|
|
|
There are 0 results for Rainer in the games. There are 5 results for Rainer in the forum. Henri-Louis Muller (2006-07-04 09:39:01) temps de reflexion Je suis également d'avis qu'il existe un très sérieux problème concernant le temps de réflexion dans les parties ! Un joueur peut ainsi rester "trainer" avec une partie durant DES MOIS sans jouer, et sans AUCUNE justification ! Il faudrait aussi reglementer la durée PAR coup et non seulement sur la totalité des coups joués. J'ai CINQ parties dans le même cas :perte certaine de l'adversaire, et on attend 50 à 90 jours avant de répondre ou de dépasser le temps !! Evidemment, le fair-play et la sportivité jouent aussi un rôle. Thibault de Vassal (2007-01-21 13:48:44) Go and chess, IGN Goama newsletter From IGN Goama newsletter by Alexander Dinerchtein - http://www.gogame.info Go and Chess Two Games, Shared Experiences Chess and go show are similar in many ways, yet it's always strange to see how the masters of each game try to "invent the wheel", instead of benefiting from the knowledge of their colleagues. Let's consider sharing experiences! These ideas can be useful even for strong Asian Go professionals: 1. Currently, only a few pros use Go databases and programs for studying. It is easy to find commentaries, written by 9-dan masters, which state that a move is new and has never been played before. Yet if one checks such moves in Go databases, one can sometimes find up to 100 examples from professional games. How can they cheat the readers who study these commentaries? Once in Korea, I showed the Bigo Assistant program (similar to GoGod, MoyoGo and SmartGo) to Lee Sedol's brother Lee Sanghun, 5-dan, who is the director of a large children's Go school. He was surprised and said that the program looked very useful, and he added that he had never met this kind of program before. He even suggested deleting all amateur games and games played on Go servers, because of their low quality. I promised to order the programs and to install them on the school's computers if he liked this idea, but he did not follow up. Lee Sanghun, 5-dan was not able to break the traditions of his forefathers … 2. Even such top chess players as Kasparov, Kramnik and Topalov enlist the support of trainers during important tournaments and matches. During the Communist era, almost every Russian grandmaster worked on behalf of world championship candidates. Our government forced them to help, to show them new moves and ideas. Those who refused to help were punished severely: for example, sometimes a player would be prohibited from playing in tournaments abroad and would be refused foreign visas. We do not see this in Go. Everyone thinks only about his or her own self. Do you know who is currently assisting Lee Changho? I don't know, either! 3. I would like to say a few words about playing technique. Chess players often used to write the move on paper first and then make it on the board. This helps to avoid impulsive moves and to prevent blunders. Go masters record the game afterwards, and so one can often find terrible mistakes, such as overlooking ataris and recapturing ko without playing a ko threat first. As an example you may see Black's move number 271 from this game: http://www.go4go.net/v2/modules/collection/sgfview.php?id=10828 I am sure that if a player looked at their move at least twice before they write it on paper and after they would not make such mistakes. 4. Even top Go tournaments are usually run by the knock-out system so we often see sensational results. Mightn’t it be reasonable to think about increasing the number of games in each round? If rounds were best-of-three (in case of time constraints, it would be possible to use blitz time controls for the third game), it would help to minimize sensations. How about organising a definitive World Go Championship? Chess players have contested one for more than 100 years, and competitions for this World Championship have revealed the very best players of each generation. In Go it's harder to tell which player is true champion. In 2006, for instance, one international tournament was won by Lee Changho and another one by Lee Sedol, while Cho U won the largest amount of prize money. Whom can we call the World Champion? Who can say which tournament is the most important : LG, Samsung, Fujitsu, Chunlan or another? We don't even have a unified rating system … If we determined a single World Go Champion, he might earn the same degree of popularity as Garry Kasparov achieved in chess, and this could have a very positive influence on Go popularity around the world! Garvin Gray (2007-06-04 11:41:42) Wch 3 in rating order KAZ Balabaev, Farit 2580 FRA de Vassal, Thibault 2512 USA Ingersol, Harry 2502 NZL Noble, Mark 2497 DEU Schuster, Peter 2480 POL Ostrowski, Leszek 2458 ARG Brunsteins, Daniel 2452 CAN Zubac, Marius 2415 ROU Mathe, Iosif 2414 UKR Khokhlov, Igor 2370 MLT Sammut, Ronald 2362 ROU Helmer, Janos 2343 PRT Pires, Miguel 2270 LKA De Silva, Dinesh 2235 POL Sanner, Zdzislaw 2219 RUS Dyakov, Alexander 2217 DEU