc7

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2257)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O h3 Bb7 d3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxe5 Nd4 Nd2 c5 Ndf3 Nxb3 axb3 Bd6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Re8 Nef3 Qc7 Bd2 b4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2257)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O h3 Bb7 d3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxe5 Nd4 Nd2 c5 Ndf3 Nxb3 axb3 Bd6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Re8 Nef3 Qc7 Bd2 b4 Rxe8 Rxe8

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2264)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 e3 Bf5 Nc3 e6 Nh4 Be4 f3 Bg6 Qb3 Qc7 Bd2 Be7 cxd5 cxd5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2264)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 e3 Bf5 Nc3 e6 Nh4 Be4 f3 Bg6 Qb3 Qc7 Bd2 Be7 cxd5 cxd5 Nxg6 hxg6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2264)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 e3 Bf5 Nc3 e6 Nh4 Be4 f3 Bg6 Qb3 Qc7 Bd2 Be7 cxd5 cxd5 Nxg6 hxg6 O-O-O Nc6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2264)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O h3 Bb7 d3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 a4 Nd4 Nbd2 Nxb3 Nxb3 f6 Na5 Qc8 c3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2264)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 e3 e6 b3 Be7

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2264)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O h3 Bb7 d3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 a4 Nd4 Nbd2 Nxb3 Nxb3 f6 Na5 Qc8 c3 c5 Qb3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2264)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 e3 Bf5 Nc3 e6 Nh4 Be4 f3 Bg6 Qb3 Qc7 Bd2 Be7 cxd5 cxd5 Nxg6 hxg6 O-O-O Nc6 Kb1 a6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2264)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O h3 Bb7 d3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 a4 Nd4 Nbd2 Nxb3 Nxb3 f6 Na5 Qc8 c3 c5 Qb3 Rb8 Nxb7

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2264)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O h3 Bb7 d3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 a4 Nd4 Nbd2 Nxb3 Nxb3 f6 Na5 Qc8 c3 c5 Qb3 Rb8 Nxb7 Qxb7 axb5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2264)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O h3 Bb7 d3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 a4 Nd4 Nbd2 Nxb3 Nxb3 f6 Na5 Qc8 c3 c5 Qb3 Rb8 Nxb7 Qxb7 axb5 axb5 d4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2264)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 e3 Bf5 Nc3 e6 Nh4 Be4 f3 Bg6 Qb3 Qc7 Bd2 Be7 cxd5 cxd5 Nxg6 hxg6 O-O-O Nc6 Kb1 a6 Rc1 Nd7

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2264)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 e3 Bf5 Nc3 e6 Nh4 Be4 f3 Bg6 Qb3 Qc7 Bd2 Be7 cxd5 cxd5 Nxg6 hxg6 O-O-O Nc6 Kb1 a6 Rc1 Nd7 Bd3 Rc8

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2264)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 e3 e6 b3 Be7 Bb2 b6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2264)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 e3 Bf5 Nc3 e6 Nh4 Be4 f3 Bg6 Qb3 Qc7 Bd2 Be7 cxd5 cxd5 Nxg6 hxg6 O-O-O Nc6 Kb1 a6 Rc1 Nd7 Bd3 Rc8 Ne2 b5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2264)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 e3 e6 b3 Be7 Bb2 b6 Bd3 Nbd7

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2264)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 e3 Bf5 Nc3 e6 Nh4 Be4 f3 Bg6 Qb3 Qc7 Bd2 Be7 cxd5 cxd5 Nxg6 hxg6 O-O-O Nc6 Kb1 a6 Rc1 Nd7 Bd3 Rc8 Ne2 b5 a4 bxa4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2264)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 e3 Bf5 Nc3 e6 Nh4 Be4 f3 Bg6 Qb3 Qc7 Bd2 Be7 cxd5 cxd5 Nxg6 hxg6 O-O-O Nc6 Kb1 a6 Rc1 Nd7 Bd3 Rc8 Ne2 b5 a4 bxa4 Qxa4 Nb6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2264)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 e3 Bf5 Nc3 e6 Nh4 Be4 f3 Bg6 Qb3 Qc7 Bd2 Be7 cxd5 cxd5 Nxg6 hxg6 O-O-O Nc6 Kb1 a6 Rc1 Nd7 Bd3 Rc8 Ne2 b5 a4 bxa4 Qxa4 Nb6 Qxa6 Ra8

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2264)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 e3 e6 b3 Be7 Bb2 b6 Bd3 Nbd7 O-O Bb7

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2264)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 e3 e6 b3 Be7 Bb2 b6 Bd3 Nbd7 O-O Bb7 Nc3 O-O

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Mateia Benone    (1424)
d4 Nf6 c4 c5 d5 b5 b3 g6 Bb2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matthew Eliphas    (1724)
e4 e6 f4 Bc5 d4 Bb6 Nc3

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1724)
e4 e6 f4 Bc5 d4 Bb6 Nc3 Ne7 Na4

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1724)
d4 Nf6 Nf3 b6 Nc3 Bb7 Bf4

Transpose to wikichess #155593#

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1724)
e4 e6 f4 Bc5 d4 Bb6 Nc3 Ne7 Na4 Ba5 c3

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1724)
e4 e6 f4 Bc5 d4 Bb6 Nc3 Ne7 Na4 Ba5 c3 Bb6 Nf3

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Mateia Benone    (1424)
d4 Nf6 c4 c5 d5 b5 b3 g6 Bb2 Bg7 e3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matthew Eliphas    (1724)
e4 e6 f4 Bc5 d4 Bb6 Nc3 Ne7 Na4 Ba5 c3 Bb6 Nf3 O-O Bd3

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1724)
e4 e6 f4 Bc5 d4 Bb6 Nc3 Ne7 Na4 Ba5 c3 Bb6 Nf3 O-O Bd3 d6 Qe2

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matej Pech    (1719)
f4 d5 Nf3 Nf6 e3 e6 b3 Be7 Be2

Transpose to wikichess #10663#

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Mateia Benone    (1424)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 e5 Qa5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1424)
d4 Nf6 c4 c5 d5 b5 b3 g6 Bb2 Bg7 e3 O-O Nf3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matthew Eliphas    (1724)
d4 Nf6 Nf3 e6 Bg5 d5 Nbd2 c5

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1724)
d4 Nf6 Nf3 e6 Bg5 d5 Nbd2 c5 e4 dxe4

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1724)
d4 Nf6 Nf3 e6 Bg5 d5 Nbd2 c5 e4 dxe4 Nxe4 Qa5

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1724)
d4 Nf6 Nf3 e6 Bg5 d5 Nbd2 c5 e4 dxe4 Nxe4 Qa5 Bd2 Qd8

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1724)
d4 Nf6 Nf3 e6 Nc3 c5 Bf4 Nc6

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1724)
d4 Nf6 Nf3 e6 Bg5 d5 Nbd2 c5 e4 dxe4 Nxe4 Qa5 Bd2 Qd8 Nxf6 Qxf6

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1724)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 c5 Nf3

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1724)
d4 Nf6 Nf3 e6 Bg5 d5 Nbd2 c5 e4 dxe4 Nxe4 Qa5 Bd2 Qd8 Nxf6 Qxf6 dxc5 Bxc5

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matej Pech    (1719)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Bxc6 dxc6 O-O f6 d4 Bg4 c3 Bd6 h3 Bh5 Nbd2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matthew Eliphas    (1724)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1724)
d4 Nf6 Nf3 e6 Nc3 c5 Bf4 Nc6 dxc5 Bxc5

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1724)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 Bd7 Nf3 Nc6 Be2

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1724)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Bd7 exd5

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1724)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 Bd7 Nf3 Nc6 Be2 Be7 O-O

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1724)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 Bd7 Nf3 Nc6 Be2 Be7 O-O Nf6 Nxf6

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1724)
f4 d5 Nf3 Bg4 d4

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1724)
f4 d5 Nf3 Bg4 d4 Nc6 e3

Transpose to wikichess #155385#

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1724)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Bd7 exd5 exd5 Nxd5

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1724)
e4 e6 Nf3 d5 Bd3

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matej Pech    (1719)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nd2 c5 exd5 Qxd5 Ngf3 cxd4 Bc4 Qd8 O-O Nc6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matthew Eliphas    (1724)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Bd7 exd5 exd5 Nxd5 cxd4 Qe2

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1724)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 Bd7 Nf3 Nc6 Be2 Be7 O-O Nf6 Nxf6 Bxf6 c3

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Mateia Benone    (1424)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 e5 Qa5 Nc3 Qxe5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matthew Eliphas    (1724)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Bd7 exd5 exd5 Nxd5 cxd4 Qe2 Be6 Nf4

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1724)
e4 e6 Nf3 d5 Bd3 c5 Bb5

Transpose to wikichess #52000#

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1724)
d4 Nf6 Nf3 e6 Nc3 c5 Bf4 Nc6 dxc5 Bxc5 e4 O-O

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1724)
d4 Nf6 Nf3 e6 Nc3 c5 Bf4 Nc6 dxc5 Bxc5 e4 O-O Bc4 b6

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matej Pech    (1719)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nd2 c5 exd5 Qxd5 Ngf3 cxd4 Bc4 Qd8 O-O Nc6 Nb3 a6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1719)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nd2 c5 exd5 Qxd5 Ngf3 cxd4 Bc4 Qd8 O-O Nc6 Nb3 a6 Nbxd4 Nxd4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matthew Eliphas    (1724)
d4 Nf6 Nf3 e6 Nc3 c5 Bf4 Nc6 dxc5 Bxc5 e4 O-O Bc4 b6 O-O Bb7

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1724)
d4 Nf6 Nf3 e6 Nc3 c5 Bf4 Nc6 dxc5 Bxc5 e4 O-O Bc4 b6 O-O Bb7 Bd6 Bxd6

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Mateia Benone    (1424)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 e5 Qa5 Nc3 Qxe5 Be2 Bc5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1424)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 e5 Qa5 Nc3 Qxe5 Be2 Bc5 Nf3 Qc7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1424)
e4 c6 c3 e5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1424)
e4 c6 c3 e5 d4 exd4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1424)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 e5 Qa5 Nc3 Qxe5 Be2 Bc5 Nf3 Qc7 O-O O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1424)
e4 c5 c3 Nf6 e5 Nd5 d4 cxd4 cxd4 Nc6 Nf3

Transpose to wikichess #11493#

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1424)
e4 c6 c3 e5 d4 exd4 cxd4 d5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matthew Eliphas    (1724)
d4 Nf6 e3 g6 Bd3 Nc6

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Mateia Benone    (1424)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nd3 Nxe4 Be2 Be7

Transpose to wikichess #173928#

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1424)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nd3 Nxe4 Qe2 Qe7 Nc3 Nxc3 dxc3 b6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1424)
e4 c6 c3 e5 d4 exd4 cxd4 d5 e5 c5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matthew Eliphas    (1724)
d4 Nf6 e3 g6 Bd3 Nc6 Nf3 Bg7

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Mateia Benone    (1424)
d4 Nf6 c4 c5 d5 b5 b3 g6 Bb2 Bg7 e3 O-O Nf3 b4 Bd3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1424)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nd3 Nxe4 Qe2 Qe7 Nc3 Nxc3 dxc3 b6 Bg5 Qxe2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1424)
d4 Nf6 c4 c5 d5 b5 b3 g6 Bb2 Bg7 e3 O-O Nf3 b4 Bd3 d6 Nbd2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1424)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nxd4 Qxd4 Qf6 e5 Qg6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1424)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nxd4 Qxd4 Qf6 e5 Qg6 Nc3 Ne7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1424)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nxd4 Qxd4 Qf6 e5 Qg6 Nc3 Ne7 Qd3 Qh5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matthew Eliphas    (1724)
b4 e5 Nf3 d6

Transpose to wikichess #132239#

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Mateia Benone    (1424)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nxd4 Qxd4 Qf6 e5 Qg6 Nc3 Ne7 Qd3 Qh5 Bf4 Ng6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matthew Eliphas    (1724)
e4 e6 d4 d5 exd5 exd5 Nf3 Bg4 Be2 Nf6 O-O c5 Ne5

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Mateia Benone    (1424)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 Bb4 Nxc6 bxc6 Bd3 Bxc3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1424)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 Bb4 Nxc6 bxc6 Bd3 Bxc3 bxc3 O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1424)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 Bb4 Nxc6 bxc6 Bd3 Bxc3 bxc3 O-O O-O Re8

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1424)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nd3 Nxe4 Qe2 Qe7 Nc3 Nxc3 dxc3 b6 Bg5 Qxe2 Bxe2 Bb7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
e4 e6 d4 d5 exd5 exd5 c4 Nc6 Nf3

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
e4 e6 d4 d5 exd5 exd5 c4 Nc6 Nf3 Bb4 Nc3

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
e4 e6 d4 d5 exd5 exd5 c4 Nc6 Nf3 Bb4 Nc3 Nf6 Bd2

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
Nc3 d5 d3 c5 f4

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
Nc3 d5 d3 c5 f4 d4 Ne4

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
e4 e6 d4 d5 exd5 exd5 c4 Nc6 Nf3 Bb4 Nc3 Nf6 Bd2 Bg4 h3

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
e4 e6 d4 d5 exd5 exd5 Bf4 Nc6 Nf3

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
e4 e5 Nf3 d5 exd5 e4 Qe2 Nf6 d3 Bf5

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
e4 e6 d4 d5 exd5 exd5 c4 Nc6 Nf3 Bb4 Nc3 Nf6 Bd2 Bg4 h3 Bxf3 Qxf3

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
Nc3 d5 d3 c5 f4 d4 Ne4 Nc6 Nxc5

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
Nc3 d5 d3 c5 f4 d4 Ne4 Nc6 Nxc5 Qa5 Bd2

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
e4 e6 d4 d5 exd5 exd5 Bf4 Nc6 Nf3 Bd6 Bg3

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Mateia Benone    (1424)
e4 c6 c3 e5 d4 exd4 cxd4 d5 e5 c5 Nf3 Nc6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1424)
e4 c5 c3 Nf6 e5 Nd5 Bc4 Nb6 Bb3 c4 Bc2 d6 exd6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1424)
e4 e5 Nf3 f5 exf5 e4 Nd4 Nf6 d3 Bc5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1424)
e4 c6 c3 e5 d4 exd4 cxd4 d5 e5 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Nc3 cxd4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1424)
e4 c5 c3 Nf6 e5 Nd5 Bc4 Nb6 Bb3 c4 Bc2 d6 exd6 Qxd6 d4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1424)
e4 c6 c3 e5 d4 exd4 cxd4 d5 e5 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Nc3 cxd4 Nxd4 Nxe5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
Nc3 d5 d3 c5 f4 d4 Ne4 Nc6 Nxc5 Qa5 Bd2 Qxc5 Nf3

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
e4 e6 d4 d5 exd5 exd5 Bf4 Nc6 Nf3 Bd6 Bg3 Nf6 c3

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Mateia Benone    (1424)
e4 c6 c3 e5 d4 exd4 cxd4 d5 e5 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Nc3 cxd4 Nxd4 Nxe5 Bb5 Bd7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
Nc3 d5 d3 c5 f4 d4 Ne4 Nc6 Nxc5 Qa5 Bd2 Qxc5 Nf3 e5 g3

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 e3 Bb4 d4 d6 Bd2 exd4 exd4

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
f4 d5 e3 b6 Nf3

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
e4 e6 d4 d5 exd5 exd5 Bf4 Nc6 Nf3 Bd6 Bg3 Nf6 c3 O-O Bd3

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Mateia Benone    (1424)
e4 e5 Nf3 f5 exf5 e4 Nd4 Nf6 d3 Bc5 dxe4 O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
Nc3 d5 d3 c5 f4 d4 Ne4 Nc6 Nxc5 Qa5 Bd2 Qxc5 Nf3 e5 g3 e4 dxe4

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
e4 e6 d4 d5 exd5 exd5 Bf4 Nc6 Nf3 Bd6 Bg3 Nf6 c3 O-O Bd3 Re8 Be2

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 e3 Bb4 d4 d6 Bd2 exd4 exd4 O-O Be2

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
f4 d5 e3 b6 Nf3 g6 c3

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
e4 e5 Nf3 d6 d4 Bg4 c3 Nf6

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Mateia Benone    (1424)
e4 c5 c3 Nf6 e5 Nd5 Bc4 Nb6 Bb3 c4 Bc2 d6 exd6 Qxd6 d4 cxd3 Bxd3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1424)
e4 e5 Nf3 f5 exf5 e4 Nd4 Nf6 d3 Bc5 dxe4 O-O Nc3 Qe7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1424)
e4 e5 Nf3 f5 exf5 e4 Nd4 Nf6 d3 Bc5 dxe4 O-O Nc3 Qe7 Bc4 Kh8

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1424)
e4 e5 Nf3 f5 exf5 e4 Nd4 Nf6 d3 Bc5 dxe4 O-O Nc3 Qe7 Bc4 Kh8 O-O d6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 e3 Bb4 d4 d6 Bd2 exd4 exd4 O-O Be2 Bg4 Be3

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
f4 d5 e3 b6 Nf3 g6 c3 Bg7 d4

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
e4 e5 Nf3 d6 d4 Bg4 c3 Nf6 dxe5 Bxf3

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Qc7 Nc3 d6

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
e4 e6 d4 d5 exd5 exd5 Nf3 Be7

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Qc7 Nc3 d6 O-O Bd7

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
e4 e6 d4 d5 exd5 exd5 Nf3 Be7 Bd3 c6

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
f4 d5 e3 b6 Nf3 g6 c3 Bg7 d4 Nf6 Bd3

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 d6 c3 a6

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Qc7 Nc3 d6 O-O Bd7 Re1 e5

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
e4 e6 d4 d5 exd5 exd5 Nf3 Be7 Bd3 c6 O-O Nf6

Transpose to wikichess #34589#

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 d6 c3 a6 Bxc6 bxc6

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
e4 e6 e5 c5 d4 cxd4 Qxd4 Nc6 Qc3

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Qc7 Nc3 d6 O-O Bd7 Re1 e5 Nd5 Qa5

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
f4 d5 e3 b6 Nf3 g6 c3 Bg7 d4 Nf6 Bd3 O-O h3

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Qc7 Nc3 d6 O-O Bd7 Re1 e5 Nd5 Qa5 c3 Nf6

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Qc7 Nc3 d6 O-O Bd7 Re1 e5 Nd5 Qa5 c3 Nf6 Bc4 b5

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
f4 d5 Nf3 g6 b3

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 d6 c3 a6 Bxc6 bxc6 d4 exd4

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
f4 d5 e3 b6 Nf3 g6 c3 Bg7 d4 Nf6 Bd3 O-O h3 Ne4 Bxe4

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
f4 d5 e3 b6 Nf3 g6 c3 Bg7 d4 Nf6 Bd3 O-O h3 Ne4 Bxe4 dxe4 Ne5

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 d6 c3 a6 Bxc6 bxc6 d4 exd4 cxd4 Bb7

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
e4 e5 Nf3 d6 d4 Bg4 c3 Nf6 dxe5 Bxf3 gxf3 dxe5

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 d6 c3 a6 Bxc6 bxc6 d4 exd4 cxd4 Bb7 O-O Nf6

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
f4 d5 Nf3 g6 b3 Bg7 c3

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
f4 d5 Nf3 g6 b3 Bg7 c3 c5 Bb2

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 d6 c3 a6 Bxc6 bxc6 d4 exd4 cxd4 Bb7 O-O Nf6 Ng5 Be7

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Mateia Benone    (1424)
d4 Nf6 c4 c5 d5 b5 Nf3 b4 Nbd2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
e4 e5 Nf3 d6 d4 Bg4 c3 Bxf3

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 b5 Bb3 d6 a4 Bb7

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
e4 e5 Nf3 d6 d4 Bg4 c3 Nf6 dxe5 Bxf3 gxf3 dxe5 Qxd8 Kxd8

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
f4 d5 Nf3 g6 b3 Bg7 c3 c5 Bb2 Nh6 e3

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
f4 d5 Nf3 g6 b3 Bg7 c3 c5 Bb2 Nh6 e3 Nf5 Be2

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
f4 d5 Nf3 g6 b3 Bg7 c3 c5 Bb2 Nh6 e3 Nf5 Be2 Nc6 O-O

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Mateia Benone    (1424)
d4 Nf6 c4 c5 d5 b5 Nf3 b4 Nbd2 d6 e4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1424)
f4 d5 Nf3 Nf6 e3 Bg4 Be2 Bxf3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1424)
f4 d5 Nf3 Nf6 e3 Bg4 Be2 Bxf3 Bxf3 Nbd7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1424)
e4 c5 f4 Nf6 Nc3 d5 exd5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
e4 e5 Nf3 d6 d4 Bg4 c3 Bxf3 gxf3 Be7

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 b5 Bb3 d6 a4 Bb7 axb5 axb5

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
e4 e5 Nf3 d6 d4 Bg4 c3 Nf6 dxe5 Bxf3 gxf3 dxe5 Qxd8 Kxd8 Nd2 Nc6

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Mateia Benone    (1424)
e4 c5 f4 Nf6 Nc3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxd5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1424)
d4 Nf6 c4 c5 d5 b5 Nf3 b4 Nbd2 d6 e4 g6 Bd3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1424)
f4 d5 Nf3 Nf6 e3 Bg4 Be2 Bxf3 Bxf3 Nbd7 d4 e6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1424)
f4 d5 Nf3 Nf6 e3 Bg4 Be2 Bxf3 Bxf3 Nbd7 d4 e6 O-O c6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1424)
d4 Nf6 c4 c5 d5 b5 Nf3 b4 Nbd2 d6 e4 g6 Bd3 Bg7 O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1424)
f4 d5 Nf3 Nf6 e3 Bg4 Be2 Bxf3 Bxf3 Nbd7 d4 e6 O-O c6 b3 Qc7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1424)
e4 c5 f4 Nf6 Nc3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxd5 Qxd5 Nf3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1424)
d4 Nf6 c4 c5 d5 b5 Nf3 b4 Nbd2 d6 e4 g6 Bd3 Bg7 O-O O-O Rb1

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1424)
e4 c5 f4 Nf6 Nc3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxd5 Qxd5 Nf3 Nc6 b3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1424)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 c3 Be7 Qa4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1424)
e4 c5 f4 Nf6 Nc3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxd5 Qxd5 Nf3 Nc6 b3 Bg4 Bc4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1424)
e4 c5 f4 Nf6 Nc3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxd5 Qxd5 Nf3 Nc6 b3 Bg4 Bc4 Qe4 Qe2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
f4 d5 Nf3 g6 b3 Bg7 c3 c5 Bb2 Nh6 e3 Nf5 Be2 Nc6 O-O O-O a3

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Mateia Benone    (1424)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 c3 Be7 Qa4 Nc6 Qxe4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1424)
f4 d5 Nf3 Nf6 e3 Bg4 Be2 Bxf3 Bxf3 Nbd7 d4 e6 O-O c6 b3 Qc7 c4 dxc4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
e4 e5 Nf3 d6 d4 Bg4 c3 Bxf3 gxf3 Be7 Rg1 g6

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 b5 Bb3 d6 a4 Bb7 axb5 axb5 Rxa8 Bxa8

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Mateia Benone    (1424)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 c3 Be7 Qa4 Nc6 Qxe4 O-O d4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
e4 e5 Nf3 d6 d4 Bg4 c3 Nf6 dxe5 Bxf3 gxf3 dxe5 Qxd8 Kxd8 Nd2 Nc6 Rg1 g6

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 b5 Bb3 d6 a4 Bb7 axb5 axb5 Rxa8 Bxa8 Qe2 Nf6

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
e4 e5 Nf3 d6 d4 Bg4 c3 Bxf3 gxf3 Be7 Rg1 g6 Qb3 b6

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Mateia Benone    (1447)
d4 d5 Nf3 g6 Bf4 Bg7 e3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
e4 e5 Nf3 d6 d4 Bg4 c3 Bxf3 gxf3 Be7 Rg1 g6 Qb3 b6 Bc4 f6

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Mateia Benone    (1424)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 c3 Be7 Qa4 Nc6 Qxe4 O-O d4 Re8 Be3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
e4 e5 Nf3 d6 d4 Bg4 c3 Bxf3 gxf3 Be7 Rg1 g6 Qb3 b6 Bc4 f6 Bxg8 Rxg8

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Matus Tkac    (2260)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 Qc2 O-O Nf3 d6 Bd2

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2260)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 Qc2 O-O Nf3 d6 Bd2 b6 e4

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2260)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 Qc2 O-O Nf3 d6 Bd2 b6 e4 e5 dxe5

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Bd3 e5 c3 g6

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Matus Tkac    (2260)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 Qc2 O-O Nf3 d6 Bd2 b6 e4 e5 dxe5 dxe5 Nxe5

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2260)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 Qc2 O-O Nf3 d6 Bd2 b6 e4 e5 dxe5 dxe5 Nxe5 Qe7 a3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2260)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O c3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxe5 Nxe5 Rxe5 c6 d4 Bd6 Re1 Qh4 g3 Qh3 Re4 g5 Qf1 Qh5 Nd2 Bh3 Qe2

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2260)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O c3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxe5 Nxe5 Rxe5 c6 d4 Bd6 Re1 Qh4 g3 Qh3 Re4 g5 Qf1 Qh5 Nd2 Bh3 Qe2 Qg6 Nf3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2260)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 Qc2 O-O Nf3 d6 Bd2 b6 e4 e5 dxe5 dxe5 Nxe5 Qe7 a3 Qxe5 axb4

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
e4 e6 Nf3 d5 exd5 exd5 d4 Bd6 Bd3 Nf6

Transpose to wikichess #102754#

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
e4 e6 d4 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nf3 Nf6 Be2 Qd6

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Matus Tkac    (2260)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 Qc2 O-O Nf3 d6 Bd2 b6 e4 e5 dxe5 dxe5 Nxe5 Qe7 a3 Qxe5 axb4 Nc6 Ra4

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
e4 e6 d4 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nf3 Nf6 Be2 Qd6 O-O Be7

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
e4 e6 d4 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nf3 Nf6 Be2 Qd6 O-O Be7 c4 O-O

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Matus Tkac    (2260)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 Qc2 O-O Nf3 d6 Bd2 b6 e4 e5 dxe5 dxe5 Nxe5 Qe7 a3 Qxe5 axb4 Nc6 Ra4 Nd4 Qb1

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
e4 e6 d4 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nf3 Nf6 Be2 Qd6 O-O Be7 c4 O-O Nc3 a6

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
e4 e6 d4 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nf3 Nf6 Be2 Qd6 O-O Be7 c4 O-O Nc3 a6 Be3 b6

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Bd3 e5 c3 g6 Nf3 Nbd7

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Matus Tkac    (2260)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 Qc2 O-O Nf3 d6 Bd2 b6 e4 e5 dxe5 dxe5 Nxe5 Qe7 a3 Qxe5 axb4 Nc6 Ra4 Nd4 Qb1 Bb7 f3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Bd3 e5 c3 g6 Nf3 Nbd7 O-O Bg7

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Bd3 e5 c3 g6 Nf3 Nbd7 O-O Bg7 Re1 O-O

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Matus Tkac    (2260)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 Qc2 O-O Nf3 d6 Bd2 b6 e4 e5 dxe5 dxe5 Nxe5 Qe7 a3 Qxe5 axb4 Nc6 Ra4 Nd4 Qb1 Bb7 f3 Nh5 Bd3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2260)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 Qc2 O-O Nf3 d6 Bd2 b6 e4 e5 dxe5 dxe5 Nxe5 Qe7 a3 Qxe5 axb4 Nc6 Ra4 Nd4 Qb1 Bb7 f3 Nh5 Bd3 Ng3 hxg3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Bd3 e5 c3 g6 Nf3 Nbd7 O-O Bg7 Re1 O-O h3 b6

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Matus Tkac    (2260)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 Qc2 O-O Nf3 d6 Bd2 b6 e4 e5 dxe5 dxe5 Nxe5 Qe7 a3 Qxe5 axb4 Nc6 Ra4 Nd4 Qb1 Bb7 f3 Nh5 Bd3 Ng3 hxg3 Qxg3 Kf1

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2260)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 Qc2 O-O Nf3 d6 Bd2 b6 e4 e5 dxe5 dxe5 Nxe5 Qe7 a3 Qxe5 axb4 Nc6 Ra4 Nd4 Qb1 Bb7 f3 Nh5 Bd3 Ng3 hxg3 Qxg3 Kf1 Nxf3 Be3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2260)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 Qc2 O-O Nf3 d6 Bd2 b6 e4 e5 dxe5 dxe5 Nxe5 Qe7 a3 Qxe5 axb4 Nc6 Ra4 Nd4 Qb1 Bb7 f3 Nh5 Bd3 Ng3 hxg3 Qxg3 Kf1 Nxf3 Be3 Nh2 Rxh2

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2260)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 Nc6 Bg5 Bd7 Qd2 a6 f4 e6

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Mateia Benone    (1447)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 d3 Qh4 Kd2 Bc5 Nf3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1447)
e4 e5 f4 d6 Nf3 Bg4 h3 Bxf3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Azaz Mathakiya    (0611)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Bd3 e5 c3 g6 Nf3 Nbd7 O-O Bg7 Re1 O-O h3 b6 Bg5 h6

============

Contributors : Azaz Mathakiya


Mateia Benone    (1447)
e4 e5 f4 d6 Nf3 Bg4 h3 Bxf3 Qxf3 Nf6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1447)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 d3 Qh4 Kd2 Bc5 Nf3 Be3 Kc3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1447)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 d3 Qh4 Kd2 Bc5 Nf3 Be3 Kc3 Qf6 Kb3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1447)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 Be7 Qe2 d6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1447)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 d3 Qh4 Kd2 Bc5 Nf3 Be3 Kc3 Qf6 Kb3 Qb6 Ka4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1447)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 g5 h3 Nf6 Nc3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1447)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 d3 Qh4 Kd2 Bc5 Nf3 Be3 Kc3 Qf6 Kb3 Qb6 Ka4 a5 Qe1

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1447)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 Be7 Qe2 d6 Nc3 Nc6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matus Tkac    (2260)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d4 Nxe4 Bd3 d5 Nxe5 Nd7 Nxd7 Bxd7 O-O Bd6 Nc3 Nxc3 bxc3 O-O Qh5 f5

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matej Pech    (1803)
Nf3 d5 b3 Nf6 Bb2 e6

Transpose to wikichess #41296#

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matus Tkac    (2260)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d4 Nxe4 Bd3 d5 Nxe5 Nd7 Nxd7 Bxd7 O-O Bd6 Nc3 Nxc3 bxc3 O-O Qh5 f5 Qf3 c6

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2260)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d4 Nxe4 Bd3 d5 Nxe5 Nd7 Nxd7 Bxd7 O-O Bd6 Nc3 Nxc3 bxc3 O-O Qh5 f5 Qf3 c6 Bf4 Qc7

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Mateia Benone    (1447)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 Be7 Qe2 d6 Nc3 Nc6 d4 Bh4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matus Tkac    (2260)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d4 Nxe4 Bd3 d5 Nxe5 Nd7 Nxd7 Bxd7 O-O Bd6 Nc3 Nxc3 bxc3 O-O Qh5 f5 Qf3 c6 Bf4 Qc7 Bxd6 Qxd6

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2260)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d4 Nxe4 Bd3 d5 Nxe5 Nd7 Nxd7 Bxd7 O-O Bd6 Nc3 Nxc3 bxc3 O-O Qh5 f5 Qf3 c6 Bf4 Qc7 Bxd6 Qxd6 c4 Rae8

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2260)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O c3 d5 d4 exd4 e5 Ne4 cxd4 Bf5 h3 Rc8 Nc3 Nb4 Be3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matej Pech    (1803)
e4 c6 d4 d5 exd5 cxd5 c4 Nf6 cxd5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matus Tkac    (2260)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O c3 d5 d4 exd4 e5 Ne4 cxd4 Bf5 h3 Rc8 Nc3 Nb4 Be3 c5 dxc5

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Mateia Benone    (1447)
e4 e5 f4 d6 Nf3 Bg4 h3 Bxf3 Qxf3 Nf6 Nc3 Nc6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1447)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 g5 Bc4 Nf6 Nxg5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matej Pech    (1803)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 dxe4 Nxe4 Be7 Bxf6 Bxf6 Nf3 O-O Bc4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matus Tkac    (2260)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O c3 d5 d4 exd4 e5 Ne4 cxd4 Bf5 h3 Rc8 Nc3 Nb4 Be3 c5 dxc5 Nxc3 bxc3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matej Pech    (1803)
e4 c6 d4 d5 exd5 cxd5 c4 Nf6 cxd5 Nxd5 Bc4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1803)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 dxe4 Nxe4 Be7 Bxf6 Bxf6 Nf3 O-O Bc4 Nc6 Nxf6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matus Tkac    (2260)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d4 Nxe4 Bd3 d5 Nxe5 Nd7 Nxd7 Bxd7 O-O Bd6 Nc3 Nxc3 bxc3 O-O Qh5 f5 Qf3 c6 Bf4 Qc7 Bxd6 Qxd6 c4 Rae8 c5 Qf6

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2260)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O c3 d5 d4 exd4 e5 Ne4 cxd4 Bf5 h3 Rc8 Nc3 Nb4 Be3 c5 dxc5 Nxc3 bxc3 Nd3 Re2

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2260)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d4 Nxe4 Bd3 d5 Nxe5 Nd7 Nxd7 Bxd7 O-O Bd6 Nc3 Nxc3 bxc3 O-O Qh5 f5 Qf3 c6 Bf4 Qc7 Bxd6 Qxd6 c4 Rae8 c5 Qf6 Rab1 Bc8

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2260)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O c3 d5 d4 exd4 e5 Ne4 cxd4 Bf5 h3 Rc8 Nc3 Nb4 Be3 c5 dxc5 Nxc3 bxc3 Nd3 Re2 Nxc5 Bxd5

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2260)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d4 Nxe4 Bd3 d5 Nxe5 Nd7 Nxd7 Bxd7 O-O Bd6 Nc3 Nxc3 bxc3 O-O Qh5 f5 Qf3 c6 Bf4 Qc7 Bxd6 Qxd6 c4 Rae8 c5 Qf6 Rab1 Bc8 c3 f4

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Mateia Benone    (1579)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Bc4 Qf6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1447)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 g5 Bc4 g4 Ne5 Qe7 Nxf7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matus Tkac    (2260)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d4 Nxe4 Bd3 d5 Nxe5 Nd7 Nxd7 Bxd7 O-O Bd6 Nc3 Nxc3 bxc3 O-O Qh5 f5 Qf3 c6 Bf4 Qc7 Bxd6 Qxd6 c4 Rae8 c5 Qf6 Rab1 Bc8 c3 f4 Rfe1 Bf5

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Mateia Benone    (1579)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Bc4 Qf6 c3 dxc3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1447)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 g5 h3 Nf6 Nc3 Nh5 Bc4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1447)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 Be7 Qe2 d6 Nc3 Nc6 d4 Bh4 Nxh4 Qxh4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matus Tkac    (2260)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d4 Nxe4 Bd3 d5 Nxe5 Nd7 Nxd7 Bxd7 O-O Bd6 Nc3 Nxc3 bxc3 O-O Qh5 f5 Qf3 c6 Bf4 Qc7 Bxd6 Qxd6 c4 Rae8 c5 Qf6 Rab1 Bc8 c3 f4 Rfe1 Bf5 h3 Bxd3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Mateia Benone    (1447)
e4 e5 f4 d6 Nf3 Bg4 h3 Bxf3 Qxf3 Nf6 Nc3 Nc6 Bb5 Qd7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1447)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 g5 Bc4 g4 Ne5 Qe7 Nxf7 f3 g3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1447)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 Be7 Qe2 d6 Nc3 Nc6 d4 Bh4 Nxh4 Qxh4 Qf2 Qxf2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1447)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 g5 Bc4 Nf6 Nxg5 d5 exd5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1447)
e4 c5 c3 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4

Transpose to wikichess #47237#

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matus Tkac    (2260)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O c3 d5 d4 exd4 e5 Ne4 cxd4 Bf5 h3 Rc8 Nc3 Nb4 Be3 c5 dxc5 Nxc3 bxc3 Nd3 Re2 Nxc5 Bxd5 Ne4 Bxe4

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Mateia Benone    (1447)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 g5 h3 Nf6 Nc3 Nh5 Bc4 Ng3 Rh2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1447)
e4 e5 f4 d6 Nf3 Bg4 h3 Bxf3 Qxf3 Nf6 Nc3 Nc6 Bb5 Qd7 fxe5 dxe5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1447)
e4 c5 c3 Nf6 e5 Nd5 d4 cxd4 cxd4 d6 f4 Nc6 Nc3 dxe5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1447)
e4 Nf6 e5 Nd5 d4 d6 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nb6 Bb3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1447)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 g5 Bc4 g4 Ne5 Qe7 Nxf7 f3 g3 Qxe4 Kf1

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1447)
e4 Nf6 e5 Nd5 d4 d6 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nb6 Bb3 Bg4 Bf4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1447)
e4 c5 c3 Nf6 e5 Nd5 d4 cxd4 cxd4 d6 f4 Nc6 Nc3 dxe5 fxe5 Bf5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1447)
e4 c5 c3 Nf6 e5 Nd5 d4 cxd4 cxd4 d6 f4 Nc6 Nc3 dxe5 fxe5 Bf5 a3 e6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1447)
e4 Nf6 e5 Nd5 d4 d6 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nb6 Bb3 Bg4 Bf4 e6 c3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1447)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 g5 h3 Nf6 Nc3 Nh5 Bc4 Ng3 Rh2 c6 h4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1447)
e4 e5 f4 d6 Nf3 Bg4 h3 Bxf3 Qxf3 Nf6 Nc3 Nc6 Bb5 Qd7 fxe5 dxe5 Nd5 O-O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1447)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 g5 h4 g4 Ne5 d6 Nxg4 Be7 Qf3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1447)
e4 Nf6 e5 Nd5 d4 d6 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nb6 Bb3 Bg4 Bf4 e6 c3 Be7 Qd3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1447)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 g5 Bc4 g4 Ne5 Qe7 Nxf7 f3 g3 Qxe4 Kf1 Qxc4 d3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1579)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Bc4 Qf6 c3 dxc3 Nxc3 Bb4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1447)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 g5 h3 Nf6 Nc3 Nh5 Bc4 Ng3 Rh2 c6 h4 d5 exd5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1447)
e4 e5 f4 Bc5 Nf3 d6 c3 Nf6 d4 Bb6 fxe5 dxe5 Nxe5 O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1447)
e4 e5 f4 Bc5 Nf3 d6 c3 Nf6 d4 Bb6 fxe5 dxe5 Nxe5 O-O Bd3 Nbd7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1447)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 Be7 Qe2 d6 Nc3 Nc6 d4 Bh4 Nxh4 Qxh4 Qf2 Qxf2 Kxf2 Nxd4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1447)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 g5 h4 g4 Ne5 d6 Nxg4 Be7 Qf3 Bxh4 Nf2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1447)
e4 e5 f4 Bc5 Nf3 d6 c3 Nf6 d4 Bb6 fxe5 dxe5 Nxe5 O-O Bd3 Nbd7 Nxd7 Bxd7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1447)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 g5 h4 g4 Ne5 d6 Nxg4 Be7 Qf3 Bxh4 Nf2 Nh6 Qxf4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1447)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 g5 Bc4 Nf6 Nxg5 d5 exd5 Qe7 Qe2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1447)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 g5 Bc4 Nf6 Nxg5 d5 exd5 Qe7 Qe2 Qxe2 Kxe2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1447)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 g5 Bc4 Nf6 Nxg5 d5 exd5 Qe7 Qe2 Qxe2 Kxe2 Bg4 Nf3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1579)
e4 c5 c3 e6 d4 cxd4 cxd4 Nc6

Transpose to wikichess #92995#

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1579)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Bc4 Qf6 c3 dxc3 Nxc3 Bb4 Bd2 Qg6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1579)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Bc4 Qf6 c3 dxc3 Nxc3 Bb4 Bd2 Qg6 O-O Nge7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Andrea Grammatica    (2255)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 Bf4 Bg7 e3 O-O Rc1 Be6 c5 c6 Bd3 Bc8 h3 Nfd7 Nf3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2255)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 Bf4 Bg7 e3 O-O Rc1 Be6 c5 c6 Bd3 Bc8 h3 Nfd7 Nf3 e5 dxe5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2255)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 Bf4 Bg7 e3 O-O Rc1 Be6 c5 c6 Bd3 Bc8 h3 Nfd7 Nf3 e5 dxe5 Nxc5 Be2

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2255)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 Bf4 Bg7 e3 O-O Rc1 Be6 c5 c6 Bd3 Bc8 h3 Nfd7 Nf3 e5 dxe5 Nxc5 Be2 Nbd7 O-O

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Mateia Benone    (1579)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Bc4 Qf6 c3 dxc3 Nxc3 Bb4 Bd2 Qg6 O-O Nge7 Re1 O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1579)
e4 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qa5 d4 c6 Nf3 e6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Andrea Grammatica    (2255)
c4 e5 Nc3 Bb4 Nd5 Bc5 e3 Nf6 b4 Be7 Nxe7 Qxe7 a3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2255)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 Bf4 Bg7 e3 O-O Rc1 Be6 c5 c6 Bd3 Bc8 h3 Nfd7 Nf3 e5 dxe5 Nxc5 Be2 Nbd7 O-O a5 Qc2

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2255)
c4 e5 Nc3 Bb4 Nd5 Bc5 e3 Nf6 b4 Be7 Nxe7 Qxe7 a3 O-O Ne2

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2255)
c4 e5 Nc3 Bb4 Nd5 Bc5 e3 Nf6 b4 Be7 Nxe7 Qxe7 a3 O-O Ne2 a5 b5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2255)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 Bf4 Bg7 e3 O-O Rc1 Be6 c5 c6 Bd3 Bc8 h3 Nfd7 Nf3 e5 dxe5 Nxc5 Be2 Nbd7 O-O a5 Qc2 Re8 Rfd1

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2255)
c4 e5 Nc3 Bb4 Nd5 Bc5 e3 Nf6 b4 Be7 Nxe7 Qxe7 a3 O-O Ne2 a5 b5 d6 Ng3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2255)
c4 e5 Nc3 Bb4 Nd5 Bc5 e3 Nf6 b4 Be7 Nxe7 Qxe7 a3 O-O Ne2 a5 b5 d6 Ng3 Bg4 f3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2255)
c4 e5 Nc3 Bb4 Nd5 Bc5 e3 Nf6 b4 Be7 Nxe7 Qxe7 a3 O-O Ne2 a5 b5 d6 Ng3 Bg4 f3 Bh5 Be2

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Mateia Benone    (1579)
e4 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qa5 d4 c6 Nf3 e6 Bd3 Nf6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Andrea Grammatica    (2255)
c4 e5 Nc3 Bb4 Nd5 Bc5 e3 Nf6 b4 Be7 Nxe7 Qxe7 a3 O-O Ne2 a5 b5 d6 Ng3 Bg4 f3 Bh5 Be2 Bg6 O-O

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2255)
c4 e5 Nc3 Bb4 Nd5 Bc5 e3 Nf6 b4 Be7 Nxe7 Qxe7 a3 O-O Ne2 a5 b5 d6 Ng3 Bg4 f3 Bh5 Be2 Bg6 O-O Nbd7 a4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2255)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 Bf4 Bg7 e3 O-O Rc1 Be6 c5 c6 Bd3 Bc8 h3 Nfd7 Nf3 e5 dxe5 Nxc5 Be2 Nbd7 O-O a5 Qc2 Re8 Rfd1 Qb6 e4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2255)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 Bf4 Bg7 e3 O-O Rc1 Be6 c5 c6 Bd3 Bc8 h3 Nfd7 Nf3 e5 dxe5 Nxc5 Be2 Nbd7 O-O a5 Qc2 Re8 Rfd1 Qb6 e4 Nxe4 Nxe4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2255)
c4 e5 Nc3 Bb4 Nd5 Bc5 e3 Nf6 b4 Be7 Nxe7 Qxe7 a3 O-O Ne2 a5 b5 d6 Ng3 Bg4 f3 Bh5 Be2 Bg6 O-O Nbd7 a4 Nh5 Nh1

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2255)
c4 e5 Nc3 Bb4 Nd5 Bc5 e3 Nf6 b4 Be7 Nxe7 Qxe7 a3 O-O Ne2 a5 b5 d6 Ng3 Bg4 f3 Bh5 Be2 Bg6 O-O Nbd7 a4 Nh5 Nh1 f5 f4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Mateia Benone    (1579)
e4 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qa5 d4 c6 Nf3 e6 Bd3 Nf6 Bd2 Qc7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Andrea Grammatica    (2255)
c4 e5 Nc3 Bb4 Nd5 Bc5 e3 Nf6 b4 Be7 Nxe7 Qxe7 a3 O-O Ne2 a5 b5 d6 Ng3 Bg4 f3 Bh5 Be2 Bg6 O-O Nbd7 a4 Nh5 Nh1 f5 f4 Nhf6 fxe5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2255)
c4 e5 Nc3 Bb4 Nd5 Bc5 e3 Nf6 b4 Be7 Nxe7 Qxe7 a3 O-O Ne2 a5 b5 d6 Ng3 Bg4 f3 Bh5 Be2 Bg6 O-O Nbd7 a4 Nh5 Nh1 f5 f4 Nhf6 fxe5 Nxe5 Ra3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2255)
c4 e5 Nc3 Bb4 Nd5 Bc5 e3 Nf6 b4 Be7 Nxe7 Qxe7 a3 O-O Ne2 a5 b5 d6 Ng3 Bg4 f3 Bh5 Be2 Bg6 O-O Nbd7 a4 Nh5 Nh1 f5 f4 Nhf6 fxe5 Nxe5 Ra3 c5 bxc6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2255)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 Bf4 Bg7 e3 O-O Rc1 Be6 c5 c6 Bd3 Bc8 h3 Nfd7 Nf3 e5 dxe5 Nxc5 Be2 Nbd7 O-O a5 Qc2 Re8 Rfd1 Qb6 e4 Nxe4 Nxe4 dxe4 Qxe4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Mateia Benone    (1579)
e4 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qa5 d4 c6 Nf3 e6 Bd3 Nf6 Bd2 Qc7 O-O Be7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Andrea Grammatica    (2255)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 Bf4 Bg7 e3 O-O Rc1 Be6 c5 c6 Bd3 Bc8 h3 Nfd7 Nf3 e5 dxe5 Nxc5 Be2 Nbd7 O-O a5 Qc2 Re8 Rfd1 Qb6 e4 Nxe4 Nxe4 dxe4 Qxe4 Qxb2 Bc4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Mateia Benone    (1579)
e4 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qa5 d4 c6 Nf3 e6 Bd3 Nf6 Bd2 Qc7 O-O Be7 Ne4 O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1579)
e4 c5 b4 b6 bxc5 bxc5 Nc3 d6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1579)
e4 c5 b4 b6 bxc5 bxc5 Nc3 d6 Nf3 e6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1579)
g3 d5 c3 e5 Nf3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1579)
g3 d5 c3 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bg2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1579)
g3 d5 c3 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bg2 Bd6 O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1579)
e4 c5 b4 b6 bxc5 bxc5 Nc3 d6 Nf3 e6 Rb1 Be7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1579)
e4 c5 b4 b6 bxc5 bxc5 Nc3 d6 Nf3 e6 Rb1 Be7 Bb5 Bd7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1579)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 c4 Bb4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1623)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 Bc4 Nf6 d3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1579)
g3 d5 c3 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bg2 Bd6 O-O Nf6 b4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1623)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 Bc4 Nf6 d3 Nc6 a4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1579)
e4 c5 b4 b6 bxc5 bxc5 Nc3 d6 Nf3 e6 Rb1 Be7 Bb5 Bd7 O-O Nf6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1579)
e4 c5 b4 b6 bxc5 bxc5 Nc3 d6 Nf3 e6 Rb1 Be7 Bb5 Bd7 O-O Nf6 e5 dxe5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1623)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 Bc4 Nf6 d3 Nc6 a4 Bg7 O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1579)
g3 d5 c3 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bg2 Bd6 O-O Nf6 b4 a6 d3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1623)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 Bc4 Nf6 d3 Nc6 a4 Bg7 O-O O-O Nc3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1579)
g3 d5 c3 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bg2 Bd6 O-O Nf6 b4 a6 d3 O-O a4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1623)
e4 c5 b4 d6 bxc5 dxc5 Nf3 Nc6 c3 e5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1623)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 Bc4 Nf6 d3 Nc6 a4 Bg7 O-O O-O Nc3 e6 Bg5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1623)
e4 c5 b4 d6 bxc5 dxc5 Nf3 Nc6 c3 e5 Bc4 Be7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1623)
e4 c5 b4 d6 bxc5 dxc5 Nf3 Nc6 c3 e5 Bc4 Be7 Qb3 Nh6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1623)
e4 c5 b4 d6 bxc5 dxc5 Nf3 Nc6 c3 e5 Bc4 Be7 Qb3 Nh6 d4 Na5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1623)
e4 c5 b4 d6 bxc5 dxc5 Nf3 Nc6 c3 e5 Bc4 Be7 Qb3 Nh6 d4 Na5 Qa4 Bd7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1579)
g3 d5 c3 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bg2 Bd6 O-O Nf6 b4 a6 d3 O-O a4 Ne7 Qc2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1623)
e4 c5 b4 cxb4 d4 d5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1623)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 Bc4 Nf6 d3 Nc6 a4 Bg7 O-O O-O Nc3 e6 Bg5 Qc7 Nb5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1623)
e4 c5 b4 cxb4 d4 d5 exd5 Nf6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1623)
e4 c5 b4 cxb4 d4 d5 exd5 Nf6 a3 Qxd5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1623)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 g6 Be3 Bg7 Nc3 Nf6 f3 O-O Qd2 d5 exd5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1623)
e4 c5 b4 cxb4 d4 d5 exd5 Nf6 a3 Qxd5 Nf3 e6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1623)
e4 c5 c3 d6 d4 cxd4 cxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1579)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 c4 Bb4 Bd2 Nxd2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1579)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 c4 Bb4 Bd2 Nxd2 Nbxd2 Qe7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1579)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 c4 Bb4 Bd2 Nxd2 Nbxd2 Qe7 Qe2 Qxe2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1623)
e4 c5 b4 cxb4 d4 d5 exd5 Nf6 a3 Qxd5 Nf3 e6 Bd3 Nc6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1623)
e4 c5 b4 cxb4 d4 d5 exd5 Nf6 a3 Qxd5 Nf3 e6 Bd3 Nc6 O-O Qd8

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1623)
e4 c5 b4 cxb4 d4 d5 exd5 Nf6 a3 Qxd5 Nf3 e6 Bd3 Nc6 O-O Qd8 axb4 Bxb4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1623)
e4 c5 c3 d6 d4 cxd4 cxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Nf3 e6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1623)
e4 c5 c3 d6 d4 cxd4 cxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Nf3 e6 Bg5 Be7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1623)
e4 c5 c3 d6 d4 cxd4 cxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Nf3 e6 Bg5 Be7 Bd3 O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1623)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 Be2 Bg7 d4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matthew Eliphas    (1556)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Be2 Bc5 Nxe5

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1556)
e4 e5 Nc3 Bc5 f4 Nc6

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Mateia Benone    (1623)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 Be2 Bg7 d4 cxd4 Nxd4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matthew Eliphas    (1556)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Be2 Bc5 Nxe5 Qh4 O-O

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1556)
d4 d5 f4 e6

Transpose to wikichess #91407#

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1556)
Nc3 e5 d4 exd4 Ne4 Nc6 Nf3 Nge7 Nxd4

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1556)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Be2 Bc5 Nxe5 Qh4 O-O Qxe4 Nxc6

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1556)
Nc3 e5 d4 exd4 Ne4 Nc6 Nf3 Nge7 Nxd4 d5 Ng3

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1556)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 a6 d4

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Mateia Benone    (1623)
e4 c5 c3 d6 d4 cxd4 cxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Nf3 e6 Bg5 Be7 Bd3 O-O O-O b5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matthew Eliphas    (1556)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Be2 Bc5 Nxe5 Qh4 O-O Qxe4 Nxc6 Qxc6 Bf3

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Mateia Benone    (1623)
d4 d5 Bf4 Nc6 e3 e6 Nd2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matthew Eliphas    (1556)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Be2 Bc5 Nxe5 Qh4 O-O Qxe4 Nxc6 Qxc6 Bf3 Qg6 Nc3

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1556)
d4 d5 Bf4 Nc6 e3 e6 Nd2 Nf6

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1556)
Nc3 e5 d4 exd4 Ne4 Nc6 Nf3 Nge7 Nxd4 d5 Ng3 Bd7 e3

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1556)
e4 d5 e5 Bf5 h4 e6

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1556)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 a6 d4 d6 Bc4

Transpose to wikichess #172119#

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1556)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Be2 Bc5 Nxe5 Qh4 O-O Qxe4 Nxc6 Qxc6 Bf3 Qg6 Nc3 Nf6 Nb5

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1556)
Nc3 e5 d4 exd4 Ne4 Nc6 Nf3 Nge7 Nxd4 d5 Ng3 Bd7 e3 g6 Bb5

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1556)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Bb4 Bd2 Ne7 Bd3

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Mateia Benone    (1623)
d4 d5 Bf4 Nc6 e3 e6 Nd2 Nf6 Bd3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1623)
e4 c5 a3 Nc6 b4 cxb4 axb4 Nxb4 Bb2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matthew Eliphas    (1556)
d4 d5 Bf4 Nc6 e3 e6 Nd2 Nf6 Bd3 Bd6

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1556)
Nc3 e5 d4 exd4 Ne4 Nc6 Nf3 Nge7 Nxd4 d5 Ng3 Bd7 e3 g6 Bb5 Bg7 O-O

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Mateia Benone    (1623)
d4 d5 Bf4 Nc6 e3 e6 Nd2 Nf6 Bd3 Bd6 Bxd6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matthew Eliphas    (1556)
d4 d5 Bf4 Nc6 e3 e6 Nd2 Nf6 Bd3 Bd6 Bxd6 Qxd6

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1556)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Bb4 Bd2 Ne7 Bd3 Bxc3 Bxc3

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1556)
e4 c5 a3 Nc6 b4 cxb4 axb4 Nxb4 Bb2 d5

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1556)
e4 d5 e5 Bf5 h4 e6 d4 c5

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Mateia Benone    (1623)
e4 c5 a3 Nc6 b4 cxb4 axb4 Nxb4 Bb2 d5 Qf3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1623)
d4 d5 Bf4 Nc6 e3 e6 Nd2 Nf6 Bd3 Bd6 Bxd6 Qxd6 c3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matthew Eliphas    (1556)
d4 d5 Bf4 Nc6 e3 e6 Nd2 Nf6 Bd3 Bd6 Bxd6 Qxd6 c3 O-O

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1556)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Bb4 Bd2 Ne7 Bd3 Bxc3 Bxc3 O-O Nf3

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1556)
e4 c5 a3 Nc6 b4 cxb4 axb4 Nxb4 Bb2 d5 Qf3 Nxc2

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1556)
d4 Nf6 c4 e5 dxe5 Ng4 e4 Nxe5 Nc3

Transpose to wikichess #63450#

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Mateia Benone    (1623)
e4 c5 a3 Nc6 b4 cxb4 axb4 Nxb4 Bb2 d5 Qf3 Nxc2 Kd1

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1623)
d4 d5 Bf4 Nc6 e3 e6 Nd2 Nf6 Bd3 Bd6 Bxd6 Qxd6 c3 O-O e4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matthew Eliphas    (1556)
d4 d5 Bf4 Nc6 e3 e6 Nd2 Nf6 Bd3 Bd6 Bxd6 Qxd6 c3 O-O e4 dxe4

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1556)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Bb4 Bd2 Ne7 Bd3 Bxc3 Bxc3 O-O Nf3 Nbc6 O-O

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1556)
e4 c5 a3 Nc6 b4 cxb4 axb4 Nxb4 Bb2 d5 Qf3 Nxc2 Kd1 Nxa1

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1556)
e4 d5 e5 Bf5 h4 e6 d4 c5 f3 Nc6

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1556)
c4 Nf6 a3

Transpose to wikichess #23703#

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1556)
Nc3 c5 g3 d5

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Mateia Benone    (1623)
d4 d5 Bf4 Nc6 e3 e6 Nd2 Nf6 Bd3 Bd6 Bxd6 Qxd6 c3 O-O e4 dxe4 Nxe4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1623)
e4 c5 a3 Nc6 b4 cxb4 axb4 Nxb4 Bb2 d5 Qf3 Nxc2 Kd1 Nxa1 Bxa1

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matthew Eliphas    (1556)
d4 d5 Bf4 Nc6 e3 e6 Nd2 Nf6 Bd3 Bd6 Bxd6 Qxd6 c3 O-O e4 dxe4 Nxe4 Nxe4

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1556)
e4 c5 a3 Nc6 b4 cxb4 axb4 Nxb4 Bb2 d5 Qf3 Nxc2 Kd1 Nxa1 Bxa1 Nf6

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Mateia Benone    (1623)
e4 c5 a3 Nc6 b4 cxb4 axb4 Nxb4 Bb2 d5 Qf3 Nxc2 Kd1 Nxa1 Bxa1 Nf6 exd5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matthew Eliphas    (1556)
Nc3 d5 e3 e5 Nge2 Nf6

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1556)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Bb4 Bd2 Ne7 Bd3 Bxc3 Bxc3 O-O Nf3 Nbc6 O-O b6 e5

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1556)
e4 c5 a3 Nc6 b4 cxb4 axb4 Nxb4 Bb2 d5 Qf3 Nxc2 Kd1 Nxa1 Bxa1 Nf6 exd5 Qxd5

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1556)
e4 d5 e5 Bf5 h4 e6 d4 c5 f3 Nc6 g4 Qa5

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1556)
Nc3 d5 e3 e5 Nge2 Nf6 d4 Nbd7

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1556)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Bb4 e5 Ne7 Bb5

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1556)
Nc3 d5 e3 e5 Nge2 Nf6 d4 Nbd7 Bd2 Be7

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1556)
Nc3 c5 g3 d5 Bg2 Nf6

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Mateia Benone    (1623)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Bc5 c3 d6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1623)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Bc5 c3 d6 d4 exd4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1623)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Bc5 c3 d6 d4 exd4 cxd4 b5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1623)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Bc5 c3 d6 d4 exd4 cxd4 b5 dxc5 bxa4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matthew Eliphas    (1556)
Nc3 d5 e3 e5 Nge2 Nf6 d4 Nbd7 Bd2 Be7 dxe5 Nxe5

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1556)
Nc3 c5 g3 d5 Bg2 Nf6 e3 Nc6

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1556)
Nc3 d5 e3 e5 Nge2 Nf6 d4 Nbd7 Bd2 Be7 dxe5 Nxe5 a4 Nc4

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1556)
Nc3 d5 e3 e5 Nge2 Nf6 d4 Nbd7 Bd2 Be7 dxe5 Nxe5 a4 Nc4 b3 Nxd2

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1556)
Nc3 d5 e3 e5 Nge2 Nf6 d4 Nbd7 Bd2 Be7 dxe5 Nxe5 a4 Nc4 b3 Nxd2 Qxd2 O-O

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1556)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Bb4 e5 Ne7 Bb5 Nbc6 Bxc6

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1556)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Bb4 e5 Ne7 Bb5 Nbc6 Bxc6 Nxc6 Nge2

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1556)
e4 c6 d4 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 f5 Ng5

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1556)
e4 c6 d4 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 f5 Ng5 e5 Bc4

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1556)
e4 c6 d4 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 f5 Ng5 e5 Bc4 Qxd4 Qe2

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1556)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Bb4 e5 Ne7 Bb5 Nbc6 Bxc6 Nxc6 Nge2 O-O O-O

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1556)
e4 d5 e5 Bf5 h4 e6 d4 c5 f3 Nc6 g4 Qa5 Bd2 Bxc2

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1556)
Nc3 c5 g3 d5 Bg2 Nf6 e3 Nc6 h3 e5

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1556)
e4 c6 d4 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 f5 Ng5 e5 Bc4 Qxd4 Qe2 h6 N1f3

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Mateia Benone    (1623)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O b5 Bb3 Be7 a4 Bb7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1623)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O b5 Bb3 Be7 a4 Bb7 d4 Nxd4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1623)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O b5 Bb3 Be7 a4 Bb7 d4 Nxd4 Bxf7 Kxf7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matthew Eliphas    (1556)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Bb4 e5 Ne7 Bb5 Nbc6 Bxc6 Nxc6 Nge2 O-O O-O f6 Bf4

