|
|
|
There are 0 results for Paul Bakwaas in the games. There are 0 results for Paul Helmer in the games. There are 32 results for Paul in the forum. Paul-Iosif Guralivu (2006-04-10 10:18:26) FICGS council / staff In will have a lot of time! Paul-Iosif Guralivu (2006-04-13 15:19:03) New Titles! To make FICGS more atractive and original I propose to make new titles for every category of players: Candidate for Master(FCM) - 2000-2200 First category (FI) - 1800-2000 Secound category (FII) - 1200-1800 Third category (FIII) - 800-1200 Every of this category could be obtain if a player plays more than 12 games in tournaments with tha same ELO. What do you think about it ? P.S.:Don't be mad on me...It's just a proposition. Paul-Iosif Guralivu (2006-04-13 15:22:36) A new comision for this! I also propose to make a new comision for giving this titles. Thibault de Vassal (2006-04-13 15:46:55) New Titles Hello Paul-Iosif. Interesting new idea. In my opinion, there are too many titles & titled players already from official & "non-official" organizations. I think this is a mistake from FIDE / ICCF they couldn't remedy anymore. Titles from other organizations and particularly IECG are not really a problem "more", cause they are hard to achieve (rare), but I don't think this could be so attractive for players. To get a title is a reward itself. Maybe even EM title shouldn't exist. But I think that ie. a KM title (over GM) could be an interesting idea ! Anyway, I'm ok with the commission idea, we'll vote that too. Another interesting & controversial idea is (as IECG do) titles not to be awarded for life ! If player's rating decrease, he could lost his title... but I don't think this is very fair. Paul-Iosif Guralivu (2006-04-13 15:52:18) New Titles I agree it's a bit confusion, but there are a lot of players wich never achieves a title..so that will be atractive. About the fact that the title to be removed it's a bit unfair, because it's hard to be achieved... ----- My humble opinion Paul-Iosif Guralivu (2006-04-13 16:25:01) New Titles I agree that the rating in a way. I was proposing that because it like in my country where chess players start with a the third category and continue with II and I and cadidate master after which it's coming the Master title. So that will simulate more the country system... Paul-Iosif Guralivu (2006-04-13 16:30:20) New Titles Again, Their is no problem if you don't create such titles... I was only proposing... and I will submit to the decitions of the FICGS council... God bless FICGS! Thibault de Vassal (2006-04-13 17:01:58) :-) We'll discuss about on the council mailing list, Paul-Iosif. If we decide to create such titles, we will create them. Paul-Iosif Guralivu (2006-04-17 18:31:35) What about my name! My name in english would be translated like this: Talkative Paul-Joseph... If I were a american, would you let me join ? Paul-Iosif Guralivu (2006-04-18 00:25:05) Explaining I put that quesion more like a joke... Put on the other hadn I asked it, because you didn't let Holycron to join.... Thibault de Vassal (2006-04-18 00:39:05) Sorry, Paul-Iosif But I don't understand.. (must be tired :)) Is there a play on words in your american name ? Kieron Holycron (Quieron holy crown) is ok but... Paul-Iosif Guralivu (2006-04-18 12:43:47) Deadline ? When is the deadline for a player which didn't moved ? In IECG is 10 days... Is in FICGS some limite ? Paul-Iosif Guralivu (2006-04-18 13:15:10) Let's forget every thing. Talkative means 'the one who speak a lot'. Thibault de Vassal (2006-04-24 11:00:22) Forfeit , 2006 April 24 Paul-Iosif forfeited all his running games. Only games 87, 149 and 150 will be unrated. (too few moves played) Sorry about that. Iosif Paulov (2006-05-20 18:44:05) That's great! All the info that you can see is great Paul-Iosif Guralivu (2006-06-06 09:59:27) Invite other players. Or you could invite players from countries that have too many players to play for Sri lanka team and you would be the captain. Dinesh De Silva (2006-06-06 11:17:47) Good Suggestion! Paul, That's a very good idea too! Amir Bagheri (2006-06-23 12:26:28) Blinfolded chess ( part II ) Very recently, however, all the honors of Europe, in this department of indoor games, have been run away with by two young Americans, Morphy and