|
|
|
There are 0 results for Svante in the games. There are 22 results for Svante in the forum. Svante Carl von Erichsen (2007-03-15 13:40:45) Adjudication in correspondence games I think that you have to be very careful with this kind of adjudication. Even if you restrict this to cases that are 100% clear, you still have to separate them from the 99% cases. I would only consider adjudication if control of the board is completely decided and one player keeps playing worthless moves. Svante Carl von Erichsen (2007-03-28 03:16:54) More links http://senseis.xmp.net (a go wiki) http://playgo.to/interactive (very good introduction) For books, you might browse e.g. http://www.hebsacker-verlag.de/ Further links can be found at the DGoB-homepage (Deutscher Go-Bund): http://www.dgob.de/golinks.htm Svante Carl von Erichsen (2007-04-05 18:10:22) Re: Go: simultaneous games with handicap Aren't all games a kind of simultaneous here? Svante Carl von Erichsen (2007-06-01 12:26:32) Go championship I think that the current rules are quite good. For the current user base, 9 players round robin is enough. If the user base gets bigger and stronger, you could introduce preliminary stages. Example: sort all players who entered the waiting list by rating, then the final league consists of the 5 strongest players plus 4 players who placed first in the preliminary (which might be a knockout, or another league). One thing I would change in the current system: the usual custom for multi-game matches between two players is to determine colours randomly for the first game, then alternate. If an uneven number of games is played, then in the last game, colours are chosen randomly again. As I interpret the rules in that way that all five final games are played simultaneously, I would propose that one of those games is played with random colours. Thibault de Vassal (2007-06-01 17:56:58) Final match Hello Svante Carl, thanks for sharing your views ! I agree about the round-robin tournament, it could evolve according to the rating list... About the final match, I have good reasons for not introducing any chancy factor in tournaments (anyway I think it's better this way), I finally agreed with players about the 5-games match but it was hard for me to consider this non symmetrical schedule... Making it different is not a problem IMO, a (2xn)-games final match with equality favourable to former champion - like FICGS chess WCH - was ok for me but 6 games may be too few, giving a too big advantage to the former winner of the tournament. Anyway, there will be no final match in this 1st championship, it will be probably discussed again & again :) Svante Carl von Erichsen (2007-06-29 20:48:01) Go sites For fast games, a "real time" server is best, e.g. KGS (http://www.gokgs.com/). A great resource is the Go wiki at http://senseis.xmp.net/ Svante Carl von Erichsen (2007-07-11 16:14:00) Norms Perhaps you could also explain what a "norm" is, for chess newbies. Svante Carl von Erichsen (2007-09-06 22:04:56) Norms What is the exact definition of a "norm"? When googling, I found something along the lines of "a tournament performance indicating that a certain level has been reached", but what does it mean? Winning more than