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Andrea Grammatica    (2256)
Nf3 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qb3 Nb6 d4 Bg7 Bf4 Be6 Qa3 c5 Qxc5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Mateia Benone    (1816)
c4 g6 g3 c6 Bg2 d5 Nf3 Bg7 cxd5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Andrea Grammatica    (2256)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Bg5 e6 f4 h6 Bh4 Qb6 a3 Nbd7 Be2 Be7

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2256)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Bg5 e6 f4 h6 Bh4 Qb6 a3 Nbd7 Be2 Be7 Bf2 Qc7

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2256)
Nf3 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qb3 Nb6 d4 Bg7 Bf4 Be6 Qa3 c5 Qxc5 Nc6 e3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2256)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Bg5 e6 f4 h6 Bh4 Qb6 a3 Nbd7 Be2 Be7 Bf2 Qc7 Bf3 Nb6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Mateia Benone    (1816)
c4 g6 g3 c6 Bg2 d5 Nf3 Bg7 cxd5 cxd5 d4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1816)
Nf3 d6 d4 Bg4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1816)
Nf3 d6 d4 Bg4 Nc3 Nf6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Andrea Grammatica    (2256)
Nf3 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qb3 Nb6 d4 Bg7 Bf4 Be6 Qa3 c5 Qxc5 Nc6 e3 Rc8 Qa3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2256)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Bg5 e6 f4 h6 Bh4 Qb6 a3 Nbd7 Be2 Be7 Bf2 Qc7 Bf3 Nb6 O-O Bd7

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2256)
Nf3 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qb3 Nb6 d4 Bg7 Bf4 Be6 Qa3 c5 Qxc5 Nc6 e3 Rc8 Qa3 O-O Rd1

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Mateia Benone    (1816)
Nf3 d6 d4 Bg4 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 Nbd7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Andrea Grammatica    (2256)
Nf3 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qb3 Nb6 d4 Bg7 Bf4 Be6 Qa3 c5 Qxc5 Nc6 e3 Rc8 Qa3 O-O Rd1 a5 Rd2

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2256)
Nf3 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qb3 Nb6 d4 Bg7 Bf4 Be6 Qa3 c5 Qxc5 Nc6 e3 Rc8 Qa3 O-O Rd1 a5 Rd2 Nc4 Bxc4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2256)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Bg5 e6 f4 h6 Bh4 Qb6 a3 Nbd7 Be2 Be7 Bf2 Qc7 Bf3 Nb6 O-O Bd7 a4 O-O

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2256)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Bg5 e6 f4 h6 Bh4 Qb6 a3 Nbd7 Be2 Be7 Bf2 Qc7 Bf3 Nb6 O-O Bd7 a4 O-O Nde2 Rac8

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matthew Eliphas    (1556)
e4 d5 e5 Bf5 h4 e6 d4 c5 f3 Nc6 g4 Qa5 Bd2 Bxc2 Qxc2 Qc7

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1556)
Nc3 c5 g3 d5 Bg2 Nf6 e3 Nc6 h3 e5 Nge2 Be7

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Matthew Eliphas    (1556)
e4 c6 d4 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 f5 Ng5 e5 Bc4 Qxd4 Qe2 h6 N1f3 Qg4 Bf7

============

Contributors : Matthew Eliphas


Andrea Grammatica    (2256)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Bg5 e6 f4 h6 Bh4 Qb6 a3 Nbd7 Be2 Be7 Bf2 Qc7 Bf3 Nb6 O-O Bd7 a4 O-O Nde2 Rac8 Kh1 Bc6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2256)
Nf3 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qb3 Nb6 d4 Bg7 Bf4 Be6 Qa3 c5 Qxc5 Nc6 e3 Rc8 Qa3 O-O Rd1 a5 Rd2 Nc4 Bxc4 Bxc4 Ne2

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Mateia Benone    (1816)
e4 c5 a4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1816)
Nf3 d6 d4 Bg4 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 Nbd7 e4 g6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Andrea Grammatica    (2256)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Bg5 e6 f4 h6 Bh4 Qb6 a3 Nbd7 Be2 Be7 Bf2 Qc7 Bf3 Nb6 O-O Bd7 a4 O-O Nde2 Rac8 Kh1 Bc6 Qd4 Nbd7

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Mateia Benone    (1623)
e4 c5 b4 cxb4 a3 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nf3 e5 axb4 Bxb4 c3 Bd6 Be2 e4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1816)
e4 c5 a4 g6 Nf3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1623)
e4 c5 b4 cxb4 a3 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nf3 e5 axb4 Bxb4 c3 Bd6 Be2 e4 Nd4 Ne7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Andrea Grammatica    (2256)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Bg5 e6 f4 h6 Bh4 Qb6 a3 Nbd7 Be2 Be7 Bf2 Qc7 Bf3 Nb6 O-O Bd7 a4 O-O Nde2 Rac8 Kh1 Bc6 Qd4 Nbd7 Qe3 e5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Mateia Benone    (1816)
Nf3 d6 d4 Bg4 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 Nbd7 e4 g6 Be2 Bg7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1816)
Nf3 d6 d4 Bg4 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 Nbd7 e4 g6 Be2 Bg7 O-O O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Andrea Grammatica    (2256)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Bg5 e6 f4 h6 Bh4 Qb6 a3 Nbd7 Be2 Be7 Bf2 Qc7 Bf3 Nb6 O-O Bd7 a4 O-O Nde2 Rac8 Kh1 Bc6 Qd4 Nbd7 Qe3 e5 Ng3 Rfe8

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2256)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Bc4 c5 Ne2 Nc6 Be3 O-O O-O b6 Bb5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Mateia Benone    (1816)
Nf3 d6 d4 Bg4 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 Nbd7 e4 g6 Be2 Bg7 O-O O-O h3 Bxf3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1816)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 c3 Bg7 d4 cxd4 cxd4 d5 e5 Nc6 h3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1816)
Nf3 d6 d4 Bg4 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 Nbd7 e4 g6 Be2 Bg7 O-O O-O h3 Bxf3 Bxf3 h6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Andrea Grammatica    (2256)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Bc4 c5 Ne2 Nc6 Be3 O-O O-O b6 Bb5 Bb7 Rc1

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Mateia Benone    (1816)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 e3 e5 Bxc4 exd4 Qb3 Qe7 Nf3 Qb4 Bd2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1816)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 e3 e5 Bxc4 exd4 Qb3 Qe7 Nf3 Qb4 Bd2 Qxb3 axb3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Andrea Grammatica    (2256)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Bc4 c5 Ne2 Nc6 Be3 O-O O-O b6 Bb5 Bb7 Rc1 Rc8 Bxc6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2256)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Bc4 c5 Ne2 Nc6 Be3 O-O O-O b6 Bb5 Bb7 Rc1 Rc8 Bxc6 Rxc6 d5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Mateia Benone    (1816)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 e3 e5 Bxc4 exd4 Qb3 Qe7 Nf3 Qb4 Bd2 Qxb3 axb3 dxe3 Bxe3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Andrea Grammatica    (2256)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Bc4 c5 Ne2 Nc6 Be3 O-O O-O b6 Bb5 Bb7 Rc1 Rc8 Bxc6 Rxc6 d5 Rd6 c4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2256)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Bc4 c5 Ne2 Nc6 Be3 O-O O-O b6 Bb5 Bb7 Rc1 Rc8 Bxc6 Rxc6 d5 Rd6 c4 e6 Qa4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2256)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Bc4 c5 Ne2 Nc6 Be3 O-O O-O b6 Bb5 Bb7 Rc1 Rc8 Bxc6 Rxc6 d5 Rd6 c4 e6 Qa4 exd5 exd5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2256)
Nf3 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qb3 Nb6 d4 Bg7 Bf4 Be6 Qa3 c5 Qxc5 Nc6 e3 Rc8 Qa3 O-O Rd1 a5 Rd2 Nc4 Bxc4 Bxc4 Ne2 Qb6 O-O

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2256)
Nf3 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qb3 Nb6 d4 Bg7 Bf4 Be6 Qa3 c5 Qxc5 Nc6 e3 Rc8 Qa3 O-O Rd1 a5 Rd2 Nc4 Bxc4 Bxc4 Ne2 Qb6 O-O Qa6 Re1

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Mateia Benone    (1816)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 c3 Bg7 d4 cxd4 cxd4 d5 e5 Nc6 h3 Nh6 Nc3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Andrea Grammatica    (2256)
Nf3 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qb3 Nb6 d4 Bg7 Bf4 Be6 Qa3 c5 Qxc5 Nc6 e3 Rc8 Qa3 O-O Rd1 a5 Rd2 Nc4 Bxc4 Bxc4 Ne2 Qb6 O-O Qa6 Re1 Rfd8 b3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2256)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Bc4 c5 Ne2 Nc6 Be3 O-O O-O b6 Bb5 Bb7 Rc1 Rc8 Bxc6 Rxc6 d5 Rd6 c4 e6 Qa4 exd5 exd5 Rd7 Bg5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Mateia Benone    (1816)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 c3 Bg7 d4 cxd4 cxd4 d5 e5 Nc6 h3 Nh6 Nc3 O-O Bb5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1816)
Nf3 c5 c4 g6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1816)
Nf3 c5 c4 g6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Bg7 e4

Transpose to wikichess #10333#

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Andrea Grammatica    (2256)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Bc4 c5 Ne2 Nc6 Be3 O-O O-O b6 Bb5 Bb7 Rc1 Rc8 Bxc6 Rxc6 d5 Rd6 c4 e6 Qa4 exd5 exd5 Rd7 Bg5 Qc8 Qb3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2256)
Nf3 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qb3 Nb6 d4 Bg7 Bf4 Be6 Qa3 c5 Qxc5 Nc6 e3 Rc8 Qa3 O-O Rd1 a5 Rd2 Nc4 Bxc4 Bxc4 Ne2 Qb6 O-O Qa6 Re1 Rfd8 b3 Bxe2 R1xe2

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Mateia Benone    (1816)
c4 e5 g3 c6 Bg2 d5 d4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1816)
c4 e5 g3 c6 Bg2 d5 d4 dxc4 dxe5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1816)
c4 e5 g3 c6 Bg2 d5 d4 dxc4 dxe5 Qxd1 Kxd1

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1816)
f4 d5 Nf3 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 c5

Transpose to wikichess #74570#

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1816)
f4 e6 Nf3 h6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1816)
f4 e6 Nf3 h6 e3 Nf6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mathieu Bain    (1284)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Qf6 d3 Bc5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mateia Benone    (1816)
f4 e6 Nf3 h6 e3 Nf6 d4 Nc6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mathieu Bain    (1284)
e4 c6 d4 d5 f3 dxe4 fxe4 Nf6 e5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1284)
e4 c6 d4 d5 f3 dxe4 fxe4 Nf6 e5 Ne4 Nf3

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1284)
e4 c6 d4 d5 f3 dxe4 fxe4 Nf6 e5 Ne4 Nf3 Bg4 Be2

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1284)
e4 c6 d4 d5 f3 dxe4 fxe4 Nf6 e5 Ne4 Nf3 Bg4 Be2 e6 Qd3

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1284)
e4 c6 d4 d5 f3 dxe4 fxe4 Nf6 e5 Ne4 Nf3 Bg4 Be2 e6 Qd3 Bf5 Qe3

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1284)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 b6 e3 Bb7

Transpose to wikichess #154670#

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1284)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 f3 O-O Be3 c5 d5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Matus Tkac    (2250)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 e4 Bb4 d3 d6 a3 Bc5 b4 Bb6 Bg5 Be6

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Mathieu Bain    (1284)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 f3 O-O Be3 c5 d5 Nbd7 Qd2

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1284)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 f3 O-O Be3 c5 d5 Nbd7 Qd2 Ne5 O-O-O

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Matus Tkac    (2250)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O c3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxe5 Nxe5 Rxe5 c6 d4 Bd6 Re1 Qh4 g3 Qh3 Re4 g5 Qf1 Qh5 f3 Kh8 Re1

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2250)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O c3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxe5 Nxe5 Rxe5 c6 d4 Bd6 Re1 Qh4 g3 Qh3 Re4 g5 Qf1 Qh5 f3 Kh8 Re1 Bh3 Qf2

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Mateia Benone    (1924)
Nf3 c5 c4 g6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nc6 e4

Transpose to wikichess #125#

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matus Tkac    (2250)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 e4 Bb4 d3 d6 a3 Bc5 b4 Bb6 Bg5 Be6 Be3 Bxe3

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Mateia Benone    (1816)
f4 e5 fxe5 d6 exd6 Bxd6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 Nc6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1816)
f4 e6 Nf3 h6 e3 Nf6 d4 Nc6 Be2 d6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1816)
c4 e5 g3 c6 Bg2 d5 d4 dxc4 dxe5 Qxd1 Kxd1 Be6 Nf3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1816)
f4 d5 Nf3 Nf6 e3 e6 d4 c5 Be2 Nc6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1816)
f4 e6 Nf3 h6 e3 Nf6 d4 Nc6 Be2 d6 c4 Bd7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Gergely Matisz    (1708)
e4 e6 d4 d5 exd5 exd5 Nf3 Nc6 a3

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Mateia Benone    (1924)
c4 e5 g3 Nf6 Bg2 c6 Nf3 e4 Nd4 d5 d3 Bc5 Nb3 Bb6 cxd5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Gergely Matisz    (1708)
e4 e6 d4 d5 exd5 exd5 Nf3 Nc6 a3 Bf5 Bd3

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1708)
b3 e5 Bb2 Nc6 e3 Nf6 Bb5 Bd6 Be2 O-O

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1708)
e4 e6 d4 d5 exd5 exd5 Nf3 Nc6 a3 Bf5 Bd3 Qd7 O-O

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1708)
b3 e5 Bb2 Nc6 e3 Nf6 Bb5 Bd6 Be2 O-O c4 Be7

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1708)
e4 e6 d4 d5 exd5 exd5 Nf3 Nc6 a3 Bf5 Bd3 Qd7 O-O Bd6 Re1

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1708)
e4 e6 d4 d5 exd5 exd5 Nf3 Nc6 a3 Bf5 Bd3 Qd7 O-O Bd6 Re1 Nge7 Nc3

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Mateia Benone    (1924)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 c3 Bg7 d4 cxd4 cxd4 d5 e5 Nh6 h3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Gergely Matisz    (1708)
b3 e5 Bb2 Nc6 e3 Nf6 Bb5 Bd6 Be2 O-O c4 Be7 Nf3 e4

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Matus Tkac    (2250)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 e4 Bb4 d3 d6 a3 Bc5 b4 Bb6 Bg5 Be6 Be3 Bxe3 fxe3 O-O

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Gergely Matisz    (1708)
b3 e5 Bb2 Nc6 e3 Nf6 Bb5 Bd6 Be2 O-O c4 Be7 Nf3 e4 Nd4 Nb4

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Mathieu Bain    (1284)
d4 d5 c4 e6 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 Nbd7 e3 h6 Bh4

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1284)
d4 d5 c4 e6 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 Nbd7 e3 h6 Bh4 Be7 Nf3

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Gergely Matisz    (1708)
b3 e5 Bb2 Nc6 e3 Nf6 Bb5 Bd6 Be2 Be7

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Mathieu Bain    (1284)
d4 d5 c4 e6 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 Nbd7 e3 h6 Bh4 Be7 Nf3 O-O Bd3

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Gergely Matisz    (1708)
b3 e5 Bb2 Nc6 e3 Nf6 Bb5 Bd6 Be2 O-O c4 Re8

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Matus Tkac    (2250)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 e4 Bb4 d3 d6 a3 Bc5 b4 Bb6 Bg5 Be6 Be3 Bxe3 fxe3 O-O Be2 Ne7

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Mathieu Bain    (1284)
d4 d5 c4 e6 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 Nbd7 e3 h6 Bh4 Be7 Nf3 O-O Bd3 dxc4 Bxc4

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Gergely Matisz    (1708)
b3 e5 Bb2 Nc6 e3 Nf6 Bb5 Bd6 Be2 O-O c4 Be7 Nf3 e4 Nd4 Nb4 Nf5 d5

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Mateia Benone    (1816)
f4 d5 Nf3 Nf6 e3 e6 d4 c5 Be2 Nc6 c4 dxc4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1816)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 g3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Bg2 Bc5 O-O O-O Nxe5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1816)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 g3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Bg2 Bc5 O-O O-O Nxe5 Nxc3 Nxc6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1816)
f4 e6 Nf3 h6 e3 Nf6 d4 Nc6 Be2 d6 c4 Bd7 O-O Qe7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1816)
c4 e5 g3 c6 Bg2 d5 d4 dxc4 dxe5 Qxd1 Kxd1 Be6 Nf3 Na6 Nc3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1816)
c4 e5 g3 c6 Bg2 d5 cxd5 cxd5 d4 e4 Nc3 Nc6 Qb3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1816)
c4 e5 g3 c6 Bg2 d5 d4 dxc4 dxe5 Qxd1 Kxd1 Be6 Nf3 Na6 Nc3 Rd8 Bd2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1816)
f4 e6 Nf3 h6 e3 Nf6 d4 Nc6 Be2 d6 c4 Bd7 O-O Qe7 Nc3 a6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matus Tkac    (2250)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 e4 Bb4 d3 d6 a3 Bc5 b4 Bb6 Bg5 Be6 Be3 Bxe3 fxe3 O-O Be2 Ne7 a4 c6

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Mateia Benone    (1816)
f4 e6 Nf3 h6 e3 Nf6 d4 Nc6 Be2 d6 c4 Bd7 O-O Qe7 Nc3 a6 Bd2 O-O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matus Tkac    (2250)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 e4 Bb4 d3 d6 a3 Bc5 b4 Bb6 Bg5 Be6 Be3 Bxe3 fxe3 O-O Be2 Ne7 a4 c6 O-O a5

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2250)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 e4 Bb4 d3 d6 a3 Bc5 b4 Bb6 Bg5 Be6 Be3 Bxe3 fxe3 O-O Be2 Ne7 a4 c6 O-O a5 b5 Ng6

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Mateia Benone    (1924)
e4 c5 Nf3 g6 c3 Bg7 d4 cxd4 cxd4 d5 e5 Nh6 h3 O-O Nc3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matus Tkac    (2250)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 e4 Bb4 d3 d6 a3 Bc5 b4 Bb6 Bg5 Be6 Be3 Bxe3 fxe3 O-O Be2 Ne7 a4 c6 O-O a5 b5 Ng6 Rc1 Rc8

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Mateia Benone    (1816)
f4 d5 Nf3 Nf6 e3 e6 d4 c5 Be2 Nc6 c4 dxc4 Bxc4 cxd4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matus Tkac    (2250)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 e4 Bb4 d3 d6 a3 Bc5 b4 Bb6 Bg5 Be6 Be3 Bxe3 fxe3 O-O Be2 Ne7 a4 c6 O-O a5 b5 Ng6 Rc1 Rc8 Qd2 h6

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Matus Tkac    (2250)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 e4 Bb4 d3 d6 a3 Bc5 b4 Bb6 Bg5 Be6 Be3 Bxe3 fxe3 O-O Be2 Ne7 a4 c6 O-O a5 b5 Ng6 Rc1 Rc8 Qd2 h6 h3 Qd7

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Mateia Benone    (1924)
Nf3 c5 d4 cxd4 c3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1924)
Nf3 c5 d4 cxd4 c3 dxc3 Nxc3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1924)
Nf3 c5 d4 cxd4 c3 dxc3 Nxc3 d6 e4

Transpose to wikichess #25114#

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matus Tkac    (2250)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 e4 Bb4 d3 d6 a3 Bc5 b4 Bb6 Bg5 Be6 Be3 Bxe3 fxe3 O-O Be2 Ne7 a4 c6 O-O a5 b5 Ng6 Rc1 Rc8 Qd2 h6 h3 Qd7 Qe1 d5

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Mateia Benone    (1816)
d4 d5 c4 e6 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 Be7 e3 O-O Nf3 b6 cxd5 exd5 Bd3 Bb7 O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matus Tkac    (2250)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 e4 Bb4 d3 d6 a3 Bc5 b4 Bb6 Bg5 Be6 Be3 Bxe3 fxe3 O-O Be2 Ne7 a4 c6 O-O a5 b5 Ng6 Rc1 Rc8 Qd2 h6 h3 Qd7 Qe1 d5 cxd5 cxd5

============

Contributors : Matus Tkac


Mathieu Bain    (1284)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 d6 Bxc6 bxc6 d4 Bg4

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1284)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 d6 Bxc6 bxc6 d4 Bg4 dxe5 Bxf3

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1405)
e4 c6 f4 d5 exd5 cxd5 d4 Nc6 Nf3 Bg4 Bb5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1405)
e4 c6 f4 d5 exd5 cxd5 d4 Nc6 Nf3 Bg4 Bb5 e6 O-O

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1405)
e4 e5 d4 exd4 c3 dxc3 Nxc3 Nc6 Bc4 Bb4

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1405)
e4 c6 f4 d5 exd5 cxd5 d4 Nc6 Nf3 Bg4 Bb5 e6 O-O Bd6 h3

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1405)
e4 c6 f4 d5 exd5 cxd5 d4 Nc6 Nf3 Bg4 Bb5 e6 O-O Bd6 h3 Bf5 Ne5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Andrea Grammatica    (2253)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 g5 Nc3 Nc6 g3 g4 Nh4 f3 d4 d6 Be3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2253)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 g5 Nc3 Nc6 g3 g4 Nh4 f3 d4 d6 Be3 Nf6 Bd3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2253)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 g5 Nc3 Nc6 g3 g4 Nh4 f3 d4 d6 Be3 Nf6 Bd3 Nb4 a3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2253)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 g5 Nc3 Nc6 g3 g4 Nh4 f3 d4 d6 Be3 Nf6 Bd3 Nb4 a3 Nxd3 Qxd3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2253)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 g5 Nc3 Nc6 g3 g4 Nh4 f3 d4 d6 Be3 Nf6 Bd3 Nb4 a3 Nxd3 Qxd3 d5 O-O-O

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2253)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 g5 Nc3 Nc6 g3 g4 Nh4 f3 d4 d6 Be3 Nf6 Bd3 Nb4 a3 Nxd3 Qxd3 d5 O-O-O dxe4 Nxe4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2253)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 g5 Nc3 Nc6 g3 g4 Nh4 f3 d4 d6 Be3 Nf6 Bd3 Nb4 a3 Nxd3 Qxd3 d5 O-O-O dxe4 Nxe4 Nxe4 Qxe4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2253)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 g5 Nc3 Nc6 g3 g4 Nh4 f3 d4 d6 Be3 Nf6 Bd3 Nb4 a3 Nxd3 Qxd3 d5 O-O-O dxe4 Nxe4 Nxe4 Qxe4 Qe7 Qd3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2253)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 g5 Nc3 Nc6 g3 g4 Nh4 f3 d4 d6 Be3 Nf6 Bd3 Nb4 a3 Nxd3 Qxd3 d5 O-O-O dxe4 Nxe4 Nxe4 Qxe4 Qe7 Qd3 Bg7 Rde1

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2253)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Bxc6 dxc6 d3 Nd7 Be3 O-O Nbd2 Re8 Nc4 Bf8

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2253)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 g5 Nc3 Nc6 g3 g4 Nh4 f3 d4 d6 Be3 Nf6 Bd3 Nb4 a3 Nxd3 Qxd3 d5 O-O-O dxe4 Nxe4 Nxe4 Qxe4 Qe7 Qd3 Bg7 Rde1 O-O h3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2253)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Bxc6 dxc6 d3 Nd7 Be3 O-O Nbd2 Re8 Nc4 Bf8 Nfd2 a5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2253)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 g5 Nc3 Nc6 g3 g4 Nh4 f3 d4 d6 Be3 Nf6 Bd3 Nb4 a3 Nxd3 Qxd3 d5 O-O-O dxe4 Nxe4 Nxe4 Qxe4 Qe7 Qd3 Bg7 Rde1 O-O h3 gxh3 Nf5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Mathieu Bain    (1405)
e4 e5 d4 exd4 c3 dxc3 Bc4 cxb2 Bxb2 d6 Nf3 Qe7

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Andrea Grammatica    (2253)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Bxc6 dxc6 d3 Nd7 Be3 O-O Nbd2 Re8 Nc4 Bf8 Nfd2 a5 a4 Nb6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2253)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 g5 Nc3 Nc6 g3 g4 Nh4 f3 d4 d6 Be3 Nf6 Bd3 Nb4 a3 Nxd3 Qxd3 d5 O-O-O dxe4 Nxe4 Nxe4 Qxe4 Qe7 Qd3 Bg7 Rde1 O-O h3 gxh3 Nf5 Bxf5 Qxf5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Mathieu Bain    (1405)
e4 e5 d4 exd4 c3 dxc3 Bc4 cxb2 Bxb2 d6 Nf3 Qe7 O-O Be6

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1405)
e4 e5 d4 exd4 c3 dxc3 Bc4 cxb2 Bxb2 d6 Nf3 Qe7 O-O Be6 Bxe6 fxe6

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Mathieu Bain    (1405)
e4 e5 d4 exd4 c3 dxc3 Bc4 cxb2 Bxb2 d6 Nf3 Qe7 O-O Be6 Bxe6 fxe6 Qb3 c5

============

Contributors : Mathieu Bain


Andrea Grammatica    (2253)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Bxc6 dxc6 d3 Nd7 Be3 O-O Nbd2 Re8 Nc4 Bf8 Nfd2 a5 a4 Nb6 Qh5 Nxc4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2253)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Bxc6 dxc6 d3 Nd7 Be3 O-O Nbd2 Re8 Nc4 Bf8 Nfd2 a5 a4 Nb6 Qh5 Nxc4 Nxc4 f6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Mateia Benone    (1749)
g3 d5 Bg2 c6 e3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Andrea Grammatica    (2253)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Bxc6 dxc6 d3 Nd7 Be3 O-O Nbd2 Re8 Nc4 Bf8 Nfd2 a5 a4 Nb6 Qh5 Nxc4 Nxc4 f6 Bd2 Bb4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2253)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Bxc6 dxc6 d3 Nd7 Be3 O-O Nbd2 Re8 Nc4 Bf8 Nfd2 a5 a4 Nb6 Qh5 Nxc4 Nxc4 f6 Bd2 Bb4 Qe2 Be6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2253)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Bxc6 dxc6 d3 Nd7 Be3 O-O Nbd2 Re8 Nc4 Bf8 Nfd2 a5 a4 Nb6 Qh5 Nxc4 Nxc4 f6 Bd2 Bb4 Qe2 Be6 Ne3 Bc5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2253)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Bxc6 dxc6 d3 Nd7 Be3 O-O Nbd2 Re8 Nc4 Bf8 Nfd2 a5 a4 Nb6 Qh5 Nxc4 Nxc4 f6 Bd2 Bb4 Qe2 Be6 Ne3 Bc5 b3 Bd4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Mateia Benone    (1749)
g3 d5 Bg2 c6 e3 e5 d3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Andrea Grammatica    (2253)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Bxc6 dxc6 d3 Nd7 Be3 O-O Nbd2 Re8 Nc4 Bf8 Nfd2 a5 a4 Nb6 Qh5 Nxc4 Nxc4 f6 Bd2 Bb4 Qe2 Be6 Ne3 Bc5 b3 Bd4 Rab1 Qd7

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Mateia Benone    (1749)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 g3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Bg2 Bb4 Nxe5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1749)
g3 d5 Bg2 c6 e3 e5 d3 Nf6 f3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1749)
g3 d5 Bg2 c6 e3 e5 d3 Nf6 f3 Bd6 Nd2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1749)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 g3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Bg2 Bb4 Nxe5 Nxe5 Nxd5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1749)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 g3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Bg2 Bb4 Nxe5 Nxe5 Nxd5 Bd6 O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1749)
g3 d5 Bg2 c6 e3 e5 d3 Nf6 f3 Bd6 Nd2 O-O Ne2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1749)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Bd3 Nc6 O-O Be7 Re1 Bg4 Be3 O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1749)
g3 d5 Bg2 c6 e3 e5 d3 Nf6 f3 Bd6 Nd2 O-O Ne2 Bf5 e4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1749)
g3 d5 Bg2 c6 e3 e5 d3 Nf6 f3 Bd6 Nd2 O-O Ne2 Bf5 e4 dxe4 fxe4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matt LaDuke    (1900)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 Nxe5 Nxe5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1900)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 Nxe5 Nxe5 d4 Ng6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1900)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 Nxe5 Nxe5 d4 Ng6 O-O Be7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1900)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 Nxe5 Nxe5 d4 Ng6 O-O Be7 e5 Nd5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1900)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 Nxe5 Nxe5 d4 Ng6 O-O Be7 e5 Nd5 f4 c6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1900)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 Nxe5 Nxe5 d4 Ng6 O-O Be7 e5 Nd5 f4 c6 f5 cxb5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1900)
d4 d5 c4 c5 cxd5 Qxd5 Nf3 cxd4 Nc3 Qa5 Nxd4 Nf6 a3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1900)
d4 d5 c4 c5 cxd5 Qxd5 Nf3 cxd4 Nc3 Qa5 Nxd4 Nf6 a3 e5 Nb3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1900)
d4 d5 c4 c5 cxd5 Qxd5 Nf3 cxd4 Nc3 Qa5 Nxd4 Nf6 a3 e5 Nb3 Qc7 e4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1900)
d4 d5 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 Ne7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1900)
d4 d5 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 Ne7 a4 b6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1900)
d4 d5 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 Ne7 a4 b6 cxd5 exd5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1900)
d4 d5 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 Ne7 a4 b6 cxd5 exd5 e3 O-O

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1900)
d4 d5 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 Ne7 a4 b6 cxd5 exd5 e3 O-O Ba3 Re8

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1900)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 e3 Bg7 Nf3 O-O Bd3 c5 O-O

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1900)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 e3 Bg7 Nf3 O-O Bd3 c5 O-O cxd4 Nxd4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1900)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 e3 Bg7 Nf3 O-O Bd3 c5 O-O cxd4 Nxd4 e5 Nde2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1900)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Bc5 Be3 Qf6 c3 Nge7 g3 h5 h3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1900)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Bc5 Be3 Qf6 c3 Nge7 g3 h5 h3 d5 Bg2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1900)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nd2 c5 Ngf3 cxd4 Nxd4 Nc6 Bb5 Bd7 Nxc6 bxc6 Bd3 Qc7 Qe2 Ne7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1900)
e4 c5 Nc3 d6 d4 cxd4 Qxd4 Nc6 Qd2 Nf6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1900)
e4 c5 Nc3 d6 d4 cxd4 Qxd4 Nc6 Qd2 Nf6 b3 e6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1900)
e4 c5 Nc3 d6 d4 cxd4 Qxd4 Nc6 Qd2 Nf6 b3 e6 Bb2 d5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1900)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 e5 Bc4 h6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1900)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 e5 Bc4 h6 Nd5 d6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1900)
e4 c5 Nc3 d6 d4 cxd4 Qxd4 Nc6 Qd2 Nf6 b3 e6 Bb2 d5 exd5 exd5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1900)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 e5 Bc4 h6 Nd5 d6 O-O Be6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1900)
e4 c5 Nc3 d6 d4 cxd4 Qxd4 Nc6 Qd2 Nf6 b3 e6 Bb2 d5 exd5 exd5 O-O-O Be6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1900)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 e5 Bc4 h6 Nd5 d6 O-O Be6 Re1 Nf6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1900)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 e5 Bc4 h6 Nd5 d6 O-O Be6 Re1 Nf6 c3 a6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1900)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 e5 Bc4 h6 Nd5 d6 O-O Be6 Re1 Nf6 c3 a6 d4 b5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1900)
d4 Nf6 Nc3 d5 Bf4 a6 e3 e6 g4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1900)
d4 Nf6 Nc3 d5 Bf4 a6 e3 e6 g4 Bb4 Nge2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1900)
d4 Nf6 Nc3 d5 Bf4 a6 e3 e6 g4 Bb4 Nge2 O-O a3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1900)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f6 d4 exd4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1900)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nxd4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1900)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nxd4 Qxd4 c6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1900)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 b5 Bb3 Nd4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1900)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nxd4 Qxd4 c6 Bc4 b5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1900)
d4 Nf6 Nc3 d5 Bf4 a6 e3 e6 g4 Bb4 Nge2 O-O a3 Be7 g5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1900)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nxd4 Qxd4 c6 Bc4 b5 Bb3 Qa5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1900)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 b5 Bb3 Nd4 Nxd4 exd4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1900)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 b5 Bb3 Nd4 Nxd4 exd4 Bxf7 Kxf7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1900)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nxd4 Qxd4 c6 Bc4 b5 Bb3 Qa5 Nc3 Bb4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1900)
d4 Nf6 Nc3 d5 Bf4 a6 e3 e6 g4 Bb4 Nge2 O-O a3 Be7 g5 Nfd7 Qd2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1900)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 b5 Bb3 Nd4 Nxd4 exd4 Bxf7 Kxf7 Qh5 g6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1900)
e4 c6 d4 d5 exd5 cxd5 Bd3 Nc6 c3 Qc7 h3 Nf6 Nf3 g6 Qc2 Bg7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1900)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 b5 Bb3 Nd4 Nxd4 exd4 Bxf7 Kxf7 Qh5 g6 Qd5 Ke8

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1900)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Bc5 c3 b5 Bc2 d5 d4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1900)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Bc5 c3 b5 Bc2 d5 d4 dxe4 Nbd2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1900)
e4 c6 d4 d5 exd5 cxd5 Bd3 Nc6 c3 Qc7 h3 Nf6 Nf3 g6 Qc2 Bg7 O-O O-O

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1941)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f6 O-O d6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1941)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f6 O-O d6 d4 Bg4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1941)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f6 O-O d6 d4 f5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1941)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f6 O-O d6 d4 Bg4 h3 Bxf3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1941)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f6 O-O d6 d4 f5 exf5 Bxf5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1941)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f6 O-O d6 d4 Bg4 h3 Bxf3 Qxf3 exd4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1941)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f6 O-O d6 d4 Bg4 h3 Bxf3 Qxf3 exd4 c3 dxc3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1941)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f6 O-O d6 d4 f5 exf5 Bxf5 dxe5 a6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1941)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f6 O-O d6 d4 a6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1941)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f6 O-O d6 d4 a6 Ba4 b5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1941)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f6 O-O d6 d4 f5 exf5 Bxf5 dxe5 a6 Bxc6 bxc6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1941)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f6 O-O d6 d4 Bg4 h3 Bxf3 Qxf3 exd4 c3 dxc3 Nxc3 a6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1941)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f6 O-O d6 d4 a6 Ba4 b5 Bb3 exd4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1941)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f6 O-O d6 d4 f5 exf5 Bxf5 dxe5 a6 Bxc6 bxc6 Re1 dxe5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1941)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f6 O-O d6 d4 a6 Ba4 b5 Bb3 exd4 a4 bxa4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1941)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f6 O-O d6 d4 a6 Ba4 b5 Bb3 exd4 a4 bxa4 Rxa4 Bb7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1900)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 d3 b5 Bb3 d6 c3 O-O Nbd2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1941)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Bc5 c3 b5 Bc2 d5 d4 dxe4 Nxe5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1941)
e4 c5 Nc3 d6 d4 cxd4 Qxd4 Nc6 Qd2 e6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1941)
e4 c6 d4 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 Bf5 Ng3 Bg6 h4 h6 Nf3 Nf6 Ne5 Bh7 Bc4 Nd5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1941)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 Nf6 e5 Nh5 d4 d6 Qe2 dxe5 Nxe5 Qh4 g3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1941)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 Nf6 e5 Nh5 d4 d6 Qe2 dxe5 Nxe5 Qh4 g3 Nxg3 hxg3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1941)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nxd4 Qxd4 c6 Be2 Ne7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1941)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nxd4 Qxd4 c6 Be2 Ne7 Be3 d6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1941)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nxd4 Qxd4 c6 Be2 Ne7 Be3 d6 Nc3 c5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1941)
e4 e5 Nf3 Bd6 d4 exd4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (1774)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Bc5 Nb3 Bb6 Qe2 d6 Be3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1774)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Bc5 Nb3 Bb6 Qe2 d6 Be3 Nf6 Nc3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1774)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Bc5 Nb3 Bb6 Qe2 d6 Be3 Nf6 Nc3 Be6 O-O-O

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (1941)
e4 c6 d4 d5 exd5 cxd5 Bd3 Nc6 c3 Nf6 Nf3 Bg4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1941)
e4 e5 Nf3 Bd6 d4 exd4 Bc4 Nf6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1900)
e4 c6 d4 d5 exd5 cxd5 Bd3 Nc6 c3 Nf6 Bf4 Bg4 Qb3 Qc8 Nd2 e6 h3 Bh5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1941)
e4 c6 d4 d5 exd5 cxd5 Bd3 Nc6 c3 Nf6 Nf3 Bg4 h3 Bh5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1941)
e4 c6 d4 d5 exd5 cxd5 Bd3 Nc6 c3 Nf6 Nf3 Bg4 h3 Bh5 Bf4 e6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Gergely Matisz    (1855)
b3 c5 Bb2 Nc6 e3 d5

Transpose to wikichess #105425#

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1855)
b3 e5 Bb2 Nc6 e3 d5 Bb5 Bd6 Nf3 f6 c4 a6

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Matt LaDuke    (1941)
e4 c6 d4 d5 exd5 cxd5 Bd3 Nc6 c3 Nf6 Nf3 Bg4 h3 Bh5 Bf4 e6 O-O Bd6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1941)
e4 e5 Nf3 Bd6 d4 exd4 Bc4 Nf6 e5 Bb4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1941)
g3 c5 Bg2 Nc6 d3 d5 h3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1941)
e4 e5 Nf3 Bd6 d4 exd4 Bc4 Nf6 e5 Bb4 c3 dxc3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1941)
g3 c5 Bg2 Nc6 d3 d5 h3 e5 h4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1941)
e4 e5 Nf3 Bd6 d4 exd4 Bc4 Nf6 e5 Bb4 c3 dxc3 bxc3 Bxc3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Gergely Matisz    (1855)
b3 e5 Bb2 Nc6 e3 d5 Bb5 Bd6 Nf3 f6 c4 a6 Bxc6 bxc6

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Matt LaDuke    (1941)
g3 c5 Bg2 Nc6 d3 d5 h3 e5 h4 Nf6 Bg5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1941)
g3 c5 Bg2 Nc6 d3 d5 h3 e5 h4 Nf6 Bg5 Be6 Nd2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1941)
g3 c5 Bg2 Nc6 d3 d5 h3 e5 h4 Nf6 Bg5 Be6 Nd2 Qd7 Bxf6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1941)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Qf6 Nc3 Bc5 Nd5 Qd6 c3 a6 d4 exd4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1941)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Qf6 Nc3 Bc5 Nd5 Qd6 c3 a6 d4 exd4 Bd3 dxc3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1941)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Qf6 Nc3 Bc5 Nd5 Qd6 c3 a6 d4 exd4 Bd3 dxc3 Bf4 Qg6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1941)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 f3 O-O Bd3 c5 d5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1941)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 f3 O-O Bd3 c5 d5 e6 Nge2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1941)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 Nf3 Bg7 Qb3 dxc4 Qxc4 O-O Bf4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1941)
e4 e5 Nf3 Bd6 d4 exd4 Bc4 Nf6 e5 Bb4 c3 dxc3 bxc3 Bxc3 Nxc3 Ng4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1941)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 Nf3 Bg7 Qb3 dxc4 Qxc4 O-O Bf4 Be6 Qxc7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1941)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 f3 O-O Bd3 c5 d5 e6 Nge2 exd5 exd5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1941)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 Nf3 Bg7 Qb3 dxc4 Qxc4 O-O Bf4 Be6 Qxc7 Nc6 e3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Gergely Matisz    (1855)
b3 e5 Bb2 Nc6 e3 d5 Bb5 Bd6 Nf3 f6 c4 a6 Bxc6 bxc6 O-O Nh6

Transpose to wikichess #164456#

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Matt LaDuke    (1941)
e4 e5 Nf3 Bd6 d4 exd4 Bc4 Nf6 e5 Bb4 c3 dxc3 bxc3 Bxc3 Nxc3 Ng4 Bg5 f6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1941)
g3 c5 Bg2 Nc6 d3 d5 h3 e5 h4 Nf6 Bg5 Be6 Nd2 Qd7 Bxf6 gxf6 Nh3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1941)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nd4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1941)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nd4 Nxd4 cxd4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1941)
e4 c6 d4 d5 exd5 cxd5 Bd3 Nc6 c3 Qc7 h3 e6 Nf3 Bd6 O-O a6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1941)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nd4 Nxd4 cxd4 d3 a6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1941)
e4 c6 d4 d5 exd5 cxd5 Bd3 Nc6 c3 Qc7 h3 e6 Nf3 Bd6 O-O a6 Re1 Nge7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1941)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nd4 Nxd4 cxd4 d3 a6 Ba4 b5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1941)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nd4 Nxd4 cxd4 d3 a6 Ba4 b5 Bb3 Bb7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1941)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 e6 Be2 Qc7 Qd2 Nbd7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Andrea Grammatica    (2244)
c4 e5 Nc3 Bb4 Nd5 Bc5 e3 Nf6 b4 Be7 Nxe7 Qxe7 Bb2 O-O Ne2 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 a3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2244)
c4 e5 Nc3 Bb4 Nd5 Bc5 e3 Nf6 b4 Be7 Nxe7 Qxe7 Bb2 O-O Ne2 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 a3 c6 Ng3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2244)
c4 e5 Nc3 Bb4 Nd5 Bc5 e3 Nf6 b4 Be7 Nxe7 Qxe7 Bb2 O-O Ne2 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 a3 c6 Ng3 a5 b5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matt LaDuke    (1941)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nd4 Nxd4 cxd4 d3 a6 Ba4 b5 Bb3 Bb7 Nd2 Bd6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Andrea Grammatica    (2244)
d4 d5 c4 e6 Nc3 Nf6 cxd5 exd5 Bg5 c6 e3 Bf5 Qf3 Bg6 Bxf6 Qxf6 Qxf6 gxf6 h4 h5 Nh3 Bd6 Kd2 Nd7

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2244)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Bc4 c5 Ne2 Nc6 Be3 O-O O-O b6 h4 e6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2244)
d4 d5 c4 e6 Nc3 Nf6 cxd5 exd5 Bg5 c6 e3 Bf5 Qf3 Bg6 Bxf6 Qxf6 Qxf6 gxf6 h4 h5 Nh3 Bd6 Kd2 Nd7 Bd3 Nf8

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2244)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Bc4 c5 Ne2 Nc6 Be3 O-O O-O b6 h4 e6 h5 Qh4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2244)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Bc4 c5 Ne2 Nc6 Be3 O-O O-O b6 h4 cxd4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2244)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Bc4 c5 Ne2 Nc6 Be3 O-O O-O b6 h4 e6 h5 Qh4 hxg6 hxg6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2244)
d4 d5 c4 e6 Nc3 Nf6 cxd5 exd5 Bg5 c6 e3 Bf5 Qf3 Bg6 Bxf6 Qxf6 Qxf6 gxf6 h4 h5 Nh3 Bd6 Kd2 Nd7 Bd3 Nf8 g3 Ne6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2244)
d4 d5 c4 e6 Nc3 Nf6 cxd5 exd5 Bg5 c6 e3 Bf5 Qf3 Bg6 Bxf6 Qxf6 Qxf6 gxf6 h4 h5 Nh3 Bd6 Kd2 Nd7 Bd3 Nf8 g3 Ne6 Rhd1 a5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2244)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O h3 Bb7 d3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nbd2

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2244)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Bc4 c5 Ne2 Nc6 Be3 O-O O-O b6 h4 e6 h5 Qh4 hxg6 hxg6 f3 cxd4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2244)
d4 d5 c4 e6 Nc3 Nf6 cxd5 exd5 Bg5 c6 e3 Bf5 Qf3 Bg6 Bxf6 Qxf6 Qxf6 gxf6 h4 h5 Nh3 Bd6 Kd2 Nd7 Bd3 Nf8 g3 Ne6 Rhd1 a5 Rac1 a4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2244)
d4 d5 c4 e6 Nc3 Nf6 cxd5 exd5 Bg5 c6 e3 Bf5 Qf3 Bg6 Bxf6 Qxf6 Qxf6 gxf6 h4 h5 Nh3 Bd6 Kd2 Nd7 Bd3 Nf8 g3 Ne6 Rhd1 a5 Rac1 a4 Ke2 Kd7

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2244)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Bc4 c5 Ne2 Nc6 Be3 O-O O-O b6 h4 e6 h5 Qh4 hxg6 hxg6 f3 cxd4 cxd4 Rd8

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2244)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 a6 e3 b5 c5 g6 Ne5 Bg7

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2244)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 a6 e3 b5 c5 g6 Ne5 Bg7 Be2 Nfd7

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2244)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Bc4 c5 Ne2 Nc6 Be3 O-O O-O b6 h4 e6 h5 Qh4 hxg6 hxg6 f3 cxd4 cxd4 Rd8 Qd2 Bb7

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2244)
d4 d5 c4 e6 Nc3 Nf6 cxd5 exd5 Bg5 c6 e3 Bf5 Qf3 Bg6 Bxf6 Qxf6 Qxf6 gxf6 h4 h5 Nh3 Bd6 Kd2 Nd7 Bd3 Nf8 g3 Ne6 Rhd1 a5 Rac1 a4 Ke2 Kd7 Kf3 Rhe8

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2244)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 a6 e3 b5 c5 g6 Ne5 Bg7 Be2 Nfd7 f4 Nxe5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matt LaDuke    (1941)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 c3 Nxe4 Re1 Nc5 Bxc6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (1941)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 c3 Nxe4 Re1 Nc5 Bxc6 dxc6 Nxe5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Andrea Grammatica    (2244)
d4 d5 c4 e6 Nc3 Nf6 cxd5 exd5 Bg5 c6 e3 Bf5 Qf3 Bg6 Bxf6 Qxf6 Qxf6 gxf6 h4 h5 Nh3 Bd6 Kd2 Nd7 Bd3 Nf8 g3 Ne6 Rhd1 a5 Rac1 a4 Ke2 Kd7 Kf3 Rhe8 Ng1 Ra5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matt LaDuke    (1941)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Nf3 c5 Be3 Nc6 Rc1

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Andrea Grammatica    (2244)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Bc4 c5 Ne2 Nc6 Be3 O-O O-O b6 h4 e6 h5 Qh4 hxg6 hxg6 f3 cxd4 cxd4 Rd8 Qd2 Bb7 Rac1 Bf6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2244)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Bc4 c5 Ne2 Nc6 Be3 O-O O-O b6 h4 e6 h5 Qh4 hxg6 hxg6 f3 cxd4 cxd4 Rd8 Qd2 Bb7 Rac1 Bf6 Bf2 Qh5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2244)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Bc4 c5 Ne2 Nc6 Be3 O-O O-O b6 h4 e6 h5 Qh4 hxg6 hxg6 f3 cxd4 cxd4 Rd8 Qd2 Bb7 Rac1 Bf6 Bf2 Qh5 Rfd1 Be5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2244)
d4 Nf6 c4 c5 d5 e6 Nc3 exd5 cxd5 d6 e4 g6 f4 Bg7 Bb5 Nbd7 e5 dxe5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matt LaDuke    (2081)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 b5 Bb3 d5 dxe5 Be6 c3 Bc5 Nbd2 O-O Bc2 Bxf2 Rxf2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Andrea Grammatica    (2244)
c4 e5 Nc3 Bb4 Nd5 Bc5 Nf3 c6 Nc3 d6 e3 Qe7 d4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2244)
c4 e5 Nc3 Bb4 Nd5 Bc5 Nf3 c6 Nc3 d6 e3 Qe7 d4 exd4 Nxd4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2244)
c4 e5 Nc3 Bb4 Nd5 Bc5 Nf3 c6 Nc3 d6 e3 Qe7 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Be2

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2244)
d4 d5 c4 Nf6 cxd5 Nxd5 Nf3 Bf5 Nbd2 Nb6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2244)
d4 d5 c4 Nf6 cxd5 Nxd5 Nf3 Bf5 Nbd2 Nb6 e4 Bg6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matt LaDuke    (2081)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 Bg4 h3 Bh5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Andrea Grammatica    (2244)
d4 d5 c4 Nf6 cxd5 Nxd5 Nf3 Bf5 Nbd2 Nb6 e4 Bg6 h4 Bh5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matt LaDuke    (2081)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 Bg4 h3 Bh5 Qd3 Qe7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Andrea Grammatica    (2244)
c4 e5 Nc3 Bb4 Nd5 Bc5 Nf3 c6 Nc3 d6 e3 Qe7 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Be2 O-O O-O

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matt LaDuke    (2081)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 b5 Bb3 d5 dxe5 Be6 c3 Bc5 Nbd2 O-O Bc2 Bxf2 Rxf2 Nxf2 Kxf2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2081)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 Bg4 h3 Bh5 Qd3 Qe7 Be2 Nc6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2081)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 b5 Bb3 d5 dxe5 Be6 c3 Bc5 Nbd2 O-O Bc2 Bxf2 Rxf2 Nxf2 Kxf2 f6 exf6

Transpose to wikichess #146235#

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2081)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 Bg4 h3 Bh5 Qd3 Qe7 Be2 Nc6 Qb5 Bxf3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Andrea Grammatica    (2244)
d4 d5 c4 Nf6 cxd5 Nxd5 Nf3 Bf5 Nbd2 Nb6 e4 Bg6 h4 Bh5 Qb3 N8d7

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2244)
d4 d5 c4 Nf6 cxd5 Nxd5 Nf3 Bf5 Nbd2 Nb6 e4 Bg6 h4 Bh5 Qb3 N8d7 d5 e5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2244)
d4 d5 c4 Nf6 cxd5 Nxd5 Nf3 Bf5 Nbd2 Nb6 e4 Bg6 h4 Bh5 Qb3 N8d7 d5 e5 dxe6 fxe6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matt LaDuke    (2081)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nxc6 bxc6 e5 Qe7 Qe2 Nd5 g3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2081)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nxc6 bxc6 e5 Qe7 Qe2 Nd5 g3 g6 c4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Andrea Grammatica    (2244)
d4 d5 c4 Nf6 cxd5 Nxd5 Nf3 Bf5 Nbd2 Nb6 e4 Bg6 h4 Bh5 Qb3 N8d7 d5 e5 dxe6 fxe6 Qxe6 Qe7

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2244)
d4 d5 c4 Nf6 cxd5 Nxd5 Nf3 Bf5 Nbd2 Nb6 e4 Bg6 h4 Bh5 Qb3 N8d7 d5 e5 dxe6 fxe6 Qxe6 Qe7 Ng5 Nc5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2244)
d4 d5 c4 Nf6 cxd5 Nxd5 Nf3 Bf5 Nbd2 Nb6 e4 Bg6 h4 Bh5 Qb3 N8d7 d5 e5 dxe6 fxe6 Qxe6 Qe7 Ng5 Nc5 Qxe7 Bxe7

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2244)
d4 d5 c4 Nf6 cxd5 Nxd5 Nf3 Bf5 Nbd2 Nb6 e4 Bg6 h4 Bh5 Qb3 N8d7 d5 e5 dxe6 fxe6 Qxe6 Qe7 Ng5 Nc5 Qxe7 Bxe7 Nb3 O-O

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matt LaDuke    (2081)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nge7 Re1 a6 Bf1 d5 exd5 Nxd5 d4 Nf6 Be3 cxd4 Nxd4 Bd7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2081)
b3 e5 Bb2 Nc6 e3 Nf6 Nf3 e4 Nd4 Bc5 d3 d5 Nxc6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Andrea Grammatica    (2244)
d4 d5 c4 Nf6 cxd5 Nxd5 Nf3 Bf5 Nbd2 Nb6 e4 Bg6 h4 Bh5 Qb3 N8d7 d5 e5 dxe6 fxe6 Qxe6 Qe7 Ng5 Nc5 Qxe7 Bxe7 Nb3 O-O f3 Rae8

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matt LaDuke    (2081)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nge7 Re1 a6 Bf1 d5 exd5 Nxd5 d4 Nf6 Be3 cxd4 Nxd4 Bd7 c4 Nxd4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2081)
b3 e5 Bb2 Nc6 e3 Nf6 Nf3 e4 Nd4 Bc5 d3 d5 Nxc6 bxc6 Nd2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Andrea Grammatica    (2244)
d4 d5 c4 Nf6 cxd5 Nxd5 Nf3 Bf5 Nbd2 Nb6 e4 Bg6 h4 Bh5 Qb3 N8d7 d5 e5 dxe6 fxe6 Qxe6 Qe7 Ng5 Nc5 Qxe7 Bxe7 Nb3 O-O f3 Rae8 Nxc5 Bxc5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2244)
d4 d5 c4 Nf6 cxd5 Nxd5 Nf3 Bf5 Nbd2 Nb6 e4 Bg6 h4 Bh5 Qb3 N8d7 d5 e5 dxe6 fxe6 Qxe6 Qe7 Ng5 Nc5 Qxe7 Bxe7 Nb3 O-O f3 Rae8 Nxc5 Bxc5 Bd2 h6

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matt LaDuke    (2081)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nge7 Re1 a6 Bf1 d5 exd5 Nxd5 d4 Nf6 Be3 cxd4 Nxd4 Bd7 c4 Nxd4 Bxd4 Bc6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2081)
b3 e5 Bb2 Nc6 e3 Nf6 Nf3 e4 Nd4 Bc5 d3 d5 Nxc6 bxc6 Nd2 O-O dxe4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2081)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nge7 Re1 a6 Bf1 d5 exd5 Nxd5 d4 Nf6 Be3 cxd4 Nxd4 Bd7 c4 Nxd4 Bxd4 Bc6 Nc3 Be7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (1794)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 g5 h4 f6 Nxg5 fxg5 Qh5 Ke7 Qxg5 Ke8 Qh5 Ke7

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2081)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nge7 Re1 a6 Bf1 d5 exd5 Nxd5 d4 Nf6 Be3 cxd4 Nxd4 Bd7 c4 Nxd4 Bxd4 Bc6 Nc3 Be7 h3 O-O

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2081)
b3 e5 Bb2 Nc6 e3 Nf6 Nf3 e4 Nd4 Bc5 d3 d5 Nxc6 bxc6 Nd2 O-O dxe4 dxe4 a3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2081)
d4 Nf6 Nf3 g6 Bg5 Bg7 Nbd2 O-O c3 d6 e4 c5 h3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (1794)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 g5 h4 f6 Nxg5 fxg5 Qh5 Ke7 Qxg5 Ke8 Qh5 Ke7 Qe5 Kf7

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Andrea Grammatica    (2244)
d4 d5 c4 Nf6 cxd5 Nxd5 Nf3 Bf5 Nbd2 Nb6 e4 Bg6 h4 Bh5 Qb3 N8d7 d5 e5 dxe6 fxe6 Qxe6 Qe7 Ng5 Nc5 Qxe7 Bxe7 Nb3 O-O f3 Rae8 Nxc5 Bxc5 Bd2 h6 Nh3 Bd4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matt LaDuke    (2081)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nge7 Re1 a6 Bf1 d5 exd5 Nxd5 d4 Nf6 Be3 cxd4 Nxd4 Bd7 c4 Nxd4 Bxd4 Bc6 Nc3 Be7 h3 O-O a3 a5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2081)
b3 e5 Bb2 Nc6 e3 Nf6 Nf3 e4 Nd4 Bc5 d3 d5 Nxc6 bxc6 Nd2 O-O dxe4 dxe4 a3 Qe7 b4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2081)
d4 Nf6 Nf3 g6 Bg5 Bg7 Nbd2 O-O c3 d6 e4 c5 h3 d5 e5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Andrea Grammatica    (2244)
d4 d5 c4 Nf6 cxd5 Nxd5 Nf3 Bf5 Nbd2 Nb6 e4 Bg6 h4 Bh5 Qb3 N8d7 d5 e5 dxe6 fxe6 Qxe6 Qe7 Ng5 Nc5 Qxe7 Bxe7 Nb3 O-O f3 Rae8 Nxc5 Bxc5 Bd2 h6 Nh3 Bd4 O-O-O c5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matt LaDuke    (2081)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nge7 Re1 a6 Bf1 d5 exd5 Nxd5 d4 Nf6 Be3 cxd4 Nxd4 Bd7 c4 Nxd4 Bxd4 Bc6 Nc3 Be7 h3 O-O a3 a5 Qd3 Qc8

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2081)
b3 e5 Bb2 Nc6 e3 Nf6 Nf3 e4 Nd4 Bc5 d3 d5 Nxc6 bxc6 Nd2 O-O dxe4 dxe4 a3 Qe7 b4 Bd6 Nc4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2081)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 Nc6 Nxc6 bxc6 e5 Nd5 Ne4 Qc7 f4 Qb6 c4 Bb4 Ke2 c5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2081)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 Be7 Bd3 Nf6 O-O O-O h3 Nc6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2081)
d4 Nf6 Nf3 g6 Bg5 Bg7 Nbd2 O-O c3 d6 e4 c5 h3 d5 e5 Ne4 Be3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2081)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nge7 Re1 a6 Bf1 d5 exd5 Nxd5 d4 Nf6 Be3 cxd4 Nxd4 Bd7 c4 Nxd4 Bxd4 Bc6 Nc3 Be7 h3 O-O a3 a5 Qd3 Qc8 Rad1 Rd8

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2081)
b3 e5 Bb2 Nc6 e3 Nf6 Nf3 e4 Nd4 Bc5 d3 d5 Nxc6 bxc6 Nd2 O-O dxe4 dxe4 a3 Qe7 b4 Bd6 Nc4 Rd8 Nxd6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2081)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 Be7 Bd3 Nf6 O-O O-O h3 Nc6 a3 d5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2081)
b3 e5 Bb2 Nc6 e3 Nf6 Nf3 e4 Nd4 Bc5 d3 d5 Nxc6 bxc6 Nd2 O-O dxe4 dxe4 a3 Qe7 b4 Bd6 Nc4 Rd8 Nxd6 Rxd6 Bd4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2081)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nge7 Re1 a6 Bf1 d5 exd5 Nxd5 d4 Nf6 Be3 cxd4 Nxd4 Bd7 c4 Nxd4 Bxd4 Bc6 Nc3 Be7 h3 O-O a3 a5 Qd3 Qc8 Rad1 Rd8 Qe3 Rd7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2081)
b3 e5 Bb2 Nc6 e3 Nf6 Nf3 e4 Nd4 Bc5 d3 d5 Nxc6 bxc6 Nd2 O-O dxe4 dxe4 a3 Qe7 b4 Bd6 Nc4 Rd8 Nxd6 Rxd6 Bd4 a5 Be2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2081)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nge7 Re1 a6 Bf1 d5 exd5 Nxd5 d4 Nf6 Be3 cxd4 Nxd4 Bd7 c4 Nxd4 Bxd4 Bc6 Nc3 Be7 h3 O-O a3 a5 Qd3 Qc8 Rad1 Rd8 Qe3 Rd7 Bd3 h6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2081)
b3 e5 Bb2 Nc6 e3 Nf6 Nf3 e4 Nd4 Bc5 d3 d5 Nxc6 bxc6 Nd2 O-O dxe4 dxe4 a3 Qe7 b4 Bd6 Nc4 Rd8 Nxd6 Rxd6 Bd4 a5 Be2 Nd5 Bc5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2081)
b3 e5 Bb2 Nc6 e3 Nf6 Nf3 e4 Nd4 Bc5 d3 d5 Nxc6 bxc6 Nd2 O-O dxe4 dxe4 a3 Qe7 b4 Bd6 Nc4 Rd8 Nxd6 Rxd6 Bd4 a5 Be2 Nd5 Bc5 Qf6 Bxd6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2081)
b3 e5 Bb2 Nc6 e3 Nf6 Nf3 e4 Nd4 Bc5 d3 d5 Nxc6 bxc6 Nd2 O-O dxe4 dxe4 a3 Qe7 b4 Bd6 Nc4 Rd8 Nxd6 Rxd6 Bd4 a5 Be2 Nd5 Bc5 Qf6 Bxd6 Qc3 Kf1