Paulsen. Paul Morphy, a native of New Orleans, seemed to be born with chess in his blood; he played almost from childhood; and at thirteen years of age he proved a formidable antagonist to Herr Lowenthal, a noted Hungarian. In 1857, when just twenty years of age, Morphy encountered Paulsen, a native of Iowa, only a little older than himself, at a chess congress in New Orleans (Editor: It was New York!). All the gray-beards struck their flag to Paulsen, and then he struck to Morphy. Of Morphy's subsequent achievements in regular play, which stamp him as perhaps the first living chess-player (we say this with fear and trembling; however, for the knights of the game are a sensitive race), we will not speak here, for our purpose is only to notice the blindfold performances. At the chess congress above mentioned, he finely played a blindfold game with a leading German player. Early in 1858, he struck the New Orleanists with amazement by playing six games simultaneously, without seeing any other the boards; winning five of them, and exhibiting beautiful play throughout. He then came to Europe, not only to "lick the Britishers," but "all creation;" and it must be admitted that he made great progress towards that achievement. At a meeting of the Chess Association at Birmingham, in August 1858, he played eight games simultaneously, without sight of the boards. His opponents were Lord Lyttelton, and seven other persons, mostly presidents or secretaries of provincial chess clubs. Against such players, and under such tremendous conditions, he won no less than six games out of the eight, drawing a seventh, and losing the eighth. In the following month, he went over and astonished the Parisians in a similar way; he contended blindfold against eight practised players at once, at the Cafe de la Regence, a famous resort of chess-players; and out of these did not lose even one; he was the victor in six, and drew the other two. In the spring of 1859, Morphy contended against eight of the most experienced members of the London Chess Club, including Mr. Mongredien and Mr. Walker, two distinguished players. He won two games, and drew the other six--all the players except himself being wearied out by a very protracted sitting. A few days afterwards, he played with eight members of the St. George's Chess Club, including Lord Cremorne, Lord Arthur Hay, and Captain Kennedy; he won five, and the rest were drawn through want of time to finish them. Nevertheless, inconceivable as these mental labors are, Morphy yields to Paulsen in blindfold play. There are whispers of twelve or fifteen games having been tried simultaneously by the latter; but the number ten has been most certainly reached, under conditions of the utmost publicity. On the 7th of October in the present year, at a Divan in the Strand, ten players accepted Mr. Paulsen's challenge to grapple with them all simultaneously, the boards being placed out of his sight. One of the players was M. Sabouroff, secretary to the Russian Embassy in London; the other nine comprised many names well known among chess-players. Ten chess-boards were placed on ten tables in the room. An arm-chair, turned away towards a window, was mounted on a dais. At two o'clock in the afternoon, Mr. Paulsen, a quiet, courteous young man, with not a trace of "brag" in him, took his seat in this arm-chair. For twelve mortal hours he never rose, never ate, never smoked, and drank nothing but a little lemonade. What were his mental labors during that time, we shall see. His ten antagonists took their seats at the ten tables; and each table speedily became the centre of a group of spectators, whose comments were not always so silent as in fairness they ought to have been. Paulsen could not see any of the chess-boards. Herr Kling, a noted player and teacher of chess, acted as general manager. He called the boards by numbers--No. 1 to No. 10. Paulsen audibly announced his first move for board No. 1; Kling made that move; the antagonist replied to it; Kling audibly announced the reply; Paulsen considered what should be his second move, and when he had audibly announced his decision, Kling made the proper move on the board. Here No. 1 rested for awhile. No. 2 now made his move, leading to the same course of proceeding as before. Then No. 