half of the games? How does it depend on the opponents' strength? Svante Carl von Erichsen (2007-09-13 16:15:49) What is the difference... What is the difference between a japanese joseki a korean jeongseok? ... After a japanese joseki, both players have an equally good result. After a korean jeongseok, both players have an equally bad result. Svante Carl von Erichsen (2007-09-28 01:07:38) empty page This is just a little issue: When I submit a move, and no game with pending moves is left, an empty page is displayed. I think it would be better to return to the games page immediately. Svante Carl von Erichsen (2007-10-10 13:28:11) Cracking Go This statement seems to relate not so much to Go but more on projected calculation power of supercomputers. My impression is that "provocative" is the main intent here. Svante Carl von Erichsen (2007-10-10 13:32:04) Why clump? What is the advantage of this in comparison to an increment of 4 days per move? Don Groves (2007-10-11 02:08:40) Cracking Go Svante Carl von Erichsen escrit: "This statement seems to relate not so much to Go but more on projected calculation power of supercomputers. My impression is that "provocative" is the main intent here." No, my intent was serious, only the small joke at the end was not ;-) By making the goban lager, Go can avoid the fate of Chess regarding brute force analysis. Even at a trillion moves per second, as mentioned in the article quoted by Thibault, brute force analysis will fail if there are trillions of trillions of trillions of possible moves! Svante Carl von Erichsen (2007-10-17 02:10:48) German "Klicken Sie bitte auf die Figur, die Sie bewegen möchten." or "Klicken Sie bitte auf die Figur, mit der Sie ziehen möchten." "Klicken Sie bitte auf das Feld, auf das Sie die Figur bewegen möchten." or "Klicken Sie bitte auf das Zielfeld." Thibault de Vassal (2007-10-17 02:48:48) German Thanks a lot Svante Carl ! So it is better than "Klicken Sie bitte an das Stück, um zu bewegen" and "Klicken Sie bitte an das Bestimmungsortquadrat" ? Thibault de Vassal (2007-11-24 16:33:54) SC. von Erichsen is FICGS Go champion ! Svante Carl von Erichsen 4d is the first FICGS Go world champion, congratulations :) According to the rules : "In case of equality, the player with the strongest tournament entry rating (TER) is qualified for the next stage." As Svante Carl now leads the tournament by 7/7, even if he loses his last game and another player also finishes with 7/8, the TER decides. And as there's no previous winner to defend his title... After the second championship (the level should increase), we may have the first 5 games match between two very strong players :) Dinesh De Silva (2007-11-25 02:34:36) Re: Svante, CONGRATULATIONS!!!!! Lincoln Tomlin (2007-11-25 14:04:07) 1st FICGS Go championship Congratulation Svante on becoming the first FICGS Go World Champion. Svante Carl von Erichsen (2007-11-30 02:00:56) attempt at clarification First, the professional ranks cannot be compared to amateur ranks. A few years ago, the general assumption was that a difference of one professional rank was equal to about one third of a stone. The EGF assumes 30 ELO points between pro ranks. Recently, however, especially in