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2081)
b3 e5 Bb2 Nc6 e3 Nf6 Nf3 e4 Nd4 Bc5 d3 d5 Nxc6 bxc6 Nd2 O-O dxe4 dxe4 a3 Qe7 b4 Bd6 Nc4 Rd8 Nxd6 Rxd6 Bd4 a5 Be2 Nd5 Bc5 Qf6 Bxd6 Qc3 Kf1 cxd6 Qd4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2081)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 Nc6 Nxc6 bxc6 e5 Nd5 Ne4 Qc7 f4 Qb6 c4 Bb4 Ke2 c5 Nd6 Ke7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2105)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O Re8 Bg5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2105)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nbd7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2105)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O Re8 Bg5 a6 Ba4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2081)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Bc4 c5 Ne2 Nc6 Be3 O-O O-O b6 dxc5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2081)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nge7 Re1 a6 Bf1 d5 exd5 Nxd5 d4 Nf6 Be3 cxd4 Nxd4 Bd7 c4 Nxd4 Bxd4 Bc6 Nc3 Be7 h3 O-O a3 a5 Qd3 Qc8 Qe3 Rd8

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2105)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O Re8 Bg5 a6 Ba4 h6 Bh4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2081)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nge7 Re1 a6 Bf1 d5 exd5 Nxd5 d4 Nf6 Be3 cxd4 Nxd4 Bd7 c4 Nxd4 Bxd4 Bc6 Nc3 Be7 h3 O-O a3 a5 Qd3 Qc8 Qe3 Rd8 Rab1 a4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2105)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Ne2 Qb6 Qc1 f6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2081)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Bc4 c5 Ne2 Nc6 Be3 O-O O-O b6 dxc5 Qc7 Nd4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2081)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nge7 Re1 a6 Bf1 d5 exd5 Nxd5 d4 Nf6 Be3 cxd4 Nxd4 Bd7 c4 Nxd4 Bxd4 Bc6 Nc3 Be7 h3 O-O a3 a5 Qd3 Qc8 Qe3 Rd8 Rab1 a4 Bd3 h6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2105)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Ne2 Qb6 Qc1 f6 c3 Be7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2105)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Ne2 Qb6 Qc1 f6 c3 Be7 exf6 Nxf6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2105)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Ne2 Qb6 Qc1 f6 c3 Be7 exf6 Nxf6 dxc5 Bxc5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (1794)
e4 e5 f4 Bc5 Nf3 d6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2081)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 b5 Bb3 d5 dxe5 Be6 Qe2 Nc5 Rd1 Nxb3 cxb3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2105)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Ne2 Qb6 Qc1 f6 c3 Be7 exf6 Nxf6 dxc5 Bxc5 Bxc5 Qxc5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2105)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Ne2 Qb6 Qc1 f6 c3 Be7 exf6 Nxf6 dxc5 Bxc5 Bxc5 Qxc5 Ned4 O-O

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (1794)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qe6 Be2 Bb4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1794)
e4 e5 f4 Bc5 Nf3 d6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 O-O Bc4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2105)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Ne2 Qb6 Qc1 f6 c3 Be7 exf6 Nxf6 dxc5 Bxc5 Bxc5 Qxc5 Ned4 O-O Bd3 Nxd4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (1794)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qe6 Be2 Bb4 O-O Bxc3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1794)
e4 e5 f4 Bc5 Nf3 d6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 O-O Bc4 Re8 Qd3

Transpose to wikichess #145273#

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2105)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Ne2 Qb6 Qc1 f6 c3 Be7 exf6 Nxf6 dxc5 Bxc5 Bxc5 Qxc5 Ned4 O-O Bd3 Nxd4 cxd4 Qd6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2105)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Ne2 Qb6 Qc1 f6 c3 Be7 exf6 Nxf6 dxc5 Bxc5 Bxc5 Qxc5 Ned4 Nxd4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Andrea Grammatica    (2244)
c4 e5 Nc3 Bb4 Nd5 Bc5 Nf3 c6 Nc3 d6 e3 Qe7 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Be2 O-O O-O d5 b3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matej Pech    (1794)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qe6 Be2 Bb4 O-O Bxc3 Bb5 Bd7

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2105)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Ne2 Qb6 Qc1 f6 c3 Be7 exf6 Nxf6 dxc5 Bxc5 Bxc5 Qxc5 Ned4 O-O Bd3 Nxd4 cxd4 Qd6 Ne5 Bd7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2105)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Ne2 Qb6 Qc1 f6 c3 Be7 exf6 Nxf6 dxc5 Bxc5 Bxc5 Qxc5 Ned4 Nxd4 cxd4 Qb6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2105)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Ne2 Qb6 Qc1 f6 c3 Be7 exf6 Nxf6 dxc5 Bxc5 Bxc5 Qxc5 Ned4 O-O Bd3 Nxd4 cxd4 Qd6 Ne5 Bd7 Nxd7 Nxd7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2105)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Ne2 Qb6 Qc1 f6 c3 Be7 exf6 Nxf6 dxc5 Bxc5 Bxc5 Qxc5 Ned4 Nxd4 cxd4 Qb6 Bd3 Bd7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (1794)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qe6 Be2 Bb4 O-O Bxc3 Bb5 Bd7 Re1 Be5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1794)
e4 e5 Nf3 Bc5 Nxe5 Qh4 d4 Qxe4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2081)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Nf3 c5 Be3 Bg4 Rc1 O-O Be2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2105)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Ne2 Qb6 Qc1 f6 c3 Be7 exf6 Nxf6 dxc5 Bxc5 Bxc5 Qxc5 Ned4 O-O Bd3 Nxd4 cxd4 Qd6 Ne5 Bd7 Nxd7 Nxd7 O-O Nf6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2105)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Ne2 Qb6 Qc1 f6 c3 Be7 exf6 Nxf6 dxc5 Bxc5 Bxc5 Qxc5 Ned4 Nxd4 cxd4 Qb6 Bd3 Bd7 Qe3 O-O

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (1794)
e4 e5 Nf3 Bc5 Nxe5 Qh4 d4 Qxe4 Be3 Nc6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2105)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 d3 a6 Ng5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (1794)
e4 e5 Nf3 Bc5 Nxe5 Qh4 d4 Qxe4 Be3 Nc6 Nd2 Qf5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2105)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Ne2 Qb6 Qc1 f6 c3 Be7 exf6 Nxf6 dxc5 Bxc5 Bxc5 Qxc5 Ned4 Nxd4 cxd4 Qb6 Bd3 Bd7 Qe3 O-O O-O Bb5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (1794)
e4 e5 Nf3 Bc5 Nxe5 Qh4 d4 Qxe4 Be3 Nc6 Nd2 Qf5 Bd3 Qf6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1794)
e4 e5 Nf3 Bc5 Nxe5 Qh4 d4 Qxe4 Be3 Nc6 Nd2 Qf5 Bd3 Qf6 Ne4 Qd6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1794)
d4 Nf6 c4 c5 e3 g6 Nf3 Bg7 Nc3

Transpose to wikichess #32974#

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2105)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Ne2 Qb6 Qc1 f6 c3 Be7 exf6 Nxf6 dxc5 Bxc5 Bxc5 Qxc5 Ned4 Nxd4 cxd4 Qb6 Bd3 Bd7 Qe3 O-O O-O Bb5 Bxb5 axb5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2105)
e4 c6 d4 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 Bf5 Ng3 Bg6 h4 h6 Nf3 Nd7 Bd3 Bxd3 Qxd3 e6 Bf4 Qa5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2105)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 d3 a6 Ng5 d5 exd5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Andrea Grammatica    (2244)
c4 e5 Nc3 Bb4 Nd5 Bc5 Nf3 c6 Nc3 d6 e3 Qe7 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Be2 O-O O-O d5 b3 dxc4 Bxc4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matt LaDuke    (2105)
e4 c6 d4 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 Bf5 Ng3 Bg6 h4 h6 Nf3 Nd7 Bd3 Bxd3 Qxd3 e6 Bf4 Qa5 Bd2 Qc7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2105)
e4 c6 d4 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 Bf5 Ng3 Bg6 h4 h6 Nf3 Nd7 Bd3 Bxd3 Qxd3 e6 Bf4 Qa5 Bd2 Qc7 O-O-O Ngf6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2105)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 d3 a6 Ng5 d5 exd5 Na5 O-O

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2105)
e4 c6 d4 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 Bf5 Ng3 Bg6 h4 h6 Nf3 Nd7 Bd3 Bxd3 Qxd3 e6 Bf4 Qa5 Bd2 Qc7 O-O-O Ngf6 Kb1 Be7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2105)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 b5 Bb3 d5 dxe5 Be6 Nbd2 Nc5 c3 Be7 Bc2 d4 Ne4 d3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2105)
e4 c6 d4 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 Bf5 Ng3 Bg6 h4 h6 Nf3 Nd7 Bd3 Bxd3 Qxd3 e6 Bf4 Qa5 Bd2 Qc7 O-O-O Ngf6 Kb1 Be7 Ne4 Rd8

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2105)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 d3 a6 Ng5 d5 exd5 Na5 O-O h6 Nf3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2105)
e4 c6 d4 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 Bf5 Ng3 Bg6 h4 h6 Nf3 Nd7 Bd3 Bxd3 Qxd3 e6 Bf4 Qa5 Bd2 Qc7 O-O-O Ngf6 Kb1 Be7 Ne4 Rd8 Rhg1 Nxe4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2105)
e4 c6 d4 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 Bf5 Ng3 Bg6 h4 h6 Nf3 Nd7 Bd3 Bxd3 Qxd3 e6 Bf4 Qa5 Bd2 Qc7 O-O-O Ngf6 Kb1 Be7 Ne4 Rd8 Rhg1 Nxe4 Qxe4 Nf6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2105)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 d3 a6 Ng5 d5 exd5 Na5 O-O h6 Nf3 Bd6 Re1

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Andrea Grammatica    (2244)
c4 e5 Nc3 Bb4 Nd5 Bc5 Nf3 c6 Nc3 d6 e3 Qe7 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Be2 O-O O-O d5 b3 dxc4 Bxc4 Nbd7 Nf5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matt LaDuke    (2105)
e4 c6 d4 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 Bf5 Ng3 Bg6 h4 h6 Nf3 Nd7 Bd3 Bxd3 Qxd3 e6 Bf4 Qa5 Bd2 Qc7 O-O-O Ngf6 Kb1 Be7 Ne4 Rd8 Rhg1 Nxe4 Qxe4 Nf6 Qe2 Ng4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2081)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Bc4 c5 Ne2 Nc6 Be3 O-O O-O b6 dxc5 Qc7 Nd4 Ne5 Nb5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2105)
e4 c6 d4 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 Bf5 Ng3 Bg6 h4 h6 Nf3 Nd7 Bd3 Bxd3 Qxd3 e6 Bf4 Qa5 Bd2 Qc7 O-O-O Ngf6 Kb1 Be7 Ne4 Rd8 Rhg1 Nxe4 Qxe4 Nf6 Qe2 Ng4 h5 O-O

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Andrea Grammatica    (2244)
c4 e5 Nc3 Bb4 Nd5 Bc5 Nf3 c6 Nc3 d6 e3 Qe7 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Be2 O-O O-O d5 b3 dxc4 Bxc4 Nbd7 Nf5 Qe5 Qc2

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matt LaDuke    (2081)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Bc4 c5 Ne2 Nc6 Be3 O-O O-O b6 dxc5 Qc7 Nd4 Ne5 Nb5 Qb8 Be2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2105)
e4 c6 d4 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 Bf5 Ng3 Bg6 h4 h6 Nf3 Nd7 Bd3 Bxd3 Qxd3 e6 Bf4 Qa5 Bd2 Qc7 O-O-O Ngf6 Kb1 Be7 Ne4 Rd8 Rhg1 Nxe4 Qxe4 Nf6 Qe2 Ng4 h5 O-O Ne5 Nxe5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2105)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 d3 a6 Ng5 d5 exd5 Na5 O-O h6 Nf3 Bd6 Re1 O-O Nxe5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Andrea Grammatica    (2244)
c4 e5 Nc3 Bb4 Nd5 Bc5 Nf3 c6 Nc3 d6 e3 Qe7 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Be2 O-O O-O d5 b3 dxc4 Bxc4 Nbd7 Nf5 Qe5 Qc2 Nb6 Bd3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matt LaDuke    (2081)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Bc4 c5 Ne2 Nc6 Be3 O-O O-O b6 dxc5 Qc7 Nd4 Ne5 Nb5 Qb8 Be2 bxc5 f4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (1780)
e4 e5 f4 d6 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nge7

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1780)
d4 d5 c4 e6 Nc3 dxc4 e4 Bb4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2081)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Bc4 c5 Ne2 Nc6 Be3 O-O O-O b6 dxc5 Qc7 Nd4 Ne5 Nb5 Qb8 Be2 bxc5 f4 Ng4 Bxc5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (1780)
e4 e5 f4 d6 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nge7 fxe5 dxe5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1780)
d4 d5 c4 e6 Nc3 dxc4 e4 Bb4 Bxc4 Bxc3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1780)
e4 e5 f4 d6 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nge7 fxe5 dxe5 c3 a6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1780)
d4 d5 c4 e6 Nc3 dxc4 e4 Bb4 Bxc4 Bxc3 bxc3 h5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2081)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Bc4 c5 Ne2 Nc6 Be3 O-O O-O b6 dxc5 Qc7 Nd4 Ne5 Nb5 Qb8 Be2 bxc5 f4 Ng4 Bxc5 a6 Na3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2081)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Bc4 c5 Ne2 Nc6 Be3 O-O O-O b6 dxc5 Qc7 Nd4 Ne5 Nb5 Qb8 Be2 bxc5 f4 Ng4 Bxc5 a6 Na3 Qc7 Bd4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2105)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 d3 a6 Ng5 d5 exd5 Na5 O-O h6 Nf3 Bd6 Re1 O-O Nxe5 Bxe5 Rxe5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (1780)
d4 d5 c4 e6 Nc3 dxc4 e4 Bb4 Bxc4 Bxc3 bxc3 h5 Nf3 Nh6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Andrea Grammatica    (2244)
c4 e5 Nc3 Bb4 Nd5 Bc5 Nf3 c6 Nc3 d6 e3 Qe7 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Be2 O-O O-O d5 b3 dxc4 Bxc4 Nbd7 Nf5 Qe5 Qc2 Nb6 Bd3 Bxf5 Bxf5

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matt LaDuke    (2081)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Bc4 c5 Ne2 Nc6 Be3 O-O O-O b6 dxc5 Qc7 Nd4 Ne5 Nb5 Qb8 Be2 bxc5 f4 Ng4 Bxc5 a6 Na3 Qc7 Bd4 e5 fxe5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2105)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 d3 a6 Ng5 d5 exd5 Na5 O-O h6 Nf3 Bd6 Re1 O-O Nxe5 Bxe5 Rxe5 Ng4 Re2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (1780)
e4 e5 f4 d6 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nge7 fxe5 dxe5 c3 a6 Bc4 b5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1780)
e4 e5 Bc4 Nf6 d3 h6 Nf3 d6 h3 Nbd7

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1780)
d4 d5 c4 e6 Nc3 dxc4 e4 Bb4 Bxc4 Bxc3 bxc3 h5 Nf3 Nh6 Ba3 Ng4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1780)
e4 e5 f4 d6 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nge7 fxe5 dxe5 c3 a6 Bc4 b5 Bb3 Ng6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1780)
e4 e5 Bc4 Nf6 d3 h6 Nf3 d6 h3 Nbd7 a4 a6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1780)
d4 d5 c4 e6 Nc3 dxc4 e4 Bb4 Bxc4 Bxc3 bxc3 h5 Nf3 Nh6 Ba3 Ng4 h3 Nf6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1780)
e4 e5 f4 d6 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nge7 fxe5 dxe5 c3 a6 Bc4 b5 Bb3 Ng6 O-O Bc5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2081)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Nf3 c5 Be3 Bg4 Rc1 O-O Be2 Qa5 Qd2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Andrea Grammatica    (2244)
c4 e5 Nc3 Bb4 Nd5 Bc5 Nf3 c6 Nc3 d6 e3 Qe7 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Be2 O-O O-O d5 b3 dxc4 Bxc4 Nbd7 Nf5 Qe5 Qc2 Nb6 Bd3 Bxf5 Bxf5 Bd6 g3

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Andrea Grammatica    (2244)
c4 e5 Nc3 Bb4 Nd5 Bc5 Nf3 c6 Nc3 d6 e3 Qe7 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Be2 O-O O-O d5 b3 dxc4 Bxc4 Nbd7 Nf5 Qe5 Qc2 Nb6 Bd3 Bxf5 Bxf5 Bd6 g3 Rfe8 Bb2

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matej Pech    (1780)
e4 e5 Bc4 Nf6 d3 h6 Nf3 d6 h3 Nbd7 a4 a6 Nc3 Nc5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1780)
e4 e5 Bc4 Nf6 d3 h6 Nf3 d6 h3 Nbd7 a4 a6 Nc3 Nc5 Be3 Ne6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2105)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 d3 a6 Ng5 d5 exd5 Na5 O-O h6 Nf3 Bd6 Re1 O-O Nxe5 Bxe5 Rxe5 Ng4 Re2 Qd6 g3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (1780)
e4 e5 Bc4 Nf6 d3 h6 Nf3 d6 h3 Nbd7 a4 a6 Nc3 Nc5 Be3 Ne6 d4 exd4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2105)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 d3 a6 Ng5 d5 exd5 Na5 O-O h6 Nf3 Bd6 Re1 O-O Nxe5 Bxe5 Rxe5 Ng4 Re2 Qd6 g3 b5 Qe1

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Andrea Grammatica    (2244)
c4 e5 Nc3 Bb4 Nd5 Bc5 Nf3 c6 Nc3 d6 e3 Qe7 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Be2 O-O O-O d5 b3 dxc4 Bxc4 Nbd7 Nf5 Qe5 Qc2 Nb6 Bd3 Bxf5 Bxf5 Bd6 g3 Rfe8 Bb2 Qc5 a4

============

Contributors : Andrea Grammatica


Matt LaDuke    (2105)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 d3 a6 Ng5 d5 exd5 Na5 O-O h6 Nf3 Bd6 Re1 O-O Nxe5 Bxe5 Rxe5 Ng4 Re2 Qd6 g3 b5 Qe1 bxc4 Qxa5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2105)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 d3 a6 Ng5 d5 exd5 Na5 O-O h6 Nf3 Bd6 Re1 O-O Nxe5 Bxe5 Rxe5 Ng4 Re2 Qd6 g3 b5 Qe1 bxc4 Qxa5 cxd3 cxd3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2105)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 d3 a6 Ng5 d5 exd5 Na5 O-O h6 Nf3 Bd6 Re1 O-O Nxe5 Bxe5 Rxe5 Ng4 Re2 Qd6 g3 b5 Qe1 bxc4 Qxa5 cxd3 cxd3 Ne5 Bf4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2105)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 d4 g5 g3 Bg7 Rg1

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2105)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 d4 g5 g3 Bg7 Rg1 g4 gxf4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2105)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 d4 g5 g3 Bg7 Rg1 g4 gxf4 Bf6 e5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2105)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 d3 a6 Ng5 d5 exd5 Na5 O-O h6 Nf3 Bd6 Re1 O-O Nxe5 Bxe5 Rxe5 Ng4 Re2 Qd6 g3 b5 Qe1 bxc4 Qxa5 cxd3 cxd3 Ne5 Bf4 Nf3 Kg2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2105)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 d3 a6 Ng5 d5 exd5 Na5 O-O h6 Nf3 Bd6 Re1 O-O Nxe5 Bxe5 Rxe5 Ng4 Re2 Qd6 g3 b5 Qe1 bxc4 Qxa5 cxd3 cxd3 Ne5 Bf4 Nf3 Kg2 Qg6 Re3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2105)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 d4 g5 g3 Bg7 Rg1 g4 gxf4 Bf6 e5 Bh4 Nxh4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2105)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 d4 g5 g3 Bg7 Rg1 g4 gxf4 Bf6 e5 Bh4 Nxh4 Qxh4 Rg3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Bc5 c3 b5 Bc2 d5 a4 dxe4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2081)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Nf3 c5 Be3 Bg4 Rc1 O-O Be2 Qa5 Qd2 Nd7 d5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Bc5 c3 b5 Bc2 d5 a4 dxe4 axb5 Bg4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Bc5 c3 b5 Bc2 d5 a4 dxe4 axb5 Bg4 bxc6 exf3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Bc5 c3 b5 Bc2 d5 a4 dxe4 axb5 Bg4 bxc6 exf3 gxf3 Bh3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2081)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Nf3 c5 Be3 Bg4 Rc1 O-O Be2 Qa5 Qd2 Nd7 d5 c4 h3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
d4 Nf6 Nc3 d5 Bf4 e6 a3 a6 e3

Transpose to wikichess #209609#

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Bc5 c3 b5 Bc2 d5 a4 dxe4 axb5 Bg4 bxc6 exf3 gxf3 Bh3 Re1 O-O

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2081)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Nf3 c5 Be3 Bg4 Rc1 O-O Be2 Qa5 Qd2 Nd7 d5 c4 h3 Bxf3 Bxf3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Bc5 c3 b5 Bc2 d5 a4 dxe4 axb5 Bg4 bxc6 exf3 gxf3 Bh3 Re1 O-O Ra5 Qd6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 d4 dxe5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2081)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Nf3 c5 Be3 Bg4 Rc1 O-O Be2 Qa5 Qd2 Nd7 d5 c4 h3 Bxf3 Bxf3 Nc5 O-O

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Bc5 c3 b5 Bc2 d5 a4 dxe4 axb5 Bg4 bxc6 exf3 gxf3 Bh3 Re1 O-O Ra5 Qd6 b4 Bxf2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 d4 dxe5 Bd3 Qxd4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 c6 d4 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 Nd7 Nf3 Ngf6 Nxf6 Nxf6 c3 Bg4 h3 Bxf3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2105)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 d4 g5 g3 Bg7 Rg1 g4 gxf4 Bf6 e5 Bh4 Nxh4 Qxh4 Rg3 Qxh2 Rg2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Bc5 c3 b5 Bc2 d5 a4 dxe4 axb5 Bg4 bxc6 exf3 gxf3 Bh3 Re1 O-O Ra5 Qd6 b4 Bxf2 Kxf2 e4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 c6 d4 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 Nd7 Nf3 Ngf6 Nxf6 Nxf6 c3 Bg4 h3 Bxf3 Qxf3 e6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2105)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 d4 g5 g3 Bg7 Rg1 g4 gxf4 Bf6 e5 Bh4 Nxh4 Qxh4 Rg3 Qxh2 Rg2 Qh4 Rf2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Bc5 c3 b5 Bc2 d5 a4 dxe4 axb5 Bg4 bxc6 exf3 gxf3 Bh3 Re1 O-O Ra5 Qd6 b4 Bxf2 Kxf2 e4 Kg1 Rae8

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 c6 d4 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 Nd7 Nf3 Ngf6 Nxf6 Nxf6 c3 Bg4 h3 Bxf3 Qxf3 e6 Bc4 Be7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2081)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Nf3 c5 Be3 Bg4 Rc1 O-O Be2 Qa5 Qd2 Nd7 d5 c4 h3 Bxf3 Bxf3 Nc5 O-O Nd3 Rc2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Bc5 c3 b5 Bc2 d5 a4 dxe4 axb5 Bg4 bxc6 exf3 gxf3 Bh3 Re1 O-O Ra5 Qd6 b4 Bxf2 Kxf2 e4 Kg1 Rae8 Re3 Nh5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2081)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Nf3 c5 Be3 Bg4 Rc1 O-O Be2 Qa5 Qd2 Nd7 d5 c4 h3 Bxf3 Bxf3 Nc5 O-O Nd3 Rc2 e6 Be2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Bc5 c3 b5 Bc2 d5 a4 dxe4 axb5 Bg4 bxc6 exf3 gxf3 Bh3 Re1 O-O Ra5 Qd6 b4 Bxf2 Kxf2 e4 Kg1 Rae8 Re3 Nh5 Rg5 Qh6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 d4 dxe5 Bd3 Qxd4 O-O Be6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 c6 d4 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 Nd7 Nf3 Ngf6 Nxf6 Nxf6 c3 Bg4 h3 Bxf3 Qxf3 e6 Bc4 Be7 O-O O-O

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2081)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Nf3 c5 Be3 Bg4 Rc1 O-O Be2 Qa5 Qd2 Nd7 d5 c4 h3 Bxf3 Bxf3 Nc5 O-O Nd3 Rc2 e6 Be2 exd5 Bxd3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Bc5 c3 b5 Bc2 d5 a4 dxe4 axb5 Bg4 bxc6 exf3 gxf3 Bh3 Re1 O-O Ra5 Qd6 b4 Bxf2 Kxf2 e4 Kg1 Rae8 Re3 Nh5 Rg5 Qh6 f4 Nxf4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 d4 dxe5 Bd3 Qxd4 O-O Be6 Nc3 Qd7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 d4 dxe5 Bd3 Qxd4 O-O Be6 Nc3 Qd7 Qe2 Nc6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 c6 d4 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 Nd7 Nf3 Ngf6 Nxf6 Nxf6 c3 Bg4 h3 Bxf3 Qxf3 e6 Bc4 Be7 O-O O-O a4 a5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 d4 dxe5 Bd3 Qxd4 O-O Be6 Nc3 Qd7 Qe2 Nc6 f4 exf4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2081)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Nf3 c5 Be3 Bg4 Rc1 O-O Be2 Qa5 Qd2 Nd7 d5 c4 h3 Bxf3 Bxf3 Nc5 O-O Nd3 Rc2 e6 Be2 exd5 Bxd3 cxd3 Qxd3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2105)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 d4 g5 g3 Bg7 Rg1 g4 gxf4 Bf6 e5 Bh4 Nxh4 Qxh4 Rg3 Qxh2 Rg2 Qh4 Rf2 Ne7 Bg2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 d4 dxe5 Bd3 Qxd4 O-O Be6 Nc3 Qd7 Qe2 Nc6 f4 exf4 Bxf4 Bc5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2105)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 d4 g5 g3 Bg7 Rg1 g4 gxf4 Bf6 e5 Bh4 Nxh4 Qxh4 Rg3 Qxh2 Rg2 Qh4 Rf2 Ne7 Bg2 g3 Rf1

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 d4 dxe5 Bd3 Qxd4 O-O Be6 Nc3 Qd7 Qe2 Nc6 f4 exf4 Bxf4 Bc5 Kh1 O-O-O

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 c6 d4 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 Nd7 Nf3 Ngf6 Nxf6 Nxf6 c3 Bg4 h3 Bxf3 Qxf3 e6 Bc4 Be7 O-O O-O a4 a5 g3 Qb6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2105)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 d4 g5 g3 Bg7 Rg1 g4 gxf4 Bf6 e5 Bh4 Nxh4 Qxh4 Rg3 Qxh2 Rg2 Qh4 Rf2 Ne7 Bg2 g3 Rf1 Qh2 Qf3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2105)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 d4 g5 g3 Bg7 Rg1 g4 gxf4 Bf6 e5 Bh4 Nxh4 Qxh4 Rg3 Qxh2 Rg2 Qh4 Rf2 Ne7 Bg2 g3 Rf1 Qh2 Qf3 Bg4 Qxg4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 c6 d4 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 Nd7 Nf3 Ngf6 Nxf6 Nxf6 c3 Bg4 h3 Bxf3 Qxf3 e6 Bc4 Be7 O-O O-O a4 a5 g3 Qb6 Kg2 Rfd8

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 c6 d4 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 Nd7 Nf3 Ngf6 Nxf6 Nxf6 c3 Bg4 h3 Bxf3 Qxf3 e6 Bc4 Be7 O-O O-O a4 a5 g3 Qb6 Kg2 Rfd8 b3 Rd7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 c6 d4 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 Nd7 Nf3 Ngf6 Nxf6 Nxf6 c3 Bg4 h3 Bxf3 Qxf3 e6 Bc4 Be7 O-O O-O a4 a5 g3 Qb6 Kg2 Rfd8 b3 Rd7 Rb1 Rad8

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d4 Nxe4 Bd3 d5 Nxe5 Nd7 Nxd7 Bxd7 O-O Bd6 Nc3 Nxc3 bxc3 O-O Qh5 f5 Re1 g6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d4 Nxe4 Bd3 d5 Nxe5 Nd7 Nxd7 Bxd7 O-O Bd6 Nc3 Nxc3 bxc3 O-O Qh5 f5 Re1 g6 Qf3 c6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 d6 O-O b5 Bb3 Na5

Transpose to wikichess #1405#

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d4 Nxe4 Bd3 d5 Nxe5 Nd7 Nxd7 Bxd7 O-O Bd6 Nc3 Nxc3 bxc3 O-O Qh5 f5 Re1 g6 Qf3 c6 Bf4 Qc7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Qd2 b5 a3 Nxd4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2105)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 d4 g5 g3 Bg7 Rg1 g4 gxf4 Bf6 e5 Bh4 Nxh4 Qxh4 Rg3 Qxh2 Rg2 Qh4 Rf2 Ne7 Bg2 g3 Rf1 Qh2 Qf3 Bg4 Qxg4 Qxg2 Nc3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d4 Nxe4 Bd3 d5 Nxe5 Nd7 Nxd7 Bxd7 O-O Bd6 Nc3 Nxc3 bxc3 O-O Qh5 f5 Re1 g6 Qf3 c6 Bf4 Qc7 Bxd6 Qxd6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 c6 d4 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 Nd7 Nf3 Ngf6 Nxf6 Nxf6 c3 Bg4 h3 Bxf3 Qxf3 e6 Bc4 Be7 O-O O-O a4 a5 g3 Qb6 Kg2 Rfd8 b3 Rd7 Rb1 Rad8 Re1 Nd5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 e3 Bb4 Qc2 Bxc3 Qxc3 Qe7 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nxd4 Qxd4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Qd2 b5 a3 Nxd4 Nxd4 cxd4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 c6 d4 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 Nd7 Nf3 Ngf6 Nxf6 Nxf6 c3 Bg4 h3 Bxf3 Qxf3 e6 Bc4 Be7 O-O O-O a4 a5 g3 Qb6 Kg2 Rfd8 b3 Rd7 Rb1 Rad8 Re1 Nd5 Bd2 g6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 e3 Bb4 Qc2 Bxc3 Qxc3 Qe7 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nxd4 Qxd4 b6 b3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Qd2 b5 a3 Nxd4 Nxd4 cxd4 Bxd4 Bc5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2105)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 d4 g5 g3 Bg7 Rg1 g4 gxf4 Bf6 e5 Bh4 Nxh4 Qxh4 Rg3 Qxh2 Rg2 Qh4 Rf2 Ne7 Bg2 g3 Rf1 Qh2 Qf3 Bg4 Qxg4 Qxg2 Nc3 h5 Qg5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d4 Nxe4 Bd3 d5 Nxe5 Nd7 Nxd7 Bxd7 O-O Bd6 Nc3 Nxc3 bxc3 O-O Qh5 f5 Re1 g6 Qf3 c6 Bf4 Qc7 Bxd6 Qxd6 c4 Rae8

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 c6 d4 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 Nd7 Nf3 Ngf6 Nxf6 Nxf6 c3 Bg4 h3 Bxf3 Qxf3 e6 Bc4 Be7 O-O O-O a4 a5 g3 Qb6 Kg2 Rfd8 b3 Rd7 Rb1 Rad8 Re1 Nd5 Bd2 g6 h4 h5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Nd6 Bxc6 dxc6 dxe5 Nf5 Qxd8 Kxd8 Nc3 Be7 h3 Nh4 Nxh4 Bxh4 f4 Bf5 Rd1 Ke8 g4 Bc8 Kg2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Qd2 b5 a3 Nxd4 Nxd4 cxd4 Bxd4 Bc5 Bxc5 Nxc5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O Nc3 Bf6 Re1 Re8 Nd5 Rxe1 Nxf6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2105)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 d4 g5 g3 Bg7 Rg1 g4 gxf4 Bf6 e5 Bh4 Nxh4 Qxh4 Rg3 Qxh2 Rg2 Qh4 Rf2 Ne7 Bg2 g3 Rf1 Qh2 Qf3 Bg4 Qxg4 Qxg2 Nc3 h5 Qg5 Qxc2 Qxg3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d4 Nxe4 Bd3 d5 Nxe5 Nd7 Nxd7 Bxd7 O-O Bd6 Nc3 Nxc3 bxc3 O-O Qh5 f5 Re1 g6 Qf3 c6 Bf4 Qc7 Bxd6 Qxd6 c4 Rae8 c5 Qc7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 e3 Bb4 Qc2 Bxc3 Qxc3 Qe7 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nxd4 Qxd4 b6 b3 Bb7 Bb2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Nd6 Bxc6 dxc6 dxe5 Nf5 Qxd8 Kxd8 Nc3 Be7 h3 Nh4 Nxh4 Bxh4 f4 Bf5 Rd1 Ke8 g4 Bc8 Kg2 h5 Kf3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Qd2 b5 a3 Nxd4 Nxd4 cxd4 Bxd4 Bc5 Bxc5 Nxc5 b4 Nd7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d4 Nxe4 Bd3 d5 Nxe5 Nd7 Nxd7 Bxd7 O-O Bd6 Nc3 Nxc3 bxc3 O-O Qh5 f5 Re1 g6 Qf3 c6 Bf4 Qc7 Bxd6 Qxd6 c4 Rae8 c5 Qc7 a4 b6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Nd6 Bxc6 dxc6 dxe5 Nf5 Qxd8 Kxd8 Nc3 Be7 h3 Nh4 Nxh4 Bxh4 f4 Bf5 Rd1 Ke8 g4 Bc8 Kg2 h5 Kf3 hxg4 hxg4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Qd2 b5 a3 Nxd4 Nxd4 cxd4 Bxd4 Bc5 Bxc5 Nxc5 b4 Nd7 Bd3 Bb7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d4 Nxe4 Bd3 d5 Nxe5 Nd7 Nxd7 Bxd7 O-O Bd6 Nc3 Nxc3 bxc3 O-O Qh5 f5 Re1 g6 Qf3 c6 Bf4 Qc7 Bxd6 Qxd6 c4 Rae8 c5 Qc7 a4 b6 Bb5 bxc5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 d4 dxe5 Bd3 Qxd4 O-O Be6 Nc3 Qd7 Qe2 Nc6 f4 exf4 Bxf4 Bc5 Kh1 O-O-O a4 Nb4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Nd6 Bxc6 dxc6 dxe5 Nf5 Qxd8 Kxd8 Nc3 Be7 h3 Nh4 Nxh4 Bxh4 f4 Bf5 Rd1 Ke8 g4 Bc8 Kg2 h5 Kf3 hxg4 hxg4 Be7 Kg3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Qd2 b5 a3 Nxd4 Nxd4 cxd4 Bxd4 Bc5 Bxc5 Nxc5 b4 Nd7 Bd3 Bb7 O-O Qb6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 e3 Bb4 Qc2 Bxc3 Qxc3 Qe7 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nxd4 Qxd4 b6 b3 Bb7 Bb2 O-O-O Qe5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Qd2 b5 a3 Nxd4 Nxd4 cxd4 Bxd4 Bc5 Bxc5 Nxc5 b4 Nd7 Bd3 Bb7 O-O Qb6 Kh1 O-O

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Nd6 Bxc6 dxc6 dxe5 Nf5 Qxd8 Kxd8 Nc3 Be7 h3 Nh4 Nxh4 Bxh4 f4 Bf5 Rd1 Ke8 g4 Bc8 Kg2 h5 Kf3 hxg4 hxg4 Be7 Kg3 Bh4 Kf3

Transpose to wikichess #211722#

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 e3 Bb4 Qc2 Bxc3 Qxc3 Qe7 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nxd4 Qxd4 b6 b3 Bb7 Bb2 O-O-O Qe5 Qb4 Bc3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d4 Nxe4 Bd3 d5 Nxe5 Nd7 Nxd7 Bxd7 O-O Bd6 Nc3 Nxc3 bxc3 O-O Qh5 f5 Re1 g6 Qf3 c6 Bf4 Qc7 Bxd6 Qxd6 c4 Rae8 c5 Qc7 a4 b6 Bb5 bxc5 Rxe8 Rxe8

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 e3 Bb4 Qc2 Bxc3 Qxc3 Qe7 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nxd4 Qxd4 b6 b3 Bb7 Bb2 O-O-O Qe5 Qb4 Bc3 Qa3 Bb2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Qd2 b5 a3 Nxd4 Nxd4 cxd4 Bxd4 Bc5 Bxc5 Nxc5 b4 Nd7 Bd3 Bb7 O-O Qb6 Kh1 O-O a4 bxa4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 d3 a6 Ng5 d5 exd5 Na5 O-O h6 Nf3 Bd6 Nbd2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 e5 Qh5 Nc6 Bc4 g6 Qf3 Nf6 Ne2 d6 Nbc3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 e3 Bb4 Qc2 Bxc3 Qxc3 Qe7 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nxd4 Qxd4 b6 b3 Bb7 Bb2 O-O-O Qe5 Qb4 Bc3 Qa3 Bb2 Qf8 f3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Qd2 b5 a3 Nxd4 Nxd4 cxd4 Bxd4 Bc5 Bxc5 Nxc5 b4 Nd7 Bd3 Bb7 O-O Qb6 Kh1 O-O a4 bxa4 Nxa4 Qc7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 e5 Qh5 Nc6 Bc4 g6 Qf3 Nf6 Ne2 d6 Nbc3 Bg4 Qg3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 d3 a6 Ng5 d5 exd5 Na5 O-O h6 Nf3 Bd6 Nbd2 b5 Bb3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 e5 Qh5 Nc6 Bc4 g6 Qf3 Nf6 Ne2 d6 Nbc3 Bg4 Qg3 Bxe2 Bxe2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 e3 Bb4 Qc2 Bxc3 Qxc3 Qe7 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nxd4 Qxd4 b6 b3 Bb7 Bb2 O-O-O Qe5 Qb4 Bc3 Qa3 Bb2 Qf8 f3 d6 Qc3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Qd2 b5 a3 Nxd4 Nxd4 cxd4 Bxd4 Bc5 Bxc5 Nxc5 b4 Nd7 Bd3 Bb7 O-O Qb6 Kh1 O-O a4 bxa4 Nxa4 Qc7 Nc3 f6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 e5 Qh5 Nc6 Bc4 g6 Qf3 Nf6 Ne2 d6 Nbc3 Bg4 Qg3 Bxe2 Bxe2 Nd4 Bd1

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 e3 Bb4 Qc2 Bxc3 Qxc3 Qe7 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nxd4 Qxd4 b6 b3 Bb7 Bb2 O-O-O Qe5 Qb4 Bc3 Qa3 Bb2 Qf8 f3 d6 Qc3 Qe7 O-O-O

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 e3 Bb4 Qc2 Bxc3 Qxc3 Qe7 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nxd4 Qxd4 b6 b3 Bb7 Bb2 O-O-O Qe5 Qb4 Bc3 Qa3 Bb2 Qf8 f3 d6 Qc3 Qe7 O-O-O Rhg8 Kb1

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Bd3 e5 Nde2 Be6 f4 Be7 O-O exf4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 e5 Qh5 Nc6 Bc4 g6 Qf3 Nf6 Ne2 d6 Nbc3 Bg4 Qg3 Bxe2 Bxe2 Nd4 Bd1 Ne6 d3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O b4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 e5 Qh5 Nc6 Bc4 g6 Qf3 Nf6 Ne2 d6 Nbc3 Bg4 Qg3 Bxe2 Bxe2 Nd4 Bd1 Ne6 d3 c6 Ne2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 e3 Bb4 Qc2 Bxc3 Qxc3 Qe7 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nxd4 Qxd4 b6 b3 Bb7 Bb2 O-O-O Qe5 Qb4 Bc3 Qa3 Bb2 Qf8 f3 d6 Qc3 Qe7 O-O-O Rhg8 Kb1 Kb8 b4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Bd3 e5 Nde2 Be6 f4 Be7 O-O exf4 Nxf4 Nc6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O b4 Bb6 Bxc6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Be3 Bg7 Qd2 c6 Bh6 Bxh6 Qxh6 e5 O-O-O Qe7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 d4 dxe5 Bd3 Qxd4 O-O Be6 Nc3 Qd7 Qe2 Nc6 f4 exf4 Bxf4 Bc5 Kh1 O-O-O a4 Nb4 Rac1 a6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O b4 Bb6 Bxc6 bxc6 Nxe5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Be3 Bg7 Qd2 c6 Bh6 Bxh6 Qxh6 e5 O-O-O Qe7 f3 exd4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 d4 dxe5 Bd3 Qxd4 O-O Be6 Nc3 Qd7 Qe2 Nc6 f4 exf4 Bxf4 Bc5 Kh1 O-O-O a4 Nb4 Rac1 a6 h3 Nxd3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Bd3 e5 Nde2 Be6 f4 Be7 O-O exf4 Nxf4 Nc6 Be3 Ne5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 e5 Qh5 Nc6 Bc4 g6 Qf3 Nf6 Ne2 d6 Nbc3 Bg4 Qg3 Bxe2 Bxe2 Nd4 Bd1 Ne6 d3 c6 Ne2 Bg7 a4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O b4 Bb6 Bxc6 bxc6 Nxe5 Re8 Nf3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Be3 Bg7 Qd2 c6 Bh6 Bxh6 Qxh6 e5 O-O-O Qe7 f3 exd4 Rxd4 Be6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 g3 d5 Bg2 Bb4 Nd2 O-O Ngf3 dxc4 a3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Ndb5 d6 Nd5 Nxd5 exd5 Nb8 a4 Be7 Be2 O-O Bd2 Bf5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Bd3 e5 Nde2 Be6 f4 Be7 O-O exf4 Nxf4 Nc6 Be3 Ne5 Bd4 O-O

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O Nc3 Ne8 Nd5 Bd6 Re1 c6 Ne3 Be7 c4 Bf6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O b4 Bb6 Bxc6 bxc6 Nxe5 Re8 Nf3 d5 e5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Be3 Bg7 Qd2 c6 Bh6 Bxh6 Qxh6 e5 O-O-O Qe7 f3 exd4 Rxd4 Be6 Rd1 d5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 g3 d5 Bg2 Bb4 Nd2 O-O Ngf3 dxc4 a3 Bxd2 Bxd2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O Nc3 Ne8 Nd5 Bd6 Re1 c6 Ne3 Be7 c4 Bf6 d4 d5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O b4 Bb6 Bxc6 bxc6 Nxe5 Re8 Nf3 d5 e5 Bg4 d4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Be3 Bg7 Qd2 c6 Bh6 Bxh6 Qxh6 e5 O-O-O Qe7 f3 exd4 Rxd4 Be6 Rd1 d5 exd5 Nxd5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Ndb5 d6 Nd5 Nxd5 exd5 Nb8 a4 Be7 Be2 O-O Bd2 Bf5 O-O Nd7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O Nc3 Ne8 Nd5 Bd6 Re1 c6 Ne3 Be7 c4 Bf6 d4 d5 cxd5 cxd5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O b4 Bb6 Bxc6 bxc6 Nxe5 Re8 Nf3 d5 e5 Bg4 d4 Ne4 h3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Be3 Bg7 Qd2 c6 Bh6 Bxh6 Qxh6 e5 O-O-O Qe7 f3 exd4 Rxd4 Be6 Rd1 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nge2 Nd7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Be3 Bg7 Qd2 c6 Bh6 Bxh6 Qxh6 e5 O-O-O Qe7 f3 exd4 Rxd4 Be6 Rd1 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nge2 Nd7 Nxd5 Bxd5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Ndb5 d6 Nd5 Nxd5 exd5 Nb8 a4 Be7 Be2 O-O Bd2 Bf5 O-O Nd7 a5 a6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Bd3 e5 Nde2 Be6 f4 Be7 O-O exf4 Nxf4 Nc6 Be3 Ne5 Bd4 O-O a4 Rc8

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 e5 Qh5 Nc6 Bc4 g6 Qf3 Nf6 Ne2 d6 Nbc3 Bg4 Qg3 Bxe2 Bxe2 Nd4 Bd1 Ne6 d3 c6 Ne2 Bg7 a4 d5 Nc3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O Nc3 Ne8 Nd5 Bd6 Re1 c6 Ne3 Be7 c4 Bf6 d4 d5 cxd5 cxd5 b3 Nc7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 d6 h3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O b4 Bb6 Bxc6 bxc6 Nxe5 Re8 Nf3 d5 e5 Bg4 d4 Ne4 h3 Bh5 g4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Be3 Bg7 Qd2 c6 Bh6 Bxh6 Qxh6 e5 O-O-O Qe7 f3 exd4 Rxd4 Be6 Rd1 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nge2 Nd7 Nxd5 Bxd5 Nc3 O-O-O

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 g3 d5 Bg2 Bb4 Nd2 O-O Ngf3 dxc4 a3 Bxd2 Bxd2 Nc6 e3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O Nc3 Ne8 Nd5 Bd6 Re1 c6 Ne3 Be7 c4 Bf6 d4 d5 cxd5 cxd5 b3 Nc7 a4 Re8

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Be3 Bg7 Qd2 c6 Bh6 Bxh6 Qxh6 e5 O-O-O Qe7 f3 exd4 Rxd4 Be6 Rd1 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nge2 Nd7 Nxd5 Bxd5 Nc3 O-O-O Nxd5 cxd5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O b4 Bb6 Bxc6 bxc6 Nxe5 Re8 Nf3 d5 e5 Bg4 d4 Ne4 h3 Bh5 g4 Bg6 a4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Ndb5 d6 Nd5 Nxd5 exd5 Nb8 a4 Be7 Be2 O-O Bd2 Bf5 O-O Nd7 a5 a6 Na3 Bg6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Ndb5 d6 Nd5 Nxd5 exd5 Nb8 a4 Be7 Be2 O-O Bd2 Bf5 O-O Nd7 a5 a6 Na3 Bg6 Bb4 Rc8

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O Nc3 Ne8 Nd5 Bd6 Re1 c6 Ne3 Be7 c4 Bf6 d4 d5 cxd5 cxd5 b3 Nc7 a4 Re8 Ba3 Bd7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O b4 Bb6 Bxc6 bxc6 Nxe5 Re8 Nf3 d5 e5 Bg4 d4 Ne4 h3 Bh5 g4 Bg6 a4 a5 Be3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Be3 Bg7 Qd2 c6 Bh6 Bxh6 Qxh6 e5 O-O-O Qe7 f3 exd4 Rxd4 Be6 Rd1 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nge2 Nd7 Nxd5 Bxd5 Nc3 O-O-O Nxd5 cxd5 g3 f5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Ndb5 d6 Nd5 Nxd5 exd5 Nb8 a4 Be7 Be2 O-O Bd2 Bf5 O-O Nd7 a5 a6 Na3 Bg6 Bb4 Rc8 Nc4 Nc5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 g3 Bc5 Bg2 Nc6 d3 O-O Nge2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O Nc3 Ne8 Nd5 Bd6 Re1 c6 Ne3 Be7 c4 Bf6 d4 d5 cxd5 cxd5 b3 Nc7 a4 Re8 Ba3 Bd7 Rc1 Bc6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O b4 Bb6 Bxc6 bxc6 Nxe5 Re8 Nf3 d5 e5 Bg4 d4 Ne4 h3 Bh5 g4 Bg6 a4 a5 Be3 f6 h4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Be3 Bg7 Qd2 c6 Bh6 Bxh6 Qxh6 e5 O-O-O Qe7 f3 exd4 Rxd4 Be6 Rd1 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nge2 Nd7 Nxd5 Bxd5 Nc3 O-O-O Nxd5 cxd5 g3 f5 Qd2 Nb6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O b4 Bb6 Bxc6 bxc6 Nxe5 Re8 Nf3 d5 e5 Bg4 d4 Ne4 h3 Bh5 g4 Bg6 a4 a5 Be3 f6 h4 h5 g5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Be3 Bg7 Qd2 c6 Bh6 Bxh6 Qxh6 e5 O-O-O Qe7 f3 exd4 Rxd4 Be6 Rd1 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nge2 Nd7 Nxd5 Bxd5 Nc3 O-O-O Nxd5 cxd5 g3 f5 Qd2 Nb6 Bd3 Nc4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Ndb5 d6 Nd5 Nxd5 exd5 Nb8 a4 Be7 Be2 O-O Bd2 Bf5 O-O Nd7 a5 a6 Na3 Bg6 Bb4 Rc8 Nc4 Nc5 Bh5 f5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 g3 Bc5 Bg2 Nc6 d3 O-O Nge2 a5 O-O

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 d6 h3 a6 Nbd2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O b4 Bb6 Bxc6 bxc6 Nxe5 Re8 Nf3 d5 e5 Bg4 d4 Ne4 h3 Bh5 g4 Bg6 a4 a5 Be3 f6 h4 h5 g5 fxe5 Nxe5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Ndb5 d6 Nd5 Nxd5 exd5 Nb8 a4 Be7 Be2 O-O Bd2 Bf5 O-O Nd7 a5 a6 Na3 Bg6 Bb4 Rc8 Nc4 Nc5 Bh5 f5 Bxg6 hxg6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 e5 Qh5 Nc6 Bc4 g6 Qf3 Nf6 Ne2 d6 Nbc3 Bg4 Qg3 Bxe2 Bxe2 Nd4 Bd1 Ne6 d3 c6 Ne2 Bg7 a4 d5 Nc3 h5 h4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 d6 h3 a6 Nbd2 h6 a4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O b4 Bb6 Bxc6 bxc6 Nxe5 Re8 Nf3 d5 e5 Bg4 d4 Ne4 h3 Bh5 g4 Bg6 a4 a5 Be3 f6 h4 h5 g5 fxe5 Nxe5 Rxe5 dxe5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Ndb5 d6 Nd5 Nxd5 exd5 Nb8 a4 Be7 Be2 O-O Bd2 Bf5 O-O Nd7 a5 a6 Na3 Bg6 Bb4 Rc8 Nc4 Nc5 Bh5 f5 Bxg6 hxg6 Qe2 Qe8

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 d6 h3 a6 Nbd2 h6 a4 O-O O-O

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 d4 dxe5 Bd3 Qxd4 O-O Be6 Nc3 Qd7 Qe2 Nc6 f4 exf4 Bxf4 Bc5 Kh1 O-O-O a4 Nb4 Rac1 a6 h3 Nxd3 cxd3 Qxd3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 e5 Qh5 Nc6 Bc4 g6 Qf3 Nf6 Ne2 d6 Nbc3 Bg4 Qg3 Bxe2 Bxe2 Nd4 Bd1 Ne6 d3 c6 Ne2 Bg7 a4 d5 Nc3 h5 h4 Qd7 O-O

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (1838)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 e6 Bg5 h6 Bh4 Be7 e3 Nbd7 Qc2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 d3 a6 Ng5 d5 exd5 Na5 O-O h6 Nf3 Bd6 Nbd2 b5 Bb3 Nxb3 axb3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 d4 dxe5 Bd3 Qxd4 O-O Be6 Nc3 Qd7 Qe2 Nc6 f4 exf4 Bxf4 Bc5 Kh1 O-O-O a4 Nb4 Rac1 a6 h3 Nxd3 cxd3 Qxd3 Qe1 Nh5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 d4 dxe5 Bd3 Qxd4 O-O Be6 Nc3 Qd7 Qe2 Nc6 f4 exf4 Bxf4 Bc5 Kh1 O-O-O a4 Nb4 Rac1 a6 h3 Nxd3 cxd3 Qxd3 Qe1 Nh5 Bh2 Bd6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 g3 Bc5 Bg2 Nc6 d3 O-O Nge2 a5 O-O Re8 h3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Bd3 e5 Nde2 Be6 f4 Be7 O-O exf4 Nxf4 Nc6 Be3 Ne5 Bd4 O-O a4 Rc8 Kh1 Nfd7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 e5 Qh5 Nc6 Bc4 g6 Qf3 Nf6 Ne2 d6 Nbc3 Bg4 Qg3 Bxe2 Bxe2 Nd4 Bd1 Ne6 d3 c6 Ne2 Bg7 a4 d5 Nc3 h5 h4 Qd7 O-O Ng4 exd5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 d6 h3 a6 Nbd2 h6 a4 O-O O-O Ba7 b4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 g3 d5 Bg2 Bb4 Nd2 O-O Ngf3 dxc4 a3 Bxd2 Bxd2 Nc6 e3 b5 b3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 d4 dxe5 Bd3 Qxd4 O-O Be6 Nc3 Qd7 Qe2 Nc6 f4 exf4 Bxf4 Bc5 Kh1 O-O-O a4 Nb4 Rac1 a6 h3 Nxd3 cxd3 Qxd3 Qe1 Nh5 Bh2 Bd6 e5 Bb4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Bd3 e5 Nde2 Be6 f4 Be7 O-O exf4 Nxf4 Nc6 Be3 Ne5 Bd4 O-O a4 Rc8 Kh1 Nfd7 Ncd5 Bg5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 e5 Qh5 Nc6 Bc4 g6 Qf3 Nf6 Ne2 d6 Nbc3 Bg4 Qg3 Bxe2 Bxe2 Nd4 Bd1 Ne6 d3 c6 Ne2 Bg7 a4 d5 Nc3 h5 h4 Qd7 O-O Ng4 exd5 cxd5 Re1

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 g3 d5 Bg2 Bb4 Nd2 O-O Ngf3 dxc4 a3 Bxd2 Bxd2 Nc6 e3 b5 b3 Bb7 bxc4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Bd3 e5 Nde2 Be6 f4 Be7 O-O exf4 Nxf4 Nc6 Be3 Ne5 Bd4 O-O a4 Rc8 Kh1 Nfd7 Ncd5 Bg5 a5 h6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 g3 d5 Bg2 Bb4 Nd2 O-O Ngf3 dxc4 a3 Bxd2 Bxd2 Nc6 e3 b5 b3 Bb7 bxc4 bxc4 O-O

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 g3 d5 Bg2 Bb4 Nd2 O-O Ngf3 dxc4 a3 Bxd2 Bxd2 Nc6 e3 b5 b3 Bb7 bxc4 bxc4 O-O Nb8 Qc2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Bd3 e5 Nde2 Be6 f4 Be7 O-O exf4 Nxf4 Nc6 Be3 Ne5 Bd4 O-O a4 Rc8 Kh1 Nfd7 Ncd5 Bg5 a5 h6 Be2 Bxf4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 g3 d5 Bg2 Bb4 Nd2 O-O Ngf3 dxc4 a3 Bxd2 Bxd2 Nc6 e3 b5 b3 Bb7 bxc4 bxc4 O-O Nb8 Qc2 Nbd7 Qxc4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 d4 dxe5 Bd3 Qxd4 O-O Be6 Nc3 Qd7 Qe2 Nc6 f4 exf4 Bxf4 Bc5 Kh1 O-O-O a4 Nb4 Rac1 a6 h3 Nxd3 cxd3 Qxd3 Qe1 Nh5 Bh2 Bd6 e5 Bb4 Qf2 Qg6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 g3 Bc5 Bg2 Nc6 d3 O-O Nge2 a5 O-O Re8 h3 Nd4 Nxd4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 g3 Bc5 Bg2 Nc6 d3 O-O Nge2 a5 O-O Re8 h3 Nd4 Nxd4 Bxd4 Kh2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Bd3 e5 Nde2 Be6 f4 Be7 O-O exf4 Nxf4 Nc6 Be3 Ne5 Bd4 O-O a4 Rc8 Kh1 Nfd7 Ncd5 Bg5 a5 h6 Be2 Bxf4 Nxf4 Nf6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 e5 Qh5 Nc6 Bc4 g6 Qf3 Nf6 Ne2 d6 Nbc3 Bg4 Qg3 Bxe2 Bxe2 Nd4 Bd1 Ne6 d3 c6 Ne2 Bg7 a4 d5 Nc3 h5 h4 Qd7 O-O Ng4 exd5 cxd5 Re1 O-O-O Bd2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 g3 d5 Bg2 Bb4 Nd2 O-O Ngf3 dxc4 a3 Bxd2 Bxd2 Nc6 e3 b5 b3 Bb7 bxc4 bxc4 O-O Nb8 Qc2 Nbd7 Qxc4 c5 Rfc1

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 g3 Bc5 Bg2 Nc6 d3 O-O Nge2 a5 O-O Re8 h3 Nd4 Nxd4 Bxd4 Kh2 c6 f4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Bd3 e5 Nde2 Be6 f4 Be7 O-O exf4 Nxf4 Nc6 Be3 Ne5 Bd4 O-O a4 Rc8 Kh1 Nfd7 Ncd5 Bg5 a5 h6 Be2 Bxf4 Nxf4 Nf6 Bf3 Re8

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 g3 d5 Bg2 Bb4 Nd2 O-O Ngf3 dxc4 a3 Bxd2 Bxd2 Nc6 e3 b5 b3 Bb7 bxc4 bxc4 O-O Nb8 Qc2 Nbd7 Qxc4 c5 Rfc1 Be4 Qa4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 e5 Qh5 Nc6 Bc4 g6 Qf3 Nf6 Ne2 d6 Nbc3 Bg4 Qg3 Bxe2 Bxe2 Nd4 Bd1 Ne6 d3 c6 Ne2 Bg7 a4 d5 Nc3 h5 h4 Qd7 O-O Ng4 exd5 cxd5 Re1 O-O-O Bd2 Kb8 Nb5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 d3 a6 Ng5 d5 exd5 Na5 O-O h6 Nf3 Bd6 Nbd2 b5 Bb3 Nxb3 axb3 Nxd5 Re1

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 d6 h3 a6 Nbd2 h6 a4 O-O O-O Ba7 b4 Ne7 Re1

Transpose to wikichess #209989#

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Mateia Benone    (1601)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 h4 Nxg5 hxg5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 g3 Bc5 Bg2 Nc6 d3 O-O Nge2 a5 O-O Re8 h3 Nd4 Nxd4 Bxd4 Kh2 c6 f4 d5 exd5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2223)
d4 Nf6 Nc3 d5 Bf4 e6 e3 Bb4 Nge2 O-O g4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Mateia Benone    (1601)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 h4 Nxg5 hxg5 c5 f4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1601)
e4 c5 f4 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qd8 Bc4 Nf6 Nf3

Transpose to wikichess #178417#

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1601)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 h4 Nxg5 hxg5 c5 f4 Qb6 b3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1601)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 h4 Nxg5 hxg5 c5 f4 Qb6 b3 cxd4 c4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1601)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nxc6 bxc6 e5 Nd5 c4 Nb6 Bd3 d6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 d3 a6 Ng5 d5 exd5 Na5 O-O h6 Nf3 Bd6 Nbd2 b5 Bb3 Nxb3 axb3 Nxd5 Re1 Bb7 d4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 g3 Bc5 Bg2 Nc6 d3 O-O Nge2 a5 O-O Re8 h3 Nd4 Nxd4 Bxd4 Kh2 c6 f4 d5 exd5 cxd5 Nb5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2223)
d4 Nf6 Nc3 d5 Bf4 e6 e3 Bb4 Nge2 O-O g4 Nxg4 Rg1

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Mateia Benone    (1601)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 h4 Nxg5 hxg5 c5 f4 Qb6 b3 cxd4 c4 e5 fxe5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1601)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nxc6 bxc6 e5 Nd5 c4 Nb6 Bd3 d6 O-O c5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1601)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 h4 Nxg5 hxg5 c5 f4 Qb6 b3 cxd4 c4 e5 fxe5 Qa5 Nd2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 d3 a6 Ng5 d5 exd5 Na5 O-O h6 Nf3 Bd6 Nbd2 b5 Bb3 Nxb3 axb3 Nxd5 Re1 Bb7 d4 Be7 Nxe5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 g3 Bc5 Bg2 Nc6 d3 O-O Nge2 a5 O-O Re8 h3 Nd4 Nxd4 Bxd4 Kh2 c6 f4 d5 exd5 cxd5 Nb5 Bb6 fxe5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2223)
d4 Nf6 Nc3 d5 Bf4 e6 e3 Bb4 Nge2 O-O g4 Nxg4 Rg1 Nf6 a3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Mateia Benone    (1601)
e4 e5 Nf3 d6 d4 Nd7 dxe5 dxe5 Bc4 h6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 d3 a6 Ng5 d5 exd5 Na5 O-O h6 Nf3 Bd6 Nbd2 b5 Bb3 Nxb3 axb3 Nxd5 Re1 Bb7 d4 Be7 Nxe5 O-O c4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2223)
d4 Nf6 Nc3 d5 Bf4 e6 e3 Bb4 Nge2 O-O g4 Nxg4 Rg1 Nf6 a3 Bd6 Qd2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Mateia Benone    (1601)
e4 e5 Nf3 d6 d4 Nd7 dxe5 dxe5 Bc4 h6 Bxf7 Kxf7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1601)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e5 O-O d6 c3 Nf6 d4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1601)
e4 e5 Nf3 d6 d4 Nd7 dxe5 dxe5 Bc4 h6 Bxf7 Kxf7 Nxe5 Kf6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 g3 Bc5 Bg2 Nc6 d3 O-O Nge2 a5 O-O Re8 h3 Nd4 Nxd4 Bxd4 Kh2 c6 f4 d5 exd5 cxd5 Nb5 Bb6 fxe5 Rxe5 d4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2223)
d4 Nf6 Nc3 d5 Bf4 e6 e3 Bb4 Nge2 O-O g4 Nxg4 Rg1 Nf6 a3 Bd6 Qd2 Nc6 O-O-O