Schiller, Wilfried 2217 DEU Koslowski, Volker 2204 DZA Ould Ahmed, Samy 2195 FRA Appendino, Jérome 2192 GBR Taylor, William 2182 GRC Bleker, Frits 2171 DNK Jorgensen, Poulerik 2168 DEU Kesselheim, Peter 2149 CAN Repa, Jason 2144 PRT Louro, Eugénio 2123 USA Kotlyansky, Edward 2114 DEU Markus, Roland 2103 FRA Czekaj, Christophe 2098 AUT Dudulec, Konstantin 2084 CAN Plante, Marc-Eric 2079 LVA Borisovs, Leonids 2078 AUT Mueller, Robert 2069 DEU Unger, Peter 2065 AUT Riha, Josef 2019 POL Skwarczylo, Marek 2018 MUS Stephenson, Andrew 2000 CZE Stanislav, Musil 1990 SCG Vidanovic, Djordje 1966 USA Burden, Don 1959 DEU Haluschka, Rainer 1950 CAN Rotaru, Dan 1937 GBR Wyborn, Graham 1890 GBR Burrows, Nick 1884 POL Broniek, Mariusz Maciej 1879 BIH Dautovic, Dzenan 1875 AUS Gray, Garvin 1863 USA Minkin, Alexander 1850 GBR Josse, Mark 1806 ARM Khachaturov, Vadim 1803 USA Kotlyanskiy, Ilya 1800 DEU Krueger, Karsten 1800 PRT Vasquez, Fernando 1775 DZA Toutaoui, Khaled 1763 DEU Wosch, Arkadiusz 1746 TUR Yuvarlak, Ugur 1732 ROU Hrubaru, Mircea 1726 ARG Carrizo, José 1724 USA Phillip, Lennox 1700 ROU Kondort, Mihai 1700 ROU Ioan, Bucsa 1700 BRA Miranda, Marcus 1691 VEN Flores, Luis 1680 RUS Ruzin, Mikhail 1639 DEU Faust, Dieter 1627 MYS Behrmann, Klaus 1617 FRA Bellanger, Michel 1606 POL Bester, Kazimierz 1600 DEU Nent, Alexander 1593 PRT Oliveira, Carlos 1586 HUN Nagy, Attila 1549 ROU Ionescu, Catalin 1535 HUN Kis-Kos, Laszlo 1512 ITA Lupinacci, Nicola 1492 BEL De Groof, Pieter 1465 DEU Odendahl, Marcel 1462 USA Hendricks, Richard 1459 BRA Queiroz, Florencio 1444 CZE Pech, Jaroslav 1433 USA Goodwin, Adam 1415 HUN Csoma, Robert 1400 USA Gillz, Nicolas 1400 BGR Toktas, Ibrahim Ugras 1400 IND Veeraiah, Karuppaiah 1400 MEX Ortiz Durán, Esteban 1400 TUR Ilhan, Alper 1400 CHE Margot, Alain 1400 TUR Erdonho, Erdinç 1400 USA Lipsits, Sasha 1400 BRA B. Lima, Edmilson 1400 DEU von Buttlar, Paul 1386 HUN Fenyves, Adam 1330 BGR Stoianov, Stoian 1316 GRC Serd, Than 1300 TUR Ak, Murat 1300 GBR Willoughby, Peter 1294 ARG Orden, Jorge 1264 GBR Neil, Charlie 1212 NLD Oldenhof, Dwight 1203 USA Greer, Stephen 1200 BRA Barradas, Anderson 1194 IND Malvankar, Vikrant 1188 BEL Tuteleers, Bruno 1145 DEU Bothe, Matthias 1143 BGR Stoyanov, Zdravko 1136 Ulrich Imbeck (2007-09-08 02:23:05) chessage.com,schachtrainer.de The guy from chessage.com (schachtrainer.de) scripted also his site himself. Jason Repa (2008-06-04 06:48:23) Poker "I should have said my statement was about those who know the mechanics of the game" Actually, you've just confirmed that you don't know anything at all about the game of poker. As is the case for you with chess. And you obviously didn't understand the expression "-EV" , so I'll explain it to you. EV means expected value. It is the sum of the probability of each possible outcome of the event multiplied by the outcome value (or payoff). Thus, it represents the average amount one "expects" as the outcome of the random trial when identical odds are repeated many times. Obviously if this value is a negative number, money-management is completely meaningless as you will lose money in the long run. Money management is actually the easiest thing to figure out. It's a no-brainer for anyone who knows anything about money gaming. It has to do with ensuring that you have enough cash on hand to keep the risk of ruin down to a comfortable level, to account for standard deviation (bad luck). If you're a losing poker player, ie, one in which the net result of all your decisions results in a negative expected value, money management is clearly totally meaningless. This simple concept is quite obvious to most people. I've never before met an adult who required it to be explained to them like this. People who's minds go beyond the superficial understand that there is much more to poker than working out the simple arithmetic of the game, such as how many outs for a flush/straight.... pot odds, implied pot odds, etc, which is probably what you mean by "knowing the mechanics of the game". Playing that kind of mindless, one-dimensional game might work OK at microlimits, but beyond that you'll need to learn that poker is much more of a game of psychology than it is a game of math. A mathematician by the name of Barry Greenstein, who incidentally has won more than $10,000,000 playing poker, once said that also. I've got a feeling he knows a bit more about the game than you do, lol. There are 0 results for Rainer in wikichess. ... or search for Rainer in FICGS via Google
[Chess rating list]
[Go ranking list]
[Chess & Go links]
[Chess forum]
[Players blog]
[Countries]
[Chess openings]
[Encyclopedia] [Seo forums] [Discussions] [Buzz] [Meet people] [Directory] [Contact] [Legal informations] |
|
FREECHESS SPAGHETTICHESS FICGS is also a social network including seo forums, a hot news & buzz blog, a free web directory and discussion forums to meet people from all over the world. Discuss the last events, improve your search engines optimization, submit your website, share your interests...
Feel free to link to FICGS to get referer links. |