Korea, there are many aspiring young players trying to become a professional, but only a handful are promoted each year. As a result, the competition for _becoming_ pro has become so fierce that any player who passes these tests is all but guaranteed to be already able to give the established players a run for their money. Another point to note is that while amateur ranks try to depict the _strength_ of a player, professional ranks are based on _merit_. Thibault de Vassal (2008-07-11 23:13:29) FICGS Go championship final match The first FICGS Go championship 5 games final match (in WCH Go 000002) just started ! Svante Carl von Erichsen (2478, 4 dan) vs. Ke Lu (2591, 5 dan) http://www.ficgs.com/tournament_FICGS__GO__WORLD_CHAMPIONSHIP__000002.html Nice & instructive games to follow :) Best of luck to both. Svante Carl von Erichsen (2008-07-23 17:33:36) Janice Kim Janice Kim was a 1 Dan professional in 1997, she is 3 Dan professional now. Is there more information available somewhere, e.g. regarding handicap and time settings? Normajean Yates (2008-12-17 18:05:42) anyway, about the 16-queens mate-in-4: Svante Carl von Erichsen showed it was possible to solve without computer help: http://www.ficgs.com/user_page.php?page=problem_read&id=311 As for proof game, The foll is from my rec.games.chess.analysis post [it *was* .analysis I think - feeling too tired to search usenet] " This one is mine: 1. 4k3/qqqqqqqq/8/8/8/8/QQQQQQQQ/4K3 w - - 0 109: [pos. 1] White to play and mate in 4. There are no duals - only one moves mates in 4. [there is no mate in 3 or less.] Move given at end of post, with sample continuation. These two were posed by me and solved by likesforests [see fics (www.freechess.org) or chess.com] in 20 minutes total! 2. Give a proof game for pos. 1, ie Show that the position in prob. 1 is legally reachable by giving a game that leads to the position. 3. Okay, so you can reach a position where you have 16 queens on board. Can you construct a game which reaches a position with 18 queens? If so, do so! [the last part carries 99% of the credit - it is to pre-empt the answers "yes" and "no". ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (note: these can be more conveniently viewed at chess.com in the thread "advantage of moving first - mate in 4 in symmetrical position" in the forum-category "more puzzles") ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Solution to 2: by likesforests [Event ] [Site ] [Date ..] [White likesforests] [Black likesforests] [Result 1-0] 1. a4 b5 2. a5 b4 3. a6 Bb7 4. axb7 Nc6 5. Na3 bxa3 6. b8=Q a2 7. Rb1 a1=Q 8. Qb3 Qa6 9. Qa2 Qb7 10. b4 a5 11. b5 a4 12. b6 Qa6 13. b7 a3 14. Qb3 a2 15. b8=Q a1=Q 16. Qh3 Q1a5 17. Qbb3 Ne5 18. Qbg3 c5 19. Rb3 c4 20. c3 cxb3 21. c4 b2 22. c5 b1=Q 23. c6 Qba2 24. c7 Qb8 25. Bb2 f6 26. Bc3 Kf7 27. c8=Q d5 28. Qc4 Nc6 29. Qch4 d4 30. d3 dxc3 31. d4 c2+ 32. Qd2 Ra7 33. f3 Q5a4 34. Kf2 c1=Q 35. d5 Qca3 36. d6 e5 37. e4 Nge7 38. d7 Kg8 39. d8=Q Qa8 40. Qb6 Nb4 41. Qbe3 Nbd5 42. exd5 e4 43. Ne2 f5 44. Qeh6 f4 45. Kg1 e3 46. Nd4 e2 47. d6 e1=Q 48. d7 Qea1 49. d8=Q Nd5 50. Nc2 Nc3 51. Ne3 fxe3 52. Qdg5 e2 53. Qdf4 e1=Q 54. Qfg4 Qeb1 55. f4 g6 56. Qc5 g5 57. f5 Bg7 58. Qgc4+ Rf7 59. f6 Bf8 60. Q5b4 g4 61. Qe5 g3 62. Qe1 