3 in the same way; then No. 4; and so on to No. 10; after which No. 1 began a new cycle, by playing a second move; and thus they proceeded over and over again. Now let us see what all this implies and involves. Chess is not one of the most frolicsome of games; indeed, ladies generally declare it to be very dull, seeing that a chess-player is apt to be "grumpy" if spoken to on other matters while playing. The truth is, there is a demand for much mental work in managing a game well; the combinations and subtleties, the attacks and counter-attacks, are so numerous and varied, as to keep the mind pretty fully occupied. Nevertheless, a fine game between two fine players is mere child's play compared with this wonderful achievement of Paulsen. He was obliged to form ten mental pictures; and every picture changed with every move, like the colored bits in a kaleidoscope. Most persons, even though knowing nothing of the game, are aware that it begins with thirty-two pieces of different colors and forms, and that these move about over a board of sixty-four squares. After every change of position in any one of the pieces, Paulsen must have changed his mental picture of the board, the field of battle, and then made that a fixture until the next move was made. This is hard enough in even one game, against an antagonist who has his eyes to help him in planning attacks and defences; but how hard must it be against ten! It is difficult to conceive what is the condition of the mental machinery under such circumstances; and yet, there he sat, the calmest man in the room. When told of his antagonist's doings, one by one, he looked quietly out of window, and rubbed his chin, as a man often does when thinking, and then announced his move--never mistaking No. 1 for No. 7, No. 9 for No. 3--never failing to recover the proper mental picture, and making the proper change in it; never embarrassed; never making an unlawful move, or likely to lose sight (mental sight) of any unlawful move made by his antagonists. Nor did he obtain the least pause for mental rest. Without one minute's interval, as soon as he had announced a move for one board, he was required to attend to the move of another antagonist at another board. Hour after hour did this continue--all the afternoon, all the evening, midnight, until two in the morning. He made two hundred and seventy moves in the twelve hours, twenty-seven per game average; this gave two minutes and a quarter for the consideration of each move. As all his moves were met by corresponding moves on the part of his antagonists, he was called upon to form five hundred and forty complete mental pictures in twelve consecutive hours, each picture representing the exact mode in which all of the sixty-four squares of a chess-board were occupied. Paulsen won two games, lost three, and drew five. Paul-Iosif Guralivu (2006-06-30 10:50:31) Forfeit problem Game 934 (chess) White clock - 30 days 23:29:09 Black clock - Out of time. [Event "FICGS__CHESS__RAPID_C__000002"] [Site "FICGS"] [Date "2006.05.31"] [Round "1"] [White "Guralivu,Paul-Iosif"] [Black "Alessandrini,Alfredo"] [Result "*"] [WhiteElo "1293"] [BlackElo "1400"] 1.e4 * Should this game be forfeit ? Should all the games of Mr. Alessandrini be forfeit ? Thibault de Vassal (2006-06-30 12:50:53) Games lost on time Hello Paul-Iosif. When a game is lost on time you just have to wait a few hours and the game is adjudicated automatically. I'll try to make a replacement in the tournament soon. You may have noticed that the game has been rated as a loss for your opponent, but not as a win for you, according to the rules cause less than 10 moves have been played. Paul-Iosif Guralivu (2006-07-06 20:35:49) Some interesting! I think this site has more succes then other(which haven't reach 500 after a few years), because: -it's offer an online way to move -it's allow players from other sites to keep their titles -and offers other title Paul-Iosif Guralivu (2006-07-13 22:02:02) Days for a move I a player doesn't move for about 20 day... I think his games should be declared as lost.... I don't know what is the actual limit... but it's look like is bigger than 40 days Garvin Gray (2007-06-04 11:41:42) Wch 3 in rating order KAZ Balabaev, Farit 2580 FRA de Vassal, Thibault 2512 USA