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Mateia Benone    (1601)
e4 e5 Nf3 d6 d4 Nd7 dxe5 dxe5 Bc4 h6 Bxf7 Kxf7 Nxe5 Kf6 Nc3 Bd6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1601)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e5 O-O d6 c3 Nf6 d4 cxd4 cxd4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1601)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 h4 d5 Qd3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1601)
e4 e5 Nf3 d6 d4 Nd7 dxe5 dxe5 Bc4 h6 Bxf7 Kxf7 Nxe5 Kf6 Nc3 Bd6 Qf3 Ke7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1601)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 h4 d5 Qd3 f6 Bf4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matt LaDuke    (2163)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 d3 a6 Ng5 d5 exd5 Na5 O-O h6 Nf3 Bd6 Nbd2 b5 Bb3 Nxb3 axb3 Nxd5 Re1 Bb7 d4 Be7 Nxe5 O-O c4 Nb6 Nf1

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Mateia Benone    (1601)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 h4 d5 Qd3 f6 Bf4 e5 Bxe5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 g3 Bc5 Bg2 Nc6 d3 O-O Nge2 a5 O-O Re8 h3 Nd4 Nxd4 Bxd4 Kh2 c6 f4 d5 exd5 cxd5 Nb5 Bb6 fxe5 Rxe5 d4 Rf5 a4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Mateia Benone    (1601)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e5 O-O d6 c3 Nf6 d4 cxd4 cxd4 exd4 Nxd4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 g3 Bc5 Bg2 Nc6 d3 O-O Nge2 a5 O-O Re8 h3 Nd4 Nxd4 Bxd4 Kh2 c6 f4 d5 exd5 cxd5 Nb5 Bb6 fxe5 Rxe5 d4 Rf5 a4 Bd7 Rxf5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2223)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Nd6 Bxc6 dxc6 dxe5 Nf5 Qxd8 Kxd8 Nc3 Bd7 h3 Be7 g4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2223)
d4 Nf6 Nc3 d5 Bf4 e6 e3 Bb4 Nge2 O-O g4 Nxg4 Rg1 Nf6 a3 Bd6 Qd2 Nc6 O-O-O Kh8 h4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Mateia Benone    (1601)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 h4 d5 Qd3 f6 Bf4 e5 Bxe5 fxe5 dxe5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1601)
d4 Nf6 h3 c5 dxc5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1601)
d4 Nf6 h3 c5 dxc5 Qa5 c3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1601)
d4 Nf6 h3 c5 dxc5 Qa5 c3 Qxc5 e3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1601)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 h4 d5 Qd3 f6 Bf4 e5 Bxe5 fxe5 dxe5 Bc5 f3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 g3 Bc5 Bg2 Nc6 d3 O-O Nge2 a5 O-O Re8 h3 Nd4 Nxd4 Bxd4 Kh2 c6 f4 d5 exd5 cxd5 Nb5 Bb6 fxe5 Rxe5 d4 Rf5 a4 Bd7 Rxf5 Bxf5 Bf4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2223)
d4 Nf6 Nc3 d5 Bf4 e6 e3 Bb4 Nge2 O-O g4 Nxg4 Rg1 Nf6 a3 Bd6 Qd2 Nc6 O-O-O Kh8 h4 Rb8 Bg5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2223)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Bd3 Bd6 O-O O-O c4 c6 Re1 Bf5 Qb3 Qd7 Nc3 Nxc3 Bxf5 Qxf5 bxc3 b6 cxd5 cxd5 Qb5 Qd7 Rb1 Nc6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Mateia Benone    (1601)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 h4 d5 Qd3 f6 Bf4 e5 Bxe5 fxe5 dxe5 Bc5 f3 Nf2 Qb5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1601)
b4 c6 e3 Qb6 a3 d5 Bb2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1601)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Qf6 Nb5 Bb4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1601)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Qf6 Nb5 Qd8

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 g3 Bc5 Bg2 Nc6 d3 O-O Nge2 a5 O-O Re8 h3 Nd4 Nxd4 Bxd4 Kh2 c6 f4 d5 exd5 cxd5 Nb5 Bb6 fxe5 Rxe5 d4 Rf5 a4 Bd7 Rxf5 Bxf5 Bf4 Qd7 Rc1

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2223)
d4 Nf6 Nc3 d5 Bf4 e6 e3 Bb4 Nge2 O-O g4 Nxg4 Rg1 Nf6 a3 Bd6 Qd2 Nc6 O-O-O Kh8 h4 Rb8 Bg5 b5 e4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2223)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Bd3 Bd6 O-O O-O c4 c6 Re1 Bf5 Qb3 Qd7 Nc3 Nxc3 Bxf5 Qxf5 bxc3 b6 cxd5 cxd5 Qb5 Qd7 Rb1 Nc6 g3 Bc7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Mateia Benone    (1601)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Qf6 Nb5 Bb4 N1c3 Ba5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1601)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Qf6 Nb5 Qd8 Bf4 d6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1601)
d4 Nf6 h3 c5 dxc5 Qa5 c3 Qxc5 e3 g6 Qc2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1601)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e5 O-O d6 c3 Nf6 d4 cxd4 cxd4 exd4 Nxd4 Bd7 Nc3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1601)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Qf6 Nb5 Qd8 Bf4 d6 N1c3 a6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1601)
d4 Nf6 h3 c5 dxc5 Qa5 c3 Qxc5 e3 g6 Qc2 Bg7 Nd2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1601)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Qf6 Nb5 Qd8 Bf4 d6 N1c3 a6 Nd4 Bd7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1601)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Qf6 Nb5 Qd8 Bf4 d6 N1c3 a6 Nd4 Bd7 Bc4 Qe7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1601)
d4 Nf6 h3 c5 dxc5 Qa5 c3 Qxc5 e3 g6 Qc2 Bg7 Nd2 O-O Ngf3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1601)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nxc6 bxc6 e5 Qe7 Qe2 Nd5 c4 Nf4 Bxf4 g6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1601)
d4 Nf6 h3 c5 dxc5 Qa5 c3 Qxc5 e3 g6 Qc2 Bg7 Nd2 O-O Ngf3 d5 b4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1601)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Qf6 Nb5 Bb4 N1c3 Ba5 Bd2 Bb6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matt LaDuke    (2223)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Bd3 Bd6 O-O O-O c4 c6 Re1 Bf5 Qb3 Qd7 Nc3 Nxc3 Bxf5 Qxf5 bxc3 b6 cxd5 cxd5 Qb5 Qd7 Rb1 Nc6 g3 Bc7 Ba3 Rfd8

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Mateia Benone    (1601)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Qf6 Nb5 Bb4 N1c3 Ba5 Bd2 Bb6 Nd5 Qe5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1601)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Qf6 Nb5 Bb4 N1c3 Ba5 Bd2 Bb6 Nd5 Qe5 Bd3 a6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1601)
e4 c5 f4 a6 Nf3 h6 d4 cxd4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matt LaDuke    (2223)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Bd3 Bd6 O-O O-O c4 c6 Re1 Bf5 Qb3 Qd7 Nc3 Nxc3 Bxf5 Qxf5 bxc3 b6 cxd5 cxd5 Qb5 Qd7 Rb1 Nc6 g3 Bc7 Ba3 Rfd8 Re2 h6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2223)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Nf3 c5 Rb1 O-O Be2 cxd4 cxd4 Qa5 Bd2 Qxa2 O-O Bg4 Be3 Nc6 d5 Ne5 Rxb7 a5 Bc5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Mateia Benone    (1601)
b4 c6 e3 Qb6 a3 d5 Bb2 a5 c4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1601)
e4 c5 f4 a6 Nf3 h6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 d6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matt LaDuke    (2223)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Nd6 Bxc6 dxc6 dxe5 Nf5 Qxd8 Kxd8 Nc3 Bd7 h3 Be7 g4 Nh4 Nxh4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2223)
d4 Nf6 Nc3 d5 Bf4 e6 e3 Bb4 Nge2 O-O g4 Nxg4 Rg1 Nf6 a3 Bd6 Qd2 Nc6 O-O-O Kh8 h4 Rb8 Bg5 b5 e4 Be7 e5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Mateia Benone    (1601)
e4 c5 f4 a6 Nf3 h6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 d6 Nc3 g6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1601)
e4 c5 f4 Nf6 Nc3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxd5 Qxd5 Nf3 Bg4 Be2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matt LaDuke    (2223)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Nd6 Bxc6 dxc6 dxe5 Nf5 Qxd8 Kxd8 Nc3 Bd7 h3 Be7 g4 Nh4 Nxh4 Bxh4 Bf4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Mateia Benone    (1601)
e4 c5 f4 a6 Nf3 h6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 d6 Nc3 g6 Be3 e5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1601)
e4 c5 f4 Nf6 Nc3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxd5 Qxd5 Nf3 Bg4 Be2 Nc6 O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matt LaDuke    (2223)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Nd6 Bxc6 dxc6 dxe5 Nf5 Qxd8 Kxd8 Nc3 Bd7 h3 Be7 g4 Nh4 Nxh4 Bxh4 Bf4 h5 f3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Mateia Benone    (1601)
b4 c6 e3 Qb6 a3 d5 Bb2 a5 c4 axb4 Qb3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1601)
e4 c5 f4 a6 Nf3 h6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 d6 Nc3 g6 Be3 e5 fxe5 dxe5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1601)
e4 c5 f4 a6 Nf3 h6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 d6 Nc3 g6 Be3 e5 fxe5 dxe5 Nf3 Bg7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1601)
e4 c5 f4 Nf6 Nc3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxd5 Qxd5 Nf3 Bg4 Be2 Nc6 O-O g6 c3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matt LaDuke    (2223)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Nd6 Bxc6 dxc6 dxe5 Nf5 Qxd8 Kxd8 Nc3 Bd7 h3 Be7 g4 Nh4 Nxh4 Bxh4 Bf4 h5 f3 a5 Kg2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2223)
d4 Nf6 Nc3 d5 Bf4 e6 e3 Bb4 Nge2 O-O g4 Nxg4 Rg1 Nf6 a3 Bd6 Qd2 Nc6 O-O-O Kh8 h4 Rb8 Bg5 b5 e4 Be7 e5 Ng8 Nf4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2223)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Nd6 Bxc6 dxc6 dxe5 Nf5 Qxd8 Kxd8 Nc3 Bd7 h3 Be7 g4 Nh4 Nxh4 Bxh4 Bf4 h5 f3 a5 Kg2 Be7 a4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Mateia Benone    (1601)
b4 c6 e3 Qb6 a3 d5 Bb2 a5 c4 axb4 Qb3 Nf6 c5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1601)
b4 c6 e3 Qb6 a3 d5 Bb2 a5 c4 axb4 Qb3 Nf6 c5 Qc7 axb4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matt LaDuke    (2223)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Nd6 Bxc6 dxc6 dxe5 Nf5 Qxd8 Kxd8 Nc3 Bd7 h3 Be7 g4 Nh4 Nxh4 Bxh4 Bf4 h5 f3 a5 Kg2 Be7 a4 Kc8 Rfd1

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2223)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Nf3 c5 Rb1 O-O Be2 cxd4 cxd4 Qa5 Bd2 Qxa2 O-O Bg4 Be3 Nc6 d5 Ne5 Rxb7 a5 Bc5 a4 Bxe7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Mateia Benone    (1601)
b4 c6 e3 Qb6 a3 d5 Bb2 a5 c4 axb4 Qb3 Nf6 c5 Qc7 axb4 Rxa1 Bxa1

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 Nxe4 Nxe4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2223)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Nd6 Bxc6 dxc6 dxe5 Nf5 Qxd8 Kxd8 Nc3 Bd7 h3 Be7 g4 Nh4 Nxh4 Bxh4 Bf4 h5 f3 a5 Kg2 Be7 a4 Kc8 Rfd1 b5 Ne4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2223)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Nf3 c5 Rb1 O-O Be2 cxd4 cxd4 Qa5 Bd2 Qxa2 O-O Bg4 Be3 Nc6 d5 Ne5 Rxb7 a5 Bc5 a4 Bxe7 Rfc8 h3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2223)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 cxd4 Nxd4 Qb6 Qd2 Qxb2 Rb1 Qa3 Bb5 Nxd4 Bxd4 a6 Bxd7 Bxd7 Rb3 Qe7 Rxb7 Rc8 O-O Qd8 Qe3 Rc4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Mateia Benone    (1601)
e4 c6 d4 d5 e5 Bf5 Bd3 Bxd3 Qxd3 e6 Nf3 Nd7 O-O c5 c4 dxc4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matt LaDuke    (2223)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Nd6 Bxc6 dxc6 dxe5 Nf5 Qxd8 Kxd8 Nc3 Bd7 h3 Be7 g4 Nh4 Nxh4 Bxh4 Bf4 h5 f3 a5 Kg2 Be7 a4 Kc8 Rfd1 b5 Ne4 Re8 gxh5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2223)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Nf3 c5 Rb1 O-O Be2 cxd4 cxd4 Qa5 Bd2 Qxa2 O-O Bg4 Be3 Nc6 d5 Ne5 Rxb7 a5 Bc5 a4 Bxe7 Rfc8 h3 Bxf3 Bxf3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2223)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 cxd4 Nxd4 Qb6 Qd2 Qxb2 Rb1 Qa3 Bb5 Nxd4 Bxd4 a6 Bxd7 Bxd7 Rb3 Qe7 Rxb7 Rc8 O-O Qd8 Qe3 Rc4 Rfb1 Be7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Mateia Benone    (1601)
e4 c6 d4 d5 e5 Bf5 Bd3 Bxd3 Qxd3 e6 Nf3 Nd7 O-O c5 c4 dxc4 Qxc4 cxd4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matt LaDuke    (2223)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 cxd4 Nxd4 Qb6 Qd2 Qxb2 Rb1 Qa3 Bb5 Nxd4 Bxd4 a6 Bxd7 Bxd7 Rb3 Qe7 Rxb7 Rc8 O-O Qd8 Qe3 Rc4 Rfb1 Be7 h3 O-O

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 Nxe4 Nxe4 dxe4 Qf6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2223)
d4 Nf6 Nc3 d5 Bf4 e6 e3 Bb4 Nge2 O-O g4 Nxg4 Rg1 Nf6 a3 Bd6 Qd2 Nc6 O-O-O Kh8 h4 Rb8 Bg5 b5 e4 Be7 e5 Ng8 Nf4 b4 axb4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2223)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 cxd4 Nxd4 Qb6 Qd2 Qxb2 Rb1 Qa3 Bb5 Nxd4 Bxd4 a6 Bxd7 Bxd7 Rb3 Qe7 Rxb7 Rc8 O-O Qd8 Qe3 Rc4 Rfb1 Be7 f5 Bg5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 Nxe4 Nxe4 dxe4 Qf6 Qd5 Bd6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2223)
d4 Nf6 Nc3 d5 Bf4 e6 e3 Bb4 Nge2 O-O g4 Nxg4 Rg1 Nf6 a3 Bd6 Qd2 Nc6 O-O-O Kh8 h4 Rb8 Bg5 b5 e4 Be7 e5 Ng8 Nf4 b4 axb4 Rxb4 Qe3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2186)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 Nxe4 Nxe4 dxe4 Qf6 Qd5 Bd6 Bxc6 bxc6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2223)
d4 Nf6 Nc3 d5 Bf4 e6 e3 Bb4 Nge2 O-O g4 Nxg4 Rg1 Nf6 a3 Bd6 Qd2 Nc6 O-O-O Kh8 h4 Rb8 Bg5 b5 e4 Be7 e5 Ng8 Nf4 b4 axb4 Rxb4 Qe3 f6 exf6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2223)
d4 Nf6 Nc3 d5 Bf4 e6 e3 Bb4 Nge2 O-O g4 Nxg4 Rg1 Nf6 a3 Bd6 Qd2 Nc6 O-O-O Kh8 h4 Rb8 Bg5 b5 e4 Be7 e5 Ng8 Nf4 b4 axb4 Rxb4 Qe3 f6 exf6 Bxf6 Ba6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Mateia Benone    (1601)
d4 Nf6 c4 c5 dxc5 e6 Nc3 Bxc5 Bg5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1601)
d4 Nf6 c4 c5 dxc5 e6 Nc3 Bxc5 Bg5 h6 Bh4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1601)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Qf6 Nb5 Bc5 Qd2 Bb6 Qf4 Qxf4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1601)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Qf6 Nb5 Bc5 Qd2 Bb6 Qf4 Qxf4 Bxf4 d6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1601)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Qf6 Nb5 Bc5 Qd2 Bb6 Qf4 Qxf4 Bxf4 d6 Bc4 Nf6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1601)
d4 Nf6 c4 c5 dxc5 e6 Nc3 Bxc5 Bg5 h6 Bh4 O-O e3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1601)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nxd4 Qxd4 Nf6 e5 Qe7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1601)
e4 e6 d4 d5 e5 Ne7 Nf3 Nf5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1601)
e4 e6 d4 d5 e5 Ne7 Nf3 Nf5 Bd3 c5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1601)
e4 e6 d4 d5 e5 Ne7 Nf3 Nf5 Bd3 c5 Bxf5 exf5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1601)
e4 e6 d4 d5 e5 Ne7 Nf3 Nf5 Bd3 c5 Bxf5 exf5 c3 Nc6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1820)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 Nc3 Nf6 d4 Be7 Bg5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1820)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 Nc3 Nf6 d4 Be7 Bg5 O-O Qd2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1601)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nxd4 Qxd4 Nf6 e5 Qe7 Be3 Qb4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1601)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nxd4 Qxd4 Nf6 e5 Qe7 Be3 Qb4 Qxb4 Bxb4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1820)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 Nc3 Nf6 d4 Be7 Bg5 O-O Qd2 Nc6 O-O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1601)
e4 e6 d4 d5 e5 Ne7 Nf3 Nf5 Bd3 c5 Bxf5 exf5 c3 Nc6 O-O Be7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1601)
d4 Nf6 c4 c5 dxc5 e6 Nc3 Bxc5 Bg5 h6 Bh4 O-O e3 Nc6 Nf3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1601)
e4 e6 d4 d5 e5 Ne7 Nf3 Nf5 Bd3 c5 Bxf5 exf5 c3 Nc6 O-O Be7 dxc5 Bxc5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1820)
d4 Nf6 c4 c5 d5 b5 Qc2 Na6 Bd2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1601)
d4 Nf6 c4 c5 dxc5 e6 Nc3 Bxc5 Bg5 h6 Bh4 O-O e3 Nc6 Nf3 d5 cxd5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1820)
d4 Nf6 c4 c5 d5 b5 Qc2 Na6 Bd2 Nb4 Bxb4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1820)
d4 Nf6 c4 c5 d5 b5 Qc2 Na6 Bd2 Nb4 Bxb4 cxb4 e4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1820)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 Nc3 Nf6 d4 Be7 h3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1820)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Qf6 Nb5 Bc5 Qe2 Bb6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1820)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Qf6 Nb5 Bc5 Qe2 Bb6 N1c3 Nd4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1820)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Qf6 Nb5 Bc5 Qe2 Bb6 N1c3 Nd4 Nxd4 Bxd4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1601)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 g6 c4 Bg7 Be3 Nf6 Nc3 Ng4 Qxg4 Nxd4 O-O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1820)
d4 Nf6 h3 d5 a3 g6 g3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1820)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 Nc3 Nf6 d4 Be7 h3 O-O Bd3

Transpose to wikichess #17722#

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1820)
d4 Nf6 c4 c5 e3 g6 Nf3 e6 g3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1820)
d4 Nf6 c4 c5 d5 b5 Qc2 Na6 Bd2 Nb4 Bxb4 cxb4 e4 Qa5 b3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1820)
d4 Nf6 c4 c5 e3 g6 Nf3 e6 g3 d5 cxd5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1820)
d4 Nf6 c4 c5 e3 g6 Nf3 e6 g3 d5 cxd5 exd5 Bg2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1820)
d4 Nf6 c4 c5 e3 g6 Nf3 e6 g3 d5 cxd5 exd5 Bg2 Nc6 dxc5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1820)
d4 Nf6 c4 c5 e3 g6 Nf3 e6 g3 d5 cxd5 exd5 Bg2 Nc6 dxc5 Bxc5 O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1820)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Qf6 Nb5 Bc5 Qe2 Bb6 N1c3 Nd4 Nxd4 Bxd4 Nd5 Qc6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1820)
d4 Nf6 c4 c5 d5 b5 Qc2 Na6 Bd2 Nb4 Bxb4 cxb4 e4 Qa5 b3 bxc4 Bxc4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1820)
d4 Nf6 b4

Transpose to wikichess #136610#

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1820)
d4 Nf6 h3 d5 a3 g6 g3 Bg7 e3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1820)
e4 a6 d4 b5 c4 Bb7 Bd3 bxc4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1820)
e4 a6 d4 b5 c4 Bb7 Bd3 bxc4 Bxc4 Bxe4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1820)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 Nxe5 d6 Nf3 Nxe4 d4 d5 Bd3 Be7 O-O O-O c4 c6 cxd5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1820)
e4 a6 d4 b5 c4 Bb7 Bd3 bxc4 Bxc4 Bxe4 Nf3 e6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1820)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Bc5 Be3 Qf6 c3 Nge7 Bc4 O-O O-O b6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matej Pech    (1809)
e4 c5 f4 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qd8 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 e6 d3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Mateia Benone    (1820)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Bc5 Be3 Qf6 c3 Nge7 Bc4 O-O O-O b6 Nc2 Bb7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matej Pech    (1809)
e4 c5 f4 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qd8 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 e6 d3 Nh6 O-O

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Mateia Benone    (1820)
d4 Nf6 h3 d5 a3 g6 g3 Bg7 e3 O-O Bg2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matej Pech    (1809)
e4 c5 f4 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qd8 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 e6 d3 Nh6 O-O Be7 Ne4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Mateia Benone    (1820)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d4 Nxe4 Bd3 d5 Nxe5 Nd7 Nc3 Nxe5 dxe5 Bb4 O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1820)
e4 a6 d4 b5 c4 Bb7 Bd3 bxc4 Bxc4 Bxe4 Nf3 e6 Nbd2 Bxf3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1820)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nf6 d4 Nxe4 Bd3 d5 Nxe5 Nd7 Nc3 Nxe5 dxe5 Bb4 O-O Nxc3 bxc3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1601)
d4 Nf6 c4 c5 Nf3 cxd4 Nxd4 e5 Nb5 d5 cxd5 Bc5 N1c3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1820)
g4 d5 h3 e5 d4 exd4 Qxd4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1820)
d4 Nf6 h3 d5 a3 g6 g3 Bg7 e3 O-O Bg2 c5 dxc5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1820)
g4 d5 h3 e5 d4 exd4 Qxd4 Nc6 Qa4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1820)
d4 Nf6 c4 c5 Nf3 cxd4 Qxd4 Nc6 Qd1 e6 g3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1820)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Bc5 Be3 Qf6 c3 d6 Be2 Qg6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1820)
d4 Nf6 c4 c5 Nf3 cxd4 Qxd4 Nc6 Qd1 e6 g3 d5 cxd5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1820)
g4 d5 h3 e5 d4 exd4 Qxd4 Nc6 Qa4 Nf6 Bg2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1820)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Bc5 Be3 Qf6 c3 d6 Be2 Qg6 Nb5 Bxe3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1820)
e4 a6 d4 b5 c4 Bb7 Bd3 bxc4 Bxc4 Bxe4 Nf3 e6 Nbd2 Bxf3 Nxf3 Bb4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1820)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Bc5 Be3 Qf6 c3 d6 Be2 Qg6 Nb5 Bxe3 Nxc7 Kd7

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1820)
d4 Nf6 h3 d5 a3 g6 g3 Bg7 e3 O-O Bg2 c5 dxc5 Nbd7 c3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1820)
e4 a6 d4 b5 c4 Bb7 Bd3 bxc4 Bxc4 Bxe4 Nf3 e6 Nbd2 Bxf3 Nxf3 Bb4 Bd2 Bxd2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1820)
d4 Nf6 Nf3 d5 Bf4 c5 c3 Nc6 e3 e6

Transpose to wikichess #21163#

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
d4 d5 Nc3 c6 Bf4 Nf6

Transpose to wikichess #28508#

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O Nc3 Bf6 Re1 Re8 Nd5 Rxe1 Qxe1 b6 Qe3 Bb7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
Nc3 d5 Nf3 d4 Ne4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
Nc3 d5 Nf3 d4 Ne4 Nc6 e3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O Nc3 Bf6 Re1 Re8 Nd5 Rxe1 Qxe1 b6 Qe3 Bb7 Nxf6 Qxf6

Transpose to wikichess #192747#

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
Nc3 d5 Nf3 d4 Ne4 Nc6 e3 dxe3 fxe3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
Nc3 d5 Nf3 d4 Ne4 Nc6 e3 dxe3 fxe3 e5 Bc4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Bb4 e5 c5 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 Ne7 Qg4 O-O Nf3 Qa5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
Nc3 d5 Nf3 d4 Ne4 Nc6 e3 dxe3 fxe3 e5 Bc4 Nh6 Qe2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
Nc3 d5 Nf3 d4 Ne4 Nc6 e3 dxe3 fxe3 e5 Bc4 Nh6 Qe2 f5 Nc3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Bb4 e5 c5 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 Ne7 Qg4 O-O Nf3 Qa5 Bd2 c4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
Nc3 d5 Nf3 d4 Ne4 Nc6 e3 dxe3 fxe3 e5 Bc4 Nh6 Qe2 f5 Nc3 e4 Nd4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
Nc3 d5 Nf3 d4 Ne4 Nc6 e3 dxe3 fxe3 e5 Bc4 Nh6 Qe2 f5 Nc3 e4 Nd4 Ne5 Bb3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
Nc3 d5 Nf3 d4 Ne4 Nc6 e3 dxe3 fxe3 e5 Bc4 Nh6 Qe2 f5 Nc3 e4 Nd4 Ne5 Bb3 c6 d3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 b5 Bb3 d5 dxe5 Be6 Nbd2 Nc5 c3 d4 Bxe6 Nxe6 cxd4 Ncxd4 a4 Bb4 axb5 Nxb5 Qa4 c5 Nc4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O d4 Bf6 Re1 Re8 c3 Rxe1 Qxe1 Ne8 Bf4 d5 a4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 b5 Bb3 d5 dxe5 Be6 Nbd2 Nc5 c3 d4 Bxe6 Nxe6 cxd4 Ncxd4 a4 Bb4 axb5 Nxb5 Qa4 c5 Nc4 O-O Be3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O d4 Bf6 Re1 Re8 c3 Rxe1 Qxe1 Ne8 Bf4 d5 a4 a5 Nd2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
Nc3 d5 Nf3 d4 Ne4 Nc6 e3 dxe3 fxe3 e5 Bc4 Nh6 Qe2 f5 Nc3 e4 Nd4 Ne5 Bb3 c6 d3 Qh4 g3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O d4 Bf6 Re1 Re8 c3 Rxe1 Qxe1 Ne8 Bf4 d5 a4 a5 Nd2 Bf5 Qd1

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O d4 Bf6 Re1 Re8 c3 Rxe1 Qxe1 Ne8 Bf4 d5 a4 a5 Nd2 Bf5 Qd1 c6 Qb3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O d4 Bf6 Re1 Re8 c3 Rxe1 Qxe1 Ne8 Bf4 d5 a4 a5 Nd2 Bf5 Qd1 c6 Qb3 Nd6 h3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
Nc3 d5 Nf3 d4 Ne4 Nc6 e3 dxe3 fxe3 e5 Bc4 Nh6 Qe2 f5 Nc3 e4 Nd4 Ne5 Bb3 c6 d3 Qh4 g3 exd3 cxd3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
Nc3 d5 Nf3 d4 Ne4 Nc6 e3 dxe3 fxe3 e5 Bc4 Nh6 Qe2 f5 Nc3 e4 Nd4 Ne5 Bb3 c6 d3 Qh4 g3 exd3 cxd3 Qg4 Rf1

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Mateia Benone    (1601)
d4 Nf6 c4 c5 Nf3 cxd4 Nxd4 e5 Nb5 d5 cxd5 Bc5 N1c3 O-O e3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1820)
d4 Nf6 h3 d5 a3 g6 g3 Bg7 e3 O-O Bg2 c5 dxc5 Nbd7 c3 Nxc5 Nd2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O d4 Bf6 Re1 Re8 c3 Rxe1 Qxe1 Ne8 Bf4 d5 a4 a5 Nd2 Bf5 Qd1 c6 Qb3 Nd6 h3 h6 Nf3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
Nc3 d5 Nf3 d4 Ne4 Nc6 e3 dxe3 fxe3 e5 Bc4 Nh6 Qe2 f5 Nc3 e4 Nd4 Ne5 Bb3 c6 d3 Qh4 g3 exd3 cxd3 Qg4 Rf1 Bd7 Ne6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Mateia Benone    (1601)
d4 Nf6 c4 c5 Nf3 cxd4 Nxd4 e5 Nb5 d5 cxd5 Bc5 N1c3 O-O e3 a6 Na3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1820)
d4 Nf6 c4 c5 Nf3 cxd4 Qxd4 Nc6 Qd1 e6 g3 d5 cxd5 Bb4 Bd2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1820)
e4 c5 b4 cxb4 d4 d5 e5 Nc6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1820)
d4 Nf6 c4 c5 Nf3 cxd4 Qxd4 Nc6 Qd1 e6 g3 d5 cxd5 Bb4 Bd2 Bxd2 Qxd2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
Nc3 d5 Nf3 d4 Ne4 Nc6 e3 dxe3 fxe3 e5 Bc4 Nh6 Qe2 f5 Nc3 e4 Nd4 Ne5 Bb3 c6 d3 Qh4 g3 exd3 cxd3 Qg4 Rf1 Bd7 Ne6 Bxe6 Bxe6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Mateia Benone    (1820)
d4 Nf6 Nf3 d5 Bf4 c5 c3 Nc6 e3 Qb6 Qb3 c4 Qxb6 axb6 Nbd2 b5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
Nc3 d5 Nf3 d4 Ne4 Nc6 e3 dxe3 fxe3 e5 Bc4 Nh6 Qe2 f5 Nc3 e4 Nd4 Ne5 Bb3 c6 d3 Qh4 g3 exd3 cxd3 Qg4 Rf1 Bd7 Ne6 Bxe6 Bxe6 Qg6 Bb3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
Nc3 d5 Nf3 d4 Ne4 Nc6 e3 dxe3 fxe3 e5 Bc4 Nh6 Qe2 f5 Nc3 e4 Nd4 Ne5 Bb3 c6 d3 Qh4 g3 exd3 cxd3 Qg4 Rf1 Bd7 Ne6 Bxe6 Bxe6 Qg6 Bb3 O-O-O d4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2245)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 exd5 exd5 Bd3 Nc6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2245)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 exd5 exd5 Bd3 Nc6 Nf3 Bg4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Mateia Benone    (1820)
g4 d5 h3 e5 d4 exd4 Qxd4 Nc6 Qa4 Nf6 Bg2 Be6 Nf3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1820)
d4 Nf6 Nf3 d5 Bf4 c5 c3 Nc6 e3 Qb6 Qb3 c4 Qxb6 axb6 Nbd2 b5 Ne5 Nh5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
Nc3 d5 Nf3 d4 Ne4 Nc6 e3 dxe3 fxe3 e5 Bc4 Nh6 Qe2 f5 Nc3 e4 Nd4 Ne5 Bb3 c6 d3 Qh4 g3 exd3 cxd3 Qg4 Rf1 Bd7 Ne6 Bxe6 Bxe6 Qg6 Bb3 O-O-O d4 Neg4 e4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2245)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 exd5 exd5 Bd3 Nc6 Nf3 Bg4 Bb5 Bb4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Mateia Benone    (1820)
d4 Nf6 Nf3 d5 Bf4 c5 e3 Nc6 Bb5 Qa5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matt LaDuke    (2245)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 exd5 exd5 Bd3 Nc6 Nf3 Bg4 Bb5 Bb4 Bxc6 bxc6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Mateia Benone    (1820)
d4 Nf6 Nf3 d5 Bf4 c5 e3 Nc6 Bb5 Qa5 Nc3 Ne4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1820)
d4 Nf6 Nf3 d5 Bf4 c5 e3 Nc6 Bb5 Qa5 Nc3 Ne4 O-O Nxc3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1820)
d4 Nf6 Nf3 d5 Bf4 c5 e3 Nc6 Bb5 Qa5 Nc3 Ne4 O-O Nxc3 Bxc6 bxc6

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 b5 Bb3 d5 dxe5 Be6 Nbd2 Nc5 c3 d4 Bxe6 Nxe6 cxd4 Ncxd4 a4 Bb4 axb5 Nxb5 Qa4 c5 Nc4 O-O Be3 Rb8 Qd1

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
d4 d5 c4 e6 Nc3 c6 e4 dxe4 Nxe4 Bb4 Bd2 Qxd4 Bxb4 Qxe4 Be2 Na6 Bd6 Qxg2 Qd2 Nf6 Bf3 Qg6 O-O-O

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Mateia Benone    (1820)
d4 Nf6 c4 c5 dxc5 e6 Nc3 Bxc5 e4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 b5 Bb3 d5 dxe5 Be6 Nbd2 Nc5 c3 d4 Bxe6 Nxe6 cxd4 Ncxd4 a4 Bb4 axb5 Nxb5 Qa4 c5 Nc4 O-O Be3 Rb8 Qd1 a5 Qxd8

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
d4 d5 c4 e6 Nc3 c6 e4 dxe4 Nxe4 Bb4 Bd2 Qxd4 Bxb4 Qxe4 Be2 Na6 Bd6 Qxg2 Qd2 Nf6 Bf3 Qg6 O-O-O e5 Bxe5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Mateia Benone    (1820)
d4 Nf6 Nf3 d5 Bf4 c5 e3 Nc6 Bb5 Qa5 Nc3 Ne4 O-O Nxc3 Bxc6 bxc6 bxc3 Qxc3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1820)
d4 Nf6 c4 c5 dxc5 e6 Nc3 Bxc5 e4 Nc6 Nf3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
d4 d5 c4 e6 Nc3 c6 e4 dxe4 Nxe4 Bb4 Bd2 Qxd4 Bxb4 Qxe4 Be2 Na6 Bd6 Qxg2 Qd2 Nf6 Bf3 Qg6 O-O-O e5 Bxe5 Be6 Ne2

Transpose to wikichess #59136#

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2245)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 exd5 exd5 Bd3 Nc6 Nf3 Bg4 Bb5 Bb4 Bxc6 bxc6 O-O O-O

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2245)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 exd5 exd5 Bd3 Nc6 Nf3 Bg4 Bb5 Bb4 Bxc6 bxc6 O-O O-O h3 Bh5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Mateia Benone    (1820)
d4 Nf6 c4 c5 e3 g6 Nf3 cxd4 exd4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1820)
g4 d5 h3 e5 d4 exd4 Qxd4 Nc6 Qa4 Nf6 Bg2 Be6 Nf3 Ne4 Nbd2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1820)
d4 Nf6 c4 c5 dxc5 e6 Nc3 Bxc5 e4 Nc6 Nf3 O-O Bd3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1820)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nxc6 bxc6 e5 Nd5 c4 Nb6 Bd3 Bb4 Nd2 Bxd2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matt LaDuke    (2245)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 exd5 exd5 Bd3 Nc6 Nf3 Bg4 Bb5 Bb4 Bxc6 bxc6 O-O O-O h3 Bh5 Qd3 c5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2245)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 exd5 exd5 Bd3 Nc6 Nf3 Bg4 Bb5 Bb4 Bxc6 bxc6 O-O O-O h3 Bh5 Qd3 c5 dxc5 Bxc5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2245)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 exd5 exd5 Bd3 Nc6 Nf3 Bg4 Bb5 Bb4 Bxc6 bxc6 O-O O-O h3 Bh5 Qd3 c5 dxc5 Bxc5 Bg5 c6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2245)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O d4 Ne8 d5 Bc5 Re1 d6 Nc3 Bf5 a3 Qh4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Mateia Benone    (1820)
d4 Nf6 c4 c5 e3 g6 Nf3 cxd4 exd4 Bg7 Nc3

Transpose to wikichess #217062#

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matt LaDuke    (2245)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 exd5 exd5 Bd3 Nc6 Nf3 Bg4 Bb5 Bb4 Bxc6 bxc6 O-O O-O h3 Bh5 Qd3 c5 dxc5 Bxc5 Bg5 c6 Rae1 Bg6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2245)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O d4 Ne8 d5 Bc5 Re1 d6 Nc3 Bf5 a3 Qh4 Be3 Bxe3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2245)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 exd5 exd5 Bd3 Nc6 Nf3 Bg4 Bb5 Bb4 Bxc6 bxc6 O-O O-O h3 Bh5 Qd3 c5 dxc5 Bxc5 Bg5 c6 Rae1 Bg6 Qd1 h6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2245)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O d4 Ne8 d5 Bc5 Re1 d6 Nc3 Bf5 a3 Qh4 Be3 Bxe3 Rxe3 Nf6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Mateia Benone    (1820)
g4 d5 h3 e5 d4 exd4 Qxd4 Nc6 Qa4 Nf6 Bg2 Be6 Nf3 Ne4 Nbd2 Nc5 Qf4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1820)
e4 e5 Nf3 f5 Nxe5 Nf6 Bc4 Qe7 d4 Nc6 O-O fxe4 Bf7 Kd8 Nxc6 bxc6 Bb3 a5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matt LaDuke    (2245)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O d4 Ne8 d5 Bc5 Re1 d6 Nc3 Bf5 a3 Qh4 Be3 Bxe3 Rxe3 Nf6 Rf3 Bd7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Mateia Benone    (1820)
d4 Nf6 c4 c5 dxc5 e6 Nc3 Bxc5 e4 Nc6 Nf3 O-O Bd3 d5 exd5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matt LaDuke    (2245)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 exd5 exd5 Bd3 Nc6 Nf3 Bg4 Bb5 Bb4 Bxc6 bxc6 O-O O-O h3 Bh5 Qd3 c5 dxc5 Bxc5 Bg5 c6 Rae1 Bg6 Qd1 h6 Bh4 Bh5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2245)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O d4 Ne8 d5 Bc5 Re1 d6 Nc3 Bf5 a3 Qh4 Be3 Bxe3 Rxe3 Nf6 Rf3 Bd7 Qc1 Qh5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2245)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O d4 Ne8 d5 Bc5 Re1 d6 Nc3 Bf5 a3 Qh4 Be3 Bxe3 Rxe3 Nf6 Rf3 Bd7 Qc1 Qh5 Qd2 Rfe8

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (1862)
e4 c5 Na3 Nc6 Bb5 g6 Nf3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1862)
e4 c5 Na3 Nc6 Bb5 g6 Nf3 Bg7 O-O

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2245)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O d4 Ne8 d5 Bc5 Re1 d6 Nc3 Bf5 a3 Qh4 Be3 Bxe3 Rxe3 Nf6 Rf3 Bd7 Qc1 Qh5 Qd2 Rfe8 Rf4 h6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (1862)
e4 c5 Na3 Nc6 Bb5 g6 Nf3 Bg7 O-O Nf6 d3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1862)
e4 c5 Na3 Nc6 Bb5 g6 Nf3 Bg7 O-O Nf6 d3 O-O h3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1862)
e4 c5 Na3 Nc6 Bb5 g6 Nf3 Bg7 O-O Nf6 d3 O-O h3 Nd4 e5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1862)
e4 c5 Na3 Nc6 Bb5 g6 Nf3 Bg7 O-O Nf6 d3 O-O h3 Nd4 e5 Ne8 Re1

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2245)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 exd5 exd5 Bd3 Nc6 Nf3 Bg4 Bb5 Bb4 Bxc6 bxc6 O-O O-O h3 Bh5 Qd3 c5 dxc5 Bxc5 Bg5 c6 Rae1 Bg6 Qd1 h6 Bh4 Bh5 Qd3 g5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2245)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 exd5 exd5 Bd3 Nc6 Nf3 Bg4 Bb5 Bb4 Bxc6 bxc6 O-O O-O h3 Bh5 Qd3 c5 dxc5 Bxc5 Bg5 c6 Rae1 Bg6 Qd1 h6 Bh4 Bh5 Qd3 g5 Bg3 Bg6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2245)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 exd5 exd5 Bd3 Nc6 Nf3 Bg4 Bb5 Bb4 Bxc6 bxc6 O-O O-O h3 Bh5 Qd3 c5 dxc5 Bxc5 Bg5 c6 Rae1 Bg6 Qd1 h6 Bh4 Bh5 Qd3 g5 Bg3 Bg6 Qd2 Ne4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Mateia Benone    (1820)
d4 Nf6 c4 c5 dxc5 e6 Nc3 Bxc5 e4 Nc6 Nf3 O-O Bd3 d5 exd5 exd5 O-O

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matt LaDuke    (2245)
e4 c5 d4 cxd4 c3 dxc3 Nxc3 Nc6 Nf3 e6 Be2 Bb4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2245)
e4 c5 d4 cxd4 c3 dxc3 Nxc3 Nc6 Nf3 e6 Be2 Bb4 O-O Nge7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2245)
e4 c5 d4 cxd4 c3 dxc3 Nxc3 Nc6 Nf3 e6 Be2 Bb4 O-O Nge7 Nb5 d5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2245)
e4 c5 d4 cxd4 c3 dxc3 Nxc3 Nc6 Nf3 e6 Be2 Bb4 O-O Nge7 Nb5 d5 Bf4 O-O

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2245)
e4 c5 d4 cxd4 c3 dxc3 Nxc3 Nc6 Nf3 e6 Be2 Bb4 O-O Nge7 Nb5 d5 Bf4 O-O Nc7 Rb8

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2245)
e4 c5 d4 cxd4 c3 dxc3 Nxc3 Nc6 Nf3 e6 Be2 Bb4 O-O Nge7 Nb5 d5 Bf4 O-O Nc7 Rb8 exd5 exd5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Bc5 d3 d6 c3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 e4 Bb4 d3 O-O a3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
e4 c6 d4 d5 e5 Bf5 Nd2 e6 Nb3 Nd7 Nf3 Qc7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2245)
e4 c5 d4 cxd4 c3 dxc3 Nxc3 Nc6 Nf3 e6 Be2 Bb4 O-O Nge7 Nb5 d5 Bf4 O-O Nc7 Rb8 exd5 exd5 Nb5 Ra8

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 e4 Bb4 d3 O-O a3 Bxc3 bxc3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
e4 c6 d4 d5 e5 Bf5 Nd2 e6 Nb3 Nd7 Nf3 Qc7 Be2 c5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2245)
e4 c5 d4 cxd4 c3 dxc3 Nxc3 Nc6 Nf3 e6 Be2 Bb4 O-O Nge7 Nb5 d5 Bf4 O-O Nc7 Rb8 exd5 exd5 Nb5 Ra8 Nc7 Rb8

Transpose to wikichess #220445#

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 e4 Bb4 d3 O-O a3 Bxc3 bxc3 Rb8 a4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 dxe4 Qe7 h3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
e4 c6 d4 d5 e5 Bf5 Nd2 e6 Nb3 Nd7 Nf3 Qc7 Be2 c5 dxc5 Bxc5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 e4 Bb4 d3 O-O a3 Bxc3 bxc3 Rb8 a4 d6 g3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 dxe4 Qe7 h3 h6 b4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
e4 c6 d4 d5 e5 Bf5 Nd2 e6 Nb3 Nd7 Nf3 Qc7 Be2 c5 dxc5 Bxc5 Nxc5 Qxc5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 e4 Bb4 d3 O-O a3 Bxc3 bxc3 Rb8 a4 d6 g3 Ne8 Nh4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 e4 Bb4 d3 O-O a3 Bxc3 bxc3 Rb8 a4 d6 g3 Ne8 Nh4 Ne7 Bg2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 dxe4 Qe7 h3 h6 b4 Bd6 a3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
e4 c6 d4 d5 e5 Bf5 Nd2 e6 Nb3 Nd7 Nf3 Qc7 Be2 c5 dxc5 Bxc5 Nxc5 Qxc5 Nd4 Ne7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 e4 Bb4 d3 O-O a3 Bxc3 bxc3 Rb8 a4 d6 g3 Ne8 Nh4 Ne7 Bg2 f5 exf5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 e4 Bb4 d3 O-O a3 Bxc3 bxc3 Rb8 a4 d6 g3 Ne8 Nh4 Ne7 Bg2 f5 exf5 Nxf5 Nf3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 dxe4 Qe7 h3 h6 b4 Bd6 a3 a5 Rb1

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
e4 c6 d4 d5 e5 Bf5 Nd2 e6 Nb3 Nd7 Nf3 Qc7 Be2 c5 dxc5 Bxc5 Nxc5 Qxc5 Nd4 Ne7 f4 Be4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 e4 Bb4 d3 O-O a3 Bxc3 bxc3 Rb8 a4 d6 g3 Ne8 Nh4 Ne7 Bg2 f5 exf5 Nxf5 Nf3 b6 O-O

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 dxe4 Qe7 h3 h6 b4 Bd6 a3 a5 Rb1 Rd8 Re1

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
e4 c6 d4 d5 e5 Bf5 Nd2 e6 Nb3 Nd7 Nf3 Qc7 Be2 c5 dxc5 Bxc5 Nxc5 Qxc5 Nd4 Ne7 f4 Be4 Be3 Qb4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Nd6 Bxc6 dxc6 dxe5 Nf5 Qxd8 Kxd8 Nc3 Bd7 h3 b6 g4 Ne7 Ng5 Ke8 Rd1 Nd5 Nge4 Nb4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 e4 Bb4 d3 O-O a3 Bxc3 bxc3 Rb8 a4 d6 g3 Ne8 Nh4 Ne7 Bg2 f5 exf5 Nxf5 Nf3 b6 O-O Bb7 d4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Gergely Matisz    (1898)
e4 Na6 Nc3

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1898)
e4 Na6 Bxa6

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1898)
e4 Na6 Bxa6 bxa6 Nf3

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1898)
Na3 e5 e3 d5

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1898)
Na3 d5 e3 e5

Transpose to wikichess #221402#

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1898)
e4 Na6 Bxa6 bxa6 Nf3 e6 d4

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Nd6 Bxc6 dxc6 dxe5 Nf5 Qxd8 Kxd8 Nc3 Bd7 h3 b6 g4 Ne7 Ng5 Ke8 Rd1 Nd5 Nge4 Nb4 Rd2 h5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
e4 Na6 Nc3 e6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Gergely Matisz    (1898)
e4 Na6 Nc3 e6 d4

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1898)
Na3 e5 e3 d5 d4 e4

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1898)
e4 Na6 Bxa6 bxa6 Nf3 e6 d4 Bb7 e5

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Nd6 Bxc6 dxc6 dxe5 Nf5 Qxd8 Kxd8 Nc3 Bd7 h3 b6 g4 Ne7 Ng5 Ke8 Rd1 Nd5 Nge4 Nb4 Rd2 h5 f3 Be7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
e4 Na6 Nc3 e6 d4 d5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 dxe4 Qe7 h3 h6 b4 Bd6 a3 a5 Rb1 Rd8 Re1 Nh5 Qc2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
e4 c6 d4 d5 e5 Bf5 Nd2 e6 Nb3 Nd7 Nf3 Qc7 Be2 c5 dxc5 Bxc5 Nxc5 Qxc5 Nd4 Ne7 f4 Be4 Be3 Qb4 Qd2 Qxd2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 e4 Bb4 d3 O-O a3 Bxc3 bxc3 Rb8 a4 d6 g3 Ne8 Nh4 Ne7 Bg2 f5 exf5 Nxf5 Nf3 b6 O-O Bb7 d4 Qf6 d5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 dxe4 Qe7 h3 h6 b4 Bd6 a3 a5 Rb1 Rd8 Re1 Nh5 Qc2 Qf6 Bf1

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
e4 c6 d4 d5 e5 Bf5 Nd2 e6 Nb3 Nd7 Nf3 Qc7 Be2 c5 dxc5 Bxc5 Nxc5 Qxc5 Nd4 Ne7 f4 Be4 Be3 Qb4 Qd2 Qxd2 Bxd2 Nf5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Nd6 Bxc6 dxc6 dxe5 Nf5 Qxd8 Kxd8 Nc3 Bd7 h3 b6 g4 Ne7 Ng5 Ke8 Rd1 Nd5 Nge4 Nb4 Rd2 h5 f3 Be7 a3 Nd5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Nd6 Bxc6 dxc6 dxe5 Nf5 Qxd8 Kxd8 Nc3 Bd7 h3 b6 g4 Ne7 Ng5 Ke8 Rd1 Nd5 Nge4 Nb4 Rd2 h5 f3 Be7 a3 Nd5 Ne2 f5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Nd6 Bxc6 dxc6 dxe5 Nf5 Qxd8 Kxd8 Nc3 Bd7 h3 b6 g4 Ne7 Ng5 Ke8 Rd1 Nd5 Nge4 Nb4 Rd2 h5 f3 Be7 a3 Nd5 Ne2 f5 exf6 Nxf6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Nd6 Bxc6 dxc6 dxe5 Nf5 Qxd8 Kxd8 Nc3 Bd7 h3 h6 b3 Kc8 Bb2 b6 Rad1 c5 Nd5 a5 Rfe1 Be6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 e4 Bb4 d3 O-O a3 Bxc3 bxc3 Rb8 a4 d6 g3 Ne8 Nh4 Ne7 Bg2 f5 exf5 Nxf5 Nf3 b6 O-O Bb7 d4 Qf6 d5 h6 Nd2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 dxe4 Qe7 h3 h6 b4 Bd6 a3 a5 Rb1 Rd8 Re1 Nh5 Qc2 Qf6 Bf1 Nf4 Kh1

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
e4 c6 d4 d5 e5 Bf5 Nd2 e6 Nb3 Nd7 Nf3 Qc7 Be2 c5 dxc5 Bxc5 Nxc5 Qxc5 Nd4 Ne7 f4 Be4 Be3 Qb4 Qd2 Qxd2 Bxd2 Nf5 Nxf5 exf5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Nd6 Bxc6 dxc6 dxe5 Nf5 Qxd8 Kxd8 Nc3 Bd7 h3 h6 b3 Kc8 Bb2 b6 Rad1 c5 Nd5 a5 Rfe1 Be6 a4 g5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 e4 Bb4 d3 O-O a3 Bxc3 bxc3 Rb8 a4 d6 g3 Ne8 Nh4 Ne7 Bg2 f5 exf5 Nxf5 Nf3 b6 O-O Bb7 d4 Qf6 d5 h6 Nd2 Qe7 a5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 dxe4 Qe7 h3 h6 b4 Bd6 a3 a5 Rb1 Rd8 Re1 Nh5 Qc2 Qf6 Bf1 Nf4 Kh1 axb4 axb4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Nd6 Bxc6 dxc6 dxe5 Nf5 Qxd8 Kxd8 Nc3 Bd7 h3 h6 b3 Kc8 Bb2 b6 Rad1 c5 Nd5 a5 Rfe1 Be6 a4 g5 g4 Ne7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Nd6 Bxc6 dxc6 dxe5 Nf5 Qxd8 Kxd8 Nc3 Bd7 h3 h6 b3 Kc8 Bb2 b6 Rad1 c5 Nd5 a5 Rfe1 Be6 a4 g5 g4 Ne7 Ne3 Ng6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 dxe4 Qe7 h3 h6 b4 Bd6 a3 a5 Rb1 Rd8 Re1 Nh5 Qc2 Qf6 Bf1 Nf4 Kh1 axb4 axb4 Bd7 Kh2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
e4 c6 d4 d5 e5 Bf5 Nd2 e6 Nb3 Nd7 Nf3 Qc7 Be2 c5 dxc5 Bxc5 Nxc5 Qxc5 Nd4 Ne7 f4 Be4 Be3 Qb4 Qd2 Qxd2 Bxd2 Nf5 Nxf5 exf5 Rc1 g5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Nd6 Bxc6 dxc6 dxe5 Nf5 Qxd8 Kxd8 Nc3 Bd7 h3 h6 b3 Kc8 Bb2 b6 Rad1 c5 Nd5 a5 Rfe1 Be6 a4 g5 g4 Ne7 Ne3 Ng6 Kg2 Kb7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 e4 Bb4 d3 O-O a3 Bxc3 bxc3 Rb8 a4 d6 g3 Ne8 Nh4 Ne7 Bg2 f5 exf5 Nxf5 Nf3 b6 O-O Bb7 d4 Qf6 d5 h6 Nd2 Qe7 a5 Nf6 axb6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 dxe4 Qe7 h3 h6 b4 Bd6 a3 a5 Rb1 Rd8 Re1 Nh5 Qc2 Qf6 Bf1 Nf4 Kh1 axb4 axb4 Bd7 Kh2 Nb8 g3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
e4 c6 d4 d5 e5 Bf5 Nd2 e6 Nb3 Nd7 Nf3 Qc7 Be2 c5 dxc5 Bxc5 Nxc5 Qxc5 Nd4 Ne7 f4 Be4 Be3 Qb4 Qd2 Qxd2 Bxd2 Nf5 Nxf5 exf5 Rc1 g5 O-O gxf4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
a4 e5 e4 Nc6 Nc3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
a4 e5 e4 Nc6 Nc3 Nf6 Nd5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
a4 e5 e4 Nc6 Nc3 Nf6 Nd5 Nxe4 d3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
d4 d5 c4 b6 cxd5 Qxd5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
e4 c6 d4 d5 e5 Bf5 Nd2 e6 Nb3 Nd7 Nf3 Qc7 Be2 c5 dxc5 Bxc5 Nxc5 Qxc5 Nd4 Ne7 f4 Be4 Be3 Qb4 Qd2 Qxd2 Bxd2 Nf5 Nxf5 exf5 Rc1 g5 O-O gxf4 Bxf4 Rg8

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Gergely Matisz    (1898)
e4 Na6 Nc3 e6 d4 d5 a3

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1898)
Na3 e5 e3 d5 d4 Nc6

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
a4 e5 e4 Nc6 Nc3 Nf6 Nd5 Nxe4 d3 Nf6 Bg5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
d4 d5 c4 b6 cxd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qd8

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Gergely Matisz    (1898)
e4 Na6 Bxa6 bxa6 Nf3 e6 d4 Bb7 e5 c5 Nc3

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1898)
Na3 e5 e3 d5 d4 e4 Ne2 c6

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
e4 Na6 Nc3 e6 d4 d5 a3 dxe4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
d4 d5 c4 b6 cxd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qd8 Nf3 Nf6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
d4 Nf6 g4 Nxg4 e4 d6 Be2 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Nf3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Gergely Matisz    (1898)
e4 Na6 Nc3 e6 d4 d5 a3 dxe4 Nxe4

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
e4 Na6 Nc3 e6 d4 d5 a3 dxe4 Nxe4 Nb8

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
Na3 e5 e3 d5 d4 Nc6 Be2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
a4 e5 e4 Nc6 Nc3 Nf6 Nd5 Nxe4 d3 Nf6 Bg5 d6 Bxf6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
d4 Nf6 g4 Nxg4 e4 d6 Be2 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Nf3 Nc6 h4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
e4 c6 d4 d5 e5 Bf5 Nd2 e6 Nb3 Nd7 Nf3 Qc7 Be2 c5 dxc5 Bxc5 Nxc5 Qxc5 Nd4 Ne7 f4 Be4 Be3 Qb4 Qd2 Qxd2 Bxd2 Nf5 Nxf5 exf5 Rc1 g5 O-O gxf4 Bxf4 Rg8 g3 Ke7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
a4 e5 e4 Nc6 Nc3 Nf6 Nd5 Nxe4 d3 Nf6 Bg5 d6 Bxf6 gxf6 Qf3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
d4 d5 c4 b6 cxd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qd8 Nf3 Nf6 e4 Bb7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
d4 Nf6 g4 Nxg4 e4 d6 Be2 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Nf3 Nc6 h4 Be7 d5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
d4 Nf6 g4 Nxg4 e4 d6 Be2 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Nf3 Nc6 h4 Be7 d5 Nb4 Rg1

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
a4 e5 e4 Nc6 Nc3 Nf6 Nd5 Nxe4 d3 Nf6 Bg5 d6 Bxf6 gxf6 Qf3 Nd4 Nxf6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
d4 d5 c4 b6 cxd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qd8 Nf3 Nf6 e4 Bb7 Bb5 Nc6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
d4 Nf6 g4 Nxg4 e4 d6 Be2 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Nf3 Nc6 h4 Be7 d5 Nb4 Rg1 g6 a3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
d4 d5 c4 b6 cxd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qd8 Nf3 Nf6 e4 Bb7 Bb5 Nc6 Ne5 Nd7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
d4 Nf6 g4 Nxg4 e4 d6 Be2 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Nf3 Nc6 h4 Be7 d5 Nb4 Rg1 g6 a3 Na6 Be3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
d4 d5 c4 b6 cxd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qd8 Nf3 Nf6 e4 Bb7 Bb5 Nc6 Ne5 Nd7 Nxc6 e6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
d4 Nf6 g4 Nxg4 e4 d6 Be2 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Nf3 Nc6 h4 Be7 d5 Nb4 Rg1 g6 a3 Na6 Be3 Bg4 Nd2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
d4 Nf6 g4 Nxg4 e4 d6 Be2 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Nf3 Nc6 h4 Be7 d5 Nb4 Rg1 g6 a3 Na6 Be3 Bg4 Nd2 Bh5 Bh6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Gergely Matisz    (1898)
e4 Na6 Nc3 e6 d4 d5 a3 dxe4 Nxe4 Nb8 Nf3

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1898)
Na3 e5 e3 d5 d4 Nc6 Be2 e4

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
e4 Na6 Nc3 e6 d4 d5 a3 dxe4 Nxe4 Nb8 Nf3 Nd7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
d4 Nf6 g4 Nxg4 e4 d6 Be2 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Nf3 Nc6 h4 Be7 d5 Nb4 Rg1 g6 a3 Na6 Be3 Bg4 Nd2 Bh5 Bh6 Nb8 Bg7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Gergely Matisz    (1898)
Na3 e5 e3 d5 d4 e4 Ne2 c6 c4 a6

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
Na3 e5 e3 d5 d4 Nc6 Be2 e4 c4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
d4 Nf6 g4 Nxg4 e4 d6 Be2 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Nf3 Nc6 h4 Be7 d5 Nb4 Rg1 g6 a3 Na6 Be3 Bg4 Nd2 Bh5 Bh6 Nb8 Bg7 Bxe2 Qxe2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
d4 Nf6 g4 Nxg4 e4 d6 Be2 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Nf3 Nc6 h4 Be7 d5 Nb4 Rg1 g6 a3 Na6 Be3 Bg4 Nd2 Bh5 Bh6 Nb8 Bg7 Bxe2 Qxe2 Rg8 Bh6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
d4 Nf6 g4 Nxg4 e4 d6 Be2 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Nf3 Nc6 h4 Be7 d5 Nb4 Rg1 g6 a3 Na6 Be3 Bg4 Nd2 Bh5 Bh6 Nb8 Bg7 Bxe2 Qxe2 Rg8 Bh6 Nbd7 Nc4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
d4 Nf6 g4 Nxg4 e4 d6 Be2 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Nf3 Nc6 h4 Be7 d5 Nb4 Rg1 g6 a3 Na6 Be3 Bg4 Nd2 Bh5 Bh6 Nb8 Bg7 Bxe2 Qxe2 Rg8 Bh6 Nbd7 Nc4 Nh5 Qxh5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
d4 Nf6 g4 Nxg4 e4 d6 Be2 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Nf3 Nc6 h4 Be7 d5 Nb4 Rg1 g6 a3 Na6 Be3 Bg4 Nd2 Bh5 Bh6 Nb8 Bg7 Bxe2 Qxe2 Rg8 Bh6 Nbd7 Nc4 Nh5 Qxh5 gxh5 Rxg8