Ne4 63. Qcb3 Nd2 64. Qhc4 Nf3+ 65. gxf3 g2 66. Be2 Bg7 67. Kf2 Bf8 68. Ke3 g1=Q+ 69. Kf4 Qgb6 70. Qcc3 Be7 71. Kg4 Qe6+ 72. Kg3 Rf8 73. fxe7 Rf7 74. e8=Q+ Rf8 75. Qeb5 Qf7 76. f4 Re8 77. f5 Re6 78. fxe6 Qff8 79. e7+ Qf7 80. Rf1 Qaf8 81. e8=Q Qa8 82. Qbb2 Q4a7 83. Qed2 Q3a6 84. Rf3 Q8b7 85. Qcc2 Qac4 86. Q4b3 Qad6+ 87. Kg2 Qdc7 88. Q3a2 Qce6 89. Qhe3 Qed7 90. Q8e4 Q8e7 91. Qb2b3 Qag7+ 92. Qg3 Qbb2 93. Bc4 Qbf6 94. Kf1 h5 95. Rf5 Qfxf5+ 96. Ke1 Rh6 97. Qxh6 Qfh7 98. Qhxh5 Qfxc4 99. Qee2 Qcf7 100. Qbb2 Kf8 101. Qgf2 Ke8 102. h4 Kf8 103. Qhg4 Qhxh4 104. Qgg2 Qhh7 105. Qbh5 Ke8 106. Qhh2 Qfe6 107. Qff3 Q6f6 108. Qff2 Qff7 1-0 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- solution to 3: by likesforests Event "?"] [Site "?"] [Date "????.??.??"] [White "likesforests"] [Black "likesforests"] [Result "1-0"] 1. a4 b5 2. a5 b4 3. a6 Bb7 4. axb7 Nc6 5. Na3 bxa3 6. b8=Q a2 7. Rb1 a1=Q 8. Qb3 Qa6 9. Qa2 Qb7 10. b4 a5 11. b5 a4 12. b6 Qa6 13. b7 a3 14. Qb3 a2 15. b8=Q a1=Q 16. Qh3 Q1a5 17. Qbb3 Ne5 18. Qbg3 c5 19. Rb3 c4 20. c3 cxb3 21. c4 b2 22. c5 b1=Q 23. c6 Qba2 24. c7 Qb8 25. Bb2 f6 26. Bc3 Kf7 27. c8=Q d5 28. Qc4 Nc6 29. Qch4 d4 30. d3 dxc3 31. d4 c2+ 32. Qd2 Ra7 33. f3 Q5a4 34. Kf2 c1=Q 35. d5 Qca3 36. d6 e5 37. e4 Nge7 38. d7 Kg8 39. d8=Q Qa8 40. Qb6 Nb4 41. Qbe3 Nbd5 42. exd5 e4 43. Ne2 f5 44. Qeh6 f4 45. Kg1 e3 46. Nd4 e2 47. d6 e1=Q 48. d7 Qea1 49. d8=Q Nd5 50. Nc2 Nc3 51. Ne3 fxe3 52. Qdg5 e2 53. Qdf4 e1=Q 54. Qfg4 Qeb1 55. f4 g6 56. Qc5 g5 57. f5 Bg7 58. Qgc4+ Rf7 59. f6 Bf8 60. Q5b4 g4 61. Qe5 g3 62. Qe1 Ne4 63. Qcb3 Nd2 64. Qhc4 Nf3+ 65. gxf3 g2 66. Be2 Bg7 67. Kf2 Bf8 68. Ke3 g1=Q+ 69. Kf4 Qgb6 70. Qcc3 Be7 71. Kg4 Qe6+ 72. Kg3 Rf8 73. fxe7 Rf7 74. e8=Q+ Rf8 75. Qeb5 Qf7 76. f4 Re8 77. f5 Re6 78. fxe6 Qff8 79. e7+ Qf7 80. Rf1 Qaf8 81. e8=Q Qa8 82. Qhc1 ( 82. Qbb2 Q4a7 83. Qed2 Q3a6 84. Rf3 Q8b7 85. Qcc2 Qac4 86. Q4b3 Qad6+ 87. Kg2 Qdc7 88. Q3a2 Qce6 89. Qhe3 Qed7 90. Q8e4 Q8e7 91. Qb2b3 Qag7+ 92. Qg3 Qbb2 93. Bc4 Qbf6 94. Kf1 h5 95. Rf5 Qfxf5+ 96. Ke1 Rh6 97. Qxh6 Qfh7 98. Qhxh5 Qfxc4 99. Qee2 Qcf7 100. Qbb2 Kf8 101. Qgf2 Ke8 102. h4 Kf8 103. Qhg4 Qhxh4 104. Qgg2 Qhh7 105. Qbh5 Ke8 106. Qhh2 Qfe6 107. Qff3 Q6f6 108. Qff2 Qff7 ) h5 83. Qhc8 h4+ 84. Kg4 h3 85. Bf3 Rh5 86. Bg2 hxg2 87. h3 Rh4+ 88. Kxh4 g1=Q 89. Rf6 Qga7 90. Qec6 Q8b8 91. Q8a6 Q8e7 92. Kg4 Kf8 93. h4 Qbe8 94. Rd6 Qg8+ 95. Kf3 Qbg6 96. h5 Q6g7 97. h6 Qad7 98. h7 Qa5 99. h8=Q Qdxd6 1-0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- solution to 1: 1. Qaxf7+! Sample continuations: 1... Kd8 2. Qexe7+ Kc8 3. Qdxd7+ Kb8 4. Qdd8# 1... Qxf7 2. Qh8+ Qxh8 3. Qxh8+ Qf8 4. Qfxf8# " There are 0 results for Svante in wikichess. ... or search for Svante in FICGS via Google
[Chess rating list]
[Go ranking list]
[Chess & Go links]
[Chess forum]
[Players blog]
[Countries]
[Chess openings]
[Encyclopedia] [Seo forums] [Discussions] [Buzz] [Meet people] [Directory] [Contact] [Legal informations] |
|
FICGS is also a social network including seo forums, a hot news & buzz blog, a free web directory and discussion forums to meet people from all over the world. Discuss the last events, improve your search engines optimization, submit your website, share your interests...
Feel free to link to FICGS to get referer links. |