Ingersol, Harry 2502 NZL Noble, Mark 2497 DEU Schuster, Peter 2480 POL Ostrowski, Leszek 2458 ARG Brunsteins, Daniel 2452 CAN Zubac, Marius 2415 ROU Mathe, Iosif 2414 UKR Khokhlov, Igor 2370 MLT Sammut, Ronald 2362 ROU Helmer, Janos 2343 PRT Pires, Miguel 2270 LKA De Silva, Dinesh 2235 POL Sanner, Zdzislaw 2219 RUS Dyakov, Alexander 2217 DEU Schiller, Wilfried 2217 DEU Koslowski, Volker 2204 DZA Ould Ahmed, Samy 2195 FRA Appendino, Jérome 2192 GBR Taylor, William 2182 GRC Bleker, Frits 2171 DNK Jorgensen, Poulerik 2168 DEU Kesselheim, Peter 2149 CAN Repa, Jason 2144 PRT Louro, Eugénio 2123 USA Kotlyansky, Edward 2114 DEU Markus, Roland 2103 FRA Czekaj, Christophe 2098 AUT Dudulec, Konstantin 2084 CAN Plante, Marc-Eric 2079 LVA Borisovs, Leonids 2078 AUT Mueller, Robert 2069 DEU Unger, Peter 2065 AUT Riha, Josef 2019 POL Skwarczylo, Marek 2018 MUS Stephenson, Andrew 2000 CZE Stanislav, Musil 1990 SCG Vidanovic, Djordje 1966 USA Burden, Don 1959 DEU Haluschka, Rainer 1950 CAN Rotaru, Dan 1937 GBR Wyborn, Graham 1890 GBR Burrows, Nick 1884 POL Broniek, Mariusz Maciej 1879 BIH Dautovic, Dzenan 1875 AUS Gray, Garvin 1863 USA Minkin, Alexander 1850 GBR Josse, Mark 1806 ARM Khachaturov, Vadim 1803 USA Kotlyanskiy, Ilya 1800 DEU Krueger, Karsten 1800 PRT Vasquez, Fernando 1775 DZA Toutaoui, Khaled 1763 DEU Wosch, Arkadiusz 1746 TUR Yuvarlak, Ugur 1732 ROU Hrubaru, Mircea 1726 ARG Carrizo, José 1724 USA Phillip, Lennox 1700 ROU Kondort, Mihai 1700 ROU Ioan, Bucsa 1700 BRA Miranda, Marcus 1691 VEN Flores, Luis 1680 RUS Ruzin, Mikhail 1639 DEU Faust, Dieter 1627 MYS Behrmann, Klaus 1617 FRA Bellanger, Michel 1606 POL Bester, Kazimierz 1600 DEU Nent, Alexander 1593 PRT Oliveira, Carlos 1586 HUN Nagy, Attila 1549 ROU Ionescu, Catalin 1535 HUN Kis-Kos, Laszlo 1512 ITA Lupinacci, Nicola 1492 BEL De Groof, Pieter 1465 DEU Odendahl, Marcel 1462 USA Hendricks, Richard 1459 BRA Queiroz, Florencio 1444 CZE Pech, Jaroslav 1433 USA Goodwin, Adam 1415 HUN Csoma, Robert 1400 USA Gillz, Nicolas 1400 BGR Toktas, Ibrahim Ugras 1400 IND Veeraiah, Karuppaiah 1400 MEX Ortiz Durán, Esteban 1400 TUR Ilhan, Alper 1400 CHE Margot, Alain 1400 TUR Erdonho, Erdinç 1400 USA Lipsits, Sasha 1400 BRA B. Lima, Edmilson 1400 DEU von Buttlar, Paul 1386 HUN Fenyves, Adam 1330 BGR Stoianov, Stoian 1316 GRC Serd, Than 1300 TUR Ak, Murat 1300 GBR Willoughby, Peter 1294 ARG Orden, Jorge 1264 GBR Neil, Charlie 1212 NLD Oldenhof, Dwight 1203 USA Greer, Stephen 1200 BRA Barradas, Anderson 1194 IND Malvankar, Vikrant 1188 BEL Tuteleers, Bruno 1145 DEU Bothe, Matthias 1143 BGR Stoyanov, Zdravko 1136 Wolfgang Utesch (2007-07-15 14:55:22) Rybka vs. Human Thibault, in my oppinion problem is your definition of intelligence. Is Kasparov really more intelligent than i.e. Jean-Paul Satre (or Johann Wolfgang von Goethe)??? A man like Bobby Fisher was/is showing, that excellent specialised skill (of chess) nothing has to do with enough intelligence for life! Artur Saigakov (2007-08-08 23:13:50) Re Hello! Please, calm down! I am a command captain on the site of igame.ru of which --- [moderator : name deleted] consisted before. I'm sorry my English is terrible! Paulina and Sex-god (SG) are one person which thus make his own PR and shows the personal offense to --- [moderator : name deleted]. --- [moderator : name deleted] anyway is not connected with drugs, he simply played in my command. I want to underline that my command is AGAINST drugs! Name of command - STOP Narkotics! Motto of our command you can read on igame.ru : "" If you found forces, or search it to give up drugs, this command is for you! This command exists for everybody who gives the vote for nature, for peace, for understanding of our existence, for light ideas, for helping each other, for healthy children and their parents!"" --- [moderator : name deleted] never was drug addict but he just agreed with a command idea. He is 17 years old, he is IM, that's why he was taken in command of igame, and SG wasn't included. SG said that he is gay, then added to the repertoire a word is a drug addict. certainly, he was offended and he said that he would beat SG or he would ask somebody to do it It is not serious, but I think that this fight wouldn't stop even after this speech. Rodolfo d Ettorre (2007-10-31 01:46:29) Another one ... Maybe it