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Gergely Matisz    (1898)
e4 Na6 Nc3 e6 d4 d5 a3 dxe4 Nxe4 Nb8 Nf3 Nd7 Bd3

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1898)
e4 Na6 Bxa6 bxa6 Nf3 e6 d4 Bb7 e5 c5 Nc3 cxd4 Qxd4

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1898)
Na3 e5 e3 d5 d4 e4 Ne2 c6 c4 a6 Nc2 Bd6

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1898)
Na3 e5 e3 d5 d4 Nc6 Be2 e4 c4 Bxa3

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
e4 Na6 Nc3 e6 d4 d5 a3 dxe4 Nxe4 Nb8 Nf3 Nd7 Bd3 Ngf6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
Na3 e5 e3 d5 d4 Nc6 Be2 e4 c4 Bxa3 bxa3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Gergely Matisz    (1898)
e4 Na6 Nc3 e6 d4 d5 a3 dxe4 Nxe4 Nb8 Nf3 Nd7 Bd3 Ngf6 Nxf6

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1898)
e4 Na6 Bxa6 bxa6 Nf3 e6 d4 Bb7 e5 c5 Nc3 cxd4 Qxd4 Ne7 Ne4

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
e4 Na6 Nc3 e6 d4 d5 a3 dxe4 Nxe4 Nb8 Nf3 Nd7 Bd3 Ngf6 Nxf6 Nxf6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Gergely Matisz    (1898)
Na3 e5 e3 d5 d4 e4 Ne2 c6 c4 a6 Nc2 Bd6 Nc3 Nf6

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1898)
Na3 e5 e3 d5 d4 Nc6 Be2 e4 c4 Bxa3 bxa3 Qg5

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
Na3 e5 e3 d5 d4 Nc6 Be2 e4 c4 Bxa3 bxa3 Qg5 Kf1

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Gergely Matisz    (1898)
Na3 e5 e3 d5 d4 Nc6 Be2 e4 c4 Bxa3 bxa3 Qg5 Kf1 Nf6

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1898)
Na3 e5 e3 d5 d4 e4 Ne2 c6 c4 a6 Nc2 Bd6 Nc3 Nf6 b3 h5

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1898)
e4 Na6 Bxa6 bxa6 Nf3 e6 d4 Bb7 e5 c5 Nc3 cxd4 Qxd4 Ne7 Ne4 Nf5 Qd3

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1898)
e4 Na6 Nc3 e6 d4 d5 a3 dxe4 Nxe4 Nb8 Nf3 Nd7 Bd3 Ngf6 Nxf6 Nxf6 Qe2

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
Na3 e5 e3 d5 d4 Nc6 Be2 e4 c4 Bxa3 bxa3 Qg5 Kf1 Nf6 Qb3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Gergely Matisz    (1898)
Na3 e5 e3 d5 d4 Nc6 Be2 e4 c4 Bxa3 bxa3 Qg5 Kf1 Nf6 Qb3 O-O

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1898)
Na3 e5 e3 d5 d4 e4 Ne2 c6 c4 a6 Nc2 Bd6 Nc3 Nf6 b3 h5 h3 Rh6

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
e4 Na6 Nc3 e6 d4 d5 a3 dxe4 Nxe4 Nb8 Nf3 Nd7 Bd3 Ngf6 Nxf6 Nxf6 Qe2 Be7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
Na3 e5 e3 d5 d4 Nc6 Be2 e4 c4 Bxa3 bxa3 Qg5 Kf1 Nf6 Qb3 O-O h4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Gergely Matisz    (1898)
Na3 e5 e3 d5 d4 Nc6 Be2 e4 c4 Bxa3 bxa3 Qg5 Kf1 Nf6 Qb3 O-O h4 Qf5

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Matt LaDuke    (2218)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 e5 Nd5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2218)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 e5 Nd5 Nc3 Nc7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2218)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 e5 Nd5 Nc3 Nc7 Bxc6 dxc6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2218)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 e5 Nd5 Nc3 Nc7 Bxc6 dxc6 d3 Ne6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2218)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 e5 Nd5 Nc3 Nc7 Bxc6 dxc6 d3 Ne6 O-O g6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2218)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 e5 Nd5 Nc3 Nc7 Bxc6 dxc6 d3 Ne6 O-O g6 Re1 Bg7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 c5 f3 Qa5 c3 Nf6 d5 e6 e4 exd5 exd5 d6 Na3 Be7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 c5 f3 Qa5 c3 Nf6 d5 e6 e4 exd5 exd5 d6 Na3 Be7 g4 Nbd7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 c5 f3 Qa5 c3 Nf6 d5 e6 e4 exd5 exd5 d6 Na3 Be7 g4 Nbd7 Nc4 Qc7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 c5 f3 Qa5 c3 Nf6 d5 e6 e4 exd5 exd5 d6 Na3 Be7 g4 Nbd7 Nc4 Qc7 Ne3 O-O

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 c5 f3 Qa5 c3 Nf6 d5 e6 e4 exd5 exd5 d6 Na3 Be7 g4 Nbd7 Nc4 Qc7 Ne3 O-O Qd2 Ne5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2218)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 e4 Bb4 d3 d6 a3 Bc5 b4 Bb6 Be3 O-O Be2 Bg4 O-O Bxf3 Bxf3 Nd4 Na4 Nxf3 Qxf3 Bxe3 Qxe3 Nh5 g3 f5 exf5 Rxf5 Nc3 Nf6 f3 h5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 c5 f3 Qa5 c3 Nf6 d5 e6 e4 exd5 exd5 d6 Na3 Be7 g4 Nbd7 Nc4 Qc7 Ne3 O-O Qd2 Ne5 O-O-O Qa5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (1989)
d4 f5 Qd3 d5 g4 g6 g5 Nc6 h4 Bg7

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1989)
d4 f5 Qd3 d5 g4 fxg4 Bf4 c5 Bxb8

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1989)
d4 f5 Qd3 d5 g4 fxg4 Nc3 Nc6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1989)
d4 f5 Qd3 d5 g4 g6 g5 Nc6 h4 Bg7 Nf3 e6

Transpose to wikichess #225122#

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1989)
d4 f5 Qd3 d5 g4 fxg4 Bf4 c5 Bxb8 Rxb8 dxc5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1989)
d4 f5 Qd3 d5 g4 fxg4 h3 gxh3 Nc3 Nf6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1989)
d4 f5 Qd3 d5 g4 g6 Nc3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1989)
d4 f5 Qd3 d5 g4 fxg4 Bf4 c5 Bxb8 Rxb8 dxc5 Nf6 Bg2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1989)
d4 f5 Qd3 d5 g4 fxg4 Bf4 c5 Bxb8 Rxb8 dxc5 Nf6 Bg2 Bd7 Bxd5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1989)
d4 f5 Qd3 d5 g4 fxg4 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 Nbd7 h3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1989)
d4 f5 Qd3 d5 g4 fxg4 Nc3 Nc6 Bg5 Nf6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1989)
d4 f5 Qd3 d5 g4 fxg4 Bf4 c5 Bxb8 Rxb8 dxc5 Nf6 Bg2 Bd7 Bxd5 Nxd5 Qxd5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1989)
d4 f5 Qd3 d5 g4 fxg4 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 Nbd7 h3 c6 Qg3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1989)
d4 f5 Qd3 d5 g4 fxg4 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 Nbd7 h3 c6 Qg3 b5 Bg2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1989)
d4 f5 Qd3 d5 g4 fxg4 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 Nbd7 h3 c6 Qg3 b5 Bg2 b4 Nd1

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1989)
d4 f5 Qd3 d5 g4 fxg4 Nc3 Nc6 Bg5 Nf6 O-O-O Be6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2218)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 e4 Bb4 d3 d6 a3 Bc5 b4 Bb6 Be3 O-O Be2 Bg4 O-O Bxf3 Bxf3 Nd4 Na4 Nxf3 Qxf3 Bxe3 Qxe3 Nh5 g3 f5 exf5 Rxf5 Nc3 Nf6 f3 h5 h4 Qd7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2218)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 d4 g5 h4 g4 Ng1 Qf6 Nc3 Ne7 Nge2 Bh6 Qd2 Nbc6 Nb5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (1989)
d4 f5 Qd3 d5 g4 fxg4 Nc3 Nc6 Bg5 Nf6 O-O-O Be6 h3 Ne4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1989)
d4 f5 Qd3 d5 g4 g6 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2218)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 d4 g5 h4 g4 Ng1 Qf6 Nc3 Ne7 Nge2 Bh6 Qd2 Nbc6 Nb5 Kd8 d5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2218)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 d4 g5 h4 g4 Ng1 Qf6 Nc3 Ne7 Nge2 Bh6 Qd2 Nbc6 Nb5 Kd8 d5 a6 Nbc3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (1989)
d4 f5 Qd3 d5 g4 fxg4 Nc3 Nc6 Bg5 Nf6 O-O-O Be6 h3 Ne4 Nxe4 dxe4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1989)
d4 f5 Qd3 d5 g4 fxg4 h3 gxh3 Nc3 Nf6 Nxh3 Nc6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2218)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 d4 g5 h4 g4 Ng1 Qf6 Nc3 Ne7 Nge2 Bh6 Qd2 Nbc6 Nb5 Kd8 d5 a6 Nbc3 Ne5 Nxf4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (1989)
d4 f5 Qd3 d5 g4 fxg4 Nc3 Nc6 Bg5 Nf6 O-O-O Be6 h3 Ne4 Nxe4 dxe4 Qb5 a6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2218)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 d4 g5 h4 g4 Ng1 Qf6 Nc3 Ne7 Nge2 Bh6 Qd2 Nbc6 Nb5 Kd8 d5 a6 Nbc3 Ne5 Nxf4 g3 Qe3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2218)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 d4 g5 h4 g4 Ng1 Qf6 Nc3 Ne7 Nge2 Bh6 Qd2 Nbc6 Nb5 Kd8 d5 a6 Nbc3 Ne5 Nxf4 g3 Qe3 N7g6 Nce2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 c5 f3 Qa5 c3 Nf6 d5 e6 e4 exd5 exd5 d6 Na3 Be7 g4 Nbd7 Nc4 Qc7 Ne3 O-O Qd2 Ne5 O-O-O Qa5 Kb1 b5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2218)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 d4 g5 h4 g4 Ng1 Qf6 Nc3 Ne7 Nge2 Bh6 Qd2 Nbc6 Nb5 Kd8 d5 a6 Nbc3 Ne5 Nxf4 g3 Qe3 N7g6 Nce2 Nxf4 Nxf4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2218)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 d4 g5 h4 g4 Ng1 Qf6 Nc3 Ne7 Nge2 Bh6 Qd2 Nbc6 Nb5 Kd8 d5 a6 Nbc3 Ne5 Nxf4 g3 Qe3 N7g6 Nce2 Nxf4 Nxf4 Ng6 Nh5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (1989)
d4 f5 Qd3 d5 g4 fxg4 h3 gxh3 Nc3 Nf6 Nxh3 Nc6 Ng5 h6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1989)
d4 f5 Qd3 d5 g4 g6 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 fxg4 Nh4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1989)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 e6 a3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1989)
d4 f5 Qd3 d5 g4 g6 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 fxg4 Nh4 e5 e4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1989)
d4 f5 Qd3 d5 g4 fxg4 h3 gxh3 Nc3 Nf6 Nxh3 Nc6 Ng5 h6 Qg6 Kd7

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 c5 f3 Qa5 c3 Nf6 d5 e6 e4 exd5 exd5 d6 Na3 Be7 g4 Nbd7 Nc4 Qc7 Ne3 O-O Qd2 Ne5 O-O-O Qa5 Kb1 b5 Be2 Rb8

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 c5 f3 Qa5 c3 Nf6 d5 e6 e4 exd5 exd5 d6 Na3 Be7 g4 Nbd7 Nc4 Qc7 Ne3 O-O Qd2 Ne5 O-O-O Qa5 Kb1 b5 Be2 Rb8 h4 b4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 c5 f3 Qa5 c3 Nf6 d5 e6 e4 exd5 exd5 d6 Na3 Be7 g4 Nbd7 Nc4 Qc7 Ne3 O-O Qd2 Ne5 O-O-O Qa5 Kb1 b5 Be2 Rb8 h4 b4 cxb4 Qxb4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2218)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 d4 g5 h4 g4 Ng1 Qf6 Nc3 Ne7 Nge2 Bh6 Qd2 Nbc6 Nb5 Kd8 d5 a6 Nbc3 Ne5 Nxf4 g3 Qe3 N7g6 Nce2 Nxf4 Nxf4 Ng6 Nh5 Bxe3 Nxf6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (1989)
d4 f5 Qd3 d5 g4 fxg4 h3 gxh3 Nc3 Nf6 Nxh3 Nc6 Ng5 h6 Qg6 Kd7 Bh3 e6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1989)
d4 f5 Qd3 d5 g4 g6 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 fxg4 Nh4 e5 e4 Qxh4 exd5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2218)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 d4 g5 h4 g4 Ng1 Qf6 Nc3 Ne7 Nge2 Bh6 Qd2 Nbc6 Nb5 Kd8 d5 a6 Nbc3 Ne5 Nxf4 g3 Qe3 N7g6 Nce2 Nxf4 Nxf4 Ng6 Nh5 Bxe3 Nxf6 Bd4 Nh5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2251)
d4 Nf6 Bg5 Ne4 Bf4 c5 f3 Qa5 c3 Nf6 d5 e6 e4 exd5 exd5 d6 Na3 Be7 g4 Nbd7 Nc4 Qc7 Ne3 O-O Qd2 Ne5 O-O-O Qa5 Kb1 b5 Be2 Rb8 h4 b4 cxb4 Qxb4 Nh3 Bd8

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2218)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nd4 Nxd4 cxd4 c3 a6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (1989)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 e6 a3 Qb6 Be2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1989)
e4 e5 f4 f5 exf5 exf4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2218)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nd4 Nxd4 cxd4 c3 a6 Be2 Bc5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (1989)
d4 f5 Qd3 d5 g4 g6 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 fxg4 Nh4 e5 e4 Qxh4 exd5 Nxd4 Nb5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matias Remus    (1711)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 Nf6 e5 Nh5 Qe2

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matias Remus    (1711)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 d5 d3

Transpose to wikichess #163673#

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matias Remus    (1711)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 Nf6 e5 Nh5 g4

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matt LaDuke    (2218)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nd4 Nxd4 cxd4 c3 a6 Be2 Bc5 Na3 d5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2218)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nd4 Nxd4 cxd4 c3 a6 Be2 Bc5 Na3 d5 exd5 Ne7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2218)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nd4 Nxd4 cxd4 c3 a6 Be2 Bc5 Na3 d5 exd5 Ne7 Nc2 O-O

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2218)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nd4 Nxd4 cxd4 c3 a6 Be2 Bc5 Na3 d5 exd5 Ne7 Nc2 O-O cxd4 Ba7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matias Remus    (1711)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 Nf6 e5 Nh5 Qe2 Be7 d4

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matias Remus    (1711)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 d4 Qh4 Kd2 Nf6 Nf3

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matias Remus    (1711)
e4 e5 f4 Qf6 Nf3 Qxf4 Nc3 Bb4 Be2 Bxc3

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matias Remus    (1711)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 Nf6 e5 Nh5 d4 d6 Bd3

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matias Remus    (1711)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 Nf6 d3 d5 Bxf4 dxe4 dxe4

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matias Remus    (1711)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Bc4 Nc6 d4 d6

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matias Remus    (1711)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 Nf6 e5 Nh5 g4 fxg3 hxg3

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matt LaDuke    (2218)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 d6 c3 O-O h3 Na5 Bc2 c5 d4 cxd4 cxd4 exd4

Transpose to wikichess #50496#

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (1989)
e4 e5 f4 Bc5 Nf3 d6 c3 Nc6 b4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1989)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 g5 h4 g4 Ne5 Nf6 Nxg4 d6

Transpose to wikichess #73075#

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1989)
e4 e5 f4 f5 exf5 exf4 Qh5 g6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1989)
e4 e5 f4 Bc5 fxe5 Qh4 g3 Qxe4 Be2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2218)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nd4 Nxd4 cxd4 c3 a6 Be2 Bc5 Na3 d5 exd5 Ne7 Nc2 O-O cxd4 Ba7 dxe6 Bxe6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matias Remus    (1711)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 Nf6 e5 Nh5 Qe2 Be7 d4 O-O Nc3

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matias Remus    (1711)
e4 e5 f4 Qf6 Nf3 Qxf4 Nc3 Bb4 Be2 Bxc3 dxc3 Qxe4

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matias Remus    (1711)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 Nf6 e5 Nh5 d4 d6 Qe2 Be7 exd6

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matias Remus    (1711)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 Nf6 e5 Nh5 d4 d6 Bd3 Be7 O-O

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matias Remus    (1711)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 Nf6 d3 d5 Bxf4 dxe4 dxe4 Qxd1 Kxd1

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matias Remus    (1711)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Bc4 Nc6 d4 d6 Bxf4 Nf6

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matias Remus    (1711)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 Nf6 e5 Nh5 g4 fxg3 hxg3 Nxg3 Rg1

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matias Remus    (1711)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 Nf6 e5 Nh5 Qe2 Be7 d4 O-O Nc3 d6 Bd2

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matias Remus    (1711)
e4 e5 f4 Qf6 Nf3 Qxf4 Nc3 Bb4 Be2 Bxc3 dxc3 Qxe4 O-O f6

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matias Remus    (1711)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 Nf6 e5 Nh5 d4 d6 Qe2 Be7 exd6 cxd6 Qb5

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matias Remus    (1711)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 Nf6 d3 d5 Bxf4 dxe4 dxe4 Qxd1 Kxd1 Nxe4 Be3

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matias Remus    (1711)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 Nf6 e5 Nh5 g4 fxg3 hxg3 Nxg3 Rg1 Nxf1 Rxf1

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matej Pech    (1989)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 g5 h4 Be7 hxg5 Bxg5 d4 d6 Qd3 Nc6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1989)
e4 e5 f4 Bc5 fxe5 Qh4 g3 Qxe4 Be2 Qxh1 Bf3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1989)
e4 e5 f4 Bc5 fxe5 Qh4 g3 Qxe4 Be2 Qxh1 Bf3 Qxg1 Ke2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1989)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 e6 a3 Qb6 Be2 d6 Rb1

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1989)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nd2 c5 exd5 Qxd5 dxc5 Bxc5 Ngf3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1989)
e4 e5 f4 Bc5 Nf3 d6 c3 Nc6 b4 Bb6 a4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1989)
e4 e5 f4 Bc5 Nf3 d6 c3 Nf6 d4 exd4 cxd4 Bb6 Nc3 O-O Be2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1989)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 d4 Qh4 Kd2 Qf2 Ne2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1989)
e4 e5 f4 Bc5 fxe5 Qh4 g3 Qxe4 Be2 Qxh1 Bf3 Qxg1 Ke2 Qf2 Kd3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1989)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 e6 a3 Qb6 Be2 d6 Rb1 Nf6 O-O

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2218)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nd4 Nxd4 cxd4 c3 a6 Be2 Bc5 Na3 d5 exd5 Ne7 Nc2 O-O cxd4 Ba7 dxe6 Bxe6 b3 Nc6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (1989)
e4 e5 f4 Bc5 fxe5 Qh4 g3 Qxe4 Be2 Qxh1 Bf3 Qxg1 Ke2 Qf2 Kd3 d5 Bxd5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1989)
e4 e5 f4 Bc5 Nf3 d6 c3 Nc6 b4 Bb6 a4 a6 d3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1989)
e4 e5 f4 Bc5 Nf3 d6 c3 Nf6 d4 exd4 cxd4 Bb6 Nc3 O-O Be2 c5 d5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1989)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 d4 Bg4 Bxf4 Nf6 h3 Bd7 Bd3 Be7

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1989)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 e6 a3 Qb6 Be2 d6 Rb1 Nf6 O-O Be7 d3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1989)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 e6 a3 Qb6 Be2 d6 Rb1 Nf6 O-O Be7 d3 O-O b4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1989)
e4 e5 f4 Bc5 Nf3 d6 c3 Nc6 b4 Bb6 a4 a6 d3 Nf6 Nbd2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1989)
d4 d5 c4 e5 dxe5 d4 Nf3 Nc6 a3 Nge7 b4 Bg4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1989)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 Bb5 Nd4 Bc4 e6 Nge2 Nf6 O-O

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matias Remus    (1711)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 Nf6 d3 d5 Bxf4 dxe4 dxe4 Qxd1 Kxd1 Nxe4 Be3 Bg4 Be2

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matias Remus    (1711)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 Nf6 e5 Nh5 Qe2 Be7 d4 O-O Nc3 d6 Bd2 Bg4 O-O-O

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matias Remus    (1711)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 d4 Qh4 Kd2 Nf6 Nf3 Qh6 Nc3

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matias Remus    (1711)
e4 e5 f4 Qf6 Nf3 Qxf4 Nc3 Bb4 Be2 Bxc3 dxc3 Qxe4 O-O f6 Bd3 Qg4

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matias Remus    (1711)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 Nf6 e5 Nh5 d4 d6 Qe2 Be7 exd6 cxd6 Qb5 Bd7 Qxh5

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matias Remus    (1711)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 Nf6 e5 Nh5 d4 d6 Bd3 Be7 O-O O-O c4

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matej Pech    (1989)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 d4 Bg4 Bxf4 Nf6 h3 Bd7 Bd3 Be7 O-O O-O

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1989)
e4 e5 f4 Bc5 Nf3 d6 c3 Nc6 b4 Bb6 a4 a6 d3 Nf6 Nbd2 Ng4 Nc4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1989)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 d6 d4 Bg4 Bxf4 Nf6 h3 Bd7 Bd3 Be7 O-O O-O Qe2 Nc6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1989)
e4 e5 f4 f5 exf5 exf4 Qh5 g6 fxg6 Ke7

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matias Remus    (1711)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 Nf6 e5 Nh5 Qe2 Be7 d4 O-O Nc3 d6 Bd2 dxe5 Qxe5

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matias Remus    (1711)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Nf3 Nf6 e5 Nh5 d4 d6 Bd3 Be7 O-O O-O c4 dxe5 dxe5

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matias Remus    (1711)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 Bc4 Nc6 d4 d6 Bxf4 Nf6 Nc3 Bg4

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matias Remus    (1711)
e4 e5 f4 Qf6 Nf3 Qxf4 Nc3 Bb4 Be2 Bxc3 dxc3 Qxe4 O-O f6 Bd3 Qg4 Be2 Qe6

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matias Remus    (1711)
e4 e5 f4 exf4 d4 Qh4 Kd2 Nf6 Nf3 Qh6 Nc3 d6 Ke1

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matt LaDuke    (2218)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nd4 Nxd4 cxd4 c3 a6 Be2 Bc5 Na3 d5 exd5 Ne7 Nc2 O-O cxd4 Ba7 dxe6 Bxe6 b3 Nc6 Bb2 Nxd4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (1989)
d4 d5 c4 e5 dxe5 d4 Nf3 Nc6 a3 Nge7 b4 Bg4 h3 Bxf3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1989)
d4 d5 c4 e5 dxe5 d4 Nf3 Nc6 a3 Nge7 b4 Bg4 h3 Bxf3 exf3 Nxe5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2218)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nd4 Nxd4 cxd4 c3 a6 Be2 Bc5 Na3 d5 exd5 Ne7 Nc2 O-O cxd4 Ba7 dxe6 Bxe6 b3 Nc6 Bb2 Nxd4 Nxd4 Bxd4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2218)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nd4 Nxd4 cxd4 c3 a6 Be2 Bc5 Na3 d5 exd5 Ne7 Nc2 O-O cxd4 Ba7 dxe6 Bxe6 b3 Nc6 Bb2 Nxd4 Nxd4 Bxd4 Bxd4 Qxd4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (1989)
d4 d5 c4 e5 dxe5 d4 Nf3 Nc6 a3 Nge7 b4 Bg4 h3 Bxf3 exf3 Nxe5 f4 N5g6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2218)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nd4 Nxd4 cxd4 c3 a6 Be2 Bc5 Na3 d5 exd5 Ne7 Nc2 O-O cxd4 Ba7 dxe6 Bxe6 b3 Nc6 Bb2 Nxd4 Nxd4 Bxd4 Bxd4 Qxd4 d3 Rfd8

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2218)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nd4 Nxd4 cxd4 c3 a6 Be2 Bc5 Na3 d5 exd5 Ne7 Nc2 O-O cxd4 Ba7 dxe6 Bxe6 b3 Nc6 Bb2 Nxd4 Nxd4 Bxd4 Bxd4 Qxd4 d3 Rfd8 Re1 a5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (1989)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 Bb5 Nd4 Bc4 e6 Nge2 Nf6 O-O a6 d3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2218)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nd4 Nxd4 cxd4 c3 a6 Be2 Bc5 Na3 d5 exd5 Ne7 Nc2 O-O cxd4 Ba7 dxe6 Bxe6 b3 Nc6 Bb2 Nxd4 Nxd4 Bxd4 Bxd4 Qxd4 d3 Rfd8 Re1 a5 Bf3 Ra7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (1989)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 Bb5 Nd4 Bc4 e6 Nge2 Nf6 O-O a6 d3 b5 Bb3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (1989)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 Bb5 Nd4 Bc4 e6 Nge2 Nf6 O-O a6 d3 b5 Bb3 Nxb3 axb3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2227)
h3 e5 c4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2227)
h3 e5 c4 Nf6 d3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2227)
h3 e5 c4 Nf6 d3 d5 cxd5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2227)
h3 e5 c4 Nf6 d3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Nf3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2227)
h3 e5 c4 Nf6 d3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Nf3 Nc6 a3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2227)
h3 e5 c4 Nf6 d3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Nf3 Nc6 a3 Bd6 e4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2227)
h3 e5 c4 Nf6 d3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Nf3 Nc6 a3 Bd6 e4 Nde7 Be2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2227)
h3 e5 c4 Nf6 d3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Nf3 Nc6 a3 Bd6 e4 Nde7 Be2 O-O Be3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2227)
h3 e5 c4 Nf6 d3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Nf3 Nc6 a3 Bd6 e4 Nde7 Be2 O-O Be3 f5 O-O

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2227)
h3 e5 c4 Nf6 d3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Nf3 Nc6 a3 Bd6 e4 Nde7 Be2 O-O Be3 f5 O-O Kh8 exf5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2227)
h3 e5 c4 Nf6 d3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Nf3 Nc6 a3 Bd6 e4 Nde7 Be2 O-O Be3 f5 O-O Kh8 exf5 Nxf5 Nc3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2227)
h3 e5 c4 Nf6 d3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Nf3 Nc6 a3 Bd6 e4 Nde7 Be2 O-O Be3 f5 O-O Kh8 exf5 Nxf5 Nc3 Nxe3 fxe3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2227)
h3 e5 c4 Nf6 d3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Nf3 Nc6 a3 Bd6 e4 Nde7 Be2 O-O Be3 f5 O-O Kh8 exf5 Nxf5 Nc3 Nxe3 fxe3 Bc5 Qd2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2227)
h3 e5 c4 Nf6 d3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Nf3 Nc6 a3 Bd6 e4 Nde7 Be2 O-O Be3 f5 O-O Kh8 exf5 Nxf5 Nc3 Nxe3 fxe3 Bc5 Qd2 Na5 d4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2227)
h3 e5 c4 Nf6 d3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Nf3 Nc6 a3 Bd6 e4 Nde7 Be2 O-O Be3 f5 O-O Kh8 exf5 Nxf5 Nc3 Nxe3 fxe3 Bc5 Qd2 Na5 d4 Nb3 Qe1

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2227)
h3 e5 c4 Nf6 d3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Nf3 Nc6 a3 Bd6 e4 Nde7 Be2 O-O Be3 f5 O-O Kh8 exf5 Nxf5 Nc3 Nxe3 fxe3 Bc5 Qd2 Na5 d4 Nb3 Qe1 exd4 Rd1

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2227)
h3 e5 c4 Nf6 d3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Nf3 Nc6 a3 Bd6 e4 Nde7 Be2 O-O Be3 f5 O-O Kh8 exf5 Nxf5 Nc3 Nxe3 fxe3 Bc5 Qd2 Na5 d4 Nb3 Qe1 exd4 Rd1 Be6 exd4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2227)
h3 e5 c4 Nf6 d3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Nf3 Nc6 a3 Bd6 e4 Nde7 Be2 O-O Be3 f5 O-O Kh8 exf5 Nxf5 Nc3 Nxe3 fxe3 Bc5 Qd2 Na5 d4 Nb3 Qe1 exd4 Rd1 Be6 exd4 Bb6 Kh1

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2227)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O d4 Bf6 Re1 Re8 c3 Rxe1 Qxe1 Ne8 Bf4 d5 Nd2 Bf5 Qe2 c6 Re1 h6 Nb3 Nd6 Be5 Qe7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2227)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O d4 Bf6 Re1 Re8 c3 Rxe1 Qxe1 Ne8 Bf4 d5 Nd2 Bf5 Qe2 c6 Re1 h6 Nb3 Nd6 Be5 Qe7 Bf4 Qd8

Transpose to wikichess #214809#

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2256)
d4 Nf6 Nf3 d5 Bf4 c5 e3 e6 Nbd2 Be7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2256)
d4 Nf6 Nf3 d5 Bf4 c5 e3 e6 Nbd2 Be7 dxc5 O-O

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2256)
d4 Nf6 Nf3 d5 Bf4 c5 e3 e6 Nbd2 Be7 dxc5 O-O Be2 Bxc5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2256)
d4 Nf6 Nf3 d5 Bf4 c5 e3 e6 Nbd2 Be7 dxc5 O-O Be2 Bxc5 c4 Nbd7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2256)
d4 Nf6 Nf3 d5 Bf4 c5 e3 e6 Nbd2 Be7 dxc5 O-O Be2 Bxc5 c4 Nbd7 O-O b6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2256)
d4 Nf6 Nf3 d5 Bf4 c5 e3 e6 Nbd2 Be7 dxc5 O-O Be2 Bxc5 c4 Nbd7 O-O b6 h3 Bb7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2256)
d4 Nf6 Nf3 d5 Bf4 c5 e3 e6 Nbd2 Be7 dxc5 O-O Be2 Bxc5 c4 Nbd7 O-O b6 h3 Bb7 Bh2 Qe7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2126)
e4 e6 f4 d5 exd5 exd5 d4 Nf6 Nf3 Be7 Bd3 c5 c3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2256)
d4 Nf6 Nf3 d5 Bf4 c5 e3 e6 Nbd2 Be7 dxc5 O-O Be2 Bxc5 c4 Nbd7 O-O b6 h3 Bb7 Bh2 Qe7 a3 Bd6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2126)
e4 e6 f4 d5 exd5 exd5 d4 Nf6 Nf3 Be7 Bd3 c5 c3 O-O O-O

Transpose to wikichess #188335#

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2256)
d4 Nf6 Nf3 d5 Bf4 c5 e3 e6 Nbd2 Be7 dxc5 O-O Be2 Bxc5 c4 Nbd7 O-O b6 h3 Bb7 Bh2 Qe7 a3 Bd6 Bxd6 Qxd6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2256)
d4 Nf6 Nf3 d5 Bf4 c5 e3 e6 Nbd2 Be7 dxc5 O-O Be2 Bxc5 c4 Nbd7 O-O b6 h3 Bb7 Bh2 Qe7 a3 Bd6 Bxd6 Qxd6 cxd5 Bxd5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2126)
e4 c5 c3 e6 d4 a6

Transpose to wikichess #113790#

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2256)
d4 Nf6 Nf3 d5 Bf4 c5 e3 e6 Nbd2 Be7 dxc5 O-O Be2 Bxc5 c4 Nbd7 O-O b6 h3 Bb7 Bh2 Qe7 a3 Bd6 Bxd6 Qxd6 cxd5 Bxd5 Nd4 h6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2256)
d4 Nf6 Nf3 d5 Bf4 c5 e3 e6 Nbd2 Be7 dxc5 O-O Be2 Bxc5 c4 Nbd7 O-O b6 h3 Bb7 Bh2 Qe7 a3 Bd6 Bxd6 Qxd6 cxd5 Bxd5 Nd4 h6 Qb1 Nc5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2256)
d4 Nf6 Nf3 d5 Bf4 c5 e3 e6 Nbd2 Be7 dxc5 O-O Be2 Bxc5 c4 Nbd7 O-O b6 h3 Bb7 Bh2 Qe7 a3 Bd6 Bxd6 Qxd6 cxd5 Bxd5 Nd4 h6 Qb1 Nc5 b4 Nce4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2256)
d4 Nf6 Nf3 d5 Bf4 c5 e3 e6 Nbd2 Be7 dxc5 O-O Be2 Bxc5 c4 Nbd7 O-O b6 h3 Bb7 Bh2 Qe7 a3 Bd6 Bxd6 Qxd6 cxd5 Bxd5 Nd4 h6 Qb1 Nc5 b4 Nce4 Nxe4 Nxe4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2256)
d4 Nf6 Nf3 d5 Bf4 c5 e3 e6 Nbd2 Be7 dxc5 O-O Be2 Bxc5 c4 Nbd7 O-O b6 h3 Bb7 Bh2 Qe7 a3 Bd6 Bxd6 Qxd6 cxd5 Bxd5 Nd4 h6 Qb1 Nc5 b4 Nce4 Nxe4 Nxe4 Rc1 a5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O a4 b4 a5 d6 c3 Rb8 Bc4 Bg4 h3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Bf4 Bg7 Qd2 c6 Nf3 O-O

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O a4 b4 a5 d6 c3 Rb8 Bc4 Bg4 h3 Bh5 Bxa6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Bf4 Bg7 Qd2 c6 Nf3 O-O a3 Nbd7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O a4 b4 a5 d6 c3 Rb8 Bc4 Bg4 h3 Bh5 Bxa6 d5 exd5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Bf4 Bg7 Qd2 c6 Nf3 O-O a3 Nbd7 O-O-O Qa5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O a4 b4 a5 d6 c3 Rb8 Bc4 Bg4 h3 Bh5 Bxa6 d5 exd5 Qxd5 d3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O a4 b4 a5 d6 c3 Rb8 Bc4 Bg4 h3 Bh5 Bxa6 d5 exd5 Qxd5 d3 Bxf3 Qxf3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O a4 b4 a5 d6 c3 Rb8 Bc4 Bg4 h3 Bh5 Bxa6 d5 exd5 Qxd5 d3 Bxf3 Qxf3 Qxf3 gxf3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O a4 b4 a5 d6 c3 Rb8 Bc4 Bg4 h3 Bh5 Bxa6 d5 exd5 Qxd5 d3 Bxf3 Qxf3 Qxf3 gxf3 bxc3 bxc3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Bf4 Bg7 Qd2 c6 Nf3 O-O a3 Nbd7 O-O-O Qa5 Kb1 e5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O a4 b4 a5 d6 c3 Rb8 Bc4 Bg4 h3 Bh5 Bxa6 d5 exd5 Qxd5 d3 Bxf3 Qxf3 Qxf3 gxf3 bxc3 bxc3 Ra8 Bb7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Bf4 Bg7 Qd2 c6 Nf3 O-O a3 Nbd7 O-O-O Qa5 Kb1 e5 dxe5 dxe5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Mateia Benone    (1690)
e4 e5 f4 d5 exd5 c6 dxc6 Nxc6 fxe5 Qh4 g3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Bf4 Bg7 Qd2 c6 Nf3 O-O a3 Nbd7 O-O-O Qa5 Kb1 e5 dxe5 dxe5 Be3 Qc7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Mateia Benone    (1690)
e4 e5 f4 d5 exd5 c6 dxc6 Nxc6 fxe5 Qh4 g3 Qe4 Qe2

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Mateia Benone    (1690)
e4 e5 f4 d5 exd5 c6 dxc6 Nxc6 fxe5 Qh4 g3 Qe4 Qe2 Qxh1 Nf3

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Bf4 Bg7 Qd2 c6 Nf3 O-O a3 Nbd7 O-O-O Qa5 Kb1 e5 dxe5 dxe5 Be3 Qc7 Bc4 b5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2126)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Ne2 Be7 c3 O-O Qc2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Mateia Benone    (1690)
Nf3 Nf6 g3 Nc6 Bg2 e5

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Bf4 Bg7 Qd2 c6 Nf3 O-O a3 Nbd7 O-O-O Qa5 Kb1 e5 dxe5 dxe5 Be3 Qc7 Bc4 b5 Bb3 Rb8

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2126)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Ne2 Be7 c3 O-O Qc2 a5 h4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Bf4 Bg7 Qd2 c6 Nf3 O-O a3 Nbd7 O-O-O Qa5 Kb1 e5 dxe5 dxe5 Be3 Qc7 Bc4 b5 Bb3 Rb8 h4 a5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2126)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Ne2 Be7 c3 O-O Qc2 a5 h4 f6 g3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2126)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Ne2 Be7 c3 O-O Qc2 a5 h4 f6 g3 a4 Bh3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Bf4 Bg7 Qd2 c6 Nf3 O-O a3 Nbd7 O-O-O Qa5 Kb1 e5 dxe5 dxe5 Be3 Qc7 Bc4 b5 Bb3 Rb8 h4 a5 Ng5 c5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nge7 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Qb6 Nxc6 bxc6 Be2 Ng6 c4 c5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Mateia Benone    (1690)
Nf3 f6 e4 Nh6

Transpose to wikichess #232574#

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Bf4 Bg7 Qd2 c6 Nf3 O-O a3 Nbd7 O-O-O Qa5 Kb1 e5 dxe5 dxe5 Be3 Qc7 Bc4 b5 Bb3 Rb8 h4 a5 Ng5 c5 h5 c4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nge7 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Qb6 Nxc6 bxc6 Be2 Ng6 c4 c5 Nc3 Be7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2126)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Ne2 Be7 c3 O-O Qc2 a5 h4 f6 g3 a4 Bh3 Kh8 O-O

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Bf4 Bg7 Qd2 c6 Nf3 O-O a3 Nbd7 O-O-O Qa5 Kb1 e5 dxe5 dxe5 Be3 Qc7 Bc4 b5 Bb3 Rb8 h4 a5 Ng5 c5 h5 c4 h6 cxb3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Bf4 Bg7 Qd2 c6 Nf3 O-O a3 Nbd7 O-O-O Qa5 Kb1 e5 dxe5 dxe5 Be3 Qc7 Bc4 b5 Bb3 Rb8 h4 a5 Ng5 c5 h5 c4 h6 cxb3 hxg7 bxc2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2126)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Ne2 Be7 c3 O-O Qc2 a5 h4 f6 g3 a4 Bh3 Kh8 O-O cxd4 cxd4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 d6 d4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Bf4 Bg7 Qd2 c6 Nf3 O-O a3 Nbd7 O-O-O Qa5 Kb1 e5 dxe5 dxe5 Be3 Qc7 Bc4 b5 Bb3 Rb8 h4 a5 Ng5 c5 h5 c4 h6 cxb3 hxg7 bxc2 Qxc2 Kxg7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2126)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Ne2 Be7 c3 O-O Qc2 a5 h4 f6 g3 a4 Bh3 Kh8 O-O cxd4 cxd4 Nb6 b3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nge7 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Qb6 Nxc6 bxc6 Be2 Ng6 c4 c5 Nc3 Be7 Rb1 O-O

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Mateia Benone    (1690)
Nf3 Nf6 g3 Nc6 Bg2 e5 d4 exd4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matej Pech    (2126)
d4 d5 c4 e6 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 Be7 e3 O-O Nf3 Nbd7 Rc1 c6 Bd3 dxc4 Bxc4 Nd5 Bxe7 Qxe7 O-O Nxc3 Rxc3 e5 dxe5 Nxe5 Nxe5 Qxe5 f4 Qe4 Qe2 Bf5 Bd3 Qd5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2126)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Ne2 Be7 c3 O-O Qc2 a5 h4 f6 g3 a4 Bh3 Kh8 O-O cxd4 cxd4 Nb6 b3 Qe8 Rfc1

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2126)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Ne2 Be7 c3 O-O Qc2 a5 h4 f6 g3 a4 Bh3 Kh8 O-O cxd4 cxd4 Nb6 b3 Qe8 Rfc1 Bd7 Kh2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2126)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Bxc6 dxc6 O-O f6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 c5 Nb3 Qxd1 Rxd1 Bg4 f3 Be6 Bf4 c4 Nd4 O-O-O Nc3 Bf7 Kf2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2126)
d4 d5 c4 e6 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 Be7 e3 O-O Nf3 Nbd7 Rc1 c6 Bd3 dxc4 Bxc4 Nd5 Bxe7 Qxe7 O-O Nxc3 Rxc3 e5 dxe5 Nxe5 Nxe5 Qxe5 f4 Qe4 Qe2 Bf5 Bd3 Qd5 e4 Qd4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2126)
d4 d5 c4 e6 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 Be7 e3 O-O Nf3 Nbd7 Rc1 c6 Bd3 dxc4 Bxc4 Nd5 Bxe7 Qxe7 O-O Nxc3 Rxc3 e5 dxe5 Nxe5 Nxe5 Qxe5 f4 Qe4 Qe2 Bf5 Bd3 Qd5 e4 Qd4 Qf2 Qxf2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2126)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Ne2 Be7 c3 O-O Qc2 a5 h4 f6 g3 a4 Bh3 Kh8 O-O cxd4 cxd4 Nb6 b3 Qe8 Rfc1 Bd7 Kh2 Ba3 Re1

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2126)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Bxc6 dxc6 O-O f6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 c5 Nb3 Qxd1 Rxd1 Bg4 f3 Be6 Bf4 c4 Nd4 O-O-O Nc3 Bf7 Kf2 Ne7 Be3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2126)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Bxc6 dxc6 O-O f6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 c5 Nb3 Qxd1 Rxd1 Bg4 f3 Be6 Bf4 c4 Nd4 O-O-O Nc3 Bf7 Kf2 Ne7 Be3 h5 g3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nge7 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Qb6 Nxc6 bxc6 Be2 Ng6 c4 c5 Nc3 Be7 Rb1 O-O Be3 Qc7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2126)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Bxc6 dxc6 O-O f6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 c5 Nb3 Qxd1 Rxd1 Bg4 f3 Be6 Bf4 c4 Nd4 O-O-O Nc3 Bf7 Kf2 Ne7 Be3 h5 g3 g6 f4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2126)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 d6 c3 O-O h3 Na5 Bc2 c5 d4 Qc7 Nbd2 cxd4 cxd4 Bb7 d5 Rac8 Bd3 Nd7 Nf1 f5 b3 Qc3 Be3 f4 Rc1 Qb2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nge7 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Qb6 Nxc6 bxc6 Be2 Ng6 c4 c5 Nc3 Be7 Rb1 O-O Be3 Qc7 f4 Bb7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2126)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Bxc6 dxc6 O-O f6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 c5 Nb3 Qxd1 Rxd1 Bg4 f3 Be6 Bf4 c4 Nd4 O-O-O Nc3 Bf7 Kf2 Ne7 Be3 h5 g3 g6 f4 b6 a3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nge7 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Qb6 Nxc6 bxc6 Be2 Ng6 c4 c5 Nc3 Be7 Rb1 O-O Be3 Qc7 f4 Bb7 Bd3 d6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nge7 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Qb6 Nxc6 bxc6 Be2 Ng6 c4 c5 Nc3 Be7 Rb1 O-O Be3 Qc7 f4 Bb7 Bd3 d6 Qc2 a6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nge7 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Qb6 Nxc6 bxc6 Be2 Ng6 c4 c5 Nc3 Be7 Rb1 O-O Be3 Qc7 f4 Bb7 Bd3 d6 Qc2 a6 a3 Rfd8

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nge7 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Qb6 Nxc6 bxc6 Be2 Ng6 c4 c5 Nc3 Be7 Rb1 O-O Be3 Qc7 f4 Bb7 Bd3 d6 Qc2 a6 a3 Rfd8 h3 Rab8

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nge7 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Qb6 Nxc6 bxc6 Be2 Ng6 c4 c5 Nc3 Be7 Rb1 O-O Be3 Qc7 f4 Bb7 Bd3 d6 Qc2 a6 a3 Rfd8 h3 Rab8 Kh2 Bf6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Mateia Benone    (1690)
Nf3 Nf6 g3 Nc6 Bg2 e5 d4 exd4 Nxd4 Nxd4

============

Contributors : Mateia Benone


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nge7 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Qb6 Nxc6 bxc6 Be2 Ng6 c4 c5 Nc3 Be7 Rb1 O-O Be3 Qc7 f4 Bb7 Bd3 d6 Qc2 a6 a3 Rfd8 h3 Rab8 Kh2 Bf6 Ne2 Nf8

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 dxe4 a5 Bxc6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 dxe4 a5 Bxc6 bxc6 Nxe5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 e5 d4 exd4 Nf3 Bb4 Nbd2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2126)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Bxc6 dxc6 O-O f6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 c5 Nb3 Qxd1 Rxd1 Bg4 f3 Be6 Bf4 c4 Nd4 O-O-O Nc3 Bf7 Kf2 Ne7 Be3 h5 g3 g6 f4 b6 a3 Kb7 h3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 e5 d4 exd4 Nf3 Bb4 Nbd2 Nc6 Bd3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Nd6 Bxc6 dxc6 dxe5 Nf5 Qxd8 Kxd8 Nc3 Bd7 h3 h6 b3 c5 Bb2 Nd4 Nxd4 cxd4 Ne4 c5 c3 dxc3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 dxe4 a5 Bxc6 bxc6 Nxe5 Re8 Nxc6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 dxe4 a5 Bxc6 bxc6 Nxe5 Re8 Nxc6 Qd6 Nd4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Nd6 Bxc6 dxc6 dxe5 Nf5 Qxd8 Kxd8 Nc3 Bd7 h3 h6 b3 c5 Bb2 Nd4 Nxd4 cxd4 Ne4 c5 c3 dxc3 Bxc3 Kc7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 e5 d4 exd4 Nf3 Bb4 Nbd2 Nc6 Bd3 Nge7 O-O

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 dxe4 a5 Bxc6 bxc6 Nxe5 Re8 Nxc6 Qd6 Nd4 a4 f3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 e5 d4 exd4 Nf3 Bb4 Nbd2 Nc6 Bd3 Nge7 O-O Bc5 a3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 e5 d4 exd4 Nf3 Bb4 Nbd2 Nc6 Bd3 Nge7 O-O Bc5 a3 a5 Re1

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2160)
d4 d5 c4 e6 cxd5 exd5 Bf4 c6 e3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
d4 d5 c4 e6 cxd5 exd5 Bf4 c6 e3 Bf5 g4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
b4 d5 Bb2 a6 e3 e6 a3 Nf6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
d4 f5 Nf3 Nf6 Bf4 g6 Nc3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 e5 d4 exd4 Nf3 Bb4 Nbd2 Nc6 Bd3 Nge7 O-O Bc5 a3 a5 Re1 O-O e5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2160)
d4 d5 c4 e6 cxd5 exd5 Bf4 c6 e3 Bf5 g4 Bxb1 Rxb1

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
d4 d5 c4 e6 cxd5 exd5 Bf4 c6 e3 Bf5 g4 Bxb1 Rxb1 Bb4 Ke2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 dxe4 a5 Bxc6 bxc6 Nxe5 Re8 Nxc6 Qd6 Nd4 a4 f3 Bxd4 cxd4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 e5 d4 exd4 Nf3 Bb4 Nbd2 Nc6 Bd3 Nge7 O-O Bc5 a3 a5 Re1 O-O e5 d5 Ng5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2160)
d4 d5 c4 e6 cxd5 exd5 Bf4 c6 e3 Bf5 g4 Bxb1 Rxb1 Bb4 Ke2 Bd6 Bg3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nge7 Re1 a6 Bf1 d5 exd5 Nxd5 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Ndb4 Nxc6 Qxd1 Rxd1 bxc6 Rd2 e5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 dxe4 a5 Bxc6 bxc6 Nxe5 Re8 Nxc6 Qd6 Nd4 a4 f3 Bxd4 cxd4 Qxd4 Kh1

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 e5 d4 exd4 Nf3 Bb4 Nbd2 Nc6 Bd3 Nge7 O-O Bc5 a3 a5 Re1 O-O e5 d5 Ng5 h6 Nh7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 e5 d4 exd4 Nf3 Bb4 Nbd2 Nc6 Bd3 Nge7 O-O Bc5 a3 a5 Re1 O-O e5 d5 Ng5 h6 Nh7 Re8 Qh5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2160)
d4 d5 c4 e6 cxd5 exd5 Bf4 c6 e3 Bf5 g4 Bxb1 Rxb1 Bb4 Ke2 Bd6 Bg3 h5 gxh5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 e5 d4 exd4 Nf3 Bb4 Nbd2 Nc6 Bd3 Nge7 O-O Bc5 a3 a5 Re1 O-O e5 d5 Ng5 h6 Nh7 Re8 Qh5 Nf5 Bxf5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nge7 Re1 a6 Bf1 d5 exd5 Nxd5 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Ndb4 Nxc6 Qxd1 Rxd1 bxc6 Rd2 e5 a3 Nd5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 dxe4 a5 Bxc6 bxc6 Nxe5 Re8 Nxc6 Qd6 Nd4 a4 f3 Bxd4 cxd4 Qxd4 Kh1 Ba6 Nb1

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 dxe4 a5 Bxc6 bxc6 Nxe5 Re8 Nxc6 Qd6 Nd4 a4 f3 Bxd4 cxd4 Qxd4 Kh1 Ba6 Nb1 Qb6 Rg1

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 e5 d4 exd4 Nf3 Bb4 Nbd2 Nc6 Bd3 Nge7 O-O Bc5 a3 a5 Re1 O-O e5 d5 Ng5 h6 Nh7 Re8 Qh5 Nf5 Bxf5 Bxf5 Qxf5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 dxe4 a5 Bxc6 bxc6 Nxe5 Re8 Nxc6 Qd6 Nd4 a4 f3 Bxd4 cxd4 Qxd4 Kh1 Ba6 Nb1 Qb6 Rg1 Rxe4 Nc3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 e5 d4 exd4 Nf3 Bb4 Nbd2 Nc6 Bd3 Nge7 O-O Bc5 a3 a5 Re1 O-O e5 d5 Ng5 h6 Nh7 Re8 Qh5 Nf5 Bxf5 Bxf5 Qxf5 Qc8 Nf6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 dxe4 a5 Bxc6 bxc6 Nxe5 Re8 Nxc6 Qd6 Nd4 a4 f3 Bxd4 cxd4 Qxd4 Kh1 Ba6 Nb1 Qb6 Rg1 Rxe4 Nc3 Rh4 Bg5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 e5 d4 exd4 Nf3 Bb4 Nbd2 Nc6 Bd3 Nge7 O-O Bc5 a3 a5 Re1 O-O e5 d5 Ng5 h6 Nh7 Re8 Qh5 Nf5 Bxf5 Bxf5 Qxf5 Qc8 Nf6 gxf6 Qxf6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 e5 d4 exd4 Nf3 Bb4 Nbd2 Nc6 Bd3 Nge7 O-O Bc5 a3 a5 Re1 O-O e5 d5 Ng5 h6 Nh7 Re8 Qh5 Nf5 Bxf5 Bxf5 Qxf5 Qc8 Nf6 gxf6 Qxf6 Qe6 Qxe6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 e5 d4 exd4 Nf3 Bb4 Nbd2 Nc6 Bd3 Nge7 O-O Bc5 a3 a5 Re1 O-O e5 d5 Ng5 h6 Nh7 Re8 Qh5 Nf5 Bxf5 Bxf5 Qxf5 Qc8 Nf6 gxf6 Qxf6 Qe6 Qxe6 Rxe6 Nf3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nge7 Re1 a6 Bf1 d5 exd5 Nxd5 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Ndb4 Nxc6 Qxd1 Rxd1 bxc6 Rd2 e5 a3 Nd5 g3 Be6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 e5 d4 exd4 Nf3 Bb4 Nbd2 Nc6 Bd3 Nge7 O-O Bc5 a3 a5 Re1 O-O e5 d5 Ng5 h6 Nh7 Re8 Qh5 Nf5 Bxf5 Bxf5 Qxf5 Qc8 Nf6 gxf6 Qxf6 Qe6 Qxe6 Rxe6 Nf3 a4 Bf4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nge7 Re1 a6 Bf1 d5 exd5 Nxd5 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Ndb4 Nxc6 Qxd1 Rxd1 bxc6 Rd2 e5 a3 Nd5 g3 Be6 Bg2 O-O-O

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nge7 Re1 a6 Bf1 d5 exd5 Nxd5 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Ndb4 Nxc6 Qxd1 Rxd1 bxc6 Rd2 e5 a3 Nd5 g3 Be6 Bg2 O-O-O c4 Ne7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Ne2 Be7 c3 O-O h4 f6 Qc2 b5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2160)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 e5 Nb3 Be6 f3 h5 Qd2 Nbd7 Nd5 Nxd5 exd5 Bf5 Na5 Be7 Be2 Bh4 g3 Bf6 O-O Qc7

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nge7 Re1 a6 Bf1 d5 exd5 Nxd5 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Ndb4 Nxc6 Qxd1 Rxd1 bxc6 Rd2 e5 a3 Nd5 g3 Be6 Bg2 O-O-O c4 Ne7 Rxd8 Kxd8

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Ne2 Be7 c3 O-O h4 f6 Qc2 b5 g3 b4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2160)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 e5 Nb3 Be6 f3 h5 Qd2 Nbd7 Nd5 Nxd5 exd5 Bf5 Na5 Be7 Be2 Bh4 g3 Bf6 O-O Qc7 c4 Bh3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nge7 Re1 a6 Bf1 d5 exd5 Nxd5 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Ndb4 Nxc6 Qxd1 Rxd1 bxc6 Rd2 e5 a3 Nd5 g3 Be6 Bg2 O-O-O c4 Ne7 Rxd8 Kxd8 Nd2 Kc7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nge7 Re1 a6 Bf1 d5 exd5 Nxd5 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Ndb4 Nxc6 Qxd1 Rxd1 bxc6 Rd2 e5 a3 Nd5 g3 Be6 Bg2 O-O-O c4 Ne7 Rxd8 Kxd8 Nd2 Kc7 b4 Nf5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Ne2 Be7 c3 O-O h4 f6 Qc2 b5 g3 b4 Bh3 Kh8

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2160)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 e5 Nb3 Be6 f3 h5 Qd2 Nbd7 Nd5 Nxd5 exd5 Bf5 Na5 Be7 Be2 Bh4 g3 Bf6 O-O Qc7 c4 Bh3 Rf2 O-O

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Ne2 Be7 c3 O-O h4 f6 Qc2 b5 g3 b4 Bh3 Kh8 O-O bxc3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2160)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 e5 Nb3 Be6 f3 h5 Qd2 Nbd7 Nd5 Nxd5 exd5 Bf5 Na5 Be7 Be2 Bh4 g3 Bf6 O-O Qc7 c4 Bh3 Rf2 O-O Rc1 e4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 Be3 e5 Nb3 Be6 f3 h5 Qd2 Nbd7 Nd5 Nxd5 exd5 Bf5 Na5 Be7 Be2 Bh4 g3 Bf6 O-O Qc7 c4 Bh3 Rf2 O-O Rc1 e4 c5 exf3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Ne2 Be7 c3 O-O h4 f6 Qc2 b5 g3 b4 Bh3 Kh8 O-O bxc3 Qxc3 c4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Ne2 Be7 c3 O-O h4 f6 Qc2 b5 g3 b4 Bh3 Kh8 O-O bxc3 Qxc3 c4 Rab1 a5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Ne2 Be7 c3 O-O h4 f6 Qc2 b5 g3 b4 Bh3 Kh8 O-O bxc3 Qxc3 c4 Rab1 a5 Bd2 f5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2168)
b3 d5 Bb2 Bf5 Nf3 e6 g3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
b4 d5 Bb2 a6 e3 e6 a3 Nf6 d4 Be7

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
Nf3 d5 b3 Nf6 Bb2 Bf5 e3 e6 c4 h6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
d4 f5 Nf3 Nf6 Bf4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 Be5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
e4 d5 exd5 Nf6 d4 Nxd5 c3 c5 Nf3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Ne2 Be7 c3 O-O h4 f6 Qc2 b5 g3 b4 Bh3 Kh8 O-O bxc3 Qxc3 c4 Rab1 a5 Bd2 f5 g4 Nb6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2249)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Ne2 Be7 c3 O-O h4 f6 Qc2 b5 g3 b4 Bh3 Kh8 O-O bxc3 Qxc3 c4 Rab1 a5 Bd2 f5 g4 Nb6 Rf2 Nb4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2160)
b4 d5 Bb2 a6 e3 e6 a3 Nf6 d4 Be7 c4 Ne4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
e4 d5 exd5 Nf6 d4 Nxd5 c3 c5 Nf3 cxd4 Nxd4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
e4 d5 exd5 Nf6 d4 Nxd5 c3 c5 Nf3 cxd4 Nxd4 a6 Bd3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
b4 d5 Bb2 a6 e3 e6 a3 Nf6 d4 Be7 c4 Ne4 Bd3 f5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
Nf3 d5 b3 Nf6 Bb2 Bf5 e3 e6 c4 h6 Be2 Be7

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
b4 d5 Bb2 a6 e3 e6 a3 Nf6 d4 Be7 c4 Ne4 Bd3 f5 Ne2 dxc4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
Nf3 d5 b3 Nf6 Bb2 Bf5 e3 e6 c4 h6 Be2 Be7 O-O O-O

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
d4 f5 Nf3 Nf6 Bf4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 Be5 e6 e3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
e4 d5 exd5 Nf6 d4 Nxd5 c3 c5 Nf3 cxd4 Nxd4 a6 Bd3 g6 O-O

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
b4 d5 Bb2 a6 e3 e6 a3 Nf6 d4 Be7 c4 Ne4 Bd3 f5 Ne2 dxc4 Bxc4 b5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
Nf3 d5 b3 Nf6 Bb2 Bf5 e3 e6 c4 h6 Be2 Be7 O-O O-O Nc3 c6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
e4 d5 exd5 Nf6 d4 Nxd5 c3 c5 Nf3 cxd4 Nxd4 a6 Bd3 g6 O-O Bg7 Re1

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
Nf3 d5 b3 Nf6 Bb2 Bf5 e3 e6 c4 h6 Be2 Be7 O-O O-O Nc3 c6 d4 Nbd7

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2168)
b3 d5 Bb2 Bf5 Nf3 e6 g3 h6 Bg2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2168)
d4 Nf6 Nc3 d5 Bf4 Bf5 Nb5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Be7 Qe2 Nd6 Bxc6 bxc6 dxe5 Nf5 Qe4 g6 c4 O-O

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O d4 Bf6 Re1 Nf5 c3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
d4 d5 c4 e6 cxd5 exd5 Bf4 c6 e3 Bf5 g4 Bxb1 Rxb1 Bb4 Ke2 Bd6 Bg3 h5 gxh5 Rxh5 Bg2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
d4 f5 Nf3 Nf6 Bf4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 Be5 e6 e3 Nc6 Bf4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
b3 a6 Nf3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2160)
d4 d5 c4 e6 cxd5 exd5 Bf4 c6 e3 Bf5 g4 Bxb1 Rxb1 Bb4 Ke2 Bd6 Bg3 h5 gxh5 Rxh5 Bg2 Bxg3 hxg3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
b3 a6 Nf3 d5 e3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2168)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 Nge2 Nd4 d3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2168)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 Nge2 Nd4 d3 g6 Nxd4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
b3 a6 Nf3 d5 e3 Bf5 Bb2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
b3 a6 Nf3 d5 e3 Bf5 Bb2 e6 c4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2160)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O d4 Bf6 Re1 Nf5 c3 d5 Nd2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
d4 d5 c4 e6 cxd5 exd5 Bf4 c6 e3 Bf5 g4 Bxb1 Rxb1 Bb4 Ke2 Bd6 Bg3 h5 gxh5 Rxh5 Bg2 Bxg3 hxg3 Rxh1 Bxh1