is a little late, but I found this one: The economy depends about as much on economists as the weather does on weather forecasters. -- Jean-Paul Kauffmann: Paul-Iosif Guralivu (2008-05-10 21:24:00) Patches My own laws of murphy about patches(being a programmer) - from my own experience: 1. A patch will allways replace a bug with more. 2. A patch will make your program taking more space on hdd, and more memory while running. Effects: Higher probability of operating system to crash, because of lake of resources Therefore the probability of program to crash is direct proportional with the number and the size of patches. Paul-Iosif Guralivu (2008-05-22 13:46:04) Definitly. Definitly. Paul-Iosif Guralivu (2008-05-31 10:23:21) From SF to Religion. The funny part about Scientology is that the founder of this religion was a SF book writer. And one day he realized that what he wrote as SF in reality is the divine true. What the *******? Paul-Iosif Guralivu (2008-06-01 15:26:35) Problem....Problem There is a problem.... In 1986 L. Ron Hubbard disappear. At that time there were questions concerning this. What really happend with him. Paul-Iosif Guralivu (2008-06-02 11:26:52) can't remember the title I was go played in a movie with a chinese princess. And 3 princes that wanted to marry her... Normajean Yates (2008-07-18 00:41:49) how did member's name change? in the FICGS__CHESS__CLASS_B__000049 tourney, Paulo Cerini after resigning against me (he put a Q en prise - no credit to me), became Frank Gavin in all his games. [now there is no member called Paulo Cerini] How? by rule 11.2 last paragraph? Kafka, Calvino, Bunuel, or 1984/testify[RATM] (who controls the present controls the past)? :) There are 44 results for Paul in wikichess. Thibault de Vassal (2407) e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bc4 Bc5 b4 The gambit is named after Captain William Davies Evans, the first player known to have employed it. The first game with the opening is considered to be Evans - McDonnell, London 1827, although in that game a slightly different move order was tried (1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4. O-O d6 and only now 5. b4). The gambit became very popular shortly after that, being employed a number of times in the series of games between McDonnell and Louis de la Bourdonnais in 1834. Players such as Adolf Anderssen, Paul Morphy and Mikhail Chigorin subsequently took it up. It was out of favour for much of the 20th century, although John Nunn and Jan Timman played some games with it in the late 1970s and early 1980s, and in the 1990s Garry Kasparov used it in a few of his games (notably a famous 25-move win against Viswanathan Anand in Riga, 1995), which prompted a brief revival of interest in it. The Evans Gambit is basically an aggressive variant of the Giuoco Piano, which normally continues with the positional moves 4. c3 or 4. d3. The idea behind the move 4. b4 is to give up a pawn in order to secure a strong centre and bear down on Black's weak-point, f7. Ideas based on Ba3, preventing black from castling, are also often in the air. The most obvious and most usual way for Black to meet the gambit is to accept it with 4... Bxb4, after which White plays 5. c3 and Black usually follows up with 5... Ba5 (5... Be7 and, less often 5... Bc5 and 5... Bd6 are also played). White usually follows up with 6. d4. ============ Contributors : Thibault de Vassal Pablo Schmid (1700) e4 c5 Nf3 e6 This move is generally played to reach the Sicilian Taimanov or the Sicilian Kan(Paulsen). The advantage of e6 is to keep options open for the bishop of the dark squares. But it as somes disadvantages too: The sicilian with c3 or b3 is stronger here compared to 2..d6 or 2..Nc6 because e6 limits Black's options. ============ Contributors : Pablo Schmid Graham Cridland (1692) e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nc6 This inaugurates the Taimanov/Paulsen lines of the Sicilian Defense. Black's main idea is to play Qc7 and a6 in some order (although the "pure" Taimanov, with ...a6 and Nge7, is also possible), controlling the dark squares with pieces and the light squares with pawns. The d5 and e6 points are generally less vulnerable than in many variations, leaving white with fewer obvious attacking possibilities. The game