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 d6 e4 c5 d5

Transpose to wikichess #211467#

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
b3 a6 Nf3 d5 e3 Bf5 Bb2 e6 c4 c6 a3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2168)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 Nge2 Nd4 d3 g6 Nxd4 cxd4 Ne2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
d4 d5 c4 e6 cxd5 exd5 Bf4 c6 e3 Bf5 g4 Bxb1 Rxb1 Bb4 Ke2 Bd6 Bg3 h5 gxh5 Rxh5 Bg2 Bxg3 hxg3 Rxh1 Bxh1 Nd7 Qb3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O d4 Bf6 Re1 Nf5 c3 d5 Nd2 c6 a4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2168)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nxc6 bxc6 Bd3 g6 Bg5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
d4 d5 c4 e6 cxd5 exd5 Bf4 c6 e3 Bf5 g4 Bxb1 Rxb1 Bb4 Ke2 Bd6 Bg3 h5 gxh5 Rxh5 Bg2 Bxg3 hxg3 Rxh1 Bxh1 Nd7 Qb3 Qb6 Qxb6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
b3 a6 Nf3 d5 e3 Bf5 Bb2 e6 c4 c6 a3 Nd7 b4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
d4 d5 Nf3 c6 Bf4 Nf6 e3 Bf5 c4 Qb6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2160)
d4 d5 c4 e6 cxd5 exd5 Bf4 c6 e3 Bf5 g4 Bxb1 Rxb1 Bb4 Ke2 Bd6 Bg3 h5 gxh5 Rxh5 Bg2 Bxg3 hxg3 Rxh1 Bxh1 Nd7 Qb3 Qb6 Qxb6 axb6 a3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2168)
e4 d5 exd5 Qxd5 Nc3 Qa5 d4 Nf6 Nf3 c6 Bc4 Bf5 Ne5

Transpose to wikichess #86098#

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2168)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 Nge2 Nd4 d3 g6 Nxd4 cxd4 Ne2 Bg7 h4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
b3 a6 Nf3 d5 e3 Bf5 Bb2 e6 c4 c6 a3 Nd7 b4 dxc4 Bxc4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
b3 a6 Nf3 d5 e3 Bf5 Bb2 e6 c4 c6 a3 Nd7 b4 dxc4 Bxc4 Ngf6 O-O

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2160)
d4 d5 c4 e6 cxd5 exd5 Bf4 c6 e3 Bf5 g4 Bxb1 Rxb1 Bb4 Ke2 Bd6 Bg3 h5 gxh5 Rxh5 Bg2 Bxg3 hxg3 Rxh1 Bxh1 Nd7 Qb3 Qb6 Qxb6 axb6 a3 Ngf6 Bf3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
b3 a6 Nf3 d5 e3 Bf5 Bb2 e6 c4 c6 a3 Nd7 b4 dxc4 Bxc4 Ngf6 O-O Be7 Be2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
d4 d5 Nf3 c6 Bf4 Nf6 e3 Bf5 c4 Qb6 Qc1 Nbd7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2168)
d4 Nf6 Nc3 d5 Bf4 Bf5 Nb5 Na6 e3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2168)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 Nge2 Nd4 d3 g6 Nxd4 cxd4 Ne2 Bg7 h4 d5 h5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2168)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 dxe4 Nxe4 Be7 Bxf6 gxf6 Nf3 f5 Nc3 a6 a4 Qd6 Bc4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
b3 a6 Nf3 d5 e3 Bf5 Bb2 e6 c4 c6 a3 Nd7 b4 dxc4 Bxc4 Ngf6 O-O Be7 Be2 a5 b5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
d4 d5 Nf3 c6 Bf4 Nf6 e3 Bf5 c4 Qb6 Qc1 Nbd7 Nc3 e6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
d4 d5 Nf3 c6 Bf4 Nf6 e3 Bf5 c4 Qb6 Qc1 Nbd7 Nc3 e6 h3 c5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
d4 d5 Nf3 c6 Bf4 Nf6 e3 Bf5 c4 Qb6 Qc1 Nbd7 Nc3 e6 h3 c5 a4 a6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2168)
d4 Nf6 Nc3 d5 Bf4 Bf5 Nb5 Na6 e3 e6 a3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2168)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 dxe4 Nxe4 Be7 Bxf6 gxf6 Nf3 f5 Nc3 a6 a4 Qd6 Bc4 Nd7 Qe2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2168)
d4 Nf6 Nc3 d5 Bf4 Bf5 Nb5 Na6 e3 e6 a3 Be7 Nf3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2168)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 dxe4 Nxe4 Be7 Bxf6 gxf6 Nf3 f5 Nc3 a6 a4 Qd6 Bc4 Nd7 Qe2 Kf8 Qe3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
b3 a6 Nf3 d5 e3 Bf5 Bb2 e6 c4 c6 a3 Nd7 b4 dxc4 Bxc4 Ngf6 O-O Be7 Be2 a5 b5 cxb5 Bxb5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
d4 d5 Nf3 c6 Bf4 Nf6 e3 Bf5 c4 Qb6 Qc1 Nbd7 Nc3 e6 h3 c5 a4 a6 a5 Qd8

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2168)
d4 Nf6 Nc3 d5 Bf4 Bf5 Nb5 Na6 e3 e6 a3 Be7 Nf3 Ne4 Nd2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
b3 a6 Nf3 d5 e3 Bf5 Bb2 e6 c4 c6 a3 Nd7 b4 dxc4 Bxc4 Ngf6 O-O Be7 Be2 a5 b5 cxb5 Bxb5 O-O Nc3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2168)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 dxe4 Nxe4 Be7 Bxf6 gxf6 Nf3 f5 Nc3 a6 a4 Qd6 Bc4 Nd7 Qe2 Kf8 Qe3 Rg8 O-O

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2168)
d4 Nf6 Nc3 d5 Bf4 Bf5 Nb5 Na6 e3 e6 a3 Be7 Nf3 Ne4 Nd2 Nxd2 Qxd2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O d4 Bf6 Re2 b6 Re1 Bb7 Bf4 Nf5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
b3 a6 Nf3 d5 e3 Bf5 Bb2 e6 c4 c6 a3 Nd7 b4 dxc4 Bxc4 Ngf6 O-O Be7 Be2 a5 b5 cxb5 Bxb5 O-O Nc3 Nc5 d4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
d4 d5 Nf3 c6 Bf4 Nf6 e3 Bf5 c4 Qb6 Qc1 Nbd7 Nc3 e6 h3 c5 a4 a6 a5 Qd8 Qd1 cxd4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
c4 e5 Nf3 e4 Nd4 Nc6 e3 Nf6 Nc3 Bb4 Qb3 Nxd4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
b3 a6 Nf3 d5 e3 Bf5 Bb2 e6 c4 c6 a3 Nd7 b4 dxc4 Bxc4 Ngf6 O-O Be7 Be2 a5 b5 cxb5 Bxb5 O-O Nc3 Nc5 d4 Nce4 Ne5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2168)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 dxe4 Nxe4 Be7 Bxf6 gxf6 Nf3 f5 Nc3 a6 a4 Qd6 Bc4 Nd7 Qe2 Kf8 Qe3 Rg8 O-O Nf6 d5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
b3 a6 Nf3 d5 e3 Bf5 Bb2 e6 c4 c6 a3 Nd7 b4 dxc4 Bxc4 Ngf6 O-O Be7 Be2 a5 b5 cxb5 Bxb5 O-O Nc3 Nc5 d4 Nce4 Ne5 Rc8 Rc1

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
d4 d5 Nf3 c6 Bf4 Nf6 e3 Bf5 c4 Qb6 Qc1 Nbd7 Nc3 e6 h3 c5 a4 a6 a5 Qd8 Qd1 cxd4 exd4 dxc4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
c4 e5 Nf3 e4 Nd4 Nc6 e3 Nf6 Nc3 Bb4 Qb3 Nxd4 exd4 a5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
b3 a6 Nf3 d5 e3 Bf5 Bb2 e6 c4 c6 a3 Nd7 b4 dxc4 Bxc4 Ngf6 O-O Be7 Be2 a5 b5 cxb5 Bxb5 O-O Nc3 Nc5 d4 Nce4 Ne5 Rc8 Rc1 Nxc3 Rxc3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2168)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 dxe4 Nxe4 Be7 Bxf6 gxf6 Nf3 f5 Nc3 a6 a4 Qd6 Bc4 Nd7 Qe2 Kf8 Qe3 Rg8 O-O Nf6 d5 Ng4 Qe2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2168)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Qc2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
b3 a6 Nf3 d5 e3 Bf5 Bb2 e6 c4 c6 a3 Nd7 b4 dxc4 Bxc4 Ngf6 O-O Be7 Be2 a5 b5 cxb5 Bxb5 O-O Nc3 Nc5 d4 Nce4 Ne5 Rc8 Rc1 Nxc3 Rxc3 Qd5 Bc4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
c4 e5 Nf3 e4 Nd4 Nc6 e3 Nf6 Nc3 Bb4 Qb3 Nxd4 exd4 a5 a3 Bxc3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
d4 d5 Nf3 c6 Bf4 Nf6 e3 Bf5 c4 Qb6 Qc1 Nbd7 Nc3 e6 h3 c5 a4 a6 a5 Qd8 Qd1 cxd4 exd4 dxc4 Bxc4 Bb4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O Be2 Na6 O-O e5 Re1 Bg4 Be3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2168)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 dxe4 Nxe4 Be7 Bxf6 gxf6 Nf3 f5 Nc3 a6 a4 Qd6 Bc4 Nd7 Qe2 Kf8 Qe3 Rg8 O-O Nf6 d5 Ng4 Qe2 e5 Nxe5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O Be2 Na6 O-O e5 Re1 Bg4 Be3 Bxf3 Bxf3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O d4 Bf6 Re2 b6 Re1 Bb7 Bf4 Nf5 c3 Re8

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
b3 a6 Nf3 d5 e3 Bf5 Bb2 e6 c4 c6 a3 Nd7 b4 dxc4 Bxc4 Ngf6 O-O Be7 Be2 a5 b5 cxb5 Bxb5 O-O Nc3 Nc5 d4 Nce4 Ne5 Rc8 Rc1 Nxc3 Rxc3 Qd5 Bc4 Qd6 Qa4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
d4 d5 Nf3 c6 Bf4 Nf6 e3 Bf5 c4 Qb6 Qc1 Nbd7 Nc3 e6 h3 c5 a4 a6 a5 Qd8 Qd1 cxd4 exd4 dxc4 Bxc4 Bb4 Qa4 Qe7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2160)
Nf3 d5 b3 Nf6 Bb2 Bf5 e3 e6 c4 h6 Be2 Be7 O-O O-O Nc3 c6 d4 Nbd7 Bd3 a6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
d4 f5 Nf3 Nf6 Bf4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 Be5 e6 e3 Nc6 Bf4 h6 Bd3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2168)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 Nge2 Nd4 d3 g6 Nxd4 cxd4 Ne2 Bg7 h4 d5 h5 Bd7 exd5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
d4 f5 Nf3 Nf6 Bf4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 Be5 e6 e3 Nc6 Bf4 h6 Bd3 d6 O-O

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O Be2 Na6 O-O e5 Re1 Bg4 Be3 Bxf3 Bxf3 exd4 Bxd4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O d4 Bf6 Re2 b6 Re1 Bb7 Bf4 Nf5 c3 Re8 Nd2 Rxe1

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
d4 d5 Nf3 c6 Bf4 Nf6 e3 Bf5 c4 Qb6 Qc1 Nbd7 Nc3 e6 h3 c5 a4 a6 a5 Qd8 Qd1 cxd4 exd4 dxc4 Bxc4 Bb4 Qa4 Qe7 O-O O-O

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
c4 e5 Nf3 e4 Nd4 Nc6 e3 Nf6 Nc3 Bb4 Qb3 Nxd4 exd4 a5 a3 Bxc3 dxc3 a4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O Be2 Na6 O-O e5 Re1 Bg4 Be3 Bxf3 Bxf3 exd4 Bxd4 c6 Qc2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O d4 Bf6 Re2 b6 Re1 Bb7 Bf4 Nf5 c3 Re8 Nd2 Rxe1 Qxe1 g5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
d4 d5 Nf3 c6 Bf4 Nf6 e3 Bf5 c4 Qb6 Qc1 Nbd7 Nc3 e6 h3 c5 a4 a6 a5 Qd8 Qd1 cxd4 exd4 dxc4 Bxc4 Bb4 Qa4 Qe7 O-O O-O Qb3 Rfc8

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
c4 e5 Nf3 e4 Nd4 Nc6 e3 Nf6 Nc3 Bb4 Qb3 Nxd4 exd4 a5 a3 Bxc3 dxc3 a4 Qb5 O-O

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O Be2 Na6 O-O e5 Re1 Bg4 Be3 Bxf3 Bxf3 exd4 Bxd4 c6 Qc2 Nc5 Rad1

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O d4 Bf6 Re2 b6 Re1 Bb7 Bf4 Nf5 c3 Re8 Nd2 Rxe1 Qxe1 g5 Be3 Qe7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
d4 d5 Nf3 c6 Bf4 Nf6 e3 Bf5 c4 Qb6 Qc1 Nbd7 Nc3 e6 h3 c5 a4 a6 a5 Qd8 Qd1 cxd4 exd4 dxc4 Bxc4 Bb4 Qa4 Qe7 O-O O-O Qb3 Rfc8 Rfc1 Bd6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O d4 Bf6 Re2 b6 Re1 Bb7 Bf4 Nf5 c3 Re8 Nd2 Rxe1 Qxe1 g5 Be3 Qe7 Nc4 Re8

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O d4 Bf6 Re2 b6 Re1 Bb7 Bf4 Nf5 c3 Re8 Nd2 Rxe1 Qxe1 g5 Be3 Qe7 Nc4 Re8 Bd2 Qxe1

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
d4 d5 Nf3 c6 Bf4 Nf6 e3 Bf5 c4 Qb6 Qc1 Nbd7 Nc3 e6 h3 c5 a4 a6 a5 Qd8 Qd1 cxd4 exd4 dxc4 Bxc4 Bb4 Qa4 Qe7 O-O O-O Qb3 Rfc8 Rfc1 Bd6 Ne5 Ne4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O Be2 Na6 O-O e5 Re1 Bg4 Be3 Bxf3 Bxf3 exd4 Bxd4 c6 Qc2 Nc5 Rad1 Qa5 Be2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O d4 Bf6 Re2 b6 Re1 Bb7 Bf4 Nf5 c3 Re8 Nd2 Rxe1 Qxe1 g5 Be3 Qe7 Nc4 Re8 Bd2 Qxe1 Rxe1 Rxe1

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
d4 d5 Nf3 c6 Bf4 Nf6 e3 Bf5 c4 Qb6 Qc1 Nbd7 Nc3 e6 h3 c5 a4 a6 a5 Qd8 Qd1 cxd4 exd4 dxc4 Bxc4 Bb4 Qa4 Qe7 O-O O-O Qb3 Rfc8 Rfc1 Bd6 Ne5 Ne4 Nxe4 Bxe4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
c4 e5 Nf3 e4 Nd4 Nc6 e3 Nf6 Nc3 Bb4 Qb3 Nxd4 exd4 a5 a3 Bxc3 dxc3 a4 Qb5 O-O Qg5 d5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2168)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 Nge2 Nd4 d3 g6 Nxd4 cxd4 Ne2 Bg7 h4 d5 h5 Bd7 exd5 Qa5 c3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O Be2 Na6 O-O e5 Re1 Bg4 Be3 Bxf3 Bxf3 exd4 Bxd4 c6 Qc2 Nc5 Rad1 Qa5 Be2 Rfe8 f3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
c4 e5 Nf3 e4 Nd4 Nc6 e3 Nf6 Nc3 Bb4 Qb3 Nxd4 exd4 a5 a3 Bxc3 dxc3 a4 Qb5 O-O Qg5 d5 cxd5 Nxd5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2160)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O d4 Bf6 Re1 Nf5 c3 d5 Nd2 c6 a4 a5 Nf3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O d4 Bf6 Re1 Nf5 c3 d5 Nd2 c6 a4 a5 Nf3 Nd6 Bf4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O Be2 Na6 O-O e5 Re1 Bg4 Be3 Bxf3 Bxf3 exd4 Bxd4 c6 Qc2 Nc5 Rad1 Qa5 Be2 Rfe8 f3 Rad8 g3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
c4 e5 Nf3 e4 Nd4 Nc6 e3 Nf6 Nc3 Bb4 Qb3 Nxd4 exd4 a5 a3 Bxc3 dxc3 a4 Qb5 O-O Qg5 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qxd8 Rxd8

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O Be2 Na6 O-O e5 Re1 Bg4 Be3 Bxf3 Bxf3 exd4 Bxd4 c6 Qc2 Nc5 Rad1 Qa5 Be2 Rfe8 f3 Rad8 g3 h5 h4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Nd6 Bxc6 dxc6 dxe5 Nf5 Qxd8 Kxd8 Nc3 Bd7 h3 h6 b3 c5 Rd1 Rc8 g4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2168)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Qc2 Bb4 Nf3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Be7 Qe2 Nd6 Bxc6 bxc6 dxe5 Nf5 Qe4 g6 c4 O-O Nc3 Re8

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
Nf3 d5 b3 Nf6 Bb2 Bf5 e3 e6 c4 h6 Be2 Be7 O-O O-O Nc3 c6 d4 Nbd7 Bd3 a6 Bxf5 exf5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Nd6 Bxc6 dxc6 dxe5 Nf5 Qxd8 Kxd8 Nc3 Bd7 h3 h6 b3 c5 Rd1 Rc8 g4 Nd4 Nxd4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
c4 e5 Nf3 e4 Nd4 Nc6 e3 Nf6 Nc3 Bb4 Qb3 Nxd4 exd4 a5 a3 Bxc3 dxc3 a4 Qb5 O-O Qg5 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qxd8 Rxd8 Bd2 c6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2160)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O d4 Bf6 Re1 Nf5 c3 d5 Nd2 c6 a4 a5 Nf3 Nd6 Bf4 Bf5 h3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Be7 Qe2 Nd6 Bxc6 bxc6 dxe5 Nf5 Qe4 g6 c4 O-O Nc3 Re8 Bf4 Rb8

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Be7 Qe2 Nd6 Bxc6 bxc6 dxe5 Nf5 Qe4 g6 c4 O-O Nc3 Re8 Bf4 Rb8 Qc2 d6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O d4 Bf6 Re1 Nf5 c3 d5 Nd2 c6 a4 a5 Nf3 Nd6 Bf4 Bf5 h3 h6 Qb3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O d4 Bf6 Re1 Nf5 c3 d5 Nd2 c6 a4 a5 Nf3 Nd6 Bf4 Bf5 h3 h6 Qb3 Be4 Nd2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O Be2 Na6 O-O e5 Re1 Bg4 Be3 Bxf3 Bxf3 exd4 Bxd4 c6 Qc2 Nc5 Rad1 Qa5 Be2 Rfe8 f3 Rad8 g3 h5 h4 Ne6 Bf2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2160)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Be7 Qe2 Nd6 Bxc6 bxc6 dxe5 Nf5 Qe4 g6 c4 O-O Nc3 Re8 Bf4 Rb8 Qc2 d6 Rad1 Be6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Nd6 Bxc6 dxc6 dxe5 Nf5 Qxd8 Kxd8 Nc3 Bd7 h3 h6 b3 c5 Rd1 Rc8 g4 Nd4 Nxd4 cxd4 Rxd4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
c4 e5 Nf3 e4 Nd4 Nc6 e3 Nf6 Nc3 Bb4 Qb3 Nxd4 exd4 a5 a3 Bxc3 dxc3 a4 Qb5 O-O Qg5 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qxd8 Rxd8 Bd2 c6 c4 Ne7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2160)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O d4 Bf6 Re1 Nf5 c3 d5 Nd2 c6 a4 a5 Nf3 Nd6 Bf4 Bf5 h3 h6 Qb3 Be4 Nd2 Bg6 Nf3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 O-O Be2 Na6 O-O e5 Re1 Bg4 Be3 Bxf3 Bxf3 exd4 Bxd4 c6 Qc2 Nc5 Rad1 Qa5 Be2 Rfe8 f3 Rad8 g3 h5 h4 Ne6 Bf2 a6 a3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
c4 e5 Nf3 e4 Nd4 Nc6 e3 Nf6 Nc3 Bb4 Qb3 Nxd4 exd4 a5 a3 Bxc3 dxc3 a4 Qb5 O-O Qg5 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qxd8 Rxd8 Bd2 c6 c4 Ne7 Bc3 Be6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2160)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Be7 Qe2 Nd6 Bxc6 bxc6 dxe5 Nf5 Qe4 g6 c4 O-O Nc3 Re8 Bf4 Rb8 Qc2 d6 Rad1 Be6 b3 g5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Nd6 Bxc6 dxc6 dxe5 Nf5 Qxd8 Kxd8 Nc3 Bd7 h3 h6 b3 c5 Rd1 Rc8 g4 Nd4 Nxd4 cxd4 Rxd4 Bc5 Rd3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
c4 e5 Nf3 e4 Nd4 Nc6 e3 Nf6 Nc3 Bb4 Qb3 Nxd4 exd4 a5 a3 Bxc3 dxc3 a4 Qb5 O-O Qg5 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qxd8 Rxd8 Bd2 c6 c4 Ne7 Bc3 Be6 O-O-O Nf5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2160)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Be7 Qe2 Nd6 Bxc6 bxc6 dxe5 Nf5 Qe4 g6 c4 O-O Nc3 Re8 Bf4 Rb8 Qc2 d6 Rad1 Be6 b3 g5 Bc1 Ng7

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2168)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 g3 Bb4 Bg2 O-O O-O e4 Ne1 Bxc3 dxc3 h6 Nc2 d6 Ne3 a5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Nd6 Bxc6 dxc6 dxe5 Nf5 Qxd8 Kxd8 Nc3 Bd7 h3 h6 b3 c5 Rd1 Rc8 g4 Nd4 Nxd4 cxd4 Rxd4 Bc5 Rd3 Ke8 Bf4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2160)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Be7 Qe2 Nd6 Bxc6 bxc6 dxe5 Nf5 Qe4 g6 c4 O-O Nc3 Re8 Bf4 Rb8 Qc2 d6 Rad1 Be6 b3 g5 Bc1 Ng7 Nd4 Qd7

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
c4 e5 Nf3 e4 Nd4 Nc6 e3 Nf6 Nc3 Bb4 Qb3 Nxd4 exd4 a5 a3 Bxc3 dxc3 a4 Qb5 O-O Qg5 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qxd8 Rxd8 Bd2 c6 c4 Ne7 Bc3 Be6 O-O-O Nf5 Be2 Nh4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2160)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Be7 Qe2 Nd6 Bxc6 bxc6 dxe5 Nf5 Qe4 g6 c4 O-O Nc3 Re8 Bf4 Rb8 Qc2 d6 Rad1 Be6 b3 g5 Bc1 Ng7 Nd4 Qd7 exd6 cxd6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Nd6 Bxc6 dxc6 dxe5 Nf5 Qxd8 Kxd8 Nc3 Bd7 h3 h6 b3 c5 Rd1 Rc8 g4 Nd4 Nxd4 cxd4 Rxd4 Bc5 Rd3 Ke8 Bf4 g5 Ne4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2160)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Be7 Qe2 Nd6 Bxc6 bxc6 dxe5 Nf5 Qe4 g6 c4 O-O Nc3 Re8 Bf4 Rb8 Qc2 d6 Rad1 Be6 b3 g5 Bc1 Ng7 Nd4 Qd7 exd6 cxd6 Ne4 Bf5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
Nf3 d5 b3 Nf6 Bb2 Bf5 e3 e6 c4 h6 Be2 Be7 O-O O-O Nc3 c6 d4 Nbd7 Bd3 a6 Bxf5 exf5 Qc2 g6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Nd6 Bxc6 dxc6 dxe5 Nf5 Qxd8 Kxd8 Nc3 Bd7 h3 h6 b3 c5 Rd1 Rc8 g4 Nd4 Nxd4 cxd4 Rxd4 Bc5 Rd3 Ke8 Bf4 g5 Ne4 Be7 Be3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2250)
c4 e5 Nf3 e4 Nd4 Nc6 e3 Nf6 Nc3 Bb4 Qb3 Nxd4 exd4 a5 a3 Bxc3 dxc3 a4 Qb5 O-O Qg5 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Qxd8 Rxd8 Bd2 c6 c4 Ne7 Bc3 Be6 O-O-O Nf5 Be2 Nh4 Rhg1 f6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2160)
Nf3 d5 b3 Nf6 Bb2 Bf5 e3 e6 c4 h6 Be2 Be7 O-O O-O Nc3 c6 d4 Nbd7 Bd3 a6 Bxf5 exf5 Qc2 g6 c5 h5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
Nf3 d5 b3 Nf6 Bb2 Bf5 e3 e6 c4 h6 Be2 Be7 O-O O-O Nc3 c6 d4 Nbd7 Bd3 a6 Bxf5 exf5 Qc2 g6 c5 h5 b4 Ne4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
Nf3 d5 b3 Nf6 Bb2 Bf5 e3 e6 c4 h6 Be2 Be7 O-O O-O Nc3 c6 d4 Nbd7 Bd3 a6 Bxf5 exf5 Qc2 g6 c5 h5 b4 Ne4 a4 Re8

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2168)
c4 e5 Nc3 Bb4 Nd5 a5 Nf3 e4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2168)
d4 f5 c4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 c6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2168)
c4 e5 Nc3 Bb4 Nd5 a5 Nf3 e4 Nd4 c6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2168)
d4 f5 c4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 c6 Nf3 d6

Transpose to wikichess #19283#

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2168)
c4 e5 Nc3 Bb4 Nd5 a5 Nf3 e4 Nd4 c6 Nxb4 axb4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2168)
c4 e5 Nc3 Bb4 Nd5 a5 Nf3 e4 Nd4 c6 Nxb4 axb4 d3 d5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2168)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Qc2 Bb4 Nf3 Bxc3 Qxc3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2168)
c4 e5 Nc3 Bb4 Nd5 a5 Nf3 e4 Nd4 c6 Nxb4 axb4 d3 d5 Bf4 Ne7

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2168)
c4 e5 Nc3 Bb4 Nd5 a5 Nf3 e4 Nd4 c6 Nxb4 axb4 d3 d5 Bf4 Ne7 e3 O-O

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2168)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Qc2 Bb4 Nf3 Bxc3 Qxc3 d6 d4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2168)
c4 e5 Nc3 Bb4 Nd5 a5 Nf3 e4 Nd4 c6 Nxb4 axb4 d3 d5 Bf4 Ne7 e3 O-O cxd5 cxd5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2168)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Qc2 Bb4 Nf3 Bxc3 Qxc3 d6 d4 e4 Nd2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2168)
c4 e5 Nc3 Bb4 Nd5 a5 Nf3 e4 Nd4 c6 Nxb4 axb4 d3 d5 Bf4 Ne7 e3 O-O cxd5 cxd5 Bxb8 Rxb8

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2168)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Qc2 Bb4 Nf3 Bxc3 Qxc3 d6 d4 e4 Nd2 O-O h3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2168)
c4 e5 Nc3 Bb4 Nd5 a5 Nf3 e4 Nd4 c6 Nxb4 axb4 d3 d5 Bf4 Ne7 e3 O-O cxd5 cxd5 Bxb8 Rxb8 dxe4 dxe4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2168)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Qc2 Bb4 Nf3 Bxc3 Qxc3 d6 d4 e4 Nd2 O-O h3 Re8 e3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2168)
c4 e5 Nc3 Bb4 Nd5 a5 Nf3 e4 Nd4 c6 Nxb4 axb4 d3 d5 Bf4 Ne7 e3 O-O cxd5 cxd5 Bxb8 Rxb8 dxe4 dxe4 Bc4 Bd7

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2168)
c4 e5 Nc3 Bb4 Nd5 a5 Nf3 e4 Nd4 c6 Nxb4 axb4 d3 d5 Bf4 Ne7 e3 O-O cxd5 cxd5 Bxb8 Rxb8 dxe4 dxe4 Bc4 Bd7 Qd2 Ng6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2168)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Qc2 Bb4 Nf3 Bxc3 Qxc3 d6 d4 e4 Nd2 O-O h3 Re8 e3 d5 b3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2168)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Qc2 Bb4 Nf3 Bxc3 Qxc3 d6 d4 e4 Nd2 O-O h3 Re8 e3 d5 b3 Nc6 a4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2168)
c4 e5 Nc3 Bb4 Nd5 a5 Nf3 e4 Nd4 c6 Nxb4 axb4 d3 d5 Bf4 Ne7 e3 O-O cxd5 cxd5 Bxb8 Rxb8 dxe4 dxe4 Bc4 Bd7 Qd2 Ng6 O-O Qg5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2168)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Bxc6 dxc6 O-O f6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 c5 Ne2 Qxd1 Rxd1 Bd7 Be3 O-O-O f3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2168)
c4 e5 Nc3 Bb4 Nd5 a5 Nf3 e4 Nd4 c6 Nxb4 axb4 d3 d5 Bf4 Ne7 e3 O-O cxd5 cxd5 Bxb8 Rxb8 dxe4 dxe4 Bc4 Bd7 Qd2 Ng6 O-O Qg5 Rfc1 Ne5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2168)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Qc2 Bb4 Nf3 Bxc3 Qxc3 d6 d4 e4 Nd2 O-O h3 Re8 e3 d5 b3 Nc6 a4 Ne7 Be2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2168)
c4 e5 Nc3 Bb4 Nd5 a5 Nf3 e4 Nd4 c6 Nxb4 axb4 d3 d5 Bf4 Ne7 e3 O-O cxd5 cxd5 Bxb8 Rxb8 dxe4 dxe4 Bc4 Bd7 Qd2 Ng6 O-O Qg5 Rfc1 Ne5 Bf1 h5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2168)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Qc2 Bb4 Nf3 Bxc3 Qxc3 d6 d4 e4 Nd2 O-O h3 Re8 e3 d5 b3 Nc6 a4 Ne7 Be2 Ng6 Ba3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2168)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Qc2 Bb4 Nf3 Bxc3 Qxc3 d6 d4 e4 Nd2 O-O h3 Re8 e3 d5 b3 Nc6 a4 Ne7 Be2 Ng6 Ba3 h6 O-O-O

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2168)
c4 e5 Nc3 Bb4 Nd5 a5 Nf3 e4 Nd4 c6 Nxb4 axb4 d3 d5 Bf4 Ne7 e3 O-O cxd5 cxd5 Bxb8 Rxb8 dxe4 dxe4 Bc4 Bd7 Qd2 Ng6 O-O Qg5 Rfc1 Ne5 Bf1 h5 Qxb4 h4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2168)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Qc2 Bb4 Nf3 Bxc3 Qxc3 d6 d4 e4 Nd2 O-O h3 Re8 e3 d5 b3 Nc6 a4 Ne7 Be2 Ng6 Ba3 h6 O-O-O Be6 Kb2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2168)
c4 e5 Nc3 Bb4 Nd5 a5 Nf3 e4 Nd4 c6 Nxb4 axb4 d3 d5 Bf4 Ne7 e3 O-O cxd5 cxd5 Bxb8 Rxb8 dxe4 dxe4 Bc4 Bd7 Qd2 Ng6 O-O Qg5 Rfc1 Ne5 Bf1 h5 Qxb4 h4 Rc7 h3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2168)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Qc2 Bb4 Nf3 Bxc3 Qxc3 d6 d4 e4 Nd2 O-O h3 Re8 e3 d5 b3 Nc6 a4 Ne7 Be2 Ng6 Ba3 h6 O-O-O Be6 Kb2 Rb8 Ka1

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2168)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Qc2 Bb4 Nf3 Bxc3 Qxc3 d6 d4 e4 Nd2 O-O h3 Re8 e3 d5 b3 Nc6 a4 Ne7 Be2 Ng6 Ba3 h6 O-O-O Be6 Kb2 Rb8 Ka1 Qd7 Qb4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2168)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Nd6 Bxc6 dxc6 dxe5 Nf5 Qxd8 Kxd8 Nc3 Bd7 h3 h6 b3 Kc8 Bb2 c5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2168)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Bxc6 dxc6 O-O f6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 c5 Ne2 Qxd1 Rxd1 Bd7 Be3 O-O-O f3 f5 Ng3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2168)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Qc2 Bb4 Nf3 Bxc3 Qxc3 d6 d4 e4 Nd2 O-O h3 Re8 e3 d5 b3 Nc6 a4 Ne7 Be2 Ng6 Ba3 h6 O-O-O Be6 Kb2 Rb8 Ka1 Qd7 Qb4 Rec8 Rhg1

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2168)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Qc2 Bb4 Nf3 Bxc3 Qxc3 d6 d4 e4 Nd2 O-O h3 Re8 e3 d5 b3 Nc6 a4 Ne7 Be2 Ng6 Ba3 h6 O-O-O Be6 Kb2 Rb8 Ka1 Qd7 Qb4 Rec8 Rhg1 b6 c5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2168)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Nd6 Bxc6 dxc6 dxe5 Nf5 Qxd8 Kxd8 Nc3 Bd7 h3 h6 b3 Kc8 Bb2 c5 Rad1 b6

Transpose to wikichess #140739#

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2168)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Bxc6 dxc6 O-O f6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 c5 Ne2 Qxd1 Rxd1 Bd7 Be3 O-O-O f3 f5 Ng3 fxe4 Nxe4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 dxe4 Qe7 b4 Bd6 a3 a5 Rb1 h6 Re1

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
d4 Nf6 f4 d5 e3 Bf5 Bd3 e6 Nf3 c5 c3 Bd6 O-O Nc6 b3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
d4 Nf6 f4 d5 e3 Bf5 Bd3 e6 Nf3 c5 c3 Bd6 O-O Nc6 b3 cxd4 exd4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2168)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Bxc6 dxc6 O-O f6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 c5 Ne2 Qxd1 Rxd1 Bd7 Be3 O-O-O f3 f5 Ng3 fxe4 Nxe4 b6 Nbc3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 dxe4 Qe7 b4 Bd6 a3 a5 Rb1 h6 Re1 Be6 h3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 dxe4 Qe7 b4 Bd6 a3 a5 Rb1 h6 Re1 Be6 h3 Rfd8 Qc2

Transpose to wikichess #220269#

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 dxe4 a5 Bxc6 bxc6 Nxe5 Re8 Nb3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 dxe4 a5 Bxc6 bxc6 Nxe5 Re8 Nb3 Bd6 Nxc6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Ne2 Qb6 Qc1 Be7 h4 cxd4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Ne2 Qb6 Qc1 Be7 h4 cxd4 Nexd4 Nc5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 f3 e5 Nb3 Be7 Be3 O-O

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Ne2 Qb6 Qc1 Be7 h4 cxd4 Nexd4 Nc5 h5 h6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2168)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Bxc6 dxc6 O-O f6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 c5 Ne2 Qxd1 Rxd1 Bd7 Be3 O-O-O f3 f5 Ng3 fxe4 Nxe4 b6 Nbc3 Be7 Nd5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Ne2 Qb6 Qc1 Be7 h4 cxd4 Nexd4 Nc5 h5 h6 c3 a5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2168)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Bxc6 dxc6 O-O f6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 c5 Ne2 Qxd1 Rxd1 Bd7 Be3 O-O-O f3 f5 Ng3 fxe4 Nxe4 b6 Nbc3 Be7 Nd5 Bc6 Nxe7

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 f3 e5 Nb3 Be7 Be3 O-O Qd2 Be6

Transpose to wikichess #6952#

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 e4 e5 Nf3 exd4 Bxc4 Nc6 O-O Be6 Bxe6 fxe6 Qb3 Qd7 Qxb7 Rb8 Qa6 Nge7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 e4 e5 Nf3 exd4 Bxc4 Nc6 O-O Be6 Bxe6 fxe6 Qb3 Qd7 Qxb7 Rb8 Qa6 Nge7 Nbd2 Ng6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2168)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Bxc6 dxc6 O-O f6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 c5 Ne2 Qxd1 Rxd1 Bd7 Be3 O-O-O f3 f5 Ng3 fxe4 Nxe4 b6 Nbc3 Be7 Nd5 Bc6 Nxe7 Nxe7 Ng3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Ne2 Qb6 Qc1 Be7 h4 cxd4 Nexd4 Nc5 h5 h6 c3 a5 Qc2 Nxd4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 e4 e5 Nf3 exd4 Bxc4 Nc6 O-O Be6 Bxe6 fxe6 Qb3 Qd7 Qxb7 Rb8 Qa6 Nge7 Nbd2 Ng6 Nc4 Be7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 e4 e5 Nf3 exd4 Bxc4 Nc6 O-O Be6 Bxe6 fxe6 Qb3 Qd7 Qxb7 Rb8 Qa6 Nge7 Nbd2 Ng6 Nc4 Be7 Bd2 O-O

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 dxe4 a5 Bxc6 bxc6 Nxe5 Re8 Nb3 Bd6 Nxc6 Qd7 e5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Ne2 Qb6 Qc1 Be7 h4 cxd4 Nexd4 Nc5 h5 h6 c3 a5 Qc2 Nxd4 Bxd4 Bd7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 e4 e5 Nf3 exd4 Bxc4 Nc6 O-O Be6 Bxe6 fxe6 Qb3 Qd7 Qxb7 Rb8 Qa6 Nge7 Nbd2 Ng6 Nc4 Be7 Bd2 O-O Kh1 Rf6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matias Remus    (1711)
c4 c5 Nc3 Nf6 g3 d5 d3

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matias Remus    (1711)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 e3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matias Remus    (1711)
c4 c5 Nc3 Nf6 g3 d5 d3 d4 Ne4

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matias Remus    (1711)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 e3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Bb5 Bd6

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matias Remus    (1711)
c4 c5 Nc3 Nf6 g3 d5 d3 d4 Ne4 Nxe4 dxe4

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matias Remus    (1711)
e4 e5 f4 d5 exd5 c6 dxc6 Nxc6 Nf3 e4 Ng5

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matej Pech    (2204)
d4 d5 c4 c6 cxd5 cxd5 Bf4 Nc6 e3 Nf6 Bb5 e6 Nc3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 e4 e5 Nf3 exd4 Bxc4 Nc6 O-O Be6 Bxe6 fxe6 Qb3 Qd7 Qxb7 Rb8 Qa6 Nge7 Nbd2 Ng6 Nc4 Be7 Bd2 O-O Kh1 Rf6 Qa4 e5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matias Remus    (1711)
e4 e5 f4 d5 exd5 c6 dxc6 Nxc6 Nf3 e4 Ng5 Nf6 Bc4

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matias Remus    (1711)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 e3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Bb5 Bd6 Nxd5 Bd7

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matias Remus    (1711)
c4 c5 Nc3 Nf6 g3 d5 d3 d4 Ne4 Nxe4 dxe4 e5 e3

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matias Remus    (1711)
e4 e5 f4 d5 exd5 c6 dxc6 Nxc6 Nf3 e4 Ng5 Nf6 Bc4 Bc5 c3

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matias Remus    (1711)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 e3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Bb5 Bd6 Nxd5 Bd7 Nc3 a6

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matias Remus    (1711)
c4 c5 Nc3 Nf6 g3 d5 d3 d4 Ne4 Nxe4 dxe4 e5 e3 Nc6 Nf3

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matias Remus    (1711)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 e3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Bb5 Bd6 Nxd5 Bd7 Nc3 a6 Be2 O-O

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matias Remus    (1711)
e4 e5 f4 d5 exd5 c6 dxc6 Nxc6 Nf3 e4 Ng5 Nf6 Bc4 Bc5 c3 O-O d4

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matias Remus    (1711)
c4 c5 Nc3 Nf6 g3 d5 d3 d4 Ne4 Nxe4 dxe4 e5 e3 Nc6 Nf3 Be7 Bd3

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 dxe4 a5 Bxc6 bxc6 Nxe5 Re8 Nb3 Bd6 Nxc6 Qd7 e5 Qxc6 exd6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 e4 e5 Nf3 exd4 Bxc4 Nc6 O-O Be6 Bxe6 fxe6 Qb3 Qd7 Qxb7 Rb8 Qa6 Nge7 Nbd2 Ng6 Nc4 Be7 Bd2 O-O Kh1 Rf6 Qa4 e5 Ne1 Qg4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2168)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Bxc6 dxc6 O-O f6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 c5 Ne2 Qxd1 Rxd1 Bd7 Be3 O-O-O f3 f5 Ng3 fxe4 Nxe4 b6 Nbc3 Be7 Nd5 Bc6 Nxe7 Nxe7 Ng3 Nd5 Bg5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 e4 e5 Nf3 exd4 Bxc4 Nc6 O-O Be6 Bxe6 fxe6 Qb3 Qd7 Qxb7 Rb8 Qa6 Nge7 Nbd2 Ng6 Nc4 Be7 Bd2 O-O Kh1 Rf6 Qa4 e5 Ne1 Qg4 Qc2 Qe2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 dxe4 a5 Bxc6 bxc6 Nxe5 Re8 Nb3 Bd6 Nxc6 Qd7 e5 Qxc6 exd6 a4 Nd4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 dxe4 a5 Bxc6 bxc6 Nxe5 Re8 Nb3 Bd6 Nxc6 Qd7 e5 Qxc6 exd6 a4 Nd4 Qxd6 Nc2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O c3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxe5 Nxe5 Rxe5 c6 d4 Bd6 Re1 Qh4 g3 Qh3 Be3 Bg4 Qd3 f5 f4 Kh8 Bxd5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 e4 e5 Nf3 exd4 Bxc4 Nc6 O-O Be6 Bxe6 fxe6 Qb3 Qd7 Qxb7 Rb8 Qa6 Nge7 Nbd2 Ng6 Nc4 Be7 Bd2 O-O Kh1 Rf6 Qa4 e5 Ne1 Qg4 Qc2 Qe2 Kg1 Bb4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2168)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Bxc6 dxc6 O-O f6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 c5 Ne2 Qxd1 Rxd1 Bd7 Be3 O-O-O f3 f5 Ng3 fxe4 Nxe4 b6 Nbc3 Be7 Nd5 Bc6 Nxe7 Nxe7 Ng3 Nd5 Bg5 Rd7 a3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O c3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxe5 Nxe5 Rxe5 c6 d4 Bd6 Re1 Qh4 g3 Qh3 Be3 Bg4 Qd3 f5 f4 Kh8 Bxd5 cxd5 Nd2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 e4 e5 Nf3 exd4 Bxc4 Nc6 O-O Be6 Bxe6 fxe6 Qb3 Qd7 Qxb7 Rb8 Qa6 Nge7 Nbd2 Ng6 Nc4 Be7 Bd2 O-O Kh1 Rf6 Qa4 e5 Ne1 Qg4 Qc2 Qe2 Kg1 Bb4 Bxb4 Nf4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2230)
e4 c6 d4 d5 exd5 cxd5 Bd3 Nc6 c3 Qc7 h3 Nf6 Nf3 g6 Qc2 Bg7 O-O O-O Be3 Nd7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2204)
e4 c6 d4 d5 e5 Bf5 Nd2 e6 Nb3 Nd7 Nf3 a6 Be2 c5 c3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2204)
e4 c6 d4 d5 e5 Bf5 Nd2 e6 Nb3 Nd7 Nf3 a6 Be2 c5 c3 h6 dxc5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2204)
e4 c6 d4 d5 e5 Bf5 Nd2 e6 Nb3 Nd7 Nf3 a6 Be2 c5 c3 h6 dxc5 Bxc5 Nxc5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 dxe4 a5 Bxc6 bxc6 Nxe5 Re8 Nb3 Bd6 Nxc6 Qd7 e5 Qxc6 exd6 a4 Nd4 Qxd6 Nc2 Qb6 Re1

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 dxe4 a5 Bxc6 bxc6 Nxe5 Re8 Nb3 Bd6 Nxc6 Qd7 e5 Qxc6 exd6 a4 Nd4 Qxd6 Nc2 Qb6 Re1 Bg4 Qd3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 dxe4 a5 Bxc6 bxc6 Nxe5 Re8 Nb3 Bd6 Nxc6 Qd7 e5 Qxc6 exd6 a4 Nd4 Qxd6 Nc2 Qb6 Re1 Bg4 Qd3 Rxe1 Nxe1

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Ne2 Be7 c3 O-O dxc5 a5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2230)
e4 c6 d4 d5 exd5 cxd5 Bd3 Nc6 c3 Qc7 h3 Nf6 Nf3 g6 Qc2 Bg7 O-O O-O Be3 Nd7 Re1 e5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2204)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 e3 O-O Bd3 c5 Nf3 Nc6 O-O Bxc3 bxc3 d6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2204)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 dxe4 Qe7 Qe2 a5 Ba4 Nb8

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2204)
e4 c6 d4 d5 e5 Bf5 Nd2 e6 Nb3 Nd7 Nf3 a6 Be2 c5 c3 h6 dxc5 Bxc5 Nxc5 Nxc5 O-O

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2204)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Ne2 Be7 c3 O-O dxc5 a5 Qc2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2171)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 f5 g3 Nf6 d4 e4 Nh4 Bb4 Nxf5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Ne2 Be7 c3 O-O dxc5 a5 Qc2 a4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2230)
e4 c6 d4 d5 exd5 cxd5 Bd3 Nc6 c3 Qc7 h3 Nf6 Nf3 g6 Qc2 Bg7 O-O O-O Be3 Nd7 Re1 e5 dxe5 Ndxe5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2230)
e4 c6 d4 d5 exd5 cxd5 Bd3 Nc6 c3 Qc7 h3 Nf6 Nf3 g6 Qc2 Bg7 O-O O-O Be3 Nd7 Re1 e5 dxe5 Ndxe5 Nbd2 Be6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2230)
e4 c6 d4 d5 exd5 cxd5 Bd3 Nc6 c3 Qc7 h3 Nf6 Nf3 g6 Qc2 Bg7 O-O O-O Be3 Nd7 Re1 e5 dxe5 Ndxe5 Nbd2 Be6 Nxe5 Nxe5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2230)
e4 c6 d4 d5 exd5 cxd5 Bd3 Nc6 c3 Qc7 h3 Nf6 Nf3 g6 Qc2 Bg7 O-O O-O Be3 Nd7 Re1 e5 dxe5 Ndxe5 Nbd2 Be6 Nxe5 Nxe5 Rad1 Rfd8

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2171)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 f5 g3 Nf6 d4 e4 Nh4 Bb4 Nxf5 d5 Ne3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2230)
e4 c6 d4 d5 exd5 cxd5 Bd3 Nc6 c3 Qc7 h3 Nf6 Nf3 g6 Qc2 Bg7 O-O O-O Be3 Nd7 Re1 e5 dxe5 Ndxe5 Nbd2 Be6 Nxe5 Nxe5 Rad1 Rfd8 Bg5 Re8

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2230)
e4 c6 d4 d5 exd5 cxd5 Bd3 Nc6 c3 Qc7 h3 Nf6 Nf3 g6 Qc2 Bg7 O-O O-O Be3 Nd7 Re1 e5 dxe5 Ndxe5 Nbd2 Be6 Nxe5 Nxe5 Rad1 Rfd8 Bg5 Re8 Bb5 Bd7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2171)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 f5 g3 Nf6 d4 e4 Nh4 Bb4 Nxf5 d5 Ne3 dxc4 d5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2171)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 f5 g3 Nf6 d4 e4 Nh4 Bb4 Nxf5 d5 Ne3 dxc4 d5 Bxc3 bxc3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2230)
e4 c6 d4 d5 exd5 cxd5 Bd3 Nc6 c3 Qc7 h3 Nf6 Nf3 g6 Qc2 Bg7 O-O O-O Be3 Nd7 Re1 e5 dxe5 Ndxe5 Nbd2 Be6 Nxe5 Nxe5 Rad1 Rfd8 Bg5 Re8 Bb5 Bd7 Bxd7 Qxd7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2230)
e4 c6 d4 d5 exd5 cxd5 Bd3 Nc6 c3 Qc7 h3 Nf6 Nf3 g6 Qc2 Bg7 O-O O-O Be3 Nd7 Re1 e5 dxe5 Ndxe5 Nbd2 Be6 Nxe5 Nxe5 Rad1 Rfd8 Bg5 Re8 Bb5 Bd7 Bxd7 Qxd7 Re3 h6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2204)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 dxe4 Qe7 Qe2 a5 Ba4 Nb8 Nc4 Bd7

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2171)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 f5 g3 Nf6 d4 e4 Nh4 Bb4 Nxf5 d5 Ne3 dxc4 d5 Bxc3 bxc3 Ne7 Ba3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2171)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 f5 g3 Nf6 d4 e4 Nh4 Bb4 Nxf5 d5 Ne3 dxc4 d5 Bxc3 bxc3 Ne7 Ba3 Nexd5 Nxc4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2171)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 d6 c3 O-O h3 Re8 a4 Bd7 d4 h6 Nbd2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2171)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 f5 g3 Nf6 d4 e4 Nh4 Bb4 Nxf5 d5 Ne3 dxc4 d5 Bxc3 bxc3 Ne7 Ba3 Nexd5 Nxc4 Nb6 Qb3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2171)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 f5 g3 Nf6 d4 e4 Nh4 Bb4 Nxf5 d5 Ne3 dxc4 d5 Bxc3 bxc3 Ne7 Ba3 Nexd5 Nxc4 Nb6 Qb3 Qd5 Ne3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2171)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 f5 g3 Nf6 d4 e4 Nh4 Bb4 Nxf5 d5 Ne3 dxc4 d5 Bxc3 bxc3 Ne7 Ba3 Nexd5 Nxc4 Nb6 Qb3 Qd5 Ne3 Qxb3 axb3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2171)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 d6 c3 O-O h3 Re8 a4 Bd7 d4 h6 Nbd2 Bf8 d5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2171)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 d6 c3 O-O h3 Re8 a4 Bd7 d4 h6 Nbd2 Bf8 d5 Na5 Bc2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2171)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 f5 g3 Nf6 d4 e4 Nh4 Bb4 Nxf5 d5 Ne3 dxc4 d5 Bxc3 bxc3 Ne7 Ba3 Nexd5 Nxc4 Nb6 Qb3 Qd5 Ne3 Qxb3 axb3 a5 c4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2171)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 g3 Bb4 Bg2 O-O O-O e4 Ne1 Bxc3 dxc3 h6 Nc2 d6 Ne3 a5 Qc2 Re8

Transpose to wikichess #28377#

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2204)
e4 c6 d4 d5 e5 Bf5 Nd2 e6 Nb3 Nd7 Nf3 a6 Be2 c5 c3 h6 dxc5 Bxc5 Nxc5 Nxc5 O-O Ne7 Nd4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2204)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Ne2 Be7 c3 O-O dxc5 a5 Qc2 a4 O-O-O

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2204)
e4 c6 d4 d5 e5 Bf5 Nd2 e6 Nb3 Nd7 Nf3 a6 Be2 c5 c3 h6 dxc5 Bxc5 Nxc5 Nxc5 O-O Ne7 Nd4 Qc7 Re1

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2204)
e4 c6 d4 d5 e5 Bf5 Nd2 e6 Nb3 Nd7 Nf3 a6 Be2 c5 c3 h6 dxc5 Bxc5 Nxc5 Nxc5 O-O Ne7 Nd4 Qc7 Re1 O-O Bf1

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2204)
e4 c6 d4 d5 e5 Bf5 Nd2 e6 Nb3 Nd7 Nf3 a6 Be2 c5 c3 h6 dxc5 Bxc5 Nxc5 Nxc5 O-O Ne7 Nd4 Qc7 Re1 O-O Bf1 Rfc8 a4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2171)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 d6 c3 O-O h3 Re8 a4 Bd7 d4 h6 Nbd2 Bf8 d5 Na5 Bc2 c6 b4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2204)
e4 c6 d4 d5 e5 Bf5 Nd2 e6 Nb3 Nd7 Nf3 a6 Be2 c5 c3 h6 dxc5 Bxc5 Nxc5 Nxc5 O-O Ne7 Nd4 Qc7 Re1 O-O Bf1 Rfc8 a4 Bg6 Bf4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2204)
e4 c6 d4 d5 e5 Bf5 Nd2 e6 Nb3 Nd7 Nf3 a6 Be2 c5 c3 h6 dxc5 Bxc5 Nxc5 Nxc5 O-O Ne7 Nd4 Qc7 Re1 O-O Bf1 Rfc8 a4 Bg6 Bf4 Bh7 h3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Ne2 Be7 c3 O-O dxc5 a5 Qc2 a4 O-O-O b6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2204)
e4 c6 d4 d5 e5 Bf5 Nd2 e6 Nb3 Nd7 Nf3 a6 Be2 c5 c3 h6 dxc5 Bxc5 Nxc5 Nxc5 O-O Ne7 Nd4 Qc7 Re1 O-O Bf1 Rfc8 a4 Bg6 Bf4 Bh7 h3 Nd7 a5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2171)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 d6 c3 O-O h3 Re8 a4 Bd7 d4 h6 Nbd2 Bf8 d5 Na5 Bc2 c6 b4 Nc4 Nxc4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2204)
e4 c6 d4 d5 e5 Bf5 Nd2 e6 Nb3 Nd7 Nf3 a6 Be2 c5 c3 h6 dxc5 Bxc5 Nxc5 Nxc5 O-O Ne7 Nd4 Qc7 Re1 O-O Bf1 Rfc8 a4 Bg6 Bf4 Bh7 h3 Nd7 a5 b5 axb6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2204)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Ne2 Be7 c3 O-O dxc5 a5 Qc2 a4 O-O-O b6 cxb6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2204)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 dxe4 Qe7 Qe2 a5 Ba4 Nb8 Nc4 Bd7 Bxd7 Nbxd7

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2171)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 d6 c3 O-O h3 Re8 a4 Bd7 d4 h6 Nbd2 Bf8 d5 Na5 Bc2 c6 b4 Nc4 Nxc4 bxc4 Nh2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Ne2 Be7 c3 O-O dxc5 a5 Qc2 a4 O-O-O b6 cxb6 Nxb6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2204)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Ne2 Be7 c3 O-O dxc5 a5 Qc2 a4 O-O-O b6 cxb6 Nxb6 Ned4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2171)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 d6 c3 O-O h3 Re8 a4 Bd7 d4 h6 Nbd2 Bf8 d5 Na5 Bc2 c6 b4 Nc4 Nxc4 bxc4 Nh2 cxd5 exd5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2204)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 dxe4 Qe7 Qe2 a5 Ba4 Nb8 Nc4 Bd7 Bxd7 Nbxd7 Bg5 Rfe8

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Ne2 Be7 c3 O-O dxc5 a5 Qc2 a4 O-O-O b6 cxb6 Nxb6 Ned4 Nxd4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2204)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Ne2 Be7 c3 O-O dxc5 a5 Qc2 a4 O-O-O b6 cxb6 Nxb6 Ned4 Nxd4 Nxd4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2171)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 d6 c3 O-O h3 Re8 a4 Bd7 d4 h6 Nbd2 Bf8 d5 Na5 Bc2 c6 b4 Nc4 Nxc4 bxc4 Nh2 cxd5 exd5 Rc8 Nf1

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Ne2 Be7 c3 O-O dxc5 a5 Qc2 a4 O-O-O b6 cxb6 Nxb6 Ned4 Nxd4 Nxd4 Qc7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2204)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Ne2 Be7 c3 O-O dxc5 a5 Qc2 a4 O-O-O b6 cxb6 Nxb6 Ned4 Nxd4 Nxd4 Qc7 Nb5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2171)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 f5 g3 Nf6 d4 e4 Nh4 Bb4 Nxf5 d5 Ne3 dxc4 d5 Bxc3 bxc3 Ne7 Ba3 Nexd5 Nxc4 Nb6 Qb3 Qd5 Ne3 Qxb3 axb3 a5 c4 a4 c5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2204)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 dxe4 Qe7 Qe2 a5 Ba4 Nb8 Nc4 Bd7 Bxd7 Nbxd7 Bg5 Rfe8 Rfd1 Qe6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Ne2 Be7 c3 O-O dxc5 a5 Qc2 a4 O-O-O b6 cxb6 Nxb6 Ned4 Nxd4 Nxd4 Qc7 Nb5 Qb8

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2171)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 f5 g3 Nf6 d4 e4 Nh4 Bb4 Nxf5 d5 Ne3 dxc4 d5 Bxc3 bxc3 Ne7 Ba3 Nexd5 Nxc4 Nb6 Qb3 Qd5 Ne3 Qxb3 axb3 a5 c4 a4 c5 Nbd7 b4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2204)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Ne2 Be7 c3 O-O dxc5 a5 Qc2 a4 O-O-O b6 cxb6 Nxb6 Ned4 Nxd4 Nxd4 Qc7 Nb5 Qb8 Kb1

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Ne2 Be7 c3 O-O dxc5 a5 Qc2 a4 O-O-O b6 cxb6 Nxb6 Ned4 Nxd4 Nxd4 Qc7 Nb5 Qb8 Kb1 Ba6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2171)
Nf3 d5 b3 Nf6 Bb2 Bf5 g3 e6 Bg2 h6 O-O c6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2171)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 f5 g3 Nf6 d4 e4 Nh4 Bb4 Nxf5 d5 Ne3 dxc4 d5 Bxc3 bxc3 Ne7 Ba3 Nexd5 Nxc4 Nb6 Qb3 Qd5 Ne3 Qxb3 axb3 a5 c4 a4 c5 Nbd7 b4 O-O Bb2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2204)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Ne2 Be7 c3 O-O dxc5 a5 Qc2 a4 O-O-O b6 cxb6 Nxb6 Ned4 Nxd4 Nxd4 Qc7 Nb5 Qb8 Kb1 Ba6 Bd3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2247)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Ne2 Be7 c3 O-O dxc5 a5 Qc2 a4 O-O-O b6 cxb6 Nxb6 Ned4 Nxd4 Nxd4 Qc7 Nb5 Qb8 Kb1 Ba6 Bd3 h6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2171)
Nf3 d5 b3 Nf6 Bb2 Bf5 g3 e6 Bg2 h6 O-O c6 d3 Be7

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2204)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 a6 Ne2 Be7 c3 O-O dxc5 a5 Qc2 a4 O-O-O b6 cxb6 Nxb6 Ned4 Nxd4 Nxd4 Qc7 Nb5 Qb8 Kb1 Ba6 Bd3 h6 Bxb6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2204)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 dxe4 Qe7 Qe2 a5 Ba4 Nb8 Nc4 Bd7 Bxd7 Nbxd7 Bg5 Rfe8 Rfd1 Qe6 a4 h6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2171)
Nf3 d5 b3 Nf6 Bb2 Bf5 g3 e6 Bg2 h6 O-O c6 d3 Be7 Nbd2 O-O

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2171)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 Ng5 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxf7 Kxf7 Qf3 Ke6 Nc3 Ncb4 O-O c6 d4 Qf6 Qe4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2204)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 dxe4 Qe7 Qe2 a5 Ba4 Nb8 Nc4 Bd7 Bxd7 Nbxd7 Bg5 Rfe8 Rfd1 Qe6 a4 h6 Bxf6 Nxf6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2204)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 dxe4 Qe7 Qe2 a5 Ba4 Nb8 Nc4 Bd7 Bxd7 Nbxd7 Bg5 Rfe8 Rfd1 Qe6 a4 h6 Bxf6 Nxf6 Kf1 Re7

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2204)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 dxe4 Qe7 Qe2 a5 Ba4 Nb8 Nc4 Bd7 Bxd7 Nbxd7 Bg5 Rfe8 Rfd1 Qe6 a4 h6 Bxf6 Nxf6 Kf1 Re7 Nfxe5 Bd6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2204)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 dxe4 Qe7 Qe2 a5 Ba4 Nb8 Nc4 Bd7 Bxd7 Nbxd7 Bg5 Rfe8 Rfd1 Qe6 a4 h6 Bxf6 Nxf6 Kf1 Re7 Nfxe5 Bd6 Nxd6 Qxe5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2171)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O c3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxe5 Nxe5 Rxe5 c6 d4 Bd6 Re1 Qh4 g3 Qh3 Be3 Bg4 Qd3 f5 f4 Rfe8

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2144)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 g3 Ba6 b3 c5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2171)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O c3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxe5 Nxe5 Rxe5 c6 d4 Bd6 Re1 Qh4 g3 Qh3 Be3 Bg4 Qd3 f5 f4 Rfe8 Nd2 Kh8

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2171)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O a4 Bb7 d3 d6 Bd2 b4 c3 Rb8 h3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2171)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O c3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxe5 Nxe5 Rxe5 c6 d4 Bd6 Re1 Qh4 g3 Qh3 Be3 Bg4 Qd3 f5 f4 Rfe8 Nd2 Kh8 Bxd5 cxd5

Transpose to wikichess #242343#

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2171)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O a4 Bb7 d3 d6 Bd2 b4 c3 Rb8 h3 bxc3 Bxc3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2144)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 g3 Ba6 b3 c5 Bg2 d5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2144)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 g3 Nd4 Bg2 Nxf3 Bxf3 Bb4 O-O O-O d3 h6 Qb3 a5

Transpose to wikichess #207793#

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2144)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 g3 Ba6 b3 c5 Bg2 d5 Nc3 Nc6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2171)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O a4 Bb7 d3 d6 Bd2 b4 c3 Rb8 h3 bxc3 Bxc3 Na7 Na3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2171)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O a4 Bb7 d3 d6 Bd2 b4 c3 Rb8 h3 bxc3 Bxc3 Na7 Na3 c5 Nc4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2144)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 g3 Ba6 b3 c5 Bg2 d5 Nc3 Nc6 O-O Be7

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2144)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d6 h3 a6 Ba4 Ba7 Re1 Ne7 Bc2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2171)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O a4 Bb7 d3 d6 Bd2 b4 c3 Rb8 h3 bxc3 Bxc3 Na7 Na3 c5 Nc4 Nc6 a5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2144)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 g3 Ba6 b3 c5 Bg2 d5 Nc3 Nc6 O-O Be7 cxd5 Nxd5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2171)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O a4 Bb7 d3 d6 Bd2 b4 c3 Rb8 h3 bxc3 Bxc3 Na7 Na3 c5 Nc4 Nc6 a5 Nd7 Ba2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2171)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O a4 Bb7 d3 d6 Bd2 b4 c3 Rb8 h3 bxc3 Bxc3 Na7 Na3 c5 Nc4 Nc6 a5 Nd7 Ba2 Kh8 Ne3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2171)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O a4 Bb7 d3 d6 Bd2 b4 c3 Rb8 h3 bxc3 Bxc3 Na7 Na3 c5 Nc4 Nc6 a5 Nd7 Ba2 Kh8 Ne3 Nd4 Bd5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2144)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 g3 Ba6 b3 c5 Bg2 d5 Nc3 Nc6 O-O Be7 cxd5 Nxd5 Nxd5 exd5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2144)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 g3 Ba6 b3 c5 Bg2 d5 Nc3 Nc6 O-O Be7 cxd5 Nxd5 Nxd5 exd5 Bb2 O-O

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2144)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 g3 Ba6 b3 c5 Bg2 d5 Nc3 Nc6 O-O Be7 cxd5 Nxd5 Nxd5 exd5 Bb2 O-O Qd2 c4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2144)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 g3 Ba6 b3 c5 Bg2 d5 Nc3 Nc6 O-O Be7 cxd5 Nxd5 Nxd5 exd5 Bb2 O-O Qd2 c4 Bc3 Rc8

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2144)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 g3 Ba6 b3 c5 Bg2 d5 Nc3 Nc6 O-O Be7 cxd5 Nxd5 Nxd5 exd5 Bb2 O-O Qd2 c4 Bc3 Rc8 Rfd1 cxb3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2144)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 g3 Ba6 b3 c5 Bg2 d5 Nc3 Nc6 O-O Be7 cxd5 Nxd5 Nxd5 exd5 Bb2 O-O Qd2 c4 Bc3 Rc8 Rfd1 cxb3 axb3 Bb5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2144)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 g3 Ba6 b3 c5 Bg2 d5 Nc3 Nc6 O-O Be7 cxd5 Nxd5 Nxd5 exd5 Bb2 O-O Qd2 c4 Bc3 Rc8 Rfd1 cxb3 axb3 Bb5 Ne5 a5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2171)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 Ng5 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxf7 Kxf7 Qf3 Ke6 Nc3 Ncb4 O-O c6 d4 Qf6 Qe4 Kf7 dxe5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2144)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d6 h3 a6 Ba4 Ba7 Re1 Ne7 Bc2 Ng6 d4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2144)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d6 h3 a6 Ba4 Ba7 Re1 Ne7 Bc2 Ng6 d4 Re8 Nbd2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2144)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d6 h3 a6 Ba4 Ba7 Re1 Ne7 Bc2 Ng6 d4 Re8 Nbd2 Bd7 a4

Transpose to wikichess #182094#

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2144)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 g3 Ba6 b3 c5 Bg2 d5 Nc3 Nc6 O-O Be7 cxd5 Nxd5 Nxd5 exd5 Bb2 O-O Qd2 c4 Bc3 Rc8 Rfd1 cxb3 axb3 Bb5 Ne5 a5 e3 Nb4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2144)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 g3 Ba6 b3 c5 Bg2 d5 Nc3 Nc6 O-O Be7 cxd5 Nxd5 Nxd5 exd5 Bb2 O-O Qd2 c4 Bc3 Rc8 Rfd1 cxb3 axb3 Bb5 Ne5 a5 e3 Nb4 Bh3 Rc7

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2262)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O Bg5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2262)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O Bg5 Be7 Bb3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2262)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O Bg5 Be7 Bb3 h6 Bh4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2262)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O Bg5 Be7 Bb3 h6 Bh4 Nh5 Bg3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2144)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 g3 Ba6 b3 c5 Bg2 d5 Nc3 Nc6 O-O Be7 cxd5 Nxd5 Nxd5 exd5 Bb2 O-O Qd2 c4 Bc3 Rc8 Rfd1 cxb3 axb3 Bb5 Ne5 a5 e3 Nb4 Bh3 Rc7 Rdc1 g6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2262)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O Bg5 Be7 Bb3 h6 Bh4 Nh5 Bg3 d6 Nbd2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2262)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O Bg5 Be7 Bb3 h6 Bh4 Nh5 Bg3 d6 Nbd2 Na5 Bc2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2262)
e4 c6 d4 d5 e5 Bf5 Nf3 e6 Be2 c5 Be3 cxd4 Nxd4 Ne7 c4 Nbc6 Qa4 a6 Nc3 dxc4 O-O-O Qa5 Qxa5 Nxa5 Nxf5 Nxf5 Bb6 Nc6 f4 Rc8 g4 Nh4 a3 Nb8

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2262)
e4 c6 d4 d5 e5 Bf5 Nf3 e6 Be2 c5 Be3 cxd4 Nxd4 Ne7 c4 Nbc6 Qa4 a6 Nc3 dxc4 O-O-O Qa5 Qxa5 Nxa5 Nxf5 Nxf5 Bb6 Nc6 f4 Rc8 g4 Nh4 a3 Nb8 Kb1 h5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2262)
e4 c6 d4 d5 e5 Bf5 Nf3 e6 Be2 c5 Be3 cxd4 Nxd4 Ne7 c4 Nbc6 Qa4 a6 Nc3 dxc4 O-O-O Qa5 Qxa5 Nxa5 Nxf5 Nxf5 Bb6 Nc6 f4 Rc8 g4 Nh4 a3 Nb8 Kb1 h5 gxh5 Nd7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2171)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 Ng5 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxf7 Kxf7 Qf3 Ke6 Nc3 Ncb4 O-O c6 d4 Qf6 Qe4 Kf7 dxe5 Qg6 f3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2262)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O Bg5 Be7 Bb3 h6 Bh4 Nh5 Bg3 d6 Nbd2 Na5 Bc2 c5 a3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2092)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Nd6 Bxc6 dxc6 dxe5 Nf5 Qxd8 Kxd8 Nc3 Ke8 h3 h5 Bf4 Be7 Rad1 Be6 Ng5 Rh6 g3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2092)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nc6 g3 f5 Bg2

Transpose to wikichess #117854#

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2262)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O Bg5 Be7 Bb3 h6 Bh4 Nh5 Bg3 d6 Nbd2 Na5 Bc2 c5 a3 Be6 O-O

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2262)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O Bg5 Be7 Bb3 h6 Bh4 Nh5 Bg3 d6 Nbd2 Na5 Bc2 c5 a3 Be6 O-O c4 dxc4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2262)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O Bg5 Be7 Bb3 h6 Bh4 Nh5 Bg3 d6 Nbd2 Na5 Bc2 c5 a3 Be6 O-O c4 dxc4 Nxc4 Nxc4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2262)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O Bg5 Be7 Bb3 h6 Bh4 Nh5 Bg3 d6 Nbd2 Na5 Bc2 c5 a3 Be6 O-O c4 dxc4 Nxc4 Nxc4 Bxc4 Re1

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2092)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Nd6 Bxc6 dxc6 dxe5 Nf5 Qxd8 Kxd8 Nc3 Ke8 h3 h5 Bf4 Be7 Rad1 Be6 Ng5 Rh6 g3 Bxg5 Bxg5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2262)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O Bg5 Be7 Bb3 h6 Bh4 Nh5 Bg3 d6 Nbd2 Na5 Bc2 c5 a3 Be6 O-O c4 dxc4 Nxc4 Nxc4 Bxc4 Re1 g6 Nd2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2171)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 Ng5 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxf7 Kxf7 Qf3 Ke6 Nc3 Ncb4 O-O c6 d4 Qf6 Qe4 Kf7 dxe5 Qg6 f3 Be6 Bb3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2262)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O Bg5 Be7 Bb3 h6 Bh4 Nh5 Bg3 d6 Nbd2 Na5 Bc2 c5 a3 Be6 O-O c4 dxc4 Nxc4 Nxc4 Bxc4 Re1 g6 Nd2 b5 Bb3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2092)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Nd6 Bxc6 dxc6 dxe5 Nf5 Qxd8 Kxd8 Nc3 Ke8 h3 h5 Bf4 Be7 Rad1 Be6 Ng5 Rh6 g3 Bxg5 Bxg5 Rg6 h4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2171)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 Ng5 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxf7 Kxf7 Qf3 Ke6 Nc3 Ncb4 O-O c6 d4 Qf6 Qe4 Kf7 dxe5 Qg6 f3 Be6 Bb3 Nxc3 bxc3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2262)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O Bg5 Be7 Bb3 h6 Bh4 Nh5 Bg3 d6 Nbd2 Na5 Bc2 c5 a3 Be6 O-O c4 dxc4 Nxc4 Nxc4 Bxc4 Re1 g6 Nd2 b5 Bb3 Rc8 Nf1

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2171)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 Ng5 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxf7 Kxf7 Qf3 Ke6 Nc3 Ncb4 O-O c6 d4 Qf6 Qe4 Kf7 dxe5 Qg6 f3 Be6 Bb3 Nxc3 bxc3 Nd5 Bd2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2092)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Nd6 Bxc6 dxc6 dxe5 Nf5 Qxd8 Kxd8 Nc3 Ke8 h3 h5 Bf4 Be7 Rad1 Be6 Ng5 Rh6 g3 Bxg5 Bxg5 Rg6 h4 f6 exf6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2171)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 Ng5 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxf7 Kxf7 Qf3 Ke6 Nc3 Ncb4 O-O c6 d4 Qf6 Qe4 Kf7 dxe5 Qg6 f3 Be6 Bb3 Nxc3 bxc3 Nd5 Bd2 Bc5 Kh1

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2092)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Nd6 Bxc6 dxc6 dxe5 Nf5 Qxd8 Kxd8 Nc3 Ke8 h3 h5 Bf4 Be7 Rad1 Be6 Ng5 Rh6 g3 Bxg5 Bxg5 Rg6 h4 f6 exf6 gxf6 Bf4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2092)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Nd6 Bxc6 dxc6 dxe5 Nf5 Qxd8 Kxd8 Nc3 Ke8 h3 h5 Bf4 Be7 Rad1 Be6 Ng5 Rh6 g3 Bxg5 Bxg5 Rg6 h4 f6 exf6 gxf6 Bf4 Nxh4 f3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2171)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 Ng5 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxf7 Kxf7 Qf3 Ke6 Nc3 Ncb4 O-O c6 d4 Qf6 Qe4 Kf7 dxe5 Qg6 f3 Be6 Bb3 Nxc3 bxc3 Nd5 Bd2 Bc5 Kh1 Rad8 Rae1

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2171)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 Ng5 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxf7 Kxf7 Qf3 Ke6 Nc3 Ncb4 O-O c6 d4 Qf6 Qe4 Kf7 dxe5 Qg6 f3 Be6 Bb3 Nxc3 bxc3 Nd5 Bd2 Bc5 Kh1 Rad8 Rae1 Rhf8 Qe2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2262)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O d4 Bf6 Re2 b6 Re1 Bb7 Bf4 Nf5 c3 Re8 Rxe8 Qxe8

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2092)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Nf3 c5 Be3 Qa5 Bd2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2092)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Nf3 c5 Be3 Qa5 Bd2 O-O h3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2262)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O d4 Bf6 Re2 b6 Re1 Bb7 Bf4 Nf5 c3 Re8 Rxe8 Qxe8 Qd3 g6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2262)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O d4 Bf6 Re2 b6 Re1 Bb7 Bf4 Nf5 c3 Re8 Rxe8 Qxe8 Qd3 g6 Nd2 Qe6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2092)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Nf3 c5 Be3 Qa5 Bd2 O-O h3 Nc6 Be2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2092)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 Nd7 Nf3 Ngf6 Nxf6 Nxf6 Bd3 c5 Be3 Qc7 Qe2 a6 O-O b6 c3 Bb7 Bc2 Bd6 Rad1 c4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2262)
b3 e5 Bb2 Nc6 e3 d5 Bb5 Bd6 f4 Qh4 g3 Qe7 Nf3 f6 Nc3 Be6 h3 Nh6 g4 exf4 Qe2 O-O O-O-O Rae8 Kb1 Nf7 Rhf1

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2262)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Nxc6 dxc6 Bf1 Be6 c3 Nf5 d3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2262)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O d4 Bf6 Re2 b6 Re1 Bb7 Bf4 Nf5 c3 Re8 Rxe8 Qxe8 Qd3 g6 Nd2 Qe6 a4 d6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2092)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Nf3 c5 Be3 Qa5 Bd2 O-O h3 Nc6 Be2 cxd4 cxd4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2092)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 Nd7 Nf3 Ngf6 Nxf6 Nxf6 Bd3 c5 Be3 Qc7 Qe2 a6 O-O b6 c3 Bb7 Bc2 Bd6 Rad1 c4 Rfe1 b5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2092)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Nf3 c5 Be3 Qa5 Bd2 O-O h3 Nc6 Be2 cxd4 cxd4 Qa3 Be3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2262)
b3 e5 Bb2 Nc6 e3 d5 Bb5 Bd6 f4 Qh4 g3 Qe7 Nf3 f6 Nc3 Be6 h3 Nh6 g4 exf4 Qe2 O-O O-O-O Rae8 Kb1 Nf7 Rhf1 Qd7 Qd3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2262)
b3 e5 Bb2 Nc6 e3 d5 Bb5 Bd6 f4 Qh4 g3 Qe7 Nf3 f6 Nc3 Be6 h3 Nh6 g4 exf4 Qe2 O-O O-O-O Rae8 Kb1 Nf7 Rhf1 Qd7 Qd3 fxe3 dxe3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2092)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 Nd7 Nf3 Ngf6 Nxf6 Nxf6 Bd3 c5 Be3 Qc7 Qe2 a6 O-O b6 c3 Bb7 Bc2 Bd6 Rad1 c4 Rfe1 b5 Bg5 Nd5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2092)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Nf3 c5 Be3 Qa5 Bd2 O-O h3 Nc6 Be2 cxd4 cxd4 Qa3 Be3 Qb4 Kf1

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2262)
b3 e5 Bb2 Nc6 e3 d5 Bb5 Bd6 f4 Qh4 g3 Qe7 Nf3 f6 Nc3 Be6 h3 Nh6 g4 exf4 Qe2 O-O O-O-O Rae8 Kb1 Nf7 Rhf1 Qd7 Qd3 fxe3 dxe3 a6 Bxc6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2092)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Nf3 c5 Be3 Qa5 Bd2 O-O h3 Nc6 Be2 cxd4 cxd4 Qa3 Be3 Qb4 Kf1 Rd8 Rb1

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2262)
b3 e5 Bb2 Nc6 e3 d5 Bb5 Bd6 f4 Qh4 g3 Qe7 Nf3 f6 Nc3 Be6 h3 Nh6 g4 exf4 Qe2 O-O O-O-O Rae8 Kb1 Nf7 Rhf1 Qd7 Qd3 fxe3 dxe3 a6 Bxc6 Qxc6 Nd4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2092)
Nf3 d5 b3 Nf6 Bb2 Bf5 g3 e6 Bg2 h6 O-O c6 d3 Be7 Nbd2 O-O c4 a5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2262)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O d4 Bf6 Re1 Re8 c3 Rxe1 Qxe1 Ne8 Bf4 d5 Nd2 Bf5 a4 a5

Transpose to wikichess #218287#

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2262)
b3 e5 Bb2 Nc6 e3 d5 Bb5 Bd6 f4 Qh4 g3 Qe7 Nf3 f6 Nc3 Be6 h3 Nh6 g4 exf4 Qe2 O-O O-O-O Rae8 Kb1 Nf7 Rhf1 Qd7 Qd3 fxe3 dxe3 a6 Bxc6 Qxc6 Nd4 Qd7 Nxe6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2092)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Nf3 c5 Be3 Qa5 Bd2 O-O h3 Nc6 Be2 cxd4 cxd4 Qa3 Be3 Qb4 Kf1 Rd8 Rb1 Qa3 Qd2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2092)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Nf3 c5 Be3 Qa5 Bd2 O-O h3 Nc6 Be2 cxd4 cxd4 Qa3 Be3 Qb4 Kf1 Rd8 Rb1 Qa3 Qd2 b6 d5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2092)
Nf3 d5 b3 Nf6 Bb2 Bf5 g3 e6 Bg2 h6 O-O c6 d3 Be7 Nbd2 O-O c4 a5 a3 Re8

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2092)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Nf3 c5 Be3 Qa5 Bd2 O-O h3 Nc6 Be2 cxd4 cxd4 Qa3 Be3 Qb4 Kf1 Rd8 Rb1 Qa3 Qd2 b6 d5 e6 Bg5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2262)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O d4 Bf6 Re1 Re8 c3 c6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2262)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O d4 Bf6 Re1 Re8 c3 c6 Nd2 Rxe1

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2092)
Nf3 d5 b3 Nf6 Bb2 Bf5 g3 e6 Bg2 h6 O-O c6 d3 Be7 Nbd2 O-O c4 a5 a3 Re8 Re1 Bh7

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2092)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 e4 Nxc3 bxc3 Bg7 Nf3 c5 Be3 Qa5 Bd2 O-O h3 Nc6 Be2 cxd4 cxd4 Qa3 Be3 Qb4 Kf1 Rd8 Rb1 Qa3 Qd2 b6 d5 e6 Bg5 f6 Bf4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2092)
Nf3 d5 b3 Nf6 Bb2 Bf5 g3 e6 Bg2 h6 O-O c6 d3 Be7 Nbd2 O-O c4 a5 a3 Re8 Re1 Bh7 Ne5 Nfd7

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2262)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O d4 Bf6 Re2 b6 Re1 Bb7 Bf4 Nf5 c3 Re8 Rxe8 Qxe8 Qd3 g6 Nd2 Qe6 a4 d6 a5 g5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2092)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 Nd7 Nf3 Ngf6 Nxf6 Nxf6 Bd3 c5 Be3 Qc7 Qe2 a6 O-O b6 c3 Bb7 Bc2 Bd6 Rad1 c4 Rfe1 b5 Bg5 Nd5 Bd2 Rc8

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2092)
Nf3 d5 b3 Nf6 Bb2 Bf5 g3 e6 Bg2 h6 O-O c6 d3 Be7 Nbd2 O-O c4 a5 a3 Re8 Re1 Bh7 Ne5 Nfd7 Nxd7 Nxd7

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2092)
Nf3 d5 b3 Nf6 Bb2 Bf5 g3 e6 Bg2 h6 O-O c6 d3 Be7 Nbd2 O-O c4 a5 a3 Re8 Re1 Bh7 Ne5 Nfd7 Nxd7 Nxd7 Bc3 b5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2092)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 Nd7 Nf3 Ngf6 Nxf6 Nxf6 Bd3 c5 Be3 Qc7 Qe2 a6 O-O b6 c3 Bb7 Bc2 Bd6 Rad1 c4 Rfe1 b5 Bg5 Nd5 Bd2 Rc8 h3 Ba8

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2092)
Nf3 d5 b3 Nf6 Bb2 Bf5 g3 e6 Bg2 h6 O-O c6 d3 Be7 Nbd2 O-O c4 a5 a3 Re8 Re1 Bh7 Ne5 Nfd7 Nxd7 Nxd7 Bc3 b5 cxb5 cxb5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2092)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 Nd7 Nf3 Ngf6 Nxf6 Nxf6 Bd3 c5 Be3 Qc7 Qe2 a6 O-O b6 c3 Bb7 Bc2 Bd6 Rad1 c4 Rfe1 b5 Bg5 Nd5 Bd2 Rc8 h3 Ba8 a3 a5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2262)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O d4 Bf6 Re2 b6 Re1 Bb7 Bf4 Nf5 c3 Re8 Rxe8 Qxe8 Qd3 g6 Nd2 Qe6 a4 d6 a5 g5 Be3 c5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2092)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 dxe4 Nxe4 Nd7 Nf3 Ngf6 Nxf6 Nxf6 Bd3 c5 Be3 Qc7 Qe2 a6 O-O b6 c3 Bb7 Bc2 Bd6 Rad1 c4 Rfe1 b5 Bg5 Nd5 Bd2 Rc8 h3 Ba8 a3 a5 Rb1 Rb8

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2092)
Nf3 d5 b3 Nf6 Bb2 Bf5 g3 e6 Bg2 h6 O-O c6 d3 Be7 Nbd2 O-O c4 a5 a3 Re8 Re1 Bh7 Ne5 Nfd7 Nxd7 Nxd7 Bc3 b5 cxb5 cxb5 b4 axb4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2262)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O d4 Bf6 Re1 Re8 c3 c6 Nd2 Rxe1 Qxe1 Nf5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2092)
Nf3 d5 b3 Nf6 Bb2 Bf5 g3 e6 Bg2 h6 O-O c6 d3 Be7 Nbd2 O-O c4 a5 a3 Re8 Re1 Bh7 Ne5 Nfd7 Nxd7 Nxd7 Bc3 b5 cxb5 cxb5 b4 axb4 Bxb4 Bf6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2092)
Nf3 d5 b3 Nf6 Bb2 Bf5 g3 e6 Bg2 h6 O-O c6 d3 Be7 Nbd2 O-O c4 a5 a3 Re8 Re1 Bh7 Ne5 Nfd7 Nxd7 Nxd7 Bc3 b5 cxb5 cxb5 b4 axb4 Bxb4 Bf6 Rc1 Qb6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2092)
Nf3 d5 b3 Nf6 Bb2 Bf5 g3 e6 Bg2 h6 O-O c6 d3 Be7 Nbd2 O-O c4 a5 a3 Re8 Re1 Bh7 Ne5 Nfd7 Nxd7 Nxd7 Bc3 b5 cxb5 cxb5 b4 axb4 Bxb4 Bf6 Rc1 Qb6 Qb3 Ne5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2100)
e4 g6 d4 Bg7 Nc3 d5 exd5 Nf6 Bc4 O-O

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2100)
e4 g6 d4 Bg7 Nc3 d5 exd5 Nf6 Bc4 O-O Nf3 Nbd7

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2100)
e4 g6 d4 Bg7 Nc3 d5 exd5 Nf6 Bc4 O-O Nf3 Nbd7 O-O Nb6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2100)
e4 g6 d4 Bg7 Nc3 d5 exd5 Nf6 Bc4 O-O Nf3 Nbd7 O-O Nb6 Bb3 Nfxd5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2100)
e4 c6 Nf3 d5 d3 dxe4 dxe4 Qxd1 Kxd1 Nf6 Nbd2 Nbd7 Ne1 Nc5 f3 e5 a4 a5 Nc4 Nfd7 Be3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2100)
e4 g6 d4 Bg7 Nc3 d5 exd5 Nf6 Bc4 O-O Nf3 Nbd7 O-O Nb6 Bb3 Nfxd5 Re1 Nxc3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2092)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 dxe4 Qe7 Qe2 a5 a4 Nb8

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2100)
e4 d5 exd5 Nf6 d4 Nxd5 c4 Nb6 Nf3 g6 h3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2092)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 dxe4 Qe7 Qe2 a5 a4 Nb8 Bd3 Rd8

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2100)
e4 d5 exd5 Nf6 d4 Nxd5 c4 Nb6 Nf3 g6 h3 Bg7 Nc3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2100)
e4 c6 Nf3 d5 d3 dxe4 dxe4 Qxd1 Kxd1 Nf6 Nbd2 Nbd7 Ne1 Nc5 f3 e5 a4 a5 Nc4 Nfd7 Be3 f6 Nd3

Transpose to wikichess #247587#

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2092)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 dxe4 Qe7 Qe2 a5 a4 Nb8 Bd3 Rd8 Nc4 Nbd7

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2092)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 dxe4 Qe7 Qe2 a5 a4 Nb8 Bd3 Rd8 Nc4 Nbd7 Bg5 h6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2092)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 dxe4 Qe7 Qe2 a5 a4 Nb8 Bd3 Rd8 Nc4 Nbd7 Bg5 h6 Bh4 g5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2092)
e4 c5 c3 Nf6 e5 Nd5 d4 cxd4 cxd4 d6 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nb6 Bb5 dxe5 Nxe5 Bd7 Nxd7 Qxd7 Nc3 e6 O-O Rd8 Qb3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2092)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 dxe4 Qe7 Qe2 a5 a4 Nb8 Bd3 Rd8 Nc4 Nbd7 Bg5 h6 Bh4 g5 Bg3 Nh5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2100)
e4 d5 exd5 Nf6 d4 Nxd5 c4 Nb6 Nf3 g6 h3 Bg7 Nc3 O-O Be3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2092)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 dxe4 Qe7 Qe2 a5 a4 Nb8 Bd3 Rd8 Nc4 Nbd7 Bg5 h6 Bh4 g5 Bg3 Nh5 Rfd1 Nxg3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2100)
e4 d5 exd5 Nf6 d4 Nxd5 c4 Nb6 Nf3 g6 h3 Bg7 Nc3 O-O Be3 Nc6 Qd2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2092)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 dxe4 Qe7 Qe2 a5 a4 Nb8 Bd3 Rd8 Nc4 Nbd7 Bg5 h6 Bh4 g5 Bg3 Nh5 Rfd1 Nxg3 hxg3 Kg7

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2092)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 dxe4 Qe7 Qe2 a5 a4 Nb8 Bd3 Rd8 Nc4 Nbd7 Bg5 h6 Bh4 g5 Bg3 Nh5 Rfd1 Nxg3 hxg3 Kg7 Rab1 Nf6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2092)
e4 c5 c3 Nf6 e5 Nd5 d4 cxd4 cxd4 d6 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nb6 Bb5 dxe5 Nxe5 Bd7 Nxd7 Qxd7 Nc3 e6 O-O Rd8 Qb3 Be7 Be3

Transpose to wikichess #246755#

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2092)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 dxe4 Qe7 Qe2 a5 a4 Nb8 Bd3 Rd8 Nc4 Nbd7 Bg5 h6 Bh4 g5 Bg3 Nh5 Rfd1 Nxg3 hxg3 Kg7 Rab1 Nf6 Nfxe5 Ra6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matias Remus    (1802)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 e5 d3 d6 Nd5

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matias Remus    (1802)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 Nf3 Nc6 d5 Nb8 e4 c6

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matias Remus    (1802)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 e5 d3 d6 Nd5 Be7 c3

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matias Remus    (1802)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 e5 d3 d6 Nd5 Be7 c3 Nf6 Nxe7

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matt LaDuke    (2264)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O d4 Bf6 Re2 b6 Re1 Bb7 Bf4 Ne4 Nd2 Re8 Nxe4 Rxe4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matias Remus    (1802)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 Nf3 Nc6 d5 Nb8 e4 c6 Bxc4 cxd5

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matias Remus    (1802)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 e5 d3 d6 Nd5 Be7 c3 Nf6 Nxe7 Qxe7 h3

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matias Remus    (1802)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 Nf3 e5 d3 d6 Nd5 Be7 c3 Nf6 Nxe7 Qxe7 h3 h6 Be3

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matt LaDuke    (2264)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O d4 Bf6 Re2 b6 Re1 Bb7 Bf4 Ne4 Nd2 Re8 Nxe4 Rxe4 Rxe4 Bxe4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matias Remus    (1802)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 Nf3 Nc6 d5 Nb8 e4 c6 Bxc4 cxd5 exd5 e6

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matias Remus    (1802)
d4 Nf6 c4 b6 Nc3 Bb7 d5 e6 a3 Be7

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matias Remus    (1802)
d4 Nf6 c4 b6 Nc3 Bb7 d5 e6 a3 Be7 e4 O-O

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matt LaDuke    (2264)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O d4 Bf6 Re2 b6 Re1 Bb7 Bf4 Ne4 Nd2 Re8 Nxe4 Rxe4 Rxe4 Bxe4 c3 d6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matias Remus    (1802)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 Nf3 Nc6 d5 Nb8 e4 c6 Bxc4 cxd5 exd5 e6 O-O exd5

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matej Pech    (2100)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 e5 Ndb5 d6 Bg5 a6 Na3 b5 Bxf6 gxf6 Nd5 f5 Bd3 Be6 c3 Bg7 Qh5 O-O exf5 Bxd5 f6 e4 fxg7 Re8 Be2 Ne5 O-O Qf6 Qh3 Qe6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2264)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O d4 Bf6 Re2 b6 Re1 Bb7 Bf4 Ne4 Nd2 Re8 Nxe4 Rxe4 Rxe4 Bxe4 c3 d6 Qa4 Qe8

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matias Remus    (1802)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 Nf3 Nc6 d5 Nb8 e4 c6 Bxc4 cxd5 exd5 e6 O-O exd5 Bxd5 Be6

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matt LaDuke    (2264)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O d4 Bf6 Re2 b6 Re1 Bb7 Bf4 Ne4 Nd2 Re8 Nxe4 Rxe4 Rxe4 Bxe4 c3 d6 Qa4 Qe8 Qc4 g5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2264)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O d4 Bf6 Re2 b6 Re1 Bb7 Bf4 Ne4 Nd2 Re8 Nxe4 Rxe4 Rxe4 Bxe4 c3 d6 Qa4 Qe8 Qc4 g5 Be3 Qd7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matias Remus    (1802)
d4 Nf6 c4 b6 Nc3 Bb7 d5 e6 a3 Be7 e4 O-O Nge2 exd5

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matias Remus    (1802)
d4 Nf6 c4 b6 Nc3 Bb7 d5 e6 a3 Be7 e4 O-O Nge2 exd5 exd5 d6

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matej Pech    (2165)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 e3 Bf5 Nc3 e6 Nh4 Bg6 Nxg6 hxg6 Bd2 Nbd7 c5 e5 b4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2165)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 b5 Bb3 Na5 O-O Nxb3 axb3 Nf6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2165)
b4 e5 Bb2 Nc6 b5 Nd4 e3 Ne6 Bxe5 d6 Bb2 Nf6 Nf3 Nc5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2165)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 b5 Bb3 Na5 O-O Nxb3 axb3 Nf6 Nxe5 Bd6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2165)
d4 Nf6 d5 c6 dxc6 Nxc6 Nc3 d5 e3 e5 f3 d4 exd4 exd4 Ne4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matias Remus    (1802)
d4 Nf6 c4 b6 Nc3 Bb7 d5 e6 a3 Be7 e4 O-O Nge2 exd5 exd5 d6 g3 Nbd7

============

Contributors : Matias Remus


Matej Pech    (2165)
b4 e5 Bb2 Nc6 b5 Nd4 e3 Ne6 Bxe5 d6 Bb2 Nf6 Nf3 Nc5 c4 Be7

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2165)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 b5 Bb3 Na5 O-O Nxb3 axb3 Nf6 Nxe5 Bd6 d4 O-O

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2165)
d4 Nf6 d5 c6 dxc6 Nxc6 Nc3 d5 e3 e5 f3 d4 exd4 exd4 Ne4 Nxe4 fxe4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2165)
b4 e5 Bb2 Nc6 b5 Nd4 e3 Ne6 Bxe5 d6 Bb2 Nf6 Nf3 Nc5 c4 Be7 d4 Nce4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2300)
c4 e5 g3 Nf6 Bg2 c6 Nf3 e4 Nd4 Qb6 e3 d5 Nc3 Bg4 Qa4 Bd7 Qc2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2300)
c4 e5 g3 Nf6 Bg2 c6 Nf3 e4 Nd4 Qb6 e3 d5 Nc3 Bg4 Qa4 Bd7 Qc2 Na6 O-O

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2300)
c4 e5 g3 Nf6 Bg2 c6 Nf3 e4 Nd4 Qb6 e3 d5 Nc3 Bg4 Qa4 Bd7 Qc2 Na6 O-O c5 Nde2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2300)
c4 e5 g3 Nf6 Bg2 c6 Nf3 e4 Nd4 Qb6 e3 d5 Nc3 Bg4 Qa4 Bd7 Qc2 Na6 O-O c5 Nde2 Nb4 Qb1

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2300)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O d4 Bf6 Re1 Re8 c3 Rxe1 Qxe1 c6 Bf4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2300)
c4 e5 g3 Nf6 Bg2 c6 Nf3 e4 Nd4 Qb6 e3 d5 Nc3 Bg4 Qa4 Bd7 Qc2 Na6 O-O c5 Nde2 Nb4 Qb1 dxc4 b3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2300)
c4 e5 g3 Nf6 Bg2 c6 Nf3 e4 Nd4 Qb6 e3 d5 Nc3 Bg4 Qa4 Bd7 Qc2 Na6 O-O c5 Nde2 Nb4 Qb1 dxc4 b3 Be7 bxc4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2300)
c4 e5 g3 Nf6 Bg2 c6 Nf3 e4 Nd4 Qb6 e3 d5 Nc3 Bg4 Qa4 Bd7 Qc2 Na6 O-O c5 Nde2 Nb4 Qb1 dxc4 b3 Be7 bxc4 Be6 Qb3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2300)
c4 e5 g3 Nf6 Bg2 c6 Nf3 e4 Nd4 Qb6 e3 d5 Nc3 Bg4 Qa4 Bd7 Qc2 Na6 O-O c5 Nde2 Nb4 Qb1 dxc4 b3 Be7 bxc4 Be6 Qb3 Qa6 Nb5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2300)
c4 e5 g3 Nf6 Bg2 c6 Nf3 e4 Nd4 Qb6 e3 d5 Nc3 Bg4 Qa4 Bd7 Qc2 Na6 O-O c5 Nde2 Nb4 Qb1 dxc4 b3 Be7 bxc4 Be6 Qb3 Qa6 Nb5 O-O Nf4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2300)
c4 e5 g3 Nf6 Bg2 c6 Nf3 e4 Nd4 Qb6 e3 d5 Nc3 Bg4 Qa4 Bd7 Qc2 Na6 O-O c5 Nde2 Nb4 Qb1 dxc4 b3 Be7 bxc4 Be6 Qb3 Qa6 Nb5 O-O Nf4 Rad8 Nc7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2300)
c4 e5 g3 Nf6 Bg2 c6 Nf3 e4 Nd4 Qb6 e3 d5 Nc3 Bg4 Qa4 Bd7 Qc2 Na6 O-O c5 Nde2 Nb4 Qb1 dxc4 b3 Be7 bxc4 Be6 Qb3 Qa6 Nb5 O-O Nf4 Rad8 Nc7 Bxc4 Nxa6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2165)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O d4 Bf6 Re1 Nf5 c3 d5 Bf4 c6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2300)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 dxe4 Qe7 b4 Bd6 a3 a5 Rb1 h6 Re1 Be6 h3 Ba2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2165)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O d4 Bf6 Re1 Nf5 c3 d5 Bf4 c6 Nd2 Bg5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2300)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 dxe4 Qe7 b4 Bd6 a3 a5 Rb1 h6 Re1 Be6 h3 Ba2 Rb2 Be6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2300)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 dxe4 Qe7 b4 Bd6 a3 a5 Rb1 h6 Re1 Be6 h3 Ba2 Rb2 Be6 Nc4 axb4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2300)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 dxe4 Qe7 b4 Bd6 a3 a5 Rb1 h6 Re1 Be6 h3 Ba2 Rb2 Be6 Nc4 axb4 axb4 Na7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2287)
g4 c6 Nf3 c5

Transpose to wikichess #7175#

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2300)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 dxe4 Qe7 b4 Bd6 a3 a5 Rb1 h6 Re1 Be6 h3 Ba2 Rb2 Be6 Nc4 axb4 axb4 Na7 Nxd6 cxd6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2287)
d4 d5 Bf4 c5 Bxb8 Rxb8 c3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2287)
g4 d5 e3 e5 Nc3 h5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2287)
d4 d5 Bf4 c5 Bxb8 Rxb8 c3 cxd4 Qxd4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2287)
g4 d5 e3 e5 Nc3 h5 gxh5 Nf6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2287)
d4 d5 Bf4 c5 Bxb8 Rxb8 c3 cxd4 Qxd4 Nf6 Qxa7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2287)
g4 d5 e3 e5 Nc3 h5 gxh5 Nf6 d4 Nc6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2287)
d4 d5 Bf4 c5 Bxb8 Rxb8 c3 cxd4 Qxd4 Nf6 Qxa7 Bd7 Qc5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2287)
g4 d5 e3 e5 Nc3 h5 gxh5 Nf6 d4 Nc6 dxe5 Nxe5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2300)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 dxe4 Qe7 b4 Bd6 a3 a5 Rb1 h6 Re1 Be6 h3 Ba2 Rb2 Be6 Nc4 axb4 axb4 Na7 Nxd6 cxd6 Bd3 Rfc8

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2287)
d4 d5 Bf4 c5 Bxb8 Rxb8 c3 cxd4 Qxd4 Nf6 Qxa7 Bd7 Qc5 e5 Qxd5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2287)
g4 d5 e3 e5 Nc3 h5 gxh5 Nf6 d4 Nc6 dxe5 Nxe5 Nf3 Bg4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2182)
Nh3 d5 d4 Bxh3 gxh3 e6 c4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2300)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 d3 Bc5 c3 O-O O-O d5 Nbd2 dxe4 dxe4 Qe7 b4 Bd6 a3 a5 Rb1 h6 Re1 Be6 h3 Ba2 Rb2 Be6 Nc4 axb4 axb4 Na7 Nxd6 cxd6 Bd3 Rfc8 Bd2 Nd7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2287)
d4 d5 Bf4 c5 Bxb8 Rxb8 c3 cxd4 Qxd4 Nf6 Qxa7 Bd7 Qc5 e5 Qxd5 Nxd5 e3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2287)
g4 d5 e3 e5 Nc3 h5 gxh5 Nf6 d4 Nc6 dxe5 Nxe5 Nf3 Bg4 Be2 Bxf3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2287)
g4 d5 e3 e5 Nc3 h5 gxh5 Nf6 d4 Nc6 dxe5 Nxe5 Nf3 Bg4 Be2 Bxf3 Bxf3 Qd7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2182)
Nh3 d5 d4 Bxh3 gxh3 e6 c4 Bb4 Bd2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2287)
g4 d5 e3 e5 Nc3 h5 gxh5 Nf6 d4 Nc6 dxe5 Nxe5 Nf3 Bg4 Be2 Bxf3 Bxf3 Qd7 Bg2 O-O-O

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2182)
Nh3 d5 d4 Bxh3 gxh3 e6 c4 Bb4 Bd2 Bxd2 Nxd2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2287)
g4 d5 e3 e5 Nc3 h5 gxh5 Nf6 d4 Nc6 dxe5 Nxe5 Nf3 Bg4 Be2 Bxf3 Bxf3 Qd7 Bg2 O-O-O h4 Kb8

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2182)
Nh3 d5 d4 Bxh3 gxh3 e6 c4 Bb4 Bd2 Bxd2 Nxd2 Ne7 h4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2287)
g4 d5 e3 e5 Nc3 h5 gxh5 Nf6 d4 Nc6 dxe5 Nxe5 Nf3 Bg4 Be2 Bxf3 Bxf3 Qd7 Bg2 O-O-O h4 Kb8 Bd2 Re8

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2287)
g4 d5 e3 e5 Nc3 h5 gxh5 Nf6 d4 Nc6 dxe5 Nxe5 Nf3 Bg4 Be2 Bxf3 Bxf3 Qd7 Bg2 O-O-O h4 Kb8 Bd2 Re8 Ne2 Neg4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2182)
Nh3 d5 d4 Bxh3 gxh3 e6 c4 Bb4 Bd2 Bxd2 Nxd2 Ne7 h4 O-O Rg1

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2287)
g4 d5 e3 e5 Nc3 h5 gxh5 Nf6 d4 Nc6 dxe5 Nxe5 Nf3 Bg4 Be2 Bxf3 Bxf3 Qd7 Bg2 O-O-O h4 Kb8 Bd2 Re8 Ne2 Neg4 Nf4 d4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2182)
Nh3 d5 d4 Bxh3 gxh3 e6 c4 Bb4 Bd2 Bxd2 Nxd2 Ne7 h4 O-O Rg1 dxc4 e3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2287)
g4 d5 e3 e5 Nc3 h5 gxh5 Nf6 d4 Nc6 dxe5 Nxe5 Nf3 Bg4 Be2 Bxf3 Bxf3 Qd7 Bg2 O-O-O h4 Kb8 Bd2 Re8 Ne2 Neg4 Nf4 d4 O-O Bd6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2182)
Nh3 d5 d4 Bxh3 gxh3 e6 c4 Bb4 Bd2 Bxd2 Nxd2 Ne7 h4 O-O Rg1 dxc4 e3 Nd7 Nxc4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2287)
g4 d5 e3 e5 Nc3 h5 gxh5 Nf6 d4 Nc6 dxe5 Nxe5 Nf3 Bg4 Be2 Bxf3 Bxf3 Qd7 Bg2 O-O-O h4 Kb8 Bd2 Re8 Ne2 Neg4 Nf4 d4 O-O Bd6 exd4 Ne4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2287)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Bc5 c3 Nf6 b4 Be7 Qe2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2287)
g4 d5 e3 e5 Nc3 h5 gxh5 Nf6 d4 Nc6 dxe5 Nxe5 Nf3 Bg4 Be2 Bxf3 Bxf3 Qd7 Bg2 O-O-O h4 Kb8 Bd2 Re8 Ne2 Neg4 Nf4 d4 O-O Bd6 exd4 Ne4 c4 Nxd2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2287)
g4 d5 e3 e5 Nc3 h5 gxh5 Nf6 d4 Nc6 dxe5 Nxe5 Nf3 Bg4 Be2 Bxf3 Bxf3 Qd7 Bg2 O-O-O h4 Kb8 Bd2 Re8 Ne2 Neg4 Nf4 d4 O-O Bd6 exd4 Ne4 c4 Nxd2 Qxd2 Qf5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2287)
g4 d5 e3 e5 Nc3 h5 gxh5 Nf6 d4 Nc6 dxe5 Nxe5 Nf3 Bg4 Be2 Bxf3 Bxf3 Qd7 Bg2 O-O-O h4 Kb8 Bd2 Re8 Ne2 Neg4 Nf4 d4 O-O Bd6 exd4 Ne4 c4 Nxd2 Qxd2 Qf5 Nh3 Nh2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2287)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Bc5 c3 Nf6 b4 Be7 Qe2 d5 exd5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2287)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 a4 Be7 Nc3 O-O d4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2287)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 a4 Be7 Nc3 O-O d4 Nxd4 Nxd4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2287)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Bc5 c3 Nf6 b4 Be7 Qe2 d5 exd5 Nxd5 O-O

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2287)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Bc5 c3 Nf6 b4 Be7 Qe2 d5 exd5 Nxd5 O-O Be6 d3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2287)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 a4 Be7 Nc3 O-O d4 Nxd4 Nxd4 exd4 Nd5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2287)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 a4 Be7 Nc3 O-O d4 Nxd4 Nxd4 exd4 Nd5 Bh4 Bd3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2287)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 a4 Be7 Nc3 O-O d4 Nxd4 Nxd4 exd4 Nd5 Bh4 Bd3 b6 Qg4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2160)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Be3 Bg7 f3 h5 Qd2 a6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Be3 Bg7 f3 h5 Qd2 a6 Be2 Nbd7

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 e3 Bf5 Nc3 e6 Nh4 Bg6 Bd2 Nbd7 Be2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Be3 Bg7 f3 h5 Qd2 a6 Be2 Nbd7 O-O O-O

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Be3 Bg7 f3 h5 Qd2 a6 Be2 Nbd7 O-O O-O a4 Re8

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Be3 Bg7 f3 h5 Qd2 a6 Be2 Nbd7 O-O O-O a4 Re8 Rad1 Qc7

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Be3 Bg7 f3 h5 Qd2 a6 Be2 Nbd7 O-O O-O a4 Re8 Rad1 Qc7 Bh6 Nc5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Be3 Bg7 f3 h5 Qd2 a6 Be2 Nbd7 O-O O-O a4 Re8 Rad1 Qc7 Bh6 Nc5 Bxg7 Kxg7

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Be3 Bg7 f3 h5 Qd2 a6 Be2 Nbd7 O-O O-O a4 Re8 Rad1 Qc7 Bh6 Nc5 Bxg7 Kxg7 Qe3 e5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Be3 Bg7 f3 h5 Qd2 a6 Be2 Nbd7 O-O O-O a4 Re8 Rad1 Qc7 Bh6 Nc5 Bxg7 Kxg7 Qe3 e5 Nf5 Bxf5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Be3 Bg7 f3 h5 Qd2 a6 Be2 Nbd7 O-O O-O a4 Re8 Rad1 Qc7 Bh6 Nc5 Bxg7 Kxg7 Qe3 e5 Nf5 Bxf5 exf5 Qc6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 e3 Bf5 Nc3 e6 Nh4 Bg6 Bd2 Nbd7 Be2 Bd6 Qb3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Be3 Bg7 f3 h5 Qd2 a6 Be2 Nbd7 O-O O-O a4 Re8 Rad1 Qc7 Bh6 Nc5 Bxg7 Kxg7 Qe3 e5 Nf5 Bxf5 exf5 Qc6 g4 Nxa4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 e3 Bf5 Nc3 e6 Nh4 Bg6 Bd2 Nbd7 Be2 Bd6 Qb3 Rb8 Nxg6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 g6 Be3 Bg7 f3 h5 Qd2 a6 Be2 Nbd7 O-O O-O a4 Re8 Rad1 Qc7 Bh6 Nc5 Bxg7 Kxg7 Qe3 e5 Nf5 Bxf5 exf5 Qc6 g4 Nxa4 g5 Nh7

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2287)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O c3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxe5 Nxe5 Rxe5 Bb7 d4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2287)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O c3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxe5 Nxe5 Rxe5 Bb7 d4 Bf6 Re1

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2160)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 e3 Bf5 Nc3 e6 Nh4 Bg6 Bd2 Nbd7 Be2 Bd6 Qb3 Rb8 Nxg6 hxg6 h4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2287)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O c3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxe5 Nxe5 Rxe5 Bb7 d4 Bf6 Re1 Re8 Nd2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2287)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O c3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxe5 Nxe5 Rxe5 Bb7 d4 Bf6 Re1 Re8 Nd2 Nf4 Rxe8

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2287)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O c3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxe5 Nxe5 Rxe5 Bb7 d4 Bf6 Re1 Re8 Nd2 Nf4 Rxe8 Qxe8 f3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2287)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O c3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxe5 Nxe5 Rxe5 Bb7 d4 Bf6 Re1 Re8 Nd2 Nf4 Rxe8 Qxe8 f3 Nd3 Nf1

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2160)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 e3 Bf5 Nc3 e6 Nh4 Bg6 Bd2 Nbd7 Be2 Bd6 Qb3 Rb8 Nxg6 hxg6 h4 g5 h5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2287)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O c3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxe5 Nxe5 Rxe5 Bb7 d4 Bf6 Re1 Re8 Nd2 Nf4 Rxe8 Qxe8 f3 Nd3 Nf1 Nxc1 Qxc1

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2287)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Nd6 Bxc6 dxc6 dxe5 Nf5 Qxd8 Kxd8 Nc3 Be7 Bf4 Be6 h3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2160)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 e3 Bf5 Nc3 e6 Nh4 Bg6 Bd2 Nbd7 Be2 Bd6 Qb3 Rb8 Nxg6 hxg6 h4 g5 h5 dxc4 Qxc4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2287)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Be7 Re1 b5 Bb3 O-O c3 d5 exd5 Nxd5 Nxe5 Nxe5 Rxe5 Bb7 d4 Bf6 Re1 Re8 Nd2 Nf4 Rxe8 Qxe8 f3 Nd3 Nf1 Nxc1 Qxc1 c5 dxc5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2287)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O d4 Bf6 Re1 Re8 c3 Rxe1 Qxe1 Qe7 Qxe7 Bxe7 a4 c6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2160)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 e3 Bf5 Nc3 e6 Nh4 Bg6 Bd2 Nbd7 Be2 Bd6 Qb3 Rb8 Nxg6 hxg6 h4 g5 h5 dxc4 Qxc4 b5 Qd3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2287)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nge7 Re1 a6 Bf1 d5 exd5 Nxd5 d4 Nf6 Be3 cxd4 Nxd4 Bd7 c4 Nxd4 Bxd4 Bc6 Nc3 Be7 a3 Qd6 b4 Rd8 Bb6 Qxd1 Nxd1 Rc8 Ne3 h5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2287)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O d4 Bf6 Re1 Re8 c3 Rxe1 Qxe1 Qe7 Qxe7 Bxe7 a4 c6 a5 Ne8

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2287)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nge7 Re1 a6 Bf1 d5 exd5 Nxd5 d4 Nf6 Be3 cxd4 Nxd4 Bd7 c4 Nxd4 Bxd4 Bc6 Nc3 Be7 a3 Qd6 b4 Rd8 Bb6 Qxd1 Nxd1 Rc8 Ne3 h5 Rad1 h4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2160)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 e3 Bf5 Nc3 e6 Nh4 Bg6 Bd2 Nbd7 Be2 Bd6 Qb3 Rb8 Nxg6 hxg6 h4 g5 h5 dxc4 Qxc4 b5 Qd3 b4 Ne4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 e3 Bf5 Nc3 e6 Nh4 Bg6 Bd2 Nbd7 Be2 Bd6 Qb3 Rb8 Nxg6 hxg6 h4 g5 h5 dxc4 Qxc4 b5 Qd3 b4 Ne4 Nxe4 Qxe4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2287)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O d4 Bf6 Re1 Re8 c3 Rxe1 Qxe1 Qe7 Qxe7 Bxe7 a4 c6 a5 Ne8 Nd2 d5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2287)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O d4 Bf6 Re1 Re8 c3 Rxe1 Qxe1 Qe7 Qxe7 Bxe7 a4 c6 a5 Ne8 Nd2 d5 Nb3 g5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2160)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 e3 Bf5 Nc3 e6 Nh4 Bg6 Bd2 Nbd7 Be2 Bd6 Qb3 Rb8 Nxg6 hxg6 h4 g5 h5 dxc4 Qxc4 b5 Qd3 b4 Ne4 Nxe4 Qxe4 c5 Rc1

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2287)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O d4 Bf6 Re1 Re8 c3 Rxe1 Qxe1 Qe7 Qxe7 Bxe7 a4 c6 a5 Ne8 Nd2 d5 Nb3 g5 h3 h6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2160)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 e3 Bf5 Nc3 e6 Nh4 Bg6 Bd2 Nbd7 Be2 Bd6 Qb3 Rb8 Nxg6 hxg6 h4 g5 h5 dxc4 Qxc4 b5 Qd3 b4 Ne4 Nxe4 Qxe4 c5 Rc1 Qe7 dxc5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2287)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O d4 Bf6 Re1 Re8 c3 Rxe1 Qxe1 Qe7 Qxe7 Bxe7 a4 c6 a5 Ne8 Nd2 d5 Nb3 g5 h3 h6 Nc5 Kg7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2160)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 e3 Bf5 Nc3 e6 Nh4 Bg6 Bd2 Nbd7 Be2 Bd6 Qb3 Rb8 Nxg6 hxg6 h4 g5 h5 dxc4 Qxc4 b5 Qd3 b4 Ne4 Nxe4 Qxe4 c5 Rc1 Qe7 dxc5 Bxc5 O-O

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
e4 e6 d4 d5 e5 c5 c3 Nc6 Nf3 Qb6 a3 Nh6 Bd3 cxd4 O-O Nf5 Re1

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
e4 e6 d4 d5 e5 c5 c3 Nc6 Nf3 Qb6 a3 Nh6 Bd3 cxd4 O-O Nf5 Re1 Be7 b4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 e4 Bb4 d3 d6 a3 Bc5 b4 Bb6 Be3 Bg4 Be2 Bxf3 Bxf3 Nd4 Na4 Nxf3 Qxf3 Bxe3 fxe3 O-O

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 e4 Bb4 d3 d6 a3 Bc5 b4 Bb6 Be3 Bg4 Be2 Bxf3 Bxf3 Nd4 Na4 Nxf3 Qxf3 Bxe3 fxe3 O-O Nc3 c6

Transpose to wikichess #230769#

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 g3 Ba6 b3 d5 Bg2 Bb4 Bd2 Be7 cxd5 exd5 O-O O-O Nc3 Nbd7 Ne5 Bb7 Rc1 Re8 Rc2 c6 e4 Nxe4 Nxe4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 g3 Ba6 b3 d5 Bg2 Bb4 Bd2 Be7 cxd5 exd5 O-O O-O Nc3 Nbd7 Ne5 Bb7 Rc1 Re8 Rc2 c6 e4 Nxe4 Nxe4 Nxe5 dxe5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nf3 b6 g3 Ba6 b3 d5 Bg2 Bb4 Bd2 Be7 cxd5 exd5 O-O O-O Nc3 Nbd7 Ne5 Bb7 Rc1 Re8 Rc2 c6 e4 Nxe4 Nxe4 Nxe5 dxe5 dxe4 Bxe4

Transpose to wikichess #198014#

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 e4 b5 a4 c6 axb5 cxb5 Nc3 Qb6 b3 e6 bxc4 Bb4 Bd2 bxc4 Bxc4 Ne7 Nge2 O-O O-O a5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
b3 e5 Bb2 Nc6 e3 d5 Bb5 Nge7 Bxe5 a6 Bxc6 Nxc6 Bg3 h5 h4 d4 Ne2 Bd6 exd4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 e4 b5 a4 c6 axb5 cxb5 Nc3 Qb6 b3 e6 bxc4 Bb4 Bd2 bxc4 Bxc4 Ne7 Nge2 O-O O-O a5 Na4 Qc6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 e4 b5 a4 c6 axb5 cxb5 Nc3 Qb6 b3 e6 bxc4 Bb4 Bd2 bxc4 Bxc4 Ne7 Nge2 O-O O-O a5 Na4 Qc6 Bd3 Nd7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
b3 e5 Bb2 Nc6 e3 d5 Bb5 Nge7 Bxe5 a6 Bxc6 Nxc6 Bg3 h5 h4 d4 Ne2 Bd6 exd4 Bxg3 Nxg3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 e4 b5 a4 c6 axb5 cxb5 Nc3 Qb6 b3 e6 bxc4 Bb4 Bd2 bxc4 Bxc4 Ne7 Nge2 O-O O-O a5 Na4 Qc6 Bd3 Nd7 Bf4 e5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
b3 e5 Bb2 Nc6 e3 d5 Bb5 Nge7 Bxe5 a6 Bxc6 Nxc6 Bg3 h5 h4 d4 Ne2 Bd6 exd4 Bxg3 Nxg3 Nxd4 Nc3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 e4 b5 a4 c6 axb5 cxb5 Nc3 Qb6 b3 e6 bxc4 Bb4 Bd2 bxc4 Bxc4 Ne7 Nge2 O-O O-O a5 Na4 Qc6 Bd3 Nd7 Bf4 e5 Bg3 Qd6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
b3 e5 Bb2 Nc6 e3 d5 Bb5 Nge7 Bxe5 a6 Bxc6 Nxc6 Bg3 h5 h4 d4 Ne2 Bd6 exd4 Bxg3 Nxg3 Nxd4 Nc3 O-O Kf1

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 e4 b5 a4 c6 axb5 cxb5 Nc3 Qb6 b3 e6 bxc4 Bb4 Bd2 bxc4 Bxc4 Ne7 Nge2 O-O O-O a5 Na4 Qc6 Bd3 Nd7 Bf4 e5 Bg3 Qd6 dxe5 Nxe5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
b3 e5 Bb2 Nc6 e3 d5 Bb5 Nge7 Bxe5 a6 Bxc6 Nxc6 Bg3 h5 h4 d4 Ne2 Bd6 exd4 Bxg3 Nxg3 Nxd4 Nc3 O-O Kf1 a5 d3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 e4 b5 a4 c6 axb5 cxb5 Nc3 Qb6 b3 e6 bxc4 Bb4 Bd2 bxc4 Bxc4 Ne7 Nge2 O-O O-O a5 Na4 Qc6 Bd3 Nd7 Bf4 e5 Bg3 Qd6 dxe5 Nxe5 Bb5 Qb8

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2033)
d4 d5 c4 c6 cxd5 cxd5 Bf4 Nc6 e3 Nf6 Bd3 Bg4 f3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
b3 e5 Bb2 Nc6 e3 d5 Bb5 Nge7 Bxe5 a6 Bxc6 Nxc6 Bg3 h5 h4 d4 Ne2 Bd6 exd4 Bxg3 Nxg3 Nxd4 Nc3 O-O Kf1 a5 d3 Ra6 Nxh5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 e4 b5 a4 c6 axb5 cxb5 Nc3 Qb6 b3 e6 bxc4 Bb4 Bd2 bxc4 Bxc4 Ne7 Nge2 O-O O-O a5 Na4 Qc6 Bd3 Nd7 Bf4 e5 Bg3 Qd6 dxe5 Nxe5 Bb5 Qb8 Nec3 f6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 c5 d5 b5 e4 d6 Nge2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2314)
g4 d5 g5 g6 d4 Nc6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2033)
d4 d5 c4 c6 cxd5 cxd5 Bf4 Nc6 e3 Nf6 Bd3 Bg4 f3 Bh5 Qb3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
b3 e5 Bb2 Nc6 e3 d5 Bb5 Nge7 Bxe5 a6 Bxc6 Nxc6 Bg3 h5 h4 d4 Ne2 Bd6 exd4 Bxg3 Nxg3 Nxd4 Nc3 O-O Kf1 a5 d3 Ra6 Nxh5 Rc6 Qd2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
b3 e5 Bb2 Nc6 e3 d5 Bb5 Nge7 Bxe5 a6 Bxc6 Nxc6 Bg3 h5 h4 d4 Ne2 Bd6 exd4 Bxg3 Nxg3 Nxd4 Nc3 O-O Kf1 a5 d3 Ra6 Nxh5 Rc6 Qd2 Bg4 Ng3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 c5 d5 b5 e4 d6 Nge2 bxc4 Nf4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
c4 e5 g3 Nf6 Bg2 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Nc3 Nb6 a3 c5 d3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2314)
g4 d5 g5 g6 d4 Nc6 Bg2 e6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
b3 e5 Bb2 Nc6 e3 d5 Bb5 Nge7 Bxe5 a6 Bxc6 Nxc6 Bg3 h5 h4 d4 Ne2 Bd6 exd4 Bxg3 Nxg3 Nxd4 Nc3 O-O Kf1 a5 d3 Ra6 Nxh5 Rc6 Qd2 Bg4 Ng3 f5 f3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2033)
d4 d5 c4 c6 cxd5 cxd5 Bf4 Nc6 e3 Nf6 Bd3 Bg4 f3 Bh5 Qb3 Qd7 Nc3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2033)
d4 d5 c4 c6 cxd5 cxd5 Bf4 Nc6 e3 Nf6 Bd3 Bg4 f3 Bh5 Qb3 Qd7 Nc3 e6 Rc1

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
b3 e5 Bb2 Nc6 e3 d5 Bb5 Nge7 Bxe5 a6 Bxc6 Nxc6 Bg3 h5 h4 d4 Ne2 Bd6 exd4 Bxg3 Nxg3 Nxd4 Nc3 O-O Kf1 a5 d3 Ra6 Nxh5 Rc6 Qd2 Bg4 Ng3 f5 f3 Qf6 fxg4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2314)
g4 d5 g5 g6 d4 Nc6 Bg2 e6 Nf3 Bg7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 c5 d5 b5 e4 d6 Nge2 bxc4 Nf4 g5 Nfe2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Nd6 Bxc6 dxc6 dxe5 Nf5 Qxd8 Kxd8 b3 Bd7 Bb2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2314)
g4 d5 g5 g6 d4 Nc6 Bg2 e6 Nf3 Bg7 c3 Nge7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2314)
g4 e5 Bg2 h5 gxh5 d5 d4 exd4 c3 dxc3 Nxc3 c6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2314)
g4 d5 g5 g6 d4 Nc6 Bg2 e6 Nf3 Bg7 c3 Nge7 Bf4 O-O