therefore can take on an oddly positional character for the Open Sicilian, with White seeking to prove dark squared weaknesses or obtain favorable piece exchanges. ============ Contributors : Graham Cridland Graham Cridland (1692) e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 Nc6 Nc3 Qc7 Black has two main choices here, the text move and ...a6. In either case, White can either ignore the move order and proceed with development (the main lines), or attempt to take advantage of the difference. In the case of ...Qc7, this generally means Ponomariov's pet line 6 Ndb5 Qb8 7 Be3!?, using the b5 square before it is covered to inconvenience Black in his development. Otherwise, we enter the major Paulsen/Taimanov variations (and Black will generally play ...a6 to rule out Ndb5 ideas). ============ Contributors : Graham Cridland Thibault de Vassal (2407) d4 f5 The dutch defense. Black's ...f5 stakes a serious claim to the e4 square and looks towards an attack on White's kingside in the middlegame. However, it weakens Black's own kingside somewhat, and does nothing to contribute to Black's development. As of 2005, the defence is unpopular in top-level play. The Dutch has never been one of the main lines against 1.d4, though in the past a number of top players, including Alexander Alekhine, Bent Larsen and Paul Morphy, have used it with success. Perhaps its high-water mark occurred in 1951, when both world champion Mikhail Botvinnik and his challenger, David Bronstein, played it in their championship match. ============ Contributors : Thibault de Vassal Pablo Schmid (1700) e4 c5 Nf3 e6 d4 cxd4 Nxd4 a6 This is the Sicilian Kan (or sometimes called Paulsen. Black plays a6 to allow Qc7 (by preventing a White Nb5) and enable ...b5. ============ Contributors : Richard Hendricks, Pablo Schmid Dirk Ghysens (2245) a3 Not very impressing, but it was played by Adolf Anderssen against Paul Morphy in their 1859 match. Anderssen subsequently used the variation, with more success, against other adversaries. Anderssen scored 1.5/3 with it against Morphy (DG). ============ Contributors : Telmo Escobar, Don Burden, Dirk Ghysens Kostis Megalios (1400) d4 d5 e4 The Blackmar-Diemer Gambit. ============ Contributors : Paul König, Kostis Megalios Artur Saigakov (1600) d4 Nf6 f3 Game 11982 ============ Contributors : Paul König, Artur Saigakov Kevin O Flaherty (1650) d4 Nf6 Nf3 d5 e3 e6 Bb5+ Bb5+ is a waste of a tempo ============ Contributors : Paul König, Kevin O Flaherty Sebastiano Paulesu (1969) e4 d5 exd5 Nf6 c4 e6 dxe6 Nc6 An interesting gambit: white must play very accurate moves to avoid an early dangerous attack... ============ Contributors : Sebastiano Paulesu Sebastiano Paulesu (1969) e4 d5 exd5 Nf6 c4 e6 dxe6 Nc6 exf7+ White, certainly, can play simply Nf3 and so transpose in the lines of the Icelandic gambit. But this move can't be wrong... ============ Contributors : Sebastiano Paulesu Sebastiano Paulesu (1969) e4 d5 exd5 Nf6 c4 e6 dxe6 Nc6 exf7+ Kxf7 Black position seem very unhappy: the king exposed, two pawns less, but the lead in developement can give some important chances to attack... ============ Contributors : Sebastiano Paulesu Sebastiano Paulesu (1969) e4 d5 exd5 Nf6 c4 e6 dxe6 Nc6 exf7+ Kxf7 Nf3 This naturally move is not the best for white. ============ Contributors : Sebastiano Paulesu Sebastiano Paulesu (1969) e4 d5 exd5 Nf6 c4 e6 dxe6 Nc6 exf7+ Kxf7 Nf3 Bg4 Be2 Bxf3 This move is very important for the Black's plan. ============ Contributors : Sebastiano Paulesu Sebastiano Paulesu (1969) e4 d5 exd5 Nf6 c4 e6 dxe6 Nc6 exf7+ Kxf7 Nf3 Bg4 Be2 Bxf3 Bxf3 Qd3 And black is better. ============ Contributors : Sebastiano Paulesu ... or search for Paul in FICGS via Google
[Chess rating list]
[Go ranking list]
[Chess & Go links]
[Chess forum]
[Players blog]
[Countries]
[Chess openings]
[Encyclopedia] [Seo forums] [Discussions] [Buzz] [Meet people] [Directory] [Contact] [Legal informations] |
|
FREECHESS SPAGHETTICHESS FICGS is also a social network including seo forums, a hot news & buzz blog, a free web directory and discussion forums to meet people from all over the world. Discuss the last events, improve your search engines optimization, submit your website, share your interests...
Feel free to link to FICGS to get referer links. |