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2314)
g4 e5 Bg2 h5 gxh5 d5 d4 exd4 c3 dxc3 Nxc3 c6 Nf3 Nf6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 c5 d5 b5 e4 d6 Nge2 bxc4 Nf4 g5 Nfe2 exd5 exd5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Nd6 Bxc6 dxc6 dxe5 Nf5 Qxd8 Kxd8 b3 Bd7 Bb2 Kc8 a4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2314)
g4 e5 Bg2 h5 gxh5 d5 d4 exd4 c3 dxc3 Nxc3 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Bg5 Be7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2314)
g4 d5 g5 g6 d4 Nc6 Bg2 e6 Nf3 Bg7 c3 Nge7 Bf4 O-O h4 Nf5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 c5 d5 b5 e4 d6 Nge2 bxc4 Nf4 g5 Nfe2 exd5 exd5 Qe7 Bxg5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Nd6 Bxc6 dxc6 dxe5 Nf5 Qxd8 Kxd8 b3 Bd7 Bb2 Kc8 a4 a5 Nc3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
c4 e5 g3 c6 Nf3 e4 Nd4 d5 cxd5 Qxd5 Nc2 Nf6 Nc3 Qe5 Bg2 Na6 O-O Be7 Ne3 O-O a3 Re8

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2314)
g4 d5 g5 g6 d4 Nc6 Bg2 e6 Nf3 Bg7 c3 Nge7 Bf4 O-O h4 Nf5 h5 Re8

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2314)
g4 e5 Bg2 h5 gxh5 d5 d4 exd4 c3 dxc3 Nxc3 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Bg5 Be7 Qd2 Na6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2160)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 g3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Bg2 Bc5 O-O O-O d3 h6 Nxd5 Qxd5 Nd2 Qe6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
e4 e6 d4 d5 e5 c5 c3 Nc6 Nf3 Qb6 a3 Nh6 Bd3 cxd4 O-O Nf5 Re1 Be7 b4 Bd7 c4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 c5 d5 b5 e4 d6 Nge2 bxc4 Nf4 g5 Nfe2 exd5 exd5 Qe7 Bxg5 Bxc3 bxc3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
c4 e5 g3 c6 Nf3 e4 Nd4 d5 cxd5 Qxd5 Nc2 Nf6 Nc3 Qe5 Bg2 Na6 O-O Be7 Ne3 O-O a3 Re8 b4 Bf8

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2314)
g4 e5 Bg2 h5 gxh5 d5 d4 exd4 c3 dxc3 Nxc3 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Bg5 Be7 Qd2 Na6 h4 Rxh5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2033)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 g3 Bb4 Bg2 O-O O-O e4 Ne1 Bxc3 dxc3 h6 Nc2 d6 Ne3 a5 Qc2 a4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 c5 d5 b5 e4 d6 Nge2 bxc4 Nf4 g5 Nfe2 exd5 exd5 Qe7 Bxg5 Bxc3 bxc3 Nbd7 Qd2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Nd6 Bxc6 dxc6 dxe5 Nf5 Qxd8 Kxd8 b3 Bd7 Bb2 Kc8 a4 a5 Nc3 Be7 Rad1

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
c4 e5 g3 c6 Nf3 e4 Nd4 d5 cxd5 Qxd5 Nc2 Nf6 Nc3 Qe5 Bg2 Na6 O-O Be7 Ne3 O-O a3 Re8 b4 Bf8 Bb2 Qh5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 c5 d5 b5 e4 d6 Nge2 bxc4 Nf4 g5 Nfe2 exd5 exd5 Qe7 Bxg5 Bxc3 bxc3 Nbd7 Qd2 Rg8 h4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
c4 e5 g3 Nf6 Bg2 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Nc3 Nb6 a3 c5 d3 Be7 Qc2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Nd6 Bxc6 dxc6 dxe5 Nf5 Qxd8 Kxd8 b3 Bd7 Bb2 Kc8 a4 a5 Nc3 Be7 Rad1 b5 Rfe1

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
c4 e5 g3 c6 Nf3 e4 Nd4 d5 cxd5 Qxd5 Nc2 Nf6 Nc3 Qe5 Bg2 Na6 O-O Be7 Ne3 O-O a3 Re8 b4 Bf8 Bb2 Qh5 Qc2 Bh3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2314)
g4 e5 Bg2 h5 gxh5 d5 d4 exd4 c3 dxc3 Nxc3 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Bg5 Be7 Qd2 Na6 h4 Rxh5 O-O-O Qb6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
c4 e5 g3 Nf6 Bg2 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Nc3 Nb6 a3 c5 d3 Be7 Qc2 O-O Be3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Nd6 Bxc6 dxc6 dxe5 Nf5 Qxd8 Kxd8 b3 Bd7 Bb2 Kc8 a4 a5 Nc3 Be7 Rad1 b5 Rfe1 Rd8 Rd3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
c4 e5 g3 c6 Nf3 e4 Nd4 d5 cxd5 Qxd5 Nc2 Nf6 Nc3 Qe5 Bg2 Na6 O-O Be7 Ne3 O-O a3 Re8 b4 Bf8 Bb2 Qh5 Qc2 Bh3 Nxe4 Nxe4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2160)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 g3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Bg2 Bc5 O-O O-O d3 h6 Nxd5 Qxd5 Nd2 Qe6 b3 b6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
e4 e6 d4 d5 e5 c5 c3 Nc6 Nf3 Qb6 a3 Nh6 Bd3 cxd4 O-O Nf5 Re1 Be7 b4 Bd7 c4 dxc4 Bxc4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 c5 d5 b5 e4 d6 Nge2 bxc4 Nf4 g5 Nfe2 exd5 exd5 Qe7 Bxg5 Bxc3 bxc3 Nbd7 Qd2 Rg8 h4 Ne5 Kf2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Nd6 Bxc6 dxc6 dxe5 Nf5 Qxd8 Kxd8 b3 Bd7 Bb2 Kc8 a4 a5 Nc3 Be7 Rad1 b5 Rfe1 Rd8 Rd3 Nh4 Nxh4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
c4 e5 g3 c6 Nf3 e4 Nd4 d5 cxd5 Qxd5 Nc2 Nf6 Nc3 Qe5 Bg2 Na6 O-O Be7 Ne3 O-O a3 Re8 b4 Bf8 Bb2 Qh5 Qc2 Bh3 Nxe4 Nxe4 Bxe4 Bxf1

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2314)
g4 e5 Bg2 h5 gxh5 d5 d4 exd4 c3 dxc3 Nxc3 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Bg5 Be7 Qd2 Na6 h4 Rxh5 O-O-O Qb6 Nd4 c5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2160)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 g3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Bg2 Bc5 O-O O-O d3 h6 Nxd5 Qxd5 Nd2 Qe6 b3 b6 Bb2 Bb7

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
e4 e6 d4 d5 e5 c5 c3 Nc6 Nf3 Qb6 a3 Nh6 Bd3 cxd4 O-O Nf5 Re1 Be7 b4 Bd7 c4 dxc4 Bxc4 Qc7 Bd3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2314)
g4 e5 Bg2 h5 gxh5 d5 d4 exd4 c3 dxc3 Nxc3 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Bg5 Be7 Qd2 Na6 h4 Rxh5 O-O-O Qb6 Nd4 c5 Na4 Qb4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2160)
e4 e6 d4 d5 e5 c5 c3 Nc6 Nf3 Qb6 a3 Nh6 Bd3 cxd4 O-O Nf5 Re1 Be7 b4 Bd7 c4 dxc4 Bxc4 Qc7 Bd3 b5 Bf4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 g3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Bg2 Bc5 O-O O-O d3 h6 Nxd5 Qxd5 Nd2 Qe6 b3 b6 Bb2 Bb7 Rc1 Rad8

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
e4 e6 d4 d5 e5 c5 c3 Nc6 Nf3 Qb6 a3 Nh6 Bd3 cxd4 O-O Nf5 Re1 Be7 b4 Bd7 c4 dxc4 Bxc4 Qc7 Bd3 b5 Bf4 Qd8 Bxb5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 g3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Bg2 Bc5 O-O O-O d3 h6 Nxd5 Qxd5 Nd2 Qe6 b3 b6 Bb2 Bb7 Rc1 Rad8 Ne4 Be7

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
e4 e6 d4 d5 e5 c5 c3 Nc6 Nf3 Qb6 a3 Nh6 Bd3 cxd4 O-O Nf5 Re1 Be7 b4 Bd7 c4 dxc4 Bxc4 Qc7 Bd3 b5 Bf4 Qd8 Bxb5 a5 g4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
e4 e6 d4 d5 e5 c5 c3 Nc6 Nf3 Qb6 a3 Nh6 Bd3 cxd4 O-O Nf5 Re1 Be7 b4 Bd7 c4 dxc4 Bxc4 Qc7 Bd3 b5 Bf4 Qd8 Bxb5 a5 g4 Nh4 Nxh4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
e4 e6 d4 d5 e5 c5 c3 Nc6 Nf3 Qb6 a3 Nh6 Bd3 cxd4 O-O Nf5 Re1 Be7 b4 Bd7 c4 dxc4 Bxc4 Qc7 Bd3 b5 Bf4 Qd8 Bxb5 a5 g4 Nh4 Nxh4 Bxh4 Qf3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
e4 e6 d4 d5 e5 c5 c3 Nc6 Nf3 Qb6 a3 Nh6 Bd3 cxd4 O-O Nf5 Re1 Be7 b4 Bd7 c4 dxc4 Bxc4 Qc7 Bd3 b5 Bf4 Qd8 Bxb5 a5 g4 Nh4 Nxh4 Bxh4 Qf3 Rc8 Nd2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 g3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Bg2 Bc5 O-O O-O d3 h6 Nxd5 Qxd5 Nd2 Qe6 b3 b6 Bb2 Bb7 Rc1 Rad8 Ne4 Be7 Qc2 Nd4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 g3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Bg2 Bc5 O-O O-O d3 h6 Nxd5 Qxd5 Nd2 Qe6 b3 b6 Bb2 Bb7 Rc1 Rad8 Ne4 Be7 Qc2 Nd4 Bxd4 exd4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2160)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 g3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Bg2 Bc5 O-O O-O d3 h6 Nxd5 Qxd5 Nd2 Qe6 b3 b6 Bb2 Bb7 Rc1 Rad8 Ne4 Be7 Qc2 Nd4 Bxd4 exd4 Qxc7 Bd5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 c5 d5 b5 e4 d6 Nge2 bxc4 Nf4 g5 Nfe2 exd5 exd5 Qe7 Bxg5 Bxc3 bxc3 Nbd7 Qd2 Rg8 h4 Ne5 Kf2 h6 Bxh6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Nd6 Bxc6 dxc6 dxe5 Nf5 Qxd8 Kxd8 b3 Bd7 Bb2 Kc8 a4 a5 Nc3 Be7 Rad1 b5 Rfe1 Rd8 Rd3 Nh4 Nxh4 Bxh4 Rf3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
c4 e5 g3 c6 Nf3 e4 Nd4 d5 cxd5 Qxd5 Nc2 Nf6 Nc3 Qe5 Bg2 Na6 O-O Be7 Ne3 O-O a3 Re8 b4 Bf8 Bb2 Qh5 Qc2 Bh3 Nxe4 Nxe4 Bxe4 Bxf1 Kxf1 Qxh2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2314)
g4 e5 Bg2 h5 gxh5 d5 d4 exd4 c3 dxc3 Nxc3 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Bg5 Be7 Qd2 Na6 h4 Rxh5 O-O-O Qb6 Nd4 c5 Na4 Qb4 Qxb4 cxb4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2160)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 g3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Bg2 Bc5 O-O O-O d3 h6 Nxd5 Qxd5 Nd2 Qe6 b3 b6 Bb2 Bb7 Rc1 Rad8 Ne4 Be7 Qc2 Nd4 Bxd4 exd4 Qxc7 Bd5 Qxa7 Ra8

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 c5 d5 b5 e4 d6 Nge2 bxc4 Nf4 g5 Nfe2 exd5 exd5 Qe7 Bxg5 Bxc3 bxc3 Nbd7 Qd2 Rg8 h4 Ne5 Kf2 h6 Bxh6 Nd3 Kg1

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
c4 e5 g3 Nf6 Bg2 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Nc3 Nb6 a3 c5 d3 Be7 Qc2 O-O Be3 Nc6 Bxc6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Nd6 Bxc6 dxc6 dxe5 Nf5 Qxd8 Kxd8 b3 Bd7 Bb2 Kc8 a4 a5 Nc3 Be7 Rad1 b5 Rfe1 Rd8 Rd3 Nh4 Nxh4 Bxh4 Rf3 b4 Ne4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
c4 e5 g3 c6 Nf3 e4 Nd4 d5 cxd5 Qxd5 Nc2 Nf6 Nc3 Qe5 Bg2 Na6 O-O Be7 Ne3 O-O a3 Re8 b4 Bf8 Bb2 Qh5 Qc2 Bh3 Nxe4 Nxe4 Bxe4 Bxf1 Kxf1 Qxh2 Ng4 Qh3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2314)
g4 e5 Bg2 h5 gxh5 d5 d4 exd4 c3 dxc3 Nxc3 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Bg5 Be7 Qd2 Na6 h4 Rxh5 O-O-O Qb6 Nd4 c5 Na4 Qb4 Qxb4 cxb4 Bf3 Rh8

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2160)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 g3 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Bg2 Bc5 O-O O-O d3 h6 Nxd5 Qxd5 Nd2 Qe6 b3 b6 Bb2 Bb7 Rc1 Rad8 Ne4 Be7 Qc2 Nd4 Bxd4 exd4 Qxc7 Bd5 Qxa7 Ra8 Qc7 Rxa2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
c4 e5 g3 c6 Nf3 e4 Nd4 d5 cxd5 Qxd5 Nc2 Nf6 Nc3 Qe5 Bg2 Na6 O-O Be7 Ne3 O-O a3 Re8 b4 Bf8 Bb2 Qh5 Qc2 Bh3 Nxe4 Nxe4 Bxe4 Bxf1 Kxf1 Qxh2 Ng4 Qh3 Kg1 Rxe4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 c5 d5 b5 e4 d6 Nge2 bxc4 Nf4 g5 Nfe2 exd5 exd5 Qe7 Bxg5 Bxc3 bxc3 Nbd7 Qd2 Rg8 h4 Ne5 Kf2 h6 Bxh6 Nd3 Kg1 Rb8 Nd4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
c4 e5 g3 Nf6 Bg2 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Nc3 Nb6 a3 c5 d3 Be7 Qc2 O-O Be3 Nc6 Bxc6 bxc6 Nf3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 Nd6 Bxc6 dxc6 dxe5 Nf5 Qxd8 Kxd8 b3 Bd7 Bb2 Kc8 a4 a5 Nc3 Be7 Rad1 b5 Rfe1 Rd8 Rd3 Nh4 Nxh4 Bxh4 Rf3 b4 Ne4 Be6 Bc1

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2314)
g4 e5 Bg2 h5 gxh5 d5 d4 exd4 c3 dxc3 Nxc3 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Bg5 Be7 Qd2 Na6 h4 Rxh5 O-O-O Qb6 Nd4 c5 Na4 Qb4 Qxb4 cxb4 Bf3 Rh8 Bxf6 Bxf6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
d4 Nf6 c4 e6 Nc3 Bb4 f3 c5 d5 b5 e4 d6 Nge2 bxc4 Nf4 g5 Nfe2 exd5 exd5 Qe7 Bxg5 Bxc3 bxc3 Nbd7 Qd2 Rg8 h4 Ne5 Kf2 h6 Bxh6 Nd3 Kg1 Rb8 Nd4 cxd4 Bxd3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
c4 e5 g3 Nf6 Bg2 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Nc3 Nb6 a3 c5 d3 Be7 Qc2 O-O Be3 Nc6 Bxc6 bxc6 Nf3 Nd5 Nd1

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2314)
g4 e5 Bg2 h5 gxh5 d5 d4 exd4 c3 dxc3 Nxc3 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Bg5 Be7 Qd2 Na6 h4 Rxh5 O-O-O Qb6 Nd4 c5 Na4 Qb4 Qxb4 cxb4 Bf3 Rh8 Bxf6 Bxf6 Bxd5 Rb8

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
c4 e5 g3 Nf6 Bg2 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Nc3 Nb6 a3 c5 d3 Be7 Qc2 O-O Be3 Nc6 Bxc6 bxc6 Nf3 Nd5 Nd1 Qa5 Qd2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2314)
g4 e5 Bg2 h5 gxh5 d5 d4 exd4 c3 dxc3 Nxc3 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Bg5 Be7 Qd2 Na6 h4 Rxh5 O-O-O Qb6 Nd4 c5 Na4 Qb4 Qxb4 cxb4 Bf3 Rh8 Bxf6 Bxf6 Bxd5 Rb8 b3 Nc7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
c4 e5 g3 Nf6 Bg2 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Nc3 Nb6 a3 c5 d3 Be7 Qc2 O-O Be3 Nc6 Bxc6 bxc6 Nf3 Nd5 Nd1 Qa5 Qd2 Qc7 Rc1

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
c4 e5 g3 Nf6 Bg2 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Nc3 Nb6 a3 c5 d3 Be7 Qc2 O-O Be3 Nc6 Bxc6 bxc6 Nf3 Nd5 Nd1 Qa5 Qd2 Qc7 Rc1 Nxe3 Nxe3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
c4 e5 g3 Nf6 Bg2 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Nc3 Nb6 a3 c5 d3 Be7 Qc2 O-O Be3 Nc6 Bxc6 bxc6 Nf3 Nd5 Nd1 Qa5 Qd2 Qc7 Rc1 Nxe3 Nxe3 f6 Nc4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2314)
g4 e5 Bg2 h5 gxh5 d5 d4 exd4 c3 dxc3 Nxc3 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Bg5 Be7 Qd2 Na6 h4 Rxh5 O-O-O Qb6 Nd4 c5 Na4 Qb4 Qxb4 cxb4 Bf3 Rh8 Bxf6 Bxf6 Bxd5 Rb8 b3 Nc7 Bf3 Rxh4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
c4 e5 g3 Nf6 Bg2 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Nc3 Nb6 a3 c5 d3 Be7 Qc2 O-O Be3 Nc6 Bxc6 bxc6 Nf3 Nd5 Nd1 Qa5 Qd2 Qc7 Rc1 Nxe3 Nxe3 f6 Nc4 Be6 O-O

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
c4 e5 g3 Nf6 Bg2 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Nc3 Nb6 a3 c5 d3 Be7 Qc2 O-O Be3 Nc6 Bxc6 bxc6 Nf3 Nd5 Nd1 Qa5 Qd2 Qc7 Rc1 Nxe3 Nxe3 f6 Nc4 Be6 O-O Qd7 Qc3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2306)
c4 e5 g3 Nf6 Bg2 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Nc3 Nb6 a3 c5 d3 Be7 Qc2 O-O Be3 Nc6 Bxc6 bxc6 Nf3 Nd5 Nd1 Qa5 Qd2 Qc7 Rc1 Nxe3 Nxe3 f6 Nc4 Be6 O-O Qd7 Qc3 Rab8 Nfd2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2314)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 g3 Bb4 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 O-O d4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2314)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 g3 Bb4 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 O-O d4 d6 Bg5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2314)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 g3 Bb4 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 O-O d4 d6 Bg5 h6 Bxf6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2033)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 g3 Bb4 Bg2 O-O O-O e4 Ne1 Bxc3 dxc3 h6 Nc2 d6 Ne3 a5 Qc2 a4 Rd1 b6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2314)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 g3 Bb4 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 O-O d4 d6 Bg5 h6 Bxf6 Qxf6 Bh3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2033)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 g3 Bb4 Bg2 O-O O-O e4 Ne1 Bxc3 dxc3 h6 Nc2 d6 Ne3 a5 Qc2 a4 Rd1 b6 Rb1 Ne5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2033)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 g3 Bb4 Bg2 O-O O-O e4 Ne1 Bxc3 dxc3 h6 Nc2 d6 Ne3 a5 Qc2 a4 Rd1 b6 Rb1 Ne5 Bxe4 Nxe4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2033)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 g3 Bb4 Bg2 O-O O-O e4 Ne1 Bxc3 dxc3 h6 Nc2 d6 Ne3 a5 Qc2 a4 Rd1 b6 Rb1 Ne5 Bxe4 Nxe4 Qxe4 Ra5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2033)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 g3 Bb4 Bg2 O-O O-O e4 Ne1 Bxc3 dxc3 h6 Nc2 d6 Ne3 a5 Qc2 a4 Rd1 b6 Rb1 Ne5 Bxe4 Nxe4 Qxe4 Ra5 Nd5 Re8

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2033)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 g3 Bb4 Bg2 O-O O-O e4 Ne1 Bxc3 dxc3 h6 Nc2 d6 Ne3 a5 Qc2 a4 Rd1 b6 Rb1 Ne5 Bxe4 Nxe4 Qxe4 Ra5 Nd5 Re8 b4 Rxd5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2033)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 g3 Bb4 Bg2 O-O O-O e4 Ne1 Bxc3 dxc3 h6 Nc2 d6 Ne3 a5 Qc2 a4 Rd1 b6 Rb1 Ne5 Bxe4 Nxe4 Qxe4 Ra5 Nd5 Re8 b4 Rxd5 Rxd5 Be6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2033)
c4 e5 Nc3 Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 g3 Bb4 Bg2 O-O O-O e4 Ne1 Bxc3 dxc3 h6 Nc2 d6 Ne3 a5 Qc2 a4 Rd1 b6 Rb1 Ne5 Bxe4 Nxe4 Qxe4 Ra5 Nd5 Re8 b4 Rxd5 Rxd5 Be6 Bf4 Qc8

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2033)
d4 d5 c4 c6 cxd5 cxd5 Bf4 Nc6 e3 Nf6 Bd3 Bg4 f3 Bh5 Qb3 Qd7 Nc3 e6 Rc1 Be7 Na4 O-O Nc5 Bxc5 Rxc5 Qe7 Ne2 Bg6 Bxg6 hxg6 Rc3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2033)
d4 d5 c4 c6 cxd5 cxd5 Bf4 Nc6 e3 Nf6 Bd3 Bg4 f3 Bh5 Qb3 Qd7 Nc3 e6 Rc1 Be7 Na4 O-O Nc5 Bxc5 Rxc5 Qe7 Ne2 Bg6 Bxg6 hxg6 Rc3 Rfc8 h4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2033)
d4 d5 c4 c6 cxd5 cxd5 Bf4 Nc6 e3 Nf6 Bd3 Bg4 f3 Bh5 Qb3 Qd7 Nc3 e6 Rc1 Be7 Na4 O-O Nc5 Bxc5 Rxc5 Qe7 Ne2 Bg6 Bxg6 hxg6 Rc3 Rfc8 h4 Na5 Qc2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2033)
d4 d5 c4 c6 cxd5 cxd5 Bf4 Nc6 e3 Nf6 Bd3 Bg4 f3 Bh5 Qb3 Qd7 Nc3 e6 Rc1 Be7 Na4 O-O Nc5 Bxc5 Rxc5 Qe7 Ne2 Bg6 Bxg6 hxg6 Rc3 Rfc8 h4 Na5 Qc2 Rxc3 Qxc3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2054)
b4 d5 Bb2 Qd6 b5 a6 a4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2054)
b4 d5 Bb2 Qd6 b5 a6 a4 axb5 axb5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2054)
b4 d5 Bb2 Qd6 b5 a6 a4 axb5 axb5 Rxa1 Bxa1

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2086)
e3 g6 Bc4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2054)
b4 d5 Bb2 Qd6 b5 a6 a4 axb5 axb5 Rxa1 Bxa1 e5 e3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2054)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 Nc3 b5 Bb3 Be7 d3 d6 O-O

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2362)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 e4 b5 a4 c6 axb5 cxb5 Nc3 Qb6 Be3 e6 Nh3 Nf6 Be2 Bb4 Bf3 Bb7 d5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2054)
b4 d5 Bb2 Qd6 b5 a6 a4 axb5 axb5 Rxa1 Bxa1 e5 e3 Nd7 c4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2362)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 e4 b5 a4 c6 axb5 cxb5 Nc3 Qb6 Be3 e6 Nh3 Nf6 Be2 Bb4 Bf3 Bb7 d5 Qd8 O-O

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2086)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 d6 d4 Bd7 Bxc6 Bxc6 Nc3 h6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2362)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 e4 b5 a4 c6 axb5 cxb5 Nc3 Qb6 Be3 e6 Nh3 Nf6 Be2 Bb4 Bf3 Bb7 d5 Qd8 O-O Bxc3 bxc3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2086)
d4 Nf6 c4 g6 Nc3 Bg7 e4 d6 Nf3 c5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2086)
d4 d5 c4 e6 Nc3 Nf6 Bg5 c6 e3 Nbd7 Nf3 Be7

Transpose to wikichess #56269#

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2362)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 e4 b5 a4 c6 axb5 cxb5 Nc3 Qb6 Be3 e6 Nh3 Nf6 Be2 Bb4 Bf3 Bb7 d5 Qd8 O-O Bxc3 bxc3 O-O dxe6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2054)
b4 d5 Bb2 Qd6 b5 a6 a4 axb5 axb5 Rxa1 Bxa1 e5 e3 Nd7 c4 Ngf6 Qa4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2362)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 e4 b5 a4 c6 axb5 cxb5 Nc3 Qb6 Be3 e6 Nh3 Nf6 Be2 Bb4 Bf3 Bb7 d5 Qd8 O-O Bxc3 bxc3 O-O dxe6 Qxd1 Rfxd1

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2086)
e3 g6 Bc4 d5 Bb3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2362)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 e4 b5 a4 c6 axb5 cxb5 Nc3 Qb6 Be3 e6 Nh3 Nf6 Be2 Bb4 Bf3 Bb7 d5 Qd8 O-O Bxc3 bxc3 O-O dxe6 Qxd1 Rfxd1 fxe6 Ng5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2362)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 e4 b5 a4 c6 axb5 cxb5 Nc3 Qb6 Be3 e6 Nh3 Nf6 Be2 Bb4 Bf3 Bb7 d5 Qd8 O-O Bxc3 bxc3 O-O dxe6 Qxd1 Rfxd1 fxe6 Ng5 e5 Ne6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2086)
e3 g6 Bc4 d5 Bb3 Bg7 Nf3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2362)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 e4 b5 a4 c6 axb5 cxb5 Nc3 Qb6 Be3 e6 Nh3 Nf6 Be2 Bb4 Bf3 Bb7 d5 Qd8 O-O Bxc3 bxc3 O-O dxe6 Qxd1 Rfxd1 fxe6 Ng5 e5 Ne6 Rc8 Nc5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2086)
e3 g6 Bc4 d5 Bb3 Bg7 Nf3 c5 d4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2086)
e3 g6 Bc4 d5 Bb3 Bg7 Nf3 c5 d4 Nf6 c4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2362)
d4 d5 c4 dxc4 e4 b5 a4 c6 axb5 cxb5 Nc3 Qb6 Be3 e6 Nh3 Nf6 Be2 Bb4 Bf3 Bb7 d5 Qd8 O-O Bxc3 bxc3 O-O dxe6 Qxd1 Rfxd1 fxe6 Ng5 e5 Ne6 Rc8 Nc5 Bc6 g4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2086)
e3 g6 Bc4 d5 Bb3 Bg7 Nf3 c5 d4 Nf6 c4 dxc4 Bxc4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2086)
e3 g6 Bc4 d5 Bb3 Bg7 Nf3 c5 d4 Nf6 c4 dxc4 Bxc4 O-O O-O

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2086)
e3 g6 Bc4 d5 Bb3 Bg7 Nf3 c5 d4 Nf6 c4 dxc4 Bxc4 O-O O-O a6 dxc5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2086)
e3 g6 Bc4 d5 Bb3 Bg7 Nf3 c5 d4 Nf6 c4 dxc4 Bxc4 O-O O-O a6 dxc5 Qc7 Nbd2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2086)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 a6 Bd3 Bc5 Nb3 Ba7 Qe2 Nc6 Be3 Bxe3 Qxe3 Nf6 Nc3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2086)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 Bb4 e5 Nd5 Bd2 Nxc3 bxc3 Ba5 Qg4 O-O Bd3 g6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2086)
e3 g6 Bc4 d5 Bb3 Bg7 Nf3 c5 d4 Nf6 c4 dxc4 Bxc4 O-O O-O a6 dxc5 Qc7 Nbd2 Qxc5 a4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2086)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 cxd4 Nxd4 Bc5 Qd2 Nxd4 Bxd4 Bxd4 Qxd4 Qb6 Qd2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2086)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 cxd4 Nxd4 Bc5 Qd2 Nxd4 Bxd4 Bxd4 Qxd4 Qb6 Qd2 Nc5 O-O-O

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2086)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 cxd4 Nxd4 Bc5 Qd2 Nxd4 Bxd4 Bxd4 Qxd4 Qb6 Qd2 Nc5 O-O-O Bd7 h4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2086)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 cxd4 Nxd4 Bc5 Qd2 Nxd4 Bxd4 Bxd4 Qxd4 Qb6 Qd2 Nc5 O-O-O Bd7 h4 O-O-O Qd4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2086)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 Bb4 e5 Nd5 Bd2 Nxc3 bxc3 Ba5 Qg4 O-O Bd3 g6 h4 Qc7

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2086)
e3 g6 Bc4 d5 Bb3 Bg7 Nf3 c5 d4 Nf6 c4 dxc4 Bxc4 O-O O-O a6 dxc5 Qc7 Nbd2 Qxc5 a4 Nc6 b3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2086)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 cxd4 Nxd4 Bc5 Qd2 Nxd4 Bxd4 Bxd4 Qxd4 Qb6 Qd2 Nc5 O-O-O Bd7 h4 O-O-O Qd4 Qc7 h5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2086)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 cxd4 Nxd4 Bc5 Qd2 Nxd4 Bxd4 Bxd4 Qxd4 Qb6 Qd2 Nc5 O-O-O Bd7 h4 O-O-O Qd4 Qc7 h5 f5 b4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2086)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 Bb4 e5 Nd5 Bd2 Nxc3 bxc3 Ba5 Qg4 O-O Bd3 g6 h4 Qc7 f4 Bxc3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2086)
e3 g6 Bc4 d5 Bb3 Bg7 Nf3 c5 d4 Nf6 c4 dxc4 Bxc4 O-O O-O a6 dxc5 Qc7 Nbd2 Qxc5 a4 Nc6 b3 Rd8 Bb2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2086)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 cxd4 Nxd4 Bc5 Qd2 Nxd4 Bxd4 Bxd4 Qxd4 Qb6 Qd2 Nc5 O-O-O Bd7 h4 O-O-O Qd4 Qc7 h5 f5 b4 Na4 Rh3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2086)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Nf6 e5 Nfd7 f4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Be3 cxd4 Nxd4 Bc5 Qd2 Nxd4 Bxd4 Bxd4 Qxd4 Qb6 Qd2 Nc5 O-O-O Bd7 h4 O-O-O Qd4 Qc7 h5 f5 b4 Na4 Rh3 Kb8 Nb5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2086)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 Bb4 e5 Nd5 Bd2 Nxc3 bxc3 Ba5 Qg4 O-O Bd3 g6 h4 Qc7 f4 Bxc3 h5 f5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2086)
e3 g6 Bc4 d5 Bb3 Bg7 Nf3 c5 d4 Nf6 c4 dxc4 Bxc4 O-O O-O a6 dxc5 Qc7 Nbd2 Qxc5 a4 Nc6 b3 Rd8 Bb2 Ng4 Qc1

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2335)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 Re1 Nd6 Nxe5 Be7 Bf1 Nxe5 Rxe5 O-O Nc3 Bf6 Re1 Re8 Nd5 Rxe1 Qxe1 b6 Nxf6 Qxf6 d3 Bb7 Qd2 c5 c3 h6 a4 Nf5 Qf4 g5 Qg4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2335)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Bb4 e5 c5 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 Ne7 h4 Qc7 Rh3 Bd7 a4 Nbc6 Ba3 cxd4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2335)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Bb4 e5 c5 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 Ne7 h4 Qc7 Rh3 Bd7 a4 Nbc6 Ba3 cxd4 cxd4 f6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2086)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 Bb4 e5 Nd5 Bd2 Nxc3 bxc3 Ba5 Qg4 O-O Bd3 g6 h4 Qc7 f4 Bxc3 h5 f5 exf6 Rxf6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2335)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Bb4 e5 c5 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 Ne7 h4 Qc7 Rh3 Bd7 a4 Nbc6 Ba3 cxd4 cxd4 f6 f4 O-O

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2335)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Bb4 e5 c5 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 Ne7 h4 Qc7 Rh3 Bd7 a4 Nbc6 Ba3 cxd4 cxd4 f6 f4 O-O Qd2 fxe5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2086)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 Bb4 e5 Nd5 Bd2 Nxc3 bxc3 Ba5 Qg4 O-O Bd3 g6 h4 Qc7 f4 Bxc3 h5 f5 exf6 Rxf6 hxg6 h6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2086)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 Bb4 e5 Nd5 Bd2 Nxc3 bxc3 Ba5 Qg4 O-O Bd3 g6 h4 Qc7 f4 Bxc3 h5 f5 exf6 Rxf6 hxg6 h6 Ne2 Bxa1

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2086)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 Bb4 e5 Nd5 Bd2 Nxc3 bxc3 Ba5 Qg4 O-O Bd3 g6 h4 Qc7 f4 Bxc3 h5 f5 exf6 Rxf6 hxg6 h6 Ne2 Bxa1 Rxh6 Rf5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2086)
e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nf6 Nc3 Bb4 e5 Nd5 Bd2 Nxc3 bxc3 Ba5 Qg4 O-O Bd3 g6 h4 Qc7 f4 Bxc3 h5 f5 exf6 Rxf6 hxg6 h6 Ne2 Bxa1 Rxh6 Rf5 c3 d5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2335)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Bb4 e5 c5 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 Ne7 h4 Qc7 Rh3 Bd7 a4 Nbc6 Ba3 cxd4 cxd4 f6 f4 O-O Qd2 fxe5 fxe5 Rf7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2335)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Bb4 e5 c5 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 Ne7 h4 Qc7 Rh3 Bd7 a4 Nbc6 Ba3 cxd4 cxd4 f6 f4 O-O Qd2 fxe5 fxe5 Rf7 Nf3 h6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2335)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Bb4 e5 c5 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 Ne7 h4 Qc7 Rh3 Bd7 a4 Nbc6 Ba3 cxd4 cxd4 f6 f4 O-O Qd2 fxe5 fxe5 Rf7 Nf3 h6 Rb1 Raf8

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2335)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Bb4 e5 c5 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 Ne7 h4 Qc7 Rh3 Bd7 a4 Nbc6 Ba3 cxd4 cxd4 f6 f4 O-O Qd2 fxe5 fxe5 Rf7 Nf3 h6 Rb1 Raf8 Bd6 Qc8

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2335)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Bb4 e5 c5 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 Ne7 h4 Qc7 Rh3 Bd7 a4 Nbc6 Ba3 cxd4 cxd4 f6 f4 O-O Qd2 fxe5 fxe5 Rf7 Nf3 h6 Rb1 Raf8 Bd6 Qc8 Bd3 Be8

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2335)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Bb4 e5 c5 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 Ne7 h4 Qc7 Rh3 Bd7 a4 Nbc6 Ba3 cxd4 cxd4 f6 f4 O-O Qd2 fxe5 fxe5 Rf7 Nf3 h6 Rb1 Raf8 Bd6 Qc8 Bd3 Be8 c3 Qd7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2086)
e3 g6 Bc4 d5 Bb3 Bg7 Nf3 c5 d4 Nf6 c4 dxc4 Bxc4 O-O O-O a6 dxc5 Qc7 Nbd2 Qxc5 a4 Nc6 b3 Rd8 Bb2 Ng4 Qc1 Qb4 Ne4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2070)
d4 d5 c4 e6 cxd5 exd5 Bf4 Bd6 Bxd6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2070)
d4 d5 c4 e6 cxd5 exd5 Bf4 Bd6 Bxd6 Qxd6 e3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2070)
a4 e5 e4 Nf6 Nc3 Bb4 Nd5 Nxd5 exd5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2070)
a4 e5 e4 Nf6 Nc3 Bb4 Nd5 Nxd5 exd5 O-O c3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2070)
d4 d5 c4 e6 cxd5 exd5 Bf4 Bd6 Bxd6 Qxd6 e3 Bf5 Qb3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2070)
a4 e5 e4 Nf6 Nc3 Bb4 Nd5 Nxd5 exd5 O-O c3 Bc5 Ne2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2070)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 a6 c5 Nbd7 Bf4 Nh5 Bd2 Nhf6 Qc2 Qc7

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2070)
d4 d5 c4 c6 Nf3 Nf6 Nc3 a6 c5 Nbd7 Bf4 Nh5 Bd2 Nhf6 Qc2 Qc7 e4 Nxe4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2070)
a4 e5 e4 Nf6 Nc3 Bb4 Nd5 Nxd5 exd5 O-O c3 Bc5 Ne2 a5 d4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Gergely Matisz    (1944)
c3 Nf6 h3 e5

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1944)
d4 Nf6 g3 b6 Bg2

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1944)
b3 e5 d3 d5

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1944)
d4 Nf6 g3 b6 Bg2 d5 c4

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1944)
c3 Nf6 h3 e5 d4 Nc6

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1944)
b3 e5 d3 d5 Nf3 Bd6

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1944)
e4 c5 Nf3 b6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Bb7 Nc3 a6 g3

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Matej Pech    (2070)
a4 e5 e4 Nf6 Nc3 Bb4 Nd5 Nxd5 exd5 O-O c3 Bc5 Ne2 a5 d4 exd4 Nxd4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Gergely Matisz    (1944)
c3 Nf6 h3 e5 d4 Nc6 dxe5 Nxe5

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Matej Pech    (2070)
d4 d5 c4 e6 cxd5 exd5 Bf4 Bd6 Bxd6 Qxd6 e3 Bf5 Qb3 Ne7 Nf3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Gergely Matisz    (1944)
e4 c5 Nf3 b6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Bb7 Nc3 a6 g3 e6 Bg2

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1944)
c3 Nf6 h3 e5 d4 Nc6 dxe5 Nxe5 Nf3 Nxf3

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1944)
b3 e5 d3 d5 Nf3 Bd6 Bb2 Nc6

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Matej Pech    (2070)
a4 e5 e4 Nf6 Nc3 Bb4 Nd5 Nxd5 exd5 O-O c3 Bc5 Ne2 a5 d4 exd4 Nxd4 d6 Be2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Gergely Matisz    (1944)
d4 Nf6 g3 b6 Bg2 d5 c4 c6 Nf3

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1944)
e4 g6 d4 c6 c4

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1944)
b3 e5 d3 d5 Nf3 Bd6 Bb2 Nc6 a3 Qe7

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1944)
e4 c5 Nf3 b6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Bb7 Nc3 a6 g3 e6 Bg2 Qc7 O-O

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1944)
c3 Nf6 h3 e5 d4 Nc6 dxe5 Nxe5 Nf3 Nxf3 exf3 d5

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1944)
e4 g6 d4 c6 c4 Bg7 Nc3

Transpose to wikichess #165757#

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Matej Pech    (2086)
e3 g6 Bc4 d5 Bb3 Bg7 Nf3 c5 d4 Nf6 c4 dxc4 Bxc4 O-O O-O a6 dxc5 Qc7 Nbd2 Qxc5 a4 Nc6 b3 Rd8 Bb2 Ng4 Qc1 Qb4 Ne4 Bd7 Ba3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2326)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Nf6 Ng5 d5 exd5 Na5 Bb5 c6 dxc6 bxc6 Be2 h6 Nh3 Bd6 d3 O-O Nc3

Transpose to wikichess #257962#

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2326)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 f4 e6 Nf3 d5 Bb5 Nge7 O-O

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2070)
d4 d5 c4 e6 cxd5 exd5 Bf4 Bd6 Bxd6 Qxd6 e3 Bf5 Qb3 Ne7 Nf3 Nd7 Be2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2086)
e3 g6 Bc4 d5 Bb3 Bg7 Nf3 c5 d4 Nf6 c4 dxc4 Bxc4 O-O O-O a6 dxc5 Qc7 Nbd2 Qxc5 a4 Nc6 b3 Rd8 Bb2 Ng4 Qc1 Qb4 Ne4 Bd7 Ba3 Qa5 Nc5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Gergely Matisz    (1944)
c3 Nf6 h3 e5 d4 Nc6 dxe5 Nxe5 Nf3 Nxf3 exf3 d5 Bb5 c6

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1944)
e4 c5 Nf3 b6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Bb7 Nc3 a6 g3 e6 Bg2 Qc7 O-O d6 Re1

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1944)
b3 e5 d3 d5 Nf3 Bd6 Bb2 Nc6 a3 Qe7 c4 dxc4

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1944)
g3 e5 Nf3 e4 Nd4 c5 Nb3 c4 Nd4 Bc5 c3 Nc6

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1944)
b3 e5 d3 d5 Nf3 Bd6 Bb2 Nc6 a3 Qe7 c4 dxc4 bxc4 f5

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1944)
c3 Nf6 h3 e5 d4 Nc6 dxe5 Nxe5 Nf3 Nxf3 exf3 d5 Bb5 c6 Bd3 Bd6

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1944)
g3 e5 Nf3 e4 Nd4 c5 Nb3 c4 Nd4 Bc5 c3 Nc6 d3 cxd3

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1944)
b3 e5 d3 d5 Nf3 Bd6 Bb2 Nc6 a3 Qe7 c4 dxc4 bxc4 f5 Nc3 Nf6

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Matej Pech    (2086)
e3 g6 Bc4 d5 Bb3 Bg7 Nf3 c5 d4 Nf6 c4 dxc4 Bxc4 O-O O-O a6 dxc5 Qc7 Nbd2 Qxc5 a4 Nc6 b3 Rd8 Bb2 Ng4 Qc1 Qb4 Ne4 Bd7 Ba3 Qa5 Nc5 Bxa1 Nxb7

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Gergely Matisz    (1944)
c3 Nf6 h3 e5 d4 Nc6 dxe5 Nxe5 Nf3 Nxf3 exf3 d5 Bb5 c6 Bd3 Bd6 O-O O-O

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Matt LaDuke    (2326)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 f4 e6 Nf3 d5 Bb5 Nge7 O-O a6 Bxc6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2070)
d4 d5 c4 e6 cxd5 exd5 Bf4 Bd6 Bxd6 Qxd6 e3 Bf5 Qb3 Ne7 Nf3 Nd7 Be2 O-O O-O

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2086)
e3 g6 Bc4 d5 Bb3 Bg7 Nf3 c5 d4 Nf6 c4 dxc4 Bxc4 O-O O-O a6 dxc5 Qc7 Nbd2 Qxc5 a4 Nc6 b3 Rd8 Bb2 Ng4 Qc1 Qb4 Ne4 Bd7 Ba3 Qa5 Nc5 Bxa1 Nxb7 Qh5 Nxd8

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Gergely Matisz    (1944)
b3 e5 d3 d5 Nf3 Bd6 Bb2 Nc6 a3 Qe7 c4 dxc4 bxc4 f5 Nc3 Nf6 Nd5 Nxd5

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Gergely Matisz    (1944)
g3 e5 Nf3 e4 Nd4 c5 Nb3 c4 Nd4 Bc5 c3 Nc6 d3 cxd3 exd3 Nf6

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Matt LaDuke    (2326)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 f4 e6 Nf3 d5 Bb5 Nge7 O-O a6 Bxc6 Nxc6 exd5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2326)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 f4 e6 Nf3 d5 Bb5 Nge7 O-O a6 Bxc6 Nxc6 exd5 exd5 d4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2326)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 f4 e6 Nf3 d5 Bb5 Nge7 O-O a6 Bxc6 Nxc6 exd5 exd5 d4 Be7 dxc5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2070)
d4 d5 c4 e6 cxd5 exd5 Bf4 Bd6 Bxd6 Qxd6 e3 Bf5 Qb3 Ne7 Nf3 Nd7 Be2 O-O O-O a5 a3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2326)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 f4 e6 Nf3 d5 Bb5 Nge7 O-O a6 Bxc6 Nxc6 exd5 exd5 d4 Be7 dxc5 Bxc5 Kh1

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2326)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 f4 e6 Nf3 d5 Bb5 Nge7 O-O a6 Bxc6 Nxc6 exd5 exd5 d4 Be7 dxc5 Bxc5 Kh1 Ne7 Re1

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2070)
d4 d5 c4 e6 cxd5 exd5 Bf4 Bd6 Bxd6 Qxd6 e3 Bf5 Qb3 Ne7 Nf3 Nd7 Be2 O-O O-O a5 a3 c6 h3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2326)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 f4 e6 Nf3 d5 Bb5 Nge7 O-O a6 Bxc6 Nxc6 exd5 exd5 d4 Be7 dxc5 Bxc5 Kh1 Ne7 Re1 O-O Be3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2326)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 f4 e6 Nf3 d5 Bb5 Nge7 O-O a6 Bxc6 Nxc6 exd5 exd5 d4 Be7 dxc5 Bxc5 Kh1 Ne7 Re1 O-O Be3 Bb4 Bd4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2326)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nge7 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Qb6 Nxc6 bxc6 Be2 Ng6 c4 Be7 Be3 c5 Nc3 Qxb2 Qe1 Bf6 Rc1 Bb7 f4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2326)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 f4 e6 Nf3 d5 Bb5 Nge7 O-O a6 Bxc6 Nxc6 exd5 exd5 d4 Be7 dxc5 Bxc5 Kh1 Ne7 Re1 O-O Be3 Bb4 Bd4 Nc6 a3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Gergely Matisz    (1944)
g3 e5 Nf3 e4 Nd4 c5 Nb3 c4 Nd4 Bc5 c3 Nc6 d3 cxd3 exd3 Nf6 dxe4 d5

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Matt LaDuke    (2326)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nge7 Re1 a6 Bf1 d5 exd5 Nxd5 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Ndb4 Nxc6 Qxd1 Rxd1 bxc6 Na3 a5 Bd2 Ba6 Rab1

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2326)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nge7 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Qb6 Nxc6 bxc6 Be2 Ng6 c4 Be7 Be3 c5 Nc3 Qxb2 Qe1 Bf6 Rc1 Bb7 f4 Bxc3 Rxc3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2326)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 f4 e6 Nf3 d5 Bb5 Nge7 O-O a6 Bxc6 Nxc6 exd5 exd5 d4 Be7 dxc5 Bxc5 Kh1 Ne7 Re1 O-O Be3 Bb4 Bd4 Nc6 a3 Bxc3 Bxc3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2326)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nge7 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Qb6 Nxc6 bxc6 Be2 Ng6 c4 Be7 Be3 c5 Nc3 Qxb2 Qe1 Bf6 Rc1 Bb7 f4 Bxc3 Rxc3 Bxe4 Bxc5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2326)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 f4 e6 Nf3 d5 Bb5 Nge7 O-O a6 Bxc6 Nxc6 exd5 exd5 d4 Be7 dxc5 Bxc5 Kh1 Ne7 Re1 O-O Be3 Bb4 Bd4 Nc6 a3 Bxc3 Bxc3 Bf5 Qd2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2326)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nge7 Re1 a6 Bf1 d5 exd5 Nxd5 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Ndb4 Nxc6 Qxd1 Rxd1 bxc6 Na3 a5 Bd2 Ba6 Rab1 Nd5 Nc4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2326)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nge7 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Qb6 Nxc6 bxc6 Be2 Ng6 c4 Be7 Be3 c5 Nc3 Qxb2 Qe1 Bf6 Rc1 Bb7 f4 Bxc3 Rxc3 Bxe4 Bxc5 Rc8 Bd6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2326)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 f4 e6 Nf3 d5 Bb5 Nge7 O-O a6 Bxc6 Nxc6 exd5 exd5 d4 Be7 dxc5 Bxc5 Kh1 Ne7 Re1 O-O Be3 Bb4 Bd4 Nc6 a3 Bxc3 Bxc3 Bf5 Qd2 Be4 Ng5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2070)
d4 d5 c4 e6 cxd5 exd5 Bf4 Bd6 Bxd6 Qxd6 e3 Bf5 Qb3 Ne7 Nf3 Nd7 Be2 O-O O-O a5 a3 c6 h3 Rfe8 Re1

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2097)
e4 e5 Nf3 d6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 c5 Nb3 Be6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2097)
e4 e5 Nf3 d6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 c5 Nb3 Be6 Bf4 Be7

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Gergely Matisz    (1944)
a3 e5 Nc3 d5

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Matt LaDuke    (2326)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nge7 Re1 a6 Bf1 d5 exd5 Nxd5 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Ndb4 Nxc6 Qxd1 Rxd1 bxc6 Na3 a5 Bd2 Ba6 Rab1 Nd5 Nc4 Bxc4 Bxc4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2326)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nge7 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Qb6 Nxc6 bxc6 Be2 Ng6 c4 Be7 Be3 c5 Nc3 Qxb2 Qe1 Bf6 Rc1 Bb7 f4 Bxc3 Rxc3 Bxe4 Bxc5 Rc8 Bd6 Ne7 Rf2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2326)
e4 c5 Nc3 Nc6 f4 e6 Nf3 d5 Bb5 Nge7 O-O a6 Bxc6 Nxc6 exd5 exd5 d4 Be7 dxc5 Bxc5 Kh1 Ne7 Re1 O-O Be3 Bb4 Bd4 Nc6 a3 Bxc3 Bxc3 Bf5 Qd2 Be4 Ng5 Bg6 Rad1

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2097)
e4 e5 Nf3 d6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 c5 Nb3 Be6 Bf4 Be7 Nc3 Nc6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2326)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nge7 Re1 a6 Bf1 d5 exd5 Nxd5 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Ndb4 Nxc6 Qxd1 Rxd1 bxc6 Na3 a5 Bd2 Ba6 Rab1 Nd5 Nc4 Bxc4 Bxc4 Bc5 Be2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2326)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nge7 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Qb6 Nxc6 bxc6 Be2 Ng6 c4 Be7 Be3 c5 Nc3 Qxb2 Qe1 Bf6 Rc1 Bb7 f4 Bxc3 Rxc3 Bxe4 Bxc5 Rc8 Bd6 Ne7 Rf2 Qb6 c5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2070)
d4 d5 c4 e6 cxd5 exd5 Bf4 Bd6 Bxd6 Qxd6 e3 Bf5 Qb3 Ne7 Nf3 Nd7 Be2 O-O O-O a5 a3 c6 h3 Rfe8 Re1 h6 a4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2326)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nge7 Re1 a6 Bf1 d5 exd5 Nxd5 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Ndb4 Nxc6 Qxd1 Rxd1 bxc6 Na3 a5 Bd2 Ba6 Rab1 Nd5 Nc4 Bxc4 Bxc4 Bc5 Be2 Ke7 Bf3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2097)
e4 e5 Nf3 d6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 c5 Nb3 Be6 Bf4 Be7 Nc3 Nc6 Qd2 Nf6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2070)
d4 d5 c4 e6 cxd5 exd5 Bf4 Bd6 Bxd6 Qxd6 e3 Bf5 Qb3 Ne7 Nf3 Nd7 Be2 O-O O-O a5 a3 c6 h3 Rfe8 Re1 h6 a4 g6 Nbd2

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2070)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Bb4 e5 c5 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 Ne7 Qg4 Qc7 Qxg7 Rg8 Qxh7 cxd4 Ne2 Nbc6 f4 Bd7 Qd3 dxc3 Qxc3 Nf5 Rb1 d4 Qd3 O-O-O Rg1 Na5 g4 Ba4 c4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2097)
e4 e5 Nf3 d6 d4 exd4 Nxd4 c5 Nb3 Be6 Bf4 Be7 Nc3 Nc6 Qd2 Nf6 O-O-O Bxb3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2326)
e4 c5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 e6 O-O Nge7 Re1 a6 Bf1 d5 exd5 Nxd5 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Ndb4 Nxc6 Qxd1 Rxd1 bxc6 Na3 a5 Bd2 Ba6 Rab1 Nd5 Nc4 Bxc4 Bxc4 Bc5 Be2 Ke7 Bf3 Ra6 c4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2070)
d4 d5 c4 e6 cxd5 exd5 Bf4 Bd6 Bxd6 Qxd6 e3 Bf5 Qb3 Ne7 Nf3 Nd7 Be2 O-O O-O a5 a3 c6 h3 Rfe8 Re1 h6 a4 g6 Nbd2 Kg7 Nh4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2070)
e4 e6 d4 d5 Nc3 Bb4 e5 c5 a3 Bxc3 bxc3 Ne7 Qg4 Qc7 Qxg7 Rg8 Qxh7 cxd4 Ne2 Nbc6 f4 Bd7 Qd3 dxc3 Qxc3 Nf5 Rb1 d4 Qd3 O-O-O Rg1 Na5 g4 Ba4 c4 Ne7 Rb4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Gergely Matisz    (1944)
a3 e5 Nc3 d5 d4 e4

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Matt LaDuke    (2329)
d4 d5 c4 e6 Nc3 c6 e4 dxe4 Nxe4 Bb4 Bd2 Qxd4 Bxb4 Qxe4 Be2 Na6 Bd6 Qxg2 Bf3 Qg5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2329)
d4 d5 c4 e6 Nc3 c6 e4 dxe4 Nxe4 Bb4 Bd2 Qxd4 Bxb4 Qxe4 Be2 Na6 Bd6 Qxg2 Bf3 Qg5 Ne2 Ne7

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2070)
d4 d5 c4 e6 cxd5 exd5 Bf4 Bd6 Bxd6 Qxd6 e3 Bf5 Qb3 Ne7 Nf3 Nd7 Be2 O-O O-O a5 a3 c6 h3 Rfe8 Re1 h6 a4 g6 Nbd2 Kg7 Nh4 Be6 Qc3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2329)
d4 d5 c4 e6 Nc3 c6 e4 dxe4 Nxe4 Bb4 Bd2 Qxd4 Bxb4 Qxe4 Be2 Na6 Bd6 Qxg2 Bf3 Qg5 Ne2 Ne7 Ng3 e5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Gergely Matisz    (1944)
a3 e5 Nc3 d5 d4 e4 Bf4 c6

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Matt LaDuke    (2329)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 b5 Bb3 d5 dxe5 Be6 c3 Be7 Bc2 Bg4 Qe1

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2329)
d4 d5 c4 e6 Nc3 c6 e4 dxe4 Nxe4 Bb4 Bd2 Qxd4 Bxb4 Qxe4 Be2 Na6 Bd6 Qxg2 Bf3 Qg5 Ne2 Ne7 Ng3 e5 Qb3 Ng6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2329)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 b5 Bb3 d5 dxe5 Be6 c3 Be7 Bc2 Bg4 Qe1 Nc5 Nbd2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2329)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 b5 Bb3 d5 dxe5 Be6 c3 Be7 Bc2 Bg4 Qe1 Nc5 Nbd2 Ne6 Qe2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2329)
d4 d5 c4 e6 Nc3 c6 e4 dxe4 Nxe4 Bb4 Bd2 Qxd4 Bxb4 Qxe4 Be2 Na6 Bd6 Qxg2 Bf3 Qg5 Ne2 Ne7 Ng3 e5 Qb3 Ng6 Be2 b6

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2097)
d4 Nf6 c4 b6 Nc3 Bb7 Qc2 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Nf3 e6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2329)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 Ba4 Nf6 O-O Nxe4 d4 b5 Bb3 d5 dxe5 Be6 c3 Be7 Bc2 Bg4 Qe1 Nc5 Nbd2 Ne6 Qe2 O-O Re1

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2070)
d4 d5 c4 e6 cxd5 exd5 Bf4 Bd6 Bxd6 Qxd6 e3 Bf5 Qb3 Ne7 Nf3 Nd7 Be2 O-O O-O a5 a3 c6 h3 Rfe8 Re1 h6 a4 g6 Nbd2 Kg7 Nh4 Be6 Qc3 Nf6 Nhf3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2097)
d4 Nf6 c4 b6 Nc3 Bb7 Qc2 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Nf3 e6 e4 Nxc3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2329)
d4 d5 c4 e6 Nc3 c6 e4 dxe4 Nxe4 Bb4 Bd2 Qxd4 Bxb4 Qxe4 Be2 Na6 Bd6 Qxg2 Bf3 Qg5 Ne2 Ne7 Ng3 e5 Qb3 Ng6 Be2 b6 h4 Nxh4

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2329)
d4 d5 c4 e6 Nc3 c6 e4 dxe4 Nxe4 Bb4 Bd2 Qxd4 Bxb4 Qxe4 Be2 Na6 Bd6 Qxg2 Bf3 Qg5 Ne2 Ne7 Ng3 e5 Qb3 Ng6 Be2 b6 h4 Nxh4 c5 Nxc5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2070)
d4 d5 c4 e6 cxd5 exd5 Bf4 Bd6 Bxd6 Qxd6 e3 Bf5 Qb3 Ne7 Nf3 Nd7 Be2 O-O O-O a5 a3 c6 h3 Rfe8 Re1 h6 a4 g6 Nbd2 Kg7 Nh4 Be6 Qc3 Nf6 Nhf3 h5 Ne5

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2329)
d4 d5 c4 e6 Nc3 c6 e4 dxe4 Nxe4 Bb4 Bd2 Qxd4 Bxb4 Qxe4 Be2 Na6 Bd6 Qxg2 Bf3 Qg5 Ne2 Ne7 Ng3 e5 Qb3 Ng6 Be2 b6 h4 Nxh4 c5 Nxc5 Bxc5 bxc5

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matt LaDuke    (2329)
d4 d5 c4 e6 Nc3 c6 e4 dxe4 Nxe4 Bb4 Bd2 Qxd4 Bxb4 Qxe4 Be2 Na6 Bd6 Qxg2 Bf3 Qg5 Ne2 Ne7 Ng3 e5 Qb3 Ng6 Be2 b6 h4 Nxh4 c5 Nxc5 Bxc5 bxc5 Qa4 Ng2

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Gergely Matisz    (1944)
a3 e5 Nc3 d5 d4 e4 Bf4 c6 f3 f5

============

Contributors : Gergely Matisz


Matej Pech    (2070)
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 f5 Nc3 fxe4 Nxe4 d5 Nxe5 dxe4 Nxc6 Qg5 Qe2 Nf6 f4 Qxf4 Ne5 c6

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matej Pech    (2097)
e4 e6 d4 d5 e5 c5 c3 Nc6 Nf3 Bd7 Be2 Nge7 O-O Ng6 Be3 Be7 Nbd2 O-O Re1 Kh8 Bd3

============

Contributors : Matej Pech


Matt LaDuke    (2329)
d4 d5 c4 e6 Nc3 c6 e4 dxe4 Nxe4 Bb4 Bd2 Qxd4 Bxb4 Qxe4 Be2 Na6 Bd6 Qxg2 Bf3 Qg5 Ne2 Ne7 Ng3 e5 Qb3 Ng6 Be2 b6 h4 Nxh4 c5 Nxc5 Bxc5 bxc5 Qa4 Ng2 Kf1 Ne3

============

Contributors : Matt LaDuke


Matej Pech    (2097)
e4 e6 d4 d5 e5 c5 c3 Nc6 Nf3 Bd7 Be2 Nge7 O-O Ng6 Be3 Be7 Nbd2 O-O Re1 Kh8 Bd3 cxd4 cxd4

============

Contributors : Matej Pech






FICGS : mat ,   Wikipedia : mat ,   Dmoz : mat ,   Google : mat ,   Yahoo : mat




A good sacrifice is one that is not necessarily sound but leaves your opponent dazed and confused. (Rudolph Spielmann)

Chess is a terrible game. If you have no center, your opponent has a freer position. If you do have a center, then you really have something to worry about ! (Siegbert Tarrasch)

Weak points or holes in the opponent's position must be occupied by pieces not Pawns. (Siegbert Tarrasch)




Back to FICGS , Wikichess




[Chess forum] [Rating lists] [Countries] [Chess openings] [Legal informations] [Contact]
[Social network] [Hot news] [Discussions] [Seo forums] [Meet people] [Directory]